Next Article in Journal
Role of Matrix Metalloproteinases in Photoaging and Photocarcinogenesis
Next Article in Special Issue
v-Src Causes Chromosome Bridges in a Caffeine-Sensitive Manner by Generating DNA Damage
Previous Article in Journal
Biochemical Engineering Approaches for Increasing Viability and Functionality of Probiotic Bacteria
Previous Article in Special Issue
Activation of DNA Damage Response Induced by the Kaposi’s Sarcoma-Associated Herpes Virus

High DRC Levels Are Associated with Let-7b Overexpression in Women with Breast Cancer

Department of Basic Sciences, Division of Pharmacology & Toxicology, Ponce Research Institute, Ponce Health Sciences University-School of Medicine, Ponce, PR 00716-2347, Puerto Rico
Biology Department, University of Puerto Rico at Ponce, Ponce, PR 00716-9996, Puerto Rico
Department of Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Guillermo T. Sáez
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17(6), 865;
Received: 7 April 2016 / Revised: 5 May 2016 / Accepted: 16 May 2016 / Published: 2 June 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue DNA Damage and Repair in Degenerative Diseases 2016)


Nucleotide Excision Repair (NER) is a critical pathway involved in breast cancer (BC). We have previously published that a low DNA repair capacity (DRC) is associated with a higher risk of BC in Puerto Rican women. Let-7b belongs to a miRNA family with tumor suppressor activity that targets oncogenes. We isolated miRNAs from plasma of 153 Puerto Rican women with and without BC. DRC was measured in lymphocytes by means of a host cell reactivation assay. These women were divided into four groups according to their DRC level: High (>3.8%) and low (<3.8%). The four groups consisted of BC patients with high (n = 35) and low (n = 43) DRC and controls with high (n = 39) and low (n = 36) DRC. Epidemiologic data were collected at initial BC diagnosis and almost five years after diagnosis. A significant difference in Let-7b expression was found in BC patients with high DRC versus the remaining groups (p < 0.001). Thus, our data reveal a possible role of Let-7b on DRC during breast carcinogenesis. Our study is innovative because it provides the first evidence that Let-7b may play role in DRC regulation (through the NER repair pathway) in BC.
Keywords: breast cancer; DNA repair; nucleotide excision repair pathway; Let-7b breast cancer; DNA repair; nucleotide excision repair pathway; Let-7b

1. Introduction

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are endogenous, short (19–24 nucleotides) non-protein-coding RNAs that regulate gene expression at the post-transcriptional level via binding to 3′-untranslated regions of protein-coding transcripts [1,2]. miRNAs have been exhaustively studied due to their role in embryonic development [1,3]. In recent years, there has been a keen interest in how miRNAs can be used to study cancer [2,4,5,6]. They have become promising tools in identifying metastases, chemo-resistance, and cell cycle checkpoints [1,7,8]. Alterations in the expression profiles of many miRNAs have been utilized as classifiers in many cancer types [9]. Numerous studies have shown that miRNAs can be detected in serum and tissue in a stable form, showing protection from endogenous RNase activity [5,9,10]. This makes them attractive biomarkers for many cancer endpoints. Dysregulation of miRNAs have pathogenic implications in breast, colon, lung, and ovarian cancers, among others [4]. Aberrant microRNA expression is a hallmark for discriminating between normal tissue and solid tumors.
Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer affecting women worldwide. It accounts for 20% of all malignancies in females; in Puerto Rico (PR), it accounted for 30% of all cancers in 2012 [11]. Humans vary in their inherent sensitivities to mutagens and carcinogens due to differences in their DNA repair capacity (DRC) levels [12,13,14]. Several studies using functional repair assays in lymphocytes have demonstrated that DRC varies greatly among individuals and that lower DRC is associated with higher risk of several types of cancer [15,16,17]. Our laboratory was the first to report that a low DRC, measured in terms of the NER pathway, is an important risk factor for BC [16].
The NER pathway is the most complex DNA repair pathway and includes the repair of bulky, helix-distorting DNA lesions, such as those induced by crosslinking agents and base-damaging carcinogens and chemical mutagens [12,13,16]. Defects in this pathway are normally associated with rare genetic syndromes and cancers [18] (e.g., Xeroderma pigmentosum (XP) and Cockayne syndrome). However, Latimer et al. (2010) demonstrated the critical importance of the NER pathway in BC [19]. Other studies in the literature have also demonstrated that a low DRC can increase the risk of developing cancer [20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]. Considered a “generalist” of DNA repair pathways, NER works in multiple capacities, particularly when other repair pathways exhibit reduced functionality. Latimer found that the mean NER capacity of the tumor samples she studied was significantly lower than that of normal breast tissues, averaging only 44% of normal activity (p < 0.001) [19]. Thus, learning how DRC influences one’s BC risk, disease progression/recurrence, and prognosis would be an invaluable addition to the arsenal of BC biomarkers [15,19,20]. Dysregulation of DNA repair mechanisms have been clearly linked to breast carcinogenesis and, in certain kinds of BCs, are being exploited today as potential therapeutic targets [10,16,21]. One of the epigenetic factors that may influence DRC and BC risk is microRNAs (miRNAs) [16,22]. Although there have been significant advances in our understanding of the functionality of miRNAs, their role as regulators of expression of DNA repair genes and variability in DRC is still poorly understood [22]. Studies on the role of miRNAs in DNA damage and repair have focused on miR-21, miR-24, miR-101, miR-210, and miR-155 [6,9,23]. The expression of several miRNAs within the Let-7 family has been associated with BC in previous studies [5,10]. There are no studies on the association between DRC levels and Let-7b expression in BC. Although this miRNA family has been widely studied, only a few articles have reported different types of Let-7b regulation, particularly in BC [2,4,5,9,10]. Therefore, our study brings innovation by increasing the knowledge in this field and adding the link with DRC levels. The review published by Barh (2008) predicted based on bioinformatics analysis, an upregulation of Let-7b expression in BC using the “miRGator” database [2,24].
Let-7b expression is differently regulated among BC populations and it has been lately considered as a potential biomarker in BC patients despite the discrepancies within the literature regarding its regulation [24,25]. Let-7b has been found to be involved in several mechanisms as a tumor suppressor, in order to halt cell proliferation, adhesion, and invasion by targeting genes of PKA1, DIAPH2, RDX, Ras, c-myc, and HMGA2 proteins [22,26]. Despite that, the exact mechanism underlying how these genes are suppressed is still unknown. Here we provide data that contributes to decipher some of these mechanisms and gain a better understanding of the role of DRC in Let-7b expression in BC.
We initially performed a discovery experiment using plasma from 30 BC patients and 30 controls with high and low DRC. Our results obtained with the RT-PCR TaqMan Array Human MicroRNA A Cards v 2.0 (Applied Biosystems) allowed us to select several candidate miRNAs that might be differentially expressed in BC patients and controls with high and low DRC. Let-7b was among the candidate miRNAs obtained in this discovery experiment with a p-value of 0.045. Therefore, the focus of this study was to compare the expression of Let-7b in women with BC with a control group using their DRC levels to determine whether such association exists. We hypothesized that if Let-7b expression is associated with DRC levels, then variability in DRC levels would alter the Let-7b transcript. To achieve this, we studied the expression of Let-7b in plasma of 73 BC patients and in 72 women without BC, with either high or low DRC levels. DRC was measured in human lymphocytes with different severities of NER deficiency by means of a host-cell reactivation phenotypic assay with a luciferase reporter gene [15].

2. Results

2.1. Sample Stratification

A Kruskal-Wallis (KW) test (nonparametric test) was performed to assess the differences among groups. The p-value for the KW test was <0.0001; thus a post hoc test was performed. Results from the Dunn multiple comparisons test suggested that the differences that occurred between groups were due to the high DRC levels of BC patients. No significant difference was found when the controls with high and low DRC were compared (p > 0.05). In addition, no significant differences were detected between the control and BC groups with low DRC (p > 0.05). However, significant differences were found when the control group was compared with BC patients with high DRC (p < 0.001). Moreover, a significant difference of Let-7b expression was detected when the high and low BC groups were compared, with higher Let-7b expression in BC patients with high DRC (p < 0.001).

2.2. Demographic Characteristics of the Control and Breast Cancer Study Groups

Our study population was composed of 153 women from a previously described cohort study [15] including women without (control) and with BC (Table 1). These groups were further classified into four subgroups according to their DRC level (Figure 1), as described in the Methods section. The demographic characteristics of the control and BC groups were evaluated using a Pearson chi-squared test. No significant association was found in the distribution between control and BC patients when divided by DRC levels (p = 0.4714). Thus, members of each pair of control and BC patients were matched between groups, and this cohort was used for further analysis. Most of the women in the control group were within the age range of 41–60 years, in contrast to the BC patients who were older (≥61 years) than the controls (p = 0.0049). In terms of body mass index, no significant association was found between the BC and control groups (p = 0.4045). Most of the women in both groups had reported to have been pregnant at least once (p = 0.2238). Despite that, a significant difference was found among BC and control women when age at first birth was compared for controls who were between 20 and 29 years old (p = 0.0029). No significant difference was found between BC and control groups when comparing breastfeeding practices (p = 0.9789). Variables, such as the use of oral contraceptives, having regular menstruation periods, age of menarche, history of endometriosis, and having a hysterectomy were not significantly different between BC patients and controls. Most of the women in our cohort did not have an oophorectomy. However, a statistical significance was found between women with BC and our control group when each group was stratified by the age at which the oophorectomy was performed (p = 0.0347). Women in the control group reported having an oophorectomy at a younger age compared to that of BC patients. No significant differences were observed in terms of menopause status when BC patients and controls were compared (p > 0.05). Controls were more likely to have received hormone replacement therapy than women in the BC group (p = 0.0143). When other nominal variables were analyzed to determinate whether harmful habits (smoking and alcohol consumption) contributed to differences between BC patients and controls, we found that neither contributed to these differences (p = 0.232 and p = 1, respectively). A positive family history of cancer, BC, or any other cancer did not affect our results. Most of the BC patients in our study were diagnosed with ductal (p = 0.0140) and invasive (p = 0.0019) breast carcinoma (Table 2).

2.3. Let-7b Expression

The expression of Let-7b was analyzed based on stratification of the four experimental groups. As previously described, the groups were stratified, using a percent cut-off in low DRC (<3.8%) and high DRC (≥3.8%). The stratification by DRC resulted in two individual control groups and two individual BC groups. Control women with a low DRC (n = 39) had a mean expression level of 0.6 ± 0.1 (mean ± SEM). BC patients with a low DRC (n = 37) had a mean Let-7b expression level of 0.7 ± 0.1. The mean value for Let-7b expression for the control group with a high DRC was 0.6 ± 0.1. For the BC group with a high DRC, the Let-7b expression level was 2.0 ± 0.5 (Figure 2). The normality test was true only for the BC group with high DRC.

2.4. Correlations and Associations Analyses between Groups

The Spearman’s test yielded an r value of 0.3695, this positive fraction shows that these variables tend to increase together. The correlation between these variables was statistically significant (p = 0.0010) (two-tailed). Contingency tables were constructed and the Fisher’s exact test was performed to assess univariate comparisons between Let-7b expression and DRC levels. After stratifying BC patients based on their DRC levels and Let-7b expression, a significant association was found between Let-7b expression and DRC (Fisher’s exact, p < 0.0001).

2.5. Let-7b Results Based on Clinicopathological Characteristics

To determinate whether Let-7b expression was associated with clinicopathological characteristics of BC, the pathologies of the BC patients were analyzed. Women with BC having high and low DRC levels were further stratified by receptor status (estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)) and tumor grade (Table 2). These groups were also divided by molecular subtypes, including Luminal A (ER+/−, PR+/−, HER2−; n = 37 patients), Luminal B (ER+/−, PR+/−, HER2+; n = 16 patients), and triple negative (ER−, PR−, HER2−; n = 3 patients), conserving the division based on DRC levels. A significant difference was detected between the BC groups with a high and a low DRC based on ER-positive (p = 0.0007) and PR-positive (p = 0.0007) status alone. A significant difference was also found among the HER2-negative groups with high and low DRC levels (p = 0.0258). The analysis based on BC molecular subtype showed no significant differences regarding Let-7b expression among the Luminal B and triple negative BC subtypes. However, a significant association was found between Let-7b expression among the groups of Luminal A (p = 0.0063) with low versus high DRC.

3. Discussion

3.1. Let-7 Expression

miRNAs are activated by a wide variety of canonical pathways, as reported in the literature, in order to regulate different cell processes such as DNA damage response [27]. This is the first report, to the best of our knowledge that provides evidence of a possible link between Let-7b overexpression and NER pathway activity, measured with a phenotypic assay, in BC. Our results suggest that Let-7b is involved in the activity of the NER pathway, as suggested by the study of Simone et al., (2009) [28]. Let-7b expression was measured in fibroblast cells after exposure to different DNA-damaging agents, including ionizing radiation, H2O2, and etoposide. After exposure to H2O2, the expression of Let-7b was induced. Among the three different DNA damaging agents, H2O2 is the only one that is known to induce the NER pathway [29,30,31]. Ionizing radiation and etoposide exposure have been shown to trigger the activation of the Base Excision Repair and DNA double-strand break repair pathways. Thus, this finding suggests and supports that Let-7b activation might be involved in the NER pathway activation. In the present study, our main objective was to examine the expression of Let-7b in BC patients versus a control group of women without BC using their DRC levels measured in lymphocytes as the basis for our analysis. The results validate our hypothesis that if Let-7b expression was associated with DRC levels, then variability in DRC levels would alter the Let-7b transcript. Here, we propose the possible up-regulation of Let-7b, a tumor suppressor miRNA, in BC patients with high DRC levels. Our findings reveal that a high Let-7b expression in BC patients is associated with a high DRC. Since Let-7b is a tumor suppressor miRNA, our findings support the hypothesis proposed by Giacona et al. (1998) and Fournie et al. (1995) [24,32,33]. These studies show that miRNAs are derived from the tumor necrotic tissue and have been found to enhance the expression of these non-coding molecules into the blood [10]. These miRNAs are transported through the plasma packed in endosomes. Previous studies have demonstrated that the lipids that compose these endosomes could be the result of the tumor necrotic lysis [11,34] Therefore, the miRNA expression profile is different between those with and without BC [25,35,36]. A similar trend was observed in our results where Let-7b expression was different among patients with BC and a control group. Our previous findings show that a higher activity of the NER pathway is associated with a reduced risk of BC [15]. In this study, we report that having a high DRC is associated with a high expression of Let-7b. Because the BC patients included in our study were recently diagnosed, the Let-7b expression levels measured were intrinsically from tumors in development. A possible explanation for these results could be that the high DRC levels may induce high Let-7b expression as a mechanism to reduce the cancer cell proliferation. However, more experiments are needed to test this hypothesis such as evaluating the expression level of other BC related miRNAs or the transcription level of important genes for NER pathway activity.
There are discrepancies in the literature regarding Let-7b expression in BC. In a UK study of women with BC, expression levels of Let-7b were found to be high, whereas in a study from Korea, women with BC displayed low expression levels [10,21]. In our cohort, most of the women with BC had a low DRC; therefore, it is not surprising to find more studies reporting low levels of Let-7b expression in women with BC. Our findings are pivotal and provide information that could lead to the generation of new hypotheses regarding the role of Let-7b in the circulation in combination with high DRC in BC. Future studies are needed to examine the expression of Let-7b in tumors and plasma from patients with BC to elucidate the relationship between the two. A wide spectrum of articles has highlighted the potential of miRNAs for diagnostic biomarkers development. The benefits of miRNA overexpression have been also reported in the literature due to their potential to suppress oncogenes, which makes them a possible tool for cancer therapy [14,16]. The wide implications of our findings open new avenues regarding DRC and Let7-b transcript. The control groups, with high and low DRC, showed no significant differences in Let-7b expression. These findings led us to conclude that a high expression of Let-7b in combination with high DRC levels is a response that takes place during breast carcinogenesis. Reduced Let-7b expression in the plasma of the controls allows us to suggest that this miRNA has a different function in women without BC (controls) compared with women with BC. It has been well documented that miRNAs may have a physiological role in healthy individuals [25,37,38]. However, no association has been reported regarding the levels of Let-7b expression in women without cancer [34]. It has been reported that low levels of Let-7b expression in individuals without cancer could be attributed to the process of apoptosis in lymphocytes and other nucleated cells [24]. This is a continuous process due to the presence of the DNase I and II enzymes in the circulation. These enzymes degrade the free circulating non-coding RNA and control the amounts of miRNAs that are released from the apoptotic processes [24,35]. Thus, smaller amounts of miRNAs have been found in the plasma of those without cancer.

3.2. Epidemiological Associations

BC and DNA damage can be caused by various factors, including aging, environmental, genetic, and epigenetic factors. Understanding the DRC as a risk factor for BC contributes to our understanding of a key mechanism associated with the development of BC. One of the intrinsic characteristics of cancer development is a deficiency in cellular DNA repair mechanisms [13,16]. Previous studies have shown that DRC levels can vary among individuals in an age-dependent manner [15,16]. However, the DRC levels in our cohort were not significantly different among the four groups despite the age differences. Most of the patients with BC in our study were 61 years of age or older. This finding correlates with previous studies from our group and others [11,15,16,39] that age is a risk factor for BC.
Most of the women in our study population reported to have been pregnant; however, a difference was observed in age at first birth. A greater number women with BC had their first child at 30 years of age or older. This finding correlates with previous studies that show that BC incidence is higher in women who had children at 30 years of age compared with those who gave birth at younger ages [40]. In terms of breastfeeding (BF), we found no significant differences between patients with BC and controls; however, this is not a typical finding since breastfeeding is considered a protective factor for BC [41]. Although oral contraceptive use is considered a risk factor associated with premenopausal BC [42,43,44], no significant differences were found between the BC and control groups. When we evaluated the history of previous surgery, such as hysterectomy and/or oophorectomy, no significant differences were found between the BC and control groups. Although most of the women in our control group reported to have had an oophorectomy before reaching 40 years of age, women with BC had it at an older age. This has been previously reported in the literature [45,46,47]. Several retrospective studies have evaluated the effects of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in BC [40,48]. In our cohort, the BC group reported a higher use of HRT compared with the control group. This supports conclusions of previous studies that have shown that the use of HRT increases the risk of BC [40,48].

3.3. Clinicopathological Characteristics

Over the past decade, BC therapies have been based on the knowledge gained from breast tumor studies and clinical outcomes of patients exposed to different therapies [49,50,51]. These studies have led to recognition of the heterogenic diversity within BC diagnosis, and breast tumors have been classified into molecular subtypes based on hormone receptor status PR, ER, HER2 [20]. In a recent study of 270 women with BC from our cohort, we have recently reported that there is an association between DRC levels and ER status, this association is modified by HER2 receptor status [52]. Consequently, Let-7b expression was analyzed using the molecular subtypes (including ER status) from the pathology reports. Our findings show that Let-7b expression was independent on ER, PR, and HER2 status. In a previous study by Joosse et al. (2014) using BC cell lines representative of different molecular subtypes, including MCF-7 (luminal A), MDA-MB-231 (luminal B), and BT-474 (triple negative), among others, Let-7b was expressed in all cell lines independently of their receptor status [10]. These results support our finding in the plasma of the BC patients in our study population.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Patient Recruitment

Participants in this study represented a subgroup of women recruited through our larger BC study (1187 patients and controls; recruited from 2006–2013), which has been previously described [15]. All participants signed an informed consent approved by the Institutional Review Board by Ponce Health Sciences University (IRB #120207-JM). This consent provided access to patient medical records, including pathology reports. Each patient completed an epidemiologic questionnaire with the assistance of the study nurse to obtain the demographic information. All patient information was de-identified and coded and kept in a locked cabinet and in protected computers available only to those involved in conducting this study. The patients selected for this study were women with primary histopathologically confirmed diagnosis of BC and were recruited from gynecology and oncology clinics throughout Puerto Rico. Inclusion criteria were patients who (1) were recently diagnosed histopathologically with primary BC; (2) were treatment-naïve (had not received chemotherapy, blood transfusions, or radiotherapy); and (3) had pathology reports that included hormone receptor information.

4.2. DNA Repair Capacity Measurements

Peripheral blood samples were used to obtain lymphocytes, which were separated, purified, and grown from each patient sample. These cells, which included tumoral cells, were used as surrogate markers of the patients’ overall DRC. A host-cell reactivation assay (HCR) was performed on the peripheral blood lymphocytes to measure in vivo DRC, as described in previous studies [15,16]. After transfection into lymphocytes, repair-transcription-blocking damage was introduced exogenously on foreign DNA, and then overall DRC was measured via HCR. This approach measured the unaffected phenotype, which reflects the cells’ inherent DRC, measured primarily in terms of their NER activity. Keeping the time constant for lymphocytes to complete the repair mirrored the true cellular process [15].
To calculate the DRC, undamaged plasmid DNA was compared with repair of in vitro-damaged plasmid DNA; the results were expressed as the percentage of residual luciferase reporter gene expression (% luciferase activity in luminescence units). The amount of gene expression reflected DRC, expressed as a percentage. A detailed description of the assay, including separation of DRC by tertiles has been published [15]. This study builds on our laboratory’s 15 years of experience in performing the HCR assay to measure DRC and its validation of the sensitivity, specificity, and usefulness as a measure of BC risk.

4.3. Sample Stratification

We collected 156 plasma samples from women with BC and controls, from the previously described study cohort [15], which were stored at −80 °C and used to stratify the groups based on their DRC level. For this study, we used a cut-off for high versus low DRC levels, where a DRC higher than 3.8% was considered high and a DRC of 3.8% or less was considered low. This cut-off was established from our previous study [15] without compromising the sensitivity or specificity of the HRC assay. Study participants were further stratified into four groups: BC patients with high DRC (n = 32) and low DRC (n = 41) and women without BC (controls) with high DRC (n = 38) and low DRC (n = 34) (Figure 1).

4.4. mRNA Extraction and cDNA Synthesis

Total RNA from the cells lines and plasma were extracted using miRNeasy Mini Kit reagents (Qiagen, Louisville, KY, USA) [38,53]. Some modifications of the protocol were done in order to mix the RNA extraction from the plasma [54]. The total sample volume was 400 µL of plasma for all extractions. After 1 mL of QUIAZOL (Qiagen, Louisville, KY, USA) was added per sample, samples were vortexed, and 5 µL of a spike-in solution was immediately added. A concentration of 5 fmol/µL of cel-miR-39 (Ambion®, Austin, TX, USA) was used as spike-in. The column volume did not exceed 700 µL during the entire extraction process. The resulting extraction was used for cDNA synthesis using the Taqman® MicroRNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied BioSystem, Frederick, MD, USA). Polymerase chain reactions (PCRs) were performed according the manufacturer’s instruction. The programmed thermal cycler for clonation was as follows: 30 min at 16 °C, 30 min at 45 °C, and 5 min at 85 °C, using a DNA Engine® Thermal Cycler (PTC-200, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA).

4.5. Let-7b Expression Using Real-Time PCR

Assessment of Let-7b expression was performed using TaqMan® microRNA assay (Applied Biosystems, Louisville, KY, USA). A validation method was first performed as suggested by the manufacturer. Quantitative florescent amplification of cDNA of has-Let-7b, has-miR-16, and cel-miR-39 was performed using TaqMan® MicroRNA Assays (Applied Biosystems, Louisville, KY, USA, USA). Real-time PCR was conducted with the use of the CFX96 TM Real-Time System (Thermal Cycler) (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Data analysis of PCRs was performed using the CFX Manager Program from Bio-Rad. The has-miR-16 was used to normalize the expression of the target miRNA. A mean of triplicate experiments was considered as the result for each sample. The Let-7b expression presented in Figure 2 and Figure 3 is equivalent to the resulted normalized expression ΔΔCq from the PCRs. Thus, the relative quantity of Let-7b was normalized to the relative quantity of the reference gene across the samples. It has been reported that miR-16 from human plasma is the best choice to perform a suitable normalization procedure [55].

4.6. Statistical Analyses

To assess differences of Let-7b expression among groups, a Kruskal-Wallis test (non-parametric) was performed followed by a post hoc Dunn multiple comparisons test. Clinicopathological characteristics were used to assess Let-7b expression, with differences analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. To determine whether epidemiological characteristics had any association with Let-7b expression, a Pearson chi-squared test was performed. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. The BC patient data was further analyzed to assess any correlations or associations between variables. The Spearman’s rank correlation test (nonparametric test) was performed to assess any dependence between the DRC and Let-7b expression (Figure 3). Contingency tables were constructed and the Fisher’s exact test was performed to assess univariate comparisons between Let-7b expression and DRC levels. Since no significant differences were found within the control groups (high and low DRC) the mean expression of Let-7b in these groups (0.6 ± 0.1) was used to establish the cutoff for high and low expression of this miRNA in BC patients.


Supported by grants from the NCI Center to Reduce Health Disparities and NIH-NIGMS MBRS Program grants #S06 GM008239-20, 9SC1CA182846-04, #R25GM096955, GM082406, and PSM-MCC Partnership grants #5U54CA163071 and #U54CA163068. We also want to acknowledge the support of the Molecular and Genomics Core Laboratory at Ponce Health Sciences University-Ponce Research Institute (Grant MD00757). We want to acknowledge Pablo Vivas, Susan McCarthy, Clara Isaza for technical help, and Luisa Morales for DRC studies. We thank Rasa Hamilton (Moffitt Cancer Center) for editorial assistance.

Author Contributions

Jarline Encarnacion, Carmen Ortiz, and Jaime L. Matta conceived and designed the experiments. The experiments were performed by, Jarline Encarnacion, Carmen Ortiz, Domenico Coppola, and Ralphdy Vergne. The data analysis was done by Jarline Encarnacion, Carmen Ortiz, and Jaime L. Matta. The manuscript was written by Jarline Encarnacion, Jaime L. Matta, Carmen Ortiz, and Domenico Coppola. The patient recruitment was done by Wanda Vargas.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. Rougvie, A.E. Control of developmental timing in animals. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2001, 2, 690–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Barh, D. Let-7 replacement therapy: Applicability in cancer. Cancer Ther. 2008, 6, 969–984. [Google Scholar]
  3. Slack, F.J.; Basson, M.; Liu, Z.; Ambros, V.; Horvitz, H.R.; Ruvkun, G. The lin-41 RBCC gene acts in the C. Elegans heterochronic pathway between the let-7 regulatory rna and the lin-29 transcription factor. Mol. Cell 2000, 5, 659–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kumar, M.S.; Lu, J.; Mercer, K.L.; Golub, T.R.; Jacks, T. Impaired microRNA processing enhances cellular transformation and tumorigenesis. Nat. Genet. 2007, 39, 673–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Barh, D.; Parida, S.; Parida, B.P.; Viswanathan, G. Let-7, miR-125, miR-205, and miR-296 are prospective therapeutic agents in breast cancer molecular medicine. Gene Ther. Mol. Biol. 2008, 12, 189–206. [Google Scholar]
  6. Soifer, H.S.; Rossi, J.J.; Saetrom, P. Micrornas in disease and potential therapeutic applications. Mol. Ther. J. Am. Soc. Gene Ther. 2007, 15, 2070–2079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Cimmino, A.; Calin, G.A.; Fabbri, M.; Iorio, M.V.; Ferracin, M.; Shimizu, M.; Wojcik, S.E.; Aqeilan, R.I.; Zupo, S.; Dono, M.; et al. MiR-15 and miR-16 induce apoptosis by targeting BCL2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 13944–13949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Ha, M.; Kim, V.N. Regulation of microrna biogenesis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2014, 15, 509–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Wang, X.; Cao, L.; Wang, Y.; Wang, X.; Liu, N.; You, Y. Regulation of Let-7 and its target oncogenes (review). Oncol. Lett. 2012, 3, 955–960. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  10. Joosse, S.; Müller, V.; Steinbach, B.; Pantel, K.; Schwarzenbach, H. Circulating cell-free cancer-testis MAGE-a RNA, BORIS RNA, Let-7b and miR-202 in the blood of patients with breast cancer and benign breast diseases. Br. J. Cancer 2014, 111, 909–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Feuer, E.J.; Wun, L.-M.; Boring, C.C.; Flanders, W.D.; Timmel, M.J.; Tong, T. The lifetime risk of developing breast cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1993, 85, 892–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Friedberg, E.C.; Walker, G.C.; Siede, W.; Wood, R.D. DNA Repair and Mutagenesis; American Society for Microbiology Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  13. Tessitore, A.; Cicciarelli, G.; del Vecchio, F.; Gaggiano, A.; Verzella, D.; Fischietti, M.; Vecchiotti, D.; Capece, D.; Zazzeroni, F.; Alesse, E. Micrornas in the DNA damage/repair network and cancer. Int. J. Genom. 2014, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wood, R.D.; Mitchell, M.; Sgouros, J.; Lindahl, T. Human DNA repair genes. Science 2001, 291, 1284–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Matta, J.; Echenique, M.; Negron, E.; Morales, L.; Vargas, W.; Gaetan, F.S.; Lizardi, E.R.; Torres, A.; Rosado, J.O.; Bolaños, G. The association of DNA repair with breast cancer risk in women. A comparative observational study. BMC Cancer 2012, 12, 490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ramos, J.M.; Ruiz, A.; Colen, R.; Lopez, I.D.; Grossman, L.; Matta, J.L. DNA repair and breast carcinoma susceptibility in women. Cancer 2004, 100, 1352–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Siegel, R.; Naishadham, D.; Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2013, 63, 11–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Lehmann, A.R. DNA repair-deficient diseases, xeroderma pigmentosum, cockayne syndrome and trichothiodystrophy. Biochimie 2003, 85, 1101–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Latimer, J.J.; Johnson, J.M.; Kelly, C.M.; Miles, T.D.; Beaudry-Rodgers, K.A.; Lalanne, N.A.; Vogel, V.G.; Kanbour-Shakir, A.; Kelley, J.L.; Johnson, R.R. Nucleotide excision repair deficiency is intrinsic in sporadic stage i breast cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 21725–21730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Davis, J.D.; Lin, S.-Y. DNA damage and breast cancer. World J. Clin. Oncol. 2011, 2, 329–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Chun, S.-M.; Park, H.-J.; Kim, C.H.; Kim, I. The significance of microrna Let-7b, miR-30c, and miR-200c expression in breast cancers. Korean J. Pathol. 2011, 45, 354–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mayr, C.; Hemann, M.T.; Bartel, D.P. Disrupting the pairing between Let-7 and HMGA2 enhances oncogenic transformation. Science 2007, 315, 1576–1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kasinski, A.L.; Slack, F.J. Micrornas en route to the clinic: Progress in validating and targeting micrornas for cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2011, 11, 849–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Swarup, V.; Rajeswari, M.R. Circulating (cell-free) nucleic acids—A promising, non-invasive tool for early detection of several human diseases. FEBS Lett. 2007, 581, 795–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Fleischhacker, M.; Schmidt, B. Circulating nucleic acids (CNAs) and cancer—A survey. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2007, 1775, 181–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Hu, X.; Guo, J.; Zheng, L.; Li, C.; Zheng, T.M.; Tanyi, J.L.; Liang, S.; Benedetto, C.; Mitidieri, M.; Katsaros, D.; et al. The heterochronic microrna Let-7 inhibits cell motility by regulating the genes in the actin cytoskeleton pathway in breast cancer. Mol. Cancer Res. 2013, 11, 240–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Wan, G.; Mathur, R.; Hu, X.; Zhang, X.; Lu, X. Mirna response to DNA damage. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2011, 36, 478–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Simone, N.L.; Soule, B.P.; Ly, D.; Saleh, A.D.; Savage, J.E.; Degraff, W.; Cook, J.; Harris, C.C.; Gius, D.; Mitchell, J.B. Ionizing radiation-induced oxidative stress alters miRNA expression. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e6377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Smart, D.J.; Halicka, H.D.; Schmuck, G.; Traganos, F.; Darzynkiewicz, Z.; Williams, G.M. Assessment of DNA double-strand breaks and γH2AX induced by the topoisomerase II poisons etoposide and mitoxantrone. Mutat. Res. 2008, 641, 43–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Gopalakrishnan, K.; Low, G.K.; Ting, A.P.; Srikanth, P.; Slijepcevic, P.; Hande, M.P. Hydrogen peroxide induced genomic instability in nucleotide excision repair-deficient lymphoblastoid cells. Genome Integr. 2010, 1, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Chaudhry, M.A. Base excision repair of ionizing radiation-induced DNA damage in G1 and G2 cell cycle phases. Cancer Cell Int. 2007, 7, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Fournie, G.J.; Courtin, J.P.; Laval, F.; Chale, J.J.; Pourrat, J.P.; Pujazon, M.C.; Lauque, D.; Carles, P. Plasma DNA as a marker of cancerous cell death. Investigations in patients suffering from lung cancer and in nude mice bearing human tumours. Cancer Lett. 1995, 91, 221–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Giacona, M.B.; Ruben, G.C.; Iczkowski, K.A.; Roos, T.B.; Porter, D.M.; Sorenson, G.D. Cell-free DNA in human blood plasma: Length measurements in patients with pancreatic cancer and healthy controls. Pancreas 1998, 17, 89–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Gilad, S.; Meiri, E.; Yogev, Y.; Benjamin, S.; Lebanony, D.; Yerushalmi, N.; Benjamin, H.; Kushnir, M.; Cholakh, H.; Melamed, N. Serum micrornas are promising novel biomarkers. PLoS ONE 2008, 3, e3148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Schwarzenbach, H.; Hoon, D.S.; Pantel, K. Cell-free nucleic acids as biomarkers in cancer patients. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2011, 11, 426–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Sozzi, G.; Comte, D.; Leon, M.; Ciricione, R.; Roz, L.; Ratcliffe, C.; Roz, E.; Cirenei, N.; Bellomi, M.; Pelosi, G.; et al. Quantification of free circulating DNA as a diagnostic marker in lung cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2003, 21, 3902–3908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Angelillo-Scherrer, A. Leukocyte-derived microparticles in vascular homeostasis. Circ. Res. 2012, 110, 356–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Lo, Y.M.; Tein, M.S.; Lau, T.K.; Haines, C.J.; Leung, T.N.; Poon, P.M.; Wainscoat, J.S.; Johnson, P.J.; Chang, A.M.; Hjelm, N.M. Quantitative analysis of fetal DNA in maternal plasma and serum: Implications for noninvasive prenatal diagnosis. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1998, 62, 768–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Kelsey, J.L.; Gammon, M.D.; John, E.M. Reproductive factors and breast cancer. Epidemiol. Rev. 1993, 15, 36. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  40. Lord, S.J.; Bernstein, L.; Johnson, K.A.; Malone, K.E.; McDonald, J.A.; Marchbanks, P.A.; Simon, M.S.; Strom, B.L.; Press, M.F.; Folger, S.G. Breast cancer risk and hormone receptor status in older women by parity, age of first birth, and breastfeeding: A case-control study. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2008, 17, 1723–1730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Miller, B. Cancer: We Can Win the War against Cancer by Aggresively Pursuing Prevention; Oak Publication Sdn Bhd: Petaling Jaya, Malaysia, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  42. Cerhan, J.R. Oral contraceptive use and breast cancer risk: Current status. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2006, 81, 1287–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Modugno, F.; Ness, R.B.; Allen, G.O.; Schildkraut, J.M.; Davis, F.G.; Goodman, M.T. Oral contraceptive use, reproductive history, and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer in women with and without endometriosis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2004, 191, 733–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Kahlenborn, C.; Modugno, F.; Potter, D.M.; Severs, W.B. Oral contraceptive use as a risk factor for premenopausal breast cancer: A meta-analysis. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2006, 81, 1290–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Rocca, W.A.; Grossardt, B.R.; de Andrade, M.; Malkasian, G.D.; Melton Iii, L.J. Survival patterns after oophorectomy in premenopausal women: A population-based cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2006, 7, 821–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Olson, J.E.; Sellers, T.A.; Iturria, S.J.; Hartmann, L.C. Bilateral oophorectomy and breast cancer risk reduction among women with a family history. Cancer Detect. Prev. 2004, 28, 357–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Metcalfe, K.A. Oophorectomy for breast cancer prevention in women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. Women’s Health 2009, 5, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Million Women Study, C. Breast cancer and hormone-replacement therapy in the million women study. Lancet 2003, 362, 419–427. [Google Scholar]
  49. Mao, X.; He, J.; Li, T.; Lu, Z.; Sun, J.; Meng, Y.; Abliz, Z.; Chen, J. Application of imaging mass spectrometry for the molecular diagnosis of human breast tumors. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 21043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Rouzier, R.; Perou, C.M.; Symmans, W.F.; Ibrahim, N.; Cristofanilli, M.; Anderson, K.; Hess, K.R.; Stec, J.; Ayers, M.; Wagner, P. Breast cancer molecular subtypes respond differently to preoperative chemotherapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 2005, 11, 5678–5685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Arsuaga, J.; Borrman, T.; Cavalcante, R.; Gonzalez, G.; Park, C. Identification of copy number aberrations in breast cancer subtypes using persistence topology. Microarrays 2015, 4, 339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Matta, J.; Morales, L.; Ortiz, C.; Adams, D.; Vargas, W.; Casbas, P.; Dutil, J.; Echenique, M.; Suarez, E. Estrogen receptor expression is associated with DNA repair capacity in breast cancer. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0152422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Kroh, E.M.; Parkin, R.K.; Mitchell, P.S.; Tewari, M. Analysis of circulating microrna biomarkers in plasma and serum using quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (QRT-PCR). Methods 2010, 50, 298–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Athas, W.F.; Hedayati, M.A.; Matanoski, G.M.; Farmer, E.R.; Grossman, L. Development and field-test validation of an assay for DNA repair in circulating human lymphocytes. Cancer Res. 1991, 51, 5786–5793. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  55. Kirschner, M.B.; Kao, S.C.; Edelman, J.J.; Armstrong, N.J.; Vallely, M.P.; van Zandwijk, N.; Reid, G. Haemolysis during sample preparation alters microrna content of plasma. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e24145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Sample stratification of 153 breast cancer patients and controls based on their DNA repair capacity (DRC) levels. These women were divided into four groups according to their DRC level: high (>3.8%) and low (<3.8%). The four groups consisted of BC patients with high (n = 35) and low (n = 43) DRC and controls with high (n = 39) and low (n = 36) DRC. Asterisk over the bars represent the statistical significance of the KW test, *** p < 0.001.
Figure 1. Sample stratification of 153 breast cancer patients and controls based on their DNA repair capacity (DRC) levels. These women were divided into four groups according to their DRC level: high (>3.8%) and low (<3.8%). The four groups consisted of BC patients with high (n = 35) and low (n = 43) DRC and controls with high (n = 39) and low (n = 36) DRC. Asterisk over the bars represent the statistical significance of the KW test, *** p < 0.001.
Ijms 17 00865 g001
Figure 2. Let-7b expression measured in plasma samples of breast cancer patients and women without breast cancer (controls) with high and low DRC. (A) No significant differences were observed between the breast cancer patients (n = 43) and the control group (n = 37) with low DRC; (B) Statistically significant results were found between the breast cancer patients (n = 35) and controls (n = 39) with high DRC; (C) Comparison between breast cancer patients with high versus low DRC showed a significant difference in Let-7b expression; (D) No significant difference was observed when control groups with high versus low DRC were compared. Box plots represent the data distribution of 78 breast cancer patients and 76 controls in independent experiments. *** p < 0.001 using KW test.
Figure 2. Let-7b expression measured in plasma samples of breast cancer patients and women without breast cancer (controls) with high and low DRC. (A) No significant differences were observed between the breast cancer patients (n = 43) and the control group (n = 37) with low DRC; (B) Statistically significant results were found between the breast cancer patients (n = 35) and controls (n = 39) with high DRC; (C) Comparison between breast cancer patients with high versus low DRC showed a significant difference in Let-7b expression; (D) No significant difference was observed when control groups with high versus low DRC were compared. Box plots represent the data distribution of 78 breast cancer patients and 76 controls in independent experiments. *** p < 0.001 using KW test.
Ijms 17 00865 g002
Figure 3. Linear regression was performed to test correlations between DNA repair capacity (DRC) levels and Let-7b expression in breast cancer patients.
Figure 3. Linear regression was performed to test correlations between DNA repair capacity (DRC) levels and Let-7b expression in breast cancer patients.
Ijms 17 00865 g003
Table 1. Patient demographics of control and breast cancer patient groups.
Table 1. Patient demographics of control and breast cancer patient groups.
VariableNumber of Patients (%)p Value
BC Group (n = 78)Control Group (n = 75)
Low (<3.8)43 (28)36 (24.0)
High (≥3.8)35 (23.0)39 (25)0.4714
21–40 years8 (10.2)13 (17.3)
41–60 years34 (43.6)46 (61.3)0.0049
≥ 61 years36 (46.2)16 (21.3)
Body mass index
<25 kg/m224 (30.8)30 (40.0)
≥25 kg/m253 (67.9)42 (56.0)0.4045
Missing1 (1.3)3 (4.0)
Ever been pregnant
Yes69 (88.5)60 (80.0)
No9 (11.5)15 (20.0)0.2238
Age at first birth
≤19 years21 (30.4)9 (15.0)
20–29 years33 (47.8)47 (78.3)
≥30 years13 (18.8)4 (6.7)0.0029
Missing2 (2.9)0 (0.0)
Ever breastfeed
Yes47 (68.1)41 (68.3)
No22 (31.9)19 (31.7)<0.9789
Oral contraceptive use
Yes33 (42.3)37 (49.3)0.4779
No45 (57.7)38 (50.7)
Age started oral contraceptive
<20 years4 (12.1)9 (24.3)
≥21 years26 (78.8)27 (73.0)0.3811
Missing3 (9.1)1 (2.7)
Regular menstrual periods
Yes52 (66.7)39 (52.0)
No26 (33.3)35 (46.7)0.1118
Missing0 (0.0)1 (1.3)
Age at menarche
≤12 years40 (51.3)40 (53.3)
≥13 years37 (47.4)35 (46.7)0.9932
Missing1 (1.3)0 (0.0)
History of endometriosis
Yes5 (6.4)4 (5.3)
No73 (93.6)71 (94.7)0.7772
Yes19 (24.4)17 (22.7)
No59 (75.6)58 (77.3)0.9553
Age of hysterectomy
≤40 years6 (31.6)7 (41.2)
41–49 years10 (52.6)10 (58.8)
≥50 years3 (15.8)0 (0.0)0.2259
Yes12 (15.4)15 (20.0)
No66 (84.6)59 (78.7)
Missing0 (0.0)1 (1.3)0.5255
Age of oophorectomy
≤40 years0 (0.0)6 (40.0)
41–49 years4 (33.3)4 (26.7)
≥50 years6 (50.0)3 (20.0)0.0347
Missing2 (16.7)2 (13.3)
Yes60 (76.9)53 (70.7)
No18 (23.1)22 (29.3)0.4623
Hormone replacement therapy
Yes17 (21.8)31 (41.3)
No61 (78.2)44 (58.7)0.0143
Yes13 (16.7)7 (9.3)
No65 (83.3)68 (90.7)0.232
Alcohol consumption
Yes15 (19.2)14 (18.7)
No63 (80.8)61 (81.3)1
Family history of cancer (not BC)
Yes49 (62.8)38 (50.7)
No29 (37.2)37 (49.3)0.4623
BC history in any family member
Yes23 (29.5)14 (18.7)
No55 (70.5)61 (81.3)0.1339
To assess significant differences (p value) among groups, Pearson chi-squared test was performed. BC, breast cancer; DRC, DNA repair capacity.
Table 2. Clinicopathological characteristics of breast cancer patients.
Table 2. Clinicopathological characteristics of breast cancer patients.
VariableNumber of BC Patients (%)Let-7b 1 p-Value
Low DRC (<3.8) Group (n = 43)High DRC (≥3.8) Group (n = 33)
Estrogen receptor
Positive34 (79.1)20 (60.6)0.0007
Negative4 (9.3)7 (21.2)p ˃ 0.05
Missing5 (11.6)6 (18.2)
Progesterone receptor
Positive30 (69.8)18 (54.5)0.0007
Negative8 (18.6)9 (27.3)p ˃ 0.05
Missing5 (11.6)6 (18.2)
Positive7 (16.3)9 (27.3)p ˃ 0.05
Negative23 (53.5)16 (48.5)0.0258
Missing13 (30.2)8 (24.2)
I6 (14.0)2 (6.1)p ˃ 0.05
II19 (44.2)15 (45.5)p ˃ 0.05
III7 (16.3)8 (24.2)p ˃ 0.05
Missing11 (25.6)8 (24.2)
Luminal A23 (53.5)14 (42.4)0.0063
Luminal B7 (16.3)9 (27.3)p ˃ 0.05
Triple negative1 (2.3)2 (6.1)p ˃ 0.05
Missing12 (27.9)8 (24.2)
Ductal39 (90.7)28 (84.8)0.0140
Ductal + lobular0 (0.0)1 (3.0)p ˃ 0.05
Lobular2 (4.7)2 (6.1)p ˃ 0.05
Missing2 (4.7)2 (6.1)
In situ4 (9.3)6 (18.2)0.0019
Invasive38 (88.4)27 (81.8)p ˃ 0.05
Missing1 (2.3)0 (0.0)
Clinicopathological characteristics of patients with breast cancer were stratified using DRC as a dichotomous variable, followed by a second stratification using the raw data of Let-7b expression. To assess to significant differences among groups, the Kruskal-Wallis test was performed; 1 p-value was based on a two-tailed test.
Back to TopTop