Next Article in Journal
Gender Differences in Factors Influencing Self-Efficacy Toward Pregnancy Planning among College Students in Korea
Next Article in Special Issue
Knowledge, Attitude and Practices towards the Tiger Mosquito Aedes Albopictus. A Questionnaire Based Survey in Lazio Region (Italy) before the 2017 Chikungunya Outbreak
Previous Article in Journal
Nitrogen-Dioxide Remains a Valid Air Quality Indicator
Previous Article in Special Issue
Detection of Exotic Mosquito Species (Diptera: Culicidae) at International Airports in Europe
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 17
Issue 10
10.3390/ijerph17103734
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Surveillance of a Pest Through a Public Health Information System: The Case of the Blackfly (Simulium erythrocephalum) in Zaragoza (Spain) during 2009–2015

by
Ignacio Ruiz-Arrondo
1,*,
José A. Oteo
1,
Javier Lucientes
2,
Ana Muniesa
2 and
Ignacio de Blas
2
1
Center for Rickettsiosis and Arthropod-Borne Diseases, Hospital San Pedro-CIBIR, Piqueras Street 98, 3rd floor, 26006 Logroño (La Rioja), Spain
2
Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón (IA2), Universidad de Zaragoza, Miguel Servet Street 177, 50013 Zaragoza (Aragon), Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(10), 3734; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph17103734
Submission received: 5 May 2020 / Revised: 20 May 2020 / Accepted: 22 May 2020 / Published: 25 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ecology, Epidemiology, Surveillance, and Control of Vectors and Vector-Borne Pathogens in Temperate Regions)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: Animals and people in many Spanish regions are increasingly being affected by blackfly bites in the last decade. Because of blackflies, the city of Zaragoza has become in recent years a paradigm of discomfort in Europe, with thousands of citizens affected. The OMI-AP system (Stacks, Barcelona, Spain) implemented by the Government of Aragón, a software that manages the electronic medical history of all patients, has been evaluated in order to document the increase of insect bite recorded by the primary care consultations in Zaragoza after the first outbreak of blackflies occurred in 2011. Methods: An observational, ecological and longitudinal study of insect bites recorded at the primary care consultations was carried out in primary care during the period 2009–2015. Results: The incidence of medical consultations by insect bites in Basic Health Areas (BHA) near to rivers is higher than the furthest BHA. Rural BHA are more affected by insect bites than the urban ones. The increase of medical assistance due to insect bites in Zaragoza since 2011 is correlated with the blackflies bites. Conclusions: This tool was very useful to describe the initial stage of this public health problem. It could be used for guiding public health responses in terms of surveillance and management of this pest.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The public health importance of blackflies in Europe is primarily attributed to nuisance and to the biting activity of females [1]. The changes through human activities like agricultural land use and the improvement of water quality, among other understudied reasons that affect the river ecosystems, have enabled an increase of blackfly populations in the middle and lower stretches of several Spanish rivers, reaching a pest status [2]. Therefore, in some regions in Spain, blackfly outbreaks have an increasing frequency, threatening the public and animal health [2,3,4].
Of the 54 reported and two in doubt blackfly species in Spain [5], only some of them have been identified as pest species, probably due to the lack of integrated research approaches in the Spanish blackfly taxonomy [6]. Simulium erythrocephalum is currently the most important anthropophilic pest species in Spain [7] and in some other European countries like Serbia [8]. The city of Zaragoza (Aragón, Spain), with less than 700,000 inhabitants, has become in the last decade a paradigm of annoyance caused by blackflies in Europe [7]. The bites of S. erythrocephalum, the species responsible for blackfly outbreaks in the city, sometimes causes allergic reactions that require medical assistance. Since 2011, problems due to arthropod bites have increased more than 200% at the region’s health centers [7].
Public health administrations implement information systems to identify health problems of the human population and to generate reliable information from health and non-health data sources that allow them to design specific health programs. One of these information systems is the one that collects the electronic medical records of the patients. In Aragón, it is collected and managed through a software called OMI-AP, where health conditions are coded according to the International Classification of Primary Care Diseases (CIAP-1). In this way, the OMI-AP system becomes an extremely useful tool to record data from the notifiable diseases and other processes under surveillance [9].
In Spain there is no active surveillance regarding arthropod bites to assess the public health impact in case of any observed changes in arthropod activity. The Mosquito Alert app is a useful citizen science tool to study the spread and establishment of the invasive mosquito Aedes albopictus in Spain [10], but it records the presence of the vector and not insect bites. We have some examples of increase of Ae. albopictus bites requiring healthcare in the Spanish Mediterranean coast [11,12] and a slight increase in the Basque Country [13]. However, to our knowledge, despite the increasing public health problem attributable to the blackfly pest, there are only a few published reports about the incidence of blackfly bites requiring healthcare attention in some Spanish regions. Two examples are the previously mentioned problems suffered by the city of Zaragoza [7] and a study developed in Catalonia, where 1,484 medical attentions to blackfly bites were recorded from the end of May to the end of October 2005, the first year in which massive bites by this insect were detected [14,15].
There are few examples of either a national surveillance system or published studies investigating the epidemiology of arthropod bites in Europe [16]; and as far as we know, there is not one about blackfly bites. It is of paramount importance to study the epidemiology of pest bites that involves massive bites to the population, so as to know the health determinants involved; this could represent a valuable step in order to plan new interventions and subsequently evaluate the impact of the control measures established. For this reason, the aim of this work was to use the OMI-AP health information system implemented by the regional government to assess the increase of primary care electronic arthropod bites records and to describe the dynamics of blackfly pest through its impact in the primary care in Zaragoza during the period 2009–2015.

2. Materials and Methods

An observational, ecological and longitudinal study of insect bites in primary care consultations was carried out during the period 2009–2015 in Zaragoza city.

2.1. Study Area

The study was carried out in Zaragoza and its metropolitan area, which with 664,938 inhabitants is the capital of Aragón, a region that is located in the northeast of Spain. Three rivers—Ebro, Gállego and Huerva—run through the city. The Ebro is the second longest river in Spain (930 km), with the highest average flow (600 m3/s, but of an irregular nature). At the end of summer, it presents very low water levels, typically carrying less than 10% of its average flow. Most of the blackfly breeding sites were identified along the Ebro River downstream and upstream from the urban area of Zaragoza [2,7]. The other two rivers have less flow than the Ebro. The Huerva River runs underground as it passes through the city, while along the Gállego River there is a paper mill industry upstream from the urban area that emits cellulose pulp which covers all the river substrates, preventing larval attachment.
No identifications of blackfly species were made in this study. The species responsible for human bites in Zaragoza is inferred to be S. erythrocephalum based on previous studies carried out during our same study period [7,17]. Species of the subgenus Wilhelmia have been also detected in the outskirts of Zaragoza city, but they have not been identified in human biting cases [7] so their role as a biting pest of humans is not discussed.

2.2. Data Source

The Public Health department of the Government of Aragón (through a model of commitment to adapt to the Organic Law on Protection of Personal Data (LODP in Spanish), provided us the data from the OMI-AP system on primary care consultations for any reason and on insect bites consultations in primary care. All data were disaggregated by BHA belonging to the metropolitan area of Zaragoza city in the period 2009–2015. The total number of primary care consultations and the insect bites primary care consultations were obtained on a monthly and weekly basis respectively.
The BHA are the territorial assistance units where the different primary care teams are grouped. Each BHA has one or more primary care centers. We selected a total of 41 BHA. Of them, 33 BHA are part of Zaragoza and categorized as urban BHA (in blue, Figure 1); we also selected the villages within a radius of 30 km from the capital and these were categorized as rural BHA (in yellow, Figure 1). Table S1 of the Supplementary Material lists each BHA and their corresponding zone (urban or rural). It must be taken into account that people may have been bitten in any area of the city but that patients normally go to the BHA that corresponds to their place of residence and not where they have been bitten.
Arthropod bites requiring healthcare were obtained from the primary electronic medical record coded as S12 “insect bite” according to the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC-1). Data were debugged deleting those descriptors that corresponded to specific health intervention where the causative arthropod was detailed and not related to the objective of our study (e.g., tick, wasp, etc.). In total, for each arthropod bite record requiring healthcare we used the following variables: year, month, week, BHA and zone type (rural or urban). Data were imported in a database managed with Access 2016 (Microsoft, Readmon, WA, USA) and then SQL queries in order to recode, categorize and create new variables.

2.3. Data Analysis

Firstly, insect bites in primary care consultations/10,000 primary care consultations for any reason were calculated. They were grouped with different criteria, temporal (year, month, week) and spatial (BHA and zone). The numbers of insect bite in primary care consultations were analyzed annually and monthly, considering the spatial distribution according to rural/urban zone.
The mean, standard deviation(s) and range of values (minimum and maximum) were used to describe the quantitative variables, evaluating the normality of the data with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. To assess the spatio-temporal variation of the bite rates we used ANOVA test to assess differences among years, and later we used Duncan post hoc test to evaluate differences between years. In order to compare differences between urban and rural zones, we used the Student’s test for independent samples. In all cases a weighted analysis was carried out using the number of primary care as weighting variable.
Analysis was performed using SPSS 19.0 for Windows (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) setting the alpha error to 0.05. Graphs were generated with Microsoft Excel 2013 (Microsoft, Readmon, WA, USA). Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3 were created by QGIS V.3.0.1 (QGIS Development Team 2018, Available from: http://www.qgis.org). Ranges used in the Figure 2 and Figure 3 were chosen using the minimum and maximum values in the period 2009–2015 and subsequently calculating the ranges based on the quartiles of the year 2012 as it reached the maximum value of the entire series.

3. Results

3.1. Analysis of Insect Bites Primary Care Consultations Accumulated Annually

The incidence of insect bites in primary care is given in Table 1. Over the years, there was an increasing evolution in the number of insect bites in primary care consultations/10,000 primary care consultations compared to 2009, reaching a maximum in 2012. Later, from 2013 to 2015, a decrease in the number of insect bites medical records is observed. The high value of the mean in 2009 is explained by the fact that the registration of total primary care consultations is less than in subsequent years because the electronic system for registering medical records was still being implemented (Table 1). An increase of 217% was observed in the number of insect bites in primary care consultations/10,000 primary care consultations in 2011 compared to the previous years 2009 and 2010. This increase was even greater during 2012, reaching 280%. Subsequently, from 2013 to 2015, a decrease in the incidence of insect bites records was observed with respect to the years 2011 and 2012, but remaining above the figures in the years 2009 and 2010. Regarding the zone type, significant differences were observed between rural and urban zones, being greater the number of consultations in the first zone (Table 1).
The spatial analysis of insect bites incidence confirms what was previously observed in the statistical analysis (Figure 2 and Figure 3). In 2009, several BHA are on grey (outside the established range green-red scale) and yellow (Figure 3) because the electronic system for registering medical records was not totally implemented in all BHA (Table 1). There is also a BHA in red during 2010 for this same reason (Figure 2). Figure 3 shows the highest incidence of insect bites in BHA close to the Ebro River during the years 2011 and 2012. In addition, an increase in the number of insect bites consultations already occurred in 2009 and 2010 in rural zones downstream of Zaragoza (Figure 2). While urban BHA have the lowest number of insect bites records in the 2013–2015 period (Figure 3), several rural BHA remain at high levels (Figure 2). Rural BHA (Zuera and María de Huerva, ID: 22 and 18 respectively in Figure 1), distant from the Ebro River but close to where the Gállego and Huerva rivers’ flow, respectively, had a large number of insect bites consultations in addition to a different annual pattern of consultations (Figure 2).

3.2. Analysis of Insect Bite Primary Care Consultations Accumulated Monthly

Table 2 shows how the highest insect bites in primary care consultations occurred during the period July–September in 2009, July and August in 2010, and peaked in August and July respectively. However, during the following years (2011 and 2012), the highest incidence of insect bites records began in May, lasting until August. In both years, the maximum was reached during the month of June, exceeding the threshold of 150 and 250 insect bites in primary care consultations/10,000 primary care consultations in 2011 and 2012 respectively. Subsequently, in 2013 a similar pattern to that of 2010 was observed, with the beginning and maximum of consultations in July. In the remaining years 2014 and 2015, the monthly pattern of consultations was modified again, reaching the peak of insect bites in primary care consultations/10,000 primary care consultations in June, as the years 2011 and 2012.
There were differences between the monthly insect bites in primary care consultations in rural and urban zones (Figure 4). Overall, during the study period, it was observed that the rural zone had higher insect bites incidence than the urban; except for 2012, when both zones showed a similar pattern.

4. Discussion

The increase in the number of insect bites in primary care consultations in the metropolitan area of Zaragoza during the period 2011–2015 compared to 2009–2010 is due to the massive presence of blackflies on the banks of the Ebro River as it flows through Aragón [2,17]. The fact that BHA next to the Ebro River were the most affected reaffirms the hypothesis that the anthropophilic blackflies have their main breeding sites in this river. In addition, the massive presence of this pest is also responsible for the change in the monthly pattern of insect bites medical records observed from 2011 with respect to the period 2009–2010. It could be thought that the monthly fluctuation of consultations in the period 2013–2015 (Table 2) is due to the blackfly control management, established in the Ebro River as it flows through the urban area of Zaragoza from 2011, and the habituation of citizens to insect bites. However, in 2017, another significant blackfly outbreak occurred in Zaragoza, exceeding the number of insect bites in primary care consultations since 2012. In the first six months of 2017, 11,512 insect bites in primary care consultations were recorded in Aragón, a higher number than the 9,422 consultations for the same period in 2012 [18], the year with the highest number of insect bites in our series. Therefore, we think this temporary pattern in the insect bites records is due to changes in the blackfly population density that in turn depends directly on the increased population along the rivers.
During the first outbreak in 2011, Ruiz-Arrondo et al. [17] observed the immature stages of S. erythrocephalum using macrophytes as a substrate to develop their biological cycle. Submerged macrophytes are phanerogamic plants that live rooted or not on the river bed and maintain their entire structure underwater, being able to grow to occupy large extensions of the river bed [19]. This association between the massive proliferation of macrophytes and blackflies has also been observed in other Spanish regions affected by this pest [2,14,20,21,22]. This relationship of macrophyte-blackfly larvae was observed again in 2012 in the Ebro River in the vicinity of Zaragoza [23]. From 2013 to 2015, the incidence of insect bites was much lower because the hydrology of the Ebro River changed compared to 2011–2012. Overall, a lower presence of macrophytes was detected than in 2011–2012 and therefore, the blackfly population was lower than in previous years (personal observation, Ruiz-Arrondo). The hypothesis proposed is that prolonged high flows of the Ebro River during the winter and the beginning of spring negatively affect the breeding sites of blackflies, which entails a decrease in the population of blood-sucking females and consequently in the number of insect bites attended at primary care centres. Marqués [21] also espoused that the flows below the ecological threshold in the Ter River in Catalonia support the presence of preimaginal forms of blackflies. The opposite situation has been described in Serbia, where a high flow of the Danube River during spring boosts the occurrence of blackfly outbreaks during the subsequent spring and summer [8,24]. All these observations reinforce the need to carry out a study to know precisely how the hydrology of the Ebro River affects the dynamic population of macrophytes and blackflies in the metropolitan area of Zaragoza.
The increase in consultations in rural zones around the Ebro river, downstream from Zaragoza (Figure 2), observed in 2010 (prior to the first outbreak in Zaragoza city in 2011) indicates that the blackfly pest expansion followed an ascending process from Ebro downstream; a fact also evidenced by Figueras et al. [3] who described the first massive blackfly bites on flocks of sheep in the same BHA zones in 2010, more than 30 km from Zaragoza city. Actually, the first blackfly outbreak recorded in settlements near the Ebro River occurred in 2005 in Catalonia (more than 200 km downstream from Zaragoza) [15]. A plausible explanation for the fact that urban areas have fewer insect bites records than rural zones during the 2013–2015 period is that the main breeding sites for S. erythrocephalum in the Ebro River are down- and upstream the urban area of Zaragoza [7]. A significant number of consultations in rural BHA far from the Ebro River but near where the Huerva and Gállego Rivers flow suggests that these latter rivers have blackfly breeding sites and the insect bites medical records in these BHA are strongly influenced by these rivers and not by the Ebro. Larvae and pupae of S. erythrocephalum and other species belonging to the subgenus Wilhelmia have been identified in both rivers outside the urban area of Zaragoza city [23]. However, the BHA through which the urban section of the Huerva River runs are not as affected by insect bites (Figure 3) because the conditions for the development of the preimaginal forms do not exist [17].
Simulium erythrocephalum has been described as a species with great flight capacity. Živković [25] described how this species was able to fly distances of 20-30 km from its breeding sites in search of hosts. Ignjatović-Ćupina et al. [8] explained how females of this species could move to distant localities more than 5 km from their breeding sites along the Danube River. In our case, the flying ability of this species is also confirmed as individuals of S. erythrocephalum were caught in human biting acitivty in green areas in the center of Zaragoza 3 km distant in a straight line from the closest point of the Ebro River [23]. This observation shows that its flight capacity is greater since adults have to move through the streets of Zaragoza city on an irregular flight from their breeding sites, located mainly outside the urban area of Zaragoza [7]. The flying ability of S. erythrocephalum could also explain why certain BHA away from the axis of the rivers had significant incidences of insect bites. Ignjatović-Ćupina et al. [8] showed how the spatial distribution of adults was irregular in the locations distant from the main blackfly larval foci.
In Europe, there are several countries that have suffered and/or suffer blackfly outbreaks that regularly threaten public health, for example: United Kingdom [26,27], Serbia [8,24,28,29], France [30,31], Hungary [32], Italy [33], Turkey [34] and Scandinavian countries [1], among others. As far as we know, although there are no published European studies based on a temporal analysis of blackfly bite medical consultations, several authors have quantified the number of people who required health care during a blackfly outbreak. Hansford and Ladle [26] described 600 people were attended in healthcare centres due to the bite of the species S. posticatum during 4 weeks in the spring of 1972 in the surroundings of Blandford (south UK). In Serbia, S. erythrocephalum has produced outbreaks in the province of Vojvodina that required medical services; for example in 1965, during the first recorded outbreak in the country, 37 people needed healthcare [28] and later in 1970, more than 2000 people [24,29]. More recently, in 2006, 30 people required hospitalization [8], although the number of citizens affected was much higher.
Summer is the season when the majority of arthropod groups are more active and consequently there is normally a higher biting activity in primary care during this period. However, blackflies in Zaragoza have caused a change in the insect bite patterns throughout the year, advancing the threshold and changing the peak of insect bite consultations in primary care. Our results indicate that the period with the highest risk of being bitten by insects in Zaragoza ranges from mid-May to the end of August, with June being the month with the maximum frequency of insect bite consultations; coinciding with the highest biting rate of S. erythrocephalum recorded during the months of May and June in Zaragoza [7]. Some European studies have pointed out similar patterns. Ignjatović-Ćupina et al. [8] trapped, using CDC traps baited with CO2, the most number of females of this species since beginning of April till mid of June in Serbia. In addition to that, the highest insect bite records were registered at the same period [8]. Bardin [31] explained that the nuisances of S. erythrocephalum in the south of France started in May decreasing during June and July but continued till October. Other authors have pointed out previously a decreasing in the adult population of this species during the months of July, August and September [8,35,36,37,38].
Traditional human health surveillance systems are unsuitable for monitoring arthropod bite activity as it is not usually an important health problem in terms of prevalence and only a small percentage of cases require hospital treatment [16]. However, in regions where arthropod bites start to threaten public health or it represents an endemic or recurring problem, surveillance systems should be established to monitor its incidence, which in addition to helping in the study of the arthropod bite epidemiology, it would be useful as an evaluation tool of pest management. A step forward would be a real-time syndromic surveillance system to monitor the incidence of arthropod bites as proposed in England by Newit et al. [16].
A limitation of the study is that only a small proportion of blackfly bites require healthcare, and of those that do, not all are attended in the public primary care system. This means that the OMI-AP system is currently detecting only the tip of the iceberg of the significant problem posed by this pest in the surroundings of Zaragoza. In any case, this surveillance system through the analysis of insect bites consultations in primary care is a good tool to assess the impact of this pest on public health and to delimit the period of greatest risk of insect bites.
Further work should explore other public healthcare settings, such as emergency departments in hospitals, analyze the arthropod bite medical records weekly getting deep in other variables such as differences between age, sex and date of attendance, and improve our knowledge of the dynamics of S. erythrocephalum such as number of generations per year, among others.

5. Conclusions

A systematic analysis of the electronic medical records of the OMI-AP system has shown to be a very useful tool to enable the early identification of a public health problem at the regional level through the epidemiology of arthropod bites attended in primary care. Furthermore, this study can be used to guide public health responses like to assess changes in arthropod biting and to establish the highest risk blackfly biting periods. This study could establish the bases of a syndromic surveillance system to help taking blackfly control decisions, such as establishing a baseline incidence of arthropod bites that marks the beginning of the control season and evaluate the effects of blackfly pest management actions.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/1660-4601/17/10/3734/s1, Table S1: Basic Health Areas of the metropolitan area of Zaragoza.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.R.-A. and I.d.B.; methodology, I.R.-A. and I.d.B.; formal analysis, I.R.-A. and I.d.B.; investigation, I.R.-A. and I.d.B.; resources, I.R.-A.; data curation, I.R.-A., A.M., and I.d.B.; writing—original draft preparation, I.R.-A.; writing—review and editing, I.R.-A., I.d.B., A.M., J.L., and J.A.O.; supervision, J.L. and J.A.O.; project administration, I.R.-A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

We thank to the Epidemiological Surveillance Service of the Public Health Department of the Government of Aragón for providing us the data from the OMI-AP system on primary care consultations. We also thank D. Jorge García (Urbe Ingenieria Civil) for his help with the Figure 2 and Figure 3 and Catalina Wajs for her English grammar review. Partial results from this study were presented at the VIII International Simuliidae Symposium held in Birmingham, UK, in June 2018.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Crosskey, R.W. The Natural History of Blackflies, 1st ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ruiz-Arrondo, I.; Alarcón-Elbal, P.M.; Figueras, L.; Delacour-Estrella, S.; Muñoz, A.; Kotter, H.; Pinal, R.; Lucientes, J. Expansión de los simúlidos (Diptera: Simuliidae) en España: Un nuevo reto para la salud pública y la sanidad animal. Bol. S.E.A. 2014, 54, 193–200. [Google Scholar]
  3. Figueras, L.; Lucientes, J.; Ruiz, I.; Ramos, J.J.; Luis Miguel, F. Ataque de simúlidos en rumiantes. Albéitar 2011, 147, 22–23. [Google Scholar]
  4. Sánchez-López, P.F.; Ruiz-Arrondo, I.; Kotter, H.; Pacheco Martínez, F.; Segovia Hernández, M.; Gómez Campoy, M.E. Nuevos retos en gestión de vectores en salud pública: La mosca negra en Murcia (España). Gac. Sanit. 2018, 32, 181–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Adler, P.H. World Blackflies (Diptera: Simuliidae): A Comprehensive Revision of the Taxonomic and Geographical Inventory. Available online: https://biomia.sites.clemson.edu/pdfs/blackflyinventory.pdf (accessed on 20 March 2020).
  6. Ruiz-Arrondo, I.; Hernández-Triana, L.M.; Ignjatović-Ćupina, A.; Nikolova, N.; Garza-Hernández, J.A.; Rodríguez-Pérez, M.A.; Oteo, J.A.; Fooks, A.R.; Lucientes Curdi, J. DNA barcoding of blackflies (Diptera: Simuliidae) as a tool for species identification and detection of hidden diversity in the eastern regions of Spain. Parasit. Vectors 2018, 11, 463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ruiz-Arrondo, I.; Garza-Hernández, J.A.; Reyes-Villanueva, F.; Lucientes-Curdi, J.; Rodríguez-Pérez, M.A. Human-landing rate, gonotrophic cycle length, survivorship, and public health importance of Simulium erythrocephalum in Zaragoza, northeastern Spain. Parasit. Vectors 2017, 10, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Ignjatović-Ćupina, A.; Zgomba, M.; Vujanović, L.; Konjević, A.; Marinković, D.; Petrić, D. An outbreak of Simulium erythrocephalum (De Geer, 1776) in the region of Novi Sad (Serbia) in 2006. Acta Entomol. Serbica 2006, Supplement, 97–114. [Google Scholar]
  9. Gobierno de Aragón. Información e Investigación Sanitaria. Available online: http://www.aragon.es/DepartamentosOrganismosPublicos/Departamentos/Sanidad/AreasTematica%0As/SanidadProfesionales/SaludPublica/Informacion_e_Investigacion?channelSelected=7ce514d66d9c%0Ab210VgnVCM100000450a15acRCRD (accessed on 10 January 2020).
  10. Palmer, J.R.B.; Oltra, A.; Collantes, F.; Delgado, J.A.; Lucientes, J.; Delacour, S.; Bengoa, M.; Eritja, R.; Bartumeus, F. Citizen science provides a reliable and scalable tool to track disease-carrying mosquitoes. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Giménez, N.; Barahona, M.; Casasa, A.; Domingo, A.; Gavagnach, M.; Martí, C. Llegada de Aedes albopictus a España, un nuevo reto para la salud pública. Gac. Sanit. 2007, 21, 25–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Lokímica. El Mosquito Tigre es, por Primera vez, el Principal Insecto Picador a Gran Escala en el Mediterráneo Peninsular. Available online: https://www.lokimica.com/el-mosquito-tigre-se-posiciona-por-primera-vez-como-el-principal-insecto-picador-gran-escala-en-el-mediterraneo-peninsular/ (accessed on 15 May 2018).
  13. Goiri, F.; González, M.A.; Goikolea, J.; Oribe, M.; De Castro, V.; Delacour, S.; Lucientes, J.; Ortega-Araiztegi, I.; Felix Barandika, J.; Luisa García-Pérez, A. Progressive invasion of Aedes albopictus in Northern Spain in the period 2013-2018 and a possible association with the increase in insect bites. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 1678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Escosa, R. Métodos de lucha frente a los simúlidos (mosca negra). Jornada de divulgación técnica: Los mosquitos y sus repercusiones sociales, sanitarias y medioambientales. In Proceedings of the Jornada de divulgación Técnica: Los Mosquitos y sus Repercusiones Sociales, Sanitarias y Medioambientales, Zaragoza, Spain, 19 June 2007. [Google Scholar]
  15. Valle Trujillo, P.; Escosa, R. Blackfly control in Spain. Ebro river. In Proceedings of the V EMCA Workshop, Turin, Italy, 9–13 March 2009. [Google Scholar]
  16. Newitt, S.; Elliot, A.J.; Morbey, R.; Durnall, H.; Pietzsch, M.E.; Medlock, J.M.; Leach, S.; Smith, G.E. The use of syndromic surveillance to monitor the incidence of arthropod bites requiring healthcare in England, 2000-2013: A retrospective ecological study. Epidemiol. Infect. 2016, 144, 2251–2259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Ruiz-Arrondo, I.; Martínez, E.; Kotter, H.; Luis, F.; Muñoz, A.; Delacour-Estrella, S.; Alarcón, P.M.; Rocio, P.; Lucientes, J. Blackfly outbreak in Zaragoza in 2011. Spread of blackflies in the Middle Ebro Valley in northeast Spain. In Proceedings of the 5th International Simuliid Symposium, Bratislava, Slovakia, 3–7 September 2012. [Google Scholar]
  18. Gobierno de Aragón. Boletín Epidemiológico Semanal de Aragón. Semana 24/2017. Available online: http://www.aragon.es/estaticos/GobiernoAragon/%0ADepartamentos/SanidadBienestarSocialFamilia/Sanidad/Profesionales/13_SaludPublica/18_Vigilancia_%0AEpidemiologica/BOLETIN_ARAGON_201724.pdf (accessed on 28 March 2018).
  19. Duran, C.; Alonso, M.; Palau, A.; Sabater, S.; Batalla, R.; Vericat, D.; Esparza, J. Asistencia Técnica Para el Control de Macrófitos: Mejora de la Gestión de Los Embalses del Bajo Ebro; United Research Services (URS) España S.L.; Confederación Hidrográfica del Ebro: Zaragoza, Spain, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  20. Rovira, A.; Jornet, L.; Ibañez, C.; Escosa, R.; Masià, M.; Pla, J. Informe Sobre els Treballs Realitzats al Riu Ebre i Segre Pel Control de la Mosca Negra Any 2007; IRTA (Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentàries); CODE (Consorci de Serveis Agroambientals de les Comarques del Baix Ebre i Montsià): Tarragona, Spain, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  21. Marqués, E. Causas de la expansión de los simúlidos. El Ejemplo de los Simúlidos del río Ter. In Proceedings of the Jornada Técnica: Los Simúlidos, Situación Actual: Problemas y soluciones, Zaragoza, Spain, 8 March 2012; Available online: http://www.zaragoza.es/contenidos/IMSP/Eduard_Marques.pdf (accessed on 22 July 2017).
  22. Soriano Hernando, Ó.; Álvarez Cobelas, M.; Cirujano Bracamonte, S.; Ruiz Arrondo, I.; Aguado Abril, A. La influencia de la vegetación acuática en el desarrollo de las poblaciones de “Simulium erythrocephalum” (De Geer, 1776) (Diptera, Simuliidae) en Madrid: Su relación con las emergencias masivas de mosca negra. Remasp 2019, 2, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ruiz-Arrondo, I. Estudio de Simulium Erythrocephalum (De Geer, 1776) en Zaragoza: Ecología e Impacto en Salud Pública. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  24. Živković, V.; Burány, B. An outbreak of Boophthora erythrocephala (Diptera, Simuliidae) in Yugoslavia in 1970. Acta Vet. Brno. 1972, 22, 133–142. [Google Scholar]
  25. Živković, V. Blackflies (Diptera, Simuliidae) of the Danube in Yugoslavia. Acta Vet. Brno. 1971, 21, 225–236. [Google Scholar]
  26. Hansford, R.G.; Ladle, M. The medical importance and behaviour of Simulium austeni Edwards (Diptera: Simuliidae) in England. Bull. Entomol. Res. 1979, 69, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Coupland, J.B. Factors influencing nuisance blackfly (Diptera: Simuliidae) activity in the Scottish Highlands. Med. Vet. Entomol. 1994, 8, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Krstić, A. Dermatitis ex insectis (Simulium erythrocephalum). Med. Pregl. 1966, 19, 17–19. [Google Scholar]
  29. Burány, B.; Živković, V.; Milakov, J. Epidemiološka i klinička slika uboda od jedne vrste simulide (Boophthora erythrocephala) u 1970. Godini u Potisju. Med. Pregl. 1972, 25, 447–454. [Google Scholar]
  30. Beaucournu-Saguez, F.; Gilot, B.; Chevrier, S.; Branquet, F.; Haltefort, B.; Beaucournu, J.C. Observation en France de Simulium erythrocephalum De Geer, 1776 comme agent de simuliidose humaine. Ann. Parasitol. Hum. Comparée 1993, 68, 109–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bardin, O. Nouvelle observation en France d’une nuisance due à Simulium (Boophthora) erythrocephalum (De Geer, 1776) (Diptera, Simuliidae). Parasite 2001, 8, 161–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Szabó, J. Mass impairment of health caused by an invasion of black flies (Diptera: Simuliidae) in Tata, Hungary. Opusc. Zool. Lnstituti Zoosystematici Oecologici Univ. Bp. 1964, 5, 113–117. [Google Scholar]
  33. Rivosecchi, L. Paesaggio e attacco massivo di Ditteri Simulidi all ’uomo e ad animali domestici. Ann. Ist. Super Sanità 2005, 41, 415–419. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  34. Sarıözkan, S.; İnci, A.; Yıldırım, A.; Düzlü, Ö.; Gray, E.W.; Adler, P.H. Economic losses during an outbreak of Simulium (Wilhelmia Species (Diptera: Simuliidae) in the Cappadocia Region of Turkey. Turk. Parazitoloji Derg. 2014, 38, 116–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Rühm, W. Zur Populationsdynamik der Kriebelrnücken, insbesondere von Boophthora erythrocephala De Geer und des Odagmia ornata- Komplexes. Z. Für Parasitenkd. 1969, 63, 212–227. [Google Scholar]
  36. Post, R.J. The annual cycle of Simulium erythrocephalum (Diptera: Simuliidae) at a site in Norfolk. Freshw. Biol. 1983, 13, 379–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Werner, D. Kriebelmücken (Simuliidae)—Informationsbroschüre zur Morphologie, Lebensweise und Verbreitung der Kriebelmücken unter Berücksichtigung der Schadregionen in Deutschland sowie des Krankheitsbildes Simuliose und des Schadbildes Simuliotoxikose. Stud. Dipterol. 2007, 3, 337–358. [Google Scholar]
  38. Bernotiene, R.; Bartkeviciene, G. The relationship between water temperature and the development cycle beginning and duration in three black fly species. J. Insect Sci. 2013, 13, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Ijerph 17 03734 g001 550
Figure 1. Basic Health Areas (BHA) in the metropolitan area of Zaragoza.
Figure 1. Basic Health Areas (BHA) in the metropolitan area of Zaragoza.
Ijerph 17 03734 g001
Ijerph 17 03734 g002 550
Figure 2. Insect bites primary care consultations/10,000 primary care consultations according BHA in the metropolitan area of Zaragoza during the period 2009–2015. PC: primary care.
Figure 2. Insect bites primary care consultations/10,000 primary care consultations according BHA in the metropolitan area of Zaragoza during the period 2009–2015. PC: primary care.
Ijerph 17 03734 g002
Ijerph 17 03734 g003 550
Figure 3. Insect bites primary care consultations/10,000 primary care consultations according urban BHA in the metropolitan area of Zaragoza during the period 2009–2015. PC: primary care.
Figure 3. Insect bites primary care consultations/10,000 primary care consultations according urban BHA in the metropolitan area of Zaragoza during the period 2009–2015. PC: primary care.
Ijerph 17 03734 g003
Ijerph 17 03734 g004 550
Figure 4. Monthly numbers of insect bites primary care consultations/10,000 primary care consultations by zone in the metropolitan area of Zaragoza during the period 2009–2015. PC: primary care.
Figure 4. Monthly numbers of insect bites primary care consultations/10,000 primary care consultations by zone in the metropolitan area of Zaragoza during the period 2009–2015. PC: primary care.
Ijerph 17 03734 g004
Table
Table 1. Insect bites primary care consultations/10,000 primary care consultations in the metropolitan area of Zaragoza stratified by year.
Table 1. Insect bites primary care consultations/10,000 primary care consultations in the metropolitan area of Zaragoza stratified by year.
YearTotal PCInsect Bites PCUrbanRuralp-Value *
MeansMeansMeans
20091,718,02420.5 b28.3118.9 b25.4636.0 a45.49<0.001
20103,605,58519.1 a28.7616.3 a20.8637.9 b55.18<0.001
20113,766,46541.5 f59.5138.9 f57.0657.9 f70.73<0.001
20123,671,76553.5 g85.1651.9 g85.3662.9 g83.35<0.001
20133,526,77624.7 c32.2621.5 c27.8142.1 d46.41<0.001
20143,522,95627.6 e29.1724.3 e24.2945.6 e43.54<0.001
20153,546,73726.4 d31.1723.7 d26.8440.9 c45.30<0.001
Total23,358,30831.549.6928.847.3747.459.36<0.001
p-value ** <0.001<0.001<0.001
* Significance of Student’s t test to test differences between zones, ** Significance of ANOVA test to analyze differences between years. Different superindexes indicate significative differences (p < 0.05) according the Duncan post hoc test. s is standard deviation. PC: primary care.
Table
Table 2. Monthly pattern of insect bites primary care consultations/10,000 primary care consultations in the metropolitan area of Zaragoza during the period 2009–2015.
Table 2. Monthly pattern of insect bites primary care consultations/10,000 primary care consultations in the metropolitan area of Zaragoza during the period 2009–2015.
Month2009201020112012
MeansMeansMeansMeans
January2.2 a1.762.5 a2.922.4 a1.863.2 a2.57
February3.2 a,b2.333.1 a3.053.7 a3.343.0 a2.81
March4.6 a,b4.305.0 a,b4.505.5 a,b4.347.0 a,b4.37
April7.0 a,b7.469.1 a,b,c11.9616.2 a,b12.3611.4 a,b9.71
May18.2 c12.7314.7 b,c11.9150.5 c26.8163.3 d27.83
June43.3 d30.6634.7 d36.62165.7 f78.27257.1 f96.36
July52.2 d35.8560.5 e52.62120.7 e58.75177.1 e55.01
August86.1 e34.7454.7 e33.9372.3 d37.4668.5 d29.28
September53.9 d18.6227.7 d16.5740.0 c19.9932.6 c15.83
October24.6 c6.9016.0 c10.3318.8 b10.3819.2 b10.03
November14.0 b,c7.088.4 a,b,c6.4113.3 a,b7.538.5 a,b5.14
December4.9 ab3.562.6 a2.544.3 a2.973.5 a2.65
Total20.528.3119.128.7641.559.5153.585.16
Month201320142015
MeansMeansMeans
January2.6 a1.933.9 a2.972.8 a2.32
February2.6 a2.264.6 a,b3.422.7 a2.01
March4.9 a,b3.707.0 a,b5.137.3 a,b4.80
April10.3 a,b,c7.8921.2 c11.1314.9 c7.96
May13.5 c8.8123.5 c10.9430.0 d14.86
June29.0 d18.5164.7 e32.4681.7 g40.25
July92.9 g41.6563.2 e31.6568.0 f31.04
August64.1 f30.3860.1 e34.5652.3 e24.41
September45.9 e26.4752.1 d20.8935.5 d14.97
October34.1 d17.4828.5 c10.5715.6 c6.50
November11.1 b,c5.6712.4 b7.2610.8 b,c6.38
December3.0 a2.524.6 a,b2.855.1 a,b3.40
Total24.732.2627.629.1726.431.17
Different superindexes indicate significative differences (p < 0.05) according the Duncan post hoc test. s is standard deviation.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ruiz-Arrondo, I.; Oteo, J.A.; Lucientes, J.; Muniesa, A.; de Blas, I. Surveillance of a Pest Through a Public Health Information System: The Case of the Blackfly (Simulium erythrocephalum) in Zaragoza (Spain) during 2009–2015. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 3734. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph17103734

AMA Style

Ruiz-Arrondo I, Oteo JA, Lucientes J, Muniesa A, de Blas I. Surveillance of a Pest Through a Public Health Information System: The Case of the Blackfly (Simulium erythrocephalum) in Zaragoza (Spain) during 2009–2015. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(10):3734. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph17103734

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ruiz-Arrondo, Ignacio, José A. Oteo, Javier Lucientes, Ana Muniesa, and Ignacio de Blas. 2020. "Surveillance of a Pest Through a Public Health Information System: The Case of the Blackfly (Simulium erythrocephalum) in Zaragoza (Spain) during 2009–2015" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 10: 3734. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph17103734

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop