Next Article in Journal
Improving Chronic Disease Self-Management by Older Home Health Patients through Community Health Coaching
Previous Article in Journal
Why Are New Tobacco Control Interventions Needed?
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Associations between Job Strain and Arterial Stiffness: A Large Survey among Enterprise Employees from Thailand

1
Faculty of Public Health, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
2
Department of Environmental, Occupational and Geospatial Health Sciences, CUNY Institute for Implementation Sciences in Population Health, CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York, NY 10027, USA
3
Institute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Centre for Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf 40225, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15(4), 659; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph15040659
Submission received: 31 January 2018 / Revised: 25 March 2018 / Accepted: 27 March 2018 / Published: 2 April 2018
(This article belongs to the Section Occupational Safety and Health)

Abstract

:
As an intermediate endpoint to cardiovascular disease, arterial stiffness has received much attention recently. So far, the research on work stress and arterial stiffness is still sparse and inconsistent, and no investigations on work stress and cardiovascular health among the Thai working population have been reported. Therefore, we conducted an epidemiological study among 2141 Thai enterprise employees (858 men and 1283 women) who were free from any diagnosed cardiovascular disease. Work stress was measured using Karasek’s Job Demand–Control model for job strain (a combination of high demand and low control). Arterial stiffness was evaluated by a non-invasive approach using pulse-wave analysis based on a finger photoplethysmogram. Multivariable linear regression was applied to examine associations between job strain and arterial stiffness. In men, job strain was significantly associated with arterial stiffness (β  =  0.078, 95% confidence interval  =  0.026 to 0.130), after accounting for sociodemographic, behavioral, dietary and biomedical factors. However, the association in women was not significant. As the first study in Thailand on work stress and cardiovascular risk, we found that job strain might be an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease among Thai working men. Further studies with longitudinal design are warranted.

1. Introduction

As the leading cause of mortality, cardiovascular disease (primarily coronary health disease and stroke) accounts for approximately one third of all deaths worldwide. In recent years, much evidence has highlighted the role of work stress in the etiology of cardiovascular disease [1]. It is estimated that work stress is associated with a 10–40% higher risk of developing cardiovascular disease [2]. Karasek’s Job Demand–Control model, which postulates that job strain results from the joint effects of high job demand and low job control [3], has been widely used in work stress epidemiological research. For example, a large collaboration that included 13–14 cohort studies, among nearly 200,000 workers, revealed that job strain increased the risk of coronary heart disease by 23% [4] and of ischemic stroke by 24% [5].
When focusing on early prevention strategies for stress-related cardiovascular disease at work, it is important to gain some insight into the different stages of the cardiovascular disease process. In 1996, Kasl recommended that the influence of work stress should be investigated at intermediate cardiovascular endpoints before the manifestation of disease [6]. As a well-established early pathological indicator of cardiovascular disease [7,8], atherosclerosis (an obstructive condition resulting from the accumulation of lipid and calcium deposits) has received notable attention since then. In the past two decades, over a dozen epidemiological studies have been conducted, indicating that work stress resulted in an increased risk of atherosclerosis [9]. Clinically, in addition to atherosclerosis there is another medical condition, arterial stiffness, which refers to medial degeneration due to vascular remodeling and loss of arterial elasticity [10]. Increasingly, new findings also suggest arterial stiffness is tightly linked to cardiovascular disease [11,12,13]. To the best of our knowledge, six cross-sectional studies examined the potential associations between work stress and arterial stiffness, four from Japan [14,15,16,17], one from Taiwan [18] and one from The Netherlands [19]. Four of them found significant positive associations, i.e., higher work stress was related to increased arterial stiffness [15,16,17,19] whereas one study reported null findings [18]; and another study discovered significant negative associations [14]. Furthermore, the results between men and women were not consistent. Otsuka et al., identified meaningful relationships between work stress and arterial stiffness in women only [17], but other studies confirmed the findings in men [15,16,19]. As a result, more research is needed in other populations and settings.
Thailand is an interesting case. First, although morbidity and mortality rates from cardiovascular disease have been mostly declining in advanced industrialized nations, in Thailand these rates have been rising notably over the past few decades [20]. For example, from 2011 to 2015 the annual mortality rates in Thailand increased from 22.5 to 29.9 per 100,000 due to coronary heart disease and from 30.0 to 43.3 per 100,000 due to stroke [21]. In addition, as a traditional agricultural society, the major occupational health problems in Thailand were due to physical, chemical and biological hazards [22]. Under rapid economic growth, the proportion of industrial and service sectors has dramatically increased from less than 30% in the 1980s to more than 60% in 2010 [23]; accordingly, psychosocial stress in the workplace is regarded as an emerging occupational hazard in Thailand. In a recent survey of Thai workers, 51% reported that they had to work very fast and 13% declared they had no decision-making power at work [24]. Finally, some studies have been conducted in Thailand to investigate the associations of work stress with mental and behavioral outcomes [24,25]. However, while the research on cardiovascular epidemiology in Thailand is still restricted to traditional risk factors, such as smoking and hypertension [26], to date there is no research evidence available on the effects of work stress on cardiovascular health among the Thai working population. Therefore, the aim of this current study was to examine the association of work stress, measured as job strain, with arterial stiffness in a large sample of Thai enterprise employees. Given the mixed findings between men and women on work stress and cardiovascular disease in studies elsewhere [27,28], for this investigation we also explored gender differences.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample

Due to limited research evidence and mixed findings on work stress and arterial stiffness (see details in Introduction), we were not able to extract solid parameter estimates for the associations. In view of the previous six cross-sectional studies on this topic, the sample sizes varied from 300 to 4000. Therefore, we projected that a sample size with 2000–3000 subjects would be appropriate for our study. This cross-sectional study was conducted with 19 different enterprises located in Bangkok and five other provinces in Thailand (Chiang Mai, Nakhon Ratchasima, Rayong, Ayutthaya and Trang) representing different geographic and socioeconomic regions in this country. The 19 enterprises were from a wide range of industrial sectors including canned food, snack food, cooking oil, footwear, pharmaceutical, ceramics, toy, steel, petrochemical and auto parts. All the 2935 employees in these enterprises were invited to a comprehensive health check comprising a questionnaire and a medical examination (detailed below). In total, 2218 employees (76% of 2935 invitees) took part in the health check. Due to voluntary participation, some employees declined the medical examination, yielding 2208 employees who had complete data on both questionnaire and medical examination (99% of 2218 respondents). The subjects with missing values on medical data (particularly arterial stiffness) did not differ significantly from the participants with complete data regarding sociodemographic or work-related characteristics. Furthermore, subjects with any diagnosis or medication related to cardiovascular disease were excluded from the current analysis (n = 67). The final sample size of this study consisted of 2141 subjects (858 males and 1283 females). All participants gave written informed consent. This study protocol was approved by the Ethics Review Committee of Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand (No.: 23/2561).

2.2. Measurements

2.2.1. Job Strain

Job strain was assessed using Karasek’s Job Content Questionnaire [29], whose validated Thai version has been made available [30]. In our current study, two scales were used: namely, demand with 5 items, and control with 9 items. Items were scored using a four-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 4 = strongly agree). The score range for demand was 12–48 and for control it was 24–96, according to pre-defined scale formulations [29]. Higher scores indicated higher demand and control. Cronbach’s α coefficients for the demand scale and the control scale were 0.65 and 0.73, respectively. Following the theory of the Job Demand–Control model [3,29], a median split of total sample or sub-sample gender-specific scale values was used to construct four combinations of demand and control, the so-called quadrant approach, i.e., low strain (low demand + high control), active (high demand + high control), passive (low demand + low control), and high strain (high demand + low control).

2.2.2. Arterial Stiffness

Arterial stiffness was evaluated by a non-invasive approach, pulse-wave analysis based on the second derivative of the finger photoplethysmogram (FCP-3166, Fukuda Denshi, Tokyo, Japan). Each subject was asked to rest at least 10 min before starting the examination, which required participants to be in a supine position with records taken from the second fingertip of the left hand while it was at the same height as the subject’s heart. The temperature in the testing room was kept at 23–25 °C. The waveform produced consisted of four systolic waves (a, b, c and d waves) and one diastolic wave (e wave). The a and b waves corresponded to the early systolic phase, the c and d waves corresponded to the late systolic phase, and the e wave corresponded to the diastolic phase of the second derivative of the finger photoplethysmogram. The amplitude levels of the a, b, c, d and e waves from the baseline were recorded, with the values above the baseline being positive and those below it negative. Then, the aging index was calculated by using the ratios of (b–c–d–e)/a. This index represented arterial stiffness, with higher values indicating lower central and peripheral arterial elasticity [31], which has been shown to be related to cardiovascular risk [32,33].

2.2.3. Covariates

In addition, data on sociodemographic factors (age, gender, marital status, education and employment position), behavioral factors (smoking, alcohol drinking and physical exercise), dietary factors (vegetable intake and fatty food intake) and biomedical factors (body mass index (BMI) and hypertension) were also collected through the questionnaires and medical examinations.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

All analyses were conducted using the SAS 9.2 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Firstly, descriptive statistics were generated. Means and standard deviations (SDs) were investigated for continuous variables and relative frequencies were examined for categorical variables. We applied Student’s t test (for continuous variables) or the chi-square test (for categorical variables) to compare the differences between men and women. Normality was examined by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test and all the continuous variables in our study followed normal distribution. Secondly, univariable associations between work stress and arterial stiffness were tested. Pearson correlation coefficients among demand, control and stiffness were calculated for the total sample, for men, and for women. Furthermore, the differences in arterial stiffness across four job-strain groups were also tested by analysis of variance. Finally, multivariable linear regression was applied for associations between job strain and arterial stiffness (dependent variable). In addition to the four job-strain groups, the single dimensions, i.e., continuous measures of demand and control (expressed as an increase or decrease per SD), were also used in regression modeling. Again, the regression analyses were performed in the total sample, for men, and for women. The results are shown as β coefficients and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), together with R2. Several regression models were calculated with incremental adjustments for sociodemographic, behavioral, dietary and biomedical factors.

3. Results

Table 1 shows the characteristics of the study sample (n = 2141). Forty percent of the study participants were men (n = 858). The mean age of men and women was similar at 34 years and approximately two-thirds of them were married. Both education and employment position levels were much lower in women than in men. The lifestyle behaviors were relatively healthy in Thai female employees, who very seldom smoked or drank alcohol, engaged more in physical exercise; and 60% of women had vegetable intake daily. More than 30% of male employees were categorized as being overweight and obese and nearly 20% were hypertensive. Women reported significantly higher demand and lower control, resulting in higher levels of job strain than men. Also, the index of arterial stiffness was harder in women compared with men (p < 0.0001).
The univariable results revealed that, in the total sample, both demand and control were significantly correlated with arterial stiffness (Table 2). Accordingly, the high-strain group had the highest score of arterial stiffness while the low-strain group had the lowest score (Table 3). The results of sub-group analyses according to gender were not significant, but the univariable associations were stronger among men than women.
Table 4 presents the multivariable regression findings for the total sample. Although the statistical level of significance was not reached, trends in increasing arterial stiffness with separate dimensions (i.e., continuous high demand and low control) or combined construct (i.e., four job strain groups) were demonstrated in the first model (adjusted for age, gender, marital status and socioeconomic status). The strength of the associations remained unchanged when taking further covariates into account (models II–IV). The adjusted R2 was slightly improved from 0.324 (model I) to 0.333 (model IV). Using the fully adjusted model, we found that, in men, high demand was significantly associated with arterial stiffness; moreover, high job strain in terms of high demand in combination with low control exerted the strongest effect on arterial stiffness (β  =  0.078, 95% CI  =  0.026 to 0.130). In women, no significant associations of job strain with arterial stiffness were observed (Table 5).

4. Discussion

The aim of our study was to examine the associations between work stress (based on the Job Demand–Control model) and arterial stiffness on stress-related cardiovascular disorders at work in Thailand, in the first investigation of this kind. The findings are in line with cross-sectional evidence from Japan and The Netherlands [15,16,17,19], preliminarily showing that job strain in terms of high demand and low control was associated with arterial stiffness, particularly in male employees, and that the associations could not be attributed to other known risk factors for cardiovascular disease, such as age, marital status, socioeconomic status, lifestyle behaviors, vegetable and fatty-food consumption, body mass index and hypertension. We also conducted sensitivity analyses to test the stability of our findings. For instance, in addition to the quadrant approach, we also used the quotient approach for job strain defined as the ratio between demand and control (balanced by item weighting) [34,35]; in addition to the continuous measures of demand, control and demand/control (D/C) ratio, these measures were also divided by tertiles into three groups (high, intermediate and low). All these sensitivity analyses exhibited similar patterns to what we present in the Results section (details are available upon request).
It is important to mention another related intermediate cardiovascular disease endpoint, atherosclerosis, with similar global findings, although most of the evidence has stemmed from studies in Europe and America, with only few conducted in Asia, (Japan [36] and China [37,38]). Clinically, the coronary artery and carotid artery are often used to evaluate atherosclerosis. By using techniques of coronary angiography or computed tomography scanning, four [36,39,40,41] out of six studies [36,37,39,40,41,42] found work stress was not related to coronary atherosclerosis. However, the findings derived from ultrasonographic carotid intima-media thickness have been more consistent. To date, 16 reports based on 11 studies in total are available [38,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57]. Among them, 12 reports based on 8 studies asserted significantly positive associations [38,43,44,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,55], 3 studies reported null findings [45,56,57], whereas 1 study observed significantly negative associations [54]. It should be highlighted that several longitudinal studies have confirmed the significant contribution of work stress to progression of carotid artery atherosclerosis, such as the 4-year longitudinal study from Denmark [53], the Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study with 6-year follow-up [52], the Kuopio Ischemic Heart Disease Risk Factor Study in Finland with 4-year follow-up [43,44] and the Pittsburgh Healthy Heart Project in the USA with 3- and 6-year follow-ups [49,50]; however, significant associations at baseline disappeared during the 9-year follow-up in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis from the USA [56]. When considering gender differences, the findings are mixed. Three studies did not find significant associations in both men and women [45,56,57], but one study found significant associations in both genders [53]. While three studies discovered significant associations in women only [38,42,47] and six significant reports in men only [43,44,46,49,51,52]; null associations in men were also identified by one study [36].
In this Thai study, we found a positive association between work stress and arterial stiffness only in men, but not in women. For a long time, it has been observed that in the labor market women encounter worse psychosocial working conditions and experience higher stress levels [58], which is supported by our study, too. On the other hand, the gender differences in occurrence and development of cardiovascular disease do exist. In women, it is less common during the premenopausal period and then sharply rises after menopause [59]. Such differences are found not only in the manifested cardiovascular diseases, but also in the early course of the asymptomatic stage, such as arterial stiffness and atherosclerosis [60,61]. Therefore, the pattern of gender differences with regard to the effect of work stress on cardiovascular disease is not clear [27,28]. Some recent research has suggested gender as an effect modifier of the association between work stress and health [62]. Furthermore, in psychosocial stress research, particularly among women, it has been suggested that working women are under dual stress from work and from family. Stress related to family and household might confound the associations between work stress and health for women. For example, the UK Whitehall II study found stress at home predicted coronary heart disease in women, but not in men [63]; the Stockholm Female Coronary Angiography Study indicated that women exposed to both work and family stress suffered most from accelerating atherosclerosis [42]; and a recent study using data from the Health and Retirement Study in the USA reported that the highest mortality group came from women who had work stress together with adverse family circumstances [64]. Although no obvious evidence from cohort research is available in Asia, some preliminary cross-sectional studies did demonstrate the burden of dual stress among Asian women on health, such as hypertension and menstrual disorders [65,66]. Thus, several global organizations including the European Society of Cardiology (Sophia Antipolis, France) and the American Heart Association (Dallas, TX, USA) have expressed concerns that further research on the broader psychosocial environment is warranted [67,68].
When looking more closely at Table 4 and Table 5, it is clear that the effects driven by job strain were primarily explained by demand. Cultural differences should be considered. Qualitative research suggests that low job control is usually perceived as a stressor at work in Western societies with individualistic values. By contrast, in societies with collectivistic values, such as Asia, high control would be perceived as a distressing lack of structure [69]. Therefore, it is not surprising to see that job control did not show any effect on arterial stiffness [15,18], or even that harmful effect was observed [14] in some Asian studies. In addition, the Job Demand–Control model was applied to measure work stress in most of the epidemiological studies on work stress and arterial stiffness/atherosclerosis mentioned above. Alternatively, another work stress model in terms of Effort–Reward Imbalance developed by Siegrist is also worthy of noting. This model emphasizes the harmful effects of failed reciprocity between effort spent at work and reward received in turn (high effort/low reward) [70]. In the past two decades, cumulative research has figured out that effort–reward imbalance at work is associated with an elevated risk for cardiovascular disease independently of job strain [71,72]. Interestingly, a couple of studies revealed that effort–reward imbalance is significantly related to atherosclerosis cross-sectionally and progression of atherosclerosis longitudinally, either in Eastern culture or in Western culture, not only in men but also in women [37,38,43,53].
One novel approach of our study is the measurement of arterial stiffness. As “the non-invasive gold standard for measuring arterial stiffness”, pulse-wave velocity has been well recognized and accepted clinically [73]. In general, carotid-femoral or brachial-ankle pulse-wave velocity are recommended by the European Network for Non-invasive Investigation of Large Arteries and the American Heart Association (Dallas, TX, USA) [74,75], as applied by those epidemiological studies on work stress and arterial stiffness [14,15,16,17,18,19]. Technically, pulse-wave velocity could be measured in any defined segment of the human circulation or from a single-point measurement. Therefore, a new method of digital finger photoplethysmography has been developed in recent years to measure pulse-wave velocity [76,77] and the aging index derived from this new method has been verified to have a high repeatability and best correlations with other standard measures of pulse-wave velocity in clinical settings [78], while epidemiological studies also indicate the utility of finger photoplethysmography as an index of arterial stiffness predicting cardiovascular morbidity and mortality [32,33]. With respect to stress and arterial stiffness measured by finger photoplethysmography, one fascinating lab study found that stress-induced (mental arithmetics and cold pressor test) changes in pressure pulse reflection by fingertip signals were associated with blood flow changes in brachial and femoral arteries measured by ultrasound [79]. As far as we know, our study is the first epidemiological study worldwide examining relationship between psychosocial stress and pulse waveform from finger, with the novelty of non-invasiveness, inexpensiveness and convenience, especially for large-scale epidemiological research. Certainly, more studies are warranted in the future to justify its applicability. One obvious advantage of using clinically validated measure of arterial stiffness is to avoid the potential bias of self-reported psychosocial exposure assessment caused by disease perception, since all individuals with manifest cardiovascular disease were excluded from the analyses and the remaining ones were asymptomatic.
Despite these merits, several limitations to our study need to be addressed and must be taken into consideration when interpreting our findings. First, as the study design is cross-sectional, it is impossible to draw any causal inference for the direction of the observed associations. Yet, given the evidence of several longitudinal studies in this field [43,44,49,50,52,53], the findings of our study seem to be in accordance with the mainstream research, particularly in men. Second, much evidence has suggested that other psychosocial factors, such as depression and anxiety, play important roles in the etiology of cardiovascular disease [80,81]. One earlier study observed that the association between work stress and arterial stiffness was partly mediated by depressive and anxiety symptoms [19]. Moreover, genetic factors, such as Neuregulin-1 genotype and catechol-o-methyltransferase gene polymorphism, were found to have moderating effects between work stress and atherosclerosis [82,83]. Nonetheless, these factors were not included in our study. The third limitation is the restricted study sample. Although a wide range of industries and regions across Thailand were included, we were not able to recruit a nationally representative sample. Thus, the power of generalization based on current findings is limited. Also, the sample size was based upon an estimation from previous cross-sectional studies and not from a direct sample-size calculation.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, despite these limitations, this study adds an important new piece of evidence, that job strain is associated with arterial stiffness in Thai male employees. Extended studies by longitudinal investigations and intervention trials are needed to promote a healthy work environment.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Research Council of Thailand and the Social Security Office.

Author Contributions

Orawan Kaewboonchoo and Jian Li developed the study conception; Jian Li conducted the statistical analyses; Orawan Kaewboonchoo, Grace Sembajwe and Jian Li critically interpreted the results; Orawan Kaewboonchoo and Jian Li prepared a first draft of the manuscript; Grace Sembajwe contributed substantially to the argument and revision. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Schnall, P.L.; Dobson, M.; Landsbergis, P. Globalization, Work and Cardiovascular Disease. Int. J. Health Serv. 2016, 46, 656–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kivimäki, M.; Kawachi, I. Work stress as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Curr. Cardiol. Rep. 2015, 17, 630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Karasek, R.A. Job demands, job decision latitude and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Adm. Sci. Q. 1979, 24, 285–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kivimäki, M.; Nyberg, S.T.; Batty, G.D.; Fransson, E.I.; Heikkilä, K.; Alfredsson, L.; Bjorner, J.B.; Borritz, M.; Burr, H.; Casini, A.; et al. IPD-Work Consortium. Job strain as a risk factor for coronary heart disease: A collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data. Lancet 2012, 380, 1491–1497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fransson, E.I.; Nyberg, S.T.; Heikkilä, K.; Alfredsson, L.; Bjorner, J.B.; Borritz, M.; Burr, H.; Dragano, N.; Geuskens, G.A.; Goldberg, M.; et al. Job strain and the risk of stroke: An individual-participant data meta-analysis. Stroke 2015, 46, 557–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kasl, S.V. The influence of the work environment on cardiovascular health: A historical, conceptual and methodological perspective. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 1996, 1, 42–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Ross, R. The pathogenesis of atherosclerosis—An update. N. Engl. J. Med. 1986, 314, 488–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Napoli, C.; Lerman, L.O.; de Nigris, F.; Gossl, M.; Balestrieri, M.L.; Lerman, A. Rethinking primary prevention of atherosclerosis-related diseases. Circulation 2006, 114, 2517–2527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Wilson, M.D.; Conroy, L.M.; Dorevitch, S. Occupational stress and subclinical atherosclerosis: A systematic review. Int. J. Occup. Environ. Health 2014, 20, 271–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Avolio, A. Arterial Stiffness. Pulse (Basel) 2013, 1, 14–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Veerasamy, M.; Ford, G.A.; Neely, D.; Bagnall, A.; MacGowan, G.; Das, R.; Kunadian, V. Association of aging, arterial stiffness and cardiovascular disease: A review. Cardiol. Rev. 2014, 22, 223–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ikonomidis, I.; Makavos, G.; Lekakis, J. Arterial stiffness and coronary artery disease. Curr. Opin. Cardiol. 2015, 30, 422–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Safar, M.E. Arterial stiffness as a risk factor for clinical hypertension. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2018, 15, 97–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Nomura, K.; Nakao, M.; Karita, K.; Nishikitani, M.; Yano, E. Association between work-related psychological stress and arterial stiffness measured by brachial-ankle pulse-wave velocity in young Japanese males from an information service company. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 2005, 31, 352–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Michikawa, T.; Nishiwaki, Y.; Nomiyama, T.; Uemura, T.; O’Uchi, T.; Sakurai, H.; Omae, K.; Takebayashi, T. Job strain and arteriosclerosis in three different types of arteries among male Japanese factory workers. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 2008, 34, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Utsugi, M.; Saijo, Y.; Yoshioka, E.; Sato, T.; Horikawa, N.; Gong, Y.; Kishi, R. Relationship between two alternative occupational stress models and arterial stiffness: A cross-sectional study among Japanese workers. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health 2009, 82, 175–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Otsuka, T.; Kawada, T.; Ibuki, C.; Kusama, Y. Relationship between job strain and radial arterial wave reflection in middle-aged male workers. Prev. Med. 2009, 49, 260–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Chou, L.P.; Li, C.Y.; Hu, S.C. Work-related psychosocial hazards and arteriosclerosis. Int. Heart J. 2015, 56, 644–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Bomhof-Roordink, H.; Seldenrijk, A.; van Hout, H.P.; van Marwijk, H.W.; Diamant, M.; Penninx, B.W. Associations between life stress and subclinical cardiovascular disease are partly mediated by depressive and anxiety symptoms. J. Psychosom. Res. 2015, 78, 332–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Ohira, T.; Iso, H. Cardiovascular disease epidemiology in Asia: An overview. Circ. J. 2013, 77, 1646–1652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Statistical Thailand 2016. Available online: https://www.moph.go.th/new_bps/sites/default/files/statistical2016.pdf (accessed on 23 January 2018).
  22. Siriruttanapruk, S.; Anantagulnathi, P. Occupational health and safety situation and research priority in Thailand. Ind. Health 2004, 42, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kelly, M.; Strazdins, L.; Dellora, T.; Khamman, S.; Seubsman, S.A.; Sleigh, A.C. Thailand’s Work and Health Transition. Int. Labour. Rev. 2010, 149, 373–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yiengprugsawan, V.; Strazdins, L.; Lim, L.L.; Kelly, M.; Seubsman, S.A.; Sleigh, A.C. Thai Cohort Study Team. Physically and psychologically hazardous jobs and mental health in Thailand. Health Promot. Int. 2015, 30, 531–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kaewboonchoo, O.; Yingyuad, B.; Rawiworrakul, T.; Jinayon, A. Job stress and intent to stay at work among registered female nurses working in Thai hospitals. J. Occup. Health 2014, 56, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zhao, J.; Kelly, M.; Bain, C.; Seubsman, S.A.; Sleigh, A. Thai Cohort Study Team. Risk factors for cardiovascular disease mortality among 86,866 members of the Thai Cohort Study, 2005–2010. Glob. J. Health Sci. 2015, 7, 107–114. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  27. Belkic, K.L.; Landsbergis, P.A.; Schnall, P.L.; Baker, D. Is job strain a major source of cardiovascular disease risk? Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 2004, 30, 85–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Theorell, T.; Jood, K.; Järvholm, L.S.; Vingård, E.; Perk, J.; Östergren, P.O.; Hall, C. A systematic review of studies in the contributions of the work environment to ischaemic heart disease development. Eur. J. Public Health 2016, 26, 470–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Karasek, R.; Brisson, C.; Kawakami, N.; Houtman, I.; Bongers, P.; Amick, B. The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ): An instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 1998, 3, 322–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Phakthongsuk, P.; Apakupakul, N. Psychometric properties of the Thai version of the 22-item and 45-item Karasek job content questionnaire. Int. J. Occup. Med. Environ. Health 2008, 21, 331–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Takazawa, K.; Tanaka, N.; Fujita, M.; Matsuoka, O.; Saiki, T.; Aikawa, M.; Tamura, S.; Ibukiyama, C. Assessment of vasoactive agents and vascular aging by the second derivative of photoplethysmogram waveform. Hypertension 1998, 32, 365–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Otsuka, T.; Kawada, T.; Katsumata, M.; Ibuki, C. Utility of second derivative of the finger photoplethysmogram for the estimation of the risk of coronary heart disease in the general population. Circ. J. 2006, 70, 304–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Inoue, N.; Kawakami, H.; Yamamoto, H.; Ito, C.; Fujiwara, S.; Sasaki, H.; Kihara, Y. Second derivative of the finger photoplethysmogram and cardiovascular mortality in middle-aged and elderly Japanese women. Hypertens. Res. 2017, 40, 207–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Li, J.; Yang, W.; Cho, S.I. Gender differences in job strain, effort-reward imbalance and health functioning among Chinese physicians. Soc. Sci. Med. 2006, 62, 1066–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Theorell, T.; Hammarström, A.; Gustafsson, P.E.; Magnusson Hanson, L.; Janlert, U.; Westerlund, H. Job strain and depressive symptoms in men and women: A prospective study of the working population in Sweden. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2014, 68, 78–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Yoshimasu, K.; Liu, Y.; Kodama, H.; Sasazuki, S.; Washio, M.; Tanaka, K.; Tokunaga, S.; Kono, S.; Arai, H.; Koyanagi, S.; et al. Job strain, Type A behavior pattern and the prevalence of coronary atherosclerosis in Japanese working men. J. Psychosom. Res. 2000, 49, 77–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Xu, W.; Zhao, Y.; Guo, L.; Guo, Y.; Gao, W. The association between effort-reward imbalance and coronary atherosclerosis in a Chinese sample. Am. J. Ind. Med. 2010, 53, 655–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Xu, W.; Hang, J.; Cao, T.; Shi, R.; Zeng, W.; Deng, Y.; Gao, W.; Zhao, Y.; Guo, L. Job stress and carotid intima-media thickness in Chinese workers. J. Occup. Health 2010, 52, 257–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Hlatky, M.A.; Lam, L.C.; Lee, K.L.; Clapp-Channing, N.E.; Williams, R.B.; Pryor, D.B.; Califf, R.M.; Mark, D.B. Job strain and the prevalence and outcome of coronary artery disease. Circulation 1995, 92, 327–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Greenlund, K.J.; Kiefe, C.I.; Giles, W.H.; Liu, K. Associations of job strain and occupation with subclinical atherosclerosis: The CARDIA Study. Ann. Epidemiol. 2010, 20, 323–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Rozanski, A.; Gransar, H.; Kubzansky, L.D.; Wong, N.; Shaw, L.; Miranda-Peats, R.; Thomson, L.E.; Hayes, S.W.; Friedman, J.D.; Berman, D.S. Do psychological risk factors predict the presence of coronary atherosclerosis? Psychosom. Med. 2011, 73, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Wang, H.X.; Leineweber, C.; Kirkeeide, R.; Svane, B.; Schenck-Gustafsson, K.; Theorell, T.; Orth-Gomér, K. Psychosocial stress and atherosclerosis: Family and work stress accelerate progression of coronary disease in women. The Stockholm Female Coronary Angiography Study. J. Intern. Med. 2007, 261, 245–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Lynch, J.; Krause, N.; Kaplan, G.A.; Salonen, R.; Salonen, J.T. Workplace demands, economic reward and progression of carotid atherosclerosis. Circulation 1997, 96, 302–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Everson, S.A.; Lynch, J.W.; Chesney, M.A.; Kaplan, G.A.; Goldberg, D.E.; Shade, S.B.; Cohen, R.D.; Salonen, R.; Salonen, J.T. Interaction of workplace demands and cardiovascular reactivity in progression of carotid atherosclerosis: Population based study. BMJ 1997, 314, 553–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Muntaner, C.; Nieto, F.J.; Cooper, L.; Meyer, J.; Szklo, M.; Tyroler, H.A. Work organization and atherosclerosis: Findings from the ARIC study. Am. J. Prev. Med. 1998, 14, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Nordstrom, C.K.; Dwyer, K.M.; Merz, C.N.; Shircore, A.; Dwyer, J.H. Work-related stress and early atherosclerosis. Epidemiology 2001, 12, 180–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Rosvall, M.; Ostergren, P.O.; Hedblad, B.; Isacsson, S.O.; Janzon, L.; Berglund, G. Work-related psychosocial factors and carotid atherosclerosis. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2002, 31, 1169–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Kamarck, T.W.; Muldoon, M.F.; Shiffman, S.; Sutton-Tyrrell, K.; Gwaltney, C.; Janicki, D.L. Experiences of demand and control in daily life as correlates of subclinical carotid atherosclerosis in a healthy older sample. Health Psychol. 2004, 23, 24–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Kamarck, T.W.; Muldoon, M.F.; Shiffman, S.S.; Sutton-Tyrrell, K. Experiences of demand and control during daily life are predictors of carotid atherosclerotic progression among healthy men. Health Psychol. 2007, 26, 324–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Kamarck, T.W.; Shiffman, S.; Sutton-Tyrrell, K.; Muldoon, M.F.; Tepper, P. Daily psychological demands are associated with 6-year progression of carotid artery atherosclerosis: The Pittsburgh Healthy Heart Project. Psychosom. Med. 2012, 74, 432–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Hintsanen, M.; Kivimäki, M.; Elovainio, M.; Pulkki-Råback, L.; Keskivaara, P.; Juonala, M.; Raitakari, O.T.; Keltikangas-Järvinen, L. Job strain and early atherosclerosis: The Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns study. Psychosom. Med. 2005, 67, 740–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Rosenström, T.; Hintsanen, M.; Kivimäki, M.; Jokela, M.; Juonala, M.; Viikari, J.S.; Raitakari, O.T.; Keltikangas-Järvinen, L. Change in job strain and progression of atherosclerosis: The Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns study. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 2011, 16, 139–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Eller, N.H.; Netterstrøm, B. Psychosocial factors at home and at work and four-year progression in intima media thickness. Int. J. Behav. Med. 2007, 14, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Bugajska, J.; Widerszal-Bazyl, M.; Radkiewicz, P.; Pasierski, T.; Szulczyk, G.A.; Zabek, J.; Wojciechowska, B.; Jedryka-Góral, A. Perceived work-related stress and early atherosclerotic changes in healthy employees. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health 2008, 81, 1037–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Fujishiro, K.; Diez Roux, A.V.; Landsbergis, P.; Baron, S.; Barr, R.G.; Kaufman, J.D.; Polak, J.F.; Stukovsky, K.H. Associations of occupation, job control and job demands with intima-media thickness: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Occup. Environ. Med. 2011, 68, 319–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Fujishiro, K.; Diez Roux, A.V.; Landsbergis, P.; Kaufman, J.D.; Korcarz, C.E.; Stein, J.H. Occupational characteristics and the progression of carotid artery intima-media thickness and plaque over 9 years: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Occup. Environ. Med. 2015, 72, 690–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Camelo, L.V.; Giatti, L.; Chor, D.; Griep, R.H.; Benseñor, I.M.; Santos, I.S.; Kawachi, I.; Barreto, S.M. Associations of life course socioeconomic position and job stress with carotid intima-media thickness. The Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil). Soc. Sci. Med. 2015, 141, 91–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Campos-Serna, J.; Ronda-Pérez, E.; Artazcoz, L.; Moen, B.E.; Benavides, F.G. Gender inequalities in occupational health related to the unequal distribution of working and employment conditions: A systematic review. Int. J. Equity Health 2013, 12, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Mendelsohn, M.E.; Karas, R.H. Molecular and cellular basis of cardiovascular gender differences. Science 2005, 308, 1583–1587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Rossi, P.; Francès, Y.; Kingwell, B.A.; Ahimastos, A.A. Gender differences in artery wall biomechanical properties throughout life. J. Hypertens. 2011, 29, 1023–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Qu, B.; Qu, T. Causes of changes in carotid intima-media thickness: A literature review. Cardiovasc. Ultrasound 2015, 13, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. La Torre, G.; Sestili, C.; Mannocci, A.; Sinopoli, A.; De Paolis, M.; De Francesco, S.; Rapaccini, L.; Barone, M.; Iodice, V.; Lojodice, B.; et al. Association between Work Related Stress and Health Related Quality of Life: The impact of socio-demographic variables. A cross sectional study in a region of central Italy. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Chandola, T.; Kuper, H.; Singh-Manoux, A.; Bartley, M.; Marmot, M. The effect of control at home on CHD events in the Whitehall II study: Gender differences in psychosocial domestic pathways to social inequalities in CHD. Soc. Sci. Med. 2004, 58, 1501–1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Sabbath, E.L.; Mejía-Guevara, I.; Noelke, C.; Berkman, L.F. The long-term mortality impact of combined job strain and family circumstances: A life course analysis of working American mothers. Soc. Sci. Med. 2015, 146, 111–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Xu, L.; Siegrist, J.; Cao, W.; Li, L.; Tomlinson, B.; Chan, J. Measuring job stress and family stress in Chinese working women: A validation study focusing on blood pressure and psychosomatic symptoms. Women Health 2004, 39, 31–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Zhou, M.; Wege, N.; Gu, H.; Shang, L.; Li, J.; Siegrist, J. Work and family stress is associated with menstrual disorders but not with fibrocystic changes: Cross-sectional findings in Chinese working women. J. Occup. Health 2010, 52, 361–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Vaccarino, V.; Badimon, L.; Corti, R.; de Wit, C.; Dorobantu, M.; Hall, A.; Koller, A.; Marzilli, M.; Pries, A.; Bugiardini, R.; Working Group on Coronary Pathophysiology and Microcirculation. Ischaemic heart disease in women: Are there sex differences in pathophysiology and risk factors? Position paper from the working group on coronary pathophysiology and microcirculation of the European Society of Cardiology. Cardiovasc. Res. 2011, 90, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. McSweeney, J.C.; Rosenfeld, A.G.; Abel, W.M.; Braun, L.T.; Burke, L.E.; Daugherty, S.L.; Fletcher, G.F.; Gulati, M.; Mehta, L.S.; Pettey, C.; et al. Preventing and Experiencing Ischemic Heart Disease as a Woman: State of the Science: A Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2016, 133, 1302–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Mazzola, J.J.; Schonfeld, I.S.; Spector, P.E. What qualitative research has taught us about occupational stress. Stress Health 2011, 27, 93–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Siegrit, J. Adverse health effects of high-effort/low-reward conditions. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 1996, 1, 27–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Dragano, N.; Siegrist, J.; Nyberg, S.T.; Lunau, T.; Fransson, E.I.; Alfredsson, L.; Bjorner, J.B.; Borritz, M.; Burr, H.; Erbel, R.; et al. Effort-reward imbalance at work and incident coronary heart disease: A multicohort study of 90,164 individuals. Epidemiology 2017, 28, 619–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Eddy, P.; Wertheim, E.H.; Kingsley, M.; Wright, B.J. Associations between the effort-reward imbalance model of workplace stress and indices of cardiovascular health: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2017, 83, 252–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Townsend, R.R. Arterial Stiffness: Recommendations and Standardization. Pulse (Basel) 2017, 4, 3–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Laurent, S.; Cockcroft, J.; Van Bortel, L.; Boutouyrie, P.; Giannattasio, C.; Hayoz, D.; Pannier, B.; Vlachopoulos, C.; Wilkinson, I.; Struijker-Boudier, H. European Network for Non-invasive Investigation of Large Arteries. Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: Methodological issues and clinical applications. Eur. Heart J. 2006, 27, 2588–2605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Townsend, R.R.; Wilkinson, I.B.; Schiffrin, E.L.; Avolio, A.P.; Chirinos, J.A.; Cockcroft, J.R.; Heffernan, K.S.; Lakatta, E.G.; McEniery, C.M.; Mitchell, G.F.; et al. American Heart Association Council on Hypertension. Recommendations for Improving and Standardizing Vascular Research on Arterial Stiffness: A Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association. Hypertension 2015, 66, 698–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Alty, S.R.; Angarita-Jaimes, N.; Millasseau, S.C.; Chowienczyk, P.J. Predicting arterial stiffness from the digital volume pulse waveform. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2007, 54, 2268–2275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Elgendi, M. On the analysis of fingertip photoplethysmogram signals. Curr. Cardiol. Rev. 2012, 8, 14–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Von Wowern, E.; Östling, G.; Nilsson, P.M.; Olofsson, P. Digital Photoplethysmography for Assessment of Arterial Stiffness: Repeatability and Comparison with Applanation Tonometry. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0135659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Ahlund, C.; Pettersson, K.; Lind, L. Pulse wave analysis on fingertip arterial pressure: Effects of age, gender and stressors on reflected waves and their relation to brachial and femoral artery blood flow. Clin. Physiol. Funct. Imaging 2008, 28, 86–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Penninx, B.W. Depression and cardiovascular disease: Epidemiological evidence on their linking mechanisms. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2017, 74, 277–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Emdin, C.A.; Odutayo, A.; Wong, C.X.; Tran, J.; Hsiao, A.J.; Hunn, B.H. Meta-analysis of anxiety as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Am. J. Cardiol. 2016, 118, 511–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Hintsanen, M.; Elovainio, M.; Puttonen, S.; Kivimäki, M.; Raitakari, O.T.; Lehtimäki, T.; Rontu, R.; Juonala, M.; Kähönen, M.; Viikari, J.; et al. Neuregulin-1 genotype moderates the association between job strain and early atherosclerosis in young men. Ann. Behav. Med. 2007, 33, 148–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Hintsanen, M.; Elovainio, M.; Puttonen, S.; Kivimäki, M.; Lehtimäki, T.; Kähönen, M.; Juonala, M.; Rontu, R.; Viikari, J.S.; Raitakari, O.T.; et al. Val/Met polymorphism of the COMT gene moderates the association between job strain and early atherosclerosis in young men. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2008, 50, 649–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Characteristics of study subjects (n = 2141).
Table 1. Characteristics of study subjects (n = 2141).
Variables Men (n = 858)Women (n = 1283)p-Value
Age (years) 34.346 ± 7.94534.885 ± 8.4920.1346
Marital statusSingle (unmarried, divorced, or widowed)294 (34.27%)432 (33.67%)0.7758
Married564 (65.73%)851 (66.33%)
EducationCollege or below674 (78.55%)1071 (83.48%)0.0041
University or above184 (21.45%)212 (16.52%)
Employment positionLow (without managerial responsibility)581 (67.72%)1058 (82.46%)<0.0001
High (with managerial responsibility)277 (32.28%)225 (17.54%)
SmokingYes279 (32.52%)7 (0.55%)<0.0001
No579 (67.48%)1276 (99.45%)
Alcohol drinkingYes193 (22.49%)17 (1.33%)<0.0001
No665 (77.51%)1266 (98.67%)
Physical exerciseYes223 (25.99%)545 (42.48%)<0.0001
No635 (74.01%)738 (57.52%)
Vegetable intakeSeldom or sometimes497 (57.93%)515 (40.14%)<0.0001
Everyday361 (42.07%)768 (59.86%)
Fatty food intakeSeldom or sometimes713 (83.10%)1051 (81.92%)0.4813
Everyday145 (16.90%)232 (18.08%)
Body mass index (BMI)Obese (BMI > 30)42 (4.90%)102 (7.95%)0.0008
Overweight (BMI > 25 and < 30)226 (26.34%)268 (20.89%)
Normal (BMI < 25)590 (68.76%)913 (71.16%)
HypertensionNo693 (80.77%)1139 (88.78%)<0.0001
Yes165 (19.23%)144 (11.22%)
Demand 33.871 ± 5.65535.128 ± 6.188<0.0001
Control 73.608 ± 10.89769.230 ± 11.795<0.0001
Demand/control (D/C) ratio 0.941 ± 0.2161.046 ± 0.279<0.0001
Arterial stiffness index −0.637 ± 0.292−0.442 ± 0.330<0.0001
Continuous variables are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and categorical variables are expressed as number (percent). Statistical analysis was performed with Student’s t test for continuous variables and chi-square test for categorical variables.
Table 2. Correlations among demand, control and arterial stiffness index (correlation coefficients).
Table 2. Correlations among demand, control and arterial stiffness index (correlation coefficients).
Study Samples DemandControlArterial Stiffness Index
Total (n = 2141)Demand1
Control0.060 **1
Arterial stiffness index0.066 **−0.057 **1
Men (n = 858)Demand1
Control0.093 **1
Arterial stiffness index0.059−0.0071
Women (n = 1283)Demand1
Control0.074 **1
Arterial stiffness index0.026−0.0031
Pearson correlation, ** p < 0.01.
Table 3. Differences of arterial stiffness index by job strain groups (means and SDs).
Table 3. Differences of arterial stiffness index by job strain groups (means and SDs).
Variables Total (n = 2141)Men (n = 858)Women (n = 1283)
Job strainLow strain−0.559 ± 0.324−0.664 ± 0.298−0.450 ± 0.322
Active−0.532 ± 0.326−0.643 ± 0.288−0.432 ± 0.330
Passive−0.518 ± 0.333−0.644 ± 0.296−0.447 ± 0.340
High strain−0.484 ± 0.331−0.604 ± 0.285−0.434 ± 0.329
p value0.00340.18390.8850
Analysis of variance.
Table 4. Associations of job strain with arterial stiffness in total sample (n = 2141, β coefficients with 95% CIs).
Table 4. Associations of job strain with arterial stiffness in total sample (n = 2141, β coefficients with 95% CIs).
Variables Model IModel IIModel IIIModel IV
DemandIncrease per SD0.011 (−0.000, 0.023)0.012 (−0.000, 0.023)0.011 (−0.001, 0.023)0.011 (−0.001, 0.022)
ControlDecrease per SD0.007 (−0.006, 0.019)0.006 (−0.006, 0.018)0.006 (−0.006, 0.018)0.007 (−0.005, 0.020)
Adjusted R20.3240.3280.3280.333
Job strainLow strain0000
Active0.011 (−0.023, 0.045)0.011 (−0.023, 0.045)0.012 (−0.022, 0.046)0.010 (−0.024, 0.044)
Passive0.009 (−0.029, 0.047)0.008 (−0.030, 0.046)0.010 (−0.028, 0.048)0.011 (−0.027, 0.049)
High strain0.034 (−0.002, 0.070)0.033 (−0.002, 0.069)0.034 (−0.002, 0.070)0.034 (−0.001, 0.070)
Adjusted R20.3240.3280.3280.333
Linear regression. Model I: Adjusted for age, gender, marital status, education and employment position; Model II: Model I + additionally adjusted for smoking, alcohol drinking and physical exercise; Model III: Model II + additionally adjusted for vegetable intake and fatty food intake; Model IV: Model III + additionally adjusted for BMI and hypertension.
Table 5. Associations of job strain with arterial stiffness in men (n = 858) and women (n = 1283) (β coefficients with 95% confidence intervals (CIs)).
Table 5. Associations of job strain with arterial stiffness in men (n = 858) and women (n = 1283) (β coefficients with 95% confidence intervals (CIs)).
Variables Men (Fully Adjusted Model)Women (Fully Adjusted Model)
DemandIncrease per SD0.020 (0.002, 0.037) *0.006 (−0.009, 0.022)
ControlDecrease per SD0.015 (−0.004, 0.033)0.002 (−0.014, 0.019)
Adjusted R20.2300.307
Job strainLow strain00
Active0.027 (−0.022, 0.076)0.015 (−0.029, 0.059)
Passive0.036 (−0.018, 0.090)0.000 (−0.041, 0.041)
High strain0.078 (0.026, 0.130) **0.015 (−0.032, 0.062)
Adjusted R20.2330.308
Linear regression, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, adjusted for age, marital status, education, employment position, smoking, alcohol drinking, physical exercise, vegetable intake, fatty food intake, BMI and hypertension.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kaewboonchoo, O.; Sembajwe, G.; Li, J. Associations between Job Strain and Arterial Stiffness: A Large Survey among Enterprise Employees from Thailand. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 659. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph15040659

AMA Style

Kaewboonchoo O, Sembajwe G, Li J. Associations between Job Strain and Arterial Stiffness: A Large Survey among Enterprise Employees from Thailand. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2018; 15(4):659. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph15040659

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kaewboonchoo, Orawan, Grace Sembajwe, and Jian Li. 2018. "Associations between Job Strain and Arterial Stiffness: A Large Survey among Enterprise Employees from Thailand" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 15, no. 4: 659. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph15040659

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop