Next Article in Journal
The Role of Compounds Derived from Natural Supplement as Anticancer Agents in Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Preventive Effects of Resveratrol on Endocannabinoid System and Synaptic Protein Modifications in Rat Cerebral Cortex Challenged by Bilateral Common Carotid Artery Occlusion and Reperfusion
Previous Article in Journal
Genetic Diversity and Genetic Relationships of Purple Willow (Salix purpurea L.) from Natural Locations
Previous Article in Special Issue
Anti-Inflammatory and Skin Barrier Repair Effects of Topical Application of Some Plant Oils
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Effects of Plant Oil Interesterified Triacylglycerols on Lipemia and Human Health

1
Dipartimento di Scienze Motorie e del Benessere, Università degli Studi di Napoli “Parthenope”, via Medina 40, 80133 Napoli, Italy
2
Ceinge-Biotecnologie Avanzate S.c.a r.l., Via G. Salvatore 486, 80145 Napoli, Italy
3
IRCCS SDN, via E. Gianturco 113, 80142 Napoli, Italy
4
Dipartimento di Medicina e di Scienze della Salute “Vincenzo Tiberio”, Università degli Studi del Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy
5
Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Ambientali Biologiche Farmaceutiche, Università della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Via G. Vivaldi 42, 81100 Caserta, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19(1), 104; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms19010104
Submission received: 31 October 2017 / Revised: 22 December 2017 / Accepted: 26 December 2017 / Published: 30 December 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Beneficial Effects of Plant Oil on Human Health)

Abstract

:
The position of the fatty acids (sn-1, sn-2 and sn-3) (stereospecific numbering (sn)) in triacylglycerol (TAG) molecules produces a characteristic stereospecificity that defines the physical properties of the fats and influences their absorption, metabolism and uptake into tissues. Fat interesterification is a process that implies a positional distribution of fatty acids (FAs) within the TAG molecules, generating new TAG species, without affecting the FA cis-trans natural balance. The interesterified (IE) fats, frequently used in the food industry comprise fats that are rich in long-chain saturated FAs, such as palmitic acid (16:0) and stearic acid (18:0). Within the interesterified fats, a critical role is played by FA occupying the sn-2 position; in fact, the presence of an unsaturated FA in this specific position influences early metabolic processing and postprandial clearance that in turn could induce atherogenesis and thrombogenesis events. Here, we provide an overview on the role of TAG structures and interesterified palmitic and stearic acid-rich fats on fasting and postprandial lipemia, focusing our attention on their physical properties and their effects on human health.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Fatty acids (FAs) constitute the main components of fat: triacylglycerols (TAGs), cholesterol esters and phospholipids. They also play a crucial role in physiological processes, like cell maintenance and replication [1]. FA metabolites, such as prostaglandins, thromboxanes and leukotrienes, act as bioactive lipophilic signaling molecules [2]. Moreover, FAs represent a major source of energy and take part into the absorption of fat-soluble vitamins: A, D, E, and K [1,3].
Most animal and plant-derived food products contain fats that ensure satiety, taste, consistency, and stability. Despite fats often being banned in restricted dietary regimens, FAs are instrumental for a proper growth and development and a minimal intake should be ensured in childhood [4,5,6].
The optimal balance of FA contribution to the diet has been a long-standing matter of debate. In fact, along with the above mentioned beneficial effects played by FAs, it is widely known that no more than 20–25% of energy intake should come from FAs and that a high-fat diet increases the risk for cardiovascular diseases (CVD). In these equations, also artificial trans and interesterified (IE) FAs have to be taken into account, both of them being obtained by chemical processing in food industries. Trans FAs are the side products of partial hydrogenation, performed on plant oil to transform them into solid or semi-solid fats; on the other side, IE fats now are used as a substitute for trans fat in a wide range of commonly consumed foods, comprising spreads, baked goods and confectionary products. At the moment, food industries have no legal requirement to specify the type of FAs (trans, IE, etc.) on food labels, making it difficult to approximate how frequently they are consumed. In the US, it is estimated that about 3% of the energy input would come from IE fats if these were the only hard fat replacing partially hydrogenated vegetable oils [7].
In this context, it becomes a matter of priority to study the effects of IE fats used in the food industry on human health, discussing the current understanding of IE structural features, their absorption and digestion properties, their effects on fasting and postprandial lipemia.

2. Triacylglycerol (TAG) Structures and Chemical Properties in Plant Oil and Animal Fats

FAs are acidic, monocarboxylic linear chains of different lengths: short-chain FAs (bearing 2–5 carbon atoms (C2–5), medium-chain FAs (C6–12), long-chain FAs (C13–20) [8]. According to the degree of saturation of their carbon chains, they can be grouped into three major categories: saturated FAs (SFAs; no double bonds), monounsaturated FAs (MUFAs; one double bond) and polyunsaturated FAs (PUFAs; two or more double bonds) [9].
Up to now, many studies have focused on the role of specific dietary FA classes associated with CVD risk. Although it is widely documented that SFA intake is directly associated with high serum concentrations of low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol [10,11], whereas PUFA intake is correlated with lower concentrations [12], some studies reported that LDL concentration is not the only risk factor for CVD and therefore SFA intake may not be predictive of CVD risk [13,14,15]. In particular, the length of the SFA chains play a crucial role, in that CVD serum biomarkers get worse when SFA chain length, mainly ranging from C12 to C18, is shorter—lauric and myristic acids (C12:0 and C14:0, respectively) are more unfavorable than palmitic acid (C16:0), which in turn is more unfavorable than stearic acid (C18:0) [16]. Nevertheless, palmitic acid is the most abundant SFA naturally occurring in animal fats and vegetable oils, followed by stearic acid. A significant improvement in CVD risk can be achieved by replacing SFAs with unsaturated FAs in diets abundant in vegetable oils, such as oleic and linoleic acids (C18:1 and C18:2, respectively) [17].
From a chemical point of view, most naturally occurring fats are mixtures of TAGs bearing a glycerol moiety esterified by three FAs, typically palmitic acid, linoleic acid and stearic acid (Figure 1). On the glycerol backbone of TAG molecules, FAs occupy one of three positions, named as sn-1, sn-2, and sn-3, according to the stereospecific numbering (sn) system. This stereospecificity determines the physical properties of the TAG, influencing absorption, metabolism and tissue uptake [18]. The occurrence of a centre of asymmetry within TAG structures, allows the existence of enantiomeric forms [19,20,21], whose identification and quantitation require the most advanced analytical technologies, based on tandem mass spectrometry [22,23,24].
Unsaturated FAs, mainly in the cis configuration, are the most represented in plant-derived fats that are thus liquid at room temperature, while SFAs are abundant in solid animal fats; unsaturated linoleic acid is, in fact, present in most plant oils, whereas lauric, myristic, and palmitic acids are common in animal fats and only in certain plant oils (palm and coconut).
To overcome the CVD risk related to SFA intake, food industries took advantage from chemical properties of healthier plant oil TAGs by reducing their double to single bonds through hydrogenation reactions. In fact, such a chemical reduction increases the melting points of oils and allows the transition to solid fats. In the manufacture of soft and semisolid fats, food industries applied a partial hydrogenation, stopping the reaction before all bonds were saturated. But such a practice led to a side effect, namely the isomerization of unsaturated FAs from the native cis to the most stable low energy trans configuration. On the other hand, trans FAs have also been implicated in CVD diseases and the American Heart Association strongly recommends removing them from dietary regimens [7].
The difference between plant oils and animal fats relies also on the overall composition and the stereospecificity of FAs in TAG molecules. The FA composition depends on dietary sources [20]. Oleic acid is the most abundant among the unsaturated FAs, while palmitic acid is the main SFA. Furthermore, the SFA composition may differ between plant and animal fats, even when they both exhibit similar levels of saturation. For instance, cocoa butter contains mainly palmitic and stearic acids, whereas milk fat contains a wider variety of SFAs, including, not only stearic and palmitic acids, but also myristic acid or other medium-chain and short-chain FAs (such as butyric acid) [21]. Moreover, palmitic and stearic acids are present in both beef tallow and palm oil, but in highly different percentages—38% stearic and 50% palmitic acid in beef tallow, whereas 5% stearic and 44% palmitic acids in palm oil [16,19].
The stereospecificity of TAGs is a characteristic hallmark of different natural vegetable oils and animal fats. In these oils and fats, the number of TAG molecules may be theoretically elevated, but actually it is limited by the preferential FA acetylation at specific positions [20]. In fact, the main TAG species in natural fats and oils preferentially retains the same type of FA in the same stereospecific position (Table 1). Generally, most vegetable oils contain SFAs on the sn-1 and/or sn-3 positions and unsaturated FAs on the sn-2 position. Accordingly, in cocoa butter, palm and soybean oils, palmitic and stearic acids are mainly located on the sn-1 and sn-3 positions, while oleic and linoleic acids occupy the sn-2 position [21]. Interestingly, this specific distribution in cocoa butter of native dietary TAGs is responsible for the characteristic melting point of chocolate [25]. Differently, in peanut and olive oils, unsaturated FAs are equally distributed among the three stereospecific positions, while, in coconut oil, the SFAs are widespread in these positions. Unlike vegetable oils, animal fats have SFAs mainly on the sn-2 position and unsaturated FAs on the sn-1 and/or sn-3 positions. In particular, palmitic acid preferentially occupies the sn-2 position in bovine milk fat and pork fat (lard), whilst oleic acid is mostly represented at the sn-1 and/or sn-3 positions (Table 1) [25,26]. Differently, in beef tallow, palmitic acid is mainly located in the sn-1 and/or sn-3 positions. In horse fat, instead, oleic acid is widespread among the three positions.

3. Postprandial Fate of Native and Interesterified Dietary Fats

The stereospecificity of native dietary TAGs, together with FA chain length, influences their digestion and absorption [19]; FAs located in the sn-1 and sn-3 positions may have different metabolic fates than FAs in the sn-2 position.
The major TAG digestion before absorption occurs in the duodenum by pancreatic lipase, and catalyzes the formation of free FAs (FFAs) and sn-2 monoacylglycerols (2-MAGs). Pancreatic lipase hydrolyzes sn-1 and sn-3 esterified FAs with a higher affinity for the sn-1 than the sn-3 position [19,20]. Short and medium chain FFAs, originating from the sn-1 and sn-3 positions, are solubilized in the intestinal environment where they, once adsorbed and complexed with albumin, are transported by portal system to the liver for oxidation [19]. On the other hand, PUFAs located in the sn-1 and sn-3 positions limit the hydrolytic activity of pancreatic lipase because of their steric hindrance and thus influence the kinetics of FA release [21].
Absorption of 2-MAGs occurs by passive diffusion into the enterocytes [27], and there they are first recycled for the synthesis of new TAGs and reassembled into lymph chylomicrons at the endoplasmic reticulum level, keeping the native stereospecificity (Figure 2) [18,25,28]. Similarly to pancreatic lipase, lipoprotein lipase (LPL), responsible for highly efficient hydrolysis of TAG-chylomicrons, is also region specific for the sn-1 and sn-3 positions—the obtained 2-MAG is isomerized to 1(3)-MAG from which FA is efficiently released [29]. Absorbed MAGs can also serve as a primary structure for gut or liver phospholipid synthesis in excessive FFA environments [25].
These findings suggest that TAGs with SFAs in the sn-2 position are digested completely, absorbed more efficiently by intestinal epithelium, delaying entry into the blood circulation, compared to TAGs containing SFAs in positions sn-1 and sn-3 (Figure 2), thus determining a reduced postprandial lipemic response [18,26,30].
In addition, FAs may exhibit different absorption patterns, based on chain length and saturation, as well as on their stereospecific position on TAGs. Unsaturated FAs and medium chain FAs are more efficiently absorbed than long chain SFAs. Animal studies showed that fat absorption from vegetable oils containing SFAs on the sn-1 and sn-3 positions occurs at a lower rate than that of animal fats with SFAs on the sn-2 position [31,32]. Long chain SFAs, such as palmitic acid, have low coefficients of absorption because of their melting points above body temperature. Moreover, when palmitic and stearic acids, located at the sn-1 and sn-3 positions, are released by digestive lipases, they are able to form insoluble calcium or magnesium soaps, due to the alkaline intestinal environment [16,19,21]. This aspect is a relevant issue for infant nutrition, in terms of fat and calcium absorption, whose optimization, as confirmed by food industry and clinical applications, has required the use of dietary TAGs with IE FAs. Interesterification allows modification of the FA position on TAG molecules. In fact, IE FAs are obtained by enzymatic or chemical methods that, at low temperatures, promote the incorporation of a specific FA on the glycerol backbone or the rearrangement of native FAs on the different positions of TAG molecules [33,34,35,36]. This consists of a randomization process in which FAs are nearly equally distributed among the three stereospecific positions of the IE TAG. The interesterification, however, does not alter the unsaturation/saturation degree or the isomeric state of FAs, but only the position of acyl groups on TAG molecules. Although the FA profile is overall unchanged, the physical properties (melting temperature and crystallization characteristics) of IE TAGs are modified and, as a consequence, their absorption properties are also modified. Moreover, the interesterification process can be applied to two or more different native fats (for example, solid fat and liquid oil) giving rise to a completely new TAG mixture. Food industries use interesterification to produce functional ingredients to be incorporated into foods; this also represents a valid alternative to the partial hydrogenation of vegetable oils in the production of margarines, cooking fats and shortenings. In clinical applications, instead, interesterification is used not only to provide products well-absorbed by infants or patients with fat malabsorption disorders, but also to design poorly absorbed fats recommended for weight loss [37].
As for infant nutrition, fat absorption from human milk has a higher rate than that from infant formula, partly due to the preferential presence of palmitic acid at the sn-2 position of the TAG glycerol backbone [37]. In infants, in fact, the palmitic acid, once absorbed, is esterified to TAG and secreted into plasma. Therefore, the specific sn-2 position of palmitic acid in human milk may influence chylomicron formation after digestion and also the metabolism of cholesterol esters and long chain PUFAs [38]. Different from human milk, in conventional infant formula, palmitic acid is mainly located in the sn-1 and sn-3 positions and absorbed as non-esterified FA. To enhance fat absorption, similarly to human milk, infant formula products contain IE TAGs (such as betapols) with up to 60% or more of palmitic acid at the sn-2 position [39,40,41]. Hence, the biological properties of native and IE dietary fats are strictly dependent on the stereospecific position of FAs, namely the presence of SFAs vs. MUFAs/PUFAs at the sn-2 position of TAGs influences their digestion and subsequent absorption, and metabolism [18,25].
Likewise, the food industry needed a replacement for hydrogenated FAs, previously developed as a cheaper alternative to animal fats, in an attempt to obtain solid or semi-solid vegetable fats, but also able to impair the naturally-occurring balance between cis and trans configurations in unsaturated FAs [42]. Successively, the occurrence of a positive association between hydrogenated fat intake and CVD risk induced a progressive reduction of industrial hard vegetable trans fats use in the food market, favoring, in parallel, the interesterification process [11,43]. Nowadays, such a process, mainly based on chemical methods, represents a valid option for the food industry to modify the texture and enhance the taste of new dietary products; in general, interesterification is largely used in commonly consumed foods, and this process has allowed the SFA content in respect to non-IE fat to be reduced by 10% [44]; such a promising acknowledgment has pushed even more interest on the health impact of these molecules.

4. Effect of Interesterified Fats on Fasting and Postprandial Lipemia

Several studies have reported the effects on fasting and postprandial lipemia on the positional distribution of palmitic and stearic acids in TAGs modified by interesterification [45]. Generally, fasting is defined as the absence of, or minimum, food intake, for a time period ranging from 12 h to a few weeks; in recent years, fasting regimens have been associated with functional improvements in myocardial infarction, diabetes and stroke. This practice has highlighted the role of fasting in the adaptive cellular response, by means of significant changes in several metabolic and cellular processes, such as stress resistance and inflammation reduction [46]. Regarding the effects of IE FAs on fasting and postprandial lipemia, most reported data refer to a fasting state, defined as no food intake for 6–8 h before blood collection [47,48]. In particular, elevated postprandial lipemia with non-fasting hypertriglyceridaemia is associated with a higher risk of vascular events [49]. This condition may be defined by increased concentrations of circulating TAGs and triyglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRLs) over time, following the consumption of a meal. High serum concentrations of lipoproteins and TAGs and fasting glucose are all important risk factors for dysmetabolic diseases [50]. Furthermore, impaired blood lipid profiles, together with high serum levels of coagulation activation factors, such as factor VIIa, during the postprandial period, increase the risk of severe atherothrombotic events [30,51].
Early studies reporting the effects of IE fats on fasting lipemia are conflicting. In fact, studies conducted in rats and in rabbits demonstrated that a lipid diet, with different positional distribution of FAs in TAG structure had no effect on the fasting lipid profile [52,53]. Conversely, more recent studies, conducted in both rats and humans, demonstrated that diets containing TAGs bearing SFAs in the sn-2 position have a positive influence on plasma lipoprotein profiles and on the reduction of plasma TAG concentrations [25,26,54,55]. Such a reduction can be explained by the different absorption pathway of 2-MAGs bearing SFAs, as shown in Figure 2.
Furthermore, many studies have compared the effects of a diet rich in IE FAs to a diet rich in native FAs, on lipid profiles, in adult subjects. Native shea butter (stearic predominantly in sn-1,3 positions) and IE shea butter were used to study the effects on fasting and postprandial lipemia. All cholesterol fractions (total cholesterol, LDL- and high density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol) and serum TAGs, together with glucose and insulin concentrations, resulted in no modification after the acute administration of two meals with different fat compositions, in a randomized crossover study in adult subjects [56]. Similar results were obtained in other studies, using native and IE butter, native and IE palm oil, or mixtures of natural and IE fats [57,58,59].
IE palm oil, with a higher percentage of palmitic acid (70.5%) in the sn-2 position, is able to reduce postprandial lipemia in young people with normolipidemic profiles—both male and female subjects [60]. These positive effects are also found in elderly subjects with high fasting TAG concentrations. In this regard, Hall and colleagues [61] compared the effects of high fat (IE palm oil) meal consumption to meals containing native palmate olein, on lipemia and plasma lipoprotein fractions, in men aged 40–70 years with high fasting TAG concentrations. After the first 4 h of the postprandial period, a significant decrease was reported in plasma TAG concentration in response to consumption of IE palm oil vs. native palmate olein. After 4–6 h in the postprandial period, chylomicron concentrations were slightly reduced in subjects consuming IE fat; no differences in plasma intermediate-density-lipoprotein (IDL)-cholesterol fraction or apolipoprotein B48 were observed between the two groups. Thus, consuming a meal containing IE palm oil with a greater proportion (45.9% vs. 9.8%) of palmitic acid in the sn-2 position decreases postprandial lipemia, when compared to consumption of a meal containing native palm oil, in the initial postprandial period (4 h) in subjects with higher fasting TAG concentrations [61]. Likewise, the same authors conducted a randomized double-blind crossover study on 12 healthy males (18–45 years), comparing the effects of a single meal, containing a commonly-consumed IE palmitic acid-rich fat mixture (palm stearin and palm kernel), vs. a meal containing non-IE fats. Unexpectedly, in early postprandial period (4 h), plasma TAG concentration was higher in subjects assuming the IE fat-rich meal; after 4 h, this concentration decreased. On the other hand, plasma TAG concentration increased constantly in the group eating native fats, both in early and late postprandial periods. This apparent contradiction could be explained by the fact that the interesterification process affects the content of solid fats and the stereospecific position of FAs in TAGs [62]. In agreement with these results, a recent study performed on young healthy subjects demonstrated that the consumption of high fat meals, rich in TAGs, containing palmitic acid at the sn-2 position, decreased postprandial lipemia, when compared to the consumption of high oleic sunflower oil meals [60]. Furthermore, gender differences were observed in plasma TAG concentrations, in response to the test meals; in fact, the postprandial increase in plasma TAGs was, in general, lower in women compared to age-matched men [40]. Successively, in a randomized crossover study on 17 healthy men, the same authors reported a reduction in postprandial lipemia after consumption of IE cocoa butter, compared with the consumption of native cocoa butter [63]. Lastly, Berry et al. [64] compared the effects of IE palm oil vs. native palm oil and IE palm oil vs. high-oleic sunflower oil consumption in two randomized clinical trials conducted on healthy men subjects, on the plasma lipid profile, glucose, insulin and VIIa factor concentrations, respectively. The authors demonstrated that IE palm oil consumption decreased postprandial plasma TAG and insulin concentrations, when compared both with native palm oil and sunflower oil consumption; IE palm oil consumption also reduced of 64% the postprandial VIIa factor plasma concentration at 6 h. No significant differences in plasma insulin concentrations or in chylomicron composition were observed in any trial [64].

5. Conclusions

IE fats have largely replaced trans fats in processed foods and the interest on their effects concerning the metabolic fate and the potential impact on human health is rapidly growing. This review provides an overview on the effects of IE fats, currently used in human nutrition, on fasting and postprandial lipemia, and highlights that further studies are needed in order to clarify their impact on human health. In fact, few data regarding the effects of randomized FAs on fasting plasma lipemia are available so far; however, they indicate that the consumption of meals with IE fats does not influence, or is able to reduce, fasting lipemic profiles compared to consumption of meals containing a mixture of native fats with the same FA profile. Such a finding, if confirmed in future studies, could represent a favourable feature in the consumption of IE fats that does not concur with CVD risk. In addition, data on the effects of randomized FAs on postprandial lipemia are in agreement with reporting a reduction of postprandial plasma TAG concentrations, in young, adult and elderly subjects, with a more pronounced effect in women compared to age-matched men. Hence, also in postprandial conditions, IE fat-rich meals could be able to reduce CVD risk [65,66,67]. Nevertheless, as quoted above, plasma TAG concentrations and cholesterol fractions are not the only measurable factors related to CVD risk, and so other independent causes have to be evaluated [13,14,15].
Overall, since clinical studies on IE fats have, in general, been performed using levels of fat intake exceeding the normal daily consumption and using commercially unavailable products [44], we highly support the need to build standardized nutrition trials, in order to explore the acute and chronic potential effects of IE fats, not only on CVD, but also on inflammation and cancer.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the “Fondo per la ricerca individuale di Ateneo, Annualità 2016” grant from the University of Naples “Parthenope” to Andreina Alfieri, Annamaria Mancini, Pasqualina Buono, Stefania Orrù; by “Bando per la Ricerca competitiva, triennio 2016-18 quota C” grant from the University of Naples “Parthenope” to Annamaria Mancini, Pasqualina Buono, Stefania Orrù.

Author Contributions

Pasqualina Buono and Annamaria Mancini conceived the manuscript; Andreina Alfieri and Daniela Vitucci focused on fasting and postprandial lipemia; Stefania Orrù and Esther Imperlini focused on TAG structure; Aurora Daniele and Ersilia Nigro focused on Interesterified fats. All authors contributed in writing the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

All the authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Tvrzicka, E.; Kremmyda, L.S.; Stankova, B.; Zak, A. Fatty acids as biocompounds: Their role in human metabolism, health and disease—A review. Part 1: Classification, dietary sources and biological functions. Biomed. Pap. Med. Fac. Univ. Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2011, 155, 117–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Farooqui, A.A. Lipid mediators in the neural cell nucleus: Their metabolism, signaling, and association with neurological disorders. Neuroscientist 2009, 15, 392–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Strassner, C.; Cavoski, I.; di Cagno, R.; Kahl, J.; Kesse-Guyot, E.; Lairon, D.; Lampkin, N.; Løes, A.K.; Matt, D.; Niggli, U.; et al. How the Organic Food System Supports Sustainable Diets and Translates These into Practice. Front. Nutr. 2015, 2, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Rioux, V.; Legrand, P. Saturated fatty acids: Simple molecular structures with complex cellular functions. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 2007, 10, 752–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Di Pasquale, M.G. The essentials of essential fatty acids. J. Diet. Suppl. 2009, 6, 143–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Legrand, P.; Rioux, V. The complex and important cellular and metabolic functions of saturated fatty acids. Lipids 2010, 45, 941–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Sundram, K.; Karupaiah, T.; Hayes, K.C. Stearic acid-rich interesterified fat and trans-rich fat raise the LDL/HDL ratio and plasma glucose relative to palm olein in humans. Nutr. Metab. 2007, 4, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Lei, E.; Vacy, K.; Boon, W.C. Fatty acids and their therapeutic potential in neurological disorders. Neurochem. Int. 2016, 95, 75–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Wahrburg, U. What are the health effects of fat? Eur. J. Nutr. 2004, 43, i6–i11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Hooper, L.; Martin, N.; Abdelhamid, A. Cochrane corner: What are the effects of reducing saturated fat intake on cardiovascular disease and mortality? Heart 2015, 101, 1938–1940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. De Souza, R.J.; Mente, A.; Maroleanu, A.; Cozma, A.I.; Ha, V.; Kishibe, T.; Uleryk, E.; Budylowski, P.; Schünemann, H.; Beyene, J.; et al. Intake of saturated and trans unsaturated fatty acids and risk of all cause mortality, cardiovascular disease, and type 2 diabetes: Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. BMJ 2015, 351, h3978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Clifton, P.M.; Keogh, J.B. A systematic review of the effect of dietary saturated and polyunsaturated fat on heart disease. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2017, 27, 1060–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Virtanen, J.K.; Mursu, J.; Tuomainen, T.P.; Voutilainen, S. Dietary fatty acids and risk of coronary heart disease in men: The Kuopio Ischemic Heart Disease Risk Factor Study. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2014, 34, 2679–2687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Siri-Tarino, P.W.; Chiu, S.; Bergeron, N.; Krauss, R.M. Saturated Fats versus Polyunsaturated Fats versus Carbohydrates for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention and Treatment. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2015, 35, 517–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Mente, A.; de Koning, L.; Shannon, H.S.; Anand, S.S. A systematic review of the evidence supporting a causal link between dietary factors and coronary heart disease. Arch. Intern. Med. 2009, 169, 659–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Mancini, A.; Imperlini, E.; Nigro, E.; Montagnese, C.; Daniele, A.; Orrù, S.; Buono, P. Biological and Nutritional Properties of Palm Oil and Palmitic Acid: Effects on Health. Molecules 2015, 20, 17339–17361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Wang, D.D.; Hu, F.B. Dietary Fat and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: Recent Controversies and Advances. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2017, 37, 423–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Berry, S.E. Triacylglycerol structure and interesterification of palmitic and stearic acid-rich fats: An overview and implications for cardiovascular disease. Nutr. Res. Rev. 2009, 22, 3–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Hunter, J.E. Studies on effects of dietary fatty acids as related to their position on triglycerides. Lipids 2001, 36, 655–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Mu, H.; Hoy, C.E. The digestion of dietary triacylglycerols. Prog. Lipid Res. 2004, 43, 105–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Michalski, M.C.; Genot, C.; Gayet, C.; Lopez, C.; Fine, F.; Joffre, F.; Vendeuvre, J.L.; Bouvier, J.; Chardigny, J.M.; Raynal-Ljutovac, K.; et al. Multiscale structures of lipids in foods as parameters affecting fatty acid bioavailability and lipid metabolism. Prog. Lipid Res. 2013, 52, 354–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Indelicato, S.; Bongiorno, D.; Pitonzo, R.; Di Stefano, V.; Calabrese, V.; Indelicato, S.; Avellone, G. Triacylglycerols in edible oils: Determination, characterization, quantitation, chemometric approach and evaluation of adulterations. J. Chromatogr. A 2017, 1515, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ruoppolo, M.; Scolamiero, E.; Caterino, M.; Mirisola, V.; Franconi, F.; Campesi, I. Female and male human babies have distinct blood metabolomic patterns. Mol. Biosyst. 2015, 11, 2483–2492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ruoppolo, M.; Campesi, I.; Scolamiero, E.; Pecce, R.; Caterino, M.; Cherchi, S.; Mercuro, G.; Tonolo, G.; Franconi, F. Serum metabolomic profiles suggest influence of sex and oral contraceptive use. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2014, 6, 614–624. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  25. Karupaiah, T.; Sundram, K. Effects of stereospecific positioning of fatty acids in triacylglycerol structures in native and randomized fats: A review of their nutritional implications. Nutr. Metab. 2007, 4, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Wang, T.; Wang, X. Effects of Lipid Structure Changed by Interesterification on Melting Property and Lipemia. Lipids 2016, 51, 1115–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Schulthess, G.; Lipka, G.; Compassi, S.; Boffelli, D.; Weber, F.E.; Paltauf, F.; Hauser, H. Absorption of monoacylglycerols by small intestinal brush border membrane. Biochemistry 1994, 33, 4500–4508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Yang, L.Y.; Kuksis, A. Apparent convergence (at 2-monoacylglycerol level) of phosphatidic acid and 2-monoacylglycerol pathways of synthesis of chylomicron triacylglycerols. J. Lipid Res. 1991, 32, 1173–1186. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  29. Emken, E.A.; Adlof, R.O.; Duval, S.M.; Shane, J.M.; Walker, P.M.; Becker, C. Effect of triacylglycerol structure on absorption and metabolism of isotope-labeled palmitic and linoleic acids by humans. Lipids 2004, 39, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Mensink, R.P.; Sanders, T.A.; Baer, D.J.; Hayes, K.C.; Howles, P.N.; Marangoni, A. The Increasing Use of Interesterified Lipids in the Food Supply and Their Effects on Health Parameters. Adv. Nutr. 2016, 7, 719–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Porsgaard, T.; Hoy, C.E. Lymphatic transport in rats of several dietary fats differing in fatty acid profile and triacylglycerol structure. J. Nutr. 2000, 130, 1619–1624. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  32. Nagata, J.; Kasai, M.; Watanabe, S.; Ikeda, I.; Saito, M. Effects of highly purified structured lipids containing medium-chain fatty acids and linoleic acid on lipid profiles in rats. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2003, 67, 1937–1943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zou, X.Q.; Huang, J.H.; Jin, Q.Z.; Liu, Y.F.; Song, Z.H.; Wang, X.G. Lipase-catalyzed preparation of human milk fat substitutes from palm stearin in a solvent-free system. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 6055–6063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Dollah, S.; Abdulkarim, S.M.; Ahmad, S.H.; Khoramnia, A.; Mohd Ghazali, H. Physico-chemical properties of Moringa oleifera seed oil enzymatically interesterified with palm stearin and palm kernel oil and its potential application in food. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2016, 96, 3321–3333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Farfan, M.; Villalon, M.J.; Ortiz, M.E.; Nieto, S.; Bouchon, P. The effect of interesterification on the bioavailability of fatty acids in structured lipids. Food Chem. 2013, 139, 571–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Thilakarathna, S.H.; Rogers, M.; Lan, Y.; Huynh, S.; Marangoni, A.G.; Robinson, L.E.; Wright, A.J. Investigations of in vitro bioaccessibility from interesterified stearic and oleic acid-rich blends. Food Funct. 2016, 7, 1932–1940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Kallio, H.; Nylund, M.; Bostrom, P.; Yang, B. Triacylglycerol regioisomers in human milk resolved with an algorithmic novel electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry method. Food Chem. 2017, 233, 351–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Ramirez, M.; Amate, L.; Gil, A. Absorption and distribution of dietary fatty acids from different sources. Early Hum. Dev. 2001, 65, S95–S101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lucas, A.; Quinlan, P.; Abrams, S.; Ryan, S.; Meah, S.; Lucas, P.J. Randomised controlled trial of a synthetic triglyceride milk formula for preterm infants. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1997, 77, F178–F184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Sanders, D.J.; Howes, D.; Earl, L.K. The absorption, distribution and excretion of 1- and 2-. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2001, 39, 709–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Miles, E.A.; Calder, P.C. The influence of the position of palmitate in infant formula triacylglycerols on health outcomes. Nutr. Res. 2017, 44, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Stender, S.; Astrup, A.; Dyerberg, J. Tracing artificial trans fat in popular foods in Europe: A market basket investigation. BMJ Open 2014, 4, e005218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Mozaffarian, D.; Katan, M.B.; Ascherio, A.; Stampfer, M.J.; Willett, W.C. Trans fatty acids and cardiovascular disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2006, 354, 1601–1613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Mills, C.E.; Hall, W.L.; Berry, S.E.E. What are interesterified fats and should we be worried about them in our diet? Nutr. Bull. 2017, 42, 153–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Teeman, C.S.; Kurti, S.P.; Cull, B.J.; Emerson, S.R.; Haub, M.D.; Rosenkranz, S.K. Postprandial lipemic and inflammatory responses to high-fat meals: A review of the roles of acute and chronic exercise. Nutr. Metab. 2016, 13, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Longo, V.D.; Mattson, M.P. Fasting: Molecular mechanisms and clinical applications. Cell Metab. 2014, 19, 181–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Mora, S.; Rifai, N.; Buring, J.E.; Ridker, P.M. Fasting compared with nonfasting lipids and apolipoproteins for predicting incident cardiovascular events. Circulation 2008, 118, 993–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. De Backer, G.; Ambrosioni, E.; Borch-Johnsen, K.; Brotons, C.; Cifkova, R.; Dallongeville, J.; Ebrahim, S.; Faergeman, O.; Graham, I.; Mancia, G.; et al. European guidelines on cardiovascular disease and prevention in clinical practice. Atherosclerosis 2003, 171, 145–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Kolovou, G.D.; Mikhailidis, D.P.; Nordestgaard, B.G.; Bilianou, H.; Panotopoulos, G. Definition of postprandial lipaemia. Curr. Vasc. Pharmacol. 2011, 9, 292–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. O’Keefe, J.H.; Gheewala, N.M.; O’Keefe, J.O. Dietary strategies for improving post-prandial glucose, lipids, inflammation, and cardiovascular health. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2008, 51, 249–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Tholstrup, T.; Miller, G.J.; Bysted, A.; Sandstrom, B. Effect of individual dietary fatty acids on postprandial activation of blood coagulation factor VII and fibrinolysis in healthy young men. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2003, 77, 1125–1132. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  52. Renaud, S.C.; Ruf, J.C.; Petithory, D. The positional distribution of fatty acids in palm oil and lard influences their biologic effects in rats. J. Nutr. 1995, 125, 229–237. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  53. Kritchevsky, D. Trans fatty acid effects in experimental atherosclerosis. Fed. Proc. 1982, 41, 2813–2817. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  54. Redgrave, T.G.; Kodali, D.R.; Small, D.M. The effect of triacyl-sn-glycerol structure on the metabolism of chylomicrons and triacylglycerol-rich emulsions in the rat. J. Biol. Chem. 1988, 263, 5118–5123. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  55. Nelson, C.M.; Innis, S.M. Plasma lipoprotein fatty acids are altered by the positional distribution of fatty acids in infant formula triacylglycerols and human milk. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1999, 70, 62–69. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  56. Berry, S.E.; Woodward, R.; Yeoh, C.; Miller, G.J.; Sanders, T.A. Effect of interesterification of palmitic acid-rich triacylglycerol on postprandial lipid and factor VII response. Lipids 2007, 42, 315–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Christophe, A.B.; de Greyt, W.F.; Delanghe, J.R.; Huyghebaert, A.D. Substituting enzymatically interesterified butter for native butter has no effect on lipemia or lipoproteinemia in Man. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 2000, 44, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Filippou, A.; Teng, K.T.; Berry, S.E.; Sanders, T.A. Palmitic acid in the sn-2 position of dietary triacylglycerols does not affect insulin secretion or glucose homeostasis in healthy men and women. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2014, 68, 1036–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Zock, P.L.; de Vries, J.H.; de Fouw, N.J.; Katan, M.B. Positional distribution of fatty acids in dietary triglycerides: effects on fasting blood lipoprotein concentrations in humans. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1995, 61, 48–55. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  60. Sanders, T.A.; Filippou, A.; Berry, S.E.; Baumgartner, S.; Mensink, R.P. Palmitic acid in the sn-2 position of triacylglycerols acutely influences postprandial lipid metabolism. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2011, 94, 1433–1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Hall, W.L.; Brito, M.F.; Huang, J.; Wood, L.V.; Filippou, A.; Sanders, T.A.; Berry, S.E. An interesterified palm olein test meal decreases early-phase postprandial lipemia compared to palm olein: a randomized controlled trial. Lipids 2014, 49, 895–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Hall, W.L.; Iqbal, S.; Li, H.; Gray, R.; Berry, S.E.E. Modulation of postprandial lipaemia by a single meal containing a commonly consumed interesterified palmitic acid-rich fat blend compared to a non-interesterified equivalent. Eur. J. Nutr. 2017, 56, 2487–2495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Sanders, T.A.; Berry, S.E.; Miller, G.J. Influence of triacylglycerol structure on the postprandial response of factor VII to stearic acid-rich fats. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2003, 77, 777–782. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  64. Berry, S.E.; Miller, G.J.; Sanders, T.A. The solid fat content of stearic acid-rich fats determines their postprandial effects. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2007, 85, 1486–1494. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  65. Afonso, M.S.; Lavrador, M.S.; Koike, M.K.; Cintra, D.E.; Ferreira, F.D.; Nunes, V.S.; Castilho, G.; Gioielli, L.A.; Paula Bombo, R.; Catanozi, S.; et al. Dietary interesterified fat enriched with palmitic acid induces atherosclerosis by impairing macrophage cholesterol efflux and eliciting inflammation. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2016, 32, 91–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Jackson, K.G.; Poppitt, S.D.; Minihane, A.M. Postprandial lipemia and cardiovascular disease risk: Interrelationships between dietary, physiological and genetic determinants. Atherosclerosis 2012, 220, 22–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Schwab, U.; Lauritzen, L.; Tholstrup, T.; Haldorssoni, T.; Riserus, U.; Uusitupa, M.; Becker, W. Effect of the amount and type of dietary fat on cardiometabolic risk factors and risk of developing type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and cancer: A systematic review. Food Nutr. Res. 2014, 58, 25145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of triacylglycerol molecule structure. Fatty acid (FA); stereospecific numbering (sn).
Figure 1. Schematic representation of triacylglycerol molecule structure. Fatty acid (FA); stereospecific numbering (sn).
Ijms 19 00104 g001
Figure 2. Digestion and absorption of dietary TAG. Dietary TAGs are digested to obtain FFAs and 2-MAGs in intestinal lumen, that are absorbed by intestinal epithelial cells. Here, 2-MAGs rapidly resynthesize TAGs which are included in chylomicron by MTP and transported in the intestinal lymph. FFAs, via glycerol-3-phosphate pathway, are transported by portal system to the liver for oxidation. TAG, Triacylglycerol; 2-MAG, 2-monoacylglycerol; FFA, free fatty acids; MTP, microsomal triglyceride transfer protein.
Figure 2. Digestion and absorption of dietary TAG. Dietary TAGs are digested to obtain FFAs and 2-MAGs in intestinal lumen, that are absorbed by intestinal epithelial cells. Here, 2-MAGs rapidly resynthesize TAGs which are included in chylomicron by MTP and transported in the intestinal lymph. FFAs, via glycerol-3-phosphate pathway, are transported by portal system to the liver for oxidation. TAG, Triacylglycerol; 2-MAG, 2-monoacylglycerol; FFA, free fatty acids; MTP, microsomal triglyceride transfer protein.
Ijms 19 00104 g002
Table 1. Distribution of FAs in TAG molecules of chosen plant oils and animal fats.
Table 1. Distribution of FAs in TAG molecules of chosen plant oils and animal fats.
Plant OilTAGAnimal FatTAG
Typesn-1sn-2sn-3Typesn-1sn-2sn-3
Cocoa butterPOPMilk (cow)PPB
POSOPB
SOSPMB
Palm oilPOPLard (pig)SPO
POLOPL
POOOPO
Soybean oilLLPTallow (beef)POP
LLLPSO
LLOPOO
Peanut oilPOLButterPPB
OLLPPC
OOLPOP
Olive oilOOPHorse fatPOO
OOOOOO
OLOLOO
Coconut oilDDDEggPOO
CDDPLO
CDMPOS
Abbreviations used for fatty acids (FAs) on the three position of triacylglycerols (TAGs): P, palmitic acid; O, oleic acid; S, stearic acid; L, linoleic acid; D, dodecanoic acid; M, myristic acid; B, butyric acid; C, capric acid.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alfieri, A.; Imperlini, E.; Nigro, E.; Vitucci, D.; Orrù, S.; Daniele, A.; Buono, P.; Mancini, A. Effects of Plant Oil Interesterified Triacylglycerols on Lipemia and Human Health. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 104. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms19010104

AMA Style

Alfieri A, Imperlini E, Nigro E, Vitucci D, Orrù S, Daniele A, Buono P, Mancini A. Effects of Plant Oil Interesterified Triacylglycerols on Lipemia and Human Health. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2018; 19(1):104. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms19010104

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alfieri, Andreina, Esther Imperlini, Ersilia Nigro, Daniela Vitucci, Stefania Orrù, Aurora Daniele, Pasqualina Buono, and Annamaria Mancini. 2018. "Effects of Plant Oil Interesterified Triacylglycerols on Lipemia and Human Health" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 19, no. 1: 104. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms19010104

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop