Next Article in Journal
Oxidative DNA Damage and Cisplatin Neurotoxicity Is Exacerbated by Inhibition of OGG1 Glycosylase Activity and APE1 Endonuclease Activity in Sensory Neurons
Previous Article in Journal
High, in Contrast to Low Levels of Acute Stress Induce Depressive-like Behavior by Involving Astrocytic, in Addition to Microglial P2X7 Receptors in the Rodent Hippocampus
Previous Article in Special Issue
Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Suppressed Proinflammatory Cytokines Secretion and Enhanced MicroRNA(miR)-3168 Expression in Macrophages
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 3
10.3390/ijms23031907
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Blood Bacteria-Free DNA in Septic Mice Enhances LPS-Induced Inflammation in Mice through Macrophage Response

by
Warerat Kaewduangduen
1,2,
Peerapat Visitchanakun
1,2,
Wilasinee Saisorn
1,2,
Ariya Phawadee
1,2,
Charintorn Manonitnantawat
1,2,
Chirapas Chutimaskul
1,2,
Paweena Susantitaphong
3,
Patcharee Ritprajak
4,
Naraporn Somboonna
5,
Thanya Cheibchalard
6,
Dhammika Leshan Wannigama
1,7,8,
Patipark Kueanjinda
1,* and
Asada Leelahavanichkul
1,2,3,*
1
Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
2
Center of Excellence on Translational Research in Inflammation and Immunology (CETRII), Department of Microbiology, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
3
Nephrology Unit, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
4
Research Unit in Integrative Immuno-Microbial Biochemistry and Bioresponsive Nanomaterials, Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
5
Microbiome Research Unit for Probiotics in Food and Cosmetics, Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
6
Program in Biotechnology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
7
Antimicrobial Resistance and Stewardship Research Unit, Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
8
School of Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(3), 1907; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms23031907
Submission received: 6 January 2022 / Revised: 3 February 2022 / Accepted: 4 February 2022 / Published: 8 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Human and Animal Monocytes and Macrophages in Homeostasis and Disease 2.0)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Although bacteria-free DNA in blood during systemic infection is mainly derived from bacterial death, translocation of the DNA from the gut into the blood circulation (gut translocation) is also possible. Hence, several mouse models with experiments on macrophages were conducted to explore the sources, influences, and impacts of bacteria-free DNA in sepsis. First, bacteria-free DNA and bacteriome in blood were demonstrated in cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) sepsis mice. Second, administration of bacterial lysate (a source of bacterial DNA) in dextran sulfate solution (DSS)-induced mucositis mice elevated blood bacteria-free DNA without bacteremia supported gut translocation of free DNA. The absence of blood bacteria-free DNA in DSS mice without bacterial lysate implies an impact of the abundance of bacterial DNA in intestinal contents on the translocation of free DNA. Third, higher serum cytokines in mice after injection of combined bacterial DNA with lipopolysaccharide (LPS), when compared to LPS injection alone, supported an influence of blood bacteria-free DNA on systemic inflammation. The synergistic effects of free DNA and LPS on macrophage pro-inflammatory responses, as indicated by supernatant cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-10), pro-inflammatory genes (NFκB, iNOS, and IL-1β), and profound energy alteration (enhanced glycolysis with reduced mitochondrial functions), which was neutralized by TLR-9 inhibition (chloroquine), were demonstrated. In conclusion, the presence of bacteria-free DNA in sepsis mice is partly due to gut translocation of bacteria-free DNA into the systemic circulation, which would enhance sepsis severity. Inhibition of the responses against bacterial DNA by TLR-9 inhibition could attenuate LPS-DNA synergy in macrophages and might help improve sepsis hyper-inflammation in some situations.

1. Introduction

Sepsis, a life-threatening organ failure caused by systemic infection, is a major health care issue worldwide [1]. During sepsis, immune responses against pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) from organisms create abnormally uncontrollable inflammation [2], causing multiple organ failure and death [3]. The robust reactions of innate immune cells such as macrophages are the key mechanism of sepsis hyper-inflammation [4] and can be found in almost all organs [5]. Additionally, the immune responses against the circulating free DNA (host and bacteria-free DNA) might be important in sepsis as free DNA is a biomarker to predict sepsis mortality [6,7]. During sepsis, the presence of bacteria-free DNA in serum [6,7] is caused by (i) the breakdown of blood bacteria (bacteremia) [8,9] that originate from the sources of infection and gut translocation [10,11], and (ii) the transfer of bacteria-free DNA from the gut. As such, gut translocation of bacteria-free DNA in patients with intestinal barrier defect without bacteremia (the elderly subjects and patients with severe COVID19) is demonstrated by positive blood bacterial DNA (DNAemia) [12,13] and blood bacterial genome (blood microbiome) [14]. Spontaneous breakdown of bacterial DNA results in small fragments of DNA (65 kDa) [15,16,17,18], a similar size of lipopolysaccharides (LPSs) (50–100 kDa) [19], a Gram-negative bacterial molecule currently used as an indirect biomarker of gut-barrier defect [20,21]. The fragments of free DNA might be small enough to pass through the gut-barrier during sepsis. Although the translocation of bacteria-free DNA from the intestinal bacteria in gut contents might be possible, data on gut translocation of free DNA is still limited.
Furthermore, the influence of bacterial DNA on sepsis severity is still controversial [7,22,23]. Bacteria-free DNA is derived from bacterial death [24,25], especially by bactericidal antibiotics [26,27], worsen sepsis severity [28], and the reduction in bacteria-free DNA by extracorporeal blood purification [29] improves sepsis outcomes [30]. However, serum bacteria-free DNA in patients with sepsis recovery [26,31] or non-bacterial sepsis [32] have no clinical significance. This is different from the solid conclusions on other sepsis worsening factors including bacteremia, tissue hypoxia, cell death, and excessive blood pro-inflammatory cytokines [33], partly because of the lower pro-inflammatory effect of bacterial DNA and unmethylated cytosine-phosphate guanine (CpG) DNA compared with LPS [34,35,36]. Although the synergy between CpG DNA and LPS in mice has been demonstrated [34,35,36], the combination between bacteria-free DNA and LPS might be a better model to resemble sepsis in patients due to some differences between CpG DNA and bacteria-free DNA [37]. For example, differences in the length of DNA and the abundance of the unmethylated CpG motifs between the bacteria-free DNA (directly isolated from bacteria) versus the commercially available CpG DNA might result in varied responses [37]. Regarding the free DNA responses, bacterial DNA activates endosomal TLR-9 [38], TLR-4 on the cell membrane [39], and several cytosol receptors [40,41,42]. While bacteria-free DNA is phagocytosed by phagocytic cells (neutrophils, monocytes, and macrophages) with subsequent TLR-9 activation [43], cytosol insertion of the DNA by lipofectamine or electroporation activates cytosol receptors [24,44]. Although TLR-9 presents in several immune cells (NK cells, monocytes, macrophages, dendritic cells, and neutrophils), macrophages are immune cells that have been frequently used as the representative cells in several studies [45,46,47,48]. The injection of CpG DNA in mice induces mild inflammatory responses, partly through TLR-9 activation in macrophages, while the co-administration of CpG DNA and LPS in mice simultaneously stimulates TLR-4 and TLR-9 in macrophages, which induce more potent responses [34,35,36]. The induction by bacterial DNA might also alter cell energy status in macrophages; however, it needs more proven evidence.
Despite the previous reports on (i) the presence of blood bacteria-free DNA in sepsis [25] and non-sepsis (elderly subjects) [13], and (ii) the enhanced responses against co-administration of synthetic CpG DNA and LPS in mice [34] and macrophages [49,50], the data on gut translocation of bacteria-free DNA, simultaneous analysis of bacteriome from blood and feces, and impact of bacteria-free DNA on cell energy status in macrophages are still very few in number. Hence, several mouse models were conducted for different purposes including (i) a cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) sepsis model, a representative model of sepsis that mostly resemble patients [51], to explore the presence of blood bacteria-free DNA and the simultaneous analysis of bacteriome from blood and feces during sepsis; (ii) a dextran sulfate solution (DSS)-induced gut-barrier defect model with oral gavage of bacterial lysate (a source of bacterial DNA) to examine gut translocation of the free DNA; and (iii) a model with co-administration of bacteria-free DNA and LPS to test the impact of the free DNA against sepsis-inflammatory responses. In addition, the cell energy status, along with several cell characteristics of macrophages after activation by LPS with and without bacteria-free DNA, was also investigated.

2. Results

2.1. Bacteria-Free DNA in the Blood of Mice with Cecal Ligation and Puncture Sepsis Was Possibly Derived from the Breakdown of Blood Bacteria and Gut Translocation

To demonstrate blood bacteria-free DNA in sepsis, the CLP model, a mouse model that resembles human sepsis [51], was performed. The severity of the CLP model was determined by survival analysis, blood bacterial burdens, serum endotoxin, serum bacteria-free DNA, and gut permeability defect (FITC dextran assay) (Figure 1A–E). The polymicrobial characteristics of CLP sepsis were demonstrated through the mixture of different colony morphologies in blood agar plates that could be identified as Gram-negative bacteria (E. coli, Enterobacter spp., and Pseudomonas spp.), and Gram-positive organisms (Streptococcus spp., Staphylococcus spp., and Enterococcus spp.) (Figure 1F). Sepsis severity was also indicated by serum cytokines, kidney injury, liver damage, and leukopenia (neutropenia and lymphopenia) (Figure 1G–I). Due to the limitation of bacterial identification by morphologies of bacterial colonies from blood culture and the possible gut-derived bacteremia from sepsis-induced gut permeability defect [20,21], the analyses of bacterial microbiome from blood and feces in CLP mice were examined (Figure 2A–E).
Although there was no difference in blood microbiome in the analysis on phylum level between the sham and CLP sepsis mice, the higher abundance of E. coli and Streptococcal spp. with the lower abundance of Enterobacteriaceae were demonstrated in the analysis on the genus level (Figure 2A,B,E). In the bacteriome analysis, the high abundance of E. coli and Streptococcal spp. was correlated with the bacterial identification through colony characteristics from blood culture (Figure 1F). In the fecal microbiome analysis (phylum level), CLP enhanced Bacteroides (Gram-negative anaerobe) and Proteobacteria (pathogenic Gram-negative aerobes including E. coli), while it reduced Firmicutes (mostly Gram-positive anaerobe) compared with the sham (Figure 2C–E). In the genus level of the fecal microbiome, the analysis was non-different between sham and CLP, partly because of the difference in genus of the bacteria, despite being in the same phylum of the individual CLP mouse (Figure 2C–E). As the predominant Proteobacteria and E. coli in the fecal and blood bacteriome, respectively (Figure 2E), some bacteria-free DNAs in serum might be a result of gut translocation of the free DNA. Thus, bacterial DNA in the blood of CLP mice was possibly due to the combination of the breakdown of blood bacteria together with gut translocation.

2.2. Bacteria-Free DNA in the Blood of DSS Mice with Oral Gavage by Bacterial Lysate Was Transferred from the Gut Contents

Due to technical limitations on the demonstration of the transfers of bacteria-free DNA from the gut into systemic circulation in the CLP model, a DSS-induced gut-barrier defect model with and without oral gavage by bacterial lysate (a source of bacterial DNA) was used. To test gut translocation without the influence of the breakdown of blood bacteria, gut-barrier damage by 3% DSS was performed with the determination of several parameters (Figure 3A–F). All DSS mice demonstrated acute diarrhea on days 6–7 post-DSS without bacteremia (data not shown), but bacteria-free DNA was detected only in the mice with bacterial lysate oral administration (a source of bacterial DNA) (Figure 3A). The intestinal damage by DSS between mice with or without bacterial lysate was not different as indicated by gut leakage (FITC-dextran assay) (Figure 3B) and colon histology (Figure 3F,G). Meanwhile, endotoxemia and serum inflammatory cytokines were more severe in the DSS mice with bacterial lysate when compared with the DSS alone (Figure 3C–E). With the demonstration of serum bacteria-free DNA in DSS mice, the presence of bacteria-free DNA in CLP sepsis mice might be a result of both blood-bacterial breakdown and gut translocation of the free DNA.

2.3. Additive Inflammatory Effect of Bacteria-Free DNA on LPS Responses in LPS Injection Mouse Model

Due to the controversial issues on (i) the impact of blood bacteria-free DNA in sepsis [7,22,23]; (ii) the effects of bacteria-free DNA and LPS co-administration, despite the previous reports using LPS with CpG DNA [34,35,36] that might be different from the isolated bacterial DNA [37]; and (iii) LPS induces gut [20,21] and hepatic injury [52], a mouse model with the co-administration of bacteria-free DNA and LPS was performed. With LPS injection alone, there was an increase in serum bacteria-free DNA (Figure 4A) without bacteremia (data not shown), possibly due to LPS-induced gut leakage (FITC-dextran assay), which facilitated LPS effects, either on hepatic damage (serum alanine transaminase and cytokines from liver tissue) or systemic inflammation (serum cytokines) (Figure 4B–I). At 0.5 h after injection, serum bacteria-free DNA after LPS injection alone was lower than that in mice with the administration of DNA alone and with LPS + DNA co-administration. At 3 h after LPS + DNA injection, the serum bacteria-free DNA was highest among all groups (Figure 4A), implying an additive effect of bacteria-free DNA from LPS-induced gut-barrier defect and direct bacteria-free DNA injection. Administration of bacteria-free DNA alone caused lower gut-barrier defect, hepatic injury (liver enzyme and cytokines in liver tissue), and serum cytokines when compared to LPS + DNA in some time-points after the injection (Figure 4B–I). In comparison with LPS injection alone, LPS + DNA induced higher bacteria-free DNA, liver enzyme, serum cytokines, and liver IL-6 in some time-points after the injection (Figure 4A–I). Hence, the presence of bacteria-free DNA may increase the pro-inflammatory effects during sepsis, partly through the synergy with endotoxemia.

2.4. Additive Inflammatory Effect of Bacteria-Free DNA on LPS Responses, a Possible Impact of Cell Energy Alteration in Macrophages

Due to the role of macrophages in recognizing pathogen molecules (both LPS and bacteria-free DNA) [49] and the lack of data on macrophage energy after free DNA activation, in vitro experiments on bone marrow-derived macrophages were performed. Accordingly, LPS + DNA induced more prominent inflammation than LPS alone, as indicated by an increase in supernatant cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-10), gene expression of pro-inflammatory signals (NFκB, iNOS, and IL-1β but not TLR-4), and anti-inflammatory signals (Arg-1 but not TGF-β and Fizz-1) (Figure 5A–J). Despite the association with the potent intensity of TLR-4 activation [53], the downregulation of TLR-4 was not different between the LPS and LPS + DNA groups (Figure 5E). With bacteria-free DNA activation alone, supernatant IL-10, but not TNF-α and IL-6, was higher than in the control media but was lower with LPS activation alone (Figure 5A–C). The NFκB expression in DNA-activated macrophages was higher than in the LPS-activation alone and lower than in the LPS + DNA activated macrophages (Figure 5D–J). The activation by bacteria-free DNA alone upregulated TLR-4 expression at the highest level without an alteration in genes for macrophage polarization (Figure 5D–J). These data support mild macrophage immune activation by bacteria-free DNA alone and further pro-inflammatory in DNA + LPS co-stimulated macrophages [34,35,36].
All immune activations were shown to affect cell energy status by reducing the expression of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and mitochondrial abundance (fluorescent staining) (Figure 6A,B). The mtDNA was lowest in LPS + DNA activated macrophages (Figure 6A,B), which supports the profound energy depletion and cell injury after potent immune responses [54]. Likewise, there was a prominent reduction in respiratory capacity and respiratory reserve in LPS + DNA activated macrophages, while LPS or DNA activation alone did not alter the mitochondrial stress test (Figure 6C–E). Although all activations similarly enhanced glycolysis capacity and glycolysis reserve, the glycolysis reserve in LPS + DNA was higher than the other groups (Figure 6F–H). Due to the dominant energy sources from the glycolysis pathway during cytokine production [55,56,57], an increase in glycolysis reserve in LPS + DNA supports the pro-inflammatory effects of bacterial DNA on the cell energy status of LPS-activated macrophages.
Because TLR-9 is a downstream signal of bacterial DNA activation, which requires proper endosomal acidification for proper activities [58], the inhibitors against endosomal acidification (chloroquine and monensin) were used as representative TLR-9 interferences. Both inhibitors attenuated responses against LPS + DNA, as indicated by supernatant cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-10) and NFκB expression (Figure 7A–D). Despite mild macrophage responses against DNA stimulation alone, the inhibitors reduced the supernatant IL-10 and gene expression of NFκB and TLR-4 (Figure 7C–E), supporting the recognition of bacteria-free DNA by TLR-9 [59,60]. Due to (i) high glycolysis activity in macrophages facilitating cytokine production [56] and (ii) chloroquine decreasing macrophage cytokine production [61] and altering energy status in some cells [62], the reduction in LPS-induced macrophage cytokine production by chloroquine (Figure 7A–C) might be a result of interference on cell energy status. In LPS + DNA stimulated macrophages, chloroquine lowered glycolysis capacity as well as mitochondrial respiratory capacity, but not glycolysis reserve nor respiratory reserve (Figure 8A–C). Although the reduced energy status of LPS + DNA activated macrophages by chloroquine might cause a decrease in cytokine production, the anti-inflammatory effect of chloroquine was insufficient to protect mitochondrial injury, as indicated by the non-difference in mtDNA and mitochondrial abundance (fluorescent staining) between LPS + DNA with and without chloroquine (Figure 8G,H).

3. Discussion

Although bacteria-free DNA is a serum pathogen molecule with a potential pro-inflammatory property, there is debate on its role in immune responses [7,22,23] and the adjunctive interventions to reduce blood-free DNA during hyper-inflammatory sepsis [30]. The presence of bacteria-free DNA induces significant stress in patients with sepsis as microbial DNA induces more potent inflammatory activity than the host DNA [34]. The sources of bacteria-free DNA in blood during sepsis were possibly not only a result of the breakdown of bacteria in the blood, but also from the gut translocation due to a sepsis-induced gut-barrier defect [20,21]. Although the intact bacterial DNAs (genome) at a molecular size of 100 to 15,000-kilo base-pair (kbp) (6.5 × 104–9.8 × 106 kDa [63,64]) cannot pass through the gut-barrier, the bacteria-free DNA is rapidly naturally broken down by several processes (depurination or deamination DNA) [65,66] into smaller sizes of less than 100 bp (65 kDa) [15,16,17,18], which can pass through the gut-barrier in several models [65,66].
Here, several mouse models were used to test the hypotheses sequentially (Figure 9). First, the CLP model, a sepsis model that more resembles patients than the LPS injection model [51], was used to explore the presence of bacteria-free DNA in blood. As such, CLP surgery induces sepsis with bacteremia (a common sepsis characteristic in the patients), while LPS injection activates hyper-inflammation without bacteremia, referred to as “a chemical toxin injection model” [67,68]. Blood bacteria-free DNA was detected in CLP mice as indicated by real-time PCR and blood bacteriome analysis. With limited data on the simultaneous analysis of bacteriome in feces and blood, we demonstrated a prominent abundance of Proteobacteria (phylum) (a group of pathogenic bacteria) in both the sham and CLP mice. An abundance of E. coli, a Proteobacteria that commonly cause gut-derived sepsis [21], was higher in CLP sepsis than sham mice. Although Firmicutes (phylum) was the most prominent bacteria in feces in both sham and CLP mice, the abundance of Firmicutes (a group of the possible beneficial bacteria [69]) in blood bacteriome was lower than Proteobacteria. These findings indicate the greater invasiveness of Proteobacteria than Firmicutes [70]. Moreover, Proteobacteria in the blood of sham mice also implies a possible transient gut translocation in healthy mice as normal physiology, especially through the induction with pathogenic bacteria (such as Proteobacteria), despite an intact gut barrier by the FITC-dextran test [71,72]. With the CLP model, we proposed that bacteria-free DNA in sepsis serum was possibly from not only the bacterial breakdown but also the gut translocation (Figure 9), which partly correlated with the invasiveness of Proteobacteria.
Second, gut translocation of bacteria-free DNA was highlighted in DSS mice with oral gavage of bacterial lysate (a source of bacterial DNA and LPS). An increase in microbe molecules in gut contents by the oral gavage of bacterial lysate enhanced the detection of bacteria-free DNA (and increased endotoxemia) in the serum. Unlike the CLP model, bacteria-free DNA in the serum of DSS mice results from the gut translocation, but not the bacterial breakdown due to an absence of bacteremia in the DSS model. As the bacterial gavage did not enhance the severity of DSS-induced mucositis (pathological analysis and FITC-dextran assay), an increase in LPS and free DNA in the serum of the lysate-administered DSS mice were from gut translocation, and not the enhanced severity of mucositis. Because of the similar molecular size between LPS and fragments of bacteria-free DNA [15,16,17,18], an increase in LPS and bacteria-free DNA in gut contents by bacterial lysate administration caused an increase in endotoxemia and blood bacteria-free DNA. Hence, we propose that an adequate amount of bacteria-free DNA in gut content along with gut permeability defect can induce gut translocation of bacteria-free DNA, as demonstrated by the bacterial lysate-administered DSS mice (Figure 9).
Third, the injection of LPS and bacteria-free DNA model was used to explore the influence of bacteria-free DNA in sepsis responses. Although LPS injection has a limitation on the resemblance to sepsis in patients [67,68], direct injection is frequently used to test immune responses. Despite previous publications on CpG DNA-LPS co-administration in mice [34] and the differences between bacteria-free DNA and CpG DNA [37], the data on the utilization of isolated bacteria-free DNA are limited. As such, the injection of LPS induced serum bacterial-free DNA, but did not cause bacteremia in mice [56,73], supporting LPS-induced bacteria-free DNA translocation from the gut [74]. In parallel, LPS injection plus bacterial DNA (LPS + DNA) induced more severe hepatic injury (liver enzyme and IL-6) than LPS alone (Figure 9), perhaps due to the impact of microbial DNA on immune responses. The co-existence of LPS and bacterial DNA in the serum of sepsis mice (CLP and LPS models) may enhance systemic inflammation through macrophage M1 polarization (iNOS and IL-1β expression) [34,35] and NFκB upregulation. Indeed, in macrophages with DNA stimulation alone, there was less potent pro-inflammatory activation (low supernatant IL-10) with TLR-4 upregulation [75], while LPS + DNA exhibited a profound inflammatory response (Figure 9). Notably, the similar downregulation of TLR-4, perhaps from the TLR-4 internalization (endocytosis) [53] between LPS and LPS + DNA activation suggests that bacteria-free DNA did not activate TLR-4, despite a possible DNA-induced TLR-4 activation in some situations [39].
From all animal models, we demonstrated the gut translocation of bacteria-free DNA in sepsis with LPS-bacterial DNA synergy, possibly through the simultaneous TLR-4 and TLR-9 activation on macrophages [49,50]. The profound inflammation induces mitochondrial injury [76,77] and mitochondrial free DNA in systemic circulation, which further facilitate inflammatory responses [78,79] in several immune cells including macrophages [80]. Here, LPS induced M1 macrophage polarization [56], partly through the acceleration of glycolysis, the main energy source of the cells during the hyper-inflammatory stage, despite the reduction in mitochondrial activities (mitochondrial abundance, mtDNA, and maximal respiration), supporting previous publications [81,82]. The bacterial DNA reduced macrophage mitochondrial functions, similar to LPS activation. However, the DNA stimulation alone did not enhance macrophage glycolysis, resulting in a lower cytokine production when compared to the LPS activation [56]. The LPS-bacterial DNA synergy might be due to the simultaneous activation of the endosomal TLR-9 [83] and TLR-4 by DNA and LPS activation, respectively [73]. This process requires high energy utilization, which results in mitochondrial injury and further inflammatory activation (Figure 10). Inhibition of endosomal acidification (a TLR-9 interference) neutralized LPS-bacterial DNA synergy and reduced mitochondrial injury (improved respiratory capacity). Because (i) LPS and bacterial DNA are simultaneously presented in sepsis [84] and (ii) inhibition of endosomal acidification (chloroquine) improves sepsis severity in animal models [85], our data support an influence of bacteria-free DNA on enhanced sepsis severity [83]. Despite debate on the use of hydroxychloroquine in sepsis, especially in acute respiratory distress syndrome from Coronavirus (COVID-19) infection [86,87], there might be some sepsis conditions that are beneficial from TLR-9 inhibition and bacterial DNA neutralization [88]. Several extracorporeal blood purification procedures reduce the free DNA particles in either sepsis [29] or non-sepsis (viral infection) [89,90,91], which could be adapted for the removal of bacteria-free DNA in sepsis.
Finally, there were several limitations to our study. First, the mortality rate of the CLP model was very high when compared to other studies, possibly due to the lack of antibiotic use [95,96,97,98,99,100]. Second, the gut translocation of bacterial DNA was indirectly determined by the measurement in serum, but not the direct intestinal imaging. Third, the mechanisms of sepsis in the animal models and the in vitro experiments might have some differences from the patients [101,102]. Finally, TLR-9 is also expressed in other immune cells such as dendritic cells and NK cells, which might also affect immunologic responses against bacteria-free DNA [103,104,105]. More studies on this topic are warranted.
In conclusion, gut translocation of bacterial DNA enhanced the synergistic activation of LPS and bacteria-free DNA on inflammatory responses and mitochondrial dysfunction. Inhibition of DNA activation might be an interesting strategy to improve sepsis outcomes in some situations and should be further tested.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Animal

The animal study protocol (025/2563) was endorsed by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University following the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) animal care and use protocol. Wild-type C57BL/6J (WT) mice were purchased from Nomura Siam (Pathumwan, Bangkok, Thailand) and only male 8-wk-old mice weighing approximately 20–22 g were used in the experiments. The mice were housed in standard clear plastic cages (3–5 mice per cage) with free access to water and food (SmartHeart Rodent; Perfect companion pet care, Bangkok, Thailand) and a light/dark cycle of 12:12 h in 22 ± 2 °C with 50 ± 10% relative humidity.

4.2. Cecal Ligation and Puncture Model and Lipopolysaccharide with and without Bacterial DNA Injection Model

Sepsis was induced by cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) surgery or lipopolysaccharide (LPS) injection with or without bacterial DNA. As such, CLP was conducted under isoflurane anesthesia following a previously published protocol [106]. Briefly, the cecum was ligated and punctured twice with a 21-gauge needle in CLP, while the sham was only an operation for cecum identification. Mice were sacrificed via cardiac puncture under isoflurane anesthesia with blood collection at 24- and 96-h post-operation for acute sepsis parameters and for survival analysis, respectively. Serum was kept at −80 °C until analysis. To test the impact of bacterial DNA on sepsis mice, bacterial DNA was administered with and without LPS in mice. Accordingly, DNA was extracted from Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922) (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) following a published protocol [75]. Briefly, E. coli in Luria–Bertani (LB) broth isolated DNA using the Tissue Genomic DNA Extraction Mini Kit (Favorgen Biotech, Wembley, WA, Australia) and quantified by a Nanodrop ND-100 (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Then, mice were intraperitoneal (ip) administered with 10 mg/kg of LPS from E. coli 026: B6 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) with or without intravenous (iv) administration of the extracted bacterial DNA at 10 mg/kg (or DNA alone). Blood samples were collected through the tail vein at three days before LPS-injection (0 h) and 0.5 h post-administration. Then, mice were sacrificed at 3 h post-injection by cardiac puncture under isoflurane anesthesia with sample collection. Serum was kept at −80 °C until use and the liver was snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen for further analysis. A total 32 and 26 mice were used for CLP and the injection of the pathogen molecule experiments, respectively.

4.3. Dextran Sulfate Solution Model with Bacterial Lysate Administration

Gut permeability defect (gut leakage) induced by dextran sulfate solution (DSS) with or without bacterial lysate administration was performed to explore a possible gut translocation of bacterial molecules. Accordingly, DSS (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was prepared by dilution into drinking water at the concentration of 3% volume by volume (v/v) for one week [107]. Bacterial lysate of E. coli (ATCC 25922) using E. coli at 4.8 × 108 CFU in 0.3 mL phosphate buffer solution (PBS) was orally administered once-daily for three consecutive days starting from the fifth day of the DSS model. At 6 h after the last dose of bacterial lysate on the seventh day of DSS, mice were sacrificed by cardiac puncture under isoflurane anesthesia with sample collection. Serum was kept at −80 °C until use and the organ was put in 10% neutral formalin for histological analysis. All 28 mice were used for this experiment.

4.4. Blood Sample Analysis and Gut Permeability Measurement

Serum endotoxin (LPS) was measured by the Limulus Amebocyte lysate test (Associates of Cape Cod, East Falmouth, MA, USA), and values of LPS < 0.01 EU/mL were recorded as 0 due to the limitation of the standard curve. Kidney injury (serum creatinine) and liver damage (alanine transaminase; ALT) were determined by QuantiChrom Creatinine-Assay (DICT-500) and EnzyChrom ALT assay (EALT-100) (BioAssay, Hayward, CA, USA). Serum cytokines were measured by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA). For peripheral blood leukocytes, blood was mixed with 3% v/v of acetic acid for red blood cell lysis in a ratio of blood and acetic acid at 1:20 by volume before counting with a hemocytometer. Then, a Wright-stained blood smear was determined for the percentage of neutrophils and lymphocytes. The total number of these cells was calculated by the total count from the hemocytometer multiplied by the percentage of cells from the Wright-stained slide. Blood in serial dilutions was directly spread onto blood agar (Oxoid, Hampshire, UK) and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h before colony enumeration. The colonies were identified by mass spectrometry analysis (Vitek MS; bioMérieux SA, Marcy-l’Etoile, France), according to the routine hospital protocol.
To determine bacterial-free DNA, the DNA in serum was extracted with 5 M potassium acetate/acetic acid buffer and quantified by a Nanodrop 100 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Afterward, the samples were examined using the 16s primer 5′-GATGAACGCTGGCGGCGTGC-3′ (F), 5′-CAATCATTTGTCCCACCTTC-3′ (R) by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with QuantStudio 6 Flex Real-time PCR System to determine bacterial DNA from the cell-free DNA preparations. For gut permeability determination, FITC-dextran, a 4.4 kDa intestinal nonabsorbable molecule (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), at 12.5 mg per 25 g mouse was orally administered at 3 h before the detection of FITC-dextran in serum using a fluorospectrometer (NanoDrop 3300; ThermoFisher Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA). The presence of non-intestinal absorbable molecules in serum after oral administration indicates gut permeability defect (gut leakage). Due to the possibility of liver injury during the detoxification of foreign molecules in the blood [108], cytokines from liver tissue after the activation by LPS and/or bacterial DNA were evaluated following a previously published protocol [109]. Briefly, liver samples were weighed, sonicated thoroughly, and the supernatant from homogenous tissue preparation was collected for cytokine measurement by the ELISA assay (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA).

4.5. Histology

The semi-quantitative evaluation of intestinal histology on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining at 200× magnification was determined [107] based on mononuclear cell infiltration (in mucosa and sub-mucosa), epithelial hyperplasia (epithelial cell in longitudinal crypts), reduction in goblet cells, and epithelial vacuolization in comparison with control groups using the following scores; 0: leukocyte < 5% and no epithelial hyperplasia (<10% of control); 1: leukocyte infiltration 5–10% or hyperplasia 10–25%; 2: leukocyte infiltration 10–25% or hyperplasia 25–50% or reduced goblet cells (>25% of control); 3: leukocyte infiltration 25–50% or hyperplasia > 50% or intestinal vacuolization; 4: leukocyte infiltration > 50% or ulceration.

4.6. Microbiome Analysis of Feces and Blood

Feces (0.25 g) and blood (200 µL) from each mouse were collected from the mice in different cages to avoid the influence of allocoprophagy on the microbiome analyses. Then, the fecal and blood microbiota analyses were performed as previously described [110]. Briefly, the metagenomic DNA was extracted from the prepared samples using a DNAeasy Kit (for feces) and QIAamp (for blood) (Qiagen, Redwood City, CA, USA) with DNA quality assessment using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer. Universal prokaryotic primers 515F (5′-GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA-3′) and 806R (5′-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3′) with appended 50 Illumina adapter and 30 Golay barcode sequences were used for 16S rRNA gene V4 library construction. The bioinformatic analyses were performed following Mothur’s Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) [111].

4.7. Macrophage Experiments and Inhibition of Endosomal Acidification

Macrophages were derived from the bone marrow of the healthy mice as previously described [55]. Briefly, bone marrow from femurs and tibias were collected by centrifugation at 6000 rpm for 4 °C and incubated for seven days with Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES) with sodium pyruvate in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator at 37 °C. Conditioned media of the L929 cell line, containing macrophage-colony stimulating factor, at 20% weight by volume (w/v) were used to induce macrophages from the pluripotent stem cells. Then, E. coli DNA from the extraction (previously mentioned) at 5 ng/µL with or without LPS (E. coli 026: B6, Sigma-Aldrich) at 100 ng/mL) or media control alone (DMEM) were incubated with macrophages at 1 × 105 cells/well at 37 °C for 24 h before the determination of supernatant cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-10) using the ELISA assay (Invitrogen). Total RNA was prepared by Trizol, quantified by a Nanodrop ND-1000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific), converted into cDNA by the Reverse Transcription System, and performed real-time quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) using the SYBR Green system (Applied biosystem, Foster City, CA, USA) for the expression of several genes [55]. The cDNA template and target primers based on the ΔΔCT method (2-∆∆Ct) with the β-actin housekeeping gene were used. Primers for inflammatory signals (TLR-4 and NF-κB), M1 pro-inflammatory macrophage polarization (iNOS and IL-1β), and M2 anti-inflammatory macrophage polarization (Fizz-1, Arginase-1, and TGF-β) were used (Table 1). Because endosomal acidification and maturation are required for proper TLR9 signaling [58], chloroquine (15 µM) or monensin (20 µM) (Sigma-Aldrich) were pre-incubated with macrophages for 2 h before incubation with several stimulators (bacterial DNA with or without LPS as above-mentioned) to investigate the influence of TLR9 [58].

4.8. Mitochondrial Evaluation and Extracellular Flux Analysis

Mitochondrial enumeration was evaluated by mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) quantification using a Tissue Genomic DNA Extraction Mini Kit (Favorgen Biotech, Wembley, WA, Australia) with a Nanodrop ND-100 (Thermo scientific) via the ΔΔCT method using β2-microglobulin (β2M) normalization [55]. In parallel, mitochondrial biogenesis was analyzed by MitoTracker using 200 nM of MitoTracker Red CMxROS (Molecular probe, Eugene, OR, USA), which was incubated at 37 °C for 15 min before fixing with cold methanol at −20 °C and measured by a microplate reader at excitation OD579 nm and emission OD599 nm [55]. Cell energy status was determined by extracellular flux analysis using Seahorse XFp Analyzers (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) with oxygen consumption rate (OCR) and extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) representing mitochondrial function (respiration) and glycolysis activity, respectively [56]. Briefly, the stimulated macrophages at 1 × 105 cells/well with different conditions were incubated in Seahorse media (DMEM complemented with glucose, pyruvate, and L-glutamine) (Agilent, 103575–100) for 1 h before activation by different metabolic interference compounds including oligomycin, carbonyl cyanide-4-(trifluoromethoxy)-phenylhydrazone (FCCP), and rotenone/antimycin A for OCR evaluation. In parallel, glycolysis stress tests were performed using glucose, oligomycin, and 2-deoxy-d-glucose (2-DG) for ECAR measurement. The data were analyzed by Seahorse Wave 2.6 software based on the following equations: (i) respiratory capacity (maximal respiration) = OCR between FCCP and rotenone/antimycin A − OCR after rotenone/antimycin A; (ii) respiratory reserve = OCR between FCCP and rotenone/antimycin A − OCR before oligomycin; (iii) maximal glycolysis (glycolysis capacity) = ECAR between oligomycin and 2-DG − ECAR after 2-DG; and (iv) glycolysis reserve = ECAR between oligomycin and 2-DG − ECAR between glucose and oligomycin.

4.9. Statistical Analysis

All data were analyzed by the Statistical Package for Social Sciences software (SPSS 22.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and Graph Pad Prism version 7.0 software (La Jolla, CA, USA). The results were presented as mean ± standard error (SE). Survival analysis was determined by a Log-rank test. The differences between two or multiple groups were examined for statistical significance by the Student’s T-test or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s analysis of comparison, respectively. The time-point experiments were analyzed by repeated measures ANOVA. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.L.; methodology, A.L., W.S. and P.K.; software, P.S., N.S. and T.C.; validation, A.L. and P.K.; formal analysis, W.K., P.V., A.P. and A.L.; investigation, W.K., P.V., A.P., C.M., C.C., P.R., D.L.W. and A.L.; resources, A.L.; data curation, W.K.. and A.L.; writing—original draft preparation, W.K. and A.L.; writing—review and editing, W.K., A.L. and P.K.; visualization, A.L. and P.K.; supervision, A.L.; project administration, P.K. and A.L.; funding acquisition, P.K. and A.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by Chulalongkorn University through Fundamental Fund 65 [CUFRB65_hea (33)_040_30_21], and the National Research Council of Thailand (grant number NRCT5-RGJ63001 and NRCT-N41A640076) with NSRF via the Program Management Unit for Human Resources & Institutional Development, Research and Innovation.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University (protocol code SST 020/2563; 10 April 2020).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Somkanya Tunsanga, Nephrology Unit, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand for their help in the manuscript outlining process.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Singer, M.; Deutschman, C.S.; Seymour, C.W.; Shankar-Hari, M.; Annane, D.; Bauer, M.; Bellomo, R.; Bernard, G.R.; Chiche, J.D.; Coopersmith, C.M.; et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 2016, 315, 801–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Rajaee, A.; Barnett, R.; Cheadle, W.G. Pathogen- and Danger-Associated Molecular Patterns and the Cytokine Response in Sepsis. Surg. Infect. 2018, 19, 107–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hotchkiss, R.S.; Moldawer, L.L.; Opal, S.M.; Reinhart, K.; Turnbull, I.R.; Vincent, J.L. Sepsis and septic shock. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2016, 2, 16045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Mosser, D.M.; Hamidzadeh, K.; Goncalves, R. Macrophages and the maintenance of homeostasis. Cell Mol. Immunol. 2021, 18, 579–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kotas, M.E.; Matthay, M.A. Mesenchymal stromal cells and macrophages in sepsis: New insights. Eur. Respir. J. 2018, 51, 1800510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. O’Dwyer, M.J.; Starczewska, M.H.; Schrenzel, J.; Zacharowski, K.; Ecker, D.J.; Sampath, R.; Brealey, D.; Singer, M.; Libert, N.; Wilks, M.; et al. The detection of microbial DNA but not cultured bacteria is associated with increased mortality in patients with suspected sepsis—A prospective multi-centre European observational study. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2017, 23, 208.e1–208.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Ziegler, I.; Cajander, S.; Rasmussen, G.; Ennefors, T.; Molling, P.; Stralin, K. High nuc DNA load in whole blood is associated with sepsis, mortality and immune dysregulation in Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia. Infect. Dis. 2019, 51, 216–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Christaki, E.; Giamarellos-Bourboulis, E.J. The complex pathogenesis of bacteremia: From antimicrobial clearance mechanisms to the genetic background of the host. Virulence 2014, 5, 57–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Gutierrez, J.; Guimaraes, A.O.; Lewin-Koh, N.; Berhanu, A.; Xu, M.; Cao, Y.; Kim, J.; Yan, D.; Chang, J.K.; Dinoso, J.B.; et al. Sustained circulating bacterial deoxyribonucleic acid is associated with complicated staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. In Open Forum Infectious Diseases; Oxford University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  10. Assimakopoulos, S.F.; Triantos, C.; Thomopoulos, K.; Fligou, F.; Maroulis, I.; Marangos, M.; Gogos, C.A. Gut-origin sepsis in the critically ill patient: Pathophysiology and treatment. Infection 2018, 46, 751–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Deitch, E.A. Gut-origin sepsis: Evolution of a concept. Surgeon 2012, 10, 350–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Fasano, A. All disease begins in the (leaky) gut: Role of zonulin-mediated gut permeability in the pathogenesis of some chronic inflammatory diseases. F1000Research 2020, 9, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gargari, G.; Mantegazza, G.; Taverniti, V.; Del Bo, C.; Bernardi, S.; Andres-Lacueva, C.; González-Domínguez, R.; Kroon, P.A.; Winterbone, M.S.; Cherubini, A.; et al. Bacterial DNAemia is associated with serum zonulin levels in older subjects. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 11054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sirivongrangson, P.; Kulvichit, W.; Payungporn, S.; Pisitkun, T.; Chindamporn, A.; Peerapornratana, S.; Pisitkun, P.; Chitcharoen, S.; Sawaswong, V.; Worasilchai, N.; et al. Endotoxemia and circulating bacteriome in severe COVID-19 patients. Intensive Care Med. Exp. 2020, 8, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lindahl, T. Instability and decay of the primary structure of DNA. Nature 1993, 362, 709–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nielsen, K.M.; Johnsen, P.J.; Bensasson, D.; Daffonchio, D. Release and persistence of extracellular DNA in the environment. Environ. Biosaf. Res. 2007, 6, 37–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Overballe-Petersen, S.; Harms, K.; Orlando, L.A.; Mayar, J.V.M.; Rasmussen, S.; Dahl, T.W.; Rosing, M.T.; Poole, A.M.; Sicheritz-Ponten, T.; Brunak, S.; et al. Bacterial natural transformation by highly fragmented and damaged DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 19860–19865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Willerslev, E.; Hansen, A.J.; Rønn, R.; Brand, T.B.; Barnes, I.; Wiuf, C.; Gilichinsky, D.; Mitchell, D.; Cooper, A. Long-term persistence of bacterial DNA. Curr Biol. 2004, 14, R9–R10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jann, B.; Reske, K.; Jann, K. Hetergeniety of Lipopolysachhride, Analysis of polysaccharide chain length by sodium dodacyl gel electrophoriesis. Eur. J. Biochem. 1975, 60, 239–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Leelahavanichkul, A.; Worasilchai, N.; Wannalerdsakun, S.; Jutivorakool, K.; Somparn, P.; Issara-Amphorn, J.; Tachaboon, S.; Srisawat, N.; Finkelman, M.; Chindamporn, A. Gastrointestinal Leakage Detected by Serum (1-->3)-beta-D-Glucan in Mouse Models and a Pilot Study in Patients with Sepsis. Shock 2016, 46, 506–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Amornphimoltham, P.; Yuen, P.S.T.; Star, R.A.; Leelahavanichkul, A. Gut Leakage of Fungal-Derived Inflammatory Mediators: Part of a Gut-Liver-Kidney Axis in Bacterial Sepsis. Dig Dis Sci. 2019, 64, 2416–2428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Schrenzel, J. PCR for the diagnosis of sepsis: Hope or hype? Crit. Care 2011, 15, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Struelens, M.J. Detection of Microbial DNAemia: Does it Matter for Sepsis Management? Intensive Care Med. 2010, 36, 193–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Cheng, Z.; Abrams, S.T.; Austin, J.; Toh, J.; Wang, S.S.; Wang, Z.; Yu, Q.; Yu, W.; Toh, C.H.; Wang, G. The Central Role and Possible Mechanisms of Bacterial DNAs in Sepsis Development. Mediat. Inflamm. 2020, 2020, 7418342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Gosiewski, T.; Ludwig-Galezowska, A.H.; Huminska, K.; Sroka-Oleksiak, A.; Radkowski, P.; Salamon, D.; Wojciechowicz, J.; Kus-Slowinska, M.; Bulanda, M.; Wolkow, P.P. Comprehensive detection and identification of bacterial DNA in the blood of patients with sepsis and healthy volunteers using next-generation sequencing method-the observation of DNAemia. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2017, 36, 329–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Chen, P.; Li, S.; Li, W.; Ren, J.; Sun, F.; Liu, R.; Zhou, X.J. Rapid diagnosis and comprehensive bacteria profiling of sepsis based on cell-free DNA. J. Transl. Med. 2020, 18, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Prins, J.M.; van Deventer, S.J.; Kuijper, E.J.; Speelman, P. Clinical relevance of antibiotic-induced endotoxin release. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1994, 38, 1211–1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Hamaguchi, S.; Akeda, Y.; Yamamoto, N.; Seki, M.; Yamamoto, K.; Oishi, K.; Tomono, K. Origin of Circulating Free DNA in Sepsis: Analysis of the CLP Mouse Model. Mediat. Inflamm. 2015, 2015, 614518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Rimmele, T.; Kellum, J.A. Clinical review: Blood purification for sepsis. Crit. Care 2011, 15, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Lilleri, D.; Gerna, G.; Furione, M.; Bernardo, M.E.; Giorgiani, G.; Telli, S.; Baldanti, F.; Locatelli, F. Use of a DNAemia cut-off for monitoring human cytomegalovirus infection reduces the number of preemptively treated children and young adults receiving hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation compared with qualitative pp65 antigenemia. Blood J. Am. Soc. Hematol. 2007, 110, 2757–2760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liao, W.; Zuo, X.; Lin, G.; Zhou, Y.; Fu, Y.; Cai, S.; Wei, P.P.; Liu, Y.X.; Liu, Y.; Ma, G.; et al. Microbial cell-free DNA in plasma of patients with sepsis: A potential diagnostic methodology. Discov. Med. 2020, 29, 129–137. [Google Scholar]
  32. Phatadon, S.; Win, K.; Sunchai, P.; Trairak, P.; Ariya, C.; Sadudee, P.; Prapaporn, P.; Suwalak, C.; Vorthon, S.; Navaporn, W.; et al. Endotoxemia and circulating bacteriome in severe COVID-19 patients. Intensive Care Med. Exp. 2020, 8, 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  33. Huang, M.; Cai, S.; Su, J. The Pathogenesis of Sepsis and Potential Therapeutic Targets. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Cornélie, S.; Wiel, E.; Lund, N.; Lebuffe, G.; Vendeville, C.; Riveau, G.; Vallet, B.; Ban, E. Cytosine-phosphate-guanine (CpG) motifs are sensitizing agents for lipopolysaccharide in toxic shock model. Intensive Care Med. 2002, 28, 1340–1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Yi, A.-K.; Yoon, J.-G.; Hong, S.-C.; Redford, T.W.; Krieg, A.M. Lipopolysaccharide and CpG DNA synergize for tumor necrosis factor-α production through activation of NF-κB. Int. Immunol. 2001, 13, 1391–1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Sparwasser, T.; Miethke, T.; Lipford, G.; Borschert, K.; Häcker, H.; Heeg, K.; Wagner, H. Bacterial DNA causes septic shock. Nature 1997, 386, 336–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Roberts, T.L.; Dunn, J.A.; Terry, T.D.; Jennings, M.P.; Hume, D.A.; Sweet, M.J.; Stacey, K.J. Differences in macrophage activation by bacterial DNA and CpG-containing oligonucleotides. J. Immunol. 2005, 175, 3569–3576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Miyake, K.; Onji, M. Endocytosis-free DNA sensing by cell surface TLR 9 in neutrophils: Rapid defense with autoimmune risks. Eur. J. Immunol. 2013, 43, 2006–2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Behnen, M.; Leschczyk, C.; Möller, S.; Batel, T.; Klinger, M.; Solbach, W.; Laskay, T. Immobilized immune complexes induce neutrophil extracellular trap release by human neutrophil granulocytes via FcgammaRIIIB and Mac-1. J. Immunol. 2014, 193, 1954–1965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Margolis, S.R.; Wilson, S.C.; Vance, R.E. Evolutionary Origins of cGAS-STING Signaling. Trends Immunol. 2017, 38, 733–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhao, Q.; Wei, Y.; Pandol, S.J.; Li, L.; Habtezion, A. STING Signaling Promotes Inflammation in Experimental Acute Pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 2018, 154, 1822–1835.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Torralba, D.; Baixauli, F.; Villarroya Beltri, C.; Fernández Delgado, I.; Latorre Pellicer, A. Priming of dendritic cells by DNA containing extracellular vesicles from activated T cells through antigen driven con tacts. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Roberts, P.J.; Segal, A.W. The digestion of bacterial macromolecules by phagocytic cells: The effect of mepacrine and ethanol. Immunology 1987, 62, 581–586. [Google Scholar]
  44. Ablasser, A.; Gulen, M.F. The role of cGAS in innate immunity and beyond. J. Mol. Med. 2016, 94, 1085–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Celhar, T.; Pereira-Lopes, S.; Thornhill, S.I.; Lee, H.Y.; Dhillon, M.K.; Poidinger, M.; Connolly, J.E.; Lim, L.H.; Biswas, S.K.; Fairhurst, A.M. TLR7 and TLR9 ligands regulate antigen presentation by macrophages. Int. Immunol. 2016, 28, 223–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. El-Sayed, O.M.; Dewyer, N.A.; Luke, C.E.; Elfline, M.; Laser, A.; Hogaboam, C.; Kunkel, S.L.; Henke, P.K. Intact Toll-like receptor 9 signaling in neutrophils modulates normal thrombogenesis in mice. J. Vasc. Surg. 2016, 64, 1450–1458.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Roda, J.M.; Parihar, R.; Carson, W.E. CpG-containing oligodeoxynucleotides act through TLR9 to enhance the NK cell cytokine response to antibody-coated tumor cells. J. Immunol. 2005, 175, 1619–1627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sacramento, L.; Trevelin, S.C.; Nascimento, M.S.; Lima-Jùnior, D.S.; Costa, D.L.; Almeida, R.P.; Cunha, F.Q.; Silva, J.S.; Carregaro, V. Toll-like receptor 9 signaling in dendritic cells regulates neutrophil recruitment to inflammatory foci following Leishmania infantum infection. Infect. Immun. 2015, 83, 4604–4616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Gao, J.J.; Xue, Q.; Papasian, C.J.; Morrison, D.C. Bacterial DNA and lipopolysaccharide induce synergistic production of TNF-α through a post-transcriptional mechanism. J. Immunol. 2001, 166, 6855–6860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Gao, J.J.; Zuvanich, E.G.; Xue, Q.; Horn, D.L.; Silverstein, R.; Morrison, D.C. Cutting edge: Bacterial DNA and LPS act in synergy in inducing nitric oxide production in RAW 264.7 macrophages. J. Immunol. 1999, 163, 4095–4099. [Google Scholar]
  51. Doi, K.; Leelahavanichkul, A.; Yuen, P.S.; Star, R.A. Animal models of sepsis and sepsis-induced kidney injury. J. Clin. Investig. 2009, 119, 2868–2878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Han, C.; Li, G.; Lim, K.; DeFrances, M.C.; Gandhi, C.R.; Wu, T. Transgenic expression of cyclooxygenase-2 in hepatocytes accelerates endotoxin-induced acute liver failure. J. Immunol. 2008, 181, 8027–8035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Tan, Y.; Zanoni, I.; Cullen, T.W.; Goodman, A.L.; Kagan, J.C. Mechanisms of Toll-like receptor 4 endocytosis reveal a common immune-evasion strategy used by pathogenic and commensal bacteria. Immunity 2015, 43, 909–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Nedeva, C. Inflammation and Cell Death of the Innate and Adaptive Immune System during Sepsis. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Jaroonwitchawan, T.; Visitchanakun, P.; Dang, P.C.; Ritprajak, P.; Palaga, T.; Leelahavanichkul, A. Dysregulation of lipid metabolism in macrophages is responsible for severe endotoxin tolerance in FcgRIIB-deficient lupus mice. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Dang, C.P.; Issara-Amphorn, J.; Charoensappakit, A.; Udompornpitak, K.; Bhunyakarnjanarat, T.; Saisorn, W.; Sae-Khow, K.; Leelahavanichkul, A. BAM15, a Mitochondrial Uncoupling Agent, Attenuates Inflammation in the LPS Injection Mouse Model: An Adjunctive Anti-Inflammation on Macrophages and Hepatocytes. J. Innate Immun. 2021, 19, 359–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Issara-Amphorn, J.; Dang, C.P.; Saisorn, W.; Limbutara, K.; Leelahavanichkul, A. Candida Administration in Bilateral Nephrectomy Mice Elevates Serum (1→ 3)-β-D-glucan That Enhances Systemic Inflammation Through Energy Augmentation in Macrophages. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Ivory, C.P.; Prystajecky, M.; Jobin, C.; Chadee, K. Toll-like receptor 9-dependent macrophage activation by Entamoeba histolytica DNA. Infect. Immun. 2008, 76, 289–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Kiemer, A.K.; Senaratne, R.H.; Hoppstädter, J.; Diesel, B.; Riley, L.W.; Tabeta, K.; Bauer, S.; Beutler, B.; Zuraw, B.L. Attenuated activation of macrophage TLR9 by DNA from virulent mycobacteria. J. Innate Immun. 2009, 1, 29–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Rother, N.; Yanginlar, C.; Lindeboom, R.G.; Bekkering, S.; van Leent, M.M.; Buijsers, B.; Jonkman, I.; de Graaf, M.; Baltissen, M.; Lamers, L.A.; et al. Hydroxychloroquine Inhibits the Trained Innate Immune Response to Interferons. Cell Rep. Med. 2020, 1, 100146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Jang, C.; Choi, J.; Byun, M.; Jue, D. Chloroquin inhibits production of TNFalpha, interleukin-1 and interleukin-6 from lipopolysaccharide-stimulated human monocytes/macrophages by different modes. Rheumatology 2006, 45, 703–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Redmann, M.; Benavides, G.A.; Berryhill, T.F.; Wani, W.Y.; Ouyang, X.; Johnson, M.S.; Ravi, S.; Barnes, S.; Darley-Usmar, V.M.; Zhang, J. Inhibition of autophagy with bafilomycin and chloroquine decreases mitochondrial quality and bioenergetic function in primary neurons. Redox Biol. 2017, 11, 73–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Ochman, H.; Caro, A. Genome Size and Structure, Bacterial; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  64. Williams, D.; Trimble, W.L.; Shilts, M.; Meyer, F.; Ochman, H. Rapid quantification of sequence repeats to resolve the size, structure and contents of bacterial genomes. BMC Genom. 2013, 14, 537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Bellot, P.; Frances, R.; Such, J. Pathological bacterial translocation in cirrhosis: Pathophysiology, diagnosis and clinical implications. Liver Int. 2013, 33, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Rodríguez-Laiz, G.P.; Zapater, P.; Melgar, P.; Alcázar, C.; Franco, M.; Giménez, P.; Pascual, S.; Bellot, P.; Palazón, J.M.; Rodríguez, M.; et al. Bacterial DNA translocation contributes to systemic inflammation and to minor changes in the clinical outcome of liver transplantation. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Remick, D.G.; Newcomb, D.E.; Bolgos, G.L.; Call, D.R. Comparison of the mortality and inflammatory response of two models of sepsis: Lipopolysaccharide vs. cecal ligation and puncture. Shock 2000, 13, 110–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Seemann Zohles, F.; Lupp, A. Comprehensive comparison of three different animal models for systemic inflammation. J. Biomed. Sci. 2017, 24, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Vaiserman, A.; Romanenko, M.; Piven, L.; Moseiko, V.; Lushchak, O.; Kryzhanovska, N.; Guryanov, V.; Koliada, A. Differences in the gut Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes ratio across age groups in healthy Ukrainian population. BMC Microbiol. 2020, 20, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Baldelli, V.; Scaldaferri, F.; Putignani, L.; Del Chierico, F. The Role of Enterobacteriaceae in Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Camilleri, M. Leaky gut: Mechanisms, measurement and clinical implications in humans. Gut 2019, 68, 1516–1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Panpetch, W.; Somboonna, N.; Palasuk, M.; Hiengrach, P.; Finkelman, M.; Tumwasorn, S.; Leelahavanichkul, A. Oral Candida administration in a Clostridium difficile mouse model worsens disease severity but is attenuated by Bifidobacterium. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0210798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Udompornpitak, K.; Bhunyakarnjanarat, T.; Charoensappakit, A.; Dang, C.P.; Saisorn, W.; Leelahavanichkul, A. Lipopolysaccharide-Enhanced Responses against Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor in FcgRIIb-Deficient Macrophages, a Profound Impact of an Environmental Toxin on a Lupus-Like Mouse Model. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Nighot, M.; Al-Sadi, R.; Guo, S.; Rawat, M.; Nighot, P.; Watterson, M.D.; Ma, T.Y. Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Increase in Intestinal Epithelial Tight Permeability Is Mediated by Toll-Like Receptor 4/Myeloid Differentiation Primary Response 88 (MyD88) Activation of Myosin Light Chain Kinase Expression. Am. J. Pathol. 2017, 187, 2698–2710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Visitchanakun, P.; Kaewduangduen, W.; Chareonsappakit, A.; Susantitaphong, P.; Pisitkun, P.; Ritprajak, P.; Townamchai, N.; Leelahavanichkul, A. Interference on Cytosolic DNA Activation Attenuates Sepsis Severity: Experiments on Cyclic GMP–AMP Synthase (cGAS) Deficient Mice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 11450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Cao, Y.; Zhang, X.; Shang, W.; Xu, J.; Wang, X.; Hu, X.; Ao, Y.; Cheng, H. Proinflammatory Cytokines Stimulate Mitochondrial Superoxide Flashes in Articular Chondrocytes In Vitro and In Situ. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e66444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Naik, E.; Dixit, V.M. Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species drive proinflammatory cytokine production. J. Exp. Med. 2011, 208, 417–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Busani, S.; De Biasi, S.; Nasi, M.; Paolini, A.; Venturelli, S.; Tosi, M.; Girardis, M.; Cossarizza, A. Increased Plasma Levels of Mitochondrial DNA and Normal Inflammasome Gene Expression in Monocytes Characterize Patients with Septic Shock Due to Multidrug Resistant Bacteria. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Timmermans, K.; Kox, M.; Scheffer, G.J.; Pickkers, P. Plasma Nuclear and Mitochondrial DNA Levels, and Markers of Inflammation, Shock, and Organ Damage in Patients with Septic Shock. Shock 2016, 45, 607–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Qiu, P.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, J. Review: The Role and Mechanisms of Macrophage Autophagy in Sepsis. Inflammation 2019, 42, 6–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Soto-Heredero, G.; Gomez de Las Heras, M.M.; Gabande-Rodriguez, E.; Oller, J.; Mittelbrunn, M. Glycolysis—A key player in the inflammatory response. FEBS J. 2020, 287, 3350–3369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Pålsson-McDermott, E.M.; O’Neill, L.A. Targeting immunometabolism as an anti-inflammatory strategy. Cell Res. 2020, 30, 300–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Hu, D.; Yang, X.; Xiang, Y.; Li, H.; Yan, H.; Zhou, J.; Caudle, Y.; Zhang, X.; Yin, D. Inhibition of Toll-like receptor 9 attenuates sepsis-induced mortality through suppressing excessive inflammatory response. Cell. Immunol. 2015, 295, 92–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. De Madaria, E.; Martinez, J.; Lozano, B.; Sempere, L.; Benlloch, S.; Such, J.; Uceda, F.; Frances, R.; Perez-Mateo, M. Detection and identification of bacterial DNA in serum from patients with acute pancreatitis. Gut 2005, 54, 1293–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Yasuda, H.; Leelahavanichkul, A.; Tsunoda, S.; Dear, J.W.; Takahashi, Y.; Ito, S.; Hu, X.; Zhou, H.; Doi, K.; Childs, R.; et al. Chloroquine and inhibition of Toll-like receptor 9 protect from sepsis-induced acute kidney injury. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 2008, 294, F1050–F1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Cadegiani, F.A.; Goren, A.; Wambier, C.G.; Mc, J. Early COVID-19 therapy with azithromycin plus nitazoxanide, ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine in outpatient settings significantly improved COVID-19 outcomes compared to known outcomes in untreated patients. New Microbes New Infect. 2021, 43, 100915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Galan, L.E.B.; Santos, N.M.D.; Asato, M.S.; Araújo, J.V.; De Lima Moreira, A.; Araújo, A.M.M.; Paiva, A.D.P.; Portella, D.G.S.; Marques, F.S.S.; Silva, G.M.A.; et al. Phase 2 randomized study on chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin in hospitalized patients with severe manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Pathog. Glob. Health 2021, 115, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Gao, W.; Xiong, Y.; Li, Q.; Yang, H. Inhibition of Toll-Like Receptor Signaling as a Promising Therapy for Inflammatory Diseases: A Journey from Molecular to Nano Therapeutics. Front. Physiol. 2017, 8, 508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Boom, R.; Sol, C.J.; Heijtink, R.; Wertheim-van Dillen, P.M.; van der Noordaa, J. Rapid purification of hepatitis B virus DNA from serum. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1991, 29, 1804–1811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  90. Hadiji-Abbes, N.; Martin, M.; Benzina, W.; Karray-Hakim, H.; Gergely, C.; Gargouri, A.; Mokdad-Gargouri, R. Extraction and purification of hepatitis B virus-like M particles from a recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain using alumina powder. J. Virol. Methods 2013, 187, 132–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Tullis, R.H.; Duffin, R.P.; Handley, H.H.; Sodhi, P.; Menon, J.; Joyce, J.A.; Kher, V. Reduction of hepatitis C virus using lectin affinity plasmapheresis in dialysis patients. Blood Purif. 2009, 27, 64–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Lu, Y.C.; Yeh, W.C.; Ohashi, P.S. LPS/TLR4 signal transduction pathway. Cytokine 2008, 42, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Suthers, A.N.; Sarantopoulos, S. TLR7/TLR9-and B cell receptor-signaling crosstalk: Promotion of potentially dangerous B cells. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Lopez-Armada, M.J.; Riveiro-Naveira, R.R.; Vaamonde-Garcia, C.; Valcarcel-Ares, M.N. Mitochondrial dysfunction and the inflammatory response. Mitochondrion 2013, 13, 106–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Doi, K.; Yuen, P.S.; Eisner, C.; Hu, X.; Leelahavanichkul, A.; Schnermann, J.; Star, R.A. Reduced production of creatinine limits its use as marker of kidney injury in sepsis. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2009, 20, 1217–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Leelahavanichkul, A.; Bocharov, A.V.; Kurlander, R.; Baranova, I.N.; Vishnyakova, T.G.; Souza, A.C.; Hu, X.; Doi, K.; Vaisman, B.; Amar, M.; et al. Class B scavenger receptor types I and II and CD36 targeting improves sepsis survival and acute outcomes in mice. J. Immunol. 2012, 188, 2749–2758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Leelahavanichkul, A.; Huang, Y.; Hu, X.; Zhou, H.; Tsuji, T.; Chen, R.; Kopp, J.B.; Schnermann, J.; Yuen, P.S.; Star, R.A. Chronic kidney disease worsens sepsis and sepsis-induced acute kidney injury by releasing High Mobility Group Box Protein-1. Kidney Int. 2011, 80, 1198–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Leelahavanichkul, A.; Yasuda, H.; Doi, K.; Hu, X.; Zhou, H.; Yuen, P.S.; Star, R.A. Methyl-2-acetamidoacrylate, an ethyl pyruvate analog, decreases sepsis-induced acute kidney injury in mice. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 2008, 295, F1825–F1835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Németh, K.; Leelahavanichkul, A.; Yuen, P.S.; Mayer, B.; Parmelee, A.; Robey, P.G.; Leelahavanichkul, K.; Koller, B.H.; Brown, J.M.; Hu, X.; et al. Bone marrow stromal cells attenuate sepsis via prostaglandin E 2–dependent reprogramming of host macrophages to increase their interleukin-10 production. Nat. Med. 2009, 15, 42–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Zafrani, L.; Ince, C.; Yuen, P.S. Microparticles During Sepsis: Target, Canary or Cure? Intensive Care Med. 2013, 39, 1854–1856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Denayer, T.; Stöhr, T.; Van Roy, M. Animal models in translational medicine: Validation and prediction. New Horiz. Transl. Med. 2014, 2, 5–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Van der Worp, H.B.; Howells, D.W.; Sena, E.S.; Porritt, M.J.; Rewell, S.; O’Collins, V.; Macleod, M.R. Can animal models of disease reliably inform human studies? PLoS Med. 2010, 7, e1000245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Chace, J.H.; Hooker, N.A.; Mildenstein, K.L.; Krieg, A.M.; Cowdery, J.S. Bacterial DNA-induced NK cell IFN-γ production is dependent on macrophage secretion of IL-12. Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol. 1997, 84, 185–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Poth, J.M.; Coch, C.; Busch, N.; Boehm, O.; Schlee, M.; Janke, M.; Zillinger, T.; Schildgen, O.; Barchet, W.; Hartmann, G. Monocyte-mediated inhibition of TLR9-dependent IFN-α induction in plasmacytoid dendritic cells questions bacterial DNA as the active ingredient of bacterial lysates. J. Immunol. 2010, 185, 7367–7373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Rizzello, V.; Bonaccorsi, I.; Dongarra, M.L.; Fink, L.N.; Ferlazzo, G. Role of natural killer and dendritic cell crosstalk in immunomodulation by commensal bacteria probiotics. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2011, 2011, 473097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Visitchanakun, P.; Tangtanatakul, P.; Trithiphen, O.; Soonthornchai, W.; Wongphoom, J.; Tachaboon, S.; Srisawat, N.; Leelahavanichkul, A. Plasma miR-370–3p as a biomarker of sepsis-associated encephalopathy, the transcriptomic profiling analysis of microrna-arrays from mouse brains. Shock 2020, 54, 347–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Saithong, S.; Saisorn, W.; Visitchanakun, P.; Sae-khow, K.; Chiewchengchol, D.; Leelahavanichkul, A. A Synergy Between Endotoxin and (1 -> 3)-Beta-D-Glucan Enhanced Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in Candida Administered Dextran Sulfate Solution Induced Colitis in FcGRIIB-/- Lupus Mice, an Impact of Intestinal Fungi in Lupus. J. Inflamm. Res. 2021, 14, 2333–2352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Grant, D.M. Detoxification pathways in the liver. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 1991, 14, 421–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Panpetch, W.; Hiengrach, P.; Nilgate, S.; Tumwasorn, S.; Somboonna, N.; Wilantho, A.; Chatthanathon, P.; Prueksapanich, P.; Leelahavanichkul, A. Additional Candida albicans administration enhances the severity of dextran sulfate solution induced colitis mouse model through leaky gut-enhanced systemic inflammation and gut-dysbiosis but attenuated by Lactobacillus rhamnosus L34. Gut Microbes 2020, 11, 465–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Li, Q.R.; Wang, C.Y.; Tang, C.; Zhao, X.F.; He, Q.; Li, J.S. Identification and Characterization of Blood and Neutrophil-Associated Microbiomes in Patients with Severe Acute Pancreatitis Using Next-Generation Sequencing. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2018, 8, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Wongpiyabovorn, J.; Soonthornchai, W.; Wilantho, A.; Palasuk, M.; Payungporn, S.; Sodsai, P.; Poomipak, W.; Weschawalit, S.; Ruchusatsawat, K.; Baillie, G.S.; et al. Effect of tarcolimus on skin microbiome in atopic dermatitis. Allergy 2019, 74, 1400–1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Ijms 23 01907 g001 550
Figure 1. Bacteremia in cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) sepsis, the impact of both intestinal infection and gut-barrier defect. Characteristics of mice after sham or CLP, as indicated by survival analysis (A), bacterial burdens in the blood (B), serum endotoxin (C), serum bacteria-free DNA (D), gut-barrier defect (FITC-dextran assay) (E), identified bacteria based on bacterial colony characteristics (mass-spectrometry analysis) (F), serum cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-10) (G), organ injury (serum creatinine and alanine transaminase) (H), and peripheral blood leukocyte (total, neutrophils, and lymphocytes) (I) are demonstrated (n = 15/group for A and n = 9–10/group for B–I). *, p < 0.05 vs. sham; survival analysis and the difference between two groups were determined by Log-rank test and Student’s T test, respectively.
Figure 1. Bacteremia in cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) sepsis, the impact of both intestinal infection and gut-barrier defect. Characteristics of mice after sham or CLP, as indicated by survival analysis (A), bacterial burdens in the blood (B), serum endotoxin (C), serum bacteria-free DNA (D), gut-barrier defect (FITC-dextran assay) (E), identified bacteria based on bacterial colony characteristics (mass-spectrometry analysis) (F), serum cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-10) (G), organ injury (serum creatinine and alanine transaminase) (H), and peripheral blood leukocyte (total, neutrophils, and lymphocytes) (I) are demonstrated (n = 15/group for A and n = 9–10/group for B–I). *, p < 0.05 vs. sham; survival analysis and the difference between two groups were determined by Log-rank test and Student’s T test, respectively.
Ijms 23 01907 g001
Ijms 23 01907 g002 550
Figure 2. Pathogenic proteobacteria were mainly presented in blood bacteriome of mice, both sham and cecal ligation and puncture (CLP), while Firmicutes were mainly demonstrated in fecal microbiome analysis of both groups. Characteristics of bacteriome analysis from the blood and feces of mice after sham or CLP, as indicated by bacterial abundance in phylum and species with the average abundance (A–D) and the graph presentation of some groups of bacteria (E) are demonstrated (n = 3–5 for sham and n = 6 for CLP). *, p < 0.05 vs. sham; the difference between groups was determined by Log-rank test and Student’s T test, respectively.
Figure 2. Pathogenic proteobacteria were mainly presented in blood bacteriome of mice, both sham and cecal ligation and puncture (CLP), while Firmicutes were mainly demonstrated in fecal microbiome analysis of both groups. Characteristics of bacteriome analysis from the blood and feces of mice after sham or CLP, as indicated by bacterial abundance in phylum and species with the average abundance (A–D) and the graph presentation of some groups of bacteria (E) are demonstrated (n = 3–5 for sham and n = 6 for CLP). *, p < 0.05 vs. sham; the difference between groups was determined by Log-rank test and Student’s T test, respectively.
Ijms 23 01907 g002
Ijms 23 01907 g003 550
Figure 3. The translocation of bacteria-free DNA from the gut into the blood circulation in a non-surgical intestinal tight-junction injury model using dextran sulfate solution (DSS)-induced mucositis. Characteristics of mice with DSS or regular drinking water (Water) with oral gavage by bacterial lysate or phosphate buffer solution (PBS) started on days 5–7 of the experiments, as indicated by serum bacteria-free DNA (A), gut-barrier defect (FITC-dextran) (B), serum lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (C), serum pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α and IL-6) (D,E) and colon injury score with representative histological pictures on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining (F,G) are demonstrated (n = 6–8/group). The colon pathology of control PBS gavage with regular drinking water (PBS–water) is not demonstrated due to the similarity with control bacterial lysate gavage with water (lysate–water). Arrows indicate inflammatory cell infiltration in DSS-induced intestinal injury. *, p < 0.05 between the indicated groups; the difference between groups was determined by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s analysis.
Figure 3. The translocation of bacteria-free DNA from the gut into the blood circulation in a non-surgical intestinal tight-junction injury model using dextran sulfate solution (DSS)-induced mucositis. Characteristics of mice with DSS or regular drinking water (Water) with oral gavage by bacterial lysate or phosphate buffer solution (PBS) started on days 5–7 of the experiments, as indicated by serum bacteria-free DNA (A), gut-barrier defect (FITC-dextran) (B), serum lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (C), serum pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α and IL-6) (D,E) and colon injury score with representative histological pictures on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining (F,G) are demonstrated (n = 6–8/group). The colon pathology of control PBS gavage with regular drinking water (PBS–water) is not demonstrated due to the similarity with control bacterial lysate gavage with water (lysate–water). Arrows indicate inflammatory cell infiltration in DSS-induced intestinal injury. *, p < 0.05 between the indicated groups; the difference between groups was determined by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s analysis.
Ijms 23 01907 g003
Ijms 23 01907 g004 550
Figure 4. Additive effect of bacteria-free DNA on LPS-induced pro-inflammation in mice and the influence of bacteria-free DNA in blood circulation. Characteristics of mice after injection with bacteria-free DNA (DNA) or lipopolysaccharide (LPS) alone or in combination (LPS + DNA), as indicated by serum bacteria-free DNA (A), gut-barrier defect (FITC-dextran) (B), serum alanine transaminase (C), serum cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-10) (D–F), cytokines from liver tissue (TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-10) (G–I) are demonstrated (n = 7–9/time-point). #, p < 0.05 vs. DNA; ϕ, p < 0.05 vs. baseline; *, p < 0.05 between the indicated groups; one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s analysis and repeated measures ANOVA were used for the analysis among groups and between different time-points within groups, respectively.
Figure 4. Additive effect of bacteria-free DNA on LPS-induced pro-inflammation in mice and the influence of bacteria-free DNA in blood circulation. Characteristics of mice after injection with bacteria-free DNA (DNA) or lipopolysaccharide (LPS) alone or in combination (LPS + DNA), as indicated by serum bacteria-free DNA (A), gut-barrier defect (FITC-dextran) (B), serum alanine transaminase (C), serum cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-10) (D–F), cytokines from liver tissue (TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-10) (G–I) are demonstrated (n = 7–9/time-point). #, p < 0.05 vs. DNA; ϕ, p < 0.05 vs. baseline; *, p < 0.05 between the indicated groups; one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s analysis and repeated measures ANOVA were used for the analysis among groups and between different time-points within groups, respectively.
Ijms 23 01907 g004
Ijms 23 01907 g005 550
Figure 5. Additive effect of bacteria-free DNA on LPS-induced pro-inflammation M1 macrophage polarization and the impact of bacterial DNA in macrophage responses. Characteristics of macrophages after activation by media control, lipopolysaccharide (LPS), bacteria-free DNA (DNA), and LPS with the DNA (LPS + DNA), as indicated by supernatant cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-10) (A–C) and the expression of genes for inflammatory signals (NFκB and TLR-4) (D,E), M1 macrophage polarization (iNOS and IL-1β) (F,G), and M2 macrophage polarization (FIZZ-1, Arg-1, and TGF-β) (H–J) are demonstrated (independent triplicated experiments were performed). *, p < 0.05 vs. all of other groups; #, p < 0.05 vs. macrophages with media control group; the difference between groups was determined by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s analysis.
Figure 5. Additive effect of bacteria-free DNA on LPS-induced pro-inflammation M1 macrophage polarization and the impact of bacterial DNA in macrophage responses. Characteristics of macrophages after activation by media control, lipopolysaccharide (LPS), bacteria-free DNA (DNA), and LPS with the DNA (LPS + DNA), as indicated by supernatant cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-10) (A–C) and the expression of genes for inflammatory signals (NFκB and TLR-4) (D,E), M1 macrophage polarization (iNOS and IL-1β) (F,G), and M2 macrophage polarization (FIZZ-1, Arg-1, and TGF-β) (H–J) are demonstrated (independent triplicated experiments were performed). *, p < 0.05 vs. all of other groups; #, p < 0.05 vs. macrophages with media control group; the difference between groups was determined by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s analysis.
Ijms 23 01907 g005
Ijms 23 01907 g006 550
Figure 6. Additive effect of bacteria-free DNA on LPS-mediated cell energy alteration in macrophages and the impact of bacteria-free DNA in macrophage responses. Characteristics of macrophages after activation by media control, lipopolysaccharide (LPS), bacteria-free DNA (DNA), and LPS with the DNA (LPS + DNA), as indicated by mitochondrial abundance using mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and MitoTracker fluorescent staining (A,B), oxygen consumption rate (OCR) of mitochondrial stress test with the graph presentation of respiratory capacity (maximal respiration) and respiratory reserve (C–E), and extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) for a glycolysis stress test with the graph presentation of glycolysis capacity (maximal glycolysis) and glycolysis reserve (F–H) are demonstrated (independent triplicated experiments were performed). *, p < 0.05 vs. all of the other groups; ϕ, p < 0.05 between the indicated groups; the difference between groups was determined by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s analysis.
Figure 6. Additive effect of bacteria-free DNA on LPS-mediated cell energy alteration in macrophages and the impact of bacteria-free DNA in macrophage responses. Characteristics of macrophages after activation by media control, lipopolysaccharide (LPS), bacteria-free DNA (DNA), and LPS with the DNA (LPS + DNA), as indicated by mitochondrial abundance using mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and MitoTracker fluorescent staining (A,B), oxygen consumption rate (OCR) of mitochondrial stress test with the graph presentation of respiratory capacity (maximal respiration) and respiratory reserve (C–E), and extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) for a glycolysis stress test with the graph presentation of glycolysis capacity (maximal glycolysis) and glycolysis reserve (F–H) are demonstrated (independent triplicated experiments were performed). *, p < 0.05 vs. all of the other groups; ϕ, p < 0.05 between the indicated groups; the difference between groups was determined by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s analysis.
Ijms 23 01907 g006
Ijms 23 01907 g007 550
Figure 7. TLR-9 inhibitors attenuated macrophage inflammatory responses against bacteria-free DNA and the impact of TLR-9 on bacteria-free DNA-induced inflammation. Characteristics of macrophages after activation by media control, lipopolysaccharide (LPS), bacteria-free DNA (DNA), and LPS with the DNA (LPS + DNA) with incubation by media (Control) or endosomal acidification inhibitors, chloroquine (CQ) or monensin, as indicated by supernatant cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-10) (A–C) and expression of inflammatory genes (NFκB and TLR-4) (D,E) are demonstrated (independent triplicated experiments were performed). *, p < 0.05 vs. all of other groups; #, p < 0.05 vs. macrophages with DNA in the control group; ϕ, p < 0.05 vs. macrophages with media control within each group of the experiments; the difference between groups was determined by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s analysis.
Figure 7. TLR-9 inhibitors attenuated macrophage inflammatory responses against bacteria-free DNA and the impact of TLR-9 on bacteria-free DNA-induced inflammation. Characteristics of macrophages after activation by media control, lipopolysaccharide (LPS), bacteria-free DNA (DNA), and LPS with the DNA (LPS + DNA) with incubation by media (Control) or endosomal acidification inhibitors, chloroquine (CQ) or monensin, as indicated by supernatant cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-10) (A–C) and expression of inflammatory genes (NFκB and TLR-4) (D,E) are demonstrated (independent triplicated experiments were performed). *, p < 0.05 vs. all of other groups; #, p < 0.05 vs. macrophages with DNA in the control group; ϕ, p < 0.05 vs. macrophages with media control within each group of the experiments; the difference between groups was determined by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s analysis.
Ijms 23 01907 g007
Ijms 23 01907 g008 550
Figure 8. TLR-9 inhibitors attenuated energy modification in macrophage with bacteria-free DNA stimulation and the impact of TLR-9 on bacteria-free DNA-induced cell-energy alteration. Characteristics of macrophages after activation by media control or lipopolysaccharide with bacteria-free DNA (LPS + DNA) alone or with chloroquine (LPS + DNA + CQ) as indicated by extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) for a glycolysis stress test with the graph presentation of glycolysis capacity (maximal glycolysis) and glycolysis reserve (A–C), oxygen consumption rate (OCR) of mitochondrial stress test with the graph presentation of respiratory capacity (maximal respiration) and respiratory reserve (D–F), and mitochondrial abundance using mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and MitoTracker fluorescent staining (G,H) are demonstrated (independent triplicated experiments were performed). *, p < 0.05 vs. all of other groups; #, p < 0.05 vs. macrophages with media control group; the difference between groups was determined by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s analysis.
Figure 8. TLR-9 inhibitors attenuated energy modification in macrophage with bacteria-free DNA stimulation and the impact of TLR-9 on bacteria-free DNA-induced cell-energy alteration. Characteristics of macrophages after activation by media control or lipopolysaccharide with bacteria-free DNA (LPS + DNA) alone or with chloroquine (LPS + DNA + CQ) as indicated by extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) for a glycolysis stress test with the graph presentation of glycolysis capacity (maximal glycolysis) and glycolysis reserve (A–C), oxygen consumption rate (OCR) of mitochondrial stress test with the graph presentation of respiratory capacity (maximal respiration) and respiratory reserve (D–F), and mitochondrial abundance using mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and MitoTracker fluorescent staining (G,H) are demonstrated (independent triplicated experiments were performed). *, p < 0.05 vs. all of other groups; #, p < 0.05 vs. macrophages with media control group; the difference between groups was determined by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s analysis.
Ijms 23 01907 g008
Ijms 23 01907 g009 550
Figure 9. Conclusion of the experiments on mouse models and macrophages with the key massages (at the bottom part of the figure). Accordingly, (i) CLP (bacteria-free DNA possibly originated from the death of bacteria in blood and gut-barrier defect); (ii) DSS mucositis with oral gavage by bacterial lysate (bacteria-free DNA in blood was transferred from the gut); (iii) LPS with and without bacteria-free DNA injection (the importance of bacteria-free DNA in blood on the induction of LPS hyper-inflammatory responses); and (iv) the synergy between LPS and bacteria-free DNA on macrophage responses and the attenuation by TLR-9 blockage. Figure created using Biorender (https://biorender.com/, accessed on 29 January 2022).
Figure 9. Conclusion of the experiments on mouse models and macrophages with the key massages (at the bottom part of the figure). Accordingly, (i) CLP (bacteria-free DNA possibly originated from the death of bacteria in blood and gut-barrier defect); (ii) DSS mucositis with oral gavage by bacterial lysate (bacteria-free DNA in blood was transferred from the gut); (iii) LPS with and without bacteria-free DNA injection (the importance of bacteria-free DNA in blood on the induction of LPS hyper-inflammatory responses); and (iv) the synergy between LPS and bacteria-free DNA on macrophage responses and the attenuation by TLR-9 blockage. Figure created using Biorender (https://biorender.com/, accessed on 29 January 2022).
Ijms 23 01907 g009
Ijms 23 01907 g010 550
Figure 10. The working hypothesis demonstrates a simultaneous stimulation of surface TLR-4 and endosomal TLR-9 by LPS and bacteria-free DNA, respectively, which induces inflammatory responses through MyD88, and non-MyD88 (TRIF), which induces TRAF-6 [92,93]. The vigorous inflammatory stimulation, especially cytokine production, requires high cell energy, mostly by the glycolysis pathway [81], which might cause mitochondrial damage with higher inflammatory responses [75,94]. MyD88, myeloid differentiation primary response 88; TRIF, TIR-domain-containing adapter-inducing interferon-β; TRAF6, TNF receptor associated factor 6; IRF-3, interferon regulatory factor 3. Figure created using Biorender (https://biorender.com/, accessed on 29 January 2022).
Figure 10. The working hypothesis demonstrates a simultaneous stimulation of surface TLR-4 and endosomal TLR-9 by LPS and bacteria-free DNA, respectively, which induces inflammatory responses through MyD88, and non-MyD88 (TRIF), which induces TRAF-6 [92,93]. The vigorous inflammatory stimulation, especially cytokine production, requires high cell energy, mostly by the glycolysis pathway [81], which might cause mitochondrial damage with higher inflammatory responses [75,94]. MyD88, myeloid differentiation primary response 88; TRIF, TIR-domain-containing adapter-inducing interferon-β; TRAF6, TNF receptor associated factor 6; IRF-3, interferon regulatory factor 3. Figure created using Biorender (https://biorender.com/, accessed on 29 January 2022).
Ijms 23 01907 g010
Table
Table 1. List of primers used in the study.
Table 1. List of primers used in the study.
PrimersForwardReverse
Nuclear factor-kB (NF-kB)5′-CTTCCTCAGCCATGGTACCTCT-3′5′-CAAGTCTTCATCAGCATCAAACTG-3′
Toll like receptor-4 (TLR-4)5′-GGCAGCAGGTGGAATTGTAT-3′5′-AGGCCCCAGAGTTTTGTTCT-3′
Inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS)5′-ACCCACATCTGGCAGAATGAG-3′5′-AGCCATGACCTTTCGCATTAG-3′
Interleukin-1ß (IL-1ß)5′-GAAATGCCACCTTTTGACAGTG-3′5′-TGGATGCTCTCATCAGGACAG-3′
Arginase-1 (Arg-1)5′-CTTGGCTTGCTTCGGAACTC-3′5′-GGAGAAGGCGTTTGCTTAGTTC-3′
Transforming Growth Factor-β (TGF-β)5′-CAGAGCTGCGCTTGCAGAG-3′5′-GTCAGCAGCCGGTTACCAAG-3′
Resistin-like molecule-α (FIZZ-1)5′-GCCAGGTCCTGGAACCTTTC-3′5′-GGAGCAGGGAGATGCAGATGA-3′
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kaewduangduen, W.; Visitchanakun, P.; Saisorn, W.; Phawadee, A.; Manonitnantawat, C.; Chutimaskul, C.; Susantitaphong, P.; Ritprajak, P.; Somboonna, N.; Cheibchalard, T.; et al. Blood Bacteria-Free DNA in Septic Mice Enhances LPS-Induced Inflammation in Mice through Macrophage Response. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 1907. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms23031907

AMA Style

Kaewduangduen W, Visitchanakun P, Saisorn W, Phawadee A, Manonitnantawat C, Chutimaskul C, Susantitaphong P, Ritprajak P, Somboonna N, Cheibchalard T, et al. Blood Bacteria-Free DNA in Septic Mice Enhances LPS-Induced Inflammation in Mice through Macrophage Response. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(3):1907. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms23031907

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kaewduangduen, Warerat, Peerapat Visitchanakun, Wilasinee Saisorn, Ariya Phawadee, Charintorn Manonitnantawat, Chirapas Chutimaskul, Paweena Susantitaphong, Patcharee Ritprajak, Naraporn Somboonna, Thanya Cheibchalard, and et al. 2022. "Blood Bacteria-Free DNA in Septic Mice Enhances LPS-Induced Inflammation in Mice through Macrophage Response" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 3: 1907. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms23031907

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop