Next Article in Journal
Risk Factors for Workplace Bullying: A Systematic Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Associations between Fitness Measures and Change of Direction Speeds with and without Occupational Loads in Female Police Officers
Previous Article in Journal
Associations between Community Environmental-Level Factors and Diet Quality in Geographically Isolated Australian Communities
Previous Article in Special Issue
Manual Cultivation Operations in Poplar Stands: A Characterization of Job Difficulty and Risks of Health Impairment
Article

Chinese Public Response to Occupational Safety and Health Problems—A Study Based on Psychological Distance

School of Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16(11), 1944; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph16111944
Received: 25 April 2019 / Revised: 25 May 2019 / Accepted: 28 May 2019 / Published: 31 May 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Worker and Public Health and Safety: Current Views)
Background: The effective governance of occupational safety and health problems is inseparable from public participation and response. Methods: Based on the perspective of psychological distance, this paper adopted a quadratic response surface regression analysis method to investigate cognitive, emotional, expected and behavioral distances to occupational safety and health topics and their corresponding responses. Results: As demonstrated by the data statistics and response surface regression analysis results for 2386 valid samples, the relatively close psychological distance dimensions of the public with regard to occupational safety and health problems indicated the high endogenous tendency of the public to pay attention to occupational safety and health problems. The consistency between public cognitive and emotional distance with regard to occupational safety and health presented a “progressive decrease” in response towards behavioral distance, whereas the consistency between cognitive and expected distance reflected “convex” changes towards behavioral distance. Finally, the consistency between emotional and expected distance generally presented a “progressive increase” response towards behavioral distance. Conclusions: This research provides information regarding the public awareness of and response to occupational safety and health issues and how to promote occupational safety and health issues in order to improve them. View Full-Text
Keywords: occupational safety and health; psychological distance; public response; response gap occupational safety and health; psychological distance; public response; response gap
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, S.; Chen, H.; Huang, X.; Hou, C.; Chen, F. Chinese Public Response to Occupational Safety and Health Problems—A Study Based on Psychological Distance. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 1944. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph16111944

AMA Style

Li S, Chen H, Huang X, Hou C, Chen F. Chinese Public Response to Occupational Safety and Health Problems—A Study Based on Psychological Distance. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019; 16(11):1944. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph16111944

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Shanshan, Hong Chen, Xinru Huang, Congmei Hou, and Feiyu Chen. 2019. "Chinese Public Response to Occupational Safety and Health Problems—A Study Based on Psychological Distance" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16, no. 11: 1944. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph16111944

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop