Next Article in Journal
A Proteome Approach Reveals Differences between Fertile Women and Patients with Repeated Implantation Failure on Endometrial Level—Does hCG Render the Endometrium of RIF Patients?
Next Article in Special Issue
Natural History of a Satellite DNA Family: From the Ancestral Genome Component to Species-Specific Sequences, Concerted and Non-Concerted Evolution
Previous Article in Journal
Antifouling (Bio)materials for Electrochemical (Bio)sensing
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of Genomic Prediction for Pasmo Resistance in Flax
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Multifaceted Role of PheDof12-1 in the Regulation of Flowering Time and Abiotic Stress Responses in Moso Bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis)

International Center for Bamboo and Rattan, Key Laboratory of Bamboo and Rattan Science and Technology, State Forestry Administration, Beijing 100102, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20(2), 424; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms20020424
Submission received: 23 December 2018 / Revised: 7 January 2019 / Accepted: 17 January 2019 / Published: 19 January 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Genomics)

Abstract

:
DNA binding with one finger (Dof) proteins, forming an important transcriptional factor family, are involved in gene transcriptional regulation, development, stress responses, and flowering responses in annual plants. However, knowledge of Dofs in perennial and erratically flowering moso bamboo is limited. In view of this, a Dof gene, PheDof12-1, was isolated from moso bamboo. PheDof12-1 is located in the nucleus and has the highest expression in palea and the lowest in bract. Moreover, PheDof12-1 expression is high in flowering leaves, then declines during flower development. The transcription level of PheDof12-1 is highly induced by cold, drought, salt, and gibberellin A3 (GA3) stresses. The functional characteristics of PheDof are researched for the first time in Arabidopsis, and the results show that transgenic Arabidopsis overexpressing PheDof12-1 shows early flowering under long-day (LD) conditions but there is no effect on flowering time under short-day (SD) conditions; the transcription levels of FT, SOC1, and AGL24 are upregulated; and FLC and SVP are downregulated. PheDof12-1 exhibits a strong diurnal rhythm, inhibited by light treatment and induced in dark. Yeast one-hybrid (Y1H) assay shows that PheDof12-1 can bind to the promoter sequence of PheCOL4. Taken together, these results indicate that PheDof12-1 might be involved in abiotic stress and flowering time, which makes it an important candidate gene for studying the molecular regulation mechanisms of moso bamboo flowering.

1. Introduction

DNA binding with one finger (Dof) transcription factors (TFs) are a family of plant-specific transcription factors. The proteins generally contain 50–52 highly conserved amino acids, including a C2C2-type zinc-finger motif at the N-terminal end [1]. Dof transcription factors have been shown to be widely distributed in the plant kingdom. The cDNA sequence of Dof was first obtained from Zea mays [2]. Since then, many Dofs have been cloned from various plant species [3,4,5]. In previous studies, it is suggested that Dof proteins are involved in the regulation of a variety of biological processes, including seed germination, floral organ abscission, hormone signaling, and cell cycles. In Arabidopsis, DAG1 and DAG2 can promote seed germination [6,7], DOF6 acts as a negative regulator of seed germination and interacts with TCP14 [8], and AtDOF4.7 participates in the transcriptional regulation of floral organ abscission via an effect on cell wall hydrolase gene expression [9]. In addition, some Dof genes (AtDof2.4, AtDof5.8, and AtDof5.6/HCA2) are expressed in the early development of vascular cells [10]. In rice, OsDof3 is involved in gibberellin-regulated expression [11]. Moreover, Dof TFs such as maize Dof1 and Dof2 are also involved in the control of carbon and nitrogen metabolism through the regulation of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PECPK), glutamine synthase (GS), and glutamate synthase (GLU) [7,12,13,14,15,16].
Genetic and molecular studies have suggested that Dof transcription factors participate in different stresses, light responsiveness, and flowering regulation. In Brachypodium distachyon, BdCBF1, BdCBF2, and BdCBF3 contribute to cold, drought, and salt stresses by regulating downstream targets such as DEHYDRIN5.1 (Dhn5.1) and COR genes [17]. Overexpressing SlCDF3 shows increased transgenic Arabidopsis drought and salt tolerance [18]. In Chinese cabbage, most BraDof genes are induced by cold, heat, high salinity, and drought stresses [19]. Moreover, Dof proteins are involved in photoperiod flowering. In Arabidopsis, cycling Dof factor-1 (CDF1) binds to the COSTANS (CO) and FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) promoter regions to block transactivation of these two flowering genes, whereas this inhibition could be released based on the GIGANTEA-FLAVIN-BINDING, KELCH REPEAT, F-BOX1(GI-FKF1) complex-mediated degradation of CDF1 under long-day (LD) conditions [20]. In addition, CDF2, CDF3, and CDF5 repress flowering of Arabidopsis by decreasing the mRNA level of CO [21]. In rice, overexpressing OsDof12 promotes early flowering under LD conditions by upregulating the expression of Hd3a and OsMADS14 [22]. Although a large number of Dofs have been extensively studied in annual plants [23,24], the knowledge of Dofs in moso bamboo is limited.
Moso bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis) is a perennial plant characterized by a long vegetative stage that flowers synchronously followed by widespread death [25]. In this case, studying the mechanism of moso bamboo flowering time is very important and challenging, and it is quite difficult to determine the key regulatory gene. Moreover, the growth of moso bamboo in the wild is severely threatened by various environmental conditions such as drought, salinity and cold, which severely limit the growth and distribution of moso bamboo and affect the yield and quality of winter shoots, as well as new bamboo yield in the following year and the yield of wood harvesting of the subsequent years [26,27,28]. In addition, recent research on Dofs is mainly in annual plants, and is limited in perennials. Therefore, researching the role of Dofs in moso bamboo is necessary, especially in terms of abiotic stress and flowering time. In this study, a Dof gene (PheDof12-1) is isolated from moso bamboo, induced by cold, drought, salt, and gibberellin (GA3) stresses. The functional characteristics of PheDof12-1 are researched for the first time by ectopic expression in Arabidopsis, and transgenic Arabidopsis overexpressing homozygous PheDof12-1 show early flowering under long-day (LD) conditions, binding to the promoter sequence of PheCOL4 with a strongly diurnal pattern. These results provide new insights into the functions of the Dof transcription factor in the regulation of photoperiod flowering time and abiotic stress in moso bamboo.

2. Results

2.1. Isolation and Analysis of PheDof12-1

Based on the moso bamboo genome database, PheDof12-1 was isolated from moso bamboo. The full-length CDS of PheDof12-1 is 1299 bp, encoding 432-amino acids, with predicted molecular weight (MW) and isoelectric point (pI) of 46.37 kDa and 8.32, respectively. Structure analysis showed that PheDof12-1 contains one intron and two exons (Figure 1A). The deduced proteins contain the conserved zf-Dof domain. Furthermore, phylogenetic analysis of PheDof12-1 and homologous proteins from other plants shows that PheDof12-1 and other Dofs from monocotyledons belong to the same clade (Figure 1B). The amino acid sequence of PheDof12-1 shows 83% and 84% identity with Brachypodium (XP_003558722) and rice (XP_015690912), respectively. This result was consistent with the findings in the stated phylogeny and classification of plants. All these proteins contain the conserved zf-Dof domain (Supplementary Figure S1).

2.2. Tissue-Specific Gene Expression

In order to analyze the expression of PheDof12-1 in different tissues (root, stem, leaf, flowering leaf, flower) and floral organs (pistil, stamen, embryo, glume, palea, flower bud, bract), RNA was isolated to perform qRT-PCR. The results show that the transcription level of PheDof12-1 in flowering leaf is significantly higher than in other tissues. In different flower organs, the expression of PheDof12-1 was highest in palea, and lowest in bract (Figure 1C). In developing flowers, PheDof12-1 had higher transcript accumulation at the floral bud formation stage (F1) (Figure 1D), and decreased gradually at flower development, which was consistent with the previously reported detection of PheDof1 at early stages of flower formation and development [29]. We further generated ProPheDof12-1-GUS transgenic lines, and glucuronidase (GUS) staining was detected in the vasculature of cotyledons and hypocotyls, true leaves, roots, flower, and pollen (Figure 1E,F). The results demonstrate that PheDof12-1 is expressed in different tissues and at different flower development stages, suggesting that it is dynamic during plant development and may play an important role in moso bamboo growth and development.

2.3. Expression Patterns of PheDof12-1 under Stress Treatments

Previous reports have shown that Dof TFs are involved in abiotic stress [30]. To determine the expression pattern of PheDof12-1 in moso bamboo under different stresses, we performed detailed qRT-PCR with TIP41 and NTB as internal reference genes. The results show that PheDof12-1 was responded to cold, drought, and salt stresses. In drought stress, PheDof12-1 was induced and upregulated at each time point, and levels of transcripts in leaves and stems were slightly elevated, but a sharp increase occurred after 1 h in roots, peaking at 70.9-fold. This implies that PheDof12-1 is induced and has a positive function in response to drought stress (Figure 2A–C). In cold treatment using NTB as a reference gene, the expression of PheDof12-1 rapidly increased in leaves, reaching 86.1-fold at 24 h (Figure 2I). Regarding salt treatment, the maximum increase was observed at 12 h, reaching 12.5-fold in leaves when TIP41 was used as the reference gene (Figure 2F), but the expression level was first induced and then decreased in roots. To further investigate the functions of PheDof12-1, we initially analyzed the effects of gibberellin A3 (GA3) and abscisic acid (ABA) on its expression (Figure 2J,K). In GA3 stress, the transcription level of PheDof12-1 was induced and upregulated at almost every time point, peaking at 15.0-fold at 24 h. Under ABA treatment, the translation level of PheDof12-1 initially decreased and then increased, was lowest at 6 h, dropping to undetectable levels, and reached a peak at 48 h. All of these data indicate that PheDof12-1 takes part in the hormones and different abiotic stresses of moso bamboo.

2.4. Overexpression of PheDof12-1 Promotes Early Flowering in Arabidopsis

In order to verify the subcellular localization of PheDof12-1, we further amplified its coding region and fused it to the N-terminal of the eGFP vector. The subcellular localization assay indicated that PheDof12-1 was localized in the nucleus, in accordance with its function as a transcription factor (Figure 3B). To study the genetic functions of PheDof12-1, we transformed it in Arabidopsis. The overexpressed plants showed an early flowering phenotype under LD conditions (Figure 3A), whereas PheDof12-1 overexpression had no effect on flowering time under SD conditions (not shown). The flowering time was about 10 days earlier than wild-type, and the number of rosette leaves of overexpressed lines was smaller than that of wild Arabidopsis (Figure 3C). We further investigated the transcription levels of FT, SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CONSTANS1 (SOC1), AGAMOUS-LIKE 24 (AGL24), FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC), and SHORT VEGETATIVE PHASE (SVP) in the T3 generation to ascertain the downstream effects of this construct. FT, SOC1, and AGL24 were upregulated, while FLC and SVP expression were rather low compared with wild-type (Figure 3D). These data suggest that PheDof12-1 might regulate flowering by controlling the expression of FT, SOC1, AGL24, FLC, and SVP.

2.5. PheDof12-1 Interacts with Photoperiod-Related Regulators

In Arabidopsis, CDFs are transcriptional repressors that bind to CO and FT promoters to repress their transcription [20]. To explore whether PheDof12-1 can form heterodimers with other proteins, an interaction prediction was performed using STRING (https://stringdb.org/) based on the interaction network of rice orthologous genes. As shown in Figure 4E, PheDof12-1 interacted with 10 identified proteins. Among them, the B-box protein (PH01004196G0130), Dof transcription factor (PH01001184G0160), grain size gene (PheSLR1) [31], photoperiodic flowering response gene (PH01002431G0090) [32], and drought-induced protein (PH01000199G0750) were identified, suggesting that PheDof12-1 may be involved in growth and development, photoperiodic response, and abiotic stress.
CDF1, CDF2, CDF3, and CDF5 had high mRNA levels at the beginning of the light period in Arabidopsis [21], and CDFs displayed a similar expression pattern in Populus [33]. So, we detected the expression patterns under photoperiod treatments. The results show that PheDof12-1 was similarly expressed under both LD and SD conditions. The transcription level of PheDof12-1 decreased with the increased light time, reaching the minimum value before dark (Figure 4A,B), with high mRNA levels at the beginning of the light period, which was consistent with the expression patterns of CDFs in Arabidopsis and Populus. The highly similar expression pattern of CDFs in Populus, Arabidopsis, and moso bamboo suggests a functional conservation.
CO and CO-like (COL) proteins are members of the B-box family, playing a central role in the photoperiod response pathway by mediating between the circadian clock and the floral integrators [34]. CDFs are transcriptional repressors that bind to the CO promoter to repress its transcription [20]. PheDof12-1 interacted with B-box proteins by interaction prediction; moreover, PheDof12-1 and PheCOL4 had similar expression patterns under photoperiod treatments (Figure 4C,D), suggesting that PheDof12-1 may interact with PheCOL4 in moso bamboo. To examine whether the PheDof12-1 protein regulated PheCOL4 expression by directly binding to the promoter region, the PheCOL4 promoter sequence was investigated. We performed a targeted yeast one-hybrid (Y1H) assay using PheDof12-1, and PheCOL4 was inserted upstream of the reporter plasmid pHIS2 and cotransfected into the yeast cells with the AD-PheCOL12-1 effector plasmid. The binding of PheCOL12-1 and the promoter of PheCOL4 was indicated by the growth of transfected yeast cells on a nutrient-deficient medium (synthetic dextrose (SD)/-Trp-Leu-His) plus 3-amino-1, 2, 4-triazole (3-AT) and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indoxyl-α-D-galactopyranoside (X-α-Gal). The results show that all transformants tested were found to grow well on the SD/-Leu/-Trp medium when transferred onto SD/-Trp/-Leu/-His/3-AT/X-α-Gal plates for 3 days; only the yeast cells of AD-PheDof12-1 + pHIS2-PheCOL4 vectors and the positive control grew strong and turned blue (Figure 4F). This result suggests that PheDof12-1 could bind to the promoter of PheCOL4 and regulate PheCOL4 expression in moso bamboo.

3. Discussion

Moso bamboo is a perennial plant characterized by rapid growth and a long vegetative stage that lasts for decades or even longer before flowering [25]. Dof proteins are a group of plant-specific TFs that are involved in diverse plant-specific biological processes [16]. In addition, recent research on Dofs is mainly in annual plants, and is limited in perennials. Therefore, researching the roles of Dofs in moso bamboo is necessary. In this study, a Dof gene, PheDof12-1, is identified from moso bamboo as a nucleus-localized transcription factor that contains typical zf-dof domains.
In recent decades, reports have indicated that Dof transcription factors are involved in stress response. In Arabidopsis, the expression level of AtCDF3 is upregulated by cold, drought, high salinity, and ABA treatment [30], and overexpression of 35S::SlCDF1 and 35S::SlCDF3 increases Arabidopsis’s tolerance to salt and drought stresses [18]. In wheat, TaDof14 and TaDof15 are significantly induced under drought treatment [35]. Previous research has suggested that drought or other environmental stresses are functional in the flowering stage of bamboo, and the transcription levels of Dof genes are upregulated in drought stress [36]. In addition, studying the tolerance of PheDof12-1 will help to characterize moso bamboo cultivars such as salt, cold, and drought tolerance. In this study, PheDof12-1 exhibited differential expression patterns under the conditions of drought, cold, salt, and ABA and GA3 treatments. Through the drought, cold, salt, and GA3 stresses, the expression pattern of PheDof12-1 is basically upregulated in roots, stems, and leaves, indicating that it might participate in abiotic stress and hormone pathways, which is consistent with previous reports [36,37]. The results provide a better understanding of the stress tolerance of PheDof12-1 in moso bamboo.
Hd1/CO and Hd3a/FT are conserved genetic pathways that regulate photoperiodic flowering between rice and Arabidopsis by their genomic comparison [38]. In Arabidopsis, CDF1CDF3 are suggested to participate in photoperiodic flowering [39]. JcDof3 is a circadian clock regulated gene involved in the regulation of flowering time in Jatropha curcas [40]. In rice, OsDof12 and CDF1 belong to the same group [41], and overexpression of OsDof12 resulted in early flowering by increasing the expression of Hd3a and OsMADS14 under LD conditions [22]. PheDof12-1 is the homologous gene of OsDof12, and Dof-Hd3a-MADS-flowering may play an important role in moso bamboo flowering [36]. Therefore, we researched the function of PheDof12-1 in flowering time by ectopic expression in Arabidopsis for the first time, and the transgenic lines overexpressing PheDof12-1 show earlier flowering than the wild-type plants under LD conditions. In addition, FT, SOC1, and AGL24 are upregulated and FLC and SVP are downregulated in the transgenic lines. FT promotes flowering [42], which is activated by CO in the phloem [43]. SOC1 is a core regulator of flowering in Arabidopsis, which can interact with SVP and AGL24 proteins, but SVP and AGL24 have opposite effects on flowering time, acting as floral repressor and inducer, respectively [44]. FLC encodes a MADS domain-containing transcription factor that acts as an inhibitor of flowering [45]. This leads us to suspect that PheDof12-1 promotes flowering time by regulating FT, SOC1, AGL24, FLC, and SVP directly or indirectly, suggesting that it might retain some function in the control of flowering time through similar molecular mechanisms to those observed when expressed in Arabidopsis.
Diurnal oscillation of the transcription levels of CDFs has been reported in Arabidopsis and other species [21,23]. In Arabidopsis, CDF1CDF3 and CDF5 show maximum expression at the beginning of the light period, decreasing to a minimum between 16 and 20 h, then rising again during dawn [21]. In tomato, SlCDF1 and SlCDF3 exhibit maximum expression at the beginning of the day, while SlCDF2, SlCDF4, and SlCDF5 exhibit maximum levels during the night [18]. In rice, OsDof12 is strongly inhibited by dark treatment [22]. In the study, PheDof12-1 exhibited significantly diurnal expression patterns with high mRNA levels at the beginning of the light period under LD and SD conditions, supporting the assumption that it is a true homologue of the Arabidopsis CDFs. In Arabidopsis, CDFs can bind to the CO promoter to repress its transcription [20], and PttCDF3 can bind directly to the PttCO2 promoter in Populus [33]. In moso bamboo, the diurnal expression pattern of PheCOL4 is consistent with PheDof12-1, and Y1H analysis shows that PheDof12-1 binds directly to the promoter of PheCOL4. These results support the hypothesis that flowering regulator CO, a target of CDFs, is controlled precisely [21], which is similar to the situation in Arabidopsis and Populus.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials and Treatments

Moso bamboo seeds were harvested from Guilin in the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China. Seedlings were grown in an illumination incubator under long-day conditions (16 h light/8 h dark) at day/night temperatures of 25/18 °C, and watered with Hoagland nutrient solution. For drought and salt stress, the seedlings were watered with 50% Hoagland’s solution with 20% polyethylene glycol 6000 (PEG 6000) and 250 mM NaCl. For low temperature treatment, the plants were transferred to a growth chamber at 4 °C, and plant leaf, stem, and root tissues were collected [46]. For abscisic acid (ABA) and gibberellin A3 (GA3) treatments, the seedlings were watered with 200 µM ABA [47] and 200 µM GA3 solution [48]. To detect the transcriptional level of PheDof12-1 in photoperiod treatments, leaves were collected for analysis from plants exposed to LD (16 h light/8 h dark) and SD (16 h light/8 h dark) treatments [21]. All samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until further analysis.

4.2. Bioinformatic Analysis

The sequences were downloaded from BambooGDB (http://forestry.fafu.edu.cn/db/PhePacBio/) [49]. Molecular weight (MW) and isoelectric point (pI) were analyzed using ProtParam (http://web.expasy.org/protparam/) [50]. The structure was shown using Gene Structure Display Server software (http://gsds1.cbi.pku.edu.cn/index.php) [51]. To search the database, the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) network service from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) web server was applied. Homologue alignment was obtained using Clustal 1.83, and a phylogenetic tree was constructed by MEGA6.0 [52] using the following parameters: NJ method, complete deletion, and bootstrap with 1000 replicates.

4.3. Vector Construction and Plant Transformation

The subcellular localization was performed by transfecting GFP-tagged PheDof12-1 into Arabidopsis sheath protoplasts [53] (Supplementary Table S1). The full-length cDNA of PheDof12-1 was fused in frame with the GFP cDNA and ligated between the CaMV 35 S promoter and the nopaline synthase terminator. The fluorescence signals were examined using a confocal laser scanning microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wiesler, Germany).
The full-length coding sequence of PheDof12-1 was cloned into the pCAMBIA 2300 vector under the control of the modified CaMV 35S promoter (Supplementary Table S1). The pCAMBIA 2300-PheDof12-1 vector was introduced into Agrobacterium umefaciens strain GV3101 for Arabidopsis transformation in the Col-0 background by the floral dipping method [54]. Putative transgenic plants were screened on 50% Murashige and Skoog (MS) solid medium supplemented with 50 mg/L kanamycin, and homozygous T3 or T4 seeds were used.
In order to analyze the spatial expression patterns of PheDof12-1, a 2 kb region upstream of the PheDof12-1 transcription start site was cloned and fused to the pCAMBIA2391Z vector to generate the ProPheDof12-1-GUS reporter, which was transformed into wild-type (WT) plants (Supplementary Table S1). For GUS staining, ProPheDof12-1-GUS transgenic plants were used as previously reported [55].

4.4. Gene Expression Analysis

Total RNA was extracted from the frozen samples using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer′s instructions and treated with DNase I (TaKaRa, Tokyo, Japan) to remove genomic DNA contamination. Then, for each sample, the first-strand cDNA was synthesized using a PrimeScript™ RT Reagent Kit (TaKaRa). The expression profiles of PheDof12-1 in different tissues, abiotic stress, and photoperiod treatments were analyzed by quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR). TIP41 and NTB were used as internal housekeeping genes [56]. The qRT-PCR reactions were carried out using a Light Cycler 480 System (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) and a SYBR Premix EX TaqTMkit (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). All reactions were performed in triplicate, both technical and biological, and data were analyzed using the Roche manager software. The primer sequences are listed in Supplementary Table S1.

4.5. Yeast One-Hybrid Assay

To perform the Y1H assay, the full length of PheDof12-1 was cloned into the pGADT7-Rec2 bait vector, and the promoter sequence of PheCOL4 was cloned into the pHIS2 prey vector (Supplementary Table S1). The lithium acetate method was used to transform into the Y187 strain. The transformed yeast cells were selected on SD/-Trp/-Leu and SD/-Trp/-Leu/-His/-3AT/X-α-Gal plates at 30 °C for 3–5 days.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, the present study provides new notions about the function of Dof TFs in moso bamboo and shows PheCOL12-1 as a key factor with multiple roles related to abiotic stress, and the developmental program underlying the transition from the vegetative to the reproductive phase under LD conditions. PheCOL12-1 is a nucleus-localized transcription factor that regulates photoperiodic-related regulators. These findings not only increase our understanding of the functional roles of Dof proteins in the regulation of abiotic stress and flowering time, but also provide an important candidate gene for studying molecular regulation mechanisms of moso bamboo flowering.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/1422-0067/20/2/424/s1.

Author Contributions

J.L. and J.G. designed the experiments; X.L., and L.X. performed the tissue and organ collection; J.L. writing—original draft preparation; Z.C. writing—review and editing; J.G. review and funding acquisition.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 31570673).

Conflicts of Interest

Authors declare that there is no competing interest.

Abbreviations

LDsLong days
SDsShort days
DOFDNA binding with One Finger
PCRPolymerase chain reaction
COCONSTANS
FTFlowering locus T
TFsTranscription Factors
GIGIGANTEA
FKF1FLAVIN-BINDING, KELCH REPEAT, F-BOX1
CDFCycling Dof Factor
Hd3aHeading date 3a
MADSMCM1, AGAMOUS, DEFICIENS and SRF
GFPGreen Xuorescent protein
ABAAbscisic acid
GAGibberellin
GUSGlucuronidase
COLCO-Like
FLC FLOWERING LOCUS C
SOC1SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CONSTANS1
SVPSHORT VEGETATIVE PHASE
AGL24AGAMOUS-LIKE 24
3-AT3-amino-1, 2, 4-triazole
X-α-Gal5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indoxyl-α-D-galactopyranoside

References

  1. Yanagisawa, S. The Dof family of plant transcription factors. Trends Plant Sci. 2002, 7, 555–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yanagisawa, S.; Izui, K. Molecular cloning of two DNA-binding proteins of maize that are structurally different but interact with the same sequence motif. J. Biol. Chem. 1993, 268, 16028–16036. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Plesch, G.; Ehrhardt, T.; Muellerroeber, B. Involvement of TAAAG elements suggests a role for Dof transcription factors in guard cell-specific gene expression. Plant J. 2001, 28, 455–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Tanaka, M.; Takahata, Y.; Nakayama, H.; Nakatani, M.; Tahara, M. Altered carbohydrate metabolism in the storage roots of sweetpotato plants overexpressing the SRF1 gene, which encodes a Dof zinc finger transcription factor. Planta 2009, 230, 737–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Wen, C.L.; Cheng, Q.; Zhao, L.; Mao, A.; Yang, J.; Yu, S.; Weng, Y.; Xu, Y. Ientification and characterisation of Dof transcription factors in the cucumber genome. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 23072–23083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Papi, M.; Sabatini, S.; Bouchez, D.; Camilleri, C.; Costantino, P.; Vittorioso, P. Identification and disruption of an Arabidopsis zinc finger gene controlling seed germination. Genes Dev. 2000, 14, 28–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Gualberti, G.; Papi, M.; Bellucci, L.; Ricci, I.; Bouchez, D.; Camilleri, C.; Costantino, P.; Vittorioso, P. Mutations in the Dof zinc finger genes DAG2 and DAG1 influence with opposite effects the germination of Arabidopsis seeds. Plant Cell 2002, 14, 1253–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Rueda-Romero, P.; Barrero-Sicilia, C.; Gomez-Cadenas, A.; Carbonero, P.; OnateSanchez, L. Arabidopsis thaliana DOF6 negatively affects germination in non-after-ripened seeds and interacts with TCP14. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 1937–1949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wei, P.C.; Tan, F.; Gao, X.Q.; Zhang, X.Q.; Wang, G.Q.; Xu, H.; Li, L.J.; Chen, J.; Wang, X.C. Overexpression of AtDOF4. 7, an Arabidopsis DOF family transcription factor, induces floral organ abscission deficiency in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2010, 153, 1031–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Guo, Y.; Qin, G.; Gu, H.; Qu, L.J. Dof5. 6/HCA2, a Dof transcription factor gene, regulates interfascicular cambium formation and vascular tissue development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2009, 21, 3518–3534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Washio, K. Functional dissections between GAMYB and Dof transcription factors suggest a role for protein-protein associations in -the gibberellin-mediated expression of the RAmy1A gene in the rice aleurone. Plant Physiol. 2003, 133, 850–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yanagisawa, S.; Sheen, J. Involvement of maize Dof zinc finger proteins in tissue-specific and light-regulated gene expression. Plant Cell 1998, 10, 75–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Yanagisawa, S. Dof1 and Dof2 transcription factors are associated with expression of multiple genes involved in carbon metabolism in maize. Plant J. 2000, 21, 281–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Rueda-López, M.; Crespillo, R.; Cánovas, F.M.; Avila, C. Differential regulation of two glutamine synthetase genes by a single Dof transcription factor. Plant J. 2008, 56, 73–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Kurai, T.; Wakayama, M.; Abiko, T.; Yanagisawa, S.; Aoki, N.; Ohsugi, R. Introduction of the ZmDof1 gene into rice enhances carbon and nitrogen assimilation under low-nitrogen conditions. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2011, 9, 826–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Yanagisawa, S.; Akiyama, A.; Kisaka, H.; Uchimiya, H.; Miwa, T. Metabolic engineering with Dof1 transcription factor in plants: Improved nitrogen assimilation and growth under low-nitrogen conditions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 7833–7838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Ryu, J.Y.; Hong, S.Y.; Jo, S.H.; Woo, J.C.; Lee, S.; Park, C.M. Molecular and functional characterization of cold responsive C-repeat binding factors from Brachypodium distachyon. BMC Plant Biol. 2014, 14, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Corrales, A.R.; Nebauer, S.G.; Carrillo, L.; Fernández-Nohales, P.; Marqués, J.; Renau-Morata, B.; Granell, A.; Pollmann, S.; Vicente-Carbajosa, J.; Molina, R.V.; et al. Characterization of tomato Cycling Dof Factors reveals conserved and new functions in the control of flowering time and abiotic stress responses. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 995–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Ma, J.; Li, M.Y.; Wang, F.; Tang, J.; Xiong, A.S. Genome-wide analysis of Dof family transcription factors and their responses to abiotic stresses in Chinese cabbage. BMC Genom. 2015, 16, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Song, Y.H.; Smith, R.W.; To, B.J.; Millar, A.J.; Imaizumi, T. FKF1 conveys timing information for CONSTANS stabilization in photoperiodic flowering. Science 2012, 336, 1045–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fornara, F.; Panigrahi, K.C.; Gissot, L.; Sauerbrunn, N.; Rühl, M.; Jarillo, J.A.; Coupland, G. Arabidopsis DOF transcription factors act redundantly to reduce CONSTANS expression and are essential for a photoperiodic flowering response. Dev. Cell 2009, 17, 75–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Li, D.; Yang, C.; Li, X.; Gan, Q.; Zhao, X.; Zhu, L. Functional characterization of rice OsDof12. Planta 2009, 229, 1159–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Iwamoto, M.; Higo, K.; Takano, M. Circadian clock- and phytochrome-regulated Dof-like gene, Rdd1, is associated with grain size in rice. Plant Cell Environ. 2009, 32, 592–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ahmad, M.; Rim, Y.; Chen, H.; Kim, J.K. Functional characterization of Arabidopsis Dof transcription factor AtDof4.1. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2013, 60, 116–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lin, X.C.; Chow, T.Y.; Chen, H.H.; Liu, C.C.; Chou, S.J.; Huang, B.L.; Kuo, C.I.; Wen, C.K.; Huang, L.C.; Fang, W. Understanding bamboo flowering based on large-scale analysis of expressed sequence tags. Genet. Mol. Res. 2010, 9, 1085–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Wu, M.; Liu, H.; Han, G.; Cai, R.; Pan, F.; Xiang, Y. A moso bamboo WRKY gene PeWRKY83 confers salinity tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis plants. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 11721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Chen, J.; Shafi, M.; Li, S.; Wang, Y.; Wu, J.; Ye, Z.; Peng, D.; Yan, W.; Liu, D. Copper induced oxidative stresses, antioxidant responses and phytoremediation potential of moso bamboo (Phyllostachys pubescens). Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 13554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, P.; Wang, J.; Zhang, H. Measures of water management and increasing drought resistance of moso forests in Anji County, Zhejiang Province. World Bamboo Rattan 2008, 6, 23–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ge, W.; Zhang, Y.; Cheng, Z.; Hou, D.; Li, X.; Gao, J. Main regulatory pathways, key genes and microRNAs involved in flower formation and development of moso bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis). Plant Biotechnol. J. 2017, 15, 82–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Corrales, A.R.; Carrillo, L.; Lasierra, P.; Nebauer, S.G.; Dominguez-Figueroa, J.; Renau-Morata, B.; Pollmann, S.; Granell, A.; Molina, R.V.; Vicente-Carbajosa, J.; et al. Multifaceted role of cycling DOF factor 3 (CDF3) in the regulation of flowering time and abiotic stress responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Environ. 2017, 40, 748–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sun, L.; Li, X.; Fu, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Tan, L.; Liu, F.; Sun, X.; Sun, X.; Sun, C. GS6, a member of the GRAS gene family, negatively regulates grain size in rice. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2013, 55, 938–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Murakami, M.; Ashikari, M.; Miura, K.; Yamashino, T.; Mizuno, T. The evolutionarily conserved OsPRR quintet: Rice pseudo-response regulators implicated in circadian rhythm. Plant Cell Physiol. 2003, 44, 1229–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Ding, J.; Böhlenius, H.; Rühl, M.G.; Chen, P.; Sane, S.; Zambrano, J.A.; Zheng, B.; Eriksson, M.E.; Nilsson, O. GIGANTEA-like genes control seasonal growth cessation in Populus. New Phytol. 2018, 218, 1491–1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Searle, L.; Coupland, G. Induction of flowering by seasonal changes in photoperiod. Embo J. 2004, 23, 1217–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Shaw, L.M.; McIntyre, C.L.; Gresshoff, P.M.; Xue, G.P. Members of the Dof transcription factor family in Triticum aestivum are associated with light-mediated gene regulation. Funct. Integr. Genom. 2009, 9, 485–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Gao, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, C.; Qi, F.; Li, X.; Mu, S.; Peng, Z. Characterization of the floral transcriptome of moso bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis) at different flowering developmental stages by transcriptome sequencing and RNA-seq analysis. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e98910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Cheng, Z.; Hou, D.; Liu, J.; Li, X.; Xie, L.; Ma, Y.; Gao, J. Characterization of moso bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis) Dof factors in floral development and abiotic stress responses. Genome 2018, 61, 151–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Izawa, T.; Takahashi, Y.; Yano, M. Comparative biology comes into bloom: Genomic and genetic comparison of flowering pathways in rice and Arabidopsis. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2003, 6, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Imaizumi, T.; Schultz, T.F.; Harmon, F.G.; Ho, L.A.; Kay, S.A. FKF1 F-box protein mediates cyclic degradation of a repressor of CONSTANS in Arabidopsis. Science 2005, 309, 293–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yang, J.; Yang, M.F.; Zhang, W.P.; Chen, F.; Shen, S.H. A putative flowering-time-related Dof transcription factor gene, JcDof3, is controlled by the circadian clock in Jatropha curcas. Plant Sci. 2011, 181, 667–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lijavetzky, D.; Carbonero, P.; Vicentecarbajosa, J. Genome-wide comparative phylogenetic analysis of the rice and Arabidopsis Dof gene families. BMC Evol. Biol. 2003, 3, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Kardailsky, I.; Shukla, V.K.; Ahn, J.H.; Dagenais, N.; Christensen, S.K.; Nguyen, J.T.; Chory, J.; Harrison, M.J.; Weigel, D. Activation tagging of the floral inducer FT. Science 1999, 286, 1962–1965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. An, H.; Roussot, C.; Suárez-López, P.; Corbesier, L.; Vincent, C.; Piñeiro, M.; Hepworth, S.; Mouradov, A.; Justin, S.; Turnbull, C.; et al. CONSTANS acts in the phloem to regulate a systemic signal that induces photoperiodic flowering of Arabidopsis. Development 2004, 131, 3615–3626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Lee, J.; Oh, M.; Park, H.; Lee, I. SOC1 translocated to the nucleus by interaction with AGL24 directly regulates LEAFY. Plant J. 2010, 55, 832–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Michaels, S.D.; Amasino, R.M. FLOWERING LOCUS C encodes a novel MADS domain protein that acts as a repressor of flowering. Plant Cell 1999, 11, 949–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Wu, H.; Lv, H.; Li, L.; Liu, J.; Mu, S.; Li, X.; Gao, J. Genome-Wide Analysis of the AP2/ERF Transcription Factors Family and the Expression Patterns of DREB Genes in Moso Bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis). PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0126657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Wang, H.; Zhao, S.; Gao, Y.; Yang, J. Characterization of Dof transcription factors and their responses to osmotic stress in Poplar (Populus trichocarpa). PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0170210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Huang, R.; Li, L.; Liu, J.; Gao, H.; Li, X.P. Sequence of PheWRKY9-1 gene in Phyllostachys edulis and analysis of related expression. Mol. Plant Breed. 2018, 14, 4569–4575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, T.; Wang, H.; Cai, D.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, H.; Wang, Y.; Lin, C.; Ma, L.; Gu, L. Comprehensive profiling of rhizome-associated alternative splicing and alternative polyadenylation in moso bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis). Plant J. 2017, 91, 684–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Gasteiger, E.; Gattiker, A.; Hoogland, C.; Ivanyi, I.; Appel, R.D.; Bairoch, A. ExPASy: The proteomics server for in-depth protein knowledge and analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31, 3784–3788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Guo, A.Y.; Zhu, Q.H.; Chen, X.; Luo, J.C. GSDS:a gene structure display server. Yi Chuan 2007, 29, 1023–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Tamura, K.; Stecher, G.; Peterson, D.; Filipski, A.; Kumar, S. MEGA6: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 2725–2729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Yoo, S.D.; Cho, Y.H.; Sheen, J. Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts: A versatile cell system for transient gene expression analysis. Nat. Protoc. 2007, 2, 1565–1572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Clough, S.J.; Bent, A.F. Floral dip: A simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1998, 16, 735–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Jefferson, R.A.; Kavanagh, T.A.; Bevan, M.W. GUS fusions: Betaglucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. Embo J. 1987, 6, 3901–3907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Fan, C.; Ma, J.; Guo, Q.; Li, X.; Wang, H.; Lu, M. Selection of reference genes for quantitative Real-Time PCR in bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis). PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e56573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Characterization and preliminary expression analysis of PheDof12-1. (A) Gene structure of PheDof12-1. (B) Phylogenetic analysis of PheDof12-1 with other DNA binding with one finger (Dof) proteins. (C) qRT-PCR analysis of PheDof12-1 in different tissues of moso bamboo. (D) Expression profile of PheDof12-1 in different flower developmental stages: F1: floral bud formation stage; F2: inflorescence growing stage; F3: blooming stage; F4: flowers are withered. (E) Glucuronidase (GUS) staining of ProPheDof12-1-GUS in transgenic Arabidopsis seedling. (F) GUS staining of ProPheDof12-1-GUS plants showing PheDof12-1 localization in flower and pollen.
Figure 1. Characterization and preliminary expression analysis of PheDof12-1. (A) Gene structure of PheDof12-1. (B) Phylogenetic analysis of PheDof12-1 with other DNA binding with one finger (Dof) proteins. (C) qRT-PCR analysis of PheDof12-1 in different tissues of moso bamboo. (D) Expression profile of PheDof12-1 in different flower developmental stages: F1: floral bud formation stage; F2: inflorescence growing stage; F3: blooming stage; F4: flowers are withered. (E) Glucuronidase (GUS) staining of ProPheDof12-1-GUS in transgenic Arabidopsis seedling. (F) GUS staining of ProPheDof12-1-GUS plants showing PheDof12-1 localization in flower and pollen.
Ijms 20 00424 g001
Figure 2. Relative expression of PheDof12-1 in different tissues of moso bamboo under drought: (A) root, (B) stem, (C) leaf; salt: (D) root, (E) stem, (F) leaf; under cold: (G) root, (H) stem, (I) leaf; and under (J) gibberellin A3 (GA3) and (K) abscisic acid (ABA) treatments.
Figure 2. Relative expression of PheDof12-1 in different tissues of moso bamboo under drought: (A) root, (B) stem, (C) leaf; salt: (D) root, (E) stem, (F) leaf; under cold: (G) root, (H) stem, (I) leaf; and under (J) gibberellin A3 (GA3) and (K) abscisic acid (ABA) treatments.
Ijms 20 00424 g002
Figure 3. Analysis of an early flowering phenotype by overexpression of PheDof12-1 in Arabidopsis. (A) Phenotypes of overexpressing PheDof12-1 transgenic lines (L3, L4) and wild-type (WT) plants as control under long-day (LD) conditions. (B) Subcellular localization of PheDof12-1. (C) Flowering time scored as number of rosette leaves at flowering of wild-type and transgenic plants under LD conditions. (D) Transcription levels of FT, SOC1, AGL24, FLC, and SVP in wild-type and transgenic plants. Arabidopsis Actin was used as the internal reference gene. Error bars indicate standard deviations. Asterisks indicate statistically significant difference between wild-type and transgenic plants (p < 0.01 by Student’s t-test).
Figure 3. Analysis of an early flowering phenotype by overexpression of PheDof12-1 in Arabidopsis. (A) Phenotypes of overexpressing PheDof12-1 transgenic lines (L3, L4) and wild-type (WT) plants as control under long-day (LD) conditions. (B) Subcellular localization of PheDof12-1. (C) Flowering time scored as number of rosette leaves at flowering of wild-type and transgenic plants under LD conditions. (D) Transcription levels of FT, SOC1, AGL24, FLC, and SVP in wild-type and transgenic plants. Arabidopsis Actin was used as the internal reference gene. Error bars indicate standard deviations. Asterisks indicate statistically significant difference between wild-type and transgenic plants (p < 0.01 by Student’s t-test).
Ijms 20 00424 g003
Figure 4. PheDof12-1 protein binds to the promoter region of PheCOL4. Relative expression of PheDof12-1 under (A) LD and (B) SD conditions. Transcription level of PheCOL4 under (C) LD and (D) SD conditions. (E) Interaction network of PheDof12-1 in moso bamboo. Colored balls (protein nodes) in the network were used as a visual aid to indicate different input proteins and predicted interactions. Enlarged protein nodes indicate the availability of 3D protein structure information. Gray lines connect proteins that are associated by recurring text mining evidence. (F) Yeast one-hybrid (Y1H) assay for AD-PheDof12-1 and pHIS2-PheCOL4. The reporter pHIS2 vector carrying the corresponding fragment and the effector AD-PheDof12-1 vector were cotransfected into yeast Y187 cells. Growth of the transfected yeast cells on a 3-AT and X-α-Gal medium indicates that the PheDof12-1 protein can bind to the PheCOL4 promoter.
Figure 4. PheDof12-1 protein binds to the promoter region of PheCOL4. Relative expression of PheDof12-1 under (A) LD and (B) SD conditions. Transcription level of PheCOL4 under (C) LD and (D) SD conditions. (E) Interaction network of PheDof12-1 in moso bamboo. Colored balls (protein nodes) in the network were used as a visual aid to indicate different input proteins and predicted interactions. Enlarged protein nodes indicate the availability of 3D protein structure information. Gray lines connect proteins that are associated by recurring text mining evidence. (F) Yeast one-hybrid (Y1H) assay for AD-PheDof12-1 and pHIS2-PheCOL4. The reporter pHIS2 vector carrying the corresponding fragment and the effector AD-PheDof12-1 vector were cotransfected into yeast Y187 cells. Growth of the transfected yeast cells on a 3-AT and X-α-Gal medium indicates that the PheDof12-1 protein can bind to the PheCOL4 promoter.
Ijms 20 00424 g004

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, J.; Cheng, Z.; Xie, L.; Li, X.; Gao, J. Multifaceted Role of PheDof12-1 in the Regulation of Flowering Time and Abiotic Stress Responses in Moso Bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 424. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms20020424

AMA Style

Liu J, Cheng Z, Xie L, Li X, Gao J. Multifaceted Role of PheDof12-1 in the Regulation of Flowering Time and Abiotic Stress Responses in Moso Bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis). International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019; 20(2):424. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms20020424

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Jun, Zhanchao Cheng, Lihua Xie, Xiangyu Li, and Jian Gao. 2019. "Multifaceted Role of PheDof12-1 in the Regulation of Flowering Time and Abiotic Stress Responses in Moso Bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis)" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20, no. 2: 424. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms20020424

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop