Next Article in Journal
Synthesis of Nano-Paramagnetic Oleuropein to Induce KRAS Over-Expression: A New Mechanism to Inhibit AGS Cancer Cells
Next Article in Special Issue
Naturopathy as a Model of Prevention-Oriented, Patient-Centered Primary Care: A Disruptive Innovation in Health Care
Previous Article in Journal
The Administration of the New Pyrimidine Derivative—4-{2-[2-(3,4-Dimethoxyphenyl)-Vinyl]-6-Ethyl-4-Oxo-5-Phenyl-4H-Pyrimidine-1-Il}Benzsulfamide Restores the Activity of Brain Cells in Experimental Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy by Maintaining Mitochondrial Function
Previous Article in Special Issue
“I’ve Only Just Heard About It”: Complementary and Alternative Medicine Knowledge and Educational Needs of Clinical Psychologists in Indonesia
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Medicina
Volume 55
Issue 7
10.3390/medicina55070387
medicina-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Utilisation of and Attitude towards Traditional and Complementary Medicine among Ebola Survivors in Sierra Leone

by
Peter Bai James
1,2,*,
Jon Wardle
1,
Amie Steel
1 and
Jon Adams
1
1
Australian Research Centre in Complementary and Integrative Medicine, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, Sydney 2007, Australia
2
Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Medicine and Allied Health Sciences, University of Sierra Leone, 00232 Freetown, Sierra Leone
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Medicina 2019, 55(7), 387; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/medicina55070387
Submission received: 5 June 2019 / Revised: 27 June 2019 / Accepted: 12 July 2019 / Published: 18 July 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Complementary and Integrative Medicine)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background and objectives: In addition to conventional healthcare, Ebola survivors are known to seek traditional and complementary healthcare (T&CM) options to meet their healthcare needs. However, little is known about the general beliefs of Ebola survivors regarding T&CM and the impact of these beliefs in influencing their decisions around T&CM use. This study examines Ebola survivors’ attitudes towards T&CM use in Sierra Leone. Materials and Methods: We conducted a nationwide quantitative cross-sectional study of 358 Ebola survivors in Sierra Leone between January and August 2018. We used descriptive analysis, chi-square tests and backward stepwise binary logistic regression for data analysis. Results: Close to half of the survivors (n = 163, 45.5%) had used T&CM since their discharge from an Ebola treatment centre. Survivors who viewed T&CM as boosting their immune system/resistance were 3.89 times (95%CI: 1.57–9.63, p = 0.003) more likely to use T&CM than those who did not view T&CM as boosting their immune system/resistance. Additionally, survivors who viewed T&CM as having fewer side effects than conventional medicine were more likely to use T&CM [OR = 5.03 (95%CI: 1.92–13.19, p = 0.001)]. Ebola survivors were more influenced to use T&CM based on their personal experience of the effectiveness of T&CM than by clinical evidence [OR = 13.72 (95%CI: 6.10–30.84, P < 0.001)]. Ebola survivors who perceived T&CM as providing them with more control than conventional medicine over their health/body were more likely to use T&CM [OR = 4.15 (95%CI: 1.74–9.89, p = 0.001)] as opposed to those who did not perceive T&CM in this way. Conclusions: Considering the widespread use of T&CM, an understanding of Ebola survivors’ attitudes/beliefs towards T&CM is useful to healthcare providers and policymakers with regard to public education and practitioner–survivors communication, T&CM regulation and research in Sierra Leone. Ebola survivors appear to turn to T&CM not only for treatment, but also to fill gaps in conventional health care services.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Traditional and complementary medicine (T&CM) can be defined as a set of healthcare modalities (local or imported products and practices) that are historically located outside the dominant model of healthcare [1,2]. In Africa, T&CM may include traditional healthcare products and practices (herbal medicine or products and traditional bone setting) and imported complementary medicine (acupuncture and massage therapy, yoga naturopathy) [3,4,5]. T&CM use in Africa is considered a public health issue primarily due to its widespread use alone or alongside conventional medicine, with most studies showing more than half the population using T&CM [4]. In Sierra Leone, high use of T&CM, especially herbal medicines use, has been observed among pregnant women [6], lactating mothers [7], hypertensive patients [8], infertile women [9], healthcare students [10] and for the treatment of malaria in children [11] and adults [12].
The 2014–2016 Ebola virus disease (EVD) outbreak in West Africa was considered to be the most significant outbreak in history with EVD infecting 28,616 people and resulting in 11,310 deaths [13]. The outbreak also produced the highest number of survivors in the three most affected countries of Sierra Leone, Liberia and Guinea. As of the 12 May 2016, the global estimate of EVD survivors was approximately 10,000 [14]. This number will increase as EVD outbreaks continue in other countries such in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DR Congo) [15]. Survivors of EVD outbreaks experience a myriad of post-ebola physical and psychological complications, which include musculoskeletal pain, ocular and auditory problems, depression, anxiety, fatigue, insomnia, as well as stigma and discrimination from the community [16,17,18]. Ebola survivors are known to seek conventional care to address their myriad health challenges [19,20] and there is evidence of EVD survivors employing local cultural practices (which encompass T&CM) in their management of EVD transmission and prevention [21,22,23]. However, no research to date has evaluated the frequency and reasons for T&CM use among Ebola survivors.
Two dominant sets of interpretations have been proposed to help explain the reasons why many people around the globe use T&CM. The first set of interpretations can loosely be referred to as pull factors, which focused on those features, and factors around T&CM that are attractive to users (pull factors). These pull factors regarding T&CM use that have been identified in the contemporary literature across sub-Saharan Africa suggest that people tend to be attracted to T&CM due to its perceived low cost, availability, congruence with their individual’s cultural and religious beliefs, patient sense of autonomy over their health and their perceived safety and efficacy of T&CM products [4]. The second interpretation relates to people who are dissatisfied with what conventional medicine can offer (push factors). The contemporary literature across sub-Saharan Africa suggests that people seek T&CM due to disenchantment with conventional medicine, the negative attitude of healthcare providers to cultural traditions (including T&CM), drug availability, long distance to and inequity in accessing health facilities as well as long waiting times [4]. In addition, beliefs related to safety, efficacy, holism and the sense of control of one’s health have been identified as possible predictors of T&CM use among different illness groups outside of Africa [24,25,26,27].
The very few studies that have explored beliefs and attitudes towards the use of T&CM in Sierra Leone have been restricted to healthcare students (showing generally positive attitudes towards T&CM amongst this sub-group) [10,28]. Given that unpublished data has suggested Ebola survivors are likely to seek T&CM healthcare in Sierra Leone to help meet their healthcare needs [29], it is important to examine Ebola survivors’ general beliefs regarding T&CM and how these beliefs are linked with their decision to use T&CM. Such information is important, as it will help healthcare providers and policymakers to understand better Ebola survivors’ use and motivations for using T&CM, which will help minimise risks to patient care and invariably maximize patient care outcomes. These studies may also serve to identify ‘push’ and ‘pull’ factors that can help design more responsive health services for Ebola survivors. However, to date, no study in Sierra Leone or across Africa has evaluated Ebola survivors’ attitudes towards the use of T&CM. To fill this significant research gap, our study evaluates Ebola survivors’ attitudes towards the use of T&CM in Sierra Leone drawing upon a nationally representative sample.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design, Setting and Participants

A descriptive nationwide questionnaire survey employing a cross-sectional study design was administered to Ebola survivors who were at least 18 years old and experiencing post-Ebola sequelae in Sierra Leone. The study was undertaken between January and August 2018. Ebola survivors who were unable to accurately provide information or participate in the study due to physical and psychological conditions such as memory loss, hearing loss, high fever and bleeding or those experiencing acute emotional distress that would put the research and other participants at risk were excluded.

2.2. Sampling Method

We collected data from the four geographic regions of Sierra Leone (Western Area, Northern province, Southern province and Eastern province). We then purposefully selected five districts to cover all four geographic regions of the country. Figure 1 shows the location of the five districts in Sierra Leone. The five districts include western area urban and western area rural districts (both in the Western area), Bo district (Southern province), Kenema district (Eastern province) and Bombali district (Northern province). We chose these five districts based on the epidemiological profile of the total confirmed Ebola cases and because they are host to the highest number of Ebola survivors in Sierra Leone. We then randomly selected Ebola survivors in each of the five districts based on proportional representation using the national list of registered Ebola survivors obtained from the Sierra Leone Association of Ebola survivors (SLAES). Survivors who were randomly selected were approached to participate in the study via telephone. The required sample of 351 Ebola survivors was determined using the formula for cross-sectional study (N = z2pq/d2), with the perceived prevalence (p) assumed to be 50% since no previous research on T&CM use among Ebola survivors has been conducted so far. To increase the statistical power, we aimed to recruit 400 Ebola survivors.

2.3. Use of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Ebola survivors were questioned about their use of T&CM (product and practitioners) since their discharge from an Ebola treatment centre for the management of common post-ebola sequelae. The T&CM products and practices considered in our study included herbal medicine, traditional medicine practice (traditional bone-setting), prayer/faith healing and massage. The T&CM products and practices considered in our study were informed by the results of previous research on T&CM use conducted in Sierra Leone [6,7,8,9,12,28] and across Africa [4].

2.4. Attitudes Towards the Use of T&CM among Ebola Survivors

Ebola survivors were asked whether they agree or disagree with the following statements: T&CM has fewer side effects than conventional medicine (CM); T&CM is more natural than CM; T&CM promotes a holistic approach to health; T&CM boosts my immune system/resistance; T&CM gives me more control over my health/body; knowledge about the evidence of T&CM is important to me as a patient; my personal experience of the effectiveness of T&CM is more important than clinical evidence; CAM needs to be tested for safety and side-effects; and T&CM is a better preventative measure than conventional medicine. Survivors were also questioned as to whether they perceived T&CM practitioners as spending a longer time in consultation with and providing more support to their patient than medical doctors. Further, we asked survivors about whether they find it easier to talk to a T&CM practitioner compared to a medical doctor and whether they believe medical doctors should be able to advise patients about T&CM.

2.5. Data Collection and Ethical Consideration

Ethical approval was obtained from the University of Technology Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee (UTS-HREC-ETH17-2080, Date of Approval = 19 April 2018) and the Sierra Leone Ethics and Scientific Review Committee (Date of Approval = 17 May 2018). The selected sample of Ebola survivors was approached to take part in the study via telephone during which the scope and rationale, as well as the option to opt out of the study, were explained. Initial verbal consent was obtained via telephone. For those who gave verbal consent, an arrangement was made either to fill the questionnaire or to be interviewed at their homes, courtyard or the regional Ebola survivor office. A participant information sheet that explains the purpose and scope of the study, as well as the option to opt out, was given or read (for illiterate participants) participants before asked to sign or thumbprint the consent form. Survivors signing or thumb printing the consent form was interpreted as their willingness to participate. Survivors who signed or thumbed printed (for illiterate participants) the consent form were then given the questionnaire to fill or to be interviewed. Data were collected from Ebola survivors using self-administered or interviewer-administered (for illiterate participants) formats. Among those who consented to participate in the study, the majority filled the questionnaire in the presence of a data collector or were interviewed by a data collector at the Ebola survivor regional office. Additionally, some Ebola survivors filled the questionnaire alone in their homes at their own time and later sent the filled questionnaires to their regional offices. In addition, some Ebola survivors filled the questionnaire in the presence of a data collector or were interviewed at their homes or the village courtyard. We collected our data between May and August 2018.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Data analysis was conducted using SPSS Statistics version 24. Chi-square or Fischer exact two-tailed tests were used to determine the association between each of the attitude statements and T&CM use. We employed a backward stepwise binary logistic model to determine the attitude statements that are significant predictors of T&CM use. All attitude statements were entered into the model, and a backward stepwise elimination process was conducted until we obtained the most parsimonious model. Ebola survivors’ age, sex, marital status, educational background, financial status, religious affiliation, perceived health status, place of residence, duration (months) since discharged from ETC and presence of chronic disease prior to being infected with Ebola were entered into the model as potential cofounders. The probability value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant for all analyses.

3. Results

Of the 400 Ebola survivors invited to participate, 376 consented, of which 358 fully completed the questionnaire. Table 1 shows the demographic and health-related characteristics between users and non-users of T&CM among Ebola survivors. More than half Ebola survivors were between the ages of 18–34 years (n = 194, 54.2%) and close to two thirds were females (n = 223, 62.3%). Moreover, close to three-quarters perceived their current health to be fair/poor (n = 262, 73.2%).
Table 2 shows that close to half of the survivors (n = 163, 45.5%) had used T&CM since their discharge from an Ebola treatment centre. Moreover, less than a quarter of survivors (n = 62, 17.3%) used both conventional medicine and T&CM concurrently. Herbal medicine (n = 136, 83.4%) is the most common type of T&CM used among T&CM users.
Table 3 shows the attitudes towards use of T&CM by Ebola survivors. More than two thirds of participants (n = 257, 71.8%) believe that T&CM is ‘natural’. Approximately three-quarters of survivors are of the view that T&CM needs to be tested for safety/side-effects and more than half (n = 213, 59.5%) report knowledge about the evidence of T&CM as important to them. In addition, the majority of Ebola survivors (n = 313, 87.4%) believe medical doctors should be able to advise patients about T&CM. On the other hand, more than half (n = 218, 60.9%) did not perceive T&CM as having fewer side effects than conventional medicine. Furthermore, more than two thirds (n = 250, 69.8%) did not perceive T&CM as promoting a holistic approach to health. In addition, less than one quarter (n = 73, 20.4%) perceived a T&CM practitioner as providing more support to their patients than a medical doctor.
Table 4 outlines the association between T&CM use and individual attitudes of Ebola survivors. Attitude statements such as T&CM is more natural than conventional medicine (p < 0.001), T&CM boosts my immune system/resistance (p < 0.001), my personal experience of the effectiveness of T&CM is more important than clinical evidence (p < 0.001), T&CM gives me more control over my health/body (p < 0.001), I find it easier to talk to a T&CM practitioner than a medical doctor (p < 0.001) and T&CM has fewer side-effects than conventional medicine (p < 0.001) are associated with T&CM use. No statistical difference was observed between T&CM users and non-users for the remaining attitude statements.
Backward stepwise logistic regression (Table 5) found that survivors who agreed that T&CM boosts their immune system/resistance were 3.89 (95%CI: 1.57–9.63, p = 0.003) times more likely to use T&CM than those that disagreed. Ebola survivors who agreed with the statement that T&CM has fewer side effects than CM were 5.03 (95%CI: 1.92–13.19, p = 0.001) times more likely to use T&CM than those who disagreed. Ebola survivors were 13.72 (95%CI: 6.10–30.84, p < 0.001) times more likely to use T&CM if they considered important their personal experience of the effectiveness of T&CM than clinical evidence. In addition, survivors who believe that T&CM gives them more control over their health/body were 4.15 (95%CI: 1.74–9.89, p = 0.001) times more likely to be T&CM users as opposed to those who disagreed with this statement.

4. Discussion

Our paper presents findings from the first nationwide study to examine Ebola survivors’ attitudes towards the use of T&CM in Sierra Leone. Ebola survivors who use T&CM appear to be of the view that these medicines boost their immune system. Similar reasons have been proffered for using T&CM among those with HIV/AIDS [30] and cancer survivors [31]. The appeal of T&CM to boosting immunity among users in our study may be explained in that, an individual’s health is a function of his/her immune status, which is in line with T&CM philosophies that disease should be managed by challenging the body to heal itself rather than focusing on symptomatic treatment [32].
Additionally, based on the results of this study this group of Ebola survivors may be of the view that the mechanism underlying the pathophysiology of most of their post-ebola sequalae is thought to be immune mediated [33,34,35] and that the use of certain T&CM with immunomodulatory properties will help manage their post-Ebola complications. This is perhaps unsurprising given the infectious nature of the viral disease that caused the acute episode. Although several T&CM approaches are reported to exert immunological changes in preclinical and clinical studies [36], thus far, these studies have employed relatively insensitive and straightforward methodologies that render findings inconclusive. Methodologically robust clinical studies that use newer and more powerful technologies (magnetic-resonance imaging and positron-emission tomography and microarray analyses) are required to provide strong evidence on the immunomodulatory effect of T&CM that might be of use in the management of post-Ebola sequelae among survivors.
Our analyses also shows Ebola survivors who are T&CM users hold the view that T&CM has fewer side effects than conventional medicine mirroring similar findings in the literature on T&CM use among HIV/AIDS patients [37] and individuals with musculoskeletal conditions within [38] and outside [25] of Africa. Moreover, our analysis suggests that Ebola survivors who use T&CM are highly likely to be driven by belief in the notion that T&CM is more natural than conventional medicine. The assumption that T&CM treatments are natural and therefore non-toxic have been found to be associated with people’s decisions to use T&CM in multiple studies in multiple conditions [4,24,39]. T&CM methods and remedies are considered natural and organic as opposed to conventional medicine, which is often thought of as artificial and/or synthetic [24].
Although some T&CM products and practices have been found to be relatively effective and safe, the safety of T&CM in general is still a debatable area—particularly in a nascent condition such as post-Ebola sequelae—as there is insufficient scientific evidence to prove that T&CM is of less risk than conventional medicine [40]. Information regarding the safety of T&CM is mostly derived from community use and are—in most cases—not reliable [41,42]. It is important that well-designed studies provide more examination of such beliefs around safety and T&CM both in the general population and among Ebola survivors.
To further understand T&CM safety, it is also important for researchers to take into consideration the fact that the risk of T&CM needs to be viewed through a wider lens of missed opportunity for known safe and effective treatments, or following advice from poorly trained health professionals in an unregulated environment [43]. Findings from studies such as ours can inform regulatory and policy frameworks, the designing of public health messages and the nature of provider-patient communication regarding T&CM use; all geared towards ensuring safe and informed care for Ebola survivors.
Our study results also indicate that Ebola survivors who use T&CM were concerned more with their personal experience of T&CM effectiveness than with clinical evidence, which is congruent with findings from studies of T&CM use among cancer survivors [44,45] and pregnant women [27]. The absence of clinical evidence of effectiveness and safety of the commonly used T&CM in the general population and among Ebola survivors in Sierra Leone, and coupled with the notion that T&CM is inherently safe and effective may help explain their preference for personal experience of T&CM over clinical evidence. While few preclinical efficacy [46,47] and toxicity [48] studies of some medicinal plants considered traditional medicine have been conducted in Sierra Leone, clinical research examining the safety and efficacy of commonly used T&CM especially herbal medicines in Sierra Leone is lacking. The availability of scientific evidence of T&CM effectiveness and safety is important in ensuring that it is effectively used. T&CM users are known to assume that T&CM is safe and effective [4] and that their decision to use T&CM is informed by non-professionals sources [42]. Therefore, it is imperative that robust efficacy and safety studies (preclinical, clinical and post-market surveillance) are conducted on commonly used T&CM in Sierra Leone that will inform personal and clinical decision making with regards T&CM.
Our study finding that survivors who are T&CM users want more control over their health is in line with insights from the current post-infectious sequelae literature both within [4,49] and outside [25] of Africa, including those among survivors of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in Hong Kong [50]. The sense of fear, vulnerability and perceived loss of control over their health due to the physical, psychosocial and economic problems experienced by Ebola survivors [18,51,52] may be a source of attraction toward T&CM. This may be particularly in view of the failures of conventional health options to address these needs, which allows survivors to have the sense of control, autonomy and active participation in decisions regarding their health and wellbeing [24,25,26,49].
T&CM is perceived to allow patients to take ownership of their health and well-being by allowing them to actively seek information and make decisions about treatment modalities that prove to be beneficial without being instructed on what to do [26,53]. Ebola survivors’ sense of control on one hand may affect their willingness to disclose their T&CM use status to their healthcare provider as disclosure of T&CM may be perceived by patients as shifting the power to their healthcare provider to make health decisions for them [53]. On the other hand, the sense of control that T&CM provides may also make survivors more assertive and therefore more communicative with their healthcare provider [53]. Notwithstanding, it is important that healthcare providers proactively seek to ask about survivors’ possible T&CM use as decisions regarding the efficacy and safety of T&CM often fail to be informed by reliable information sources [42], and such use may be indicative of unmet needs.
The majority of T&CM users and non-users amongst the Ebola survivors in our study agreed that medical doctors should be able to advise their patients about T&CM. Although this is in contrast to some studies in other conditions and in other countries [27], our finding suggests that Ebola survivors in Sierra Leone regardless of their T&CM use status will prefer to get advice about T&CM from a conventional medicine provider. The expectation of Ebola survivors for conventional medicine practitioners to be able to provide advice on T&CM illustrates a potential need for healthcare providers to routinely initiate and incorporate discussions about T&CM during consultation with Ebola survivors. The provision of evidence-based information on T&CM to patients requires healthcare providers to be knowledgeable about the safety and efficacy of commonly used T&CM among Ebola survivors.

Study Limitations

One limitation of our study is that the data collected is self-reported, which may reflect recall bias. Moreover, our findings are not necessarily representative of the perceptions and experiences of Ebola survivors in other countries. Also, due to the cross-sectional nature of our study, a cause-effect relationship cannot be deduced from our results. In addition, we excluded Ebola survivors in our study with conditions that limit their ability to accurately provide information or participate in the study and may put the research and other participants at risk. Although the demographic characteristics of Ebola survivors excluded are similar to those included in our study, those excluded may have held different views with regards to the attitude statements considered in our study.

5. Conclusions

Findings from our study have provided insights into the reasons for T&CM use among Ebola survivors in Sierra Leone. Ebola survivors who are T&CM users value safety, personal experience of effectiveness, patient autonomy and the need to boost the body’s immunity when using T&CM. Such reasons for T&CM use among Ebola survivors are useful to conventional health providers, in improving practitioner-patient communication regarding T&CM and identify survivors’ beliefs about T&CM that might be targets for public education among Ebola survivors by policymakers and health providers.

Author Contributions

P.B.J. and J.W. conceived of the study. All authors contributed to the study design. P.B.J. did the database search and data extraction, while J.W., A.S. and J.A. supervised the process. P.B.J. wrote the first draft of the manuscript, while J.W., A.S. and J.A. contributed to the intellectual content and reviewed the subsequent and final drafts of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

We want to extend our thanks and appreciation to the Ebola survivors who consented to take part in this study. We also want to extend our appreciation to the staff of the Sierra Leone Ebola survivors association for their support during data collection.

Conflicts of Interest

Jon Wardle is a guest editor of Medicina. The other authors have no conflict of interest whatsoever.

References

  1. World Health Organization (WHO). WHO Traditional Medicine Strategy: 2014–2023; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  2. Adams, J.; Andrews, G.; Barnes, J.; Broom, A.; Magin, P. Traditional, Complementary and Integrative Medicine: An International Reader; Macmillan International Higher Education: London, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  3. Kirschner, K.; Mandell, R.; Knowlton, J.; Romeo, M.J.; Conboy, L. Acupuncture in Uganda: A research letter on the integration of acupuncture with conventional biomedical treatments. Glob. Adv. Health Med. 2014, 3, 61–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. James, P.B.; Wardle, J.; Steel, A.; Adams, J. Traditional, complementary and alternative medicine use in Sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review. BMJ Glob. Health 2018, 3, e000895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ericksen-Pereira, W.G.; Roman, N.V.; Swart, R. An overview of the history and development of naturopathy in South Africa. Health SA Gesondheid 2018, 23, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. James, P.B.; Bah, A.J.; Tommy, M.S.; Wardle, J.; Steel, A. Herbal medicines use during pregnancy in Sierra Leone: An exploratory cross-sectional study. Women Birth 2017, 31, e302–e309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. James, P.B.; Kaikai, A.I.; Bah, A.J.; Steel, A.; Wardle, J. Herbal medicine use during breastfeeding: A cross-sectional study among mothers visiting public health facilities in the Western area of Sierra Leone. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2019, 19, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. James, P.B.; Kamara, H.; Bah, A.J.; Steel, A.; Wardle, J. Herbal medicine use among hypertensive patients attending public and private health facilities in Freetown Sierra Leone. Complement. Ther. Clin. Pract. 2018, 31, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. James, P.B.; Taidy-Leigh, L.; Bah, A.J.; Kanu, J.S.; Kangbai, J.B.; Sevalie, S. Prevalence and Correlates of Herbal Medicine Use among Women Seeking Care for Infertility in Freetown, Sierra Leone. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2018, 2018, 9493807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. James, P.B.; Bah, A.J.; Kondorvoh, I.M. Exploring self-use, attitude and interest to study complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) among final year undergraduate medical, pharmacy and nursing students in Sierra Leone: A comparative study. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2016, 16, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Diaz, T.; George, A.S.; Rao, S.R.; Bangura, P.S.; Baimba, J.B.; McMahon, S.A.; Kabano, A. Healthcare seeking for diarrhoea, malaria and pneumonia among children in four poor rural districts in Sierra Leone in the context of free health care: Results of a cross-sectional survey. BMC Public Health 2013, 13, 157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ranasinghe, S.; Ansumana, R.; Lamin, J.M.; Bockarie, A.S.; Bangura, U.; Buanie, J.A.; Stenger, D.A.; Jacobsen, K.H. Herbs and herbal combinations used to treat suspected malaria in Bo, Sierra Leone. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2015, 166, 200–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. WHO. Ebola Situation Report—30 March 2016. Available online: http://apps.who.int/ebola/current-situation/ebola-situation-report-30-march-2016 (accessed on 16 October 2017).
  14. WHO. Interim Guidance. Clinical Care for Survivors of Ebola Virus Disease. 2016. Available online: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/204235/1/WHO_EVD_OHE_PED_16.1_eng.pdf?ua=1 (accessed on 12 December 2018).
  15. Barry, A.; Ahuka-Mundeke, S.; Ali Ahmed, Y.; Allarangar, Y.; Anoko, J.; Archer, B.N.; Aruna Abedi, A.; Bagaria, J.; Belizaire, M.R.D.; Bhatia, S.; et al. Outbreak of Ebola virus disease in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, April–May, 2018: An epidemiological study. Lancet 2018, 392, 213–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Vetter, P.; Kaiser, L.; Schibler, M.; Ciglenecki, I.; Bausch, D.G. Sequelae of Ebola virus disease: The emergency within the emergency. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2016, 16, e82–e91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lotsch, F.; Schnyder, J.; Goorhuis, A.; Grobusch, M.P. Neuropsychological long-term sequelae of Ebola virus disease survivors—A systematic review. Travel Med. Infect. Dis. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. James, P.; Wardle, J.; Steel, A.; Adams, J. Post-Ebola psychosocial Experiences and coping mechanisms among Ebola survivors: A systematic review. Trop. Med. Int. Health 2019, 24, 671–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. de St. Maurice, A.; Ervin, E.; Orone, R.; Choi, M.; Dokubo, E.K.; Rollin, P.E.; Nichol, S.T.; Williams, D.; Brown, J.; Sacra, R.; et al. Care of Ebola Survivors and Factors Associated with Clinical Sequelae—Monrovia, Liberia. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2018, 5, ofy239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Keita, M.M.; Taverne, B.; Savané, S.S.; March, L.; Doukoure, M.; Sow, M.S.; Touré, A.; Etard, J.F.; Barry, M.; Delaporte, E. Depressive symptoms among survivors of Ebola virus disease in Conakry (Guinea): Preliminary results of the PostEboGui cohort. BMC Psychiatry 2017, 17, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Manguvo, A.; Mafuvadze, B. The impact of traditional and religious practices on the spread of Ebola in West Africa: Time for a strategic shift. Pan Afr. Med. J. 2015, 22, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. De Roo, A.; Ado, B.; Rose, B.; Guimard, Y.; Fonck, K.; Colebunders, R. Survey among survivors of the 1995 Ebola epidemic in Kikwit, Democratic Republic of Congo: Their feelings and experiences. Trop. Med. Int. Health 1998, 3, 883–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. WHO. Sierra Leone: A Traditional Healer and a Funeral. World Health Organization. Available online: http://www.who.int/csr/disease/ebola/ebola-6-months/sierra-leone/en/ (accessed on 12 October 2017).
  24. Bishop, F.L.; Yardley, L.; Lewith, G.T. A systematic review of beliefs involved in the use of complementary and alternative medicine. J. Health Psychol. 2007, 12, 851–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Corp, N.; Jordan, J.L.; Croft, P.R. Justifications for using complementary and alternative medicine reported by persons with musculoskeletal conditions: A narrative literature synthesis. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0200879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Barrett, B.; Marchand, L.; Scheder, J.; Plane, M.B.; Maberry, R.; Appelbaum, D.; Rakel, D.; Rabago, D. Themes of holism, empowerment, access, and legitimacy define complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine in relation to conventional biomedicine. J. Altern. Complement. Med. 2003, 9, 937–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Frawley, J.; Sibbritt, D.; Broom, A.; Gallois, C.; Steel, A.; Adams, J. Women’s attitudes towards the use of complementary and alternative medicine products during pregnancy. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2016, 36, 462–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. James, P.B.; Bah, A.J. Awareness, use, attitude and perceived need for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) education among undergraduate pharmacy students in Sierra Leone: A descriptive cross-sectional survey. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2014, 14, 438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Yoon-Cho. Experiences of Ebola Survivors on Healthcare Access in Bombali District, Sierra Leone. University of Sheffield. Available online: http://unimak.edu.sl/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/Yoon-Cho-MPHID-dissertation-2016.pdf (accessed on 12 December 2018).
  30. Peltzer, K.; Preez, N.F.; Ramlagan, S.; Fomundam, H.; Anderson, J.; Chanetsa, L. Antiretrovirals and the use of traditional, complementary and alternative medicine by HIV patients in a longitudinal study. Afr. J. Tradit. Complement. Altern. Med. 2011, 8, 337–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Egger, S.; Hughes, S.; Smith, D.P.; Chambers, S.; Kahn, C.; Moxey, A.; O’Connell, D.L. Factors associated with the use of complementary and alternative medicines for prostate cancer by long-term survivors. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0193686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Pal, S.K. Complementary and alternative medicine: An overview. Curr. Sci. 2002, 82, 518–524. [Google Scholar]
  33. Rivera, A.; Messaoudi, I. Molecular mechanisms of Ebola pathogenesis. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2016, 100, 889–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Carod-Artal, F.J. Post-Ebolavirus disease syndrome: What do we know? Expert Rev. Anti Infect. Ther. 2015, 13, 1185–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Fausther-Bovendo, H.; Qiu, X.; McCorrister, S.; Westmacott, G.; Sandstrom, P.; Castilletti, C.; Di Caro, A.; Ippolito, G.; Kobinger, G.P. Ebola virus infection induces autoimmunity against dsDNA and HSP60. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 42147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Goldrosen, M.H.; Straus, S.E. Complementary and alternative medicine: Assessing the evidence for immunological benefits. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2004, 4, 912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Littlewood, R.A.; Vanable, P.A. Complementary and alternative medicine use among HIV-positive people: Research synthesis and implications for HIV care. AIDS Care 2008, 20, 1002–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Mbada, C.E.; Adeyemi, T.L.; Adedoyin, R.A.; Badmus, H.D.; Awotidebe, T.O.; Arije, O.O.; Omotosho, O.S. Prevalence and modes of complementary and alternative medicine use among peasant farmers with musculoskeletal pain in a rural community in South-Western Nigeria. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2015, 15, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Jane-lovena, E.O.; Okoronkwo, I.L.; Ogbonnaya, N.P. Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults in Enugu, Nigeria. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2011, 11, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. WHO. WHO Traditional Medicine Strategy 2002–2005; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  41. Ekor, M. The growing use of herbal medicines: Issues relating to adverse reactions and challenges in monitoring safety. Front. Pharmacol. 2013, 4, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Frawley, J.; Adams, J.; Broom, A.; Steel, A.; Gallois, C.; Sibbritt, D. Majority of women are influenced by nonprofessional information sources when deciding to consult a complementary and alternative medicine practitioner during pregnancy. J. Altern. Complement. Med. 2014, 20, 571–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Wardle, J.L.; Adams, J. Indirect and non-health risks associated with complementary and alternative medicine use: An integrative review. Eur. J. Integr. Med. 2014, 6, 409–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Evans, M.; Shaw, A.; Thompson, E.A.; Falk, S.; Turton, P.; Thompson, T.; Sharp, D. Decisions to use complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) by male cancer patients: Information-seeking roles and types of evidence used. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2007, 7, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Verhoef, M.J.; Mulkins, A.; Carlson, L.E.; Hilsden, R.J.; Kania, A. Assessing the role of evidence in patients’ evaluation of complementary therapies: A quality study. Integr. Cancer Ther. 2007, 6, 345–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Marshall, S.J.; Russell, P.F.; Phillipson, J.D.; Kirby, G.C.; Warhurst, D.C.; Wright, C.W. Antiplasmodial and antiamoebic activities of medicinal plants from Sierra Leone. Phytother. Res. 2000, 14, 356–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Macfoy, C.A.; Cline, E.I. In vitro antibacterial activities of three plants used in traditional medicine in Sierra Leone. J. Ethnopharmacol. 1990, 28, 323–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Abiri, O.T.; Samai, M.; Koker, A.; Bawoh, M.; Kwanashie, H.O. Acute toxicity studies and antidotal therapy of ethanol extract of Jatropha curcas seeds in experimental animals. Sierra Leone J. Biomed. Res. 2015, 7, 38–48. [Google Scholar]
  49. Gyasi, R.M.; Asante, F.; Yeboah, J.Y.; Abass, K.; Mensah, C.M.; Siaw, L.P. Pulled in or pushed out? Understanding the complexities of motivation for alternative therapies use in Ghana. Int. J. Qual. Stud. Health Well Being 2016, 11, 29667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Siu, J.Y.M. Coping with future epidemics: Tai chi practice as an overcoming strategy used by survivors of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in post-SARS Hong Kong. Health Expect. 2016, 19, 762–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Bakare, W.A.; Ilesanmi, O.S.; Nabena, E.P.; Famuyide, T. Psychosocial stressors and support needs of survivors of Ebola virus disease, Bombali District, Sierra Leone, 2015. Healthc. Low Resour. Settings 2015, 3, 48–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Rabelo, I.; Lee, V.; Fallah, M.P.; Massaquoi, M.; Evlampidou, I.; Crestani, R.; Decroo, T.; Van den Bergh, R.; Severy, N. Psychological Distress among Ebola Survivors Discharged from an Ebola Treatment Unit in Monrovia, Liberia—A Qualitative Study. Front. Public Health 2016, 4, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Warriner, S.; Bryan, K.; Brown, A.M. Women’s attitude towards the use of complementary and alternative medicines (CAM) in pregnancy. Midwifery 2014, 30, 138–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Medicina 55 00387 g001 550
Figure 1. Location of the five sampled districts (Bo District, Kenema District, Bombali District, Western Area Urban District and Western Area Rural District) in Sierra Leone.
Figure 1. Location of the five sampled districts (Bo District, Kenema District, Bombali District, Western Area Urban District and Western Area Rural District) in Sierra Leone.
Medicina 55 00387 g001
Table
Table 1. Socio-demographic and health related characteristics of Ebola survivors (n = 358).
Table 1. Socio-demographic and health related characteristics of Ebola survivors (n = 358).
CharacteristicsVariablesTotal
n (%)
Age Group18–33 years194 (54.2)
34–49 years134 (37.4)
≥50 years30 (8.4)
SexMale135 (37.7)
female223 (62.3)
Educational StatusNon-formal education147 (41.1)
Primary44 (12.3)
Secondary126 (35.2)
Tertiary41 (11.5)
Religious AffiliationChristianity92 (25.7)
Islam266 (74.3)
Marital StatusSingle100 (27.9)
Married/Cohabitating171 (47.8)
Divorced/Separated/widowed87 (24.3)
Monthly Income (Leones)Less than 500,000252 (70.4)
500,000–1million94 (26.3)
>1million12 (3.4)
Residential AreaUrban219 (61.2)
Rural139 (38.8)
RegionNorthern region (Bambali district)120 (33.5)
Southern region (Bo district)55 (15.4)
Eastern region (Kenema district)62 (17.3)
Western Area121 (33.8)
Current Perceived Health StatusVery good/Good96 (26.8)
Fair/poor262 (73.2)
Duration (Months) since Discharged from ETC≤3 years27 (7.5)
>3 years331 (92.5)
Known Chronic DiseaseYes46 (12.8)
No312 (87.2)
Table
Table 2. Traditional and complementary healthcare (T&CM) utilization among Ebola survivors (n = 358).
Table 2. Traditional and complementary healthcare (T&CM) utilization among Ebola survivors (n = 358).
T&CM UtilizationVariablen (%)
Users163 (45.5)
Non-user195 (54.5)
Concurrent use of both conventional medicine and T&CMYes62 (17.3)
No296 (82.7)
Types of T&CM use—multiple choiceHerbal medicine136 (83.4)
Animal Extract23 (14.1)
Prayer/faith healing60 (36.8)
Acupuncture1 (0.6%)
Massage 33 (20.2)
Others (scarification local surgery)10 (6.1)
Average monthly direct cost of T&CM per person = Le 14,036 approximately 1.8 US dollars (0 to 10.9 USD)
Table
Table 3. Attitude of Ebola survivors towards the use of T&CM.
Table 3. Attitude of Ebola survivors towards the use of T&CM.
Attitude of Ebola Survivors towards the Use of T&CMAgreeNeutralDisagree
n (%)n (%)n (%)
T&CM is a more natural than conventional medicine257 (71.8)20 (5.6)81 (22.6)
TCAM boosts my immune system/resistance114 (31.8)44 (12.3)200 (55.9)
T&CM has fewer side-effects than conventional medicine82 (22.9)58 (16.2)218 (60.9)
T&CM promotes a holistic approach to health100 (27.9)55 (15.4)203 (56.7)
T&CM gives me more control over my health/body120 (33.5)78 (21.8)160 (44.7)
Knowledge about the evidence of T&CM effectiveness is important to me as a patient213 (59.5)25 (7.0)120 (33.5)
My personal experience of the effectiveness of T&CM is more important than clinical evidence163 (45.5)36 (10.1)159 (44.4)
T&CM is a better preventative measure than conventional medicine 58 (16.2)50 (14.0)250 (69.8)
T&CM needs to be tested for safety/side-effects268 (74.9)27 (7.5)63 (17.6)
T&CM practitioner spends a longer time with patients in consultations compared with a medical doctor177 (49.4)47 (13.1)134 (37.4)
T&CM practitioner provides more support to his/her patient than a medical doctor73 (20.4)47 (13.1)238 (66.5)
I find it easier to talk to a T&CM practitioner than a medical doctor100 (27.9)33 (9.2)225 (62.8)
Medical doctors should be able to advise patient about T&CM313 (87.4)16 (4.5)29 (8.1)
Table
Table 4. Comparison of attitudes between users and non-users of TCAM treatment among Ebola survivors.
Table 4. Comparison of attitudes between users and non-users of TCAM treatment among Ebola survivors.
Attitude StatementsVariablesT&CM USE
UsersNon-Userp-Value
n (%)n (%)
T&CM is a more natural than conventional medicineDisagree10 (6.1)71 (36.4)<0.001
Neutral6 (3.7)14 (7.2)
Agree147 (90.2)110 (56.4)
T&CM boosts my immune system/resistanceDisagree46 (28.2)154 (79.0)<0.001
Neutral14 (8.6)30 (15.4)
Agree103 (63.2)11 (5.6)
T&CM has fewer side-effects than conventional medicineDisagree69 (42.3)149 (76.4)<0.001
Neutral30 (18.4)28 (14.4)
Agree64 (39.3)18 (9.2)
T&CM promotes a holistic approach to healthDisagree60 (36.8)143 (73.3)<0.001
Neutral23 (14.1)32 (16.4)
Agree80 (49.1)20 (10.3)
T&CM gives me more control over my health/bodyDisagree39 (23.9)121 (62.1)<0.001
Neutral28 (17.2)50 (25.6)
Agree96 (58.9)24 (12.3)
Knowledge about the evidence of T&CM is important to me as a patientDisagree18 (11.0)102 (52.3)<0.001
Neutral 3 (1.8)22 (11.3)
Agree142 (87.1)71 (36.4)
My personal experience of the effectiveness of T&CM is more important than clinical evidenceDisagree19 (11.7)140 (71.8)<0.001
Neutral 11 (6.7)25 (12.8)
Agree133 (81.6)30 (15.4)
T&CM is a better preventative measure than conventional medicineDisagree87 (53.4)163 (83.6)<0.001
Neutral 24 (14.7)26 (13.3)
Agree52 (31.9)6 (3.1)
T&CM needs to be tested for safety/side-effectsDisagree30 (18.4)33 (16.9)0.409
Neutral9 (5.5)18 (9.2)
Agree124 (76.1)144 (73.8)
T&CM practitioner spends a longer time with patients in consultations compared with a medical doctorDisagree59 (36.2)75 (38.5)0.257
Neutral17 (10.4)30 (15.4)
Agree87 (53.4)90 (46.2)
T&CM practitioner provides more support to his/her patient than a medical doctorDisagree87 (53.4)151 (77.4)<0.001
Neutral20 (12.3)27 (13.8)
Agree56 (34.4)17 (8.7)
I find it easier to talk to a T&CM practitioner than a medical doctorDisagree78 (47.9)147 (75.4)<0.001
Neutral13 (8.0)20 (10.3)
Agree72 (44.2)28 (14.4)
Medical doctors should be able to advise patient about T&CMDisagree13 (8.0)16 (8.2)0.496
Neutral5 (3.1)11 (5.6)
Agree145 (89.0)168 (86.2)
Table
Table 5. Logistic regression analyses demonstrating attitudes towards T&CM and use of TCAM treatment among Ebola survivors.
Table 5. Logistic regression analyses demonstrating attitudes towards T&CM and use of TCAM treatment among Ebola survivors.
Attitude StatementsVariablesT&CM Treatment Use
Adjusted OR95% C.I.p-Value
T&CM boosts my immune system/resistanceDisagree1
Neutral0.830.29–2.390.729
Agree3.891.57–9.630.003
T&CM has fewer side-effects than conventional medicineDisagree1
Neutral1.920.73–5.080.189
Agree5.031.92–13.190.001
T&CM gives me more control over my health/bodyDisagree1
Neutral1.680.68–4.200.263
Agree4.151.74–9.890.001
My personal experience of the effectiveness of T&CM is more important than clinical evidenceDisagree1
Neutral2.070.58–7.410.263
Agree13.726.10–30.84<0.001
Note: C.I. =Confidence Interval; OR= Odd ratio.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

James, P.B.; Wardle, J.; Steel, A.; Adams, J. Utilisation of and Attitude towards Traditional and Complementary Medicine among Ebola Survivors in Sierra Leone. Medicina 2019, 55, 387. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/medicina55070387

AMA Style

James PB, Wardle J, Steel A, Adams J. Utilisation of and Attitude towards Traditional and Complementary Medicine among Ebola Survivors in Sierra Leone. Medicina. 2019; 55(7):387. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/medicina55070387

Chicago/Turabian Style

James, Peter Bai, Jon Wardle, Amie Steel, and Jon Adams. 2019. "Utilisation of and Attitude towards Traditional and Complementary Medicine among Ebola Survivors in Sierra Leone" Medicina 55, no. 7: 387. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/medicina55070387

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop