Next Article in Journal
The Effect of Vinegar Supplementation on High-Intensity Cycling Performance within Recreationally Trained Individuals
Next Article in Special Issue
Positive Anti-SSA/Ro Antibody in a Woman with SARS-CoV-2 Infection Using Immunophenotyping: A Case Report
Previous Article in Journal
Association of the PSRC1 rs599839 Variant with Coronary Artery Disease in a Mexican Population
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Relationship between the IFNG (rs2430561) Polymorphism and Metabolic Syndrome in Perimenopausal Women
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Uterine Artery Doppler Ultrasonography for First Trimester Prediction of Preeclampsia in Individuals at Risk from Low-Resource Settings

1
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
2
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Grigore T Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania
3
Department of Neurosciences, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
4
RoNeuro Institute for Neurological Research and Diagnostic, 400354 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 8 July 2020 / Revised: 18 August 2020 / Accepted: 24 August 2020 / Published: 26 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis, Prevention and Treatment for Diseases Specific to Women)

Abstract

:
Background and objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential of first trimester uterine artery Doppler ultrasonography for the early prediction of preeclampsia (PE), in at-risk pregnant women. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective longitudinal study, including 120 Caucasian pregnant women with risk factors for PE. The potential of pulsatility indexes (PI) and notch was assessed as a tool for preeclampsia screening. Results: Doppler examination of the uterine artery performed early at 11–14 WA allows the detection of pregnancies that will develop PE with a sensitivity of 61.5% and a specificity of 63.8% based on PI analysis. Predictive power increases slightly by adding bilateral notch (sensitivity = 65.4%; specificity = 66%). Conclusions: Uterine artery Doppler examination is an effective non-invasive screening test for the development of PE in pregnancies at risk, particularly appropriate in health systems with limited means of evaluating other biomarkers.

1. Introduction

Preeclampsia (PE) is one of the most severe complications of pregnancy and remains a principal cause of maternal–fetal mortality and morbidity worldwide. The prevalence of the disease is estimated at 3–5% of all pregnant women, representing the most frequent medical complication during pregnancy [1].
Recent years have seen important progress in understanding the pathogenesis of this disorder, as well as its prevention [2]. Additionally, a wide range of potential biomarkers for prediction of preeclampsia have been studied: maternal characteristics (African-American ethnicity, body mass index, pregestational diabetes mellitus, systolic blood pressure, educational level), pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A), A Disintegrin and Metalloprotease 12 (ADAM-12), placental growth factor (PlGF), soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt-1), placental protein 13 (PP13), proteomics studies, Doppler ultrasonography, and many others [3,4,5,6,7,8].
The pathophysiological events that lead to the development of PE occur in response to abnormal placentation. Despite an adaptive response in the early phase, systemic circulation alterations and an imbalance of vasoactive factors occur. Trophoblast invasion failure, supposedly due to the interaction between exposure to risk, presence of polymorphic genes and several other factors (vasoactive and vascular remodeling proteins, thrombophilia, hypofibrinolysis, oxidative stress, lipid metabolism, endothelial injury and immunogenetic factors), deters physiological remodeling in the spiral arteriolar walls [9]. Changes in these physiological processes determine high resistance circulation in the terminal vascular territory of spiral arteries. Moreover, terminal circulation maintains its reactivity to vasomotor agents [10,11].
These hemodynamic changes occur before the clinical onset of PE and may be assessed by Doppler examination. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of vascular flows by ultrasonography is reliable and reproducible, having been reported to detect 75% of cases of preterm (before 37 weeks of gestation) preeclampsia, as part of a multidimensional ensemble of screening indicators [12].
Nevertheless, the translation of rich biomarker evidence into clinical practice remains difficult in low-resource settings. Unfortunately, countries with low expenditure for health do not have the resources to implement changes to common practice that incur additional cost. Impoverished countries require novel approaches to adapt existing evidence in medicine in order to benefit the largest possible number of people [13].
The uterine artery has been extensively evaluated in PE, indicating maternal vascular status by assessment of pulsatility index (PI), resistivity index (RI), and the presence of early diastolic notch. The persistence of early diastolic notch or abnormal velocity aspects of the blood flow have been associated with trophoblast invasion failure [14,15,16,17].
In this context, we explored the hypothesis that a basic, routinely performed procedure—first-trimester ultrasound monitoring—may provide a window of opportunity for screening for preeclampsia using a standalone biomarker, in pregnant women with known risk factors for the disorder. Therefore, we studied the potential of first trimester uterine artery Doppler ultrasonography for the early prediction of PE, in at-risk pregnant women.

2. Materials and Methods

A prospective longitudinal study of Caucasian pregnant women with risk factors for PE was waived by the institutional review board of the Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy in Cluj-Napoca. Study inclusion criteria required the presence of at least one of the following risk factors: primiparity; history of PE in previous pregnancies; family history of PE; chronic arterial hypertension; renal diseases; diabetes mellitus; systemic lupus erythematosus; antiphospholipid syndrome; thrombophilia; history of obstetric disorders (fetal hypotrophy, oligoamnios, perinatal mortality, premature separation of the normally implanted placenta); obesity (BMI > 30 kg/m2); maternal age (<18 years or >40 years). Exclusion criteria were infections, recent treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and corticosteroids (14 days prior to inclusion), chronic inflammatory diseases, multiple pregnancies, and fetal abnormalities.
All patients included in the study signed an informed consent. A standardized work chart was drawn up, which recorded anthropometric data, family history, personal physiological and pathological history, obstetric parameters (gestation, parity, date of the last menstruation, first fetal movements, probable date of birth, evolution of previous pregnancies and births), ultrasound parameters in the first trimester (measurement of craniocaudal length (CCL), presence of embryonic cardiac activity, Doppler examination of the uterine artery).
For the diagnosis of PE, we used criteria proposed by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: blood pressure values of at least 140/90 mm Hg (2 examinations between 6 h and 7 days apart), proteinuria above 30 mg/dl (2 urine samples collected between 4 and 6 h apart). Moderate PE were defined as asymptomatic, presenting hypertension with values below 160/110 mm Hg and proteinuria [18]. Hypertension and proteinuria was observed after 20 weeks of pregnancy in previously (prior to pregnancy) normotensive women and normalized by 12 weeks postpartum. At the end of the study, the patients were divided into two groups depending on the pregnancy evolution. The basic parameter monitored in our study was the pulsatility index (PI = S-D/Mean) and the presence of bilateral notch in the uterine artery.
The results obtained were correlated with the subsequent evolution of PE or its complications: eclampsia, PSNIP, HELLP syndrome, perinatal fetal distress (fetal hypotrophy, antepartum or intrapartum fetal death, Apgar score at birth < 7).

Doppler Ultrasound Procedures

Ultrasonography was performed using a General Electric Voluson 730 ultrasound machine, equipped with a convex abdominal probe of 2.0–5.0 MHz and an endovaginal probe (4–10 MHz). The procedure required an angle of less than 60° between the incident ultrasound beam and the studied vessel. Indicators were calculated on samples of minimum 5 waves with identical appearance and a clearly defined outline of the spectrum.
Uterine and fetal vessels were identified using color Doppler and power Doppler, then quantitative and qualitative evaluation was performed by pulsed Doppler. The velocimetric evaluation of the uterine artery reflects the hemodynamic particularities of the maternal side as part of the maternal–fetal–placental unit.
As part of routine ultrasound at 11–14 weeks, a sagittal section of the cervix was obtained. The probe was swept laterally until the paracervical plexus was identified. Color Doppler was used to identify the uterine artery at the cervico-corporeal junction. The measurements were performed at this point, before the branching of the uterine artery into the arcuate arteries. Pulsatility indices were measured bilaterally and the mean PI was calculated. The presence or the absence of bilateral early diastolic notch was also recorded. Abnormal uterine artery Doppler appearance was defined as the presence of bilateral notch and/or a mean PI > 95th percentile. For PI interpretation, we used the normative reference curves by age (first trimester 95th percentile value = 2.6).
A binary logit model was used to assess whether Doppler changes (PI > 95th percentile or bilateral notch) in the first and/or second trimester are correlated with the probability of development of PE. A t test was used for the study of the statistical significance of coefficients. A variable is considered to be statistically significant if the value of p < 0.05. The predictive power of the functions used was assessed by the ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristics) curve. Statistical processing was performed with the STATA 9.1 software (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Study Population

The study enrolled 120 pregnant women who met inclusion and exclusion criteria. Group I was comprised of 26 patients who developed PE (21.6%), out of which nine had severe and 17 had moderate forms. Of the nine pregnant women with the severe form of PE, four also had intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). Group II was comprised of 94 pregnant women who did not develop PE, following a physiological evolution of the pregnancy. Basic demographic characteristics of patients are available in Table 1.
We analyzed the predictive power of Doppler changes in the uterine artery in the first trimester of pregnancy (11–14 WA). The difference between the mean PI value between groups was statistically significant (p = 0.012). Of all pregnant women included in the study, on Doppler examination of the uterine artery performed in the first trimester of pregnancy, 16.6% (20/120) had a pathological PI (>2.6). Of these, 26.9% (7/26) belonged to group I, subsequently developing PE, and 13.8% (13/94) were assigned to group II, without developing this disease. The increased PI values in the first trimester are statistically significant (Table 2).

3.2. PI Alone as a First-Trimester Biomarker for Preeclampsia

For the cut-point c = 0.22 in which sensitivity is closest to specificity, prediction was correct for 16 of 26 patients, sensitivity being 61.5% among patients with PE. Among patients without PE, prediction was correct for 60 of 94 patients, specificity being 63.8%. On ultrasound examination in the first trimester of pregnancy, 45.8% (55/120) of patients in the studied group had bilateral notch. Of these, 61.5% (16/26) developed PE during pregnancy evolution, being included in group I, and 41.5% (39/94) did not develop this disease and were included in group II. An analysis of the global changes in the Doppler parameters studied in the first trimester (pathological PI and notch) shows that of the 120 pregnant women included in the study, 63 (52.5%) had altered Doppler. Of these, 17 patients belonged to group I, representing 65.4% of it.
The predictive power of PI values in the first trimester is moderate (Figure 1—AUROC = 0.6612). In conjunction with result of the linear logistic regression (Table 3), preeclampsia screening based only on PI values in the first trimester is not advised.

3.3. PI and Notch as First Trimester Biomarkers for Preeclampsia

For the cut-point c = 0.25 in which sensitivity is closest to specificity, among patients with PE, prediction was correct for 17/26 patients (sensitivity = 65.4%). Among patients without PE, prediction was correct for 62/94, specificity being 66.0%. For all patients, the percentage of correct predictions was 65.8%.
The predictive power of PI values and the presence of notch in the first trimester is slightly higher (Figure 2—area under the ROC curve (AUROC) = 0.6825) than when prediction is based on PI alone in the first trimester. In conjunction with the result of regression (Table 4), it shows that a suspicion of PE based only on PI values and the frequency of notch in the first trimester is risky.

4. Discussion

Of the 120 pregnant women included in the study, 26 (21.6%) developed PE during pregnancy. It should be noted that the presence of vascular pathology prior to pregnancy or obstetric accidents unexplained at the time of their occurrence increase the risk of PE. The results obtained demonstrated the presence of significant hemodynamic changes in uterine circulation in the first half of pregnancy, in accordance with other existing studies [19,20,21,22]. The trophoblast invades the decidual part of spiral arteries between 8 and 12 WA [23]. Changes in protein and steroid hormones can also play an important role in these vascular alterations [24]. In addition, intervillous circulation stabilization and marked changes in umbilical circulation occur during this early stage of pregnancy [25]. Our study allowed describing the differences in the sequence of changes in uterine artery Doppler waves in normal pregnancy and pregnancy complicated by hypertensive pathology. We monitored both the mean uterine artery PI and the presence of bilateral notch, which allowed us to analyze them separately. Early diastolic notch is characteristic of high resistance vessels and quantifies the vessel elasticity. It seems to be dependent on maternal–placental interactions, more probably reflecting the decidualization of spiral arteries [26].
On the other hand, uterine artery PI reflects total measurable distal vascular resistance and provides information about placental volume and the cross-section of placental vessels [27]. Recent studies have evidenced that predisposing maternal factors may induce functional atherosclerotic and vasoactive changes in spiral arteries, which are more or less transformed into uteroplacental arteries, resulting in preeclamptic syndrome [28,29,30].
Our study demonstrated that patients with high uterine artery PI and bilateral notch in the first trimester of pregnancy had the highest risk of developing PE. The data obtained in this study show the fact that in PE screening, in patients at high risk, Doppler examination of the uterine artery performed early at 11–14 WA allows the detection of pregnancies that will develop PE with a sensitivity of 61.5% and a specificity of 63.8% based on PI analysis. If the presence of bilateral notch is added to this parameter, the predictive power increases slightly (sensitivity = 65.4%; specificity = 66%). The results of our study are in agreement with other studies which, analyzing Doppler changes in the first trimester of pregnancy, reported similar detection rates of overall PE, with a higher prediction for early onset PE (<34 WA) [31,32,33,34,35,36,37].
One of the limitations of our study was the small number of patients. This is why only the prediction of overall PE was considered. Early detection of cases with a risk of developing PE will allow the application of prophylactic treatment. The cases detected in this way are those that will develop severe complications and could be further subjected to an intensive monitoring program.
Currently, the ability of individual markers to predict PE remains modest. The use of first trimester bioumoral parameters and uterine artery Doppler indices has the highest potential to become a screening method in low-resource settings. Adequate prospective studies using standardized methods are necessary in the future to evaluate the choice of parameters and strategies for an association aimed at obtaining the best predictive methods. Improving the knowledge of the pathogenesis of complications during pregnancy will facilitate the development of new prediction and prevention methods.

5. Conclusions

Uterine artery Doppler examination is an effective non-invasive screening test for the development of PE in pregnancies at risk, particularly appropriate in health systems with limited means of evaluating other biomarkers. Doppler evaluation in pregnancies with PE allows adequate monitoring, with a judicious choice of the time and way of delivery, a decrease in the number of emergency cesarean sections for fetal distress, and an improvement of perinatal outcomes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.O., M.G., R.C. and D.M.; methodology, M.O., M.R. and S.S.; validation, M.O., M.G. and D.M.; formal analysis, S.S., M.R. and C.B.; investigation, M.O., M.G., R.C., D.D., D.B., C.B. and M.R.; writing—original draft preparation, M.O., M.G., R.C. and D.D.; writing—review and editing, M.O., M.G., D.B., C.B., S.S., M.R., and D.M.; visualization, D.B., M.R. and C.B.; supervision, M.O., D.M.; project administration, D.D., M.O. and D.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Filipek, A.; Jurewicz, E. Preeclampsia—A disease of pregnant women. Postępy Biochemii 2018, 64, 229–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Mayrink, J.; Costa, M.L.; Cecatti, J.G. Preeclampsia in 2018: Revisiting concepts, physiopathology, and prediction. Sci. World J. 2018, 2018, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Myatt, L.; Roberts, J.M. Preeclampsia: Syndrome or disease? Curr. Hypertens. Rep. 2015, 17, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Poon, L.C.; Kametas, N.; Chelemen, T.; Leal, A.; Nicolaides, K.H. Maternal risk factors for hypertensive disorders in pregnancy: A multivariate approach. J. Hum. Hypertens. 2009, 24, 104–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Odibo, A.O.; Goetzinger, K.R.; Odibo, L.; Cahill, A.G.; Macones, G.A.; Nelson, D.M.; Dietzen, D.J. First-trimester prediction of preeclampsia using metabolomic biomarkers: A discovery phase study. Prenat. Diagn. 2011, 31, 990–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Kenny, L.C.; Black, M.A.; Poston, L.; Taylor, R.; Myers, J.E.; Baker, P.N.; McCowan, L.M.E.; Simpson, N.A.; Dekker, G.A.; Roberts, C.T.; et al. Early pregnancy prediction of preeclampsia in nulliparous women, combining clinical risk and biomarkers: The Screening for Pregnancy Endpoints (SCOPE) International Cohort Study. Hypertension 2014, 64, 644–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Andrietti, S.; Silva, M.; Wright, A.; Wright, D.; Nicolaides, K.H. Competing-risks model in screening for pre-eclampsia by maternal factors and biomarkers at 35–37 weeks’ gestation. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2016, 48, 72–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Tarca, A.L.; Romero, R.; Benshalom-Tirosh, N.; Than, N.G.; Gudicha, D.W.; Done, B.; Pacora, P.; Chaiworapongsa, T.; Panaitescu, B.; Tirosh, D.; et al. The prediction of early preeclampsia: Results from a longitudinal proteomics study. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0217273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chávez, J.; Cavalli, R.D.C. Preeclampsia: Vascular pathophysiological mechanism and the basis for early diagnosis and treatment. Rev. Bras. Ginecol. Obs. 2016, 38, 369–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Burton, G.J.; Redman, C.W.; Roberts, J.M.; Moffett, A. Pre-eclampsia: Pathophysiology and clinical implications. BMJ 2019, 366, l2381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Ayoubi, J.-M.; Uzan, J.; Carbonnel, M.; Piconne, O.; Asmar, R. Pre-eclampsia: Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. Vasc. Health Risk Manag. 2011, 7, 467–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. O’Gorman, N.; Nicolaides, K.H.; Poon, L.C. The use of ultrasound and other markers for early detection of preeclampsia. Women’s Health 2016, 12, 199–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Yapa, H.M.; Bärnighausen, T. Implementation science in resource-poor countries and communities. Implement. Sci. 2018, 13, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Espinoza, J.; Kusanovic, J.P.; Bahado-Singh, R.; Gervasi, M.T.; Romero, R.; Lee, W.; Vaisbuch, E.; Mazaki-Tovi, S.; Mittal, P.; Gotsch, F.; et al. Should bilateral uterine artery notching be used in the risk assessment for preeclampsia, small-for-gestational-age, and gestational hypertension? J. Ultrasound Med. 2010, 29, 1103–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Giordano, R.; Cacciatore, A.; Romano, M.; La Rosa, B.; Fonti, I.; Vigna, R. Uterine artery Doppler flow studies in obstetric practice. J. Prenat. Med. 2010, 4, 59–62. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. Park, Y.W.; Lim, J.C.; Kim, Y.-H.; Kwon, H.S. Uterine artery doppler velocimetry during mid-second trimester to predict complications of pregnancy based on unilateral or bilateral abnormalities. Yonsei Med. J. 2005, 46, 652–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Parry, S.; Sciscione, A.; Haas, D.M.; Grobman, W.A.; Iams, J.D.; Mercer, B.M.; Silver, R.M.; Simhan, H.N.; Wapner, R.J.; Wing, D.A.; et al. Role of early second-trimester uterine artery Doppler screening to predict small-for-gestational-age babies in nulliparous women. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2017, 217, 594.e1–594.e10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Sibai, B.M. Diagnosis and management of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. Obstet. Gynecol. 2003, 102, 181–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gomez, O.; Martinez, J.; Figueras, F. Uterine artery Doppler at 11–14 weeks of gestation to screen for hypertensive disorders and associated complications in an unselected population. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2005, 26, 490–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Becker, R.; Vonk, R.; Vollert, W.; Entezami, M. Doppler sonography of uterine arteries at 20–23 weeks: Risk assessment of adverse pregnancy outcome by quantification of impedance and notch. J. Périnat. Med. 2002, 30, 388–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Harrington, K.; Carpenter, R.G.; Goldfrad, C.; Campbell, S. Transvaginal Doppler ultrasound of the uteroplacental circulation in the early prediction of pre-eclampsia and intrauterine growth retardation. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1997, 104, 674–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Harrington, K.; Goldfrad, C.; Carpenter, R.; Campbell, S. Transvaginal uterine and umbilical artery Doppler examination of 12–16 weeks and the subsequent development of preeclampsia and intrauterine growth retardation. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. Off. J. Int. Soc. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 1997, 9, 94–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Pijnenborg, R.; Robertson, W.; Brosens, I.; Dixon, G. Review article: Trophoblast invasion and the establishment of haemochorial placentation in man and laboratory animals. Placenta 1981, 2, 71–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Jauniaux, E.; Jurkovic, D.; Campbell, S. In Vivo investigations of the anatomy and the physiology of early human placental circulations. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 1991, 1, 435–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Campbell, S. First-trimester screening for pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2005, 26, 487–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hafner, E.; Schuchter, K.; Metzenbauer, M.; Philipp, K. Uterine artery Doppler perfusion in the first and second pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2000, 16, 625–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Harrington, K.; Fayyad, A.; Thakur, V.; Aquilina, J. The value of uterine artery Doppler in the prediction of uteroplacental complications in multiparous women. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2003, 23, 50–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ness, R.B.; Roberts, J.M. Heterogeneous causes constituting the single syndrome of preeclampsia: A hypothesis and its implications. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1996, 175, 1365–1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Aardema, M.M.; Saro, M.; Lander, M.; De Wolf, H.; Oosterhof, H.; Aarnoudse, J.G. Second trimester Doppler ultrasound screening of the uterine arteries differentiates between subsequent normal and poor outcomes of hypertensive pregnancy: Two different pathophysiological entities? Clin. Sci. 2004, 106, 377–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Prefumo, F.; Sebire, N.J.; Thilaganathan, B. Decreased endovascular trophoblast invasion in first trimester pregnancies with high-resistance uterine artery Doppler indices. Hum. Reprod. 2004, 19, 206–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Martin, A.M.; Bindra, R.; Curcio, P.; Cicero, S.; Nicolaides, K.H. Screening for pre-eclampsia and fetal growth restriction by uterine artery Doppler at 11–14 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2001, 18, 583–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Pilalis, A.; Souka, A.P.; Antsaklis, P.; Basayiannis, K.; Benardis, P.; Haidopoulos, D.; Papantoniou, N.; Mesogitis, S.; Antsaklis, A. Screening for pre-eclampsia and small for gestational age fetuses at the 11–14 weeks scan by uterine artery Dopplers. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2007, 86, 530–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Hollis, B.; Prefumo, F.; Bhide, A.; Rao, S.; Thilaganathan, B. First-trimester uterine artery blood flow and birth weight. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2003, 22, 373–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gomez, O.; Figueras, F.; Martinez, J.M.; Del Rio, M.; Palacio, M.; Eixarch, E.; Puerto, B.; Coll, O.; Cararach, V.; Vanrell, J.A. Sequential changes in uterine artery blood flow pattern between the first and second trimesters of gestation in relation to pregnancy outcome. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2006, 28, 802–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Melchiorre, K.; Leslie, K.; Prefumo, F.; Bhide, A.; Thilaganathan, B. First-trimester uterine artery Doppler indices in the prediction of small-for-gestational age pregnancy and intrauterine growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2009, 33, 524–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Melchiorre, K.; Wormald, B.; Leslie, K.; Bhide, A.; Thilaganathan, B. First-trimester uterine artery Doppler indices in term and preterm pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2008, 32, 133–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Carbillon, L.; Uzan, M.; Largillière, C.; Perrot, N.; Tigaizin, A.; Paries, J.; Pharizien, I.; Uzan, S. Prospective evaluation of uterine artery flow velocity waveforms at 12–14 and 22–24 weeks of gestation in relation to pregnancy outcome and birth weight. Fetal Diagn. Ther. 2004, 19, 381–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve associated with the binary logit model. Dependent variable: PI in the first trimester. PI: pulsatility index.
Figure 1. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve associated with the binary logit model. Dependent variable: PI in the first trimester. PI: pulsatility index.
Medicina 56 00428 g001
Figure 2. ROC curve associated with the binary logit model. Explicative variables: PI and notch in the first trimester.
Figure 2. ROC curve associated with the binary logit model. Explicative variables: PI and notch in the first trimester.
Medicina 56 00428 g002
Table 1. Maternal and newborn characteristics of the study population.
Table 1. Maternal and newborn characteristics of the study population.
IndicatorN% Total
Blood Pressure
Normal9478.33%
≥160/110 mmHg97.50%
SBP 140–160 mmHg and DBP 90–110 mmHg1714.17%
Body Mass Index
≥302016.67%
<3010083.33%
Age (years)
18–295142.50%
30–406050.00%
over 4097.50%
Gestational Age at Birth (Weeks)
<34 weeks54.17%
34–37 weeks2520.83%
over 37 weeks9075.00%
Birth Weight (Grams)
0–150043.33%
1501–2000119.17%
2001–25003226.67%
2501–30004134.17%
3001–35002823.33%
3501–400032.50%
4001+10.83%
Apgar Score
343.33%
443.33%
586.67%
61310.83%
72420.00%
81714.17%
91613.33%
103428.33%
Table 2. Descriptive statistics for pulsatility index in the first trimester.
Table 2. Descriptive statistics for pulsatility index in the first trimester.
Group I (Preeclampsia)Group II (Control)
Mean2.251.97
Standard deviation0.540.49
Minimum0.920.87
Q11.871.69
Median2.401.93
Q32.622.23
Maximum3.303.04
t test (p value)0.012
Table 3. Results of binary logit regression, PI in the first trimester.
Table 3. Results of binary logit regression, PI in the first trimester.
CoefficientStd. ErrorZ *p Value
PI first trimester1.1290.4672.420.016
Const.−3.6641.044−3.510.000
* Regression coefficient divided by standard error. PI: pulsatility index.
Table 4. Results of binary logit regression, with the explicative variables PI and notch in the first trimester.
Table 4. Results of binary logit regression, with the explicative variables PI and notch in the first trimester.
CoefficientStd. ErrorZp Value
PI first trimester1.0560.4722.240.025
Notch first trimester0.7080.4661.520.128
Const.−3.8751.068−3.630.000

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Oancea, M.; Grigore, M.; Ciortea, R.; Diculescu, D.; Bodean, D.; Bucuri, C.; Strilciuc, S.; Rada, M.; Mihu, D. Uterine Artery Doppler Ultrasonography for First Trimester Prediction of Preeclampsia in Individuals at Risk from Low-Resource Settings. Medicina 2020, 56, 428. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/medicina56090428

AMA Style

Oancea M, Grigore M, Ciortea R, Diculescu D, Bodean D, Bucuri C, Strilciuc S, Rada M, Mihu D. Uterine Artery Doppler Ultrasonography for First Trimester Prediction of Preeclampsia in Individuals at Risk from Low-Resource Settings. Medicina. 2020; 56(9):428. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/medicina56090428

Chicago/Turabian Style

Oancea, Mihaela, Mihaela Grigore, Razvan Ciortea, Doru Diculescu, Diana Bodean, Carmen Bucuri, Stefan Strilciuc, Maria Rada, and Dan Mihu. 2020. "Uterine Artery Doppler Ultrasonography for First Trimester Prediction of Preeclampsia in Individuals at Risk from Low-Resource Settings" Medicina 56, no. 9: 428. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/medicina56090428

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop