My Mind is Working Overtime—Towards an Integrative Perspective of Psychological Detachment, Work-Related Rumination, and Work Reflection
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Switching Off—A Brief Review of the Research on Psychological Detachment
1.2. Beyond Psychological Detachment—Affective Rumination and Problem-Solving Pondering
1.3. Beyond the Tripartite Model of Work-Related Rumination—Positive and Negative Work Reflection
1.4. Linking Rumination to Different Facets of Employee Well-Being
1.5. Concomitants of Thinking about Work
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Procedure
2.2. Sample
2.3. Measures
2.3.1. Psychological Detachment
2.3.2. Affective Rumination
2.3.3. Problem-Solving Pondering
2.3.4. Positive Work Reflection
2.3.5. Negative Work Reflection
2.3.6. Burnout
2.3.7. Work Engagement
2.3.8. Thriving
2.3.9. Satisfaction with Life
2.3.10. Flourishing
2.3.11. Irritation
2.3.12. Worry
2.3.13. Neuroticism
2.4. Analytic Strategy
3. Results
3.1. Factorial Structure and Psychometric Properties of the Focal Scales
3.2. Differential Links between the Facets of Rumination and Employee Well-Being
3.3. Associations between the Five Facets of Work-Related Rumination and Their Concomitants
4. Discussion
4.1. Theoretical Implications
4.2. Practical Implications
4.3. Strengths and Limitations
4.4. Avenues for Future Research
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Meurs, J.A.; Perrewé, P.L. Cognitive activation theory of stress: An integrative theoretical approach to work stress. J. Manag. 2011, 37, 1043–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brosschot, J.F.; Gerin, W.; Thayer, J.F. The perseverative cognition hypothesis: A review of worry, prolonged stress-related physiological activation, and health. J. Psychosom. Res. 2006, 60, 113–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ottaviani, C.; Thayer, J.F.; Verkuil, B.; Lonigro, A.; Medea, B.; Couyoumdjian, A.; Brosschot, J.F. Physiological concomitants of perseverative cognition: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 2016, 142, 231–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Etzion, D.; Eden, D.; Lapidot, Y. Relief from job stressors and burnout: Reserve service as a respite. J. Appl. Psychol. 1998, 83, 577–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sonnentag, S.; Fritz, C. The recovery experience questionnaire: Development and validation of a measure for assessing recuperation and unwinding from work. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 2007, 12, 204–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wendsche, J.; Lohmann-Haislah, A. A meta-analysis on antecedents and outcomes of detachment from work. Front. Psychol. 2017, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bennett, A.A.; Bakker, A.B.; Field, J.G. Recovery from work-related effort: A meta-analysis. J Organ Behav 2018, 39, 262–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cropley, M.; Michalianou, G.; Pravettoni, G.; Millward, L.J. The relation of post-work ruminative thinking with eating behaviour. Stress Health J. Int. Soc. Investig. Stress 2012, 28, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cropley, M.; Zijlstra, F.R.H. Work and rumination. In Handbook of Stress in the Occupations; Langan-Fox, J., Cooper, C.L., Eds.; New horizons in management; Edward Elgar Publishing: Northampton, MA, USA, 2011; pp. 487–501. ISBN 978-0-85-793114-6. [Google Scholar]
- Fritz, C.; Sonnentag, S. Recovery, health, and job performance: Effects of weekend experiences. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 2005, 10, 187–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Binnewies, C.; Sonnentag, S.; Mojza, E.J. Feeling recovered and thinking about the good sides of one’s work. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 2009, 14, 243–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Casper, A.; Tremmel, S.; Sonnentag, S. Patterns of positive and negative work reflection during leisure time: A latent profile analysis. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frone, M.R. Relations of negative and positive work experiences to employee alcohol use: Testing the intervening role of negative and positive work rumination. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 2015, 20, 148–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martin, L.L.; Tesser, A. Some ruminative thoughts. In Ruminative Thoughts; Wyer, R.S., Jr., Ed.; Advances in social cognition; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.: Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 1996; pp. 1–47. [Google Scholar]
- Mitchell, T.R.; James, L.R. Building better theory: Time and the specification of when things happen. Acad. Manag. Rev. 2001, 26, 530–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- George, J.M.; Jones, G.R. The role of time in theory and theory building. J. Manag. 2000, 26, 657–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sonnentag, S.; Bayer, U.-V. Switching off mentally: Predictors and consequences of psychological detachment from work during off-job time. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 2005, 10, 393–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sonnentag, S.; Fritz, C. Recovery from job stress: The stressor-detachment model as an integrative framework. J. Organiz. Behav. 2015, 36, S72–S103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zoupanou, Z.; Cropley, M.; Rydstedt, L.W. Recovery after work: The role of work beliefs in the unwinding process. PloS ONE 2013, 8, e81381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamesch, U.; Cropley, M.; Lang, J. Emotional versus cognitive rumination: Are they differentially affecting long-term psychological health? The impact of stressors and personality in dental students. Stress Health J. Int. Soc. Investig. Stress 2014, 30, 222–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Syrek, C.J.; Weigelt, O.; Peifer, C.; Antoni, C.H. Zeigarnik’s sleepless nights: How unfinished tasks at the end of the week impair employee sleep on the weekend through rumination. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 2017, 22, 225–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vahle-Hinz, T.; Mauno, S.; de Bloom, J.; Kinnunen, U. Rumination for innovation? Analysing the longitudinal effects of work-related rumination on creativity at work and off-job recovery. Work Stress 2017, 31, 315–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kinnunen, U.; Feldt, T.; Sianoja, M.; de Bloom, J.; Korpela, K.; Geurts, S. Identifying long-term patterns of work-related rumination: Associations with job demands and well-being outcomes. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol. 2017, 26, 514–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kinnunen, U.; Feldt, T.; de Bloom, J. Testing cross-lagged relationships between work-related rumination and well-being at work in a three-wave longitudinal study across 1 and 2 years. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 2019, 92, 645–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Firoozabadi, A.; Uitdewilligen, S.; Zijlstra, F.R.H. Should you switch off or stay engaged? The consequences of thinking about work on the trajectory of psychological well-being over time. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 2018, 23, 278–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kinnunen, U.; Feldt, T.; de Bloom, J.; Sianoja, M.; Korpela, K.; Geurts, S. Linking boundary crossing from work to nonwork to work-related rumination across time: A variable- and person-oriented approach. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 2017, 22, 467–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carver, C.S. Goal engagement and the human experience. In Ruminative Thoughts; Wyer, R.S., Jr., Ed.; Advances in social cognition; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 1996; pp. 49–61. [Google Scholar]
- Fritz, C.; Sonnentag, S. Recovery, well-being, and performance-related outcomes: The role of workload and vacation experiences. J. Appl. Psychol. 2006, 91, 936–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meier, L.L.; Cho, E.; Dumani, S. The effect of positive work reflection during leisure time on affective well-being: Results from three diary studies. J. Organiz. Behav. 2016, 37, 255–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daniel, S.; Sonnentag, S. Work to non-work enrichment: The mediating roles of positive affect and positive work reflection. Work Stress 2014, 28, 49–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brosschot, J.F.; Pieper, S.; Thayer, J.F. Expanding stress theory: Prolonged activation and perseverative cognition. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2005, 30, 1043–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ott, A.R.; Haun, V.C.; Binnewies, C. Negative work reflection, personal resources, and work engagement: The moderating role of perceived organizational support. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol. 2019, 28, 110–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cropley, M.; Purvis, L.M. Job strain and rumination about work issues during leisure time: A diary study. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol. 2003, 12, 195–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cropley, M.; Rydstedt, L.W.; Devereux, J.J.; Middleton, B. The relationship between work-related rumination and evening and morning salivary cortisol secretion. Stress Health J. Int. Soc. Investig. Stress 2015, 31, 150–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, M.; Liu, S.; Liao, H.; Gong, Y.; Kammeyer-Mueller, J.; Shi, J. Can’t get it out of my mind: Employee rumination after customer mistreatment and negative mood in the next morning. J. Appl. Psychol. 2013, 98, 989–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Volmer, J.; Binnewies, C.; Sonnentag, S.; Niessen, C. Do social conflicts with customers at work encroach upon our private lives? A diary study. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 2012, 17, 304–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maslach, C.; Leiter, M.P. Early predictors of job burnout and engagement. J. Appl. Psychol. 2008, 93, 498–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Demerouti, E.; Bakker, A.B.; Nachreiner, F.; Schaufeli, W.B. The job demands-resources model of burnout. J. Appl. Psychol. 2001, 86, 499–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meijman, T.F.; Mulder, G. Psychological aspects of workload. In Handbook of Work and Organizational: Work Psychology, 2nd ed.; Drenth, P.J.D., Thierry, H., de Wolff, C.J., Eds.; Handbook of work and organizational psychology; Psychology Press/Erlbaum (UK) Taylor & Francis: Hove, UK, 1998; pp. 5–33. ISBN 978-0-86-377522-2. [Google Scholar]
- Sonnentag, S.; Schiffner, C. Psychological detachment from work during nonwork time and employee well-being: The role of leader’s detachment. Span. J. Psychol. 2019, 22, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sonnentag, S.; Kuttler, I.; Fritz, C. Job stressors, emotional exhaustion, and need for recovery: A multi-source study on the benefits of psychological detachment. J. Vocat. Behav. 2010, 76, 355–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Vandevala, T.; Pavey, L.; Chelidoni, O.; Chang, N.-F.; Creagh-Brown, B.; Cox, A. Psychological rumination and recovery from work in intensive care professionals: Associations with stress, burnout, depression and health. J. Intensive Care 2017, 5, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schaufeli, W.B.; Salanova, M.; González-Romá, V.; Bakker, A.B. The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. J. Happiness Stud. 2002, 3, 71–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Li, A.; Liu, P.; Rao, M. The Relationship Between Psychological Detachment and Employee Well-Being: The Mediating Effect of Self-Discrepant Time Allocation at Work. Front. Psychol. 2018, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hallberg, U.E.; Schaufeli, W.B. “Same Same” But Different? Can Work Engagement Be Discriminated from Job Involvement and Organizational Commitment? Eur. Psychol. 2006, 11, 119–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Porath, C.; Spreitzer, G.; Gibson, C.; Garnett, F.G. Thriving at work: Toward its measurement, construct validation, and theoretical refinement. J. Organ. Behav. 2012, 33, 250–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luthans, F.; Youssef, C.M. Emerging positive organizational behavior. J. Manag. 2007, 33, 321–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spreitzer, G.; Sutcliffe, K.; Dutton, J.; Sonenshein, S.; Grant, A.M. A socially embedded model of thriving at work. Organ. Sci. 2005, 16, 537–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kleine, A.-K.; Rudolph, C.W.; Zacher, H. Thriving at Work: A Meta-Analysis. J. Organ. Behav. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ryan, R.M.; Frederick, C. On energy, personality, and health: Subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well-being. J. Personal. 1997, 65, 529–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fritz, C.; Lam, C.F.; Spreitzer, G.M. It’s the little things that matter: An examination of knowledge workers’ energy management. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 2011, 25, 28–39. [Google Scholar]
- Amabile, T.; Kramer, S. The Progress Principle: Using Small Wins to Ignite Joy, Engagement, and Creativity at Work; Harvard Business Review Press: Boston, MA, USA, 2011; ISBN 978-1-42-219857-5. [Google Scholar]
- Diener, E.; Suh, E.M.; Lucas, R.E.; Smith, H.L. Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychol. Bull. 1999, 125, 276–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheldon, K.M.; Abad, N.; Ferguson, Y.; Gunz, A.; Houser-Marko, L.; Nichols, C.P.; Lyubomirsky, S. Persistent pursuit of need-satisfying goals leads to increased happiness: A 6-month experimental longitudinal study. Motiv. Emot. 2010, 34, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diener, E.; Wirtz, D.; Tov, W.; Kim-Prieto, C.; Choi, D.; Oishi, S.; Biswas-Diener, R. New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Soc. Indic. Res. 2010, 97, 143–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ryff, C.D. Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1989, 57, 1069–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sutton, A. Measuring the effects of self-awareness: Construction of the Self-Awareness Outcomes Questionnaire. Eur. J. Psychol. 2016, 12, 645–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sutton, A.; Williams, H.M.; Allinson, C.W. A longitudinal, mixed method evaluation of self-awareness training in the workplace. Eur. J. Train. Dev. 2015, 39, 610–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hülsheger, U.R.; Lang, J.W.B.; Depenbrock, F.; Fehrmann, C.; Zijlstra, F.R.H.; Alberts, H.J.E.M. The power of presence: The role of mindfulness at work for daily levels and change trajectories of psychological detachment and sleep quality. J. Appl. Psychol. 2014, 99, 1113–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohr, G.; Müller, A.; Rigotti, T.; Aycan, Z.; Tschan, F. The assessment of psychological strain in work contexts: Concerning the structural equivalency of nine language adaptations of the irritation scale. Eur. J. Psychol. Assess. 2006, 22, 198–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vahle-Hinz, T.; Bamberg, E.; Dettmers, J.; Friedrich, N.; Keller, M. Effects of work stress on work-related rumination, restful sleep, and nocturnal heart rate variability experienced on workdays and weekends. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 2014, 19, 217–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berset, M.; Elfering, A.; Luethy, S.; Luethi, S.; Semmer, N.K. Work stressors and impaired sleep: Rumination as a mediator. Stress Health 2011, 27, E71–E82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Segerstrom, S.C.; Stanton, A.L.; Alden, L.E.; Shortridge, B.E. A Multidimensional Structure for Repetitive Thought: What’s on Your Mind, and How, and How Much? J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 2003, 85, 909–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kircanski, K.; Thompson, R.J.; Sorenson, J.E.; Sherdell, L.; Gotlib, I.H. Rumination and Worry in Daily Life Examining the Naturalistic Validity of Theoretical Constructs. Clin. Psychol. Sci. 2015, 3, 926–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muris, P.; Roelofs, J.; Meesters, C.; Boomsma, P. Rumination and worry in nonclinical adolescents. Cogn. Ther. Res. 2004, 28, 539–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fresco, D.M.; Frankel, A.N.; Mennin, D.S.; Turk, C.L.; Heimberg, R.G. Distinct and overlapping features of rumination and worry: The relationship of cognitive production to negative affective states. Cogn. Ther. Res. 2002, 26, 179–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goring, H.J.; Papageorgiou, C. Rumination and worry: Factor analysis of self-report measures in depressed participants. Cogn. Ther. Res. 2008, 32, 554–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoyer, J.; Gloster, A.T.; Herzberg, P.Y. Is worry different from rumination? Yes, it is more predictive of psychopathology! Gms Psycho. Soc. Med. 2009, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hur, J.; Heller, W.; Kern, J.L.; Berenbaum, H. A bi-factor approach to modeling the structure of worry and rumination. J. Exp. Psychopathol. 2017, 8, 252–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Constantin, K.; English, M.M.; Mazmanian, D. Anxiety, depression, and procrastination among students: Rumination plays a larger mediating role than worry. J Rat. Emo. Cogn. Behav 2018, 36, 15–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Banerjee, M.; Cavanaugh, K.; Strauss, C. Barriers to mindfulness: A path analytic model exploring the role of rumina...: EBSCOhost. Mindfulness 2018, 9, 980–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Woods, S.A.; Anderson, N.R. Toward a periodic table of personality: Mapping personality scales between the five-factor model and the circumplex model. J. Appl. Psychol. 2016, 101, 582–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saucier, G. Mini-Markers: A brief version of Goldberg’s unipolar Big-Five markers. J. Personal. Assess. 1994, 63, 506–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wiese, B.S.; Heidemeier, H.; Burk, C.L.; Freund, A.M. When work takes over: Emotional labor strategies and daily ruminations about work while at home. J. Pers. Psychol. 2017, 16, 150–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ebert, D.D.; Berking, M.; Thiart, H.; Riper, H.; Laferton, J.A.C.; Cuijpers, P.; Sieland, B.; Lehr, D. Restoring depleted resources: Efficacy and mechanisms of change of an internet-based unguided recovery training for better sleep and psychological detachment from work. Health Psychol. 2015, 34, 1240–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kristensen, T.S.; Borritz, M.; Villadsen, E.; Christensen, K.B. The Copenhagen Burnout Inventory: A new tool for the assessment of burnout. Work Stress 2005, 19, 192–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schaufeli, W.B.; Bakker, A.B.; Salanova, M. The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 2006, 66, 701–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sonnentag, S. Recovery, work engagement, and proactive behavior: A new look at the interface between nonwork and work. J. Appl. Psychol. 2003, 88, 518–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niessen, C.; Mäder, I.; Stride, C.; Jimmieson, N.L. Thriving when exhausted: The role of perceived transformational leadership. J. Vocat. Behav. 2017, 103, 41–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Glaesmer, H.; Grande, G.; Braehler, E.; Roth, M. The German version of the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS): Psychometric properties, validity, and population-based norms. Eur. J. Psychol. Assess. 2011, 27, 127–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diener, E.; Emmons, R.A.; Larsen, R.J.; Griffin, S. The Satisfaction With Life Scale. J. Personal. Assess. 1985, 49, 71–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Esch, T.; Jose, G.; Gimpel, C.; von Scheidt, C.; Michalsen, A. Die Flourishing Scale (FS) von Diener et al. liegt jetzt in einer autorisierten deutschen Fassung (FS-D) vor: Einsatz bei einer Mind-Body-medizinischen Fragestellung. Forsch. Komplementärmedizin/Res. Complementary Med. 2013, 20, 267–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohr, G.; Rigotti, T.; Müller, A. Irritation—Ein Instrument zur Erfassung psychischer Befindensbeeinträchtigungen im Arbeitskontext. Skalen- und Itemparameter aus 15 Studien. Zeitschrift Für Arbeits-und Organisationspsychologie 2005, 49, 44–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stöber, J. Besorgnis: Ein Vergleich dreier Inventare zur Erfassung Allgemeiner Sorgen. Zeitschrift Für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie 1995, 16, 50–63. [Google Scholar]
- Meyer, T.J.; Miller, M.L.; Metzger, R.L.; Borkovec, T.D. Development and validation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire. Behav. Res. Ther. 1990, 28, 487–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weller, I.; Matiaske, W. Persönlichkeit und Personalforschung. Vorstellung einer Kurzskala zur Messung der “Big Five”. Ger. J. Hum. Resour. Res. 2009, 23, 258–266. [Google Scholar]
- Kline, R.B. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 4th ed.; Taylor & Francis Ltd.: New York, NY, USA, 2015; ISBN 978-1-46-252334-4. [Google Scholar]
- Rosseel, Y. lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. J. Stat. Softw. 2012, 48, 1–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mîndrila, D. Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Diagonally Weighted Least Squares (DWLS) Estimation Procedures: A Comparison of Estimation Bias with Ordinal and Multivariate Non-Normal Data. Int. J. Digit. Soc. 2010, 1, 60–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schermelleh-Engel, K.; Moosbrugger, H.; Müller, H. Evaluating the Fit of Structural Equation Models: Tests of Significance and Descriptive Goodness-of-Fit Measures. Methods Psychol. Res. Online 2003, 8, 23–74. [Google Scholar]
- Hahn, V.C.; Binnewies, C.; Sonnentag, S.; Mojza, E.J. Learning how to recover from job stress: Effects of a recovery training program on recovery, recovery-related self-efficacy, and well-being. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 2011, 16, 202–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bono, J.E.; Glomb, T.M.; Shen, W.; Kim, E.; Koch, A.J. Building positive resources: Effects of positive events and positive reflection on work stress and health. Acad. Manag. J. 2013, 56, 1601–1627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ganster, D.C.; Rosen, C.C. Work stress and employee health: A multidisciplinary review. J. Manag. 2013, 39, 1085–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Podsakoff, P.M.; MacKenzie, S.B.; Podsakoff, N.P. Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2012, 63, 539–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spector, P.E. Method variance in organizational research truth or urban legend? Organ. Res. Methods 2006, 9, 221–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ohly, S.; Sonnentag, S.; Niessen, C.; Zapf, D. Diary studies in organizational research: An introduction and some practical recommendations. J. Pers. Psychol. 2010, 9, 79–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spector, P.E. Do Not Cross Me: Optimizing the Use of Cross-Sectional Designs. J. Bus. Psychol. 2019, 34, 125–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dormann, C.; Griffin, M. Optimal time lags in panel studies. Psychol. Methods 2015, 20, 489–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Driver, C.C.; Oud, J.H.L.; Voelkle, M.C. Continuous Time Structural Equation Modeling with R Package ctsem. J. Stat. Softw. 2017, 77, 1–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smallwood, J.; Schooler, J.W. The science of mind wandering: Empirically navigating the stream of consciousness. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2015, 66, 487–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marcus, B.; Weigelt, O.; Hergert, J.; Gurt, J.; Gelléri, P. The use of snowball sampling for multi source organizational research: Some cause for concern. Pers. Psychol. 2017, 70, 635–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ilies, R.; Aw, S.S.Y.; Lim, V.K.G. A naturalistic multilevel framework for studying transient and chronic effects of psychosocial work stressors on employee health and well-being. Appl. Psychol. 2016, 65, 223–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McCormick, B.W.; Reeves, C.J.; Downes, P.E.; Li, N.; Ilies, R. Scientific contributions of within-person research in management: Making the juice worth the squeeze. J. Manag. 2018, 0149206318788435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mucci, N.; Giorgi, G.; Roncaioli, M.; Fiz Perez, J.; Arcangeli, G. The correlation between stress and economic crisis: A systematic review. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 2016, 12, 983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giorgi, G.; Arcangeli, G.; Mucci, N.; Cupelli, V. Economic stress in the workplace: The impact of fear of the crisis on mental health. Work 2015, 51, 135–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Variable | M | SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | Sex | 1.72 | 0.45 | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2. | Age | 34.34 | 9.55 | 0.01 | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
3. | Working Time/Week | 28.93 | 11.26 | −0.17 ** | 0.32 ** | - | ||||||||||||||||||||
4. | Detachment | 3.47 | 0.90 | −0.02 | 0.04 | −0.12 ** | (0.85) | |||||||||||||||||||
5. | Affective Rumination | 2.42 | 0.91 | 0.03 | −0.06 | 0.12 ** | −0.56 ** | (0.90) | ||||||||||||||||||
6. | PSP | 2.66 | 0.79 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.09 | −0.52 ** | 0.42 ** | (0.82) | |||||||||||||||||
7. | PWR | 2.94 | 0.87 | 0.13 ** | −0.04 | −0.11 * | −0.02 | −0.11 * | 0.40 ** | (0.92) | ||||||||||||||||
8. | NWR | 2.80 | 0.95 | 0.04 | −0.10 * | −0.03 | −0.36 ** | 0.58 ** | 0.31 ** | −0.04 | (0.91) | |||||||||||||||
9. | Burnout | 2.36 | 0.97 | 0.08 | −0.12 * | −0.01 | −0.40 ** | 0.55 ** | 0.29 ** | −0.09 * | 0.47 ** | (0.91) | ||||||||||||||
10. | WE—Vigor | 3.61 | 1.32 | 0.06 | −0.05 | −0.06 | 0.19 ** | −0.34 ** | 0.19 ** | 0.53 ** | −0.35 ** | −0.31 ** | (0.86) | |||||||||||||
11. | WE—Dedication | 3.70 | 1.27 | 0.08 | −0.01 | −0.01 | 0.06 | −0.25 ** | 0.29 ** | 0.60 ** | −0.30 ** | −0.24 ** | 0.83 ** | (0.91) | ||||||||||||
12. | WE—Absorption | 3.66 | 1.49 | 0.08 | −0.03 | −0.01 | 0.00 | −0.16 ** | 0.31 ** | 0.55 ** | −0.23 ** | −0.16 ** | 0.79 ** | 0.87 ** | (0.89) | |||||||||||
13. | Work Engagement | 3.46 | 1.45 | 0.08 | −0.03 | −0.03 | 0.09 | −0.26 ** | 0.28 ** | 0.60 ** | −0.31 ** | −0.25 ** | 0.92 ** | 0.96 ** | 0.95 ** | (0.95) | ||||||||||
14. | Thriving—Learning | 4.75 | 1.34 | −0.04 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.03 | −0.09 | 0.29 ** | 0.41 ** | −0.22 ** | −0.13 ** | 0.54 ** | 0.61 ** | 0.53 ** | 0.60 ** | (0.91) | |||||||||
15. | Thriving—Vitality | 4.22 | 1.23 | 0.04 | 0.02 | −0.04 | 0.24 ** | −0.39 ** | 0.15 ** | 0.52 ** | −0.42 ** | −0.40 ** | 0.82 ** | 0.77 ** | 0.70 ** | 0.80 ** | 0.66 ** | (0.85) | ||||||||
16. | Thriving | 4.48 | 1.17 | 0.00 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.15 ** | −0.25 ** | 0.24 ** | 0.51 ** | −0.35 ** | −0.28 ** | 0.74 ** | 0.76 ** | 0.67 ** | 0.76 ** | 0.92 ** | 0.90 ** | (0.80) | |||||||
17. | Satisfaction with Life | 4.63 | 1.28 | 0.00 | 0.09 * | 0.01 | 0.23 ** | −0.21 ** | 0.08 | 0.28 ** | −0.21 ** | −0.29 ** | 0.48 ** | 0.44 ** | 0.37 ** | 0.45 ** | 0.32 ** | 0.42 ** | 0.40 ** | (0.91) | ||||||
18. | Flourishing | 5.23 | 1.11 | 0.05 | 0.10 * | −0.03 | 0.38 ** | −0.26 ** | 0.02 | 0.31 ** | −0.18 ** | −0.29 ** | 0.49 ** | 0.44 ** | 0.35 ** | 0.45 ** | 0.38 ** | 0.48 ** | 0.47 ** | 0.77 ** | (0.93) | |||||
19. | Cognitive Irritation | 2.43 | 0.95 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.18 ** | −0.77 ** | 0.69 ** | 0.66 ** | 0.12 * | 0.49 ** | 0.50 ** | −0.12 * | 0.01 | 0.07 | −0.01 | 0.07 | −0.17 ** | −0.05 | −0.12 * | −0.21 ** | (0.88) | ||||
20. | Emotional Irritation | 2.16 | 0.83 | 0.03 | −0.06 | 0.05 | −0.49 ** | 0.67 ** | 0.35 ** | −0.07 | 0.55 ** | 0.56 ** | −0.32 ** | −0.22 ** | −0.13 ** | −0.23 ** | −0.20 ** | −0.39 ** | −0.32 ** | −0.34 ** | −0.41 ** | 0.61 ** | (0.89) | |||
21. | Irritation | 2.26 | 0.79 | 0.05 | −0.03 | 0.12* | −0.69 ** | 0.75 ** | 0.53 ** | 0.00 | 0.58 ** | 0.60 ** | −0.27 ** | −0.14 ** | −0.05 | −0.16 ** | −0.10 * | −0.33 ** | −0.23 ** | −0.28 ** | −0.36 ** | 0.85 ** | 0.93 ** | (0.90) | ||
22. | Worry | 2.90 | 0.75 | 0.18 ** | −0.14 ** | −0.12 ** | −0.41 ** | 0.49** | 0.32 ** | 0.04 | 0.51 ** | 0.55 ** | −0.27 ** | −0.18 ** | −0.12 ** | −0.20 ** | −0.11 * | −0.29 ** | −0.22 ** | −0.35 ** | −0.31 ** | 0.47 ** | 0.58 ** | 0.59** | (0.93) | |
23. | Neuroticism | 3.08 | 1.03 | 0.02 | −0.15 ** | −0.05 | −0.30 ** | 0.40 ** | 0.14 ** | −0.05 | 0.39 ** | 0.43 ** | −0.29 ** | −0.23 ** | −0.15 ** | −0.24 ** | −0.15 ** | −0.29 ** | −0.24 ** | −0.39 ** | −0.41 ** | 0.34 ** | 0.63 ** | 0.56** | 0.54** | (0.85) |
Model | χ2 | df | CFI | TLI | RMSEA | SRMR | Δdf | Δχ2 | Preference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Single Factor Model | 2159.2 | 189 | 0.819 | 0.798 | 0.148 | 0.162 | 1 | 1555.32 | 5-Factor Model |
3-Factor Model (AR + NWR, PSP + PWR) | 1562.5 | 186 | 0.873 | 0.857 | 0.125 | 0.138 | 7 | 958.603 | 5-Factor Model |
4-Factor Model b (PSP + PWR) | 1397.4 | 183 | 0.888 | 0.872 | 0.118 | 0.131 | 4 | 793.456 | 5-Factor Model |
4-Factor Model a (AR + NWR) | 771.9 | 183 | 0.946 | 0.938 | 0.082 | 0.093 | 4 | 167.97 | 5-Factor Model |
5 Factor Model | 603.93 | 179 | 0.961 | 0.954 | 0.071 | 0.082 |
Fit Index | Good Fit | Acceptable Fit |
---|---|---|
χ2 | 0 ≤ χ2 ≤ 2df | 2df < χ2 ≤ 3df |
p-value | 0.05 < p ≤ 1.00 | 0.01 ≤ p ≤ 0.05 |
RMSEA | 0 ≤ RMSEA ≤ 0.05 | 0.05 < RMSEA ≤ 0.08 |
SRMR | 0 ≤ SRMR ≤ 0.05 | 0.05 < SRMR ≤ 0.10 |
TLI | 0.97 ≤ TLI ≤ 1.00 | 0.95 ≤ TLI < 0.97 |
CFI | 0.97 ≤ CFI ≤ 1.00 | 0.95 ≤ CFI < 0.97 |
additional recommended for nested models: | ||
χ2 -Difference Test |
Model | χ2 | df | CFI | TLI | RMSEA | SRMR | Δdf | Δꭓ2 | Preference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Single Factor Model | 7408.965 | 1325 | 0.900 | 0.896 | 0.099 | 0.117 | 36 | 5164.308 | 9-Factor Model |
3-Factor Model (neutral, positive, negative) | 6589.688 | 1322 | 0.913 | 0.910 | 0.092 | 0.110 | 33 | 4345.031 | 9-Factor Model |
7-Factor Model (AR + EI, DET + CI) | 2641.922 | 1304 | 0.978 | 0.977 | 0.047 | 0.069 | 15 | 397.265 | 9-Factor Model |
8-Factor Model b (AR + EI) | 2576.69 | 1297 | 0.979 | 0.978 | 0.046 | 0.068 | 8 | 332.032 | 9-Factor Model |
8-Factor Model a (DET + CI) | 2309.257 | 1297 | 0.983 | 0.982 | 0.041 | 0.065 | 8 | 64.6 | 9-Factor Model |
9-Factor Model | 2244.657 | 1289 | 0.984 | 0.983 | 0.040 | 0.063 |
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Weigelt, O.; Gierer, P.; Syrek, C.J. My Mind is Working Overtime—Towards an Integrative Perspective of Psychological Detachment, Work-Related Rumination, and Work Reflection. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 2987. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph16162987
Weigelt O, Gierer P, Syrek CJ. My Mind is Working Overtime—Towards an Integrative Perspective of Psychological Detachment, Work-Related Rumination, and Work Reflection. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019; 16(16):2987. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph16162987
Chicago/Turabian StyleWeigelt, Oliver, Petra Gierer, and Christine J. Syrek. 2019. "My Mind is Working Overtime—Towards an Integrative Perspective of Psychological Detachment, Work-Related Rumination, and Work Reflection" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16, no. 16: 2987. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph16162987