Next Article in Journal
Diabetes Mellitus Promotes Smooth Muscle Cell Proliferation in Mouse Ureteral Tissue through the P-ERK/P-JNK/VEGF/PKC Signaling Pathway
Next Article in Special Issue
Validity of Clinical Assessment Using Clinical Symptoms and C-Reactive Protein for Therapeutic Response in Pyogenic Vertebral Osteomyelitis: Analysis Based on 18F-FDG-PET
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Blue Light Filtering Intraocular Lenses on Visual Perception
Previous Article in Special Issue
Prognostic Impact of Pretreatment 2-[18F]-FDG PET/CT Parameters in Primary Gastric DLBCL
Article

To Enhance or Not to Enhance? The Role of Contrast Medium 18F-FDG PET/CT in Recurrent Ovarian Carcinomas

1
Department of Nuclear Medicine, E.O. “Ospedali Galliera”, Mura delle Cappuccine 14, 16128 Genoa, Italy
2
IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, via Manzoni 56, 20089 Milan, Italy
3
Department of Medical Physics, E.O. “Ospedali Galliera”, 16128 Genoa, Italy
4
Department of Oncology, E.O. “Ospedali Galliera”, 16128 Genoa, Italy
5
Department of Radiology, E.O. “Ospedali Galliera, 16128 Genoa, Italy
6
Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, 1100 Lausanne, Switzerland
7
Academic Education, Research and Innovation Area, General Directorate, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
8
Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera italiana, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Shared first authorship.
Shared senior authorship.
Academic Editors: Domenico Albano and Francesco Bertagna
Received: 23 April 2021 / Revised: 29 May 2021 / Accepted: 31 May 2021 / Published: 1 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 2-[18F]-FDG PET/CT in Oncology: New Evidences and Future Perspectives)
Background and Objectives: 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/X-ray computed tomography (PET/CT) represents the mainstay diagnostic procedure for suspected ovarian cancer (OC) recurrence. PET/CT can be integrated with contrast medium and in various diagnostic settings; however, the effective benefit of this procedure is still debated. We aimed to compare the diagnostic capabilities of low-dose and contrast-enhanced PET/CT (PET/ldCT and PET/ceCT) in patients with suspected ovarian cancer relapse. Materials and Methods: 122 OC patients underwent both PET/ldCT and PET/ceCT. Two groups of nuclear medicine physicians and radiologists scored the findings as positive or negative. Clinical/radiological follow-up was used as ground truth. Sensitivity, specificity, negative/positive predictive value, and accuracy were calculated at the patient and the lesion level. Results: A total of 455 and 474 lesions were identified at PET/ldCT and PET/ceCT, respectively. At the lesion level, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were not significantly different between PET/ldCT and PET/ceCT (98%, 93.3%, 97.4%, 94.9%, and 96.9% for PET/ldCT; 99%, 95.5%, 98.3%, 97%, and 98% for PET/ceCT, p = ns). At the patient level, no significant differences in these parameters were identified (e.g., p = 0.22 and p = 0.35 for accuracy, in the peritoneum and lymph nodes, respectively). Smaller peritoneal/lymph node lesions close to physiological FDG uptake sources were found in the cases of misidentification by PET/ldCT. PET/ceCT prompted a change in clinical management in four cases (3.2%) compared to PET/ldCT. Conclusions: PET/ceCT does not perform better than PET/ldCT but can occasionally clarify doubtful peritoneal findings on PET/ldCT. To avoid unnecessary dose to the patient, PET/ceCT should be excluded in selected cases. View Full-Text
Keywords: PET/CT; contrast enhancement; ovarian cancer; FDG; relapse PET/CT; contrast enhancement; ovarian cancer; FDG; relapse
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Massollo, M.; Fiz, F.; Bottoni, G.; Ugolini, M.; Paparo, F.; Puppo, C.; Provinciali, N.; Iacozzi, M.; Altrinetti, V.; Cistaro, A.; Cabria, M.; DeCensi, A.; Treglia, G.; Piccardo, A. To Enhance or Not to Enhance? The Role of Contrast Medium 18F-FDG PET/CT in Recurrent Ovarian Carcinomas. Medicina 2021, 57, 561. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/medicina57060561

AMA Style

Massollo M, Fiz F, Bottoni G, Ugolini M, Paparo F, Puppo C, Provinciali N, Iacozzi M, Altrinetti V, Cistaro A, Cabria M, DeCensi A, Treglia G, Piccardo A. To Enhance or Not to Enhance? The Role of Contrast Medium 18F-FDG PET/CT in Recurrent Ovarian Carcinomas. Medicina. 2021; 57(6):561. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/medicina57060561

Chicago/Turabian Style

Massollo, Michela, Francesco Fiz, Gianluca Bottoni, Martina Ugolini, Francesco Paparo, Cristina Puppo, Nicoletta Provinciali, Massimiliano Iacozzi, Vania Altrinetti, Angelina Cistaro, Manlio Cabria, Andrea DeCensi, Giorgio Treglia, and Arnoldo Piccardo. 2021. "To Enhance or Not to Enhance? The Role of Contrast Medium 18F-FDG PET/CT in Recurrent Ovarian Carcinomas" Medicina 57, no. 6: 561. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/medicina57060561

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop