Next Article in Journal
Proteases of Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus
Next Article in Special Issue
Genomic Insight into the Role of lncRNAs in Cancer Susceptibility
Previous Article in Journal
Insulin Treatment May Alter Fatty Acid Carriers in Placentas from Gestational Diabetes Subjects
Previous Article in Special Issue
EZH2 in Cancer Progression and Potential Application in Cancer Therapy: A Friend or Foe?
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 18
Issue 6
10.3390/ijms18061210
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Association of Smoking, Alcohol Use, and Betel Quid Chewing with Epigenetic Aberrations in Cancers

by
Tong-Hong Wang
1,2,3,4,†,
Shih-Min Hsia
5,6,†,
Yin-Hwa Shih
7,* and
Tzong-Ming Shieh
8,*
1
Tissue Bank, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan 33305, Taiwan
2
Research Center for Industry of Human Ecology, Chang Gung University of Science and Technology, Taoyuan 33303, Taiwan
3
Graduate Institute of Health Industry Technology, Chang Gung University of Science and Technology, Taoyuan 33303, Taiwan
4
Liver Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan 33305, Taiwan
5
School of Nutrition and Health Sciences, College of Nutrition, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan
6
Nutrition Research Center, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei 11031, Taiwan
7
Department of Oral Hygiene, College of Dental Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
8
Department of Dental Hygiene, College of Health Care, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18(6), 1210; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms18061210
Submission received: 28 April 2017 / Revised: 26 May 2017 / Accepted: 2 June 2017 / Published: 6 June 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cancer Epigenetics)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Numerous environmental factors such as diet, alcohol use, stress, and environmental chemicals are known to elicit epigenetic changes, leading to increased rates of cancers and other diseases. The incidence of head and neck cancer, one of the most common cancers in Taiwanese males, is increasing: oral cancer and nasopharyngeal carcinoma are ranked fourth and tenth respectively, among the top ten cancers in this group, and a major cause of cancer-related deaths in Taiwanese males. Previous studies have identified smoking, alcohol use, and betel quid chewing as the three major causes of head and neck cancers; these three social habits are commonly observed in Taiwanese males, resulting in an increasing morbidity rate of head and neck cancers in this population. In this literature review, we discuss the association between specific components of betel quid, alcohol, and tobacco, and the occurrence of head and neck cancers, lung cancer, gastrointestinal cancers, and urethral cancer. We focus on regulatory mechanisms at the epigenetic level and their oncogenic effects. The review further discusses the application of FDA-approved epigenetic drugs as therapeutic strategies against cancer.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Inappropriate diet, alcoholism, or exposure to toxic chemicals are all known to increase the risk of disease [1,2]. It has been shown that this increased risk may be attributed to, among other factors, epigenetic changes that result in abnormal cell physiology [3,4,5,6]. Epigenetic modification is defined as chromosomal modifications that result in changes to gene expression without alteration of the DNA sequence. Classical epigenetic regulation involves DNA methylation and histone modification, in which modification of DNA or histones, respectively, alters chromatin structure, thereby affecting gene expression. Epigenetic modifications in various species are known to regulate gene expression in a spatiotemporal manner in the physiological context as well as during development. Epigenetic regulation plays a critical role during embryonic development as well as in disease; dysfunctional epigenetic regulation, which results in aberrant gene expression, is closely linked with various diseases such as cancer [7,8,9]. In addition to endogenous intracellular factors, various environmental factors such as diet, environmental chemicals, or exposure to stress are known to affect epigenetic processes, thereby increasing the risk of disease [10]. In addition, numerous reports have shown that the exposure of pregnant women to harmful environmental factors results in epigenetic abnormalities in the embryo such as growth retardation [11,12,13].
Betel quid chewing, smoking, and alcohol use are the three major risk factors for oral cancer and throat cancer [14,15]. In Taiwan, ~2 million people chew betel quid recreationally; among these, 90% are reported to smoke tobacco and drink alcohol simultaneously [14,16]. Several recent reports have shown that betel quid chewing combined with smoking or drinking significantly increases the risk of oral and throat cancers. These effects are attributed to the presence of carcinogens, such as arecoline and arecaidine, in betel quid and alcohol. Such carcinogens exert oncogenic effects via long-term stimulation of, and the induction of epigenetic changes in, oral mucosal cells, resulting in the aberrant expression of oncogenes and tumor suppressors such as p53, BRCA2, and XRCC4 [17,18,19,20,21]. This literature review focuses on three carcinogenic factors (betel quid chewing, smoking, and alcohol) and their role in eliciting epigenetic changes associated with head and neck cancers, gastrointestinal cancers, and other malignant tumor types.

2. Epigenetic Modification of DNA

2.1. DNA Methylation

Methylation of DNA is defined as the addition of a methyl group from the methyl donor S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) to a cytosine base within the DNA. This reaction is catalyzed by families of DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs), including DNMT1, DNMT2, and DNMT3 [22]. DNA methylation most commonly occurs on CpG dinucleotides; however, several instances of non-CpG methylation have been found to occur in mammals [23,24]. Most CpG dinucleotide methylation occurs outside of CpG-rich clusters, which also known as CpG islands; these are defined as 500–3000-bp DNA segments that exhibit at least 50% CG content and a ratio of observed CpGs to expected CpGs of greater than 0.6 [25,26,27]. There are approximately 50,000 CGIs in the human genome, several of which have been found in or near approximately 40% of the promoters of mammalian genes [28,29,30]. DNA methylation inhibits the binding of transcription factors directly by “masking the DNA” or indirectly by recruiting methyl-CpG binding proteins (MBPs), which possess repressive chromatin-remodeling activities [31,32].

2.2. Epigenetic Modification of Histones

2.2.1. Histone Modification

Chromatin is composed of nucleosomes, which comprise 146 bp of DNA wrapped around an octamer containing two copies of four histone proteins (H2A, H2B, H3, and H4). Histones are basic proteins that regulate the compaction of chromatin and modulate gene expression by altering chromatin structure. Most histone modifications occur at their unstructured alkaline N-terminal tails, via acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation, ubiquitination, and SUMOylation [33,34,35]. These post-transcriptional modifications collectively regulate chromatin structure, which affects biological processes such as gene expression, DNA repair, and chromosome condensation.

2.2.2. Acetylation

Histone acetylation, which most commonly occurs at basic amino acids lysine and arginine, is the most widely studied epigenetic protein modification [36]. Histone acetylation is mediated by histone acetyltransferases (HATs) and histone deacetylases (HDACs). Activation of gene expression by HATs involves the acetylation of specific lysine residues in histone tails, resulting in the removal of the positive charge on histones. This reduces the affinity of histones for DNA, thereby relaxing DNA structure and enhancing transcription. This effect may be reversed by HDAC activity, resulting in transcription suppression.

2.2.3. Methylation

Histone methylation occurs on both lysine and arginine residues. The most extensively studied histone methylation sites include histone H3 lysine 4 (H3K4), H3K9, H3K27, H3K36, H3K79, and H4K20. Sites of arginine methylation include H3R2, H3R8, H3R17, H3R26, and H4R3 [37]. However, methylation at numerous other basic residues present on histone proteins H1, H2A, H2B, H3, and H4 has also been recently shown to occur [38]. Histone methylation is controlled by histone methyltransferases (HMTs) specific to lysine and arginine residues, as well as by histone demethylases (HDMs) such as peptidylarginine deiminase (PADI), Jumonji-C domain-containing histone demethylases (JMJCs), and lysine-specific demethylases (LSDs) [32]. Histone methylation causes transcription repression or activation, depending on the target sites. The precise site at which methylation occurs is crucial for determining its effect on gene transcription. For instance, H3K9 methylation within the coding region of a gene has been found to correlate with transcription activation, whereas the same modification is associated with inactive transcription when found in the promoter region [39].

2.2.4. Phosphorylation

Histone phosphorylation, which occurs on serine, threonine, and tyrosine residues, is most commonly associated with transcriptional activation as the negative charge of the phosphate group creates a repulsive force between the histone and the negatively charged DNA [32]. Histone phosphorylation is regulated by protein kinases (PKs) and protein phosphatases (PPs).

2.2.5. Ubiquitination

In addition to acetylation, methylation, and phosphorylation, histones may be modified through ubiquitination. Histone ubiquitination refers to the covalent addition of the 76-amino-acid protein ubiquitin to histones H2A and H2B. Similar to acetylation and phosphorylation, histone ubiquitination is a reversible modification. Several studies have demonstrated that histone ubiquitination and methylation often cross-talk and act in combination as well as sequentially to regulate transcription. H2B ubiquitination is considered a prerequisite for H3 methylation, but H2A inhibits H3 methylation of the gene on which they are located [40,41].

2.2.6. SUMOylation

Similar to ubiquitination, histone SUMOylation refers to enzymatic conjugation of the 100-amino-acid small ubiquitin-related modifier (SUMO) groups at specific lysine residues of histones [42]. Histone SUMOylation mediates transcriptional repression via interaction with other repressor factors and prevention of histone acetylation [43].

3. Smoking Modulates the Epigenome during Carcinogenesis

Cigarette smoke condensate (CSC) induces cancer-associated epigenomic alterations in cultured respiratory epithelial cells [44]. Cigarette smoke induced DNA damage occurs in nuclear and mitochondrial DNA during the early phase of lung cancer carcinogenesis [45]. Both tobacco-induced DNA changes and tobacco-induced epigenetic changes affect molecular regulatory mechanisms, including (1) receptors, (2) cell cycle regulators, (3) signaling pathways, (4) apoptosis mediators, (5) angiogenic factors, and (6) invasive and metastasis mediators, to induce carcinogenesis [46]. Here, we will focus on how smoking modulates the epigenome during carcinogenesis.

3.1. Smoking Induces DNA Methylation-Associated Enzymes Activity

Smoking, which is the largest preventable cause of morbidity and mortality in the world, causes various cancers such as those of the mouth and throat, voice box, esophagus, lung, stomach, kidney, pancreas, liver, bladder, cervix, colon, and rectum, as well as leukemia. In 2004, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) reported that 4000 compounds are present in mainstream tobacco smoke; among these, 200 are poisonous, and 60 carcinogens. The composition of mainstream smoke, sidestream smoke, and secondhand smoke, in terms of the content of these compounds, is similar [47]. The carcinogens present in tobacco smoke include polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, N-nitrosamines, aromatic amines, aldehydes, miscellaneous organics, and inorganic compounds. Inhalation and metabolic activation of these carcinogens during exposure to tobacco smoke often causes changes in DNA sequences, such as formation of DNA adducts [48], induction of double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) breaks [49], and development of point mutations [50,51]. Furthermore, tobacco smoke also commonly induces changes in the activity of chromatin-modifying enzymes, such as DNMTs [28,52], HATs [53], HMTs [44], histone kinases, and ubiquitinases [54], that result in epigenetic changes and abnormal cell physiology.

3.2. DNA Methylation in Smoking-Related Cancers

Both current tobacco use and prenatal smoke exposure strongly induce DNA methylation [28]. In the context of prenatal exposure, cigarette smoke induces hypoxia in the embryo, which in turn modulates methyl group availability [28]. Current smokers with gene-specific DNA hyper- or hypo-methylation may be highly susceptible to disease development based on their genomic DNA methylation profiles. In lung cancer, the retinoic acid receptor beta (RAR-β) has been found to be absent in varying degrees in all malignant tumor types. Tobacco smoke may play a potential role in RAR-β gene methylation during early pathogenesis of lung cancer [55]. Several CpG loci in WWTR1, NHP2L1, PLA2G6, NFIX, and SMUG1, with significant association with smoking, localize to a CpG island within the transcription start site (TSS), exon, or 5′ untranslated region (UTR) [56]. Methylation at cg05575921, a CpG residue in the aryl hydrocarbon receptor repressor (AHRR), is the most sensitive indicator of smoking status at all levels of smoking. Reversion of AHRR demethylation is a quantitative biomarker of smoking cessation, and AHRR methylation status is a quantifiable biomarker for lung cancer progress in smoking cessation [57]. In bladder cancer, there is a relationship between epigenetic silencing of the tumor-suppressor genes p16 (INK4A), RASSF1A, PRSS3, and the four SFRP genes and exposure to both tobacco and arsenic. Promoter methylation-mediated silencing of each of these genes occurs in approximately 30–50% of bladder cancers. Epigenetic silencing of RASSF1A, PRSS3, or any of the SFRP genes is significantly associated with advanced tumor stage (P < 0.001, P < 0.04, and P < 0.005, respectively) [58]. Promoter methylation of p16 (INK4A), RASSF1A, and PRSS3 occurs in approximately 30% of cases of bladder cancer; promoter methylation of both RASSF1A and PRSS3 is associated with advanced tumor stage. Arsenic exposure, measured by determination of toenail arsenic concentration, was associated with promoter methylation of RASSF1A and PRSS3, but not that of p16INK4A [59]. In prostate cancer, cigarette smoking-induced methylation of genes such as aldehyde oxidase 1 (AOX1), claudin 5 (CLDN5), early B-cell factor 1 (EBF1), homeobox A7 (HOXA7), lectin galactoside-binding soluble 3 (LGALS3), microtubule-associated protein τ (MAPT), protocadherin γ A (PCDHGA)/protocadherin γ B (PCDHGB), paraoxonase 3 (PON3), synaptonemal complex protein 2 like (SYCP2L), and zinc finger and SCAN domain containing 12 (ZSCAN12) was associated with a higher risk of recurrence and mortality [60].

3.3. Smoking Induces DNA Methylation

Cigarette smoke extract (CSE) treatment (0.1% CSE) induces the transformation of simian virus 40 (SV40) immortalized normal human urinary tract epithelial cells (SV40-HUC-1), and increases the methylation levels of DCC, HIC1, and MCAM genes [61]. Tobacco exposure, in combination with increasing age and male gender, drives and enhances the selection of promoter-hypermethylated cells in patients with bladder cancer [62]. CSE has been shown to cause hypermethylation and inactivation of the WW domain-containing oxidoreductase (WWOX) gene in T-24 human bladder cancer cells [63]. However, it has been shown that DNA methylation may be induced by a single compound, such as tobacco-specific nitrosamine 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK) and inorganic arsenic in CSE, acting alone. The death-associated protein (DAP)-kinase gene was inactivated in both a murine model of cigarette smoke-induced lung cancer and human non-small cell lung cancer. The DAP-kinase gene methylation rates of NNK-induced hyperplasias and adenocarcinomas were 46% and 52%, respectively [64]. High-Temperature Requirement Factor A3 (HtrA3) expression is reduced in lung cancer cell lines and lung tumors. NNK treatment downregulated HtrA3 expression by increasing the methylation level of the first exon of HtrA3 in human bronchial epithelial cells BEAS-2B and lung tumors [65]. Lysyl oxidase (LOX) propeptide is considered to act as a tumor suppressor. NNK has been shown to enhance methylation of CpG at the LOX promoter, but decrease histone H3 acetylation at the core promoter region of LOX gene in rat fetal lung fibroblasts (RFL6) [66]. Arsenic exposure was associated with promoter methylation of RASSF1A (P < 0.02) and PRSS3 (P < 0.1), but not of p16 (INK4A) or SFRP, in human bladder tumor samples adjusted for stage and other risk factors. Cigarette smoking was associated with a greater than two-fold increased risk of promoter methylation of p16 (INK4A), with greater risk seen in patients recent exposure. Furthermore, smoking has been shown to be significantly associated with SFRP methylation (P < 0.01) [58]. Maternal cigarette smoking during pregnancy has been associated with dysregulated expression of microRNA, which affects fetal growth and development [67]. MicroRNAs and long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are epigenetic regulators of stem cell pluripotency, differentiation, and malignancy. MicroRNA-487b (miR-487b) is a tumor suppressor microRNA that is silenced by epigenetic mechanisms during tobacco-induced pulmonary carcinogenesis [68]. Cigarette smoke mediates the epigenetic repression of miR-217 and miR-218 during esophageal adenocarcinogenesis and transformation of human bronchial epithelial (HBE) cells, respectively [69,70]. CSE has also been shown to induce Hox transcript antisense intergenic RNA (HOTAIR) during the transformation of HBE cells [71]. Both the epigenetic silencing of miR-218 and HOTAIR-activated epigenetic silencing of p21 are mediated via EZH2-mediated histone H3 lysine 27 tri-methylation (H3K27) trimethylation, which is in turn induced by CSE treatment.

3.4. Smoking Induces Histone Modification

Cigarette smoke induces posttranslational histone modifications in specific lysine and arginine residues of histones H3 and H4 in lung cells [72]. In the C57BL/6J mouse model and in human lungs, cigarette smoke exposure elicits a significant increase in the activity of chromatin modification enzymes to inhibit Dnmt1, Dnmt3a, Dnmt3b, Hdac2, Hdac4, Hat1, Prmt1, and Aurkb expression. These genes were identified by acetylation of histone H3, at lysine 56 residue (H3K56), and of H4 at lysine 12 (H4K12) [54]. Acrolein (Acr) is a potential major carcinogen implicated in smoking-related lung cancer. Acr preferentially binds free histones rather than nucleosomal histones, and inhibits the acetylation of N-terminal tails of histones H3 and H4 to regulate nuclear import and chromatin assembly [73]. Cigarette sidestream smoke (CSS) treatment markedly induced histone H3 phosphorylation at serine 10 and 28 residues (H3S10 and H3S28) in human pulmonary epithelial cell and normal human lung fibroblasts. The phosphorylation of H3S10 was mediated by c-jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt pathways. H3S10 phosphorylation was found to occur at high levels in the promoter sites of the proto-oncogenes c-fos and c-jun [74].

4. Alcohol Use Known to Induce DNA Methylation during Carcinogenesis

Alcohol consumption is associated with a large number of health disorders, chronic diseases, and deaths worldwide [75]. According to the IARC Monographs, “alcohol consumption is carcinogenic to humans (Group 1); ethanol in alcoholic beverages is carcinogenic to humans (Group 1); acetaldehyde associated with the consumption of alcoholic beverages is carcinogenic to humans (Group 1)” [75]. Alcohol consumption causes cancers of the oral cavity, pharynx, larynx, esophagus, breast, colorectum, liver, pancreas and colorectum; alcohol consumption is associated with an approximately 10% increased risk of breast cancer with each drink per day [76]. Recent studies show that alcohol elicits epigenetic changes, such as DNA methylation, histone acetylation, and histone methylation, that are implicated in carcinogenesis [77]. Alcohol has additionally been shown to interfere with the epigenetic regulation of gene expression: Mahnke et al. have shown that chronic low-level drinking results in DNA hypomethylation, while high levels of drinking result in hypermethylation [76]. Acute alcohol exposure associated with the opening of chromatin as a result of increased histone acetylation and HDAC inhibition [78]. Bohacek et al. reported that moderate and heavy drinkers show subtle reductions in DNA methylation of the H19 imprinted gene in their sperm compared with non-drinkers [79]. Changes in acetylation commonly occur at H3K9 and are regulated in specific addiction-related brain circuitry [80]. The effect of acute and chronic alcohol exposure on DNA methylation of specific promoter sequences in animal models has been investigated [81]. Previous studies have shown that DNA hypermethylation of specific genes is related to oral cancers [82]. Furthermore, Pattani et al. reported that the severity of oral cancer histopathology increases with the degree of tumor suppressor gene promoter hypermethylation [83]. Therefore, alcohol plays an important role in DNA methylation events and histone modifications that promote carcinogenesis. Future studies should focus on identifying drugs that target the epigenome, including those that modulate DNA methylation and histone modification.

5. Betel Quid Chewing Modulates the Epigenome during Carcinogenesis

Betel quid preparation methods vary by country. In India, betel quid comprises a mixture of areca nut, lime, tobacco, or piper betel leaf [84]. In Taiwan and Papua New Guinea, piper betel inflorescence is used instead of tobacco [85,86]. An increasing number of studies show that betel quid chewing affects the epigenetic modulation of gene expression, resulting in carcinogenesis. However, the complexity of betal quid components makes the assessment of its carcinogenic potency challenging.
The absence of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) expression [87], CDKN2A promoter hypermethylation [88], and p14, p15, p16 promoter hypermethylation [89] has been detected in tumors from betel-quid chewing patients. The most common betel-quid chewing-related cancers are oral cancer and esophageal cancer. Histone methylation- and acetylation-related enzymes were found to be expressed at high levels in tumor tissue from patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma [90]. The histone modification-related proteins, ARK2, G9a, EZH2, and SUV39H1 are associated with poor prognosis of the male oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) population in Taiwan [91]. Over 80% of cases of OSCC and over 50% of epithelial dysplasia have been reported to show positive HDAC2 nuclear staining, which is related to larger tumor size, lymph node metastasis, and shorter overall survival [92]. Betel quid chewing releases toxic chemicals into blood circulation; animal studies have shown that 3-(Methylnitrosamino) propionitrile (MNPN), which is found in the saliva of betel quid chewers, acts a potent carcinogen by promoting DNA methylation in the nasal mucosa, liver, and esophagus [93]. The predominant alkaloid and most potent carcinogen present in betel quid is arecoline [94,95,96]; this compound has been shown to alter the expression of several genes involved in histone methylation (MII, Setdb1, and Suv39h2), acetylation (Atf2), and demethylation (JMJD6). Further, arecoline reduces the levels of H3K9 methylation, which is involved in the stability of chromatin structure in the K-562 bone marrow cell line [97]. In animal models, treatment with a combination of 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide (4-NQO) and arecoline has been shown to induce hypermethylation of PARβ, whose expression is lost during carcinogenesis [98].

6. Therapeutic Drugs Targeting the Epigenome

An increasing number of studies have described the association between specific lifestyle choices (smoking, betel quid chewing, and alcohol consumption) and epigenetic modulation of carcinogenesis. Numerous drugs targeting the epigenome, including those that modulate DNA methylation and histone modification, have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and used for cancer therapy. According to The Human Epigenetic Drug Database (HEDD) [99], epigenetic drugs that modulate DNA methylation and histone modification are categorized into seven main types: DNA methyltransferase inhibitors (DNMTis), histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACis), histone demethylase inhibitors (HDMis), histone methyltransferase inhibitor (HMTis), histone acetyltransferases inhibitors (HATis), inhibitor of protein binding to acetylated histone (PAHis), and inhibitor of protein binding to methylated histone (PMHis). FDA-approved human epigenetic drugs are mainly classified into two types, DNMTis and HDACis; these are listed in Table 1. The FDA-approved DNMTis and HDACis were nowadays used in the specific disease, and the anti-cancer potency is testing and evaluating in preclinical or phase 1 to 2 studies. The FDA-approved DNMTis 5-Aza-2′-deoxycytidine and 5-Azacytidine are used to treat myelodysplastic syndromes. Their potential for the treatment of cancers, including leukemia [100,101], breast cancer [102,103], lung cancer [104,105], and prostate cancer [106,107], is currently being tested in phase 1 clinical trials. To date, 5-Azacytidine has been studied in phase 2 clinical trials for non-small cell lung cancer. Hydralazine is used for the treatment of hypertension, and its anti-cancer potential for cervical [108] and breast cancer [109] is under evaluation in preclinical studies. The FDA-approved HDACis suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid and romidepsin are used to treat cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, and their efficacy against other types of cancers, such as urothelial carcinoma [110] and colorectal carcinoma [111], is in phase 1 or phase 2 testing. Panobinostat, which is used for the treatment of multiple myeloma, is currently under testing in preclinical studies for its efficacy against chronic myelogenous leukemia [112], epithelioid sarcoma [113], endometrial cancer [114], and prostate cancer [115]. Belinostat, which is used to treat peripheral T-cell lymphoma, is under phase 1 or phase 2 testing for the treatment of lung cancer [116] and multiple myeloma [117].
In addition to the FDA-approved epigenetic drugs discussed, numerous additional epigenetic drugs have been developed; these include natural compound derivatives or known drugs with novel epigenetic applications. Clorgiline (HDMi) is a monoamine oxidase inhibitor used for the treatment of depression. Its efficacy as an anti-cancer agent, for the treatment of bladder cancer and prostate cancer [118,119], is currently under evaluation in preclinical studies. Further, 3-deazaneplanocin A (HMTi), an anti-viral drug used for the treatment of Ebola viral infection, is also an EZH2 inhibitor; the combination treatment with retinoic acid and belinostat is an effective inducer of acute promyelocytic leukemia cell differentiation [120]. Hydrazinocurcumin (CTK7A), a HATi derived from curcumin, has been shown to reduce the growth of xenografted oral tumors in mice [121], reverse androgen-regulated gene expression in prostate cancer cells, inhibit the growth of xenografted castration–resistant prostate tumors [122], and attenuate the invasiveness of hypoxia-induced gastric cancer cells [123]. Resveratrol is a natural phenol and phytoalexin produced by fruit skin when the plant is under attack by pathogens. This compound acts as a pan-HDACi inhibitor, suppressing growth and HDAC activity in HepG2 hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines [124]. Trichostatin A is not only an antifungal antibiotic but also a HDACi, whose efficacy against lung cancer [125], cervical cancer [126], prostate cancer [127], and breast cancer [128] is currently being tested in preclinical studies.
Most developed epigenetic drugs are in pre-clinical, phase 1, or phase 2 testing for lung cancer, breast cancer, prostate cancer, and leukemia. However, investigations of applications for betel quid chewing-induced cancers, such as head and neck cancer and esophageal cancer, are lacking. There is a need for investigations into the use of epigenetic drug treatments on head and neck and esophageal cancer.

7. Conclusions

Numerous environmental factors such as diet, alcohol use, stress, and environmental chemicals are currently known to affect epigenetic regulation of gene expression, leading to increased rates of cancers and other diseases. The present review discusses the effects of specific lifestyle factors, namely smoking, betel quid chewing, and alcohol consumption, on the epigenome (Table 2). The prevention or reversal of these epigenetic changes is crucial; accordingly, the development of drugs targeting the epigenome represents a promising strategy in cancer therapy. The present review summarizes current understanding of the oncogenic effects of epigenetic aberrations induced by smoking, alcohol use, and betel chewing and drug discovery, thereby informing drug discovery aimed at the mitigation of these effects.

Acknowledgments

China Medical University: CMU105-S-29, National Security Council, R.O.C: NSC 102-2314-B-039-015-MY3, MOST 103-2313-B-038-003-MY3, Taipei Medical University: 104-6202-015-111. Chang Gung Medical Research Program, Taiwan: CRRPG3F0071.

Author Contributions

Tong-Hong Wang, Shih-Min Hsia, Yin-Hwa Shih and Tzong-Ming Shieh drafted the manuscript and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hardy, T.M.; Tollefsbol, T.O. Epigenetic diet: Impact on the epigenome and cancer. Epigenomics 2011, 3, 503–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Bishop, K.S.; Ferguson, L.R. The interaction between epigenetics, nutrition and the development of cancer. Nutrients 2015, 7, 922–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Legaki, E.; Gazouli, M. Influence of environmental factors in the development of inflammatory bowel diseases. World J. Gastrointest. Pharmacol. Ther. 2016, 7, 112–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Leung, A.; Trac, C.; Du, J.; Natarajan, R.; Schones, D.E. Persistent chromatin modifications induced by high fat diet. J. Biol. Chem. 2016, 291, 10446–10455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Lee, H.S. Impact of maternal diet on the epigenome during in utero life and the developmental programming of diseases in childhood and adulthood. Nutrients 2015, 7, 9492–9507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Krautkramer, K.A.; Kreznar, J.H.; Romano, K.A.; Vivas, E.I.; Barrett-Wilt, G.A.; Rabaglia, M.E.; Keller, M.P.; Attie, A.D.; Rey, F.E.; Denu, J.M. Diet-microbiota interactions mediate global epigenetic programming in multiple host tissues. Mol. Cell 2016, 64, 982–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Maury, E.; Hashizume, R. Epigenetic modification in chromatin machinery and its deregulation in pediatric brain tumors: Insight into epigenetic therapies. Epigenetics 2017, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Maroni, P.; Matteucci, E.; Bendinelli, P.; Desiderio, M.A. Functions and epigenetic regulation of WWOX in bone metastasis from breast carcinoma: Comparison with primary tumors. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Koschmann, C.; Nunez, F.J.; Mendez, F.; Brosnan-Cashman, J.A.; Meeker, A.K.; Lowenstein, P.R.; Castro, M.G. Mutated chromatin regulatory factors as tumor drivers in cancer. Cancer Res. 2017, 77, 227–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. O’Keefe, S.J. Diet, microorganisms and their metabolites, and colon cancer. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2016, 13, 691–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Laufer, B.I.; Kapalanga, J.; Castellani, C.A.; Diehl, E.J.; Yan, L.; Singh, S.M. Associative DNA methylation changes in children with prenatal alcohol exposure. Epigenomics 2015, 7, 1259–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Finegersh, A.; Homanics, G.E. Paternal alcohol exposure reduces alcohol drinking and increases behavioral sensitivity to alcohol selectively in male offspring. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e99078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Grandjean, P.; Barouki, R.; Bellinger, D.C.; Casteleyn, L.; Chadwick, L.H.; Cordier, S.; Etzel, R.A.; Gray, K.A.; Ha, E.H.; Junien, C.; et al. Life-long implications of developmental exposure to environmental stressors: New perspectives. Endocrinology 2015, 156, 3408–3415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Shiu, M.N.; Chen, T.H.; Chang, S.H.; Hahn, L.J. Risk factors for leukoplakia and malignant transformation to oral carcinoma: A leukoplakia cohort in Taiwan. Br. J. Cancer 2000, 82, 1871–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Moutasim, K.A.; Jenei, V.; Sapienza, K.; Marsh, D.; Weinreb, P.H.; Violette, S.M.; Lewis, M.P.; Marshall, J.F.; Fortune, F.; Tilakaratne, W.M.; et al. Betel-derived alkaloid up-regulates keratinocyte αvβ6 integrin expression and promotes oral submucous fibrosis. J. Pathol. 2011, 223, 366–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Lu, C.T.; Lan, S.J.; Hsieh, C.C.; Yang, M.J.; Ko, Y.C.; Tsai, C.C.; Yen, Y.Y. Prevalence and characteristics of areca nut chewers among junior high school students in Changhua county, Taiwan. Community Dent. Oral Epidemiol. 1993, 21, 370–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Wong, Y.K.; Liu, T.Y.; Chang, K.W.; Lin, S.C.; Chao, T.W.; Li, P.L.; Chang, C.S. P53 alterations in betel quid- and tobacco-associated oral squamous cell carcinomas from Taiwan. J. Oral Pathol. Med. 1998, 27, 243–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Xu, J.; Gimenez-Conti, I.B.; Cunningham, J.E.; Collet, A.M.; Luna, M.A.; Lanfranchi, H.E.; Spitz, M.R.; Conti, C.J. Alterations of p53, cyclin D1, rb, and H-ras in human oral carcinomas related to tobacco use. Cancer 1998, 83, 204–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chiu, C.F.; Tsai, M.H.; Tseng, H.C.; Wang, C.L.; Wang, C.H.; Wu, C.N.; Lin, C.C.; Bau, D.T. A novel single nucleotide polymorphism in XRCC4 gene is associated with oral cancer susceptibility in taiwanese patients. Oral Oncol. 2008, 44, 898–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Tseng, H.C.; Tsai, M.H.; Chiu, C.F.; Wang, C.H.; Chang, N.W.; Huang, C.Y.; Tsai, C.W.; Liang, S.Y.; Wang, C.L.; Bau, D.T. Association of XRCC4 codon 247 polymorphism with oral cancer susceptibility in Taiwan. Anticancer Res. 2008, 28, 1687–1691. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  21. Yang, C.H.; Lin, Y.D.; Yen, C.Y.; Chuang, L.Y.; Chang, H.W. A systematic gene-gene and gene-environment interaction analysis of DNA repair genes XRCC1, XRCC2, XRCC3, XRCC4, and oral cancer risk. Omics 2015, 19, 238–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Laird, P.W. The power and the promise of DNA methylation markers. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2003, 3, 253–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ramsahoye, B.H.; Biniszkiewicz, D.; Lyko, F.; Clark, V.; Bird, A.P.; Jaenisch, R. Non-CpG methylation is prevalent in embryonic stem cells and may be mediated by DNA methyltransferase 3a. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 5237–5242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Venhoranta, H.; Li, S.; Salamon, S.; Flisikowska, T.; Andersson, M.; Switonski, M.; Kind, A.; Schnieke, A.; Flisikowski, K. Non-CpG hypermethylation in placenta of mutation-induced intrauterine growth restricted bovine foetuses. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2014, 444, 391–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Han, L.; Su, B.; Li, W.H.; Zhao, Z. Cpg island density and its correlations with genomic features in mammalian genomes. Genome. Biol. 2008, 9, R79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Rakyan, V.K.; Down, T.A.; Balding, D.J.; Beck, S. Epigenome-wide association studies for common human diseases. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2011, 12, 529–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Xu, X.; Su, S.; Barnes, V.A.; de Miguel, C.; Pollock, J.; Ownby, D.; Shi, H.; Zhu, H.; Snieder, H.; Wang, X. A genome-wide methylation study on obesity: Differential variability and differential methylation. Epigenetics 2013, 8, 522–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Lee, K.W.; Pausova, Z. Cigarette smoking and DNA methylation. Front. Genet. 2013, 4, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Fatemi, M.; Pao, M.M.; Jeong, S.; Gal-Yam, E.N.; Egger, G.; Weisenberger, D.J.; Jones, P.A. Footprinting of mammalian promoters: Use of a CpG DNA methyltransferase revealing nucleosome positions at a single molecule level. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33, e176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Sabounchi, S.; Bollyky, J.; Nadeau, K. Review of environmental impact on the epigenetic regulation of atopic diseases. Curr. Allergy Asthma Rep. 2015, 15, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Bird, A. DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory. Genes Dev. 2002, 16, 6–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Graff, J.; Kim, D.; Dobbin, M.M.; Tsai, L.H. Epigenetic regulation of gene expression in physiological and pathological brain processes. Physiol. Rev. 2011, 91, 603–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Lawrence, M.; Daujat, S.; Schneider, R. Lateral thinking: How histone modifications regulate gene expression. Trends Genet. 2016, 32, 42–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zou, C.; Mallampalli, R.K. Regulation of histone modifying enzymes by the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1843, 694–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Tessarz, P.; Kouzarides, T. Histone core modifications regulating nucleosome structure and dynamics. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2014, 15, 703–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Verdin, E.; Ott, M. 50 years of protein acetylation: From gene regulation to epigenetics, metabolism and beyond. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2015, 16, 258–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Greer, E.L.; Shi, Y. Histone methylation: A dynamic mark in health, disease and inheritance. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2012, 13, 343–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Tan, M.; Luo, H.; Lee, S.; Jin, F.; Yang, J.S.; Montellier, E.; Buchou, T.; Cheng, Z.; Rousseaux, S.; Rajagopal, N.; et al. Identification of 67 histone marks and histone lysine crotonylation as a new type of histone modification. Cell 2011, 146, 1016–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Li, B.; Carey, M.; Workman, J.L. The role of chromatin during transcription. Cell 2007, 128, 707–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Shilatifard, A. Chromatin modifications by methylation and ubiquitination: Implications in the regulation of gene expression. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2006, 75, 243–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Weake, V.M.; Workman, J.L. Histone ubiquitination: Triggering gene activity. Mol. Cell 2008, 29, 653–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Gill, G. Sumo and ubiquitin in the nucleus: Different functions, similar mechanisms? Genes Dev. 2004, 18, 2046–2059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Liu, H.W.; Zhang, J.; Heine, G.F.; Arora, M.; Gulcin Ozer, H.; Onti-Srinivasan, R.; Huang, K.; Parvin, J.D. Chromatin modification by sumo-1 stimulates the promoters of translation machinery genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, 10172–10186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Liu, F.; Killian, J.K.; Yang, M.; Walker, R.L.; Hong, J.A.; Zhang, M.; Davis, S.; Zhang, Y.; Hussain, M.; Xi, S.; et al. Epigenomic alterations and gene expression profiles in respiratory epithelia exposed to cigarette smoke condensate. Oncogene 2010, 29, 3650–3664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Izzotti, A.; Pulliero, A. Molecular damage and lung tumors in cigarette smoke-exposed mice. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2015, 1340, 75–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Chen, R.J.; Chang, L.W.; Lin, P.; Wang, Y.J. Epigenetic effects and molecular mechanisms of tumorigenesis induced by cigarette smoke: An overview. J. Oncol. 2011, 2011, 654931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Moritsugu, K.P. The 2006 report of the surgeon general: The health consequences of involuntary exposure to tobacco smoke. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2007, 32, 542–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Peterson, L.A. Context matters: Contribution of specific DNA adducts to the genotoxic properties of the tobacco-specific nitrosamine NNK. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2017, 30, 420–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Leanderson, P.; Tagesson, C. Cigarette smoke-induced DNA damage in cultured human lung cells: Role of hydroxyl radicals and endonuclease activation. Chem. Biol. Interact. 1992, 81, 197–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Risch, A.; Plass, C. Lung cancer epigenetics and genetics. Int. J. Cancer 2008, 123, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Vineis, P.; Caporaso, N. Tobacco and cancer: Epidemiology and the laboratory. Environ. Health Perspect. 1995, 103, 156–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Mukhopadhyay, P.; Greene, R.M.; Pisano, M.M. Cigarette smoke induces proteasomal-mediated degradation of DNA methyltransferases and methyl CpG-/CpG domain-binding proteins in embryonic orofacial cells. Reprod. Toxicol. 2015, 58, 140–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Pace, E.; di Vincenzo, S.; Ferraro, M.; Siena, L.; Chiappara, G.; Dino, P.; Vitulo, P.; Bertani, A.; Saibene, F.; Lanata, L.; et al. Effects of carbocysteine and beclomethasone on histone acetylation/deacetylation processes in cigarette smoke exposed bronchial epithelial cells. J. Cell. Physiol. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Sundar, I.K.; Rahman, I. Gene expression profiling of epigenetic chromatin modification enzymes and histone marks by cigarette smoke: Implications for COPD and lung cancer. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2016, 311, L1245–L1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Li, W.; Deng, J.; Wang, S.S.; Ma, L.; Pei, J.; Zeng, X.X.; Tang, J.X. Association of methylation of the RAR-β gene with cigarette smoking in non-small cell lung cancer with southern-central Chinese population. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2014, 15, 10937–10941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Freeman, J.R.; Chu, S.; Hsu, T.; Huang, Y.T. Epigenome-wide association study of smoking and DNA methylation in non-small cell lung neoplasms. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 69579–69591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Philibert, R.; Hollenbeck, N.; Andersen, E.; McElroy, S.; Wilson, S.; Vercande, K.; Beach, S.R.; Osborn, T.; Gerrard, M.; Gibbons, F.X.; et al. Reversion of AHRR demethylation is a quantitative biomarker of smoking cessation. Front. Psychiatry 2016, 7, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Marsit, C.J.; Karagas, M.R.; Schned, A.; Kelsey, K.T. Carcinogen exposure and epigenetic silencing in bladder cancer. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2006, 1076, 810–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Marsit, C.J.; Karagas, M.R.; Danaee, H.; Liu, M.; Andrew, A.; Schned, A.; Nelson, H.H.; Kelsey, K.T. Carcinogen exposure and gene promoter hypermethylation in bladder cancer. Carcinogenesis 2006, 27, 112–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Shui, I.M.; Wong, C.J.; Zhao, S.; Kolb, S.; Ebot, E.M.; Geybels, M.S.; Rubicz, R.; Wright, J.L.; Lin, D.W.; Klotzle, B.; et al. Prostate tumor DNA methylation is associated with cigarette smoking and adverse prostate cancer outcomes. Cancer 2016, 122, 2168–2177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Brait, M.; Munari, E.; LeBron, C.; Noordhuis, M.G.; Begum, S.; Michailidi, C.; Gonzalez-Roibon, N.; Maldonado, L.; Sen, T.; Guerrero-Preston, R.; et al. Genome-wide methylation profiling and the PI3K-AKT pathway analysis associated with smoking in urothelial cell carcinoma. Cell Cycle 2013, 12, 1058–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Marsit, C.J.; Houseman, E.A.; Schned, A.R.; Karagas, M.R.; Kelsey, K.T. Promoter hypermethylation is associated with current smoking, age, gender and survival in bladder cancer. Carcinogenesis 2007, 28, 1745–1751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Yang, W.; Cui, S.; Ma, J.; Lu, Q.; Kong, C.; Liu, T.; Sun, Z. Cigarette smoking extract causes hypermethylation and inactivation of WWOX gene in T-24 human bladder cancer cells. Neoplasma 2012, 59, 216–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Pulling, L.C.; Vuillemenot, B.R.; Hutt, J.A.; Devereux, T.R.; Belinsky, S.A. Aberrant promoter hypermethylation of the death-associated protein kinase gene is early and frequent in murine lung tumors induced by cigarette smoke and tobacco carcinogens. Cancer Res. 2004, 64, 3844–3848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Beleford, D.; Liu, Z.; Rattan, R.; Quagliuolo, L.; Boccellino, M.; Baldi, A.; Maguire, J.; Staub, J.; Molina, J.; Shridhar, V. Methylation induced gene silencing of HtrA3 in smoking-related lung cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2010, 16, 398–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Cheng, G.; Li, J.; Zheng, M.; Zhao, Y.; Zhou, J.; Li, W. NNK, a tobacco-specific carcinogen, inhibits the expression of lysyl oxidase, a tumor suppressor. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2014, 12, 64–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Knopik, V.S.; Maccani, M.A.; Francazio, S.; McGeary, J.E. The epigenetics of maternal cigarette smoking during pregnancy and effects on child development. Dev. Psychopathol. 2012, 24, 1377–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Xi, S.; Xu, H.; Shan, J.; Tao, Y.; Hong, J.A.; Inchauste, S.; Zhang, M.; Kunst, T.F.; Mercedes, L.; Schrump, D.S. Cigarette smoke mediates epigenetic repression of miR-487b during pulmonary carcinogenesis. J. Clin. Investig. 2013, 123, 1241–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Xi, S.; Inchauste, S.; Guo, H.; Shan, J.; Xiao, Z.; Xu, H.; Miettenen, M.; Zhang, M.R.; Hong, J.A.; Raiji, M.T.; et al. Cigarette smoke mediates epigenetic repression of miR-217 during esophageal adenocarcinogenesis. J. Clin. Investig. 2015, 34, 5548–5559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Wang, B.; Liu, Y.; Luo, F.; Xu, Y.; Qin, Y.; Lu, X.; Xu, W.; Shi, L.; Liu, Q.; Xiang, Q. Epigenetic silencing of microRNA-218 via EZH2-mediated H3K27 trimethylation is involved in malignant transformation of HBE cells induced by cigarette smoke extract. Arch. Toxicol. 2016, 90, 449–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Liu, Y.; Wang, B.; Liu, X.; Lu, L.; Luo, F.; Lu, X.; Shi, L.; Xu, W.; Liu, Q. Epigenetic silencing of p21 by long non-coding RNA hotair is involved in the cell cycle disorder induced by cigarette smoke extract. Toxicol. Lett. 2016, 240, 60–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Sundar, I.K.; Nevid, M.Z.; Friedman, A.E.; Rahman, I. Cigarette smoke induces distinct histone modifications in lung cells: Implications for the pathogenesis of COPD and lung cancer. J. Proteome Res. 2014, 13, 982–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Chen, D.; Fang, L.; Li, H.; Tang, M.S.; Jin, C. Cigarette smoke component acrolein modulates chromatin assembly by inhibiting histone acetylation. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 21678–21687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Ibuki, Y.; Toyooka, T.; Zhao, X.; Yoshida, I. Cigarette sidestream smoke induces histone H3 phosphorylation via JNK and PI3K/Akt pathways, leading to the expression of proto-oncogenes. Carcinogenesis 2014, 35, 1228–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Dalton, A.M.; Jones, A.P.; Sharp, S.J.; Cooper, A.J.; Griffin, S.; Wareham, N.J. Residential neighbourhood greenspace is associated with reduced risk of incident diabetes in older people: A prospective cohort study. BMC Public Health 2016, 16, 1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Cao, Y.; Willett, W.C.; Rimm, E.B.; Stampfer, M.J.; Giovannucci, E.L. Light to moderate intake of alcohol, drinking patterns, and risk of cancer: Results from two prospective us cohort studies. BMJ 2015, 351, h4238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Mahnke, A.H.; Miranda, R.C.; Homanics, G.E. Epigenetic mediators and consequences of excessive alcohol consumption. Alcohol 2017, 60, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Pandey, S.C.; Kyzar, E.J.; Zhang, H. Epigenetic basis of the dark side of alcohol addiction. Neuropharmacology 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Bohacek, J.; Mansuy, I.M. Epigenetic inheritance of disease and disease risk. Neuropsychopharmacology 2013, 38, 220–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Finegersh, A.; Homanics, G.E. Acute ethanol alters multiple histone modifications at model gene promoters in the cerebral cortex. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2014, 38, 1865–1873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Zhang, X.; Kusumo, H.; Sakharkar, A.J.; Pandey, S.C.; Guizzetti, M. Regulation of DNA methylation by ethanol induces tissue plasminogen activator expression in astrocytes. J. Neurochem. 2014, 128, 344–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Kaur, J.; Demokan, S.; Tripathi, S.C.; Macha, M.A.; Begum, S.; Califano, J.A.; Ralhan, R. Promoter hypermethylation in Indian primary oral squamous cell carcinoma. Int. J. Cancer 2010, 127, 2367–2373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Pattani, K.M.; Zhang, Z.; Demokan, S.; Glazer, C.; Loyo, M.; Goodman, S.; Sidransky, D.; Bermudez, F.; Jean-Charles, G.; McCaffrey, T.; et al. Endothelin receptor type B gene promoter hypermethylation in salivary rinses is independently associated with risk of oral cavity cancer and premalignancy. Cancer Prev. Res. 2010, 3, 1093–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Arjungi, K.N. Areca nut: A review. Arzneimittelforschung 1976, 26, 951–956. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  85. Thomas, S.J.; MacLennan, R. Slaked lime and betel nut cancer in papua new guinea. Lancet 1992, 340, 577–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Ko, Y.C.; Huang, Y.L.; Lee, C.H.; Chen, M.J.; Lin, L.M.; Tsai, C.C. Betel quid chewing, cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption related to oral cancer in Taiwan. J. Oral Pathol. Med. 1995, 24, 450–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Huang, S.H.; Lee, H.S.; Mar, K.; Ji, D.D.; Huang, M.S.; Hsia, K.T. Loss expression of O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase by promoter hypermethylation and its relationship to betel quid chewing in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod 2010, 109, 883–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Rai, A.K.; Freddy, A.J.; Banerjee, A.; Kurkalang, S.; Rangad, G.M.; Islam, M.; Nongrum, H.B.; Dkhar, H.; Chatterjee, A. Distinct involvement of 9p21–24 and 13q14.1–14.3 chromosomal regions in raw betel-nut induced esophageal cancers in the state of meghalaya, India. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2012, 13, 2629–2633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Takeshima, M.; Saitoh, M.; Kusano, K.; Nagayasu, H.; Kurashige, Y.; Malsantha, M.; Arakawa, T.; Takuma, T.; Chiba, I.; Kaku, T.; et al. High frequency of hypermethylation of p14, p15 and p16 in oral pre-cancerous lesions associated with betel-quid chewing in Sri Lanka. J. Oral Pathol. Med. 2008, 37, 475–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Singh, V.; Singh, L.C.; Singh, A.P.; Sharma, J.; Borthakur, B.B.; Debnath, A.; Rai, A.K.; Phukan, R.K.; Mahanta, J.; Kataki, A.C.; et al. Status of epigenetic chromatin modification enzymes and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma risk in northeast Indian population. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2015, 5, 979–999. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  91. Chen, J.H.; Yeh, K.T.; Yang, Y.M.; Chang, J.G.; Lee, H.E.; Hung, S.Y. High expressions of histone methylation- and phosphorylation-related proteins are associated with prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma in male population of Taiwan. Med. Oncol. 2013, 30, 513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Chang, H.H.; Chiang, C.P.; Hung, H.C.; Lin, C.Y.; Deng, Y.T.; Kuo, M.Y. Histone deacetylase 2 expression predicts poorer prognosis in oral cancer patients. Oral Oncol. 2009, 45, 610–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Prokopczyk, B.; Rivenson, A.; Bertinato, P.; Brunnemann, K.D.; Hoffmann, D. 3-(methylnitrosamino) propionitrile: Occurrence in saliva of betel quid chewers, carcinogenicity, and DNA methylation in f344 rats. Cancer Res. 1987, 47, 467–471. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  94. Lin, K.H.; Lin, C.Y.; Liu, C.C.; Chou, M.Y.; Lin, J.K. Arecoline n-oxide: Its mutagenicity and possible role as ultimate carcinogen in areca oral carcinogenesis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 3420–3428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Tsai, Y.S.; Lee, K.W.; Huang, J.L.; Liu, Y.S.; Juo, S.H.; Kuo, W.R.; Chang, J.G.; Lin, C.S.; Jong, Y.J. Arecoline, a major alkaloid of areca nut, inhibits p53, represses DNA repair, and triggers DNA damage response in human epithelial cells. Toxicology 2008, 249, 230–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Jeng, J.H.; Chang, M.C.; Hahn, L.J. Role of areca nut in betel quid-associated chemical carcinogenesis: Current awareness and future perspectives. Oral Oncol. 2001, 37, 477–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Lin, P.C.; Chang, W.H.; Chen, Y.H.; Lee, C.C.; Lin, Y.H.; Chang, J.G. Cytotoxic effects produced by arecoline correlated to epigenetic regulation in human K-562 cells. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health 2011, 74, 737–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Lai, Z.L.; Tsou, Y.A.; Fan, S.R.; Tsai, M.H.; Chen, H.L.; Chang, N.W.; Cheng, J.C.; Chen, C.M. Methylation-associated gene silencing of RARβ in areca carcinogens induced mouse oral squamous cell carcinoma. BioMed Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 378358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Qi, Y.; Wang, D.; Jin, T.; Yang, L.; Wu, H.; Li, Y.; Zhao, J.; Du, F.; Song, M.; Wang, R. Hedd: The human epigenetic drug database. Database J. Biol. Databases Curation 2016, 2016, baw159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Figueroa, M.E.; Skrabanek, L.; Li, Y.; Jiemjit, A.; Fandy, T.E.; Paietta, E.; Fernandez, H.; Tallman, M.S.; Greally, J.M.; Carraway, H.; et al. Mds and secondary aml display unique patterns and abundance of aberrant DNA methylation. Blood 2009, 114, 3448–3458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Minkovsky, A.; Sahakyan, A.; Bonora, G.; Damoiseaux, R.; Dimitrova, E.; Rubbi, L.; Pellegrini, M.; Radu, C.G.; Plath, K. A high-throughput screen of inactive X chromosome reactivation identifies the enhancement of DNA demethylation by 5-Aza-2′-dC upon inhibition of ribonucleotide reductase. Epigenet. Chromatin 2015, 8, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Sun, F.; Chan, E.; Wu, Z.; Yang, X.; Marquez, V.E.; Yu, Q. Combinatorial pharmacologic approaches target EZH2-mediated gene repression in breast cancer cells. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2009, 8, 3191–3202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Miranda, T.B.; Cortez, C.C.; Yoo, C.B.; Liang, G.; Abe, M.; Kelly, T.K.; Marquez, V.E.; Jones, P.A. Dznep is a global histone methylation inhibitor that reactivates developmental genes not silenced by DNA methylation. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2009, 8, 1579–1588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Hascher, A.; Haase, A.K.; Hebestreit, K.; Rohde, C.; Klein, H.U.; Rius, M.; Jungen, D.; Witten, A.; Stoll, M.; Schulze, I.; et al. DNA methyltransferase inhibition reverses epigenetically embedded phenotypes in lung cancer preferentially affecting polycomb target genes. Clin. Cancer Res. 2014, 20, 814–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Heller, G.; Weinzierl, M.; Noll, C.; Babinsky, V.; Ziegler, B.; Altenberger, C.; Minichsdorfer, C.; Lang, G.; Dome, B.; End-Pfutzenreuter, A.; et al. Genome-wide miRNA expression profiling identifies miR-9–3 and miR-193a as targets for DNA methylation in non-small cell lung cancers. Clin. Cancer Res. 2012, 18, 1619–1629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Hudson, R.S.; Yi, M.; Esposito, D.; Watkins, S.K.; Hurwitz, A.A.; Yfantis, H.G.; Lee, D.H.; Borin, J.F.; Naslund, M.J.; Alexander, R.B.; et al. Microrna-1 is a candidate tumor suppressor and prognostic marker in human prostate cancer. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, 3689–3703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Kumar, S.R.; Bryan, J.N.; Esebua, M.; Amos-Landgraf, J.; May, T.J. Testis specific y-like 5: Gene expression, methylation and implications for drug sensitivity in prostate carcinoma. BMC Cancer 2017, 17, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Duenas-Gonzalez, A.; Coronel, J.; Cetina, L.; Gonzalez-Fierro, A.; Chavez-Blanco, A.; Taja-Chayeb, L. Hydralazine-valproate: A repositioned drug combination for the epigenetic therapy of cancer. Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol. 2014, 10, 1433–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Hilakivi-Clarke, L.; Warri, A.; Bouker, K.B.; Zhang, X.; Cook, K.L.; Jin, L.; Zwart, A.; Nguyen, N.; Hu, R.; Cruz, M.I.; et al. Effects of in utero exposure to ethinyl estradiol on tamoxifen resistance and breast cancer recurrence in a preclinical model. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2017, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Pinkerneil, M.; Hoffmann, M.J.; Deenen, R.; Kohrer, K.; Arent, T.; Schulz, W.A.; Niegisch, G. Inhibition of class I histone deacetylases 1 and 2 promotes urothelial carcinoma cell death by various mechanisms. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2016, 15, 299–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Liu, Y.; Salvador, L.A.; Byeon, S.; Ying, Y.; Kwan, J.C.; Law, B.K.; Hong, J.; Luesch, H. Anticolon cancer activity of largazole, a marine-derived tunable histone deacetylase inhibitor. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2010, 335, 351–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Matsuda, Y.; Yamauchi, T.; Hosono, N.; Uzui, K.; Negoro, E.; Morinaga, K.; Nishi, R.; Yoshida, A.; Kimura, S.; Maekawa, T.; et al. Combination of panobinostat with ponatinib synergistically overcomes imatinib-resistant cml cells. Cancer Sci. 2016, 107, 1029–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Van Maldegem, A.M.; Bovee, J.V.; Gelderblom, H. Panobinostat-a potential treatment for metastasized ewing sarcoma? A case report. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 2016, 63, 1840–1843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Yang, S.; Jia, Y.; Liu, X.; Winters, C.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Devor, E.J.; Hovey, A.M.; Reyes, H.D.; Xiao, X.; et al. Systematic dissection of the mechanisms underlying progesterone receptor downregulation in endometrial cancer. Oncotarget 2014, 5, 9783–9797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Welsbie, D.S.; Xu, J.; Chen, Y.; Borsu, L.; Scher, H.I.; Rosen, N.; Sawyers, C.L. Histone deacetylases are required for androgen receptor function in hormone-sensitive and castrate-resistant prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2009, 69, 958–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Kong, L.R.; Tan, T.Z.; Ong, W.R.; Bi, C.; Huynh, H.; Lee, S.C.; Chng, W.J.; Eichhorn, P.J.; Goh, B.C. Belinostat exerts anti-tumor cytotoxicity through the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway in lung squamous cell carcinoma. Mol. Oncol. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Feng, R.; Oton, A.; Mapara, M.Y.; Anderson, G.; Belani, C.; Lentzsch, S. The histone deacetylase inhibitor, pxd101, potentiates bortezomib-induced anti-multiple myeloma effect by induction of oxidative stress and DNA damage. Br. J. Haematol. 2007, 139, 385–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Han, H.; Yang, X.; Pandiyan, K.; Liang, G. Synergistic re-activation of epigenetically silenced genes by combinatorial inhibition of dnmts and lsd1 in cancer cells. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e75136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Zhao, H.; Flamand, V.; Peehl, D.M. Anti-oncogenic and pro-differentiation effects of clorgyline, a monoamine oxidase a inhibitor, on high grade prostate cancer cells. BMC Med. Genom. 2009, 2, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Valiuliene, G.; Stirblyte, I.; Jasnauskaite, M.; Borutinskaite, V.; Navakauskiene, R. Anti-leukemic effects of hdaci belinostat and hmti 3-deazaneplanocin a on human acute promyelocytic leukemia cells. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2017, 799, 143–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Arif, M.; Vedamurthy, B.M.; Choudhari, R.; Ostwal, Y.B.; Mantelingu, K.; Kodaganur, G.S.; Kundu, T.K. Nitric oxide-mediated histone hyperacetylation in oral cancer: Target for a water-soluble HAT inhibitor, CTK7A. Chem. Biol. 2010, 17, 903–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Wu, M.; Kim, S.H.; Datta, I.; Levin, A.; Dyson, G.; Li, J.; Kaypee, S.; Swamy, M.M.; Gupta, N.; Kwon, H.J.; et al. Hydrazinobenzoylcurcumin inhibits androgen receptor activity and growth of castration-resistant prostate cancer in mice. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 6136–6150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Rath, S.; Das, L.; Kokate, S.B.; Ghosh, N.; Dixit, P.; Rout, N.; Singh, S.P.; Chattopadhyay, S.; Ashktorab, H.; Smoot, D.T.; et al. Inhibition of histone/lysine acetyltransferase activity kills CoCL2-treated and hypoxia-exposed gastric cancer cells and reduces their invasiveness. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2017, 82, 28–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Venturelli, S.; Berger, A.; Bocker, A.; Busch, C.; Weiland, T.; Noor, S.; Leischner, C.; Schleicher, S.; Mayer, M.; Weiss, T.S.; et al. Resveratrol as a pan-HDAC inhibitor alters the acetylation status of histone [corrected] proteins in human-derived hepatoblastoma cells. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e73097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Hassan, W.A.; Takebayashi, S.I.; Abdalla, M.O.A.; Fujino, K.; Kudoh, S.; Motooka, Y.; Sato, Y.; Naito, Y.; Higaki, K.; Wakimoto, J.; et al. Correlation between histone acetylation and expression of notch1 in human lung carcinoma and its possible role in combined small-cell lung carcinoma. Lab. Investig. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Zhang, X.F.; Yan, Q.; Shen, W.; Gurunathan, S. Trichostatin a enhances the apoptotic potential of palladium nanoparticles in human cervical cancer cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Boyanapalli, S.S.; Li, W.; Fuentes, F.; Guo, Y.; Ramirez, C.N.; Gonzalez, X.P.; Pung, D.; Kong, A.N. Epigenetic reactivation of rassf1a by phenethyl isothiocyanate (peitc) and promotion of apoptosis in lncap cells. Pharmacol. Res. 2016, 114, 175–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Chen, L.; Jin, T.; Zhu, K.; Piao, Y.; Quan, T.; Quan, C.; Lin, Z. Pi3k/mtor dual inhibitor bez235 and histone deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin a synergistically exert anti-tumor activity in breast cancer. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 11937–11949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table
Table 1. FDA-approved epigenetic drugs.
Table 1. FDA-approved epigenetic drugs.
CategorySynonymsCas NumberDiseaseFDA Approval Number
DNMTi5-Azacytidine320-67-2Myelodysplastic syndromes50794
5-Aza-2′-deoxycytidine2353-33-5Myelodysplastic syndromes21790
Hydralazine86-54-4Hypertension8303
HDACiSuberoylanilide hydroxamic acid149647-78-9Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma21991
Panobinostat404950-80-7Multiple myeloma205353
Belinostat414864-00-9Peripheral T-cell lymphoma206256
Romidepsin128517-07-7Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma22393
FDA: the US Food and Drug Administration; DNMTi: DNA methyltransferase inhibitor; HDACi: histone deacetylase inhibitor.
Table
Table 2. Risk factors that induce epigenetic aberrations in various cancer types.
Table 2. Risk factors that induce epigenetic aberrations in various cancer types.
Risk FactorEpigenetic AberrationsCancer TypesReferences
SmokeDNA methylationLung cancer[55,56,57,64,65,66] [68,69,70]
Bladder cancers[58,59]
Prostate cancer[60,62,63]
Histone modificationLung cancer[72,73,74]
AlcoholDNA methylationLiver cancer[77]
Oral cancer[82]
Histone modificationOral cancer[77]
Betel nutDNA methylationEsophageal cancers[88]
Oral pre-cancerous lesions[89]
Histone modificationEsophageal squamous cell carcinoma[90]
Oral squamous cell carcinoma[91]
Oral cancer[92]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, T.-H.; Hsia, S.-M.; Shih, Y.-H.; Shieh, T.-M. Association of Smoking, Alcohol Use, and Betel Quid Chewing with Epigenetic Aberrations in Cancers. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 1210. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms18061210

AMA Style

Wang T-H, Hsia S-M, Shih Y-H, Shieh T-M. Association of Smoking, Alcohol Use, and Betel Quid Chewing with Epigenetic Aberrations in Cancers. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2017; 18(6):1210. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms18061210

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Tong-Hong, Shih-Min Hsia, Yin-Hwa Shih, and Tzong-Ming Shieh. 2017. "Association of Smoking, Alcohol Use, and Betel Quid Chewing with Epigenetic Aberrations in Cancers" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 18, no. 6: 1210. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms18061210

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop