Next Article in Journal
Repurposing Histaminergic Drugs in Multiple Sclerosis
Next Article in Special Issue
Disrupted Decision-Making: EcoHIV Inoculation in Cocaine Dependent Rats
Previous Article in Journal
A Single-Component Blue Light-Induced System Based on EL222 in Yarrowia lipolytica
Previous Article in Special Issue
New Insights into and Emerging Roles of Animal Models for Neurological Disorders
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Sedentary Lifestyle and Masticatory Dysfunction: Time to Review the Contribution to Age-Associated Cognitive Decline and Astrocyte Morphotypes in the Dentate Gyrus

by
Fabíola de Carvalho Chaves de Siqueira Mendes
1,2,
Marina Negrão Frota de Almeida
1,
Manoela Falsoni
1,
Marcia Lorena Ferreira Andrade
1,
André Pinheiro Gurgel Felício
1,
Luisa Taynah Vasconcelos Barbosa da Paixão
1,
Fábio Leite do Amaral Júnior
1,
Daniel Clive Anthony
3,
Dora Brites
4,5,
Cristovam Wanderley Picanço Diniz
1 and
Marcia Consentino Kronka Sosthenes
1,*
1
Laboratório de Investigações em Neurodegeneração e Infecção, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Hospital Universitário João de Barros Barreto, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém 66073-005, PA, Brazil
2
Curso de Medicina, Centro Universitário do Estado do Pará, Belém 66613-903, PA, Brazil
3
Laboratory of Experimental Neuropathology, Department of Pharmacology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QT, UK
4
Research Institute for Medicines (iMed.ULisboa), Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-004 Lisbon, Portugal
5
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Medicines, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-004 Lisbon, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(11), 6342; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms23116342
Submission received: 29 April 2022 / Revised: 15 May 2022 / Accepted: 16 May 2022 / Published: 6 June 2022

Abstract

:
As aging and cognitive decline progresses, the impact of a sedentary lifestyle on the appearance of environment-dependent cellular morphologies in the brain becomes more apparent. Sedentary living is also associated with poor oral health, which is known to correlate with the rate of cognitive decline. Here, we will review the evidence for the interplay between mastication and environmental enrichment and assess the impact of each on the structure of the brain. In previous studies, we explored the relationship between behavior and the morphological features of dentate gyrus glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)-positive astrocytes during aging in contrasting environments and in the context of induced masticatory dysfunction. Hierarchical cluster and discriminant analysis of GFAP-positive astrocytes from the dentate gyrus molecular layer revealed that the proportion of AST1 (astrocyte arbors with greater complexity phenotype) and AST2 (lower complexity) are differentially affected by environment, aging and masticatory dysfunction, but the relationship is not straightforward. Here we re-evaluated our previous reconstructions by comparing dorsal and ventral astrocyte morphologies in the dentate gyrus, and we found that morphological complexity was the variable that contributed most to cluster formation across the experimental groups. In general, reducing masticatory activity increases astrocyte morphological complexity, and the effect is most marked in the ventral dentate gyrus, whereas the effect of environment was more marked in the dorsal dentate gyrus. All morphotypes retained their basic structural organization in intact tissue, suggesting that they are subtypes with a non-proliferative astrocyte profile. In summary, the increased complexity of astrocytes in situations where neuronal loss and behavioral deficits are present is counterintuitive, but highlights the need to better understand the role of the astrocyte in these conditions.

1. Introduction

Unhealthy brain aging and cognitive decline associate with a sedentary lifestyle and, at a cellular level, this is accompanied by astrocyte hypertrophy, myelin dysregulation, neurovascular dysfunction [1] and the impairment of neurogenesis [2]. Highly sedentary humans (≥8 h/day) display reduced hippocampal volumes and increased white matter (WM) hyperintensities [3,4] that are associated with accelerated cognitive, neuropsychiatric and functional decline [5]. In addition to the changes associated with a sedentary life, it has become clear that oral dysfunction is present in the same individuals and that this group feature is also associated with dementia or mild cognitive decline [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. While it is not clear whether poor oral health predicts dementia, substantial data suggests that oral health declines as cognitive impairment and dementia progresses [7,12,14,15,16]. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that masticatory exercise improves cognitive function in older adults [17] and thus the link between cognitive decline and masticatory dysfunction is now clear [8,18,19,20,21,22]. As loss of masticatory activity [8,11,12,13,18,19,20,21,22] and sedentary life style [23,24] are risk factors for age-related cognitive decline, there is a need to focus attention on those sub-populations that experience greater oral health deterioration or impairment of the stomatognathic system, and those having living sedentary lives.
Several experimental models of masticatory dysfunction have been explored to clarify the cellular and molecular mechanisms associated with memory impairment [25,26,27]. From these studies, we have learned that chewing maintains hippocampus-dependent cognitive function [18], and that age-related spatial memory deficits can be aggravated by a sedentary lifestyle and a reduction in masticatory activity [26,28,29,30,31]. In agreement with the findings described above, oral rehabilitation and environmental enrichment act in concert to restore spatial memory decline in aged mice [31]. In rat models of occlusal disharmony, amyloid-β is increased in the hippocampus and this was also associated with cognitive dysfunction [32,33]. Studies in similar mouse models of occlusal disharmony report significant increases in the expression of interleukin-1β in the brain, which was later accompanied by the appearance of amyloid-β and hyperphosphorylated tau in the hippocampus, and the induction of learning and memory deficits [34].
At the cellular level, cognitive decline has been linked to neuroinflammation via the enhanced activation of astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, and microglia [35,36,37] and these events are underscored by the presence of specific molecular signatures in the aging brain [38,39,40].
As a function of environmental stimuli [41,42], age [43,44], or the presence of other pathology [45,46,47], astrocytes differentially respond to changes in the microenvironment of the brain, in both form and function [48,49]. For example, physical exercise induces astrocyte proliferation and morphological changes, which alters the interplay between astrocytes, microglia and neurons to enhance neuroplasticity [23,50,51,52]. A distinctive pattern of gene expression is also induced in regions of the brain that are activated by exercise [53]. An enriched environment also induces neuroplastic changes in the dorsoventral hippocampal regions [54,55], increasing BDNF levels, p-AKT and p-MAPK1/2 and preventing neuroplastic decline by increasing the formation of dendritic spines and new neurons [24].
In rodent models of dysfunctional mastication, induced either by tooth loss, raised bite or soft diet, cognitive decline is associated with differential effects on astrocytes in different areas and different layers within the same greater brain region [56,57,58,59]. Indeed, five transcriptionally distinct astrocyte subtypes have been found in the mouse hippocampus [60,61]. In aged brains, previous transcriptomic analysis has revealed that there is upregulation of reactive astrocyte genes [62], which includes the expression of genes for neuroinflammation, synapse elimination pathways, and decreased cholesterol synthesis enzymes [63]. These changes were accompanied by an increase of A1 reactive astrocytes, which are argued to release a neurotoxic factor that induces neuronal death and cognitive decline [62]. In addition, dysregulated astrocytes and astrogliosis with an increased expression of GFAP and cellular hypertrophy [64] have been shown to be associated with impaired memory function in late life [65].
From optogenetics and chemogenetics studies, in which astrocytes can be selectively manipulated, emergent data has provided evidence that astrocytes directly participate in cognition [66,67,68,69], and other behavioral functions, including sensorimotor behaviours [70,71], sleep [72], feeding [73], fear and anxiety [74,75], and this is associated with regulation of synapses and circuits (see [76,77] for recent reviews). These tools may provide, in the near future, greater understanding of functional contributions of astrocyte subtypes within different areas of the central nervous system.
Here, we have re-evaluated morphological data concerning GFAP-positive astrocytes in the dentate gyrus at different ages under the influence of contrasting environments and induced masticatory dysfunction. We concluded that the differential effects of these challenges on astrocyte morphological complexities may reflect the existing transcriptomic diversity of astrocyte dentate gyrus phenotypes, and that environment and masticatory activity interact to alter the spatial distribution and morphology of glial fibrillary acidic protein in aged astrocyte arbors.

2. Running, Experiencing Novelty, and Mastication to Learn Faster, Better Remember, and Enhance Individual Ethological Behavior

It is well known that long-term voluntary running improves learning and memory, by enchancing the strength of neuronal connections, through synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus [78,79], and increasing neurogenesis [55,80]. Continuous voluntary wheel running exercise also contributes to astrogenesis and the repopulation of microglia [81]. The voluntary running-enhanced plasticity seems to be mediated by the Notch1 signaling pathway [82] and brain-specific angiogenesis inhibitor 1 (BAI1) [83]. In the absence of exercise, short-term [84] and lifelong environmental enrichment are able to improve memory and postpone age-related cognitive decline [85]; but for rodents enriched cages usually combine elements for physical exercise and cognitive stimuli. Indeed, running wheel, toys, tunnels, bridges, ropes, stairs, which are replaced or displaced from time to time (1 or 2 weeks) [86,87], encourage locomotor and exploratory activity in these cages, whereas the absence of these elements in standard laboratory cages do not.
The elements inside enriched cages provide novelty, visuo-spatial and somatomotor stimuli and social interaction, but the stimuli for neurogenesis and the release of neurotrophins originate from voluntary exercise [88]. Comparative effects of the elements provided by an enriched environment have enabled the disentanglement of the influence of novelty, social and physical activity and behavioral performance in hippocampal-dependent tasks. Indeed, well designed comparative studies demonstrated that running stimulates hippocampal neurogenesis, while a complex environment does not. A complex environment, and not running, increases depolarization-associated c-fos expression and reduces plasma corticosterone [89]. However, the combination of cognitive stimuli, social interaction, and physical exercise was found to be the most effective way to reduce neuropathological outcomes in a transgenic mouse model of cerebral amyloid angiopathy [90].
Innate behavioral and physiological programs ensure survival and must be flexible enough to cope with environmental changes and build adaptive responses [91,92]. The impoverished environment of standard laboratory housing is associated with reduced display of species typical behaviors, whereas enriched cages seem to enhance ethological natural behaviors and increase individualized behavior in mice [55,93]. Hiding behavior is a good example of the innate repertoire to avoid attack and predation and this is a species-specific response that may explain the tendency of a mouse to avoid open/lit areas and to spontaneously explore unfamiliar areas [94]. In an open arena, for example, this mouse behavior is readily recognized as a preference for the safety of the peripheral zone of the open field [95]. Another innate typical behavior is related to the detection and exploration of novelty. In general terms, novelty is defined as a new event with which partial or no previous experience has occurred [96], being classified respectively as contextual/spatial novelty or stimulus novelty [97]. Enriched cages provide periodic inanimate object novelty and complexity through alterations in the physical and social environment, and these elements enhance sensory, cognitive and physical stimulation [98]. Similarly, an enriched environment enhances spatial learning, reversal learning and memory through the balance of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic densities [99]. The exploration of novelty related to a social stimulus or object recognition in rodents is known to activate different neural circuits [96], which appear to be an evolutionary adaptive response to provide parallel processing for novelty.
Oral and cognitive health are interconnected [100] and the recovery of masticatory activity can prevent cognitive decline [101,102,103]. The use of dental human prostheses successfully reduces cognitive consequences of masticatory dysfunction [104]. In animal studies, the relation between decrease in masticatory activity, due to a soft diet [28,30,105] or tooth loss [106], and memory impairment have been previously demonstrated [107]. Similarly, occlusal disharmony induces spatial memory impairment [29,106,108,109,110] and chronic stress [111,112,113]. Coherently, mastication activity, as a stress-coping behavior [114], is associated with activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and hippocampus [115].
Mice housed in standard cages have reduced physical fitness and impaired thermoregulation, which leads to decreased ethological behavior and welfare [116]. In addition, long-term powdered diet increases the spontaneous locomotor activity of mice and their social interaction or impulsive and anxiety-like behaviors in elevated-plus-maze tasks [117]. These changes are associated with significant modifications in dopaminergic/noradrenergic systems and γ-aminobutyric acid-ergic (GABAergic) mediations in the frontal cortex [118]. In contrast, chewing prevents stress-induced hippocampal long-term depression (LTD) formation and anxiety-related behaviors, while ameliorating stress-induced suppression of hippocampal long-term potentiation (LTP) [119] via histamine H1 receptor [119]. Indeed, gene expression after weaning varies as a function of soft (reduced masticatory activity) or chow (normal masticatory activity) diets. In this study, gene ontology analysis of differential expression in the thalamus showed that glutamate decarboxylase, GABA receptors and the vesicular GABA transporter were upregulated in the chow diet group, whereas dendritic spine morphogenesis was downregulated, with a significant reduction in the number of spines at the ventral posterolateral and posteromedial nucleus [120].
The hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus (PVN), a high order integration center between the neuroendocrine and autonomic nervous systems, is affected by chewing, which reduces the number of corticotropin releasing factor positive cells inhibiting the autonomic releasing of adrenaline and noradrenaline via locus coeruleus [120].
We previously examined, in an open field, the combined influences of contrasting environments and masticatory regimens on exploratory and locomotor activity and found that all mice, independent of the masticatory condition, environment, or age, exhibited a similar temporal organization of their spatial horizontal exploratory activity in the open field task. However, aged mice living in life-long environmental enrichment and with normal masticatory activity showed reduced tendency to avoid open/lit spaces and that a contrasting diet regimen—a reduction or reduction/rehabilitation of mastication—showed differential effects at different ages. The combined effects of aging, environmental impoverishment and reduction in masticatory activity affect the innate behavioral repertoire of mice to explore novel environments and to assess risk [121].

3. Enriched Environment and Masticatory Rehabilitation to Prevent Synaptic Dysfunction Associated with Age-Related Cognitive Decline

As lifelong environmental enrichment [85], physical exercise [122] and normal masticatory activity [100] may prevent cognitive decline, we re-evaluated our findings of combined induced masticatory dysfunction, oral rehabilitation and enriched environment on spatial learning and memory of aged mice. Data were obtained from three different conditions: (1) to mimic sedentary and active lifestyles we raised mice in standard or in enriched cages; (2) to induce masticatory dysfunction we used soft diet and compared with hard diet; and, (3) to measure age effects on spatial learning and memory, we compared mature adult (6M old) with aged (18M old) mice. Figure 1 is a schematic representation of the experimental approach.
In animal models all the approaches that have been used to induce masticatory dysfunction (soft diet feeding, molar extraction and bite raising) are associated with impairment of spatial learning and memory, a reduction of the number of hippocampal pyramidal neurons, the downregulation of brain derived neurotrophic factor, decreased synaptic activity, impaired neurogenesis in dentate gyrus and increased glial cell proliferation, which seem to be dose-dependent through the reduction of chewing-related stimuli (see [27,123] for systematic reviews).
The synaptic changes in form, function, and plasticity associated with learning and memory formation are interrelated in the hippocampus [124,125,126]. As the hippocampal circuits mature, the establishment of synaptic reinforcement occurs in association with lasting structural changes and long-term potentiation (LTP). The intense synaptogenesis in the developmental period is replaced by an increase and clustering of mature synapses [127] and these synaptic rearrangements are selective and strengthen the circuits related to the task being learned [128].
A re-evaluation of the findings related to the performance of aged mice in the Morris water maze, and comparative effects of combined masticatory and environmental changes, are shown in Figure 2A–D. Figure 2A shows the influence of aging (3, 6 and 18 months) and masticatory reduction on mouse learning rates in the Morris water maze. Figure 2B shows the combined effects of environmental enrichment and masticatory activity rehabilitation in the recovery of spatial learning and memory, while Figure 2C,D demonstrate that this effect is not dependent on differential swimming speed, but is dependent on learning and memory. Taken together, the combined effects of these influences demonstrate that a reduction in masticatory activity (HD/SD) reduces learning rates at all ages, independent of the environment, and masticatory rehabilitation and environmental enrichment recover age-related memory impairments [30,31,59].
Functional magnetic resonance imaging studies have shown that when a comparison of the activity in the hippocampal subfields is made, the dentate gyrus (DG) is more active than the horn of Amon (CA1-CA2-CA3) and the subiculum, and that in both the coding process and information retrieval, the rostral (septal) pole is more active than the caudal (temporal) pole [129]. In fact, adult rats trained to remember the spatial location of an object, exhibited remodeling of synapses 6 h later in the molecular layer of the dorsal DG (septal) (DG-Mol) [130].
The entorhinal-to-dentate gyrus pathway is involved in memory formation carrying spatial and non-spatial information through the medial and lateral perforant excitatory pathways onto granule cells [131,132]. Astrocytes sense local synaptic transmission in the molecular layer of the dentate gyrus and control these inputs to the dentate granule cells at the presynaptic level [133,134,135].
Evidence has now emerged in rodents that the astrocyte is an essential mediator of learning and memory [135] and that astrocytic ephrin-B1 controls synapse formation in the hippocampus during learning and memory by regulating new dendritic spine formation and clustering on hippocampal neurons activated during memory recall [136]. Astrocytic processes encapsulate synapses allowing bidirectional communication with neurons [136] through G-protein-coupled receptors influencing learning and memory [137]. The activation of hippocampal astrocytes enhances synaptic potentiation and memory acquisition [66,138,139].
In the next section, we review our previous findings on learning and memory impairment induced by age, masticatory dysfunction and sedentary lifestyle and discuss the underlying mechanisms associated with differential effects on the morphological complexity of astrocytes at the molecular layer of the dentate gyrus.

4. Dentate Gyrus Astrocytes, Long Life Sedentary Lifestyle and Dysfunctional Mastication

It is known that physical exercise promotes morphological changes in astrocytes, and astrocytes may contribute to episodic memory function [42,140]. Astrocytic activation is necessary for synaptic plasticity and is sufficient to induce NMDA-dependent long-term potentiation in the hippocampus in a task-specific way, coupled with learning [138]. Since form precedes function, we explored the hypothesis that astrocyte morphological changes may reflect perforant pathway activity [127].
Here, we re-evaluated our findings of mouse age-related cognitive decline and used astrocyte morphological complexity to disentangle the multivariate morphological changes that were induced [59]. Our previous analysis of three-dimensional (3D) microscopic reconstruction of 1800 GFAP immunolabeled astrocytes from the dentate gyrus molecular layer, showed that after hierarchical cluster and discriminant analysis of 20 morphological features, two main astrocyte phenotypes could be identified. To this binary classification, we adopted the highest Euclidian distance between the two main clusters. Discriminant analysis suggested that morphological complexity was the morphological feature that most contributed to the cluster formation, so we named the two morphotypes AST1 and AST2, respectively, as a function of greater and lower mean values of morphological complexities of each. Figure 3 is a pictorial quantitative representation of age, environment, and masticatory activity influence on morphological complexity of AST1 and AST2 astrocytes.
Morphological complexity definition in the present report was adapted to astrocyte morphology from the definition of morphological complexity of neuronal dendritic arbors described elsewhere [141] as follows:
Complexity = [Sum of the terminal orders + Number of terminals] × [Total branch length/Number of primary branches]
In general, astrocyte arbors with the greater complexity phenotype (AST1) from an enriched environment, independent of masticatory regimen or age, showed thinner and more ramified branches than astrocytes from mice raised in an impoverished environment. This effect, however, is not readily recognized in astrocytes with the lower complexity phenotype (AST2). Thus, AST1 and AST2 morphological complexities are diversely affected by environment, aging and masticatory dysfunction, suggesting that astrocyte morphology does not respond linearly to these influences and that these morphotypes may have differential physiological roles.
Astro-glial morphological atrophy and loss of function seem to be part of neuropathological changes of the aging brain [142], and astrosenescence is characterized by loss of function and neuroinflammation, which seem to be central components to the mechanisms of age-related neurodegenerative disorders [35]. Astrocyte senescence is associated with an increased expression of glial fibrillary acid protein and vimentin [143], and aged astrocytes are associated with the releasing of chemokines, cytokines, and proteases [63,144]. Morphological [86] and metabolic astrocyte changes [145] also emerge as aging progresses and these changes can be aggravated by a sedentary lifestyle and masticatory dysregulation [30,31,146,147,148].
It has been suggested that astrocytes exhibit two main phenotypes associated with a proliferative profile surrounding areas of damaged tissues and a non-proliferative, but reactive, profile retaining basic structural organization and cell interactions in intact tissues [149]. All reconstructed astrocytes previously described [59] retained basic structural organization in intact tissue, suggesting that AST1 and AST2 phenotypes are indeed subtypes of a non-proliferative, reactive profile. Our findings suggest that astrocyte reactivity is not part of the neuropathological outcomes within the ageing brain and that they are influenced by masticatory dysfunction and sedentary lifestyle. Here, it is important to highlight that the term ‘reactive astrocyte’ is limited to astrocytes that undergo morphological, molecular, and functional changes in response to disease of the central nervous system, injury, or experimental damage [49,142]. For nomenclature, definitions, and future directions, see [49].

5. Differential Effects of Sedentary Lifestyle and Masticatory Dysfunction on Dorsal/Ventral Dentate Gyrus Morphological Phenotypes

Although dorsal and ventral hippocampal regions show similar laminar and cellular organization, their connectivity to other brain regions are different [150,151,152,153,154]. They exhibit differential rates of neurogenesis and each displays a distinct pattern of neurotransmitter receptor distribution [155,156,157]. In addition, the septal/temporal divisions of the hippocampus exhibit significant differences in behavior-induced arc gene expression [158], distinct transcriptional and epigenetic effects in response to an enriched environment or physical activity [82,159], and distinct pathological responses throughout aging [160]. The dorsal hippocampus is associated with spatial memory and contextual information processing, while the ventral hippocampus is related to emotional behavior in association with fear, anxiety, and reward processing [161,162,163]. For example, small lesions in either the dorsal or ventral hippocampus generate distinct behavioral impairments in working memory and reference memory retrieval [164] and normal or abnormal neurogenesis along the septal/temporal hippocampal regions, which may be connected to mental health, neurological diseases [165,166] or affective disorders [167].
Astrocyte morphology is affected by aging [160,168,169,170,171,172], enriched environment [41,173] and masticatory dysfunctions [27], in a region- and subregion-specific manner. However, our previous astrocyte analysis related to masticatory dysfunction, age and sedentary lifestyle did not explore the septal-temporal (dorsoventral) hippocampal division. Therefore, we now re-analyzed our previous 3D morphometric reconstructions and compared dorsal and ventral astrocyte morphologies in the DG of the same individuals.
We used a stereological sampling approach to select astrocytes from the molecular layer of dorsal and ventral dentate gyrus for three-dimensional reconstructions and the Hierarchical Ward’s Minimum Variance Clustering Method [174] was applied to variance-shrunk logarithmic values of multimodal morphometrical features to classify cells [175]. Following discriminant analysis, we found that morphological complexity was by far the variable that most contributed to cluster formation in most experimental groups. Indeed, 19 of 24 groups (10 in 12 and 9 in 12 experimental groups for dorsal and ventral dentate gyrus, respectively) shared morphological complexity as the variable that significantly contributed to cluster formation. The next variable shared by the experimental groups that contributed to cluster formation was the convex hull volume (9 in 24).
Figure 4 and Figure 5 show data revealing significant differences between the mean values of morphological complexity of astrocyte morphotypes suggested by hierarchical cluster and discriminant analysis. The designation of morphotypes 1-4 was based on their decrescent morphological complexity mean values with morphotype 1 and 4 corresponding to higher and lower mean values, respectively.
Three main astrocyte morphotypes, exhibiting significant differences in morphological complexity mean values, were found in all experimental conditions. These phenotypes were differentially affected by dysfunctional mastication, sedentary lifestyle, and aging. A fourth astrocyte phenotype, with very low morphological complexity values, was found in 5 of 12 experimental conditions in the dorsal dentate gyrus and in only one instance the ventral dentate gyrus. Due to its asymmetric distribution in the experimental conditions and low occurrence, the comparative analysis of the 4th phenotype with the other phenotypes could not be undertaken and they were removed from our analysis.
Data for the three main phenotypes from dorsal and ventral dentate gyrus are exhibited in Figure 6 and Figure 7, respectively. In general, the differential effects of diet regime on dorsal region were strong in AST1 and AST2 astrocytes from 6M-old mice from impoverished environment and in AST3 18M-old mice from enriched environment. Please note that environmental enrichment reversed all effects induced by diet regime on AST2 astrocytes. In general, the differential effects induced by environment and age on the mean values of morphological complexity of dorsal dentate gyrus astrocytes seem to be stronger than those induced by diet regime.
In contrast to astrocytes reconstructed from the molecular layer of dorsal dentate gyrus, the influence of the masticatory regime on the mean value of astrocyte morphological complexity was more conspicuous in the ventral region. Indeed, all chewing regimes, regardless of environment and age, influenced the mean value of morphological complexity of AST1 and AST2 morphotypes. Interestingly, the AST3 subtype in the ventral dentate gyrus was influenced by age and diet regime, but it was not influenced by environment.
A previous report, limited to search for age influence on morphological complexity of GFAP astrocytes, demonstrated remarkable heterogeneity in the age-related changes in distinct subfields and along the dorsoventral axis of the hippocampus and in the entorhinal cortex of C57Bl6 mice [160]. These authors found that compared to 6-month-old mice the number of intersections, as a function of soma distance, increased significantly in dorsal dentate gyrus of 14-month-old mice, and the total sum of intersections, the number of processes and the total branch length followed a similar tendency, but no changes were observed in the ventral dentate gyrus.
Recently [176], cyclic multiplex fluorescent immunohistochemistry was used to classify astrocytes morphologically in normal aging and Alzheimer’s Disease, and showed three main phenotypes of astrocytes: homeostatic, intermediate, and reactive. Reactive astrocytes and, to a lesser extent, intermediate astrocytes were associated with Alzheimer’s disease pathology. The intermediate astrocytes were suggested to represent a transitional state between reactive and homeostatic or to represent a resilience mechanism. These authors concluded that the classic binary “homeostatic vs. reactive” classification for astrocytes, but also relevant to microglia, may now include a third state that may represent gain or loss of function. Nevertheless, recent literature points out that astrocytes are heterogeneous and dynamic phenotypes with timing- and context-dependent states [74,149,177]. Based on Escartin et al. findings that “reactive astrocytes” encompass multiple potential states [49], our revisited findings of astrocyte morphological families did not include the designation of reactive astrocytes. In the future, morphological, molecular, and functional changes in response to ageing and pathological conditions in the surrounding tissue should be integrated to qualify astrocytes as reactive.

6. Concluding Remarks

Overall, we have reviewed the rapidly expanding literature on astrocyte behavior in homeostatic conditions to highlight how the cellular and molecular characteristics relate to behavior. In particular, we have focused on the cognitive decline aggravated by a sedentary lifestyle and by masticatory disorders by re-evaluating their influence on the morphology of the dentate gyrus astrocytes. We found that reduction of masticatory activity reduced learning rates at all ages, which was independent of the environment, and that masticatory rehabilitation and environmental enrichment recovered age-related memory impairments. These spatial learning and memory deficits, and their recovery by an enriched environment and masticatory rehabilitation, were associated with differential morphological changes of the dentate gyrus astrocytes. Unbiased selection of astrocytes for three-dimensional reconstruction from the external one-third of the molecular layer of the dentate gyrus, using a random and systematic stereological approach followed by hierarchical cluster and discriminant analysis, revealed the presence of four main astrocyte morphotypes. These morphological families, identified in the external third of the molecular layer of both dorsal and ventral dentate gyrus, were differentially affected by age, sedentary lifestyle, and masticatory dysfunction, which suggests that they have different physiological roles in homeostatic conditions. All the morphotypes retained basic structural organization in intact tissue, suggesting that they are indeed subtypes of a non-proliferative astrocyte profile. Future studies directly assessing astrocyte functions in the aging mouse brain should integrate molecular, cellular systemic and behavioral analysis to unravel the underlying mechanisms associated with aging cognitive decline aggravated by sedentary lifestyle and masticatory dysfunction.

Author Contributions

F.d.C.C.d.S.M., M.N.F.d.A., M.F., M.L.F.A., A.P.G.F., L.T.V.B.d.P., F.L.d.A.J., C.W.P.D. and M.C.K.S. participated in the development and methodological design, collection and treatment of data, and analysis and interpretation of data and writing. F.d.C.C.d.S.M., F.L.d.A.J., C.W.P.D. and M.C.K.S. participated in the collection and processing of data. F.d.C.C.d.S.M., D.C.A., D.B., C.W.P.D. and M.C.K.S. participated in the development and methodological design, supervision, analysis and interpretation of data and writing. D.C.A. and D.B., critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project was supported by research funds from the Brazilian government. M.C.K.S. was supported by grants from the Brazilian Research Council CNPq (grant numbers 475677/2008-0) and the Fundação Amazônia Paraense de Amparo à Pesquisa (FAPESPA, grant number 136/08). Research funds from the Fundação de Amparo e Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa (FADESP) and the Pró-Reitoria de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação (PROPESP/UFPA) payed for proofreading, editing, and publication fees. F.C.C.S.M. was supported by CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior). Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (Projects PTDC/MED-NEU/31395/2017, LISBOA-01-0145-FEDER-031395 and PTDC/MED-NEU/2382/2021 to D.B., and in part UID/DTP/04138/2019-2021 to iMed.ULisboa), as well as “la Caixa” Foundation HR21-00931 to D.B.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The authors will meet any demand allowing access to the required data.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Latimer, C.S.; Searcy, J.L.; Bridges, M.T.; Brewer, L.D.; Popović, J.; Blalock, E.M.; Landfield, P.W.; Thibault, O.; Porter, N.M. Reversal of glial and neurovascular markers of unhealthy brain aging by exercise in middle-aged female mice. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e26812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Nishijima, T.; Llorens-Martín, M.; Tejeda, G.S.; Inoue, K.; Yamamura, Y.; Soya, H.; Trejo, J.L.; Torres-Alemán, I. Cessation of voluntary wheel running Increases anxiety-like behavior and impairs adult hippocampal neurogenesis in mice. Behav. Brain Res. 2013, 245, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Maasakkers, C.M.; Claassen, J.A.H.R.; Gardiner, P.A.; Olde Rikkert, M.G.M.; Lipnicki, D.M.; Scarmeas, N.; Dardiotis, E.; Yannakoulia, M.; Anstey, K.J.; Cherbuin, N.; et al. The Association of Sedentary Behaviour and Cognitive Function in People Without Dementia: A Coordinated Analysis Across Five Cohort Studies from COSMIC. Sports Med. 2020, 50, 403–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Maasakkers, C.M.; Thijssen, D.H.; Knight, S.P.; Newman, L.; O’Connor, J.D.; Scarlett, S.; Carey, D.; Buckley, A.; McMorrow, J.P.; Leidhin, C.N.; et al. Hemodynamic and structural brain measures in high and low sedentary older adults. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2021, 41, 2607–2616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Puzo, C.; Labriola, C.; Sugarman, M.A.; Tripodis, Y.; Martin, B.; Palmisano, J.N.; Steinberg, E.G.; Stein, T.D.; Kowall, N.W.; McKee, A.C.; et al. Independent effects of white matter hyperintensities on cognitive, neuropsychiatric, and functional decline: A longitudinal investigation using the National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center Uniform Data Set. Alzheimers Res. 2019, 11, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Daly, B.; Thompsell, A.; Sharpling, J.; Rooney, Y.M.; Hillman, L.; Wanyonyi, K.L.; White, S.; Gallagher, J.E. Evidence summary: The relationship between oral health and dementia. Br. Dent. J. 2018, 223, 846–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Delwel, S.; Scherder, E.J.A.; Perez, R.S.G.M.; Hertogh, C.M.P.M.; Maier, A.B.; Lobbezoo, F. Oral function of older people with mild cognitive impairment or dementia. J. Oral. Rehabil. 2018, 45, 990–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Miquel, S.; Aspiras, M.; Day, J.E.L. Does reduced mastication influence cognitive and systemic health during aging? Physiol. Behav. 2018, 188, 239–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Saito, S.; Ohi, T.; Murakami, T.; Komiyama, T.; Miyoshi, Y.; Endo, K.; Satoh, M.; Asayama, K.; Inoue, R.; Kikuya, M.; et al. Association between tooth loss and cognitive impairment in community-dwelling older Japanese adults: A 4-year prospective cohort study from the Ohasama study. BMC Oral. Health 2018, 18, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Galindo-Moreno, P.; Lopez-Chaichio, L.; Padial-Molina, M.; Avila-Ortiz, G.; O’Valle, F.; Ravida, A.; Catena, A. The impact of tooth loss on cognitive function. Clin. Oral. Investig. 2021, 26, 3493–3500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nakamura, T.; Zou, K.; Shibuya, Y.; Michikawa, M. Oral dysfunctions and cognitive impairment/dementia. J. Neurosci. Res. 2021, 99, 518–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Suzuki, H.; Furuya, J.; Hidaka, R.; Miyajima, S.; Matsubara, C.; Ohwada, G.; Asada, T.; Akazawa, C.; Sato, Y.; Tohara, H.; et al. Patients with mild cognitive impairment diagnosed at dementia clinic display decreased maximum occlusal force: A cross-sectional study. BMC Oral. Health 2021, 21, 665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Xu, S.; Huang, X.; Gong, Y.; Sun, J. Association between tooth loss rate and risk of mild cognitive impairment in older adults: A population-based longitudinal study. Aging (Albany NY) 2021, 13, 21599–21609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lauritano, D.; Moreo, G.; Della Vella, F.; Di Stasio, D.; Carinci, F.; Lucchese, A.; Petruzzi, M. Oral Health Status and Need for Oral Care in an Aging Population: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Env. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 4558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Marchini, L.; Ettinger, R.; Caprio, T.; Jucan, A. Oral health care for patients with Alzheimer’s disease: An update. Spec. Care Dent. 2019, 39, 262–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Scambler, S.; Curtis, S.; Manthorpe, J.; Samsi, K.; Rooney, Y.M.; Gallagher, J.E. The mouth and oral health in the field of dementia. Health 2021, 13634593211049891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kim, T.H. Effects of masticatory exercise on cognitive function in community-dwelling older adults. Technol. Health Care 2021, 29, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chen, H.; Iinuma, M.; Onozuka, M.; Kubo, K.Y. Chewing Maintains Hippocampus-Dependent Cognitive Function. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2015, 12, 502–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Tada, A.; Miura, H. Association between mastication and cognitive status: A systematic review. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2017, 70, 44–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lin, C.S. Revisiting the link between cognitive decline and masticatory dysfunction. BMC Geriatr. 2018, 18, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Alvarenga, M.O.P.; Ferreira, R.O.; Magno, M.B.; Fagundes, N.C.F.; Maia, L.C.; Lima, R.R. Masticatory Dysfunction by Extensive Tooth Loss as a Risk Factor for Cognitive Deficit: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front. Physiol. 2019, 10, 832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Kim, J.H.; Oh, J.K.; Wee, J.H.; Kim, Y.H.; Byun, S.H.; Choi, H.G. Association between Tooth Loss and Alzheimer’s Disease in a Nested Case-Control Study Based on a National Health Screening Cohort. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 3763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Li, F.; Geng, X.; Yun, H.J.; Haddad, Y.; Chen, Y.; Ding, Y. Neuroplastic Effect of Exercise Through Astrocytes Activation and Cellular Crosstalk. Aging Dis. 2021, 12, 1644–1657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ramírez-Rodríguez, G.; Ocaña-Fernández, M.A.; Vega-Rivera, N.M.; Torres-Pérez, O.M.; Gómez-Sánchez, A.; Estrada-Camarena, E.; Ortiz-López, L. Environmental enrichment induces neuroplastic changes in middle age female Balb/c mice and increases the hippocampal levels of BDNF, p-Akt and p-MAPK1/2. Neuroscience 2014, 260, 158–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Takeda, Y.; Oue, H.; Okada, S.; Kawano, A.; Koretake, K.; Michikawa, M.; Akagawa, Y.; Tsuga, K. Molar loss and powder diet leads to memory deficit and modifies the mRNA expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in the hippocampus of adult mice. BMC Neurosci. 2016, 17, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Fukushima-Nakayama, Y.; Ono, T.; Hayashi, M.; Inoue, M.; Wake, H.; Nakashima, T. Reduced Mastication Impairs Memory Function. J. Dent. Res. 2017, 96, 1058–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Piancino, M.G.; Tortarolo, A.; Polimeni, A.; Bramanti, E.; Bramanti, P. Altered mastication adversely impacts morpho-functional features of the hippocampus: A systematic review on animal studies in three different experimental conditions involving the masticatory function. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0237872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kubo, K.Y.; Ichihashi, Y.; Kurata, C.; Iinuma, M.; Mori, D.; Katayama, T.; Miyake, H.; Fujiwara, S.; Tamura, Y. Masticatory function and cognitive function. Okajimas Folia Anat. Jpn. 2010, 87, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Ono, Y.; Yamamoto, T.; Kubo, K.Y.; Onozuka, M. Occlusion and brain function: Mastication as a prevention of cognitive dysfunction. J. Oral. Rehabil. 2010, 37, 624–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Frota de Almeida, M.N.; de Siqueira Mendes, F.e.C.; Gurgel Felício, A.P.; Falsoni, M.; Ferreira de Andrade, M.L.; Bento-Torres, J.; da Costa Vasconcelos, P.F.; Perry, V.H.; Picanço-Diniz, C.W.; Kronka Sosthenes, M.C. Spatial memory decline after masticatory deprivation and aging is associated with altered laminar distribution of CA1 astrocytes. BMC Neurosci. 2012, 13, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Mendes, F.e.C.; de Almeida, M.N.; Felício, A.P.; Fadel, A.C.; Silva, D.e.J.; Borralho, T.G.; da Silva, R.P.; Bento-Torres, J.; Vasconcelos, P.F.; Perry, V.H.; et al. Enriched environment and masticatory activity rehabilitation recover spatial memory decline in aged mice. BMC Neurosci. 2013, 14, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Ekuni, D.; Tomofuji, T.; Irie, K.; Azuma, T.; Endo, Y.; Kasuyama, K.; Morita, M. Occlusal disharmony increases amyloid-beta in the rat hippocampus. Neuromol. Med. 2011, 13, 197–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Ekuni, D.; Endo, Y.; Tomofuji, T.; Azuma, T.; Irie, K.; Kasuyama, K.; Morita, M. Effects of apoE deficiency and occlusal disharmony on amyloid-beta production and spatial memory in rats. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e74966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Maeshiba, M.; Kajiya, H.; Tsutsumi, T.; Migita, K.; Goto-T, K.; Kono, Y.; Tsuzuki, T.; Ohno, J. Occlusal disharmony transiently decrease cognition via cognitive suppressor molecules and partially restores cognitive ability via clearance molecules. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2022, 594, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Cohen, J.; Torres, C. Astrocyte senescence: Evidence and significance. Aging Cell 2019, 18, e12937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Morales-Rosales, S.L.; Santín-Márquez, R.; Posadas-Rodriguez, P.; Rincon-Heredia, R.; Montiel, T.; Librado-Osorio, R.; Luna-López, A.; Rivero-Segura, N.A.; Torres, C.; Cano-Martínez, A.; et al. Senescence in Primary Rat Astrocytes Induces Loss of the Mitochondrial Membrane Potential and Alters Mitochondrial Dynamics in Cortical Neurons. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2021, 13, 766306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Pannese, E. Quantitative, structural and molecular changes in neuroglia of aging mammals: A review. Eur. J. Histochem. 2021, 65, 3249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Barter, J.D.; Foster, T.C. Aging in the Brain: New Roles of Epigenetics in Cognitive Decline. Neuroscientist 2018, 24, 516–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lupo, G.; Gaetani, S.; Cacci, E.; Biagioni, S.; Negri, R. Molecular Signatures of the Aging Brain: Finding the Links Between Genes and Phenotypes. Neurotherapeutics 2019, 16, 543–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. González-Velasco, O.; Papy-García, D.; Le Douaron, G.; Sánchez-Santos, J.M.; De Las Rivas, J. Transcriptomic landscape, gene signatures and regulatory profile of aging in the human brain. Biochim. Biophys Acta Gene Regul. Mech. 2020, 1863, 194491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Diniz, D.G.; de Oliveira, M.A.; de Lima, C.M.; Foro, C.A.R.; Sosthenes, M.C.K.; Bento-Torres, J.; Vasconcelos, P.F.D.; Anthony, D.C.; Diniz, C.W.P. Age, environment, object recognition and morphological diversity of GFAP-immunolabeled astrocytes. Behav. Brain Funct. 2016, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Maugeri, G.; D’Agata, V.; Magrì, B.; Roggio, F.; Castorina, A.; Ravalli, S.; Di Rosa, M.; Musumeci, G. Neuroprotective Effects of Physical Activity via the Adaptation of Astrocytes. Cells 2021, 10, 1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Matias, I.; Morgado, J.; Gomes, F.C.A. Astrocyte Heterogeneity: Impact to Brain Aging and Disease. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2019, 11, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Matias, I.; Diniz, L.P.; Damico, I.V.; Araujo, A.P.B.; Neves, L.D.S.; Vargas, G.; Leite, R.E.P.; Suemoto, C.K.; Nitrini, R.; Jacob-Filho, W.; et al. Loss of lamin-B1 and defective nuclear morphology are hallmarks of astrocyte senescence in vitro and in the aging human hippocampus. Aging Cell 2022, 21, e13521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Bento-Torres, J.; Sobral, L.L.; Reis, R.R.; de Oliveira, R.B.; Anthony, D.C.; Vasconcelos, P.F.C.; Diniz, C.W.P. Age and Environment Influences on Mouse Prion Disease Progression: Behavioral Changes and Morphometry and Stereology of Hippocampal Astrocytes. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2017, 2017, 4504925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Moulson, A.J.; Squair, J.W.; Franklin, R.J.M.; Tetzlaff, W.; Assinck, P. Diversity of Reactive Astrogliosis in CNS Pathology: Heterogeneity or Plasticity? Front. Cell Neurosci. 2021, 15, 703810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Preman, P.; Alfonso-Triguero, M.; Alberdi, E.; Verkhratsky, A.; Arranz, A.M. Astrocytes in Alzheimer’s Disease: Pathological Significance and Molecular Pathways. Cells 2021, 10, 540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ferrer, I. Diversity of astroglial responses across human neurodegenerative disorders and brain aging. Brain Pathol. 2017, 27, 645–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Escartin, C.; Galea, E.; Lakatos, A.; O’Callaghan, J.P.; Petzold, G.C.; Serrano-Pozo, A.; Steinhäuser, C.; Volterra, A.; Carmignoto, G.; Agarwal, A.; et al. Reactive astrocyte nomenclature, definitions, and future directions. Nat. Neurosci. 2021, 24, 312–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Viola, G.G.; Rodrigues, L.; Americo, J.C.; Hansel, G.; Vargas, R.S.; Biasibetti, R.; Swarowsky, A.; Goncalves, C.A.; Xavier, L.L.; Achaval, M.; et al. Morphological changes in hippocampal astrocytes induced by environmental enrichment in mice. Brain Res. 2009, 1274, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Saur, L.; Baptista, P.P.; de Senna, P.N.; Paim, M.F.; do Nascimento, P.; Ilha, J.; Bagatini, P.B.; Achaval, M.; Xavier, L.L. Physical exercise increases GFAP expression and induces morphological changes in hippocampal astrocytes. Brain Struct. Funct. 2014, 219, 293–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Viola, G.G.; Loss, C.M. Letter to Editor about: “Physical exercise increases GFAP expression and induces morphological changes in hippocampal astrocytes”. Brain Struct. Funct. 2014, 219, 1509–1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Lundquist, A.J.; Parizher, J.; Petzinger, G.M.; Jakowec, M.W. Exercise induces region-specific remodeling of astrocyte morphology and reactive astrocyte gene expression patterns in male mice. J. Neurosci. Res. 2019, 97, 1081–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Cooper, C.; Moon, H.Y.; van Praag, H. On the Run for Hippocampal Plasticity. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2018, 8, a029736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Kempermann, G. Environmental enrichment, new neurons and the neurobiology of individuality. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2019, 20, 235–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Onozuka, M.; Watanabe, K.; Nagasaki, S.; Jiang, Y.; Ozono, S.; Nishiyama, K.; Kawase, T.; Karasawa, N.; Nagatsu, I. Impairment of spatial memory and changes in astroglial responsiveness following loss of molar teeth in aged SAMP8 mice. Behav. Brain Res. 2000, 108, 145–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Mendes, F.C.C.S.; Felício, A.P.G.; Diniz, C.W.P.; Sosthenes, M.C.K. Alteração mastigatória, ambiente enriquecido e envelhecimento: Estudos estereológicos de CA1 do hipocampo de camundongos suíços albinos. Rev. Pan-Amaz. Saude. 2016, 7, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kida, K.; Tsuji, T.; Tanaka, S.; Kogo, M. Zinc deficiency with reduced mastication impairs spatial memory in young adult mice. Physiol. Behav. 2015, 152, 231–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. De Siqueira Mendes, F.C.C.; Paixão, L.T.V.B.; Diniz, D.G.; Anthony, D.C.; Brites, D.; Diniz, C.W.P.; Sosthenes, M.C.K. Sedentary Life and Reduced Mastication Impair Spatial Learning and Memory and Differentially Affect Dentate Gyrus Astrocyte Subtypes in the Aged Mice. Front Neurosci. 2021, 15, 632216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Batiuk, M.Y.; Martirosyan, A.; Wahis, J.; de Vin, F.; Marneffe, C.; Kusserow, C.; Koeppen, J.; Viana, J.F.; Oliveira, J.F.; Voet, T.; et al. Identification of region-specific astrocyte subtypes at single cell resolution. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Chai, H.; Diaz-Castro, B.; Shigetomi, E.; Monte, E.; Octeau, J.C.; Yu, X.; Cohn, W.; Rajendran, P.S.; Vondriska, T.M.; Whitelegge, J.P.; et al. Neural Circuit-Specialized Astrocytes: Transcriptomic, Proteomic, Morphological, and Functional Evidence. Neuron 2017, 95, 531–549.e539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Clarke, L.E.; Liddelow, S.A.; Chakraborty, C.; Münch, A.E.; Heiman, M.; Barres, B.A. Normal aging induces A1-like astrocyte reactivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, E1896–E1905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Boisvert, M.M.; Erikson, G.A.; Shokhirev, M.N.; Allen, N.J. The Aging Astrocyte Transcriptome from Multiple Regions of the Mouse Brain. Cell Rep. 2018, 22, 269–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Munger, E.L.; Edler, M.K.; Hopkins, W.D.; Ely, J.J.; Erwin, J.M.; Perl, D.P.; Mufson, E.J.; Hof, P.R.; Sherwood, C.C.; Raghanti, M.A. Astrocytic changes with aging and Alzheimer’s disease-type pathology in chimpanzees. J. Comp. Neurol. 2019, 527, 1179–1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Bettcher, B.M.; Olson, K.E.; Carlson, N.E.; McConnell, B.V.; Boyd, T.; Adame, V.; Solano, D.A.; Anton, P.; Markham, N.; Thaker, A.A.; et al. Astrogliosis and episodic memory in late life: Higher GFAP is related to worse memory and white matter microstructure in healthy aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging 2021, 103, 68–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Adamsky, A.; Goshen, I. Astrocytes in Memory Function: Pioneering Findings and Future Directions. Neuroscience 2018, 370, 14–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Navarrete, M.; Cuartero, M.I.; Palenzuela, R.; Draffin, J.E.; Konomi, A.; Serra, I.; Colié, S.; Castaño-Castaño, S.; Hasan, M.T.; Nebreda, Á.; et al. Astrocytic p38α MAPK drives NMDA receptor-dependent long-term depression and modulates long-term memory. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 2968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Iwai, Y.; Ozawa, K.; Yahagi, K.; Mishima, T.; Akther, S.; Vo, C.T.; Lee, A.B.; Tanaka, M.; Itohara, S.; Hirase, H. Transient Astrocytic Gq Signaling Underlies Remote Memory Enhancement. Front. Neural. Circuits 2021, 15, 658343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Van Den Herrewegen, Y.; Sanderson, T.M.; Sahu, S.; De Bundel, D.; Bortolotto, Z.A.; Smolders, I. Side-by-side comparison of the effects of Gq- and Gi-DREADD-mediated astrocyte modulation on intracellular calcium dynamics and synaptic plasticity in the hippocampal CA1. Mol. Brain. 2021, 14, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Corkrum, M.; Covelo, A.; Lines, J.; Bellocchio, L.; Pisansky, M.; Loke, K.; Quintana, R.; Rothwell, P.E.; Lujan, R.; Marsicano, G.; et al. Dopamine-Evoked Synaptic Regulation in the Nucleus Accumbens Requires Astrocyte Activity. Neuron 2020, 105, 1036–1047.e1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Lines, J.; Martin, E.D.; Kofuji, P.; Aguilar, J.; Araque, A. Astrocytes modulate sensory-evoked neuronal network activity. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 3689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Vaidyanathan, T.V.; Collard, M.; Yokoyama, S.; Reitman, M.E.; Poskanzer, K.E. Cortical astrocytes independently regulate sleep depth and duration via separate GPCR pathways. Elife 2021, 10, e63329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Sweeney, P.; Qi, Y.; Xu, Z.; Yang, Y. Activation of hypothalamic astrocytes suppresses feeding without altering emotional states. Glia 2016, 64, 2263–2273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Li, Y.; Li, L.; Wu, J.; Zhu, Z.; Feng, X.; Qin, L.; Zhu, Y.; Sun, L.; Liu, Y.; Qiu, Z.; et al. Activation of astrocytes in hippocampus decreases fear memory through adenosine A. Elife 2020, 9, e57155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Ren, J.; Lu, C.L.; Huang, J.; Fan, J.; Guo, F.; Mo, J.W.; Huang, W.Y.; Kong, P.L.; Li, X.W.; Sun, L.R.; et al. A Distinct Metabolically Defined Central Nucleus Circuit Bidirectionally Controls Anxiety-Related Behaviors. J. Neurosci. 2022, 42, 2356–2370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Lyon, K.A.; Allen, N.J. From Synapses to Circuits, Astrocytes Regulate Behavior. Front. Neural Circuits 2021, 15, 786293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Nagai, J.; Yu, X.; Papouin, T.; Cheong, E.; Freeman, M.R.; Monk, K.R.; Hastings, M.H.; Haydon, P.G.; Rowitch, D.; Shaham, S.; et al. Behaviorally consequential astrocytic regulation of neural circuits. Neuron 2021, 109, 576–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Patten, A.R.; Sickmann, H.; Hryciw, B.N.; Kucharsky, T.; Parton, R.; Kernick, A.; Christie, B.R. Long-term exercise is needed to enhance synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus. Learn Mem. 2013, 20, 642–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Vivar, C.; van Praag, H. Running Changes the Brain: The Long and the Short of It. Physiology (Bethesda) 2017, 32, 410–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Van Praag, H. Neurogenesis and exercise: Past and future directions. Neuromolecular Med. 2008, 10, 128–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Huang, Y.Q.; Wu, C.; He, X.F.; Wu, D.; He, X.; Liang, F.Y.; Dai, G.Y.; Pei, Z.; Xu, G.Q.; Lan, Y. Effects of Voluntary Wheel-Running Types on Hippocampal Neurogenesis and Spatial Cognition in Middle-Aged Mice. Front. Cell Neurosci. 2018, 12, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Zhang, T.Y.; Keown, C.L.; Wen, X.; Li, J.; Vousden, D.A.; Anacker, C.; Bhattacharyya, U.; Ryan, R.; Diorio, J.; O’Toole, N.; et al. Environmental enrichment increases transcriptional and epigenetic differentiation between mouse dorsal and ventral dentate gyrus. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Zhu, D.; Li, C.; Swanson, A.M.; Villalba, R.M.; Guo, J.; Zhang, Z.; Matheny, S.; Murakami, T.; Stephenson, J.R.; Daniel, S.; et al. BAI1 regulates spatial learning and synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus. J. Clin. Investig. 2015, 125, 1497–1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Birch, A.M.; McGarry, N.B.; Kelly, A.M. Short-term environmental enrichment, in the absence of exercise, improves memory, and increases NGF concentration, early neuronal survival, and synaptogenesis in the dentate gyrus in a time-dependent manner. Hippocampus 2013, 23, 437–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Birch, A.M.; Kelly, Á. Lifelong environmental enrichment in the absence of exercise protects the brain from age-related cognitive decline. Neuropharmacology 2019, 145, 59–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Diniz, D.G.; Foro, C.A.R.; Rego, C.M.D.; Gloria, D.A.; de Oliveira, F.R.R.; Paes, J.M.P.; de Sousa, A.A.; Tokuhashi, T.P.; Trindade, L.S.; Turiel, M.C.P.; et al. Environmental impoverishment and aging alter object recognition, spatial learning, and dentate gyrus astrocytes. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2010, 32, 509–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Harland, B.C.; Dalrymple-Alford, J.C. Enriched Environment Procedures for Rodents: Creating a Standardized Protocol for Diverse Enrichment to Improve Consistency across Research Studies. Bio Protoc. 2020, 10, e3637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Kobilo, T.; Liu, Q.R.; Gandhi, K.; Mughal, M.; Shaham, Y.; van Praag, H. Running is the neurogenic and neurotrophic stimulus in environmental enrichment. Learn Mem. 2011, 18, 605–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Grégoire, C.A.; Bonenfant, D.; Le Nguyen, A.; Aumont, A.; Fernandes, K.J. Untangling the influences of voluntary running, environmental complexity, social housing and stress on adult hippocampal neurogenesis. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e86237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Robison, L.S.; Francis, N.; Popescu, D.L.; Anderson, M.E.; Hatfield, J.; Xu, F.; Anderson, B.J.; Van Nostrand, W.E.; Robinson, J.K. Environmental Enrichment: Disentangling the Influence of Novelty, Social, and Physical Activity on Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy in a Transgenic Mouse Model. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Wolf, M.; Weissing, F.J. Animal personalities: Consequences for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2012, 27, 452–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Füzesi, T.; Daviu, N.; Wamsteeker Cusulin, J.I.; Bonin, R.P.; Bains, J.S. Hypothalamic CRH neurons orchestrate complex behaviours after stress. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Kentner, A.C.; Speno, A.V.; Doucette, J.; Roderick, R.C. The Contribution of Environmental Enrichment to Phenotypic Variation in Mice and Rats. eNeuro 2021, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Komada, M.; Takao, K.; Miyakawa, T. Elevated plus maze for mice. J. Vis. Exp. 2008, 22, 1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Ennaceur, A. Tests of unconditioned anxietyPitfalls and disappointments. Physiol. Behav. 2014, 135, 55–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Tapper, A.R.; Molas, S. Midbrain circuits of novelty processing. Neurobiol. Learn Mem. 2020, 176, 107323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Schomaker, J.; Meeter, M. Short- and long-lasting consequences of novelty, deviance and surprise on brain and cognition. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2015, 55, 268–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Girbovan, C.; Plamondon, H. Environmental enrichment in female rodents: Considerations in the effects on behavior and biochemical markers. Behav. Brain Res. 2013, 253, 178–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Wang, H.; Xu, X.; Gao, J.; Zhang, T. Enriched Environment and Social Isolation Affect Cognition Ability via Altering Excitatory and Inhibitory Synaptic Density in Mice Hippocampus. Neurochem. Res. 2020, 45, 2417–2432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Da Silva, J.D.; Ni, S.C.; Lee, C.; Elani, H.; Ho, K.; Thomas, C.; Kuwajima, Y.; Ishida, Y.; Kobayashi, T.; Ishikawa-Nagai, S. Association between cognitive health and masticatory conditions: A descriptive study of the national database of the universal healthcare system in Japan. Aging (Albany N.Y.) 2021, 13, 7943–7952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Krishnamoorthy, G.; Narayana, A.I.; Balkrishanan, D. Mastication as a tool to prevent cognitive dysfunctions. Jpn. Dent. Sci. Rev. 2018, 54, 169–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Chuhuaicura, P.; Dias, F.J.; Arias, A.; Lezcano, M.F.; Fuentes, R. Mastication as a protective factor of the cognitive decline in adults: A qualitative systematic review. Int. Dent. J. 2019, 69, 334–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Lopez-Chaichio, L.; Padial-Molina, M.; O’Valle, F.; Gil-Montoya, J.A.; Catena, A.; Galindo-Moreno, P. Oral health and healthy chewing for healthy cognitive ageing: A comprehensive narrative review. Gerodontology 2021, 38, 126–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Ahmed, S.E.; Mohan, J.; Kalaignan, P.; Kandasamy, S.; Raju, R.; Champakesan, B. Influence of Dental Prostheses on Cognitive Functioning in Elderly Population: A Systematic Review. J. Pharm. Bioallied. Sci. 2021, 13, S788–S794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Tsutsui, K.; Kaku, M.; Motokawa, M.; Tohma, Y.; Kawata, T.; Fujita, T.; Kohno, S.; Ohtani, J.; Tenjoh, K.; Nakano, M.; et al. Influences of reduced masticatory sensory input from soft-diet feeding upon spatial memory/learning ability in mice. Biomed. Res. 2007, 28, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Kondo, H.; Kurahashi, M.; Mori, D.; Iinuma, M.; Tamura, Y.; Mizutani, K.; Shimpo, K.; Sonoda, S.; Azuma, K.; Kubo, K.Y. Hippocampus-dependent spatial memory impairment due to molar tooth loss is ameliorated by an enriched environment. Arch. Oral. Biol. 2016, 61, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Weijenberg, R.A.F.; Delwel, S.; Ho, B.V.; van der Maarel-Wierink, C.D.; Lobbezoo, F. Mind your teeth-The relationship between mastication and cognition. Gerodontology 2019, 36, 2–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  108. Arakawa, Y.; Ichihashi, Y.; Iinuma, M.; Tamura, Y.; Iwaku, F.; Kubo, K.Y. Duration-dependent effects of the bite-raised condition on hippocampal function in SAMP8 mice. Okajimas Folia Anat. Jpn. 2007, 84, 115–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Kubo, K.Y.; Yamada, Y.; Iinuma, M.; Iwaku, F.; Tamura, Y.; Watanabe, K.; Nakamura, H.; Onozuka, M. Occlusal disharmony induces spatial memory impairment and hippocampal neuron degeneration via stress in SAMP8 mice. Neurosci. Lett. 2007, 414, 188–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Mori, D.; Katayama, T.; Miyake, H.; Fujiwara, S.; Kubo, K.Y. Occlusal disharmony leads to learning deficits associated with decreased cellular proliferation in the hippocampal dentate gyrus of SAMP8 mice. Neurosci. Lett. 2013, 534, 228–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Yoshihara, T.; Matsumoto, Y.; Ogura, T. Occlusal disharmony affects plasma corticosterone and hypothalamic noradrenaline release in rats. J. Dent. Res. 2001, 80, 2089–2092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Iinuma, M.; Ichihashi, Y.; Hioki, Y.; Kurata, C.; Tamura, Y.; Kubo, K.Y. Malocclusion induces chronic stress. Okajimas Folia Anat. Jpn. 2008, 85, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  113. Tang, X.; Li, J.; Jiang, T.; Han, S.H.; Yao, D.Y. Experimental occlusal disharmonyA promoting factor for anxiety in rats under chronic psychological stress. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2017, 75, 165–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Kubo, K.Y.; Iinuma, M.; Chen, H. Mastication as a Stress-Coping Behavior. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 876409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Azuma, K.; Zhou, Q.; Niwa, M.; Kubo, K.Y. Association between Mastication, the Hippocampus, and the HPA Axis: A Comprehensive Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 1687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  116. Cait, J.; Cait, A.; Scott, R.W.; Winder, C.B.; Mason, G.J. Conventional laboratory housing increases morbidity and mortality in research rodents: Results of a meta-analysis. BMC Biol. 2022, 20, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Ono, Y.; Koizumi, S.; Onozuka, M. Chewing prevents stress-induced hippocampal LTD formation and anxiety-related behaviors: A possible role of the dopaminergic system. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 294068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Yaoita, F.; Tsuchiya, M.; Arai, Y.; Tadano, T.; Tan-No, K. Involvement of catecholaminergic and GABAAergic mediations in the anxiety-related behavior in long-term powdered diet-fed mice. Neurochem. Int. 2019, 124, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Ono, Y.; Kataoka, T.; Miyake, S.; Cheng, S.J.; Tachibana, A.; Sasaguri, K.I.; Onozuka, M. Chewing ameliorates stress-induced suppression of hippocampal long-term potentiation. Neuroscience 2008, 154, 1352–1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Ono, Y.; Kataoka, T.; Miyake, S.; Sasaguri, K.; Sato, S.; Onozuka, M. Chewing rescues stress-suppressed hippocampal long-term potentiation via activation of histamine H1 receptor. Neurosci. Res. 2009, 64, 385–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Ogawa, M.; Nagai, T.; Saito, Y.; Miyaguchi, H.; Kumakura, K.; Abe, K.; Asakura, T. Short-term mastication after weaning upregulates GABAergic signalling and reduces dendritic spine in thalamus. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018, 498, 621–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Sasaguri, K.; Yamada, K.; Yamamoto, T. Uncovering the neural circuitry involved in the stress-attenuation effects of chewing. Jpn. Dent. Sci. Rev. 2018, 54, 118–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. De Siqueira Mendes, F.C.C.; da Paixão, L.T.V.B.; Diniz, C.W.P.; Sosthenes, M.C.K. Environmental Impoverishment, Aging, and Reduction in Mastication Affect Mouse Innate Repertoire to Explore Novel Environments and to Assess Risk. Front. Neurosci. 2019, 13, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  124. Ma, C.L.; Ma, X.T.; Wang, J.J.; Liu, H.; Chen, Y.F.; Yang, Y. Physical exercise induces hippocampal neurogenesis and prevents cognitive decline. Behav. Brain. Res. 2017, 317, 332–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Wang, X.; Hu, J.; Jiang, Q. Tooth Loss-Associated Mechanisms That Negatively Affect Cognitive Function: A Systematic Review of Animal Experiments Based on Occlusal Support Loss and Cognitive Impairment. Front. Neurosci. 2022, 16, 811335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Eichenbaum, H.; Yonelinas, A.P.; Ranganath, C. The medial temporal lobe and recognition memory. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2007, 30, 123–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Hiscox, L.V.; Johnson, C.L.; McGarry, M.D.J.; Schwarb, H.; van Beek, E.J.R.; Roberts, N.; Starr, J.M. Hippocampal viscoelasticity and episodic memory performance in healthy older adults examined with magnetic resonance elastography. Brain. Imaging Behav. 2020, 14, 175–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. Sander, M.C.; Fandakova, Y.; Grandy, T.H.; Shing, Y.L.; Werkle-Bergner, M. Oscillatory Mechanisms of Successful Memory Formation in Younger and Older Adults Are Related to Structural Integrity. Cereb. Cortex. 2020, 30, 3744–3758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Harris, K.M. Structural LTP: From synaptogenesis to regulated synapse enlargement and clustering. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2020, 63, 189–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Caroni, P.; Chowdhury, A.; Lahr, M. Synapse rearrangements upon learning: From divergent-sparse connectivity to dedicated sub-circuits. Trends Neurosci. 2014, 37, 604–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Hrybouski, S.; MacGillivray, M.; Huang, Y.; Madan, C.R.; Carter, R.; Seres, P.; Malykhin, N.V. Involvement of hippocampal subfields and anterior-posterior subregions in encoding and retrieval of item, spatial, and associative memories: Longitudinal versus transverse axis. Neuroimage 2019, 191, 568–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Scully, D.; Fedriani, R.; Desouza, I.E.; Murphy, K.J.; Regan, C.M. Regional dissociation of paradigm-specific synapse remodeling during memory consolidation in the adult rat dentate gyrus. Neuroscience 2012, 209, 74–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Van Groen, T.; Miettinen, P.; Kadish, I. The entorhinal cortex of the mouse: Organization of the projection to the hippocampal formation. Hippocampus 2003, 13, 133–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Nilssen, E.S.; Doan, T.P.; Nigro, M.J.; Ohara, S.; Witter, M.P. Neurons and networks in the entorhinal cortex: A reappraisal of the lateral and medial entorhinal subdivisions mediating parallel cortical pathways. Hippocampus 2019, 29, 1238–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  135. Jourdain, P.; Bergersen, L.H.; Bhaukaurally, K.; Bezzi, P.; Santello, M.; Domercq, M.; Matute, C.; Tonello, F.; Gundersen, V.; Volterra, A. Glutamate exocytosis from astrocytes controls synaptic strength. Nat. Neurosci. 2007, 10, 331–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Savtchouk, I.; Di Castro, M.A.; Ali, R.; Stubbe, H.; Luján, R.; Volterra, A. Circuit-specific control of the medial entorhinal inputs to the dentate gyrus by atypical presynaptic NMDARs activated by astrocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 13602–13610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  137. Di Castro, M.A.; Volterra, A. Astrocyte control of the entorhinal cortex-dentate gyrus circuit: Relevance to cognitive processing and impairment in pathology. Glia 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Akther, S.; Hirase, H. Assessment of astrocytes as a mediator of memory and learning in rodents. Glia 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Nguyen, A.Q.; Koeppen, J.; Woodruff, S.; Mina, K.; Figueroa, Z.; Ethell, I.M. Astrocytic Ephrin-B1 Controls Synapse Formation in the Hippocampus During Learning and Memory. Front. Synaptic Neurosci. 2020, 12, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Kofuji, P.; Araque, A. G-Protein-Coupled Receptors in Astrocyte-Neuron Communication. Neuroscience 2021, 456, 71–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Adamsky, A.; Kol, A.; Kreisel, T.; Doron, A.; Ozeri-Engelhard, N.; Melcer, T.; Refaeli, R.; Horn, H.; Regev, L.; Groysman, M.; et al. Astrocytic Activation Generates De Novo Neuronal Potentiation and Memory Enhancement. Cell 2018, 174, 59–71.e14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  142. Covelo, A.; Araque, A. Stimulating Astrocytes to Remember. Cell 2018, 174, 12–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  143. Loprinzi, P.D. The role of astrocytes on the effects of exercise on episodic memory function. Physiol. Int. 2019, 106, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Pillai, A.G.; de Jong, D.; Kanatsou, S.; Krugers, H.; Knapman, A.; Heinzmann, J.M.; Holsboer, F.; Landgraf, R.; Joëls, M.; Touma, C. Dendritic morphology of hippocampal and amygdalar neurons in adolescent mice is resilient to genetic differences in stress reactivity. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e38971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  145. Verkhratsky, A.; Augusto-Oliveira, M.; Pivoriūnas, A.; Popov, A.; Brazhe, A.; Semyanov, A. Astroglial asthenia and loss of function, rather than reactivity, contribute to the ageing of the brain. Pflug. Arch 2021, 473, 753–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Porchet, R.; Probst, A.; Bouras, C.; Dráberová, E.; Dráber, P.; Riederer, B.M. Analysis of glial acidic fibrillary protein in the human entorhinal cortex during aging and in Alzheimer’s disease. Proteomics 2003, 3, 1476–1485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Han, X.; Zhang, T.; Liu, H.; Mi, Y.; Gou, X. Astrocyte Senescence and Alzheimer’s Disease: A Review. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2020, 12, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Morita, M.; Ikeshima-Kataoka, H.; Kreft, M.; Vardjan, N.; Zorec, R.; Noda, M. Metabolic Plasticity of Astrocytes and Aging of the Brain. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. Watanabe, K.; Tonosaki, K.; Kawase, T.; Karasawa, N.; Nagatsu, I.; Fujita, M.; Onozuka, M. Evidence for involvement of dysfunctional teeth in the senile process in the hippocampus of SAMP8 mice. Exp. Gerontol. 2001, 36, 283–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Yamamoto, T.; Hirayama, A. Effects of soft-diet feeding on synaptic density in the hippocampus and parietal cortex of senescence-accelerated mice. Brain Res. 2001, 902, 255–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Kubo, K.Y.; Iwaku, F.; Watanabe, K.; Fujita, M.; Onozuka, M. Molarless-induced changes of spines in hippocampal region of SAMP8 mice. Brain Res. 2005, 1057, 191–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Sofroniew, M.V. Astrocyte Reactivity: Subtypes, States, and Functions in CNS Innate Immunity. Trends Immunol. 2020, 41, 758–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Fanselow, M.S.; Dong, H.W. Are the dorsal and ventral hippocampus functionally distinct structures? Neuron 2010, 65, 7–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  154. Kim, W.B.; Cho, J.H. Synaptic Targeting of Double-Projecting Ventral CA1 Hippocampal Neurons to the Medial Prefrontal Cortex and Basal Amygdala. J. Neurosci. 2017, 37, 4868–4882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  155. Wahlstrom, K.L.; Huff, M.L.; Emmons, E.B.; Freeman, J.H.; Narayanan, N.S.; McIntyre, C.K.; LaLumiere, R.T. Basolateral Amygdala Inputs to the Medial Entorhinal Cortex Selectively Modulate the Consolidation of Spatial and Contextual Learning. J. Neurosci. 2018, 38, 2698–2712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Kim, W.B.; Cho, J.H. Encoding of contextual fear memory in hippocampal-amygdala circuit. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Jarzebowski, P.; Hay, Y.A.; Grewe, B.F.; Paulsen, O. Different encoding of reward location in dorsal and intermediate hippocampus. Curr. Biol. 2022, 32, 834–841.e835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Papatheodoropoulos, C. Striking differences in synaptic facilitation along the dorsoventral axis of the hippocampus. Neuroscience 2015, 301, 454–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Dubovyk, V.; Manahan-Vaughan, D. Gradient of Expression of Dopamine D2 Receptors Along the Dorso-Ventral Axis of the Hippocampus. Front. Synaptic Neurosci. 2019, 11, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  160. Trompoukis, G.; Papatheodoropoulos, C. Dorsal-Ventral Differences in Modulation of Synaptic Transmission in the Hippocampus. Front. Synaptic Neurosci. 2020, 12, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Chawla, M.K.; Sutherland, V.L.; Olson, K.; McNaughton, B.L.; Barnes, C.A. Behavior-driven arc expression is reduced in all ventral hippocampal subfields compared to CA1, CA3, and dentate gyrus in rat dorsal hippocampus. Hippocampus 2018, 28, 178–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Frey, S.; Schieweck, R.; Forné, I.; Imhof, A.; Straub, T.; Popper, B.; Kiebler, M.A. Physical Activity Dynamically Regulates the Hippocampal Proteome along the Dorso-Ventral Axis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Bondi, H.; Bortolotto, V.; Canonico, P.L.; Grilli, M. Complex and regional-specific changes in the morphological complexity of GFAP. Neurobiol. Aging 2021, 100, 59–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Padilla-Coreano, N.; Bolkan, S.S.; Pierce, G.M.; Blackman, D.R.; Hardin, W.D.; Garcia-Garcia, A.L.; Spellman, T.J.; Gordon, J.A. Direct Ventral Hippocampal-Prefrontal Input Is Required for Anxiety-Related Neural Activity and Behavior. Neuron 2016, 89, 857–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  165. Parfitt, G.M.; Nguyen, R.; Bang, J.Y.; Aqrabawi, A.J.; Tran, M.M.; Seo, D.K.; Richards, B.A.; Kim, J.C. Bidirectional Control of Anxiety-Related Behaviors in Mice: Role of Inputs Arising from the Ventral Hippocampus to the Lateral Septum and Medial Prefrontal Cortex. Neuropsychopharmacology 2017, 42, 1715–1728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Graham, J.; D’Ambra, A.F.; Jung, S.J.; Teratani-Ota, Y.; Vishwakarma, N.; Venkatesh, R.; Parigi, A.; Antzoulatos, E.G.; Fioravante, D.; Wiltgen, B.J. High-Frequency Stimulation of Ventral CA1 Neurons Reduces Amygdala Activity and Inhibits Fear. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 2021, 15, 595049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Hauser, J.; Llano López, L.H.; Feldon, J.; Gargiulo, P.A.; Yee, B.K. Small lesions of the dorsal or ventral hippocampus subregions are associated with distinct impairments in working memory and reference memory retrieval, and combining them attenuates the acquisition rate of spatial reference memory. Hippocampus 2020, 30, 938–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Gage, F.H. Adult neurogenesis in neurological diseases. Science 2021, 374, 1049–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Terreros-Roncal, J.; Moreno-Jiménez, E.P.; Flor-García, M.; Rodríguez-Moreno, C.B.; Trinchero, M.F.; Cafini, F.; Rábano, A.; Llorens-Martín, M. Impact of neurodegenerative diseases on human adult hippocampal neurogenesis. Science 2021, 374, 1106–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Gomes-Leal, W. Adult Hippocampal Neurogenesis and Affective Disorders: New Neurons for Psychic Well-Being. Front. Neurosci. 2021, 15, 594448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Takahashi, T.; Amano, N.; Asamura, H.; Nomiyama, T.; Hanihara, T.; Nakayama, J.; Fukushima, H. Correlation between glial fibrillary acidic protein-positive astrocytes and age in the human hippocampus. Leg. Med. 2006, 8, 161–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Jinno, S. Regional and laminar differences in antigen profiles and spatial distributions of astrocytes in the mouse hippocampus, with reference to aging. Neuroscience 2011, 180, 41–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Rodríguez, J.J.; Yeh, C.Y.; Terzieva, S.; Olabarria, M.; Kulijewicz-Nawrot, M.; Verkhratsky, A. Complex and region-specific changes in astroglial markers in the aging brain. Neurobiol. Aging 2014, 35, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Rodríguez-Arellano, J.J.; Parpura, V.; Zorec, R.; Verkhratsky, A. Astrocytes in physiological aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroscience 2016, 323, 170–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Verkhratsky, A.; Ho, M.S.; Vardjan, N.; Zorec, R.; Parpura, V. General Pathophysiology of Astroglia. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2019, 1175, 149–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Sampedro-Piquero, P.; De Bartolo, P.; Petrosini, L.; Zancada-Menendez, C.; Arias, J.L.; Begega, A. Astrocytic plasticity as a possible mediator of the cognitive improvements after environmental enrichment in aged rats. Neurobiol. Learn Mem. 2014, 114, 16–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Ward, J. Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1963, 58, 236–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Experimental timeline. Female Swiss albino mice were fed under one of the following diet regimens: continuous hard (pellet) (HD), continuous soft (powder) diets (SD), sequences of hard and soft diet (HD/SD), as well as series of hard, soft, and hard diets (HD/SD/HD). Mice were maintained either in standard or enriched cages from 21st postnatal day onwards. Continuous or interrupted colored lines indicate continuous or interrupted diet regimens respectively: blue, red, green, and orange lines indicate HD, HD/SD, HD/SD/HD, and SD diet regimens respectively. The Morris water maze (MWM) behavioral tests are schematically represented on the right side of the scheme. Graphic representation of soft and hard diets, as well as standard and enriched cages are on the top.
Figure 1. Experimental timeline. Female Swiss albino mice were fed under one of the following diet regimens: continuous hard (pellet) (HD), continuous soft (powder) diets (SD), sequences of hard and soft diet (HD/SD), as well as series of hard, soft, and hard diets (HD/SD/HD). Mice were maintained either in standard or enriched cages from 21st postnatal day onwards. Continuous or interrupted colored lines indicate continuous or interrupted diet regimens respectively: blue, red, green, and orange lines indicate HD, HD/SD, HD/SD/HD, and SD diet regimens respectively. The Morris water maze (MWM) behavioral tests are schematically represented on the right side of the scheme. Graphic representation of soft and hard diets, as well as standard and enriched cages are on the top.
Ijms 23 06342 g001
Figure 2. Influences of contrasting environments (impoverished and enriched), differential age and masticatory activity on Morris Water Maze spatial learning and memory performances in albino Swiss mice. (A) 3-, 6- and 18-month-old mice with correspondent mean values of escape latencies on five consecutive testing days. Blue- and orange-colored curves show progressive reduction in escape latency for hard diet (HD) and soft diet (SD) groups. Swimming tracking analysis below the curves shows that aged mice under SD exhibited longer trajectories than mice with HD at 6- and 18-month-old [30]. (B) Graphical representation of the influence of contrasting environments and masticatory activity rehabilitation in sequences of hard, soft, and hard diets (HD/SD/HD) on learning rate expressed as percentage 4th testing day values. Note that reduction of masticatory activity with sequences of hard and soft diet (HD/SD) reduced mouse learning rates at all ages independently of experienced environments, and this was not related to swimming speed (cm/s) (C). (D) Swimming trajectories for each group was selected based on the average distance closer to mean values of each group [31]. Results are expressed as mean ± standard error. M, month.
Figure 2. Influences of contrasting environments (impoverished and enriched), differential age and masticatory activity on Morris Water Maze spatial learning and memory performances in albino Swiss mice. (A) 3-, 6- and 18-month-old mice with correspondent mean values of escape latencies on five consecutive testing days. Blue- and orange-colored curves show progressive reduction in escape latency for hard diet (HD) and soft diet (SD) groups. Swimming tracking analysis below the curves shows that aged mice under SD exhibited longer trajectories than mice with HD at 6- and 18-month-old [30]. (B) Graphical representation of the influence of contrasting environments and masticatory activity rehabilitation in sequences of hard, soft, and hard diets (HD/SD/HD) on learning rate expressed as percentage 4th testing day values. Note that reduction of masticatory activity with sequences of hard and soft diet (HD/SD) reduced mouse learning rates at all ages independently of experienced environments, and this was not related to swimming speed (cm/s) (C). (D) Swimming trajectories for each group was selected based on the average distance closer to mean values of each group [31]. Results are expressed as mean ± standard error. M, month.
Ijms 23 06342 g002
Figure 3. Three-dimensional reconstructions of astrocyte phenotypes (AST1 and AST2), under influence of different diet regimens (HD, HD/SD, and HD/SD/HD), environments (impoverished-IE vs. enriched-EE) and age (6M vs. 18M old). (A,D): Low (A1 and D1) and high (A2 and D2) power photomicrographs of GFAP-immunolabeled astrocytes to illustrate high (AST1) and low (AST2) morphological complexities of astrocytes from the external one third of molecular layer of mouse dentate gyrus. (B,E): Mean values of branch complexity and corresponding standard errors of astrocyte arbors to illustrate morphological differences between AST1 (B) and AST2 (E) for each experimental group. HD: hard diet/pellet food and SD: soft diet/powder food. (C,F): Three-dimensional reconstructions of the morphological phenotypes of astrocytes located in the outer 1/3 of the molecular layer of dentate gyrus with respective dendrograms. To choose the representative cell of each group, the distance matrix was used to obtain the sum of the distances of each cell in relation to all the others. Branches originating from the same parental trunk (primary branch) are shown with the same color. (C) AST1; (F) AST2. Dashed white squares identify the anatomical region from where photomicrographs of illustrated cells were taken. Scale bars: A1/D1 = 125 μm; A2/D2 = 25 μm. IE: impoverished environment; EE: enriched environment; 6M: six-month-old; 18M: eighteen-month-old; 9M: nine-month-old; HD: hard diet/pellet; SD: soft diet/powder food. AST1: astrocyte with high morphological complexity; AST2: astrocyte with low morphological complexity.
Figure 3. Three-dimensional reconstructions of astrocyte phenotypes (AST1 and AST2), under influence of different diet regimens (HD, HD/SD, and HD/SD/HD), environments (impoverished-IE vs. enriched-EE) and age (6M vs. 18M old). (A,D): Low (A1 and D1) and high (A2 and D2) power photomicrographs of GFAP-immunolabeled astrocytes to illustrate high (AST1) and low (AST2) morphological complexities of astrocytes from the external one third of molecular layer of mouse dentate gyrus. (B,E): Mean values of branch complexity and corresponding standard errors of astrocyte arbors to illustrate morphological differences between AST1 (B) and AST2 (E) for each experimental group. HD: hard diet/pellet food and SD: soft diet/powder food. (C,F): Three-dimensional reconstructions of the morphological phenotypes of astrocytes located in the outer 1/3 of the molecular layer of dentate gyrus with respective dendrograms. To choose the representative cell of each group, the distance matrix was used to obtain the sum of the distances of each cell in relation to all the others. Branches originating from the same parental trunk (primary branch) are shown with the same color. (C) AST1; (F) AST2. Dashed white squares identify the anatomical region from where photomicrographs of illustrated cells were taken. Scale bars: A1/D1 = 125 μm; A2/D2 = 25 μm. IE: impoverished environment; EE: enriched environment; 6M: six-month-old; 18M: eighteen-month-old; 9M: nine-month-old; HD: hard diet/pellet; SD: soft diet/powder food. AST1: astrocyte with high morphological complexity; AST2: astrocyte with low morphological complexity.
Ijms 23 06342 g003
Figure 4. Mean values of astrocyte morphological phenotypes based on the cell arborization complexity at the external one-third of the molecular layer of the dorsal dentate gyrus. Impoverished environment—IE (AF); Enriched environment—EE (GL) age (6M—6-month-old; 18M—18-month-old) and masticatory regimen (HD, HD/SD, and HD/SD/HD). Morphological complexity is expressed as Mean/SD. Astrocyte morphotypes are indicated as 1–4 under each colored dataset. HD: hard diet/pellet; SD: soft diet/powder food; GFAP. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 and **** p < 0.0001; ns, not significant.
Figure 4. Mean values of astrocyte morphological phenotypes based on the cell arborization complexity at the external one-third of the molecular layer of the dorsal dentate gyrus. Impoverished environment—IE (AF); Enriched environment—EE (GL) age (6M—6-month-old; 18M—18-month-old) and masticatory regimen (HD, HD/SD, and HD/SD/HD). Morphological complexity is expressed as Mean/SD. Astrocyte morphotypes are indicated as 1–4 under each colored dataset. HD: hard diet/pellet; SD: soft diet/powder food; GFAP. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 and **** p < 0.0001; ns, not significant.
Ijms 23 06342 g004
Figure 5. Mean values of astrocyte morphological phenotypes based on the cell arborization complexity at the external one-third of the molecular layer of the ventral dentate gyrus. Impoverished environment—IE (AF); Enriched environment—EE (GL), age (6M—6-month-old; 18M—18-month-old) and masticatory regimen (HD, HD/SD, and HD/SD/HD). Morphological complexity is expressed as Mean/SD. Astrocyte morphotypes are indicated as 1-4 under each colored dataset. HD: hard diet/pellet; SD: soft diet/powder food; * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001 and **** p < 0.0001; ns, not significant.
Figure 5. Mean values of astrocyte morphological phenotypes based on the cell arborization complexity at the external one-third of the molecular layer of the ventral dentate gyrus. Impoverished environment—IE (AF); Enriched environment—EE (GL), age (6M—6-month-old; 18M—18-month-old) and masticatory regimen (HD, HD/SD, and HD/SD/HD). Morphological complexity is expressed as Mean/SD. Astrocyte morphotypes are indicated as 1-4 under each colored dataset. HD: hard diet/pellet; SD: soft diet/powder food; * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001 and **** p < 0.0001; ns, not significant.
Ijms 23 06342 g005
Figure 6. Mean values of astrocyte morphological phenotypes based on branch complexity at the external one-third of the molecular layer of the dorsal dentate gyrus. (AC): Mean values of branch complexity and corresponding standard errors of astrocyte arbors to illustrate morphological differences between AST1 (A), AST2, (B) and AST 3 (C) for each experimental group based on impoverished environment and enriched environment, age (6M—6-month-old; 18M—18-month-old) and masticatory regimen (HD, HD/SD, and HD/SD/HD). HD: hard diet/pellet; SD: soft diet/powder food; ** p < 0.01 and **** p < 0.0001, by three-way ANOVA.
Figure 6. Mean values of astrocyte morphological phenotypes based on branch complexity at the external one-third of the molecular layer of the dorsal dentate gyrus. (AC): Mean values of branch complexity and corresponding standard errors of astrocyte arbors to illustrate morphological differences between AST1 (A), AST2, (B) and AST 3 (C) for each experimental group based on impoverished environment and enriched environment, age (6M—6-month-old; 18M—18-month-old) and masticatory regimen (HD, HD/SD, and HD/SD/HD). HD: hard diet/pellet; SD: soft diet/powder food; ** p < 0.01 and **** p < 0.0001, by three-way ANOVA.
Ijms 23 06342 g006
Figure 7. Mean values of morphological complexity for astrocytes morphological phenotypes from the external one-third of the molecular layer of the ventral dentate gyrus. (AC): Mean values of branch complexity and corresponding standard errors of astrocyte arbors to illustrate morphological differences between AST1 (A), AST2 (B) and AST 3 (C) for each experimental group based on impoverished environment and enriched environment, age (6M—6-month-old; 18M—18-month-old) and masticatory regimen (HD, HD/SD, and HD/SD/HD). Asterisk (*) over connector bars denotes statistically significant difference (*) = p < 0.05; (**) = p < 0.01; (***) = p < 0.001; (****) = p < 0.0001.
Figure 7. Mean values of morphological complexity for astrocytes morphological phenotypes from the external one-third of the molecular layer of the ventral dentate gyrus. (AC): Mean values of branch complexity and corresponding standard errors of astrocyte arbors to illustrate morphological differences between AST1 (A), AST2 (B) and AST 3 (C) for each experimental group based on impoverished environment and enriched environment, age (6M—6-month-old; 18M—18-month-old) and masticatory regimen (HD, HD/SD, and HD/SD/HD). Asterisk (*) over connector bars denotes statistically significant difference (*) = p < 0.05; (**) = p < 0.01; (***) = p < 0.001; (****) = p < 0.0001.
Ijms 23 06342 g007
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Siqueira Mendes, F.d.C.C.d.; Almeida, M.N.F.d.; Falsoni, M.; Andrade, M.L.F.; Felício, A.P.G.; Paixão, L.T.V.B.d.; Júnior, F.L.d.A.; Anthony, D.C.; Brites, D.; Diniz, C.W.P.; et al. The Sedentary Lifestyle and Masticatory Dysfunction: Time to Review the Contribution to Age-Associated Cognitive Decline and Astrocyte Morphotypes in the Dentate Gyrus. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 6342. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms23116342

AMA Style

Siqueira Mendes FdCCd, Almeida MNFd, Falsoni M, Andrade MLF, Felício APG, Paixão LTVBd, Júnior FLdA, Anthony DC, Brites D, Diniz CWP, et al. The Sedentary Lifestyle and Masticatory Dysfunction: Time to Review the Contribution to Age-Associated Cognitive Decline and Astrocyte Morphotypes in the Dentate Gyrus. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(11):6342. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms23116342

Chicago/Turabian Style

Siqueira Mendes, Fabíola de Carvalho Chaves de, Marina Negrão Frota de Almeida, Manoela Falsoni, Marcia Lorena Ferreira Andrade, André Pinheiro Gurgel Felício, Luisa Taynah Vasconcelos Barbosa da Paixão, Fábio Leite do Amaral Júnior, Daniel Clive Anthony, Dora Brites, Cristovam Wanderley Picanço Diniz, and et al. 2022. "The Sedentary Lifestyle and Masticatory Dysfunction: Time to Review the Contribution to Age-Associated Cognitive Decline and Astrocyte Morphotypes in the Dentate Gyrus" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 11: 6342. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms23116342

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop