Next Article in Journal
Repeated Vaginal Exposures to the Common Cosmetic and Household Preservative Methylisothiazolinone Induce Persistent, Mast Cell-Dependent Genital Pain in ND4 Mice
Next Article in Special Issue
Comprehensive Identification of PTI Suppressors in Type III Effector Repertoire Reveals that Ralstonia solanacearum Activates Jasmonate Signaling at Two Different Steps
Previous Article in Journal
Fatty Acid-Binding Protein 3 is Critical for α-Synuclein Uptake and MPP+-Induced Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Cultured Dopaminergic Neurons
Previous Article in Special Issue
Novel Crosstalks between Circadian Clock and Jasmonic Acid Pathway Finely Coordinate the Tradeoff among Plant Growth, Senescence and Defense
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Sorghum MSD3 Encodes an ω-3 Fatty Acid Desaturase that Increases Grain Number by Reducing Jasmonic Acid Levels

1
Plant Stress and Germplasm Development Unit, Cropping Systems Research Laboratory, U.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Lubbock, TX 79415, USA
2
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, NY 11724, USA
3
Current address: Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA
4
Chemistry Research Unit, USDA-ARS, 1700 S.W. 23rd Drive, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA
5
U.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, NEA Robert W. Holley Center for Agriculture and Health, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, NY 14853, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20(21), 5359; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms20215359
Submission received: 16 September 2019 / Revised: 25 October 2019 / Accepted: 26 October 2019 / Published: 28 October 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Jasmonic Acid Pathway in Plants)

Abstract

:
Grain number per panicle is an important component of grain yield in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.)) and other cereal crops. Previously, we reported that mutations in multi-seeded 1 (MSD1) and MSD2 genes result in a two-fold increase in grain number per panicle due to the restoration of the fertility of the pedicellate spikelets, which invariably abort in natural sorghum accessions. Here, we report the identification of another gene, MSD3, which is also involved in the regulation of grain numbers in sorghum. Four bulked F2 populations from crosses between BTx623 and each of the independent msd mutants p6, p14, p21, and p24 were sequenced to 20× coverage of the whole genome on a HiSeq 2000 system. Bioinformatic analyses of the sequence data showed that one gene, Sorbi_3001G407600, harbored homozygous mutations in all four populations. This gene encodes a plastidial ω-3 fatty acid desaturase that catalyzes the conversion of linoleic acid (18:2) to linolenic acid (18:3), a substrate for jasmonic acid (JA) biosynthesis. The msd3 mutants had reduced levels of linolenic acid in both leaves and developing panicles that in turn decreased the levels of JA. Furthermore, the msd3 panicle phenotype was reversed by treatment with methyl-JA (MeJA). Our characterization of MSD1, MSD2, and now MSD3 demonstrates that JA-regulated processes are critical to the msd phenotype. The identification of the MSD3 gene reveals a new target that could be manipulated to increase grain number per panicle in sorghum, and potentially other cereal crops, through the genomic editing of MSD3 functional orthologs.

1. Introduction

Grain number per panicle is a major determinant of grain yield in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) and other cereal crops [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Increased grain number and grain size, which are directly related to improved grain yield, are common goals during domestication of cereal crops, resulting in selection of genetic stocks with greater grain number and larger seeds [7]. Genetic, physiological, and agronomic studies performed in different environments have revealed that grain number per panicle is strongly correlated with grain yield per hectare [3,4,6,8,9]. Thus, understanding the mechanisms that govern the genetic determination of grain number per panicle and the effect of genetic manipulation of this trait have great potential to increase grain yield.
Currently, however, very little is known about how grain number per panicle is determined. Several features of the inflorescence contribute to the final grain number, including the number and size of the primary and secondary flower branches and fertility of spikelets (grass flowers). In sorghum, the inflorescence or panicle consists of a main rachis on which many primary branches are developed. Secondary branches and tertiary branches are developed from the primary branches [10,11]. The main inflorescence—primary, secondary, and tertiary branches—all end with a terminal triplet of spikelets, consisting of one sessile bisexual spikelet and two lateral pedicellate spikelets [12]. Below the terminal spikelets, one or more spikelet pairs can develop. These adjacent spikelet pairs consist of one sessile and one pedicellate spikelet.
In natural accessions of sorghum, only the sessile spikelets are fertile and capable of producing viable grains. The pedicellate spikelets occasionally develop anthers, but do not develop ovaries and eventually abort. Recently, we isolated and characterized a series of sorghum mutants in which both the sessile and pedicellate spikelets are fertile [11], and in which the number and size of the primary inflorescence branches are increased. These mutants were designated as multiseeded (msd) because their panicles are capable of producing more than 200% of the normal grain number per panicle relative to the nonmutated BTx623 [11]. Previously, we reported two MSD genes, MSD1 and MSD2, which determine the fertility of the pedicellate spikelets. The MSD1 gene encodes a TCP (teosinte branched/cycloidea/proliferating cell nuclear antigen)-domain plant-specific transcription factor that increases the expression of enzymes involved in the biosynthesis of jasmonic acid (JA) during panicle development [13]. The MSD2 encodes a lipoxygenase (LOX) that catalyzes the first committed step of JA biosynthesis [14]. The elevated levels of JA in the wild type panicle may activate programmed cell death, leading to the arrest of the pedicellate spikelets in the wild type BTx623 [13,15]. Because the increase in JA is blocked in the msd1 and msd2 mutants, the pedicellate spikelets continue to develop into viable grains.
Here, we describe the identification of the MSD3 gene, defined by a new msd mutant locus. MSD3 encodes a major plastidial ω-3 fatty acid desaturase that catalyzes the desaturation of linoleic acid (18:2, 18 carbon chain with two double bonds) to linolenic acid (18:3, 18 carbon chain with three double bonds). The msd3 mutants have dramatically reduced levels 18:3 fatty acid, as well as reduced levels of JA. JAs are lipid-derived cyclopentanone compounds that functionally resemble animal prostaglandins. Similar to the eicosanoid pathway of animals, JA is synthesized from linolenic acid (18:3) and hexadecatrienoic acid (16:3) through a series of steps of cyclization, reduction, and oxidation [16,17]. The reduced levels of 18:3 fatty acid in msd3 mutants may lead to lower levels of endogenous JA. Indeed, the msd3 phenotype can be reverted to the wild-type phenotype by application of MeJA. Our results indicate that the msd phenotype observed in the msd3 mutants is caused by the reduction of endogenous levels of JA.

2. Results

2.1. Phenotype of the msd3 Mutants

Here, we characterized a new group of multi-seeded (msd) mutants that include p6 (putative mutant #6), p14, p21, and p24. Similar to the msd1 and msd2 mutants, the msd3 mutants also exhibit increases in number and size of the primary inflorescence branches (Figure S1) [11,13,14], and both their sessile and pedicellate spikelets are fertile. These coordinated phenotypic changes led to a ~2-fold increase in grain number per panicle. Complementation tests revealed that these msd mutants p6, p14, p21, and p24 represented a new locus that is distinct from the msd1 and msd2 loci (Table 1). These mutants were designated as msd3. Similar to the msd1 and msd2 mutants, the increase in grain number in msd3 mutants was also associated with reduction in grain size [11,13,14]. However, the msd3 mutants had larger grains than the msd1 and msd2 mutants, (Figure 1), making msd3 potentially useful trait for improving grain yield and grain appeal.

2.2. Identification of the MSD3 Gene

The MSD3 gene was identified through bulk segregant analysis of whole-genome sequencing data with an in-house bioinformatics pipeline, as described in rice and sorghum [18,19]. Previously, we crossed p6, p14, p21, and p24 to BTx623 and derived four F2 populations. After bioinformatics analysis of the four bulked F2 pools, we identified only one gene (Sorbi_3001G407600) that carried homozygous mutations in all four bulked F2 pools (Figure 2). The genomic sequence of MSD3 is 3132 bp in length, with a CDS of 1356 bp that encodes a protein of 451 amino acids. Two putative msd mutants, p21 and p24, harbored a mutation that converted the G residue at Chr01_69163608 to A, creating a splice site mutation at the junction of the third exon and the third intron (Figure 3). Both were renamed as msd3-1. The mutant p14, renamed msd3-2, harbored a G-to-A transition at Chr01_69163762 that created a nonsynonymous mutation, R240W, in the MSD3 protein. Mutant p6, renamed msd3-3, harbored a G-to-A transition at Chr01_69164229, resulting in a premature stop codon (W321*). Subsequently, we identified another mutation in the MSD3 gene from the sequenced mutant library (ASR106, 25M2-1370) at Chr01_69165175, which created a splice site mutation at the junction of the seventh exon and the seventh intron [20]. The homozygous mutant (p37) exhibited the expected msd phenotype and was named as msd3-4.
To determine whether these mutations in the MSD3 gene resulted in the msd phenotype, we made pairwise crosses among these four msd3 mutants; all F1 plants from these crosses exhibited the msd phenotype (Table 1). By contrast, F1 plants resulting from crosses between msd3 and msd1, msd3 and msd2, or msd2 and msd1 exhibited the wild type panicle phenotype. Together, these results indicate that Sorbi_3001G407600 is the MSD3 gene. Furthermore, we tested the co-segregation of the msd3-4 mutation by Kompetitive allele-specific PCR (KASP) (Figure 4). Among 63 individual F2 plants derived from the cross of BTx623 * msd3-4 (p37), 15 plants were scored as AA at the mutation site, and all 15 lines exhibited the expected msd3 phenotype. Fifteen plants were scored as GG, and 33 were scored as GA; these two genotypic classes, GG (wild-type, WT) and GA (heterozygote), exhibited that the wild-type panicle structure indicating that the msd3 mutation is recessive. These results also showed that the causal mutation in the msd3-4 co-segregated perfectly with the msd phenotype.

2.3. MSD3 is FAD7, a Major Plastidial ω-3 Fatty Acid Desaturase

Sequencing analysis indicates that the MSD3 gene (Sorbi_3001G407600) encodes a plastidial fatty acid desaturase that adds a double bond to the ω-3 carbon of linoleic acid (18:2) to convert it to linolenic acid (18:3). The sorghum genome has two plastid-targeted ω-3 fatty acid desaturases, Sorbi_3001G407600 and Sorbi_3002G430100. However, in many plants, FAD7 is the major plastidial linoleic acid desaturase [21,22,23,24,25]. Based on the panicle phenotype of the msd3 mutant, we reasoned that MSD3 could be FAD7 rather than FAD8. To determine whether MSD3 is FAD7 or FAD8, we constructed a matrix of identity between the two sorghum genes using the annotated FAD7 and FAD8 genes from rice and maize (Figure S2 and Table S1). MSD3 exhibits 84.8% identity with rice FAD7 (OsFAD7_LOC_Os03g18070.1) and 74.6% identity with rice FAD8 (OsFAD8_LOC_Os07g49310.1), whereas the other linoleic acid desaturase (Sorbi_3002g430100) shows 76.2% identity with rice FAD7 but 81.5% with rice FAD8. Therefore, we concluded that MSD3 is FAD7 not FAD8.
FAD7 appears to be the major ω-3 fatty acid desaturase in sorghum. To determine the relative transcript abundance of the two plastidial ω-3 fatty acid desaturases in the developing panicle of the wild type BTx623, we compared the transcript levels of FAD7 and FAD8 using qPCR with three biological and three technical replicates. Comparing with the internal gene control EIF4α, the average cycle threshold (Ct) to detect FAD8 transcript was 24.2 cycles, while the Ct number to detect FAD7 transcript was 19.8. This difference in Ct translated to a relative abundance of FAD7 transcript 21-fold over FAD8 according to the calculation method as described previously [26]. This relative abundance was largely consistent with the trends of online data (Figure S3).
To determine which of two plastidial ω-3 fatty acid desaturases were affected in the msd3 mutants, we compared the abundance of FAD7 and FAD8 transcripts in the msd3-1 and msd3-3 mutants relative to the wild type BTx623 (Figure 5). The abundance of FAD7 was reduced to 10% in msd3-1 and 30% in msd3-3 in comparison to the wild type FAD7 levels. Because the primers of FAD7 and FAD8 were designed based on the 3′-UTR sequences, which lie outside of the mutation sites, the low levels of the FAD7 and FAD8 transcripts may be due to truncated RNAs that do not encode active proteins. On the other hand, the transcript levels of FAD8 were increased by 3.8-fold and 1.5-fold in the msd3-1 and msd3-3 mutants relative to the levels of BTx623, respectively, indicating that only the transcript abundance of the FAD7 gene was significantly reduced in the msd3 mutants. The slight increase in the abundance of FAD8 gene suggested that the loss of function mutations in FAD7 gene may be partially compensated by the elevated expression of FAD8 (Figure 5). This result suggested that expression of FAD7, but not FAD8, was greatly reduced in the msd3 mutants.
In addition to the two plastidial ω-3 fatty acid desaturases, the sorghum genome encodes two microsomal ω-3 fatty acid desaturases, Sorbi_3005G002800 and Sorbi_3008G003200, homologous to the Arabidopsis FAD3 gene [25,27]. We searched our mutation database from the 256 sequenced mutant lines [20] and identified nonsynonymous mutations in all three genes (Table S2). However, none of the sequenced lines that harbored a mutation in one of the three ω-3 fatty acid desaturase genes exhibited a phenotype similar to the msd mutants.

2.4. Mutation in MSD3 Gene Dramatically Reduced the Levels of Linolenic Acid

To understand how mutations in the MSD3 (FAD7) gene lead to the dramatic change in panicle architecture and restore the fertility of the pedicellate spikelets, we first assessed the effect of the msd3 mutations on lipid composition of leaves and panicles of the msd3-1 mutant. In WT BTx623 leaves, 18-carbon fatty acids account for over 92% of total leaf lipids (Figure 6, Table S2). Levels of seven lipid species with molar percentage >1% are plotted in Figure 6. Galactolipids, including monogalactosyl diacylglycerol (MGDG) and digalactosyl diacylglycerol (DGDG), are the major lipids in leaves, accounting for over 90% of the total lipids. The lipid species with 36 carbon and six double bonds (36:6) consist of two linolenic acid molecules, whereas those with four double bonds (36:4) consist of two linoleic acid molecules, and species with five double bonds (36:5) consist of one linoleic acid and one linolenic acid. Sorghum has very low levels of 16-carbon fatty acids, and hexadecatrienoic acid (16:3) was not detectable in either leaves or panicles (Table S3).
As can be seen from Figure 6, mutation in MSD3 decreased the levels of 36:6 lipid species and concomitantly increased the levels of 36:4 species. The ratio of linolenic acid to linoleic acid was 13.43 in the WT BTx623 leaves, falling to 2.48 in msd3-3 leaves (Table S3). In general, panicles contained much less linolenic acid than in leaves. In WT BTx623 panicles, the ratio of linolenic acid to linoleic acid was 0.62, falling to 0.08 in the msd3-3 mutant panicles. Thus, msd3-3 panicles contained very little linolenic acid (7% vs. 38% in WT panicles). This result confirms that MSD3 is an ω-3 fatty acid desaturase that catalyzes the desaturation of linoleic acid to linolenic acid in both leaves and panicles. Moreover, the dramatic effect of msd3 mutations on linoleic acid desaturation was consistent with the idea that MSD3 is sorghum FAD7, as FAD7 has major effects on linoleic acid desaturation in other plant species [22,23,24].

2.5. The msd3 Phenotype Was Reverted by Treatment with MeJA

Because linolenic acid (18:3) is a substrate for JA biosynthesis [28], we next asked whether the msd phenotype of the msd3 mutants was due to a deficiency of JA. For this purpose, we then measured the level of JA in developing panicles of msd3-1 and BTx623. The JA level was reduced from 709 ng/g fresh weight (FW) in the wild type to 409 ng/g FW in msd3-1 (Figure S4).
To further demonstrate if the decrease in JA led to the msd phenotype, we applied MeJA to the whorls of BTx623 and the msd3-1 mutant every other day, starting from when the plants had eight fully expanded leaves until the plants had 10 fully expanded leaves. Because the pedicellate spikelets never produce viable grains in BTx623 and other natural accessions, the reversion of the pedicellate spikelets from grain-bearing perfect flowers to sterile spikelets is a reliable indicator to demonstrate the effect of JA treatment. As shown in Figure 7, the pedicellate spikelets of the wild type BTx623 were sterile while that of msd3-3 mutant were fertile and produced viable grain. After treatment with MeJA, the pedicellate spikelets of msd3-3 mutants became sterile spikelets as in the wild type BTx623. Furthermore, the grain size of the msd3 mutant also restored to similar size as the wild type BTx623 (Table S4). This result indicates that the lack of sufficient JA in the msd3 panicle resulted in full fertility in the pedicellate spikelets.

3. Discussion

In this study, we characterized a new group of msd mutants, msd3, that exhibits increases in the size and number of the primary branches and fertile pedicellate spikelets, similar to the panicle structure previously reported in the msd1 and msd2 mutants [13,14]. Using bulk segregant analysis of four independent F2 populations, we identified that all causal mutations are located within the FAD7 (Sorbi_3001G407600) gene. Because FAD7 is a major plastidial fatty acid desaturase, loss-of-function mutations in the FAD7 gene resulted in a dramatic reduction in the content of linolenic acid, a substrate of JA, in both leaves and panicles. The reduction in JA levels in msd3 panicles and the reversion of the msd3 phenotype to the wild type by application of MeJA indicate that the msd phenotype in msd3 mutants is probably due to insufficient levels of JA to activate the programmed cell death pathway leading to the arrest of the pedicellate spikelets. This conclusion is consistent with the previously reported mechanisms in msd1 and msd2 mutants [13,14].
MSD3 (FAD7) appears to the predominant form of ω-3 fatty acid desaturase in sorghum. Most plants, including sorghum, have multiple forms of microsomal and plastidial ω-3 fatty acid desaturases that catalyze the formation of linolenic acids from linoleic acid. Arabidopsis has one microsomal fatty acid desaturase, originally known as FAD3, and two closely related plastidial ω-3 desaturases, FAD7 and FAD8 (plastidial) [21,22,23,24,29]. Mutations in all three genes, FAD3, FAD7, and FAD8, are required to reduce the linolenic acid levels sufficiently to affect JA-regulated processes such as male sterility and the defense response to insect attack [29,30,31]. However, loss-of-function mutation in FAD7 alone blocks the JA-induced responses in tomato [22]. The sorghum genome encodes two microsomal ω-3 fatty acid desaturases, Sorbi_3005G002800 and Sorbi_3008G003200, which are homologous to Arabidopsis FAD3 [25,27], and two plastidial fatty acid ω-3 desaturases, Sorbi_3001G407600 and Sorbi_3002g430100, which are homologous to Arabidopsis FAD7 and FAD8 [27,32]. Loss-of-function mutations in MSD3 (FAD7) alone decreased the ratio of linolenic acid to linoleic acid from 13.43 to 2.48 in leaves, and from 0.62 to 0.08 in panicles, resulting in dramatic changes in panicle architecture, and restoration of the fertility of the pedicellate spikelets. As noted above, MSD3 encodes one of the four ω-3 fatty acid desaturases, but the roles of the other three enzymes in fatty acid desaturation remains unclear. Based on their relative expression levels (Figure S3), these genes may not contribute much to the desaturation of linoleic acid except at specific developmental stages. Thus, MSD3 (FAD7) plays a major role in the desaturation of linoleic acid to linolenic acid in sorghum.
Linolenic acid (18:3) and hexadecatrienoic acid (16:3) are the substrates for the lipid-derived JAs [16,17]. Because sorghum has non-detectable levels of hexadecatrienoic acid, linolenic acid serves as the main substrate for JA biosynthesis. We propose that the dramatic decrease in linolenic acid in the msd3 mutants may result in deficiency of JA, which failed to arrest the development of the pedicellate spikelets in sorghum. Thus, we determined the JA levels in the developing panicles of BTx623 and msd3-1 mutant. Although JA level in the msd3-1 mutant panicle was significantly reduced to 409 ng/g FW from 709 ng/g fresh weight (FW) of the wild type, the msd3 panicles still contained substantial levels of JA. Next, we tested if the msd3 phenotype, such as fertile pedicellate spikelets, can be reversed by JA treatment. As shown in Figure 7 and Figure S5, the fertile pedicellate spikelets on the msd3 panicle was reverted to sterile spikelets as in the BTx623. Thus, it is more likely that the dramatic reduction in linolenic acid in msd3 mutants may lead to lower levels of JA, which failed to trigger the programmed cell death pathway and allowed the pedicellate spikelets to develop viable grains. This conclusion is also supported by our previous reports on msd1 and msd2 mutants [13,14].
The role of JA in the mediation of the msd phenotype in sorghum may be closely related to its role in maize tassel development by functioning at the level of sexual determination. Maize is monoecious with separate staminate (male) and pistillate (female) inflorescences called the tassel and the ear, respectively. During early floral development, the florets in both the tassel and the ear spikelets are bisexual. The monoecious nature is conferred by the selective abortion of pistillate organs in tassel florets [15]. A large number of sex-determination mutants (tasselseed) have been identified in maize [33]. The TS1 encodes a lipoxygenase that catalyze the conversion of free linolenic acid to 13(S)-hydroperoxylinolenic acid, the first committed step in JA biosynthesis. The sorghum MSD2 gene is an ortholog of the maize TS2 gene [14]. The maize TS2 gene encodes a short-chain alcohol dehydrogenase, probably involved in JA biosynthesis [34]. Another tasselseed mutant was created by knocking out the duplicated orthologs of OPR3, a major OPR (12-oxo-phytodienoic acid reductase) gene in Arabidopsis that acts in JA biosynthesis [35]. The resulting maize opr7opr8 double mutant is phenotypically similar to ts1 and ts2 mutants and can be reverted to normal tassel phenotype by treatment with MeJA [36]. The maize TS5 gene encodes a wound-inducible gene, CY94B, which serves as an enzyme that inactivates the biologically active JA-isoleucine [33]. Although the causal mutation in the TS5 gene has not been identified, the mutation of ts5 is dominant and leads to the overexpression of CY94B, decreased JA-isoleucine, and a concomitant increase in the deactivated 12OH-JA-isoleucine. As with the maize ts1 and ts2 mutants, the tasselseed phenotype was reverted by JA treatment. It is well-established that JA plays a critical role in the maintenance of the staminate state of the tassel by suppressing the development of female flower organs through JA-induced programmed cell death [15].
Sorghum is hermaphroditic and produces perfect flowers with both male and female floral organs. Like many other grasses, sorghum produces two types of spikelets depending on the mode of attachment to the inflorescence axis. The sessile spikelets, directly attached to the inflorescence axis, contain perfect flowers and produce viable grains. The pedicellate spikelets, attached to the inflorescence axis through a short petiole called pedicel, occasionally produce anthers but never produce mature ovaries, and thus, become sterile spikelets in mature panicles. In sorghum, msd mutants produce both sessile and pedicellate spikelets that contain perfect flowers and can develop viable grains. Sorghum may employ similar mechanisms to control the fertility of the pedicellate spikelets as reported in maize in controlling the ovary development in tassels. In the wild type BTx623, both sessile and pedicellate spikelets have both male and female floral organs initially but the floral organs, especially the ovary, in the pedicellate spikelets become arrested in a late development stage [13]. The abortion of the ovary has been shown to be regulated by JA-induced programmed cell death as in maize tassels [13,15]. As previously reported, the MSD1 gene encodes a TCP-transcription factor that activates many genes involved in JA biosynthesis and MSD2 encodes a lipoxygenase that catalyzes the first committed step of JA biosynthesis from linolenic acid [13,14]. The discovery of the MSD3 gene as a predominant form of ω-3 fatty acid desaturase responsible for the conversion of linoleic acid to linolenic acid highlights the importance of the JA regulatory module(s) in the control of the fertility of the pedicellate spikelets in sorghum.
The mechanisms determining the staminate state of tassels in maize and that suppressing the development of the pedicellate spikelets in sorghum may also differ. All maize tasselseed mutants are male sterile due to the ectopic growth of the silks. However, the sorghum msd mutants develop both anthers and ovaries. Male sterility was never observed in the sorghum msd mutants. In addition, JA may also contribute to panicle development in sorghum, because all msd mutants exhibit increases in the number and size of the primary inflorescence branches [11,13,14].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials

Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) msd mutants were identified from a pedigreed sorghum mutant library that was developed by mutagenizing the sorghum inbred line BTx623 seeds with the chemical mutagen ethyl methane sulfonate (EMS) [37]. The wild type BTx623, the msd mutants, and their backcrossed F2 populations were planted in the Agricultural Experiment Station at Lubbock, TX (33′39” N, 101′49” W) of the Agricultural Research Service of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA-ARS) in May 2017. During the late grain-filling stage, when the msd phenotype could be easily observed, leaf samples were collected from each of the confirmed homozygous msd mutants to prepare genomic DNA as described previously [38].
The msd mutants isolated from the library harbored a high density of EMS-induced mutations [20]. To decrease the number of background mutations, these mutants were backcrossed (BC) to WT BTx623 for three generations before use in this study. Moreover, the new msd mutants were also crossed to the known msd1 and msd2 mutants, as well as to each other, to determine whether they represented alleles of known msd loci or new locus.

4.2. Gene Identification by Next-Generation Sequencing

Homozygous msd mutants were identified from the backcrossed F2 populations of p6, p14, p21, and p24 during the grain-filling stage, during which the msd phenotype could be easily scored. Genomic DNA pooled from the homozygous msd mutants from each F2 population was sequenced to >20× coverage on an Illumina HiSeq 2000 through a service from BGI (https://www.bgi.com/us/). Causal mutations in these populations were identified by an inhouse bioinformatic pipeline described previously [19]. Briefly, low-quality reads, adapter sequences, and contamination were excluded from the raw reads, and then the clean reads were aligned to the sorghum reference genome v3.0 with Bowtie2 [39]. SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) calling was performed by Samtools and Bcftools using only reads with mapping and sequencing quality greater than Q20 [40]. The read depth for true SNPs was set from 3 to 50. Because EMS induces only G/C-to-A/T transition mutations [41], only homozygous G/C to A/T SNPs were used for prediction of effects on gene function by the Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor [42]. Homology analysis and functional annotation of candidate genes were obtained from Gramene database release 39 [43] (http://www.gramene.org).

4.3. Confirmation of the Causal Mutation with KASP

The BC3F2 population consisting of 63 F2 offspring was utilized for this study. Based on putative SNPs discovered through the sequencing analysis described above, three types of SNP–KASP primers were designed [44,45] and synthesized by Integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville, IA, USA). Genotyping analyses were performed using extracted genomic DNA from leaf tissues of sorghum plants collected from the field. SNP genotype in each offspring was determined by Kompetitive Allele Specific PCR (KASP) chemistry (www.lgcgenomics.com) with some modifications [44]. Analysis of genotypes was conducted at the Plant Stress and Germplasm Development Unit at Lubbock, TX, USA. Phenotype data for the population were gathered at the full maturity stage of the panicle. Co-segregation analyses were conducted based on the correspondence of genotype to phenotype and chi-square test.

4.4. Lipidomic Assay

Samples were obtained from ~5 cm2 from the middle lamina of the first mature leaf (the youngest leaf with a visible leaf collar) and from developing panicles (approximately 3 cm long). The samples were quickly immersed in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until use. Lipids were extracted and analyzed following the procedure established at the Lipidomic Center of Kansas State University (https://www.k-state.edu/lipid/). The original protocol was modified as follows: instead of cutting leaves into small pieces, the leaf tissue was completely ground into a fine powder with liquid nitrogen chilled mortars and pestles. The plant material was then treated with hot isopropanol and 0.01% butylated hydroxytoluene (preheated to 75 °C). The resultant lipid extract was dissolved in chloroform and stored at −80 °C. Lipid extracts were dried with a stream of nitrogen gas, packed in dry ice, and shipped to the Lipidomic Center of Kansas State University for lipid analysis. The tissue used for extraction was dried in an oven at 65 °C for 1 week to estimate the total dry weight of tissue used for extraction of each lipid sample.

4.5. Jasmonic Acid Determination

Panicles at stage 4, when the fate of the pedicellate spikelets is determined [13,14], were collected and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. Five biological replicates were solvent-extracted, methylated, collected on a polymeric adsorbent using vapor-phase extraction, and analyzed using GC/isobutene chemical ion mass spectrometry (GC/CI-MS) [46]. For metabolite quantification, d5JA (Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was used as an internal standard. The JA level in each sample was normalized to the mass of the panicle, and expressed as ng/g fresh weight (FW).

4.6. Quantitative Gene Expression Analysis of FAD7 and FAD8

Sorghum msd3 and BTx623 plants were grown in a greenhouse with temperatures maintained at 28 °C (12 h day)/25 °C (12 h night) cycle. Panicle samples at stage 4, about 3 cm long, were collected, flash frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80 °C until use. Total RNA was extracted from a single panicle with Trizol reagent (Thermo–Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), followed by column purification using the RNA Extraction kit from Sigma–Aldrich (Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). After purification, genomic DNA contaminants were removed by On-Column DNase I Digestion supplied in the Sigma kit (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA). RNA concentration was measured using a BioSpectrophotometer® Kinetic (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). RNA quality was checked by electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel. First-strand cDNA was synthesized from 1 µg RNA per sample using the Superscript 2 Reverse Transcriptase kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The reaction mixture was incubated at 42 °C for 50 min followed by heat inactivation at 70 °C for 15 min. The resultant cDNA is used as a template for quantitative analysis of FAD7 and FAD8 genes with control eukaryotic translation initiation factor.
Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis was used to determine which plastidial fatty acid desaturase was affected in the msd3 mutants. The Primer3 software was used to design primers for the FAD7 and FAD8 genes from sorghum. Combinations of forward and reverse primers with Tm above 60 °C were selected for real-time PCR analysis, and the annealing temperature was set to 53 °C. Because of the high sequence similarity among fatty acid desaturase genes, primers were designed within the 3′-UTR region to prevent non-specific binding to genes in the same family. 3′-UTR regions unique to FAD7 (FAD7 forward primer: 5′ TCC CTC AAA TCC CAC ATT 3‘, FAD7 reverse primer: 5′ GAA GAG CAC CCG ACT TCT TT 3‘) and FAD8 (FAD8 forward primer: 5′ TGC ATG GAG GTT CAT ATA CTG C 3‘, FAD8 reverse primer: 5′ AAT TCT GTT CTG TTT GGT TGG TG 3‘) were used to design primer pairs that amplified a product of ~100 base pairs. Internal control primers were designed against the gene encoding eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 α (EIF4α) (SB_EIF4α Forward: 5′ CAA CTT TGT CAC CCG CGA TGA 3′ SB_EIF4αReverse: 5′ TCC AGA AAC CTT AGC AGC CCA 3′).
The cDNA was diluted five times with nuclease-free water, mixed with Roche Fast Start SYBR Green® (Roche, San Francisco, CA, USA) along with specific primers and run on a Roche LightCycler 96. Three biological replicates (control and mutant samples) were used for gene expression analysis. The melt curve from the Light Cycler was analyzed by exporting the ΔCt and ΔΔCt values to an Excel file. EIF4α was used as an internal control for analyzing the relative expression level differences of FAD7 and FAD8 genes.

4.7. Reversion of the msd3 Panicle Structure by MeJA

Treatment with MeJA was performed as described [13,14]. Briefly, 1 mL of 1 mM MeJA in 0.05% Tween-20 in water was applied to the central whorl every other day, starting when the plants had eight fully expanded leaves until the plants had 10 fully expanded leaves. Controls were treated with 1 mL of 0.05% Tween-20.

4.8. Statistical Analyses

Statistical analyses, such as one-way ANOVA and t-test, were run in Excel with the XRealStats add-in (http://www.real-statistics.com). Option ‘Tukey’s HSD’ was used for multiple comparisons.

5. Conclusions

We identified MSD3 as FAD7 (Sorbi_3001G407600), a major plastid-targeted ω-3 fatty acid desaturase. Loss-of-function mutations in MSD3 (as in msd3-1, msd3-3, and msd3-4) result in low levels of linolenic acid, the substrate for JA biosynthesis. The msd panicle architecture was restored to the wild-type panicle phenotype by treatment with MeJA. The discovery that MSD3 is FAD7 provides further support for the idea that JA-regulated modules are responsible for suppressing the development of pedicellate spikelets in sorghum, as described previously in our characterization of the msd1 and msd2 mutants. Compared with msd1 and msd2 mutants, msd3 mutants have higher grain weight indicating that msd3 mutants may be better adapted to increasing sink capacity, and therefore may have better potential to increase grain yield. These findings of this study provide a new approach for genetic manipulation of grain numbers per panicle with the goal of increasing grain yield.

Supplementary Materials

Author Contributions

Z.X. and D.W. conceived the study. L.D. conducted the lipidomics study and characterization of the MSD3 expression. Y.J. analyzed genomic data. J.C. isolated the msd3 mutants. R.C. and G.B. conducted genetic and co-segregation analyses. S.A.C. performed J.A. experiments. L.D., I.C., N.G., G.B., R.C., C.H., S.C., J.C. and J.B. participated in the characterization of the msd3 mutants. L.D. and Z.X. wrote the manuscript. All authors participated in the revision and agreed with the final manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded in part by the United Sorghum Checkoff. ZX was also partly supported by USDA–ARS 3096-21000-020-00-D, and DW was partly supported by USDA–ARS 8062-21000-041-00D.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Lan Liu-Gitz, Halee Hughes, and Jing Wang from the Plant Stress and Germplasm Development Research Unit, USDA–ARS for their technical support. We thank the two peer reviewers for their valuable input, which helped us to improve the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest pertaining to this work.

Disclaimer

Mention of trade names or commercial products in this article is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

References

  1. Saeed, M.; Francis, C.A.; Clegg, M.D. Yield component analysis in grain sorghum. Crop Sci. 1986, 26, 346–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ashikari, M.; Sakakibara, H.; Lin, S.; Yamamoto, T.; Takashi, T.; Nishimura, A.; Angeles, E.R.; Qian, Q.; Kitano, H.; Matsuoka, M. Cytokinin oxidase regulates rice grain production. Science 2005, 309, 741–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Duggan, B.L.; Domitruk, D.R.; Fowler, D.B. Yield component variation in winter wheat grown under drought stress. Can. J. Plant Sci. 2000, 80, 739–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Reynolds, M.; Foulkes, M.J.; Slafer, G.A.; Berry, P.; Parry, M.A.J.; Snape, J.W.; Angus, W.J. Raising yield potential in wheat. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60, 1899–1918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Richards, R.A. Selectable traits to increase crop photosynthesis and yield of grain crops. J. Exp. Bot. 2000, 51, 447–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Boyles, R.E.; Cooper, E.A.; Myers, M.T.; Brenton, Z.; Rauh, B.L.; Morris, G.P.; Kresovich, S. Genome-Wide Association Studies of Grain Yield Components in Diverse Sorghum Germplasm. Plant Genome 2016, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Zohary, D.; Hopf, M.; Weiss, E. Domestication of Plants in the Old World: The Origin and Spread of Cultivated Plants in West Asia, Europe, and the Mediterranean Basin, 4th ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2012; p. 280. [Google Scholar]
  8. Dolferus, R.; Ji, X.; Richards, R. Abiotic stress and control of grain number in cereals. Plant Sci. Int. J. Exp. Plant Biol. 2011, 181, 331–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sreenivasulu, N.; Schnurbusch, T. A genetic playground for enhancing grain number in cereals. Trends Plant Sci. 2012, 17, 91–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Brown, P.J.; Klein, P.E.; Bortiri, E.; Acharya, C.B.; Rooney, W.L.; Kresovich, S. Inheritance of inflorescence architecture in sorghum. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2006, 113, 931–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Burow, G.; Xin, Z.; Hayes, C.; Burke, J. Characterization of a multiseeded mutant of sorghum for increasing grain yield. Crop Sci. 2014, 54, 2030–2037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Walters, D.R.; Keil, D.J. Vascular Plant Taxonomy, 4th ed.; Kendall/Hunt Pub. Co.: Dubuque, IA, USA, 1988; p. 607. [Google Scholar]
  13. Jiao, Y.; Lee, Y.K.; Gladman, N.; Chopra, R.; Christensen, S.A.; Regulski, M.; Burow, G.; Hayes, C.; Burke, J.; Ware, D.; et al. MSD1 regulates pedicellate spikelet fertility in sorghum through the jasmonic acid pathway. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Gladman, N.; Jiao, Y.; Lee, Y.K.; Zhang, L.; Chopra, R.; Regulski, M.; Burow, G.; Hayes, C.; Christensen, S.A.; Dampanaboina, L.; et al. Fertility of Pedicellate Spikelets in Sorghum Is Controlled by a Jasmonic Acid Regulatory Module. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Acosta, I.F.; Laparra, H.; Romero, S.P.; Schmelz, E.; Hamberg, M.; Mottinger, J.P.; Moreno, M.A.; Dellaporta, S.L. tasselseed1 is a lipoxygenase affecting jasmonic acid signaling in sex determination of maize. Science 2009, 323, 262–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ghasemi Pirbalouti, A.; Sajjadi, S.E.; Parang, K. A Review (Research and Patents) on Jasmonic Acid and Its Derivatives. Arch. Der Pharm. 2014, 347, 229–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wasternack, C.; Hause, B. Jasmonates: Biosynthesis, perception, signal transduction and action in plant stress response, growth and development. An update to the 2007 review in Annals of Botany. Ann. Bot. 2013, 111, 1021–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Abe, A.; Kosugi, S.; Yoshida, K.; Natsume, S.; Takagi, H.; Kanzaki, H.; Matsumura, H.; Mitsuoka, C.; Tamiru, M.; Innan, H.; et al. Genome sequencing reveals agronomically important loci in rice using MutMap. Nat. Biotechnol. 2012, 30, 174–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Jiao, Y.; Burow, G.; Gladman, N.; Acosta-Martinez, V.; Chen, J.; Burke, J.; Ware, D.; Xin, Z. Efficient identification of causal mutations through sequencing of bulked f2 from two allelic bloomless mutants. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 8, 2267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jiao, Y.; Burke, J.J.; Chopra, R.; Burow, G.; Chen, J.; Wang, B.; Hayes, C.; Emendack, Y.; Ware, D.; Xin, Z. A sorghum mutant resource as an efficient platform for gene discovery in grasses. Plant Cell 2016, 28, 1551–1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Berberich, T.; Harada, M.; Sugawara, K.; Kodama, H.; Iba, K.; Kusano, T. Two maize genes encoding ω-3 fatty acid desaturase and their differential expression to temperature. Plant Mol. Biol. 1998, 36, 297–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, C.; Liu, G.; Xu, C.; Lee, G.I.; Bauer, P.; Ling, H.-Q.; Ganal, M.W.; Howe, G.A. The Tomato Suppressor of prosystemin-mediated responses2 Gene Encodes a Fatty Acid Desaturase Required for the Biosynthesis of Jasmonic Acid and the Production of a Systemic Wound Signal for Defense Gene Expression. Plant Cell 2003, 15, 1646–1661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Roman, A.; Hernandez, M.L.; Soria-Garcia, A.; Lopez-Gomollon, S.; Lagunas, B.; Picorel, R.; Martinez-Rivas, J.M.; Alfonso, M. Non-redundant Contribution of the Plastidial FAD8 omega-3 Desaturase to Glycerolipid Unsaturation at Different Temperatures in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 2015, 8, 1599–1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Tovuu, A.; Zulfugarov, I.S.; Wu, G.; Kang, I.S.; Kim, C.; Moon, B.Y.; An, G.; Lee, C.H. Rice mutants deficient in omega-3 fatty acid desaturase (FAD8) fail to acclimate to cold temperatures. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2016, 109, 525–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Arondel, V.; Lemieux, B.; Hwang, I.; Gibson, S.; Goodman, H.; Somerville, C. Map-based cloning of a gene controlling omega-3 fatty acid desaturation in Arabidopsis. Science 1992, 258, 1353–1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Rao, X.; Huang, X.; Zhou, Z.; Lin, X. An improvement of the 2ˆ(–delta delta CT) method for quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction data analysis. Biostat. Bioinforma. Biomath. 2003, 3, 71–85. [Google Scholar]
  27. Iba, K.; Gibson, S.; Nishiuchi, T.; Fuse, T.; Nishimura, M.; Arondel, V.; Hugly, S.; Somerville, C. A gene encoding a chloroplast omega-3 fatty acid desaturase complements alterations in fatty acid desaturation and chloroplast copy number of the fad7 mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Biol. Chem. 1993, 268, 24099–24105. [Google Scholar]
  28. Lyons, R.; Manners, J.M.; Kazan, K. Jasmonate biosynthesis and signaling in monocots: A comparative overview. Plant Cell Rep. 2013, 32, 815–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. McConn, M.; Browse, J. The Critical Requirement for Linolenic Acid Is Pollen Development, Not Photosynthesis, in an Arabidopsis Mutant. Plant Cell 1996, 8, 403–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. McConn, M.; Creelman, R.A.; Bell, E.; Mullet, J.E.; Browse, J. Jasmonate is essential for insect defense in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 5473–5477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Vijayan, P.; Shockey, J.; Levesque, C.A.; Cook, R.J.; Browse, J. A role for jasmonate in pathogen defense of arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 7209–7214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. McConn, M.; Hugly, S.; Browse, J.; Somerville, C. A Mutation at the fad8 Locus of Arabidopsis Identifies a Second Chloroplast [omega]-3 Desaturase. Plant Physiol. 1994, 106, 1609–1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Lunde, C.; Kimberlin, A.; Leiboff, S.; Koo, A.J.; Hake, S. Tasselseed5 overexpresses a wound-inducible enzyme, ZmCYP94B1, that affects jasmonate catabolism, sex determination, and plant architecture in maize. Commun. Biol. 2019, 2, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. DeLong, A.; Calderon-Urrea, A.; Dellaporta, S.L. Sex determination gene TASSELSEED2 of maize encodes a short-chain alcohol dehydrogenase required for stage-specific floral organ abortion. Cell 1993, 74, 757–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Stintzi, A.; Browse, J. The Arabidopsis male-sterile mutant, opr3, lacks the 12-oxophytodienoic acid reductase required for jasmonate synthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 10625–10630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Yan, Y.; Christensen, S.; Isakeit, T.; Engelberth, J.; Meeley, R.; Hayward, A.; Emery, R.J.; Kolomiets, M.V. Disruption of OPR7 and OPR8 reveals the versatile functions of jasmonic acid in maize development and defense. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 1420–1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Xin, Z.; Wang, M.L.; Barkley, N.A.; Burow, G.; Franks, C.; Pederson, G.; Burke, J. Applying genotyping (TILLING) and phenotyping analyses to elucidate gene function in a chemically induced sorghum mutant population. BMC Plant Biol. 2008, 8, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Xin, Z.; Chen, J. A high throughput DNA extraction method with high yield and quality. Plant Methods 2012, 8, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Langmead, B.; Salzberg, S.L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 357–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Li, H.; Handsaker, B.; Wysoker, A.; Fennell, T.; Ruan, J.; Homer, N.; Marth, G.; Abecasis, G.; Durbin, R.; Genome Project Data Processing, S. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 2078–2079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Greene, E.A.; Codomo, C.A.; Taylor, N.E.; Henikoff, J.G.; Till, B.J.; Reynolds, S.H.; Enns, L.C.; Burtner, C.; Johnson, J.E.; Odden, A.R.; et al. Spectrum of chemically induced mutations from a large-scale reverse-genetic screen in Arabidopsis. Genetics 2003, 164, 731–740. [Google Scholar]
  42. McLaren, W.; Pritchard, B.; Rios, D.; Chen, Y.; Flicek, P.; Cunningham, F. Deriving the consequences of genomic variants with the Ensembl API and SNP Effect Predictor. Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 2069–2070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Monaco, M.K.; Stein, J.; Naithani, S.; Wei, S.; Dharmawardhana, P.; Kumari, S.; Amarasinghe, V.; Youens-Clark, K.; Thomason, J.; Preece, J.; et al. Gramene 2013: Comparative plant genomics resources. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, D1193–D1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Burow, G.; Chopra, R.; Sattler, S.; Burke, J.; Acosta-Martinez, V.; Xin, Z. Deployment of SNP (CAPS and KASP) markers for allelic discrimination and easy access to functional variants for brown midrib genes bmr6 and bmr12 in Sorghum bicolor. Mol. Breed. 2019, 39, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Rosas, J.E.; Bonnecarrère, V.; Pérez de Vida, F. One-step, codominant detection of imidazolinone resistance mutations in weedy rice (Oryza sativa L.). Electron. J. Biotechnol. 2014, 17, 95–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Schmelz, E.A.; Engelberth, J.; Tumlinson, J.H.; Block, A.; Alborn, H.T. The use of vapor phase extraction in metabolic profiling of phytohormones and other metabolites. Plant J. 2004, 39, 790–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Comparison of grain weight (mg/grain) of msd3 mutants vs. BTx623 and the msd1 and msd2 mutants. Grain weight was determined from plants planted on the Farm of Texas Tech University on Quaker Avenue in 2017. Four samples of 100 grains were weighed from each line. One-way ANOVA analysis revealed that grain weight varied significantly with an F-value of 276 and p-value of 1.8−15. Grain weights labeled with different letters are significantly different.
Figure 1. Comparison of grain weight (mg/grain) of msd3 mutants vs. BTx623 and the msd1 and msd2 mutants. Grain weight was determined from plants planted on the Farm of Texas Tech University on Quaker Avenue in 2017. Four samples of 100 grains were weighed from each line. One-way ANOVA analysis revealed that grain weight varied significantly with an F-value of 276 and p-value of 1.8−15. Grain weights labeled with different letters are significantly different.
Ijms 20 05359 g001
Figure 2. Identification of the Msd3 gene by MutMap. Four F2 populations, BTx623*p6, BTx623*p14, BTx623*p21, and BTx623*p24, were subjected to sequencing of 20 bulked F2 mutants. The number in each circle represents the number of homozygous deleterious mutations. Only one gene, Sorbi_3001G407600, was commonly mutated in all four populations. In p21 and p24, the MSD3 gene was mutated at the same position.
Figure 2. Identification of the Msd3 gene by MutMap. Four F2 populations, BTx623*p6, BTx623*p14, BTx623*p21, and BTx623*p24, were subjected to sequencing of 20 bulked F2 mutants. The number in each circle represents the number of homozygous deleterious mutations. Only one gene, Sorbi_3001G407600, was commonly mutated in all four populations. In p21 and p24, the MSD3 gene was mutated at the same position.
Ijms 20 05359 g002
Figure 3. MSD3 gene model and mutations. The MSD3 gene, Sorbi_3001G407600, spanning a genomic sequence of 3132 bp, with a CDS of 1356 bp, encodes a protein of 451 amino acids. The gene has eight exons (grey boxes) and seven introns (black line). The vertical lines indicate mutation sites as described in the table above.
Figure 3. MSD3 gene model and mutations. The MSD3 gene, Sorbi_3001G407600, spanning a genomic sequence of 3132 bp, with a CDS of 1356 bp, encodes a protein of 451 amino acids. The gene has eight exons (grey boxes) and seven introns (black line). The vertical lines indicate mutation sites as described in the table above.
Ijms 20 05359 g003
Figure 4. Genotyping of msd3-4 F2 backcrossed population by KASP (Kompetitive Allele-Specific PCR) SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) analysis. The x-axis represents the endpoint fluorescence data at 483–533 nm (allele X or wild type allele) and the y-axis represents the endpoint fluorescence data at 523–568 nm (allele Y or mutant allele). Genotype for individual F2 plants was determined by cluster analysis of the endpoint KASP assay. AA, homozygous msd3-4; GG, homozygous wild-type (WT); and GA, heterozygous WT.
Figure 4. Genotyping of msd3-4 F2 backcrossed population by KASP (Kompetitive Allele-Specific PCR) SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) analysis. The x-axis represents the endpoint fluorescence data at 483–533 nm (allele X or wild type allele) and the y-axis represents the endpoint fluorescence data at 523–568 nm (allele Y or mutant allele). Genotype for individual F2 plants was determined by cluster analysis of the endpoint KASP assay. AA, homozygous msd3-4; GG, homozygous wild-type (WT); and GA, heterozygous WT.
Ijms 20 05359 g004
Figure 5. Expression of FAD7 and FAD8 genes in developing panicles. Relative change in FAD7 and FAD8 mRNA levels in msd3 mutants in comparison to BTx623 (normalized as 1).
Figure 5. Expression of FAD7 and FAD8 genes in developing panicles. Relative change in FAD7 and FAD8 mRNA levels in msd3 mutants in comparison to BTx623 (normalized as 1).
Ijms 20 05359 g005
Figure 6. Lipid profiles of leaves and panicles from BTx623 and msd3-3 (p6) mutants. Lipid profiles of the youngest mature leaves and panicles were carried out by the Lipidomics Center at Kansas State University. Numbers in parenthesis indicate the length and number of double bonds of the fatty acid moiety: (36:6) represents lipid species with two linolenic acids (18:3), (36:4) represents lipid species with two linoleic acids (18:2), and (36:5) represents lipid species with one linolenic acid and one linoleic acid moiety. Minor lipid species (molar percentage <1%) were not plotted, but can be found in Table S3. The difference between WT and msd3-1 in each lipid species was analyzed by t-test. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.
Figure 6. Lipid profiles of leaves and panicles from BTx623 and msd3-3 (p6) mutants. Lipid profiles of the youngest mature leaves and panicles were carried out by the Lipidomics Center at Kansas State University. Numbers in parenthesis indicate the length and number of double bonds of the fatty acid moiety: (36:6) represents lipid species with two linolenic acids (18:3), (36:4) represents lipid species with two linoleic acids (18:2), and (36:5) represents lipid species with one linolenic acid and one linoleic acid moiety. Minor lipid species (molar percentage <1%) were not plotted, but can be found in Table S3. The difference between WT and msd3-1 in each lipid species was analyzed by t-test. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.
Ijms 20 05359 g006
Figure 7. Reversion of the msd panicle phenotype by jasmonic acid (JA). 0.05% Tween-20 in water or 1 mM methyl-JA (MeJA) in 0.05% Tween-20 was directly applied to the central whorl of BTx623 and msd3-3 (p6) plants every other day, starting from when the plants had eight fully expanded leaves and continuing until they had 10 fully expanded leaves. Shown in the figure were a few spikelets to demonstrate the reversion of the fertile pedicellate spikelets of the msd3 mutant to sterile spikelets by the addition of MeJA. The effect of JA treatment on an entire primary inflorescence branch was shown in Figure S5.
Figure 7. Reversion of the msd panicle phenotype by jasmonic acid (JA). 0.05% Tween-20 in water or 1 mM methyl-JA (MeJA) in 0.05% Tween-20 was directly applied to the central whorl of BTx623 and msd3-3 (p6) plants every other day, starting from when the plants had eight fully expanded leaves and continuing until they had 10 fully expanded leaves. Shown in the figure were a few spikelets to demonstrate the reversion of the fertile pedicellate spikelets of the msd3 mutant to sterile spikelets by the addition of MeJA. The effect of JA treatment on an entire primary inflorescence branch was shown in Figure S5.
Ijms 20 05359 g007
Table 1. Complementation tests between msd3, msd2, and msd1 mutants. The msd3 mutants were crossed to each other and to msd1-1 and msd2-1 mutants by hand emasculation and manual pollination. The panicle phenotypes of the F1 plants were evaluated during the grain filling stage.
Table 1. Complementation tests between msd3, msd2, and msd1 mutants. The msd3 mutants were crossed to each other and to msd1-1 and msd2-1 mutants by hand emasculation and manual pollination. The panicle phenotypes of the F1 plants were evaluated during the grain filling stage.
Mutant msd1-1 (p12)msd2-1 (p4)msd3-1 (p24)msd3-2 (p14)msd3-3 (p6)
msd1-1 (p12)
msd2-1 (p4)WT
msd3-1 (p24)WTWT
msd3-2 (p14)WTWTmsd
msd3-3 (p6)WTWTmsdmsd
msd3-4 (p37)WTWTmsdmsdmsd

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dampanaboina, L.; Jiao, Y.; Chen, J.; Gladman, N.; Chopra, R.; Burow, G.; Hayes, C.; Christensen, S.A.; Burke, J.; Ware, D.; et al. Sorghum MSD3 Encodes an ω-3 Fatty Acid Desaturase that Increases Grain Number by Reducing Jasmonic Acid Levels. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5359. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms20215359

AMA Style

Dampanaboina L, Jiao Y, Chen J, Gladman N, Chopra R, Burow G, Hayes C, Christensen SA, Burke J, Ware D, et al. Sorghum MSD3 Encodes an ω-3 Fatty Acid Desaturase that Increases Grain Number by Reducing Jasmonic Acid Levels. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019; 20(21):5359. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms20215359

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dampanaboina, Lavanya, Yinping Jiao, Junping Chen, Nicholas Gladman, Ratan Chopra, Gloria Burow, Chad Hayes, Shawn A. Christensen, John Burke, Doreen Ware, and et al. 2019. "Sorghum MSD3 Encodes an ω-3 Fatty Acid Desaturase that Increases Grain Number by Reducing Jasmonic Acid Levels" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20, no. 21: 5359. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms20215359

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop