Next Article in Journal
Identification of 3,4-Dihydro-2H,6H-pyrimido[1,2-c][1,3]benzothiazin-6-imine Derivatives as Novel Selective Inhibitors of Plasmodium falciparum Dihydroorotate Dehydrogenase
Previous Article in Journal
The Lrat−/− Rat: CRISPR/Cas9 Construction and Phenotyping of a New Animal Model for Retinitis Pigmentosa
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Citric Acid-Mediated Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Plants

1
Graduate School of Environmental and Life Science, Okayama University, Okayama 700-8530, Japan
2
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh
3
Plant Breeding Division, Bangladesh Rice Research Institute, Gazipur 1701, Bangladesh
4
Department of Crop Botany, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh
5
Department of Agronomy, Khulna Agricultural University, Khulna 9100, Bangladesh
6
Chemistry Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture—Agricultural Research Service, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA
7
Department of Fisheries, Bangamata Sheikh Fojilatunnesa Mujib Science and Technology University, Melandah, Jamalpur 2012, Bangladesh
8
Department of Seed Science and Technology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh
9
Department of Plant Physiology, Slovak University of Agriculture, 94976 Nitra, Slovakia
10
Department of Botany and Plant Physiology, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 16500 Prague, Czech Republic
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Authors contributed equally.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(13), 7235; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms22137235
Submission received: 5 June 2021 / Revised: 26 June 2021 / Accepted: 27 June 2021 / Published: 5 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Plant Sciences)

Abstract

:
Several recent studies have shown that citric acid/citrate (CA) can confer abiotic stress tolerance to plants. Exogenous CA application leads to improved growth and yield in crop plants under various abiotic stress conditions. Improved physiological outcomes are associated with higher photosynthetic rates, reduced reactive oxygen species, and better osmoregulation. Application of CA also induces antioxidant defense systems, promotes increased chlorophyll content, and affects secondary metabolism to limit plant growth restrictions under stress. In particular, CA has a major impact on relieving heavy metal stress by promoting precipitation, chelation, and sequestration of metal ions. This review summarizes the mechanisms that mediate CA-regulated changes in plants, primarily CA’s involvement in the control of physiological and molecular processes in plants under abiotic stress conditions. We also review genetic engineering strategies for CA-mediated abiotic stress tolerance. Finally, we propose a model to explain how CA’s position in complex metabolic networks involving the biosynthesis of phytohormones, amino acids, signaling molecules, and other secondary metabolites could explain some of its abiotic stress-ameliorating properties. This review summarizes our current understanding of CA-mediated abiotic stress tolerance and highlights areas where additional research is needed.

1. Introduction

Abiotic stresses such as drought, flooding, high temperature, low temperature, salinity, and heavy metals (HM) inhibit plant growth and lower yield potentialities in crops [1]. As climate change leads to less predictable and more extreme weather events, environmental stresses have become a major threat to food security [2]. About 90% of arable lands are prone to one or more environmental stress [3] and abiotic stresses already account for up to 50% yield loss in many major crops [1]. Abiotic stresses cause changes in plant metabolism, growth, and development and in extreme cases lead to plant death [4,5]. The exogenous application of protective plant metabolites like citric acid or citrate (CA) has emerged as an effective approach to improve plant resilience to environmental stresses and thus sustain food production.
Citric acid, a 6-carbon tricarboxylic acid synthesized by the citrate synthase (CS)-catalyzed condensation of oxaloacetate (OAA) and acetyl-CoA, is an intermediate of the mitochondrial tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle [6,7]. In the glycolytic pathway, glucose is converted to pyruvate, which is transported to the mitochondria and is either oxidized to produce acetyl-CoA or carboxylated to form OAA. Alternatively, OAA can be formed by the catalysis of phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP), an intermediate in glycolysis, by phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPC) [8]. OAA serves as a substrate for CA biosynthesis in the TCA cycle [8,9]. In plant cells, CA is also a metabolic intermediate of glyoxylate cycle, which occurs in specialized peroxisomes called glyoxysomes [6] (Figure 1). After being transported into the cytosol, the CA can be utilized by the cell immediately or stored in the vacuole to maintain the cytosolic pH [9,10] (Figure 1).
More than a decade ago, it was reported that plants growing in alkaline soils exude CA and malate from their roots and that this enables them to uptake essential nutrients like phosphorus and iron by decreasing the pH of the rhizosphere [11]. Since then, several studies have demonstrated that the positive effects of CA are not from the pH modulation along, but that there are also many physiological responses by plants to exogenously applied CA. In addition, application of CA improved physiological parameters in numerous plant species such as Polianthes tuberosa [12], Lilium spp. [13], and Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean) [14]. Moreover, CA has also been used to mitigate drought, salinity, temperature, and HM stresses in a variety of plant species [15,16,17,18]. This review discusses the current understanding of the physiological and biological roles of CA in enhancing abiotic stress tolerance to salinity, drought, HMs, alkalinity, and temperature.

2. Effects of Abiotic Stress on Endogenous CA Levels

Abiotic stresses trigger complex responses in plants involving diverse signaling events, physiological adjustments and activation of defense mechanisms that together result in changes to the biosynthesis, transport, and storage of many primary and secondary metabolites (SMs). Various types of experimental evidence have demonstrated that abiotic stresses can influence endogenous CA levels in plants (Table 1). In some plant species, such as Helianthus annuus (sunflower), Solanum lycopersicum (tomato), Acacia ampliceps, and Trigonella foenum-graecum, CA increased after 7 days to 4 weeks of salinity exposure [19,20,21,22]. Tomato, Gossypium hirsutum, Clusia sp. and Aptenia cordifolia, showed large increases in endogenous CA levels under drought stress [23,24,25,26], whereas levels did not change in Solanum tuberosum (potato) [27]. In Festuca arundinacea, hybrid bermudagrass and Lolium arundinaceum, endogenous CA levels increased under heat stress [17,28,29], whereas no change in CA was observed in the tuber or leaf of potato nor in the leaf of Poa pratensis [26,28].
Various studies have reported that endogenous CA accumulates after exposure to HM stresses. Exposure to cadmium (Cd) or nickel (Ni) causes CA accumulation in the roots of Solanum nigrum, the shoots of Brassica juncea and Sesuvium portulacastrum and both the roots and shoots of Amaranthus paniculatus, while causing a CA decrease in roots of Sesuvium portulacastrum [30,31,32,33]. Another study showed that endogenous CA levels increased in Oryza sativa (rice) after exposure to 50 µM chromium (Cr) for 8 days [34]. A large increase in endogenous CA levels in root exudates from Secale cereale, Triticum aestivum (wheat), Glycine max (soybean), rice, Zea mays (maize), Pisum sativum (pea), Hordeum vulgare (barley), and Cassia tora has been observed under aluminum (Al) stress [35,36,37,38,39].
In general, endogenous CA levels tend to increase in response to salinity, drought, heat, and HM stresses. The degree and longevity of increased CA are specific to the plant species and the type of abiotic stress. Exogenous application of CA appears to improve the tolerance of plants to abiotic stress [17,18,40,41]. Despite the growing number of scientific investigations, our understanding of the effects endogenous CA or exogenously applied CA on abiotic stress tolerance in plants remains limited. In the following sections, we describe the roles of exogenous CA application in ameliorating plant stress responses to various abiotic stresses.

3. Exogenous CA for Mitigation of Abiotic Stress

3.1. Salinity Stress

Exogenous application of CA can increase the salinity tolerance of plants and ultimately increase growth and yield (Table 2). Carica papaya (papaya) seeds primed with a CA solution showed improved germination under salt stress conditions [42]. A foliar spray with CA reduced the sensitivity of G. barbadense to salt stress, improving growth and yield, and led to higher total soluble sugars (TSS), total soluble protein (TSP), total phenolic compounds (TPCs), free amino acids (FAA), and proline content [18]. Moreover, El-Hawary and Nashed [43] reported that the foliar application of CA in combination with ascorbic or salicylic acid enhanced the growth and productivity of maize under salt stress conditions. Application of CA in combination with ascorbic acid and thiamin improved salinity tolerance by upregulating the non-enzymatic antioxidants (TPCs and proline accumulation) and decreasing enzymatic antioxidants [CAT, POX, and phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL)] in H. sabdariffa and Melissa officinalis (lemon balm), a response related to the maintenance of the cellular redox state [44,45]. Several studies have shown that CA application can increase the activity of antioxidants, including superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POX), catalase (CAT), glutathione peroxidase (GPX), polyphenol oxidase (PPO), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) in cotton, maize, Beta vulgaris (sugar beet), Hibiscus sabdariffa, and Leymus chinensis (Chinese ryegrass) [18,43,45,46,47]. Essential oil components (monoterpene hydrocarbons and oxygenated sesquiterpenes) of lemon balm under salt stress conditions were increased by CA treatment [44]. The application of CA in sugar beet individually or in combination with peel extracts of banana and/or tomato improved tap roots yield in saline soil [47].

3.2. Drought Stress

Application of exogenous CA improved drought tolerance and increased productivity of Lilium Cv. Brunello and cotton plants [13,15]. Accumulation of some OAs including CA is associated with improved drought tolerance in G. barbadense [48]. Exogenous application of CA improved the growth of Brassica oleracea var. capitata (cabbage) seedlings in drought-affected areas by alleviating oxidative stress [49]. Additionally, in cabbage, CA was shown to increase phosphorus uptake and decrease hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) accumulation [49]. In common bean plants, exogenous application of CA increased the relative water content (RWC) and chlorophyll (Chl) content of leaves, leading to increased growth and productivity [14]. Several morphological and yield-related traits, metabolite concentrations, (Chl a, Chl b, Chl a+b, carotenoid, and proline), and antioxidant enzyme activities (CAT, POX, and APX) were increased by exogenously applied CA in Gossypium barbadense [15].

3.3. Temperature Stress

High temperature stress results in decreased yield in many crops. However, it has been reported that exogenous CA can alleviate heat stress in several plant species (Table 3). Spraying of 20 mM CA on leaves of Lolium arundicaceum significantly improved photosynthetic efficiency, Chl biosynthesis, and activity of antioxidant enzyme such as SOD, POX, and CAT. The enhanced antioxidant system alleviated cell membrane damage (lower electrolyte leakage (EL) and malondialdehyde (MDA) content), ROS accumulation, and leaf senescence [17]. In addition, foliar spraying of CA application at the rate of 2.5 and 5 g L−1 increased fruit setting and yield in tomato under heat stress [50]. There has also been at least one report of CA application alleviating low temperature stress, as CA application suppressed defoliation and increased leaf number in Hibiscus rosa-sinensis under cold stress treatment [51].

3.4. Alkalinity Stress

It has been also reported that application of CA can ameliorate the effects of alkalinity stress. Treatment of Chinese ryegrass with 50 mg L−1 CA increased alkaline stress tolerance, improving growth, relative growth rate, photosynthesis and activities CAT, SOD, and APX in plants grown in the presence of 100 mM Na2CO3 [46]. Another study showed that soil treatment with CA at 40, 80, and 120 mg kg−1 significantly improved plant growth features such as plant biomass, root development, root–shoot ratio, and total root surface area and also increased soil nutrients of Rosa roxburghii seedlings under alkaline stress [52].

3.5. Heavy Metal Stress

Exposure to HMs causes plant stress and reduces plant growth and biomass production. Application of exogenous CA has been shown to mitigate HM stress in numerous instances (Table 4). Plants treated with CA had improved growth and biomass accumulation, increased photosynthesis and Chl content, higher water use efficiency, and higher antioxidant enzymes activity, and reduced ROS, MDA, and EL [53,54,55].
Exogenous CA (2.5 mM) in the growth medium of Cu-stressed (100 µM) Brassica napus increased shoot and root length, numbers of leaves, and leaf area [56]. Moreover, improved growth and biomass of B. napus has been shown for CA-treated plants exposed to Cd stress [16], Pb stress [57], and Cr stress [58]. Similarly, the application of CA at a rate of 100 μmol L−1 in nutrient solution reversed the Cd stress-induced loss of root biomass in Salix variegate [55].
It is well-known that Chl content is an important contributor to rates of photosynthesis and that exogenous application of CA can mitigate HM stress by increasing Chl content (Table 4). Addition of CA (5 mM) increased total Chl by 18% in Cr-stressed Helianthus annuus (sunflower) plants [59], where supplementation with CA was also shown to increase Chl a, Chl b, and Chl a+b contents grown under Cd stress [55], Cr stress [40] and Pb stress [57]. Sebastian and Prasad [60] showed that exogenous CA (50.0 µM) enhanced Cd stress tolerance in rice with increased Chl (54.0–64.0%) and carotenoid (40.0–53.0%) content. Moreover, SPAD values (a measure of Chl content) increased by 35.2% with CA (0.6 mM) foliar application to B. juncea under Cd stress [61]. Application of CA also led to a 17% increase in carotenoid content in Salix variegate under Cd stress [55] and a 23% increase in sunflower under Cr stress [59]. Kaur et al. [33] reported that soil treatment with 0.6 mM CA ameliorated Cd stress in B. juncea with increased total Chl and carotenoid content.
Net photosynthesis rate (Pn) and stomatal conductance (Gs) generally increase in CA-treated plants (Table 4). CA treatment (5 mM) of Cr-stressed (20 mg Cr kg−1) sunflower increased Pn, water use efficiency (Pn/E), transpiration rate (E), and Gs by 21%, 53%, 26%, and 12%, respectively [59]. Furthermore, CA increased leaf RWC and reduced the proline content, thereby improving the water status of treated plants [53]. Addition of exogenous CA (2.5 mM) to growth media improved the Pn, E, Gs, and Pn/E of B. napus grown under Pb stress (50 and 100 μM) [57]. Both root irrigation and foliar application of CA improved the tolerance to Pb stress in Larix olgensis, a response associated with increased proline [54]. Foliar spray of CA (0.6 mM) also increased the proline content (63%) in leaves of B. juncea [61].
Furthermore, treatment of plants with CA has been shown to reduce HM accumulation (Table 4). Inclusion of exogenous CA (5 mM) in the growth medium led to reduced Cd uptake and mitigated the Cd stress in Corchorus olitorius [62]. CA application (0.25 g kg−1) decreased Cd uptake by 83.9% in the Sahiwal-2002 maize variety [63]. Another study showed that CA application in conjunction with other OAs such as malic acid or oxalic acid or chelators such as EDTA or DTPA decreased Cd accumulation in wheat, thereby reducing bioavailability of Cd and enhancing tolerance to Cd stress [64]. Sebastian and Prasad [60] reported that addition of CA (50.0 µM) along with malate decreased the Cd translocation (18.0–20.0%) in rice. Similarly, exogenous CA (5.0 mmol L−1) reduced Ni uptake by roots in B. juncea (leaf mustard) and increased shoot/root ratio (the ratio of shoot to root Ni concentration) and thereby conferred Ni stress tolerance [65].
Production of ROS is a known outcome of HM stress. Addition of exogenous CA dramatically reduced ROS levels and improved stress tolerance in B. juncea and Pisum sativum [66,67]. Inclusion of CA (2.5 mM) in growth media reduced H2O2 and MDA contents in both leaves and roots of Pb-stressed B. napus [57]. Moreover, Kaur et al. [68] reported that soil containing 0.6 mM CA reduced ROS production and ameliorated Cd stress in B. juncea. Foliar spray of CA (0.6 mM) along with SA decreased H2O2 content by 19% in Cd-stressed B. juncea [61]. Kumar et al. [69] reported that exogenous CA (250 μM) in a nutrient solution mitigated Pb stress in tomato, a response associated with decreased α-tocopherol content and MDA levels. Several studies have shown that antioxidant enzyme activities increased with CA treatment and that increased antioxidants improved the stress tolerance in plants (Table 4). Antioxidant enzyme activities such as SOD, POX, CAT, and APX were increased in B. napus when the plants were treated with 2.5 mM CA under various HM stress conditions [56,57,58]. Soil treatment with CA (20 mmol kg−1) increased antioxidant defense mechanisms and slightly reduced the sensitivity to Cd stress in Solanum nigram [70]. Clearly exogenous CA application in plants can help mitigate the effects of HM stress, apparently by improving osmotic balance, HM sequestration, photosynthetic attributes, and antioxidant systems.
On the contrary, several studies have shown that CA application can enhance uptake of HMs in plants such as Cr in B. napus [58] and sunflower [59], Cd in B. napus [16], Solanum nigrum [70], and B. juncea [53], Mn in Juncus effuses [71], Pb in B. napus [57], and Cu in B. napus [56]. Although CA application increased HM uptake, there were no obvious toxicity symptoms associated. Instead, CA treatment helped mitigate HM stress by promoting enhanced growth and biomass, higher Chl content and photosynthesis, higher antioxidant enzyme activity, lower ROS accumulation, and reduced membrane lipid oxidation [55,72], all while accelerating phytoextraction of HMs from the soil [53,56,57,59].

4. Mechanisms of CA-Mediated Abiotic Stress Tolerance

4.1. Regulation of Heavy Metal Uptake and Sequestration

Plants have developed various strategies to withstand high concentrations of HMs in the rhizosphere, which can impose adverse effects on the growth and physiological processes [73,76]. Selective uptake or efflux of metals at the plasma membrane, chelation of metals in the cytosol by peptides, and compartmentalization of metal ions in the vacuole by tonoplast located transporters are all strategies to limit damage by HMs [76,77].
Exogenous application of CA can enhance HM stress tolerance through the detoxification of HMs by chelating them at the root surface, in the xylem, or in the cytosol (Figure 2 and Figure 3). There are a variety of plant-produced high-affinity HM ligands. In the xylem sap, CA is one of the primary ligands for Fe, Cu, Ni, Cd, and Zn [78]. The secretion of OAs, e.g., CA, oxalic acid, malic acid, increases under HM stress [79]. Generally, OAs, including CA, have one or more carboxyl group which acts as a ligand for HMs, chelating HMs and thereby affect their redox behavior by forming non-toxic compounds or preventing their uptake by plant roots [80]. When intercellular HM levels approach toxic levels plants can store them into vacuoles [81]. However, the difference in HM concentration between the vacuolar lumen and the cytosol can be high, presenting the possibility of HM leakage from the vacuole into the cytosol. Most HMs are bound to chelators such as CA inside the vacuole to reduce this risk [82]. After HM chelation in the cytosol or at the root-soil interface, HMs are translocated to the shoot via xylem as non-toxic CA-chelated complexes (Figure 2) [77]. According to Vatansever et al. [83], CA works as a chelator for solubilized Ni, allowing transportation via cation transport systems such as Fe, Mg, Cu, Zn as well as various proteins. Root exudates also have a role in HM tolerance. Root exudates containing high levels of CA make HMs unavailable for plant uptake by forming HM-citrate complexes (Figure 2) [80]. Salt et al. [84] reported that roots of Thlaspi sp. secreted Ni-chelating exudates rich in CA and histidine in response to Ni stress, which resulted in decreased Ni uptake. Moreover, Ma and Hiradate [85] showed that CA formed non-toxic Al-citrate complexes in the symplasm of Hydrangea grown in the presence of Al. Similarly, buckwheat grown in the presence of Al showed upregulation of genes involved in CA release and increased CA in the xylem, where CA complexes with Al through a ligand exchange reaction [85]. Another study showed that in soybean, Al resistance is promoted exudation of CA by roots [86]. CA has a lower affinity for HMs like Cd, Ni, Co (Cobalt) and Zn and comparatively a strong binding affinity toward Fe and Al [77,87]. The chelating potential and plant growth-promoting role of CA has been reported under various HM stresses, including Cr [58], Cd [16], Pb [57], and Cu [56].
The molecular nature of exogenous CA-mediated HM stress tolerance remains poorly understood. In general, a specific tolerance mechanism is adopted by plants for a given HM stress. It is possible that several mechanisms may be involved in reducing the toxicity of HMs. From the above discussion, we can hypothesize exogenous CA application in rooting media may promote HM stress tolerance by directly impairing the uptake of HMs. Moreover, increased intracellular CA accumulation in cells resulting from exogenous application likely improves HM tolerance by acting as an HM chelator, promoting sequestration of HMs into vacuoles (Figure 2 and Figure 3).
Another strategy to limit the uptake of metal ions by plants lies in modifying the rhizosphere pH, which can result in precipitation and insolubility of HMs (Figure 2). One mechanism behind modifying pH involves exudation of OAs like CA [88,89]. Root exudates also serve to concentrate metal ions to the apoplast and help prohibit HMs from entering cellular spaces [90]. Root exudates of several plants including Secale cereale, wheat, soybean, rice, maize, pea, and barley grown under Al stress contain high levels of CA [35,36,37,38,39].
The central vacuole is the principal metal ion storage compartment in the plant cell [91]. Several families of intracellular transporters located on the tonoplast membrane were identified in plants experiencing HM stress and undergoing HM compartmentalization [91]. Metals enter cells via cation transporters with a wide range of substrate specificity [91,92]. Overall, it is quite clear that CA can regulate HM stress directly through phytochelation and then store HMs in the vacuole, but very little is known about the movement of CA-HM complexes across the tonoplast membrane via vacuolar transporters. More research is needed to identify the role of the vacuolar transporters for CA-HM compartmentalization. Similarly, little is known about the release of CA from the HM chelation complex or its remobilization back outside the vacuole.

4.2. Regulation of ROS and Antioxidants

Many recent studies have demonstrated that the application of exogenous CA can provide protection against oxidative stress in plants through increasing the activity of antioxidant defense systems [16,46,53,70,93]. Drought, flooding, heat, cold, salinity, and HM stress can lead to elevated ROS levels and result in disturbance of the cellular redox balance, leading to oxidative or nitrosative stress [94] and induction of antioxidant enzyme activities [95,96]. Oxidative stress results in cellular damage through membrane lipid peroxidation, natural antioxidant blockage, and reduced photosynthesis [97]. Antioxidant enzymes work to scavenge ROS and limit oxidative damage in the plant. CAT and APX directly detoxify ROS by converting H2O2 to water and oxygen [98], while SOD protects plants from oxidative damage by converting O2•− (superoxide anion) to H2O2 [4,5].
The non-enzymatic and enzymatic components of the antioxidant defense system work together to scavenge ROS under stress conditions [5,98]. Build-up of CA due to redox-dependent inhibition of aconitase (ACO) during hypoxia has been suggested to induce metabolic changes as a stress adaptation strategy [99]. Plants react to stresses by activating the enzymatic defense system [100], a process facilitated by CA accumulation [17,18,43,59]. In several studies, both under non-stress and various stress conditions, the role of CA in promoting antioxidant enzyme activities has been reported [16,58,101,102,103]. CA functions as an elicitor of phenylpropanoid-derived compounds and activates signaling cascades to increase antioxidant activity [104]. Other interpretations of CA’s role in abiotic stress tolerance have been proposed as well. Zhao et al. [105] reported that CA functions as an antioxidant intermediate involving the defense pathways in response to abiotic stress. A similar study reported endogenous CA functioned primarily as an antioxidant and intermediate in respiration metabolism involving the defense pathways in response to high temperature stress [105].
Alternative oxidase (AOX) facilitates lower ROS levels by augmenting the capability of mitochondrial electron transport and inhibiting the production of O2•− [106]. Importantly, the most powerful inducer of AOX expression yet reported is CA [107]. It is possible that higher endogenous CA, whether caused by metabolic engineering or exogenous application, will limit ROS-induced damages by promoting higher AOX activity (Figure 3). In support of this hypothesis, a recent study reported that ACO inhibition mediated by higher CA induced AOX activity in Arabidopsis thaliana under hypoxia and limited ROS production in mitochondria [99]. Moreover, a study on rice by Khatun et al. [7] reported that the activity of antioxidant enzymes (such as glutathione reductase, GR; GPX; SOD; CAT and glutathione S-transferase, GST) and antioxidant metabolites (such as GSH, proline, and carotenoid) increased significantly after CA supplementation, suggesting the active involvement of CA in ROS scavenging. CA can promote several enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants and AOX activity and thereby help ameliorate damage by stress-induced ROS and enhance stress tolerance of plants (Figure 3).

4.3. Regulation of Osmoregulators and Secondary Metabolites

Plant cells accumulate osmolytes and SMs in part to protect cellular components from osmotic and oxidative stresses [108,109]. The most abundant osmolytes in plant cells are proline, glycine betaine, polyamines, and soluble sugars [109]. SMs including phenolics such as flavonoids, anthocyanins, and lignins [108] play roles in protecting plant cells from oxidative stress by scavenging free radicals [110,111]. There is insufficient evidence regarding the potential of CA to regulate the production of SMs under HM stress conditions, though at least three studies have reported an increase in SM synthesis, primarily flavonoids, after the application of exogenous CA.
Plants experiencing environmental stress conditions accumulate proline in the leaves and proline levels correlate with stress tolerance [109]. In several studies, CA has been shown to stimulate synthesis of proline and other metabolites (including phenolic compounds, flavonoids, tannins, and sugars) in plants experiencing abiotic stress conditions [68,112,112,113]. In Arabidopsis thaliana, CA enhances the biosynthesis of amino acids such as proline, glycine, serine, leucine, and lysine [99]. HMs upset the water balance in plants and lower water potential [68]. Proline stabilizes subcellular structures and molecules experiencing osmotic stress conditions by working as a molecular chaperone, maintaining the integrity of proteins [114,115]. It also serves as an antioxidant in its own right [114,115]. Exogenous application of CA led to increased proline content in B. juncea grown under Cd stress [61,68], thereby protecting against HM stress.
Phenolic compounds accumulate in cellular vacuoles through hydrolyzation and decomposition of cellular components and cell walls [116,117]. Limón et al. [118] and Li et al. [113] reported that CA increased cellular phenolic compounds by eliciting the degradation of polyphenols (e.g., tannins) into simple phenols. Such phenols may have protective benefits for plants under HM or other osmotic- or oxidative-stress inducing conditions.
Treatment with CA has also been shown to promote anthocyanin and flavonoid accumulation [68,101]. A probable mechanism for this relationship was identified in Cd-stressed B. juncea plants where exogenous CA treatment enhanced chalcone synthase (CHS) gene expression [68]. Another study showed that in wheat sprouts treated with CA, signal transduction pathways leading to increased secondary metabolites accumulation were activated [101]. Exogenous CA lowered the pH which enhanced the release of flavonoids and anthocyanins [119].

5. Genetic Engineering for CA-Mediated Abiotic Stress Tolerance

Genetic engineering offers a promising approach to modulate CA metabolism in plants for improved abiotic stress tolerance (Table 5). A favored approach has been to increase CA biosynthesis by overexpressing CA biosynthetic genes like CS, which converts OAA and acetyl-CoA to CA during the TCA cycle [6], or PEPC, that produces OAA from PEP [8]. Several studies have demonstrated the utility of overexpressing CS-encoding genes in overcoming Al stress. Transgenic tobacco, papaya, and Arabidopsis overexpressing CS from Pseudomonas aeruginosa showed higher tolerance to Al-toxicity [11,120,121,122]. Likewise, overexpression of CS from Malus xiaojinensis in tobacco led to higher CA content and improved tolerance to Fe-stress [123]. However, overexpression alone is not always sufficient to cause increased CA accumulation or HM tolerance [124]. Transgenics overexpressing mitochondrial isoforms of CS (mtCS) have also been employed. Koyama et al. [121] overexpressed carrot mtCS in Arabidopsis and showed a 60% increase in CA efflux and better performance under toxic Al concentrations. Similar results were obtained in transgenic canola overexpressing Arabidopsis mtCS, where increased CA exudation from roots was shown to directly correlate with transgene expression [125]. Importantly, CS encompasses only a small part of the complex system behind CA metabolism and genetic manipulation of several metabolite enzymes at once (super expression strategies), such as malate dehydrogenase (MDH), CS, and PEPC, may increase the synthesis and accumulation of CA even more [125]. A contrasting strategy has been to down-regulate CA catabolism by repressing ACO and isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) using an antisense approach, and thus increase CA concentration and efflux from roots [125,126].
Another popular target for genetic manipulation has been anion channels in the plasma membrane that play a major regulatory role in the transport of CA from roots [127]. Transporters for CA anions include members of the Al-activated malate transporter (ALMT) and multidrug and toxic compound extrusion (MATE) families [128,129]. The FeMATE1 involved in the Al-induced secretion of citrate in the roots, while FeMATE2 transports citrate into the Golgi system for internal detoxification of Al in both the roots and leaves of Fagopyrum esculentum [130]. In ricebean (Vigna umbellata) grown under Al toxicity, VuMATE2 and VuMATE1 control the CA efflux from roots in the early phase and late phase growth, respectively [131]. MATE transporters underlying aluminum-activated CA secretions have been identified in various species, including ZmMATE1 (Zea mays) [132], ScFRDL2 (Secale cereale) [133], OsFRDL4 (Oryza sativa) [134], AhMATE1 (Amaranthus hypochondriacus) [135], and HvAACT1 (Hordium vulgare) [136]. Two genes, BdMATE and SbMATE obtained from Brachypodium distachyon and Sorghum bicolor, respectively, were overexpressed in Setaria viridis and caused increased CA secretion from the apex of the root [137,138].
Lastly, the role of CA in alkaline stress tolerance has also been a target of genetic engineering. Zhu et al. [139] showed improved alkaline tolerance in transgenic M. sativa overexpressing TIFY10a gene from Glycine soja. These findings suggested that the ability to maintain cytosolic pH homeostasis through increased NADP-ME (NADP-dependent malic enzyme) activity and CA content could alleviate high pH damage. Results from Sun et al. [140] revealed that transgenic M. sativa produced through the overexpression of the Glycine soja PEPC kinase 3 (PPCK3) gene exhibited higher levels of CA and performed better under alkali stress.
Genetic engineering for enhanced CA accumulation can improve Al, Fe, and alkalinity stress tolerance. The identification of genes regulating CA synthesis and transport, the determination of their expression patterns in response to stress, and a deeper understanding of their functions in stress adaptation will further enable genetic engineering and breeding technologies for improved stress tolerance. Evidence for whether CA over-accumulation can promote resiliency against other stresses is lacking and further studies are needed.

6. Metabolism of CA and Its Role in the Biosynthesis of Secondary Metabolites, Signaling Molecules, and Phytohormones

Citric acid, the 1st intermediate of the TCA (Krebs) cycle, is central to numerous interrelated metabolic networks that produce a myriad of SMs, amino acids, phytohormones and OAs [6,143,144], many of which play roles in abiotic stress tolerance in plants [145]. During the TCA cycle, the condensation of OAA and acetyl-CoA yields CA [146,147], which can then be utilized for the biosynthesis of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) [148], isoprenoids, flavonoids, fatty acids, sugars, and hormones (Figure 4) [149].
Citric acid can be utilized for amino acid or GABA biosynthesis through the production of glutamate [148,150]. ACO, IDH, glutamate synthase (GS), and glutamate decarboxylase (GAD) are key enzymes involved in CA catabolism through the ACO-GABA pathway [9]. The citric acid cycle intermediates α-ketoglutarate (α-KG) and 2-oxoglutarate (2-OG) feed into the ACO-GABA pathway [151]. An oxidative deamination process converts α-KG to glutamate via glutamate dehydrogenase [152]. This glutamate can be utilized by two alternative pathways, one involving the conversion of glutamate into glutamine and the other processing glutamate through the GABA shunt [8,9,148,150,153]. Glutamate serves as a precursor for many amino acids and amino acid-derived compounds including proline, arginine, ornithine, thiamine, and lysine [154]. Elevated levels of CA in the cytosol have been shown to enhance the activity of enzymes of the GABA shunt pathway in Citrus limon callus and citrus fruits [8,150].
Another destination for CA is the acetyl-CoA pathway, alternatively known as the ATP citrate lyase (ACL) pathway [151,155,156], which utilizes CA for biosynthesis of numerous secondary metabolites via either the mevalonate (MVA) pathway or the non-MVA pathway [9,151,157]. Acetyl-CoA produced from CA is primarily utilized for the biosynthesis of isoprenoids and other SMs [149,158,159]. The mevalonate (MVA) pathway uses acetyl-CoA to synthesize the universal isoprenoid precursor isopentenyl diphosphate, a substrate for the biosynthesis of many important metabolites and phytohormones including GA, carotenoids, abscisic acid (ABA), strigolactones, cytokinins (CK), brassinosteroids (BR), and tocopherols (Figure 4) [160,161,162]. In addition, acetyl-CoA is utilized for fatty acid elongation which ultimately can lead to jasmonate biosynthesis through the non-MVA octadecanoid pathway (Figure 4) [163].
Finally, OAA, another product of ACL catalysis and intermediate in the citric acid cycle, can be utilized for gluconeogenesis to produce soluble sugars (sucrose, fructose, and glucose) and for the synthesis of organic acids such as ascorbate and aspartic acid (Figure 4) [9,154]. Furthermore, OAA is needed for ethylene biosynthesis in plants [151].
In summary, CA and other CA-derived TCA cycle intermediates are intimately involved in the complex metabolic networks leading to the biosynthesis of many phytohormones, amino acids, SMs, and OAs. Many of these compounds play roles in amelioration of abiotic stresses including drought, salinity, light, temperature, air pollution, and HM toxicity [144]. As discussed previously, amino acids including GABA, proline, arginine, glutamine, and aspartic acid have been shown to contribute to osmotic and oxidative stresses. Similarly, the major classes of phytohormones and related metabolites including BR, GA, ABA, CK, carotenoid, strigolactones, ethylene, tocopherols, and thiamine have been shown to play important roles in abiotic stress tolerance. Moreover, soluble sugars like sucrose, fructose, glucose and glucose-6-phosphate-derived from ascorbic acid (AsA) also contribute to abiotic stress adaptation. Therefore, the role of CA in abiotic stress tolerance is complex and likely involves the biosynthesis of stress-mitigating phytohormones, SMs, OAs, and sugars.
Several studies have corroborated the hypothesis that stress ameliorating effect of CA may involve its position in secondary metabolism. For example, the GABA pathway is associated with temperature stress response in Citrus sinensis (blood orange) [158,164]. Hot air treatment of mandarin fruits led to degradation of organic acids including CA and the accumulation of soluble sugars, a response involving the ACO-IDH-GAD cascade [165]. Alternatively, the ACL pathway utilizing CA for flavonoid biosynthesis is associated with stress mitigation in cold-stressed blood oranges [164]. Additionally, overexpression of ACLA-1 gene of Saccharum officinarum, associated with CA catabolism in the ACL pathway, enhanced drought tolerance in tobacco [166]. Exogenous CA application ameliorated Cd stress in B. napus, a response associated with higher total soluble sugars, Chl, and carotenoid contents [16]. Crosstalk amongst stress-ameliorating OAs, SMs, phytohormones, and CA likely contributes to CA-mediated stress tolerance as suggested by Ye et al. [167] and Sadak et al. [168], each of whom showed increased levels of GA, BRs, indole acetic acid (IAA), and decreased ABA content after AsA and CA treatment. However, more research is needed to clarify the complex mechanisms and interactions between CA-dependent metabolites and their individual and combined influences on stress tolerance in plants.

7. Conclusions and Future Perspective

It can be concluded from the above discussion that exogenous CA application by foliar sprays or through rooting medium can effectively modulate various plant growth responses under diverse environmental stress conditions. In sum, exogenous CA:
  • Enhances growth, photosynthesis, and many physio-biochemical parameters that promote crop productivity under abiotic stress conditions.
  • Alleviates the abiotic stress-induced osmotic imbalance by increasing osmoregulators and protecting membranes from damage.
  • Reduces the severity of oxidative stress by upregulating non-enzymatic and enzymatic antioxidants.
  • Accelerates the HM stress tolerance of plants by chelating and sequestering HMs and improves HM phytoextraction from HM-polluted soils.
  • Provides the substrate for a wide variety of metabolic pathways synthesizing stress protectant metabolites including phytohormones, amino acids, organic acids, and fatty acids.
Still, the role of CA in abiotic stress tolerance has not yet been studied exhaustively and additional research is needed. A number of important relationships between CA and stress responses have not been examined. For example, the role of CA in cold stress tolerance has not been reported. The influence of CA on plant growth regulators, such as auxins, ABA, CK, GA, ethylene, salicylic acid, jasmonates, BRs, etc. are largely unknown. The interaction between exogenous CA and AOX has not been shown. Moreover, malate, an OA structurally similar to CA, can regulate anion channels in guard cells and involved in stomatal signaling [169], but the role of CA in stomatal signaling remains unknown. Finally, the effect of CA application on plant defense genes and interactions with biotic stresses remains largely unexplored. With the development of advanced omics technologies, more detailed research will emerge that explores CA-mediated stress tolerance at the transcriptome, proteome, and metabolome levels.
The use of biostimulants and chemical protectants has potential to overcome abiotic stress-caused losses on crops yields [170]. Many reports have shown that exogenous application of naturally-occurring plant chemicals such as salicylic acid, hydrogen peroxide, calcium, glutathione, ABA, jasmonic acid, polyphosphoinositides, nitric oxide, thiourea, and others can mitigate various abiotic stresses [4,171,172,173,174,175].
CA is a weak OA that occurs naturally in plants and to particularly high levels in citrus fruits. It is generally recognized as safe by the Food and Drug Administration and has no associated health concerns. CA is inexpensive to synthesize and to apply exogenously to crops, most cost-effectively by foliar spray along with post-emergent herbicides, insecticides, or fungicides. Exogenous application of CA is a promising low-cost approach to help alleviate abiotic stresses and promote crop yield.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.T.-U.-A.; writing—original draft preparation, M.T.-U.-A., C.T.H., M.I.Z., M.M.K., S.I., M.S.I., M.A.M., and M.S.R.; writing—review and editing, M.T.-U.-A., C.T.H., M.A.H. (Md. Afzal Hossain), M.A.H. (Md. Abdul Hannan), M.B., M.S., and Y.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The APC was funded by an S-grant from the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The present work was carried out with the support of the project VEGA 1/0589/19 and EPPN2020-OPVaI-VA—ITMS313011T813. We also acknowledged the support of Md. Toufiq Hasan during the preparation of illustrations.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The use of trade name, commercial product or corporation in this publication is for the information and convenience of the reader and does not imply an official recommendation, endorsement or approval by the US Department of Agriculture or the Agricultural Research Service for any product or service to the exclusion of mothers that may be suitable. USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

References

  1. Yadav, S.; Modi, P.; Dave, A.; Vijapura, A.; Patel, D.; Patel, M. Effect of Abiotic Stress on Crops. In Sustainable Crop Production; Hasanuzzaman, M., Filho, M.C.M.T., Fujita, M., Nogueira, T.A.R., Eds.; IntechOpen Publishing, 2020; Available online: https://www.intechopen.com/books/sustainable-crop-production/effect-of-abiotic-stress-on-crops (accessed on 17 June 2020).
  2. Wang, Y.; Frei, M. Stressed Food–The Impact of Abiotic Environmental Stresses on Crop Quality. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2011, 141, 271–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dos Reis, S.P.; Lima, A.M.; De Souza, C.R.B. Recent Molecular Advances on Downstream Plant Responses to Abiotic Stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 13, 8628–8647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tuteja, N.; Sopory, S.K. Chemical Signaling under Abiotic Stress Environment in Plants. Plant Signal. Behav. 2008, 3, 525–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Gill, S.S.; Tuteja, N. Reactive Oxygen Species and Antioxidant Machinery in Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Crop Plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2010, 48, 909–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Trejo-Tellez, L.; Gomez-Merino, F.; Schmitt, J. Citric Acid: Biosynthesis, Properties and Applications on Higher Plants; DA Vargas and JV Medina Nova Science Publishers, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2012; pp. 43–70. [Google Scholar]
  7. Khatun, M.R.; Mukta, R.H.; Islam, M.A.; Huda, A.N. Insight into Citric Acid-Induced Chromium Detoxification in Rice (Oryza Sativa. L). Int. J. Phytoremediat. 2019, 21, 1234–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hussain, S.B.; Shi, C.-Y.; Guo, L.-X.; Kamran, H.M.; Sadka, A.; Liu, Y.-Z. Recent Advances in the Regulation of Citric Acid Metabolism in Citrus Fruit. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2017, 36, 241–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Guo, L.-X.; Shi, C.-Y.; Liu, X.; Ning, D.-Y.; Jing, L.-F.; Yang, H.; Liu, Y.-Z. Citrate Accumulation-Related Gene Expression and/or Enzyme Activity Analysis Combined with Metabolomics Provide a Novel Insight for an Orange Mutant. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Etienne, A.; Génard, M.; Lobit, P.; Mbeguié-A-Mbéguié, D.; Bugaud, C. What Controls Fleshy Fruit Acidity? A Review of Malate and Citrate Accumulation in Fruit Cells. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 1451–1469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Lopez-Bucio, J.; de la Vega, O.M.; Guevara-Garcia, A.; Herrera-Estrella, L. Enhanced Phosphorus Uptake in Transgenic Tobacco Plants That Overproduce Citrate. Nat. Biotechnol. 2000, 18, 450–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Eidyan, B.; Hadavi, E.; Moalemi, N. Pre-Harvest Foliar Application of Iron Sulfate and Citric Acid Combined with Urea Fertigation Affects Growth and Vase Life of Tuberose (Polianthes Tuberosa L.) ‘Por-Par’. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 2014, 55, 9–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Darandeh, N.; Hadavi, E. Effect of Pre-Harvest Foliar Application of Citric Acid and Malic Acid on Chlorophyll Content and Post-Harvest Vase Life of Lilium Cv. Brunello. Front. Plant Sci. 2012, 2, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. El-Tohamy, W.; El-Abagy, H.; Badr, M.; Gruda, N. Drought Tolerance and Water Status of Bean Plants (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.) as Affected by Citric Acid Application. J. Appl. Bot. Food Qual. 2013, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gebaly, S.G.; Ahmed, F.M.; Namich, A.A. Effect of Spraying Some Organic, Amino Acids and Potassium Citrate on Alleviation of Drought Stress in Cotton Plant. J. Plant Prod. 2013, 4, 1369–1381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ehsan, S.; Ali, S.; Noureen, S.; Mahmood, K.; Farid, M.; Ishaque, W.; Shakoor, M.B.; Rizwan, M. Citric Acid Assisted Phytoremediation of Cadmium by Brassica Napus L. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2014, 106, 164–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hu, L.; Zhang, Z.; Xiang, Z.; Yang, Z. Exogenous Application of Citric Acid Ameliorates the Adverse Effect of Heat Stress in Tall Fescue (Lolium Arundinaceum). Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. El-Beltagi, H.S.; Ahmed, S.H.; Namich, A.A.M.; Abdel-Sattar, R.R. Effect of Salicylic Acid and Potassium Citrate on Cotton Plant under Salt Stress. Fresen. Environ. Bull. 2017, 26, 1091–1100. [Google Scholar]
  19. Shi, D.; Sheng, Y. Effect of Various Salt–Alkaline Mixed Stress Conditions on Sunflower Seedlings and Analysis of Their Stress Factors. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2005, 54, 8–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Abbas, G.; Saqib, M.; Akhtar, J.; Murtaza, G.; Shahid, M. Effect of Salinity on Rhizosphere Acidification and Antioxidant Activity of Two Acacia Species. Can. J. For. Res. 2015, 45, 124–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kang, S.-M.; Shahzad, R.; Bilal, S.; Khan, A.L.; Park, Y.-G.; Lee, K.-E.; Asaf, S.; Khan, M.A.; Lee, I.-J. Indole-3-Acetic-Acid and ACC Deaminase Producing Leclercia Adecarboxylata MO1 Improves Solanum Lycopersicum L. Growth and Salinity Stress Tolerance by Endogenous Secondary Metabolites Regulation. BMC Microbiol. 2019, 19, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Mickky, B.M.; Abbas, M.A.; Sameh, N.M. Morpho-Physiological Status of Fenugreek Seedlings under NaCl Stress. J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 2019, 31, 1276–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Timpa, J.D.; Burke, J.J.; Quisenberry, J.E.; Wendt, C.W. Effects of Water Stress on the Organic Acid and Carbohydrate Compositions of Cotton Plants. Plant Physiol. 1986, 82, 724–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Franco, A.; Ball, E.; Lüttge, U. Differential Effects of Drought and Light Levels on Accumulation of Citric and Malic Acids during CAM in Clusia. Plant Cell Environ. 1992, 15, 821–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Herppich, W.; Peckmann, K. Responses of Gas Exchange, Photosynthesis, Nocturnal Acid Accumulation and Water Relations of Aptenia Cordifolia to Short-Term Drought and Rewatering. J. Plant Physiol. 1997, 150, 467–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bethke, P.C.; Sabba, R.; Bussan, A.J. Tuber Water and Pressure Potentials Decrease and Sucrose Contents Increase in Response to Moderate Drought and Heat Stress. Am. J. Potato Res. 2009, 86, 519–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Nahar, K.; Ullah, S.M. Drought Stress Effects on Plant Water Relations, Growth, Fruit Quality and Osmotic Adjustment of Tomato (Solanum Lycopersicum) under Subtropical Condition. Asian J. Agric. Hortic. Res. 2018, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Du, H.; Wang, Z.; Yu, W.; Liu, Y.; Huang, B. Differential Metabolic Responses of Perennial Grass Cynodon Transvaalensis× Cynodon Dactylon (C4) and Poa Pratensis (C3) to Heat Stress. Physiol. Plant. 2011, 141, 251–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Yu, J.; Du, H.; Xu, M.; Huang, B. Metabolic Responses to Heat Stress under Elevated Atmospheric CO2 Concentration in a Cool-Season Grass Species. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2012, 137, 221–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Xu, J.; Zhu, Y.; Ge, Q.; Li, Y.; Sun, J.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, X. Comparative Physiological Responses of Solanum Nigrum and Solanum Torvum to Cadmium Stress. New Phytol. 2012, 196, 125–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mnasri, M.; Ghabriche, R.; Fourati, E.; Zaier, H.; Sabally, K.; Barrington, S.; Lutts, S.; Abdelly, C.; Ghnaya, T. Cd and Ni Transport and Accumulation in the Halophyte Sesuvium Portulacastrum: Implication of Organic Acids in These Processes. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Pietrini, F.; Iori, V.; Cheremisina, A.; Shevyakova, N.I.; Radyukina, N.; Kuznetsov, V.V.; Zacchini, M. Evaluation of Nickel Tolerance in Amaranthus Paniculatus L. Plants by Measuring Photosynthesis, Oxidative Status, Antioxidative Response and Metal-Binding Molecule Content. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 482–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kaur, R.; Yadav, P.; Thukral, A.K.; Sharma, A.; Bhardwaj, R.; Alyemeni, M.N.; Wijaya, L.; Ahmad, P. Castasterone and Citric Acid Supplementation Alleviates Cadmium Toxicity by Modifying Antioxidants and Organic Acids in Brassica Juncea. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2018, 37, 286–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zeng, F.; Chen, S.; Miao, Y.; Wu, F.; Zhang, G. Changes of Organic Acid Exudation and Rhizosphere PH in Rice Plants under Chromium Stress. Environ. Pollut. 2008, 155, 284–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ma, J.F.; Zheng, S.J.; Matsumoto, H. Specific Secretion of Citric Acid Induced by Al Stress in Cassia Tora L. Plant Cell Physiol. 1997, 38, 1019–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ishikawa, S.; Wagatsuma, T.; Sasaki, R.; Ofei-Manu, P. Comparison of the Amount of Citric and Malic Acids in Al Media of Seven Plant Species and Two Cultivars Each in Five Plant Species. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2000, 46, 751–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Li, X.F.; Ma, J.F.; Matsumoto, H. Pattern of Aluminum-Induced Secretion of Organic Acids Differs between Rye and Wheat. Plant Physiol. 2000, 123, 1537–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Li, X.F.; Ma, J.F.; Matsumoto, H. Aluminum-Induced Secretion of Both Citrate and Malate in Rye. Plant Soil 2002, 242, 235–243. [Google Scholar]
  39. Kidd, P.; Llugany, M.; Poschenrieder, C.; Gunse, B.; Barcelo, J. The Role of Root Exudates in Aluminium Resistance and Silicon-induced Amelioration of Aluminium Toxicity in Three Varieties of Maize (Zea Mays L.). J. Exp. Bot. 2001, 52, 1339–1352. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  40. Farid, M.; Ali, S.; Saeed, R.; Rizwan, M.; Bukhari, S.A.H.; Abbasi, G.H.; Hussain, A.; Ali, B.; Zamir, M.S.I.; Ahmad, I. Combined Application of Citric Acid and 5-Aminolevulinic Acid Improved Biomass, Photosynthesis and Gas Exchange Attributes of Sunflower (Helianthus Annuus L.) Grown on Chromium Contaminated Soil. Int. J. Phytoremediat. 2019, 21, 760–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Tahjib-Ul-Arif, M.; Al Mamun Sohag, A.; Mostofa, M.G.; Polash, M.A.S.; Mahamud, A.S.U.; Afrin, S.; Hossain, A.; Hossain, M.A.; Murata, Y.; Phan Tran, L. Comparative Effects of Ascobin and Glutathione on Copper Homeostasis and Oxidative Stress Metabolism in Mitigation of Copper Toxicity in Rice. Plant Biol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zanotti, R.F.; Lopes, J.C.; Motta, L.B.; de Freitas, A.R.; Mengarda, L.H.G. Tolerance Induction to Saline Stress in Papaya Seeds Treated with Potassium Nitrate and Sildenafil Citrate. Semin. Ciências Agrárias 2013, 1, 3669–3673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. El-Hawary, M.; Nashed, M.E. Effect of Foliar Application by Some Antioxidants on Growth and Productivity of Maize under Saline Soil Conditions. J. Plant Prod. 2019, 10, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Ahmed, A.; Talaat, I.; Khalid, K. Citric Acid Affects Melissa Officinalis L. Essential Oil under Saline Soil. Asian J. Crop. Sci. 2017, 9, 40–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Abdellatif, Y.; Ibrahim, M. Non-Enzymatic Anti-Oxidants Potential in Enhancing Hibiscus Sabdariffa L. Tolerance to Oxidative Stress. Int. J. Bot. 2018, 14, 43–58. [Google Scholar]
  46. Sun, Y.-L.; Hong, S.-K. Effects of Citric Acid as an Important Component of the Responses to Saline and Alkaline Stress in the Halophyte Leymus Chinensis (Trin.). Plant Growth Regul. 2011, 64, 129–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ahmed, S.; Abdel-Razek, M.; Hafez, W.; Aziz, A.E. Environmental Impacts of Some Organic Extracts on Sugar Beet Yield under Saline-Sodic Soil Conditions. J. Soil Sci. Agric. Eng. 2017, 8, 821–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Levi, A.; Paterson, A.H.; Cakmak, I.; Saranga, Y. Metabolite and Mineral Analyses of Cotton Near-isogenic Lines Introgressed with QTLs for Productivity and Drought-related Traits. Physiol. Plant. 2011, 141, 265–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Miyazawa, K. Drought Stress Alleviation of Cabbage Seedlings by Citric Acid Application. In Proceedings of the XXIX International Horticultural Congress on Horticulture: Sustaining Lives, Livelihoods and Landscapes (IHC2014), Brisbane, QLD, Australia, 17 August 2014. [Google Scholar]
  50. El-Desouky, S.; Ismaeil, F.; Wanas, A.; Fathy, E.; AbdEl-All, M.; Abd, M. Effect of Yeast Extract, Amino Acids and Citric Acid on Physioanatomical Aspects and Productivity of Tomato Plants Grown in Late Summer Season. Minufiya J. Agric. Res 2011, 36, 859–884. [Google Scholar]
  51. Zhang, L.; Livingstone, J.; Tarui, Y.; Hirasawa, E. Effects of Citric Acid, Sucrose, and Proton Concentration in Suppressing Defoliation in Hibiscus Plants Grown under Low-Illumination Conditions. HortTechnology 2009, 19, 305–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Gong, F.; Fan, W. Effects of Exogenous Citric Acids on Nutrient Activation of Calcareous Yellow Soil and Promotion Effects of Nutrient Absorption and Growth of Rosa Roxburghii Seedlings. Sci. Agric. Sin. 2018, 51, 2164–2177. [Google Scholar]
  53. Al Mahmud, J.; Hasanuzzaman, M.; Nahar, K.; Bhuyan, M.B.; Fujita, M. Insights into Citric Acid-Induced Cadmium Tolerance and Phytoremediation in Brassica Juncea L.: Coordinated Functions of Metal Chelation, Antioxidant Defense and Glyoxalase Systems. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 147, 990–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Song, J.; Markewitz, D.; Wu, S.; Sang, Y.; Duan, C.; Cui, X. Exogenous Oxalic Acid and Citric Acid Improve Lead (Pb) Tolerance of Larix Olgensis A. Henry Seedlings. Forests 2018, 9, 510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Chen, H.-C.; Zhang, S.-L.; Wu, K.-J.; Li, R.; He, X.-R.; He, D.-N.; Huang, C.; Wei, H. The Effects of Exogenous Organic Acids on the Growth, Photosynthesis and Cellular Ultrastructure of Salix Variegata Franch. Under Cd Stress. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 187, 109790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zaheer, I.E.; Ali, S.; Rizwan, M.; Farid, M.; Shakoor, M.B.; Gill, R.A.; Najeeb, U.; Iqbal, N.; Ahmad, R. Citric Acid Assisted Phytoremediation of Copper by Brassica Napus L. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2015, 120, 310–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Shakoor, M.B.; Ali, S.; Hameed, A.; Farid, M.; Hussain, S.; Yasmeen, T.; Najeeb, U.; Bharwana, S.A.; Abbasi, G.H. Citric Acid Improves Lead (Pb) Phytoextraction in Brassica Napus L. by Mitigating Pb-Induced Morphological and Biochemical Damages. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2014, 109, 38–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Afshan, S.; Ali, S.; Bharwana, S.A.; Rizwan, M.; Farid, M.; Abbas, F.; Ibrahim, M.; Mehmood, M.A.; Abbasi, G.H. Citric Acid Enhances the Phytoextraction of Chromium, Plant Growth, and Photosynthesis by Alleviating the Oxidative Damages in Brassica Napus L. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 11679–11689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Farid, M.; Ali, S.; Rizwan, M.; Ali, Q.; Abbas, F.; Bukhari, S.A.H.; Saeed, R.; Wu, L. Citric Acid Assisted Phytoextraction of Chromium by Sunflower; Morpho-Physiological and Biochemical Alterations in Plants. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2017, 145, 90–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Sebastian, A.; Prasad, M. Exogenous Citrate and Malate Alleviate Cadmium Stress in Oryza Sativa L.: Probing Role of Cadmium Localization and Iron Nutrition. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 166, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Faraz, A.; Faizan, M.; Sami, F.; Siddiqui, H.; Hayat, S. Supplementation of Salicylic Acid and Citric Acid for Alleviation of Cadmium Toxicity to Brassica Juncea. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2020, 39, 641–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Hassan, M.; Dagari, M.; Muazu, A.; Sanusi, K. Effect of Citric Acid on Cadmium Ion Uptake and Morphological Parameters of Hydroponically Grown Jute Mallow (Corchorus Olitorius). Int. J. Chem. Mater. Environ. Res. 2016, 3, 14–19. [Google Scholar]
  63. Anwer, S.; Ashraf, M.Y.; Hussain, M.; Ashraf, M.; Jamil, A. Citric Acid Mediated Phytoextraction of Cadmium by Maize (Zea Mays L.). Pak. J. Bot. 2012, 44, 1831–1836. [Google Scholar]
  64. Sun, Q.; Wang, X.; Ding, S.; Yuan, X. Effects of Exogenous Organic Chelators on Phytochelatins Production and Its Relationship with Cadmium Toxicity in Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.) under Cadmium Stress. Chemosphere 2005, 60, 22–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Qiu, R.; Liu, W.; Zeng, X.; Tang, Y.; Brewer, E.; Fang, X. Effects of Exogenous Citric Acid and Malic Acid Addition on Nickel Uptake and Translocation in Leaf Mustard (Brassica Juncea Var. Foliosa Bailey) and Alyssum Corsicum. Int. J. Environ. Pollut. 2009, 38, 15–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Irtelli, B.; Navari-Izzo, F. Influence of Sodium Nitrilotriacetate (NTA) and Citric Acid on Phenolic and Organic Acids in Brassica Juncea Grown in Excess of Cadmium. Chemosphere 2006, 65, 1348–1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ben Massoud, M.; Karmous, I.; El Ferjani, E.; Chaoui, A. Alleviation of Copper Toxicity in Germinating Pea Seeds by IAA, GA3, Ca and Citric Acid. J. Plant Interact. 2018, 13, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Kaur, R.; Yadav, P.; Sharma, A.; Thukral, A.K.; Kumar, V.; Kohli, S.K.; Bhardwaj, R. Castasterone and Citric Acid Treatment Restores Photosynthetic Attributes in Brassica Juncea L. under Cd (II) Toxicity. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2017, 145, 466–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kumar, A.; Pal, L.; Agrawal, V. Glutathione and Citric Acid Modulates Lead-and Arsenic-Induced Phytotoxicity and Genotoxicity Responses in Two Cultivars of Solanum Lycopersicum L. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2017, 39, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Gao, Y.; Miao, C.; Mao, L.; Zhou, P.; Jin, Z.; Shi, W. Improvement of Phytoextraction and Antioxidative Defense in Solanum Nigrum L. under Cadmium Stress by Application of Cadmium-Resistant Strain and Citric Acid. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 181, 771–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Najeeb, U.; Xu, L.; Ali, S.; Jilani, G.; Gong, H.; Shen, W.; Zhou, W. Citric Acid Enhances the Phytoextraction of Manganese and Plant Growth by Alleviating the Ultrastructural Damages in Juncus Effusus L. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 170, 1156–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Amir, W.; Farid, M.; Ishaq, H.K.; Farid, S.; Zubair, M.; Alharby, H.F.; Bamagoos, A.A.; Rizwan, M.; Raza, N.; Hakeem, K.R. Accumulation Potential and Tolerance Response of Typha Latifolia L. under Citric Acid Assisted Phytoextraction of Lead and Mercury. Chemosphere 2020, 257, 127247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Shahid, M.; Dumat, C.; Pourrut, B.; Silvestre, J.; Laplanche, C.; Pinelli, E. Influence of EDTA and Citric Acid on Lead-Induced Oxidative Stress to Vicia Faba Roots. J. Soils Sediments 2014, 14, 835–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Lu, L.; Tian, S.; Yang, X.; Peng, H.; Li, T. Improved Cadmium Uptake and Accumulation in the Hyperaccumulator Sedum Alfredii: The Impact of Citric Acid and Tartaric Acid. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 2013, 14, 106–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. An, Y.; Zhou, P.; Xiao, Q.; Shi, D. Effects of Foliar Application of Organic Acids on Alleviation of Aluminum Toxicity in Alfalfa. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2014, 177, 421–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Hall, J.L. Cellular Mechanisms for Heavy Metal Detoxification and Tolerance. J. Exp. Bot. 2002, 53, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ghori, N.H.; Ghori, T.; Hayat, M.Q.; Imadi, S.R.; Gul, A.; Altay, V.; Ozturk, M. Heavy Metal Stress and Responses in Plants. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 16, 1807–1828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Dresler, S.; Hanaka, A.; Bednarek, W.; Maksymiec, W. Accumulation of Low-Molecular-Weight Organic Acids in Roots and Leaf Segments of Zea Mays Plants Treated with Cadmium and Copper. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2014, 36, 1565–1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Sazanova, K.; Osmolovskaya, N.; Schiparev, S.; Yakkonen, K.; Kuchaeva, L.; Vlasov, D. Organic Acids Induce Tolerance to Zinc-and Copper-Exposed Fungi under Various Growth Conditions. Curr. Microbiol. 2015, 70, 520–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Yu, G.; Ma, J.; Jiang, P.; Li, J.; Gao, J.; Qiao, S.; Zhao, Z. The Mechanism of Plant Resistance to Heavy Metal. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2019, 310, 052004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. DalCorso, G.; Farinati, S.; Furini, A. Regulatory Networks of Cadmium Stress in Plants. Plant Signal. Behav. 2010, 5, 663–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Martinoia, E. Vacuolar Transporters–Companions on a Longtime Journey. Plant Physiol. 2018, 176, 1384–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Vatansever, R.; Ozyigit, I.I.; Filiz, E. Essential and Beneficial Trace Elements in Plants, and Their Transport in Roots: A Review. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2017, 181, 464–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Salt, D.; Kato, N.; Kramer, U.; Smith, R.; Raskin, I. The Role of Root Exudates in Nickel Hyperaccumulation and Tolerance in Accumulator and Non Accumulator Species of Thlaspi. In Phytoremediation of Contaminated Soil and Water; Terry, N., Banuelos, G., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2000; pp. 189–200. [Google Scholar]
  85. Ma, J.F.; Hiradate, S. Form of Aluminium for Uptake and Translocation in Buckwheat (Fagopyrum Esculentum Moench). Planta 2000, 211, 355–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Yang, Z.M.; Sivaguru, M.; Horst, W.J.; Matsumoto, H. Aluminium Tolerance Is Achieved by Exudation of Citric Acid from Roots of Soybean (Glycine Max). Physiol. Plant. 2000, 110, 72–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. De Noronha, A.L.O.; Guimaraes, L.; Duarte, H.A. Structural and Thermodynamic Analysis of the First Mononuclear Aqueous Aluminum Citrate Complex Using DFT Calculations. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2007, 3, 930–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Javed, M.T.; Stoltz, E.; Lindberg, S.; Greger, M. Changes in PH and Organic Acids in Mucilage of Eriophorum Angustifolium Roots after Exposure to Elevated Concentrations of Toxic Elements. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2013, 20, 1876–1880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Seshadri, B.; Bolan, N.; Naidu, R. Rhizosphere-Induced Heavy Metal (Loid) Transformation in Relation to Bioavailability and Remediation. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2015, 15, 524–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Mariano, E.D.; Jorge, R.A.; Keltjens, W.G.; Menossi, M. Metabolism and Root Exudation of Organic Acid Anions under Aluminium Stress. Braz. J. Plant Physiol. 2005, 17, 157–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Sharma, S.S.; Dietz, K.; Mimura, T. Vacuolar Compartmentalization as Indispensable Component of Heavy Metal Detoxification in Plants. Plant Cell Environ. 2016, 39, 1112–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Manara, A. Plant Responses to Heavy Metal Toxicity. In Plants and Heavy Metals; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2012; pp. 27–53. [Google Scholar]
  93. Yeh, T.; Lin, C.; Chuang, C.; Pan, C. The Effect of Varying Soil Organic Levels on Phytoextraction of Cu and Zn Uptake, Enhanced by Chelator EDTA, DTPA, EDDS and Citric Acid. J. Environ. Anal. Toxicol. 2012, 2, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Dumont, S.; Rivoal, J. Consequences of Oxidative Stress on Plant Glycolytic and Respiratory Metabolism. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Jagtap, V.; Bhargava, S. Variation in the Antioxidant Metabolism of Drought Tolerantand Drought Susceptible Varieties of Sorghum Bicolor (L.) Moench. Exposed to High Light, Low Water and High Temperature Stress. J. Plant Physiol. 1995, 145, 195–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Gong, M.; Chen, S.-N.; Song, Y.-Q.; Li, Z.-G. Effect of Calcium and Calmodulin on Intrinsic Heat Tolerance in Relation to Antioxidant Systems in Maize Seedlings. Funct. Plant Biol. 1997, 24, 371–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Kordrostami, M.; Rabiei, B.; Ebadi, A. Oxidative Stress in Plants: Production, Metabolism, and Biological Roles of Reactive Oxygen Species. In Handbook of Plant and Crop Stress; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2019; pp. 85–92. [Google Scholar]
  98. Mittler, R. Oxidative Stress, Antioxidants and Stress Tolerance. Trends Plant Sci. 2002, 7, 405–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Gupta, K.J.; Shah, J.K.; Brotman, Y.; Jahnke, K.; Willmitzer, L.; Kaiser, W.M.; Bauwe, H.; Igamberdiev, A.U. Inhibition of Aconitase by Nitric Oxide Leads to Induction of the Alternative Oxidase and to a Shift of Metabolism towards Biosynthesis of Amino Acids. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 1773–1784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Demidchik, V. Mechanisms of Oxidative Stress in Plants: From Classical Chemistry to Cell Biology. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2015, 109, 212–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Preciado-Rangel, P.; Gaucín-Delgado, J.M.; Salas-Pérez, L.; Chavez, E.S.; Mendoza-Vllarreal, R.; Ortiz, J.C.R. The Effect of Citric Acid on the Phenolic Compounds, Flavonoids and Antioxidant Capacity of Wheat Sprouts. Rev. Fac. Cienc. Agrar. UNCuyo 2018, 50, 119–127. [Google Scholar]
  102. Salas-Pérez, L.; Gaucín Delgado, J.; Preciado-Rangel, P.; Gonzales Fuentes, J.; Ayala Garay, A.; Segura Castruita, M. The Application of Citric Acid Increases the Quality and Antioxidant Capacity of Lentil Sprouts. Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agrícolas 2018, 9, 4301–4309. [Google Scholar]
  103. Mallhi, Z.I.; Rizwan, M.; Mansha, A.; Ali, Q.; Asim, S.; Ali, S.; Hussain, A.; Alrokayan, S.H.; Khan, H.A.; Alam, P. Citric Acid Enhances Plant Growth, Photosynthesis, and Phytoextraction of Lead by Alleviating the Oxidative Stress in Castor Beans. Plants 2019, 8, 525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Pérez-Balibrea, S.; Moreno, D.A.; García-Viguera, C. Influence of Light on Health-promoting Phytochemicals of Broccoli Sprouts. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2008, 88, 904–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Zhao, Z.; Hu, L.; Hu, T.; Fu, J. Differential Metabolic Responses of Two Tall Fescue Genotypes to Heat Stress. Acta Prataculturae Sin. 2015, 24, 58–69. [Google Scholar]
  106. Maxwell, D.P.; Wang, Y.; McIntosh, L. The Alternative Oxidase Lowers Mitochondrial Reactive Oxygen Production in Plant Cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 8271–8276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Kumari, A.; Pathak, P.K.; Bulle, M.; Igamberdiev, A.U.; Gupta, K.J. Alternative Oxidase Is an Important Player in the Regulation of Nitric Oxide Levels under Normoxic and Hypoxic Conditions in Plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 70, 4345–4354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Naikoo, M.I.; Dar, M.I.; Raghib, F.; Jaleel, H.; Ahmad, B.; Raina, A.; Khan, F.A.; Naushin, F. Role and Regulation of Plants Phenolics in Abiotic Stress Tolerance: An Overview. Plant Signal. Mol. 2019, 157–168. [Google Scholar]
  109. Sharma, A.; Shahzad, B.; Kumar, V.; Kohli, S.K.; Sidhu, G.P.S.; Bali, A.S.; Handa, N.; Kapoor, D.; Bhardwaj, R.; Zheng, B. Phytohormones Regulate Accumulation of Osmolytes under Abiotic Stress. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Chalker-Scott, L. Do Anthocyanins Function as Osmoregulators in Leaf Tissues? Adv. Bot. Res. 2002, 37, 103–106. [Google Scholar]
  111. Wahid, A.; Ghazanfar, A. Possible Involvement of Some Secondary Metabolites in Salt Tolerance of Sugarcane. J. Plant Physiol. 2006, 163, 723–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Reynoso-Camacho, R.; Ramos-Gomez, M.; Loarca-Pina, G. Advances in Agricultural and Food Biotechnology. Bioactive Components in Common Beans (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.); Research Signpost: Trivandrum, India, 2006; pp. 217–236. [Google Scholar]
  113. Li, W.; Zhang, J.; Tan, S.; Zheng, Q.; Zhao, X.; Gao, X.; Lu, Y. Citric Acid-enhanced Dissolution of Polyphenols during Soaking of Different Teas. J. Food Biochem. 2019, 43, e13046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Szabados, L.; Savouré, A. Proline: A Multifunctional Amino Acid. Trends Plant Sci. 2010, 15, 89–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Kavi Kishor, P.B.; Hima Kumari, P.; Sunita, M.; Sreenivasulu, N. Role of Proline in Cell Wall Synthesis and Plant Development and Its Implications in Plant Ontogeny. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  116. Yıldırım, E.; Dursun, A. Effect of Foliar Salicylic Acid Applications on Plant Growth and Yield of Tomato under Greenhouse Conditions. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Strategies Towards Sustainability of Protected Cultivation in Mild Winter Climate, Antalya, Turkey, 6–11 April 2008; pp. 395–400. [Google Scholar]
  117. Ulloa, J.; Aguilar-Pusian, J.; Rosas-Ulloa, P.; Galavíz-Ortíz, K.M.d.C.; Ulloa-Rangel, B. Effect of Soaking Conditions with Citric Acid, Ascorbic Acid and Potassium Sorbate on the Physicochemical and Microbiological Quality of Minimally Processed Jackfruit. CyTA-J. Food 2010, 8, 193–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Limón, R.I.; Peñas, E.; Torino, M.I.; Martínez-Villaluenga, C.; Dueñas, M.; Frias, J. Fermentation Enhances the Content of Bioactive Compounds in Kidney Bean Extracts. Food Chem. 2015, 172, 343–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Markakis, P.; Jurd, L. Anthocyanins and Their Stability in Foods. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 1974, 4, 437–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. De la Fuente, J.M.; Ramírez-Rodríguez, V.; Cabrera-Ponce, J.L.; Herrera-Estrella, L. Aluminum Tolerance in Transgenic Plants by Alteration of Citrate Synthesis. Science 1997, 276, 1566–1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Koyama, H.; Kawamura, A.; Kihara, T.; Hara, T.; Takita, E.; Shibata, D. Overexpression of Mitochondrial Citrate Synthase in Arabidopsis Thaliana Improved Growth on a Phosphorus-Limited Soil. Plant Cell Physiol. 2000, 41, 1030–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Guerinot, M.L. Improving Rice Yields—Ironing out the Details. Nat. Biotechnol. 2001, 19, 417–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Han, D.; Wang, L.; Wang, Y.; Yang, G.; Gao, C.; Yu, Z.; Li, T.; Zhang, X.; Ma, L.; Xu, X. Overexpression of Malus Xiaojinensis CS1 Gene in Tobacco Affects Plant Development and Increases Iron Stress Tolerance. Sci. Hortic. 2013, 150, 65–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Delhaize, E.; Hebb, D.M.; Ryan, P.R. Expression of a Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Citrate Synthase Gene in Tobacco Is Not Associated with Either Enhanced Citrate Accumulation or Efflux. Plant Physiol. 2001, 125, 2059–2067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  125. Anoop, V.M.; Basu, U.; McCammon, M.T.; McAlister-Henn, L.; Taylor, G.J. Modulation of Citrate Metabolism Alters Aluminum Tolerance in Yeast and Transgenic Canola Overexpressing a Mitochondrial Citrate Synthase. Plant Physiol. 2003, 132, 2205–2217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Kruse, A.; Fieuw, S.; Heineke, D.; Müller-Röber, B. Antisense Inhibition of Cytosolic NADP-Dependent Isocitrate Dehydrogenase in Transgenic Potato Plants. Planta 1998, 205, 82–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Diatloff, E.; Roberts, M.; Sanders, D.; Roberts, S.K. Characterization of Anion Channels in the Plasma Membrane of Arabidopsis Epidermal Root Cells and the Identification of a Citrate-Permeable Channel Induced by Phosphate Starvation. Plant Physiol. 2004, 136, 4136–4149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. Yamaguchi, M.; Sasaki, T.; Sivaguru, M.; Yamamoto, Y.; Osawa, H.; Ahn, S.J.; Matsumoto, H. Evidence for the Plasma Membrane Localization of Al-Activated Malate Transporter (ALMT1). Plant Cell Physiol. 2005, 46, 812–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  129. Wu, X.; Li, R.; Shi, J.; Wang, J.; Sun, Q.; Zhang, H.; Xing, Y.; Qi, Y.; Zhang, N.; Guo, Y.-D. Brassica Oleracea MATE Encodes a Citrate Transporter and Enhances Aluminum Tolerance in Arabidopsis Thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 2014, 55, 1426–1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Lei, G.J.; Yokosho, K.; Yamaji, N.; Ma, J.F. Two MATE Transporters with Different Subcellular Localization Are Involved in Al Tolerance in Buckwheat. Plant Cell Physiol. 2017, 58, 2179–2189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Liu, M.Y.; Lou, H.Q.; Chen, W.W.; Piñeros, M.A.; Xu, J.M.; Fan, W.; Kochian, L.V.; Zheng, S.J.; Yang, J.L. Two Citrate Transporters Coordinately Regulate Citrate Secretion from Rice Bean Root Tip under Aluminum Stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2018, 41, 809–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Maron, L.G.; Piñeros, M.A.; Guimarães, C.T.; Magalhaes, J.V.; Pleiman, J.K.; Mao, C.; Shaff, J.; Belicuas, S.N.; Kochian, L.V. Two Functionally Distinct Members of the MATE (Multi-drug and Toxic Compound Extrusion) Family of Transporters Potentially Underlie Two Major Aluminum Tolerance QTLs in Maize. Plant J. 2010, 61, 728–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Yokosho, K.; Yamaji, N.; Ma, J.F. Isolation and Characterisation of Two MATE Genes in Rye. Funct. Plant Biol. 2010, 37, 296–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Yokosho, K.; Yamaji, N.; Ma, J.F. An Al-inducible MATE Gene Is Involved in External Detoxification of Al in Rice. Plant J. 2011, 68, 1061–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Fan, W.; Xu, J.-M.; Lou, H.-Q.; Xiao, C.; Chen, W.-W.; Yang, J.-L. Physiological and Molecular Analysis of Aluminium-Induced Organic Acid Anion Secretion from Grain Amaranth (Amaranthus Hypochondriacus L.) Roots. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  136. Furukawa, J.; Yamaji, N.; Wang, H.; Mitani, N.; Murata, Y.; Sato, K.; Katsuhara, M.; Takeda, K.; Ma, J.F. An Aluminum-Activated Citrate Transporter in Barley. Plant Cell Physiol. 2007, 48, 1081–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  137. Magalhaes, J.V.; Liu, J.; Guimaraes, C.T.; Lana, U.G.; Alves, V.M.; Wang, Y.-H.; Schaffert, R.E.; Hoekenga, O.A.; Pineros, M.A.; Shaff, J.E. A Gene in the Multidrug and Toxic Compound Extrusion (MATE) Family Confers Aluminum Tolerance in Sorghum. Nat. Genet. 2007, 39, 1156–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Ribeiro, A.P.; de Souza, W.R.; Martins, P.K.; Vinecky, F.; Duarte, K.E.; Basso, M.F.; da Cunha, B.A.; Campanha, R.B.; de Oliveira, P.A.; Centeno, D.C. Overexpression of BdMATE Gene Improves Aluminum Tolerance in Setaria Viridis. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Zhu, D.; Li, R.; Liu, X.; Sun, M.; Wu, J.; Zhang, N.; Zhu, Y. The Positive Regulatory Roles of the TIFY10 Proteins in Plant Responses to Alkaline Stress. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e111984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Sun, M.; Sun, X.; Zhao, Y.; Zhao, C.; DuanMu, H.; Yu, Y.; Ji, W.; Zhu, Y. Ectopic Expression of GsPPCK3 and SCMRP in Medicago Sativa Enhances Plant Alkaline Stress Tolerance and Methionine Content. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e89578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Barone, P.; Rosellini, D.; LaFayette, P.; Bouton, J.; Veronesi, F.; Parrott, W. Bacterial Citrate Synthase Expression and Soil Aluminum Tolerance in Transgenic Alfalfa. Plant Cell Rep. 2008, 27, 893–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Deng, W.; Luo, K.; Li, Z.; Yang, Y.; Hu, N.; Wu, Y. Overexpression of Citrus Junos Mitochondrial Citrate Synthase Gene in Nicotiana Benthamiana Confers Aluminum Tolerance. Planta 2009, 230, 355–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Sweetlove, L.J.; Beard, K.F.; Nunes-Nesi, A.; Fernie, A.R.; Ratcliffe, R.G. Not Just a Circle: Flux Modes in the Plant TCA Cycle. Trends Plant Sci. 2010, 15, 462–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Ganjewala, D.; Kaur, G.; Srivastava, N. Metabolic Engineering of Stress Protectant Secondary Metabolites to Confer Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Plants. In Molecular Approaches in Plant Biology and Environmental Challenges; Springer: Singapore, 2019; pp. 207–227. [Google Scholar]
  145. Araújo, W.L.; Martins, A.O.; Fernie, A.R.; Tohge, T. 2-Oxoglutarate: Linking TCA Cycle Function with Amino Acid, Glucosinolate, Flavonoid, Alkaloid, and Gibberellin Biosynthesis. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  146. Katz, E.; Fon, M.; Lee, Y.; Phinney, B.; Sadka, A.; Blumwald, E. The Citrus Fruit Proteome: Insights into Citrus Fruit Metabolism. Planta 2007, 226, 989–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Walker, R.P.; Battistelli, A.; Moscatello, S.; Chen, Z.-H.; Leegood, R.C.; Famiani, F. Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxykinase in Cherry (Prunus Avium L.) Fruit during Development. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 5357–5365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  148. Cercós, M.; Soler, G.; Iglesias, D.J.; Gadea, J.; Forment, J.; Talón, M. Global Analysis of Gene Expression during Development and Ripening of Citrus Fruit Flesh. A Proposed Mechanism for Citric Acid Utilization. Plant Mol. Biol. 2006, 62, 513–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Fatland, B.L.; Nikolau, B.J.; Wurtele, E.S. Reverse Genetic Characterization of Cytosolic Acetyl-CoA Generation by ATP-Citrate Lyase in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2005, 17, 182–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  150. Degu, A.; Hatew, B.; Nunes-Nesi, A.; Shlizerman, L.; Zur, N.; Katz, E.; Fernie, A.R.; Blumwald, E.; Sadka, A. Inhibition of Aconitase in Citrus Fruit Callus Results in a Metabolic Shift towards Amino Acid Biosynthesis. Planta 2011, 234, 501–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Li, S.; Wang, W.; Ma, Y.; Liu, S.; Grierson, D.; Yin, X.; Chen, K. Citrus CitERF6 Contributes to Citric Acid Degradation via Upregulation of CitAclα1, Encoding ATP-Citrate Lyase Subunit α. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 10081–10087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Signorelli, S.; Arellano, J.B.; Melø, T.B.; Borsani, O.; Monza, J. Proline Does Not Quench Singlet Oxygen: Evidence to Reconsider Its Protective Role in Plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2013, 64, 80–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  153. Shimajiri, Y.; Oonishi, T.; Ozaki, K.; Kainou, K.; Akama, K. Genetic Manipulation of the Γ-aminobutyric Acid (GABA) Shunt in Rice: Overexpression of Truncated Glutamate Decarboxylase (GAD 2) and Knockdown of Γ-aminobutyric Acid Transaminase (GABA-T) Lead to Sustained and High Levels of GABA Accumulation in Rice Kernels. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2013, 11, 594–604. [Google Scholar]
  154. Ali, Q.; Habib-ur-Rehman Athar, M.Z.; Haider, S.S.; Aslam, N.; Shehzad, F.; Naseem, J.; Ashraf, R.; Ali, A.; Hussain, S.M. Role of Amino Acids in Improving Abiotic Stress Tolerance to Plants. In Plant Tolerance to Environmental Stress: Role of Phytoprotectants; Hasanuzzaman, M., Fujita, M., Oku, H., Islam, M.T., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2019; pp. 175–204. [Google Scholar]
  155. Igamberdiev, A.U.; Eprintsev, A.T. Organic Acids: The Pools of Fixed Carbon Involved in Redox Regulation and Energy Balance in Higher Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  156. Ludwig, M. The Roles of Organic Acids in C4 Photosynthesis. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  157. Han, Y.-C.; Kuang, J.-F.; Chen, J.-Y.; Liu, X.-C.; Xiao, Y.-Y.; Fu, C.-C.; Wang, J.-N.; Wu, K.-Q.; Lu, W.-J. Banana Transcription Factor MaERF11 Recruits Histone Deacetylase MaHDA1 and Represses the Expression of MaACO1 and Expansins during Fruit Ripening. Plant Physiol. 2016, 171, 1070–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  158. Crifò, T.; Puglisi, I.; Petrone, G.; Recupero, G.R.; Piero, A.R.L. Expression Analysis in Response to Low Temperature Stress in Blood Oranges: Implication of the Flavonoid Biosynthetic Pathway. Gene 2011, 476, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Xing, S.; van Deenen, N.; Magliano, P.; Frahm, L.; Forestier, E.; Nawrath, C.; Schaller, H.; Gronover, C.S.; Prüfer, D.; Poirier, Y. ATP Citrate Lyase Activity Is Post-translationally Regulated by Sink Strength and Impacts the Wax, Cutin and Rubber Biosynthetic Pathways. Plant J. 2014, 79, 270–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Yang, D.; Du, X.; Liang, X.; Han, R.; Liang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Liu, F.; Zhao, J. Different Roles of the Mevalonate and Methylerythritol Phosphate Pathways in Cell Growth and Tanshinone Production of Salvia Miltiorrhiza Hairy Roots. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e46797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Liao, P.; Hemmerlin, A.; Bach, T.J.; Chye, M.-L. The Potential of the Mevalonate Pathway for Enhanced Isoprenoid Production. Biotechnol. Adv. 2016, 34, 697–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Lipko, A.; Swiezewska, E. Isoprenoid Generating Systems in Plants—A Handy Toolbox How to Assess Contribution of the Mevalonate and Methylerythritol Phosphate Pathways to the Biosynthetic Process. Prog. Lipid Res. 2016, 63, 70–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Li, C.; Schilmiller, A.L.; Liu, G.; Lee, G.I.; Jayanty, S.; Sageman, C.; Vrebalov, J.; Giovannoni, J.J.; Yagi, K.; Kobayashi, Y. Role of β-Oxidation in Jasmonate Biosynthesis and Systemic Wound Signaling in Tomato. Plant Cell 2005, 17, 971–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  164. Piero, A.R.L.; Cicero, L.L.; Puglisi, I. The Metabolic Fate of Citric Acid as Affected by Cold Storage in Blood Oranges. J. Plant Biochem. Biotechnol. 2014, 23, 161–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Chen, M.; Jiang, Q.; Yin, X.-R.; Lin, Q.; Chen, J.-Y.; Allan, A.C.; Xu, C.-J.; Chen, K.-S. Effect of Hot Air Treatment on Organic Acid-and Sugar-Metabolism in Ponkan (Citrus Reticulata) Fruit. Sci. Hortic. 2012, 147, 118–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Phan, T.-T.; Li, J.; Sun, B.; Liu, J.-Y.; Zhao, W.-H.; Huang, C.; Yang, L.-T.; Li, Y.-R. ATP-Citrate Lyase Gene (SoACLA-1), a Novel ACLA Gene in Sugarcane, and Its Overexpression Enhance Drought Tolerance of Transgenic Tobacco. Sugar. Tech. 2017, 19, 258–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Ye, N.; Zhu, G.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, A.; Li, Y.; Liu, R.; Shi, L.; Jia, L.; Zhang, J. Ascorbic Acid and Reactive Oxygen Species Are Involved in the Inhibition of Seed Germination by Abscisic Acid in Rice Seeds. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 1809–1822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  168. Sadak, M.S.; Elhamid, E.; Mostafa, H.M. Alleviation of Adverse Effects of Salt Stress in Wheat Cultivars by Foliar Treatment with Antioxidants I. Changes in Growth, Some Biochemical Aspects and Yield Quantity and Quality. Am. Eur. J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 2013, 13, 1476–1487. [Google Scholar]
  169. Hedrich, R.; Marten, I. Malate-induced Feedback Regulation of Plasma Membrane Anion Channels Could Provide a CO2 Sensor to Guard Cells. EMBO J. 1993, 12, 897–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Van Oosten, M.J.; Pepe, O.; De Pascale, S.; Silletti, S.; Maggio, A. The Role of Biostimulants and Bioeffectors as Alleviators of Abiotic Stress in Crop Plants. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 2017, 4, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  171. Chavoushi, M.; Najafi, F.; Salimi, A.; Angaji, S. Improvement in Drought Stress Tolerance of Safflower during Vegetative Growth by Exogenous Application of Salicylic Acid and Sodium Nitroprusside. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 134, 168–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Roy, P.R.; Tahjib-Ul-Arif, M.; Polash, M.A.S.; Hossen, M.Z.; Hossain, M.A. Physiological Mechanisms of Exogenous Calcium on Alleviating Salinity-Induced Stress in Rice (Oryza Sativa L.). Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2019, 25, 611–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Tahjib-Ul-Arif, M.; Afrin, S.; Polash, M.A.S.; Akter, T.; Ray, S.R.; Hossain, M.T.; Hossain, M.A. Role of Exogenous Signaling Molecules in Alleviating Salt-Induced Oxidative Stress in Rice (Oryza Sativa L.): A Comparative Study. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2019, 41, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Sohag, A.A.M.; Tahjib-Ul-Arif, M.; Afrin, S.; Khan, M.K.; Hannan, M.A.; Skalicky, M.; Mortuza, M.G.; Brestic, M.; Hossain, M.A.; Murata, Y. Insights into Nitric Oxide-Mediated Water Balance, Antioxidant Defence and Mineral Homeostasis in Rice (Oryza Sativa L.) under Chilling Stress. Nitric Oxide 2020, 100, 7–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Sohag, A.A.M.; Tahjib-Ul-Arif, M.; Polash, M.A.S.; Chowdhury, M.B.; Afrin, S.; Burritt, D.J.; Murata, Y.; Hossain, M.A.; Hossain, M.A. Exogenous Glutathione-Mediated Drought Stress Tolerance in Rice (Oryza Sativa L.) Is Associated with Lower Oxidative Damage and Favorable Ionic Homeostasis. Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. Sci. 2020, 44, 955–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. A simplified model showing the biosynthetic pathway of CA in plant cells. CA biosynthesis occurs in the TCA cycle in the mitochondria or via the Glyoxylate cycle in the glyoxysome. CA is exported to the cytosol where it can remain or be stored in the vacuole. Citric acid/Citrate, CA; oxaloacetate, OAA.
Figure 1. A simplified model showing the biosynthetic pathway of CA in plant cells. CA biosynthesis occurs in the TCA cycle in the mitochondria or via the Glyoxylate cycle in the glyoxysome. CA is exported to the cytosol where it can remain or be stored in the vacuole. Citric acid/Citrate, CA; oxaloacetate, OAA.
Ijms 22 07235 g001
Figure 2. Mechanisms of HM stress tolerance mediated by citric acid (CA). In response to HM-containing soil, (1) plant roots release exudate containing CA whereupon CA can detoxify HMs by forming HM-CA complexes. (2) Moreover, organic acids like CA decrease the rhizosphere pH and cause precipitation of HMs. (3) Sensing of HMs activates genes involved in CA release in the shoot xylem. (4) HMs form HM-CA complexes through ligand exchange reactions with citrate. (5) Complexes of HM-CA, once transferred from xylem to leaf cells through iron regulated/Ferroportin family transporters or ABC transporters, undergo another ligand exchange reaction to reform HM-oxalate complexes which are deposited in the vacuole. (6) HMs are sequestered in the cytosol through phyotochelation and transplanted into tonoplast via transporters.
Figure 2. Mechanisms of HM stress tolerance mediated by citric acid (CA). In response to HM-containing soil, (1) plant roots release exudate containing CA whereupon CA can detoxify HMs by forming HM-CA complexes. (2) Moreover, organic acids like CA decrease the rhizosphere pH and cause precipitation of HMs. (3) Sensing of HMs activates genes involved in CA release in the shoot xylem. (4) HMs form HM-CA complexes through ligand exchange reactions with citrate. (5) Complexes of HM-CA, once transferred from xylem to leaf cells through iron regulated/Ferroportin family transporters or ABC transporters, undergo another ligand exchange reaction to reform HM-oxalate complexes which are deposited in the vacuole. (6) HMs are sequestered in the cytosol through phyotochelation and transplanted into tonoplast via transporters.
Ijms 22 07235 g002
Figure 3. Overview of cellular mechanisms for HM detoxification and stress tolerance involving citric acid (CA). HMs enter cytosol after uptake through anion channels or metal transporters, for example, ZIP (zinc/iron -regulated transporter) family members or NRAMPs (macrophage proteins associated with natural resistance) family members or NIP aquaporin (nodulin-26-like intrinsic proteins of the aquaporin family) etc. Cellular CA functions as high-affinity ligand, chelating HMs in the cytosol and then binding together to form a stable chelation complex via the cytosol ligand exchange reaction. The chelation complex is then transported into the vacuole via vacuolar transporters like ABC (ATP-binding cassette) tonoplast transporter achieving HM sequestration. CA further aids vacuolar compartmentalization or remobilization of HMs by buffering the concentrations of cytosolic HMs, but the precise mechanism remains unclear. HMs induce oxidative stress in cells, leading to the formation of ROS. Exogenous CA enhances antioxidant systems (e.g., glutathione (GSH), superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), glutathione peroxidase (GPX), etc.) to fine-tune ROS levels and maintain normal cellular activities. High cellular CA also activates alternative oxidase (AOX) and that detoxifies ROS. Exogenous CA also induces osmolyte synthesis (e.g., proline, glycine betaine (GB), etc.) which regulates the osmotic balance and promotes ROS scavenging enzyme gene expression. Finally, CA decreases the pH of the cell and increases the synthesis of total polyphenol compounds (TPC) which directly scavenge ROS.
Figure 3. Overview of cellular mechanisms for HM detoxification and stress tolerance involving citric acid (CA). HMs enter cytosol after uptake through anion channels or metal transporters, for example, ZIP (zinc/iron -regulated transporter) family members or NRAMPs (macrophage proteins associated with natural resistance) family members or NIP aquaporin (nodulin-26-like intrinsic proteins of the aquaporin family) etc. Cellular CA functions as high-affinity ligand, chelating HMs in the cytosol and then binding together to form a stable chelation complex via the cytosol ligand exchange reaction. The chelation complex is then transported into the vacuole via vacuolar transporters like ABC (ATP-binding cassette) tonoplast transporter achieving HM sequestration. CA further aids vacuolar compartmentalization or remobilization of HMs by buffering the concentrations of cytosolic HMs, but the precise mechanism remains unclear. HMs induce oxidative stress in cells, leading to the formation of ROS. Exogenous CA enhances antioxidant systems (e.g., glutathione (GSH), superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), glutathione peroxidase (GPX), etc.) to fine-tune ROS levels and maintain normal cellular activities. High cellular CA also activates alternative oxidase (AOX) and that detoxifies ROS. Exogenous CA also induces osmolyte synthesis (e.g., proline, glycine betaine (GB), etc.) which regulates the osmotic balance and promotes ROS scavenging enzyme gene expression. Finally, CA decreases the pH of the cell and increases the synthesis of total polyphenol compounds (TPC) which directly scavenge ROS.
Ijms 22 07235 g003
Figure 4. Schematic representation of CA metabolism in plants. Citrate derived from the TCA cycle can be converted to acetyl-CoA. Acetyl-CoA carboxylase converts acetyl-CoA to malonyl-CoA, a precursor for fatty acid and jasmonate biosynthesis via the octadecanoid metabolic pathway. Malonyl Co-A also feeds into the mevalonate pathway and provides building blocks of phytohormones (cytokinins, gibberellins, abscisic acid, brassinosteroids, and strigolactones) and vitamins (vitamin K and vitamin A). Oxaloacetate (OAA) can be converted into glucose-6-phosphate via PEP caroxykinase and phosphatases, providing a source of ascorbic acid as well as glucose, sucrose and fructose. 2-oxoglutarate can be converted into glutamate, feeding into GABA and amino acid biosynthesis.
Figure 4. Schematic representation of CA metabolism in plants. Citrate derived from the TCA cycle can be converted to acetyl-CoA. Acetyl-CoA carboxylase converts acetyl-CoA to malonyl-CoA, a precursor for fatty acid and jasmonate biosynthesis via the octadecanoid metabolic pathway. Malonyl Co-A also feeds into the mevalonate pathway and provides building blocks of phytohormones (cytokinins, gibberellins, abscisic acid, brassinosteroids, and strigolactones) and vitamins (vitamin K and vitamin A). Oxaloacetate (OAA) can be converted into glucose-6-phosphate via PEP caroxykinase and phosphatases, providing a source of ascorbic acid as well as glucose, sucrose and fructose. 2-oxoglutarate can be converted into glutamate, feeding into GABA and amino acid biosynthesis.
Ijms 22 07235 g004
Table 1. Published effects of abiotic stresses on endogenous CA levels in plants.
Table 1. Published effects of abiotic stresses on endogenous CA levels in plants.
StressTreatmentPlant SpeciesOrgan/TissueDurationEndogenous CA LevelReference
Salinity50 to 250 mM NaClHelianthus annuusShoot7 days[19]
20 and 120 mM NaClSolanum lycopersicumShoot10 days[21]
100 and 200 mM NaCl Root exudates4 weeks[20]
100 and 200 mM NaClAcacia niloticaRoot exudates4 weeks[20]
25 to 200 mM NaClTrigonella foenum-graecumSeedling5 days[22]
Drought40, 70, and 100% FCSolanum lycopersicumFruit120 days[27]
Irrigated and drylandGossypium hirsutumLeaf108 days[23]
Withholding waterClusia sp.Leaf16 days[24]
Withholding waterAptenia cordifoliaLeaf10 days[25]
−20, −20 to −40, and −40 to −60 kPaSolanum tuberosumTuber42 days=[26]
Heat 25/20 °C and 35/30 °C (D/N)Festuca arundinaceaLeaf28 days[29]
22°C and 30 °C (daytime) Solanum tuberosumTuber42 days=[26]
20/15 °C and 35/30 °C Poa pratensisLeaf18 days=[28]
30/25 °C and 45/40 °C Hybrid bermudagrassLeaf18 days[28]
25/20 °C and 35/30 °C (D/N)Lolium arundinaceumLeaf15 days[17]
HMs50 µM CdCl2Solanum nigrumRoot24 h[30]
0.6 mM CdCl2Brassica junceaShoot7 days[33]
150 μM NiCl2.6H20Amaranthus paniculatusLeaf and root1 week[32]
50 µM K2Cr2O7Oryza sativaRoot exudates8 days[34]
100 µM K2Cr2O7Oryza sativaRoot exudates8 days[34]
100 µM K2Cr2O7Oryza sativaRoot exudates16 days[34]
50 μM AlCl3Secale cereale and Triticum aestivumRoot exudates12 h[37]
15 μM AlCl3.6H2OGlycine maxRoot exudates24 h[39]
50 μM AlCl3Brachiaria brizanthaRoot exudates12 h[36]
30 μM AlCl3Cassia toraRoot exudates9 h[35]
↑ CA increase; ↓ CA decrease; = CA unchanged; FC, Field Capacity; D/N, day/night.
Table 2. Effectiveness of exogenous CA on mediating salinity and drought stress tolerance.
Table 2. Effectiveness of exogenous CA on mediating salinity and drought stress tolerance.
Plant SpeciesStressCA Treatments and Method of ApplicationEffectsOutcomesReferences
Gossypium barbadense
(Cotton)
Salt (205, 135, and 35 mM NaCl)Foliar spray of 2.5 g L−1 potassium citrateIncreased growth, yield, and photosynthetic pigments. Increased TSS, TSP, TPC, FAA, and proline. Enhanced CAT, POX, and SOD activities.Improved growth and yield but no effects on fiber properties.
Increased salt tolerance.
[18]
Carica papaya
(Papaya)
Salt (NaCl)Seed soaking with CA (500 mg L−1) as sildenafil citrateIncreased germination rate.Improved the tolerance and development of papaya plants in saline environments.[42]
Phaseolus vulgaris
(Common Bean)
DroughtSpraying of CA (0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2 g L−1)Increased relative water content (RWC) and Chl. Increased plant growth and productivity.Application of CA at 1.5 g L−1 was most effective for drought alleviation.[14]
Zea mays
(Maize)
Salt (NaCl) (4.2–4.6 dSm−1)Foliar spray of CA with ascorbic acid and salicylic acid (100 or 200 ppm)Increased leaf area index, net assimilation rate, growth rate, and photosynthetic pigments. Enhanced CAT, POX, PPO, and PAL activities. Decreased proline and Na+. Increased K+.Improved tolerance to salinity.
Enhanced growth and yield.
[43]
Leymus chinensis
(Chinese ryegrass)
Salt (200 mM NaCl) and alkaline stress (100 mM Na2CO3)Irrigation with CA (50 mg L−1)Increased growth and CA exudation. Increased RWC and CO2 assimilation rate. Enhanced MDA content, CAT, APX, and SOD activities.Improved tolerance to saline and alkaline stress.[46]
Gossypium barbadense
(Cotton)
DroughtFoliar spray of CA (500 ppm)Increased growth, number of fruiting branches, number of open bolls per plant, seed index, boll weight, lint percentage, and seed cotton yield. Increased Chl a, Chl b, Chl a+b, carotenoid, and proline contents in leaves. Enhanced CAT and POX activities.Reduced drought sensitivity but no significant effects on fiber properties.[15]
Hibiscus sabdariffa (Roselle)Salt
(75 mM NaCl)
Foliar spray of CA (10 mM)Increased TPC and proline accumulation. Reduced GSH content. Enhanced SOD activity but decreased CAT, POX, and PAL activitiesImproved flower production under salinity condition.[45]
Brassica oleracea
(Cabbage)
DroughtSpraying of CA (5 mM)Increased P uptake. Decreased hydrogen peroxide production.Alleviated drought-induced oxidative stress.[49]
Melissa officinalis
(Lemon balm)
Salt (0.0, 1.6, 3.1, and 6.3 dSm−1)Foliar spray of CA (0.3 g L−1)Increased levels of α-pinene, β-bisabolene, monoterpene hydrocarbons (MCH) and oxygenated sesquiterpenes (SCHO).Improved growth.[44]
Beta vulgaris
(Sugar beet)
Salt (12.50 dSm−1)Soil application of CA (300 mg L−1)Increased K, N, and P when added in combination with tomato peel extract. Increased CAT and POX activity when added in combination with banana peel extract.Banana extract and CA reduced soil salinity.
Increased root and sugar yield.
[47]
Table 3. Effectiveness of exogenous CA on mediating temperature and alkaline stress tolerance.
Table 3. Effectiveness of exogenous CA on mediating temperature and alkaline stress tolerance.
Plant SpeciesStressCA doseEffectsOutcomesReference
Lolium arundinaceumHeat stress: (25/20 °C and 35/30 °C, day/night) in growth chambersFoliar spraying of CA (0, 0.2, 2, and 20 mM)Increased growth. Increased Chl content, photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm) and SOD, POX, and CAT activities. Decreased EL and MDA content. Increased expression of heat shock protein genes.Alleviated growth and physiological damage caused by high temperature[17]
Lycopersicon esculentumHeat stress as manipulated by late summer sowing (air temp up to 35 °C)Spraying of CA (2.5 and 5 g L−1)Increased yield and fertility of pollen grains. Increased vitamin C content, TSS, minerals. Increased stem thickness, epidermis, phloem and xylem tissues.
Enhanced POX, SOD, and CAT activities.
Increased yield during late summer[50]
Hibiscus rosa-sinensisCold stress (˂10 °C)CA (5 mM) in nutrient solutionIncreased the number of leaves remaining on plants grown under low-illumination.Suppressed defoliation[51]
Leymus chinensisAlkaline stress (100 mM Na2CO3)Spraying of CA (50 mg L−1)Increased growth, relative growth rate, and photosynthesis. Enhanced CAT, SOD, and APX activities.Increased stress tolerance[46]
Rosa roxburghiiCalcareous yellow soil (pH higher than 8)CA (40, 80 and 120 mg kg−1 soil)Increased growth, total biomass, root development, root-shoot ratio, and total root surface area.
Increased nutrient contents.
Increased seedling growth[52]
Table 4. Effectiveness of exogenous CA on mediating HM stress tolerance.
Table 4. Effectiveness of exogenous CA on mediating HM stress tolerance.
Plant SpeciesHM StressTreatmentsEffectsOutcomesReferences
Brassica napusCu (50 and 100 µM as CuSO4)CA (2.5 mM) in
nutrient solution
Increased plant growth, biomass, Chl content, stomatal conductance, and water use efficiency. Enhanced POX, SOD, CAT, and APX activities. Reduced H2O2, MDA, and EL.Minimized Cu toxicity and enhanced biomass production.[56]
Brassica napusCd (10 and 50 µM as CdCl2)CA (2.5 mM) in
solution medium
Enhanced plant growth and biomass, gas exchange activities, and antioxidant enzymes activity. Reduced oxidative stress by reducing H2O2 and MDA production and decreasing EL.Mitigated Cd stress.[16]
Solanum nigramCd (50 mg Cd2+ kg−1 dry soil)CA (20 mmol kg−1 soil) applied in soilPromoted plant growth, biomass, and antioxidative defense e.g., SOD and POX activity at initial stage.Slightly reduced Cd stress.[70]
Brassica junceaCd (0.6 mmol kg−1 soil as CdCl2)CA (0.6 mmol kg−1 soil) applied in soilIncreased plant height, Chl a+b, carotenoid, anthocyanins, and flavonoids in leaves. Non-significant increment of the activities of SOD, POX, CAT, and GPX. Reduced MDA levels.Alleviated Cd-induced toxicity.[68]
Brassica junceaCd (0.6 mM) as CdCl2Soil treatment with CA
(0 and 0.6 mM)
Significantly increased Chl a+b, carotenoid, and polyphenols. Non-significant increase in flavonoids, anthocyanins and total carbohydrate content. Induced stomatal opening. Reduced ROS production.Alleviated Cd stress.[33]
Brassica napusCr (100 and 500 μM)Irrigated with CA (2.5 and 5.0 mM)Increased plant growth, biomass, Chl a, Chl b, Chl a+b, carotenoid, and soluble protein concentrations. Enhanced activities SOD, POX, CAT, and APX. Reduced MDA and EL.Improved Cr stress tolerance. [58]
Brassica junceaCd (0.5 mM Cd and 1.0 mM CdCl2)CA (0.5 and 1.0 mM) in nutrient solutionIncreased plant growth, leaf RWC, and Chl content. Enhanced activities of APX, MDHAR, DHAR, GR, GPX, SOD, and CAT. Reduced oxidative damage.Enhanced Cd stress tolerance by regulating antioxidant defense.[53]
Helianthus annuus (Sunflower)Cr (5, 10 and 20 mg kg−1 dry weight)CA treatment
(2.5 and 5.0 mM)
Increased plant growth and biomass, Chl, carotenoid, photosynthesis, gas exchange, and soluble proteins. Enhanced activities of antioxidant enzymes. Reduced production of ROS and MDA.Improved Cr stress tolerance. [59]
Juncus effususMn (50, 100 and 500 μM as MnSO4)CA (5 mM) in the
nutrient solution
Increased shoot length and root number.Alleviated Mn toxicity and enhanced growth.[71]
Germinating pea seedsCu (as 200 µM CuCl2)Irrigated with CA
(as 100 µM Na-citrate)
Reduced oxidative stress. Decreased H2O2, MDA, carbonyl groups, lipid peroxidation, and protein oxidation.Enhanced growth and reduced stress.[67]
Zea mays (Maize)Cd as CdCl2 (300 mg kg−1)Irrigation with CA (0.25, 0.5, 1.0 and 2 g kg−1 soil)Increased root and shoot length, biomass. Reduced bioaccumulation coefficient and translocation factor. Reduced Cd uptake.CA
proved inefficient for Cd phytoextraction, however, ameliorated the toxicity of Cd
[63]
Brassica junceaCd (150 mg Cd2+ kg−1 soil)CA (10 and 20 mmol kg−1 soil)Increased shoot phenolic acids. Reduced ROS production.Improved Cd stress tolerance. [66]
Brassica napusPb as Pb(NO3)2 (50 and 100 μM)CA (2.5 mM) in
solution media
Increased plant height, root length, leaf growth, fresh and dry weight, Chl content, SPAD values, Pn, E, Gs, and Pn/E. Enhanced SOD, POX, CAT, and APX activities. Prevented lipid membrane damage. Reduced MDA and H2O2 production.Increased Pb stress tolerance.[57]
Solanum lycopersicumPb (10 μM as Pb(NO3)2) and As (10 μM as Na2HAsO4)CA (250 μM) in
nutrient solution
Increased Chl a and Chl b content. Decreased Pb accumulation, α-tocopherol content, and MDA levels.Increased Pb and As tolerance.[69]
Roots of Vicia fabaPb (5 μM) as Pb(NO3)2CA (550 μM and 1000 μM) in nutrient cultureNon-significant effect on antioxidant enzyme activities (i.e., SOD, GPX, APX, and GR).CA did not mitigate Pb toxicity[73]
Sedum alfrediiCd (100 µmol L−1 CdCl2)CA (0, 10, 50, 100, 500 µmol L−1) in solution cultureIncreased plant growth and biomass.Improved Cd stress tolerance[74]
Corchorus olitoriusCd (20 mg L−1) as Cd(NO3)2.
4H2O
5 mM CA in nutrient culture Enhanced antioxidant enzyme activity. Decreased Cd2+ uptake and accumulation.Improved Cd stress tolerance[62]
Salix variegateCd (50 μmol L−1) as CdCl2·2.
5H2O
CA (100 μmol L−1) in nutrient solutionIncreased biomass, carotenoid, Chl a, Chl b and Chl a+b content. Increased net photosynthesis rate, stomatal conductance, chloroplast size and width.Reduced stress and enhanced growth, biomass, and photosynthesis.[55]
Brassica junceaNi as NiSO4 (0.003 mmol L−1)CA (0.5, 1.0, and 5.0 mmol L−1) in nutrient solutionReduced Ni uptake but had no effect on Ni translocation.Reduce stress by reducing Ni uptake.[65]
Brassica junceaCd (0.6 mM)Foliar spray of CA (0.6 mM)Increased plant growth.
Increased antioxidant activity. Reduced ROS.
Enhanced growth and efficacy of photosynthetic machinery [61]
Helianthus annuus (Sunflower)Cr (5, 10, and 20 mg kg−1)Irrigation with CA (2.5 and 5 mM)Increased plant growth, Chl, carotenoid, Pn, E, Gs, and water use efficiency.Increased tolerance to Cr stress.[40]
Larix olgensis100 mg kg−1 Pb from Pb(NO3)2Root irrigation and foliar spraying of CA (0.2, 1.0, 5.0, and 10.0 mmol L−1)Increased plant growth and biomass, proline, total Chl, and carotenoid content. Enhanced SOD and POX activities. Reduced Pb content and MDA levels.Improved tolerance to Pb stress[54]
Oryza sativa (Rice)Cd as CdCl2 (25.0 µM)CA (50.0 µM) in nutrient solutionIncreased GSH, Chl, carotenoid, and anthocyanin contents. Decreased Cd content in leaves.Enhanced Cd tolerance and promoted higher biomass production[60]
Triticum aestivum (Wheat)20 µM Cd (added as CdCl2)Irrigation with CA (10, 50, 100, and 500 µM)Increased index of tolerance, root and shoot biomass. Decreased Cd uptake, MDA levels, and PCs-SH production in roots.Reduced bioavailability of Cd.[64]
Medicago sativa (Alfalfa)100 µM Al in nutrient solutionFoliar spraying with 100 µM of CAIncreased growth. Reduced lipid peroxidation.Alleviated Al toxicity through roots Al detoxification[75]
Typha latifoliaPb and Hg (1, 2.5 and 5 mM)CA (5 mM) in
nutrient medium
Increased fresh and dry biomass of root, stem, and leaf. Increased Chl a, Chl b, Chl a+b, carotenoid, soluble protein contents, and SPAD values. Decreased ROS, MDA, and EL. Enhanced the activities of SOD, POX, APX, and CAT.Improved stress tolerance with increased physiological parameters.[72]
Table 5. Examples of transgenic plants overexpressing genes for CA biosynthesis and their phenotypic response to abiotic stresses.
Table 5. Examples of transgenic plants overexpressing genes for CA biosynthesis and their phenotypic response to abiotic stresses.
Gene(s)OriginsTransgenic PlantsPhenotypeReferences
Citrate Synthase (CS)Pseudomonas aeruginosaNicotiana tabacumAl stress tolerance[120]
CSPseudomonas aeruginosaPapaya sp.Al stress tolerance[120]
CSPseudomonas aeruginosaTobacco plantAl stress intolerance[124]
AACT1Hordeum vulgareTobacco cellsAl stress tolerance[136]
MATESorghum bicolorArabidopsis thalianaAl stress tolerance[137]
CSPseudomonas aeruginosaMedicago sativaAl stress tolerance[141]
CSCitrus junosNicotiana benthamianaAl stress tolerance[142]
MATE1Zea maysArabidopsis thalianaAl stress tolerance[132]
MATEVigna umbellateSolanum lycopersicumAl stress tolerance[134]
MATEBrachypodium distachyonSetaria viridisAl stress tolerance[138]
Mitochondrial Citrate
Synthase (mtCS)
Arabidopsis thalianaDaucus carotaAl stress tolerance[121]
mtCSArabidopsis thalianaBrassica napusAl stress tolerance[125]
TIFY10aGlycine sojaMedicago sativaAlkaline stress tolerance[139]
PPCK3Glycine sojaMedicago sativaAlkaline stress tolerance[140]
CS1Malus xiaojinensisNicotiana tabacumFe stress tolerance[123]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tahjib-Ul-Arif, M.; Zahan, M.I.; Karim, M.M.; Imran, S.; Hunter, C.T.; Islam, M.S.; Mia, M.A.; Hannan, M.A.; Rhaman, M.S.; Hossain, M.A.; et al. Citric Acid-Mediated Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7235. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms22137235

AMA Style

Tahjib-Ul-Arif M, Zahan MI, Karim MM, Imran S, Hunter CT, Islam MS, Mia MA, Hannan MA, Rhaman MS, Hossain MA, et al. Citric Acid-Mediated Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Plants. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(13):7235. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms22137235

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tahjib-Ul-Arif, Md., Mst. Ishrat Zahan, Md. Masudul Karim, Shahin Imran, Charles T. Hunter, Md. Saiful Islam, Md. Ashik Mia, Md. Abdul Hannan, Mohammad Saidur Rhaman, Md. Afzal Hossain, and et al. 2021. "Citric Acid-Mediated Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Plants" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 13: 7235. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms22137235

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop