Next Article in Journal
PON-tstab: Protein Variant Stability Predictor. Importance of Training Data Quality
Next Article in Special Issue
Differentiation of Adsorptive and Viscous Effects of Dietary Fibres on Bile Acid Release by Means of In Vitro Digestion and Dialysis
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of Circulating Free DNA and MicroRNA in Non-Invasive Diagnosis of HBV- and HCV-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Influences of Soybean Agglutinin and Functional Oligosaccharides on the Intestinal Tract of Monogastric Animals
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Impact of Carnitine on Dietary Fiber and Gut Bacteria Metabolism and Their Mutual Interaction in Monogastrics

1
College of Animal Science and Technology, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China
2
Tonghua Normal University, Tonghua 134000, China
3
Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Agriculture, Al-Azhar University, Cairo 11884, Egypt
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19(4), 1008; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms19041008
Submission received: 23 January 2018 / Revised: 6 March 2018 / Accepted: 21 March 2018 / Published: 28 March 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dietary Fibre: New Insights on Biochemistry and Health Benefits)

Abstract

:
Carnitine has vital roles in the endogenous metabolism of short chain fatty acids. It can protect and support gut microbial species, and some dietary fibers can reduce the available iron involved in the bioactivity of carnitine. There is also an antagonistic relationship between high microbial populations and carnitine bioavailability. This review shows the interactions between carnitine and gut microbial composition. It also elucidates the role of carnitine bacterial metabolism, mitochondrial function, fiber fermentability, and short chain fatty acids (SCFAs).

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Carnitine (γ-trimethylamino-β-hydroxybutyric acid) is a quaternary ammonium molecule required for the transport of long-chain fatty acids (LCFAs) into the mitochondria, where β-oxidation takes place [1]. Moreover, carnitine is involved in buffering the equilibrium between acyl-CoA and CoA [2]. Carnitine can be synthesized in mammals [3], but not in bacteria, where carnitine or its immediate precursors are imported into the cells [4]. Carnitine occurs in humans, animal products (such as meat, milk and egg), plants, and several micro-organisms [5]. Animal tissues are the main source of carnitine, especially muscles which possess about 95% of the body’s carnitine pool [6,7]. Most mammals can endogenously synthesize carnitine to provide most of their carnitine requirement; any further requirement can be supplied by their diet [5].
Carnitine can act in a direct or indirect manner with dietary fibers; this is because of the various interactions carnitine has with the gut microbiome [8]. Dietary fibers are heterogeneous and consequently have different effects on both the gut microbial community and the host animal [9,10]. The main end products of bacterial fermentation of dietary fiber are short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) [11], vitamins [10], H2 and CO2 [12]. Moreover, the intestinal microbiota can control various biological processes such as nutrient absorption, lipid and glucose homeostasis, and systemic inflammation [13]. SCFAs can improve the well-being of the host animal. For instance, butyrate is the preferred energy source for colonic epithelium cells [14]. Such an energy source can decrease the rate of formation of secondary bile acids from primary bile acids, and protect the host against colorectal cancer. Additionally, higher concentrations of primary bile acids have been observed in non-atherosclerosis patients than in atherosclerosis patients [15,16]. Moreover, propionate reduces the biosynthesis of cholesterol [17], providing protection against cardiovascular disease (CVD) [18]. Most acetate molecules are absorbed from the circulatory system by the liver, and used as an energy source. They are also used as a substrate to form cholesterol and long-chain fatty acids (LCFAs) [19,20].
Dietary carnitine is one of the main factors that can interact with dietary fibers, microbial composition [4], and related metabolites such as SCFAs [21]. The aforementioned interactions have not been well characterized. This review aims to show that carnitine is a key molecule in the metabolism of dietary fibers and gut microbial composition, and to elucidate the role of carnitine in bacterial metabolism, mitochondrial function, and fiber fermentability.

2. Carnitine and Bacterial Cell Functions

Carnitine and acylcarnitines (fatty acyl ester of l-carnitine) are absorbed by the lumen of the small intestine. These carnitines are transported into enterocytes by active transport, and subsequently into the circulatory system through the serosal membrane via diffusion [22,23]. Carnitine that does not get absorbed will reach the large intestine, where the microbiota is located. Carnitine that reaches the large intestine is digested by bacteria, since there are no active digestive exocrine enzyme systems that can breakdown carnitine [24]. There is no debate that bacteria can utilize the carnitine in different ways [25].
There are different mechanisms by which dietary carnitine is used as a carbon or nitrogen source. The first one is to cleave the carbon–nitrogen bond to produce trimethylamine and malic semialdehyde [4]. For example, Acinetobacter calcoaceticus can further degrade the carnitine into trimethylamine and malic acid, which can be used as a carbon source [26]. A similar pathway has been found in the aerobic bacterium Serratia marcescens [27], where the malic semialdehyde enters the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle. This pathway requires two subunits of oxidoreductase that can be found in Acinetobacter baumannii and Serratia marcescens [28].
The second mechanism begins by converting carnitine to glycine betaine in the presence of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) or CoA [4,29]. Without ATP or CoA, carnitine is decarboxylated into the two compounds: trimethylaminoacetone and CO2 [29]. With CoA or ATP, glycine betaine is subjected to three demethylations that produce glycine which then enters the central metabolism [4]. Glycine betaine can act as either an osmolyte, carbon, nitrogen, or energy source. This decarboxylation and demethylation of carnitine has been shown in bacteria that possess the required conversion enzymes [4]. For example, Pseudomonas syringae B728a has the ability to convert carnitine to glycine betaine, because this species of bacterium possesses the required conversion genes. Brevibacterium linensconverts l-carnitine to glycine betaine, and consequently, such betaine could be utilized as a sole carbon or nitrogen source [30], whereas Pseudomonas syringae DC3000 has no carnitine catabolic operon [31,32]. Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Xanthomonas translucens, Enterobacter sp., Pseudomonas putida, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Burkholderia cepacia, Rhizobium sp., and Agrobacterium sp. can encode carnitine dehydrogenases (CDHs) that are specific for converting l-carnitine to glycine betaine [4].
Acinetobacter calcoaceticus and other species can utilize both d- and l-carnitines as sole carbon sources [26], since these species can produce both l-carnitine dehydrogenase (l-CDH) and d-carnitine dehydrogenase (d-CDH) [4]. Enterobacteriaceae such as E. coli, Salmonella typhimurium, Proteus vulgaris and Proteus mirabilisis are able to convert carnitine into γ-butyrobetaine via crotonobetaine reductase [33]. Acinetobacter calcoaceticus 69/V is able to utilize l-carnitine, l-O-acylcarnitine, and γ-butyrobetaine as sole carbon sources, d-carnitine can also be utilized as a carbon and nitrogen source, but only in the presence of l-carnitine to act as an inducer [26]. The latter pathway has been established in the species Agrobacterium radiobacter [34]. Pseudomonas aeruginosa can utilize acylcarnitines (2–16 fatty acids) as sole carbon and nitrogen sources, except for octanoylcarnitine [35]. Short-chain acylcarnitines (acetyl- and butyl-carnitine) are hydrolyzed to l-carnitine and SCFA by the esterase HocS (hydrolase of O-acylcarnitine, short-chains) [35]. Thus, the gut microbiota can use carnitine as a carbon source via two mechanisms.
Rhizobium meliloti metabolizes glycine betaine as an energy source. Such bacteria can convert glycine betaine into dimethylglycine by the action of glycine betaine transmethylase; dimethylglycine is then converted into monomethyl glycine by the action of dimethylglycine dehydrogenase. Monomethyl glycine is then converted into glycine by the action of monomethylglycine dehydrogenase, and this glycine is converted into serine by the action of serine transhydroxy methylase. Finally, serine is deaminated by serine dehydratase into pyruvate, which then enters the TCA cycle to generate ATP molecules [36].
In anaerobic conditions, where oxygen cannot act as an electron acceptor, the bacteria can use alternative electron acceptors such as sulfates, nitrates, ferric iron, carbon dioxide, and fumarate. Even when common electron acceptors are not available, some Enterobacteriaceae species (e.g., E. coli and Salmonella typhimurium) can use carnitine and its catabolic product (crotonobetaine) as final electron acceptors [37,38]. In aerobic conditions, Pseudomonas species, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, are able to grow on l-carnitine as their sole sources of carbon and nitrogen. Aerobic carnitine degradation starts with hydroxyl group oxidation by l-carnitine dehydrogenase to form 3-dehydrocarnitine [39]. Both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria can use carnitine for different cellular functions in anaerobic or aerobic environments, because carnitine can be used as a sole nitrogen and sole carbon source, or as an electron acceptor [4]. Thus, bacteria can use carnitine for a variety of cellular functions including the former biological actions, and also to maintain the normal enteric pH. Thus, in prokaryotes, carnitine can be catabolized to act as a sole nitrogen and/or sole carbon source, or electron acceptor and osmolyte by the bacterial cell.

3. Carnitine and Bacterial Protection

The gut microbiota can import or synthesize compatible solutes to protect themselves against stresses resulting from salt, pressure, temperature, or changing water content. Such a solute accumulates at high concentrations in the cytoplasm, without conflicting with the normal biological processes [40]. Interestingly, carnitine is an ideal compatible solute that can be imported, or generated by many bacteria [41,42]. Carnitine can act as an osmoprotectant and/or osmolyte that can be utilized by bacteria to protect against osmotic stress [4,43].
Carnitine is transported into the cytosol of bacteria by different mechanisms, for example, Bacillus subtilis can import d- and l-carnitine, acetylcarnitine, crotonobetaine, c-butyrobetaine and octanoylcarnitine via the OpuC transporter, which is an ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter family member [44]. The expression of the OpuC carnitine uptake system is increased at low temperatures in order to protect against heat stress [4,45]. In Listeria monocytogenes, the OpuC carnitine transport system uses the OpuC transporter to import carnitine, which is important for protecting against bile stress [46], and maintaining the gut bacteria [47]. Another mechanism was observed in P. aeruginosa whereby three members of the betaine\choline\carnitine transporter (BCCT) family and a single ABC family member are produced in order to transport carnitine to the bacterial cell [48]. Furthermore, the degradation of O-acylcarnitines as a mechanism was observed in B. subtilis [35], since the degradation of O-acylcarnitines can provide an osmolyte to protect such microbiota against hyperosmotic stress [44]. O-acetylcarnitine can be hydrolyzed by HocS to generate free carnitine, which acts as an osmoprotectant [35], such as in Bacillus subtilis and P. putida [44]. These species can utilize short-chain acylcarnitines ranging from 10 to 16 carbons in length. However, P. aeruginosa hydrolyzes short-chain acylcarnitines ranging from 2 to 6 carbons in length by an l-enantiomer-specific hydrolase [35]. Thus, carnitine is transported into the cytosol of bacterial cells by one of three mechanisms: ABC, BCCT [49,50], or indirect degradation of O-acylcarnitines [48]. Interestingly, the gut bacteria not only use the imported form of carnitine, but they can also produce endocellular carnitine forms.

4. Microbial Carnitine Production

De novo carnitine synthesis has not been confirmed in any bacterial species [4]. By contrast, carnitine is synthesized in mammals from the amino acids lysine and methionine. The carbon backbone of carnitine is derived from lysine, and the 4-N-methyl groups are derived from methionine. These reactions are catalyzed by methyltransferases to release trimethyl lysine (TML). This TML is hydroxylated by trimethyl lysine dioxygenase (TMLD) to form 3-hydroxy trimethyl lysine (HTML). The later molecule is acted on by HTML aldolase to generate 4-trimethylaminobutyraldehyde (TMABA) and glycine. The TMABA is acted on by TMABA dehydrogenase (TMABA-DH) to form 4-N-trimethylaminobutyrate (butyrobetaine), that is finally hydroxylated by γ-butyrobetaine dioxygenase (BBD) to form carnitine [5]. However, bacteria can produce carnitine by utilizing other substrates [4], for instance, Escherichia coli and Proteus sp. can produce l-carnitine from crotonobetaine or d-carnitine using carnitinyl-CoA hydrolase and carnitine racemase [1]. Bacillus subtilis also utilizes acetylcarnitine to produce carnitine by the action of acyl-l-carnitine esterases. The carnitine acts as an osmolyte to protect the bacterium against cellular hyperosmotic stress [44]. Members of the family Enterobacteriaceae produce carnitine using γ-butyrobetaine as a substrate [1]. The Betaproteobacterium Achromobacter cycloclast and the Gammaproteobacterium Acinetobacter calcoaceticus have the same ability to produce carnitine from γ-butyrobetaine, and they are predicted to have similar enzymic activities to species of Enterobacteriaceae. The latter family can utilize γ-butyrobetaine hydroxylase for the biosynthesis of carnitine [4]. Therefore, gut microbiota can use different substrates to form carnitine. Further studies are needed to investigate the effect of carnitine concentration on gut bacterial composition.

5. The Interaction between Carnitine and the Gut Microbial Community

The uptake of carnitine by the large intestine (colon) is likely to be influenced by the gut microbial population. The carnitine transporter (Octn2), which is involved in carnitine absorption, is expressed in both the small and large intestines [5]. If the colonic bacterial community reaches a high cell density, quorum-sensing systems can facilitate cell-to-cell communication within the bacterial population by producing molecules such as CSF (sporulation-stimulating factor) and LSP (lipopolysaccharide; carnitine absorption factor). Such factors can regulate gene expression in colonocytes [51]. CSF induces functions in bacterial cells and in colonocytes, since the CSF passes into bacterial cells using oligopeptide permease (Opp) [52,53]. However, CSF passes into colonocytes using organic cation transporter novel 2 (Octn2) [54]. In bacterial cells, both CSFs and ComX pheromone (a regulator protein) can work together to regulate some functions, such as genetic competence initiation, sporulation, and antibiotic synthesis [53,55]. In colonocytes, CSF passes into the cells to stimulate the expression of heat-shock inducible protein 27 (Hsp27), which protects the cells against oxidant stress [56]. However, CSF competes with carnitine for Octn2 transport, leading to an inhibition of carnitine absorption [57]. Thus, when there is a high microbial population density, carnitine absorption may be inhibited as depicted in Figure 1. Conversely, the bacterial LSP molecule activates Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) in colonocytes, which stimulates PPAR-γ (xenoreceptor) activity, and Octn2 gene expression, leading to an increase in the carnitine absorption rate [58,59].

6. Carnitine and Fatty Acid Regulation

Carnitine has a crucial role in propionic acid metabolism; this is because carnitine promotes the synthesis of propionyl-CoA carboxylase (PCC) by promoting the transcription of propionyl-CoA carboxylase A (PCCA) and propionyl-CoA carboxylase B (PCCB) genes [60]. These enzymes can convert residual SCFAs into acetyl-CoA that is used in the Krebs cycle to produce ATP molecules. Moreover, carnitine can bind to residual amounts of mitochondrial propionic acid in order to remove and excrete them into the urine [61]. Many clinical studies have suggested that an improvement in propionic acidemia disorder can occur by administering carnitine to affected individuals [21,60,62]. SCFAs may change mitochondrial function through carnitine metabolism and the Krebs cycle [21] to elicit their effects. Propionic acid induces the expression of carnitine palmitoyltransferase II (CPT-II), which is part of the carnitine transport system within the cell. Such induction can be promoted by phosphorylation of ERK kinase, leading to an upregulation of PPAR-α for CPT-II gene expression [63].
Carnitine can also activate butyrate absorption in an indirect way. As carnitine protects bacteria against abnormal salinity [64], such bacteria have an anti-inflammatory effect against cytokine TNF-α activity which inhibits butyrate transporter activity [65]. The anti-inflammatory effects of bacteria may be due to a balance between the suppression of proinflammatory mediators (TNF-α) and the induction of anti-inflammatory cytokines, which may be related to the production of SCFAs [66]. For instance, the species L. plantarum stimulates enteric butyrate absorption by modulating the sodium-coupled monocarboxylate transporter 1 (SMCT1) [65] and monocarboxylate transporter 1 (MCT1) [67]. Conversely, in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), these transporters can be inhibited by cytokine TNF-α, and consequently butyrate uptake can be down-regulated. In addition, L. plantarum can block the inhibitory effect that cytokine TNF-α has on SMCT1 transporter expression [65].
In eukaryotes, butyrate passes the double-mitochondrial membrane to the mitochondrial matrix, where oxidation of butyrate is activated to produce acetyl-CoA, which then enters the Krebs cycle [68]. Excess acetyl-CoA inhibits butyrate oxidation, leading to a reduction in Krebs cycle capacity in colonocytes, asbutyrate provides 70% of the energy supply to the colonocytes [69]. Carnitine transfers any excess amounts of intra-mitochondrial acetyl-CoA through the carnitine acetyltransferase pathway to the cytosol [70,71], to produce fatty acids [72,73]. Therefore, carnitine can regulate energy metabolism.
Carnitine has a crucial role in fatty acid β-oxidation during the transport of activated LCFAs from the cytosol to the mitochondrial matrix, and in the modulation of the intra-mitochondrial acetyl-CoA/CoASH ratio [74,75,76]. In addition, carnitine is involved in peroxisomal β-oxidation by moving acetyl-CoA to the mitochondria for oxidation in the Krebs cycle to produce CO2, H2O [77,78], and energy [76]. Carnitine can also store energy (as acetyl groups) in the form of acetyl carnitine [6,79], and detoxify the poorly metabolized acyl groups by forming carnitine esters that are excreted out of mitochondria [80].

7. Fiber–Carnitine Interaction

Dietary fiber can affect carnitine homeostasis by trapping the co-factor element iron. This co-factor is necessary for carnitine biosynthesis and a deficiency results in an increase in the risk of atherosclerosis and other disorders.
Iron is an important co-factor that is required for the activity of the first enzyme in carnitine biosynthesis, as TMLD is a non-haem ferrous-iron dioxygenase. TMLD requires 2-oxoglutarate, Fe2+, and molecular oxygen as cofactors [81,82,83,84]. Dietary fibers can have a negative effect on iron absorption in the small intestine, as some dietary fibers can bind iron and consequently decrease the availability of iron for absorption [4]. This negative effect of fiber depends on fiber components [85], colonic fermentation [86], viscosity [87,88], pH [89,90], and fiber esterification [91]. Fiber components, such as some non-starch polysaccharides (NSP) and lignin, can form complexes with the iron and lead to further decreased iron bioavailability [85], as depicted in Figure 1. Binding occurs between iron and functional groups such as carboxyl groups (e.g., in uronic acids) or carboxyl and hydroxyl groups (e.g., in phenols) [85,89,90]. Moreover, carnitine biosynthesis requires some dietary vitamins [92] and minerals to support the intestinal microbiota [93]. There is limited research describing the effect of anti-nutritional factors or enhancers on carnitine biosynthesis cofactors and coenzymes.
A low fiber intake can stimulate carnitine breakdown by enteric microbiota, producing trimethylamine (TMA) [94]. This TMA is converted in the liver to trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO), leading to an increased risk of atherosclerosis and CVD [95].

8. Conclusions

Carnitine has an important role in maintaining the high fiber fermentation ability of the colonic microbiota. Colonic microbiota can use carnitine as a source of carbon, nitrogen, or as an electron acceptor. Furthermore, carnitine is utilized by the intestinal microbiota as a protective solute against different stressors. Carnitine also mediates the metabolism of SCFAs by regulating normal levels of such SCFAs in the cytosol and mitochondria, in order to provide normal energy maintenance for the host. There is an antagonistic relation between dietary iron and carnitine biosynthesis when there is a high intake of dietary fiber, and an antagonistic relation between a high intestinal bacterial population and carnitine absorption. A low dietary fiber intake can affect metabolic carnitine pathways, leading to an increase in the risks of atherosclerosis and CVD. Further investigation is required to evaluate the effects of different anti-nutritional factors on carnitine bioactivity.

Acknowledgments

This review was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 30671621) and was supported by Development and Application of New Efficient Aquatic Microorganism Feed Additives (20180201017NY), the Industrial Technology Research and Exploitation Project of the Jilin Province (No. 2011002-1), the Foreign Trade Development Project in the Northeastern Old Industrial Base of the Jilin Province, and the Science Fund Project of Jilin Agricultural University (No. 201704).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

ABCATP-binding cassette
ATPAdenosine triphosphate
BBDγ-Butyrobetaine dioxygenase
BCCTBetainecholinecarnitine transporter
CDHCarnitine dehydrogenase
CPT-IICarnitine palmitoyltransferase II
CSFSporulation-stimulating factor
CVDCardiovascular disease
HocSHydrolase of O-acylcarnitine, short-chains
Hsp27Heat-shock inducible protein27
HTML3-Hydroxy trimethyl lysine
IBDInflammatory bowel disease
L-CDHl-Carnitine dehydrogenase
LCFAsLong chain fatty acids
LSPLipopolysaccharide
MCT1Monocarboxylate transporter1
NSPNon-starch polysaccharides
Octn2Organic cation transporter novel 2
PCCPropionyl-CoA carboxylase
PCCAPropionyl-CoA carboxylase A
PCCBPropionyl-CoA carboxylase B
SCFAsShort chain fatty acids
SMCT1Sodium coupled monocarboxylate transporter1
TLR4Toll-like receptor 4
TMATrimethylamine
TMLTrimethyl lysine
TMABA4-Trimethylaminobutyraldehyde
TMAOTrimethylamine-N-oxide
TMLDTrimethyllysine dioxygenase

References

  1. Bernal, V.; Sevilla, Á.; Cánovas, M.; Iborra, J.L. Production of L-carnitine by secondary metabolism of bacteria. Microb. Cell Fact. 2007, 6, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Schroeder, M.A.; Atherton, H.J.; Dodd, M.S.; Lee, P.; Cochlin, L.E.; Radda, G.K.; Clarke, K.; Tyler, D.J. The Cycling of Acetyl-CoA through acetylcarnitine buffers cardiac substrate supply: A hyperpolarised (13)c magnetic resonance study. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2012, 5, 201–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Flanagan, J.L.; Simmons, P.A.; Vehige, J.; Willcox, M.D.; Garrett, Q. Role of carnitine in disease. Nutr. Metab. 2010, 7, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Meadows, J.A.; Wargo, M.J. Carnitine in bacterial physiology and metabolism. Microbiology 2015, 161, 1161–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Vaz, F.M.; Wanders, R.J. Carnitine biosynthesis in mammals. Biochem. J. 2002, 361 Pt 3, 417–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bremer, J. Carnitine—Metabolism and functions. Physiol. Rev. 1983, 63, 1420–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Brass, E.P. Pharmacokinetic considerations for the therapeutic use of carnitine in hemodialysis patients. Clin. Ther. 1995, 17, 176–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Walter, J.; Ley, R. The human gut microbiome: Ecology and recent evolutionary changes. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2011, 65, 411–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Holscher, H.D. Dietary fiber and prebiotics and the gastrointestinal microbiota. Gut Microbes 2017, 8, 172–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Jiang, H.; Che, D.; Qin, G.; Kong, X.; Farouk, M.H. Effects of dietary non-fiber carbohydrates on composition and function of gut microbiome in monogastrics: A Review. Protein Pept. Lett. 2017, 24, 432–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Duncan, S.H.; Belenguer, A.; Holtrop, G.; Johnstone, A.M.; Flint, H.J.; Lobley, G.E. Reduced dietary intake of carbohydrates by obese subjects results in decreased concentrations of butyrate and butyrate-producing bacteria in feces. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 1073–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Cummings, J.H.; Pomare, E.W.; Branch, W.J.; Naylor, C.P.; Macfarlane, G.T. Short chain fatty acids in human large intestine, portal, hepatic and venous blood. Gut 1987, 28, 1221–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Delzenne, N.M.; Neyrinck, A.M.; Bäckhed, F.; Cani, P.D. Targeting gut microbiota in obesity: Effects of prebiotics and probiotics. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2011, 7, 639–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Csordas, A. Butyrate, aspirin and colorectal cancer. Eur. J. Cancer Prev. 1996, 5, 221–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zampa, A.; Silvi, S.; Fabiani, R.; Morozzi, G.; Orpianesi, C.; Cresci, A. Effects of different digestible carbohydrates on bile acid metabolism and SCFA production by human gut micro-flora grown in an in vitro semi-continuous culture. Anaerobe 2004, 10, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Charach, G.; Grosskopf, I.; Rabinovich, A.; Shochat, M.; Weintraub, M.; Rabinovich, P. The association of bile acid excretion and atherosclerotic coronary artery disease. Therap. Adv. Gastroenterol. 2011, 4, 95–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Wolever, T.M.; Spadafora, P.J.; Cunnane, S.C.; Pencharz, P.B. Propionate inhibits incorporation of colonic [1,2-13C]acetate into plasma lipids in humans. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1995, 61, 1241–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Scott, K.P.; Duncan, S.H.; Flint, H.J. Dietary fibre and the gut microbiota. Nutr. Bull. 2008, 33, 201–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bloemen, J.G.; Venema, K.; van de Poll, M.C.; Olde Damink, S.W.; Buurman, W.A.; Dejong, C.H. Short chain fatty acids exchange across the gut and liver in humans measured at surgery. Clin. Nutr. 2009, 28, 657–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Den Besten, G.; van Eunen, K.; Groen, A.K.; Venema, K.; Reijngoud, D.-J.; Bakker, B.M. The role of short-chain fatty acids in the interplay between diet, gut microbiota, and host energy metabolism. J. Lipid Res. 2013, 54, 2325–2340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. MacFabe, D.F. Enteric short-chain fatty acids: Microbial messengers of metabolism, mitochondria, and mind: Implications in autism spectrum disorders. Microb. Ecol. Health Dis. 2015, 26, 28177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Marciani, P.; Lindi, C.; Marzo, A.; Arrigoni Martelli, E.; Cardace, G.; Esposito, G. l-carnitine and carnitine ester transport in the rat small intestine. Pharmacol. Res. 1991, 23, 157–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Rebouche, C.J. Kinetics, pharmacokinetics, and regulation of l-carnitine and acetyl-l-carnitine metabolism. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2004, 1033, 30–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Rebouche, C.J.; Chenard, C.A. Metabolic fate of dietary carnitine in human adults: Identification and quantification of urinary and fecal metabolites. J. Nutr. 1991, 121, 539–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ussher, J.R.; Lopaschuk, G.D.; Arduini, A. Gut microbiota metabolism of l-carnitine and cardiovascular risk. Atherosclerosis 2013, 231, 456–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Miura-Fraboni, J.; Kleber, H.-P.; Englard, S. Assimilation of γ-butyrobetaine, and d- and l-carnitine by resting cell suspensions of Acinetobacter calcoaceticus and Pseudomonas putida. Arch. Microbiol. 1982, 133, 217–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Unemoto, T.; Hayashi, M.; Miyaki, K.; Hayashi, M. Formation of trimethylamine from dl-carnitine by Serratia marcescens. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1966, 121, 220–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhu, Y.; Jameson, E.; Crosatti, M.; Schafer, H.; Rajakumar, K.; Bugg, T.D.; Chen, Y. Carnitine metabolism to trimethylamine by an unusual Rieske-type oxygenase from human microbiota. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 4268–4273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Lindstedt, G.; Lindstedt, S.; Midtvedt, T.; Tofft, M. The formation and degradation of carnitine in Pseudomonas. Biochemistry 1967, 6, 1262–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jebbar, M.; Champion, C.; Blanco, C.; Bonnassie, S. Carnitine acts as a compatible solute in Brevibacterium linens. Res. Microbiol. 1998, 149, 211–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chen, C.; Malek, A.A.; Wargo, M.J.; Hogan, D.A.; Beattie, G.A. The ATP-binding cassette transporter Cbc (choline/betaine/carnitine) recruits multiple substrate-binding proteins with strong specificity for distinct quaternary ammonium compounds. Mol. Microbiol. 2010, 75, 29–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Chen, C.; Beattie, G.A. Characterization of the osmoprotectant transporter OpuC from Pseudomonas syringae and demonstration that cystathionine-beta-synthase domains are required for its osmoregulatory function. J. Bacteriol. 2007, 189, 6901–6912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kleber, H.P. Bacterial carnitine metabolism. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1997, 147, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Hanschmann, H.; Kleber, H.-P. Purification and characterization of d(+)-carnitine dehydrogenase from Agrobacterium sp.—A new enzyme of carnitine metabolism. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Protein Struct. Mol. Enzymol. 1997, 1337, 133–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Meadows, J.A.; Wargo, M.J. Characterization of Pseudomonas aeruginosa growth on O-acylcarnitines and identification of a short-chain acylcarnitine hydrolase. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79, 3355–3363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Smith, L.T.; Pocard, J.A.; Bernard, T.; Le Rudulier, D. Osmotic control of glycine betaine biosynthesis and degradation in Rhizobium meliloti. J. Bacteriol. 1988, 170, 3142–3149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Seim, H.; Loster, H.; Claus, R.; Kleber, H.P.; Strack, E. Stimulation of the anaerobic growth of Salmonella typhimurium by reduction of l-carnitine, carnitine derivatives and structure-related trimethylammonium compounds. Arch. Microbiol. 1982, 132, 91–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Seim, H.; Loster, H.; Kleber, H.P. Reductive metabolism of l-carnitine and structure-related trimethylammonium compounds in Escherichia coli. Acta Biol. Med. Ger. 1982, 41, 1009–1018. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  39. Aurich, H.; Kleber, H.P.; Schopp, W.D. An inducible carnitine dehydrogenase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1967, 139, 505–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Brown, A.D.; Simpson, J.R. Water relations of sugar-tolerant yeasts: The role of intracellular polyols. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1972, 72, 589–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Warren, C.R. High diversity of small organic N observed in soil water. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2013, 57 (Suppl. C), 444–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Warren, C.R. Quaternary ammonium compounds can be abundant in some soils and are taken up as intact molecules by plants. New Phytol. 2013, 198, 476–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Smiddy, M.; Sleator, R.D.; Patterson, M.F.; Hill, C.; Kelly, A.L. Role for compatible solutes glycine betaine and l-carnitine in Listerial barotolerance. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 7555–7557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Kappes, R.M.; Bremer, E. Response of Bacillus subtilis to high osmolarity: Uptake of carnitine, crotonobetaine and γ-butyrobetaine via the ABC transport system OpuC. Microbiology 1998, 144, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Angelidis, A.S.; Smith, G.M. Role of the glycine betaine and carnitine transporters in adaptation of Listeria monocytogenes to chill stress in defined medium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 69, 7492–7498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Watson, D.; Sleator, R.D.; Casey, P.G.; Hill, C.; Gahan, C.G. Specific osmolyte transporters mediate bile tolerance in Listeria monocytogenes. Infect. Immun. 2009, 77, 4895–4904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Gahan, C.G.; Hill, C. Listeria monocytogenes: Survival and adaptation in the gastrointestinal tract. Food Res. Int. 2014, 4, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Wargo, M.J. Homeostasis and catabolism of choline and glycine betaine: Lessons from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79, 2112–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Malek, A.A.; Chen, C.; Wargo, M.J.; Beattie, G.A.; Hogan, D.A. Roles of three transporters, CbcXWV, BetT1, and BetT3, in Pseudomonas aeruginosa choline uptake for catabolism. J. Bacteriol. 2011, 193, 3033–3041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Ziegler, C.; Bremer, E.; Kramer, R. The BCCT family of carriers: From physiology to crystal structure. Mol. Microbiol. 2010, 78, 13–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Williams, P.; Winzer, K.; Chan, W.C.; Camara, M. Look who’s talking: Communication and quorum sensing in the bacterial world. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2007, 362, 1119–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Hamon, M.A.; Lazazzera, B.A. The sporulation transcription factor Spo0A is required for biofilm development in Bacillus subtilis. Mol. Microbiol. 2001, 42, 1199–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Auchtung, J.M.; Lee, C.A.; Grossman, A.D. Modulation of the ComA—Dependent quorum response in Bacillus subtilis by multiple Rap proteins and Phr peptides. J. Bacteriol. 2006, 188, 5273–5285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Fujiya, M.; Musch, M.W.; Nakagawa, Y.; Hu, S.; Alverdy, J.; Kohgo, Y.; Schneewind, O.; Jabri, B.; Chang, E.B. The Bacillus subtilis quorum-sensing molecule CSF contributes to intestinal homeostasis via OCTN2, a host cell membrane transporter. Cell Host Microbe 2007, 1, 299–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Lazazzera, B.A. The intracellular function of extracellular signaling peptides. Peptides 2001, 22, 1519–1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Tao, Y.; Drabik, K.A.; Waypa, T.S.; Musch, M.W.; Alverdy, J.C.; Schneewind, O.; Chang, E.B.; Petrof, E.O. Soluble factors from Lactobacillus GG activate MAPKs and induce cytoprotective heat shock proteins in intestinal epithelial cells. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2006, 290, C1018–C1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Williams, P. Bacillus subtilis: A shocking message from a probiotic. Cell Host Microbe 2007, 1, 248–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Wang, K.; Wan, Y.-J.Y. Nuclear receptors and inflammatory diseases. Exp. Biol. Med. 2008, 233, 496–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. D’Argenio, G.; Petillo, O.; Margarucci, S.; Torpedine, A.; Calarco, A.; Koverech, A.; Boccia, A.; Paolella, G.; Peluso, G. Colon OCTN2 gene expression is up-regulated by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ in humans and mice and contributes to local and systemic carnitine homeostasis. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 27078–27087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Kalousek, F.; Darigo, M.D.; Rosenberg, L.E. Isolation and characterization of propionyl-CoA carboxylase from normal human liver. Evidence for a protomeric tetramer of nonidentical subunits. J. Biol. Chem. 1980, 255, 60–65. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  61. Chapman, K.A.; Gropman, A.; MacLeod, E.; Stagni, K.; Summar, M.L.; Ueda, K.; Mew, N.A.; Franks, J.; Island, E.; Matern, D.; et al. Acute Management of Propionic Acidemia. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2012, 105, 16–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Roe, C.R.; Millington, D.S.; Maltby, D.A.; Bohan, T.P.; Hoppel, C.L. l-carnitine enhances excretion of propionyl coenzyme A as propionylcarnitine in propionic acidemia. J. Clin. Investig. 1984, 73, 1785–1788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Higashimura, Y.; Naito, Y.; Takagi, T.; Uchiyama, K.; Mizushima, K.; Yoshikawa, T. Propionate promotes fatty acid oxidation through the up-regulation of Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha in intestinal epithelial cells. J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol. 2015, 61, 511–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Kets, E.P.W.; de Bont, J.A.M. Effect of carnitines on Lactobacillus plantarum subjected to osmotic stress. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1997, 146, 205–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Borthakur, A.; Anbazhagan, A.N.; Kumar, A.; Raheja, G.; Singh, V.; Ramaswamy, K.; Dudeja, P.K. The probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum counteracts TNF-α-induced downregulation of SMCT1 expression and function. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2010, 299, G928–G934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Puddu, A.; Sanguineti, R.; Montecucco, F.; Viviani, G.L. Evidence for the gut microbiota short-chain fatty acids as key pathophysiological molecules improving diabetes. Mediat. Inflamm. 2014, 2014, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Hadjiagapiou, C.; Schmidt, L.; Dudeja, P.K.; Layden, T.J.; Ramaswamy, K. Mechanism(s) of butyrate transport in Caco-2 cells: Role of monocarboxylate transporter 1. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2000, 279, G775–G780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Fritz, I.B. Carnitine and its role in fatty acid metabolism. Adv. Lipid Res. 1963, 1, 285–334. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  69. D’Argenio, G.; Calvani, M.; Casamassimi, A.; Petillo, O.; Margarucci, S.; Rienzo, M.; Peluso, I.; Calvani, R.; Ciccodicola, A.; Caporaso, N.; et al. Experimental colitis: Decreased Octn2 and Atb0+ expression in rat colonocytes induces carnitine depletion that is reversible by carnitine-loaded liposomes. FASEB J. 2006, 20, 2544–2546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Zambell, K.L.; Fitch, M.D.; Fleming, S.E. Acetate and butyrate are the major substrates for de novo lipogenesis in rat colonic epithelial cells. J. Nutr. 2003, 133, 3509–3515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Boren, J.; Lee, W.N.; Bassilian, S.; Centelles, J.J.; Lim, S.; Ahmed, S.; Boros, L.G.; Cascante, M. The stable isotope-based dynamic metabolic profile of butyrate-induced HT29 cell differentiation. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 28395–28402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Peluso, G.; Petillo, O.; Margarucci, S.; Mingrone, G.; Greco, A.V.; Indiveri, C.; Palmieri, F.; Melone, M.A.; Reda, E.; Calvani, M. Decreased mitochondrial carnitine translocase in skeletal muscles impairs utilization of fatty acids in insulin-resistant patients. Front. Biosci. 2002, 7, a109–a116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Peluso, G.; Nicolai, R.; Reda, E.; Benatti, P.; Barbarisi, A.; Calvani, M. Cancer and anticancer therapy-induced modifications on metabolism mediated by carnitine system. J. Cell Physiol. 2000, 182, 339–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. McGarry, J.D.; Brown, N.F. The mitochondrial carnitine palmitoyltransferase system. From concept to molecular analysis. Eur. J. Biochem. 1997, 244, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Ramsay, R.R.; Gandour, R.D.; van der Leij, F.R. Molecular enzymology of carnitine transfer and transport. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2001, 1546, 21–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Stephens, F.B.; Constantin-Teodosiu, D.; Greenhaff, P.L. New insights concerning the role of carnitine in the regulation of fuel metabolism in skeletal muscle. J. Physiol. 2007, 581 Pt 2, 431–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Jakobs, B.S.; Wanders, R.J. Fatty acid beta-oxidation in peroxisomes and mitochondria: The first, unequivocal evidence for the involvement of carnitine in shuttling propionyl-CoA from peroxisomes to mitochondria. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1995, 213, 1035–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Verhoeven, N.M.; Roe, D.S.; Kok, R.M.; Wanders, R.J.; Jakobs, C.; Roe, C.R. Phytanic acid and pristanic acid are oxidized by sequential peroxisomal and mitochondrial reactions in cultured fibroblasts. J. Lipid Res. 1998, 39, 66–74. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  79. Carter, A.L.; Abney, T.O.; Lapp, D.F. Biosynthesis and metabolism of carnitine. J. Child Neurol. 1995, 10, S3–S7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Duran, M.; Loof, N.E.; Ketting, D.; Dorland, L. Secondary carnitine deficiency. J. Clin. Chem. Clin. Biochem. 1990, 28, 359–363. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  81. Hulse, J.D.; Ellis, S.R.; Henderson, L.M. Carnitine biosynthesis. beta-Hydroxylation of trimethyllysine by an alpha-ketoglutarate-dependent mitochondrial dioxygenase. J. Biol. Chem. 1978, 253, 1654–1659. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  82. Sachan, D.S.; Broquist, H.P. Synthesis of carnitine from ε-N-trimethyllysine in post mitochondrial fractions of Neurospora crassa. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1980, 96, 870–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Sachan, D.S.; Hoppel, C.L. Carnitine biosynthesis. Hydroxylation of N6-trimethyl-lysine to 3-hydroxy-N6-trimethyl-lysine. Biochem. J. 1980, 188, 529–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Stein, R.; Englard, S. Properties of rat 6-N-trimethyl-l-lysine hydroxylases: Similarities among the kidney, liver, heart, and skeletal muscle activities. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1982, 217, 324–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Torre, M.; Rodriguez, A.R.; Saura-Calixto, F. Interactions of Fe(II), Ca(II) and Fe(III) with high dietary fibre materials: A physicochemical approach. Food Chem. 1995, 54, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Baye, K.; Guyot, J.P.; Mouquet-Rivier, C. The unresolved role of dietary fibers on mineral absorption. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 57, 949–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Van der Klis, J.D.; Kwakernaak, C.; de Wit, W. Effects of endoxylanase addition to wheat-based diets on physico-chemical chyme conditions and mineral absorption in broilers. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 1995, 51, 15–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Guillon, F.; Champ, M. Structural and physical properties of dietary fibres, and consequences of processing on human physiology. Food Res. Int. 2000, 33, 233–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Debon, S.J.J.; Tester, R.F. In vitro binding of calcium, iron and zinc by non-starch polysaccharides. Food Chem. 2001, 73, 401–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Miyada, T.; Nakajima, A.; Ebihara, K. Iron bound to pectin is utilised by rats. Br. J. Nutr. 2011, 106, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Kim, M.; Atallah, M.T.; Amarasiriwardena, C.; Barnes, R. Pectin with low molecular weight and high degree of esterification increases absorption of 58Fe in growing rats. J. Nutr. 1996, 126, 1883–1890. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  92. Liu, J.; Liu, X.; Xiong, X.Q.; Yang, T.; Cui, T.; Hou, N.L.; Lai, X.; Liu, S.; Guo, M.; Liang, X.H.; et al. Effect of vitamin A supplementation on gut microbiota in children with autism spectrum disorders—A pilot study. BMC Microbiol. 2017, 17, 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Skrypnik, K.; Suliburska, J. Association between the gut microbiota and mineral metabolism. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Clouatre, D.; Bell, S. Is l-carnitine the link between red meat and heart disease? J. Nutr. Food Sci. 2013, 3, e119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Koeth, R.A.; Wang, Z.; Levison, B.S.; Buffa, J.A.; Org, E.; Sheehy, B.T.; Britt, E.B.; Fu, X.; Wu, Y.; Li, L.; et al. Intestinal microbiota metabolism of l-carnitine, a nutrient in red meat, promotes atherosclerosis. Nat. Med. 2013, 19, 576–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Carnitine and iron absorption in the intestines. Non-absorbed dietary carnitine reaches the large intestine (colonocytes), where bacterial sporulation-stimulating factor (CSF) competes with carnitine on the organic cation transporter novel 2 (Octn2) transporter, leading to reduced carnitine absorption. Iron conjugated to fiber is absorbed less in the small intestine (enterocytes), but is absorbed more in the large intestine, as bacterial fermentation can dissociate such conjugates.
Figure 1. Carnitine and iron absorption in the intestines. Non-absorbed dietary carnitine reaches the large intestine (colonocytes), where bacterial sporulation-stimulating factor (CSF) competes with carnitine on the organic cation transporter novel 2 (Octn2) transporter, leading to reduced carnitine absorption. Iron conjugated to fiber is absorbed less in the small intestine (enterocytes), but is absorbed more in the large intestine, as bacterial fermentation can dissociate such conjugates.
Ijms 19 01008 g001

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ghonimy, A.; Zhang, D.M.; Farouk, M.H.; Wang, Q. The Impact of Carnitine on Dietary Fiber and Gut Bacteria Metabolism and Their Mutual Interaction in Monogastrics. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1008. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms19041008

AMA Style

Ghonimy A, Zhang DM, Farouk MH, Wang Q. The Impact of Carnitine on Dietary Fiber and Gut Bacteria Metabolism and Their Mutual Interaction in Monogastrics. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2018; 19(4):1008. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms19041008

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ghonimy, Abdallah, Dong Ming Zhang, Mohammed Hamdy Farouk, and Qiuju Wang. 2018. "The Impact of Carnitine on Dietary Fiber and Gut Bacteria Metabolism and Their Mutual Interaction in Monogastrics" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 19, no. 4: 1008. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms19041008

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop