Next Article in Journal
Human Leptospirosis on Reunion Island: Past and Current Burden
Next Article in Special Issue
The Impact of Climate Change on Ozone-Related Mortality in Sydney
Previous Article in Journal
Poultry Farm Vulnerability and Risk of Avian Influenza Re-Emergence in Thailand
Previous Article in Special Issue
Health in the New Scenarios for Climate Change Research
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 11
Issue 1
10.3390/ijerph110100952
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparison of UTCI with Other Thermal Indices in the Assessment of Heat and Cold Effects on Cardiovascular Mortality in the Czech Republic

by
Aleš Urban
1,2,* and
Jan Kyselý
1
1
Institute of Atmospheric Physics AS CR, Boční II 1401, 141 31 Prague 4, Czech Republic
2
Department of Physical Geography and Geoecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Albertov 6, 128 43 Prague 2, Czech Republic
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2014, 11(1), 952-967; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph110100952
Submission received: 20 September 2013 / Revised: 10 December 2013 / Accepted: 30 December 2013 / Published: 9 January 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Climate Change and Human Health)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
We compare the recently developed Universal Thermal Climate Index (UTCI) with other thermal indices in analysing heat- and cold-related effects on cardiovascular (CVD) mortality in two different (urban and rural) regions in the Czech Republic during the 16-year period from 1994–2009. Excess mortality is represented by the number of deaths above expected daily values, the latter being adjusted for long-term changes, annual and weekly cycles, and epidemics of influenza/acute respiratory infections. Air temperature, UTCI, Apparent Temperature (AT) and Physiologically Equivalent Temperature (PET) are applied to identify days with heat and cold stress. We found similar heat effects on CVD mortality for air temperature and the examined thermal indices. Responses of CVD mortality to cold effects as characterised by different indices were much more varied. Particularly important is the finding that air temperature provides a weak cold effect in comparison with the thermal indices in both regions, so its application—still widespread in epidemiological studies—may underestimate the magnitude of cold-related mortality. These findings are important when possible climate change effects on heat- and cold-related mortality are estimated. AT and PET appear to be more universal predictors of heat- and cold- related mortality than UTCI when both urban and rural environments are of concern. UTCI tends to select windy rather than freezing days in winter, though these show little effect on mortality in the urban population. By contrast, significant cold-related mortality in the rural region if UTCI is used shows potential for UTCI to become a useful tool in cold exposure assessments.

1. Introduction

An adverse effect of heat and cold stress on mortality due to cardiovascular diseases has been reported in many studies [1]. Most of these employed air temperature or another simple measure of equivalent temperature (empirical indices) including effects of air temperature, humidity and/or wind speed (apparent temperature, heat index etc., [2]). Human thermal comfort is an outcome of energy balance between the human body surface and the environment, and it is influenced by human physiology, psychology and behaviour [3,4]. Not all of these factors are well characterized by empirical indices, which, therefore, are unable to serve all human-biometeorological applications (e.g., public weather service, public health system, urban and regional planning, climate impact in the health sector) across all climatic zones, regions and seasons [4].
Human thermal comfort models, on the other hand, consider in addition to atmospheric parameters (air temperature, water vapour pressure, wind speed and mean radiant temperature [5]) complex metabolic processes including physical activity level and clothing insulation [4]. Human thermal comfort indices such as Physiologically Equivalent Temperature (PET [6,7,8]) based on the Munich Energy—Balance Model for Individuals (MEMI) and the Klima–Michel model with Perceived Temperature (PT) as the equivalent temperature [9,10] have been commonly used in human-biometeorological assessments during the last decade [11,12,13,14,15,16]. One of the most advanced models based on the latest progress in all associated disciplines (thermal physiology, occupational medicine, physics, meteorology, as well as biometeorological and environmental sciences) is the Fiala multi-node model of human thermoregulation [17] with a derived equivalent temperature Universal Thermal Climate Index (UTCI). It has been developed in order to create a standard measure for outdoor thermal conditions suitable in all major fields of human biometeorology [4,18]. The Fiala thermophysiological model is coupled with a clothing model which defines in detail the effect of clothing insulation for each of the body segments over a wide range of climatic conditions [19]. UTCI, in comparison with other indices, is more sensitive to even slight changes in temperature, solar radiation, humidity and wind speed and describes better various climatic conditions, which might be an opportunity for more appropriate human-biometeorological assessments [20].
Błażejczyk [20] compared UTCI with other indices using meteorological data. Only a few studies, however, have evaluated how UTCI performs compared to other indices in assessing epidemiological outcomes [13,16], and their results have been unconvincing. Indeed, no significant predictive advantage for any thermal index (including UTCI) over the use of air temperature has been observed. Both aforementioned studies [13,16] were carried out in a warm climate (Bangladesh and Greece), and there have been no studies comparing the applicability of various human thermal comfort indices for studying heat- and cold-related mortality in populations living under temperate climatic conditions (such as central Europe).
Recent epidemiological data available in the Czech Republic allow for more detailed study of heat and cold stress impacts on individual cardiovascular (CVD) diagnoses (groups of diagnoses) and enable the study of regional differences within the country. This paper resumes our earlier research [21] and investigates differences in heat- and cold-related cardiovascular mortality evaluated in terms of different thermal indices in an urban and a rural region in the Czech Republic. In the context of a complex thermal environment, we compared UTCI with other thermal indices and with air temperature for their abilities to identify days with adverse thermal conditions for persons with cardiovascular diseases. A special focus was given to differences in the performance of various indices under cold stress conditions due to the effect of wind.

2. Data and Methods

Daily data on mortality due to CVDs (codes I00–I99 according to the International Statistical Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision [ICD-10]), covering the period 1994–2009, were provided by the Czech Statistical Office (CZSO) and the Institute of Health Information and Statistics (IHIS). The data were sorted according to the primary cause of death (Table 1) and region of residence. Two regions with different characteristics—the city of Prague (1.25 million inhabitants) and the southern Bohemian region (1.15 million inhabitants)—were defined as urban and rural regions in accordance with the OECD’s international definition [22,23]. OECD’s terminology [22] defines a rural region as one in which at least 37.5% of inhabitants live in municipalities with population density less than 150 inhabitants per km2. In accordance with this definition, the two regional administrative units in the Czech Republic with the largest proportions of rural population are the South Bohemia Region (Jihočeský kraj, 46.8%) and the adjoining Highlands Region (Kraj Vysočina, 51.9%) [23]. Together, these constitute a contiguous geographic region (southern Bohemia; Figure 1) with population size and structure similar to Prague, but only 36% of inhabitants live in municipalities with population above 10,000 [24]. More details about the population under study are given in [21].
Table
Table 1. Examined diagnoses according to the International Statistical Classification of Diseases (ICD–10) coding and abbreviations used.
Table 1. Examined diagnoses according to the International Statistical Classification of Diseases (ICD–10) coding and abbreviations used.
ICD-10 code AbbreviationDiagnosis
I00–I99CVDcardiovascular disease
I20–I25IHDischemic heart disease
I60–I69CDcerebrovascular disease
I21–I22MImyocardial infarction (acute and subsequent)
I25CIHDchronic ischemic heart disease
I70ASVDatherosclerosis – atherosclerotic vascular disease
An indirect standardization procedure, analogous to that in [25,26], was used to adjust mortality data for long-term changes, as well as seasonal and weekly variations. The expected number of deaths for every day of the examined period M0(y,d) for year y (y = 1994, ... 2009) and day d (d = 1, ... 365) was determined according to the formula:
M0(y,d) = M0(d).W(y,d).Y(y)
In the equation, M0(d) denotes the mean daily mortality on day d in a year (computed from the mean annual cycle over 1994–2009). In view of known relationships between influenza/acute respiratory infections (ARI) and CVD mortality [27,28], 169 winter days during six epidemics were omitted from the analysis (before calculating the mean annual cycle) in order not to confound results (see also [21]). W(y,d) is a correction factor for the observed weekly cycle of mortality, calculated separately for individual days of the week and defined as the ratio of the mean mortality on a given day to the overall mean mortality, and Y(y) is a correction factor for the observed year-to-year changes in mortality, defined as the ratio of the number of deaths in year y to the mean annual number of deaths during the analyzed period. The correction factors for the weekly cycle W(y,d) and the year-to-year changes Y(y) were calculated over the April–November period when epidemics of influenza/ARI did not occur. When calculating W(y,d), all public holidays were excluded, too. An output of the standardization procedure is an expected number of deaths for every day of the examined period (baseline mortality), and deviations of observed and expected mortality determine excess mortality. Relative deviations (in %) from the baseline mortality are presented in results.
Ijerph 11 00952 g001 1024
Figure 1. Study areas. Red triangles show the meteorological stations used.
Figure 1. Study areas. Red triangles show the meteorological stations used.
Ijerph 11 00952 g001
Because of the need for more input variables, different meteorological datasets were used in comparison to those from our previous study [14]. Data on air temperature (T, in °C), wind speed at 10 m above surface (v10, m∙s−1), relative humidity (RH, %) and cloudiness (C, octas) from the Prague-Ruzyně (airport) station and three southern Bohemian stations (České Budějovice, Kostelní Myslová, Přibyslav), were obtained from the Czech Hydrometeorological Institute (CHMI; Figure 1). All stations measured three times daily in standard climatic terms (7:00, 14:00 and 21:00 local time) and covered the same period of 1994–2009.
The heat budget-based indices—PET and UTCI—were calculated from air temperature, relative humidity, wind speed, and mean radiant temperature (Tmrt) that was modelled as a function of air temperature and cloudiness, in the RayMan Pro model (Version 2.1) [29,30]. For the calculation of PET, it is necessary to consider meteorological input parameters important for the human energy balance at a height relevant for human-biometeorological assessment [6,7]. Therefore, the wind speed was recalculated to the height of 1.1 m above surface, using Hellman’s exponential law [31]:
Ijerph 11 00952 i001
where v is the wind speed at height H = 1.1 m, v10 is the wind speed at height H10 = 10 m, and α is the friction coefficient (Hellman exponent). We used α = 0.40 for the urban area (Prague) and α = 0.30 for the rural area according to Table 1 in [31]. PET is then defined as an equivalent temperature in a typical indoor setting (without wind and solar radiation) at which the energy balance of the sitting reference person (with the same core and skin temperature) is equal to that under the actual outdoor conditions to be assessed [7]. We note that the reference height at which wind speed is considered when calculating PET is important for the PET values but has little influence on the selection of warm/cold days (above/below the 90%/10% quantile) in our study, as the samples of warm and cold days were very similar if PET was calculated from wind speed at 10-m height.
UTCI is an equivalent temperature defined for a walking person (4 km/h) with adaptive clothing [19] in referent outdoor conditions with 50% relative humidity, still air, and Tmrt equalling air temperature [4]. Wind speed at 10-m height is used for the UTCI calculation (by definition) [32]. Apparent Temperature (AT) is the temperature at the reference humidity level requiring the same thermal resistance of a walking adult as that experienced under the current ambient temperature, humidity, wind and solar radiation [33]. The Steadman’s “non-radiation” formula [34,35] was used for the AT calculation: AT = T + 0.33∙vp − 0.7∙v10 − 4.0. Since it includes in addition to vapour pressure (vp) also the “wind chill” effect of wind speed (v10), AT is applicable in a wide range of temperatures. Vapour pressure values were calculated from air temperature and humidity in the RayMan Pro model. All indices were computed separately for every station at each observation time (7:00, 14:00 and 21:00 local time) and then averaged to obtain mean daily values.
Days with mean (equivalent) temperature (T, AT, PET, and UTCI) above/below the 90%/10% quantile of the empirical distribution in summer (June–August)/winter (December–February (in the next year)) seasons over 1994–2009 were defined as warm/cold days. Use of the percentile method (unlike determining an exact temperature threshold) allows for examining approximately the same sample sizes in different regions and at both temperature extremes. This method has commonly been used for regional comparison of heat and cold impact on human health [14,36,37,38]. Because some winter days were omitted due to influenza/ARI epidemics, and also because winter seasons (usually 90 days) are shorter than summer seasons (92 days), the examined samples of cold days are slightly smaller than those of warm days.
Summed and averaged deviations from the expected values of mortality over all warm/cold days (D0) and one day thereafter (D+1, to capture basic lagged effects) were calculated. In the case of consecutive warm/cold days, only D0 values were included into the calculation so that no day is counted twice. The deviations’ significance was evaluated using 95% confidence intervals (CI), calculated using the limit factors for a Poisson-distributed variable according to [39]. When the number of cases was larger than 100, the normal approximation was used.

3. Results

On warm days in both regions, excess mortality tends to be highest when AT is used to determine those days (Figure 2). This holds true for all examined groups of diagnoses except for atherosclerosis (ASVD) (Table 2). We found similar urban–rural differences for all indices, with slightly higher mortality deviations in the urban region. This pattern holds true also for most examined groups of diagnoses.
All indices fit well with one another in summer (Table 3, Figure 3). PET and AT fit equally well with UTCI (the coefficient of determination (R2) is around 0.93, and there are about 83% warm days in common for these pairs of indices in both regions), although the AT calculation does not include the effect of Tmrt. The relationship between air temperature and UTCI is weaker (about 75% warm days in common). The average Tmrt values were very similar for all indices on warm days, however, and the other input meteorological variables (T, v10, RH, C) also showed few differences in the two regions (Table 4).
Ijerph 11 00952 g002 1024
Figure 2. Mean relative excess CVD mortality (% above the expected value) for warm and cold days as determined by individual indices in the urban versus rural region. Error bars represent the 95% CI (specific values are given in Table 2 and Table 5).
Figure 2. Mean relative excess CVD mortality (% above the expected value) for warm and cold days as determined by individual indices in the urban versus rural region. Error bars represent the 95% CI (specific values are given in Table 2 and Table 5).
Ijerph 11 00952 g002
Table
Table 2. Relative excess cardiovascular mortality with 95% CI (in parentheses) on warm days, defined as days with average (equivalent) temperature above the 90% quantile of the empirical distribution (≥°C), in Prague and southern Bohemia over 1994–2009. Values significantly different from zero are highlighted in bold.
Table 2. Relative excess cardiovascular mortality with 95% CI (in parentheses) on warm days, defined as days with average (equivalent) temperature above the 90% quantile of the empirical distribution (≥°C), in Prague and southern Bohemia over 1994–2009. Values significantly different from zero are highlighted in bold.
Urban Region (Prague)
Thermal index/DiagnosisUTCI (≥22.0 °C)PET (≥19.2 °C)AT (≥22.0 °C)T (≥22.5 °C)
CVD 11.8 (8.6; 15.2)11.5 (8.2; 14.8)12.6 (9.4; 16.0)10.8 (7.5; 14.1)
IHD 7.8 (2.9; 13.0)8.0 (3.0; 13.2)8.7 (3.7; 13.9)7.0 (2.1; 12.2)
CD 11.6 (5.4; 18.2)9.5 (3.3; 16.1)13.0 (6.7; 19.7)10.0 (3.8; 16.6)
MI −0.8 (−8.8; 7.9)1.5 (−6.6; 10.4)−0.2 (−8.2; 8.5)−1.6 (−9.6; 7.1)
CIHD 12.0 (5.8; 18.6)10.9 (4.7; 17.5)13.0 (6.8; 19.7)10.9 (4.7; 17.4)
ASVD 17.6 (10.0; 25.7)18.5 (10.9; 26.6)18.5 (10.9; 26.5)19.4 (11.6; 27.7)
Rural Region (Southern Bohemia)
Themal index/Diagnosis UTCI (≥21.9 °C)PET (≥18.0 °C)AT (≥21.7 °C)T (≥22.0 °C)
CVD 8.5 (5.1; 12.1)8.7 (5.2; 12.3)10.1 (6.6; 13.7)8.4 (4.9; 12.0)
IHD 6.9 (2.0; 12.0)7.3 (2.3; 12.5)7.9 (2.9; 13.2)7.2 (2.2; 12.5)
CD 11.4 (5.0; 18.3)10.3 (3.8; 17.2)13.5 (6.9; 20.6)7.9 (1.3; 14.8)
MI 1.6 (−5.6; 9.4)1.2 (−6.1; 9.1)2.0 (−5.4; 9.9)3.6 (−3.9; 11.8)
CIHD 11.4 (4.8; 18.4)11.9 (5.2; 19.0)12.4 (5.6; 19.5)10.2 (3.5; 17.4)
ASVD 9.8 (0.4; 20.2)10.9 (1.4; 21.3)11.2 (1.5; 21.8)14.9 (5.0; 25.6)
Table
Table 3. Coefficients of determination (R2) for linear relationships between mean daily UTCI, PET, AT, and T in the urban vs. rural region in summer (JJA) and winter (DJF) seasons. (%) denotes percentages of warm (cold) days in common in summer (winter) during 1994–2009.
Table 3. Coefficients of determination (R2) for linear relationships between mean daily UTCI, PET, AT, and T in the urban vs. rural region in summer (JJA) and winter (DJF) seasons. (%) denotes percentages of warm (cold) days in common in summer (winter) during 1994–2009.
Thermal Indices ComparedUrban JJA R2 (%)Urban DJF R2 (%)Rural JJA R2 (%)Rural DJF R2 (%)
T~UTCI 0.83 73 0.23 31 0.86 77 0.52 45
PET~UTCI 0.91 820.41 39 0.92 82 0.68 59
AT~UTCI 0.93 83 0.56 45 0.94 84 0.75 62
T~AT 0.94 79 0.88 86 0.95 84 0.94 81
AT~PET 0.98 82 0.95 91 0.98 870.98 91
T~PET 0.96 84 0.95 88 0.95 87 0.96 80
Ijerph 11 00952 g003 1024
Figure 3. Linear regression between mean daily UTCI, PET, AT, and T in the urban (Prague) region in summer over 1994–2009. Coefficients of determination are shown in Table 3.
Figure 3. Linear regression between mean daily UTCI, PET, AT, and T in the urban (Prague) region in summer over 1994–2009. Coefficients of determination are shown in Table 3.
Ijerph 11 00952 g003
Table
Table 4. Average values of (equivalent) temperature indices and input meteorological variables on warm days identified by individual indices in urban vs. rural region.
Table 4. Average values of (equivalent) temperature indices and input meteorological variables on warm days identified by individual indices in urban vs. rural region.
Urban RegionUTCI (°C)PET (°C)AT (°C)T (°C)Tmrt (°C)v10 (m∙s−1)RH (%)C (octas)
UTCI23.920.823.723.829.72.3593.7
PET23.721.023.724.029.82.6583.9
AT23.820.823.824.029.62.5603.5
T23.420.823.524.229.82.9563.3
Rural RegionUTCI (°C)PET(°C)AT (°C)T (°C)Tmrt (°C)v10 (m∙s−1)RH (%)C (octas)
UTCI23.419.323.223.228.82.2622.6
PET23.219.423.223.328.72.4612.6
AT23.319.423.323.328.62.4632.5
T23.119.323.223.528.92.6602.4
On cold days, by contrast, we found no general pattern of higher excess mortality for any index (Figure 2) and the results depend on region and diagnosis (Table 5). The urban–rural differences in cold-related mortality for individual indices are much less consistent compared to heat-related mortality. While mean excess mortality is comparable (predominantly insignificant differences) for PET, AT and T in Prague, it is higher and mostly significant for UTCI and AT in southern Bohemia. In particular, UTCI indicates substantial difference between no cold effect (−0.1%, 95% confidence interval (CI) −3.1% to 3.0%) on CVD mortality in Prague but significant 6.8% (3.5% to 10.3%) excess mortality in southern Bohemia, a pattern that is not found for any other index.
UTCI correlates weakly with the other indices and air temperature in winter (Table 3, Figure 4), while PET and AT are much more strongly linked to air temperature. Moreover, little consensus in the selection of cold days between UTCI and the other indices was found in the two regions. In Prague, only 31% of cold days were common for air temperature and UTCI, and the R2 for all winter daily values of T and UTCI was just 0.23.
Examining specific diagnoses and groups of diagnoses, the general pattern of heat-related mortality was associated primarily with chronic CVDs (atherosclerosis (ASVD), chronic ischemic heart disease (CIHD)) while the highest cold-related mortality from acute myocardial infarction (MI) observed in both regions and for all indices was in agreement with our previous study based on air temperature only [21]. However, while the heat-related mortality deviations show a similar pattern of differences between individual diagnoses (with the largest deviations for ASVD and the lowest for ischemic heart disease (IHD) and MI) for all indices (Table 2), the differences in excess mortality for individual groups of diagnoses on cold days are much less consistent (Table 5). UTCI and AT indicate significant (p = 0.05) excess mortality in the rural region also for both main subgroups of CVDs (IHD and cerebrovascular disease (CD)). This is in contrast with the results for air temperature, in relation to which excess cold-related mortality is very small in both regions and all diagnoses, except for MI.
Table
Table 5. Relative excess cardiovascular mortality with 95% CI (in parentheses) on cold days, defined as days with average (equivalent) temperature above the 90% quantile of the empirical distribution (≤°C), in Prague and southern Bohemia over 1994–2009. Values significantly different from zero are highlighted in bold.
Table 5. Relative excess cardiovascular mortality with 95% CI (in parentheses) on cold days, defined as days with average (equivalent) temperature above the 90% quantile of the empirical distribution (≤°C), in Prague and southern Bohemia over 1994–2009. Values significantly different from zero are highlighted in bold.
Urban Region (Prague)
Thermal index/DiagnosisUTCI (≤−21.5 °C)PET (≤−12.9 °C)AT (≤−12.1 °C)T (≤−6.5 °C)
CVD −0.1 (−3.1; 3.0)3.4 (0.1; 6.8)2.4 (−0.8; 5.7)2.4 (−0.9; 5.8)
IHD −0.6 (−5.4; 4.3)3.9 (−1.4; 9.4)3.8 (−1.3; 9.3)2.1 (−3.1; 7.6)
CD 0.9 (−5.0; 7.2)4.6 (−2.0; 11.5)4.1 (−2.3; 11.0)4.6 (−2.0; 11.6)
MI 4.5 (−3.6; 13.3)10.6 (1.3; 20.7)10.5 (1.4; 20.4)7.1 (−2.1; 17.1)
CIHD −3.1 (−8.9; 3.0)0.6 (−5.7; 7.3)0.5 (−5.8; 7.1)−0.3 (−6.7; 6.5)
ASVD 1.7 (−4.7; 8.5)3.6 (−3.4; 11.1)1.4 (−5.2; 8.5)2.8 (−4.0; 10.1)
Rural Region (Southern Bohemia)
Thermal index/DiagnosisUTCI (≤−19.9 °C)PET (≤−13.5 °C)AT (≤−12.4 °C)T (≤−7.3 °C)
CVD 6.8 (3.5; 10.3)3.7 (0.3; 7.3)5.1 (1.6; 8.7)1.6 (−1.9; 5.2)
IHD 8.3 (3.4; 13.5)3.3 (−1.8; 8.5)5.7 (0.6; 11.1)2.0 (−3.1; 7.4)
CD 10.7 (4.4; 17.3)7.0 (0.5; 14.0)8.0 (1.4; 15.1)2.7 (−3.8; 9.5)
MI 15.2 (7.4; 23.6)12.6 (4.4; 21.4)17.2 (8.8; 26.2)10.6 (2.4; 19.5)
CIHD 2.9 (−3.4; 9.6)−3.5 (−9.8; 3.2)−2.7 (−9.1; 4.2)−4.3 (−10.7; 2.6)
ASVD −1.5 (−10.3; 8.2)−1.4 (−10.7; 8.8)−1.7 (−11.1; 8.7)1.5 (−7.9; 11.9)
Ijerph 11 00952 g004 1024
Figure 4. Linear regression between mean daily UTCI, PET, AT, and T in the urban (Prague) region in winter over 1994–2009. Coefficients of determination are shown in Table 3.
Figure 4. Linear regression between mean daily UTCI, PET, AT, and T in the urban (Prague) region in winter over 1994–2009. Coefficients of determination are shown in Table 3.
Ijerph 11 00952 g004

4. Discussion

In this study, we tested the extent to which UTCI, other thermal indices (PET, AT), and air temperature are able to identify days with adverse thermal conditions for persons with cardiovascular diseases (CVD). While similar heat effects for air temperature and thermal indices on cardiovascular (CVD) mortality were found in both urban and rural region of the Czech Republic, we observed no general pattern of higher excess mortality for any index on cold days and the urban-rural differences in cold-related mortality were much less consistent compared to heat-related mortality. In particular, UTCI indicates substantial difference between no cold effect on CVD mortality in Prague but significant excess mortality in southern Bohemia.
The different cold effects of air temperature and thermal indices are related to the different samples of cold days for individual indices (Table 6). The enhanced cooling effect of wind involved in the UTCI calculation [20] is probably the main reason for this dissimilarity. While the average wind speed at Prague-Ruzyně airport on cold days is approximately twice as high for UTCI (7.2 m∙s−1) in comparison to the other indices (2.6–3.4 m∙s−1), average air temperature is higher as well (−4.4 °C vs. −9.3 to −9.6 °C; Table 6). Also the other meteorological variables, in particular Tmrt, show substantially different average values on cold days as defined by UTCI in comparison to those defined by the other indices. A similar pattern exists in the rural area.
Table
Table 6. Average values of (equivalent) temperature indices and input meteorological variables on cold days identified by individual indices in urban versus rural region.
Table 6. Average values of (equivalent) temperature indices and input meteorological variables on cold days identified by individual indices in urban versus rural region.
Urban RegionUTCI (°C)PET (°C)AT (°C)T (°C)Tmrt (°C)v10 (m∙s−1)RH (%)C (octas)
UTCI−25.5−11.5−12.2−4.4−9.07.2815.7
PET−20.9−15.7−14.7−9.3−16.33.2834.0
AT−21.4−15.6−14.8−9.3−16.03.4834.3
T−19.3−15.5−14.6−9.6−16.32.6844.3
Rural RegionUTCI (°C)PET (°C)AT (°C)T (°C)Tmrt (°C)v10 (m∙s−1)RH (%)C (octas)
UTCI−24.4−14.1−13.6−6.8−12.15.5825.5
PET−21.8−16.1−15.0−9.4−15.93.5824.2
AT−22.2−16.0−15.1−9.4−15.73.7824.4
T−19.6−15.8−14.7−9.6−16.32.8823.9
The rapid fall in UTCI due to wind speed in cold weather has been documented by Novák [40]. UTCI selects windy rather than freezing days in winter, and these show little effect on excess mortality among the urban population that is well protected against wind. However, windy winter weather with not extremely low air temperatures (but still far below 0 °C) may be related to more snowfalls [41] and therefore to diminished accessibility of small villages in the rural region, where the cold effect on mortality is most pronounced as indicated by UTCI. An analysis of relationships between cold days and the snowfalls in the two regions may help to explain the observed pattern, as there has been some evidence of a relationship between snowy weather and higher cardiovascular mortality [42]. This relates, among other things, to physical exertion due to snow shovelling [43,44].
Our results extend previous findings [13,15,16,45] that air temperature (T), as the most widely used proxy for ambient thermal conditions in environmental epidemiology [2,46], is a completely comparable tool to thermal indices in assessing heat-related mortality. However, insignificant (and substantially smaller compared to the other indices) cold-related mortality for T suggests that studies based on air temperature (including [21]) may be biased towards too-small estimates of cold effects. This finding is particularly important when the magnitude of changes in heat- and cold-related mortality associated with climate change in temperate regions is estimated [47,48,49].
Large differences on cold days as determined by UTCI, with excess mortality in the rural region but no effect in the urban region, suggest that UTCI may be less universal than other indices when applied in bioclimatic and epidemiological analyses (in which “average” thermal conditions for a population are used) as opposed to small-scale biometeorological studies with more specific meteorological input data. However, an influence of complex biometeorological conditions on human thermal comfort is indisputable, and human thermal comfort indices represent the thermal environment better than do simple empirical indices when proper input data are available [20]. Nevertheless, human thermal comfort indices refer to an “average” healthy person, while the population groups most affected by thermal stress are elderly, young children and persons with impaired thermoregulation due to poor physical and medical condition [1,2,50,51]. According to Burkart et al. [13], the crucial question for the applicability of human thermal comfort indices to assessing epidemiological outcomes is the significance of the relationship between human health outcomes and the human heat balance. Moreover, the determination accuracy of human thermal comfort indices is affected by uncertainties in modelling mean radiant temperature (Tmrt). If all radiative fluxes are modelled based on synoptic observations (air temperature, air humidity, wind speed and cloudiness), the UTCI’s uncertainties, which are due to uncertainties of the four meteorological input variables, may be as much as 6 °C [52]. This may cause inaccuracy in the thermal stress determination.
In addition to the aforementioned uncertainties in modelling of Tmrt, some other limitations need to be mentioned. Lacking appropriate data, we did not take into account demographic, socioeconomic and other environmental factors (e.g., air pollution) which are significant modifiers of weather-related mortality and should be considered in future research [53,54,55]. Another limitation of this study is the use of airport station data in the analysis for the urban region. The station is situated at the airport on the north-western edge of Prague, which is colder and windier than the city centre, and hence the meteorological data may not be fully representative for the Prague population. Airport stations are often used in similar studies, however, and an analogous dataset from another Prague station was not available. Finally, since the lagged cold effect on mortality is still not wholly explained [28,56,57,58], we did not focus on analyzing lagged effects in this study. This issue needs to be elaborated in follow-up research.

5. Conclusions

We investigated the ability of UTCI and other thermal indices to identify discomfort days having adverse effects on patients with CVD in two regions of the Czech Republic. The results bring new insight to cold-related mortality assessment under temperate climatic conditions and to the applicability of thermal indices for estimating heat and cold effects in populations living in different environments (urban vs. rural).
While similar heat effects for air temperature and thermal indices were found in both regions, differences in cold effects between individual indicators were much larger. In particular, UTCI selects windy winter days over the most freezing ones. That results in a small effect on excess mortality in the urban population that is sheltered from the effects of wind and, by contrast, the largest effect (among the examined indices) on excess mortality in the rural population. These findings raise also a critical issue as to the representativeness of wind speed measurements (taken at 10 m height above the surface and strongly determined by local conditions at the measuring site) for estimating human thermal discomfort, particularly in winter. While air temperature seems to be an appropriate tool for heat-related mortality assessment, it appears to be unsuitable when effect of cold on epidemiological outcomes is considered, and thermal indices (PET, AT) yield higher and probably more realistic cold-related mortality.
A universal indicator of human thermal comfort for various related disciplines (biometeorological forecasting, epidemiology, urban and regional planning, bioclimatic mapping, etc.) is desirable for easier comparison of results from different geographical areas and on different temporal and spatial scales. UTCI has the potential to become such a useful tool in human biometeorology [4,20]. However, AT (requiring only standard meteorological data) and PET appear to be more universal indicators in heat- and cold-related mortality assessments. Such findings need to be further investigated for other regions and populations, and they are important for determining the final procedure for cold exposure assessment within the UTCI calculation [4,59].

Acknowledgements

The study was supported by the Czech Science Foundation, Project P209/11/1985. Thanks are due to Bohumír Kříž and Jan Kynčl, National Institute of Public Health, and Hana Davídkovová, Institute of Atmospheric Physics AS CR, for preparing epidemiological and meteorological datasets as well as for useful discussions concerning their interpretation. In addition, thanks go to Andreas Matzarakis, University of Freiburg, for kindly providing the RayMan Pro software, and to anonymous reviewers that helped improve the original manuscript. Data were provided by the Institute of Health Information and Statistics, the Czech Statistical Office, and the Czech Hydrometeorological Institute.

Author Contributions

Both authors contributed to the conception and design of the study, acquisition, analysis and interpretation of the data, and writing and revising of the manuscript. Aleš Urban carried out most statistical analyses and drafted the manuscript. Both authors approved the final version submitted for publication.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cheng, X.; Su, H. Effects of climatic temperature stress on cardiovascular diseases. Eur. J. Intern. Med. 2010, 21, 164–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Basu, R. High ambient temperature and mortality: A review of epidemiologic studies from 2001 to 2008. Environ. Health 2009, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. McGregor, G.R. Human biometeorology. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 2011, 36, 93–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Jendritzky, G.; de Dear, R.; Havenith, G. UTCI—Why another thermal index? Int. J. Biometeorol. 2012, 56, 421–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Kántor, N.; Unger, J. The most problematic variable in the course of human-biometeorological comfort assessment—The mean radiant temperature. Cent. Eur. J. Geosci. 2011, 3, 90–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Mayer, H.; Höppe, P. Thermal comfort of man in different urban environments. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 1987, 38, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Höppe, P. The physiological equivalent temperature—A universal index for the biometeorological assessment of the thermal environment. Int. J. Biometeorol. 1999, 43, 71–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Matzarakis, A; Mayer, H.; Iziomon, M.G. Applications of a universal thermal index: Physiological equivalent temperature. Int. J. Biometeorol. 1999, 43, 76–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jendritzky, G.; Staiger, H.; Bucher, K.; Graetz, A.; Laschewski, G. The Perceived Temperature: The Method of the Deutscher Wetterdienst for the Assessment of Cold Stress and Heat Load for the Human Body. In Proceedings of Internet Workshop on Windchill, Environment Canada, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada, 3–7 April 2000.
  10. Staiger, H.; Laschewski, G.; Grätz, A. The perceived temperature—A versatile index for the assessment of the human thermal environment. Part A: Scientific basics. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2012, 56, 165–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Laschewski, G.; Jendritzky, G. Effects of the thermal environment on human health: An investigation of 30 years of daily mortality data from SW Germany. Clim. Res. 2002, 21, 91–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Matzarakis, A.; Muthers, S.; Koch, E. Human biometeorological evaluation of heat-related mortality in Vienna. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 2010, 105, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Burkart, K.; Schneider, A.; Breitner, S.; Khan, M.H.; Krämer, A.; Endlicher, W. The effect of atmospheric thermal conditions and urban thermal pollution on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in Bangladesh. Environ. Pollut. 2011, 159, 2035–2043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gabriel, K.M.A.; Endlicher, W.R. Urban and rural mortality rates during heat waves in Berlin and Brandenburg, Germany. Environ. Pollut. 2011, 159, 2044–2050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kim, Y.-M.; Kim, S.; Cheong, H.-K.; Kim, E.-H. Comparison of temperature indexes for the impact assessment of heat stress on heat-related mortality. Environ. Health Toxicol. 2011, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nastos, P.T.; Matzarakis, A. The effect of air temperature and human thermal indices on mortality in Athens, Greece. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 2011, 108, 591–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fiala, D.; Havenith, G.; Bröde, P.; Kampmann, B.; Jendritzky, G. UTCI-Fiala multi-node model of human heat transfer and temperature regulation. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2012, 56, 429–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. UTCI—Universal Thermal Climate Index. Available online: http://www.utci.org/ (accessed on 10 June 2013).
  19. Havenith, G.; Fiala, D.; Błazejczyk, K.; Richards, M.; Bröde, P.; Holmér, I.; Rintamaki, H.; Benshabat, Y.; Jendritzky, G. The UTCI-clothing model. Int. J. Biometeorol 2012, 56, 461–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Błażejczyk, K.; Epstein, Y.; Jendritzky, G.; Staiger, H.; Tinz, B. Comparison of UTCI to selected thermal indices. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2012, 56, 515–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Urban, A.; Davídkovová, H.; Kyselý, J. Heat- and cold-stress effects on cardiovascular mortality and morbidity among urban and rural populations in the Czech Republic. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Spiezia, V. Measuring Regional Economies. Statistics Brief OECD, No. 6, 2003. Available online: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/2/15/15918996.pdf (accessed on 14 August 2013).
  23. Blatecká, K. The Basic Characteristics of Czech Rural Areas. (in Czech). Available online: http://is.muni.cz/th/137827/esf_m/Diplomova_prace.pdf (accessed on 14 August 2013).
  24. CZSO—Czech Statistical Office. Statistical Yearbook 2011. Available online: http://www.czso.cz/csu/2011edicniplan.nsf/publ/0001-11-2010 (accessed on 20 August 2012).
  25. Whitman, S.; Good, G.; Donoghue, E.R.; Benbow, N. Public health biefs mortality in Chicago attributed to the July 1995 heat wave. Public Health 1997, 87, 1515–1518. [Google Scholar]
  26. Smoyer, K.E.; Rainham, D.G.; Hewko, J.N. Heat-stress-related mortality in five cities in Southern Ontario: 1980–1996. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2000, 44, 190–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kynčl, J.; Procházka, B.; Goddard, N.L.; Havlíčková, M.; Částková, J.; Otavová, M.; Kříž, B. A study of excess mortality during influenza epidemics in the Czech Republic, 1982–2000. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 2005, 20, 365–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kyselý, J.; Pokorná, L.; Kynčl, J.; Kříž, B. Excess cardiovascular mortality associated with cold spells in the Czech Republic. BMC Public Health 2009, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Matzarakis, A.; Rutz, F.; Mayer, H. Modelling radiation fluxes in simple and complex environments—Application of the RayMan model. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2007, 51, 323–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Matzarakis, A.; Rutz, F.; Mayer, H. Modelling radiation fluxes in simple and complex environments—Basics of the RayMan model. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2010, 54, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bañuelos-Ruedas, F.; Camacho, C.Á. Methodologies Used in the Extrapolation of Wind Speed Data at Different Heights and Its Impact in the Wind Energy Resource Assessment in a Region. In Wind Farm—Technical Regulations, Potential Estimation and Siting Assessment; Suvire, G.O., Ed.; InTech: Rijeka, Croatia, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  32. Bröde, P.; Fiala, D.; Błażejczyk, K.; Holmér, I.; Jendritzky, G.; Kampmann, B.; Tinz, B.; Havenith, G. Deriving the operational procedure for the Universal Thermal Climate Index (UTCI). Int. J. Biometeorol. 2012, 56, 481–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Steadman, R.G. A universal scale of apparent temperature. J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol. 1984, 23, 1674–1687. [Google Scholar]
  34. Steadman, R.G. Norms of apparent temperature in Australia. Aust. Meteorol. Mag. 1994, 43, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  35. Australian Government, Bureau of Meterology. Thermal Comfort observations. Available online: http://www.bom.gov.au/info/thermal_stress (accessed on 5 November 2013).
  36. Hajat, S.; Kovats, R.S.; Lachowycz, K. Heat-related and cold-related deaths in England and Wales: Who is at risk? Occup Environ. Med. 2007, 64, 93–100. [Google Scholar]
  37. Medina-Ramón, M.; Schwartz, J. Temperature, temperature extremes, and mortality: A study of acclimatization and effect modification in 50 United States cities. Occup. Environ. Med. 2007, 827–834. [Google Scholar]
  38. Gómez-Acebo, I.; Dierssen-Sotos, T.; Llorca, J. Effect of cold temperatures on mortality in Cantabria (Northern Spain): A case-crossover study. Public Health 2010, 124, 398–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Schoenberg, B.S. Calculating confidence intervals for rates and ratios. Neuroepidemiology 1983, 2, 257–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Novák, M. Use of the UTCI in the Czech Republic. Geogr. Pol. 2013, 86, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Spreitzhofer, G. Synoptic classification of severe snowstorms over Austria. Met. Z. 1999, 8, 3–15. [Google Scholar]
  42. Kalkstein, S.; Davis, R. Weather and human mortality: An evaluation of demographic and interregional responses in the united states. Ann. Assn. Amer Geogr 1989, 79, 44–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Baker-Blocker, A. Winter weather and cardiovascular mortality in Minneapolis-St. Paul. Amer. J. Public Health 1982, 72, 261–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Southern, D.A.; Knudtson, M.L.; Ghali, W.A. Myocardial infarction on snow days: Incidence, procedure use and outcomes. Can. J. Cardiol. 2006, 22, 59–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Vaneckova, P.; Neville, G.; Tippett, V.; Aitken, P.; FitzGerald, G.; Tong, S. Do biometeorological indices improve modeling outcomes of heat-related mortality? J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol. 2011, 50, 1165–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ye, X.; Wolff, R.; Yu, W.; Vaneckova, P.; Pan, X.; Tong, S. Ambient temperature and morbidity: a review of epidemiological evidence. Environ. Health Perspect. 2012, 120, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Gosling, S.N.; Lowe, J.A.; McGregor, G.R.; Pelling, M.; Malamud, B.D. Associations between elevated atmospheric temperature and human mortality: A critical review of the literature. Climate Change 2008, 92, 299–341. [Google Scholar]
  48. Markandya, A.; Chiabai, A. Valuing climate change impacts on human health: Empirical evidence from the literature. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2009, 6, 759–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Christidis, N.; Donaldson, G.C.; Stott, P.A. Causes for the recent changes in cold- and heat-related mortality in England and Wales. Climate Change 2010, 102, 539–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mercer, J.B. Cold, an underrated risk factor for health. Environ. Res. 2002, 92, 8–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kenney, W.L.; Munce, T.A. Invited review: Aging and human temperature regulation. J. Appl. Physiol. 2003, 95, 2598–2603. [Google Scholar]
  52. Weihs, P.; Staiger, H.; Tinz, B.; Batchvarova, E.; Rieder, H.; Vuilleumier, L.; Maturilli, M.; Jendritzky, G. The uncertainty of UTCI due to uncertainties in the determination of radiation fluxes derived from measured and observed meteorological data. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2012, 56, 537–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Iñiguez, C.; Ballester, F.; Ferrandiz, J.; Pérez-Hoyos, S.; Sáez, M.; López, A. Relation between temperature and mortality in thirteen Spanish cities. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2010, 7, 3196–3210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Hattis, D.; Ogneva-Himmelberger, Y.; Ratick, S. The spatial variability of heat-related mortality in Massachusetts. Appl. Geogr. 2012, 33, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Burkart, K.; Khan, M.H.; Krämer, A.; Breitner, S.; Schneider, A.; Endlicher, W.R. Seasonal variations of all-cause and cause-specific mortality by age, gender, and socioeconomic condition in urban and rural areas of Bangladesh. Int. J. Equity Health 2011, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Carder, M.; McNamee, R.; Beverland, I.; Elton, R.; Cohen, G.R.; Boyd, J.; Agius, R.M. The lagged effect of cold temperature and wind chill on cardiorespiratory mortality in Scotland. Occup. Environ. Med. 2005, 62, 702–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wichmann, J.; Andersen, Z.J.; Ketzel, M.; Ellermann, T.; Loft, S. Apparent temperature and cause-specific mortality in Copenhagen, Denmark: A case-crossover analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2011, 8, 3712–3727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Yu, W.; Mengersen, K.; Wang, X.; Ye, X.; Guo, Y.; Pan, X.; Tong, S. Daily average temperature and mortality among the elderly: A meta-analysis and systematic review of epidemiological evidence. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2012, 56, 569–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Shitzer, A.; Tikuisis, P. Advances, shortcomings, and recommendations for wind chill estimation. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2012, 56, 495–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Urban, A.; Kyselý, J. Comparison of UTCI with Other Thermal Indices in the Assessment of Heat and Cold Effects on Cardiovascular Mortality in the Czech Republic. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2014, 11, 952-967. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph110100952

AMA Style

Urban A, Kyselý J. Comparison of UTCI with Other Thermal Indices in the Assessment of Heat and Cold Effects on Cardiovascular Mortality in the Czech Republic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2014; 11(1):952-967. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph110100952

Chicago/Turabian Style

Urban, Aleš, and Jan Kyselý. 2014. "Comparison of UTCI with Other Thermal Indices in the Assessment of Heat and Cold Effects on Cardiovascular Mortality in the Czech Republic" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 11, no. 1: 952-967. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph110100952

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop