Next Article in Journal
Mechanisms of p53 Functional De-Regulation: Role of the IκB-α/p53 Complex
Next Article in Special Issue
Comprehensive Analysis of miRNome Alterations in Response to Sorafenib Treatment in Colorectal Cancer Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Advances in Lipidomics for Cancer Biomarkers Discovery
Previous Article in Special Issue
Microarray Expression Profiling of Long Non-Coding RNAs Involved in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Metastasis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Roles of MicroRNA across Prenatal and Postnatal Periods

Biochemistry, Microbiology & Immunology Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON K1H8M5, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Current address: Labo’Life France, Pescalis, Les Magnys, 79320 Moutiers-sous-Chantemerle, France.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17(12), 1994; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms17121994
Submission received: 16 October 2016 / Revised: 11 November 2016 / Accepted: 17 November 2016 / Published: 28 November 2016
(This article belongs to the Collection Regulation by Non-coding RNAs)

Abstract

:
Communication between mother and offspring in mammals starts at implantation via the maternal–placental–fetal axis, and continues postpartum via milk targeted to the intestinal mucosa. MicroRNAs (miRNAs), short, noncoding single-stranded RNAs, of about 22 nucleotides in length, are actively involved in many developmental and physiological processes. Here we highlight the role of miRNA in the dynamic signaling that guides infant development, starting from implantation of conceptus and persisting through the prenatal and postnatal periods. miRNAs in body fluids, particularly in amniotic fluid, umbilical cord blood, and breast milk may offer new opportunities to investigate physiological and/or pathological molecular mechanisms that portend to open novel research avenues for the identification of noninvasive biomarkers.

Graphical Abstract

1. Background

In developing mammals, the vulnerability and immature immune status of the fetus and newborn are compensated by maternal factors that are transferred via the placenta or amniotic fluid, during intrauterine life, and by milk after birth [1].
During development, mother-fetal cross-talk begins at implantation, via the maternal–placental–fetal axis [1]. The biological dialogue initiates between the maternal reproductive tissue and the conceptus [2]. The placenta plays a fundamental and regulatory role by producing a wide variety of hormones, growth factors, and cytokines [3], as well as other biologically active molecules, including miRNA [4,5]. These biomolecules act both locally and systemically, exchanging information and regulating the physiological and metabolic processes required during intrauterine fetal life [3,4,5]. The intrauterine environment strongly influences growth and fetal development, in addition to the health status of both the mother and child long after birth [5,6,7,8].
During fetal development, the gastrointestinal (GI) tract is characterized by higher permeability which may allow amniotic fluid to be absorbed by the fetus. Both amniotic fluid and breast milk have nutritive, protective, and regulatory roles [9]. Strikingly, amniotic fluid administered postpartum in the preterm piglet model is comparable to colostrum in its ability to modulate intestinal inflammation, to increase body weight, to alter bacterial colonization, and to induce differential expression of mRNA coding for genes involved in gut inflammatory responses [10].
After birth, the mother’s milk continues to provide oral biochemical signaling previously provided to the fetus via amniotic fluid [1]. Milk undoubtedly offers the nutritional requirements for growth and infant development, but it is much more than food, providing protection and long-term programming agents for the infant [11]. The term “lactocrine” has been proposed to indicate the comprehensive maternal signals sent to the offspring via milk [12].
The biochemical factors strongly influencing offspring development in both pre- and postnatal periods are interpreted as an ancient adaptation of mammals, starting with the origin of lactation [13,14], and enhanced with the evolution of the placenta. Particularly, human infants are born much earlier than nonhuman primates and are in need of additional support. For example, comparative proteome studies in humans and rhesus macaques revealed that human milk is richer in proteins involved in the development of the GI tract, the immune system, and the brain [15]. Indeed, lactation strategies and milk composition vary among species and individuals, reflecting the biological process of natural selection [16,17]. In this review, after summarizing the current knowledge of miRNA expression and potential participation in the regulation of various cell mechanisms, we will present recent findings suggesting that miRNAs are involved in maternal-infant crosstalk during both pregnancy and suckling periods.

2. Micro-Intro to the MicroRNA World

miRNAs are short, noncoding, single-stranded RNA of about 22 nucleotides in length. They are transcribed in the nucleus from miRNA genes as longer hairpin precursors known as primary miRNA, which are processed by the endoribonuclease Drosha to form precursor miRNA. These are exported by Exportin-5 into the cytoplasm, where they are further processed by the endoribonuclease Dicer to form mature miRNA duplexes [18,19]. The duplex consists of a guide strand and a messenger strand of which the latter ultimately is degraded and the former becomes a mature miRNA. The mature miRNA becomes part of the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) after being loaded onto Argonaute. Through partial complementation, miRNA becomes a guide for the RISC to target the 3′ untranslated region of messenger RNA (mRNA) [18]. Their main function is to repress target mRNA via translation inhibition and/or transcript degradation, and to silence gene expression [19]. A single miRNA can bind and target multiple mRNAs and in turn, one mRNA can be regulated by multiple miRNAs [20,21]. Transcription, translation, and protein degradation are prominent examples of how gene activity is controlled by miRNAs, considered to be “meta-regulators” [22]. Importantly, miRNAs can target epigenetic regulators, which play a role in fetal metabolic programming [23,24], mediating long-term effects on target cells [24,25], and on developing organs and tissues. Epigenetic factors and miRNAs have been shown to be reciprocally regulated [24,25]. Thus, miRNAs are recognized as key regulators of diverse biological and developmental processes in eukaryotes (cell proliferation and differentiation, maintenance of tissue identity, apoptosis, immune system development, and responses) and are associated with pathologies, including different types of cancer [26], vascular diseases [27,28], and diabetes [24,29].
Nomenclature and other important information about precursor hairpin sequences, and experimentally identified mature miRNA sequences, are available online in a database called miRBase (http://www.mirbase.org/). In October 2016, miRBase had a total of 28,645 entries of hairpin precursor miRNAs profiled in a vast range of plant and animal species. For Homo sapiens we counted 1881 precursors and 2588 mature miRNAs. In addition, miRBase provides links to databases for validated miRNA targets (TarBase) and miRNA target prediction (DIANA-microT, microRNA.org, miRDB, RNA22, TargetMiner, PicTar-vertebrates) for in silico studies. Other in silico tools are progressively becoming available for functional miRNA analysis. For example, MAGIA83 (miRNA And Genes Integrated Analysis) (http://gencomp.bio.unipd.it/magia/start/) integrates expression profiles of miRNA and mRNA to investigate more deeply into biological networks and pathways. Online databases, such as miR2disease86 (http://www.mir2disease.org/), can display miRNA expression profiles in human disease scenarios. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) is a commonly used tool to identify mRNAs as targets for miRNAs in silico.
miRNAs are expressed not only in tissues and cells, but also in all body fluids tested: milk, plasma, urine, saliva, tears, seminal fluid, amniotic fluid [4], and umbilical cord blood [30]. RNA molecules were once considered to be very unstable due to the presence of ribonucleases (RNases), which are abundant and ubiquitous to neutralize viral and bacterial nucleic acids. However, RNA molecules are now known to circulate in a “safe and stable” manner in body fluids [4]. RNases are implicated in various functions of innate and acquired immunity, in stimulating host defense, and in sustaining mucosal barriers [31]. In early 1988, Steven Benner proposed a hypothesis regarding “extracellular communicator RNA”. He suggested that RNA molecules might be messengers involved in cell–cell communication, the balance between RNase/RNase inhibitors. He also proposed that RNA molecules were related to diseases, including cancer and angiogenesis [32]. During the following 20 years, researchers around the world working in different fields, continued to investigate RNA control of gene expression [33] and its role in cell-to-cell signaling [34]. Today we are aware that extracellular noncoding RNA, such as miRNA and long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) [35,36], are involved in cellular communication, may be involved in childhood development, and are protected from RNases through association with RNA-binding proteins and/or by their encapsulation inside extracellular vesicles [36,37,38].
During the last decade, extracellular vesicles (EV) have been studied thoroughly regarding their biogenesis, content, and biological function. They can mediate the transfer of proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids, including miRNAs and lncRNAs [36], and have been recognized as potent vehicles of intercellular communication, both in prokaryotes and eukaryotes [39]. EV have biological functions linked to sperm maturation and motility, follicular growth, oocyte meiosis, steroidogenesis, and the prevention of polyspermy after fertilization. In the uterus, EV mediate the crosstalk between embryo and endometrium during implantation [40] and are crucial regulators throughout pregnancy [41,42].

3. New Kids on the Block: miRNAs Really Do Matter

During the dynamics of pregnancy, miRNAs appear to play important regulatory roles in maternal-fetal crosstalk [5]. miRNAs are involved in endometrial receptivity, implantation, placental function, and labor in eutherian organisms [43,44]. Once fertilization has taken place it may be possible that seminal fluid or sperm cell miRNAs affect gene expression in the zygote, with downstream effects on successful implantation. The abundance and identity of miRNA that may be present in a single spermatocyte remains unknown [2]. miRNAs contribute to establishing immune tolerance at conception [45]. Altered immune-regulatory miRNAs during preconception and the first trimester are indicative of later pregnancy outcomes in humans (n = 48) [45]. During placental development, miRNAs can bind to target genes responsible for cellular invasion, proliferation, apoptosis, and angiogenesis [44]. Placenta and maternal plasma are characterized by specific miRNA patterns [46]. Many of these miRNA genes form clusters, likely controlled by the same promoters to work in a synergistic manner, which are mainly expressed during pregnancy [47]. Their rapid decrease after parturition suggests a placental-fetal origin and an expression pattern that is specifically induced during pregnancy [48]. The regulation of miRNA expression remains to be determined as some miRNAs are expressed constitutively and others are expressed in a tissue-specific manner in response to environmental stimuli. Notably, miRNAs contribute to normal term and pre-term labor. For example, in a study with 17 patients (8 term patients, 9 spontaneous term labour patients), expression of miR-223 and miR-34 was induced in the cervix during term parturition [48]. In a murine model, expression of the miR-200 family acts to control uterine quiescence and contractility via regulation of the progesterone receptor as well as the transcription factors ZEB1 and ZEB2, which was further validated using myometrial biopsies from pregnant women subject to caesarean section, both during and prior to active labour [49]. Interestingly, the fetal genome, including loci for miRNA, can generate molecular signals that are sent through the placenta and amniotic fluid into maternal circulation [50]. In addition to endogenous miRNA, exogenous non-coding RNA consumed by the mother can cross the placenta and gain access to the fetus, regulating fetal development [51]. miRNA profiles in amniotic fluid reveal their involvement in pathways (such as axon guidance, focal adhesion, and mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathways) related to the normal development of the nervous system and other organs (Figure 1) [52]. Even though the effect of labour on miRNA profiles has been reported in plasma, miRNA profiles have yet to be identified in milk or amniotic fluid based on vaginal or caesarean-section modes of delivery [53]. The mode of delivery has been shown to affect the bacterial presence and abundance in human milk [54]. This suggests potential for differing miRNA expression in milk depending on the mode of delivery, however, this intriguing aspect remains to be explored [55].
Early enteral feeds appear to have long-term health effects regarding epigenetic mechanisms. Interestingly, in mice, a low protein diet from weaning resulted in an altered miRNA profile (miR-98, miR-199, miR-21, let-7, and miR-210), most of which are involved with cellular proliferation [56]. Recent studies have revealed miRNA involvement in chromatin remodeling. Gene expression may be regulated by intertwined mechanisms of miRNAs, DNA methylation, and histone modification [56]. Previously, research focused on the changes in DNA methylation based on diet, however, there is now an increase in research emphasizing the role of nutrition in the variation of miRNAs [57]. In a sheep study, undernourishment at the time of conception led to altered miRNA expression in the skeletal muscle of offspring which was suggested to be linked to insulin resistance development [58]. Additionally, a sheep model of maternal obesity also lead to differentiation of fetal miRNA expression in muscles thought to intensify intramuscular adipogenesis [59]. These variations in miRNA profiles could be due to the signaling from the mother in utero via amniotic fluid. However, more studies need to be conducted to demonstrate the direct effects of maternal health on the miRNA profiles of offspring.

4. miRNA-Associated Pregnancy Complications

While assessing miRNA roles in normal pregnancy, one cannot overlook the miRNAs associated with pregnancy-related pathologies including gestational diabetes (GD) [24], implantation failure, pre-eclampsia, preterm labor, and intrauterine growth restriction [44]. GD, a glucose intolerance first recognized during pregnancy, is an independent risk factor of disease in both offspring and mother [60,61]. The hyperglycemia occurring during pregnancy induces long-term phenotypic alterations in fetal endothelial cells, changes in miR-101 expression levels, as well as in those of Enhancer of Zester Homolog 2 (EZH2), its target [24]. EZH2 is the only protein of the Polycomb Repressor Complex 2 (PRC2), known to date, to have catalytic activity [62]. PRC2 works in concert with chromatin regulators and other proteins to initiate and maintain the methylation of histone H3 on lysine 27 (H3K27), an epigenetic mark which mediates long-term gene silencing [62]. EZH2 is both a target of miR-101 and a transcriptional repressor of miR-101 via binding with the regulatory sequence(s) in the ‘miR-101 locus’ [24]. miR-101 and EZH2 are reciprocally controlled through a regulatory feedback loop. The disturbance of this homeostatic loop is associated with cell phenotypic alterations, observed after five to six passages in culture under normal glucose conditions. These alterations include lower proliferation, impaired migration and angiogenic capacity, as well as increased apoptosis [24]. Alterations of noncoding RNA, including miRNA, are implicated in persistent and long lasting epigenetic changes, that can be transferred during cell division [63], and that are associated with cell dysfunction and disease [24,63]. In diabetic conditions, the prolonged exposure to hyperglycemia generates a long-lasting impression on vascular cells and the progression of vascular complications [64], leading to the ‘glycemic memory’ theory that explains how chronic hyperglycemic conditions lead to persistent outcomes, through epigenetic changes [65] and miRNA alterations [64].
Seven miRNAs in peripheral blood (miR-1, miR-133b, miR-199a-5p, miR-1267, miR-1229, miR-223, and miR-148a-3p) are related to the predisposition for pregnancy complications such as miscarriage and early- and late-onset pre-eclampsia [45]. They have a predictive value for adverse pregnancy outcomes and therefore have a role as potential biomarkers. In addition, they are associated with low regulatory T cell numbers and low TNF/IL-10 levels, that implies an altered immunological mechanism [39]. These observations are in line with the emerging viewpoint regarding the conundrum of preterm birth, still poorly understood. Labour onset is thought to depend on the balance between maternal cells, myometrial cells, and immune cells circulating in the tissues of the mother and fetus. As there appear to be multifactorial causes for preterm birth, one systematic approach to comprehend the phenomenon and decipher its intrinsic signaling is to focus on pro-inflammatory signals and immunological pathways [66], and also explore the role(s) of related miRNAs to better understand the molecular mechanisms involved in uterine exposure to endo-/exo-genous factors [67].

5. Breast Milk miRNA: Possible Key Regulators and Noninvasive Biomarkers

The neonatal and infant period is substantial for growth and development, especially in humans. Human milk has the indisputable role of protecting the infant against infection and confers both short and long-term benefits, reducing morbidity and mortality while contributing to cognitive attributes [11,68,69,70]. Breast milk contains the highest concentration of total RNA of the 12 body fluids tested, more than 80 times the concentration found in amniotic fluid [4]. More than 1400 mature miRNAs are expressed in human milk [71]. These miRNAs are thought to originate from mammary gland epithelial cells [72]. Their resistance to degradation stems from their assembly with proteins (Ago2 and other RNA-binding proteins) in skim milk [72,73], packaged inside milk cells [74] and inside the heterogeneous population of milk vesicles, which include milk fat globules [75] and exosomes [76,77]. Human milk somatic cells or exosomes which carry miRNA [74] are thought to survive in the acidic environment of the stomach, to be transferred into the circulation and may then be integrated in various tissues [78]. Using a model GI tract, bovine milk exosomes have been shown to withstand the harsh conditions of the gut [79]. There are a number of known and unknown miRNAs conserved in human milk cells and lipids that are differentially expressed during lactation [80]. Exogenous food-derived miRNAs appear to be stable in the oral cavity and in the GI tract and are transferred to the blood of adults, thought to influence gene expression in different tissues [81,82,83]. Recent evidence noted that bovine milk exosomes are taken up by human intestinal cells and vascular endothelial cells via endocytosis [84]. However, more studies are required to demonstrate that milk miRNAs, once ingested, can cross the GI tract of the infant [83,85]. Recent studies have shown the resistance of miRNA to degradation and that uptake of bovine milk exosomes by intestinal cells in vitro is mediated by temperature dependent-endocytosis [79,86]. A more recent study has provided evidence that porcine milk exosomal miRNAs modify gene expression and promote proliferation in intestinal cells in vitro and in vivo [87]. Importantly, miRNAs are thought to either have a functional role or a nutritional role. The functional hypothesis suggests that milk miRNAs are absorbed by the suckling baby to imply specific actions: for example, to modulate and shape the immune system [85,88] by regulating T-cells, inducing B-cell differentiation [71,77], and preventing the development of allergies [89]. The nutritional hypothesis suggests miRNAs simply provide nutrition and refutes the transfer and the absorption of milk miRNA into the systemic circulation of offspring [85].
The fate and the role of miRNAs and other non-coding RNA components in breast milk still remain unknown. Interestingly, breast milk is rich with immune-related miRNAs [71,77,88] and miRNAs are implicated in multiple physiological processes [75], including cellular differentiation and proliferation, tissue identity, metabolism, and developmental programming [72]. Some miRNAs present in milk are involved in nervous system pathways and may mediate brain development. For example, miR-118.2 [75] targets the Teneurin Transmembrane Protein 2, a protein abundant in the central nervous system and important in neural function [90]. Some other miRNAs in human milk are tissue-specific, such as miR-142-5p [73], which is hematopoiesis-specific [91]. These findings suggest that milk miRNA may target specific organs and tissues of the feeding infant. In addition, there are milk miRNAs that are involved in metabolic pathways. For instance, miR-21 [73,75,77], appears to play an important role in promoting postnatal growth via mTORC1 signaling [92], while components of the let-7 family, also abundant in milk [73,75], are involved in glucose metabolism and can regulate glucose tolerance and insulin-sensitivity [93]. Furthermore, miR-33, miR-122, miR-370, miR-378-3p, and miR-125a-5p, abundant in the human milk lipid fraction [75] and milk exosomes [77], are potential regulators of lipid metabolic pathways in the developing infant and/or are possible factors involved in mammary gland function during lactation [94].
Where miRNAs are found to target epigenetic regulators the effect on the recipient target can be persistent and durable [24,63]. miR-148-3p, one of the most highly expressed miRNAs in human milk [75], targets the DNA methyltransferase 3b, a key component of the epigenetic machinery during development [95] and an essential DNA methyltransferase in the intestinal epithelium [96]. Through milk, the infant may benefit from these bioactive molecules, which may act as key regulators to set up important processes during the maturation of organs, such as the GI tract. The epithelium of the GI system is continuously renewed and dynamically regulated by epigenetic modifications and transcription factors, which influence intestinal cells throughout the crypt-villus axis [97]. Histone methylation and acetylation are crucial in controlling proliferation and differentiation of intestinal cells of the crypts [97]. DNA methylation sites are key regulators of postnatal epigenetic changes in intestinal stem cells [98]. Promisingly, miRNAs in milk that target epigenetic regulators involved in histone modification and DNA methylation are possible candidates for the process of gut maturation.
Daily fluctuations of mRNA [99] and miRNA [73] in human milk suggest that other physiological roles can be explored. Circadian variations of milk components, including miRNA, may help to establish and/or fine-tune gastrointestinal circadian rhythmicity of the breast fed infant, mediating what we now refer to as lactocrine circadian signals [73].
During the course of the lactation period the expression levels of miRNAs such as miR-25, miR-155, miR-182, miR-191, miR-221, and miR-223, change in the mammary glands of cows [100], pigs [101], rats [102], and humans [71]. The expression of cellular and extracellular miRNA in bovine mammary epithelial cells changes under the influence of lactogenic hormones such as prolactin [103]. These findings suggest that miRNA is implicated in the physiological processes of milk synthesis under normal conditions. In this context, it is noteworthy that the deregulation of miRNA has been associated with disease and pathological status [21,26], supporting their use as biomarkers for evaluating the performance and health status of the mammary gland during lactation [11,99]. miRNA levels in blood are measured and successfully used to predict breast cancer susceptibility [104] and other diseases [105], for example, mastitis [106]. In a similar way, miRNA in breast milk deserves to be studied in neonatal and perinatal medicine to identify biomarkers for infant diseases [11] and to better understand the unique dyadic exchange between mothers and their babies.

6. Conclusions

The biological dialogue between a mother and her offspring starts from the implantation of the embryo in the uterus and continues during fetal life via the maternal–placental–fetal axis [1]. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge concerning the role(s) of miRNA in the regulation of various physiological and pathological processes involved in maternal-infant crosstalk during both pregnancy and suckling periods. The expression of miRNAs is ubiquitous; they are present in cells and body fluids of both maternal and fetal origin. Here we focus on their potential participation in offspring development throughout prenatal and post-natal life. In particular, we discuss and cite studies congruent with the functional hypothesis [85], which proposes that milk miRNAs are absorbed by the GI of the suckling baby to ensure and regulate specific physiological processes.

Acknowledgments

We thank Jean-Francois Beaulieu and Elizabeth Herring (University of Sherbrooke, Canada) for providing comments and suggestions. The human milk biology program in the senior author’s laboratory was supported by Operating Grant 82816 from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Author Contributions

The first two authors contributed equally to the manuscript. Ilaria Floris conceived and drafted this review and the figure, Jamie D. Kraft edited and prepared the manuscript, and Illimar Altosaar supervised, wrote and revised the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

miRNAmicroRNA
EVExtracellular Vesicles
GDGestational Diabetes
EZH2Enhancer of Zester Homolog 2
PRC2Polycomb Repressor Complex 2
H3K27Histone H3 on Lysine27
GIGastrointestinal

References

  1. Power, M.L.; Schulkin, J. Maternal regulation of offspring development in mammals is an ancient adaptation tied to lactation. Appl. Transl. Genom. 2013, 2, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Fazeli, A.; Holt, W.V. Cross talk during the periconception period. Theriogenology 2016, 86, 438–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Petraglia, F.; Pasquale, F.; Wylie, W.V. Placental expression of neurohormones and other neuroactive molecules in human pregnancy. In Birth, Distress and Disease; Power, M.L., Schulkin, J., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2005; pp. 16–73. [Google Scholar]
  4. Weber, J.A.; Baxter, D.H.; Zhang, S.; Huang, D.Y.; Huang, K.H.; Lee, M.J.; Galas, D.J.; Wang, K. The microRNA spectrum in 12 body fluids. Clin. Chem. 2010, 56, 1733–1741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Forbes, K. IFPA Gabor than Award lecture: Molecular control of placental growth: The emerging role of microRNAs. Placenta 2013, 34, S27–S33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Thornburg, K.L.; Marshall, N. The placenta is the center of the chronic disease universe. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2015, 213, S14–S20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Janssen, A.B.; Kertes, D.A.; McNamara, G.I.; Braithwaite, E.C.; Creeth, H.D.J.; Glover, V.I.; John, R.M. A role for the placenta in programming maternal mood and childhood behavioural disorders. J. Neuroendocrinol. 2016, 28, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Tung, J.; Archie, E.A.; Altmann, J.; Alberts, S.C. Cumulative early life adversity predicts longevity in wild baboons. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Underwood, M.A.; Gilbert, W.M.; Sherman, M.P. Amniotic fluid: Not just fetal urine anymore. J. Perinatol. 2005, 25, 341–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Siggers, J.; Ostergaard, M.V.; Siggers, R.H.; Skovgaard, K.; Mølbak, L.; Thymann, T.; Schmidt, M.; Møller, H.K.; Purup, S.; Fink, L.N.; et al. Postnatal amniotic fluid intake reduces gut inflammatory responses and necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm neonates. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2013, 304, G864–G875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Altosaar, I.; Siggers, J. Micromolecules to nanoparticles-human milk: More than nutrition. In Proceedings of the 3rd Annual International Conference on Human Milk Science and Innovation; German, B., Rhine, W., Eds.; Prolacta Bioscience, City of Industry, CA: Pasadena, CA, USA, 2015; pp. 6–8. [Google Scholar]
  12. Bartol, F.F.; Wiley, A.A.; Bagnell, C.A. Epigenetic programming of porcine endometrial function and the lactocrine hypothesis. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2008, 43, 273–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Vorbach, C.; Capecchi, M.R.; Penninger, J.M. Evolution of the mammary gland from the innate immune system? BioEssays News Rev. Mol. Cell. Dev. Biol. 2006, 28, 606–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Sale, S.; Pavelic, K. Mammary lineage tracing: The coming of age. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2015, 72, 1577–1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Beck, K.L.; Weber, D.; Phinney, B.S.; Smilowitz, J.T.; Hinde, K.; Lönnerdal, B.; Korf, I.; Lemay, D.G. Comparative proteomics of human and macaque milk reveals species-specific nutrition during postnatal development. J. Proteome Res. 2015, 14, 2143–2157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Hinde, K.; Milligan, L.A. Primate milk: Proximate mechanisms and ultimate perspectives. Evol. Anthropol. 2011, 20, 9–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Hinde, K.; German, J.B. Food in an evolutionary context: Insights from mother’s milk. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2012, 92, 2219–2223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Finnegan, E.F.; Pasquinelli, A.E. MicroRNA biogenesis: Regulating the regulators. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2013, 48, 51–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Guo, H.; Ingolia, N.T.; Weissman, J.S.; Bartel, D.P. Mammalian microRNAs predominantly act to decrease target mRNA levels. Nature 2010, 466, 835–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Krol, J.; Loedige, I.; Filipowicz, W. The widespread regulation of microRNA biogenesis, function and decay. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2010, 11, 597–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Lewis, B.P.; Burge, C.B.; Bartel, D.P. Conserved seed pairing, often flanked by adenosines, indicates that thousands of human genes are microRNA targets. Cell 2005, 120, 15–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Enright, A.J.; John, B.; Gaul, U.; Tuschl, T.; Sander, C.; Marks, D.S. MicroRNA targets in Drosophila. Genome Biol. 2003, 5, R1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Sookoian, S.; Gianotti, T.F.; Burgueño, A.L.; Pirola, C.J. Fetal metabolic programming and epigenetic modifications: A systems biology approach. Pediatr. Res. 2013, 73, 531–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Floris, I.; Descamps, B.; Vardeu, A.; Mitić, T.; Posadino, A.M.; Shantikumar, S.; Sala-Newby, G.; Capobianco, G.; Mangialardi, G.; Howard, L.; et al. Gestational diabetes mellitus impairs fetal endothelial cell functions through a mechanism involving microRNA-101 and histone methyltransferase enhancer of zester homolog-2. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2015, 35, 664–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Pasquinelli, A.E. MicroRNAs and their targets: Recognition, regulation and an emerging reciprocal relationship. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2012, 13, 271–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Xue, Z.; Yilan, D.; Ping, J.; Fei, M. Bioinformatic analysis of cancer-related microRNAs and their target genes. Yi Chuan 2015, 37, 855–864. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  27. Spinetti, G.; Fortunato, O.; Caporali, A.; Shantikumar, S.; Marchetti, M.; Meloni, M.; Descamps, B.; Floris, I.; Sangalli, E.; Vono, R.; et al. MicroRNA-15a and microRNA-16 impair human circulating proangiogenic cell functions and are increased in the proangiogenic cells and serum of patients with critical limb ischemia. Circ. Res. 2013, 112, 335–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Ovchinnikova, E.S.; Schmitter, D.; Vegter, E.L.; Ter Maaten, J.M.; Valente, M.A.E.; Liu, L.C.Y.; van der Harst, P.; Pinto, Y.M.; de Boer, R.A.; Meyer, S.; et al. Signature of circulating microRNAs in patients with acute heart failure. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2016, 18, 414–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Shantikumar, S.; Caporali, A.; Emanueli, C. Role of microRNAs in diabetes and its cardiovascular complications. Cardiovasc. Res. 2012, 93, 583–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Merkerova, M.; Vasikova, A.; Belickova, M.; Bruchova, H. MicroRNA expression profiles in umbilical cord blood cell lineages. Stem Cells Dev. 2010, 19, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Rosenberg, H.F. Vertebrate secretory (RNAse A) ribonucleases and host defense. In Ribonucleases; Nicholson, A.W., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011; Volume 26, pp. 35–53. [Google Scholar]
  32. Benner, S.A. Extracellular “communicator RNA”. FEBS Lett. 1988, 233, 225–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Diederichs, S.; Bartsch, L.; Berkmann, J.C.; Fröse, K.; Heitmann, J.; Hoppe, C.; Iggena, D.; Jazmati, D.; Karschnia, P.; Linsenmeier, M.; et al. The dark matter of the cancer genome: Aberrations in regulatory elements, untranslated regions, splice sites, non-coding RNA and synonymous mutations. EMBO Mol. Med. 2016, 8, 442–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Mittelbrunn, M.; Sánchez-Madrid, F. Intercellular communication: Diverse structures for exchange of genetic information. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2012, 13, 328–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Karlsson, O.; Baccarelli, A.A. Environmental health and long non-coding RNAs. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 2016, 3, 178–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Karlsson, O.; Rodosthenous, R.S.; Jara, C.; Brennan, K.J.; Wright, R.O.; Baccarelli, A.A.; Wright, R.J. Detection of long non-coding RNAs in human breastmilk extracellular vesicles: Implications for early child development. Epigenetics 2016, 11, 721–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Mitchell, P.S.; Parkin, R.K.; Kroh, E.M.; Fritz, B.R.; Wyman, S.K.; Pogosova-Agadjanyan, E.L.; Peterson, A.; Noteboom, J.; O’Briant, K.C.; Allen, A.; et al. Circulating microRNAs as stable blood-based markers for cancer detection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 10513–10518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Valadi, H.; Ekström, K.; Bossios, A.; Sjöstrand, M.; Lee, J.J.; Lötvall, J.O. Exosome-mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007, 9, 654–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Yáñez-Mó, M.; Siljander, P.R.-M.; Andreu, Z.; Zavec, A.B.; Borràs, F.E.; Buzas, E.I.; Buzas, K.; Casal, E.; Cappello, F.; Carvalho, J.; et al. Biological properties of extracellular vesicles and their physiological functions. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2015, 4, 27066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Machtinger, R.; Laurent, L.C.; Baccarelli, A.A. Extracellular vesicles: Roles in gamete maturation, fertilization and embryo implantation. Hum. Reprod. Update 2016, 22, 182–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Nardi Fda, S.; Michelon, T.F.; Neumann, J.; Manvailer, L.F.S.; Wagner, B.; Horn, P.A.; Bicalho Mda, G.; Rebmann, V. High levels of circulating extracellular vesicles with altered expression and function during pregnancy. Immunobiology 2016, 221, 753–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Burnett, L.A.; Nowak, R.A. Exosomes mediate embryo and maternal interactions at implantation and during pregnancy. Front. Biosci. 2016, 8, 79–96. [Google Scholar]
  43. Mouillet, J.-F.; Chu, T.; Sadovsky, Y. Expression patterns of placental microRNAs. Birth Defects Res. A Clin. Mol. Teratol. 2011, 91, 737–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Bidarimath, M.; Khalaj, K.; Wessels, J.M.; Tayade, C. MicroRNAs, immune cells and pregnancy. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2014, 11, 538–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Winger, E.E.; Reed, J.L.; Ji, X. First-trimester maternal cell microRNA is a superior pregnancy marker to immunological testing for predicting adverse pregnancy outcome. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2015, 110, 22–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Chim, S.S.C.; Shing, T.K.F.; Hung, E.C.W.; Leung, T.-Y.; Lau, T.-K.; Chiu, R.W.K.; Lo, Y.M.D. Detection and characterization of placental microRNAs in maternal plasma. Clin. Chem. 2008, 54, 482–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Morales-Prieto, D.M.; Ospina-Prieto, S.; Chaiwangyen, W.; Schoenleben, M.; Markert, U.R. Pregnancy-associated miRNA-clusters. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2013, 97, 51–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Hassan, S.S.; Romero, R.; Pineles, B.; Tarca, A.L.; Montenegro, D.; Erez, O.; Mittal, P.; Kusanovic, J.P.; Mazaki-Tovi, S.; Espinoza, J.; et al. MicroRNA expression profiling of the human uterine cervix after term labor and delivery. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2010, 202, 80.e1–80.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Williams, K.C.; Renthal, N.E.; Condon, J.C.; Gerard, R.D.; Mendelson, C.R. MicroRNA-200a serves a key role in the decline of progesterone receptor function leading to term and preterm labor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 7529–7534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Wong, F.C.K.; Lo, Y.M.D. Prenatal diagnosis innovation: Genome sequencing of maternal plasma. Annu. Rev. Med. 2016, 67, 419–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Li, J.; Zhang, Y.; Li, D.; Liu, Y.; Chu, D.; Jiang, X.; Hou, D.; Zen, K.; Zhang, C.-Y. Small non-coding RNAs transfer through mammalian placenta and directly regulate fetal gene expression. Protein Cell 2015, 6, 391–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Sun, T.; Li, W.; Li, T.; Ling, S. MicroRNA profiling of amniotic fluid: Evidence of synergy of microRNAs in fetal development. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0153950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Morisaki, S.; Miura, K.; Higashijima, A.; Abe, S.; Miura, S.; Hasegawa, Y.; Yoshida, A.; Kaneuchi, M.; Yoshiura, K.; Masuzaki, H. Effect of labor on plasma concentrations and postpartum clearance of cell-free, pregnancy-associated, placenta-specific microRNAs. Prenat. Diagn. 2015, 35, 44–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Cabrera-Rubio, R.; Collado, M.C.; Laitinen, K.; Salminen, S.; Isolauri, E.; Mira, A. The human milk microbiome changes over lactation and is shaped by maternal weight and mode of delivery. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2012, 96, 544–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Cretoiu, D.; Xu, J.; Xiao, J.; Suciu, N.; Cretoiu, S.M. Circulating microRNAs as potential molecular biomarkers in pathophysiological evolution of pregnancy. Dis. Markers 2016, 2016, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Lillycrop, K.A.; Burdge, G.C. Epigenetic mechanisms linking early nutrition to long term health. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2012, 26, 667–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Vickers, M.H. Early life nutrition, epigenetics and programming of later life disease. Nutrients 2014, 6, 2165–2178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Lie, S.; Morrison, J.L.; Williams-Wyss, O.; Suter, C.M.; Humphreys, D.T.; Ozanne, S.E.; Zhang, S.; Maclaughlin, S.M.; Kleemann, D.O.; Walker, S.K.; et al. Periconceptional undernutrition programs changes in insulin-signaling molecules and microRNAs in skeletal muscle in singleton and twin fetal sheep. Biol. Reprod. 2014, 90, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Yan, X.; Huang, Y.; Zhao, J.-X.; Rogers, C.J.; Zhu, M.-J.; Ford, S.P.; Nathanielsz, P.W.; Du, M. Maternal obesity downregulates microRNA let-7g expression, a possible mechanism for enhanced adipogenesis during ovine fetal skeletal muscle development. Int. J. Obes. 2013, 37, 568–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Nahum Sacks, K.; Friger, M.; Shoham-Vardi, I.; Abokaf, H.; Spiegel, E.; Sergienko, R.; Landau, D.; Sheiner, E. Prenatal exposure to gestational diabetes mellitus as an independent risk factor for long-term neuropsychiatric morbidity of the offspring. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2016, 215, 380.e1–380.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Jensen, L.A.; Chik, C.L.; Ryan, E.A. Review of gestational diabetes mellitus effects on vascular structure and function. Diab. Vasc. Dis. Res. 2016, 13, 170–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Brooun, A.; Gajiwala, K.S.; Deng, Y.-L.; Liu, W.; Bolaños, B.; Bingham, P.; He, Y.-A.; Diehl, W.; Grable, N.; Kung, P.-P.; et al. Polycomb repressive complex 2 structure with inhibitor reveals a mechanism of activation and drug resistance. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Weinberg, M.S.; Morris, K.V. Transcriptional gene silencing in humans. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, 6505–6517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Berezin, A. Metabolic memory phenomenon in diabetes mellitus: Achieving and perspectives. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. 2016, 10, S176–S183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Rajasekar, P.; O’Neill, C.L.; Eeles, L.; Stitt, A.W.; Medina, R.J. Epigenetic changes in endothelial progenitors as a possible cellular basis for glycemic memory in diabetic vascular complications. J. Diabetes Res. 2015, 2015, 436879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Wallenstein, M.B.; Shaw, G.M.; Stevenson, D.K. Preterm birth as a calendar event or immunologic anomaly. JAMA Pediatr. 2016, 170, 525–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Kappil, M.; Chen, J. Environmental exposures in utero and microRNA. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 2014, 26, 243–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Isaacs, E.B.; Fischl, B.R.; Quinn, B.T.; Chong, W.K.; Gadian, D.G.; Lucas, A. Impact of breast milk on intelligence quotient, brain size, and white matter development. Pediatr. Res. 2010, 67, 357–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Luby, J.L.; Belden, A.C.; Whalen, D.; Harms, M.P.; Barch, D.M. Breastfeeding and childhood IQ: The mediating role of gray matter volume. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 2016, 55, 367–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Parylak, S.L.; Deng, W.; Gage, F.H. Mother’s milk programs offspring’s cognition. Nat. Neurosci. 2014, 17, 8–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Alsaweed, M.; Hartmann, P.E.; Geddes, D.T.; Kakulas, F. MicroRNAs in breastmilk and the lactating breast: Potential immunoprotectors and developmental regulators for the infant and the mother. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 2015, 12, 13981–14020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Alsaweed, M.; Lai, C.T.; Hartmann, P.E.; Geddes, D.T.; Kakulas, F. Human milk miRNAs primarily originate from the mammary gland resulting in unique miRNA profiles of fractionated milk. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 20680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Floris, I.; Billard, H.; Boquien, C.Y.; Joram-Gauvard, E.; Simon, L.; Legrand, A.; Boscher, C.; Roze, J.C.; Bolanos-Jimenez, F.; Kaeffer, B. miRNA analysis by quantitative PCR in preterm human breast milk reveals daily fluctuations of hsa-miR-16–5p. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0140488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Alsaweed, M.; Lai, C.T.; Hartmann, P.E.; Geddes, D.T.; Kakulas, F. Human milk cells contain numerous miRNAs that may change with milk removal and regulate multiple physiological processes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Munch, E.M.; Harris, R.A.; Mohammad, M.; Benham, A.L.; Pejerrey, S.M.; Showalter, L.; Hu, M.; Shope, C.D.; Maningat, P.D.; Gunaratne, P.H.; et al. Transcriptome profiling of microRNA by next-gen deep sequencing reveals known and novel miRNA species in the lipid fraction of human breast milk. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e50564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Kosaka, N.; Iguchi, H.; Ochiya, T. Circulating microRNA in body fluid: A new potential biomarker for cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Cancer Sci. 2010, 101, 2087–2092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Zhou, Q.; Li, M.; Wang, X.; Li, Q.; Wang, T.; Zhu, Q.; Zhou, X.; Wang, X.; Gao, X.; Li, X. Immune-related microRNAs are abundant in breast milk exosomes. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2012, 8, 118–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Hassiotou, F.; Beltran, A.; Chetwynd, E.; Stuebe, A.M.; Twigger, A.-J.; Metzger, P.; Trengove, N.; Lai, C.T.; Filgueira, L.; Blancafort, P.; et al. Breastmilk is a novel source of stem cells with multilineage differentiation potential. Stem Cells 2012, 30, 2164–2174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Benmoussa, A.; Lee, C.H.C.; Laffont, B.; Savard, P.; Laugier, J.; Boilard, E.; Gilbert, C.; Fliss, I.; Provost, P. Commercial dairy cow milk microRNAs resist digestion under simulated gastrointestinal tract conditions. J. Nutr. 2016, 146, 2206–2215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Alsaweed, M.; Lai, C.T.; Hartmann, P.E.; Geddes, D.T.; Kakulas, F. Human milk cells and lipids conserve numerous known and novel miRNAs, some of which are differentially expressed during lactation. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0152610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Zhang, L.; Hou, D.; Chen, X.; Li, D.; Zhu, L.; Zhang, Y.; Li, J.; Bian, Z.; Liang, X.; Cai, X.; et al. Exogenous plant MIR168a specifically targets mammalian LDLRAP1: Evidence of cross-kingdom regulation by microRNA. Cell Res. 2012, 22, 107–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Baier, S.R.; Nguyen, C.; Xie, F.; Wood, J.R.; Zempleni, J. MicroRNAs are absorbed in biologically meaningful amounts from nutritionally relevant doses of cow milk and affect gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, HEK-293 kidney cell cultures, and mouse livers. J. Nutr. 2014, 144, 1495–1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Zempleni, J.; Baier, S.R.; Howard, K.M.; Cui, J. Gene regulation by dietary microRNAs. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2015, 93, 1097–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Kusuma, R.J.; Manca, S.; Friemel, T.; Sukreet, S.; Nguyen, C.; Zempleni, J. Human vascular endothelial cells transport foreign exosomes from cow’s milk by endocytosis. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2016, 310, C800–C807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Melnik, B.C.; Kakulas, F.; Geddes, D.T.; Hartmann, P.E.; John, S.M.; Carrera-Bastos, P.; Cordain, L.; Schmitz, G. Milk miRNAs: Simple nutrients or systemic functional regulators? Nutr. Metab. 2016, 13, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Wolf, T.; Baier, S.R.; Zempleni, J. The intestinal transport of bovine milk exosomes is mediated by endocytosis in human colon carcinoma Caco-2 cells and rat small intestinal IEC-6 cells. J. Nutr. 2015, 145, 2201–2206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Chen, T.; Xie, M.-Y.; Sun, J.-J.; Ye, R.-S.; Cheng, X.; Sun, R.-P.; Wei, L.-M.; Li, M.; Lin, D.-L.; Jiang, Q.-Y.; et al. Porcine milk-derived exosomes promote proliferation of intestinal epithelial cells. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 33862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Na, R.S.; E, G.X.; Sun, W.; Sun, X.W.; Qiu, X.Y.; Chen, L.P.; Huang, Y.F. Expressional analysis of immune-related miRNAs in breast milk. Genet. Mol. Res. 2015, 14, 11371–11376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Melnik, B.C.; John, S.M.; Schmitz, G. Milk: An exosomal microRNA transmitter promoting thymic regulatory T cell maturation preventing the development of atopy? J. Transl. Med. 2014, 12, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Silva, J.-P.; Lelianova, V.G.; Ermolyuk, Y.S.; Vysokov, N.; Hitchen, P.G.; Berninghausen, O.; Rahman, M.A.; Zangrandi, A.; Fidalgo, S.; Tonevitsky, A.G.; et al. Latrophilin 1 and its endogenous ligand Lasso/teneurin-2 form a high-affinity transsynaptic receptor pair with signaling capabilities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 12113–12118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Ramkissoon, S.H.; Mainwaring, L.A.; Ogasawara, Y.; Keyvanfar, K.; McCoy, J.P.; Sloand, E.M.; Kajigaya, S.; Young, N.S. Hematopoietic-specific microRNA expression in human cells. Leuk. Res. 2006, 30, 643–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Melnik, B.C.; John, S.M.; Schmitz, G. Milk is not just food but most likely a genetic transfection system activating mTORC1 signaling for postnatal growth. Nutr. J. 2013, 12, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Zhu, H.; Shyh-Chang, N.; Segrè, A.V.; Shinoda, G.; Shah, S.P.; Einhorn, W.S.; Takeuchi, A.; Engreitz, J.M.; Hagan, J.P.; Kharas, M.G.; et al. The Lin28/let-7 axis regulates glucose metabolism. Cell 2011, 147, 81–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Fernández-Hernando, C.; Suárez, Y.; Rayner, K.J.; Moore, K.J. MicroRNAs in lipid metabolism. Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 2011, 22, 86–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Duursma, A.M.; Kedde, M.; Schrier, M.; le Sage, C.; Agami, R. miR-148 targets human DNMT3b protein coding region. RNA 2008, 14, 872–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Elliott, E.N.; Sheaffer, K.L.; Kaestner, K.H. The ‘de novo’ DNA methyltransferase Dnmt3b compensates the Dnmt1-deficient intestinal epithelium. Elife 2016, 5, e12975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Roostaee, A.; Benoit, Y.D.; Boudjadi, S.; Beaulieu, J.-F. Epigenetics in intestinal epithelial cell renewal. J. Cell. Physiol. 2016, 231, 2361–2367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Yu, D.-H.; Gadkari, M.; Zhou, Q.; Yu, S.; Gao, N.; Guan, Y.; Schady, D.; Roshan, T.N.; Chen, M.-H.; Laritsky, E.; et al. Postnatal epigenetic regulation of intestinal stem cells requires DNA methylation and is guided by the microbiome. Genome Biol. 2015, 16, 211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Maningat, P.D.; Sen, P.; Rijnkels, M.; Sunehag, A.L.; Hadsell, D.L.; Bray, M.; Haymond, M.W. Gene expression in the human mammary epithelium during lactation: The milk fat globule transcriptome. Physiol. Genom. 2009, 37, 12–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Li, Z.; Liu, H.; Jin, X.; Lo, L.; Liu, J. Expression profiles of microRNAs from lactating and non-lactating bovine mammary glands and identification of miRNA related to lactation. BMC Genom. 2012, 13, 731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Gu, Y.; Li, M.; Wang, T.; Liang, Y.; Zhong, Z.; Wang, X.; Zhou, Q.; Chen, L.; Lang, Q.; He, Z.; et al. Lactation-related microRNA expression profiles of porcine breast milk exosomes. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e43691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Izumi, H.; Kosaka, N.; Shimizu, T.; Sekine, K.; Ochiya, T.; Takase, M. Time-dependent expression profiles of microRNAs and mRNAs in rat milk whey. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e88843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Muroya, S.; Hagi, T.; Kimura, A.; Aso, H.; Matsuzaki, M.; Nomura, M. Lactogenic hormones alter cellular and extracellular microRNA expression in bovine mammary epithelial cell culture. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2016, 7, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Singh, R.; Mo, Y.-Y. Role of microRNAs in breast cancer. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2013, 14, 201–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Chen, X.; Ba, Y.; Ma, L.; Cai, X.; Yin, Y.; Wang, K.; Guo, J.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, J.; Guo, X.; et al. Characterization of microRNAs in serum: A novel class of biomarkers for diagnosis of cancer and other diseases. Cell Res. 2008, 18, 997–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Taga, I.; Lan, C.Q.; Altosaar, I. Plant essential oils and mastitis disease: Their potential inhibitory effects on pro-inflammatory cytokine production in response to bacteria related inflammation. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2012, 7, 675–682. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Figure 1. MicroRNA in the maternal-offspring biologic interchange. MicroRNA are expressed in cells and body fluids continuously during intra-uterine (a,b) and post-natal life. After birth, the dynamic, bidirectional interchange of bioactive components, including specific miRNA, continues and can occur through breastfeeding. (c) miRNAs expressed constitutively and those which are expressed in a tissue-specific manner in response to environmental stimuli remains to be determined.
Figure 1. MicroRNA in the maternal-offspring biologic interchange. MicroRNA are expressed in cells and body fluids continuously during intra-uterine (a,b) and post-natal life. After birth, the dynamic, bidirectional interchange of bioactive components, including specific miRNA, continues and can occur through breastfeeding. (c) miRNAs expressed constitutively and those which are expressed in a tissue-specific manner in response to environmental stimuli remains to be determined.
Ijms 17 01994 g001

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Floris, I.; Kraft, J.D.; Altosaar, I. Roles of MicroRNA across Prenatal and Postnatal Periods. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1994. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms17121994

AMA Style

Floris I, Kraft JD, Altosaar I. Roles of MicroRNA across Prenatal and Postnatal Periods. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2016; 17(12):1994. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms17121994

Chicago/Turabian Style

Floris, Ilaria, Jamie D. Kraft, and Illimar Altosaar. 2016. "Roles of MicroRNA across Prenatal and Postnatal Periods" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 17, no. 12: 1994. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms17121994

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop