Next Article in Journal
Correction: Sato, K., et al. Identification of a Novel Oligosaccharide in Maple Syrup as a Potential Alternative Saccharide for Diabetes Mellitus Patients. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5041
Next Article in Special Issue
Ephs and Ephrins in Adult Endothelial Biology
Previous Article in Journal
The Application of Molecular Spectroscopy in Combination with Chemometrics for Halal Authentication Analysis: A Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor during Oral Glucose Tolerance Test Predicts Cardiovascular Outcomes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Emerging Roles for Neuropilin-2 in Cardiovascular Disease

1
Department of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, Royal College Street, London NW1 0TU, UK
2
University College London, Division of Medicine, Rayne Building, University Street, London WC1E 6JF, UK
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(14), 5154; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms21145154
Submission received: 30 June 2020 / Revised: 16 July 2020 / Accepted: 17 July 2020 / Published: 21 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Role of Neuronal Guidance Cues in Inflammation and Vascular Biology)

Abstract

:
Cardiovascular disease, the leading cause of death worldwide, is predominantly associated with atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis is a chronic inflammatory disease characterised by the narrowing of large to medium-sized arteries due to a build-up of plaque. Atherosclerotic plaque is comprised of lipids, extracellular matrix, and several cell types, including endothelial, immune, and vascular smooth muscle cells. Such narrowing of the blood vessels can itself restrict blood flow to vital organs but most severe clinical complications, including heart attacks and strokes, occur when lesions rupture, triggering the blood to clot and obstructing blood flow further down the vascular tree. To circumvent such obstructions, percutaneous coronary intervention or bypass grafts are often required; however, re-occlusion of the treated artery frequently occurs. Neuropilins (NRPs), a multifunctional family of cell surface co-receptors, are expressed by endothelial, immune, and vascular smooth muscle cells and are regulators of numerous signalling pathways within the vasculature. Here, we review recent studies implicating NRP2 in the development of occlusive vascular diseases and discuss how NRP2 could be targeted for therapeutic intervention.

1. Introduction

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death worldwide, costing the National Health Service in England an estimated £7.4 billion per year [1]. CVD is predominantly associated with atherosclerosis, which can typically be classified into four main stages (Figure 1).
(1) Firstly, endothelial cell (EC) activation, commonly occurring in areas of aberrant blood flow, stimulates the accumulation and oxidation of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) within the vessel wall [2]. Oxidised LDL and adhesion molecules secreted from activated ECs attract monocytes from the blood into the subendothelial intima where they differentiate into macrophages, which ingest lipoproteins and subsequently become foam cells [2]. These deposits, referred to as fatty streaks, begin to develop in childhood [3].
(2) In humans, vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) accumulation in the intimal space occurs in utero in conserved locations susceptible to the development of atherosclerotic plaque, including branch sites and areas of turbulent blood flow [4]. In response to inflammatory mediators and cytokines, VSMCs migrate, proliferate, and secrete extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins [2]. ECs have also been reported to lose cell-cell interaction and undergo endothelial to mesenchymal transition (EndoMT), contributing to plaque growth [2]. By the age of puberty, more than 50% of children present fibrous atherosclerotic plaque, containing hyperplastic VSMCs [3].
(3) In progressing plaques, macrophages and VSMCs become necrotic, releasing lipids which accumulate within the centre of the lesion to form the necrotic core [2]. VSMCs migrate and proliferate to create the fibrous cap and secrete ECM components providing stability to the atherosclerotic lesion [2]. Lymphangiogenesis and neovascularisation may also occur at this stage [5,6]. By our late 20s, almost a third of us have well-developed lesions with large lipid-filled necrotic cores and thick fibromuscular caps [3].
(4) In advanced plaque, the fibrous cap may rupture and trigger the blood to clot—this can lead to complications including heart attack and stroke by middle age [3,7]. Percutaneous coronary intervention and bypass grafts are sometimes required to restore blood flow; however, such interventions themselves may lead to further clinical complications [8,9]. In recent years, numerous studies have revealed that ECs, macrophages, and VSMCs undergo extensive phenotypic changes in diseased blood vessels, often in response to lipid and pro-inflammatory cytokine exposure [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. These phenotypic changes can both promote and attenuate the progression of occlusive vascular diseases including atherosclerosis, interventional restenosis, and transplant vasculopathy [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22].
Neuropilin-1 (NRP1) and its closely related family member NRP2, are transmembrane co-receptors, which are devoid of kinase activity [23,24,25]. Both NRP family members are expressed by a wide variety of cell types [23,24,25]. Although NRPs are commonly found at the cell surface, they have also been reported within the mitochondria [26,27] and nucleus [28]. NRPs were first implicated in neuronal guidance, vasculogenesis and angiogenesis in the embryo via mediating signalling pathways driven by class 3 Semaphorins (SEMA3s) and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF), respectively [25,29,30,31,32]. However, NRPs are now known to partner with a wide variety of transmembrane receptors and therefore modulate numerous signalling pathways [23,24], including those activated by Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF) [33], Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF) [34], Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF) [35], Insulin-like Growth Factor (IGF) [36], Platelet-Derived Growth Factor (PDGF) [37,38] and Transforming Growth Factor beta (TGFβ) [39]. As a result, NRPs mediate multiple cellular processes, and dysregulation of their activity has been implicated with several pathological conditions [23,38,40,41,42]. NRPs are expressed by ECs [31], leukocytes [24] and VSMCs [38,40,43,44,45] within the vasculature, and are emerging as multifaceted regulators of signalling pathways associated with CVD [23].
Both NRP family members share the same basic structure consisting of an extracellular domain comprised of two CUB (complement C1r/C1s, Uegf, Bmp1) subunits (a1, a2), a factor V/VIII coagulation factor homology subunit (b1, b2) and a MAM (meprin, A-5 protein, receptor protein-tyrosine phosphatase mu) subunit (c), a transmembrane domain, and a short cytoplasmic domain (Figure 2) [24,46,47]. NRPs can also be found in soluble forms created by alternative splicing [47] or by extracellular domain shedding of the transmembrane proteins [27] (Figure 2). The a1/a2/b1 subunits have long been known to interact with class 3 Semaphorins to regulate neurogenesis while the b1/b2 domains bind to VEGF-A and VEGF-C to mediate angiogenesis [48]. Although less well characterised, VEGF-D has also been described to interact with NRP2 in the context of lymphangiogenesis [49]. The extracellular c domain was thought to be important for NRP oligomerisation with other cell surface receptors [48,50]; however, a recent study has challenged this function [51]. The intracellular PDZ (PSD95, Dlg, ZO-1) binding motif facilitates association with PDZ domain-containing proteins, including GIPC (RGS-GAIP-interacting protein), which can directly mediate signalling in ECs [52,53,54].
Despite being 44% identical at the amino acid level, NRP1 and NRP2 exhibit distinct expression patterns and ligand preferences in vivo [46,55]. For example, NRP1 predominantly binds to VEGF-A165 to mediate angiogenesis [56,57,58] in vascular ECs, whereas NRP2 interacts with VEGF-C to regulate lymphangiogenesis [46,59,60,61]. NRP1 and NRP2 knockout mice also display disparate phenotypes—while NRP1 knockout is embryonic lethal at E10.5 to E13.5 due to a spectrum of cardiovascular and neuronal defects, NRP2 knockout embryos remain viable but exhibit decreased numbers of lymphatic capillaries, as well as abnormal guidance and arrangement of cranial and spinal nerves [30,32,61,62]. NRP1 and NRP2 double knockout mice display even greater vascular defects and die in utero at E8.5 with large areas in the yolk sac totally void of blood vessels [63]. Furthermore, NRP1 and NRP2 are regulated by separate stimuli which elicit different cellular responses. For example, in smooth muscle cells (SMCs), while NRP1 appears to be upregulated by FGF and PDGF [38,64], which promote migration and proliferation [65,66], NRP2 is induced by Tumour Necrosis Factor alpha (TNFα) and Interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β), which elicit a pro-inflammatory response [66,67,68,69,70]. Together, these observations suggest that NRP1 and NRP2 have unique as well as overlapping functions. NRP1 is known to mediate vascular disease associated TGFβ and PDGF signalling as reviewed by Kofler and Simons [23]; however, the role of NRP2 is less well defined. Here, we discuss recent studies implicating NRP2 in the development of occlusive vascular diseases and consider how NRP2 could be targeted for therapeutic intervention.

2. Endothelial Cell Dysfunction

Disturbed blood flow results in EC activation, which refers to the attainment of a pro-inflammatory and pro-coagulant state associated with the initiation of atherogenesis (Figure 1). Although much is known regarding NRP1 function in EC migration, proliferation, and permeability [23,71,72], the role of NRP2 in EC dysfunction remains unclear. However, there is building evidence implicating EC-derived NRP2 in EndoMT, lymphangiogenesis, and neovascularisation. These processes are all associated with the development of occlusive vascular diseases.

2.1. Endothelial to Mesenchymal Transition

Following their activation, ECs further contribute to neointimal thickening in atherosclerosis by undergoing EndoMT. EC lineage tracing studies have shown that, in response to injury or inflammation, ECs lose the expression of EC markers such as VE-cadherin and CD31, and acquire myofibroblast markers, including α-smooth muscle actin, N-cadherin and calponin [17]. As well as the acquisition of a more contractile phenotype, EndoMT is accompanied by loss of cell-cell/cell-ECM contact, increased migratory activity, and synthesis of ECM components [17].
Both in vitro and in vivo studies have revealed that activation of the TGFβ signalling pathway is a major inducer of EndoMT [17,73]. In mouse pancreatic ECs, TGFβ-induced EndoMT upregulates miR27 levels, which post-transcriptionally suppresses NRP2 expression [74]. Since NRP2 deficiency promotes SMC contractility [43,70,75], the authors hypothesise that miR27-induced silencing of NRP2 activity is required for the transition to a more contractile phenotype [74]. However, the authors observed that miR27 also targets ELK1, a myogenic transcription factor which acts as a competitive inhibitor of serum response factor (SRF). Many contractile genes are regulated by SRF, a transcription factor which binds to CC(A/T-rich)6GG (CArG) cis-elements of all known CArG dependent contractile SMC genes, including ACTA2, CNN1, TAGLN and MYH11 [18]. Therefore, miR27-induced silencing of NRP2 may not be causally linked to the transition to a more contractile phenotype in EndoMT but rather the modulation of contractile genes by SRF.
Indeed, Grandclement et al. found that transfecting a colon cancer epithelial cell line (HT29 cells) with plasmids encoding NRP2 induces an elongated fibroblast-like cell morphology reminiscent of mesenchymal cells [39]. The authors go on to show that NRP2 expression in HT29 cells activates TGFβ signalling, leading to constitutive phosphorylation of the Smad2/3 complex and inhibition of E-cadherin expression (an epithelial cell marker) and upregulation of vimentin expression (a protein specific to mesenchymal cells) [39]. The group used surface plasmon resonance to demonstrate that NRP2 binds to TGFβ1 and performed co-immunoprecipitation to show that NRP2 complexes with TGFBR1 in HT29 cells. Pharmacological inhibition of TGFBR1 restored epithelial cell markers and inhibited NRP2-induced mesenchymal gene induction in HT29 cells [39]. Therefore, NRP2 may positively regulate EndoMT by directly binding to TGFβ1 and complexing with TGFBR1 (Figure 3a).

2.2. Lymphangiogenesis and Neovascularisation

Lymphatic vessels (LVs) are found in adventitial and intraplaque regions of human atherosclerotic carotid arteries [76]. There is evidence suggesting LVs are essential for the removal of cholesterol, leukocytes, and cytokines from atherosclerotic blood vessels [5]. As a result, LVs may help reduce plaque burden. In atherosclerotic lesion sites, local environmental cues also stimulate angiogenesis from pre-existing vasa vasorum, a network of small blood vessels that supply the walls of large arteries. Intraplaque neovascularisation facilitates the supply of nutrients and O2 to atherosclerotic lesions supporting plaque growth. However, dysregulated neo-capillary development may promote intraplaque haemorrhages increasing the chance of plaque rupture.
NRP2 is highly expressed in lymphatic ECs and in the stroma of many types of tumour, where it supports lymphangiogenesis and neovascularisation [77]. Furthermore, NRP2 deficiency suppresses lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced lymphangiogenesis [78] and VEGF-induced neovascularisation in the retina [79]. These observations suggest that NRP2 may play a role in lymphangiogenesis and neovascularisation associated with occlusive vascular diseases. In 2006, in vitro studies demonstrated that NRP2 interacts with VEGFR2 and VEGFR3 to promote human EC survival and migration induced by VEGF-A and VEGF-C [80]. Furthermore, in 2006, Kärpänen et al. found that NRP2 interacts with VEGF-C and VEGF-D and complexes with VEGFR3 in lymphatic ECs [49]. A couple of years later, Caunt et al. found that tumour associated lymphangiogenesis was reduced by blocking VEGF-C–NRP2 binding [59]. Using transgenic mice, Xu et al. demonstrated that the sprouting of lymphatic ECs in response to VEGF-C is mediated by NRP2 complexing with VEGFR3 [81] (Figure 3b). Further studies showed that TGFβ-mediated activation of TGFBR1 and TGFBR2 promotes dermal lymphatic EC sprouting by upregulating VEGFR3 and NRP2 expression [82].
NRP2 is also known to regulate lymphangiogenesis and angiogenesis via VEGF independent mechanisms. Indeed, recent studies have revealed that NRP2 interacts with integrins, a family of widely expressed cell adhesion receptors [83,84,85]. In particular, NRP2 has been shown to complex with integrin α5 [83] and α9 [84]—adhesion molecules which bind to proteins containing an arginine, glycine, and aspartate (RGD) amino acid sequence [85]. The RGD motif is common to numerous ECM proteins which display enhanced deposition during vascular remodelling responses, such as fibronectin, fibrinogen, and vitronectin [85]. Interestingly, EC integrin α5β1 interaction with fibronectin is implicated with activation of the CVD-associated NFkB signalling pathway [86,87,88] and atherosclerotic angiogenesis [89]. Cao et al. demonstrated that NRP2 expressed on cancer cells interact with α5 integrins on ECs to promote vascular adhesion and extravasation using renal and pancreatic cell cancer models [83]. Activation of the NFkB signalling pathway is responsible for the transcriptional induction of pro-inflammatory cytokines, chemokines, adhesion molecules, and genes which alter the composition of the ECM. The development of numerous cancers as well as vascular diseases are strongly associated with the expression of NFkB target genes. Therefore, it is worthwhile investigating whether the modulation of EC adhesion and migration on fibronectin by recycling integrin α5 via NRP2, as described in Alghamdi et al., is NFkB-dependent [90]. Furthermore, Ou et al. observed that, in colorectal carcinoma, expression of NRP2 in lymphatic ECs significantly increases their migration, sprouting, and tubulogenesis capacity via binding to integrin α9β1 and stimulating activation of the FAK/ERK signalling pathway [84] (Figure 3c). NRP2 may therefore modulate integrin-mediated vascular cell-ECM and cell-cell interactions to regulate signalling pathways, and fine-tune cell function to local environmental conditions.
NRP2 is also thought to play a role in blocking lymphangiogenesis and neovascularisation while promoting vascular permeability through interacting with Plexin receptors and binding to SEMA3s [91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98] (Figure 3d). There is evidence suggesting that SEMA3s may compete with VEGF family members for binding to NRP2 [91,97]. However, other studies have demonstrated that NRP2 complexes with Plexin receptors to promote SEMA3 driven R-Ras signalling, leading to the inactivation of β1-integrin and dissociation from the ECM [93,98]. As a result, SEMA3s are thought to inhibit angiogenesis via impairing EC adhesion after binding to NRP2. SEMA3G stimulation, a ligand known to bind to NRP2, of EC and SMC co-cultures leads to rapid EC detachment [95]. NRP2 interaction with Sema3F and Plexin A1 has also been shown to inhibit PI-3K and mTORC signalling attenuating EC proliferation and survival [94]. There is evidence suggesting that loss of endogenous Sema3F activity is responsible for enhanced vascular permeability, inflammation, and lymphedema observed in inflamed ears of NRP2 deficient mice compared to wild type controls [96].
Finally, NRP2 also binds to Angiopoietin-like 4 (ANGPTL4), a multifunctional protein involved in wound healing and modulation of vascular permeability. The resulting activation of the complex leads to the activation of the RhoA/ROCK signalling pathway, the dissociation of EC-EC junctions, and subsequent retinal vascular leakage [99] (Figure 3e).
With these observations in mind, it is tempting to speculate that NRP2 influences changes in EC behaviour associated with CVD. However, whether it is beneficial to target EC-derived NRP2 to treat occlusive vascular diseases is most likely context dependent. Therefore, more studies are required to further our understanding of EC-derived NRP2 in the context of CVD.

3. Monocyte Recruitment and Macrophage Activity

3.1. Monocyte Recruitment

Atherogenesis involves the recruitment of circulating monocytes to the vascular wall. Once adhered to the vascular wall, monocytes differentiate into macrophages, ingest lipoproteins, and subsequently become foam cells (Figure 1) [100]. This process helps clear atherogenic lipoprotein complexes from the blood vessel; however, excessive oxLDL uptake has adverse effects [100]. Lipid-rich foam cells secrete pro-inflammatory cytokines, elicit pro-apoptotic pathways, and inhibit clearance of dying cells leading to lesion growth and destabilisation of the necrotic core [100]. Interestingly, leukocytes, as well as ECs and VSMCs, express integrins, which are known to interact with NRPs [85,101]. As activated ECs [82] and VSMCs [38,68,69,70] upregulate NRP2 expression, NRP2 may mediate monocyte adhesion to the vascular wall by interacting with integrins expressed by monocytes.

3.2. Macrophage Activity

Lipid-laden macrophages are a key feature of atherosclerotic lesions. Plaque resident macrophages originate from numerous sources including circulating bone marrow-derived monocytes, local proliferation of tissue-resident macrophages, and transdifferentiation of VSMCs [11,12]. Indeed, single-cell transcriptomic analysis revealed that macrophages within atherosclerotic plaque are extremely heterogenous—this observation may help explain how they perform multiple functions, which influence atherogenesis and lesion stability [11,12].
Interestingly, NRP2 is not initially detectable in monocytes but becomes highly expressed as they differentiate into macrophages [102,103]. NRP2 is highly and broadly expressed by different macrophage subsets, including alveolar, bronchial, peritoneal, and intravascular macrophages [24,102,104]. This observation suggests that NRP2 may play an important role in macrophage function.
Roy et al. observed that NRP2 expression in macrophages correlates with their ability to perform efferocytosis, a process by which apoptotic cells are engulfed and cleared by macrophages [103]. NRP2 inhibition using siRNA attenuated phagosome maturation without affecting uptake of phagocytic cargo in macrophages derived from human peripheral blood mononuclear cells treated with colony-stimulating factor (CSF) [103]. Furthermore, NRP2 knockout specifically in bone marrow-derived macrophages attenuated the clearance of apoptotic cells in vitro [103]. These observations were validated in vivo; in the same study, they demonstrated that the ablation of NRP2 in tumour-associated macrophages (TAMs) impaired the clearance of apoptotic tumour cells, resulting in elevated levels of necrosis within the tumour core [103]. Interestingly, the group also observed downregulation of immunosuppressive genes (IL4, IL10, MMP11, MMP13) and upregulation of immunostimulatory genes (IL12a, IFNb, Gr-K, Gr-F) following NRP2 deletion in TAMs [103] (Figure 4). Therefore, it is tempting to speculate that NRP2 enables macrophages to efferocytose without causing an immune response against apoptotic tumour cell components. It would be worthwhile investigating whether NRP2+ macrophages, in a similar manner, help clear lipids and dying cells from atherosclerotic plaque without eliciting inflammation. If so, NRP2+ macrophages could promote atherosclerotic plaque regression and stability.
Intriguingly, NRP2 is one of only six proteins which can be post-translationally modified by the addition of polysialic acid (polysialylation) and removal of polySia enhances phagocytosis of Klebsiella pneumoniae by peritoneal macrophages [105]. Furthermore, peritoneal macrophages isolated from inflamed sites express NRP2 which has not been modified by polysialylation but start to re-express polySia on NRP2 after 24 h in culture when removed from the inflammatory environment [105]. This observation suggests NRP2 facilitates phagocytosis in peritoneal macrophages although a direct causal link has not yet been demonstrated (Figure 4). Therefore, in the context of atherosclerosis, loss of polySia on macrophage-derived NRP2 may facilitate phagocytosis of lipids and apoptotic cells.
Polysialylated NRP2 is shed by microglia in response to LPS-induced conversion to a pro-inflammatory phenotypic state (Figure 4). LPS stimulation of cultured microglial cells induces translocation of polysialylated NRP2 from Golgi-confined intracellular pools to the cell surface before polysialylated NRP2 is cleaved and shed into the supernatant [27] (Figure 4). Because polysialylated NRP2 is presented at the cell surface during early LPS challenge it may mediate interactions with signalling proteins which promote a pro-inflammatory phenotype; however, this is yet to be investigated (Figure 4). Conversely, polysialic acid is known to inhibit inflammatory responses by binding to sialic acid-binding immoglobulin-like lectin 11 receptor (SIGLET1) on human myeloid cells [106]. Polysialic binding to SIGLET1 initiates recruitment of cytoplasmic phosphatases to block signal transduction through dephosphorylation of signalling molecules [106]. Therefore, polysialated soluble NRP2 may act as an anti-inflammatory mediator [107] (Figure 4). Soluble forms of NRP2 are also known to act as decoy receptors. For example, a soluble form of NRP2 has been shown to scavenge VEGF-C and inhibit pathological NRP2/VEGF-C signalling in a prostate cancer cell line [108]. Further studies are required to elucidate the role of macrophage-derived NRP2, including post-translationally-modified, full length, and soluble isoforms, in phagocytosis and inflammation associated with CVD.

4. VSMC Phenotypic Switching

In recent years, numerous studies have demonstrated that VSMCs play a substantial role in atherosclerosis [18]. In the healthy blood vessel, VSMCs predominantly exhibit a quiescent “contractile” phenotype but can switch to a more active “synthetic” state which exhibits pronounced migratory and proliferative activity [18]. Upon insult, VSMCs downregulate the expression of contractile VSMC markers and upregulate genes required for vascular remodelling including cytokines, adhesion molecules, and proteins which alter the composition of the ECM [18]. VSMCs can also express markers typically associated with other cell types including macrophages, myofibroblasts, MSCs, and osteochondrocytes [18]. Strikingly, genetic lineage tracing studies have shown that up to 90% of plaque-resident cells are VSMC-derived [15,16].

4.1. NRPs are Expressed by Cardiovascular Precursor Cells

Ding et al. demonstrated that in murine embryonic stem cells (mESCs), upon BMP4 stimulation, NRPs are often co-expressed with Brachyury, a critical mesoderm inducing factor. NRP2 expression is induced in mesodermal precursor cell subpopulations capable of differentiating into cardiomyocytes, endothelium, and VSMCs. By inhibiting NRP2 expression in mESCs, the group demonstrated that NRP2 is functionally required for differentiation towards endothelium and VSMCs but not toward cardiomyocytes [109]. A study assessing the onset of NRP2 expression in early chick embryos supports this in vitro finding. In the chick embryo, NRP2 expression is found in cardiovascular precursor cells derived from the blood islands, primitive streak, and lateral plate mesoderm [110]. Additionally, during avian blood vessel development, NRP1 is predominantly expressed in the arteries whereas NRP2 is expressed in the veins [110]. Furthermore, by crossing mice containing Cre recombinase driven by the NRP2 locus with a ROSA26-LacZ reporter line, researchers have demonstrated that at E12.5, NRP2 is expressed mainly in the venous vasculature, while NRP1 expression is more arterial [111]. Interestingly, in vitro analyses of rabbit VSMCs demonstrated that venous VSMCs display a more de-differentiated phenotypic state and exhibit increased proliferative and synthetic activity in comparison to arterial VSMCs [112].
As cardiovascular precursor cells differentiate toward VSMCs, NRP2 expression is lost [109]. However, NRP2 expression can be re-induced in VSMCs in response to insult [38,67]. With these observations in mind, it is tempting to speculate that NRP2 marks a more dedifferentiated VSMC—a hallmark of many occlusive vascular diseases. In support of this theory, NRP2 promotes stem-like traits in breast cancer cells via VEGF-driven signalling [113]. Importantly, although the analysis is not yet peer-reviewed, new single-cell transcriptomic data of human atherosclerotic plaque also implicates NRP2 in VSMC transdifferentiation within the core [42] (Figure 5). It would, therefore, be of great scientific and therapeutic interest to investigate whether NRP2 expression marks a more plastic VSMC state.

4.2. Nrp2 is Re-Expressed in Mature VSMCs in Response to Injury/Inflammation

VSMCs do not appear to express NRP2 under quiescent conditions [43] but increased levels of NRP2 have been observed in SMCs in response to injury [38,41,114] and inflammatory stimuli [66,67,68,69,70] (Figure 5). Elevated NRP2 expression has been detected within VSMCs following balloon angioplasty in a rat model of vascular injury [38]. This increase was particularly noticeable at time points known to correlate with increased levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines within the vessel wall [115,116]. Downregulation of NRP2 using shRNA adenoviral vectors resulted in a significant reduction of neointimal hyperplasia following balloon angioplasty, supporting a role for NRP2 in disease-associated vascular remodelling [38]. NRP2 inhibition was also shown to reduce PDGFbb-mediated migration and proliferation of rat VSMCs in vitro as well as injury-induced rat VSMC proliferation in vivo [38] (Figure 5). However, NRP2 levels were not influenced by PDGFbb stimulation. Xie et al. observed that NRP2 expression in VSMCs in response to injury is induced by p-SMAD3 binding to the 5′ untranslated region (UTR) of NRP2, between +51 to +78bp from the transcriptional start site (TSS) [41]. Importantly, using siRNA to inhibit NRP2 activity, the group demonstrate that, in primary human aortic SMCs, NRP2 positively regulates TGFβ-induced VSMC proliferation and migration as well as cholesterol-induced conversion to a macrophage-like (CD68+) phenotype [41] (Figure 5).
Numerous studies have demonstrated that, in response to inflammation, VSMCs downregulate the expression of contractile genes—a process associated with plaque instability [18]. In healthy adult mice, NRP2 is expressed by SMCs in the bladder and gut but not in the vasculature, heart, or skeletal muscle [43]. Interestingly, SMC-specific knockout of NRP2 promotes the contractility of SMCs in the bladder and gut via mediating activation of the RhoA/ROCK signalling pathway [43,70,75] (Figure 5). This finding suggests that injury/inflammation-induced NRP2 upregulation by VSMCs may be linked to loss of the contractile VSMC state. However, no studies to date have investigated if disease-associated loss of VSMC contractility is causally linked to NRP2 expression. Additionally, while NRP2 expression is upregulated by pro-inflammatory stimuli known to activate the NFkB signalling pathway [68,69,70], contractile VSMC genes are downregulated [117,118,119,120], suggesting NRP2 may not directly cause loss of VSMC contractility. Activation of the NFkB signalling pathway in VSMCs eventuates in NFkB (p65 subunit) binding to the MYOCD promoter, decreasing the expression of MYOCD and MYOCD-dependent contractile genes (e.g., ACTA2, TAGLN, and MYH11) [117,118,119,120].

5. NRP2 is an Attractive Therapeutic Target

NRP2 is upregulated by vascular cell types in response to injury/inflammation and is involved in numerous processes associated with the development of occlusive vascular diseases. Currently, many molecules linked to CVD, including various transcription factors, are poor drug targets. Because cell surface receptors are more easily targeted, NRP2 could be a novel therapeutic candidate or biomarker to treat or detect diseased blood vessels.
A variety of methods to inhibit VEGF-C/NRP2-driven signalling have been explored [59,108,121]. VEGF-C/NRP2 driven signalling promotes EC migration and survival as well as angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis (Figure 3)—processes associated with vascular neointimal hyperplasia and atherosclerosis. Therefore, inhibiting VEGF-C/NRP2 driven signalling could potentially be used therapeutically in the treatment of occlusive vascular diseases. Monoclonal antibodies targeting the VEGF-C binding domain of NRP2 have been developed and were able to decrease the number of tumour-associated lymphatic vessels and metastasis in animal xenograft experiments [59]. Furthermore, a soluble splice variant of NRP2, s9NRP2, has been shown to scavenge VEGF-C away from the functional complex and inhibit the formation of prostatospheres by a human prostate carcinoma cell line [108], suggesting that s9NRP2 could potentially be used to inhibit pathological VEGF-C/NRP2 signalling in prostate cancer [108]. In 2020, Said et al. have reported the discovery of a novel benzamidine-based inhibitor that functions via competitive inhibition of VEGF-C binding to NRP2 [121]. To date, no other pharmacological inhibitors have been identified which target NRP2.
However, atherogenesis is complex and whether VEGF-C/NRP2-driven cellular responses prevent or promote adverse clinical outcomes is most likely context-dependent. For example, local inhibition of VEGF-C/NRP2 driven signalling may block a deleterious EC response to injury by attenuating EC migration and survival and may, therefore, be a useful strategy to prevent re-occlusion of blood vessels after surgical intervention. However, as NRP2 promotes lymphangiogenesis, which is important for the removal of cholesterol, leukocytes, and cytokines from plaque, inhibiting NRP2 in advanced atherosclerotic lesions may promote plaque growth and instability.
Additionally, because NRP2 promotes PDGFbb and TGFβ-induced VSMC migration, proliferation, and loss of SMC contractility, it may be beneficial to inhibit NRP2 as a therapeutic strategy to treat occlusive vascular diseases. NRP2 could be inhibited by developing neutralising antibodies. Promisingly, directly inhibiting PCSK9 (a protein which promotes levels of circulating LDLs) and IL-1β (a pro-inflammatory cytokine) using monoclonal antibodies reduced the rate of cardiovascular events, including heart attack and stroke, compared to placebo in patients [122,123,124]. However, NRP2 inhibition may also have a deleterious effect as NRP2 could potentially play an important role in the phagocytosis of lipids by macrophages, helping clear atherogenic lipid complexes from the vascular wall. Once again, it is important to emphasise that NRP2 inhibition may promote or prevent clinical complications associated with CVD depending on the context. Consequently, a better understanding of NRP2 function in CVD is of potential therapeutic interest.
As NRP2 is upregulated in the vasculature in response to injury and inflammation, it could be used to help diagnose diseased arteries. For instance, Chen et al. developed an iodine-131 labelled NRP2 monoclonal antibody to image A549 xenograft tumours in mice by single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) [125]. As SPECT is used clinically to visualise atherosclerotic plaques [126], perhaps, a similar approach could be used to visualise obstructed blood vessels in patients.

6. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

To summarise, NRP2 is expressed by numerous cell types within the vasculature and plays multifunctional roles in processes associated with the development of occlusive vascular diseases. Recent studies implicate NRP2 in EndoMT, lymphangiogenesis, angiogenesis, monocyte recruitment, the ability of macrophages to phagocytose, and VSMC plasticity. Consequently, NRP2 is likely to have complex roles within atherosclerotic blood vessels and may function to both prevent and promote plaque stability depending on the context. NRP2 is already targeted for cancer therapy [127]. Since cancer and occlusive vascular diseases share many commonalities, including pronounced cell plasticity, migration, proliferation, and inflammation [6], NRP2, an accessible cell surface receptor, may be a novel candidate for therapeutic intervention. However, the role of NRP2 in CVD remains enigmatic—a detailed mechanistic characterisation of NRP2 function in CVD is required to develop efficient strategies to limit cardiovascular risk.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.L.H., J.S., C.C., and C.P.-M. Writing-original draft preparation, J.L.H. Writing-review and editing, J.L.H., J.S., C.C., and C.P.-M. Visualization, J.L.H. Funding acquisition, C.P.-M. and Supervision, C.P.-M. All authors have read and agreed to this version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the British Heart Foundation (PG/16/84/32464 and FS/18/84/33695). Jennifer L. Harman and Jacob Sayers are supported by the British Heart Foundation (PG/16/84/32464 and FS/18/84/33695) and Chey Chapman is the recipient of a Royal Veterinary College PhD studentship. Figures were created with BioRender.com. Figures were created with BioRender.com.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Organization, W.H. The top 10 causes of death. 2018. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/the-top-10-causes-of-death (accessed on 1 June 2020).
  2. Libby, P.; Buring, J.E.; Badimon, L.; Hansson, G.K.; Deanfield, J.; Bittencourt, M.S.; Tokgozoglu, L.; Lewis, E.F. Atherosclerosis. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2019, 5, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. McGill, H.C.; McMahan, C.A.; Herderick, E.E.; Malcom, G.T.; Tracy, R.E.; Strong, J.P. Origin of atherosclerosis in childhood and adolescence. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2000, 72, 1307S–1315S. [Google Scholar]
  4. Basatemur, G.L.; Jorgensen, H.F.; Clarke, M.C.H.; Bennett, M.R.; Mallat, Z. Vascular smooth muscle cells in atherosclerosis. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2019, 16, 727–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Csányi, G.; Singla, B. Arterial Lymphatics in Atherosclerosis: Old Questions, New Insights, and Remaining Challenges. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Tapia-Vieyra, J.V.; Delgado-Coello, B.; Mas-Oliva, J. Atherosclerosis and Cancer; A Resemblance with Far-reaching Implications. Arch. Med. Res. 2017, 48, 12–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Libby, P.; Ridker, P.M.; Hansson, G.K. Progress and challenges in translating the biology of atherosclerosis. Nature 2011, 473, 317–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Libby, P. Inflammation in atherosclerosis. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2012, 32, 2045–2051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Cuneo, A.A.; Autieri, M.V. Expression and function of anti-inflammatory interleukins: The other side of the vascular response to injury. Curr. Vasc. Pharmacol. 2009, 7, 267–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Shankman, L.S.; Gomez, D.; Cherepanova, O.A.; Salmon, M.; Alencar, G.F.; Haskins, R.M.; Swiatlowska, P.; Newman, A.A.; Greene, E.S.; Straub, A.C.; et al. KLF4-dependent phenotypic modulation of smooth muscle cells has a key role in atherosclerotic plaque pathogenesis. Nat. Med. 2015, 21, 628–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Lin, J.-D.; Nishi, H.; Poles, J.; Niu, X.; McCauley, C.; Rahman, K.; Brown, E.J.; Yeung, S.T.; Vozhilla, N.; Weinstock, A.; et al. Single-cell analysis of fate-mapped macrophages reveals heterogeneity, including stem-like properties, during atherosclerosis progression and regression. JCI Insight 2019, 4, e124574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Cochain, C.; Vafadarnejad, E.; Arampatzi, P.; Pelisek, J.; Winkels, H.; Ley, K.; Wolf, D.; Saliba, A.E.; Zernecke, A. Single-Cell RNA-Seq Reveals the Transcriptional Landscape and Heterogeneity of Aortic Macrophages in Murine Atherosclerosis. Circ. Res. 2018, 122, 1661–1674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Feil, S.; Fehrenbacher, B.; Lukowski, R.; Essmann, F.; Schulze-Osthoff, K.; Schaller, M.; Feil, R. Transdifferentiation of vascular smooth muscle cells to macrophage-like cells during atherogenesis. Circ. Res. 2014, 115, 662–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Rong, J.X.; Shapiro, M.; Trogan, E.; Fisher, E.A. Transdifferentiation of mouse aortic smooth muscle cells to a macrophage-like state after cholesterol loading. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 13531–13536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Chappell, J.; Harman, J.L.; Narasimhan, V.M.; Yu, H.; Foote, K.; Simons, B.D.; Bennett, M.R.; Jorgensen, H.F. Extensive Proliferation of a Subset of Differentiated, yet Plastic, Medial Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells Contributes to Neointimal Formation in Mouse Injury and Atherosclerosis Models. Circ. Res. 2016, 119, 1313–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Dobnikar, L.; Taylor, A.L.; Chappell, J.; Oldach, P.; Harman, J.L.; Oerton, E.; Dzierzak, E.; Bennett, M.R.; Spivakov, M.; Jorgensen, H.F. Disease-relevant transcriptional signatures identified in individual smooth muscle cells from healthy mouse vessels. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 4567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Souilhol, C.; Harmsen, M.C.; Evans, P.C.; Krenning, G. Endothelial-mesenchymal transition in atherosclerosis. Cardiovasc. Res. 2018, 114, 565–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Harman, J.L.; Jorgensen, H.F. The role of smooth muscle cells in plaque stability: Therapeutic targeting potential. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2019, 176, 3741–3753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Chen, P.Y.; Schwartz, M.A.; Simons, M. Endothelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition, Vascular Inflammation, and Atherosclerosis. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2020, 7, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Helmke, A.; Casper, J.; Nordlohne, J.; David, S.; Haller, H.; Zeisberg, E.M.; von Vietinghoff, S. Endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition shapes the atherosclerotic plaque and modulates macrophage function. FASEB J. 2019, 33, 2278–2289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Lai, B.; Li, Z.; He, M.; Wang, Y.; Chen, L.; Zhang, J.; Yang, Y.; Shyy, J.Y. Atheroprone flow enhances the endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2018, 315, H1293–H1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Chen, P.Y.; Qin, L.; Li, G.; Wang, Z.; Dahlman, J.E.; Malagon-Lopez, J.; Gujja, S.; Cilfone, N.A.; Kauffman, K.J.; Sun, L.; et al. Endothelial TGF-β signalling drives vascular inflammation and atherosclerosis. Nat. Metab. 2019, 1, 912–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kofler, N.; Simons, M. The expanding role of neuropilin: Regulation of transforming growth factor-β and platelet-derived growth factor signaling in the vasculature. Curr. Opin. Hematol. 2016, 23, 260–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Roy, S.; Bag, A.K.; Singh, R.K.; Talmadge, J.E.; Batra, S.K.; Datta, K. Multifaceted Role of Neuropilins in the Immune System: Potential Targets for Immunotherapy. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Pellet-Many, C.; Frankel, P.; Jia, H.; Zachary, I. Neuropilins: Structure, function and role in disease. Biochem. J. 2008, 411, 211–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Issitt, T.; Bosseboeuf, E.; De Winter, N.; Dufton, N.; Gestri, G.; Senatore, V.; Chikh, A.; Randi, A.M.; Raimondi, C. Neuropilin-1 Controls Endothelial Homeostasis by Regulating Mitochondrial Function and Iron-Dependent Oxidative Stress. iScience 2019, 11, 205–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Werneburg, S.; Buettner, F.F.; Erben, L.; Mathews, M.; Neumann, H.; Muhlenhoff, M.; Hildebrandt, H. Polysialylation and lipopolysaccharide-induced shedding of E-selectin ligand-1 and neuropilin-2 by microglia and THP-1 macrophages. Glia 2016, 64, 1314–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Mehta, V.; Fields, L.; Evans, I.M.; Yamaji, M.; Pellet-Many, C.; Jones, T.; Mahmoud, M.; Zachary, I. VEGF (Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor) Induces NRP1 (Neuropilin-1) Cleavage via ADAMs (a Disintegrin and Metalloproteinase) 9 and 10 to Generate Novel Carboxy-Terminal NRP1 Fragments That Regulate Angiogenic Signaling. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2018, 38, 1845–1858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Schwarz, Q.; Ruhrberg, C. Neuropilin, you gotta let me know: Should I stay or should I go? Cell Adh. Migr. 2010, 4, 61–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Kitsukawa, T.; Shimizu, M.; Sanbo, M.; Hirata, T.; Taniguchi, M.; Bekku, Y.; Yagi, T.; Fujisawa, H. Neuropilin-semaphorin III/D-mediated chemorepulsive signals play a crucial role in peripheral nerve projection in mice. Neuron 1997, 19, 995–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Soker, S.; Takashima, S.; Miao, H.Q.; Neufeld, G.; Klagsbrun, M. Neuropilin-1 is expressed by endothelial and tumor cells as an isoform-specific receptor for vascular endothelial growth factor. Cell 1998, 92, 735–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Kawasaki, T.; Kitsukawa, T.; Bekku, Y.; Matsuda, Y.; Sanbo, M.; Yagi, T.; Fujisawa, H. A requirement for neuropilin-1 in embryonic vessel formation. Development 1999, 126, 4895–4902. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. Rizzolio, S.; Rabinowicz, N.; Rainero, E.; Lanzetti, L.; Serini, G.; Norman, J.; Neufeld, G.; Tamagnone, L. Neuropilin-1-dependent regulation of EGF-receptor signaling. Cancer Res. 2012, 72, 5801–5811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. West, D.C.; Rees, C.G.; Duchesne, L.; Patey, S.J.; Terry, C.J.; Turnbull, J.E.; Delehedde, M.; Heegaard, C.W.; Allain, F.; Vanpouille, C.; et al. Interactions of multiple heparin binding growth factors with neuropilin-1 and potentiation of the activity of fibroblast growth factor-2. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 13457–13464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Hu, B.; Guo, P.; Bar-Joseph, I.; Imanishi, Y.; Jarzynka, M.J.; Bogler, O.; Mikkelsen, T.; Hirose, T.; Nishikawa, R.; Cheng, S.Y. Neuropilin-1 promotes human glioma progression through potentiating the activity of the HGF/SF autocrine pathway. Oncogene 2007, 26, 5577–5586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Jia, T.; Choi, J.; Ciccione, J.; Henry, M.; Mehdi, A.; Martinez, J.; Eymin, B.; Subra, G.; Coll, J.L. Heteromultivalent Targeting of Integrin α v β 3 and Neuropilin 1 Promotes Cell Survival via the Activation of the IGF-1/insulin Receptors. Biomaterials 2018, 155, 64–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Muhl, L.; Folestad, E.B.; Gladh, H.; Wang, Y.; Moessinger, C.; Jakobsson, L.; Eriksson, U. Neuropilin 1 binds PDGF-D and is a co-receptor in PDGF-D-PDGFRβ signaling. J. Cell Sci. 2017, 130, 1365–1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Pellet-Many, C.; Mehta, V.; Fields, L.; Mahmoud, M.; Lowe, V.; Evans, I.; Ruivo, J.; Zachary, I. Neuropilins 1 and 2 mediate neointimal hyperplasia and re-endothelialization following arterial injury. Cardiovasc. Res. 2015, 108, 288–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Grandclement, C.; Pallandre, J.R.; Valmary Degano, S.; Viel, E.; Bouard, A.; Balland, J.; Remy-Martin, J.P.; Simon, B.; Rouleau, A.; Boireau, W.; et al. Neuropilin-2 expression promotes TGF-beta1-mediated epithelial to mesenchymal transition in colorectal cancer cells. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e20444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Mahmoud, M.; Evans, I.M.; Mehta, V.; Pellet-Many, C.; Paliashvili, K.; Zachary, I. Smooth muscle cell-specific knockout of neuropilin-1 impairs postnatal lung development and pathological vascular smooth muscle cell accumulation. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2019, 316, C424–C433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Xie, X.; Urabe, G.; Marcho, L.; Williams, C.; Guo, L.W.; Kent, K.C. Smad3 Regulates Neuropilin 2 Transcription by Binding to its 5′ Untranslated Region. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2020, 9, e015487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Alsaigh, T.; Evans, D.; Frankel, D.; Torkamani, A. Decoding the transcriptome of atherosclerotic plaque at single-cell resolution. bioRxiv 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Bielenberg, D.R.; Seth, A.; Shimizu, A.; Pelton, K.; Cristofaro, V.; Ramachandran, A.; Zwaans, B.M.; Chen, C.; Krishnan, R.; Seth, M.; et al. Increased smooth muscle contractility in mice deficient for neuropilin 2. Am. J. Pathol. 2012, 181, 548–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Pellet-Many, C.; Frankel, P.; Evans, I.M.; Herzog, B.; Junemann-Ramirez, M.; Zachary, I.C. Neuropilin-1 mediates PDGF stimulation of vascular smooth muscle cell migration and signalling via p130Cas. Biochem. J. 2011, 435, 609–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Banerjee, S.; Sengupta, K.; Dhar, K.; Mehta, S.; D’Amore, P.A.; Dhar, G.; Banerjee, S.K. Breast cancer cells secreted platelet-derived growth factor-induced motility of vascular smooth muscle cells is mediated through neuropilin-1. Mol. Carcinog. 2006, 45, 871–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Peng, K.; Bai, Y.; Zhu, Q.; Hu, B.; Xu, Y. Targeting VEGF-neuropilin interactions: A promising antitumor strategy. Drug Discov. Today 2019, 24, 656–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Rossignol, M.; Gagnon, M.L.; Klagsbrun, M. Genomic organization of human neuropilin-1 and neuropilin-2 genes: Identification and distribution of splice variants and soluble isoforms. Genomics 2000, 70, 211–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Giger, R.J.; Urquhart, E.R.; Gillespie, S.K.; Levengood, D.V.; Ginty, D.D.; Kolodkin, A.L. Neuropilin-2 is a receptor for semaphorin IV: Insight into the structural basis of receptor function and specificity. Neuron 1998, 21, 1079–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Karpanen, T.; Heckman, C.A.; Keskitalo, S.; Jeltsch, M.; Ollila, H.; Neufeld, G.; Tamagnone, L.; Alitalo, K. Functional interaction of VEGF-C and VEGF-D with neuropilin receptors. FASEB J. 2006, 20, 1462–1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Nakamura, F.; Tanaka, M.; Takahashi, T.; Kalb, R.G.; Strittmatter, S.M. Neuropilin-1 extracellular domains mediate semaphorin D/III-induced growth cone collapse. Neuron 1998, 21, 1093–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Yelland, T.; Djordjevic, S. Crystal Structure of the Neuropilin-1 MAM Domain: Completing the Neuropilin-1 Ectodomain Picture. Structure 2016, 24, 2008–2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Cai, H.; Reed, R.R. Cloning and characterization of neuropilin-1-interacting protein: A PSD-95/Dlg/ZO-1 domain-containing protein that interacts with the cytoplasmic domain of neuropilin-1. J. Neurosci. 1999, 19, 6519–6527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Lee, H.J.; Zheng, J.J. PDZ domains and their binding partners: Structure, specificity, and modification. Cell Commun. Signal. 2010, 8, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Wang, L.; Mukhopadhyay, D.; Xu, X. C terminus of RGS-GAIP-interacting protein conveys neuropilin-1-mediated signaling during angiogenesis. FASEB J. 2006, 20, 1513–1515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Tsai, Y.-C.I.; Fotinou, C.; Rana, R.; Yelland, T.; Frankel, P.; Zachary, I.; Djordjevic, S. Structural studies of neuropilin-2 reveal a zinc ion binding site remote from the vascular endothelial growth factor binding pocket. FEBS J. 2016, 283, 1921–1934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Fuh, G.; Garcia, K.C.; de Vos, A.M. The interaction of neuropilin-1 with vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptor flt-1. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 26690–26695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Pan, Q.; Chanthery, Y.; Liang, W.C.; Stawicki, S.; Mak, J.; Rathore, N.; Tong, R.K.; Kowalski, J.; Yee, S.F.; Pacheco, G.; et al. Blocking neuropilin-1 function has an additive effect with anti-VEGF to inhibit tumor growth. Cancer Cell 2007, 11, 53–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Kawamura, H.; Li, X.; Goishi, K.; van Meeteren, L.A.; Jakobsson, L.; Cébe-Suarez, S.; Shimizu, A.; Edholm, D.; Ballmer-Hofer, K.; Kjellén, L.; et al. Neuropilin-1 in regulation of VEGF-induced activation of p38MAPK and endothelial cell organization. Blood 2008, 112, 3638–3649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Caunt, M.; Mak, J.; Liang, W.C.; Stawicki, S.; Pan, Q.; Tong, R.K.; Kowalski, J.; Ho, C.; Reslan, H.B.; Ross, J.; et al. Blocking neuropilin-2 function inhibits tumor cell metastasis. Cancer Cell 2008, 13, 331–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Roth, L. The good, the bad and the ugly: A neuropilin-2 story from normal to tumor-associated lymphangiogenesis. Cell Adh. Migr. 2008, 2, 217–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Yuan, L.; Moyon, D.; Pardanaud, L.; Breant, C.; Karkkainen, M.J.; Alitalo, K.; Eichmann, A. Abnormal lymphatic vessel development in neuropilin 2 mutant mice. Development 2002, 129, 4797–4806. [Google Scholar]
  62. Lin, F.J.; Chen, X.; Qin, J.; Hong, Y.K.; Tsai, M.J.; Tsai, S.Y. Direct transcriptional regulation of neuropilin-2 by COUP-TFII modulates multiple steps in murine lymphatic vessel development. J. Clin. Investig. 2010, 120, 1694–1707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Takashima, S.; Kitakaze, M.; Asakura, M.; Asanuma, H.; Sanada, S.; Tashiro, F.; Niwa, H.; Miyazaki Ji, J.; Hirota, S.; Kitamura, Y.; et al. Targeting of both mouse neuropilin-1 and neuropilin-2 genes severely impairs developmental yolk sac and embryonic angiogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 3657–3662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Liu, W.; Parikh, A.A.; Stoeltzing, O.; Fan, F.; McCarty, M.F.; Wey, J.; Hicklin, D.J.; Ellis, L.M. Upregulation of neuropilin-1 by basic fibroblast growth factor enhances vascular smooth muscle cell migration in response to VEGF. Cytokine 2005, 32, 206–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Lindner, V.; Lappi, D.A.; Baird, A.; Majack, R.A.; Reidy, M.A. Role of basic fibroblast growth factor in vascular lesion formation. Circ. Res. 1991, 68, 106–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Alexander, M.R.; Murgai, M.; Moehle, C.W.; Owens, G.K. Interleukin-1β modulates smooth muscle cell phenotype to a distinct inflammatory state relative to PDGF-DD via NF-κB-dependent mechanisms. Physiol. Genom. 2012, 44, 417–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Gruber, H.E.; Hoelscher, G.L.; Bethea, S.; Hanley, E.N., Jr. Interleukin 1-beta upregulates brain-derived neurotrophic factor, neurotrophin 3 and neuropilin 2 gene expression and NGF production in annulus cells. Biotech. Histochem. 2012, 87, 506–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Chevillard, G.; Derjuga, A.; Devost, D.; Zingg, H.H.; Blank, V. Identification of interleukin-1beta regulated genes in uterine smooth muscle cells. Reproduction 2007, 134, 811–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Koeck, I.; Hashemi Gheinani, A.; Baumgartner, U.; Vassella, E.; Bruggmann, R.; Burkhard, F.C.; Monastyrskaya, K. Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha Initiates miRNA-mRNA Signaling Cascades in Obstruction-Induced Bladder Dysfunction. Am. J. Pathol. 2018, 188, 1847–1864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Bielenberg, D.R.; Doyle, C.; Vasquez, E.; Pelton, K.; Cristofaro, V.; Sullivan, M.P.; Adam, R.M. Altered Gut Motility in Mice Lacking Neuropilin 2 in Smooth Muscle. FASEB J. 2019, 33, 496.31. [Google Scholar]
  71. Zachary, I. Neuropilins: Role in signalling, angiogenesis and disease. Chem. Immunol. Allergy 2014, 99, 37–70. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Becker, P.M.; Waltenberger, J.; Yachechko, R.; Mirzapoiazova, T.; Sham, J.S.; Lee, C.G.; Elias, J.A.; Verin, A.D. Neuropilin-1 regulates vascular endothelial growth factor-mediated endothelial permeability. Circ. Res. 2005, 96, 1257–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Maleszewska, M.; Moonen, J.R.; Huijkman, N.; van de Sluis, B.; Krenning, G.; Harmsen, M.C. IL-1β and TGFβ2 synergistically induce endothelial to mesenchymal transition in an NFκB-dependent manner. Immunobiology 2013, 218, 443–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Suzuki, H.I.; Katsura, A.; Mihira, H.; Horie, M.; Saito, A.; Miyazono, K. Regulation of TGF-β-mediated endothelial-mesenchymal transition by microRNA-27. J. Biochem. 2017, 161, 417–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Vasquez, E.; Cristofaro, V.; Lukianov, S.; Burkhard, F.C.; Gheinani, A.H.; Monastyrskaya, K.; Bielenberg, D.R.; Sullivan, M.P.; Adam, R.M. Deletion of neuropilin 2 enhances detrusor contractility following bladder outlet obstruction. JCI Insight 2017, 2, e90617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Kutkut, I.; Meens, M.J.; McKee, T.A.; Bochaton-Piallat, M.L.; Kwak, B.R. Lymphatic vessels: An emerging actor in atherosclerotic plaque development. Eur. J. Clin. Investig. 2015, 45, 100–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Wang, J.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Xing, B.; Xuan, W.; Wang, H.; Huang, H.; Yang, J.; Tang, J. NRP-2 in tumor lymphangiogenesis and lymphatic metastasis. Cancer Lett. 2018, 418, 176–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Tang, X.; Sun, J.; Du, L.; Du, H.; Wang, L.; Mai, J.; Zhang, F.; Liu, P. Neuropilin-2 contributes to LPS-induced corneal inflammatory lymphangiogenesis. Exp. Eye Res. 2016, 143, 110–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Shen, J.; Samul, R.; Zimmer, J.; Liu, H.; Liang, X.; Hackett, S.; Campochiaro, P.A. Deficiency of neuropilin 2 suppresses VEGF-induced retinal neovascularization. Mol. Med. (Camb. Mass.) 2004, 10, 12–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Favier, B.; Alam, A.; Barron, P.; Bonnin, J.; Laboudie, P.; Fons, P.; Mandron, M.; Herault, J.P.; Neufeld, G.; Savi, P.; et al. Neuropilin-2 interacts with VEGFR-2 and VEGFR-3 and promotes human endothelial cell survival and migration. Blood 2006, 108, 1243–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Xu, Y.; Yuan, L.; Mak, J.; Pardanaud, L.; Caunt, M.; Kasman, I.; Larrivée, B.; del Toro, R.; Suchting, S.; Medvinsky, A.; et al. Neuropilin-2 mediates VEGF-C-induced lymphatic sprouting together with VEGFR3. J. Cell Biol. 2010, 188, 115–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. James, J.M.; Nalbandian, A.; Mukouyama, Y.-S. TGFβ signaling is required for sprouting lymphangiogenesis during lymphatic network development in the skin. Development (Cambridge, England) 2013, 140, 3903–3914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Cao, Y.; Hoeppner, L.H.; Bach, S.; Cao, Y.; Hoeppner, L.H.; Bach, S.; Guangqi, E.; Guo, Y.; Wang, E.; Wu, J.; et al. Neuropilin-2 promotes extravasation and metastasis by interacting with endothelial alpha5 integrin. Cancer Res. 2013, 73, 4579–4590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Ou, J.J.; Wei, X.; Peng, Y.; Zha, L.; Zhou, R.B.; Shi, H.; Zhou, Q.; Liang, H.J. Neuropilin-2 mediates lymphangiogenesis of colorectal carcinoma via a VEGFC/VEGFR3 independent signaling. Cancer Lett. 2015, 358, 200–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Finney, A.C.; Stokes, K.Y.; Pattillo, C.B.; Orr, A.W. Integrin signaling in atherosclerosis. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2017, 74, 2263–2282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Sun, X.; Fu, Y.; Gu, M.; Zhang, L.; Li, D.; Li, H.; Chien, S.; Shyy, J.Y.; Zhu, Y. Activation of integrin alpha5 mediated by flow requires its translocation to membrane lipid rafts in vascular endothelial cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 769–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Yun, S.; Budatha, M.; Dahlman, J.E.; Coon, B.G.; Cameron, R.T.; Langer, R.; Anderson, D.G.; Baillie, G.; Schwartz, M.A. Interaction between integrin α5 and PDE4D regulates endothelial inflammatory signalling. Nat. Cell Biol. 2016, 18, 1043–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Yurdagul, A., Jr.; Green, J.; Albert, P.; McInnis, M.C.; Mazar, A.P.; Orr, A.W. α5β1 integrin signaling mediates oxidized low-density lipoprotein-induced inflammation and early atherosclerosis. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2014, 34, 1362–1373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Xu, X.; Mao, W.; Chai, Y.; Dai, J.; Chen, Q.; Wang, L.; Zhuang, Q.; Pan, Y.; Chen, M.; Ni, G.; et al. Angiogenesis Inhibitor, Endostar, Prevents Vasa Vasorum Neovascularization in a Swine Atherosclerosis Model. J. Atheroscler. Thromb. 2015, 22, 1100–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Alghamdi, A.A.A.; Benwell, C.J.; Atkinson, S.J.; Lambert, J.; Johnson, R.T.; Robinson, S.D. NRP2 as an Emerging Angiogenic Player; Promoting Endothelial Cell Adhesion and Migration by Regulating Recycling of α5 Integrin. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Mumblat, Y.; Kessler, O.; Ilan, N.; Neufeld, G. Full-Length Semaphorin-3C Is an Inhibitor of Tumor Lymphangiogenesis and Metastasis. Cancer Res. 2015, 75, 2177–2186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Wu, F.; Zhou, Q.; Yang, J.; Duan, G.J.; Ou, J.J.; Zhang, R.; Pan, F.; Peng, Q.P.; Tan, H.; Ping, Y.F.; et al. Endogenous axon guiding chemorepulsant semaphorin-3F inhibits the growth and metastasis of colorectal carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2011, 17, 2702–2711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Toledano, S.; Nir-Zvi, I.; Engelman, R.; Kessler, O.; Neufeld, G. Class. 3 Semaphorins and Their Receptors: Potent Multifunctional Modulators of Tumor Progression. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Nakayama, H.; Bruneau, S.; Kochupurakkal, N.; Coma, S.; Briscoe, D.M.; Klagsbrun, M. Regulation of mTOR Signaling by Semaphorin 3F-Neuropilin 2 Interactions In Vitro and In Vivo. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 11789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Kutschera, S.; Weber, H.; Weick, A.; De Smet, F.; Genove, G.; Takemoto, M.; Prahst, C.; Riedel, M.; Mikelis, C.; Baulande, S.; et al. Differential endothelial transcriptomics identifies semaphorin 3G as a vascular class 3 semaphorin. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2011, 31, 151–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. Mucka, P.; Levonyak, N.; Geretti, E.; Zwaans, B.M.M.; Li, X.; Adini, I.; Klagsbrun, M.; Adam, R.M.; Bielenberg, D.R. Inflammation and Lymphedema Are Exacerbated and Prolonged by Neuropilin 2 Deficiency. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2016, 186, 2803–2812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Guo, H.-F.; Li, X.; Parker, M.W.; Waltenberger, J.; Becker, P.M.; Vander Kooi, C.W. Mechanistic basis for the potent anti-angiogenic activity of semaphorin 3F. Biochem. 2013, 52, 7551–7558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  98. Liu, X.; Uemura, A.; Fukushima, Y.; Yoshida, Y.; Hirashima, M. Semaphorin 3G Provides a Repulsive Guidance Cue to Lymphatic Endothelial Cells via Neuropilin-2/PlexinD1. Cell Rep. 2016, 17, 2299–2311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Sodhi, A.; Ma, T.; Menon, D.; Deshpande, M.; Jee, K.; Dinabandhu, A.; Vancel, J.; Lu, D.; Montaner, S. Angiopoietin-like 4 binds neuropilins and cooperates with VEGF to induce diabetic macular edema. J. Clin. Investig. 2019, 129, 4593–4608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Maguire, E.M.; Pearce, S.W.A.; Xiao, Q. Foam cell formation: A new target for fighting atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease. Vascul. Pharmacol. 2019, 112, 54–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Dupuy, A.G.; Caron, E. Integrin-dependent phagocytosis: Spreading from microadhesion to new concepts. J. Cell Sci. 2008, 121, 1773–1783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Chellenburg, S.; Schulz, A.; Poitz, D.M.; Muders, M.H. Role of neuropilin-2 in the immune system. Mol. Immunol. 2017, 90, 239–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Roy, S.; Bag, A.K.; Dutta, S.; Polavaram, N.S.; Islam, R.; Schellenburg, S.; Banwait, J.; Guda, C.; Ran, S.; Hollingsworth, M.A.; et al. Macrophage-Derived Neuropilin-2 Exhibits Novel Tumor-Promoting Functions. Cancer Res. 2018, 78, 5600–5617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Aung, N.Y.; Ohe, R.; Meng, H.; Kabasawa, T.; Yang, S.; Kato, T.; Yamakawa, M. Specific Neuropilins Expression in Alveolar Macrophages among Tissue-Specific Macrophages. PloS ONE 2016, 11, e0147358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Stamatos, N.M.; Zhang, L.; Jokilammi, A.; Finne, J.; Chen, W.H.; El-Maarouf, A.; Cross, A.S.; Hankey, K.G. Changes in polysialic acid expression on myeloid cells during differentiation and recruitment to sites of inflammation: Role in phagocytosis. Glycobiol. 2014, 24, 864–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Shahraz, A.; Kopatz, J.; Mathy, R.; Kappler, J.; Winter, D.; Kapoor, S.; Schütza, V.; Scheper, T.; Gieselmann, V.; Neumann, H. Anti-inflammatory activity of low molecular weight polysialic acid on human macrophages. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 16800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Immormino, R.M.; Lauzier, D.C.; Nakano, H.; Hernandez, M.L.; Alexis, N.E.; Ghio, A.J.; Tilley, S.L.; Doerschuk, C.M.; Peden, D.B.; Cook, D.N.; et al. Neuropilin-2 regulates airway inflammatory responses to inhaled lipopolysaccharide. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 2018, 315, L202–L211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Parker, M.W.; Linkugel, A.D.; Goel, H.L.; Wu, T.; Mercurio, A.M.; Vander Kooi, C.W. Structural basis for VEGF-C binding to neuropilin-2 and sequestration by a soluble splice form. Structure 2015, 23, 677–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  109. Ding, S.; Ma, M.; Negro, A.; Berry, C.; Kovacic, J.C.; Cimato, T.R.; Boehm, M. Neuropilin-2 Identifies Cardiovascular Precursor Cells and is Required for Vascular Differentiation in Murine Embryonic Stem Cells System. J. Stem. Cell Res. Transpl. 2015, 2, 1017. [Google Scholar]
  110. Herzog, Y.; Kalcheim, C.; Kahane, N.; Reshef, R.; Neufeld, G. Differential expression of neuropilin-1 and neuropilin-2 in arteries and veins. Mech. Dev. 2001, 109, 115–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Wiszniak, S.; Scherer, M.; Ramshaw, H.; Schwarz, Q. Neuropilin-2 genomic elements drive cre recombinase expression in primitive blood, vascular and neuronal lineages. Genesis 2015, 53, 709–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Wong, A.P.; Nili, N.; Strauss, B.H. In vitro differences between venous and arterial-derived smooth muscle cells: Potential modulatory role of decorin. Cardiovasc. Res. 2005, 65, 702–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Elaimy, A.L.; Guru, S.; Chang, C.; Ou, J.; Amante, J.J.; Zhu, L.J.; Goel, H.L.; Mercurio, A.M. VEGF-neuropilin-2 signaling promotes stem-like traits in breast cancer cells by TAZ-mediated repression of the Rac GAP β2-chimaerin. Sci. Signal 2018, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Klagsbrun, M.; Takashima, S.; Mamluk, R. The role of neuropilin in vascular and tumor biology. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2002, 515, 33–48. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  115. Alberts-Grill, N.; Rezvan, A.; Son, D.J.; Qiu, H.; Kim, C.W.; Kemp, M.L.; Weyand, C.M.; Jo, H. Dynamic immune cell accumulation during flow-induced atherogenesis in mouse carotid artery: An expanded flow cytometry method. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2012, 32, 623–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  116. Herring, B.P.; Hoggatt, A.M.; Griffith, S.L.; McClintick, J.N.; Gallagher, P.J. Inflammation and vascular smooth muscle cell dedifferentiation following carotid artery ligation. Physiol. Genom. 2017, 49, 115–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Choi, S.; Park, M.; Kim, J.; Park, W.; Kim, S.; Lee, D.K.; Hwang, J.Y.; Choe, J.; Won, M.H.; Ryoo, S.; et al. TNF-alpha elicits phenotypic and functional alterations of vascular smooth muscle cells by miR-155-5p-dependent down-regulation of cGMP-dependent kinase 1. J. Biol. Chem. 2018, 293, 14812–14822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Yoshida, T.; Yamashita, M.; Horimai, C.; Hayashi, M. Smooth muscle-selective inhibition of nuclear factor-kappaB attenuates smooth muscle phenotypic switching and neointima formation following vascular injury. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2013, 2, e000230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Tang, R.H.; Zheng, X.L.; Callis, T.E.; Stansfield, W.E.; He, J.; Baldwin, A.S.; Wang, D.Z.; Selzman, C.H. Myocardin inhibits cellular proliferation by inhibiting NF-kappaB(p65)-dependent cell cycle progression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 3362–3367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Singh, P.; Zheng, X.L. Dual regulation of myocardin expression by tumor necrosis factor-alpha in vascular smooth muscle cells. Plos ONE 2014, 9, e112120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  121. Said, A.M.; Parker, M.W.; Vander Kooi, C.W. Design, synthesis, and evaluation of a novel benzamidine-based inhibitor of VEGF-C binding to Neuropilin-2. Bioorg. Chem. 2020, 100, 103856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Nicholls, S.J.; Puri, R.; Anderson, T.; Ballantyne, C.M.; Cho, L.; Kastelein, J.J.P.; Koenig, W.; Somaratne, R.; Kassahun, H.; Yang, J.; et al. Effect of Evolocumab on Coronary Plaque Composition. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2018, 72, 2012–2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Ridker, P.M. Canakinumab for Residual Inflammatory Risk. Eur. Heart J. 2017, 38, 3545–3548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  124. Sabatine, M.S.; Leiter, L.A.; Wiviott, S.D.; Giugliano, R.P.; Deedwania, P.; De Ferrari, G.M.; Murphy, S.A.; Kuder, J.F.; Gouni-Berthold, I.; Lewis, B.S.; et al. Cardiovascular safety and efficacy of the PCSK9 inhibitor evolocumab in patients with and without diabetes and the effect of evolocumab on glycaemia and risk of new-onset diabetes: A prespecified analysis of the FOURIER randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017, 5, 941–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Chen, L.; Wang, L.; Yan, J.; Ma, C.; Lu, J.; Chen, G.; Chen, S.; Su, F.; Wang, W.; Su, X. 131I-labeled monoclonal antibody targeting neuropilin receptor type-2 for tumor SPECT imaging. Int. J. Oncol. 2017, 50, 649–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Reimann, C.; Brangsch, J.; Colletini, F.; Walter, T.; Hamm, B.; Botnar, R.M.; Makowski, M.R. Molecular imaging of the extracellular matrix in the context of atherosclerosis. Adv. Drug. Deliv. Rev. 2017, 113, 49–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  127. Niland, S.; Eble, J.A. Neuropilins in the Context of Tumor Vasculature. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Four main stages of atherogenesis. (1) In response to endothelial cell (EC) activation, circulating monocytes adhere to the vascular wall and infiltrate the intima. In the intima, monocytes mature to macrophages and uptake lipids to become foam cells. (2) Vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) migrate, proliferate, and secrete extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins. VSMCs and macrophages uptake lipid to form foam cells leading to fatty streak formation. ECs undergo EndoMT. These two initial stages can occur by puberty. (3) Extracellular lipids released from dead and dying VSMCs and macrophages accumulate at the centre of the plaque to form the necrotic core. VSMCs on the luminal side of the vessel wall secrete ECM, forming the fibrous cap, and provide stability to the lesion. Neovascularisation and lymphangiogenesis may also occur at this stage. By our late 20s, almost a third of us have well-developed lesions. (4) Finally, chronic inflammation and necrosis can lead to plaque rupture. Subsequent thrombosis may obstruct blood flow, often resulting in adverse clinical outcomes, including heart attack and stroke. Such clinical complications associated with complex atherosclerotic lesions can occur by middle age [2,3,5,6].
Figure 1. Four main stages of atherogenesis. (1) In response to endothelial cell (EC) activation, circulating monocytes adhere to the vascular wall and infiltrate the intima. In the intima, monocytes mature to macrophages and uptake lipids to become foam cells. (2) Vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) migrate, proliferate, and secrete extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins. VSMCs and macrophages uptake lipid to form foam cells leading to fatty streak formation. ECs undergo EndoMT. These two initial stages can occur by puberty. (3) Extracellular lipids released from dead and dying VSMCs and macrophages accumulate at the centre of the plaque to form the necrotic core. VSMCs on the luminal side of the vessel wall secrete ECM, forming the fibrous cap, and provide stability to the lesion. Neovascularisation and lymphangiogenesis may also occur at this stage. By our late 20s, almost a third of us have well-developed lesions. (4) Finally, chronic inflammation and necrosis can lead to plaque rupture. Subsequent thrombosis may obstruct blood flow, often resulting in adverse clinical outcomes, including heart attack and stroke. Such clinical complications associated with complex atherosclerotic lesions can occur by middle age [2,3,5,6].
Ijms 21 05154 g001
Figure 2. Basic Neuropilin (NRP) structure. NRPs have an extracellular domain comprised of two tandem CUB (complement C1r/C1s, Uegf, Bmp1) subunits (blue circles), two factor V/VIII coagulation factor homology domains (pink squares) and a MAM (meprin, A-5 protein, receptor protein-tyrosine phosphatase mu) subunit (orange octagon), a transmembrane domain, and a short cytoplasmic domain [24,46,47]. NRPs can also be found in soluble forms [27,47]. The a1/a2/b1 subunits interact with class 3 Semaphorins, the b1/b2 subunits interact with VEGF-A, -C, and -D, and the c subunit is thought to be involved in oligomerisation with other receptors [48,49,50]. The PDZ binding motif facilitates association with proteins containing a PDZ (PSD95, Dlg, ZO-1) domain, including GIPC (RGS-GAIP-interacting protein) [52,53,54].
Figure 2. Basic Neuropilin (NRP) structure. NRPs have an extracellular domain comprised of two tandem CUB (complement C1r/C1s, Uegf, Bmp1) subunits (blue circles), two factor V/VIII coagulation factor homology domains (pink squares) and a MAM (meprin, A-5 protein, receptor protein-tyrosine phosphatase mu) subunit (orange octagon), a transmembrane domain, and a short cytoplasmic domain [24,46,47]. NRPs can also be found in soluble forms [27,47]. The a1/a2/b1 subunits interact with class 3 Semaphorins, the b1/b2 subunits interact with VEGF-A, -C, and -D, and the c subunit is thought to be involved in oligomerisation with other receptors [48,49,50]. The PDZ binding motif facilitates association with proteins containing a PDZ (PSD95, Dlg, ZO-1) domain, including GIPC (RGS-GAIP-interacting protein) [52,53,54].
Ijms 21 05154 g002
Figure 3. Endothelial cell NRP2-mediated signalling pathways. (a) NRP2 may positively regulate EndoMT by directly binding to TGFβ1 and complexing with TGFBR1 [39]. (b) NRP2 interacts with VEGFR2 and VEGFR3 to promote migration and survival induced by VEGF-A and VEGF-C [80]. NRP2 has also been found to interact with VEGF-D [49]. The sprouting response of lymphatic ECs to VEGF-C is mediated by NRP2 complexing with VEGFR-3 [81]. (c) VEGF/NRP2 signalling facilitates α6β1 integrin engagement with ECM components. Signalling through this integrin activates a FAK/ERK driven signalling resulting in EC migration, sprouting and lymphangiogenesis [84] (d) NRP2 complexes with Plexins to drive SEMA3 driven R-Ras signalling leading to loss of EC-ECM/VSMC adhesion which leads to increased vascular permeability [93,95]. NRP2/Sema3F/Plexin A1 inhibits PI-3K and mTORC signalling attenuating EC proliferation and survival [94]. The NRP2/SEMA3/Plexin complexes are implicated in downregulating angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis, while promoting vascular permeability [91,92,93,94,95,96,97]. (e) NRP2 binding to ANGPTL4 drives the activation of the RhoA/ROCK signalling pathway to facilitate breakdown of EC-EC junctions and thus increase permeability [99].
Figure 3. Endothelial cell NRP2-mediated signalling pathways. (a) NRP2 may positively regulate EndoMT by directly binding to TGFβ1 and complexing with TGFBR1 [39]. (b) NRP2 interacts with VEGFR2 and VEGFR3 to promote migration and survival induced by VEGF-A and VEGF-C [80]. NRP2 has also been found to interact with VEGF-D [49]. The sprouting response of lymphatic ECs to VEGF-C is mediated by NRP2 complexing with VEGFR-3 [81]. (c) VEGF/NRP2 signalling facilitates α6β1 integrin engagement with ECM components. Signalling through this integrin activates a FAK/ERK driven signalling resulting in EC migration, sprouting and lymphangiogenesis [84] (d) NRP2 complexes with Plexins to drive SEMA3 driven R-Ras signalling leading to loss of EC-ECM/VSMC adhesion which leads to increased vascular permeability [93,95]. NRP2/Sema3F/Plexin A1 inhibits PI-3K and mTORC signalling attenuating EC proliferation and survival [94]. The NRP2/SEMA3/Plexin complexes are implicated in downregulating angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis, while promoting vascular permeability [91,92,93,94,95,96,97]. (e) NRP2 binding to ANGPTL4 drives the activation of the RhoA/ROCK signalling pathway to facilitate breakdown of EC-EC junctions and thus increase permeability [99].
Ijms 21 05154 g003
Figure 4. Role of NRP2 in macrophages. In peritoneal macrophages (green boxes), NRP2 is implicated in phagocytosis [105]. In tumour-associated macrophages (TAMs) (pink boxes), NRP2 facilitates efferocytosis whilst promoting the expression of pro-inflammatory genes [103]. In microglia (blue boxes), following LPS challenge, polysialylated NRP2 rapidly translocates to the cell surface before being shed from the cells [27]. Soluble polysialylated NRP2 may have an immunosuppressive role by binding to SIGLET to attenuate activation of pro-inflammatory signalling pathways [106,107]. However, polysialylated NRP2 at the cell surface may facilitate protein interactions to promote pro-inflammatory signalling.
Figure 4. Role of NRP2 in macrophages. In peritoneal macrophages (green boxes), NRP2 is implicated in phagocytosis [105]. In tumour-associated macrophages (TAMs) (pink boxes), NRP2 facilitates efferocytosis whilst promoting the expression of pro-inflammatory genes [103]. In microglia (blue boxes), following LPS challenge, polysialylated NRP2 rapidly translocates to the cell surface before being shed from the cells [27]. Soluble polysialylated NRP2 may have an immunosuppressive role by binding to SIGLET to attenuate activation of pro-inflammatory signalling pathways [106,107]. However, polysialylated NRP2 at the cell surface may facilitate protein interactions to promote pro-inflammatory signalling.
Ijms 21 05154 g004
Figure 5. Roles of NRP2 in SMC phenotypic switching. NRP2 expression is upregulated in SMCs in response to injury [38,114] and pro-inflammatory stimuli [69,70] via Smad3 transcription factor binding to the NRP2 promoter [41]. NRP2 expression is linked to VSMC transdifferentiation [41,42]. Evidence suggests NRP2 positively regulates PDGFbb-induced VSMC migration and proliferation [38]. NRP2 is linked to loss of the contractile phenotype via promoting activation of the RhoA/ROCK signalling pathway [43,70,75]. TSS; transcriptional start site, UTR; untranslated region.
Figure 5. Roles of NRP2 in SMC phenotypic switching. NRP2 expression is upregulated in SMCs in response to injury [38,114] and pro-inflammatory stimuli [69,70] via Smad3 transcription factor binding to the NRP2 promoter [41]. NRP2 expression is linked to VSMC transdifferentiation [41,42]. Evidence suggests NRP2 positively regulates PDGFbb-induced VSMC migration and proliferation [38]. NRP2 is linked to loss of the contractile phenotype via promoting activation of the RhoA/ROCK signalling pathway [43,70,75]. TSS; transcriptional start site, UTR; untranslated region.
Ijms 21 05154 g005

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Harman, J.L.; Sayers, J.; Chapman, C.; Pellet-Many, C. Emerging Roles for Neuropilin-2 in Cardiovascular Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5154. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms21145154

AMA Style

Harman JL, Sayers J, Chapman C, Pellet-Many C. Emerging Roles for Neuropilin-2 in Cardiovascular Disease. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21(14):5154. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms21145154

Chicago/Turabian Style

Harman, Jennifer L., Jacob Sayers, Chey Chapman, and Caroline Pellet-Many. 2020. "Emerging Roles for Neuropilin-2 in Cardiovascular Disease" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 14: 5154. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms21145154

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop