Next Article in Journal
Diversity-Oriented Synthesis as a Tool for Chemical Genetics
Next Article in Special Issue
Anti-Obesity Effects of Hispidin and Alpinia zerumbet Bioactives in 3T3-L1 Adipocytes
Previous Article in Journal
Design of Composite Photocatalyst of TiO2 and Y-Zeolite for Degradation of 2-Propanol in the Gas Phase under UV and Visible Light Irradiation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Exploration of Piperidinols as Potential Antitubercular Agents
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Concept Paper

Modern Prodrug Design for Targeted Oral Drug Delivery

by
Arik Dahan
1,*,
Ellen M. Zimmermann
2 and
Shimon Ben-Shabat
1
1
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva 84105, Israel
2
Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 12 September 2014 / Revised: 7 October 2014 / Accepted: 8 October 2014 / Published: 14 October 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Prodrugs)

Abstract

:
The molecular information that became available over the past two decades significantly influenced the field of drug design and delivery at large, and the prodrug approach in particular. While the traditional prodrug approach was aimed at altering various physiochemical parameters, e.g., lipophilicity and charge state, the modern approach to prodrug design considers molecular/cellular factors, e.g., membrane influx/efflux transporters and cellular protein expression and distribution. This novel targeted-prodrug approach is aimed to exploit carrier-mediated transport for enhanced intestinal permeability, as well as specific enzymes to promote activation of the prodrug and liberation of the free parent drug. The purpose of this article is to provide a concise overview of this modern prodrug approach, with useful successful examples for its utilization. In the past the prodrug approach used to be viewed as a last option strategy, after all other possible solutions were exhausted; nowadays this is no longer the case, and in fact, the prodrug approach should be considered already in the very earliest development stages. Indeed, the prodrug approach becomes more and more popular and successful. A mechanistic prodrug design that aims to allow intestinal permeability by specific transporters, as well as activation by specific enzymes, may greatly improve the prodrug efficiency, and allow for novel oral treatment options.

1. Introduction

Prodrugs are derivatives of active drug moieties, designed to undergo conversion in the body, thereby releasing the active parent drug. The prodrug approach is taken in order to overcome pharmaceutical, pharmacokinetic, or pharmacodynamic obstacles, such as low oral absorption, inadequate site specificity, poor stability, etc. In recent years, prodrugs have become increasingly popular and successful; to date, ~10% of the global marketed medications are prodrugs, 20% of all small molecular medicines approved between 2000 and 2008 were prodrugs, and when focusing on 2008, it emerges that over 30% of drugs approved in this year were prodrugs [1,2,3].
During the past years, the pharmaceutical sciences have undergone a molecular revolution; no longer relying on empirical fitting based on plasma levels, the modern ADME (absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion) research considers molecular/cellular factors, such as membrane transporters and cellular enzyme expression and distribution. This molecular revolution dramatically influenced today’s drug design and delivery at large, and the prodrug approach in particular, as will be presented in this article.
The prodrug approach is frequently utilized to increase drug absorption following oral administration. For that, the traditional/classic prodrug approach may be taken, e.g., to mask charged moieties and enhance drug lipophilicity and passive diffusion by various carboxylic acid esters, which release the active carboxylic acid after hydrolysis [4]. More recently, a novel “targeted-prodrug” approach has emerged thanks to the research of transporters and enzymes, utilizing carrier-mediated transport to increase drug absorption [5,6,7]. Naturally, this approach necessitates considerable understanding of the molecular and functional characteristics of the transporter.
In order to exert therapeutic effect, prodrugs must be activated to produce the active parent drug. This activation can be nonspecific; however, knowledge of the potential enzymes responsible for this process may help to rationale the design of successful prodrugs. By considering enzyme-substrate specificity, one may overcome inadequate site specificity, leading to higher efficacy and lower toxicity.
In this article, the concepts of modern vs. traditional prodrug approach will be presented. Examples for the two prodrug approaches, the traditional vs. the classical, will be offered. Finally, the new opportunities that the continuous molecular advancement in related fields brings to the field of orally administered prodrug will be discussed.

2. The Classical Prodrug Approach

Prodrugs or drug conjugates involve the synthesis of inactive drug derivatives that are converted to the active form in the body. The classical approach for prodrug design uses the non-specific strategy of covalently modifying the drug of interest by attaching hydrophilic functionalities (e.g., phosphate, sulfate) to increase the solubility of the parent drug [8,9,10], or lipophilic moieties (e.g., ester) to increase its passive permeability [11,12,13,14,15]. This approach lacks site specificity, and as a prodrug will eventually be converted into the active form [16]. The purpose for taking this approach is to overcome physicochemical or biopharmaceutical problems associated with the parent drug, hence providing an alternative approach to design less reactive and less cytotoxic form of drugs [17]. The objectives include altering the physicochemical properties of drugs to achieve modified drug pharmacokinetics, extended activity, reduced side effects, or increased selectivity. Specific aims include overcoming inadequate oral absorption, insufficient skin penetration, poor blood-brain barrier permeability, disruption in metabolic pathways and toxicity [18].
Following oral administration, free testosterone undergoes complete first pass metabolism, resulting in non-detectable systemic bioavailability. Testosterone undecanoate is a prodrug of testosterone esterified in the 17-position with undecanoic acid. During oral administration the majority of the prodrug is absorbed via the lymphatic system into the systemic circulation [19], and hence first pass hepatic metabolism is avoided [20,21,22]. More than 80% of the free testosterone detected in the plasma was contributed by hydrolysis of the lymphatically transported prodrug [23].
The development of topical and transdermal drug delivery systems aims to overcome the remarkably efficient barrier properties of human skin by employing non-toxic and non-irritant methods. For example, calcipotriol, Vitamin D3 derivative, has poor penetration through the stratum corneum into the epidermis which may explain its limited efficacy and frequent treatment failures in the treatment of psoriasis [24]. On the basis of increased lipophilicity prodrug design, new molecules that combine calcipotriol and poly-unsaturated-fatty-acids, through an ester bond, were synthesized. The ester bond was partially and gradually hydrolyzed by skin esterases, releasing the free active drug at high levels in the deep skin layers, leading to sustained drug delivery followed by prolonged activity [25,26].
Another challenging scope in drug delivery deals with poor blood-brain barrier drug permeability. Various drug delivery systems have been studied for delivery of pharmaceutical agents through the endothelial capillaries (BBB) for CNS therapeutics [27]. Enhanced brain delivery via prodrugs may be based on both the classical approach through increased lipophilicity and the modern approach which includes the utilization of transporters. Combining motives of both approaches represents a promising approach to enhance brain drug delivery via prodrug. In a recent study, the L-ascorbic acid prodrug of ibuprofen was synthesized and evaluated [28]. L-ascorbic acid has two bidirectional transporters in the brain; while the first one, GLUT1, leads to the entry into the brain, the second one, SVCT2, takes it outside of the brain. To avoid the L-ascorbic acid prodrugs from being evacuated out of the brain, a lipophilic thiamine disulfide system (TDS) was combined in order to help in two directions: to increase the lipophilicity of the drug (as per the classical prodrug approach) and to prevent the bidirectional active transport of the drug (as per the modern prodrug approach). The investigators concluded that this prodrug is a promising carrier system to enhance CNS drug delivery ability into brain [28].

3. The Modern Prodrug Approach

The molecular revolution has allowed for a modern prodrug approach to emerge, in which pro-moieties are covalently attached to the molecule of interest to selectively target certain transporters or enzymes [5,6,29]. This modern strategy offers a remarkable potential for improving drug bioavailability and selectivity of poorly absorbed drug molecules [30,31,32].

3.1. Targeting Transporters in Prodrug Design

The recent advances in biochemistry and molecular biology have provided a wide scope of information about the function and expression of transporters and enzymes. For instance, many transporters are expressed on both the apical and basolateral sides of the intestinal enterocytes, that may allow selective drug targeting. These include the organic anion transporters (OAT) family [33,34], organic cation transporter (OCT) family [35,36], sodium dependent bile acid transporter (ASBT) [37,38,39], sodium-dependent glucose transporter (SGLT) family [40], monocarboxylate transporter (MCT) family [41,42], amino acid transporter PAT1 [43,44], amino acid transporter ATB°,+ [45,46], folate transporter (PCFT) [47,48], and oligopeptide transporter (PEPT1) [49,50,51,52,53]. These transporters were characterized in detail, and have been shown to play important roles in the absorption of certain nutrients and drugs [54,55,56,57]. The information available on the substrate specificity of these transporters allows to chemically modify drug moieties so that their oral absorption will be enhanced via targeting intestinal transporters. PEPT1 has captured the greatest attention as a drug transport pathway, mainly due to wide distribution throughout the entire small intestine, broad substrate specificity and high capacity [53,58,59]. PEPT1 is characterized as a high-capacity low-affinity transporter, predominantly expressed in the small intestine, and accepts dipeptides, tripeptides, and peptidomimetic drugs such as β-lactam antibiotics and ACE inhibitors [51,60,61]. Thus, PEPT1 targeted prodrugs may present a promising strategy for enhanced oral drug delivery.
FDA approved neuraminidase inhibitors for the treatment of influenza infection include two drugs, zanamivir and oseltamivir. Oseltamivir (tamiflu®) is a carboxylic acid ester that represents an example for the traditional prodrug approach; the low oral bioavailability (>5%) of oseltamivir carboxylate increased to ~80% for oseltamivir in humans [62]. While no reports indicating resistance against zanamivir could be found, there are several reports in the literature on resistance to oseltamivir [63]. However, the polarity of zanamivir results in extremely low oral bioavailability (~2%) [64]. The modern approach for prodrug design was taken in attempts to improve the oral absorption of zanamivir, targeting PEPT1 for transporter-mediated absorption [65]. A series of acyloxy ester prodrugs of zanamivir conjugated with amino acids were synthesized and characterized for chemical stability, membrane transport, and enzymatic activation. The L-valyl prodrug of zanamivir showed three-fold higher uptake by PEPT1 overexpressing cells in comparison to zanamivir, indicating recognition between the prodrug and the transporter. Intestinal permeability studies of amino acid zanamivir’s prodrugs compared to the parent drug confirmed that this targeted prodrug strategy greatly improved zanamivir's intestinal permeability (Figure 1) [65]. This research demonstrates that the modern prodrug approach has significant potential to allow for oral zanamivir therapy, and since no oral product of zanamivir currently exists [66], this may represent new treatment options in fighting the common seasonal flu as well as the recent H1N1 global pandemic [67].
A variety of amino acid, dipeptide and tripeptide prodrugs have been investigated in recent years for their suitability as PEPT1 substrates, including the anticancer drug floxuridine [68,69,70,71], the antiviral drugs acyclovir, gancyclovir, and zidovudine [72,73], the anticancer drugs melphalan [74] and gemcitabine [75,76], the antihypotensive agent midodrine [77], the antiosteoporotic drug alendronate [78,79], and more. Structure–activity relationship studies have assured that mono amino acid and dipeptide ester prodrugs generally provide enhanced PEPT1-mediated transport, resulting in improved oral absorption and bioavailability.
Figure 1. Molecular structure of zanamivir and its L-valyl prodrug, and the permeability of zanamivir and its amino acids prodrug in the single-pass rat jejunal perfusion method. Reproduced from [65] with permission.
Figure 1. Molecular structure of zanamivir and its L-valyl prodrug, and the permeability of zanamivir and its amino acids prodrug in the single-pass rat jejunal perfusion method. Reproduced from [65] with permission.
Molecules 19 16489 g001
Another recently published study investigated the highly active polar antiviral agent, guanidine oseltamivir carboxylate, which has very low oral bioavailability (4%) [80]. In order to enhance its oral bioavailability, a series of acyloxy(alkyl) ester prodrugs conjugated with amino acids were synthesized and characterized. The results indicated 2–5-fold increased intestinal permeability, as well as ~30-fold increased affinity for PEPT1, of the amino acid prodrugs compared to the parent drug, demonstrating high recognition between the prodrugs and the transporter. The most promising derivative was found to be the guanidine oseltamivir carboxylate-L-Val, with 28% systemic oral bioavailability in mice under fed conditions, and 48% under fasted conditions, while the parent drug exhibited bioavailability of only 5% under both fed and fasted state (Figure 2) [80].
Figure 2. Systemic oral bioavailability of GOCarb and its L-Valine prodrug following oral administration of 10 mk/kg (n = 5). Reproduced from [80] with permission.
Figure 2. Systemic oral bioavailability of GOCarb and its L-Valine prodrug following oral administration of 10 mk/kg (n = 5). Reproduced from [80] with permission.
Molecules 19 16489 g002
Targeting of monocarboxylate transporter type 1 (MCT1) has also been shown to enhance intestinal prodrug/drug absorption. This low-affinity high-capacity transporter accepts unbranched aliphatic monocarboxylates, and is widely expressed along the entire intestinal tract [81]. The GABA analogue gabapentin suffers from many poor PK properties (high variability, saturable absorption, lack of dose proportionality), and hence XP13512, a carbamate prodrug of gabapentin, was synthesized. The systemic bioavailability of gabapentin was dramatically increased after oral administration of XP13512, in both preclinical [82] and clinical [83] studies, while MCT1 plays a significant role in this absorption enhancement [82,84].
The sodium dependent bile acid transporter (ASBT) was also investigated as a potential prodrug target [37,85], and significantly improved absorption of the antiviral agent acyclovir [86] and the GABA analogue gabapentin [87] have been reported. Other transporters have also been targeted, as described above. Overall, this modern approach for oral prodrug design represents a mechanistic and intelligent strategy to increase oral absorption of poorly permeable compounds. Since intestinal permeability is, alongside the drug solubility, the most important factors dictating drug absorption following oral administration [88,89,90,91,92,93], the improved permeability achieved by this approach may enhance “developability” and drug-like properties [94,95,96], thus allowing new oral treatment options.
In a unique recent study, the modern prodrug approach was taken in order to avoid recognition between the protease inhibitor agent lopinavir and the efflux transporters P-gp and MRP2, which together with extensive metabolism by CYP3A4, limit the drug’s absorption. Three amino acid prodrugs of lopinavir were designed and investigated for their potential to circumvent efflux processes and also first pass metabolism [97]. Indeed, these prodrugs were shown to carry significantly lower affinity towards P-gp and MRP2 relative to the parent drug lopinavir. Moreover, the prodrugs exhibited higher liver microsomal stability relative to the parent drug lopinavir, suggesting circumvention of first pass metabolism [97]. This study demonstrates that the modern prodrug approach can be used not only to target desired transporters, but also to circumvent undesired processes and thereby enhance “developability” and drug-like properties.

3.2. Targeting Enzymes in Prodrug Design

An essential step in effective prodrug therapy is the activation of the prodrug and the release of the free active therapeutic agent. Important enzymes involved in the activation and bioconversion of ester-based prodrugs include paraoxonase, carboxylesterase, acetylcholinesterase, and cholinesterase [98,99,100]. Previously, the mechanism of the prodrug activation was often overlooked, and as long as the free parent drug was liberated, the activation was considered successful, and the activating enzymes did not draw much attention. In recent years, however, it is well recognized that substantial knowledge of the activating enzyme/s can aid to rationally design successful prodrugs. Hence, identifying the activating enzymes of different prodrugs can provide significant new targets for the design of effective therapeutic agents.
Valacyclovir is the 5'-valyl ester prodrug of the antiviral drug acyclovir. Valacyclovir increased the oral bioavailability of its parent drug acyclovir by 3- to 5-fold [101], attributable to carrier-mediated intestinal transport of the prodrug by PEPT1 [53,72,102]. Hence, valacyclovir is a successful example for the modern transporter-targeted approach for prodrug design. However, valacyclovir’s efficiency as an antiviral agent relies also on the rapid conversion of the prodrug to acyclovir in vivo. At first, it has been shown that enzymatic (rather than chemical) hydrolysis is the predominant activation mechanism of valacyclovir [103,104,105]. Then, it was found that valacyclovir is relatively stable in the gastrointestinal milieu, but carries high susceptibility to intracellular enzymatic hydrolysis [106]. Also, several peptide fragments of the major activating polypeptide were purified and sequenced [107]. Only in 2003, Kim et al., succeeded to purify, identify and characterize the enzyme that activates valacyclovir to acyclovir in humans, naming it valacyclovirase, a serine hydrolase containing a catalytic triad S122-H255-D227 [108,109]. It was found that valacyclovirase is one of the main enzymes activating amino acid ester prodrug with high specificity, attributed to the critical residue D123 forming electrostatic interaction with the α-amino group of substrates. Valacyclovirase contains a large leaving group accommodating groove, which accommodates a variety of leaving groups, e.g., nucleoside analogues, as well as simple alcohols such as methanol, ethanol, and benzyl alcohol [98,110,111,112,113].
A novel type of prodrug was designed and synthesized, conjugating the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug indomethacin in place of the sn-2 positioned fatty acid of a phospholipid, through a linker [12,13,114,115,116]. Physiologically, the fatty acid in the sn-2 position is liberated by the enzyme phospholipase A2 (PLA2), resulting in a free fatty acid and a lysophospholipid as the lipolysis products [117]. The substitution of the sn-2 positioned fatty acid by a drug moiety, hence, was designed to target PLA2 as the activating enzyme for this prodrug. Although it was reported that PLA2 strictly requires a fatty acid at the sn-2 positioned [118], we have found that, depending on the carbonic linker length, PLA2 was able to recognize and activate the phospholipidic prodrugs of indomethacin both in vitro (Figure 3) and in vivo. A follow up study in rats revealed that after oral administration there was no absorption of the intact prodrug, however, the prodrug was continuously activated by PLA2 throughout the entire intestinal tract, resulting in a controlled release profile of the liberated free indomethacin in the systemic circulation [12]. This research illustrates the advantage of rational activating-enzyme targeted prodrug design, which minimizes the empirical elements of the activation process, and allows to better control the liberation of the free active drug moiety.
Figure 3. Activation of a series of phospholipid-indomethacin prodrugs by PLA2 enzyme in vitro. Reproduced from [12] with permission.
Figure 3. Activation of a series of phospholipid-indomethacin prodrugs by PLA2 enzyme in vitro. Reproduced from [12] with permission.
Molecules 19 16489 g003
While the amino acid ester prodrug strategy was applied to many nucleoside analogues and was successful in improving PEPT1-mediated oral absorption, the activation of these prodrugs was not well-studied and was assumed to be nonspecific until the identification of valacyclovirase. A unique modern approach to prodrug design, in which both transport and activation processes are accounted for already at the initial design stage, was taken (Figure 4). In this double-targeted prodrug approach, a series of amino acid esters of a model guanidine containing compound, 3-HPG, was synthesized and evaluated for both transport and activation [113,119,120]. Valine and isoleucine esters of 3-HPG had a significantly higher intestinal permeability than the parent compound, attributable to PEPT1-mediated transport. Remarkably, these L-amino acid prodrugs of 3-HPG were shown to be effectively activated by valacyclovirase, with Km values in the range of the positive control valacyclovir, thereby liberating the parent moiety [119]. This novel approach, in which both transport and activation are taken into consideration already at the earliest design stages, represents the next step in the modern approach to drug delivery using prodrugs. This mechanistic approach may greatly minimize the empirical elements of the development and hence may result in better products with more predictable performance compared to the traditional practice.
Figure 4. Illustration of the ‘double targeted’ prodrug approach, accounting for both transport via PEPT1 and activation via valacyclovirase.
Figure 4. Illustration of the ‘double targeted’ prodrug approach, accounting for both transport via PEPT1 and activation via valacyclovirase.
Molecules 19 16489 g004

4. Conclusions

Previously, the prodrug approach was viewed as a last option strategy, after all other possible solutions were exhausted; this is no longer the case. In fact, the prodrug approach should be considered already in the very earliest development stages. Indeed, the prodrug approach becomes more and more popular and successful.
The molecular revolution has significantly changed the pharmaceutical sciences in general, and the way we use the prodrug approach in particular. While the traditional approach was aimed at altering various physiochemical parameters, e.g., lipophilicity and charge state, the modern prodrug approach considers molecular/cellular factors, e.g., membrane influx/efflux transporters and cellular protein expression and distribution [121,122,123]. A mechanistic design that aims to allow intestinal permeability by specific transporters, as well as activation by specific enzymes, may greatly improve the prodrug efficiency, and allow for novel oral treatment options. Minimizing the empirical elements by taking the targeted prodrug approach represents an intelligent and powerful process, as the outcomes may be significantly more predictable; knowledge of the activating enzyme(s) may potentially speed the prodrug development process and lower its cost. Additionally, good knowledge of the transporter(s) and enzyme(s) involved in the absorption and activation may allow to predict and recognize potential competition-based drug-drug interactions [124,125]. A critical aspect that was not covered in this paper is the site-specific targeting potential; a prodrug designed to be activated by a specific enzyme that is overexpressed in the target site may allow to target the free drug to the site of action, resulting in improved efficacy and reduced toxicity.
Overall, in the near future, more information will certainly become available regarding transporters and enzymes that may be exploited for the targeted modern prodrug approach. Awareness of such information opens promising opportunities for precise and efficient drug delivery, as well as enhancement of treatment options and therapeutic efficacy.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by European Union grant FP7 Marie Curie IRG 277079.

Author Contributions

AD, EMZ and SBS collaboratively discussed and analyzed the data, and outlined the manuscript. AD wrote the skeleton of the paper, and SBS and EMZ contributed to the writing of the full version. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bildstein, L.; Dubernet, C.; Couvreur, P. Prodrug-based intracellular delivery of anticancer agents. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2011, 63, 3–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Huttunen, K.M.; Raunio, H.; Rautio, J. Prodrugs—From serendipity to rational design. Pharmacol. Rev. 2011, 63, 750–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Stella, V.J. Prodrugs: Some thoughts and current issues. J. Pharm. Sci. 2010, 99, 4755–4765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Beaumont, K.; Webster, R.; Gardner, I.; Dack, K. Design of ester prodrugs to enhance oral absorption of poorly permeable compounds: Challenges to the discovery scientist. Curr. Drug Metab. 2003, 4, 461–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Dahan, A.; Khamis, M.; Agbaria, R.; Karaman, R. Targeted prodrugs in oral drug delivery: The modern molecular biopharmaceutical approach. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2012, 9, 1001–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Han, H.K.; Amidon, G.L. Targeted prodrug design to optimize drug delivery. AAPS PharmSci. 2000, 2, 48–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sai, Y.; Tsuji, A. Transporter-mediated drug delivery: Recent progress and experimental approaches. Drug Discov. Today 2004, 9, 712–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Amidon, G.L.; Leesman, G.D.; Elliott, R.L. Improving intestinal absorption of water-insoluble compounds: A membrane metabolism strategy. J. Pharm. Sci. 1980, 69, 1363–1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Fleisher, D.; Bong, R.; Stewart, B.H. Improved oral drug delivery: Solubility limitations overcome by the use of prodrugs. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 1996, 19, 115–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Stella, V.J.; Nti-Addae, K.W. Prodrug strategies to overcome poor water solubility. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2007, 59, 677–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Bernard, T. Prodrugs: Bridging pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic gaps. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2009, 13, 338–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Dahan, A.; Duvdevani, R.; Dvir, E.; Elmann, A.; Hoffman, A. A novel mechanism for oral controlled release of drugs by continuous degradation of a phospholipid prodrug along the intestine: In-vivo and in vitro evaluation of an indomethacin—Lecithin conjugate. J. Control. Release 2007, 119, 86–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Dahan, A.; Duvdevani, R.; Shapiro, I.; Elmann, A.; Finkelstein, E.; Hoffman, A. The oral absorption of phospholipid prodrugs: In vivo and in vitro mechanistic investigation of trafficking of a lecithin-valproic acid conjugate following oral administration. J. Control. Release 2008, 126, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ettmayer, P.; Amidon, G.L.; Clement, B.; Testa, B. Lessons learned from marketed and investigational prodrugs. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 2393–2404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Rautio, J.; Kumpulainen, H.; Heimbach, T.; Oliyai, R.; Oh, D.; Jarvinen, T.; Savolainen, J. Prodrugs: Design and clinical applications. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2008, 7, 255–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Zawilska, J.; Wojcieszak, J.; Olejniczak, A. Prodrugs: A challenge for the drug development. Pharmacol. Rep. 2013, 65, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Serafin, A.; Stańczak, A. Different concepts of drug delivery in disease entities. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 2009, 9, 481–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Perez, C.; Daniel, K.B.; Cohen, S.M. Evaluating prodrug strategies for esterase-triggered release of alcohols. ChemMedChem 2013, 8, 1662–1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Horst, H.; Höltje, W.; Dennis, M.; Coert, A.; Geelen, J.; Voigt, K. Lymphatic absorption and metabolism of orally administered testosterone undecanoate in man. Klin Wochenschr. 1976, 54, 875–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Dahan, A.; Hoffman, A. Evaluation of a chylomicron flow blocking approach to investigate the intestinal lymphatic transport of lipophilic drugs. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2005, 24, 381–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Dahan, A.; Hoffman, A. Use of a dynamic in vitro lipolysis model to rationalize oral formulation development for poor water soluble drugs: Correlation with in vivo data and the relationship to intra-enterocyte processes in rats. Pharm. Res. 2006, 23, 2165–2174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Dahan, A.; Mendelman, A.; Amsili, S.; Ezov, N.; Hoffman, A. The effect of general anesthesia on the intestinal lymphatic transport of lipophilic drugs: Comparison between anesthetized and freely moving conscious rat models. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2007, 32, 367–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Shackleford, D.M.; Faassen, W.A.; Houwing, N.; Lass, H.; Edwards, G.A.; Porter, C.J.H.; Charman, W.N. Contribution of lymphatically transported testosterone undecanoate to the systemic exposure of testosterone after oral administration of two andriol formulations in conscious lymph duct-cannulated dogs. J. Pharm. Exp. Ther. 2003, 306, 925–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ring, J.; Kowalzick, L.; Christophers, E.; Schill, W.B.; Schöpf, E.; Ständer, M.; Wolff, H.H.; Altmeyer, P. Calcitriol 3 μg·g−1 ointment in combination with ultraviolet B phototherapy for the treatment of plaque psoriasis: Results of a comparative study. Br. J. Dermatol. 2001, 144, 495–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ben-Shabat, S.; Benisty, R.; Wormser, U.; Sintov, A.C. Vitamin D3-based conjugates for topical treatment of psoriasis: Synthesis, antiproliferative activity, and cutaneous penetration studies. Pharm. Res. 2005, 22, 50–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Sintov, A.C.; Yarmolinsky, L.; Dahan, A.; Ben-Shabat, S. Pharmacological effects of vitamin D and its analogs: Recent developments. Drug Discov. Today 2014, in press. [Google Scholar]
  27. Upadhyay, R.K. Drug delivery systems, CNS protection, and the blood brain barrier. BioMed. Res. Int. 2014, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Zhao, Y.; Qu, B.; Wu, X.; Li, X.; Liu, Q.; Jin, X.; Guo, L.; Hai, L.; Wu, Y. Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of brain targeting l-ascorbic acid prodrugs of ibuprofen with “lock-in” function. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 82, 314–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Majumdar, S.; Duvvuri, S.; Mitra, A.K. Membrane transporter/receptor-targeted prodrug design: Strategies for human and veterinary drug development. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2004, 56, 1437–1452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Dahan, A.; Amidon, G.L.; Zimmermann, E.M. Drug targeting strategies for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease: A mechanistic update. Expert Rev. Clin. Immunol. 2010, 6, 543–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Sabit, H.; Dahan, A.; Sun, J.; Provoda, C.J.; Lee, K.-D.; Hilfinger, J.H.; Amidon, G.L. Cytomegalovirus protease targeted prodrug development. Mol. Pharm. 2013, 10, 1417–1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Wolk, O.; Epstein, S.; Ioffe-Dahan, V.; Ben-Shabat, S.; Dahan, A. New targeting strategies in drug therapy of inflammatory bowel disease: Mechanistic approaches and opportunities. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2013, 10, 1275–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kato, K.; Shirasaka, Y.; Kuraoka, E.; Kikuchi, A.; Iguchi, M.; Suzuki, H.; Shibasaki, S.; Kurosawa, T.; Tamai, I. Intestinal absorption mechanism of tebipenem pivoxil, a novel oral carbapenem: Involvement of human OATP family in apical membrane transport. Mol. Pharm. 2010, 7, 1747–1756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Tamai, I. Oral drug delivery utilizing intestinal OATP transporters. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2012, 64, 508–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Jonker, J.W.; Schinkel, A.H. Pharmacological and physiological functions of the polyspecific organic cation transporters: OCT1, 2, and 3 (SLC22A1–3). J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2004, 308, 2–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Koepsell, H.; Lips, K.; Volk, C. Polyspecific organic cation transporters: Structure, function, physiological roles, and biopharmaceutical implications. Pharm. Res. 2007, 24, 1227–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Balakrishnan, A.; Polli, J.E. Apical sodium dependent bile acid transporter (ASBT, SLC10A2): A potential prodrug target. Mol. Pharm. 2006, 3, 223–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Kolhatkar, V.; Polli, J.E. Structural requirements of bile acid transporters: C-3 and C-7 modifications of steroidal hydroxyl groups. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2012, 46, 86–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Zheng, X.; Polli, J.E. Synthesis and in vitro evaluation of potential sustained release prodrugs via targeting ASBT. Int. J. Pharm. 2010, 396, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Cao, X.; Gibbs, S.; Fang, L.; Miller, H.; Landowski, C.; Shin, H.-C.; Lennernas, H.; Zhong, Y.; Amidon, G.; Yu, L.; et al. Why is it challenging to predict intestinal drug absorption and oral bioavailability in human using rat model. Pharm. Res. 2006, 23, 1675–1686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Tsuji, A. Tissue selective drug delivery utilizing carrier-mediated transport systems. J. Control. Release 1999, 62, 239–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Varma, M.; Ambler, C.; Ullah, M.; Rotter, C.; Sun, H.; Litchfield, J.; Fenner, K.; El-Kattan, A. Targeting intestinal transporters for optimizing oral drug absorption. Curr. Drug Metab. 2010, 11, 730–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Anderson, C.M.H.; Grenade, D.S.; Boll, M.; Foltz, M.; Wake, K.A.; Kennedy, D.J.; Munck, L.K.; Miyauchi, S.; Taylor, P.M.; Campbell, F.C.; et al. Thwaites, H+/amino acid transporter 1 (PAT1) is the imino acid carrier: An intestinal nutrient/drug transporter in human and rat. Gastroenterology 2004, 127, 1410–1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Thwaites, D.T.; Anderson, C.M.H. The SLC36 family of proton-coupled amino acid transporters and their potential role in drug transport. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2011, 164, 1802–1816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Ganapathy, M.E. Ganapathy, Amino acid transporter ATB0,+ as a delivery system for drugs and prodrugs. Curr. Drug Targets Immune Endocr. Metabol. Disord. 2005, 5, 357–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Hatanaka, T.; Haramura, M.; Fei, Y.-J.; Miyauchi, S.; Bridges, C.C.; Ganapathy, P.S.; Smith, S.B.; Ganapathy, V.; Ganapathy, M.E. Transport of amino acid-based prodrugs by the Na+- and Cl—Coupled amino acid transporter ATB0,+ and expression of the transporter in tissues amenable for drug delivery. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2004, 308, 1138–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Qiu, A.; Jansen, M.; Sakaris, A.; Min, S.H.; Chattopadhyay, S.; Tsai, E.; Sandoval, C.; Zhao, R.; Akabas, M.H.; Goldman, I.D. Identification of an intestinal folate transporter and the molecular basis for hereditary folate malabsorption. Cell 2006, 127, 917–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Zhao, R.; Diop-Bove, N.; Visentin, M.; Goldman, I.D. Mechanisms of membrane transport of folates into cells and across epithelia. Ann. Rev. Nutr. 2011, 31, 177–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Bai, J.P.F.; Amidon, G.L. Structural specificity of mucosal-cell transport and metabolism of peptide drugs: Implication for oral peptide drug delivery. Pharm. Res. 1992, 9, 969–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Brandsch, M.; Knütter, I.; Bosse-Doenecke, E. Pharmaceutical and pharmacological importance of peptide transporters. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2008, 60, 543–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Kikuchi, A.; Tomoyasu, T.; Tanaka, M.; Kanamitsu, K.; Sasabe, H.; Maeda, T.; Odomi, M.; Tamai, I. Peptide derivation of poorly absorbable drug allows intestinal absorption via peptide transporter. J. Pharm. Sci. 2009, 98, 1775–1787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Lee, V.H.L.; Chu, C.; Mahlin, E.D.; Basu, S.K.; Ann, D.K.; Bolger, M.B.; Haworth, I.S.; Yeung, A.K.; Wu, S.K.; Hamm-Alvarez, S.; et al. Biopharmaceutics of transmucosal peptide and protein drug administration: Role of transport mechanisms with a focus on the involvement of PepT1. J. Control. Release 1999, 62, 129–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Yang, B.; Smith, D.E. Significance of peptide transporter 1 in the intestinal permeability of valacyclovir in wild-type and PepT1 knockout mice. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2013, 41, 608–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Giacomini, K.; Huang, S.; Tweedie, D.; Benet, L.; Brouwer, K.; Chu, X.; Dahlin, A.; Evers, R.; Fischer, V.; Hillgren, K.; et al. Membrane transporters in drug development. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2010, 9, 215–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Martinez, M.N.; Amidon, G.L. A mechanistic approach to understanding the factors affecting drug absorption: A review of fundamentals. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2002, 42, 620–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Mizuno, N.; Niwa, T.; Yotsumoto, Y.; Sugiyama, Y. Impact of drug transporter studies on drug discovery and development. Pharmacol. Rev. 2003, 55, 425–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Shugarts, S.; Benet, L. The role of transporters in the pharmacokinetics of orally administered drugs. Pharm. Res. 2009, 26, 2039–2054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Posada, M.; Smith, D. Relevance of PepT1 in the intestinal permeability and oral absorption of cefadroxil. Pharm. Res. 2013, 30, 1017–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Yang, B.; Hu, Y.; Smith, D.E. Impact of peptide transporter 1 on the intestinal absorption and pharmacokinetics of valacyclovir after oral dose escalation in wild-type and PepT1 knockout mice. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2013, 41, 1867–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Jappar, D.; Hu, Y.; Smith, D.E. Effect of dose escalation on the in vivo oral absorption and disposition of glycylsarcosine in wild-type and pept1 knockout mice. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2011, 39, 2250–2257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Jappar, D.; Wu, S.-P.; Hu, Y.; Smith, D.E. Significance and regional dependency of peptide transporter (PEPT) 1 in the intestinal permeability of glycylsarcosine: In situ single-pass perfusion studies in wild-type and Pept1 knockout mice. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2010, 38, 1740–1746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Aoki, F.Y.; Doucette, K.E. Oseltamivir: A clinical and pharmacological perspective. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 2001, 2, 1671–1683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Le, Q.M.; Kiso, M.; Someya, K.; Sakai, Y.T.; Nguyen, T.H.; Nguyen, K.H.L.; Pham, N.D.; Ngyen, H.H.; Yamada, S.; Muramoto, Y.; et al. Avian flu: Isolation of drug-resistant H5N1 virus. Nature 2005, 437, 1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Cass, L.; Efthymiopoulos, C.; Bye, A. Pharmacokinetics of zanamivir after intravenous, oral, inhaled or intranasal administration to healthy volunteers. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 1999, 36, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Gupta, S.V.; Gupta, D.; Sun, J.; Dahan, A.; Tsume, Y.; Hilfinger, J.; Lee, K.-D.; Amidon, G.L. Enhancing the intestinal membrane permeability of zanamivir: A carrier mediated prodrug approach. Mol. Pharm. 2011, 8, 2358–2367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Miller, J.M.; Dahan, A.; Gupta, D.; Varghese, S.; Amidon, G.L. Enabling the intestinal absorption of highly polar antiviral agents: Ion-pair facilitated membrane permeation of zanamivir heptyl ester and guanidino oseltamivir. Mol. Pharm. 2010, 7, 1223–1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Dawood, F.; Jain, S.; Finelli, L.; Shaw, M.; Lindstrom, S.; Garten, R.; Gubareva, L.; Xu, X.; Bridges, C.; Uyeki, T. Emergence of a novel swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) virus in humans. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009, 360, 2605–2615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Landowski, C.P.; Vig, B.S.; Song, X.; Amidon, G.L. Targeted delivery to PEPT1-overexpressing cells: Acidic, basic, and secondary floxuridine amino acid ester prodrugs. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2005, 4, 659–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Tsume, Y.; Hilfinger, J.; Amidon, G. Potential of amino acid/dipeptide monoester prodrugs of floxuridine in facilitating enhanced delivery of active drug to interior sites of tumors: A two-tier monolayer in vitro study. Pharm. Res. 2011, 28, 2575–2588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Tsume, Y.; Hilfinger, J.M.; Amidon, G.L. Enhanced cancer cell growth inhibition by dipeptide prodrugs of floxuridine: Increased transporter affinity and metabolic stability. Mol. Pharm. 2008, 5, 717–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Tsume, Y.; Vig, B.; Sun, J.; Landowski, C.; Hilfinger, J.; Ramachandran, C.; Amidon, G. Enhanced absorption and growth inhibition with amino acid monoester prodrugs of floxuridine by targeting hPEPT1 transporters. Molecules 2008, 13, 1441–1454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Han, H.-k.; de Vrueh, R.L.A.; Rhie, J.K.; Covitz, K.-M.Y.; Smith, P.L.; Lee, C.-P.; Oh, D.-M.; Sadee, W.; Amidon, G.L. 5'-Amino acid Esters of antiviral nucleosides, acyclovir, and AZT are absorbed by the Intestinal PEPT1 peptide transporter. Pharm. Res. 1998, 15, 1154–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Li, F.; Maag, H.; Alfredson, T. Prodrugs of nucleoside analogues for improved oral absorption and tissue targeting. J. Pharm. Sci. 2008, 97, 1109–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Mittal, S.; Song, X.; Vig, B.S.; Landowski, C.P.; Kim, I.; Hilfinger, J.M.; Amidon, G.L. Prolidase, a potential enzyme target for melanoma: Design of proline-containing dipeptide-like prodrugs. Mol. Pharm. 2005, 2, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Song, X.; Lorenzi, P.L.; Landowski, C.P.; Vig, B.S.; Hilfinger, J.M.; Amidon, G.L. Amino acid ester prodrugs of the anticancer agent gemcitabine: Synthesis, bioconversion, metabolic bioevasion, and hPEPT1-mediated transport. Mol. Pharm. 2005, 2, 157–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Tsume, Y.; Bermejo, B.B.; Amidon, G. The dipeptide monoester prodrugs of floxuridine and gemcitabine-feasibility of orally administrable nucleoside analogs. Pharmaceuticals 2014, 7, 169–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Tsuda, M.; Terada, T.; Irie, M.; Katsura, T.; Niida, A.; Tomita, K.; Fujii, N.; Inui, K.-I. Transport characteristics of a novel peptide transporter 1 substrate, antihypotensive drug midodrine, and its amino acid derivatives. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2006, 318, 455–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Ezra, A.; Golomb, G. Administration routes and delivery systems of bisphosphonates for the treatment of bone resorption. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2000, 42, 175–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Ezra, A.; Hoffman, A.; Breuer, E.; Alferiev, I.S.; Mönkkönen, J.; el Hanany-Rozen, N.; Weiss, G.; Stepensky, D.; Gati, I.; Cohen, H.; et al. A peptide prodrug approach for improving bisphosphonate oral absorption. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 3641–3652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Gupta, D.; Gupta, S.V.; Dahan, A.; Tsume, Y.; Hilfinger, J.; Lee, K.-D.; Amidon, G.L. Increasing oral absorption of polar neuraminidase inhibitors: A prodrug transporter approach applied to oseltamivir analogue. Mol. Pharm. 2013, 10, 512–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Halestrap, A.; Meredith, D. The SLC16 gene family—From monocarboxylate transporters (MCTs) to aromatic amino acid transporters and beyond. Pflüg. Archiv. Eur. J. Physiol. 2004, 447, 619–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Cundy, K.C.; Annamalai, T.; Bu, L.; de Vera, J.; Estrela, J.; Luo, W.; Shirsat, P.; Torneros, A.; Yao, F.; Zou, J.; et al. XP13512, a novel gabapentin prodrug: II. Improved oral bioavailability, dose proportionality, and colonic absorption compared with gabapentin in rats and monkeys. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2004, 311, 324–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Cundy, K.C.; Sastry, S.; Luo, W.; Zou, J.; Moors, T.L.; Canafax, D.M. Clinical pharmacokinetics of XP13512, a novel transported prodrug of gabapentin. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2008, 48, 1378–1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Cundy, K.C.; Branch, R.; Chernov-Rogan, T.; Dias, T.; Estrada, T.; Hold, K.; Koller, K.; Liu, X.; Mann, A.; Panuwat, M.; et al. XP13512, a novel gabapentin prodrug: I. Design, synthesis, enzymatic conversion to gabapentin, and transport by intestinal solute transporters. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2004, 311, 315–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. González, P.M.; Lagos, C.F.; Ward, W.C.; Polli, J.E. Structural requirements of the human sodium-dependent bile acid transporter (hASBT): Role of 3- and 7-OH moieties on binding and translocation of bile acids. Mol. Pharm. 2013, 11, 588–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Tolle-Sander, S.; Lentz, K.A.; Maeda, D.Y.; Coop, A.; Polli, J.E. Increased acyclovir oral bioavailability via a bile acid conjugate. Mol. Pharm. 2004, 1, 40–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Rais, R.; Fletcher, S.; Polli, J.E. Synthesis and in vitro evaluation of gabapentin prodrugs that target the human apical sodium-dependent bile acid transporter (hASBT). J. Pharm. Sci. 2011, 100, 1184–1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Amidon, G.L.; Lennernas, H.; Shah, V.P.; Crison, J.R. A theoretical basis for a biopharmaceutic drug classification: The correlation of in vitro drug product dissolution and in vivo bioavailability. Pharm. Res. 1995, 12, 413–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Dahan, A.; Lennernäs, H.; Amidon, G.L. The fraction dose absorbed, in humans, and high jejunal human permeability relationship. Mol. Pharm. 2012, 9, 1847–1851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Dahan, A.; Miller, J.M.; Amidon, G.L. Prediction of solubility and permeability class membership: Provisional BCS classification of the world’s top oral drugs. AAPS J. 2009, 11, 740–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Dahan, A.; Miller, J.M.; Hilfinger, J.M.; Yamashita, S.; Yu, L.X.; Lennernas, H.; Amidon, G.L. High-permeability criterion for BCS classification: Segmental/pH dependent permeability considerations. Mol. Pharm. 2010, 7, 1827–1834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Fairstein, M.; Swissa, R.; Dahan, A. Regional-dependent intestinal permeability and BCS classification: Elucidation of pH-related complexity in rats using pseudoephedrine. AAPS J. 2013, 15, 589–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Zur, M.; Gasparini, M.; Wolk, O.; Amidon, G.L.; Dahan, A. The low/high BCS permeability class boundary: Physicochemical comparison of metoprolol and labetalol. Mol. Pharm. 2014, 11, 1707–1714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Dahan, A.; Wolk, O.; Kim, Y.H.; Ramachandran, C.; Crippen, G.M.; Takagi, T.; Bermejo, M.; Amidon, G.L. Purely in silico BCS classification: Science based quality standards for the world’s drugs. Mol. Pharm. 2013, 10, 4378–4390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Lipinski, C.A.; Lombardo, F.; Dominy, B.W.; Feeney, P.J. Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2001, 46, 3–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Sun, D.; Yu, L.; Hussain, M.; Wall, D.; Smith, R.; Amidon, G. In vitro testing of drug absorption for drug “developability” assessment: Forming an interface between in vitro preclinical data and clinical outcome. Curr. Opin. Drug Discov. Dev. 2004, 7, 75–85. [Google Scholar]
  97. Patel, M.; Mandava, N.; Gokulgandhi, M.; Pal, D.; Mitra, A. Amino acid prodrugs: An approach to improve the absorption of HIV-1 protease inhibitor, lopinavir. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2014, 7, 433–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Landowski, C.P.; Lorenzi, P.L.; Song, X.; Amidon, G.L. Nucleoside ester prodrug substrate specificity of liver carboxylesterase. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2006, 316, 572–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Liederer, B.M.; Borchardt, R.T. Enzymes involved in the bioconversion of ester-based prodrugs. J. Pharm. Sci. 2006, 95, 1177–1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Satoh, T.; Hosokawa, M. The mammalian carboxylesterases: From molecules to functions. Ann. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 1998, 38, 257–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Weller, S.; Blum, M.; Doucette, M.; Burnette, T.; Cederberg, D.; de Miranda, P.; Smiley, M. Pharmacokinetics of the acyclovir pro-drug valaciclovir after escalating single- and multiple-dose administration to normal volunteers. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 1993, 54, 595–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Balimane, P.V.; Tamai, I.; Guo, A.; Nakanishi, T.; Kitada, H.; Leibach, F.H.; Tsuji, A.; Sinko, P.J. Direct evidence for peptide transporter (PepT1)-mediated uptake of a nonpeptide prodrug, valacyclovir. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1998, 250, 246–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Burnette, T.C.; de Miranda, P. Metabolic disposition of the acyclovir prodrug valaciclovir in the rat. Drug Metab. Dispos. 1994, 22, 60–64. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  104. De Miranda, P.; Burnette, T.C. Metabolic fate and pharmacokinetics of the acyclovir prodrug valaciclovir in cynomolgus monkeys. Drug Metab. Dispos. 1994, 22, 55–59. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  105. Soul-Lawton, J.; Seaber, E.; On, N.; Wootton, R.; Rolan, P.; Posner, J. Absolute bioavailability and metabolic disposition of valaciclovir, the L-valyl ester of acyclovir, following oral administration to humans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1995, 39, 2759–2764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Sinko, P.J.; Balimane, P.V. Carrier-mediated intestinal absorption of valacyclovir, the L-valyl ester prodrug of acyclovir. 1. Interactions with peptides, organic anions and organic cations in rats. Biopharm. Drug Dispos. 1998, 19, 209–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Burnette, T.C.; Harrington, J.A.; Reardon, J.E.; Merrill, B.M.; de Miranda, P. Purification and characterization of a rat liver enzyme that hydrolyzes valaciclovir, the L-valyl ester prodrug of acyclovir. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 15827–15831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Kim, I.; Chu, X.-y.; Kim, S.; Provoda, C.J.; Lee, K.-D.; Amidon, G.L. Identification of a human valacyclovirase. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 25348–25356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Lai, L.; Xu, Z.; Zhou, J.; Lee, K.-D.; Amidon, G.L. Molecular basis of prodrug activation by human valacyclovirase, an α-amino acid ester hydrolase. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 9318–9327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Gupta, D.; Gupta, S.V.; Lee, K.-D.; Amidon, G.L. Chemical and enzymatic stability of amino acid prodrugs containing methoxy, ethoxy and propylene glycol linkers. Mol. Pharm. 2009, 6, 1604–1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Kim, I.; Crippen, G.M.; Amidon, G.L. Structure and specificity of a human valacyclovir activating enzyme: A homology model of BPHL. Mol. Pharm. 2004, 1, 434–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Kim, I.; Song, X.; Vig, B.S.; Mittal, S.; Shin, H.-C.; Lorenzi, P.J.; Amidon, G.L. A novel nucleoside prodrug-activating enzyme: Substrate specificity of biphenyl hydrolase-like protein. Mol. Pharm. 2004, 1, 117–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Sun, J.; Dahan, A.; Walls, Z.F.; Lai, L.; Lee, K.-D.; Amidon, G.L. Specificity of a prodrug-activating enzyme hVACVase: The leaving group effect. Mol. Pharm. 2010, 7, 2362–2368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Dahan, A.; Hoffman, A. Mode of administration-dependent brain uptake of indomethacin: Sustained systemic input increases brain influx. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2007, 35, 321–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Dvir, E.; Elman, A.; Simmons, D.; Shapiro, I.; Duvdevani, R.; Dahan, A.; Hoffman, A.; Friedman, J.E. DP-155, a lecithin derivative of indomethacin, is a novel nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug for analgesia and Alzheimer’s disease therapy. CNS Drug Rev. 2007, 13, 260–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Dvir, E.; Friedman, J.E.; Lee, J.Y.; Koh, J.Y.; Younis, F.; Raz, S.; Shapiro, I.; Hoffman, A.; Dahan, A.; Rosenberg, G.; et al. A novel phospholipid derivative of indomethacin, DP-155, shows superior safety and similar efficacy in reducing brain amyloid β in an Alzheimer’s disease model. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2006, 318, 1248–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Dahan, A.; Hoffman, A. Rationalizing the selection of oral lipid based drug delivery systems by an in vitro dynamic lipolysis model for improved oral bioavailability of poorly water soluble drugs. J. Control. Release 2008, 129, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Kurz, M.; Scriba, G.K.E. Drug–phospholipid conjugates as potential prodrugs: Synthesis, characterization, and degradation by pancreatic phospholipase A2. Chem. Phys. Lipids 2000, 107, 143–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Sun, J.; Dahan, A.; Amidon, G.L. Enhancing the intestinal absorption of molecules containing the polar guanidino functionality: A double-targeted prodrug approach. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 53, 624–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Sun, J.; Miller, J.M.; Beig, A.; Rozen, L.; Amidon, G.L.; Dahan, A. Mechanistic enhancement of the intestinal absorption of drugs containing the polar guanidino functionality. Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol. 2011, 7, 313–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Dahan, A.; Amidon, G.L. Segmental dependent transport of low permeability compounds along the small intestine due to P-glycoprotein: The role of efflux transport in the oral absorption of BCS class III drugs. Mol. Pharm. 2009, 6, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Dahan, A.; Sabit, H.; Amidon, G.L. Multiple efflux pumps are involved in the transepithelial transport of colchicine: Combined effect of p-glycoprotein and multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 leads to decreased intestinal absorption throughout the entire small intestine. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2009, 37, 2028–2036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Dahan, A.; Amidon, G.L. Small intestinal efflux mediated by MRP2 and BCRP shifts sulfasalazine intestinal permeability from high to low, enabling its colonic targeting. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2009, 297, G371–G377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Dahan, A.; Amidon, G.L. MRP2 mediated drug—Drug interaction: Indomethacin increases sulfasalazine absorption in the small intestine, potentially decreasing its colonic targeting. Int. J. Pharm. 2010, 386, 216–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Dahan, A.; Sabit, H.; Amidon, G. The H2 receptor antagonist nizatidine is a P-glycoprotein substrate: Characterization of its intestinal epithelial cell efflux transport. AAPS J. 2009, 11, 205–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dahan, A.; Zimmermann, E.M.; Ben-Shabat, S. Modern Prodrug Design for Targeted Oral Drug Delivery. Molecules 2014, 19, 16489-16505. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules191016489

AMA Style

Dahan A, Zimmermann EM, Ben-Shabat S. Modern Prodrug Design for Targeted Oral Drug Delivery. Molecules. 2014; 19(10):16489-16505. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules191016489

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dahan, Arik, Ellen M. Zimmermann, and Shimon Ben-Shabat. 2014. "Modern Prodrug Design for Targeted Oral Drug Delivery" Molecules 19, no. 10: 16489-16505. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules191016489

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop