Next Article in Journal
Chromosomal-Level Assembly of Antarctic Scaly Rockcod, Trematomus loennbergii Genome Using Long-Read Sequencing and Chromosome Conformation Capture (Hi-C) Technologies
Next Article in Special Issue
Crassoascoma gen. nov. (Lentitheciaceae, Pleosporales): Unrevealing Microfungi from the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau in China
Previous Article in Journal
Cultivable Endophytic Bacteria in Seeds of Dongxiang Wild Rice and Their Role in Plant-Growth Promotion
Previous Article in Special Issue
Taxonomy and Phylogeny Reveal Two New Potential Edible Ectomycorrhizal Mushrooms of Thelephora from East Asia
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Description of Lepiotaceous Fungal Species of the Genera Chlorophyllum, Clarkeinda, Macrolepiota, Pseudolepiota, and Xanthagaricus, from Laos and Thailand

1
Center of Excellence in Fungal Research, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand
2
School of Science, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand
3
Ecology Division, Biotechnology and Ecology Institute, Ministry of Science and Technology, Vientiane P.O. Box 2279, Laos
4
School of Life Science and Technology, Center for Informational Biology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China
5
UC Herbarium, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720-2465, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 12 November 2021 / Revised: 4 December 2021 / Accepted: 7 December 2021 / Published: 12 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Hidden Fungal Diversity in Asia)

Abstract

:
In our ongoing research on lepiotaceous taxa (Agaricaceae s.l.) in Laos and northern Thailand, we focus here on Chlorophyllum, Clarkeinda, Macrolepiota, Pseudolepiota, and Xanthagaricus. Collections were obtained from various habitats, including agricultural habitats, grasslands, and rainforests. A total of 12 taxa were examined and investigated. Of these 12, two are new for science; viz. Xanthagaricus purpureosquamulosus with brownish-grey to violet-brown squamules on a pale-violet to violet background; it shares the pileus color with X. caeruleus and X. ianthinus, but differs in other characters; and Macrolepiota excelsa, rather similar to M. procera but related to M. detersa. Two species, Pseudolepiota zangmui and Xanthagaricus necopinatus are recorded for the first time in Thailand. Four species of Chlorophyllum and a total of four species of Macrolepiota were found, viz., C. demangei and C. hortense with white basidiospores, C. molybdites and C. globosum with green basidiospores, M. detersa, M. dolichaula, the new M. excelsa, and M. velosa. Another rather common striking species is Clarkeinda trachodes, with yellow-green basidiospores. Each species is described in detail, with color photographs and line drawings. Phylogenetic analyses based on internal transcribed spacer (nrITS) region, the large subunit nuclear ribosomal (nrLSU) DNA and RNA polymerase II second largest subunit (rpb2) genes provide evidence for the placement of the species covered.

1. Introduction

As part of ongoing survey into the mycological diversity of Laos and northern Thailand [1], the focus of this article is on Macrolepiota Singer, and some genera in the ‘wider Agaricus clade’ (also considered to be Agaricaceae in the strict sense [2,3,4], in particular, the genera Chlorophyllum Massee, Clarkeinda Kuntze, Pseudolepiota Z.W. Ge, and Xanthagaricus (Heinem.) Little Flower, Hosag. and T.K. Abraham. Earlier, we described two new genera in this clade, viz. Coniolepiota Vellinga and Eriocybe Vellinga [2] focused on the genus Lepiota (Pers.) Gray [5,6,7,8] and documented the rarely recorded species Verrucospora vulgaris Pegler [9].
Chlorophyllum Massee is widespread in tropical to temperate regions, often in anthropogenic landscapes, with a total of 19 species [10,11,12]. The species are agaricoid or secotioid, the latter occurring in steppes, deserts, and other dry habitats. Until 2003 Chlorophyllum was restricted to the green-spored agaricoid species, whereas the white-spored agaricoid taxa were included in Macrolepiota Singer, and the secotioid taxa were considered part of Endoptychum Czern. or Secotium Kunze. Molecular-phylogenetic research clearly showed that Chlorophyllum includes white-spored taxa with a smooth stipe and with or without a simple germ pore, that Chlorophyllum and Macrolepiota s. str. are not closely related [2,13,14], and that the secotioid taxa are relatively recent morphological adaptations (e.g., Vellinga et al. 2003 [12,13,15]). A proposal to conserve the name Chlorophyllum against Secotium was published [16]. Only three Chlorophyllum species are listed in the checklist for Thailand [17]. Of these three, Chl. molybdites (G. Mey.) Massee seems to be common and widespread; Chl. rhacodes (Vittad.) Vellinga was reported from the northeast, while Chl. hortense (Murrill) Vellinga was only recorded from the southern part of Thailand [17,18,19]. However, these reports are based on morphology alone, and in this group of similar-looking species, it is better to have molecular and morphological evidence. The occurrence of Chl. rhacodes has not yet been confirmed in Thailand, but in this article, we report Chl. globosum (Mossebo) Vellinga with green basidiospores, and Chl. demangei (Pat.) Z.W. Ge and Zhu L. Yang with white basidiospores as additions to the Thai mycoflora.
Clarkeinda trachodes (Berk.) Singer, originally described from Sri Lanka as Agaricus trachodes Berk. [20], is commonly found in tropical regions of eastern and southern Asia; there are reports from Bangladesh [21], India [22,23], Malaysia [24], Indonesia, and southern China [25]. The species was also recorded from Thailand [2,17]. Here, we describe the Thai collections in detail.
Macrolepiota Singer is also widespread, and members of this genus can be found in various habitats, from grasslands to native forests. Till the early 2000s, the smooth-stiped species, now accommodated in Chlorophyllum, were considered part of Macrolepiota. However, Macrolepiota species differ from Chlorophyllum in the presence of a vestiture on the stipe, resulting in a tiger pattern in the full-grown specimens, the trichodermal appearance of the pileus covering, and the presence of a real germ pore in the spores [13,26,27]. The two genera are not closely related, with Chlorophyllum in the Agaricus clade and Macrolepiota close to Lepiota [13]. Similar to Chlorophyllum, Macrolepiota also harbors secotioid taxa [28]. Seven Macrolepiota taxa have been reported from Thailand, viz. M. africana (R. Heim) Heinem, M. dolichaula (Berk. and Br.) Pegler and Rayner, M. excoriata (Schaeff.) Wasser, M. gracilenta (Krombh.) Wasser, M. mastoidea (Fr.) Singer, M. procera var. procera and M. zeyheri Heinem [17,18,29,30,31]. However, these records are based on morphology only; the presence of some of these species in Thailand has to be confirmed by molecular means.
The monotypic genus Pseudolepiota Z.W. Ge was recently described from southern China, based on Ps. zangmui Z.W. Ge [32]. This is one of the species superficially resembling the European species Lepiota fuscovinacea F.H. Møller and J.E. Lange with a cutis-like pileus covering and no clamp connections [2]. The species was found in two different locations in northern Thailand, expanding the known distribution considerably.
Xanthagaricus (Heinem.) Little Flower, Hosag. and T.K. Abraham is thus far only known from southern and eastern Asia and South Africa. It is a small genus characterized by small basidiomata, a squamulose pileus, white to pale-yellow basidiospores, and the absence of clamp connections. Heinemann and Little Flower [33] considered it a subgenus of Hymenagaricus Heinem., but recent phylogenetic research showed that it did not form a monophyletic group with Hymenagaricus species [34]. Two species were described from Thailand, viz., X. thailandensis J. Kumla, N. Suwannarach and S. Lumyong [35] and X. siamensis Yuan S. Liu and S. Lumyong [36], and here we describe a third species. We also record X. necopinatus Iqbal Hosen, T.H. Li, and G.M. Gates, described from Bangladesh, from Chiang Mai and Chiang Rai provinces in northern Thailand, expanding the known distribution of that species.
In this study, we aim to give descriptions of new species and report new records and extensive descriptions of some more common species for northern Thailand and Laos, based on morphological studies and comparisons and molecular phylogenetic analyses.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection and Morphological Study

The specimens were collected during the wet seasons of 2007–2019 in Laos and Thailand. In the field, the forest type and habitat or substrate of mushrooms were recorded, and the samples were photographed. Macro-morphology, examined on fresh samples, included notes on shape, size, and color of the basidiomata, pileus, lamellae, stipe, annulus, context, and spore print following the glossary of Vellinga and Noordeloos [26] and Kornerup and Wanscher [37] for color annotations. Samples were dried on hot, dry air for 24 h and preserved in plastic bags with silica gel. Thai specimens were deposited in the herbarium at Mae Fah Luang University (MFLU) with duplicates for the 2007 collections made by Vellinga at UC; and Lao specimens were deposited in the National Herbarium of Laos (HNL).
The micromorphology was illustrated from dried material: basidiospores, basidia, and cheilocystidia from the lamellae and the structure of the pileus covering, using a drawing tube attached to an Olympus CX-41 research compound microscope. The original color of all characteristics was observed in water (H2O) and 3–10% of potassium hydroxide (KOH), and chemical reactions were observed using Melzer’s reagent, Cotton Blue, and Cresyl Blue; line drawings were made of material mounted in Congo Red in ammonia. A total of 25 basidiospores, 15 basidia, and cheilocystidia per collection were measured. Spores were measured in side-view. The notation [50/2/2] indicates that the measurements were made on 50 basidiospores in 2 samples in 2 collections; the size averages are given in the description, while quotient (Q) of length and width average was calculated to indicate the basidiospore shape. The technical terms used for the descriptions followed those of Vellinga and Noordeloos [26].

2.2. Molecular Study

DNA was extracted from dried herbarium collections, according to the instructions of the Biospin Fungus Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (Bioer Technology Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China). Primers ITS1 and ITS4 were used for the nrITS1, 5.8S, and nrITS2 regions; primers LR0R and LR5 for large subunit region (LSU); primers fRPB2-6F and fRPB2-7R for polymerase II second largest subunit (rpb2) region; and PCR conditions followed common protocols [38,39]. The PCR amplified products were cleaned and sequenced by Shanghai Majorbio Bio-Pharm Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Sequences were edited, and contigs were assembled using the SeqMan program (DNAStar, Madison, WI, USA), and all new sequences were deposited in GenBank. The sequences were checked against existing sequences at GenBank, and related sequences were obtained for each analysis.
Dataset 1, a combined dataset of nrITS-LSU genes (91 sequences), was composed of 10 newly generated sequences (8 ITS, 2 LSU) and 81 sequences from GenBank (54 ITS, 27 LSU). Totally; 63 sequences in the Agaricus clade of the Agaricaceae were included, representing Agaricus, Clarkeinda, Coniolepiota, Eriocybe, Heinemannomyces, Hymenagaricus, Pseudolepiota, Micropsalliota, and Xanthagaricus; and Chlorophyllum rhacodes (Vittad.) Vellinga is set as outgroup (Table 1). Dataset 2, Chlorophyllum species, 125 sequences of nrITS sequences, was composed of 10 new sequences and 115 sequences from GenBank representing all known species in the genus; Clarkeinda trachodes (Berk.) Singer and Agaricus campestris L. are outgroups, and GenBank accession number and country of origin are indicated after the species name in the tree (Figure 2). Dataset 3, a combined dataset of nrITS-LSU-rpb2 genes (139 sequences) of Chlorophyllum species, was composed of 19 new sequences (10 nrITS, 8 LSU, 1 rpb2) and 120 sequences from GenBank (48 nrITS, 40 LSU, 32 rpb2), with Clarkeinda trachodes and Agaricus campestris as outgroup (Table 2); all known Chlorophyllum taxa are represented in this dataset as well. Dataset 4, a dataset of nrITS gene regions (96 sequences) of Macrolepiota species, was composed of 17 new sequences and 80 sequences from GenBank, with Leucoagaricus meleagris as the outgroup, and GenBank accession number and country of origin are indicated after the species name in the tree (Figure 4).
The datasets were aligned using MAFFT version 7.130-win32 (https://wiki.anunna.wur.nl/index.php/MAFFT_7.130, accessed on 10 December 2021) [40,41]. The final alignments were submitted to the TreeBase website (https://www.treebase.org/treebase-web/home.html, TreeBase No. 24630, accessed on 10 December 2021).
A Maximum likelihood (ML) analysis was performed in RAxML 7.2.6 [42] for the individual dataset with GTRGAMMA + I as the model of evolution, and branch support was estimated over 1000 bootstrap partitions (BP) with the rapid bootstrap option. For Bayesian inferences (BI) analysis, the best substitution model of the individual dataset was defined by using MrModelTest v.2.3 [43]. For dataset (1), the best-selected model was GTR + I + G for both ITS and LSU. For dataset (2), the ITS dataset, the best-selected model was HKY + I + G. For dataset (3), the best-selected model for ITS was HKY + I + G, and GTR + I + G was the best for LSU and rpb2. For dataset (4), the best-selected model was again GTR + I + G. A Bayesian inference (BI) analysis was performed with mrbayes 3.2.7a [44] at the CIPRES webserver (available at https://www.phylo.org/ (accessed on 10 December 2021) with the suitable setting of 4 individual runs. The Bayesian inference analysis; each one beginning from random trees with 4 simultaneous independent chains, each of 4 Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) chains for 2 independent runs, 2,000,000 generations for datasets 1, 2, and 3, and 1,000,000 generations for dataset (4), sampled every 1000 generations, the first 25% (0.25) of the sampled trees were discarded as burn-in, and all sampled after the average standard deviation of split frequencies lowered than 0.01 were used to reconstruct a 50% majority-rule consensus tree and to calculate the Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP) of the clades. The phylogenetic tree results of all analyses were exported and edited in TreeView 1.0.0.0. [45]. The phylogenetic trees were edited in the software of Adobe Illustrator CS3.

3. Results

3.1. Result of the Phylogenetic Analyses

Figure 1 shows the maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of the extended Agaricus clade based on a combined ITS and LSU data set. A total of 63 taxa were analyzed (Table 1). The alignment dataset comprised 1560 characters (including the gaps). Seven different major clades can be recognized in the phylogenetic tree (Figure 1). The Xanthagaricus clade received high bootstrap support and was completely comprised of Xanthagaricus species; the two Thai specimens of X. purpureosquamulosus had identical sequences and are basal to a clade comprised of X. epipastus, X. necopinatus, and X. pakistanicus; the sequences of the Thai specimens of Ps. Zangmui were identical with those from China. Clarkeinda also forms a monophyletic clade, composed of a Thai specimen from this study, two Thai specimens from Vellinga et al. [2], a specimen from Bangladesh Hosen et al. [34], and a specimen from the type location in Sri Lanka [46].
Figure 2 indicates the maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of Chlorophyllum species based on nrITS sequences. Data from 126 collections were included, and the alignment dataset comprised 809 characters (including the gaps). Six clades were distinguished, all receiving high bootstrap support. Thai taxa clustered into two sections as in an analysis of combined sequences data (Figure 3).
Figure 3 shows the maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of Chlorophyllum species based on multi-gene DNA data set of ITS, LSU, and rpb2 gene regions. The alignment comprised 58 collections (Table 2), and this dataset comprised 2322 characters (including the gaps). The six clades or sections in Chlorophyllum, (Chlorophyllum, Ellipsoidospororum, Endoptychorum, Rhacodium, Parvispororum, and Sphaerospororum) received high bootstrap support, and these results are consistent with those found by Ge et al. [10]. The Thai specimens were distributed in two sections: C. demangei and C. hortense with white basidiospores without a germ pore in section Ellipsoidospororum, and the species with greenish basidiospores and a germ pore, C. globosum and C. molybdites, in section Chlorophyllum.
Figure 4 shows the maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of Macrolepiota species based on nrITS sequences. A total of 97 sequences was analyzed; the aligned dataset comprised 777 characters (including the gaps). Three major clades or sections (sect. Macrolepiota, sect. Macrosporae, sect. Volvata) were recognized with high bootstrap support in the phylogenetic tree.

3.2. Taxonomy

3.2.1. Chlorophyllum Massee

Chlorophyllum demangei (Pat.) Z.W. Ge & Zhu L. Yang, MycoKeys 33: 80 (2018)

Lepiota demangei Pat., Bull. trimest. Soc. mycol. Fr. 23 (2): 78 (1907).
Index Fungorum number: IF 823863; Facesoffungi number: FoF 07067; Figure 5 and Figure 6.
Pileus 50–90 mm, subglobose when young, expanding to parabolic, convex-hemispherical with umbo, applanate to plano-concave, with straight to the deflexed margin; surface smooth when young, brownish-grey (5D2), later breaking up into scales and leaving light-brown to brown (5D4, 6D7–8) glabrous calotte at the center, with concolorous with tufted patches around umbo and irregular patches scattered toward the margin, on white to pale-yellow (5A3) background, turning orange-white (5A2) with time; margin with strongly sulcate marginal zone, striate, up to 15 mm wide, with exceeding lamellae when mature. Lamellae free, slightly or distinctly ventricose, up to 5 mm wide, white to yellowish-white (4A2), crowded, lamella-edge eroded. Stipe 10–90 × 6–7 mm, cylindrical, or slightly wider at base; surface covered with white fibrils, turning orange-white (5A2) when touched. Annulus superonate, attached at the upper side of the stipe, moveable when mature, with surface concolorous to patches on the pileus. The context in pileus white, in stipe white and hollow, turning orange-white (5A2) in both stipe and pileus context. Taste peanut-like. Smell mild. Spore print white.
Basidiospores [100,4,4] 6.5–8.5 × 4.2–6.5 µm, avl × avw = 7.5 × 5.5 µm, Q = 1.3–1.67, Qav = 1.4–1.55, in side-view ellipsoid to oblong-amygdaliform, in frontal view ellipsoid, oblong, without germ pore, slightly thick-walled, hyaline, dextrinoid, congophilous, cyanophilous, metachromatic in Cresyl Blue. Basidia 18–28 × 7.0–11.5 µm, clavate, hyaline and thin-walled, 2-spored and 4-spored, occasionally 1-spored. Lamella edge sterile, with abundant cheilocystidia. Cheilocystidia 24–55 × 6–9.5 µm, narrowly clavate, slightly narrowly lageniform, cylindrical, colorless, and slightly thick-walled. Pleurocystidia absent. Pileus covering a trichoderm made up of cylindrical, narrowly clavate elements with a long stalk, 40–145 × 6–14 µm, colorless or with pale-brown parietal pigment, with the encrusted wall in some elements and lower hyphae. Stipe covering a cutis made up of cylindrical hyphae and elements, colorless, up to 12 µm wide. Clamp connections not found.
Habitat and distribution: Solitary or in large groups, saprotrophic, on decaying wood and leaves on rich humus soil; in deciduous rainforest, gardens, and grasslands.
Material examined: Thailand, Chiang Mai Province, Mae Taeng District, Pha Deng Village: 19°07′13.7″ N; 98°43′52.9″ E, alt., 905 m, 6 July 2007, P. Sysouphanthong, PNG05 (MFLU 09-0005); ibidem, 12 July 2007, P. Sysouphanthong, PNG050 (MFLU 09-0051); ibidem, 25 July 2007, E. C. Vellinga, ecv3557; ibidem, 15 July 2007, E. C. Vellinga, ecv3622; Chiang Rai, Muang District, Pong Phra Bath Village, 21 July 2012, P. Sysouphanthong, 2012-6 (MFLU 12-1769).
Notes: the Thai collections of Chlorophyllum demangei can be recognized by brownish-grey to yellowish-brown irregular patches on white pileus with sulcate or striate margin in most collections, white and free lamellae with a white spore print, a simple annulus, oblong-ovoid to oblong amygdaliform, and hyaline basidiospores without a germ pore, clavate, 4-spored basidia, narrowly clavate to cylindrical cheilocystidia, trichodermal pileus covering made up of cylindrical to narrowly clavate elements, and absence of clamp connections. It closely resembles C. hortense, microscopically because of the basidiospores without a germ pore and the cylindrical cheilocystidia, but it differs in the 4-spored basidia. Thus far, it seems to be much more restricted in its distribution than C. hortense, as it is only known from China, northern Thailand, and Vietnam [10,47]. This is the first record of the species from Thailand.

Chlorophyllum globosum (Mossebo) Vellinga, Mycotaxon 83: 416 (2002)

Macrolepiota globosa Mossebo, Mycotaxon 76: 268 (2000).
Index Fungorum number: IF 374394; Facesoffungi number: FoF 07069; Figure 7 and Figure 8.
Pileus 50–200 mm, subglobose to globose when young, expanding to parabolic to convex, plano-concave when fully mature, with straight or slightly inflexed margin; glabrous at the center, pale-orange to brownish-orange (5A2–3, 6C7–8), with concolorous patches of irregular shapes around the center and scatted towards the margin and fragile when mature, on white to yellowish-white (2A2, 3A2, 4A2) felted or fibrillose background and turning pastel red to red (9A4–6) when touched; margin white, sulcate, but non-striate, not fringed, exceeding lamellae when mature. Lamellae free, slightly remote from the stipe, white to orange-white (5A1–2) when young, turning pastel red to red (9A4–6) when touched, pastel green to grayish-green (29A4, 29B4) when fully mature, crowded, ventricose, and narrowly to pileal margin, up to 20 mm wide, with the eroded edge. Stipe 85–210 × 12–31 mm, tapering to apex, with bulb-like, 30–34 mm wide base; white to brownish-orange (6C3–6) background, sometimes with some white fibrils at apical zone, turning pastel red to red (9A4–6) when touched, with white rhizomorphs connected to the substrate. Annulus under-developed, cuff-like, moveable when mature, white and fibrillose in the upper part, at underside with squamules similar to the patches on the pileus. Context thick and white in pileus, white in the stipe, brownish-orange (6C3–6) at apical zone, paler in the middle zone, and white toward the base, turning pastel red to red (9A4–6) in both pileus and stipe context. Smell and taste not observed. Spore print dull green to grayish-green (29D3–5, 29D5–6).
Basidiospores [75,3,2] 9.0–12.0 × 7.0–9.0 µm, avl × avw = 10.3–11.3 × 7.4–8.3 µm, Q = 1.3–1.57, avQ = 1.4, in side-view broadly ellipsoid to ellipsoid-amygdaliform, in frontal view broadly ellipsoid or amygdaliform, with truncate apex and germ pore, thick-walled, hyaline to hyaline green, dextrinoid, congophilous, cyanophilous, metachromatic. Basidia 22.0–34.0 × 9.0–14.0 µm, clavate, hyaline, thin-walled, 4-spored, often 2-spored, rarely 1-spored. Lamella edge sterile. Cheilocystidia 30.0–58.0 × 10.0–29.0 µm, essentially clavate, occasionally with a slightly long stalk, rarely utriform and spheropedunculate, thin-walled and colorless. Pleurocystidia absent. Pileus covering a hymenoderm made up of layers of oblong to cylindrical, narrowly clavate elements, terminal elements 40.0–100 × 5.0–11.0 µm, with rounded or attenuate apex, hyaline and thin-walled, sometimes with pale-yellow intracellular pigment in upper elements. Clamp connections not found.
Habitat and distribution: growing in small groups, saprotrophic, on nutrient-rich soil, in grassland in shade of Samanea saman and on soil rich in humus in deciduous rain forest during June to August in the wet season of northern Thailand and also known from Vientiane Capital, Laos.
Material examined: THAILAND, Chiang Mai Province, Mae Taeng District, Pongduad Village:16°06′16.1″ N; 99°43′07.9″ E, alt., 780–805 m, 16 June 2010, P. Sysouphanthong, P37 (MFLU 10-0555); Chiang Rai Province, Muang District, Ratjabhat University Campus, 30 August 2012, P. Sysouphanthong, 2012-21 (MFLU 12-1815); Chiang Rai Province, Muang District, Forest of Mae Fah Luang University Campus, 10 July 2019, P. Sysouphanthong, 2019-24 (MFLU 19-2357). LAOS, Vientiane Capital, Xaythany, Houay Yang Preserve Forest, 16 June 2017, P. Sysouphanthong, PS2017–7 (HNL503445).
Notes: Chlorophyllum globosum is recognized by medium to large-sized, white basidiomata, subglobose to globose pileus, which expands to convex when mature, pale-brown to orange-brown patches on white pileus, a white stipe, a cuff-like annulus, and a reddening reaction in most parts of the basidioma when touched or damaged.
Chlorophyllum globosum was described from Cameroon as Macrolepiota globosa [48], and the Thai material fits the description very well, except for the spore color, which was originally given as white. The species was transferred to Chlorophyllum by Vellinga [49], based on phylogenetic analyses of ITS and LSU. C. globosum is very close to C. molybdites in morphology, and they are sister taxa in the phylogenetic trees, but they are definitely different species [10,27].
The noticeable differences between the Chlorophyllum molybdites and C. globosum samples from Thailand and Laos are the whiter basidiomata, longer elements of the pileus covering, and longer cheilocystidia with a distinct stalk in C. globosum (Figure 7 and Figure 8), while cheilocystidia are subglobose, broadly clavate to clavate without a long stalk in C. molybdites (Figures 11 and 12). However, they are identical in most other characteristics. If we had not obtained sequence data from our collections, this species would most probably not have been recognized, and the different morphology of the cheilocystidia tabled as an intraspecific variation.
Chlorophyllum globosum is now known from various countries in Africa (Benin, Cameroon, and South Africa) and Asia (India, Laos, Thailand, and China). The occurrence in some countries is based on ITS sequences in GenBank that are identical to those from Thailand (Figure 2).

Chlorophyllum hortense (Murrill) Vellinga, Mycotaxon 83: 416 (2002)

Lepiota hortensis Murrill, N. Amer. Fl. 10 (1): 59 (1914)
Leucoagaricus hortensis (Murrill) Pegler, Kew Bull. add. Ser. 9: 414 (1983)
Lepiota humei Murrill, Lloydia 6: 220 (1943)
= Chlorophyllum humei (Murrill) Vellinga, Mycotaxon 83: 416 (2002)
= Lepiota mammillata Murrill, Lloydia 6: 220 (1943)
= Chlorophyllum mammillatum (Murrill) Vellinga, Mycotaxon 83: 416 (2002)
= Lepiota subfulvidisca Murrill, Lloydia 6: 221 (1943)
= Chlorophyllum subfulvidiscum (Murrill) Vellinga, Mycotaxon 83: 416 (2002)
= Lepiota alborubescens Hongo, Mem. Fac. lib. Arts Educ. Shiga Univ., nat. Sci. 12: 40
= Macrolepiota alborubescens (Hongo) Hongo, Trans. Soc. mycol. Japan 27: 107 (1986)
= Chlorophyllum alborubescens (Hongo) Vellinga, Mycotaxon 83: 416 (2002)
= Leucoagaricus bisporus Heinem., Bull. Jard. bot. nat. Belg. 43: 8 (1973).
Index Fungorum number: IF 374396; Facesoffungi number: FoF 03444; Figure 9 and Figure 10.
Pileus 72–98 mm, convex, expanding to umbonate with distinctly umbo, with straight margin; surface covered with light-brown to yellow-brown (5D4–5) glabrous calotte at center, with brownish-yellow (5C7–8) irregular patches or squamules toward the margin, on orang white to light-orange (5A2–4) background; margin sulcate or slightly striate, white. Lamellae free, narrowly fusiform, up to 7 mm wide, white, crowded, lamella-edge eroded. Stipe 60–110 × 6–7 mm, cylindrical, slightly wider to base; surface smooth, white. Annulus superonate, moveable, white, with brownish-yellow (5C7–8) on the upper part. Context white in pileus, white in stipe and hollow. All parts of basidiomata turn orange-white (5A2) when touched. Taste peanut-like. Smell mild. Spore print white.
Basidiospores [50,2,1] 6.0–8.5 × 5.3–6.5 µm, avl × avw = 7.5 × 5.8 µm, Q = 1.2–1.54, Qav = 1.3, in side-view broadly ellipsoid to ellipsoid amygdaliform, in frontal view ellipsoid, oblong, without germ pore, hyaline, dextrinoid, congophilous, cyanophilous, metachromatic. Basidia 25–30 × 8–11.5 µm, clavate, hyaline, 2-spored, occasionally 1-spored. Lamella edge sterile, with abundant cheilocystidia. Cheilocystidia 35–50 × 7–9 µm, narrowly clavate, cylindrical, sometimes with short apical excrescence or appendage, colorless. Pleurocystidia absent. Pileus covering of scales a trichoderm made up of cylindrical, narrowly clavate elements with long stalk, 30–155 × 6.3–16 µm, colorless or with pale-brown parietal pigment, with an encrusted wall in some elements and lower hyphae. Stipe covering a cutis made up of cylindrical hyphae and elements, colorless, 10 µm wide. Clamp connections not observed.
Habitat and distribution: growing in large groups, in grasslands, saprotrophic on nutrient-rich soil.
Material examined: Thailand, Chiang Rai Province, Muang District, Mae Korn District, 22 July 2010, P. Sysouphanthong, BJP54 (MFLU 12-1783); Muang District, Pongphabath Village, 1 July 2018, P. Sysouphanthong, PS2018-31 (MFLU 19-2352).
Notes: Chlorophyllum hortense can be recognized by light-brown to yellow-brown irregular patches on white to light-orange pileus and sulcate or striate margin, white and free lamellae with a white spore print, an annulus, oblong ovoid to oblong amygdaliform, and hyaline basidiospores without a germ pore, 2-spored basidia, narrowly clavate to cylindrical cheilocystidia, trichodermal pileus covering made up of cylindrical to narrowly clavate elements, and absence of clamp connections. It should be noted that most species of lepiotaceous fungi have 4-spored basidia; only a handful of species in various genera are characterized by 2-spored basidia.
This species has been described by several mycologists [27,50], and because of the basidiospores without a germ pore, it was accommodated in Leucoagaricus. It is one of the most widespread species in Chlorophyllum. A record from India [51] might refer to C. demangei, because of the 4-spored basidia.
The species is found throughout the tropics in diverse, mostly man-influenced habitats, on dung, compost, and soil [14,27].

Chlorophyllum molybdites (G. Mey.) Massee, Kew Bull. 1898: 136 (1898)

Agaricus molybdites G. Mey., Pr. Fl. essequ.: 300 (1818)
Lepiota molybdites (G. Mey.) Sacc., Syll. Fung. 5: 30 (1887)
= Mastocephalus molybdites (G. Mey.) Kuntze, Rev. Gen. Pl. 2: 860 (1891)
= Leucocoprinus molybdites (G. Mey.) Pat., Bull. Soc. mycol. Fr. 29: 215 (1913)
= Macrolepiota molybdites (G. Mey.) Moreno, Bañares and Heykoop, Mycotaxon 55: 467 (1995)
= Agaricus morganii Peck, Bot. Gaz. 4: 137 (1879)
= Lepiota morganii (Peck) Sacc., Syll. Fung. 5: 30 (1887)
= Mastocephalus morganii (Peck) Kuntze, Rev. Gen. Pl. 2: 860 (1891)
= Chlorophyllum morganii (Peck) Massee, Kew Bull. 1898: 136 (1898)
= Agaricus glaziovii Berk., Vidensk., Meddel. 1879-1880: 32 (1880)
= Pholiota glaziovii (Berk.) Sacc., Syll. Fung. 5: 751 (1887)
= Lepiota ochrospora Cooke and Massee, Grevillea 21: 73 (1893)
= Chlorophyllum esculentum Massee, Kew Bull. 1898: 136 (1898)
= Lepiota esculenta (Massee) Sacc. and P. Syd., Syll. Fung. 16: 2 (1902)
= Agaricus guadelupensis Pat., Bull. Soc. mycol. Fr. 15: 197 (1899)
= Annularia camporum Speg. in An. Mus. nac. Buenos Aires, Ser. II, 6: 117 (1899) [1898]
= Lepiota camporum (Speg.) Speg.,Bol. Acad. nac. Cienc. Cordoba 29: 114 (1926)
= Agaricus congolensis Beeli in Bull. Soc. roy. bot. Belg. 61: 92 (1928)
= Chlorophyllum molybdites var. congolense (Beeli) Heinem., Fl. Icon. Champ. Congo 16: 323 (1967).
Index Fungorum number: IF 604726; Facesoffungi number: FoF 03445; Figure 11 and Figure 12.
Pileus 70–110 mm, globose to subglobose when young, expanding to convex, plano–convex, with low umbo, with straight margin, with glabrous calotte at center, light-brown to brown (7D5–6), with concolorous patches and squamules scattered toward margin, on concentrically fibrillose background, orange-white (6A2) around umbo, and white around marginal zone; margin fibrillose, fringed, exceeding lamellae when mature. Lamellae free, broad, crowded, white when young, becoming dull green (27D3) when mature, with an eroded edge. Stipe 60–85 × 10–12 mm, widening downward base, 18–23 mm at the base, white to yellowish-white (4A2), smooth, hollow. Annulus free, descending, with a cuff around stipe, movable, white; underside concolorous with umbo. The context in pileus and stipe white, turning brownish-orange (7C5). Smell carrot-like. Taste not observed. Spore print grayish-green (27C3–4).
Basidiospores [100,5,5] 8.5–13 × 6–7.5 µm, avl × avw = 9.6 × 7.0 µm, Q = 1.3–1.5, avQ = 1.4, ellipsoid-amygdaliform, with truncate apex and germ pore, hyaline or pale-green, thick-walled, dextrinoid, congophilous, cyanophilous, and metachromatic in Cresyl blue. Basidia 29–36 × 10–12 µm, 4-spored, some 1-spored or 2-spored, hyaline, slightly thick-walled. Lamella edge sterile. Cheilocystidia 14–35 × 10–20 µm, clavate, broadly clavate, hyaline, slightly thick-walled. Pileus covering a hymeniderm made up of tightly packed clavate, narrowly clavate, oblong, cylindrical, elements; terminal elements 25–62.5 × 5.0–12 µm, with hyaline to pale-brown parietal pigment. Stipe covering a cutis made up of cylindrical to narrowly cylindrical elements, 4.5–7.5 µm wide, thin-walled, hyaline. Clamp connections not found.
Habitat and distribution: growing in small groups to large groups or fairy rings in grasslands and under shade trees along with grasslands, saprotrophic and terrestrial, throughout northern Thailand.
Material examined: Thailand, Chiang Rai Province, Muang District, Mae Fah Luang University Campus, 7 May 2009, P. Sysouphanthong and J-K. Liu, BJP0041; ibidem, 22 July 2012, P. Sysouphanthong, 2012-9 (MFLU 12-1772); ibidem, 05 August 2012, P. Sysouphanthong, 2012-12 (MFLU 12-1775); Chiang Rai Province, Muang District, Pongphrabath Village, 17 July 2012, P. Sysouphanthong, 2012-2 (MFLU 12-1765); Pha Yao Province, Muang District, Kuawn Pra Yuan Area, 12 June 2011, P. Callac and S.C. Karunarathna, 2011-11 (MFLU 12-1819).
Notes: Chlorophyllum molybdites are easy to recognize by the free and dull green lamellae when fully mature, the grayish-green spore print, and the large basidiomata with a light-pileus with brown squamules at the center. All parts of the basidioma turn orange to red when damaged. It is often found in lawns and grasslands. The species might be confused with Macrolepiota species when samples are collected in a young stage. It could also be confused with Clarkeinda trachodes (Berk.) Sing, which has a yellow to olive-brown spore print, a much flimsier annulus, and white velar remnants over the pileus scales. Cl. trachodes grows in northern Thailand in the same area and habitat as C. molybdites, but has not been found outside Asia yet. For differences with C. globosum, see notes under that species.
Chlorophyllum molybdites is widespread, especially in subtropical and tropical regions [10,14,27,49,52]. In northern-temperate regions in Europe, it was found only indoors [53], Watling [54]. It was first recorded in Thailand by Høiland and Schumacher (1982), and since then, there have been several reports of the species throughout Thailand [17,18]. However, those studies were only based on their macro-morphological characters. This is the first study on C. molybdites in Thailand, providing a full description and illustrations. Læssøe et al. [55] recorded this species from Xiangkhouang Province of northern Laos.
In the nrITS sequence analysis (Figure 2) and in the combined nrITS-rnLSU-rpb2 analysis (Figure 3), three sequences of Thai specimens from this study are clustered with other specimens from other countries worldwide.
Chlorophyllum molybdites cause gastrointestinal distress, but the severity of the reactions to this species differs among people and whether the mushrooms have been cooked or not.
The list of synonyms as given above is based on morphology; it is possible that some of the names, such as Agaricus congolensis Beeli, in fact, refer to C. globosum, which is morphologically very similar to C. molybdites [56,57].

3.2.2. Clarkeinda Kuntze

Clarkeinda trachodes (Berk.) Singer, Lilloa 22: 413 (1951) [1949]

Agaricus trachodes Berk., London J. Bot. 6: 487 bis (1847)
Chitoniella trachodes (Berk.) Petch, Ann. R. bot. Gdns Peradeniya 4 (6): 396 (1909)
Fungus trachodes (Berk.) Kuntze, Revis. gen. pl. (Leipzig) 3 (3): 480 (1898).
Index Fungorum number: IF 294937; Facesoffungi number: FoF 07066; Figure 13 and Figure 14.
Pileus 50–220 mm, first hemispherical to campanulate, expanding to convex or umbonate, applanate to plano-concave, with straight or uplifted margin, with a large irregular patch at the center covering up to 1/3 of pileus, smooth or glabrous, light-brown (6D5–8) to brown (6E7–8), with yellowish-white or pale-yellow (4A3–4) to light-brown (6D5–8) squamules around patch toward the margin, on yellowish-white or pale-yellow (4A3–4) fibrillose background, with white velar remnants on top the central patch; margin split, with concolorous squamules same as on rest of pileus. Lamellae L = around 180, l = 1–3, 7–12 mm wide, free and remote (2.5 mm) from the stipe, white when young, becoming dull yellow (3B2) to greyish-yellow (4B2) and finally greyish-yellow (3D4) to olive (3C4), with a concolorous or white eroded edge. Stipe 80–150 × 10–28 mm (apex) × 15–28 mm (base), wider at bulbous up to 25 mm wide base, tapering to apex, with white to yellowish-white or pale-yellow (4A3–4) surface, with concolorous squamules same as those on pileus, turning reddish-brown (8E5–7) when touched, hollow. Annulus up to 6 cm wide, attached at the upper part of the stipe, membranous, with eroded margin, fragile and ragged with age; upper side smooth or fibrillose, white to pale-yellow (4A3–4); underside covered with concolorous squamules as on pileus or stipe. Volva present, white. Context white and up to 8 mm thick in pileus with turning orange or reddish-brown (8E5–7), white and hollow in stipe with turning reddish-brown (8E5–7). Odor strong, a mixture of artificial fruit flavor and rubber. Taste not tried. Spore print greyish-yellow (3D4) to olive (3C4) or olivaceous yellow.
Basidiospores [25,1,1] 5.0–6.0 × 3.5–4.0 µm, avl × avw = 5.36 × 3.74 µm, Q = 1.32–1.57, avQ = 1.43, ellipsoid ovoid in side-view, broadly to ellipsoid ovoid in frontal view, with truncate apex and germ pore, hyaline, thick-walled. Basidia 19–28 × 5–8 µm, clavate, hyaline, thin-walled, 4-spored. Pleurocystidia absent. Cheilocystidia abundant, 20–50 × 12–35 µm, clavate to broadly clavate, often subglobose to sphaeropedunculate with a short or long stalk, hyaline, slightly thick-walled. Pileus covering in squamules an epithelium composed of 4–5 layers of clavate or short clavate elements, often oblong to fusiform, rarely subclavate in the upper layer, 30–50 × 15–25 µm; subglobose, oblong to clavate in the lower layer, 18–45 × 15–25 µm; elements, with pale-brown to brown partial and intracellular pigment. Stipe covering in squamules same as those on pileus, stipe surface not observed. Clamp connections absent.
Habitat and distribution: growing solitary or in small groups, saprotrophic, on nutrient-rich soil, in the deciduous rain forest of northern Thailand.
Material examined: Thailand, Chiang Mai Province, Mae Taeng District, Pha Deng Village, alt. 900–950 m, 15 August 2011, P. Sysouphanthong, PS2011-12 (MFLU 19-2351); ibidem, 22 August 2007, P. Sysouphanthong (MFLU 09-0059); ibidem, 25 June 2007, E.C. Vellinga 3550 (UC); ibidem, 4 July 2008, E.C. Vellinga 3838 (MFLU 08-1227). Laos, Oudomxay Province, Xay District, Houay Houm Village, 16 August 2014, PS2014-752 (HNL502423).
Notes: Clarkeinda trachodes is commonly found in tropical regions of eastern and southern Asia. It has been recorded in Thailand before [2,17,55] and Laos [55]. This study provides a full description, line drawing, and color photos taken in the field. A new nrITS sequence data analysis showed that our new collection clustered together with specimens collected from Thailand [2], Bangladesh [21], and the type location in Sri [46] (Figure 1).

3.2.3. Macrolepiota Singer

Macrolepiota detersa Z. W. Ge, Zhu. L. Yang and Vellinga, Fungal Diversity 45: 83 (2010)

Index Fungorum number: IF 518349; Facesoffungi number: FoF 09698; Figure 15 and Figure 16.
Pileus 60–160 mm, when young globose to subglobose, expanding to convex, umbonate, broadly campanulate, plane-umbonate, with straight or decurrent margin; when young glabrous, brownish-orange to light-brown or dark red-brown (7C5–6, 8–9 F7–8), surface-breaking around the center, with concolorous squamules or patches around glabrous calotte at the center toward the margin, crowded, with distantly fragile patches toward margin), with concolorous brownish-orange (7C5–6) fibrillose squamules or squamules between patches towards the margin, on white to yellowish-white (4A2) matted-fibrillose to the felted background; margin splitted, covered with light-grey (6C3) to grey orange (6B3) granular-floccose Universal Veil elements. Lamellae free, slightly remote from the stipe, white, sometimes with reddish spots, ventricose to broad, 8–16 mm wide, close to crowded, with the eroded edge. Stipe 80–400 × 12–18 mm, cylindrical with slight wider downward base, with bulb at base, 20–30 mm; dull, dry, scurfy to squamulose overall, minute squamules at apex zone to middle and squamules downward base, concolorous with those squamules on pileus, on brown-grey (6C3) background. Annulus superior, membranous, thin, descending, double, persistent but easily removable, pendulous, 30–40 mm long, with concolorous squamules underside of internal cuff-liked. Context white and thick in pileus; stipe white and hollow, fibrous, turning pinkish-grey when cut, not changing color in bulb. Taste not observed. Smell strong, pleasant. Spore print white.
Basidiospores [50,2,2] 14–16.2 × 9.5–11 µm, avl × avw = 15.2 × 10.1 µm, Q = 1.45–1.62, avQ = 1.52, ellipsoid amygdaliform, ellipsoid to oblong in frontal view, with apical germ pore and hyaline cap, hyaline and thick-walled, dextrinoid, congophilous, cyanophilous, metachromatic in Cresyl Blue. Basidia 38–41 × 12–14 µm, clavate, slightly thick-walled, hyaline, 4-spored. Lamella edge sterile. Cheilocystidia 20–25 × 7–14 µm, short clavate to clavate, irregular clavate, rarely utriform, sometime branched, hyaline, thin-walled. Pleurocystidia absent. Pileus covering a hymenoderm made up of layers of oblong to cylindrical elements, branched, terminal cylindrical elements cylindrical or fusiform, oblong, with rounded or attenuate to apex, 10–80 × 7–16 µm, slightly thick-walled, with hyaline to pale-brown parietal pigment. Stipe covering not observed. Clamp-connections not found.
Habitat and distribution: solitary, saprotrophic, and terrestrial, growing on the ground beside a grassland or yard, and ground with decomposing deciduous leaves from the mixed rain forest, dominant species being Castanopsis spp. in northern Thailand and in northern Laos. This is proposed as a new record for tropical Southeast Asia.
Material examined: Thailand, Chiang Rai, Muang District, Pong Phra Bath Village, 8 June 2011, P. Sysouphanthong, 2011-10 (MFLU 12-1772); Chiang Rai, Mae Fah Luang District, Mae Sa Long Nok Village, 9 July 2012, P. Sysouphanthong, 20112-19 (MFLU 12-1784). Laos, Oudomxay Province, Xay District, Houay Houm Village, 28 July 2014, P. Sysouphanthong, PS2014-567 (HNL502238).
Notes: Macrolepiota detersa is recognized by medium to large and very tall basidiomata, white to yellowish-white pileus covering with brownish-orange to light-brown central calotte and patches or squamules, white and free lamellae, long stipe with a draping white membranous annulus attached at the upper part, amygdaliform basidiospores with germ pore and hyaline cap, clavate to narrowly clavate cheilocystidia, and the hymenidermal pileus covering made up of oblong to cylindrical elements.
Macrolepiota detersa was originally described, from a temperate region in the Anhui province of eastern China, as an edible species by Ge et al. [58]. It was already known from Japan (as an undescribed species; Vellinga et al. [13] and was later reported from South Korea [59]. Here we record its presence in northern Thailand and Laos [55].
The ITS sequence of the Thai collection is identical to materials from China, Japan, and South Korea with 100% bootstrap support, and it is sister to M. excelsa (Figure 4).

Macrolepiota dolichaula (Berk. and Broome) Pegler and Rayner, Kew Bull. 23: 365 (1969)

≡ Agaricus dolichaulus Berk. and Broome, Trans. linn. Soc., Bot. 27: 150 (1870)
Lepiota dolichaula (Berk. and Broome) Sacc., Syll. Fung. 5: 32 (1887)
Leucocoprinus dolichaulus (Berk. and Broome) Pat., Bull. trimest. Soc. mycol. Fr. 29: 215 (1913)
= Agaricus beckleri Berk., J. linn. Soc., Bot. 13: 156 (1872)
= Lepiota beckleri (Berk.). Sacc., Syll. Fung. 5: 56 (1887)
= Agaricus stenophyllus Cooke and Massee, Grevillea 15: 98 (1887)
= Lepiota stenophylla (Cooke and Massee) Sacc., Syll. Fung. 9: 4 (1891)
= Leucocoprinus dolichaulus var. cryptocyclus Pat., Bull. trimest. Soc. mycol. Fr. 29: 215 (1913)
= Lepiota dolichaula var. cryptocycla (Pat.) Sacc. and Trotter, Syll. Fung. 23: 23 (1925.)
Index Fungorum number: IF 333540; Facesoffungi number: FoF 09699; Figure 17 and Figure 18.
Pileus 75–175 mm, first subglobose to globose, soon expanding to campanulate, umbonate with high umbo, with inflexed margin, with brownish-orange to light-brown (6C5–6, 6D6–7) glabrous surface and smooth when young, soon surface radially broken from margin to center, with light-brown (6C5–6, 6D6–7) radially crowded squamules around central calotte toward margin; squamules fragile and distant or completely disappearing when mature, on white fibrillose background; marginal zone with white fibrils, sulcate when mature. Lamellae free, white, crowded, ventricose, wider at pileus margin and narrow to pileus center, 20–28 mm wide. Stipe 140–260 × 10–15 mm, cylindrical, white background, white and smooth from apex to the middle, covered with orange-white to pale-orange (5A2–3) minute squamules downward base, turning pale-red to pastel (7A3–5) when touched, with crowded white rhizomorphs at the base. Annulus membranous, descendent, white on the upper side, with concolorous squamules underside as those on pileus, moveable when mature. Context, white and moderately thick in pileus, white and hollow in the stipe, slowly turning pale-red to pastel (7A3–5) in both pileus and stipe. Taste and smell note observed. Spore print whitish to white.
Basidiospores [100,4,4] 12.5–15 × 8.5–11.5 µm, avl × avw = 13.86 × 10.2 µm, Q = 1.31–1.5, avQ = 1.37, ellipsoid-ovoid, ellipsoid, to ellipsoid-amygdaliform in the side view, ellipsoid in frontal view, hyaline and thick-walled, with germ pore and hyalinous cap over germ pore, dextrinoid, congophilous, cyanophilous, metachromatic. Basidia 30–45 × 10–15 µm, clavate, hyaline, and thin-walled, 4-spored. Lamella edge sterile. Cheilocystidia 20–30 × 10–14 µm, clavate, rarely spheropedunculate, slightly thick-walled, hyaline. Pleurocystidia absent. Pileus covering a hymeniderm made up of oblong to cylindrical elements, terminal elements oblong, cylindrical, short clavate, with rounded or attenuate apex, 15–55 × 6–9 µm, hyaline to pale-brown parietal pigment. Stipe covering not observed. Clamp-connections are present and abundant at the base of basidia and cheilocystidia.
Habitat and distribution: saprotrophic and terrestrial growing in grasslands, under shade trees beside grassland, in pine forests, and on cow dung; solitary or with many basidiomata spread over a wide area; widely distributed and found throughout northern Thailand.
Material examined: Thailand, Chiang Rai, Muang District, Mae Fah Luang University Campus: 20°03′16.9″ N; 99°53′42.6″ E, alt., 410 m, 7 August 2011, P. Sysouphanthong, 2011-15 (MFLU 12-1816); Chiang Rai, Muang District, Pong Phra Bath Village, 15 July 2012, P. Sysouphanthong, 2012-1 (MFLU 12-1764); ibidem, 20 August 2012, P. Sysouphanthong, 2012-13 (MFLU 12-1776); ibidem, 27 August 2012, P. Sysouphanthong, 2012-15 (MFLU 12-1778); Chiang Rai, Muang District, Mae Pu Ka Village, 14 June 2009, K. Anchalee, BJP020, culture (MFLUCC 10-0366); ibidem, 9 July 2009, K. Anchalee, BJP0046 (MFLU 12-1782); Chiang Rai, Mae Fah Luang District, Mae Salong Nok Village: 20°09′121.7″ N; 99°39′26.6″ E, alt., 985 m, 22 July 2012, P. Sysouphanthong, 2012-8 (MFLU 12-1771); Chiang Mai, Mae Taeng District, Pha Deng Village: 19°06′49.1″ N; 98°43′33.5″ E, alt., 971 m, 16 June 2009, P. Sysouphanthong, BJP017, culture (MFLUCC 10-0363). Laos, Xiang Khouang Province, Pek District, Mak Khay Village, 8 June 2016, P. Sysouphanthong, PS2016-81 (HNL503204); Champasak Province, Pak Song District, 3 October 2015, P. Sysouphanthong, PS50 (HNL503277).
Notes: All specimens of M. dolichaula are characterized by large basidiomata, a pileus with small, brownish-orange to light-brown, crowded squamules on a white fibrillose background, a long stipe with pale-orange minute squamules, and membranous annulus attached at the upper part of stipe, ellipsoid to ellipsoid-amydaliform spores with germ pore and cap, clavate cheilocystidia, and oblong to cylindrical elements in the pileus covering.
This species is widespread all through tropical Asia and has been reported from Sri Lanka [60,61,62,63], India [64], and Vietnam [65], both tropical and temperate China [58,66], Laos [55,67], and is also known from Australia [27,68,69] (Figure 4).
Macrolepiota dolichaula is common in Thailand [17], and it was also recorded from Laos by Læssøe et al. [55], however, these studies were based on macromorphology only. Thus, we redescribe this species based on morphology and molecular evidence. In Figure 4, the nrITS sequences from Thailand and Laos group with specimens from China and Australia with high bootstrap support. Macrolepiota aberdarensis Mbaluto and Otieno, a close relative from Kenya, does not differ much from M. dolichaula in morphology and nrITS sequences analysis [70]. However, a multiple genes analysis is required to verify both species. It is well possible that the species recorded by Pegler and Rayner [71] from East Africa is M. aberdarensis, and not M. dolichaula proper. One should also note that M. abararensis was not validly published as a herbarium for the type collections was not indicated.

Macrolepiota excelsa Vellinga, Sysouph., Thongkl. and K.D. Hyde sp. nov.

Mycobank umbero: MB 838685; Facesoffungi number: FoF 09700; Figure 19 and Figure 20.
Etymology: The Latin name ‘excelsa’ refers to ‘high, lofty, distinguished.’
Diagnosis: Macrolepiota excelsa is recognized by large brown to dark brown pileus, free and white lamellae, brown to dark brown cylindrical stipe with the white membranous annulus, broadly ellipsoid to ellipsoid basidiospore with a germ pore, utriform to narrowly clavate cheilocystidia, a hymeniderm made up of clavate to cylindrical elements in pileus covering.
Holotype: ecv3572 (UC).
Pileus 120–220 mm, when young globose to subglobose, paraboloid, expanding to campanulate, convex, umbonate or not, sometimes slightly depressed at the center, when young completely brown (6E5), later covering broken and with dark brown, irregular calotte (6F4–8; Mu. 7.5 YR 5/4, 6/6) at the center, with concolorous big patches and squamules around calotte toward the margin, patches fragile when mature; background radially fibrillose and light to greyish-brown (6D3–5; 10 YR 7/4–7.5 YR 8/6–4), slightly squarrose especially in the outer part, where the fibrils are more spread out and show the white background in between; margin irregular and exceeding lamellae. Lamellae, L = 80–130, l = 0 or 1, moderately crowded to crowded, free and remote (up to 4 mm) from stipe, off-white, broad and ventricose, up to 12 mm wide, with white floccose (cystidiose) edge. Stipe 130–350 × 7–10 mm at apex, 10–18 mm wide in the center, cylindrical or slightly widening downward, 23–30 mm wide at base; base in some specimens bulbous; completely covered in brown tomentose-velvety light-brown to brown, or reddish-brown (6D4–5, 6E5–6, 7.5 YR 7–6/6) covering, which breaks open into small very fine to fine horizontal bands that can form zig-zag patterns, hollow with central white cottony strand, protruding into pileus. Annulus a white descending or ascending cuff, and a flaring double part, white to yellowish-white (4A2) membranous on the upper side with a fringed edge; underside with squamules as on pileus; movable with age. Context thick and soft, white and dull in pileus; in stipe buff and hollow. Smell fungoid. Taste not observed. Spore print white.
Basidiospores [90,3,3] 11.8–16.5 × 8.3–13.5 µm, avl × avw = 13.2–15.3 × 9.2–11.2 µm, Q = 1.2–1.51, avQ = 1.3–1.45, in side-view broadly ellipsoid to ellipsoid, with germ pore covered by the hyaline cap, thick-walled, hyaline to pale-yellow, dextrinoid, congophilous, metachromatic. Basidia 30–40 × 11–19 µm, clavate, slightly thick-walled, 4-spored, rarely 2-spored, with basal clamp-connection. Lamella edge sterile. Cheilocystidia in chains of up to 5 elements; terminal elements 7–40 × 7–30 µm, variable in size and shape, usually subglobose, occasionally clavate, with rarely cylindrical, hyaline. Pleurocystidia not found. Pileus covering at umbo and calotte a hymenoderm made up of hemispherical to cylindrical elements, thick-walled, hyaline to pale-brown, 20–92.5 × 10–12.5 µm. Stipe covering a hymeniderm made up of cylindrical elements and hyphae, 8.7–15 µm wide. Clamp-connections at the base of basidia and cheilocystidia.
Habitat and distribution: growing solitary to small group, saprotrophic, and terrestrial in half-open forests and on the edge of grasslands; known from Chiang Mai province of northern Thailand and Oudomxay province of North Laos.
Material examined: Thailand, Chiang Mai Province, Mae Taeng District, Pha Deng Village, 25 June 2007, E.C. Vellinga 3553 (UC); ibidem, 3 July 2007, R. Walleyn (coll. E.C. Vellinga 3599) (UC); ibidem, 28 September 2008, P. Sysouphanthong (MFLU 09-0203); ibidem, 20 June 2009, P. Sysouphanthong and J.K. Lui, BJP0023, culture (MFLUCC 10-0369); Chiang Mai province, Mae Taeng District, Pongduad Village, 22 June 2009, P. Sysouphanthong and J.K. Lui, BJP0029, culture (MFLUCC 10-0375). Laos, Oudomxay Privince, Xay District, Houy Houm Village, 30 June 2014, P. Sysouphanthong, PS2014-260 (HNL501921); ibidem, 16 July 2014, P. Sysouphanthong, PS2014-437 (HNL502108); ibidem, 05 August 2014, P. Sysouphanthong, PS2014-648 (HNL502319).
Notes: Macrolepiota excelsa is a new species found in northern Thailand and northern Laos. Macroscopically this species resembles M. procera (Scop.: Fr.) Singer very much in general appearance, but it differs in the brown, not grey-brown, colors on pileus and stipe. The ITS sequence, however, does not place this species in the vicinity of M. procera, but closely related to M. detersa, M. dolichaula, the Australian sequestrate species M. turbinata T. Lebel, and M. aberdarensis Mbaluto and Otieno from Kenya (Figure 4). Macrolepiota detersa differs in brownish-orange to light-brown squamules on pileus and yellowish-white background, the very well-developed hanging annulus, and the branched cheilocystidia (Figure 15 and Figure 16); the holotype from China showed more clavate to broadly clavate to pyriform and rarely subfusiform cheilocystidia [58]. The pileus of M. dolichaula is much lighter colored with small brown squamules on a white background, and more clavate to sphaeropedunculate cheilocystidia (Figure 19 and Figure 20). Macrolepiota aberdarensis, a species resembling M. dolichaula, is distinghuised from M. detersa by the lighter color of squamules on pileus and white background and the cheilocystidia not arranged in chains [70]. Another species in the same clade, Macrolepiota umbonata H. J. Cho, H. Lee, and Y.W. Lim, described from South Korea differs from M. excelsa by the distinct umbo on the pileus, the white background of the pileus surface, and superior and non-membranous annulus [59].
The stipes of M. excelsa have a central cord, similar to the stipes of Coprinus comatus (O.F. Müll.: Fr.) Pers. and Montagnea arenaria (DC.) Zeller [72]. This is the first report of this feature outside the Coprinus comatus clade.

Macrolepiota velosa Vellinga and Zhu L. Yang, Mycotaxon 85: 184 (2003)

Index Fungorum number: IF 373847; Facesoffungi number: FoF 09701; Figure 21 and Figure 22.
Pileus 100–140 mm, slightly globose when young, expanding to hemispherical, parabolic to campanulate with wide umbo, straight margin, center with a round to star shape or calotte, 10–15 mm diam., with uplifted margin, dark brown (8F4) to dark, with dark brown (8F4) warts or squamules around center toward the margin, squamules long around the marginal zone, with uplift tip, with orange write (5A2) radially fibrillose, background, with white to orange (5A2) white remnant partial veil at the center and scattered on the surface, in mature sample 4–6 grooves, with split margins, exceeding lamellae, fringe. Lamellae free, white, remote from the stipe, close to crowded, ventricose, up to 13 mm wide with white fine-floccose at lamellae surface and marginal edge turning brownish-orange at the edge. Stipe 80–160 × 8–115 mm, long cylindrical, wider at the base, with 20 mm wide bulb, white, smooth, yellowish-white (4A2) fibrillose at apex, with brown (7E4) fibrillose at base zone, with white membranous volva at base. Annulus ascending, movable, with cuff, white to cream at the upper side, grayish-orange (5B3) at underside, thick, with broken brownish beige (6E3) margin. The context in pileus white, 4–6 mm wide, in stipe white. Odor such as vitamin B. Taste mild, sweet.
Basidiospores [75,3,3] 9–11.8 × 6.5–7.5 µm, avl × avw + 9.5 × 7.0 µm, Q = 1.28–1.68, avQ = 1.35, in the side view broadly to ellipsoid-amygdaliform, in frontal view ellipsoid, with germ pore covered by hyaline cap, thick-walled, dextrinoid, congophilous, cyanophilous, metachromatic in Cresyl Blue. Basidia 28–35 × 11–13 µm, 4-spored, clavate, hyaline. Lamella edge sterile, with crowded cheilocystidia. Cheilocystidia 20–85 × 5.5–8 µm, cylindrical, wide at apex, with granular content at apex; clamp-connections absent. Pleurocystida absent. Pileus covering a trichoderm, in upper layer or squamules, made up of clavate to long clavate terminal elements, 20.0–120 × 4–13 µm, with brown parietal and intraocular pigment. Stipe covering a cutis composed of hyaline hyphae and cylindrical elements up to 7 µm wide. Clamp-connections absent.
Habitat and distribution: solitary or in small groups, saprotrophic and terrestrial on soil or ground with decomposing leaves mixed with humus; distributed in the rainforest in the highlands in Chiang Mai and Chiang Rai Provinces.
Material examined: Thailand, Chiang Rai Province, Mueng District, Hua Doi Village, 15 August 2009, P. Sysouphanthong and Jainkui Lui, BJP0072, culture (MFLUCC 10-0417); Chiang Rai, Mae Fah Luang District, Pa Kluay Village, 22, August 2011, P. Sysouphanthong, 2011-14 (MFLU 12-1781); Chiang Mai, Mae Taeng District, Pha Deng Village, 12 August 2007, P. Sysouphanthong, PNG055 (MFLU 09-0055); ibidem, 12 August 2012, P. Sysouphanthong, PNG052 (MFLU 09-0052), ibidem, 19 July 2007, P. Sysouphanthong, PNG015 (MFLU 09-0015). Laos, Oudomxay Province, Xay District, Houay Houm Village, 6 August 2014, P. Sysouphanthong, PS2014-700 (HNL502371); Oudomxay Province, Xay District, Houay Hoom Village, 6 September 2014, P. Sysouphanthong, PS2014-984 (HNL502655); Xekong Province, Tha Taeng District, Dongmakjong Forest, 30 September 2015, P. Sysouphanthong, PS1 (HNL503228).
Notes: Macrolepiota velosa differs from other Macrolepiota species as it is covered with dark brown to dark squamules on pileus and has a white volva at the basal stipe bulb, cylindrical to narrowly clavate cheilocystidia; the pileus covering is a hymeniderm made up of long, narrowly clavate terminal elements, with pale-brown parietal and intracellular pigment; clamp-connections were not found in the basidiomata. This is also the smallest of the Thai Macrolepiota species.
Ge et al. [58] and Vellinga et al. [2] already mentioned the occurrence of M. velosa in northern Thailand. [73] Vellinga and Yang (2003) discussed all volvate Macrolepiota species. The nrITS sequences of the Thai species are grouped with specimens from China and form a sister group with the volvate M. eucharis from Australia (Figure 4). Sysouphanthong et al. [67] recorded M. velosa in central Laos, and here we report the species also from northern and southern parts of Laos.

3.2.4. Pseudolepiota Z.W. Ge

Pseudolepiota zangmui Z.W. Ge in Ge and Yang, Phytotaxa 312: 252 (2017)

Index Fungorum number: IF 820482; Facesoffungi number: FoF 07068; Figure 23 and Figure 24.
Pileus 20–50 mm, at first hemispherical, campanulate, expanding to convex, umbonate or often plano-convex with an umbo and inflexed margin; surface covering violet-brown (10F5-8, 11F-8), darker at umbo or center, dark ruby to dark (12F4–8), smooth or rough, later splitting off and becoming irregularly concolorous squamulose, with larger scales around the umbo and with smaller squamules toward the margin, with dull red (9B3–4) fibrillose or fibrillose squamules at the marginal zone on a white to orange-white (6A2) background; squamules are fragile when mature; margin appendiculate, with white to dull red (9B3–4) fibrillose remnants. Lamellae free, at first white, turning yellowish-white when mature and greyish-orange (5B3–4) when dried, 3.5–5 mm wide, crowded, with 4–5 lamellulae in between lamellae, slightly fragile with age, with an eroded edge. Stipe 25–40 × 5–8 mm, equal, slightly wider at base zone, completely covered by white to yellowish-white fibrils, sometimes with white remnants at the annular zone. Annulus a white annular zone. Context white in pileus, up to 4 mm wide, white in the stipe, changing to reddish with age, hollow. Spore print whitish. Taste and smell not observed.
Basidiospores [2,2,50] 4.8–5.2 × 3.5–4.5 µm, avl × avw = 5.0 × 4.0 µm, Q = 1.15–1.37, Qav = 1.25, in side-view broadly ellipsoid to ellipsoid-ovoid, in frontal view broadly ellipsoid to ellipsoid, hyaline to pale-yellow in water and KOH, slightly thick-walled without a germ pore, dextrinoid, congophilous, cyanophilous, not metachromatic. Basidia 15–18 × 4.8–5.0 µm, clavate, 4-spored, some 2-spored. Lamella edge sterile. Cheilocystidia 15–24 × 6–10 µm, most clavate, some with a long stalk, rarely utriform and sphaeropedunculate, thin-walled, hyaline. Pleurocystidia absent. Pileus covering hymenoderm made up of 3–4 layers of elements, oblong to cylindrical in the lower layer, mostly with clavate, rarely subclavate, elements in the upper layer, 12–30 × 5.0–10 µm, thick-walled, smooth and with hyaline to pale-yellow parietal pigments, with brown intracellular pigments and encrusted walls in some lower elements. Clamp connections absent.
Habitat and distribution: in small to large groups, saprotrophic and terrestrial in deciduous forests dominated by Lithocarpus spp. and Castanopsis spp. at 650–950 m alt. Found in China and Thailand.
Material examined: THAILAND, Chiang Rai Province, Muang District, Forest of Hua Doi Village, 23 September 2009, P. Sysouphanthong, PHO25 (MFLU 10-0515); ibidem, 25 September 2009, P. Sysouphanthong, PHO28 (MFLU 10-0518); Chiang Rai Province, Muang District, Mae Fah Luang University Campus, 13 August 2019, P. Sysouphanthong, PS2019-74 (MFLU 19-2360). Chiang Mai Province, Mae Taeng District, Pha Deng Village, alt. 900–950 m, 7 August 2018, P. Sysouphanthong, PS2018-84 (MFLU 19-2355).
Notes: Pseudolepiota zangmui is characterized by squat basidiomata in which the pileus diameter is equal or slightly longer than the stipe length; the pileus is covered in violet-brown to dark ruby squamules with dull red fibrils between squamules, and it has a white appendiculate margin; the basidiospores are pale-yellow, and oblong-ovoid in side-view, the cheilocystidia are clavate, and the pileus covering is hymenidermal.
The type of Pseudolepiota zangmui was described from Xishuangbanna, Yunnan Province, Southwest Yunnan, China [59]; it closely resembles Xanthagaricus species but differs in the white to pale-cream spore print and the squat basidiomata. Based on phylogenetic analyses of combined ITS and LSU data with a wide sampling of Xanthagaricus species, it is closely related and basal to Xanthagaricus with good support (Figure 1). However, in a phylogenetic analysis including protein-coding genes [32], Pseudolepiota is clearly separated from Xanthagaricus.

3.2.5. Xanthagaricus (Heinem.) Little Flower, Hosag. and T.K. Abraham

Xanthagaricus necopinatus Iqbal Hosen, T.H. Li, and G.M. Gates in Hosen, Song, Gates, Karunarathna and Li, MycoKeys 28: 9 (2017).
Index Fungorum number: IF 820482; Facesoffungi number: FoF 07068; Figure 25 and Figure 26.
Pileus 10–20 mm, first paraboloid, expanding to convex, plano-convex, with or without umbo, with straight or slightly incurved margin; when young covered with crowded squamules, greyish-yellow to yellow (3B3–8), with brownish-yellow squamules (5C7–8) at center; when mature with yellowish-white to yellow (3A2–6) squamules on yellowish-white to pastel yellow (3A2–4) background; margin with concolorous squamules as on pileus surface and with light-orange (6A4–5) appendiculate velar remnants. Lamellae, l = 3 series, free, 2–4 mm wide, yellowish-white to orange-white (4A2, 5A2) when young, becoming orange-grey to greyish-orange (5B2–3) when mature, broadly ventricose, with white, eroded edge. Stipe 20–45 × 2–3 mm, cylindrical, white fibrillose at apex zone, with yellowish-white to yellow (3A2–6) squamules below annulus to base, with orange-grey to greyish-orange (5B2–3) background, turning greyish red (7B4–5). Annulus attached to the apical zone of the stipe, membranous, greyish-orange (6B4–6), sometimes fragile with age. Context white to orange-white (5A2) in pileus, up to 2 mm thick at the center; hollow in stipe and concolorous with the surface. Odor and taste not observed. Spore pint not observed.
Basidiospores [75,3,3] 4.0–5.2 × 2.5–3.5 µm, avl × avw = 4.71 × 2.90 µm, Q = 1.42–1.80, avQ = 1.62, ellipsoid to oblong-ovoid in frontal view, ellipsoid to oblong in side-view, thick-walled, smooth, hyaline to pale-brown, without a germ pore. Basidia 15–20 × 4.5–7 µm, short clavate to clavate, thin-walled, hyaline, 4-spored. Pleurocystidia absent. Cheilocystidia 17–25 × 5–10 µm, short clavate to clavate, often ellipsoid, with 1 or 2 septa at the base, slightly thick-walled, hyaline. Pileus covering an irregular epithelium composed of oblong to short clavate elements in the upper layer, 10–20 × 5–15 µm, with irregular globose to subglobose elements in the lower layer, 5–15 µm wide, slightly thick-walled, rough-walled, encrusted, with pale-brown to brown parietal and intracellular pigments, with hyaline to brown rough-walled and encrusted, up to 8 µm wide hyphae at base of the epithelial layers. Stipe covering an epithelium similar to that on pileus. Clamp connections absent.
Habitat and distribution: growing in large groups, saprotrophic on humus-rich soil with dead leaves and wood under trees or in grassland; commonly found in Chiang Mai and Chiang Rai Provinces, northern Thailand.
Material examined: Thailand, Chiang Mai Province, Muang District, Chiangmai University Campus, 28 July 2018, P. Sysouphanthong, PS2018-56 (MFLU 19-2353); Chiang Rai Province, Muang District, Forest of Mae Fah Luang University Campus, 8 June 2019, P. Sysouphanthong, PS2019-45 (MFL 19-2358); ibidem, 8 August 2019, P. Sysouphanthong, PS2019-67 (MFL 19-2359).
Notes: Xanthagaricus necopinatus has the slender basidiomata characteristic for the genus, and a pale-yellow pileus and stipe with squamules, velar remnants on the pileus margin, hyaline to pale-brown basidiospores, clavate to ellipsoid cheilocystidia, and an irregular epithelium on pileus and stipe; clamp-connections are absent. The basidiospores are smooth.
Xanthagaricus necopinatus was originally described from Bangladesh [34], and this is the first report of this species outside that country. Thai specimens completely resemble the type specimens, but the stipe covering of type specimens is a cutis while the Thai specimens have an epithelium on the stipe. However, the nrITS sequences of Thai specimens are clustered with the type specimens with high BS (Figure 1).
Xanthagaricus necopinatus can be confused with X. flavosquamosus T.H. Li, Iqbal Hosen and Z.P. Song, described from China, but differs from that species in the smoother pileus and the smooth (vs. rough) basidiospores. The differences in the width and shape of the cheilocystidia as mentioned by Hosen et al. [74], are not supported by the data from the Thai collections.

Xanthagaricus purpureosquamulosus Sysouph., Thongkl. and K.D. Hyde sp. nov.

Mycobank umbero: MB 833740; Facesoffungi number: FoF 07071; Figure 27 and Figure 28.
Etymology: from purpureus (L) purple, and squamulosus (L) with small scales, as the basidiomata are covered with purple squamules.
Diagnosis: Xanthagaricus purpureosquamulosus has slender basidiomata, characterized by a pileus with brownish-grey to violet-brown squamules on a pale-violet to violet background, brownish-grey to greyish-brown appendiculate velar remnants, white to greyish lamellae, a stipe with greyish-yellow to light-brown squamules, and a small apical annulus, ellipsoid-ovoid basidiospores, which are convex on adaxial side, with hyaline to a pale-brown wall, short clavate to ellipsoid cheilocystidia, an irregular epithelium as pileus and stipe covering, and no clamp connections.
Holotype: MFLU 19-2354.
Pileus 4.5–10 mm, first paraboloid or hemispherical, expanding to convex, plano-convex, with or without low umbo, when young completely covered with crowded squamules, brownish-grey (9D2–3) to violet-brown (10D4–8), soon breaking up into greyish-brown (9E2, 9D3) to violet-brown (10E4) squamules, crowded around center or umbo and with radially arranged squamules toward the margin, on pale-violet to violet (17A3–7) background and paler when mature; margin incurved, with brownish-grey (9D2–3) to greyish-brown (9E2, 9D3) appendiculate triangular velar remnants. Lamellae, l = 3–4 series, free, 1.5–2 mm wide, white to yellowish-white (4A2), becoming yellowish-grey to greyish-yellow (4B2–3) when mature, broadly ventricose, with white, smooth to slightly eroded margin. Stipe 15–30 × 1–1.5 mm, slender and tapering downwards, covered with white to yellowish-white (4A2) squamules at apex, bellow annulus with crowded squamules toward the base, greyish-yellow, greyish-brown to light-brown (6D3–5), on yellowish-white to pale-yellow (4A2–3) background, darker at base zone, with greyish-brown (7E3–4) squamules. Annulus attached to apical zone of stipe, with velar remnants and concolorous to those on pileus margin, sometimes fragile with age. Context white in pileus, up to 1 mm thick at center; hollow in stipe and concolorous with surface. Odor and taste not observed. Spore pint greyish-orange (5B3).
Basidiospores [50,2,2] 4.5–6 × 3.5–4 µm, avl × avw = 5.34 × 3.78 µm, Q = 1.3–1.5, avQ = 1.4, ellipsoid-ovoid in frontal view, ellipsoid in side-view, thick-walled, smooth, hyaline to pale-brown, without a germ pore. Basidia 10–12 × 5.5–7 µm, obovoid, short clavate to ellipsoid, thin-walled, hyaline, 4-spored. Pleurocystidia absent. Cheilocystidia 10–16 × 5–8 µm, short clavate to clavate, ellipsoid, some branched, slightly thick-walled, hyaline. Pileus covering an irregular epithelium composed of globose to subglobose (7.5–25 µm wide) cells in the upper layer, broadly ellipsoid to oblong cells (10–62 × 5–15 µm) in the lower layer, thin-walled, smooth, with pale-brown to brown parietal and intracellular pigments, with pale-brown to hyaline, up to 7 µm wide hyphae at base of the epithelial layers. Stipe covering an irregular epithelium same as on pileus. Clamp connections absent.
Habitat and distribution: growing in small to large groups, saprotrophic on humus-rich soil with dead leaves and wood under trees of Samanea saman or beside grassland; commonly found on Mae Fah Luang University Campus, Chiang Rai, Thailand.
Additional material examined: Thailand, Chiang Rai Province, Muang District, Mae Fah Luang University Campus, 26 October 2018, P. Sysouphanthong, PS2018-217 (MFL19-2356, paratype).
Notes: there are only two species of Xanthagaricus, which resemble X. purpureosquamulosus in pileus color. X. caeruleus Iqbal Hosen, T.H. Li and Z.P. Song, described from China has pale-lilac to grayish-lilac or grayish-violet squamules on a pale-grayish-lilac to violet white background, but it differs from X. purpureosquamulosus by having white lamellae, which turn light-blue or pastel blue to grayish and finally ink-blue or blackish blue [74]. Based on the phylogenetic analysis of ITS and LSU sequence data, X. caeruleus is not closely related to X. purpureosquamulosus (Figure 1). The second species with similar colors is X. ianthinus Y. Li and F.J. Wang, also from China, which differs from X. purpureosquamulosus by having bluish-violet to violet, more or less violet-brown squamules, white velar remnants, and yellowish-white to light-pinkish-white (4A2) lamellae [75]. It is not close to X. purpureosquamulosus either in the phylogenetic tree based on ITS and LSU sequences (Figure 1).
Xanthagaricus thailandensis J. Kumla, N. Suwannarach, and S. Lumyong, recently described from Thailand, differs in the larger pileus (30−45 mm), and the pale-orange to grayish-orange, large squamules on the pileus [35].
The phylogenetic analysis of the ITS and LSU sequences (Figure 1) shows that X. purpureosquamulosus is closely related to a group of species with yellow to olive-brown squamules, viz. X. epipastus (Berk. and Broome) S. Hussain, known from Sri Lanka [33,76], X. pakistanicus Hussain, Afshan and Ahmad from Pakistan [77], and X. necopinatus.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.S., E.C.V., N.T. and J.-K.L.; methodology, E.C.V., P.S., J.-K.L. and N.T.; formal analysis, J.-K.L., E.C.V., P.S. and N.T.; data curation, E.C.V., P.S., N.T. and J.-K.L.; supervision, N.T. and E.C.V.; writing—original draft, P.S., E.C.V., N.T. and J.-K.L.; writing—review and editing, E.C.V., P.S., N.T. and J.-K.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

We were supported by Thailand research fund grants “Study of saprobic Agaricales in Thailand to find new industrial mushroom products” (Grant No. DBG6180015) and Thailand Science Research and Innovation (TSRI) grant, Macrofungi diversity research from the Lancang-Mekong Watershed and surrounding areas (Grant No. DBG6280009). The fieldwork of ECV in 2007 was conducted under an MTA agreement with Dr. Kasem Soytong of KMITL. Financial support of ECV and PS was from NSF grant DEB 0618293.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data can be found within the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

Kevin D. Hyde is thanked for his advising and providing a laboratory for fieldwork at the Mushroom Research Centre in Chiang Mai, Thailand. Mae Fah Luang University is thanked for providing laboratory facilities for microscopical study and herbarium. Biotechnology and Ecology Institute, Ministry of Science and Technology of Laos is also thanked for depositing herbarium.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hyde, K.D.; Norphanphoun, C.; Chen, J.; Dissanayake, A.J.; Doilom, M.; Hongsanan, S.; Jayawardena, R.S.; Jeewon, R.; Perera, R.H.; Thongbai, B.; et al. Thailand’s amazing diversity—Up to 96% of fungi in northern Thailand are novel. Fungal Divers. 2018, 93, 215–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Vellinga, E.C.; Sysouphanthong, P.; Hyde, K.D. The family Agaricaceae: Phylogenies and two new white-spored genera. Mycologia 2011, 103, 494–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. He, M.Q.; Zhao, R.L.; Hyde, K.D.; Begerow, D.; Kemler, M.; Yurkov, A.; McKenzie, E.H.C.; Raspé, O.; Kakishima, M.; Sánchez-Ramírez, S.; et al. Notes, outline and divergence times of Basidiomycota. Fungal Divers. 2019, 99, 105–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Kalichman, J.; Kirk, P.M.; Matheny, P.B. A compendium of generic names of agarics and Agaricales. Taxon 2020, 69, 425–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sysouphanthong, P.; Hyde, K.D.; Chukeatirote, E.; Bahkali, A.H.; Vellinga, E.C. Lepiota (Agaricales) in northern Thailand-1 Lepiota section Stenosporae. Mycotaxon 2011, 117, 53–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sysouphanthong, P.; Hyde, K.D.; Chukeatirote, E.; Bahkali, A.H.; Vellinga, E.C. Lepiota (Agaricales) in northern Thailand–2 Lepiota section Lepiota. Cryptogam. Mycol. 2012, 33, 25–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sysouphanthong, P.; Hyde, K.D.; Vellinga, E.C.; Chukeatirote, E. Diversity of Lepiota (Agaricales) in northern Thailand. Mycol. Int. J. Fungal. Biol. 2013, 4, 22–28. [Google Scholar]
  8. Sysouphanthong, P.; Guo, J.; Hyde, K.D.; Xu, J.; Mortimer, P.E. Lepiota thailandica (Agaricaceae), a new species from Thailand. Phytotaxa 2016, 245, 262–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sysouphanthong, P.; Hyde, K.D.; Chukeatirote, E.; Bahkali, A.H.; Vellinga, E.C. Verrucospora vulgaris (Agaricaceae, Agaricales), a rare tropical species and a new record for Thailand. Chiang Mai J. Sci. 2013, 40, 289–293. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ge, Z.W.; Jacobs, A.; Vellinga, E.C.; Sysouphanthong, P.; van der Walt, R.; Lavorato, C.; An, Y.F.; Yang, Z.L. A multi-gene phylogeny of Chlorophyllum (Agaricaceae, Basidiomycota): New species, new combination and infrageneric classification. MycoKeys 2018, 32, 65–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Dutta, A.K.; Bera, S.; Paloi, S.; Rakshit, S.; Tarafder, E.; Sherpa, A.R.; Acharya, K. Lepiotaceous fungi of West Bengal, India: The genus Chlorophyllum. Phytotaxa 2020, 451, 113–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Loizides, M.; Alvarado, P.; Dimou, D.; Zervakis, G.I.; Thines, M.; Telle, S.; Konstantinou, G.; Gube, M. Multiple evolutionary origins of sequestrate species in the genus Chlorophyllum. Mycologia 2020, 112, 400–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Vellinga, E.C.; de Kok, R.P.J.; Bruns, T.D. Phylogeny and taxonomy of Macrolepiota (Agaricaceae). Mycologia 2003, 95, 442–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Vellinga, E.C. Genera in the family Agaricaceae—Evidence from nrITS and nrLSU sequences. Mycol. Res. 2004, 108, 354–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Gube, M. Ontogeny and Phylogeny of Gasteroid Members of Agaricaeae (Basidiomycetes). Ph.D. Thesis, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität, Jena, Germany, 2009. Available online: https://www.db-thueringen.de/receive/dbt_mods_00014723 (accessed on 10 December 2021).
  16. Gube, M.; Vellinga, E.C.; Alvarado, P.; Polemis, E.; Dimou, D.M.; Zervakis, G.I.; Loizides, M. (2749) Proposal to conserve Chlorophyllum against the additional name Secotium (Agaricaceae). Taxon 2020, 69, 819–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chandrasrikul, A.; Suwanarit, P.; Sangwanit, U.; Lumyong, S.; Payapanon, A.; Sanoamuang, N.; Pukahuta, C.; Petcharat, V.; Sardsud, U.; Duengkae, K.; et al. Checklist of Mushrooms (Basidiomycetes) in Thailand; Office of Natural Resources and Environmental Policy and Planning: Bangkok, Thailand, 2011; 448p.
  18. Soytong, K. Mushrooms and Macrofungi in Thailand; Siritham Offset Publishers Ltd.: Ubonratchathani, Thailand, 1994; 151p. (In Thai) [Google Scholar]
  19. Høiland, K.; Schumacher, T. Agarics, clavarioid and some heterobasidiomycetous fungi from Northern Thailand. Nord. J. Bot. 1982, 2, 265–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Berkeley, M.J. Decades of fungi. Decade XV-XIX. Ceylon fungi. Lond. J. Bot. 1847, 6, 479–514. [Google Scholar]
  21. Hosen, M.I.; Ge, Z.W. Clarkeinda trachodes (Agaricales, Basidiomycetes), first record from Bangladesh. Mycotaxo 2011, 118, 331–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Leelavathy, K.K.; Zachariah, S.; Sankaran, K.V. Clarkeinda trachodes—An agaric new to India. Mycologia 1981, 73, 204–207. [Google Scholar]
  23. Verma, R.K.; Tiwari, C.; Parihar, J.; Kumar, S. Diversity of macro-fungi in central India-II: Clarkeinda trachodes. Van Sangyan. 2016, 3, 17–20. [Google Scholar]
  24. Pegler, D.N. Agaric Flora of Sri Lanka. Kew Bull. Addit. Ser. 1986, 12, 1–519. [Google Scholar]
  25. Yang, Z.L. Clarkeinda trachodes an agaric new to China. Acta Bot. Yunnanica 1991, 13, 279–282. [Google Scholar]
  26. Vellinga, E.C.; Noordeloos, M.E. Glossary. In Flora Agaricina Neerlandica 5; Noordeloos, M.E., Kuyper, T.W., Vellinga, E.C., Eds.; A.A. Balkema Publishers: Tokyo, Japan, 2001; pp. 6–11. [Google Scholar]
  27. Vellinga, E.C. Chlorophyllum and Macrolepiota (Agaricaceae) in Australia. Aust. Syst. Bot. 2003, 16, 361–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lebel, T.; Syme, A. Sequestrate species of Agaricus and Macrolepiota from Australia: New species and combinations and their position in a calibrated phylogeny. Mycologia 2012, 104, 496–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Junopat, M.; Junopat, W.; Jongjitvimol, T.; Chiengkul, A.; Sanpote, P. Survey of macrofungi in Doi Vieng La Wildlife reserve, Mae Hong Son Province. Naresuan Univ. Sci. J. 2006, 2, 175–181. [Google Scholar]
  30. Klinhom, U. Checklist of edible mushrooms in Northeast Thailand of survey from 2002–2007 (I). Inf. Mushroom Cultiv. 2008, 13, 8–14. (In Thai) [Google Scholar]
  31. Sanoamuang, N. Wild Mushrooms of Thailand: Biodiversity and Utilization; Khon Kaen University: Universal Graphic & Trading Ltd.: Bangkok, Thailand, 2010; 424p. (In Thai) [Google Scholar]
  32. Ge, Z.W.; Yang, Z.L. Pseudolepiota zangmui gen. et sp. nov. (Agaricaceae, Basidiomycota), a new white-spored mushroom from China. Phytotaxa 2017, 312, 247–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Heinemann, P.; Little Flower, S.R. Hymenagaricus (Agaricaceae) de Kerala (Inde) et de Sri Lanka. Bull. Du Jard. Bot. Natl. De Belg. 1984, 54, 151–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hosen, M.I.; Song, Z.P.; Gates, G.; Karunarathna, S.C.; Chowdhury, M.S.M.; Li, T.H. Two new species of Xanthagaricus and some notes on Heinemannomyces from Asia. MycoKeys 2017, 28, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Kumla, J.; Suwannarach, N.; Sringernyuang, K.; Lumyong, S. Xanthagaricus thailandensis sp. nov. (Agaricales, Basidiomycota), from northern Thailand. Phytotaxa 2018, 348, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Liu, S.Y.; Liu, J.K.; Syouphanthong, P.; Hyde, K.D.; Lumyong, S. Xanthagaricus siamensis sp. nov. (Agaricaceae), a new species with dull green lamellae from northern Thailand. Phytotaxa 2020, 437, 14–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kornerup, A.; Wanscher, J.H. Methuen Handbook of Colour, 3rd ed.; Eyre Methuen: London, UK, 1978; 243p. [Google Scholar]
  38. Gardes, M.; Bruns, T.D. ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes—Application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol. Ecol. 1993, 2, 113–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.; Taylor, J.W. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications; Innis, M.A., Gelfand, D.H., Sninsky, J.J., White, T.J., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1990; pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Katoh, K.; Misawa, K.; Kuma, K.; Miyata, T. MAFFT: A novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30, 3059–3066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Katoh, K.; Toh, H. Recent developments in the MAFFT multiple sequence alignment program. Brief. Bioinform. 2008, 9, 286–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Stamatakis, A.; Hoover, P.; Rougemont, J. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML webservers. Syst. Biol. 2008, 75, 758–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Nylander, J.A.A. Modeltest v2. Program Distributed by the Author; Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University: Uppsala, Sweden, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  44. Ronquist, F.; Huelsenbeck, J.P. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 2003, 19, 1572–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Page, R.D. TreeView: An application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 1996, 12, 357–358. [Google Scholar]
  46. Li, G.J.; Hyde, K.D.; Zhao, R.L.; Hongsanan, S.; Abdel-Aziz, F.A.; Abdel-Wahab, M.A.; Alvarado, P.; Alves Silva, G.; Ammirati, J.F.; Ariyawansa, H.A.; et al. Fungal diversity notes 253–366: Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa. Fungal Divers. 2016, 78, 1–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Patouillard, N. Champignons nouveaux du Tonkin. Bull. Trimest. De La Soc. Mycol. De Fr. 1907, 23, 69–79. [Google Scholar]
  48. Mossebo, D.C.; Akoa, A.; Eteme, R.A. Macrolepiota globosa et Nothopanus nsimalenensis, deux nouvelles espèces fongiques du Cameroun. Mycotaxon 2000, 76, 267–278. [Google Scholar]
  49. Vellinga, E.C. New combinations in Chlorophyllum. Mycotaxon 2002, 83, 415–417. [Google Scholar]
  50. Akers, B.P.; Sundberg, W.J. Leucoagaricus hortensis: Some synonyms from Florida and taxonomic observations. Mycotaxon 1997, 62, 401–419. [Google Scholar]
  51. Kumari, B.; Atri, N.S.; Kaur, M. Chlorolepiota indica sp. nov. A new species from India. Mycoscience 2013, 54, 257–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Reid, D.A.; Eicker, A. A comprehensive account of Chlorophyllum molybdites. Bot. Bull. Acad. Sin. 1991, 32, 317–333. [Google Scholar]
  53. Vellinga, E.C. Een tropisch paddestoelenparadijs. Coolia 1990, 33, 78–79. [Google Scholar]
  54. Watling, R. A striking addition to the British mycoflora. Mycologist 1991, 5, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Læssøe, T.; Pedersen, O.S.; Sysouphanthong, P. An Introduction to the Edible, Poisonous and Medicinal Fungi of Northern Laos; Privately Published: Bangkok, Thailand, 2019; 192p. [Google Scholar]
  56. Bijeesh, C.; Vrinda, K.B.; Pradeep, C.K. Mushroom poisoning by Chlorophyllum molybdites in Kerala. J. Mycopathol. Res. 2017, 54, 477–483. [Google Scholar]
  57. Wang, N.; Zhao, Z.; Gao, J.; Tian, E.; Yu, W.; Li, H.; Zhang, J.; Xie, R.; Zhao, X.; Chen, A. Rapid and Visual Identification of Chlorophyllum molybdites With Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Method. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 638315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ge, W.; Yang, Z.L.; Vellinga, E.C. The genus Macrolepiota (Agaricaceae, Basidiomycota) in China. Fungal Divers. 2010, 45, 81–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Cho, H.J.; Lee, H.; Park, M.S.; Kim, C.; Wisitrassameewong, K.; Lupala, A.; Park, K.H.; Kim, M.J.; Fong, J.J.; Lim, Y.W. Macrolepiota in Korea: New records and a new species. Mycobiology 2019, 47, 310–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Pegler, D.N. A revision of the genus Lepiota from Ceylon. Kew Bull. 1972, 27, 155–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Pegler, D.N. A preliminary Agaric Flora of East Africa; Kew Bull. Additional Series 6: 1–615; Her Majesty’s Stationery Office: London, UK, 1977.
  62. Petch, T. Revision of Ceylon Fungi. Annals royal botanic gardens. Peradeniya 1907, 4, 21–68. [Google Scholar]
  63. Petch, T.; Bisby, G.R. The fungi of Ceylon. Perad. Manua 1950, 6, 1–111. [Google Scholar]
  64. Natarajan, K.; Manjula, P. South Indian Agaricales. Indian J. Bot. 1981, 4, 50–59. [Google Scholar]
  65. Yang, Z.L. Type studies on Agarics described by N. Patouillard (and his co-authors) from Vietnam. Mycotaxon 2000, 75, 431–476. [Google Scholar]
  66. Chiu, W.F. The Amanitaceae of Yunnan. Sci. Rep. Natl. Tsing Hua Univ. Ser. B Biol. Psychol. Sci. 1948, 3, 165–178. [Google Scholar]
  67. Sysouphanthong, P.; Bouamanivong, S.; Salichan, T. Some Mushrooms in Houayyang Preserves; Biotechnology and Ecology Institute: Vientiane, Laos, 2018; 87p. (In Lao) [Google Scholar]
  68. Aberdeen, J.E.C. Notes on Lepiota in the Kew Herbarium. Kew Bull. 1962, 16, 129–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Grgurinovic, C.A. Larger Fungi of South Australia; Botanic Gardens of Adelaide; State Herbarium; Flora of South Australia Handbooks Committee: Adelaide, Australia, 1997.
  70. Mbaluto, C.; Runo, S.; Wanyoike, W.; Onyango, C.; Kimani, W.; Jagger, H.; Otieno, D.O. Macrolepiota aberdarense, a new edible mushroom from Kenya. Curr. Res. Environ. Appl. Mycol. J. Fungal. Biol. 2018, 8, 247–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Pegler, D.N.; Rayner, R.W. A contribution to the Agaric flora of Kenya. Kew Bull. 1969, 23, 347–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Redhead, S.A. Bully for Coprinus—A story of manure, minutiae, and molecules. McIlvainea 2001, 14, 5–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Vellinga, E.C.; Yang, Z.L. Volvolepiota and Macrolepiota—Macrolepiota velosa, a new species from China. Mycotaxon 2003, 85, 183–186. [Google Scholar]
  74. Hosen, M.I.; Song, Z.; Gates, G.; Li, T.H. Xanthagaricus caeruleus, a new species with ink-blue lamellae from southeast China. Mycoscience 2017, 59, 190–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Wang, F.; Qi, L.L.; Zhou, X.; Li, Y. A new species and a new record of Xanthagaricus (Agaricaceae, Agaricales) from China. Phytotaxa 2018, 371, 241–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Berkeley, M.J.; Broome, C. The fungi of Ceylon (Hymenomycetes, from Agaricus to Cantharellus). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 1871, 11, 494–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Hussain, S.; Afshan, N.S.; Ahmad, H.; Sher, H.; Khalid, A.N. Xanthagaricus pakistanicus sp. nov. (Agaricaceae), the first report of the genus from Pakistan. Turk. J. Bot. 2018, 42, 123–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of the Agaricus clade in the Agaricaceae based on nrITS-LSU sequence data. New sequences generated from Thailand are in bold. Bootstrap values (ML/B) are given above the branches. Bootstrap values for maximum likelihood equal to or greater than ≥60 and Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥0.95 are placed above the branches. Genus abbreviations are as follows: A = Agaricus, C = Chlorophyllum, Cl = Clarkeinda, Co = Coniolepiota, E = Eriocybe, H = Heinemannomyces, Ha = Hymenagaricus, Ps = Pseudolepiota, M = Micropsalliota, and X = Xanthagaricus. Chlorophyllum rachodes Vellinga is an outgroup.
Figure 1. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of the Agaricus clade in the Agaricaceae based on nrITS-LSU sequence data. New sequences generated from Thailand are in bold. Bootstrap values (ML/B) are given above the branches. Bootstrap values for maximum likelihood equal to or greater than ≥60 and Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥0.95 are placed above the branches. Genus abbreviations are as follows: A = Agaricus, C = Chlorophyllum, Cl = Clarkeinda, Co = Coniolepiota, E = Eriocybe, H = Heinemannomyces, Ha = Hymenagaricus, Ps = Pseudolepiota, M = Micropsalliota, and X = Xanthagaricus. Chlorophyllum rachodes Vellinga is an outgroup.
Diversity 13 00666 g001
Figure 2. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of Chlorophyllum based on nrITS sequences. New sequences generated from Thailand are in bold. Bootstrap values for maximum likelihood equal to or greater than ≥60 and Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥0.95 are placed above the branches. Genus abbreviations are as follows: A = Agaricus, C = Chlorophyllum, Cl = Clarkeinda, Thai specimens from this study are in bold types. Clarkeinda trachodes (Berk.) Singer and Agaricus campestris L. are outgroup. GenBank accession number and country are indicated after species name.
Figure 2. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of Chlorophyllum based on nrITS sequences. New sequences generated from Thailand are in bold. Bootstrap values for maximum likelihood equal to or greater than ≥60 and Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥0.95 are placed above the branches. Genus abbreviations are as follows: A = Agaricus, C = Chlorophyllum, Cl = Clarkeinda, Thai specimens from this study are in bold types. Clarkeinda trachodes (Berk.) Singer and Agaricus campestris L. are outgroup. GenBank accession number and country are indicated after species name.
Diversity 13 00666 g002
Figure 3. Maximum Likelihood tree of Chlorophyllum based on analysis of nrITS-LSU-rpb2 sequence data. Bootstrap values (ML/B) are given above the branches. Bootstrap values for maximum likelihood equal to or greater than ≥60 and Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥0.95 are placed above the branches. Abbreviations are as follows: A. = Agaricus, C = Chlorophyllum, and Cl = Clarkeinda. Clarkeinda trachodes and Agaricus campestris are used as outgroup. New sequences are in bold type.
Figure 3. Maximum Likelihood tree of Chlorophyllum based on analysis of nrITS-LSU-rpb2 sequence data. Bootstrap values (ML/B) are given above the branches. Bootstrap values for maximum likelihood equal to or greater than ≥60 and Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥0.95 are placed above the branches. Abbreviations are as follows: A. = Agaricus, C = Chlorophyllum, and Cl = Clarkeinda. Clarkeinda trachodes and Agaricus campestris are used as outgroup. New sequences are in bold type.
Diversity 13 00666 g003
Figure 4. Maximum parsimony tree of Macrolepiota based on analysis of nrITS sequences. Bootstrap values for maximum likelihood equal to or greater than ≥60 and Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥0.95 are placed above the branches. Abbreviations are as follows: La. = Leucoagaricus, L = Lepiota, and M = Macrolepiota. All taxon names in bold are new sequences in this study. Leucoagaricus meleagris (Gray) Singer and Lepiota cristata (Bolton) P. Kumm. are used as outgroup. Country, type, and GenBank accession number are indicated after each species name.
Figure 4. Maximum parsimony tree of Macrolepiota based on analysis of nrITS sequences. Bootstrap values for maximum likelihood equal to or greater than ≥60 and Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥0.95 are placed above the branches. Abbreviations are as follows: La. = Leucoagaricus, L = Lepiota, and M = Macrolepiota. All taxon names in bold are new sequences in this study. Leucoagaricus meleagris (Gray) Singer and Lepiota cristata (Bolton) P. Kumm. are used as outgroup. Country, type, and GenBank accession number are indicated after each species name.
Diversity 13 00666 g004
Figure 5. Fresh basidiomata of Chlorophyllum demangei in situ. (a,b) MFLU 09-0005. (c) MFLU 12-1769.
Figure 5. Fresh basidiomata of Chlorophyllum demangei in situ. (a,b) MFLU 09-0005. (c) MFLU 12-1769.
Diversity 13 00666 g005
Figure 6. Chlorophyllum demangei (ecv3622). (a) Basidiomata. (b) Basidiospores. (c) Basidia. (d) Cheilocystidia. (e) Pileus covering elements.
Figure 6. Chlorophyllum demangei (ecv3622). (a) Basidiomata. (b) Basidiospores. (c) Basidia. (d) Cheilocystidia. (e) Pileus covering elements.
Diversity 13 00666 g006
Figure 7. Fresh basidiomata of Chlorophyllum globosum in situ. (a) MFLU 12-1815. (b,c) MFLU 192357. (d) MFLU 10-0555.
Figure 7. Fresh basidiomata of Chlorophyllum globosum in situ. (a) MFLU 12-1815. (b,c) MFLU 192357. (d) MFLU 10-0555.
Diversity 13 00666 g007
Figure 8. Chlorophyllum globosum (MFLU 12-1815). (a) Basidiomata. (b) Basidiospores. (c) Pileus covering elements.
Figure 8. Chlorophyllum globosum (MFLU 12-1815). (a) Basidiomata. (b) Basidiospores. (c) Pileus covering elements.
Diversity 13 00666 g008
Figure 9. Fresh basidiomata of Chlorophyllum hortense. (a) MFLU 12-1783. (b,c) MFLU 19-2352.
Figure 9. Fresh basidiomata of Chlorophyllum hortense. (a) MFLU 12-1783. (b,c) MFLU 19-2352.
Diversity 13 00666 g009
Figure 10. Microcharacters of Chlorophyllum hortense (MFLU 12-1783). (a) basidiospores. (b) basidia. (c) cheilocystidia. (d) pileus covering.
Figure 10. Microcharacters of Chlorophyllum hortense (MFLU 12-1783). (a) basidiospores. (b) basidia. (c) cheilocystidia. (d) pileus covering.
Diversity 13 00666 g010
Figure 11. Fresh basidiomata of Chlorophyllum molybdites in situ. (a) MFLU 12-1775. (b) MFLU 12-1819.
Figure 11. Fresh basidiomata of Chlorophyllum molybdites in situ. (a) MFLU 12-1775. (b) MFLU 12-1819.
Diversity 13 00666 g011
Figure 12. Microcharacters of Chlorophyllum molybdites (MFLU 12-1783). (a) basidiospores. (b) cheilocystidia. (c) pileus covering.
Figure 12. Microcharacters of Chlorophyllum molybdites (MFLU 12-1783). (a) basidiospores. (b) cheilocystidia. (c) pileus covering.
Diversity 13 00666 g012
Figure 13. Fresh basidiomata of Clarkeinda trachodes in situ. (a,b) MFLU 19-2351.
Figure 13. Fresh basidiomata of Clarkeinda trachodes in situ. (a,b) MFLU 19-2351.
Diversity 13 00666 g013
Figure 14. Microcharacters of Clarkeinda trachodes (MFLU 192-351). (a) basidiospores. (b) basidia. (c) cheilocystidia. (d) pileus covering.
Figure 14. Microcharacters of Clarkeinda trachodes (MFLU 192-351). (a) basidiospores. (b) basidia. (c) cheilocystidia. (d) pileus covering.
Diversity 13 00666 g014
Figure 15. Fresh basidiomata of Macrolepiota detersa in situ. (a,b) MFLU 12-1784. (ce) MFLU 12-1772.
Figure 15. Fresh basidiomata of Macrolepiota detersa in situ. (a,b) MFLU 12-1784. (ce) MFLU 12-1772.
Diversity 13 00666 g015
Figure 16. Microcharacters of Macrolepiota detersa (MFLU 192-351). (a) basidiospores. (b) cheilocystidia. (c) pileus covering.
Figure 16. Microcharacters of Macrolepiota detersa (MFLU 192-351). (a) basidiospores. (b) cheilocystidia. (c) pileus covering.
Diversity 13 00666 g016
Figure 17. Fresh basidiomata of Macrolepiota dolichaula in situ. (a) MFLU 12-1816. (b) MFLU 12-1776. (c) HNL503204.
Figure 17. Fresh basidiomata of Macrolepiota dolichaula in situ. (a) MFLU 12-1816. (b) MFLU 12-1776. (c) HNL503204.
Diversity 13 00666 g017
Figure 18. Microcharacters of Macrolepiota dolichaula (MFLU 12-1816). (a) pileus covering. (b) basidiospores. (c) cheilocystidia.
Figure 18. Microcharacters of Macrolepiota dolichaula (MFLU 12-1816). (a) pileus covering. (b) basidiospores. (c) cheilocystidia.
Diversity 13 00666 g018
Figure 19. Fresh basidiomata of Macrolepiota excelsa in situ. (a) MFLU 09-0203. (b) ecv3553. (c) ecv3572 (type). (d,e) HNL501921.
Figure 19. Fresh basidiomata of Macrolepiota excelsa in situ. (a) MFLU 09-0203. (b) ecv3553. (c) ecv3572 (type). (d,e) HNL501921.
Diversity 13 00666 g019
Figure 20. Microcharacters of Macrolepiota excelsa (ecv3572, Type). (a) basidiospores. (b) Cheilocystidia. (c) pileus covering.
Figure 20. Microcharacters of Macrolepiota excelsa (ecv3572, Type). (a) basidiospores. (b) Cheilocystidia. (c) pileus covering.
Diversity 13 00666 g020
Figure 21. Fresh basidiomata of Macrolepiota velosa in situ. (a,b) HNL502655. (c) MFLU 09-0052. (d) HNL502371. (e) MFLU 12-1818. (f) MFLU 09-0055.
Figure 21. Fresh basidiomata of Macrolepiota velosa in situ. (a,b) HNL502655. (c) MFLU 09-0052. (d) HNL502371. (e) MFLU 12-1818. (f) MFLU 09-0055.
Diversity 13 00666 g021
Figure 22. Microcharacters of Macrolepiota velosa (MFLU 09-0052). (a) basidiospores. (b) cheilocystidia. (c) pileuscovering.
Figure 22. Microcharacters of Macrolepiota velosa (MFLU 09-0052). (a) basidiospores. (b) cheilocystidia. (c) pileuscovering.
Diversity 13 00666 g022
Figure 23. Fresh basidiomata of Pseudolepiota zangmui. (a) MFLU 10-0515. (b) MFLU 10-0518. (c,d) MFLU 192-355.
Figure 23. Fresh basidiomata of Pseudolepiota zangmui. (a) MFLU 10-0515. (b) MFLU 10-0518. (c,d) MFLU 192-355.
Diversity 13 00666 g023
Figure 24. Microcharacters of Pseudolepiota zangmui (MFLU 10-0515). (a) basidiospores. (b) basidia. (c) cheilocystidia. (d) pileus covering.
Figure 24. Microcharacters of Pseudolepiota zangmui (MFLU 10-0515). (a) basidiospores. (b) basidia. (c) cheilocystidia. (d) pileus covering.
Diversity 13 00666 g024
Figure 25. Basidiomata of Xanthagaricus necopinatus in situ. (a) MFLU 19-2353. (b) MFLU 19-2359. (c) MFLU 19-2358.
Figure 25. Basidiomata of Xanthagaricus necopinatus in situ. (a) MFLU 19-2353. (b) MFLU 19-2359. (c) MFLU 19-2358.
Diversity 13 00666 g025
Figure 26. Microcharacters of Xanthagaricus necopinatus (MFLU 19-2353). (a) basidiospores. (b) basidia. (c) cheilocystidia. (d) pileus covering.
Figure 26. Microcharacters of Xanthagaricus necopinatus (MFLU 19-2353). (a) basidiospores. (b) basidia. (c) cheilocystidia. (d) pileus covering.
Diversity 13 00666 g026
Figure 27. Fresh basidiomata of Xanthagaricus purpureosquamulosus. (ac) MFLU 19-2354 (holotype). (d) MFLU 192356.
Figure 27. Fresh basidiomata of Xanthagaricus purpureosquamulosus. (ac) MFLU 19-2354 (holotype). (d) MFLU 192356.
Diversity 13 00666 g027
Figure 28. Microcharacters of Xanthagaricus purpureosquamulosus (MFLU 19-2354, holotype). (a) basidiospores. (b) basidia. (c) cheilocystidia. (d) pileus covering.
Figure 28. Microcharacters of Xanthagaricus purpureosquamulosus (MFLU 19-2354, holotype). (a) basidiospores. (b) basidia. (c) cheilocystidia. (d) pileus covering.
Diversity 13 00666 g028
Table 1. List of collections of taxa in the Agaricaceae and their GenBank accession numbers used in the molecular analyses of dataset 1.
Table 1. List of collections of taxa in the Agaricaceae and their GenBank accession numbers used in the molecular analyses of dataset 1.
TaxonVoucher NumberCountry/Collection NumberGenBAnk Accession Number
ITSLSU
Agaricus aff. campestrisMurphy 6242USAHM488744-
Agaricus bisporatusContu1-AF432882-
Agaricus bohusiiLAPAG562-KM657928KR006613
Agaricus deserticolaM. SmithUSAHM488747-
Agaricus diminutivusVellinga 2360USAAF482831AF482877
Agaricus megacystidiatusMFLU 12-0137ThailandNR_119953-
Agaricus sp.NTS113ThailandJF514531-
Agaricus sp.C3182TogoKJ540956-
Agaricus sp.BAB5059IndiaKR155104-
Chlorophyllum rhacodesVellinga 2106NetherlandsAF482849-
Clarkeinda trachodesIqbal 806Bangladesh-MG462712
Clarkeinda trachodesecv3838ThailandHM488750HM488771
Clarkeinda trachodesecv3550ThailandHM488751KY418837
Clarkeinda trachodesMFLUCC:100139Sri LankaKU845621-
Clarkeinda trachodesMFLU 19-2351ThailandMN099351-
Coniolepiota spongodesecv3898ThailandHM488755-
Coniolepiota spongodesHKAS 77574BangladeshKC625531KC625530
Eriocybe chioneaecv3560ThailandHM488752HM488773
Heinemannomyces splendidissimusecv3586ThailandHM488760HM488769
Heinemannomyces splendidissimuszrl3043ThailandJF691559-
Heinemannomyces splendidissimusGDGM 46633ChinaMF621038MF621039
Hymenagaricus ardosiicolorLAPAF9TogoJF727840-
Hymenagaricus ardosiicolorisolateZ4TanzaniaKM360160-
Hymenagaricus cf. kivuensisBR6089BurundiKM982454-
Hymenagaricus sp.CA833ThailandJF727858-
Hymenagaricus sp.CA801ThailandJF727859
Hymenagaricus sp.zrl3103ThailandKM982450KM982452
Hymenagaricus sp.LD2012186ThailandKM982451KM982453
Micropsalliota arginophaeaSFSU zrl 2089ChinaHM436616HM436578
Micropsalliota pusillissimaSFSU zrl 3047ChinaHM436645HM436594
Pseudolepiota zangmuiZ. W. Ge 3537ChinaKY768925-
Pseudolepiota zangmuiZ. W. Ge 2106ChinaKY768927-
Pseudolepiota zangmuiZ. W. Ge 2107ChinaKY768926-
Pseudolepiota zangmuiZ. W. Ge 2175ChinaKY768928MG742049
Pseudolepiota zangmuiMFLU 10-0515ThailandKX904355-
Pseudolepiota zangmuiMFLU 10-0518ThailandKX904356-
Pseudolepiota zangmuiMFLU 19-2355ThailandMN099352-
Xanthagaricus caeruleusGDGM 50651ChinaMF039088MF039086
Xanthagaricus caeruleusGDGM 50794ChinaMF039089MF039087
Xanthagaricus epipastuszrl 3045ThailandHM436649HM436609
Xanthagaricus flavosquamosusGDGM 50913ChinaMF351627-
Xanthagaricus flavosquamosusGDGM 50924ChinaMF351628-
Xanthagaricus flavosquamosusGDGM 50918ChinaMF351629MF351631
Xanthagaricus ianthinusHMJAU45193ChinaMH166760-
Xanthagaricus ianthinusHMJAU45192ChinaMH166761-
Xanthagaricus ianthinusHMJAU45191ChinaMH166762-
Xanthagaricus ianthinusHMJAU45194ChinaMH166764-
Xanthagaricus necopinatusIqbal821BangladeshMF351626MF351630
Xanthagaricus necopinatusMFLU 19-2353ThailandMN480544-
Xanthagaricus necopinatusMFLU 19-2358ThailandMN480545-
Xanthagaricus pakistanicusLAH SH 207PakistanKY621555KY621554
Xanthagaricus pakistanicusHUP SH 315PakistanKY621556-
Xanthagaricus pakistanicusSWAT SH 389PakistanKY621557-
Xanthagaricus purpureosquamulosusMFLU 19-2354ThailandMN099353MN097917
Xanthagaricus purpureosquamulosusMFLU 19-2356ThailandMN099354MN097918
Xanthagaricus siamensisMFLU 19-0575ThailandMN176991MN176981
Xanthagaricus siamensisMFLU 19-0574ThailandMN176992MN176982
Xanthagaricus siamensisMFLU 19-0576ThailandMN176993MN176983
Xanthagaricus sp.ecv3807ThailandHM488761HM488770
Xanthagaricus taiwanensisC.M. Chen 3636TaiwanDQ006271DQ006270
Xanthagaricus taiwanensisHKAS 42545TaiwanDQ490633-
Xanthagaricus thailandensisCMUJK010ThailandMG256663MG256665
Xanthagaricus thailandensisCMUJK0115ThailandMG256664MG256666
Note: New specimens and sequences are in bold.
Table 2. List of fungal taxa of second dataset of Chlorophyllum species and their GenBank accession numbers used in molecular analysis of datasets 2.
Table 2. List of fungal taxa of second dataset of Chlorophyllum species and their GenBank accession numbers used in molecular analysis of datasets 2.
TaxonVoucher/Collection NumberCountryGenBank Accession Number
ITSLSUrpb2
Agaricus campestrisLAPAG370ChinaKM657927KR006607KT951556
Chlorophyllum africanumPREM 62140South AfricaMG741961MG742041MG742070
Chlorophyllum africanumPREM 62141South AfricaMG741963MG742042MG742071
Chlorophyllum agaricoidesHKAS 101312RussiaMG742003MG742020MG742050
Chlorophyllum agaricoidesHMAS 71678ChinaMG742004MG742021MG742051
Chlorophyllum arizonicumAH31724MexicoKR233490KR233499-
Chlorophyllum arizonicumTrappe 11481USAHQ020416HQ020419-
Chlorophyllum brunneumHKAS 101315ItalyMG742013MG742022MG742052
Chlorophyllum brunneumecv2361USAAY083206AF482886HM488804
Chlorophyllum demangeiZ. W. Ge 3112ChinaMG741965MG742027MG742056
Chlorophyllum demangeiZ. W. Ge 3574ChinaMG741964MG742025MG742055
Chlorophyllum demangeiecv3622ThailandHM488765--
Chlorophyllum demangeiMFLU 12-1769ThailandKJ524556MN097907-
Chlorophyllum demangeiMFLU 09-0005ThailandKJ524555MN097908-
Chlorophyllum demangeiecv3557ThailandMN582745--
Chlorophyllum globosumZ. W. Ge 2006-1ChinaMG741995MG742023-
Chlorophyllum globosumPREM 62147South AfricaMG742002MG742024MG742053
Chlorophyllum globosumMFLU 12-1815ThailandKJ524553MN097909-
Chlorophyllum hortenseHKAS 101317ChinaMG741967MG742026MG742054
Chlorophyllum hortenseZ. W. Ge 3115ChinaMG741968MG742028MG742057
Chlorophyllum hortenseHKAS 90470ChinaMG741971MG742029MG742058
Chlorophyllum hortenseMFLU 12-1783ThailandKJ524554MN097910-
Chlorophyllum hortenseMFLU 19-2352ThailandMN099355MN097916MN816433
Chlorophyllum hortensePC17PhilippinesMN099356MN097915-
Chlorophyllum lusitanicumAH45540SpainKR233482KR233491-
Chlorophyllum lusitanicumAH43927SpainKR233483KR233492-
Chlorophyllum molybditesHKAS 45051ChinaMG741985MG742030MG742059
Chlorophyllum molybditesZ. W. Ge 3381USAMG741993MG742034MG742063
Chlorophyllum molybditesZ. W. Ge 3146ChinaMG741987MG742031MG742060
Chlorophyllum molybditesHKAS 101322ItalyMG741988MG742032MG742061
Chlorophyllum molybditesZ. W. Ge 3377USAMG741992MG742033MG742062
Chlorophyllum molybditesMFLU 12-1772ThailandKJ524557MN097911-
Chlorophyllum molybditesMFLU 12-1765ThailandKJ524559MN097912-
Chlorophyllum molybditesMFLU 12-1775ThailandKJ524558MN097913-
Chlorophyllum molybditesS57SudanMK541941--
Chlorophyllum molybditesJ. States AEF1097USAAF482836--
Chlorophyllum molybditesDMSC09538ThailandKP229775--
Chlorophyllum molybditesAM150 (CUH)IndiaKM190077--
Chlorophyllum molybditesHKAS 101319ThailandMG741994--
Chlorophyllum molybditesFS10IndiaMK855510--
Chlorophyllum neomastoideumHKAS 83208ChinaMG741976MG742035MG742064
Chlorophyllum nothorachodesH. Lepp 1142AustraliaAF482855--
Chlorophyllum olivieriHKAS 31587GermanyMG742016MG742036MG742065
Chlorophyllum olivieriHKAS 53466GermanyMG742017MG742037MG742066
Chlorophyllum palaeotropicumPREM 62142South AfricaMG741978MG742038MG742067
Chlorophyllum palaeotropicumPREM 62145South AfricaMG741982MG742039MG742068
Chlorophyllum palaeotropicumHKAS 93747BeninMG741983MG742040MG742069
Chlorophyllum palaeotropicumpc21PhilippinesMN099357MN097914-
Chlorophyllum pseudoglobosumAM155IndiaKP642506KR080484-
Chlorophyllum rhacodesecv2106NetherlandsAF482849AY176345-
Chlorophyllum rhacodesOKM19588USAU85312U85277HM488803
Chlorophyllum sphaerosporumHMAS 66153ChinaMG742011MG742043MG742072
Chlorophyllum sphaerosporumHMAS 71683ChinaMG742012MG742044MG742073
Chlorophyllum subrhacodesZ. W. Ge 3411USAMG741975MG742045MG742074
Chlorophyllum subrhacodesZ. W. Ge 3232USAMG741973MG742046MG742075
Chlorophyllum subrhacodesZ. W. Ge 3385USAMG741972MG742048MG742077
Chlorophyllum subrhacodesZ. W. Ge 3242USAMG741974MG742047MG742076
Clarkeinda trachodesecv3550ThailandHM488751KY418837HM488802
Note: New specimens and sequences are in bold.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sysouphanthong, P.; Thongklang, N.; Liu, J.-K.; Vellinga, E.C. Description of Lepiotaceous Fungal Species of the Genera Chlorophyllum, Clarkeinda, Macrolepiota, Pseudolepiota, and Xanthagaricus, from Laos and Thailand. Diversity 2021, 13, 666. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/d13120666

AMA Style

Sysouphanthong P, Thongklang N, Liu J-K, Vellinga EC. Description of Lepiotaceous Fungal Species of the Genera Chlorophyllum, Clarkeinda, Macrolepiota, Pseudolepiota, and Xanthagaricus, from Laos and Thailand. Diversity. 2021; 13(12):666. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/d13120666

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sysouphanthong, Phongeun, Naritsada Thongklang, Jian-Kui Liu, and Else C. Vellinga. 2021. "Description of Lepiotaceous Fungal Species of the Genera Chlorophyllum, Clarkeinda, Macrolepiota, Pseudolepiota, and Xanthagaricus, from Laos and Thailand" Diversity 13, no. 12: 666. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/d13120666

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop