Next Article in Journal
Aging of the Nigrostriatal Tract in the Human Brain: A Diffusion Tensor Imaging Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Associations of Spiritual Well-Being and Hope with Health Anxiety Severity in Patients with Advanced Coronary Artery Disease
Previous Article in Journal
The Development of Large Radicular Cysts in Endodontically Versus Non-Endodontically Treated Maxillary Teeth
Previous Article in Special Issue
Existential Suffering in Palliative Care: An Existential Positive Psychology Perspective
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Perceived Positive and Negative Life Changes in Testicular Cancer Survivors

by
Sigrun Vehling
1,2,*,
Karin Oechsle
2,
Michael Hartmann
3,
Carsten Bokemeyer
2 and
Anja Mehnert-Theuerkauf
4
1
Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
2
Department of Oncology, Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation with Section of Pneumology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
3
Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
4
Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Medicina 2021, 57(9), 993; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57090993
Submission received: 6 September 2021 / Revised: 16 September 2021 / Accepted: 18 September 2021 / Published: 20 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Existential Suffering in Palliative and Supportive Care Settings)

Abstract

:
Background and objectives: Despite a generally good prognosis, testicular cancer can be a life-altering event. We explored perceived positive and negative life changes after testicular cancer in terms of frequency, demographic and disease-related predictors, and associations with depression and anxiety. Materials and methods: All testicular cancer survivors receiving follow-up care at two specialized outpatient treatment facilities were approached at follow-up visits or via mail. We assessed a total of N = 164 patients (66% participation rate, mean time since diagnosis: 11.6 years, SD = 7.4) by the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI, modified version assessing positive and negative changes for each of 21 items), Patient-Health-Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and Generalized-Anxiety-Disorder-Scale-7 (GAD-7). We conducted controlled multivariate regression analyses. Results: Most survivors (87%) reported at least one positive change (mean number: 7.2, SD = 5.0, possible range: 0–21). The most frequent perceived positive changes were greater appreciation of life (62%), changed priorities in life (62%), and ability rely on others (51%). At least one negative change was perceived by 33% (mean number of changes: 1.1, SD = 2.5). Negative changes were most frequent for decreases in self-reliance (14%), personal strength (11%), and ability to express emotions (9%). A higher socioeconomic status was associated with more positive changes (β = 0.25, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.42); no other association with demographic and disease-related predictors emerged. While positive life changes were not associated with depression (β = −0.05, 95% CI −0.17 to 0.07) and anxiety (β = 0.00, 95% CI −0.13 to 0.13), more negative life changes were significantly associated with higher depression (β = 0.15, 95% CI −0.03 to 0.27) and anxiety (β = 0.23, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.36). There was no significant interaction of positive and negative changes on depression or anxiety. Conclusions: Although positive life changes after testicular cancer are common, a significant number of survivors perceive negative changes in life domains that have been primarily investigated in terms of personal growth. Early identification of and psychosocial support for patients who perceive predominantly negative changes may contribute to prevention of prolonged symptoms of anxiety and depression.

1. Introduction

Many survivors report that, despite its stressfulness, the diagnosis and treatment of cancer has also had positive consequences on their lives [1,2]. Frequent areas of such perceived positive changes are one’s sense of relatedness with others, appreciation of life, and ability to cope with challenges in life [3], often accompanied by a sense of personal growth as a result of having gone through cancer-related adversity.
From a conceptual perspective, the perceived positive changes in the face of a stressful life event can be understood as an outcome of successful psychological adaptation efforts. For example, meaning-making processes can promote the integration of stressful experiences with previously held beliefs and life goals [4]. Under the threat of losing one’s life, close relationships, autonomy, and health due to a serious illness, survivors may reevaluate what is important in their lives and make fundamental changes to their private and vocational relationships. At the same time, perceived positive changes have been understood as adaptive illusions that help individuals to cope with the losses and negative consequences of a critical life event by positive reappraisal and benefit-finding [5,6].
Despite a generally good prognosis, the diagnosis and treatment of testicular cancer confronts individuals at an often earlier-than-expected life phase with long-term side effects of chemotherapy treatment, sexual dysfunction, a changed body image, hospitalization, and potential death [7]. Although perceived positive life changes and cancer-related growth have been documented in this population [8,9], many testicular cancer survivors find it difficult to return to normality, and experience ongoing negative consequences for their quality of life and increased levels of psychological distress [10,11]. To our knowledge, no previous quantitative study has analyzed the extent and frequency of domains of perceived life changes in testicular cancer survivors so far.
Earlier studies show no or only small associations of perceived positive life changes and post-traumatic growth with lower psychological distress, including depression and anxiety, while negative changes were highly correlated with worse adjustment outcomes [12,13]. This finding may relate to the different psychological underpinnings of perceived positive change, but also to assessment and methodological issues [5]. Researchers have thus turned away from the exclusive study of positive personality change after stressful life events, and increasingly focus on coexisting positive and negative changes in domains of potential personal growth [13,14]. In this regard, modifications of assessment procedures have been proposed which allow individuals to rate positive or negative changes in each life domain covered by the particular instrument [15]. Such modified methods also allow for the study of interaction effects of perceived positive and negative changes on adaptation outcomes. A higher level of positive change may buffer the detrimental effect of perceived negative changes [13]. According to this idea, distress may be lowest in individuals with high positive and low to medium negative changes, and highest in individuals with high negative and little or no positive changes.
In the present study, we aimed to investigate
(1)
the frequency and extent of perceived positive and negative life changes in survivors of testicular cancer,
(2)
the extent to which sociodemographic and disease-related variables are associated with perceived positive and negative changes,
(3)
the association of positive and negative life changes with depression and anxiety, and
(4)
whether positive life changes moderated the association of negative life changes with depression and anxiety.

2. Methods

2.1. Participants and Procedures

In this cross-sectional study, we enrolled all adult male testicular germ cell tumor survivors receiving routine follow-up care at the uro-oncological outpatient ward of the University Medical Center within the University Cancer Center Hamburg and a specialized private practice in Hamburg, Germany over one year. Eligible patients had completed anti-tumor treatment for at least 12 months prior without any further evidence of disease. Exclusion criteria were severe cognitive or physical impairment and insufficient proficiency in German to complete questionnaires and provide written informed consent. All patients who fulfilled the study inclusion criteria were contacted by their treating germ cell tumor specialist either in a personal conversation or via mail and were asked to complete a set of questionnaires. Patients provided written informed consent prior to study inclusion. The study was approved by the research ethics committee of the medical association in Hamburg, Germany (reference number PV4171).

2.2. Measures

Demographic data were collected from patients using a standardized self-report questionnaire. Disease-related characteristics were obtained from medical charts.
We assessed perceived positive and negative life changes using a modified version of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI) [16]. The original PTGI asks individuals to rate the extent to which life changes occurred as a result of a specific stressful event, which is cancer diagnosis in the present study. Its 21 items belong to five subscales: new possibilities, relating to others, personal strength, spiritual change, and appreciation of life. Following the suggestion of Tennen and Affleck [15], we replaced each original item by its analogous current standing version (e.g., “I have a greater sense of closeness with others” was replaced by “I have a sense of closeness with others”). Perceived positive or negative life changes with respect to each current standing item were assessed by a separate change item (“This has changed due to my illness”). Response options for change items were −2 = high negative change, −1 = low negative change, 0 = no change, +1 = low positive change, +2 = high positive change. The positive change count refers to the total number of positive changes and may range from 0 to 21. The total positive change score refers to the sum of positive change ratings and may range from 0 to 42. The procedure is analogous for negative change count and total positive change score. Higher scores indicate higher positive or negative change.
We assessed depression using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) [17]. The PHQ-9 is a self-report measure of depression according to DSM-IV/V criteria on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). Total scores may range from 0 to 27. Scores ≥10 indicate at least moderate depression.
We assessed anxiety with the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener-7 (GAD-7) [18]. The scale measures the frequency of symptoms of generalized anxiety disorder during the past two weeks according to DSM-IV/V criteria on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). GAD-7 scores range from 0 to 21. Scores ≥10 indicate at least moderate anxiety.
We assessed physical symptom burden with the self-report Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale—Short Form (MSAS-SF) [19]. The scale assesses the presence of 28 common physical symptoms in patients with cancer over the past week. The symptom count refers to the total number of symptoms reported and may range from 0 to 28.
We calculated the multidimensional socioeconomic status index (SES) as an aggregate score of school and professional education level, occupational status, and income. Calculation followed the standardized procedure applied by the German Health Survey [20]. SES scores range from 3 to 21. A low SES refers to scores ≤8, a middle SES to scores between 9 and 14, and a high SES to scores ≥15.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

We used R version 4.1.0 for all analyses [21]. We calculated descriptive statistics including means, standard deviations, and frequencies for demographic and disease-related characteristics, perceived positive and negative life changes, depression, and anxiety. Group differences were calculated by t-tests and χ²-tests. Cohen’s d was used as effect size for group differences. We calculated Pearson correlations among predictor and dependent variables to study bivariate correlations.
To analyze the association of positive and negative life change with depression and anxiety, we conducted a multiple linear regression analysis that controlled for age at diagnosis, cohabitation, children, socioeconomic status, time since diagnosis, metastatic disease, relapse, and physical symptom count. To test whether negative life change moderated the association of positive life change with depression and anxiety, we added an interaction term as a predictor to the regression model in a subsequent step. The interaction term was calculated by multiplying the standardized values of positive and negative life change scores.

3. Results

3.1. Sample Characteristics and Frequency of Perceived Positive and Negative Life Changes

Of the 255 eligible patients approached, 61.1% (N = 164) completed the questionnaire. Participants and non-participants did not differ in terms of age (d = 0.24, p = 0.18), years since diagnosis (d = 0.16, p = 0.39), and presence of metastases at first diagnosis (d = 0.00, p = 0.98). Table 1 shows demographic and disease-related characteristics as well as descriptive information for dependent variables.
Survivors reported a mean number of 7.2 (SD = 5.0) positive changes out of 21 possible positive changes (Table 2). Positive changes in at least one life domain after testicular cancer were reported by 87% of the survivors. As shown in Table 3, patients most frequently experienced positive changes in the following domains: appreciation of life in general (62%) and of each day (52%), knowing what is important in life (62%), and perceived ability to accept needing (43%) and to count on others in times of trouble (51%). Negative changes were remarkably less frequent, with 33% reporting at least one negative change after testicular cancer. The mean number of negative changes was M = 1.1 (SD = 2.5). Patients reported negative changes most frequently for their sense of self-reliance (13%), personal strength (11%), and ability to express emotions (9%).
Table 4 shows the co-occurrence of subgroups reporting no, low, and high numbers of positive and negative changes at the same time. N = 19 (11.6%) survivors reported no changes at all. N = 51 (31%) reported both positive and negative changes. This corresponded to 94% of those with negative changes reporting also positive change, and 36% of those with positive changes reporting simultaneous negative changes.
The mean total positive change score, which accounts for the total number (0–21) and degree of positive and negative changes perceived in each domain (0–2), was 9.6 (SD = 6.7, range 0–27, possible range 0–42). The mean total negative change score was 1.5 (SD = 4.2, range = 0–38). The correlation of positive and negative change scores was r = −0.12 (p = 0.39).

3.2. Sociodemographic and Disease-Related Predictors of Perceived Positive and Negative Life Changes

All following analyses were performed using the total positive and negative change scores. Table 5 shows that in the multivariate model combining all predictors, only a higher socioeconomic status was significantly associated with a higher level of perceived positive changes. None of the other assessed demographic and disease-related variables showed any significant association with positive or negative changes.

3.3. Association of Perceived Positive and Negative Life Changes with Depression and Anxiety

Table 6 shows bivariate correlations between positive and negative life changes and outcome variables. Table 7 shows regression weights for the association of positive and negative life changes with depression and anxiety, controlled for demographic and disease-related variables. A higher level of positive life changes was not associated with depression (β = −0.05, 95% CI −0.17 to 0.07) or anxiety levels (β = 0.00, 95% CI −0.13 to 0.13). Yet a higher level of negative changes was significantly associated with higher levels of depression (β = 0.15, 95% CI −0.03 to 0.27) and anxiety (β = 0.23, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.36), even when the impact of age, gender, physical symptoms, and other important confounders was controlled. There was no significant interaction of positive and negative life changes on outcome variables when confounders were controlled.

4. Discussion

The present study analyzed perceived positive and negative life changes among 164 testicular cancer survivors (mean age at diagnosis: 33 years, mean time since diagnosis: 21 years, metastatic disease: 48%). We used a modified version of the posttraumatic growth inventory to assess positive and negative subjective life changes across 21 domains. While almost two thirds of participants reported positive changes in six or more life domains, one third experienced at least one negative change. Of those experiencing negative changes, 94% experienced simultaneous positive change.
The high percentage of survivors reporting positive life changes is consistent with studies using the original posttraumatic growth inventory in cancer patients [22]. Qualitative studies in testicular cancer survivors have documented, consistent with the present results, a variety of perceived positive outcomes [23,24]. The present lack of a relationship between a higher level of positive change and lower psychological distress is in line with earlier studies [13,25]. One possible explanation is that the perception and report of positive changes may reflect efforts to cope with a psychologically demanding situation and not necessarily actual personality change. Positive reappraisal of negative implications is known to play a central role in adaptation to severe illness [26]. This is also supported by findings in testicular cancer patients that positive changes were associated with effective goal adjustment efforts and approach-oriented coping [23]. A study of Park et al. [27] has further shown that positive changes reported by young and middle aged survivors were not directly associated with actual changes.
Although negative consequences after testicular cancer have been mostly studied in terms of long-term side-effects, our results suggest that perceived negative changes in psychological domains play an important role for the subjective experience of survivors. Consistent with the present results, testicular cancer survivors were found to experience the diagnosis as a disruptive event that led to an increased sense of vulnerability and impaired sense of connectedness with significant others [28]. In an interview study, many young adult cancer survivors also reported coexisting positive and negative changes [29]. The surprising result that negative changes were, contrary to studies in other cancer populations [13,30], not associated with younger age, metastasized disease, shorter time since diagnosis, or physical symptom burden in the present study, may further strengthen the relevance of psychological resources for coping with testicular cancer over objective prognostic and treatment-related factors [24].
The significant contribution of perceived negative life changes to depression and anxiety beyond physical symptom burden and other established confounders provides further support for the idea that a higher number of negative changes might increase the vulnerability for prolonged psychological distress [13]. That negative changes were most frequent in areas of self-reliance and emotional expression may suggest increased coping demands for patients whose regulation of self-worth is closely tied to physical or emotional strength, which may relate to avoiding expression of emotional states and need for independence in close relationships. Clinicians may ask survivors whether they feel distressed by an ongoing sense of weakness or disconnect from significant others in order to explore a potential need for extended psychosocial support beyond routine survivorship care [7]. Such support may provide an in-depth elaboration of life areas potentially affected by testicular cancer including the interconnection of fertility, sexuality, self-worth and relationships [28]. It is important to note that patients reporting a high number of negative changes may have developed distorted negative perceptions as a symptom of clinical depression, requiring treatment according to guidelines.
Our study is limited by its cross-sectional design, a rather small sample size, and high heterogeneity with respect to age at diagnosis and time since diagnosis. Moreover, our assessment did not cover the possibility of simultaneous positive and negative change in the same domain, i.e., survivors might experience an increased sense of reliability of certain others (positive change), but feel disappointed by others (negative change). The newly developed Posttraumatic Growth and Posttraumatic Depreciation Inventory-Expanded version (PTGDI-X, [14]) offers a validated assessment of positive and negative perceived changes after stressful life events.

5. Conclusions

Although positive life changes were common, one third of survivors perceived negative life changes after testicular cancer. Thus, a significant subgroup reports negative changes in life domains that are usually investigated in terms of potential personal growth after cancer. Domains with negative changes included depreciated feelings of personal strength, self-reliance, and ability for emotional expression. A higher number of negative changes may increase the risk for prolonged psychological distress. Objective medical factors were not associated with the perception of positive or negative changes. Future longitudinal studies should therefore investigate the specific psychological processes that lead to the perception of positive and negative illness-related changes over the course of treatment and survivorship of testicular cancer. Early identification of patients who perceive predominantly negative changes may contribute to prevention of prolonged symptoms of anxiety and depression.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: S.V., K.O., A.M.-T.; Data curation: S.V., K.O., A.M.-T.; Formal analysis: S.V.; Funding acquisition: A.M.-T.; Methodology: S.V., K.O., A.M.-T.; Project administration: S.V., K.O., A.M.-T.; Resources: K.O., M.H., C.B., A.M.-T.; Writing—original draft: all authors, Writing—review & editing: all authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Donor’s Association for the Promotion of Humanities and Sciences in Germany Vehling was supported by the Max-Eder junior research group program of the German Cancer Aid [grant number 70113404], within which parts of the present work were accomplished.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved by the research ethics committee of the medical association in Hamburg, Germany (reference number PV4171).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

MMean
SDStandard deviation
CIConfidence interval
PTGIPosttraumatic Growth Inventory
PHQ-9Patient-Health-Questionnaire-9
GAD-7Generalized-Anxiety-Disorder-Scale-7
MSAS-SFMemorial Symptom Assessment Scale—Short Form
SESSocioeconomic status index

References

  1. Casellas-Grau, A.; Ochoa, C.; Ruini, C. Psychological and clinical correlates of posttraumatic growth in cancer: A systematic and critical review. Psycho-Oncology 2017, 26, 2007–2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zebrack, B.; Kwak, M.; Salsman, J.; Cousino, M.; Meeske, K.; Aguilar, C.; Embry, L.; Block, R.; Hayes-Lattin, B.; Cole, S. The relationship between posttraumatic stress and posttraumatic growth among adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer patients. Psycho-Oncology 2014, 24, 162–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Park, C.L. Overview of theoretical perspectives. In Medical Illness and Positive Life Change: Can Crisis Lead to Personal Transformation; Park, C.L., Lechner, S.C., Antoni, M.H., Stanton, A.L., Eds.; American Psychological Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2009; pp. 11–30. [Google Scholar]
  4. Park, C.L. Making sense of the meaning literature: An integrative review of meaning making and its effects on adjustment to stressful life events. Psychol. Bull. 2010, 136, 257–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Infurna, F.J.; Jayawickreme, E. Fixing the Growth Illusion: New Directions for Research in Resilience and Posttraumatic Growth. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 2019, 28, 152–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sumalla, E.C.; Ochoa, C.; Blanco, I. Posttraumatic growth in cancer: Reality or illusion? Clin. Psychol. Rev. 2009, 29, 24–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Alexis, O.; Adeleye, A.O.; Worsley, A.J. Men’s experiences of surviving testicular cancer: An integrated literature review. J. Cancer Surviv. 2019, 14, 284–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Fleer, J.; Hoekstra, H.J.; Sleijfer, D.; Tuinman, M.A.; Hoekstra-Weebers, J.E.H.M. The Role of Meaning in the Prediction of Psychosocial Well-being of Testicular Cancer Survivors. Qual. Life Res. 2006, 15, 705–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, A.W.-T.; Hoyt, M.A. Cancer-related masculinity threat in young adults with testicular cancer: The moderating role of benefit finding. Anxiety Stress. Coping 2020, 33, 207–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Schepisi, G.; De Padova, S.; De Lisi, D.; Casadei, C.; Meggiolaro, E.; Ruffilli, F.; Rosti, G.; Lolli, C.; Ravaglia, G.; Conteduca, V.; et al. Psychosocial Issues in Long-Term Survivors of Testicular Cancer. Front. Endocrinol. 2019, 10, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Smith, A.B.; Rutherford, C.; Butow, P.; Olver, I.; Luckett, T.; Grimison, P.; Toner, G.; Stockler, M.; King, M. A systematic review of quantitative observational studies investigating psychological distress in testicular cancer survivors. Psycho-Oncology 2018, 27, 1129–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Marziliano, A.; Ma, M.T.; Moyer, A. The relationship between post-traumatic stress and post-traumatic growth in cancer patients and survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psycho-Oncology 2020, 29, 604–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Park, C.L.; Blank, T.O. Associations of positive and negative life changes with well-being in young and middle-aged adult cancer survivors. Psychol. Health 2012, 27, 412–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Taku, K.; Tedeschi, R.G.; Shakespeare-Finch, J.; Krosch, D.; David, G.; Kehl, D.; Grunwald, S.; Romeo, A.; Di Tella, M.; Kamibeppu, K.; et al. Posttraumatic growth (PTG) and posttraumatic depreciation (PTD) across ten countries: Global validation of the PTG-PTD theoretical model. Pers. Individ. Differ. 2021, 169, 110222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tennen, H.; Affleck, G. Assessing positive life change: In search of meticulous methods. In Medical Illness and Positive Life Change: Can Crisis Lead to Personal Transformation; Park, C.L., Lechner, S.C., Antoni, M.H., Stanton, A.L., Eds.; American Psychological Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2009; pp. 31–49. [Google Scholar]
  16. Maercker, A.; Langner, R. Persönliche Reifung (Personal Growth) durch Belastungen und Traumata: Validierung zweier deutschsprachiger Fragebogenversionen. Diagnostica 2001, 47, 153–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Löwe, B.; Kroenke, K.; Herzog, W.; Gräfe, K. Measuring depression outcome with a brief self-report instrument: Sensitivity to change of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). J. Affect. Disord. 2004, 81, 61–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Löwe, B.; Decker, O.; Müller, S.; Brähler, E.; Schellberg, D.; Herzog, W.; Herzberg, P.Y. Validation and Standardization of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD-7) in the General Population. Med. Care 2008, 46, 266–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Chang, V.T.; Hwang, S.S.; Feuerman, M.; Kasimis, B.S.; Thaler, H.T. The memorial symptom assessment scale short form (MSAS-SF). Cancer 2000, 89, 1162–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lampert, T.; Kroll, L.; Muters, S.; Stolzenberg, H. Messung des sozioökonomischen Status in der Studie zur Gesundheit Erwachsener in Deutschland (DEGS1). Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundh. Gesundh. 2013, 56, 631–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. R Foundation for Statistical Computing; R Development Core Team R. A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Development Core Team R: Vienna, Austria, 2008; ISBN 3-900051-07-0. [Google Scholar]
  22. Wu, X.; Kaminga, A.C.; Dai, W.; Deng, J.; Wang, Z.; Pan, X.; Liu, A. The prevalence of moderate-to-high posttraumatic growth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Affect. Disord. 2019, 243, 408–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Hoyt, M.A.; Gamarel, K.E.; Saigal, C.S.; Stanton, A.L. Goal Navigation, Approach-Oriented Coping, and Adjustment in Young Men with Testicular Cancer. Ann. Behav. Med. 2016, 50, 572–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Matheson, L.; Boulton, M.; Lavender, V.; Protheroe, A.; Brand, S.; Wanat, M.; Watson, E. Dismantling the present and future threats of testicular cancer: A grounded theory of positive and negative adjustment trajectories. J. Cancer Surviv. 2015, 10, 194–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Schroevers, M.J.; Kraaij, V.; Garnefski, N. Cancer patients’ experience of positive and negative changes due to the illness: Relationships with psychological well-being, coping, and goal reengagement. Psycho-Oncology 2011, 20, 165–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Folkman, S. Stress, coping, and hope. Psycho-Oncology 2010, 19, 901–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Park, C.L.; Sinnott, S.M. Testing the Validity of Self-Reported Posttraumatic Growth in Young Adult Cancer Survivors. Behav. Sci. 2018, 8, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Petrella, A.R.; Sabiston, C.M.; O’Rourke, R.H.; Mina, D.S.; Matthew, A.G. Exploring the Survivorship Experiences and Preferences for Survivorship Care Following Testicular Cancer: A Mixed Methods Study. J. Psychosoc. Oncol. Res. Pract. 2020, 2, e038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hauken, M.A.; Grue, M.; Dyregrov, A. “It’s been a life-changing experience!” A qualitative study of young adult cancer survivors’ experiences of the coexistence of negative and positive outcomes after cancer treatment. Scand. J. Psychol. 2019, 60, 577–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rowlands, I.J.; Lee, C.; Janda, M.; Nagle, C.M.; Obermair, A.; Webb, P.M.; Australian National Endometrial Cancer Study Group. Predicting positive and negative impacts of cancer among long-term endometrial cancer survivors. Psycho-Oncology 2013, 22, 1963–1971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Demographic and disease related sample characteristics and descriptive statistics for dependent variables (N = 164).
Table 1. Demographic and disease related sample characteristics and descriptive statistics for dependent variables (N = 164).
VariableN%
Age, mean (SD, range)44.4 (9.6, 24–77)
Age at diagnosis, mean (SD, range)32.8 (9.5)
Cohabiting13683
Children8652
Education
Elementary school (8–9 years)1710
Junior high school (10 years)4025
High school (12–13 years)2314
University8451
Socioeconomic status index a, mean (SD)13.0 (3.5)
Low2416
Middle7751
High5134
Time since diagnosis, mean (SD)11.6 (7.4)
1–5 years5030
6–10 years3421
11–15 years3320
16–20 years2717
≥21 years2012
Disease stage
Localized disease8552
Metastatic disease7948
Disease phase
First disease13683
Relapse2817
Medical treatments
Chemotherapy12476
Surgery16098
Radiotherapy3823
Physical symptom count, mean (SD) b4.5 (4.3)
Depression, mean (SD) c3.6 (3.6)
Low to mild15192.1
Moderate to high137.9
Anxiety, mean (SD) d3.3 (3.3)
Low to mild15493.9
Moderate to high106.1
a Possible range: 3–21. b Possible range: 0–28. c Possible range: 0–27. d Possible range: 0–21.
Table 2. Number of perceived positive and negative life changes for 21 life domains (N = 164).
Table 2. Number of perceived positive and negative life changes for 21 life domains (N = 164).
Number Of Positive Life ChangesNumber of Negative Life Changes
N%N%
0 (no change)2213.411067.1
1–5 domains4317.74628.0
6–10 domains5642.763.7
11–15 domains3219.510.6
16–21 domains116.710.6
Mean (SD)7.2 (5.0)1.1 (2.5)
Table 3. Frequency of patients reporting positive and negative change for each life domain (N = 164).
Table 3. Frequency of patients reporting positive and negative change for each life domain (N = 164).
Domains of Positive Life ChangesDomains of Negative Life Changes
N% N%
Priorities about what is important10262.2Self-reliance2213.4
Appreciation for value of life10161.6Personal strength1811.0
Appreciate each day8551.8Express emotions148.5
Count on people in times of trouble8350.6Understand spiritual matters137.9
Accept needing others7042.7Strength of religious faith106.1
Do better things with life6740.9Handle difficulties106.1
Accept the way things work out6740.9Priorities about what is important95.5
Handle difficulties6640.2Establish new path for life84.9
Closeness with others6338.4Do better things with life84.9
Compassion for others6035.9Develop new interests74.3
Put effort into relationships5936.0Appreciation for value of life74.3
Change things that need changing5030.5Change things that need changing74.3
Personal strength5030.5Goodness of others74.3
Express emotions4628.0Count on people in times of trouble63.7
Establish new path for life4628.0Accept the way things work out53.0
Develop new interests4125.0Compassion for others53.0
Self-reliance4125.0Put effort into relationships53.0
Goodness of others3622.0Accept needing others53.0
New opportunities available2213.4New opportunities available42.4
Understand spiritual matters2213.4Closeness with others42.4
Strength of religious faith1710.4Appreciate each day10.6
Table 4. Co-occurrence of positive and negative life changes (N = 164).
Table 4. Co-occurrence of positive and negative life changes (N = 164).
Number of Positive Life Changes
Number of Negative Life ChangesNo Change (0)Low (1–5)High (6–21)
No change (0)19 (11.6%)27 (16.5%)64 (39.0%)
Low (1–5)2 (1.2%)12 (7.3%)32 (19.5%)
High (6–21)1 (0.6%)4 (2.4%)3 (1.8%)
Table 5. Multiple linear regression model analyzing predictors of positive and negative life change scores (N = 164).
Table 5. Multiple linear regression model analyzing predictors of positive and negative life change scores (N = 164).
Positive Life ChangeNegative Life Change
β a95% CIpβ a95% CIp
Age at diagnosis−0.13−0.31 to 0.060.170.17−0.02 to 0.350.08
Cohabitation b−0.09−0.26 to 0.080.31−0.06−0.24 to 0.110.49
Children b0.09−0.08 to 0.270.28−0.01−0.19 to 0.170.92
Socioeconomic status0.260.09 to 0.440.0030.02−0.16 to 0.200.84
Time since diagnosis
(>10 years vs. ≤10 years)
0.08−0.10 to 0.250.400.06−0.12 to 0.250.52
Metastatic vs. localized disease0.09−0.08 to 0.260.270.06−0.12 to 0.230.52
Physical symptom count0.07−0.09 to 0.240.380.11−0.06 to 0.290.21
a Standardized regression coefficients. b 0 = No, 1 = Yes; Total variation accounted for: Positive life change: adj. R² = 0.07, Negative life change: R² = 0.00. Significant β-values are printed bold.
Table 6. Intercorrelations of positive and negative life changes, depression, and anxiety (N = 164).
Table 6. Intercorrelations of positive and negative life changes, depression, and anxiety (N = 164).
Negative Life Change aDepressionAnxiety
Positive life change a−0.12−0.070.00
Negative life change a-0.50 ***0.50 ***
Depression--0.77 ***
a Total change score. *** p ≤ 0.001.
Table 7. Impact of positive and negative change on depression and anxiety (N = 164).
Table 7. Impact of positive and negative change on depression and anxiety (N = 164).
DepressionAnxiety
β a95% CIpβ a95% CIp
Model 1: Positive life change
Age at diagnosis−0.04−0.17 to 0.090.57−0.17−0.31 to −0.030.02
Cohabitation b−0.16−0.29 to −0.040.009−0.05−0.18 to 0.090.50
Children b0.130.01 to 0.250.030.170.04 to 0.300.01
Socioeconomic status−0.01−0.14 to 0.110.840.07−0.06 to 0.210.28
Time since diagnosis
(>10 years vs. ≤10 years)
−0.06−0.19 to 0.060.33−0.13−0.27 to 0.000.06
Metastatic vs. localized disease−0.10−0.22 to 0.020.11−0.16−0.29 to −0.030.02
Physical symptom count0.710.59 to 0.83<0.0010.680.55 to 0.81<0.001
Positive life change−0.05−0.17 to 0.070.400.00−0.13 to 0.130.97
Model 2: Negative life change
Age at diagnosis−0.02−0.15 to 0.100.70−0.16−0.29 to −0.020.02
Cohabitation b−0.14−0.26 to −0.020.02−0.02−0.14 to 0.110.79
Children b0.130.01 to 0.250.030.180.05 to 0.300.01
Socioeconomic status−0.01−0.13 to 0.110.880.10−0.02 to 0.230.11
Time since diagnosis
(>10 years vs. ≤10 years)
−0.08−0.21 to 0.040.20−0.16−0.29 to −0.030.02
Metastatic vs. localized disease−0.010−0.22 to 0.020.10−0.16−0.28 to −0.030.01
Physical symptom count0.660.54 to 0.79<0.0010.610.48 to 0.74<0.001
Negative life change0.15−0.03 to 0.270.020.230.11 to 0.36<0.001
Model 3: Interaction of positive and negative life change
Age at diagnosis−0.03−0.15 to 0.100.67−0.16−0.29 to −0.030.02
Cohabitation b−0.14−0.27 to −0.020.02−0.02−0.15 to 0.100.72
Children b0.130.01 to 0.260.030.190.06 to 0.310.004
Socioeconomic status0.00−0.13 to 0.130.990.11−0.03 to 0.240.11
Time since diagnosis
(>10 years vs. ≤10 years)
−0.08−0.20 to 0.050.22−0.16−0.29 to −0.030.02
Metastatic vs. localized disease−0.10−0.22 to 0.020.11−0.15−0.27 to −0.030.02
Physical symptom count0.670.55 to 0.79<0.0010.600.47 to 0.73<0.001
Positive life change−0.04−0.16 to 0.080.440.00−0.12 to 0.130.47
Negative life change0.160.03 to 0.3000.160.200.05 to 0.34<0.001
Positive × negative life change (interaction effect)0.03−0.11 to 0.160.69−0.11−0.25 to 0.040.14
a Standardized regression coefficients. b 0 = No, 1 = Yes. Significant β-values are printed bold.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vehling, S.; Oechsle, K.; Hartmann, M.; Bokemeyer, C.; Mehnert-Theuerkauf, A. Perceived Positive and Negative Life Changes in Testicular Cancer Survivors. Medicina 2021, 57, 993. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/medicina57090993

AMA Style

Vehling S, Oechsle K, Hartmann M, Bokemeyer C, Mehnert-Theuerkauf A. Perceived Positive and Negative Life Changes in Testicular Cancer Survivors. Medicina. 2021; 57(9):993. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/medicina57090993

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vehling, Sigrun, Karin Oechsle, Michael Hartmann, Carsten Bokemeyer, and Anja Mehnert-Theuerkauf. 2021. "Perceived Positive and Negative Life Changes in Testicular Cancer Survivors" Medicina 57, no. 9: 993. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/medicina57090993

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop