Next Article in Journal
Exposure to Indoor Ferromagnetic Particulate Matter Monitored by Strawberry Plants and the Occurrence of Acute Respiratory Events in Adults
Previous Article in Journal
Binge Drinking in Spanish University Students: Associated Factors and Repercussions: A Preliminary Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Level of Burden and Health-Related Quality of Life in Caregivers of Palliative Care Patients
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Grief Experiences in Family Caregivers of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)

1
Mind, Brain and Behaviour Research Centre (CIMCYC), University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain
2
Department of Psychology, University of Cádiz, 11001 Cádiz, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16(23), 4821; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph16234821
Submission received: 23 October 2019 / Revised: 26 November 2019 / Accepted: 28 November 2019 / Published: 30 November 2019

Abstract

:
The main objective of this study was to analyse the experience of grief and feelings of loss in family caregivers of children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), as well as the perceived overload from taking on the primary caregiver role. Twenty family caregivers of children with ASD participated. The family members were assessed using an ad-hoc semi-structured interview that addressed the families’ reactions to the diagnosis, implications for daily functioning, and concerns for the immediate and long-term future of their relatives with ASD. The results indicate that family caregivers of children with ASD endure intense and continuous sorrow and grief due to the impact that having and caring for a child with these characteristics has on all aspects of their lives. These data highlight the importance of creating support and intervention programmes and services focused on the feelings and manifestations of ambiguous grief that occur in these family members, in order to improve their well-being and quality of life and reduce caregiver role overload.

1. Introduction

An estimated 1 in 160 children has an autism spectrum disorder (ASD). This is the estimated mean, as the observed prevalence varies considerably across studies, with well-controlled studies reporting considerably higher figures [1]. According to epidemiological studies conducted over the past 50 years, the global prevalence of these disorders seems to be increasing. Some possible explanations for this apparent increase have been suggested, including greater awareness, broader diagnostic criteria, better diagnostic tools, and improved communication among professionals [1].
ASDs are a range of mental disorders of the neurodevelopmental type that appear at an early age and are characterised by difficulties in social interaction, communication, and flexibility, among others [2]. People with ASD have complex care needs and require a range of integrated services, including health promotion, personalised care, rehabilitation services, and collaboration with other sectors, such as the educational, occupational, and social sectors [1].
Planning the needs discussed above starts with one of the key moments: informing the family of the diagnosis. When a family receives an ASD diagnosis of one of its members, a very painful assimilation process ensues, which experts compare to a grieving process, in this case, grief over the loss of a “typical child” [3].
Raising a child with ASD is a challenge for parents, who, after coming to terms with the diagnosis, must begin to implement adaptive strategies that favour the development of their children and the family as a whole [4]. This situation is complex and has been associated with an important change in family dynamics [5,6]. Raising a child with ASD often entails an emotional and financial burden for families, and caring for children with severe cases of ASD can be demanding, especially when access to services and support is inadequate [1].
Researchers have emphasised the occurrence of physical and emotional health problems and high levels of caregiver overload in these children’s parents [7,8,9,10,11]. Parental feelings of disbelief, distress, anxiety, or sadness are common at the time of diagnosis and in the following months [12]. Numerous studies show that these parents often experience higher levels of stress, depression, anxiety, and lower quality of life than parents of children with other types of disabilities, such as Down syndrome, or typically developing children [13,14,15,16].
Another consequence of the child-rearing process is the isolation of caregivers, especially the primary caregivers, who are mostly mothers [17]. This isolation is often reinforced because caregivers, trying to prevent stigmatisation, avoid any social interaction [18]. In addition, caregivers often have higher levels of stress and overload due to the responsibility acquired, thus experiencing feelings of guilt, which are increased when facing criticism from those in their immediate environment when there are problems regarding the child’s upbringing [11].
An important part of the emotional response of these families is associated with feelings of loss or grief [19,20]. Accordingly, Ponte et al. [21] reported that parents experience emotional pain due to the loss of their ideal child and the disruption of their expectations, as well as shock and/or helplessness in family members after diagnosis. Several concepts have been proposed to explain the dynamics experienced by these families in these cases. Among these is the concept of ambiguous loss [22,23]. O’Brien [19] relates this concept to several factors, such as uncertain diagnoses and prognoses, variable daily functioning, seemingly normal development of the child during the first years, manifestation of only some symptoms, and the difficulty of these children in recognising and expressing their emotions. Parents may experience grief over the loss of their “expected child” and find it difficult to accept the reality [24,25]. Parents’ grieving reactions to an ASD diagnosis have also been considered to be a type of “chronic sorrow” [26] and “non-finite grief” [27].
Other authors have adapted the concept of “ambiguous loss” in order to include a fundamental characteristic of this type of circumstance, in which the child, although physically present, appears to be emotionally absent or distant [23]. In this context, Olshansky [26] defines the concept of chronic sorrow as a “profound sadness,” referring to the sadness felt by the parents of children with mental disabilities [28]. Boss [23], in turn, describes ambiguous loss as an “incomplete and uncertain loss” which occurs in two different ways: the family member may be physically present and psychologically absent, or physically absent and psychologically present. Finally, Bruce and Schultz [29] propose the concept of unresolved or non-finite grief to describe families experiencing loss due to chronic illness, disability, or accident. These authors found that families did not experience the stages of bereavement only once; rather, they continually revisited the different stages again and again, especially when faced with developmental milestones that were not being reached by their children [27].
There are few recent studies exploring grieving reactions of parents of children with ASD [28,30,31,32] that have used grounded theory to analyse parents’ feelings of sorrow and loss, a relevant issue given the considerable emotional adjustment that these parents have to undergo [6]. These feelings could be related to receiving the diagnosis, hopes for the child’s development, how they perceive positive aspects of the child’s education [33], and different coping styles [34,35]. Interventions to support these parents require knowledge of their emotional state in order to plan and implement programmes adapted to their real needs.
The main objective of this study is to analyse the experience of grief and feelings of loss in family members of children diagnosed with ASD, as well as the perceived overload of taking on the primary caregiver role. Identifying this type of loss, as well as the associated emotions and barriers to processing it, is an essential step towards preventing this grief from becoming chronic. This information, together with the information on caregiver overload, could be of great utility in designing programmes to address the specific needs of this population. The specific objective was to analyse the following: the manifestations of grief in the relatives of individuals with ASD; their reactions to the diagnosis (associated thoughts and emotions); and how this has affected their lives (family, work, social, as well as relationships and personal changes).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Participants

The study involved 20 family members (4 men and 16 women) who are the primary caregivers of individuals with ASD. These individuals were either users of two mental health clinics in the provinces of Cádiz and Granada, Spain, or members of an association of relatives of individuals with ASD in Cádiz. The median age of these individuals was 40.00 years (range: 31–68). Two of the caregivers had completed only basic education, twelve had secondary education, and six had higher education. Fifteen of the participants were married, three were separated/divorced, one was single, and one was widowed. Regarding their employment status, 10 were employed, eight were unemployed, and two were engaged in household chores. The age range of the children at the time of the study was from 6 to 12 years of age (mode = 8). All of the children were attending school and lived with their original families (15 with both of their parents and 5 with their mothers) (see Table 1).
In the present study, the children’s median age at which the parents were informed of the diagnosis of ASD was 30.00 months (range: 17–132). The professional who communicated the diagnosis was a psychologist on 10occasions.Medical professionals (psychiatrist, neuropaediatrician, paediatrician, neurologist, and general practitioner) communicated the diagnosis on eight occasions. The diagnosishad been communicated by a counsellor in one case only. Only one individual in the sample reported having discovered the diagnosis themselves, without being informed by third parties (see Table 2).

2.2. Instruments

Family members were assessed using an ad-hoc semi-structured interview that addressed family reactions to the diagnosis, implications for daily functioning, and concerns for the immediate and long-term future of their family members with ASD.
Subsequently, family members were interviewed. All of the interviews were conducted by the same trained researcher, specialized in the field of health psychology, on the mental health clinics and associations’ premises, in a quiet environment ensuring privacy. The interviewer is an expert in qualitative methodology. In addition, a pilot study was conducted, which consisted of interviewing two professionals from the participating centres. The one-to-one interviews were semi-structured and largely based on previous research in the area. Although the main aim of the interview was to explore patterns in going through the grieving process, it seemed sensitive to gather further data on other issues, such as information about the moment of receiving the diagnosis, the caregiver’s overload or the change in future expectations. Table 3 shows the general framework of the four sections in which the interview was structured.

2.3. Procedure

Firstly, the management teams of the different centres were contacted in order to present them with the research objectives and ask for their collaboration. Once approved, the study was disseminated by means of a dedicated website and leaflets, as well as by the participating centres. Centre staffs were informed of the research objectives and they subsequently contacted the participants. The participants were called to a meeting where the principal investigator informed them about the study and answered their questions. Interested individuals signed the informed consent form. They were also provided with a copy of the protocol for handling of personal data. In the information sheet, participants were provided with general data of the research, the voluntary nature of the participation, the commitment acquired when participating, possible risks and benefits for the participant, the confidential nature of the data, the rights of the participant, and the data of contact of the main researcher. Subsequently, family members were interviewed. All of the interviews were conducted on the mental health clinics’ and associations’ premises, in a quiet environment ensuring privacy. The duration of the interviews was variable, the mean being around 30 minutes. The procedure included providing emotional support after the interview to the family members who needed it or requested it. However, in no case was it necessary to do so.
Each of the family members was assigned a numerical code. To preserve their anonymity, their names were not transcribed. The study had been approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Granada (Ref: 359/CEIH/2017).

2.4. Data Analysis

A qualitative design was used based on the grounded theory of Glaser and Strauss [36].
The analysis of the interview data was carried out with Atlas.ti v.7 (Scientific Software Development GmbH, Berlin, Germany). The interviews were recorded on paper, taped, and then digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim using f4 software. The main ideas present in these data were then underlined, coded, and grouped into categories. Finally, the hierarchical relationships of the codes and families were created, building a network map.
Specifically, a method of constant comparison was used, organized into three stages, adapting the proposal of Strauss, Corbin and Zimmerman [37] to the present research objectives. First, an inductive strategy was used in which fragments of the participants’ discourse were analysed and codified (micro-analysis). The properties of each code were later described and delimited, allowing for comparison among them. Names for these codes were selected based on expressions in the participants’ discourse. This step represented the open coding stage, in which four researchers participated. The different codes were named and defined by consensus. In cases of disagreement, debate among the researchers and a review of the literature were conducted to ensure that each code was as close as possible to the experience of the participants. Second, the identified codes (see Table 4) were grouped into categories according to their characteristics. These categories were derived from the participants’ discourses and were created by comparing cases and merging codes. The most complex categories were organized into subordinate concepts or sub-categories (axial coding). The same strategy as in the previous analytic phase was adopted for grouping the codes. Finally, the categories obtained were integrated, and hierarchical relations were discussed. A central (core) category was identified and the most important codes were used to build a theoretical framework to explain the phenomenon. A core category must be related to other categories, must appear frequently in the data, and must provide a coherent explanation of the data [37]. Later, the theory was refined using strategies of constant comparison. The final model was submitted to triangulation among all of the investigators to ensure its suitability for the phenomenon under study. This final stage corresponds to selective coding as described by [37]. The interviews were transcribed by the researchers with wide experience in qualitative investigation. The analysis was performed using the original Spanish interviews. The quotations selected for inclusion in this article were independently translated by two experienced professional translators (English-native and Spanish-native), who then produced a jointly-agreed version that was further reviewed by two of the authors (both fluent in English) to ensure that the meaning of the original was accurately conveyed.

3. Results

Table 4 shows the identified themes associated with the grieving experience of family caregivers of people diagnosed with ASD: anticipation, the children’s age, professional who communicated the diagnosis, reaction to the diagnosis, disruption of expectations, experience of grief, discontinued activities and time for oneself, changes in family dynamics, and feelings of loss/gain. These themes were coded and grouped into three categories: diagnostic processes, grief processes, and stress and overload.

3.1. Codes Grouped under The “Diagnostic Process” Category

3.1.1. Anticipation

A child’s acquisition of different psychomotor, cognitive, social, and linguistic skills is something the family looks forward to during the child’s first years of life. Families usually know the normotypical age at which the different developmental milestones are reached, sometimes comparing the child’s development with that of another child of a similar age, or with a older sibling.
Most of the mothers had already been observing certain signs that made them suspect and/or become alerted to the possibility that the child might be affected by some disorder. Consequently, they had been expecting it by the time the diagnosis was communicated to them. In these cases, this anticipation cushioned the impact of the diagnosis.
“I already knew, I saw things in my son, so I expected it.” (06-Mother)
“At 18 months, but I knew since he was born.” (08-Mother)
“B. His wife had already noticed since he was a very young boy. She knew that something was wrong with him […]. It was a major blow, but I already imagined it because I saw it. Because he had been doing very weird things since he was a little boy” (12-Father)
“It was kind of what we had been expecting. It was not a slap in the face because we had suspected it” (15-Father).

3.1.2. Age and Professional Who Communicated the Diagnosis

ASD is usually detected before the age of 3. It is therefore common for family members to begin searching for explanations of the warning signs they see in their child before this age. This search usually involves seeking advice from different child health professionals (psychologists and paediatricians, mainly) on the child’s development, and concludes when the diagnosis of ASD is confirmed by the professional.

3.2. Codes Grouped under The “Grief Process” Category

3.2.1. Reaction to The Diagnosis

Receiving such a diagnosis is usually not easy, and it goes without saying that this is always coupled with an emotional response. The different reactions to a diagnosis can be shaped by various factors, such as the coping skills of family members, predictability, prognosis, severity, and availability and knowledge of social and financial resources.
The families of the children with ASD expressed having experienced intense emotions at the time of diagnosis. The reactions they described of that moment were diverse, ranging from a state of shock to a proactive and resilient attitude, through phases of denial, guilt, anger, and helplessness (see Table 5).

3.2.2. Disruption of Expectations: Differences Regarding the Children’s Future.

There was great homogeneity with respect to the disruption of expectations, specifically with respect to how family members expected their child’s future to be before the diagnosis and how they believe it will be after the diagnosis. At the time of pregnancy or during the first year of life, the families of children with ASD did not imagine that their child would receive this diagnosis. As a result, they imagined a normally developing child with an ideal future during this time. These expectations disappear the moment they become aware of the full implications of the diagnosis. We observed different emotional reactions in parents to this mismatch between the ideal and the real. Concern and uncertainty were the most frequent emotions among the sample of family members. Both emotions seem to be related to the ambiguity about the prognosis and the future of the child. In particular, the main concern of relatives was the independence and autonomy of the child with ASD (see Table 6).

3.2.3. Grieving Experience

The experiences of diagnosis-related grief in the families of children with ASD who participated in this study are varied. Most family members view the process of assimilating their child’s diagnosis as an experience as intense as grieving over the death of a family member, or even more painful, because of the lack of predictability and the uncertainty about the future. Other family members, on the other hand, highlight that the difference between grieving for the death of a loved one and grieving for a diagnosis of ASD lies in the cyclical nature of the latter, which is characterised by a fluctuation of painful emotions, such as anguish and sadness, and periods of acceptance and happiness. Other family members report that this feeling of loss is caused by the difference between the expected child and the real child. Although after receiving the diagnosis the child with ASD does not actually die, the “healthy” child with whom they had been living until that moment is gone. For others, grief is related to a chronic sorrow, an “endless, living sorrow.” Finally, other family members experience this as an ambiguous loss, because they feel as if the child has been taken away from them and that the child may never speak to them (see Table 7).

3.3. Codes Grouped under the “Grieving Process” Category

3.3.1. Discontinued Activities and Time for Oneself

The alterations in different aspects of a child with ASD require multidisciplinary treatment involving different types of professionals, such as psychologists, educational psychologists, speech therapists, and occupational therapists, as well as school hours at the child’s own chronological age.
Family members of children with ASD are engrossed by the disorder and the intense pace of life involved in raising such children. This means that they have to give up many of the activities they used to engage in.
“I was leading a completely different life: travelling, leisure...” (02-Mother)
“Going out to eat with the family, going to funfairs, going for coffee... going out and leisure in general. Activities for couples too.” (04-Mother)
“Many: travelling, going out to bars, the gym, sports...” (11-Father)
“Everything: working, having fun, going for coffee, going out, having a drink, enjoying bars...” (18-Mother)
“Sport, I loved it... and now I don’t do anything. Cinema, reading... everything.” (19-Mother)
Along the same lines, when family members were asked about the time, they spent on themselves during the week, the responses were very similar and showed an evident lack of time spent on themselves.
“Little. The time to shower. And when they’re at school I have chores and things to do.” (01-Mother)
“No, not at all. I want to make time to walk because I need it.” (03-Mother)
“Two hours a week in the gym. Also going shopping alone is an escape route for me.” (05-Mother)
“When I’m sleeping. Other than that, not at all. That’s my hobby. My coffee and my cigarette are the short moment I have for myself.” (08-Mother)
“When his grandparents take him with them, once a month or so. That day that I have off I’m doing garden stuff or crafts. And that’s the only time I can dedicate to myself.” (12-Father)
“Nothing, I don’t spend time on myself. I have long hair because I can’t go to the hairdresser.” (16-Mother)

3.3.2. Changes in Family Dynamics

Children with ASD have a number of needs that differentiate them from normotypical children. They will have to attend certain activities and will require certain support measures and therapies that are not necessary for children without ASD. The deficit in communicative and social functioning that characterises children with ASD affects social interactions and differentiates them from children without ASD, thus compounding the situation. This is why family members of children with ASD, when asked about changes in family dynamics, agree that, when there is an individual with ASD in the family, everything revolves around the needs of this individual, thereby affecting family dynamics completely.
“It limits you. A typical mother would go to the park in the evenings, we don’t.” (01-Mother)
“Totally. We do everything through A. If he’s happy, we’re happy. Our lives revolve around him.” (02-Mother)
“Our outings are adapted to him. For example, my daughter loves McDonald’s, and instead of eating in, we order it at the drive-thru.” (04-Mother)
“Everything is crazy, from the time you get up to the time you go to bed. There is nothing normal about meals, outings, tasks, conversations...” (07-Mother)
“It has 100% affected everything. Now everything revolves around him: now he’s got this therapy, these activities...” (11-Father)
“All the time devoted to him. I also have a girl. I used to take them to classes and stuff... and she couldn’t take it anymore. She needs time for her studies and it’s a pain. I have a kid coming home to help.” (13-Mother)

3.3.3. Differences, According to Sex, as to Whether There Is Anything Family Members Would Like to Recover

Only in the sample of women have we found feelings of loss of freedom, time, etc., as a result of the diagnosis of their children. The women have reported wanting to recover certain things in their lives, while the majority of the sample of men answered that there was nothing they would like to recover (three fathers out of four). In contrast, most women report lack of time and overload, as well as anxiety and constant worry.
“The harmony when they were babies, not thinking.” (04-Mother)
“My freedom.” (05-Mother)
“More time for myself.” (06-Mother)
“The life I had before; with my books, my gym, friends... having my own small space.” (09-Mother)
“Knowing that my son doesn’t have anything and not having to worry so much about him.” (10-Mother)
“The energy of youth.” (20-Father)

3.3.4. Gains

When a traumatic event occurs in the family, sorrow is inevitable at first. Over time, family members usually undergo a process of acceptance of the event and develop a resilient attitude that leads them to value the positive side of the situation. However, this process is influenced by different factors related both to the event itself and to the characteristics of family dynamics.
All members of the sample in this study acknowledge that, despite having lost many things, such as time, leisure, or peace at home, they have gained a child, strength, and family unity.
“Almost everything. But I have gained my son.” (02-Mother)
“But I’ve gained finding myself. I have gained the ability to face it and say that my son has ASD in front of people. I used to be very embarrassed.” (04-Mother)
“The change has been for the better. It has brought us closer together. Now the bond with her (my wife) is stronger.” (11-Father)
“Not a thing. In fact, I feel that I have gained from this experience.” (12-Father)
“A little bit of freedom, but I’m delighted to be with my boy.” (15-Father)

3.3.5. Integration of Results

The results show that there is a time sequence that begins with the anticipation of the diagnosis, before receiving it officially. Once the diagnosis has been communicated, family members react in a variety of ways. Among these reactions we identified the phases of shock, denial, guilt, anger, fear, or a positive attitude. The experience of grief is varied and ambiguous, including the disruption of expectations in virtually all cases, as well as the existence of various feelings, such as uncertainty, worry about the future, guilt, and, in some cases, optimism.
After diagnosis, the lives of these parents are completely changed. They become overburdened and exhausted, with little time for themselves, having to give up many of the activities they used to do, and suffering significant changes to their family dynamics, which from now on are completely focused on the needs of the child with ASD. This stress is compounded by being in charge of more family members, i.e., other children who are normally developing, but who also need their attention, or other family members who need their attention. This means that many areas of the lives of these family members are affected, such as leisure and time for themselves, their relationships with other family members, or family dynamics itself (see Figure 1).

4. Discussion

The main objective of this study was to identify the manifestations related to the grieving experiences of primary caregivers of children with ASD and their perceived overburden from adopting the caregiver role. The diagnosis of ASD of a family member is associated with important changes in family functioning, as well as with the need to face new challenges in caring for that child, which puts significant pressure on caregivers, with ramifications for their physical and mental health.
Participants in this study acknowledged experiencing diverse and intense emotions related to grieving for having a family member with ASD and to having high levels of overburdening for caring for and raising these children, which is consistent with previous studies [13,16,30,32]. These emotional reactions include anxiety because of uncertainty, sadness and guilt because of the loss, or anger because of difficulty accepting the situation. These emotions can promote the onset of physical and mental health problems [7,8,9,10]. Different types of grief have been identified from the qualitative analysis of the interviews with family members. Unresolved grief, cyclical grief, and ambiguous loss stand out. This illustrates the complexity of these experiences and the need to take into consideration the specific characteristics of each experience.
Traditional models of grief are difficult to apply to people experiencing this type of loss [38]. The particular characteristics of these feelings of loss and grief, as well as their continuation and perpetuation over time [6], make it necessary to implement specific intervention programmes that address these feelings and emotions in order to improve their well-being and quality of life. These programmes would focus on the following: helping caregivers to accept the reality of the situation; tools to identify their feelings; emotions and sorrow caused by the loss, in order to work on them; strategies to adapt to the new unexpected situation; and identifying new goals and objectives beyond the caregiver role [39].
Early diagnosis is extremely important in order to minimise its impact and emotional effect on parents, as well as to establish criteria for early intervention in children [40].
When the diagnosis is communicated to them and they become aware of all that it involves, different emotional reactions are produced, such as worry, uncertainty, disappointment, and resignation. Voguel [41] points out that mothers, after the diagnosis, are forced to bid farewell to the mother–child bond that they had envisaged, and when mothers feel that the child they had imagined is gone, they experience a psychological death. Our results indicate that the main aspect that characterises and differentiates this type of loss from others is that the child has not died, although the family’s dreams, expectations, and hopes for the child have died [29,38,42]. In this sense, the subjective experience of feelings of loss and grief in parents with children with ASD is manifested, to a large extent, over the loss of a child that was normal and that, at a time of its early development, was lost, but not over the expected ideal child and the dreams and hopes placed in this child [24,25,33]. However, it should also be noted that some parents display an optimistic attitude after learning of the diagnosis. In this sense, they express that knowing their children’s real situation and needs allowed them to start an active coping mechanism and seek solutions suited to the new reality.
With regard to the experience of grief at the time of diagnosis, family members reported that they felt an experience as intense as that of grieving for the death of a family member, or even more painful, alluding to the uncertainty and lack of predictability of the future. Other relatives stated that they felt their grief was different from that of other types of losses, because of the cyclical nature of their grief or the disruption of their expectations about the future. This diagnosis would entail for families the loss of a previously “healthy” child, only to be mired in uncertainty about their child’s prognosis and development [41]. These results are in line with the concepts of “chronic grief” [26], “unresolved grief,” [27] and Bruce’s and Schultz’s “non-finite” grief [29].
Relatives report in their discourses that they are caught up in and trapped by the disorder and by the hectic pace of life involved in raising a child of this nature. As a result, they have been forced to give up many of the activities they used to do, the friends they once had, and the lifestyles they once enjoyed. They also commented that they do not have time for themselves, that they have neglected themselves, and that they prioritise the needs of the child over their own. All this is a result of the complexity of raising a child with ASD and the profound impact and change it produces in family dynamics [5,6]. The characteristics and particularities of these children make them have a set of needs that have to be met and that are very demanding of others, such as attending certain stimulation activities (playroom, swimming pool, horseback riding, surfing, etc.) and specific therapies (with the psychologist, speech therapist, or occupational therapist, among others) [7,8,9,11,13,16].
In spite of all this, some family members show signs of resilience and recognise they have also gained from this experience. Resilience becomes a fundamental element for coping with the problems these families have [43]. It is very helpful to encourage family members to listen, express their opinions and needs freely, seek support from their community and/or loved ones, and use constructive problem-solving strategies. These findings are consistent with Walsh’s theory of family resilience [44]. This theory states that individual resilience is connected to the resilience of the whole family, which is the positive adaptation to a significant adversity [44,45,46,47].
The implementation of specific intervention programmes focused on the emotional and coping difficulties experienced by these family members is crucial, since the emotions and sorrow involved in this type of grief are compounded by the great complexity involved in raising children with ASD [5,6]. Family members encounter many obstacles that interfere with an acceptable quality of life [48], from the initial diagnosis to the caregiver’s ongoing responsibilities and daily demands. The consequence of not addressing these issues is that the tensions from caring for a child of this nature will increase stress levels in parents, which will lead them to use maladaptive strategies to cope with these tensions. Seymour et al. [49] point out that the consequences of using these maladaptive strategies will be manifested in the behaviour of family members, by neglecting their responsibilities at work and at home, or by opting for problem-solving strategies that are unfavourable or cause more emotional problems. All of this will result in the occurrence of negative and aversive feelings towards the child with ASD [49]. In general, we have found that, in order to face the stress caused by these changes, family members use maladaptive strategies, such as avoidance, self-blame, drug abuse, and trying to deny the reality by recreating in their minds these stressful situations in a more positive but unreal light [50,51].
The grief felt by family members of people with ASD is called disallowed grief, and it has a number of characteristics that differentiate it from other types of grief. This type of grief is dismissed by the environment or society surrounding the bereaved. Manifesting this type of grief is denied to them, not valued, and even reproached to and blamed upon the bereaved, which prevents them from receiving social support from their environment. This is compounded by the difficulties inherent in individuals with these characteristics, which make it impossible for their relatives to complete their grieving process, because grieving never ends. This is due to the fact that successive losses are experienced throughout the development of the child, so that in each milestone not reached, there appear feelings of loss, frustration, pain, injustice, uncertainty, anger, and sadness
In summary, the following may be highlighted among the main contributions deriving from this study: a) the importance of making the diagnosis as soon as possible in order to allow family members to accept the disorder and cope with the new situation as soon as possible; b) the importance for these families of being able to identify some of the manifestations they experience as part of their grieving process, which is fundamental to overcoming it; c) the importance for professionals to be trained and proficient in identifying and recognising the emotional impact generated by communicating an ASD diagnosis, and to be able to assess associated emotions and, if possible, to monitor these emotions; and d) the requirement to address the needs that have been identified in the parents’ discourses. These needs are related both to the normalisation of the grieving process (which in most cases is not recognised as such) and to the provision of coping strategies regarding the management of the disorder and the levels of caregiver overload.
The main limitation of this study is the reduced number of participants in the sample. It would be necessary to increase the sample in future studies, especially that of fathers. It would also be interesting to be able to compare the discourse of relatives who are members of associations with that of other caregivers in order to verify to what extent these associations help to alleviate the emotional discomfort of these caregivers. It would also be desirable to involve siblings and other immediate family members. A further major limitation of the present work is its cross-sectional nature. It is necessary to continue to make progress in identifying the specific characteristics of this type of grief by focusing on its cyclical nature. To this end, it would be important to carry out longitudinal studies with long-term monitoring. In addition, the sampling method used was not randomized. Rather, intentional sampling was used, thus limiting the application of the results to other settings. Another limitation of this study is the low number of male participants. Finally, differences in the severity of the diagnoses could not be taken into account in order to assess their effect on the grieving process. As a result, caution must be exercised when interpreting the results obtained and generalising them to other populations in different cultural settings.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, it is worth pointing out the profound impact of raising a child with ASD on physical and mental health of caregivers, as well as on financial and practical aspects of their lives. The characteristics of the symptoms, together with the uncertainty and lack of predictability of the course of the disorder, mean that feelings of sorrow and grief do not cease and are repeated and continued at each unattained developmental stage of the child. All of this underlines the importance of creating programmes and services to support and address the feelings and manifestations of ambiguous grief that are produced in these family members in order to improve their well-being and quality of life, and to reduce the overload in the performance of their caregiver role.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.B.-B., F.C.-Q. and M.N.P.-M.; methodology, J.B.-B., F.C.-Q. and M.N.P.; software, J.B.-B., F.C.-Q., B.R.-A. and M.N.P.-M.; validation, J.B.-B., F.C.-Q. and M.N.P.-M.; formal analysis, J.B.-B., F.C.-Q., B.R.-A. and M.N.P.-M.; investigation, J.B.-B., F.C.-Q. and M.N.P.-M.; resources, J.B.-B., F.C.-Q. and M.N.P.; data curation, J.B.-B., F.C.-Q., B.R.-A. and M.N.P.-M.; writing—original draft preparation, J.B.-B., F.C.-Q., B.R.-A. and M.N.P.-M.; writing—review and editing, J.B.-B., F.C.-Q., B.R.-A. and M.N.P.-M.; visualization, J.B.-B., F.C.-Q. and M.N.P.-M.; supervision F.C.-Q. and M.N.P.; project administration, J.B.-B., F.C.-Q. and M.N.P.-M.; funding acquisition, J.B.-B.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Organización Mundial de la Salud. Available online: https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/autism-spectrum-disorders (accessed on 2 April 2018).
  2. Baron-Cohen, S.; Chaparro, S. Autismo y Síndrome de Asperger; Alianza Editorial: Madrid, Spain, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  3. Mansell, W.; Morris, K. A survey of parents’ reactions to the diagnosis of an autistic spectrum disorder by a local service: Access to information and use of services. Autism 2004, 8, 387–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Honey, E.; Hastings, R.P.; Mcconachie, H. Use of the Questionnaire on Resources and Stress (QRS-F) with parents of young children with autism. Autism 2005, 9, 246–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Altiere, M.J.; von Kluge, S. Family functioning and coping behaviors in parents of children with autism. J. Child Fam. Stud. 2009, 18, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cridland, E.K.; Jones, S.C.; Caputi, P.; Magee, C.A. Qualitative research with families living with autism spectrum disorder: Recommendations for conducting semistructured interviews. J. Intellect. Dev. Disabil. 2015, 40, 78–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gatzoyia, D.; Kotsis, K.; Koullourou, I.; Goulia, P.; Carvalho, A.F.; Soulis, S.; Hyphantis, T. The association of illness perceptions with depressive symptoms and general psychological distress in parents of an offspring with autism spectrum disorder. Disabil. Health J. 2014, 7, 173–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Giovagnoli, G.; Postorino, V.; Fatta, L.M.; Sanges, V.; De Peppo, L.; Vassena, L.; &Mazzone, L. Behavioral and emotional profile and parental stress in preschool children with autism spectrum disorder. Res. Dev. Disabil. 2015, 45, 411–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Karp, E.A.; Kuo, A.A.; Sandler, J.; Suarez, Z.F. Maternal Mental Health After a Child’s Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2015, 313, 81–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. O’Halloran, M.; Sweeney, J.; Doody, O. Exploring fathers’ perceptions of parenting a child with Asperger syndrome. J. Intellect. Disabil. 2013, 17, 198–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Seguí, J.D.; Ortiz-Tallo, M.; De Diego, Y. Factores asociados al estrés del cuidador primario de niños con autismo: Sobrecarga, psicopatología y estado de salud. Psicol. Ann. Psychol. 2008, 24, 100–105. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ludlow, A.; Skelly, C.; Rohleder, P. Challenges faced by parents of children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder. J. Health Psychol. 2012, 17, 702–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Costa, A.P.; Steffgen, G.; Ferring, D. Contributors to well-being and stress in parents of children with autism spectrum disorder. Res. Autism Spectr. Disord. 2017, 37, 61–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dabrowska, A.; Pisula, E. Parenting stress and coping styles in mothers and fathers of pre-school children with autism and Down syndrome. J. Intellect. Disabil. Res. 2010, 54, 266–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Pottie, C.G.; Ingram, K.M. Daily stress, coping, and well-being in parents of children with autism: A multilevel modeling approach. J. Fam. Psychol. 2008, 22, 855–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Vasilopoulou, E.; Nisbet, J. The quality of life of parents of children with autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review. Res. Autism Spectr. Disord. 2016, 23, 36–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bromley, J.; Hare, D.J.; Davison, K.; Emerson, E. Mothers supporting children with autistic spectrum disorders: Social support, mental health status and satisfaction with services. Autism 2004, 8, 409–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Woodgate, R.L.; Ateah, C.; Secco, L. Living in a world of our own: The experience of parents who have a child with autism. Qual. Health Res. 2008, 18, 1075–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. O’Brien, M. Ambiguous loss in families of children with autism spectrum disorders. Fam. Relat. 2007, 56, 135–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mulligan, J.; MacCulloch, R.; Good, B.; Nicholas, D.B. Transparency, hope, and empowerment: A model for partnering with parents of a child with autism spectrum disorder at diagnosis and beyond. Soc. Work Ment. Health 2012, 10, 311–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ponte, J.; Perpiñán, S.; Mayo, M.E.; Millá, M.G.; Pegenaute, F.; Poch-Olivé, M.L. Estudio sobre los procedimientos profesionales, las vivencias y las necesidades de los padres cuando se les informa de que su hijo tiene una discapacidad o un trastorno del desarrollo. La primera noticia. Rev. Neurol. 2012, 54, 3–9. [Google Scholar]
  22. Boss, P. Ambiguous loss research, theory, and practice: Reflections after 9/11. J. Marriage Fam. 2004, 66, 551–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Boss, P. Ambiguous Loss: Learning to Live with Unresolved Grief; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  24. Casey, L.B.; Zanksas, S.; Meindl, J.N.; Parra, G.R.; Cogdal, P.; Powell, K. Parental symptoms of posttraumatic stress following a child’s diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder: A pilot study. Res. Autism Spectr. Disord. 2012, 6, 1186–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Heiman, T. Parents of children with disabilities: Resilience, coping, and future expectations. J. Dev. Phys. Disabil. 2002, 14, 159–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Olshansky, S. Chronic sorrow: A response to having a mentally defective child. Soc. Casework 1962, 43, 190–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rarity, J.C. Nonfinite Grief in Families with Children on the Autism Spectrum; ProQuest: San Antonio, TX, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  28. Patrick-Ott, A.; Ladd, L.D. The blending of Boss’s concept of ambiguous loss and Olshansky’s concept of chronic sorrow: A case study of a family with a child who has significant disabilities. J. Creat. Ment. Health 2010, 5, 73–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bruce, E.J.; Schultz, C.L. Nonfinite Loss and Grief: A Psychoeducational Approach; Paul H Brookes Publishing: Baltimore, MD, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  30. Abbott, M.; Bernard, P.; Forge, J. Communicating a diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder-a qualitative study of parents’ experiences. Clin. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 2013, 18, 370–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. King, G.A.; Zwaigenbaum, L.; King, S.; Baxter, D.; Rosenbaum, P.; Bates, A. A qualitative investigation of changes in the belief systems of families of children with autism or Down syndrome. Child Care Health Dev. 2006, 32, 353–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mahmood, H.; Saleemi, M.; Riaz, H.; Hassan, Y.; Khan, F. Coping strategies of mothers with ASD children. Prof. Med. J. 2015, 22, 1454–1463. [Google Scholar]
  33. Fernańdez-Alcántara, M.; García-Caro, M.P.; Pérez-Marfil, M.N.; Hueso-Montoro, C.; Laynez-Rubio, C.; Cruz-Quintana, F. Feelings of loss and grief in parents of children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Res. Dev. Disabil. 2016, 55, 312–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lutz, H.R.; Patterson, B.J.; Klein, J. Coping with autism: A journey toward adaptation. J. Pediatr. Nurs. 2012, 27, 206–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Marshall, V.; Long, B.C. Coping processes as revealed in the stories of mothers of children with autism. Qual. Health Res. 2010, 20, 105–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Glaser, B.; Strauss, A. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research; Aldine Publishing: Chicago, IL, USA, 1967. [Google Scholar]
  37. Strauss, A.L.; Corbin, J.; Zimmerman, E. Bases de la Investigación Cualitativa: Técnicas y Procedimientos Para Desarrollar la Teoría Fundamentada; Aldine: New York, NY, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  38. Kurtzer-White, E.; Luterman, D. Families and children with hearing loss: Grief and coping. Ment. Retard. Dev. Disabil. Res. Rev. 2003, 9, 232–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Nomen, L. Tratando el Proceso de Duelo y de Morir; Pirámide Psicología: Madrid, Spain, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  40. Canal, R.; Martín, M.V.; Bohórquez, D.; Guisuraga, Z.; Herráez, L.; Herráez, M.; Posada, M. La detección precoz del autismo y el impacto en la calidad de vida de las familias. In Aplicación del Paradigma de Calidad de Vida. VII Seminario de Actualización Metodológica en Investigación Sobre Discapacidad; INICO: Salamanca, Spain, 2010; pp. 91–98. [Google Scholar]
  41. Vogel, J.S. A Mythopoetic Exploration of Maternal Grief: When a Child Is Diagnosed on the Autism Spectrum; Pacifica Graduate Institute: Bárbara, CA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  42. Ozgul, S. Parental grief and serious mental illness: A narrative. Aust. N. Z. J. Fam. 2004, 25, 183–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Gardiner, E.; Mâsse, L.C.; Iarocci, G. A psychometric study of the Family Resilience Assessment Scale among families of children with autism spectrum disorder. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 2019, 17, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Walsh, F. Family resilience: A framework for clinical practice. Fam. Process 2003, 42, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Bhana, A.; Bachoo, S. The determinants of family resilience among families in low-and middle-income contexts: A systematic literature review. S. Afr. J. Psychol. 2011, 41, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hawley, D.R. Clinical implications of family resilience. Am. J. Fam. Ther. 2000, 28, 101–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Rutter, M. Resilience concepts and findings: Implications for family therapy. J. Fam. Ther. 1999, 21, 119–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Bilgin, H.; Kucuk, L. Raising an autistic child: Perspectives from Turkish mothers. J. Child Adolesc. Psychiatr. Nurs. 2010, 23, 92–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Seymour, M.; Wood, C.; Giallo, R.; Jellett, R. Fatigue, stress and coping in mothers of children with an autism spectrum disorder. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2013, 43, 1547–1554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Picci, R.L.; Oliva, F.; Trivelli, F.; Carezana, C.; Zuffranieri, M.; Ostacoli, L.; Furlan, P.M.; Lala, R. Emotional burden and coping strategies of parents of children with rare diseases. J. Child Fam. Stud. 2015, 24, 514–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Worden, J.W. Grief Counseling and Grief Therapy: A Handbook for the Mental Health Practitioner; Springer Publishing Company: New York, NY, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Concept map of the emotional impact of the diagnosis on parents of children with ASD (autism spectrum disorder).
Figure 1. Concept map of the emotional impact of the diagnosis on parents of children with ASD (autism spectrum disorder).
Ijerph 16 04821 g001
Table 1. Socio-demographic data of the participants.
Table 1. Socio-demographic data of the participants.
SubjectSexAgeLevel of EducationMarital StatusEmployment Status
01Female36Secondary education or vocational trainingMarriedUnemployed
02Female32Secondary education or vocational trainingMarriedUnemployed
03Female40Secondary education or vocational trainingSeparated/divorcedUnemployed
04Female40Secondary education or vocational trainingMarriedEmployed
05Female57Secondary education or vocational trainingWidowEmployed
06Female45GraduateSeparated/divorcedUnemployed
07Female42University studiesMarriedEmployed
08Female31Secondary education or vocational trainingMarriedUnemployed
09Female40Secondary education or vocational trainingMarriedUnemployed
10Female48Secondary education or vocational trainingMarriedEmployed
11Male37GraduateMarriedEmployed
12Male35Secondary education or vocational trainingMarriedEmployed
13Female45Basic educationMarriedUnemployed
14Female30Secondary education or vocational trainingSingleEmployed
15Male40Basic educationMarriedUnemployed
16Female40University studiesSeparated/divorcedEmployed
17Female68Secondary education or vocational trainingMarriedHousehold chores
18Female40Secondary education or vocational trainingMarriedHousehold chores
19Female43GraduateMarriedEmployed
20Male45University studiesMarriedEmployed
Table 2. Children’s ages, in months, at which the diagnosis was communicated to their family members and the professionals who communicated it.
Table 2. Children’s ages, in months, at which the diagnosis was communicated to their family members and the professionals who communicated it.
SubjectAge (months)Professional
0136Psychologist
0224Psychiatrist
0327Psychologist
0418Herself
0554Psychologist
0623Psychologist
0717Neuropaediatrician
0818Psychologist
09132Counsellor
10120Psychologist
1118Paediatrician
1224Psychologist
1342Neurologist
1436General practitioner
1524Psychologist
1630Psychiatrist
17-Neurologist
1884Psychiatrist
1960Psychologist
2066Psychologist
Table 3. Sections of the semi-structured interview.
Table 3. Sections of the semi-structured interview.
Section 1: DiagnosisWho communicated the diagnosis to the relative? At what age? How did you feel at the moment you were communicated? What were your reactions? What concerns came to mind?
Section 2: Loss and grieving processInterference in work, leisure, friendship, family, care people and relationship, health, welfare in general.
Associated emotions.
Perceived losses.
Section 3: Caregiver overloadActivities that you used to do and have stopped doing now.
Do you spend time for yourself? How much per week and how?
How has it affected family dynamics?
Section 4: FutureHas your vision changed about the future of your family member due to diagnosis? Could you explain it?
Table 4. Themes identified and associated with the grieving experience of family caregivers after receiving the diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD).
Table 4. Themes identified and associated with the grieving experience of family caregivers after receiving the diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD).
DiagnosticProcessGrief ProcessStress and Overload
AnticipationReaction to the diagnosisDiscontinued activities and time for oneself
Age of the childDisruption of expectationsChanges in family dynamics
Professional who communicated the diagnosisExperience of griefFeelings of loss/gain
Table 5. Quotations associated with reactions to the diagnosis.
Table 5. Quotations associated with reactions to the diagnosis.
SubcodeQuotations from the Participants
Shock“In shock. The stereotype of autism that I had was more exaggerated, so I didn’t think my son had this.” (07-Mother)
“I didn’t know how to react, I was shocked. I didn’t know what to do, or how to act, or... this is horrible... unbearable...” (17-Grandmother)
Denial“Petrified. I thought: This is not happening to me. And then I thought: Why me? What will become of my son?” (05-Mother)
Guilt“My world fell apart.It crossed my mind whether I had been a good mother.” (09-Mother)
Anger“I felt an intense rage and then frustration afterwards: Why me? I felt helpless not knowing how to deal with the situation... uncertainty.” (11-Father)
“Awful, I don’t want to say it because I’m going to cry. I felt rage... why did this happen to me?!” (18-Mother)
Proactive attitude“I felt like I wanted to fight. I thought: now that I know what my child’s got, we’re going to work on this. I reacted proactively. I got down to work: looking for information and resources everywhere. I avoid standing still.” (03-Mother)
“I felt that you have to try harder, press harder, and take more care of the situation.” (20-Father)
Table 6. Main quotations on the expectations for the future of the child in the past and in the present.
Table 6. Main quotations on the expectations for the future of the child in the past and in the present.
EmotionQuotations
Concern and uncertainty“A healthy girl who would run and jump, happily. Now I don’t know, I’m not quite sure. Her autonomy is what worries me the most.” (01-Mother)
“Now his future is a question mark. It depends on his progress. What I want is for him to be independent and to be able to lead a life like everybody else.” (02-Mother)
“Now I’m very worried about my son’s future. That’s what worries me the most, if he will be able to become independent, autonomous. I’m worried that society will take advantage of him […]. I’m very concerned that there will be no more resources for him, that there are finite resources.” (07-Mother)
“A normal future, with a job... Now I really don’t know. That’s what worries me the most.” (09-Mother)
“Very different. I imagined that I was going to be able to talk to him, that I was going to teach him my stuff, sports... and that he was going to have an education. Now, I really don’t know what’s going to happen, if he can’t speak...” (12-Mother)
“I didn’t used to think much about the future, but I imagined him beingwell, happy. Now I don’t know, I’m hopeless. Sometimes I think about giving him a sibling, but I’m afraid.” (14-Mother)
“The usual... where is he going to study? Will I teach him English?... The usual... Now, I’m scared and you think what will become of him when I’m gone...? The million dollar question.” (16-Mother)
“With my wife, several children, a simple life, and making a living. Now it hurts because I wanted to have another child and take more care of them. And I’m concerned for the day we are gone.” (20-Father)
Disappointment“We all expect to have a perfect child, and that’s the letdown we get. Because that’s the child we lose.” (04-Mother)
“I thought that he would be a university student, that he would play football, be a good person, an athlete... now I think of him as totally dependent, always asking to have good people around to take care of him.” (05-Mother)
“Before, when he was younger, it came to mind a lot what it would be like without the diagnosis. I really wanted to have a child to enjoy it: when they started to walk, to talk... and I’ve been left with the desire to enjoy my son’s normal early stages.”(07-Mother)
“I thought that he’d be an amusing kid, very talkative… a little rascal” (08-Mother)
“I wanted some intellectually gifted children, super clever, and now what... My friends, with their children, who are super good at something whereas mine, what... well...” (13-Mother)
“[…] that now you have to be dedicated to him for everything, I imagined him on a motorbike and now... you see... not anymore.” (15-Father)
“Like everybody else, I wanted to have three children, very nice, like everybody else... my studios arein Madrid... And now I’m gloomy, always with my son, he is totally dependent and I don’t trust anyone.” (18-Mother)
Resignation“I pictured him studying, with his friends, with his girlfriend... a normal life. Now, I don’t even think about the future, what for?” (06-Mother)
“Well, having my grandson, pampering him, taking him to the streets, to the cinema, drawings... talking to him... now I don’t have a future, I don’t want to think about it, it scares me so much...” (17-Grandmother)
Optimism“I wanted my children to travel, to be independent, to go to university... to be free people. Now I think the same way, or at least I hope so. It’s improving a lot.” (04-Mother)
“Like anyone else: university studies, football... now I still think the same way, or I’d like to think the same way. Instead of football, chess... let him be happy with whatever it is. If instead of football he likes to learn the roads, so be it.” (11-Father)
Table 7. Main quotations about feelings and experiences related to grief.
Table 7. Main quotations about feelings and experiences related to grief.
EmotionQuotations
Unresolved grief“For me the grief is worse now than at the time of diagnosis, because I see how L. is and I’m worried about the future.” (01-Mother)
“It’s been worse for me. Because when I lost my parents, it hurt, but it’s something I had accepted would happen. But not this.” (05-Mother)
“Yes, to me it’s something similar. I keep experiencing it inside. I experienced it in this way: they give you the diagnosis and you have to ride it out. I made sure I didn’t have time to grieve by looking for therapies and resources everywhere.” (11-Father)
Cyclical grief“It’s not the same to me. Grieving for a diagnosis of ASD is a cycle of grief that you enter and exit continuously. Each stage of the child’s development makes you worry about some things and it makes you grieve again.” (07-Mother)
“Yes, it’s similar. It changes everything for you. It’s as though I had to learn everything from him. I have to learn to deal with him. And then there are days when you just can’t accept that your child has ASD. You have ups and downs. The grief goes up and down, up and down.” (08-Mother)
Grieving for the loss of the expected child“Yes, it’s not the same because the person is there, but it’s not what you had in mind. When you consider having a child, you don’t expect this. And I really thought about it.” (01-Mother)
“Yes, it’s as if you’ve lost your child. We all expect to have a perfect child, and that’s the letdown we get. Because that’s the child we lose” (04-Mother)
“It may resemble something like that, because what you imagine when you’re having a baby vanishes, so it’s like you’re losing something of yourself.” (12-Mother)
“It’s not like a bereavement, no. It’s like... now what? Uncertainty. I wanted to have intellectually gifted children, super clever, and now what? …” (13-Mother)
Chronic sorrow orlatent grief“It’s very similar, but it’s more painful. Because when you lose someone you learn to live without them, and now you learn to live with them, it’s exactly the opposite.” (06-Mother)
“No, not so much, but I’m always trying to make sure that he does not suffer, that people don’t deceive him... it hurts so much that I have inappropriate outbursts at times.” (10-Mother)
“No, it felt worse than the death of a loved one. My father died, I have already experienced that, but this is worse than the death of a loved one. It’s like a living sorrow. It never ends.” (16-Mother)
“No, I feel it more (worse)... because this is not sorrow, it’s... just that it leaves you empty, a very big void... there is sorrow here, there is no satisfaction... a very big sorrow in your soul.” (17-Mother)
Ambiguous loss“I didn’t experience it that way. Although it is as though he had been taken away from me. After the vaccinations, he stopped looking at me, talking to me... everything. Before, he used to do it.” (03-Mother)
“No, the feeling is that your son is never going to talk to you. It’s a weird feeling, I haven’t experienced anything similar, but it’s not comparable to the loss of a loved one.” (15-Father)

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bravo-Benítez, J.; Pérez-Marfil, M.N.; Román-Alegre, B.; Cruz-Quintana, F. Grief Experiences in Family Caregivers of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 4821. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph16234821

AMA Style

Bravo-Benítez J, Pérez-Marfil MN, Román-Alegre B, Cruz-Quintana F. Grief Experiences in Family Caregivers of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019; 16(23):4821. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph16234821

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bravo-Benítez, Jorge, María Nieves Pérez-Marfil, Belén Román-Alegre, and Francisco Cruz-Quintana. 2019. "Grief Experiences in Family Caregivers of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16, no. 23: 4821. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph16234821

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop