1. Introduction
Bladder cancer is the most common malignancy of the urinary tract and one of the major fatal cancers in adult men [
1]. Over 70% of the patients are superficial bladder cancer at initial diagnosis, which would be managed with transurethral resection followed by intravesical chemotherapy [
2]. However, approximately 60%–70% of these cases will develop recurrent tumors, with 25% showing progression to a higher stage or grade [
3]. For advanced bladder cancer, cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy is the current standard therapeutic regimen. Even though bladder cancer is relatively chemotherapy-sensitive, unfortunately, the responses are not typically durable and the majority of these patients experience subsequent disease progression, with a 5-year survival rate of approximately 20%–40% [
4,
5]. Since the existing treatment options are hardly satisfactory, new effective therapeutic agents with fewer side effects are urgently required for the treatment of bladder cancer.
Metformin (1,1-dimethylbiguanide hydrochloride), an oral biguanide agent, has been widely used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes [
6]. Its antihyperglycemic effect mainly relies on the ability to activate the intracellular enzyme AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), which leads to reduction of hepatic gluconeogenesis and increase of glucose uptake in peripheral tissues [
7,
8]. In addition to the antidiabetic properties, it has shown that metformin inhibits the growth of various cancer cells
in vitro and
in vivo, including breast cancer [
9,
10], ovarian cancer [
11,
12], prostate cancer [
13] and gastric cancer [
14]. Epidemiological studies also revealed that metformin indeed decreased the incidence of cancer and cancer-related mortality in diabetic patients compared with those treated with other antidiabetic agents [
15,
16]. Interestingly, a recent study demonstrated that metformin could exert a protective effect on disease recurrence in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer [
17], indicating that metformin may be a potential candidate for the development of novel therapeutic agents for bladder cancer. However, the precise mechanism for the anti-cancer effects of metformin on bladder cancer is not entirely elucidated, which needs to be investigated in bladder cancer cell lines and animal models at preclinical level.
In the present study, we investigated the effects of metformin on the proliferation of human bladder cancer cells through cell viability MTT assay, cell count assay and colony formation assay. Then we detected the function of metformin on cell cycle progression by flow cytometry analysis, and further determined whether metformin was involved in AMPK activation and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibition through western blot analysis. More importantly, we also identified whether daily treatment of metformin decreased tumor growth in a xenograft model. Finally, we found that metformin was an efficient inhibitor on the growth of bladder cancer cells.
3. Discussion
Metformin is an oral antidiabetic agent used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and has the clinical advantage of being highly effective with minimal toxicity. Recent studies indicated that metformin reduced the risk of cancer and inhibited the proliferation of various cancer cells
in vitro and
in vivo, such as breast cancer [
9,
10], ovarian cancer [
11,
12], prostate cancer [
13] and gastric cancer [
14]. However, the anti-cancer effects of metformin on bladder cancer remain unknown. Here, we demonstrate for the first time that metformin not only effectively inhibits the proliferation and clonogenicity of human bladder cancer cells
in vitro, but also suppresses the tumor growth in a xenograft model when administered intraperitoneally.
Downregulation of cyclin D1 in response to metformin has been shown in several cancer cell lines. In prostate cancer cells, metformin treatment led to a dose-dependent inhibition of proliferation through a decrease in cyclin D1 levels, correlated with blocking cell cycle in the G0/G1 phases [
13]. Downregulation of cell cycle proteins, including cyclin D1, CDK4 and CDK6, was also observed in metformin-treated gastric cancer cells [
14]. Our results also demonstrated that metformin could arrest bladder cancer cells in the G0/G1 phases with concomitant decreases in the expression of cyclin D1, CDK4 and E2F1. Cyclin D1 plays a pivotal role in the regulation of cell cycle transitions in mammalian cells, it binds to CDK4 and CDK6 to form active cyclin/CDK complexes that help to phosphorylate the retinoblastoma protein (Rb). Then phosphorylation Rb releases the transcription factor E2F, which activates the transcription of genes required for G1/S phases transition [
19]. Thus downregulation of cyclin D1 may be essential for the anti-cancer effects of metformin in bladder cancer cells. Previous reports have shown that the cyclin D1 gene (CCND1) is amplified and/or overexpressed in several human tumors including bladder cancer [
20,
21]. Overexpression of cyclin D1 appeared to play an important role in the early stage of urothelial tumorigenesis and correlated with early recurrence in superficial bladder cancers [
22]. Moreover, the polymorphism within the cyclin D1 gene was associated with risk and clinicopathologic characteristics of urinary bladder cancer [
23,
24]. Therefore, inhibition of cyclin D1 seems to be an effective molecular target for the treatment of bladder cancer. Our
in vivo study also showed that metformin could decrease the expression levels of cyclin D1 in a bladder cancer xenograft model and suggests that metformin may be a valuable potential therapeutic agent to block bladder tumor growth.
In the present study, metformin activated the AMPK pathway in human bladder cancer cells as seen in other cell types [
9]. AMPK is a serine/threonine kinase that acts as a cellular energy sensor maintaining the energy balance in the eukaryotic cells [
25]. It is activated in response to cellular stresses that deplete cellular energy levels and increase the AMP/ATP ratio [
26,
27]. The antihyperglycemic effect of metformin mainly relies on its ability to activate AMPK, leading to inhibition of gluconeogenesis in liver and increase of glucose uptake in peripheral tissues [
7,
8]. In addition to the metabolic effects, activation of AMPK has been recognized as an attractive anti-cancer therapeutic strategy [
28]. Some researches demonstrated that the antiproliferative action of metformin was exactly via activation of AMPK and small interfering RNAs against AMPK (α1 subunit) or AMPK inhibitors could rescue cells from metformin-induced growth inhibition [
9,
29]. Activation of AMPK has been shown to inhibit its downstream target, mTOR, which plays a central role in cell growth and proliferation [
18]. It is the AMPK-mediated mTOR inhibition that is supposed to be the crucial factor responsible for the antitumor properties of metformin [
30]. Our study also demonstrated that mTOR signaling pathway was inhibited by metformin in bladder cancer cells, as evidenced by the decreased phosphorylation of mTOR, S6K1, and 4E-BP1. These data indicate that metformin activates AMPK in bladder cancer cells, leading to inhibition of mTOR signaling pathway and thus a reduced cellular proliferation. Previous studies suggested that mTOR was activated in most bladder caners and increased p-mTOR status was associated with worsened pathological stage and shortened patient survival [
31]. Moreover, inhibition of mTOR signaling pathway in bladder cancer models demonstrated remarkable anti-cancer activity both
in vitro and
in vivo [
32–
34], making it an attractive target for cancer therapeutics. Taken together, our study reveals that metformin may be a potential therapeutic agent to treat bladder cancer. On the other hand, a study of Sahra
et al. showed that metformin could still inhibit mTOR pathway in prostate cancer cells even in the absence of AMPK activation [
13]. Other groups also observed that metformin could hinder the proliferation of AMPK null mouse embryo fibroblasts and AMPK silenced ovarian cancer cells [
11]. This disparity may be due to a cell specific effect and need further clarification. The tumor suppressor liver kinase B1 (LKB1) has been identified as the key upstream serine/threonine kinase that activates AMPK [
28]. Recent studies demonstrated that cancer cells lacking LKB1 protein expression do not respond to metformin
in vitro, indicating LKB1 may play an important role in mediating the anti-cancer effects of metformin [
11,
35]. In bladder cancers, LKB1 was not a critical mutation target unlike other sporadic cancers and both 5637 and T24 were LKB1 wild-type cancer cell lines [
36,
37]. Future studies are required to investigate the role of LKB1 in the metformin-mediated anti-cancer effects in bladder cancer cells.
Our
in vitro study was conducted using higher doses of metformin in millimolar range, from 2 to 20 mM, which were coincident with those of similar pre-clinical and
in vitro studies in other cancer cell types [
9,
11]. But the use of such higher doses has been the subject of criticism since it seems unattainable
in vivo. Indeed, the plasma concentration of metformin in type 2 diabetic patients treated with the drug approximates 50 μM [
38], thus the dose range employed in the present study is 100-fold higher than the therapeutic levels. However, it must be noted that the high concentrations of glucose and FBS in culture medium are excessive stimulators for cell growth and it may need a higher dose to see the anti-cancer effects of metformin in cell culture systems. Moreover, it has been reported that metformin accumulates in tissues at much higher concentrations than in the blood [
39,
40], indicating that the concentrations of metformin employed
in vitro study (1–10 mM) might be attained during cancer treatment. Therefore, the present results still seem clinically relevant. Furthermore, our
in vivo study showed that metformin markedly inhibited the growth of human bladder tumor in a xenograft model. The concentration of metformin administered to the animal was 100 mg/kg body weight per day, which was equivalent to 480 mg/60 kg per day in humans. Given that the maximum recommended daily dose of metformin for the treatment of type 2 diabetic patients is 2550 mg per day, our study indicates that metformin could exert its anti-cancer ability
in vivo even at a safe dose level. Collectively, the remarkable efficiency of metformin to inhibit bladder cancer cells proliferation and tumor growth may have important implications in the treatment of bladder cancer.
4. Experimental Section
4.1. Reagents
Metformin (1,1-dimethylbiguanide hydrochloride) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) and diluted across a range of concentrations at 2, 5, 10 and 20 mM in culture media. Antibodies against AMPKα, phospho-AMPKα (Thr172), mTOR, phospho-mTOR (Ser2448), S6 Kinase 1 (S6K1), phospho-S6K1 (Thr389), phospho-eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E)-binding protein 1 (p-4E-BP1) (Thr37/46), peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies were obtained from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA). Antibodies against cyclin D1, cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4), E2F1, P21, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and β-actin were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). All other reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) unless otherwise specified.
4.2. Cell Lines and Culture Conditions
The human bladder transitional cell carcinoma cell line 5637 and T24 were from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Rockville, MD, USA) and cultured in fewer than 6 months after resuscitation. Cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 (5637) or Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM; T24) supplemented with 10% of fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% of penicillin-streptomycin at 37 °C, in humidified air containing 5% of CO2. Cell culture media and FBS were obtained from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA). Cells were passaged with 0.25% trypsin-EDTA when they reached ~80% confluence.
4.3. Cell Viability Assay
Cell viablility was assessed using a tetrazolium-based assay. Briefly, cells were seeded at 5 × 103 per well in 96-well culture plates and incubated in medium containing 10% FBS. After 24 h, cells were treated with metformin (0, 2, 5, 10, 20 mM) for 24, 48 and 72 h. At the indicated time points, cells were washed once and incubated with 0.5 mg/mL of 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) at 37 °C for 4 h. Then the medium was discarded carefully and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was added to solubilize the formazan crystals. Finally, the absorbance was measured for each well at a wavelength of 490 nm using the Microplate Autoreader (Bio-Tek Instruments Inc., Winooski, VT, USA). Independent experiments were repeated in triplicate.
4.4. Cell Count Assay
Cells were seeded at 5 × 104 per well in 12-well culture plates. After 24 h, cells were incubated in the absence or presence of metformin for 24, 48 and 72 h. At the indicated time points, cells were washed twice with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) to remove any loosely attached or floating cells. The cells were then harvested and immediately stained with 0.2% trypan blue. Viable cells were quantified using a hemocytometer under an inverted microscope. Independent experiments were repeated in triplicate.
4.6. Flow Cytometric Analysis
Flow cytometric analysis was performed to evaluate the effects of metformin on cell cycle distribution. In brief, cells grown in 6-well culture plates (2.0 × 105 cells/well) were treated with 5 mM metformin or without metformin for 12, 24 and 48 h. After treatments, cells were harvested by trypsinization, washed twice with ice-cold PBS, and then fixed overnight at −20 °C in 70% ethanol. Before analysis, cells were washed with PBS and incubated with 50 μg/mL propidium iodide (PI) and 50 μg/mL RNase A in PBS at room temperature for 30 min. Then flow cytometry was performed using a FACSCalibur (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA) system with CELLQuest software (Version 3.3; Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA) and the cell cycle distributions were calculated by ModFit LT software (Version 3.0; Verity Software House, Topsham, ME, USA). All experiments were carried out in triplicate to assess the consistency of response.
4.7. Protein Extraction and Western Blot Analysis
After treatment for the indicated time, cells were washed thrice with ice-cold PBS and lysed in lysis buffer (10 mM of Tris-HCl (pH of 7.4), 150 mM of NaCl, 0.1% of SDS, 1 mM of EDTA, 1 mM of EGTA, 0.3 mM of PMSF, 0.2 mM of sodium orthovanadate, 1% of NP-40, 10 mg/mL of leupeptin and 10 mg/mL of aprotinin) on ice for 30 min. The lysates were then centrifuged at 15,000 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C and the supernatants were collected for protein concentration determination. For immunoblot analyses, equal amounts of protein (30–60 μg) were subjected to SDS-PAGE on 8% or 12% Tris-glycine gels, and separated proteins were transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes by western blot. The membranes were blocked with 5% skim milk in Tris Buffered Saline (TBS) for 1 h at room temperature and probed with primary antibodies against desired molecules overnight at 4 °C. After washing in TBS-Tween (0.1%), the membranes were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody for 1 h at room temperature. Protein signal was then detected with the ECL chemiluminescent detection system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). β-actin was used as a loading control.
4.8. Tumor Xenograft Model
Four-week-old male athymic BALB/c nu/nu mice were obtained from the Experimental Animal Center of Xi’an Jiaotong University (Xi’an, China). Animal care and protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Xi’an Jiaotong University and the permit number was SCXK2012-2096. The animal experiments were performed in adherence with the NIH Guidelines on the Use of Laboratory Animals [
41]. To establish 5637 tumors in mice, the early passage 5637 cells were harvested and resuspended in serum-free RPMI-1640 medium. Cells (2 × 10
6 cells in 100 μL) were then injected subcutaneously into the right flank regions of each mouse to initiate tumor growth. After 7 days, the tumors reached a mean diameter of 6 mm in all recipients. Then tumor-bearing mice were randomly divided into control and treated groups (5 mice per group). The metformin-treated group was injected intraperitoneally at 100 mg/kg body weight per day for 3 weeks and the control group received vehicle only. Body weight and diet consumption were recorded twice weekly throughout the study. After the initiation of the metformin administration, the tumor size was measured with an external caliper twice a week and tumor volume was calculated by the formula 0.5236 × A × B
2, wherein A represents the long axis and B represents the short axis of the tumor. At the end of experiment, all the animals were sacrificed and the tumors were excised, weighed, then fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and embedded in paraffin for further analyses.
4.9. Immunohistochemistry
Paraffin-embedded tissue sections (5-μm thick) were processed and immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed using a Dako Autostainer Plus system (DakoCytomation, Carpinteria, CA, USA). In brief, sections were deparaffinized, rehydrated, subjected to 5 min of heat-induced antigen retrieval, 15 min of endogenous enzyme block, and incubated with primary antibody at 4 °C overnight. Next day, after 30 min of DakoCytomation EnVision-HRP reagent (DakoCytomation, Carpinteria, CA, USA) incubation at room temperature, the signals were detected by adding substrate hydrogen peroxide using diaminobenzidine (DAB) as a chromogen followed by hematoxylin counterstaining. Negative controls were incubated only with primary antibody dilution buffer under identical conditions. All sections were examined under a light microscope and positive stained cells (brown) were quantified as number of positive cell × 100/total number of cells in 10 random microscopic (400×) fields in each slice.
4.10. Statistical Analysis
Data are presented as the mean ± SE from three independent experiments, and statistical analysis was done using a Student’s t test by software of SPSS 15.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.