Betulinic Acid Derivatives NVX-207 and B10 for  Treatment of Glioblastoma—An in Vitro Study of  Cytotoxicity and Radiosensitization

Bache, Matthias; Bernhardt, Stephan; Passin, Sarina; Wichmann, Henri; Hein, Anja; Zschornak, Martin P; Kappler, Matthias; Taubert, Helge; Paschke, Reinhard; Vordermark, Dirk

doi:10.3390/ijms151119777

Open AccessArticle

Betulinic Acid Derivatives NVX-207 and B10 for Treatment of Glioblastoma—An in Vitro Study of Cytotoxicity and Radiosensitization

by

Matthias Bache

^1,*,

Stephan Bernhardt

^1,2,

Sarina Passin

¹,

Henri Wichmann

^1,3,

Anja Hein

¹,

Martin P Zschornak

¹,

Matthias Kappler

³,

Helge Taubert

⁴

,

Reinhard Paschke

⁵ and

Dirk Vordermark

¹

Department of Radiotherapy, Martin Luther University Halle–Wittenberg, Ernst Grube Straße 40, D-06120 Halle, Germany

²

Division of Molecular Genome Analysis, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 580, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany

³

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Plastic Surgery, Martin Luther University Halle–Wittenberg, Ernst Grube Straße 40, D-06120 Halle, Germany

⁴

Clinic of Urology, Friedrich Alexander University Hospital Erlangen, Hartmann Str. 14, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany

⁵

Biozentrum, Martin Luther Universität Halle–Wittenberg, Weinbergweg 22, D-06120 Halle, Germany

^*

Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15(11), 19777-19790; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms151119777

Submission received: 27 May 2014 / Revised: 24 October 2014 / Accepted: 27 October 2014 / Published: 30 October 2014

(This article belongs to the Collection Radiation Toxicity in Cells)

Download

Browse Figures

Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Betulinic acid (BA), a pentacyclic triterpene, represents a new therapeutic substance that has potential benefits for treating glioblastoma. Recently, new strategies for producing BA derivatives with improved properties have evolved. However, few studies have examined the combination of BA or BA derivatives using radiotherapy. The effects of two BA derivatives, NVX-207 and B10, on cellular and radiobiological behavior were analyzed using glioblastoma cell lines (U251MG, U343MG and LN229). Based on IC₅₀ values under normoxic conditions, we detected a 1.3–2.9-fold higher cytotoxicity of the BA derivatives B10 and NVX-207, respectively, compared to BA. Incubation using both BA derivatives led to decreased cell migration, cleavage of PARP and decreased protein expression levels of Survivin. Weak radiation sensitivity enhancement was observed in U251MG cells after treatment with both BA derivatives. The enhancement factors at an irradiation dose of 6 Gy after treatment with 5 µM NVX-207 and 5 µM B10 were 1.32 (p = 0.029) and 1.55 (p = 0.002), respectively. In contrast to BA, neither NVX-207 nor B10 had additional effects under hypoxic conditions. Our results suggest that the BA derivatives NVX-207 and B10 improve the effects of radiotherapy on human malignant glioma cells, particularly under normoxic conditions.

Keywords:

betulinic acid derivatives; glioma; cytotoxicity; irradiation; normoxia; hypoxia

1. Introduction

Glioblastoma is the most common malignant primary brain tumor. Its treatment typically consists of surgery and subsequent radiotherapy with concomitant and sequential chemotherapy. Because glioblastomas are usually only incompletely resected, a definitive cure is not possible. In randomized trials, the additional use of temozolomide, a DNA alkylating agent, has improved the survival of patients with glioblastoma. Despite multimodal treatment concepts, the median overall survival has been estimated to be approximately 12 to 15 months [1,2,3,4]. The intrinsic resistance to DNA alkylating agents, such as temozolomide, represents another problem. Betulinic acid (BA), a pentacyclic triterpene, is a natural substance derived from birch bark and is used in various preparations as a medication for treating inflammation, malaria and obesity. Additionally, BA seems to be important for tumor therapy. In vitro analyses have indicated that BA is cytotoxic in various types of tumors, such as neuroectodermal tumors, head and neck cancer, colon cancer, lung cancer, ovarian cancer, melanoma and sarcoma [5,6].

BA is an effective agent for treating primary and established glioblastoma cell lines [7,8,9]. Initial investigations have revealed that BA improved the effects of chemotherapy and radiotherapy and increased doxorubicin- or cisplatin-induced apoptosis in various tumor cell lines [10]. The chemotherapy-resistant colon carcinoma cell line SNU-C5 showed significantly increased cytotoxicity when 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan or oxaliplatin treatment was combined with BA [11]. Using a combination of BA and irradiation, first-line trials with certain melanoma and head/neck-tumor cell lines illustrated additive effects [12,13]; this finding was confirmed by our results. In human malignant glioma cells, the additive effects under normoxic conditions were observed. Cytotoxicity and radiosensitization of BA were increased under hypoxic conditions [14].

A drawback for the therapeutic use of BA may be its low solubility. To overcome this limitation, several studies have investigated new derivatives evolved by modifying BA at the C-3 and C-28 positions [15,16,17]. Clinical testing is most advanced for bevirimat, a BA-derivative that is used against HIV. A clinical phase II study showed that the oral uptake was well tolerated by patients and that the viral load was effectively reduced compared with other antiviral substances [18]. NVX-207, a BA ester derivative, has a higher cytotoxicity than BA in various human and canine tumor cell lines. Furthermore, in a phase I/II study, the clinical use of NVX-207 led to complete remission of therapy-resistant tumors in dogs [19]. Another analysis indicated that glycosylation of BA significantly increased the activity and selectivity toward cancer cell lines [20]. B10, a BA ester derivative coupled with D-glucose, was more effective than BA and induced apoptosis in different tumor cell lines [21]. Recently, it was reported that B10 induced autophagy, in addition to cell death, by apoptosis in glioma cell lines [22]. However, to date, only a few studies have examined the combination of BA or BA derivatives with radiotherapy. In the present study, we analyzed the effects of the BA derivatives NVX-207 and B10 on cytotoxicity, migration, protein expression of PARP, Survivin and CAIX and radiosensitivity under normoxic and hypoxic conditions in human malignant glioma cells. The chemical structures of BA derivatives NVX-207 and B10, shown in Figure 1, were previously described [21,23].

Figure 1. Structures of betulinic acid (BA), NVX-207 and B10.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Results

2.1.1. Effects of Betulinic Acid (BA) and BA Derivatives on the Cytotoxicity and Protein Expression of Malignant Glioma Cell Lines under Normoxic and Hypoxic Conditions

BA showed a moderate cytotoxicity, with IC₅₀ values ranging between 18.4 and 23.1 µM (Table 1). NVX-207 and B10 had a higher cytotoxicity than BA, with IC₅₀ values ranging from 7.6–8.5 and 8.1–17.2 µM, respectively, in the three analyzed malignant glioma cell lines under normoxic conditions using the Sulforhodamine-B (SRB) assay. Under hypoxic conditions, a significantly increased cytotoxicity of BA, with IC₅₀ values ranging from 7.0–8.5 µM, was observed (Table 1). Similar effects were previously observed using a clonogenic survival assay [14]. However, neither NVX-207 nor B10 had obviously stronger effects under hypoxic conditions. Overall, NVX-207 revealed the strongest effect, with IC₅₀ values ranging from 7.6–9.6 µM in malignant glioma cells independent of the oxygen concentration. In U251MG cells, B10 presented a good response, with an IC₅₀ value of 11.4 µM under hypoxic conditions. However, B10 displayed only moderate effects, with IC₅₀ values of 22.4 and 24.9 µM in cell lines U343MG and LN229, respectively, under hypoxic conditions. Similar effects were observed using cell growth and clonogenic survival assays (Figure 2 and Figure 3).

Table 1. IC₅₀ values of BA, NVX-207 and B10 for glioma cell lines, determined using the SRB-assay.

**Table 1.** IC₅₀ values of BA, NVX-207 and B10 for glioma cell lines, determined using the SRB-assay.
Cell Lines	IC₅₀ (µM)
	U251MG		LN229		U343MG
	N	H	N	H	N	H
BA	18.4 ± 3.7	7.6 ± 1.0	23.1 ± 5.3	8.5 ± 0.7	20.2 ± 4.4	7.0 ± 1.2
NVX-207	7.6 ± 0.4	9.6 ± 0.9	7.9 ± 0.5	8.5 ± 0.3	8.5 ± 0.8	8.3 ± 0.1
B10	8.1 ± 0.8	11.4 ± 3.7	17.2 ± 1.5	22.4 ± 3.7	15.8 ± 1.7	24.9 ± 4.8

N, normoxia; H, hypoxia; IC₅₀, inactivation concentration of 50%.

Figure 2. Effects of NVX-207 and B10 on the cell growth of glioma cells. Cell number of glioma cells after treatment with NVX-207 or B10 for 24 h under normoxic or hypoxic conditions. Under hypoxia, NVX-207 (a,b) and B10 (c,d) did not show decreased cell growth in glioma cell lines compared to normoxic conditions. The data represent the mean values (±SD) of three independent experiments.

Figure 3. Effects of NVX-207 and B10 on the clonogenic survival of glioma cells. Clonogenic survival of glioma cells after treatment with NVX-207 or B10 for 24 h under normoxic or hypoxic conditions. Under hypoxia, NVX-207 (a,b) and B10 (c,d) did not show decreased clonogenic survival in glioma cell lines compared to normoxic conditions. The data represent the mean values (±SD) of three independent experiments.

Previously, we detected BA incubation results in the cleavage of the apoptotic protein PARP and a decrease in the protein level of the apoptosis inhibitor Survivin [14]. Using Western blot analysis, we examined the effects of BA derivatives on the cleavage of PARP as well as the expression levels of Survivin and hypoxia-induced CAIX under normoxic and hypoxic conditions (Figure 4). Hypoxia resulted in an increased CAIX expression level. Additionally, slightly increased levels of cleaved PARP or decreased expression levels of Survivin were detected under hypoxic conditions (Figure 4). Incubation with NVX-207 and B10 led to PARP cleavage and to a decrease in Survivin expression levels under normoxic and hypoxic conditions. However, no change in the hypoxia-induced CAIX protein level was observed (Figure 4). There were no effects of NVX-207 and B10 incubation on the mRNA expression levels of HIF1α and CAIX (data not shown). Our former analysis indicated that the stronger cytotoxic effects by BA under hypoxic conditions were accompanied by reduced hypoxia-induced gene expressions in U251MG and U343MG cells [14].

Figure 4. Effects of NVX-207 and B10 on protein expressions of PARP, CAIX and Survivin in glioma cells using Western blot analysis. NVX-207 and B10 treatment affects cleavage of PARP and expression of Survivin in glioma cells. However, there was no change in the expression levels of hypoxia-induced CAIX. β-Actin served as an internal loading control. Cell lines were untreated or treated using DMSO or increasing doses of NVX-207 (a) or B10 (b) under normoxic or hypoxic conditions. The Western blot analysis showed one representative result of three independent experiments.

2.1.2. Effects of BA and BA Derivatives on Necrosis, Migration, and Radiosensitivity in Malignant Glioma Cell Lines

NVX-207 and B10 induce higher rates of necrosis compared to BA, as detected by the LDH assay. A significantly higher rate of necrosis of glioma cell lines was detected using 20 µM NVX-207 and B10. BA also showed a significant increase of necrosis at a concentration of 30 µM (Figure 5).

Figure 5. Effects of 20 (a) and 30 µM (b) BA, B10 or NVX-207 on necrosis of glioma cell lines were determined using the LDH assay. The data represent the mean values (±SD) of three independent experiments. Significant differences between BA and BA derivatives were labeled (* p < 0.05).

The effects of NVX-207, B10 and BA on the cell migration rates of malignant glioma cell lines were determined using a scratch assay. A dose-dependent inhibition of migration was observed. At a concentration of 5 µM NVX-207, B10 or BA, a slightly decreased rate of migration between 8% and 23% was detected (data not shown). In all of the glioma cell lines, NVX-207 showed the strongest effects on the inhibition of migration at a concentration of 10 µM compared to B10 and BA (Figure 6).

Figure 6. Effects of 10 µM BA, NVX-207 or B10 on the migration of glioma cells. The data represent the mean values (±SD) of three or four independent experiments (* p < 0.05).

We determined the radiosensitivity of NVX-207 and B10 after irradiation with 2 or 6 Gy. The two BA derivatives had slightly increased effects on the radiosensitivity of glioma cells. In U251MG cells, the enhancement factors for 5 µM NVX-207 or B10 after a radiation dose of 6 Gy were 1.32 (p = 0.029) and 1.55 (p = 0.002), respectively. The enhancement factors increased with higher concentrations of both BA derivatives (Figure 7). Former analyses have shown that BA slightly radiosensitized glioma cells [14].

Figure 7. Effects of NVX-207 and B10 on the radiosensitivity of glioma cells. U251MG cells were treated with NVX-207 (a) or B10 (b) and irradiated with a dose of 2 and 6 Gy under normoxic conditions (c). The data represent the mean values (±SD) of three independent experiments (* p < 0.05). EF, enhancement factor.

2.2. Discussion

Betulinic acid represents a new therapeutic substance that has potential benefits for treating glioblastomas. However, low solubility has been observed to prevent the therapeutic application of BA for tumor therapy. Modifications could be an alternative approach for using BA in therapeutic applications. In the present study, we analyzed the cell biological effects of two promising BA derivatives in combination with radiation therapy on human malignant glioma cell lines.

Compared with BA, the two BA derivatives, NVX-207 and B10, showed a 1.3–2.9-fold higher cytotoxicity in glioma cell lines under normoxic conditions (Table 1). Additionally, NVX-207, a betulinic ester, displayed the strongest effect independent of the oxygen concentration. Recently, NVX-207 revealed strong cytotoxicity in tumor cells in vitro and in vivo [19]. The gene expression analyses have suggested that NVX-207 has modulatory effects in lipid metabolism, with an induction of insulin-induced gene 1, which is a key regulator of sterol synthesis [19]. Nevertheless, additional information concerning the molecular mechanisms and targets is needed to specifically design new anticancer drugs, including BA derivatives [24]. In a former study, the 3-O-glycoside B10 showed higher cytotoxicity in different tumor cell lines compared to BA [21]. We confirmed these findings for malignant glioma cell lines under normoxic conditions in our study (Table 1). The high activity of B10 is triggered by apoptotic and non-apoptotic cell death in glioma cell lines [22]. Consistent with this finding, our analysis showed that B10 induced the cleavage of the apoptotic protein PARP and decreased the protein level of the apoptosis inhibitor Survivin. By analyzing the release of LDH, we observed a higher rate of necrosis after NVX-207 and B10 incubation compared to BA (Figure 5). Additional analysis revealed that the effectiveness of the anticancer activities of 3-O-glycosides was varied based on the sugar at the C-3 position and the modification of the C-28 position [20,25].

Comparable to BA, NVX-207 and B10 treatments resulted in slightly reduced rates of glioblastoma cell migration. However, NVX-207 showed the strongest effect on inhibition of migration (Figure 6). To date, few studies have examined the combination of BA or BA derivatives with radiotherapy. NVX-207 and B10, in combination with irradiation, have shown slightly enhanced effects on the radiosensitivity of malignant glioma cells (Figure 7). Our results have shown that these two treatments were more effective in combination. Consistent with this finding, the preliminary data on incubation with B10 showed additive effects with the PI3K inhibitor GDC-0941, temozolomide or irradiation [26,27]. Considering BA in combination with radiation, few studies obtained additive or radiosensitizing effects in different tumor cell lines [12,13,14]. These results suggest that BA and BA derivatives are potentially useful in combination with radiotherapy. However, this observation must be examined more closely in future studies. Furthermore, the incubation of BA resulted in HIF1α inhibition or anti-angiogenic activity [28,29,30]. Consistent with this finding, we previously demonstrated a reduced, BA-induced HIF1α expression level that was coupled with stronger effects on cytotoxicity and radiosensitivity under hypoxic conditions in glioma cells [14]. However, NVX-207 and B10 did not affect hypoxia-induced gene expression of HIF1α or CAIX or cytotoxicity dependent on the oxygen concentration. The results of SRB assay and cell growth analysis suggest that B10 decreases cytotoxicity under hypoxic conditions. It is well known that cell growth is strongly delayed under hypoxic conditions. Lesser proliferation of hypoxic control cells seems to be responsible for the apparent resistance of glioma cell lines. Contrary to this observation, B10 had a stronger effect on cytotoxicity in two glioma cell lines under hypoxic conditions [27]. Potentially, the cell-type specificity or the different p53 gene status of the analyzed cell lines [31,32] could explain the different results.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Cell Lines, Culture Conditions, and Treatments with BA and Irradiation

The human malignant glioma cell lines U251MG (kindly provided by Dr. Ariane Söling, Department of Pediatrics, University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany), U343MG (CLS Cell Lines Service, Eppelheim, Germany) and LN229 (kindly provided by Annie-Claire Diserens, Laboratoire de Neurochirurgie, Lausanne, Switzerland) were grown in RPMI 1640 medium (Lonza, Walkersville, MD, USA) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (PAA Laboratories, Cölbe, Germany), 1% sodium pyruvate (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany), 185 U/mL penicillin (Invitrogen) and 185 μg/mL streptomycin (Invitrogen) at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere containing 3% CO₂. Hypoxia (<0.1% O₂) was achieved using a gas generator system as previously described [33]. All of the experiments were performed with cells in logarithmic growth phase. BA, NVX-207 and B10 (all compounds from BioSolution GmbH, Halle, Germany) were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) to achieve a 20 mM stock solution (Figure 1). The cells were seeded in 25-cm² flasks 24 h before treatment; the cells were treated with BA, NVX-207 or B10 for 24 h at 37 °C under normoxic or hypoxic conditions and were subsequently irradiated in tissue culture flasks (Greiner, Frickenhausen, Germany). Irradiation was performed using 6-MV photons, adequate bolus material, and a linear accelerator (SIEMENS ONCOR, Erlangen, Germany) at a dose rate of 2 Gy/min.

3.2. Sulforhodamine-B (SRB) Assay

Cytotoxic activities were evaluated using the Sulforhodamine-B (SRB) assay. Exponentially growing cells were seeded into 96-well plates at cell densities to prevent confluence for 96 h. After 24 h, the cells were treated using a dilution series of the compounds for 72 h under normoxic or hypoxic conditions. After treatment, the adherent cells were fixed using 10% TCA at 4 °C for 1 h; the cells were washed with ice-cold water and were dyed using 100 µL of 4.4% SRB solution for 10 min. After staining, the plates were washed with 1% acetic acid and air-dried overnight. Three hundred microliters of 20 mM Tris base solution was added, and the absorbance was measured at 540 nm using a 96-well plate reader (TECAN GENios, Männedorf, Switzerland). The IC₅₀ values indicate the concentrations of the compound that cause 50% cell inhibition. The data were obtained in three independent experiments.

3.3. Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) Assay

To detect cellular membrane damage with the release of the cytosolic enzyme LDH into the culture medium, a colorimetric LDH assay was performed. The cells were seeded for 24 h and were treated with dilutions of the compounds. After a 24-h incubation of the compounds, 50 μL of the culture supernatant was collected from each well and was placed in a 96-well plate. The LDH activity was assessed using a CytoTox-ONE™ Homogeneous Membrane Integrity Assay (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, 50 µL of CytoTox-One solution was added to the samples, which were then incubated in the dark at room temperature for 15 min. After incubation, the reaction was terminated with 25 µL of stop solution, and the excitation at 560 nm/emission at 590 nm was measured using a microplate reader. As a positive control for LDH release, the cells were treated using 1% solution of Triton X-100 (Sigma–Aldrich, Munich, Germany) for 5 min to lyse all of the cells before collecting the supernatants. Sample emission values were normalized to maintain a positive control and culture medium background. All of the experimental conditions were performed in three independent experiments.

3.4. Scratch Assay

We used a wound-scratch assay to determine the migration of cells after treatment with BA, NVX-207 or B10. The cells were grown in 24-well cell culture plates in RPMI medium containing 10% FBS and cultured to 100% confluence. A uniform, cell-free area was created by scratching the confluent monolayer with a 200-µL pipette tip. To determine the migration of glioma cells, the wound closure was observed 16 h after incubation with BA, NVX-207 or B10. To evaluate the relative cell migration rate, the initial and the final wound areas were measured using Adobe Photoshop CS6. The wound-scratch assay was performed three or four times in independent experiments.

3.5. Western Blotting

The cells were washed, trypsinized and centrifuged. The cells were washed with PBS and resuspended in 100 µL of lysis buffer (50 mM Tris at pH 8.0, 0.3 M NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 0.1% NP40 and protease inhibitors) followed by ultrasonic homogenization. After centrifugation at 14,000× g for 15 min, the supernatant was collected, and the protein concentration was determined using the Bradford assay (BioRad, Munich, Germany). Approximately, 30 mg of total protein from each cell lysate was separated on a 10% NuPAGE Bis–Tris (Invitrogen) gel that was placed in an X-Cell SureLock Mini-Cell (Invitrogen). The membrane was blocked with 10% non-fat milk in TBST (50 mM NaCl, 30 mM Tris–HCl at pH 8.0 and 0.1% Tween) for 1 h and incubated with rabbit anti-human Survivin antibody (1:1000 dilution, clone AF886, R&D Systems, Wiesbaden, Germany), rabbit anti-human cleaved PARP (1:2000, Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA), mouse CAIX antibody (1:3000, BioScience, Bratislava, Slovakia) and mouse anti-β-actin (1:5000, Sigma, Deisenhofen, Germany) at 4 °C overnight. After washing, the membranes were incubated with a horseradish peroxidase-labeled goat anti-rabbit or anti-mouse IgG (1:2000, DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark) for 1 h at room temperature. For protein detection, the membranes were incubated with ECL substrate or the ECL Plus Blotting Detection System (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Freiburg, Germany) for 1 min and exposed to X-ray film (Biomax, Kodak, Braunschweig, Germany). To detect a difference between the expression levels of cleaved PARP, CAIX or Survivin we visually compared the differences between the DMSO-treated control cells and the NVX-207 or B10-treated cells. β-Actin served as an internal loading control. The Western blot analysis showed one representative result in three independent experiments.

3.6. Clonogenic Survival Assays and Radiosensitivity

The cells were trypsinized 24 h after treatment with BA, NVX-207 or B10 (1 h after irradiation), and the cell numbers were determined. Based on the optimal plating efficacy (depending on the BA treatment and irradiation dose), 500–10,000 cells were seeded in 25-cm² flasks. The cells were cultured in RPMI supplemented with 10% FBS in a humidified atmosphere of 3% CO₂ at 37 °C, and the medium was changed after 5 days. Between 10 and 14 days after irradiation, the cells were fixed using paraformaldehyde (Sigma, Deisenhofen, Germany), and colony formation was visualized by staining with 10% Giemsa solution (Sigma, Deisenhofen, Germany). Only colonies with >50 cells were scored to determine the surviving fraction (SF), which was defined as the ratio of colonies that were formed after irradiation with 2 or 6 Gy to the number of colonies that were formed in the unirradiated controls. The enhancement factor (EF) was defined as the ratio of the surviving fraction of the DMSO-treated control cells to B10- or NVX-207-treated cells and was dependent on the dose of irradiation. The data represented at least three independent experiments.

3.7. Statistical Analyses

The experimental results were analyzed using paired Student’s t-tests. A p-value of 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, the BA derivatives NVX-207 and B10 modulate clonogenic survival, migration, apoptosis and radiosensitivity in human malignant glioma cells. Compared to BA, higher cytotoxic effects were observed, particularly under normoxic conditions. These results suggest that BA derivatives may be capable of increasing the therapeutic efficacy of radiotherapy in malignant gliomas.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank our colleagues from the Department of Radiotherapy for contributing to this study and for their continuous support. We would also like to thank Gabriele Thomas and Kathrin Spröte for their excellent technical assistance. We would like to thank American Journal Experts for providing English-language editing for our manuscript. Betulinic acid, B10 and NVX-207 were obtained as a kind gift from BioSolutions Halle GmbH (Halle, Germany). This work was supported by the Wilhelm Roux program of BMBF/NBL3 (grant number: FKZ: 21/30).

Author Contributions

Matthias Bache and Dirk Vordermark designed the study, analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript. Stephan Bernhardt, Sarina Passin, Henri Wichmann, Anja Hein and Martin Zschornak performed experimental procedures, analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript. Matthias Kappler, Reinhard Paschke and Helge Taubert aided in study design, analyzed the data and reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

Kortmann, R.D.; Jeremic, B.; Weller, M.; Plasswilm, L.; Bamberg, M. Radiochemotherapy of malignant glioma in adults. Clinical experiences. Strahlenther. Onkol. 2003, 179, 219–232. [Google Scholar]
Henriksson, R.; Asklund, T.; Poulsen, H.S. Impact of therapy on quality of life, neurocognitive function and their correlates in glioblastoma multiforme: A review. J. Neurooncol. 2011, 104, 639–646. [Google Scholar]
Nieder, C.; Mehta, M.P. Advances in translational research provide a rationale for clinical re-evaluation of high-dose radiotherapy for glioblastoma. Med. Hypotheses 2011, 76, 410–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Shirai, K.; Chakravarti, A. Towards personalized therapy for patients with glioblastoma. Expert Rev. Anticancer Ther. 2011, 11, 1935–1944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Alakurtti, S.; Mäkelä, T.; Koskimies, S.; Yli-Kauhaluoma, J. Pharmacological properties of the ubiquitous natural product betulin. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2006, 29, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Kessler, J.H.; Mullauer, F.B.; de Roo, G.M.; Medema, J.P. Broad in vitro efficacy of plant-derived betulinic acid against cell lines derived from the most prevalent human cancer types. Cancer Lett. 2007, 251, 132–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Fulda, S.; Jeremias, I.; Steiner, H.H.; Pietsch, T.; Debatin, K.M. Betulinic acid: A new cytotoxic agent against malignant brain-tumor cells. Int. J. Cancer 1999, 82, 435–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Wick, W.; Grimmel, C.; Wagenknecht, B.; Dichgans, J.; Weller, M. Betulinic acid-induced apoptosis in glioma cells: A sequential requirement for new protein synthesis, formation of reactive oxygen species, and caspase processing. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1999, 289, 1306–1312. [Google Scholar]
Jeremias, I.; Steiner, H.H.; Benner, A.; Debatin, K.M.; Herold-Mende, C. Cell death induction by betulinic acid, ceramide and TRAIL in primary glioblastoma multiforme cells. Acta Neurochir. 2004, 146, 721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Fulda, S.; Debatin, K.M. Sensitization for anticancer drug-induced apoptosis by betulinic acid. Neoplasia 2005, 7, 162–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jung, G.R.; Kim, K.J.; Choi, C.H.; Lee, T.B.; Han, S.I.; Han, H.K.; Lim, S.C. Effect of betulinic acid on anticancer drug-resistant colon cancer cells. Basic. Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2007, 101, 277–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Selzer, E.; Pimentel, E.; Wacheck, V.; Schlegel, W.; Pehamberger, H.; Jansen, B.; Kodym, R. Effects of betulinic acid alone and in combination with irradiation in human melanoma cells. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2000, 114, 935–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Eder-Czembirek, C.; Erovic, B.M.; Czembirek, C.; Brunner, M.; Selzer, E.; Pötter, R.; Thurnher, D. Betulinic acid a radiosensitizer in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell lines. Strahlenther. Onkol. 2010, 186, 143–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Bache, M.; Zschornak, M.P.; Passin, S.; Kessler, J.; Wichmann, H.; Kappler, M.; Paschke, R.; Kaluđerović, G.N.; Kommera, H.; Taubert, H.; et al. Increased betulinic acid induced cytotoxicity and radiosensitivity in glioma cells under hypoxic conditions. Radiat. Oncol. 2011, 6, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Kumar, V.; Rani, N.; Aggarwal, P.; Sanna, V.K.; Singh, A.T.; Jaggi, M.; Joshi, N.; Sharma, P.K.; Irchhaiya, R.; Burman, A.C. Synthesis and cytotoxic activity of heterocyclic ring-substituted betulinic acid derivatives. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18, 5058–5062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Bar, F.M.; Khanfar, M.A.; Elnagar, A.Y.; Liu, H.; Zaghloul, A.M.; Badria, F.A.; Sylvester, P.W.; Ahmad, K.F.; Raisch, K.P.; el Sayed, K.A. Rational design and semisynthesis of betulinic acid analogues as potent topoisomerase inhibitors. J. Nat. Prod. 2009, 72, 1643–1650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Santos, R.C.; Salvador, J.A.; Marín, S.; Cascante, M. Novel semisynthetic derivatives of betulin and betulinic acid with cytotoxic activity. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2009, 17, 6241–6250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Smith, P.F.; Ogundele, A.; Forrest, A.; Wilton, J.; Salzwedel, K.; Doto, J.; Allaway, G.P.; Martin, D.E. Phase I and II study of the safety, virologic effect, and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of single-dose 3-o-(3',3'-dimethylsuccinyl)betulinic acid (bevirimat) against human immunodeficiency virus infection. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2007, 51, 3574–3581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Willmann, M.; Wacheck, V.; Buckley, J.; Nagy, K.; Thalhammer, J.; Paschke, R.; Triche, T.; Jansen, B.; Selzer, E. Characterization of NVX-207, a novel betulinic acid-derived anti-cancer compound. Eur. J. Clin. Investig. 2009, 39, 384–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Gauthier, C.; Legault, J.; Lebrun, M.; Dufour, P.; Pichette, A. Glycosidation of lupane-type triterpenoids as potent in vitro cytotoxic agents. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2006, 14, 6713–6725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Kommera, H.; Kaluderović, G.N.; Bette, M.; Kalbitz, J.; Fuchs, P.; Fulda, S.; Mier, W.; Paschke, R. In vitro anticancer studies of α- and β-d-glucopyranose betulin anomers. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2010, 185, 128–136. [Google Scholar]
Gonzalez, P.; Mader, I.; Tchoghandjian, A.; Enzenmüller, S.; Cristofanon, S.; Basit, F.; Debatin, K.M.; Fulda, S. Impairment of lysosomal integrity by B10, a glycosylated derivative of betulinic acid, leads to lysosomal cell death and converts autophagy into a detrimental process. Cell Death Differ. 2012, 19, 1337–1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Kommera, H.; Kaluderović, G.N.; Kalbitz, J.; Dräger, B.; Paschke, R. Small structural changes of pentacyclic lupane type triterpenoid derivatives lead to significant differences in their anticancer properties. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 45, 3346–3353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Mullauer, F.B.; Kessler, J.H.; Medema, J.P. Betulinic acid, a natural compound with potent anticancer effects. Anticancer Drugs 2010, 21, 215–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Goff, R.D.; Thorson, J.S. Enhancing the divergent activities of betulinic acid via neoglycosylation. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 461–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Enzenmüller, S.; Gonzalez, P.; Karpel-Massler, G.; Debatin, K.M.; Fulda, S. GDC-0941 enhances the lysosomal compartment via TFEB and primes glioblastoma cells to lysosomal membrane permeabilization and cell death. Cancer Lett. 2013, 329, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Fischer, S.; Ronellenfitsch, M.W.; Thiepold, A.L.; Harter, P.N.; Reichert, S.; Kögel, D.; Paschke, R.; Mittelbronn, M.; Weller, M.; Steinbach, J.P.; et al. Hypoxia enhances the antiglioma cytotoxicity of b10, a glycosylated derivative of betulinic acid. PLoS One 2014, 9, e94921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Karna, E.; Szoka, L.; Palka, J.A. Betulinic acid inhibits the expression of hypoxia-inducible factor 1α and vascular endothelial growth factor in human endometrial adenocarcinoma cells. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2010, 340, 15–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Shin, J.; Lee, H.J.; Jung, D.B.; Jung, J.H.; Lee, H.J.; Lee, E.O.; Lee, S.G.; Shim, B.S.; Choi, S.H.; Ko, S.G.; et al. Suppression of STAT3 and HIF-1α mediates anti-angiogenic activity of betulinic acid in hypoxic PC-3 prostate cancer cells. PLoS One 2011, 6, e21492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Dehelean, C.A.; Feflea, S.; Ganta, S.; Amiji, M. Anti-angiogenic effects of betulinic acid administered in nanoemulsion formulation using chorioallantoic membrane assay. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 2011, 7, 317–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ishii, N.; Maier, D.; Merlo, A.; Tada, M.; Sawamura, Y.; Diserens, A.C.; van Meir, E.G. Frequent co-alterations of TP53, p16/CDKN2A, p14ARF, PTEN tumor suppressor genes in human glioma cell lines. Brain Pathol. 1999, 9, 469–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Berger, B.; Capper, D.; Lemke, D.; Pfenning, P.N.; Platten, M.; Weller, M.; von Deimling, A.; Wick, W.; Weiler, M. Defective p53 antiangiogenic signaling in glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol. 2010, 12, 894–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Kappler, M.; Rot, S.; Taubert, H.; Greither, T.; Bartel, F.; Dellas, K.; Hänsgen, G.; Trott, K.R.; Bache, M. The effects of knockdown of wild-type survivin, survivin-2B or survivin-delta3 on the radiosensitization in a soft tissue sarcoma cells in vitro under different oxygen conditions. Cancer Gene Ther. 2007, 14, 994–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

© 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bache, M.; Bernhardt, S.; Passin, S.; Wichmann, H.; Hein, A.; Zschornak, M.P.; Kappler, M.; Taubert, H.; Paschke, R.; Vordermark, D. Betulinic Acid Derivatives NVX-207 and B10 for Treatment of Glioblastoma—An in Vitro Study of Cytotoxicity and Radiosensitization. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 19777-19790. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms151119777

AMA Style

Bache M, Bernhardt S, Passin S, Wichmann H, Hein A, Zschornak MP, Kappler M, Taubert H, Paschke R, Vordermark D. Betulinic Acid Derivatives NVX-207 and B10 for Treatment of Glioblastoma—An in Vitro Study of Cytotoxicity and Radiosensitization. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2014; 15(11):19777-19790. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms151119777

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bache, Matthias, Stephan Bernhardt, Sarina Passin, Henri Wichmann, Anja Hein, Martin P Zschornak, Matthias Kappler, Helge Taubert, Reinhard Paschke, and Dirk Vordermark. 2014. "Betulinic Acid Derivatives NVX-207 and B10 for Treatment of Glioblastoma—An in Vitro Study of Cytotoxicity and Radiosensitization" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 15, no. 11: 19777-19790. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms151119777

Article Menu