Next Article in Journal
Rhinacanthin-C but Not -D Extracted from Rhinacanthus nasutus (L.) Kurz Offers Neuroprotection via ERK, CHOP, and LC3B Pathways
Next Article in Special Issue
Pharmacogenetics of Metformin Transporters Suggests No Association with Therapeutic Inefficacy among Diabetes Type 2 Mexican Patients
Previous Article in Journal
Spectroscopy Approach for Highly-Efficient Screening of Lectin-Ligand Interactions in Application for Mannose Receptor and Molecular Containers for Antibacterial Drugs
Previous Article in Special Issue
Biological Properties of Transition Metal Complexes with Metformin and Its Analogues
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pharmaceuticals
Volume 15
Issue 5
10.3390/ph15050626
pharmaceuticals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Metformin and Cancer, an Ambiguanidous Relationship

by
Sarah J. Skuli
1,†,
Safwan Alomari
2,†,
Hallie Gaitsch
2,3,
A’ishah Bakayoko
4,
Nicolas Skuli
1,4,‡ and
Betty M. Tyler
2,*,‡
1
Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
2
Hunterian Neurosurgical Research Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
3
NIH-Oxford-Cambridge Scholars Program, Wellcome—MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute and Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, UK
4
Stem Cell and Xenograft Core, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
‡
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15(5), 626; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ph15050626
Submission received: 28 March 2022 / Revised: 10 May 2022 / Accepted: 12 May 2022 / Published: 19 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Metformin: Mechanism and Application 2022)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The deregulation of energetic and cellular metabolism is a signature of cancer cells. Thus, drugs targeting cancer cell metabolism may have promising therapeutic potential. Previous reports demonstrate that the widely used normoglycemic agent, metformin, can decrease the risk of cancer in type 2 diabetics and inhibit cell growth in various cancers, including pancreatic, colon, prostate, ovarian, and breast cancer. While metformin is a known adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) agonist and an inhibitor of the electron transport chain complex I, its mechanism of action in cancer cells as well as its effect on cancer metabolism is not clearly established. In this review, we will give an update on the role of metformin as an antitumoral agent and detail relevant evidence on the potential use and mechanisms of action of metformin in cancer. Analyzing antitumoral, signaling, and metabolic impacts of metformin on cancer cells may provide promising new therapeutic strategies in oncology.

1. Introduction

The history of the biguanide, metformin (molecular formula C4-H11-N5, Table 1), is linked to Galega officinalis and is also known as French lilac or Italian fitch. The Galega officinalis represents a traditional herbal medicine that was found to lower blood glucose in 1918 [1]. Guanidine derivatives were used to treat diabetes mellitus (DM) in the 1920s and 1930s but with the availability of insulin were discontinued due to their toxicity [2]. During World War II and throughout the search for antimalarial agents, metformin was re-discovered and determined to lower blood glucose levels [3,4]. The French physician-scientist Jean Sterne was the first to report the use of metformin to treat DM in 1957 and named the compound Glucophage, which means glucose eater [5]. Since its introduction, metformin has become the most prescribed glucose-lowering drug worldwide [2].
In 1998, the UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS), a prospective randomized trial of 5100 type 2 DM patients who received glucose-lowering treatment for more than a decade showed reduced cancer risk [6]. Subsequent large database analyses have reported lower incidence of certain types of cancer among diabetic populations taking metformin despite data indicating that these diabetic populations were overall more prone to developing cancer. This has led to a deeper investigation into the role of metformin in cancer [7,8]. Here, we review five years of updated literature on metformin’s antineoplastic activity, its mechanisms of action, as well as current limitations and future directions for the repurposing of metformin in the treatment of cancer.

2. Metformin in Cancer

To date, there are over 50 recent or active clinical trials investigating the use of metformin in human malignancies (Table 2). Total daily dose of oral metformin in these clinical trials ranges from 500 to 3000 mg. This range reflects the previously established dosing strategy used to treat patients with type 2 DM, with gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity limiting use beyond 2500 mg per day [9]. In future clinical trials, we suggest aiming to achieve the maximum tolerated dose of 2500 mg per day given the majority of preclinical studies required high concentrations of metformin to achieve anti-cancer activity [10]. Furthermore, we recommend planned dose escalation to allow for GI habituation as well as allowance of dose interruptions and reductions for drug toxicity to reflect real-world practices.

2.1. Glioma

While there remains a lack of high-level evidence describing the specific role of metformin in patients with brain tumors, available literature has reported several advantages of repurposing metformin to be used in the management of glioma. Systemically administered drugs must be able to cross the blood–brain barrier (BBB) to effectively treat brain tumors. Using a rat model, orally administered metformin was found to penetrate the BBB at a high rate with biodistribution throughout the central nervous system [49]. Furthermore, metformin reduces vasogenic brain edema and the neurological symptoms that accompany brain tumors [50]. There has also been recent effort to characterize the subpopulations of glioma patients that would benefit most from metformin. A recent retrospective study of 1093 patients with high-grade glioma from a population-based clinical cancer registry in Germany reported a survival benefit from metformin in patients with World Health Organization (WHO) grade III glioma [51]. The benefit in WHO grade III glioma is attributed to the high frequency of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations, which can increase the vulnerability of tumor cells to therapeutic interventions targeting glutamine and mitochondrial metabolism [52].

2.2. Breast Cancer

Despite promising preclinical studies demonstrating the synergistic effects of metformin and breast cancer chemotherapeutics [53], several clinical trials investigating the addition of metformin to traditional treatment regimens did not result in improved efficacy. Negative results were seen with trials using metformin and aromatase inhibitors in hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer [11], metformin/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer [12], and metformin and erlotinib in patients with metastatic triple negative breast cancer [13]. Another trial of nondiabetic patients receiving several different chemotherapeutic agents for metastatic breast cancer found that the addition of metformin had no effect on progression free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) [14]. However, there have been some positive results using metformin to treat breast tumors. Metformin monotherapy has been found to reduce the likelihood of significant tumor enlargement in women with breast fibroadenomas [15]. Interestingly, subanalysis of a trial featuring HER2-positive breast cancer patients revealed that metformin-treated DM participants had better prognoses compared to patients not treated with metformin, whereas the outcomes of patients with HR-negative cancers were not affected by DM status [16]. Furthermore, combined therapy with everolimus, exemestane, and metformin provided moderate clinical benefit in overweight and obese patients with metastatic, HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer [17].

2.3. Lung Cancer

The use of metformin in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the focus of many conflicting clinical trial results. Based on preclinical studies indicating that metformin can sensitize lung cancer cells to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), a combination of gefitinib, a TKI-targeting mutant epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and metformin was tested in nondiabetic NSCLC patients. However, co-treatment resulted in non-significantly worse outcomes for NSCLC patients in terms of PFS and OS [18,54]. In contrast, a trial comparing EGFR-TKI combination treatment with metformin versus EGFR-TKI monotherapy in advanced NSCLC found that there was a significant survival benefit to the addition of metformin [19]. It is possible that the synergistic effect of metformin and EGFR-TKIs is only observable in patients with higher body mass index (BMI), thereby resulting in conflicting phase II trial results [55]. These mixed results extend beyond that of EGFR-TKI combination therapies. Two studies examining the impact of combining metformin with chemoradiation found that metformin resulted in either no survival benefit [20] or worse outcomes, potentially due to drug–drug interactions [21]. Others have reported PFS and/or survival benefits in diabetic NSCLC patients treated with metformin in combination with chemotherapy [22,56,57]. A recent meta-analysis concluded that more randomized clinical trials, particularly those incorporating time-dependent analyses in nondiabetic patients, are necessary to determine the association between metformin and OS in NSCLC [58].

2.4. Colorectal Cancer

Clinical use of metformin to suppress polyp formation and proliferation in the rectal mucosa of nondiabetic, obese patients with a history of colorectal adenoma has been unsuccessful to date [23]. Furthermore, a subanalysis from the large scale Three or Six Colon Adjuvant (TOSCA) trial found that neither metformin use nor DM status were associated with survival outcomes in colorectal patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy post-resection [24]. Despite these negative findings, a recent study suggests the potential use of metformin alongside irinotecan for disease control in refractory colorectal patients [25].

2.5. Esophageal Cancers

Metformin dosing below the anti-cancer threshold may still activate the tumor immune microenvironment in animal models and patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma [59], which in turn may be beneficial for priming patients for subsequent immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment.

2.6. Kidney Cancer

Retrospective analysis of clinical trials involving metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients found that the addition of metformin to the TKI, sunitinib, in DM patients was associated with an improved OS compared to use of other diabetic agents [60]. Another retrospective study found that, regardless of diabetic status, the addition of metformin to sunitinib or an alternative TKI, pazopanib, in mRCC patients resulted in a PFS and OS benefit [61].

2.7. Liver Cancer

A large, retrospective study comparing diabetic patients receiving sulfonylureas versus metformin revealed a strong inverse correlation between metformin use and incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (56% risk reduction), indicating the potential use of metformin as a preventative agent for liver cancer. No association was observed for several other solid tumors after adjusting for BMI and level of glycemic control [62]. Metformin treatment may enhance the benefit of certain interventions, as was demonstrated in a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing Yttrium-90 radioembolization segmentectomy for non-resectable HCC [63]. However, metformin use does not appear to affect HCC recurrence in diabetic patients following initial resection [64].

2.8. Bladder Cancer

A retrospective analysis of diabetic patients with Bacillus Calmette–Guerin (BCG)-treated, non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) found that metformin use was associated with increased disease-specific survival and OS [65]. Exploiting the fact that metformin accumulates in the urine prior to excretion, an ongoing trial is testing oral metformin treatment in patients with NMIBC [26]. The high upper limit on metformin dosing in this study (3000 mg daily) may allow for observation of tumor effects not seen in studies using lower doses.

2.9. Ovarian Cancer

The effect of metformin on epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patient outcomes is ambiguous. A clinical trial in China found that addition of metformin to the traditional therapy for EOC had no impact on PFS [27]. However, a US trial in nondiabetic EOC patients found that neoadjuvant metformin treatment resulted in better-than-expected OS as well as a significant reduction in cancer stem cells [28]. A recent dose escalation study demonstrated that the combination of metformin and paclitaxel/carboplatin is well-tolerated [29].

2.10. Pancreatic Cancer

A meta-analysis of 21 studies found that metformin treatment was associated with a survival benefit in patients with concurrent DM and pancreatic cancer (PC), specifically for patients at early and intermediate PC disease stages [66], suggesting its potential as an adjuvant chemotherapeutic.

2.11. Prostate Cancer

Clinical studies in metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer patients show that the addition of metformin is not able to rescue resistance to anti-androgen agent, abiraterone [30], nor is it able to improve survival or response outcomes when combined with a chemotherapy agent, docetaxel [31]. A recent trial combining metformin with a different anti-androgen agent, bicalutamide, in overweight and obese prostate cancer patients found that this paired treatment had no effect on PSA levels compared to bicalutamide alone [32].

2.12. Skin Cancer

In the treatment of metastatic melanoma, neither metformin monotherapy [33] nor combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors (anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA-4) [67] has been shown to improve patient outcomes.

2.13. Uterine Cancer

Pre-hysterectomy metformin treatment in women with endometrial cancer (EC) has yielded mixed results; one study found no anti-cancer effects [34], while others suggest that metformin reduces tumor proliferation [35] and promotes anti-tumor effects by altering EC steroid receptor signaling [36]. These pre-surgical study designs are limited due to the short treatment period and small number of patients enrolled. A recent meta-analysis concluded that metformin does not function as an anti-proliferative agent in EC and is not a beneficial adjunct therapy to progesterone therapy for EC patients seeking to spare their fertility [68], though this latter point is still being investigated in an ongoing clinical trial in Japan [37].

2.14. Acute Myeloid Leukemia

A retrospective hospital cohort study found that though metformin users did not fare better than non-users in OS and disease-free state, they did far better than insulin users. Insulin users were found to have a two-fold increase in the risk of death and an 85% greater risk of relapse [69].

2.15. Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

In a single center observation study, metformin use in combination with a TKI was associated with 100% cytogenetic response (CCyR) compared to only 73.6% of single agent TKI [70]. Patients receiving a TKI with or without metformin were able to achieve major molecular response (MMR) as well as complete molecular response (CMR), however, metformin users achieved this within a shorter period of time with a median time to response of 11.1 months and 37.4 months, respectively, compared to 19.5 months and not reached in the control group [70]. Furthermore, CML leukemic stem cells (LSCs) have been shown to have increased mitochondrial oxygen consumption compared to hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) [71], which could be specifically targeted by metformin [70].

2.16. Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

In a prospective study of 102 patients with de novo Philadelphia-negative B-cell ALL, metformin use was associated with a lower risk of therapeutic failure (odds ratio (OR) 0.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.0037–1.53) and early relapse (OR 0.05, 95% CI 0.0028–1.153) [72]. Furthermore, the patients who benefited most were those with high expression of multi-drug resistant protein, ATP binding cassette subfamily B member 1 (ABCB1) [72]. In a small phase I clinical trial of ALL patients, the addition of metformin to standard chemotherapy was well-tolerated and yielded responses in a heavily pretreated population, with 56% achieving a complete response (CR) [73].

2.17. Myelodysplastic Syndrome

In a single prospective study, no mortality benefit was detected among myelodysplastic syndrome patients receiving metformin or sulfonylureas [74].

2.18. Lymphoma

In a population-based case-control study and two large, retrospective analyses, there were no significant correlations between metformin use and disease progression or survival in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) [75,76,77]. However, in a Taiwanese study using a database of over 600,000 newly diagnosed DM patients enrolled in the National Health Insurance database, metformin initiators consistently had a lower risk of NHL [78]. Furthermore, in a retrospective case-control study of DM patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treated with or without metformin, metformin was associated with improved response to immunochemotherapy [79]. The metformin group had CR and objective response rates (ORR) of 84% and 88%, respectively, compared to control groups, which had rates of 48% and 68% [79]. Additionally, a retrospective case–control study found that CR was achieved in 92% of DLBCL patients on metformin, compared to 54% of control subjects [80]. This data was corroborated by a retrospective study of DLBCL patients with diabetes in which metformin use was associated with improved PFS from 60 to 90 months and OS from 71 to 100 compared to diabetic patients not on metformin [81].

2.19. Multiple Myeloma

High levels of insulin and a history of DM are poor prognostic indicators for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) [82]. However, within the DM population, metformin was associated with a decreased incidence of death from MM [82]. Metformin use has also been associated with decreased progression of monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance (MGUS) to MM [83,84]. The current risk of progression to MM is 1% per year in MGUS patients [85]. In a retrospective cohort study from the US Veterans Health Administration database that followed patients diagnosed with MGUS for a total of 10 years, 3% of metformin users progressed to MM compared with 5% of non-users [83]. Among those who did progress to MM, the individuals on metformin progressed in an average of 71 months compared to 47 months in non-users. A similar benefit was found in a matched case–control study from a population-representative database of 11,000,000 individuals treated over an 18-year period in the United Kingdom, but only for those who had received metformin for at least two years [83].

3. Metformin, Mechanism of Action

3.1. Anti-Cancer Activity of Metformin

In multiple malignancies, metformin has been shown to exert anti-cancer properties, such as decreased proliferation, cell cycle arrest, and induction of apoptosis and/or autophagy [86,87,88]. More recently, it has also been established that metformin can induce alternative forms of cell death, such as pyroptosis, which involves an inflammatory, caspase 1-dependent programmed cell death. Metformin has been shown to induce pyroptosis through adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK)-dependent activation of sirtuin 1, a nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+)-dependent deacetylase, and downstream nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kB) expression [89]. In breast cancer cell lines, metformin has also been shown to induce oxidative stress-dependent necroptosis, which was rescued with necroptosis inhibitors [90]. In in vitro and in vivo models of breast cancer, metformin was found to induce ferroptosis, which is a non-apoptotic form of cell death that involves iron-dependent accumulation of lipid oxidation and depletion of plasma membrane polyunsaturated fatty acids [91,92]. Ferroptosis was induced by upregulation of miRNA-324-3p expression and subsequent downregulation of glutathione peroxidase 4, which is a glutathione-dependent antioxidant enzyme that prevents ferroptosis [91]. Finally, metformin can also induce mitophagy in a cervical cancer cell line [93].
In addition to tumor-killing properties, cancer drug development has also focused on decreasing metastatic spread as well as recurrence post-treatment. Metformin has recently been found to decrease cell motility and invasion while increasing cellular adhesion in multiple solid tumor models [94,95,96,97,98,99]. Furthermore, metformin could specifically target cancer stem cells [96,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109]. The mechanisms by which cancer stem cells were targeted varied but included targeting of mitochondrial respiration in osteosarcoma stem cells [100], inhibition of stem cell markers, specifically CD133 in HCC and oral cancer cell lines [102,104] and CD47 in breast cancer [105], and regulation of crucial transcription factors [103,110].

3.2. Mechanisms of Metformin’s Anti-Cancer Activity

Nearly 25 years of literature consistently demonstrates that there is no single unifying mechanism of action of metformin in cancer. As a normoglycemic agent for type 2 DM, metformin decreases hepatic gluconeogenesis and lipid synthesis, decreases adipose tissue fatty acid synthesis and lipolysis, decreases pancreatic insulin secretion, and increases muscle glucose uptake [111,112] (Figure 1). This can occur either through liver kinase B1 (LKB1)/AMPK activation in target tissues or a direct inhibition of insulin signaling.
Next, we will briefly summarize the well-established activity of metformin in cancer that has been recently reviewed [48,86,87] and as summarized in Figure 2. We will then shift to novel mechanisms of action established over the last five years, including immunomodulatory and epigenetic effects of metformin.
Metformin’s well-established anti-cancer mechanisms involve direct and indirect, AMPK-dependent and -independent inhibition of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), which plays a significant role in promoting tumor proliferation as well as inhibiting apoptosis and autophagy. The indirect, AMPK-independent inhibition of mTOR stems from metformin’s ability to decrease systemic insulin [113,114,115,116]. Decreased insulin leads to decreased signaling through the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)-protein kinase B (AKT) pathway, subsequently allowing tuberous sclerosis complex 2 (TSC2) to inhibit mTOR [117]. Metformin is also taken up by cancer cells through organic cation transporters [118] and subsequently inhibits complex I of the mitochondrial electron transport chain leading to decreased oxidative phosphorylation [119]. The decreased ratio of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) to adenosine monophosphate (AMP) leads to cellular stress, activation of AMPK [120,121,122,123], and downstream inhibition of mTOR kinase activity, which results in a decrease in protein synthesis, cell growth, and proliferation [117,124,125,126,127]. Early on, metformin’s role in cancer clearly showed that AMPK-dependent inhibition of mTOR is required for multiple anti-cancer effects, as the phenotype can be rescued by targeting AMPK with siRNA or Compound C as well as constitutive activation of mTOR and short hairpin RNA targeting TSC2 [117,124,125,128,129]. Furthermore, multiple reports have demonstrated that metformin can also activate AMPK indirectly through activation of upstream energy sensor, LKB1, or via ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) [130,131,132]. Metformin also inhibits mTOR independently of AMPK through activation of DNA-damage-inducible transcript 4 (REDD1), which inhibits mTOR via TSC2 activation [133], or via inhibition of Rag GTPases [134]. Metformin’s inhibition of Rag GTPases was independent of amino acid levels, which have previously been shown to control Rag GTPases and downstream mTOR activity [135,136].
Metformin’s mechanism of action also involves regulation of additional transcription factors, such forkhead box O3a (FOXO3a), mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), Sonic hedgehog, Wnt, Notch, and Kruppel-like factor 5 [103,110,137,138]. FOXO3a upregulation by metformin is particularly interesting given FOXO3a’s ability to induce MAPK-dependent expression of the mitochondrial genome to support mitochondrial metabolism. In fact, activation of FOXO3a has been shown to be necessary for metformin’s pro-apoptotic and chemosensitizing effects in multiple tumor models by allowing metformin to promote mitochondrial biogenesis while simultaneously inhibiting complex I activity [137,138]. It is these multifaceted aspects of metformin that make it a unique drug and encourages further elucidation of its anti-cancer mechanism of action to identify optimal drug combinations to effectively target cancer cells.

3.3. Immunomodulatory Effects of Metformin

More recently, metformin has been found to exhibit antitumor activity through regulation of the immune response to cancer. Multiple studies have found metformin can decrease programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) on tumor cells through both AMPK-dependent [139,140,141] and AMPK-independent [142,143] mechanisms, resulting in enhanced cytotoxic T lymphocyte activity. However, this anti-PD-L1 activity may be tissue-dependent. In a NSCLC model, the inverse was found to be true in which LKB1-overexpression actually increased PD-L1 in an AMPK-dependent fashion [144]. As a result, LKB1-intact NSCLC tumors could be sensitized to anti-PD-1 antibodies with metformin whereas no obvious suppression from metformin was observed in LKB1-deficient tumors [144].
Metformin may also act directly on cytotoxic T cells to augment their anti-cancer activity. Metformin administration induces interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) production in CD8+ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in multiple solid tumor models [145,146,147]. Furthermore, metformin inhibited accumulation and suppressive activity of myeloid-derived suppressor cells, which are a major immunosuppressive cell type that inhibits T-cells and promotes tumor immune escape [145,148]. Interestingly, metformin is detrimental to CD19-chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells as it inhibits proliferation and cytotoxicity while inducing apoptosis via AMPK activation and downstream suppression of mTOR [149]. Thus, the T-cell targeting properties of metformin may be context- and cancer subtype-dependent.
In addition to T cell regulation, metformin can enhance natural killer (NK) cell cytotoxicity of human cervical cancer cells by altering tumor cell surface expression of NK-cell ligands via the PI3K/AKT pathway, leading to increased NK cell activation [106]. Furthermore, direct exposure of NK cells to metformin enhances their cytolytic activity and increases NK cell tumor infiltration independently of AMPK [150]. Metformin also directly and indirectly modulates macrophage-targeting of tumor cells. Metformin represses CD47 gene expression in a miRNA-708-dependent manner to allow macrophage phagocytosis of breast cancer stem cells [105]. Furthermore, metformin modulates expression of macrophage-related cytokines, thereby suppressing the ability of cancer cells to promote the protective macrophage 2 phenotype and promoting the anti-cancer macrophage 1 phenotype in an AMPK/NF-κB-dependent manner [151,152].

3.4. Epigenetic Regulation of Metformin

Epigenetic mechanisms, such as hypermethylation of tumor suppressor genes, general hypomethylation of the genome, and alterations in histone posttranslational modifications, play a role in tumorigenesis and therapy resistance [153]. Recent studies indicate that metformin can target cancer cells through epigenetic modifications. Metformin-activated AMPK has been demonstrated to increase global DNA methylation in colon, breast, and endometrial cancer cells [154,155,156]. Altered DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) activity by metformin also contributed to anti-cancer activity by regulating long non-coding RNAs [157,158]. In two studies, metformin has been found to regulate epigenetics specifically through targeting the oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate (2HG) [159,160]. Interestingly, in one study this was through the traditional route of targeting IDH1/2 mutations in endometrial cancer [160]. In another study, the 2HG oncometabolite was found to be elevated in breast cancer in vitro and in vivo in the absence of IDH1/2 mutations [159]. Metformin specifically inhibited 2HG production in this model through knockdown of phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase in an AMPK-dependent manner leading to anti-cancer activity [159]. Additional work has demonstrated that metformin can also suppress epigenetic modifier, enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2), in its anti-cancer activity in prostate adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine tumors [161,162]. Metformin can also target histone acetylation to antagonize melanoma progression [163].

4. Conclusive Remarks

Preclinical studies have consistently demonstrated antineoplastic effects of metformin. Additionally, observational and epidemiological studies have reported lower incidence and mortality rates of cancer in patients taking metformin. However, these results have translated to modest benefits in clinical trials, which may be attributed to several hypotheses that can guide future research. The inherent limitations of observational and retrospective study designs can be a source of potential bias leading to an overestimation of the benefits of metformin in patients. Moreover, while preclinical models have been key in characterizing the antineoplastic mechanisms of metformin, they suffer from several limitations that impact their translation to the clinic. Some authors have argued that metformin concentrations used in preclinical studies were significantly higher than the plasma concentrations reached in clinical trials [10]. Additionally, in vivo models require optimization to recapitulate tumor heterogeneity, including cancer stem cells [164], and the immuno- and micro-environments to better predict clinical results [165].
Of note, many of the relevant clinical trials either recruited a small number of patients or enrolled patients with an advanced cancer stage, both of which can confound results. To optimize the design of clinical trials, additional research is required to identify key factors (both patient- and tumor-related) that affect metformin sensitivity. For example, the insulin-lowering effect of metformin is thought to contribute to its anti-cancer activity, which suggests that patients with hyperinsulinemia or tumors expressing the insulin receptor, LKB1, or TSC2 may benefit most from metformin [166].

Author Contributions

S.J.S., S.A., H.G., A.B., N.S. and B.M.T., writing—original draft preparation, S.J.S., S.A., H.G., N.S. and B.M.T., writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

S.J.S. is funded by the National Institute of Health T32 HL0439.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Hunterian Neurosurgical Research Laboratory. Figures were created with BioRender.com (accessed on 28 March 2022).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bailey, C.J.; Turner, R.C. Metformin. N. Engl. J. Med. 1996, 334, 574–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bailey, C.J. Metformin: Historical overview. Diabetologia 2017, 60, 1566–1576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Curd, F.H.S.; Davey, D.G.; Rose, F.L. Studies on synthetic antimalarial drugs; Some biguanide derivatives as new types of antimalarial substances with both therapeutic and causal prophylactic activity. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 1945, 39, 208–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, K.K.; Anderson, R.C. The toxicity and general pharmacology of N1-p-chlorophenyl-N5-isopropyl biguanide. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1947, 91, 157–160. [Google Scholar]
  5. Sterne, J. Traits and portraits. Maroc. Medical. 1957, 36, 593–618. [Google Scholar]
  6. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). Lancet 1998, 352, 854–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Evans, J.M.M.; Donnelly, L.A.; Emslie-Smith, A.M.; Alessi, D.R.; Morris, A.D. Metformin and reduced risk of cancer in diabetic patients. Br. Med. J. 2005, 330, 1304–1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Currie, C.J.; Poole, C.D.; Gale, E.A.M. The influence of glucose-lowering therapies on cancer risk in type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia 2009, 52, 1766–1777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Nathan, D.M.; Buse, J.B.; Davidson, M.B.; Ferrannini, E.; Holman, R.R.; Sherwin, R.; Zinman, B. Medical Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes: A Consensus Algorithm for the Initiation and Adjustment of Therapy—A Consensus Statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes; American Diabetes Association: Alexandria, VI, USA, 2009; Volume 27. [Google Scholar]
  10. Saengboonmee, C.; Sanlung, T.; Wongkham, S. Repurposing metformin for cancer treatment: A great challenge of a promising drug. Anticancer. Res. 2021, 41, 5913–5918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhao, Y.; Gong, C.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, J.; Wang, L.; Zhang, S.; Cao, J.; Tao, Z.; Li, T.; Wang, B.; et al. A randomized phase II study of aromatase inhibitors plus metformin in pre-treated postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor positive metastatic breast cancer. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 84224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nanni, O.; Amadori, D.; De Censi, A.; Rocca, A.; Freschi, A.; Bologna, A.; Gianni, L.; Rosetti, F.; Amaducci, L.; Cavanna, L.; et al. Metformin plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in the first-line treatment of HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. The MYME randomized, phase 2 clinical trial. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2019, 174, 433–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Fenn, K.; Maurer, M.; Lee, S.M.; Crew, K.D.; Trivedi, M.S.; Accordino, M.K.; Hershman, D.L.; Kalinsky, K. Phase 1 study of erlotinib and metformin in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Clin. Breast Cancer 2020, 20, 80–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Pimentel, I.; Lohmann, A.E.; Ennis, M.; Dowling, R.J.O.; Cescon, D.; Elser, C.; Potvin, K.R.; Haq, R.; Hamm, C.; Chang, M.C.; et al. A phase II randomized clinical trial of the effect of metformin versus placebo on progression-free survival in women with metastatic breast cancer receiving standard chemotherapy. Breast 2019, 48, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Alipour, S.; Abedi, M.; Saberi, A.; Maleki-Hajiagha, A.; Faiz, F.; Shahsavari, S.; Eslami, B. Metformin as a new option in the medical management of breast fibroadenoma; A randomized clinical trial. BMC Endocr. Disord. 2021, 21, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sonnenblick, A.; Agbor-Tarh, D.; Bradbury, I.; Di Cosimo, S.; Azim, H.A.; Fumagalli, D.; Sarp, S.; Wolff, A.C.; Andersson, M.; Kroep, J.; et al. Impact of diabetes, insulin, and metformin use on the outcome of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive primary breast cancer: Analysis from the ALTTO phase III randomized trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 2017, 35, 1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yam, C.; Esteva, F.J.; Patel, M.M.; Raghavendra, A.S.; Ueno, N.T.; Moulder, S.L.; Hess, K.R.; Shroff, G.S.; Hodge, S.; Koenig, K.H.; et al. Efficacy and safety of the combination of metformin, everolimus and exemestane in overweight and obese postmenopausal patients with metastatic, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer: A phase II study. Investig. New Drugs 2019, 37, 345–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, K.; Li, L.; Zhang, P.; Kang, J.; Wang, Y.B.; Chen, H.Y.; He, Y. A multicenter double-blind phase II study of metformin with gefitinib as first-line therapy of locally advanced non–small-cell lung cancer. Clin. Lung Cancer 2017, 18, 340–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Arrieta, O.; Barrón, F.; Padilla, M.Á.S.; Avilés-Salas, A.; Ramírez-Tirado, L.A.; Arguelles Jiménez, M.J.; Vergara, E.; Zatarain-Barrón, Z.L.; Hernández-Pedro, N.; Cardona, A.F.; et al. Effect of metformin plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors compared with tyrosine kinase inhibitors alone in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated lung adenocarcinoma: A phase 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2019, 5, e192553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Skinner, H.; Hu, C.; Tsakiridis, T.; Santana-Davila, R.; Lu, B.; Erasmus, J.J.; Doemer, A.J.; Videtic, G.M.M.; Coster, J.; Yang, A.X.; et al. Addition of metformin to concurrent chemoradiation in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: The NRG-LU001 phase 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2021, 7, 1324–1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tsakiridis, T.; Pond, G.R.; Wright, J.; Ellis, P.M.; Ahmed, N.; Abdulkarim, B.; Roa, W.; Robinson, A.; Swaminath, A.; Okawara, G.; et al. Metformin in combination with chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: The OCOG-ALMERA randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2021, 7, 1333–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Marrone, K.A.; Zhou, X.; Forde, P.M.; Purtell, M.; Brahmer, J.R.; Hann, C.L.; Kelly, R.J.; Coleman, B.; Gabrielson, E.; Rosner, G.L.; et al. A randomized phase II study of metformin plus paclitaxel/carboplatin/bevacizumab in patients with chemotherapy-naïve advanced or metastatic nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer. Oncologist 2018, 23, 859–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Zell, J.A.; McLaren, C.E.; Morgan, T.R.; Lawson, M.J.; Rezk, S.; Albers, C.G.; Chen, W.P.; Carmichael, J.C.; Chung, J.; Richmond, E.; et al. A phase IIa trial of metformin for colorectal cancer risk reduction among individuals with history of colorectal adenomas and elevated body mass index. Cancer Prev. Res. 2020, 13, 203–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Vernieri, C.; Galli, F.; Ferrari, L.; Marchetti, P.; Lonardi, S.; Maiello, E.; Iaffaioli, R.V.; Zampino, M.G.; Zaniboni, A.; De Placido, S.; et al. Impact of metformin use and diabetic status during adjuvant fluoropyrimidine-oxaliplatin chemotherapy on the outcome of patients with resected colon cancer: A TOSCA study subanalysis. Oncologist 2019, 24, 385–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Bragagnoli, A.C.; Araujo, R.L.C.; Ferraz, M.W.; Dos Santos, L.V.; Abdalla, K.C.; Comar, F.; Santos, F.A.; Oliveira, M.A.; Carvalheira, J.B.C.; Cárcano, F.M.; et al. Metformin plus lrinotecan in patients with refractory colorectal cancer: A phase 2 clinical trial. Br. J. Cancer 2021, 124, 1072–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Molenaar, R.J.; Van Hattum, J.W.; Brummelhuis, I.S.; Oddens, J.R.; Savci-Heijink, C.D.; Boevé, E.R.; Van Der Meer, S.A.; Witjes, J.F.; Pollak, M.N.; De Reijke, T.M.; et al. Study protocol of a phase II clinical trial of oral metformin for the intravesical treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. BMC Cancer 2019, 19, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Zheng, Y.; Zhu, J.; Zhang, H.; Liu, Y.; Sun, H. Metformin plus first-line chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer: A prospective open-label pilot trial. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2019, 84, 1349–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Brown, J.R.; Chan, D.K.; Shank, J.J.; Griffith, K.A.; Fan, H.; Szulawski, R.; Yang, K.; Reynolds, R.K.; Johnston, C.; McLean, K.; et al. Phase II clinical trial of metformin as a cancer stem cell–targeting agent in ovarian cancer. JCI Insight 2020, 5, e133247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Broekman, K.E.; Hof, M.A.J.; Touw, D.J.; Gietema, J.A.; Nijman, H.W.; Lefrandt, J.D.; Reyners, A.K.L.; Jalving, M. Phase I study of metformin in combination with carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Investig. New Drugs 2020, 38, 1454–1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Mark, M.; Klingbiel, D.; Mey, U.; Winterhalder, R.; Rothermundt, C.; Gillessen, S.; Von Moos, R.; Pollak, M.; Manetsch, G.; Strebel, R.; et al. Impact of addition of metformin to abiraterone in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients with disease progressing while receiving abiraterone treatment (metAb-pro): Phase 2 pilot study. Clin. Genitourin. Cancer 2019, 17, e323–e328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Pujalte Martin, M.; Borchiellini, D.; Thamphya, B.; Guillot, A.; Paoli, J.B.; Besson, D.; Hilgers, W.; Priou, F.; el Kouri, C.; Hoch, B.; et al. TAXOMET: A french prospective multicentric randomized phase II study of docetaxel plus metformin versus docetaxel plus placebo in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Clin. Genitourin. Cancer 2021, 19, 501–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bilusic, M.; Toney, N.J.; Donahue, R.N.; Wroblewski, S.; Zibelman, M.; Ghatalia, P.; Ross, E.A.; Karzai, F.; Madan, R.A.; Dahut, W.L.; et al. A randomized phase 2 study of bicalutamide with or without metformin for biochemical recurrence in overweight or obese prostate cancer patients (BIMET-1). Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2022, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Montaudié, H.; Cerezo, M.; Bahadoran, P.; Roger, C.; Passeron, T.; Machet, L.; Arnault, J.P.; Verneuil, L.; Maubec, E.; Aubin, F.; et al. Metformin monotherapy in melanoma: A pilot, open-label, prospective, and multicentric study indicates no benefit. Pigment. Cell Melanoma Res. 2017, 30, 378–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kitson, S.J.; Maskell, Z.; Sivalingam, V.N.; Allen, J.L.; Ali, S.; Burns, S.; Gilmour, K.; Latheef, R.; Slade, R.J.; Pemberton, P.W.; et al. PRE-surgical metformin in uterine malignancy (PREMIUM): A multi-center, randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 25, 2424–2432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Petchsila, K.; Prueksaritanond, N.; Insin, P.; Yanaranop, M.; Chotikawichean, N. Effect of metformin for decreasing proliferative marker in women with endometrial cancer: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2020, 21, 733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Pabona, J.M.P.; Burnett, A.F.; Brown, D.M.; Quick, C.M.; Simmen, F.A.; Montales, M.T.E.; Liu, S.J.; Rose, T.; Alhallak, I.; Siegel, E.R.; et al. Metformin promotes anti-tumor biomarkers in human endometrial cancer cells. Reprod. Sci. 2020, 27, 267–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Mitsuhashi, A.; Kawasaki, Y.; Hori, M.; Fujiwara, T.; Hanaoka, H.; Shozu, M. Medroxyprogesterone acetate plus metformin for fertility-sparing treatment of atypical endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial carcinoma: Trial protocol for a prospective, randomised, open, blinded-endpoint design, dose-response trial (FELICIA trial). BMJ Open 2020, 10, e035416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Molenaar, R.J.; Van De Venne, T.; Weterman, M.J.; Mathot, R.A.; Klümpen, H.J.; Richel, D.J.; Wilmink, J.W. A Phase Ib Study of Everolimus Combined with Metformin for Patients with Advanced Cancer. Investig. New Drugs 2018, 36, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sehdev, A.; Karrison, T.; Zha, Y.; Janisch, L.; Turcich, M.; Cohen, E.E.W.; Maitland, M.; Polite, B.N.; Gajewski, T.F.; Salgia, R.; et al. A Pharmacodynamic Study of Sirolimus and Metformin in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2018, 82, 309–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Saif, M.W.; Rajagopal, S.; Caplain, J.; Grimm, E.; Serebrennikova, O.; Das, M.; Tsichlis, P.N.; Martell, R. A Phase I Delayed-Start, Randomized and Pharmacodynamic Study of Metformin and Chemotherapy in Patients with Solid Tumors. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2019, 84, 1323–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Khurshed, M.; Molenaar, R.J.; Van Linde, M.E.; Mathôt, R.A.; Struys, E.A.; Van Wezel, T.; Van Noorden, C.J.F.; Klümpen, H.-J.; Bovée, J.V.M.G.; Wilmink, J.W. A Phase Ib Clinical Trial of Metformin and Chloroquine in Patients with IDH1-Mutated Solid Tumors. Cancers 2021, 13, 2474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lord, S.R.; Cheng, W.C.; Liu, D.; Gaude, E.; Haider, S.; Metcalf, T.; Patel, N.; Teoh, E.J.; Gleeson, F.; Bradley, K.; et al. Integrated Pharmacodynamic Analysis Identifies Two Metabolic Adaption Pathways to Metformin in Breast Cancer. Cell Metab. 2018, 28, 679–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Crawley, D.; Chandra, A.; Loda, M.; Gillett, C.; Cathcart, P.; Challacombe, B.; Cook, G.; Cahill, D.; Santa Olalla, A.; Cahill, F.; et al. Metformin and Longevity (METAL): A Window of Opportunity Study Investigating the Biological Effects of Metformin in Localised Prostate Cancer. BMC Cancer 2017, 17, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Curry, J.; Johnson, J.; Tassone, P.; Vidal, M.D.; Menezes, D.W.; Sprandio, J.; Mollaee, M.; Cotzia, P.; Birbe, R.; Lin, Z.; et al. Metformin Effects on Head and Neck Squamous Carcinoma Microenvironment: Window of Opportunity Trial. Laryngoscope 2017, 127, 1808–1815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Amin, D.; Richa, T.; Mollaee, M.; Zhan, T.; Tassone, P.; Johnson, J.; Luginbuhl, A.; Cognetti, D.; Martinez-Outschoorn, U.; Stapp, R.; et al. Metformin Effects on FOXP3+ and CD8+ T Cell Infiltrates of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Laryngoscope 2020, 130, E490–E498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Gulati, S.; Desai, J.; Palackdharry, S.M.; Morris, J.C.; Zhu, Z.; Jandarov, R.; Riaz, M.K.; Takiar, V.; Mierzwa, M.; Gutkind, J.S.; et al. Phase 1 Dose-Finding Study of Metformin in Combination with Concurrent Cisplatin and Radiotherapy in Patients with Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer. Cancer 2020, 126, 354–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Gutkind, J.S.; Molinolo, A.A.; Wu, X.; Wang, Z.; Nachmanson, D.; Harismendy, O.; Alexandrov, L.B.; Wuertz, B.R.; Ondrey, F.G.; Laronde, D.; et al. Inhibition of MTOR Signaling and Clinical Activity of Metformin in Oral Premalignant Lesions. JCI Insight 2021, 6, e147096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Curry, J.M.; Johnson, J.; Mollaee, M.; Tassone, P.; Amin, D.; Knops, A.; Whitaker-Menezes, D.; Mahoney, M.G.; South, A.; Rodeck, U.; et al. Metformin Clinical Trial in HPV+ and HPV-Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Impact on Cancer Cell Apoptosis and Immune Infiltrate. Front. Oncol. 2018, 8, 436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Łabuzek, K.; Suchy, D.; Gabryel, B.; Bielecka, A.; Liber, S.; Okopień, B. Quantification of metformin by the HPLC method in brain regions, cerebrospinal fluid and plasma of rats treated with lipopolysaccharide. Pharmacol. Rep. 2010, 62, 956–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Takata, F.; Dohgu, S.; Matsumoto, J.; Machida, T.; Kaneshima, S.; Matsuo, M.; Sakaguchi, S.; Takeshige, Y.; Yamauchi, A.; Kataoka, Y. Metformin induces up-regulation of blood—Brain barrier functions by activating AMP-activated protein kinase in rat brain microvascular endothelial cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2013, 433, 586–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Seliger, C.; Luber, C.; Gerken, M.; Schaertl, J.; Proescholdt, M.; Riemenschneider, M.J.; Meier, C.R.; Bogdahn, U.; Leitzmann, M.F.; Klinkhammer-Schalke, M.; et al. Use of metformin and survival of patients with high-grade glioma. Int. J. Cancer 2019, 144, 273–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Cuyàs, E.; Fernández-Arroyo, S.; Corominas-Faja, B.; Rodríguez-Gallego, E.; Bosch-Barrera, J.; Martin-Castillo, B.; De Llorens, R.; Joven, J.; Menendez, J.A. Oncometabolic mutation IDH1 R132H confers a metformin-hypersensitive phenotype. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 12279–12296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. El-Ashmawy, N.E.; Khedr, N.F.; El-Bahrawy, H.A.; Abo Mansour, H.E. Metformin augments doxorubicin cytotoxicity in mammary carcinoma through activation of adenosine monophosphate protein kinase pathway. Tumor Biology 2017, 39, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Li, L.; Jiang, L.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, X.J.; Wu, G.; Zhou, X.; Sun, J.; Bai, J.; Ren, B.; et al. Combination of metformin and gefitinib as first-line therapy for nondiabetic advanced NSCLC Ppatients with EGFR mutations: A randomized, double-blind phase II trial. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 25, 6967–6975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Arrieta, O.; Zatarain-Barron, Z.L.; Turcott, J.G.; Barron, F.; Yundamuri, S.; Cardona, A.F.; Rosell, R. Association of BMI with benefit of metformin plus epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma: A secondary analysis of a phase 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2022, 8, 477–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Xu, T.; Li, D.; He, Y.; Zhang, F.; Qiao, M.; Chen, Y. Prognostic value of metformin for non-small cell lung cancer patients with diabetes. World J. Surg. Oncol. 2018, 16, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Wang, J.L.; Tsai, Y.T.; Lin, C.H.; Cidem, A.; Staniczek, T.; Chang, G.R.L.; Yen, C.C.; Chen, W.; Chong, K.Y.; Chen, C.M. Benefits of metformin combined with pemetrexed-based platinum doublets as a first-line therapy for advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients with diabetes. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Brancher, S.; Ribeiro, A.E.; Toporcov, T.N.; Weiderpass, E. The role of metformin on lung cancer survival: The first systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and randomized clinical trials. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2021, 147, 2819–2836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wang, S.; Lin, Y.; Xiong, X.; Wang, L.; Guo, Y.; Chen, Y.; Chen, S.; Wang, G.; Lin, P.; Chen, H.; et al. Low-dose metformin reprograms the tumor immune microenvironment in human esophageal cancer: Results of a phase II clinical trial. Clin. Cancer Res. 2020, 26, 4921–4932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hamieh, L.; McKay, R.R.; Lin, X.; Moreira, R.B.; Simantov, R.; Choueiri, T.K. Effect of metformin use on survival outcomes in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Clin. Genitourin. Cancer 2017, 15, 221–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Fiala, O.; Ostašov, P.; Rozsypalová, A.; Hora, M.; Šorejs, O.; Šustr, J.; Bendová, B.; Trávníček, I.; Filipovský, J.; Fínek, J.; et al. Metformin use and the outcome of metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with sunitinib or pazopanib. Cancer Manag. Res. 2021, 13, 4077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Murff, H.J.; Roumie, C.L.; Greevy, R.A.; Hackstadt, A.J.; McGowan, L.E.A.; Hung, A.M.; Grijalva, C.G.; Griffin, M.R. Metformin use and incidence cancer risk: Evidence for a selective protective effect against liver cancer. Cancer Causes Control. 2018, 29, 823–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Elsayed, M.; Wagstaff, W.; Behbahani, K.; Villalobos, A.; Bercu, Z.; Majdalany, B.S.; Akce, M.; Schuster, D.M.; Mao, H.; Kokabi, N. Improved tumor response in patients on metformin undergoing yttrium-90 radioembolization segmentectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. CardioVascular Interv. Radiol. 2021, 44, 1937–1944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Cho, W.R.; Wang, C.C.; Tsai, M.Y.; Chou, C.K.; Liu, Y.W.; Wu, Y.J.; Lin, M.T.; Chen, K.D.; Chuang, C.H.; Huang, P.Y.; et al. Impact of metformin use on the recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after initial liver resection in diabetic patients. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0247231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Wang, Z.; Ong, W.; Shen, T.; Sng, J.; Lata, R.; Mahendran, R.; Kesavan, E.; Chiong, E. Beyond diabetes mellitus: Role of metformin in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Singap. Med. J. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Shi, Y.Q.; Zhou, X.C.; Du, P.; Yin, M.Y.; Xu, L.; Chen, W.J.; Xu, C.F. Relationships are between metformin use and survival in pancreatic cancer patients concurrent with diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine 2020, 99, e21687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Afzal, M.Z.; Mercado, R.R.; Shirai, K. Efficacy of metformin in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors (anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA-4) in metastatic malignant melanoma. J. ImmunoTherapy Cancer 2018, 6, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Prodromidou, A.; Lekka, S.; Fotiou, A.; Psomiadou, V.; Iavazzo, C. The evolving role of targeted metformin administration for the prevention and treatment of endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J. Gynecol. Obstet. Hum. Reprod. 2021, 50, 102164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ceacareanu, A.; Nimako, G.; Wintrob, Z.A. Missing the benefit of metformin in acute myeloid leukemia: A problem of contrast? J. Res. Pharm. Pract. 2017, 6, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Pokorny, R.; Stenehjem, D.D.; Gilreath, J.A. Impact of metformin on tyrosine kinase inhibitor response in chronic myeloid leukemia. J. Oncol. Pharm. Pract. 2022, 28, 10781552221077254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Kuntz, E.M.; Baquero, P.; Michie, A.M.; Dunn, K.; Tardito, S.; Holyoake, T.L.; Helgason, G.V.; Gottlieb, E. Targeting mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation eradicates therapy-resistant chronic myeloid leukemia stem cells. Nat. Med. 2017, 23, 1234–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Ramos-Peñafiel, C.; Olarte-Carrillo, I.; Cerón-Maldonado, R.; Rozen-Fuller, E.; Kassack-Ipiña, J.J.; Meléndez-Mier, G.; Collazo-Jaloma, J.; Martínez-Tovar, A. Effect of metformin on the survival of patients with ALL who express high levels of the ABCB1 drug resistance gene. J. Transl. Med. 2018, 16, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Trucco, M.; Barredo, J.C.; Goldberg, J.; Leclerc, G.M.; Hale, G.A.; Gill, J.; Setty, B.; Smith, T.; Lush, R.; Lee, J.K.; et al. A phase I window, dose escalating and safety trial of metformin in combination with induction chemotherapy in relapsed refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Metformin with induction chemotherapy of vincristine, dexamethasone, PEG-asparaginase, and doxorubicin. Pediatric Blood Cancer 2018, 65, e27224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Brailovski, E.; Li, Q.; Liu, N.; Leber, B.; Khalaf, D.; Sabloff, M.; Christou, G.; Yee, K.; Chodirker, L.; Parmentier, A.; et al. The Impact of Oral Hypoglycemics and Statins on Outcomes in Myelodysplastic Syndromes. Blood 2021, 138, 3064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Ye, X.; Zhang, G.; Righolt, C.; Johnston, J.B.; Banerji, V.; Gibson, S.B.; Mahmud, S.M. Metformin is not associated with incidence risk of non-hodgkin lymphomas among diabetic patients. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2018, 27, 610–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Wang, Y.; Maurer, M.J.; Larson, M.C.; Allmer, C.; Feldman, A.L.; Bennani, N.N.; Thompson, C.A.; Porrata, L.F.; Habermann, T.M.; Witzig, T.E.; et al. Impact of metformin use on the outcomes of newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma. Br. J. Haematol. 2019, 186, 820–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Smyth, L.; Blunt, D.N.; Gatov, E.; Nagamuthu, C.; Croxford, R.; Mozessohn, L.; Cheung, M.C. Statin and Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitors Improve Survival in Newly Diagnosed Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Large Population-Based Study of 4913 Subjects. Br. J. Haematol. 2020, 191, 396–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Tseng, C.H. Metformin Is Associated with a Lower Risk of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Metab. 2019, 45, 458–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Jiang, X.N.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, W.G.; Sheng, D.; Zhou, X.Y.; Li, X.Q. Alteration of cholesterol metabolism by metformin is associated with improved outcome in type II diabetic patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 1632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Alkhatib, Y.; Abdel Rahman, Z.; Kuriakose, P. Clinical Impact of Metformin in Diabetic Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Patients: A Case-Control Study. Leuk. Lymphoma 2017, 58, 1130–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Singh, A.R.; Gu, J.J.; Zhang, Q.; Torka, P.; Sundaram, S.; Mavis, C.; Hernandez-Ilizaliturri, F.J. Metformin Sensitizes Therapeutic Agents and Improves Outcome in Pre-Clinical and Clinical Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma. Cancer Metab. 2020, 8, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Wu, W.; Merriman, K.; Nabaah, A.; Seval, N.; Seval, D.; Lin, H.; Wang, M.; Qazilbash, M.H.; Baladandayuthapani, V.; Berry, D.; et al. The association of diabetes and anti-diabetic medications with clinical outcomes in multiple myeloma. Br. J. Cancer 2014, 111, 628–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Boursi, B.; Mamtani, R.; Yang, Y.X.; Weiss, B.M. Impact of Metformin on the Progression of MGUS to Multiple Myeloma. Leuk. Lymphoma 2017, 58, 1265–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Chang, S.-H.; Luo, S.; O’Brian, K.K.; Thomas, T.S.; Colditz, G.A.; Carlsson, N.P.; Carson, K.R. Association between Metformin Use and Progression of Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance to Multiple Myeloma in US Veterans with Diabetes Mellitus: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study. Lancet Haematol. 2015, 2, e30–e36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Kyle, R.A.; Therneau, T.M.; Rajkumar, S.V.; Offord, J.R.; Larson, D.R.; Plevak, M.F.; Melton, L.J. A Long-Term Study of Prognosis in Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance. N. Engl. J. Med. 2002, 346, 564–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Misirkic Marjanovic, M.S.; Vucicevic, L.M.; Despotovic, A.R.; Stamenkovic, M.M.; Janjetovic, K.D. Dual Anticancer Role of Metformin: An Old Drug Regulating AMPK Dependent/Independent Pathways in Metabolic, Oncogenic/Tumorsuppresing and Immunity Context. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2021, 11, 5625–5643. [Google Scholar]
  87. Saraei, P.; Asadi, I.; Kakar, M.A.; Moradi-Kor, N. The Beneficial Effects of Metformin on Cancer Prevention and Therapy: A Comprehensive Review of Recent Advances. Cancer Manag. Res. 2019, 11, 3295–3313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Chomanicova, N.; Gazova, A.; Adamickova, A.; Valaskova, S.; Kyselovic, J. The Role of AMPK/MTOR Signaling Pathway in Anticancer Activity of Metformin. Physiol. Res. 2021, 70, 501–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Zheng, Z.; Bian, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Ren, G.; Li, G. Metformin Activates AMPK/SIRT1/NF-ΚB Pathway and Induces Mitochondrial Dysfunction to Drive Caspase3/GSDME-Mediated Cancer Cell Pyroptosis. Cell Cycle 2020, 19, 1089–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Dias Lopes, N.M.; Marinello, P.C.; Sanches, L.J.; Da Silva Brito, W.A.; Lovo-Martins, M.I.; Pinge-Filho, P.; Luiz, R.C.; Cecchini, R.; Cecchini, A.L. Patterns of Cell Death Induced by Metformin in Human MCF-7 Breast Cancer Cells. Pathol. Res. Pract. 2020, 216, 153199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Hou, Y.; Cai, S.; Yu, S.; Lin, H. Metformin Induces Ferroptosis by Targeting MiR-324-3p/GPX4 Axis in Breast Cancer. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. 2021, 53, 333–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Chen, J.; Qin, C.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, Y.; Mao, M.; Yang, J. Metformin May Induce Ferroptosis by Inhibiting Autophagy via LncRNA H19 in Breast Cancer. FEBS Open Bio 2022, 12, 146–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Chen, J.; Zhou, C.; Yi, J.; Sun, J.; Xie, B.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, Q.; Chen, G.; Jin, S.; Hou, J.; et al. Metformin and Arsenic Trioxide Synergize to Trigger Parkin/Pink1-Dependent Mitophagic Cell Death in Human Cervical Cancer HeLa Cells. J. Cancer 2021, 12, 6310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Hassan, M.A.; Fakhoury, I.; Masri, Z.E.; Ghazale, N.; Dennaoui, R.; Atat, O.E.; Kanaan, A.; El-Sibai, M. Metformin Treatment Inhibits Motility and Invasion of Glioblastoma Cancer Cells. Anal. Cell. Pathol. 2018, 2018, 5917470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Athreya, A.P.; Kalari, K.R.; Cairns, J.; Gaglio, A.J.; Wills, Q.F.; Niu, N.; Weinshilboum, R.; Iyer, R.K.; Wang, L. Model-Based Unsupervised Learning Informs Metformininduced Cell-Migration Inhibition through an AMPK-Independent Mechanism in Breast Cancer. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 27199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Bocci, F.; Jolly, M.K.; George, J.T.; Levine, H.; Onuchic, J.N. A Mechanism-Based Computational Model to Capture the Interconnections among Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition, Cancer Stem Cells and Notch-Jagged Signaling. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 29906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Duan, W.; Qian, W.; Zhou, C.; Cao, J.; Qin, T.; Xiao, Y.; Cheng, L.; Li, J.; Chen, K.; Li, X.; et al. Metformin Suppresses the Invasive Ability of Pancreatic Cancer Cells by Blocking Autocrine TGF-SS1 Signaling. Oncol. Rep. 2018, 40, 1495–1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Guo, Z.; Zhao, M.; Howard, E.W.; Zhao, Q.; Parris, A.B.; Ma, Z.; Yang, X. Phenformin Inhibits Growth and Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition of ErbB2—Overexpressing Breast Cancer Cells through Targeting the IGF1R Pathway. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 60342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Kang, S.; Kim, B.R.; Kang, M.H.; Kim, D.Y.; Lee, D.H.; Oh, S.C.; Min, B.W.; Um, J.W. Anti-Metastatic Effect of Metformin via Repression of Interleukin 6-Induced Epithelial—Mesenchymal Transition in Human Colon Cancer Cells. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0205449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Deguchi, T.; Hosoya, K.; Kim, S.; Murase, Y.; Yamamoto, K.; Bo, T.; Yasui, H.; Inanami, O.; Okumura, M. Metformin Preferentially Enhances the Radio-Sensitivity of Cancer Stem-like Cells with Highly Mitochondrial Respiration Ability in HMPOS. Mol. Ther. Oncolytics 2021, 22, 143–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Kwon, Y.S.; Chun, S.Y.; Nan, H.Y.; Nam, K.S.; Lee, C.; Kim, S. Metformin Selectively Targets 4T1 Tumorspheres and Enhances the Antitumor Effects of Doxorubicin by Downregulating the AKT and STAT3 Signaling Pathways. Oncol. Lett. 2019, 17, 2523–2530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Maehara, O.; Ohnishi, S.; Asano, A.; Suda, G.; Natsuizaka, M.; Nakagawa, K.; Kobayashi, M.; Sakamoto, N.; Takeda, H. Metformin Regulates the Expression of CD133 Through the AMPK-CEBPβ Pathway in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cell Lines. Neoplasia 2019, 21, 545–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Shi, P.; Liu, W.; Tala, T.; Wang, H.; Li, F.; Zhang, H.; Wu, Y.; Kong, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Wang, C.; et al. Metformin Suppresses Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Stem Cells by Targeting KLF5 for Degradation. Cell Discov. 2017, 3, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Siddappa, G.; Kulsum, S.; Ravindra, D.R.; Kumar, V.V.; Raju, N.; Raghavan, N.; Sudheendra, H.V.; Sharma, A.; Sunny, S.P.; Jacob, T.; et al. Curcumin and Metformin-Mediated Chemoprevention of Oral Cancer Is Associated with Inhibition of Cancer Stem Cells. Mol. Carcinog. 2017, 56, 2446–2460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Tan, W.; Tang, H.; Jiang, X.; Ye, F.; Huang, L.; Shi, D.; Li, L.; Huang, X.; Li, L.; Xie, X.; et al. Metformin Mediates Induction of MiR-708 to Inhibit Self-Renewal and Chemoresistance of Breast Cancer Stem Cells through Targeting CD47. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2019, 23, 5994–6004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Xia, C.; Yang, F.; He, Z.; Cai, Y. ITRAQ-Based Quantitative Proteomic Analysis of the Inhibition of Cervical Cancer Cell Invasion and Migration by Metformin. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2020, 123, 109762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Singh, S.K.; Clarke, I.D.; Hide, T.; Dirks, P.B. Cancer Stem Cells in Nervous System Tumors. Oncogene 2004, 23, 7267–7273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Singh, S.K.; Hawkins, C.; Clarke, I.D.; Squire, J.A.; Bayani, J.; Hide, T.; Henkelman, R.M.; Cusimano, M.D.; Dirks, P.B. Identification of Human Brain Tumour Initiating Cells. Nature 2004, 432, 396–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Najbauer, J.; Kraljik, N.; Németh, P. Glioma Stem Cells: Markers, Hallmarks and Therapeutic Targeting by Metformin. Pathol. Oncol. Res. 2014, 20, 789–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Schulten, H.J. Pleiotropic Effects of Metformin on Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Stumvoll, M.; Nurjhan, N.; Perriello, G.; Dailey, G.; Gerich, J.E. Metabolic Effects of Metformin in Non-Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus. N. Engl. J. Med. 1995, 333, 550–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Jalving, M.; Gietema, J.A.; Lefrandt, J.D.; Jong, S.D.; Reyners, A.K.L.; Gans, R.O.B.; Vries, E.G.E.D. Metformin: Taking Away the Candy for Cancer? Eur. J. Cancer 2010, 46, 2369–2380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Memmott, R.M.; Mercado, J.R.; Maier, C.R.; Kawabata, S.; Fox, S.D.; Dennis, P.A. Metformin Prevents Tobacco Carcinogen-Induced Lung Tumorigenesis. Cancer Prev. Res. 2010, 3, 1066–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Liu, B.; Fan, Z.; Edgerton, S.M.; Yang, X.; Lind, S.E.; Thor, A.D. Potent Anti-Proliferative Effects of Metformin on Trastuzumab-Resistant Breast Cancer Cells via Inhibition of ErbB2/IGF-1 Receptor Interactions. Cell Cycle 2011, 10, 2959–2966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  115. Chaudhary, S.C.; Kurundkar, D.; Elmets, C.A.; Kopelovich, L.; Athar, M. Metformin, an antidiabetic agent reduces growth of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma by targeting MTOR signaling pathway. Photochem. Photobiol. 2012, 88, 1–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Würth, R.; Pattarozzi, A.; Gatti, M.; Bajetto, A.; Corsaro, A.; Parodi, A.; Sirito, R.; Massollo, M.; Marini, C.; Zona, G.; et al. Metformin Selectively Affects Human Glioblastoma Tumor-Initiating Cell Viability: A Role for Metformin-Induced Inhibition of Akt. Cell Cycle 2013, 12, 145–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  117. Zakikhani, M.; Blouin, M.J.; Piura, E.; Pollak, M.N. Metformin and Rapamycin Have Distinct Effects on the AKT Pathway and Proliferation in Breast Cancer Cells. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2010, 123, 271–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Jonker, J.W.; Schinkel, A.H. Pharmacological and Physiological Functions of the Polyspecific Organic Cation Transporters: OCT1, 2, and 3 (SLC22A1-3). J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2004, 308, 2–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Hardie, D.G.; Hawley, S.A.; Scott, J.W. AMP—Activated Protein Kinase—Development of the Energy Sensor Concept. J. Physiol. 2006, 574, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Zhou, G.; Myers, R.; Li, Y.; Chen, Y.; Shen, X.; Fenyk-Melody, J.; Wu, M.; Ventre, J.; Doebber, T.; Fujii, N.; et al. Role of AMP-Activated Protein Kinase in Mechanism of Metformin Action. J. Clin. Investig. 2001, 108, 1167–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Doran, E.; Halestrap, A.P. Cytochrome c Release from Isolated Rat Liver Mitochondria Can Occur Independently of Outer-Membrane Rupture: Possible Role of Contact Sites. Biochem. J. 2000, 348, 343–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. El-Mir, M.Y.; Nogueira, V.; Fontaine, E.; Avéret, N.; Rigoulet, M.; Leverve, X. Dimethylbiguanide Inhibits Cell Respiration via an Indirect Effect Targeted on the Respiratory Chain Complex I. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 12590–12597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  123. Scotland, S.; Saland, E.; Skuli, N.; de Toni, F.; Boutzen, H.; Micklow, E.; Sénégas, I.; Peyraud, R.; Peyriga, L.; Théodoro, F.; et al. Mitochondrial Energetic and AKT Status Mediate Metabolic Effects and Apoptosis of Metformin in Human Leukemic Cells. Leukemia 2013, 27, 2129–2138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Zakikhani, M.; Dowling, R.J.O.; Sonenberg, N.; Pollak, M.N. The Effects of Adiponectin and Metformin on Prostate and Colon Neoplasia Involve Activation of AMP—Activated Protein Kinase. Cancer Prev. Res. 2008, 1, 369–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  125. Zakikhani, M.; Dowling, R.; Fantus, I.G.; Sonenberg, N.; Pollak, M. Metformin Is an AMP Kinase-Dependent Growth Inhibitor for Breast Cancer Cells. Cancer Res. 2006, 66, 10269–10273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  126. Gotlieb, W.H.; Saumet, J.; Beauchamp, M.C.; Gu, J.; Lau, S.; Pollak, M.N.; Bruchim, I. In Vitro Metformin Anti-Neoplastic Activity in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 2008, 110, 246–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Song, C.W.; Lee, H.; Dings, R.P.M.; Williams, B.; Powers, J.; dos Santos, T.; Choi, B.H.; Park, H.J. Metformin Kills and Radiosensitizes Cancer Cells and Preferentially Kills Cancer Stem Cells. Sci. Rep. 2012, 2, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. Green, A.S.; Chapuis, N.; Maciel, T.T.; Willems, L.; Lambert, M.; Arnoult, C.; Boyer, O.; Bardet, V.; Park, S.; Foretz, M.; et al. The LKB1/AMPK Signaling Pathway Has Tumor Suppressor Activity in Acute Myeloid Leukemia through the Repression of MTOR-Dependent Oncogenic MRNA Translation. Blood 2010, 116, 4262–4273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Shi, W.-Y.; Xiao, D.; Wang, L.; Dong, L.-H.; Yan, Z.-X.; Shen, Z.-X.; Chen, S.-J.; Chen, Y.; Zhao, W.-L. Therapeutic Metformin/AMPK Activation Blocked Lymphoma Cell Growth via Inhibition of MTOR Pathway and Induction of Autophagy. Cell Death Dis. 2012, 3, e275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Suzuki, A.; Kusakai, G.; Kishimoto, A.; Shimojo, Y.; Ogura, T.; Lavin, M.F.; Esumi, H. IGF-1 Phosphorylates AMPK-Alpha Subunit in ATM-Dependent and LKB1-Independent Manner. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2004, 324, 986–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Sun, Y.; Connors, K.E.; Yang, D.Q. AICAR Induces Phosphorylation of AMPK in an ATM-Dependent, LKB1-Independent Manner. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2007, 306, 239–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Alexander, A.; Cai, S.-L.; Kim, J.; Nanez, A.; Sahin, M.; MacLean, K.H.; Inoki, K.; Guan, K.-L.; Shen, J.; Person, M.D.; et al. ATM Signals to TSC2 in the Cytoplasm to Regulate MTORC1 in Response to ROS. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 4153–4158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  133. Ben Sahra, I.; Regazzetti, C.; Robert, G.; Laurent, K.; Le Marchand-Brustel, Y.; Auberger, P.; Tanti, J.-F.; Giorgetti-Peraldi, S.; Bost, F. Metformin, Independent of AMPK, Induces MTOR Inhibition and Cell-Cycle Arrest through REDD1. Cancer Res. 2011, 71, 4366–4372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  134. Kalender, A.; Selvaraj, A.; Kim, S.Y.; Gulati, P.; Brûlé, S.; Viollet, B.; Kemp, B.E.; Bardeesy, N.; Dennis, P.; Schlager, J.J.; et al. Metformin, Independent of AMPK, Inhibits MTORC1 in a Rag GTPase-Dependent Manner. Cell Metab. 2010, 11, 390–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  135. Kim, E.; Goraksha-Hicks, P.; Li, L.; Neufeld, T.P.; Guan, K.L. Regulation of TORC1 by Rag GTPases in Nutrient Response. Nat. Cell Biol. 2008, 10, 935–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  136. Sancak, Y.; Peterson, T.R.; Shaul, Y.D.; Lindquist, R.A.; Thoreen, C.C.; Bar-Peled, L.; Sabatini, D.M. The Rag GTPases Bind Raptor and Mediate Amino Acid Signaling to MTORC1. Science 2008, 320, 1496–1501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  137. Celestini, V.; Tezil, T.; Russo, L.; Fasano, C.; Sanese, P.; Forte, G.; Peserico, A.; Lepore Signorile, M.; Longo, G.; De Rasmo, D.; et al. Uncoupling FoxO3A Mitochondrial and Nuclear Functions in Cancer Cells Undergoing Metabolic Stress and Chemotherapy Article. Cell Death Dis. 2018, 9, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Grossi, V.; Fasano, C.; Celestini, V.; Signorile, M.L.; Sanese, P.; Simone, C. Chasing the Foxo3: Insights into Its New Mitochondrial Lair in Colorectal Cancer Landscape. Cancers 2019, 11, 414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Cha, J.H.; Yang, W.H.; Xia, W.; Wei, Y.; Chan, L.C.; Lim, S.O.; Li, C.W.; Kim, T.; Chang, S.S.; Lee, H.H.; et al. Metformin Promotes Antitumor Immunity via Endoplasmic-Reticulum-Associated Degradation of PD-L1. Mol. Cell 2018, 71, 606–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  140. Xue, J.; Li, L.; Li, N.; Li, F.; Qin, X.; Li, T.; Liu, M. Metformin Suppresses Cancer Cell Growth in Endometrial Carcinoma by Inhibiting PD-L1. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2019, 859, 172541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Munoz, L.E.; Huang, L.; Bommireddy, R.; Sharma, R.; Monterroza, L.; Guin, R.N.; Samaranayake, S.G.; Pack, C.D.; Ramachandiran, S.; Reddy, S.J.C.; et al. Metformin Reduces PD-L1 on Tumor Cells and Enhances the Anti-Tumor Immune Response Generated by Vaccine Immunotherapy. J. ImmunoTherapy Cancer 2021, 9, e002614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Lu, Y.; Xin, D.; Guan, L.; Xu, M.; Yang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Yang, Y.; Wang-Gillam, A.; Wang, L.; Zong, S.; et al. Metformin Downregulates PD-L1 Expression in Esophageal Squamous Cell Catrcinoma by Inhibiting IL-6 Signaling Pathway. Front Oncol. 2021, 11, 762523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Zhang, J.-J.; Zhang, Q.-S.; Li, Z.-Q.; Zhou, J.-W.; Du, J. Metformin Attenuates PD-L1 Expression through Activating Hippo Signaling Pathway in Colorectal Cancer Cells. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2019, 11, 6965. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  144. Shen, X.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, G.; Zhou, H.-L.; Fan, J.; Zhang, L.; Li, Y.-L.; Wang, Y.; Liang, J.; Xu, Z.-X. Upregulation of Programmed Death Ligand 1 by Liver Kinase B1 and Its Implication in Programmed Death 1 Blockade Therapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Life Sci. 2020, 256, 117923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Xu, P.; Yin, K.; Tang, X.; Tian, J.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, J.; Xu, H.; Xu, Q.; Wang, S. Metformin Inhibits the Function of Granulocytic Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells in Tumor-Bearing Mice. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2019, 120, 108800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Nishida, M.; Yamashita, N.; Ogawa, T.; Koseki, K.; Warabi, E.; Ohue, T.; Komatsu, M.; Matsushita, H.; Kakimi, K.; Kawakami, E.; et al. Mitochondrial Reactive Oxygen Species Trigger Metformin-Dependent Antitumor Immunity via Activation of Nrf2/MTORC1/P62 Axis in Tumor-Infiltrating CD8T Lymphocytes. J. ImmunoTherapy Cancer 2021, 9, e002954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Taghipour, F.; Oladpour, O.; Rezayati, M.T.; Khorramdelazad, H.; Nemati, M.; Taghipour, Z.; Masoumi, J.; Hassan, Z.M.; Jafarzadeh, A. Modulatory Effects of Metformin Alone and in Combination with Cimetidine and Ibuprofen on T Cell-Related Parameters in a Breast Cancer Model. Iran J. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2021, 20, 600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Veeramachaneni, R.; Yu, W.; Newton, J.M.; Kemnade, J.O.; Skinner, H.D.; Sikora, A.G.; Sandulache, V.C. Metformin Generates Profound Alterations in Systemic and Tumor Immunity with Associated Antitumor Effects. J. ImmunoTherapy Cancer 2021, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Mu, Q.; Jiang, M.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, F.; Li, H.; Zhang, W.; Wang, F.; Liu, J.; Li, L.; Wang, D.; et al. Metformin Inhibits Proliferation and Cytotoxicity and Induces Apoptosis via AMPK Pathway in CD19-Chimeric Antigen Receptor-Modified T Cells. OncoTargets Ther. 2018, 11, 1767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  150. Xia, W.; Qi, X.; Li, M.; Wu, Y.; Sun, L.; Fan, X.; Yuan, Y.; Li, J. Metformin Promotes Anticancer Activity of NK Cells in a P38 MAPK Dependent Manner. OncoImmunology 2021, 10, 1995999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Chiang, C.F.; Chao, T.T.; Su, Y.F.; Hsu, C.C.; Chien, C.Y.; Chiu, K.C.; Shiah, S.G.; Lee, C.H.; Liu, S.Y.; Shieh, Y.S. Metformin-Treated Cancer Cells Modulate Macrophage Polarization through AMPK-NF-ΚB Signaling. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 20706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  152. Liu, Q.; Tong, D.; Liu, G.; Gao, J.; Wang, L.A.; Xu, J.; Yang, X.; Xie, Q.; Huang, Y.; Pang, J.; et al. Metformin Inhibits Prostate Cancer Progression by Targeting Tumor-Associated Inflammatory Infiltration. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018, 24, 5622–5634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  153. Pei, H.; Guo, W.; Peng, Y.; Xiong, H.; Chen, Y. Targeting Key Proteins Involved in Transcriptional Regulation for Cancer Therapy: Current Strategies and Future Prospective. Med. Res. Rev. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Zhong, T.; Men, Y.; Lu, L.; Geng, T.; Zhou, J.; Mitsuhashi, A.; Shozu, M.; Maihle, N.J.; Carmichael, G.G.; Taylor, H.S.; et al. Metformin Alters DNA Methylation Genome-Wide via the H19/SAHH Axis. Oncogene 2017, 36, 2345–2354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  155. Cuyàs, E.; Fernández-Arroyo, S.; Verdura, S.; García, R.Á.-F.; Stursa, J.; Werner, L.; Blanco-González, E.; Montes-Bayón, M.; Joven, J.; Viollet, B.; et al. Metformin Regulates Global DNA Methylation via Mitochondrial One-Carbon Metabolism. Oncogene 2018, 37, 963–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Davies, G.; Lobanova, L.; Dawicki, W.; Groot, G.; Gordon, J.R.; Bowen, M.; Harkness, T.; Arnason, T. Metformin Inhibits the Development, and Promotes the Resensitization, of Treatment-Resistant Breast Cancer. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0187191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  157. Wu, P.; Tang, Y.; Fang, X.; Xie, C.; Zeng, J.; Wang, W.; Zhao, S. Metformin Suppresses Hypopharyngeal Cancer Growth by Epigenetically Silencing Long Non-Coding RNA SNHG7 in FaDu Cells. Front. Pharmacol. 2019, 10, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Li, K.; Gao, S.; Ma, L.; Sun, Y.; Peng, Z.-Y.; Wu, J.; Du, N.; Ren, H.; Tang, S.-C.; Sun, X. Stimulation of Let-7 Maturation by Metformin Improved the Response to Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy in an M6A Dependent Manner. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 731561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Oh, S.; Cho, Y.U.; Chang, M.; Park, S.; Kwon, H. Metformin Decreases 2-HG Production through the MYC-PHGDH Pathway in Suppressing Breast Cancer Cell Proliferation. Metabolites 2021, 11, 480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Bai, M.; Yang, L.; Liao, H.; Liang, X.; Xie, B.; Xiong, J.; Tao, X.; Chen, X.; Cheng, Y.; Chen, X.; et al. Metformin Sensitizes Endometrial Cancer Cells to Chemotherapy through IDH1-Induced Nrf2 Expression via an Epigenetic Mechanism. Oncogene 2018, 37, 5666–5681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Tyagi, M.; Cheema, M.S.; Dryhurst, D.; Eskiw, C.H.; Ausió, J. Metformin Alters H2A.Z Dynamics and Regulates Androgen Dependent Prostate Cancer Progression. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 37054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Barazeghi, E.; Hellman, P.; Norlén, O.; Westin, G.; Stålberg, P. EZH2 Presents a Therapeutic Target for Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Small Intestine. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Li, K.; Zhang, T.T.; Wang, F.; Cui, B.; Zhao, C.X.; Yu, J.J.; Lv, X.X.; Zhang, X.W.; Yang, Z.N.; Huang, B.; et al. Metformin Suppresses Melanoma Progression by Inhibiting KAT5-Mediated SMAD3 Acetylation, Transcriptional Activity and TRIB3 Expression. Oncogene 2018, 37, 2967–2981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Carmignani, M.; Volpe, A.R.; Aldea, M.; Soritau, O.; Irimie, A.; Florian, I.S.; Tomuleasa, C.; Baritchii, A.; Petrushev, B.; Crisan, G.; et al. Glioblastoma Stem Cells: A New Target for Metformin and Arsenic Trioxide. J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents 2014, 28, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  165. Saito, A.; Kitayama, J.; Horie, H.; Koinuma, K.; Ohzawa, H.; Yamaguchi, H.; Kawahira, H.; Mimura, T.; Lefor, A.K.; Sata, N. Metformin Changes the Immune Microenvironment of Colorectal Cancer in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Cancer Sci. 2020, 111, 4012–4020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Belfiore, A.; Frasca, F. IGF and Insulin Receptor Signaling in Breast Cancer. J. Mammary Gland. Biol. Neoplasia 2008, 13, 381–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Pharmaceuticals 15 00626 g001 550
Figure 1. Overview of metformin’s systemic effects on tumor growth. Metformin’s activation of the LKB1/AMPK pathway in hepatocytes and adipocytes, and in the pancreas, leads to reduced blood glucose and insulin availability, respectively. Decreased glucose and insulin availability can slow tumor growth and progression. LKB1: Liver Kinase B1, AMPK: AMP-Activated Protein Kinase. Created in BioRender.
Figure 1. Overview of metformin’s systemic effects on tumor growth. Metformin’s activation of the LKB1/AMPK pathway in hepatocytes and adipocytes, and in the pancreas, leads to reduced blood glucose and insulin availability, respectively. Decreased glucose and insulin availability can slow tumor growth and progression. LKB1: Liver Kinase B1, AMPK: AMP-Activated Protein Kinase. Created in BioRender.
Pharmaceuticals 15 00626 g001
Pharmaceuticals 15 00626 g002 550
Figure 2. Molecular effects of metformin in cancer cells. Metformin directly inhibits complex I of the electron transport chain in the mitochondria resulting in decreased ATP/AMP ratio and activation of AMPK. AMPK activation inhibits mTOR and activates P53 to impact subsequent cellular processes. Metformin also inhibits mTOR in an AMPK-independent manner, through Rag GTPases and REDD1. Reduced insulin availability through metformin’s systemic effects indirectly modulates the proliferative pathway, PI3K/AKT. AMP: Adenosine Monophosphate; AMPK: AMP-Activated Protein Kinase; ATP: Adenosine Triphosphate; IGF: Insulin-like Growth Factors; IGF-R: Insulin-like Growth Factor Receptor; mTOR: Mammalian Target of Rapamycin; OTC: Organic Cation Transporter; PI3K: Phosphoinositide 3-kinase; REDD1: Regulated in Development and DNA damage responses 1; SLC: Solute Carrier Transporter; TSC2: Tuberous Sclerosis Complex 2. Created in BioRender.
Figure 2. Molecular effects of metformin in cancer cells. Metformin directly inhibits complex I of the electron transport chain in the mitochondria resulting in decreased ATP/AMP ratio and activation of AMPK. AMPK activation inhibits mTOR and activates P53 to impact subsequent cellular processes. Metformin also inhibits mTOR in an AMPK-independent manner, through Rag GTPases and REDD1. Reduced insulin availability through metformin’s systemic effects indirectly modulates the proliferative pathway, PI3K/AKT. AMP: Adenosine Monophosphate; AMPK: AMP-Activated Protein Kinase; ATP: Adenosine Triphosphate; IGF: Insulin-like Growth Factors; IGF-R: Insulin-like Growth Factor Receptor; mTOR: Mammalian Target of Rapamycin; OTC: Organic Cation Transporter; PI3K: Phosphoinositide 3-kinase; REDD1: Regulated in Development and DNA damage responses 1; SLC: Solute Carrier Transporter; TSC2: Tuberous Sclerosis Complex 2. Created in BioRender.
Pharmaceuticals 15 00626 g002
Table
Table 1. Metformin’s biometric information.
Table 1. Metformin’s biometric information.
CharacteristicsMetformin
Structural name3-(diaminomethylidene)-1,1-dimethylguanidine
Structure Pharmaceuticals 15 00626 i001
FormulaC4-H11-N5
Molecular weight129.16 g/mol
Density1.3 g/cm3
Melting point223–226 °C
Boiling point224.1 °C at 760 mmHg
ColorWhite
CAS number657-24-9
PubChem Substance ID 4091
Table
Table 2. Recent clinical trials investigating oral metformin use in cancers [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48]. N/A: not applicable.
Table 2. Recent clinical trials investigating oral metformin use in cancers [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48]. N/A: not applicable.
Tumor
Location		Trial
Reference		ID/
Phase		Tumor/Patient CharacteristicsNumber of ParticipantsTreatmentResultOther Comments
Various Solid
Tumors		[38]Phase IbVariety of advanced solid tumors refractory to standard therapies9Everolimus + metformin (n = 9; metformin 500 mg twice daily)Combination therapy was poorly toleratedOpen-label, prospective, single-center, dose-escalation study, The Netherlands
[39] --Variety of advanced solid tumors (metastatic or unresectable)24Sirolimus + metformin (n = 11; maintenance on 1000 mg once daily) vs.
sirolimus (n = 13)		Combination therapy did not improve mTOR inhibitionOpen-label, randomized
[40]NCT01442870 Phase IVariety of solid tumors (nondiabetic, histologically confirmed solid tumors receiving adjuvant or systemic chemotherapy)100Concurrent chemotherapy + metformin (n = 49; 500 mg twice daily) vs.
delayed chemotherapy + metformin (n = 51; 500 mg twice daily)		Metformin is safe to use in combination with a wide range of chemotherapy regimensDelayed-start, randomized
[41]NCT02496741 Phase IbIDH1-mutated solid tumors including chondrosarcoma (refractory grade II-III), glioma (WHO grade II-IV), and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma17Chloroquine + metformin (n = 17; maximum of 1500 mg twice daily) Combination treatment with chloroquine and metformin did not induce clinical responseProspective, open-label, dose-escalation, The Netherlands
GliomaN/ANCT04945148
Phase II		Glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype640Metformin (1500–3000 mg daily) plus radiation and temozolomideNo results availableOpen-label, prospective, single-center, France
N/ANCT02149459
Phase I		Brain neoplasms18Metformin (dose not specified), radiation, and low carbohydrate dietNo results availableOpen-label, prospective, single-center, Israel
N/ANCT02780024
Phase II		Glioblastoma50Metformin (dose not specified) and neoadjuvant temozolomide followed by combined radiation and temozolomideNo results availableOpen-label, prospective, single-center, Canada
N/ANCT03243851
Phase II		Recurrent or refractory glioblastoma81Metformin (ramp up to 2000 mg daily) and low dose temozolomideNo results availableOpen-label, prospective, single-center, South Korea
N/ANCT03151772
Phase I		Glioblastoma3Metformin (850 mg daily) and disulfiram for 3 days preoperativelyNo results available, study was terminated for low enrollmentOpen-label, prospective, single-center, Sweden
N/ANCT04691960
Phase II		Glioblastoma36Metformin (ramp up to 850 mg three times daily) and ketogenic dietNo results availableOpen-label, prospective, single-center, US
N/ANCT05183204
Phase II		Glioblastoma33Metformin (ramp up to 850 mg three times daily as tolerated), ketogenic diet and Paxalisib|No results availableOpen-label, prospective, single-center, US
N/ANCT01430351
Phase I		Glioblastoma and gliosarcoma144Metformin (dose not specified), mefloquine, memantine, hydrochloride, hydrochloride, and temozolomideNo results availableOpen-label, prospective, single-center, US
Bladder
Tumors		[26]NCT03379909 Phase IINon-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (intermediate-risk)49 (target)Metformin (maximum of 3000 mg daily)OngoingMulticenter, open-label
Breast
Tumors		[16]NCT00490139 Phase IIIHER2-positive primary breast cancer8381Substudy analysis of diabetic study participants on/off metformin therapy (dose not specified; all patients previously taking for DM) in patients receiving relevant anti-HER2 therapies, described elsewhereDiabetic patients with HER2-positive breast cancer demonstrated better outcomes when treated with metformin compared to diabetic breast cancer patients not on metformin, whereas outcomes of patients with HR-negative status were not affected by diabetes treatment statusRandomized, adjuvant trial
[11]NCT01654185 Phase IIHormone receptor positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer60Aromatase inhibitor (exemestane or letrozole) + metformin (n = 30; maintenance on 500 mg daily) vs.
aromatase inhibitor (exemestane or letrozole) + placebo (n = 30)		No improved efficacy was observed in the addition of metformin to aromatase inhibitor treatmentRandomized, China
[42]NCT01266486 Phase ITreatment-naïve primary breast cancer40Metformin (n = 40; maintenance on 1500 mg daily)Metformin treatment precipitated two distinct metabolic responses in tumorsWindow study design, UK
[14]NCT01310231 Phase IIMetastatic breast cancer (nondiabetic)40Chemotherapy + metformin (n = 22; maintenance on 850 mg daily) vs.
chemotherapy + placebo (n = 18)		Combined chemotherapy with metformin had no demonstrated effect on PFS, OS, or RRRandomized, double-blind, Canada
[12]NCT01885013 Phase IIMetastatic breast cancer (HER2-negative, nondiabetic)122Chemotherapy (doxorubicin + cyclophosphamide) + metformin (n = 57; maintenance on 2000 mg daily) vs.
chemotherapy (doxorubicin + cyclophosphamide) (n = 65)		The addition of metformin did not provide a meaningful clinical benefit to PFS or OS but was found to decrease the incidence of severe neutropeniaOpen-label, multicenter, randomized
[13]NCT01650506 Phase IMetastatic triple negative breast cancer who had received at least one prior therapy8Erlotinib + metformin (n = 8; maximum dose was 850 mg thrice daily)Combination therapy was well-tolerated but did not result in objective tumor responseUSA
[15]IRCT20100706004329N7Breast fibroadenoma (nondiabetic)175Metformin (n = 83; maximum dose was 1000 mg daily) vs.
placebo (n = 92)		The effect of metformin is most obvious in smaller masses and appears to have a favorable effect compared to placebo in terms of reducing chances of significant enlargement of tumors Iran
[17]NCT01627067 Phase IIMetastatic, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer (obese or overweight, postmenopausal)22Everolimus + exemestane + metformin (n = 22; 1000 mg twice daily)This treatment combination had moderate clinical benefitUSA
Colorectal Tumors[24]--Stage II-III colon cancer120 out of total 3759 enrolled in TOSCAGoal of original TOSCA study was to compare 3- vs. 6-month treatment with fluoropyrimidine-oxaliplatin adjuvant chemotherapy (post-resection)
■
Metformin users (n = 76; dose not specified)
■
Metformin nonusers (n = 44)
Neither metformin use, nor DM, nor metformin dosage were associated with OR/RFSSubanalysis
[23]NCT01312467 Phase IIaNondiabetic, obese patients with recent history of colorectal adenoma32Metformin (n = 32; maintenance on 1000 mg twice daily) Metformin intervention did not reduce rectal mucosa pS6 (marker of polyp suppression) or Ki-67 (marker of proliferation) levelsUSA
[25]Phase IIRefractory colon cancer41Irinotecan + metformin (n = 41; maintenance on 2500 mg daily) Irinotecan/metformin was able to provide disease control, with diarrhea as a significant side effectSingle-center
Lung Tumors[18]NCT01864681 Phase IINon-small cell lung cancer (locally advanced, stage IIIb-IV, EGFR mutated, treatment-naïve, nondiabetic)224Gefitinib + metformin (n = 100; maintenance on 1000 mg twice daily) vs.
gefitinib + placebo (n = 100)		Combination treatment resulted in non-significantly worse outcomes and was accompanied by more side effects (diarrhea)Multicenter, double-blind, China
[22]NCT01578551 Phase IIChemo-naïve or metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC (stage IIIB or IV; nondiabetic)25Carboplatin + paclitaxel + bevacizumab + metformin (n = 19; 1000 mg twice daily) vs.
carboplatin + paclitaxel + bevacizumab (n = 6)		The metformin combination treatment group experienced increased PFSingle center, open-label, USA
[19]NCT03071705 Phase IILung adenocarcinoma (EGFR-mutated, stage IIIb-IV)139EGFR-TKI (erlotinib, afatinib, or gefitinib) + metformin (n = 69; 500 mg twice daily) vs.
EGFR-TKI (erlotinib, afatinib, or gefitinib) (n = 70)		The addition of metformin to EGFR-TKI standard therapy significantly improved PFS and OS in advanced lung adenocarcinoma patientsRandomized, open-label, prospective, Mexico
[20]NCT02186847 Phase IINSCLC (unresectable, stage III; nondiabetic)167Chemoradiation + metformin (n = 86; maintained on 2000 mg daily) vs.
chemoradiation (n = 81)		There was no survival benefit associated with metformin addition to traditional chemoradiation therapyRandomized, open-label, multicenter, international
[21]NCT02115464 Phase IILocally advanced NSCLC (nondiabetic)54Chemoradiation (platinum-based) + metformin (n = 26; maintained on 2000 mg daily) vs.
chemoradiation (platinum-based) (n = 28)		Trial was stopped early due to low accrual; the addition of metformin to chemoradiotherapy was associated with a worse treatment outcome and increased toxicityRandomized, open-label, multicenter, Canada
Ovarian Tumors[27]ChiCTR-IOR-17011859 Epithelial ovarian cancer (nondiabetic)47Debulking + paclitaxel/carboplatin + metformin (n = 20; 850 mg daily)
Debulking + paclitaxel/carboplatin (n = 24) 		There was no evidence of metformin effect on PFSChina
[29]NCT02312661 Phase IAdvanced epithelial ovarian cancer (FIGO III-IV)15Paclitaxel/carboplatin + metformin (n = 15; maximum dose of 1000 mg thrice daily)The recommended phase II dose is 1000 mg thrice daily and there is a potential pharmacokinetic interaction between metformin and carboplatin, though the combination is well-toleratedDose escalation study, the Netherlands
[28]NCT01579812 Phase IIAdvanced-stage (IIC/III/IV) epithelial ovarian cancer (nondiabetic)38 evaluableNeoadjuvant metformin + debulking surgery + adjuvant chemotherapy plus metformin (n = 23; maintenance on 1000 mg twice daily) vs.
neoadjuvant chemotherapy and metformin + interval debulking surgery + adjuvant chemotherapy plus metformin (n = 15)		Addition of metformin is associated with better OS and a significant cancer stem cell population reductionUSA
Prostate Tumors[43]EudraCT number 2014–005193-11Prostate cancer (newly diagnosed, localized, scheduled for radical prostatectomy)100Metformin (n = 50; maintenance on 1000 mg twice daily) vs.
placebo (n = 50)		OngoingRandomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, window of opportunity, UK
[30]NCT01677897 Phase IIProstate cancer (metastatic, castration-resistant, with PSA progression while on abiraterone therapy)25Abiraterone + metformin (n = 25; 1000 mg twice daily)Combination therapy resulted in no clinical benefit and did not affect progression; higher-than-expected gastrointestinal toxicity was also reportedPilot study, Switzerland
[31]NCT01796028 Phase IIProstate cancer (metastatic, castration-resistant, nondiabetic)99Docetaxel + metformin (n = 50; 850 mg twice daily) vs.
docetaxel + placebo (n = 49)		No improvement was observed in metformin group vs. placeboFrench, prospective, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled
[32]NCT02614859 Phase IIProstate cancer (nondiabetic, recurrent PC, overweight or obese with BMI > 25)29Bicalutamide + metformin (n = 20; 1000 mg twice daily) vs. bicalutamide (n = 9)This study was ended early due to predicted inability to reach its primary endpoint (achievement of undetectable PSA at 32 weeks)Randomized, open-label, USA
Skin Tumors[44]NCT02325401HNSCC39Metformin (n = 39; maintenance on 2000 mg daily)Metformin is capable of modulating the HNSCC microenvironmentWindow of opportunity (post-biopsy, pre-resection)
[33]NCT01840007 Phase IMetastatic melanoma (patients who progressed after first-line treatment and were not eligible or did not respond to ipilimumab)17Metformin (n = 17; 1000 mg thrice daily)Metformin shows no efficacy and poor safety in treating metastatic melanomaMulticenter, pilot, prospective, open-label, France
[45]NCT02083692HNSCC (nondiabetics)50Metformin (n = 49; maintenance on 1000 mg twice daily)Metformin treatment alters the immune tumor microenvironment, regardless of HPV statusNon-randomized
[46]NCT02325401 Phase ILocally advanced HNSCC (nondiabetic, stage III-IV)20Cisplatin + radiotherapy + metformin (n = 20; maximum dose was 3000 mg daily)Cisplatin did not appear to affect metformin pharmacokineticsUSA
[47]NCT02581137 Phase IIaOral premalignant lesions (nondiabetic)26Metformin (n = 26; maintenance on 2000 mg daily)Metformin treatment was associated with good histological response and decreased mTOR activityOpen-label
[48]NCT02083692HNSCC50Metformin (n = 39 completed; maintenance on 1000 mg twice daily)Metformin treatment alters the immune tumor microenvironment and results in increased apoptosis in HPV-, tobacco+ HNSCC patients compared to HPV+ HNSCC patientsUSA
Uterine Tumors[34]Phase IIIEndometrioid endometrial cancer or atypical endometrial hyperplasia (pre-surgery)88Metformin (n = 45; maintenance on 850 mg twice daily) vs.
placebo (n = 43)		Pre-surgical treatment with metformin does not reduce tumor proliferationMulticenter, randomized, double-blind, pre-surgical window study design, UK
[36]NCTO1877564Endometrial cancer (nondiabetic, obese, pre-surgery)13Metformin (maintenance at 850 mg twice daily)Pre-surgical treatment with metformin alters steroid receptor signaling of EC cellsWindow design
[37]jRCT2031190065Endometrial cancer120 (target)Medroxyprogesterone acetate vs.
medroxyprogesterone acetate + metformin (750 mg daily) vs.
medroxyprogesterone acetate + metformin (1500 mg daily)		OngoingProspective, randomized, open, blinded-endpoint, dose–response, multicenter, Japan
[35]NCT03618472Endometrial cancer (nondiabetic)49Metformin (n = 25; 850 mg daily) vs.
placebo (n = 24)		Pre-surgical metformin treatment significantly decreased proliferative tissue marker Ki-67Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Thailand
LeukemiaN/ANCT01324180
Phase I		Relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia 14Metformin (twice daily in dose escalation schema) in combination with vincristine, dexamethasone, PEG-asparaginase, doxorubicin, and intrathecal cytarabineCompletedSingle group assignment, interventional, dose-escalating, open-label
N/ANCT01849276
Phase I		Relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia 2Metformin (twice daily in dose escalation schema on days 1–15) + intravenous cytarabine Terminated (due to slow accrual) Single group assignment, interventional, open-label
LymphomaN/ANCT03200015
Phase II		Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL)15Metformin (ramp up to 850 mg thrice daily) + rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisoneUnknown Single group assignment, interventional, open-label
N/ANCT02531308
Phase II		DLBCL 5Metformin (ramp up to 850 mg twice daily) + rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone, pegfilgrastimTerminated (slow accrual) Single group assignment, interventional, open-label
MyelomaN/A NCT03829020
Phase I		Recurrent plasma cell myeloma and refractory plasma cell myeloma 36Metformin (dose escalation schema) + bortezomib, nelfinavirRecruiting Single group assignment, interventional
N/A NCT02948283
Phase I		Recurrent plasma cell myeloma and refractory plasma cell myeloma3Metformin (twice daily in dose escalation schema) + ritonavirCompleted Single group assignment, interventional
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Skuli, S.J.; Alomari, S.; Gaitsch, H.; Bakayoko, A.; Skuli, N.; Tyler, B.M. Metformin and Cancer, an Ambiguanidous Relationship. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 626. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ph15050626

AMA Style

Skuli SJ, Alomari S, Gaitsch H, Bakayoko A, Skuli N, Tyler BM. Metformin and Cancer, an Ambiguanidous Relationship. Pharmaceuticals. 2022; 15(5):626. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ph15050626

Chicago/Turabian Style

Skuli, Sarah J., Safwan Alomari, Hallie Gaitsch, A’ishah Bakayoko, Nicolas Skuli, and Betty M. Tyler. 2022. "Metformin and Cancer, an Ambiguanidous Relationship" Pharmaceuticals 15, no. 5: 626. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ph15050626

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop