Next Article in Journal
Quantification of Elemental Contaminants in Unregulated Water across Western Navajo Nation
Next Article in Special Issue
An Optimization-Based Approach to Social Network Group Decision Making with an Application to Earthquake Shelter-Site Selection
Previous Article in Journal
Body Image Concern and Eating Disorder Symptoms Among Elite Icelandic Athletes
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Solidification of Lead-Zinc Smelting Slag through Bentonite Supported Alkali-Activated Slag Cementitious Material
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 16
Issue 15
10.3390/ijerph16152729
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Case Report

Land Subsidence Control Zone and Policy for the Environmental Protection of Shanghai

by
Xi-Cun He
1,2,
Tian-Liang Yang
2,
Shui-Long Shen
3,*,
Ye-Shuang Xu
1,2,* and
Arul Arulrajah
4
1
State Key Laboratory of Ocean Engineering, School of Naval Architecture, Ocean, and Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
2
Key Laboratory of Land Subsidence Monitoring and Prevention, Ministry of Land and Resources & Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Land subsidence, Shanghai 201204, China
3
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, Shantou University, Shantou 515063, China
4
Department of Civil and Construction Engineering, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne 3122, Australia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16(15), 2729; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph16152729
Submission received: 11 June 2019 / Revised: 28 July 2019 / Accepted: 30 July 2019 / Published: 31 July 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Hazard, Risk and Disaster Management)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Land subsidence was once a major geo-hazard in the city of Shanghai, China. From 1921 to 1965, the maximum cumulative land subsidence in the urban areas of China reached 2.6 m. This large subsidence has resulted in high economic losses for Shanghai. The Regulation of Prevention and Control of Land Subsidence of Shanghai Municipality was published in 2013 (simply cited as the 2013-regulation in the following context). The characteristics of the 2013-regulation included the combination of the subsidence monitoring network and the groundwater detection network due to both the effects of groundwater withdrawal and construction. In addition, the setting up of a supervision system was also incorporated in the 2013-regulation. To control the land subsidence, Shanghai demarcated three land subsidence control zones, where special measures have been implemented. From a strategic environmental assessment (SEA) point of view, the 2013-regulation attains a high total score, indicating that the control of groundwater withdrawal and recharge is effective. The observed land subsidence over the past six years also confirms the effectiveness of the 2013-regulation with the most consideration of SEA for sustainable environment protection in Shanghai. However, more effort should be made in the implementation of SEA in land subsidence control in the future.

1. Introduction

Land subsidence has been observed in many large metropolitan cities such as Shanghai [1,2,3], Tianjin [4,5,6], Xi’an [7], Houston [8], Bangkok [9], and Mexico [10]. Land subsidence results in loss of altitude, invasion of seawater, and urban waterlogging [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. Non-uniform land subsidence results in damages to structures such as underground tunnels and elevated roads [19,20]. With the improvement in environmental protection, cities are increasingly monitoring and controlling land subsidence. A variety of control policies for land subsidence has been established in the cities suffering land subsidence. The land subsidence in Bangkok once reached more than 1 m over the past 35 years [9]. In trying to mitigate groundwater withdrawal, the Bangkok government decided to raise the price of groundwater at the turn of the century. Mexico City is another well-known city that suffers from serious land subsidence. The regional Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar with Small Baseline Interferometry Time-series Techniques (InSAR-SB time-series) survey was conducted by researchers to monitor the land subsidence in central Mexico [10]. The monitoring system can provide guidance for groundwater recharge/withdrawal balance. In Houston, a large number of GPS stations were installed to study the ground deformation induced by land subsidence [8]. A monitoring network based on GPS was installed to collect continuous data [21].
The monitoring of land subsidence in Shanghai can be first traced back to the beginning of the 20th century. From 1921 to 1965, the maximum cumulative land subsidence in urbanized districts reached 2.6 m (nearly 59 mm per year). Since 1966, the Shanghai government has realized that land subsidence can cause geo-hazards and significant economic losses. Groundwater withdrawal in urban areas was forbidden. Until 1985, the land subsidence in urban areas was well controlled (only 1 mm per year). At the same time, the land subsidence in suburban regions was evident since the groundwater pumping. However, with the rapid development of China’s economy and society, land subsidence in both urban and suburban regions began to deteriorate after 1986 [22]. The implementation of multiple measurements since 2000 has reduced the annual land subsidence to below critical values. In 2006, the Regulation of Prevention and Control of Land Subsidence of Shanghai Municipality (labeled as the 2006-regulation) was implemented. But the 2006-regulaton did not follow the principles of strategic environmental assessment (SEA) for sustainable urban development [23]. Most of the principles of SEA were just partially considered in the 2006-regulation. Considering the deficiency of 2006-regulation, the Regulation of Prevention and Control of Land Subsidence of Shanghai Municipality in 2013 (labeled as the 2013-regulation) was issued [24,25]. To ensure the sustainable development of Shanghai, the implementation effect of the 2013-regulation should be evaluated after 6 years of application.
The intent of this paper is to introduce the characteristics and measurements of the 2013-regulation and evaluate the effect of the implementation of the 2013-regulation on the control of land subsidence in Shanghai. First, the situation and reasons of land subsidence in Shanghai is introduced. Then the history of subsidence management in Shanghai is presented. Based on the characteristics of the 2013-regulation, the specific measures of land subsidence in Shanghai is also introduced. Lastly, the implementation effect of the 2013-regulation is discussed, based on the SEA level.

2. Situation and Reasons of Land Subsidence in Shanghai

Figure 1 shows the overall distribution of land subsidence in Shanghai from 1921 to 2016 [18]. The largest land subsidence in urban areas was up to 2.6 m (Figure 2). Until now, the annual land subsidence in Shanghai is controlled within 6 mm [26]. Groundwater withdrawal is the main reason that results in land subsidence in Shanghai. Figure 2 is a profile that shows the geology and hydrogeology information of Shanghai. The land in Shanghai is composed of soft deltaic sediments with several isolated outcrops of bedrock [23]. Most of the bedrock is buried under Quaternary sediments [27]. The aquifers in Shanghai consist of a phreatic aquifer group (Aq0) and five confined aquifers (AqI to AqV), of which AqII to AqV are the groundwater withdrawal layers in Shanghai [28,29]. Aq0 is not represented in Figure 2.
Shanghai is a coastal city that has 213 km of coastlines. With the rapid changes in sea-level and coastal land subsidence, the risk of coastal hazards such as marine flooding, storm surges, and tsunamis, will increase annually [30,31,32]. Figure 3 shows the global average sea level from 1990 to 2009. As the change in global climate continues, the sea level is rising fast and is expected to continue rising for centuries [33,34]. In the Shanghai coastal area, the mean annual eustatic sea level of Yangtze River estuary reached 2.5 mm from 1997 to 2010 [35,36]. From 1997, the sea level along Shanghai will likely rise 86.6 mm, 185.5 mm, and 433.1 mm by 2030, 2050, and 2100, respectively [36]. Meanwhile, ongoing coastal land subsidence will amplify sea-level rise [36]. With the combination of coastal land subsidence and sea-level rise, the risk of coastal hazards will be higher. Since land subsidence will cause many problems with urban infrastructure and coastal hazards, control measures should be adopted to prevent damage induced by land subsidence.

3. History of Subsidence Management in Shanghai

Figure 4 shows the publishing time of main management policies for land subsidence in Shanghai over the time frame of 1920 till present day. The land subsidence in Shanghai was first recorded in 1921. The Shanghai government first implemented the control of land subsidence in 1963, when the cumulative land subsidence had reached approximately 1.69 m. In 1963, the regulation for deep wells in Shanghai was issued. In 1966, the artificial recharge was conducted in the urban area, based on the policy named “winter-recharge and summer-withdraw”. At the end of 1960s, the land subsidence in urban area was generally controlled. Following the initial success, the government further enhanced the groundwater recharge capacity, and the withdrawal of groundwater was adjusted to the deep aquifers [37]. With the urbanization of Shanghai, a large number of factories were removed from the urban area to the suburban region. Most of deep wells in the urban area were shut down during this period. In order to control increasing land subsidence in suburban areas, the municipal water supply project was conducted to reduce groundwater withdrawals.
For better control of land subsidence, Shanghai began building its own monitoring network by installing levelling points in the entire administrative region. In 1996, a regulation for the management of land subsidence monitoring network (labeled as the 1996-regulation) was approved by the municipal government. As the protection of groundwater is a regional issue in the large scale, the Shanghai municipal government persuaded Jiangsu province authorities to enhance the ban to groundwater withdrawals. In the current century, a great quantity of skyscrapers constructed in urban areas have further aggravated land subsidence. In 2003, the urban planning (labeled as the 2003-planning) proposed by the Shanghai Municipal Planning and Ground & Resources Administration, allowed the increase of a public greenbelt and space, and to decrease the plot ratio and the amount of buildings. Due to the high economic cost of land subsidence, the municipal government established a threshold of land subsidence at a value of 6 mm/year in the Twelfth Five-year Plan of subsidence management. In 2013, the latest regulation for the management of land subsidence in Shanghai was approved, and it has been successfully implemented for the past 6 years. Relying on the 2013-regulation, the land subsidence in the entire administrative region has been reduced to about 5 mm per year.

4. Characteristics and Specific Measurements of Regulation

The 2013-regulation was drafted based on a wide range of scientific research projects and experiences from decades of subsidence management. There are four main characteristics compared to previous regulations, which are: (i) Combining the subsidence monitoring network and groundwater detecting network, (ii) considering the effect of groundwater withdrawal and project construction, (iii) building a supervision system for the entire process, and (iv) dividing the Shanghai city into land subsidence control zones. More specific measurements related to these characteristics are presented in the following sections.

4.1. Combining Monitoring Networks

The 2013-regulation was proposed to improve the subsidence monitoring network based on the existing monitoring points for major municipal projects. The monitoring network uses a variety of technologies, including GPS and GIS, to automatically measure land subsidence each year. Meanwhile, the setting up of a groundwater detecting network was required for these purposes. One important measure in the 2013-regulation was to combine these two monitoring networks, which enables monitoring of the land subsidence and groundwater level in the entire administrative region, as shown in Figure 5. All the related monitoring data should be made available to the public.

4.2. Considering Multiple Factors

Both the dewatering of groundwater and construction of high-rise buildings are considered as important factors that contribute to land subsidence. The municipal government invests in the construction of recharge wells and makes groundwater recharge plans each year. Groundwater withdrawal has been forbidden in the region covered by the pipeline network of water supply since the application of the 2013-regulation. Based on the subsidence monitoring results, a planning area called subsidence-sensitive area is defined. Based on the current land subsidence and the development of urbanization, a prior prevention area is further designed in the planning area. The planning of urbanization in this region should adjust the development scale to prevent the further land subsidence.

4.3. Supervising the Entire Process

A supervision system for the 2013-regulation was developed to prevent land subsidence, monitor the process, and mitigate geo-hazards caused by land subsidence including loss of altitude, invasion of seawater, and urban waterlogging. According to monitoring results, the control objective of land subsidence should be determined each year. A series of measurements are provided to prevent the occurrence and mitigate the adverse effect of land subsidence.
In subsidence-sensitive areas, a scientific assessment is required before the excavation of foundation pits of depths exceeding 15 m. The necessary contents in the assessment include: (i) The possibility of suffering from land subsidence for the surrounding buildings, (ii) the influence degree and scale of land subsidence during and after the construction, and (iii) suggestions for the prevention of land subsidence.
During construction, monitoring networks together with newly installed detecting wells are used to conduct real-time supervision. In the maintenance period, the land subsidence near major municipal projects should be uploaded to the administrative departments. Government officers should regularly inspect the equipment in the field and provide guidance for daily operation.
If an unacceptable amount of subsidence occurs, related contingency plans will be performed immediately to mitigate all unfavorable factors. For the subsequent sanctions after the occurrence of land subsidence, the 2013-regulation defines specific legal liabilities and perfect standards in different conditions of land subsidence.

4.4. Dividing Land Subsidence into Control Zones

4.4.1. Division of Land Subsidence Control Zone

On the basis of the 2013-regulation, Shanghai has proposed the innovative concept of land subsidence control zones, which consider the geological background, urban development planning, land subsidence susceptibility, and the development status of land subsidence. Shanghai is divided into three land subsidence control zones, including key land subsidence control zones I (containing I1, I2, I3), sub-key land subsidence control zones II, and general land subsidence control zones III. The main information of each land subsidence control zone, such as area, distribution areas and control objectives, are listed in Table 1. The different land subsidence control zones distributed over Shanghai are given and mapped (Figure 6).

4.4.2. Main Control Measures

Different control zones have different measures to control land subsidence in Shanghai. There are five control measures in control zones I1, seven control measures in control zones I2, three control measures in control zones I3, three control measures in control zones II and four control measures in control zones III. The detailed control measures applied in each control zones are listed in Table 2.

5. Discussion

Shepherd and Ortolano [40] proposed a strategic environmental assessment (SEA) method to evaluate the environmental impact of policies, plans and programs. Xu et al. [23] used SEA to evaluate the 2006-regulation [24] for the management of land subsidence in Shanghai. The eventual results including 1996-regulation, 2003-planning, and 2006-regulation were not satisfactory. The improvement of the 2013-regulation in SEA analysis is presented in Table 3. The score of the 2013-regulation in SEA was 24, while the score of the 2006-regulation in SEA was 16 (total score is 30).
Figure 7 shows the volume of groundwater withdrawal and recharge from 2000 to 2017 in Shanghai [41]. Before the approval of the 2013-regulation, the groundwater withdrawal showed a decreasing tendency and groundwater recharge showed an increasing tendency [42,43]. After the approval of the 2013-regulation, the decrease of groundwater withdrawal and the increase of groundwater recharge were more obvious.
The 2013-regulation has been implemented for nearly 6 years since being approved in 2013. Figure 8 shows the monitoring results of land subsidence published in the Shanghai Geological Environmental Bulletin [26]. After the approval of the 2013-regulation, the land subsidence in the entire administrative region shows a decreasing tendency. All the recent monitoring results are below the limited value (6 mm/year). The effectiveness of the 2013-regulation can be confirmed by field monitoring results.
Shanghai is a city with plentiful water resources, such that land subsidence can be limited by the control of groundwater withdrawal and recharge. The 2013-regulation is formulated according to the characteristics of Shanghai city. The experience of the 2013-regulation on Shanghai can be used for reference even though it may not be directly applied to other cities. For example, it is inadvisable to limit the land subsidence by controlling groundwater withdrawal in the North China Plain due to the shortage of water resources.

6. Conclusions

The 2013-regulation was implemented to manage land subsidence due to sustainable urbanization. By reviewing the history of land subsidence management in Shanghai, the constitutive principle was to improve the effectiveness and sustainability of management measures. The 2013-regulation further combines the subsidence monitoring network and groundwater detecting network, considering effects of groundwater withdrawal and constructions, and building a supervision system in the entire process. Based on the characteristics of the 2013-regulation, Shanghai is divided into three land subsidence control zones, and each control zone has its special measures to control the land subsidence. According to the field data, the implementation of the 2013-regulation controlled the annual land subsidence to below the limited value. Hence, the effectiveness of SEA in the municipal’s environmental management is verified.

Author Contributions

This paper represents a result of collaborative teamwork. Y.-S.X. and S.-L.S. developed the concept of the manuscript; X.-C.H. drafted the manuscript; T.-L.Y. provided constructive suggestions and revised the manuscript; A.A. revised the manuscript. The five authors contributed equally to this work.

Funding

The research was funded by the Key Laboratory of Land Subsidence Monitoring and Prevention, Ministry of Land and Resources in China (Grant No. KLLSMP201502), the Innovative Research Funding of the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (Grant No. 18DZ1201102), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (973 Program: 2015CB057802).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Shen, S.L.; Wu, H.N.; Cui, Y.J.; Yin, Z.Y. Long-term settlement behavior of metro tunnels in the soft deposits of Shanghai. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2014, 40, 309–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Shen, S.L.; Wang, J.P.; Wu, H.N.; Xu, Y.S.; Ye, G.L.; Yin, Z.Y. Evaluation of hydraulic conductivity for both marine and deltaic deposits based on piezocone testing. Ocean Eng. 2015, 110, 174–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Shen, S.L.; Wu, Y.X.; Misra, A. Calculation of head difference at two sides of a cut-off barrier during excavation dewatering. Comput. Geotech. 2017, 91, 192–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Shen, S.L.; Wu, Y.X.; Xu, Y.S.; Hino, T.; Wu, H.N. Evaluation of hydraulic parameters from pumping tests of multi-aquifers with vertical leakage in Tianjin. Comput. Geotech. 2015, 68, 196–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wu, Y.X.; Lyu, H.M.; Shen, J.S.; Arulrajah, A. Geological and hydrogeological environment in Tianjin with potential geohazards and groundwater control during excavation. Environ. Earth Sci. 2018, 77, 392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wu, Y.X.; Lyu, H.M.; Han, J.; Shen, S.L. Dewatering-induced building settlement around a deep excavation in soft deposit in Tianjin, China. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 2019, 145, 05019003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, Z.F.; Cheng, W.C.; Wang, Y.Q. Investigation into geohazards during urbanization process of xi’an, china. Nat. Hazards 2018, 92, 1937–1953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, G.; Soler, T. Using OPUS for measuring vertical displacements in Houston, Texas. J. Surv. Eng. 2013, 139, 126–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Phien-Wej, N.; Giao, P.H.; Nutalaya, P. Land subsidence in Bangkok, Thailand. Eng. Geol. 2006, 82, 187–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chaussard, E.; Wdowinski, S.; Cabral-Cano, E.; Amelung, F. Ground subsidence in central Mexico detected by ALOS InSAR time-series. Remote Sens. Environ. 2014, 140, 94–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wu, Y.X.; Shen, S.L.; Yuan, D.J. Characteristics of dewatering induced drawdown curve under blocking effect of retaining wall in aquifer. J. Hydrol. 2016, 539, 554–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wu, Y.X.; Shen, J.S.; Cheng, W.C.; Hino, T. Semi-analytical solution to pumping test data with barrier, wellbore storage, and partial penetration effects. Eng. Geol. 2017, 226, 44–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lyu, H.M.; Sun, W.J.; Shen, S.L.; Arulrajah, A. Flood risk assessment in metro systems of mega-cities using a GIS-based modeling approach. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 626, 1012–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lyu, H.M.; Shen, S.L.; Arulrajah, A. Assessment of Geohazards and preventive countermeasures using AHP incorporated with GIS in Lanzhou, China. Sustainability 2018, 10, 304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Xu, Y.S.; Shen, S.L.; Lai, Y.; Zhou, A.N. Design of Sponge City: Lessons learnt from an ancient drainage system in Ganzhou, China. J. Hydrol. 2018, 563, 900–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Xu, Y.S.; Yan, X.X.; Shen, S.L.; Zhou, A.N. Experimental investigation on the blocking of groundwater seepage from waterproof curtain during dewatering pumping in excavation. Hydrogeol. J. 2019, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lyu, H.M.; Shen, S.L.; Zhou, A.N.; Yang, J. Perspectives for flood risk assessment and management for mega-city metro system. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2019, 84, 31–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lyu, H.M.; Shen, S.L.; Zhou, W.H.; Zhou, A.N. Flood risk assessment of metro systems in a subsiding environment using the interval FAHP-FCA approach. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2019, 50, 101682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wu, H.N.; Shen, S.L.; Yang, J. Identification of tunnel settlement caused by land subsidence in soft deposit of Shanghai. J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 2017, 31, 04017092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lyu, H.M.; Sun, W.J.; Shen, S.L.; Zhou, A.N. Risk assessment using a new consulting process in fuzzy AHP. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, G.; Yu, J.; Ortega, J.; Saenz, G.; Burrough, T.; Neill, R. A stable reference frame for the study of ground deformation in the Houston metropolitan area, Texas. J. Geod. Sci. 2013, 3, 188–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Shen, S.L.; Xu, Y.S. Numerical evaluation of land subsidence induced by groundwater pumping in Shanghai. Can. Geotech. J. 2011, 48, 1378–1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xu, Y.S.; Shen, S.L.; Ren, D.J.; Wu, H.N. Analysis of factors in ground subsidence in Shanghai: A view based on a strategic environmental assessment. Sustainability 2016, 8, 573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Regulation of Prevention and Control of Land Subsidence of Shanghai Municipality. Decree of Shanghai Municipal People’s Government (in Chinese). 2006. Available online: http://www.shanghai.gov.cn/nw2/nw2314/nw2319/nw11494/nw12654/nw15801/u26aw8263.html (accessed on 16 April 2019).
  25. Shanghai Municipal People’s Congress. Regulation of Prevention and Control of Land Subsidence of Shanghai Municipality (in Chinese). 2013. Available online: http://www.shgtj.gov.cn/zcfg/dzkc (accessed on 16 April 2019).
  26. Shanghai Municipal Planning and Land & Resources Administration. Regulation of Shanghai Municipality on the Administration of Prevention and Control of Land Subsidence (in Chinese). 2017. Available online: http://www.shgtj.gov.cn/dzkc/dzhjbg (accessed on 16 April 2019).
  27. Xu, Y.S.; Ma, L.; Shen, S.L.; Sun, W.J. Evaluation of land subsidence by considering underground structures penetrated into aquifers in Shanghai. Hydrogeol. J. 2012, 20, 1623–1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Xu, Y.S.; Shen, S.L.; Ma, L.; Sun, W.J.; Yin, Z.Y. Evaluation of the blocking effect of retaining walls on groundwater seepage in aquifers with different insertion depths. Eng. Geol. 2014, 183, 254–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Xu, Y.S.; Ma, L.; Du, Y.J.; Shen, S.L. Analysis on urbanization induced land subsidence in Shanghai. Nat. Hazards 2012, 63, 1255–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Antonioli, F.; Anzidei, M.; Amorosi, A.; Lo Presti, V.; Mastronuzzi, G.; Deiana, G.; De Falco, G.; Fontana, A.; Fontolan, G.; Lisco, S.; et al. Sea-level rise and potential drowning of the Italian coastal plains: Flooding risk scenarios for 2100. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2017, 158, 29–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Carbognin, L.; Teatini, P.; Tomasin, A.; Tosi, L. Global change and relative sea level rise at Venice: What impact in term of flooding. Clim. Dyn. 2010, 35, 1039–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lambeck, K.; Antonioli, F.; Anzidei, M.; Ferranti, L.; Leoni, G.; Scicchitano, G.; Silenzi, S. Sea level change along the Italian coast during the Holocene and projections for the future. Quat. Int. 2011, 232, 250–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Church, J.A.; Aarup, T.; Woodworth, P.L.; Wilson, W.S.; Nicholls, R.J.; Rayner, R.; Lambeck, K.; Mitchum, G.T.; Steffen, K.; Cazenave, A.; et al. Sea-Level Rise and Variability: Synthesis and Outlook for the Future. Underst. Sea-Level Rise Variabil. 2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Church, J.A.; White, N.J. Sea-level rise from the late 19th to the early 21st century. Surv. Geophys. 2011, 32, 585–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Li, Y.P.; Qin, Z.H.; Duan, Y.H. An estimation and assessment of future sea level rise in Shanghai region. Acta Geogr. Sci. 1998, 53, 393–403. [Google Scholar]
  36. Wang, J.; Gao, W.; Xu, S.Y.; Yu, L.Z. Evaluation of the combined risk of sea level rise, land subsidence, and storm surges on the coastal areas of Shanghai, China. Clim. Chang. 2012, 115, 537–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Shen, S.L.; Ma, L.; Xu, Y.S.; Yin, Z.Y. Interpretation of increased deformation rate in aquifer IV due to groundwater pumping in Shanghai. Can. Geotech. J. 2013, 50, 1129–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Shanghai Surveying and Mapping Institute (in Chinese). 2019. Available online: https://www.shsmi.cn/info/iList.jsp?cat_id=10060 (accessed on 10 April 2019).
  39. Shanghai Planning and Land Resources Administration; Shanghai Water Affairs Bureau. Shanghai Land Subsidence Control Area Delimitation Plan; Shanghai Planning and Land Resources Administration: Shanghai, China, 2017.
  40. Shepherd, A.; Ortolano, L. Strategic environmental assessment for sustainable urban development. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 1996, 16, 321–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Shanghai Institute of Geological Survey. Research Report on Construction of Coordination Control and Application Mechanism of Land Subsidence; Shanghai Institute of Geological Survey: Shanghai, China, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  42. Lyu, H.M.; Wang, G.F.; Cheng, W.C.; Shen, S.L. Tornado hazards on June 23rd in Jiangsu Province, China: Preliminary investigation and analysis. Nat. Hazards 2017, 85, 597–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wang, X.W.; Yang, T.L.; Xu, Y.S.; Shen, S.L. Evaluation of optimized depth of waterproof curtain to mitigate negative impacts during dewatering. J. Hydrol. 2019, 577, 123969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijerph 16 02729 g001 550
Figure 1. Overall land subsidence in Shanghai (from 1921 to 2016) (data from Reference [18]).
Figure 1. Overall land subsidence in Shanghai (from 1921 to 2016) (data from Reference [18]).
Ijerph 16 02729 g001
Ijerph 16 02729 g002 550
Figure 2. Geology and hydrogeology profile of Shanghai (cross-section A–B in Figure 1) (data from Reference [28]).
Figure 2. Geology and hydrogeology profile of Shanghai (cross-section A–B in Figure 1) (data from Reference [28]).
Ijerph 16 02729 g002
Ijerph 16 02729 g003 550
Figure 3. Global average sea level rise from 1990 to 2009 (Data from Reference [34]).
Figure 3. Global average sea level rise from 1990 to 2009 (Data from Reference [34]).
Ijerph 16 02729 g003
Ijerph 16 02729 g004 550
Figure 4. History of subsidence management in Shanghai (from 1920 to 2019).
Figure 4. History of subsidence management in Shanghai (from 1920 to 2019).
Ijerph 16 02729 g004
Ijerph 16 02729 g005 550
Figure 5. Monitoring networks in Shanghai: (a) Groundwater detecting network, (b) land subsidence monitoring network (redrawn used the data from Reference [38]).
Figure 5. Monitoring networks in Shanghai: (a) Groundwater detecting network, (b) land subsidence monitoring network (redrawn used the data from Reference [38]).
Ijerph 16 02729 g005
Ijerph 16 02729 g006 550
Figure 6. The comprehensive division map of land subsidence control zones in Shanghai (data from Reference [39]).
Figure 6. The comprehensive division map of land subsidence control zones in Shanghai (data from Reference [39]).
Ijerph 16 02729 g006
Ijerph 16 02729 g007 550
Figure 7. Volume of groundwater withdrawal and recharge in Shanghai from 2000 to 2017 (data from Reference [41]).
Figure 7. Volume of groundwater withdrawal and recharge in Shanghai from 2000 to 2017 (data from Reference [41]).
Ijerph 16 02729 g007
Ijerph 16 02729 g008 550
Figure 8. Monitoring results of annual land subsidence between 2000 and 2016 in Shanghai (data from Reference [26]).
Figure 8. Monitoring results of annual land subsidence between 2000 and 2016 in Shanghai (data from Reference [26]).
Ijerph 16 02729 g008
Table
Table 1. Main information of land subsidence control zones in Shanghai (data from Reference [39]).
Table 1. Main information of land subsidence control zones in Shanghai (data from Reference [39]).
Name of Control ZonesArea (km2)Distribution AreasControl Objectives by the End of 2020
Key land subsidence control zones (I)Key control sub-zones I1649Urban center within outer ring line(1) To control the annual average land subsidence (AALS) within 7 mm;
(2) to reduce the impact of differential land subsidence
Key control sub-zones I21307Pudong New District and Dahongqiao District beyond the outer ring line(1) To control AALS within 7 mm;
(2) to steadily raise the groundwater level;
(3) to alleviate the impact of differential land subsidence
Key control sub-zones I3476(1) Within 500 m on both sides of the major infrastructure protection areas such as high-speed rail and rail transit;
(2) within 500 m of the flood control wall and the inner side of the seawall in the sub-key and general land subsidence control zones (zones II and zones III)		(1) To control AALS within 5 mm;
(2) to reduce differential land subsidence along major infrastructure (including high-speed rail, rail transit, flood control wall, and seawall)
Sub-key land subsidence control zones (II)974Baoshan District, Jiading District and Minhang District(1) To control AALS within 6 mm;
(2) to basically eliminate of the depression cone of groundwater level around major infrastructure
General land subsidence control zones (III)3903Fengxian District, Songjiang District, Jinshan District, Qingpu District and Chongming District(1) To control AALS within 5 mm;
(2) to actively eliminate the depression cone of groundwater level
Table
Table 2. Main control measures of each control zones in Shanghai (data from Reference [39]).
Table 2. Main control measures of each control zones in Shanghai (data from Reference [39]).
No.Main Control Measures by the End of 2020Control Zones
1(1) Coordinated estimation of the allocation of groundwater resources in the city and the groundwater withdrawal and recharge plan in the zones should be adjusted dynamically;
(2) the total amount of groundwater withdrawal in the AqII to AqV will be controlled at Q1 million m3 per year;
(3) the total amount of groundwater artificial recharge is not less than Q2 million m3 per year		I1 (Q1 = 0.8; Q2 = 10)
I2 (Q1 = 1; Q2 = 1.4)
II (Q1 = 0.7; Q2 = 3.2)
III (Q1 = 5.5; Q2 = 5.4)
2Special recharge of groundwater in shallow confined aquifers with emphasis on the AqI is implemented, to ensure that the artificial recharge of groundwater in the AqI reaches about 0.4 m3 per yearI1, I2
3(1) Improve key safety technologies for land subsidence along major infrastructure areas;
(2) reduce the impact of uneven settlement on major infrastructure		I1, I2
4Deepening the research on the mechanism and control countermeasures of engineering land subsidence caused by the precipitation of foundation pitI1, I2, II
5Improve the prevention and measure of land subsidence based on the management of groundwater withdrawal and rechargeI1, I2, II
6Improve the backbone monitoring network of land subsidence along major infrastructure such as rail transit and high-speed railI2, I3, III
7Efforts should be made to strengthen the investigation and mechanism study of land subsidence in coastal new land areasI2
8(1) Improve the monitoring system during the construction around major infrastructure;
(2) the existing groundwater withdrawal wells shall be closed within 500 m on both sides of major infrastructure;
(3) the groundwater withdrawal shall be prohibited, and drilling of new wells shall be stopped		I3
9(1) Strengthen the layered settlement analysis along major infrastructure;
(2) deepen the study of land subsidence mechanism along major infrastructure;
(3) improve the safety early warning mechanism of land subsidence along rail transit		I3
10(1) The land subsidence investigation and mechanism research in the new land area of Hengsha Dongtan should be carried out;
(2) the land subsidence monitoring stations should be deployed and constructed in the monitoring blank areas of the new land area and regional node towns		III
11(1) In view of the relatively low water level areas of the AqIV and AqV formed by groundwater withdrawal in Qingpu Baihe and Jinshan Fengjing areas and adjacent areas of Jiangsu and Zhejiang province, the joint management of regional groundwater withdrawal should be continuously strengthened;
(2) the investigation of the present situation of groundwater withdrawal in provincial boundaries and the inspection of irregular groundwater withdrawal should be jointly carried out		III
Table
Table 3. Specific evaluation of the 2013-regulation by SEA six principles.
Table 3. Specific evaluation of the 2013-regulation by SEA six principles.
SEA PrincipleEstablishment of the 2013-RegulationScore Out of 5
1Yes: Sustainability principles are considered in municipal management and urbanization plan.5
2Not perfect: Most of the examination just before the projects. 3
3Yes: Groundwater withdrawal and constructions are considered for the cumulative impacts. 4
4Yes: Specific sustainable measurements are conducted in major projects.4
5Yes: Monitoring of environment during construction and in operation period.5
6Not perfect: Limited public involvement before implementation.3
Total score 24
Note: If SEA principles are fully and positively followed, a full score of 5 is awarded for each principle; the total score following SEA principles is 30.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

He, X.-C.; Yang, T.-L.; Shen, S.-L.; Xu, Y.-S.; Arulrajah, A. Land Subsidence Control Zone and Policy for the Environmental Protection of Shanghai. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 2729. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph16152729

AMA Style

He X-C, Yang T-L, Shen S-L, Xu Y-S, Arulrajah A. Land Subsidence Control Zone and Policy for the Environmental Protection of Shanghai. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019; 16(15):2729. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph16152729

Chicago/Turabian Style

He, Xi-Cun, Tian-Liang Yang, Shui-Long Shen, Ye-Shuang Xu, and Arul Arulrajah. 2019. "Land Subsidence Control Zone and Policy for the Environmental Protection of Shanghai" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16, no. 15: 2729. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph16152729

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop