Next Article in Journal
Analysis of the Impact of Type 2 Diabetes on the Psychosocial Functioning and Quality of Life of Perimenopausal Women
Next Article in Special Issue
Correlation of Mortality Burdens of Cerebrovascular Disease and Diabetes Mellitus with Domestic Consumption of Soya and Palm Oils
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Forest Therapy on Health Promotion among Middle-Aged Women: Focusing on Physiological Indicators
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dietary Patterns and Associated Factors Among Adolescents in Malaysia: Findings from Adolescent Nutrition Survey 2017
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 17
Issue 12
10.3390/ijerph17124350
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Associations between Intrinsic Heart Rate, P Wave and QT Interval Durations and Pulse Wave Analysis in Patients with Hypertension and High Normal Blood Pressure

by
Ioana Mozos
1,2,
Cristina Gug
3,*,
Costin Mozos
4,
Dana Stoian
5,
Marius Pricop
6,* and
Daniela Jianu
7,8
1
Department of Functional Sciences, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300173 Timisoara, Romania
2
Center for Translational Research and Systems Medicine, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300173 Timisoara, Romania
3
Department of Microscopic Morphology, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
4
Faculty of Medicine, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300042 Timisoara, Romania
5
2nd Department of Internal Medicine, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300723 Timisoara, Romania
6
Discipline of Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, 300062 Timisoara, Romania
7
1st Department of Internal Medicine, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
8
Department of Internal Medicine, Military Hospital, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(12), 4350; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph17124350
Submission received: 19 May 2020 / Revised: 4 June 2020 / Accepted: 10 June 2020 / Published: 17 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Burden of Noncommunicable Diseases: From Individual to Society)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The present study aimed to explore the relationship between electrocardiographic (ECG) and pulse wave analysis variables in patients with hypertension (HT) and high normal blood pressure (HNBP). A total of 56 consecutive, middle-aged hypertensive and HNBP patients underwent pulse wave analysis and standard 12-lead ECG. Pulse wave velocity (PWV), heart rate, intrinsic heart rate (IHR), P wave and QT interval durations were as follows: 7.26 ± 0.69 m/s, 69 ± 11 beats/minute, 91 ± 3 beats/minute, 105 ± 22 mm and 409 ± 64 mm, respectively. Significant correlations were obtained between PWV and IHR and P wave duration, respectively, between early vascular aging (EVA) and P wave and QT interval durations, respectively. Linear regression analysis revealed significant associations between ECG and pulse wave analysis variables but multiple regression analysis revealed only IHR as an independent predictor of PWV, even after adjusting for blood pressure variables and therapy. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis revealed P wave duration (area under curve (AUC) = 0.731; 95% CI: 0.569–0.893) as a predictor of pathological PWV, and P wave and QT interval durations were found as sensitive and specific predictors of EVA. ECG provides information about PWV and EVA in patients with HT and HNBP. IHR and P wave durations are independent predictors of PWV, and P wave and QT interval may predict EVA.

1. Introduction

Central and Eastern Europe are regions with a high cardiovascular burden [1]. Romania was considered a high-cardiovascular-risk country according to the European Guidelines [2]. Thus, prophylactic measures deserve special attention, as well as information beyond standard cardiovascular risk factors in early prediction of future cardiovascular events [3].
Arterial stiffness, the consequence of arteriosclerosis and subclinical atherosclerosis, is involved in cardiovascular disease development and, if assessed, can improve risk prediction, especially in hypertensive and intermediate risk patients [4,5,6,7,8].
Heart rate and electrocardiography, especially repolarization variables, including QT interval duration, can also provide useful information in cardiovascular risk assessment [9,10,11,12,13]. The links between increased resting heart rate and mortality include sympathetic overactivity, increased metabolic rate and systemic inflammation, present in several systemic conditions, as well as cardiovascular risk factors [12]. An accelerated heart rate enables low, oscillatory endothelial shear stress and increased tensile stress, inducing a proinflammatory phenotype, with elevated levels of adhesion molecules, promoting atherogenesis and arterial stiffness [14,15]. Intrinsic heart rate is the heart rate under the simultaneous beta-blockade and muscarinic receptor blockade with propranolol and atropine, respectively [16,17].
Chronological age has some limitations when assessing cardiovascular risk [18]. Vascular age can be assessed considering arterial stiffness, and early vascular aging can be defined if one’s vascular age increases faster than one’s chronological age, related to the upper 10, 20 or 25% of the pulse wave velocity (PWV) distribution in the population [19].
Arterial stiffness is characterized by a decrease of elastin content, as well as by an increased production and accumulation of collagen within the arterial wall [20]. Arterial stiffness, assessed by pulse wave analysis, especially pulse wave velocity, is increased in hypertensive patients, regardless of blood pressure levels, and is related to endothelial dysfunction, vascular remodeling and progression of blood pressure [21,22]. On the other hand, increased arterial stiffness has a major effect on systolic blood pressure, wave reflections and cardiovascular risk [22].
Considering the importance of prophylactic measures in hypertensive patients and the limits of the classical cardiovascular risk factors in predicting cardiovascular events, new, simple, inexpensive surrogate biomarkers are needed. Our objective is to explore the relationship between electrocardiographic (ECG) and pulse wave analysis variables in patients with hypertension and high normal blood pressure. We hypothesized that ECG variables can reveal increased arterial stiffness and early vascular aging in patients with elevated blood pressure values.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Population

The study included 56 consecutive hypertensive and high normal blood pressure (HNBP) patients, recruited from the Military Hospital Timisoara in the period of July 2016–March 2017.
Patients with essential hypertension and high normal blood pressure, aged between 18 and 55 years, were included. Essential hypertension and high normal blood pressure were diagnosed according to the criteria of the European Society of Cardiology [23]. The most important exclusion criteria were secondary hypertension, atrial fibrillation, diabetes mellitus, history of coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction, stroke, transient ischemic attack or peripheral arterial disease, systemic inflammatory processes, active infections, trauma and therapy with statins [24].
The investigations were performed considering the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki [25]. The study was approved by the “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy (2743/9 March 2016). Written informed consent was obtained from each study participant and the aims, procedures and implications of the study were explained to all of them.
The patients underwent pulse wave analysis and standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). Additional data related to diagnosis and therapy of the patients were available from medical records. The investigations were performed independently by different skilled investigators, who were not aware of the patient’s diagnosis and data.

2.2. Mobil-O-Graph

Pulse wave analysis, including pulse wave velocity (PWV), augmentation index and pressure (AI, AP), vascular age and central and peripheral blood pressure were assessed using a Mobil-O-Graph (IEM GmbH, Stolberg, Germany), a noninvasive, cuff-based, one site, validated device. Pulse wave velocity is the speed at which the arterial pulse wave propagates along an arterial segment [26]. Augmentation pressure (AP) is the increment in aortic pressure above its first systolic shoulder [27]. Augmentation index is the ratio between augmentation pressure and pulse pressure, a measure of the contribution of wave reflection on the arterial pressure waveform [28]. The methodology and the significance of the variables were previously published [24]. PWV and vascular age were estimated from the reconstructed aortic pulse waveform via mathematical models [29]. Early vascular aging was considered when one’s vascular age was higher than the chronological age.

2.3. Standard 12-Lead ECG

Standard ECG was recorded at a paper speed of 25 mm/s. Resting heart rate (HR), P wave (P), PR (PR—the time from the onset of the P wave to the start of the QRS complex) and QT interval duration (QT) were automatically measured. QT was corrected considering heart rate, according to the Bazett formula, resulting in heart rate corrected QT interval (QTc). Intrinsic heart rate (IHR = 118 − (0.57 × age)) and the difference between IHR and resting heart rate (DHR) were also calculated [16]. The amplitude of the R wave in leads V5 (RV5) and V6 (RV6) and of the S wave in leads V1 (SV1) and V2 (SV2) were manually measured.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Categorical data are given as numbers and percentages, continuous data as means ± standard deviation. Correlations (Bravais–Pearson’s, Kendall’s and Spearman’s), univariate and multivariate linear regression analysis and receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis were used as statistical methods. Analyses were performed using IBM SPSS base edition (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). Normality testing of dependent variables was performed using Q–Q plots, skewness and kurtosis. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. PASS 2019 (NCSS Statistical Software, Kaysville, UT, USA) was used to conduct a power analysis before the study to calculate the sample size needed for the present study [24].

3. Results

The study included middle-aged patients (48 ± 6 years) with hypertension and high normal blood pressure, most of them male (57%) [24]. Table 1 includes demographic data, the values measured or calculated for several electrocardiographic variables and pulse wave analysis results. A total of 21 patients (37.5%) had high normal blood pressure, 16 (28.6%) grade 1, 13 (23.2%) grade 2 and 6 (10.7%) grade 3 hypertension. Hypertension grades considered the guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology for the management of arterial hypertension [23]. Therapy included angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, sartans, diuretics, beta blockers and calcium channel blockers.
Normality testing of dependent variables using Q–Q plots, skewness and kurtosis revealed that the data were approximately normally distributed.
Correlations were calculated for all ECG and pulse wave analysis variables. Significant correlations were obtained just between pulse wave velocity (PWV) and intrinsic heart rate (IHR) and the difference between IHR and resting heart rate (DHR) (Table 2). P wave duration significantly correlated with augmentation pressure, and augmentation index with heart rate corrected QT interval duration (QTc) and the amplitude of the S wave in lead V1 (SV1), respectively. No significant correlations were obtained between PWV and resting heart rate.
Linear regression analysis revealed significant associations of IHR with PWV and early vascular aging (EVA). A prolonged QTc interval (exceeding 450 ms: QTc450) was significantly associated with EVA and augmentation index (AI). The association EVA-long QTc lost its significance after adjusting for systolic blood pressure (SBP). Significant associations were also found between AI and S wave in V1 (Table 3).
Multiple linear regression analysis revealed only IHR as an independent predictor of PWV, even after adjusting for blood pressure variables and heart rate and blood pressure-lowering therapy (Table 4). IHR lost its significant association with EVA after adjusting for blood pressure variables (SBP, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and pulse pressure (PP)) and therapy.
ROC curve analysis revealed P wave duration as a predictor of pathological pulse wave velocity (pPWV) (Table 5). P wave and QT interval durations (Figure 1) were found as sensitive and specific predictors of EVA.

4. Discussion

The present study reveals significant correlations and associations between electrocardiographic biomarkers and pulse wave velocity and early vascular aging, respectively, in middle-aged patients with hypertension and high normal blood pressure. Intrinsic heart rate and P wave duration were found as independent predictors of pulse wave velocity, while QT interval and P wave durations as independent predictors of early vascular aging, confirming our hypothesis that ECG variables can reveal increased arterial stiffness and early vascular aging in patients with elevated blood pressure values.
The influence of heart rate on PWV measurements remains controversial, with conflicting results observed in both acute and epidemiological studies [30,31,32,33]. A significant blood pressure independent association between heart rate and PWV was mentioned [33], significant only for subjects with increased aortic stiffness [34]. A higher resting heart rate was independently associated with arterial stiffness in healthy Korean adults [35]. Heart rate plays differential roles in the development of arterial stiffness and subclinical atherosclerosis during young adulthood [31]. Heart rate related changes in arterial stiffness were attributed to the viscoelasticity of the arterial wall [33]. According to other authors, the increase of arterial stiffness with heart rate is considered as an adjustment of the arterial tree to enable optimization of its performance and is more important in arteries supplying end capillaries with high permeability and low reflection coefficients [36]. A lower heart rate prolongs ejection time, increases overlapping of the forward and backward pressure waves by widening the forward arterial waveform [37]. The present study does not reveal any relationship between resting heart rate and pulse wave velocity and early vascular aging but reports significant correlations and associations between intrinsic heart rate and PWV and EVA, respectively. Multiple regression analysis demonstrates the independent predictive value of IHR for PWV, even after controlling for blood pressure and therapy—variables that influence arterial stiffness. According to our knowledge, this is the first study reporting a relationship between intrinsic heart rate and arterial stiffness. The possible link between IHR and arterial stiffness could be, besides age, also exercise training, considering that IHR is lower with training [17]. Training-induced bradycardia is related to intrinsic electrophysiological changes in the sinus node, with downregulation of ion channels, especially funny channel HCN4 [38]. On the other hand, training may also improve arterial stiffness [39].
Several other studies reported links between electrocardiographic and pulse wave analysis biomarkers. QTc interval, prolonged in patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, was related to subclinical atherosclerosis, measured by carotid-femoral pulse-wave velocity, after controlling for age and hypertension [40]. A study including 54 apparently healthy participants revealed significant correlations and associations between Tpeak–Tend interval, a measurement of dispersion of the terminal part of the repolarization and predictor of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias, and both brachial and aortic augmentation index, pulse wave velocity and early vascular aging [41]. The Nagahama Study Group reported the longer corrected QT interval as an independent determinant of increased augmentation index and smaller pulse pressure amplification in persons free from cardiovascular symptoms and not receiving insulin therapy [37]. The possible mechanisms explaining the association of impaired pulse wave and repolarization variables are electrophysiological remodeling related to aging, including action potential prolongation, blunted ionic exchanges across sarcolemma, increased myocardial fibrosis, increased ventricular load or subendocardial ischemia due to microvascular coronary atherosclerosis [42,43,44]. A longer ventricular conduction period broadens the forward arterial pressure wave and increases the overlapping of the forward and backward pressure wave, which might explain the elevated augmentation index, which is also a marker of arterial stiffness, in patients with a long QT interval [37]. The present study reveals the QT interval as a sensitive and specific predictor of EVA.
P wave duration was previously correlated with arterial stiffness variables, related to interatrial block, in overweight patients [45]. Body mass index was 27.14 ± 6.01 kg/m2, with a high prevalence of overweight (25%) and obesity (25%), which might be associated with a sedentary lifestyle in our study, but P wave duration exceeded 120 ms only in 7 patients (13%). The possible link could also be left atrial volume. A significant relationship between carotid arterial stiffness and left atrial volume was reported previously in patients with untreated hypertension [46]. Ruaengsri et al. demonstrated in a canine model of mitral regurgitation that an increase of left atrial size is associated not only with an increased atrial fibrillation inducibility but also with a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction, with an increase of end-systolic and end-diastolic volume [47]. A study using the Campania Salute Network registry demonstrated that left atrial size was an independent predictor of cardiovascular events, regardless of other coexisting signs of target organ damage [48]. Other factors that must be considered in the aging heart include atrial fibrosis associated with atrial conduction slowing and atrial fibrillation [49]. Our study reveals P wave duration as an independent predictor of both EVA and pathological PWV.
Study limitations: arterial stiffness and early vascular aging are surrogate endpoints for cardiovascular events but using them demonstrates the prophylactic character of our study. The cross-sectional study design does not assure causality between the evaluated variables. The sample size is relatively small but the power analysis demonstrated an appropriate number of patients. Another limitation is related to the selection of study participants, including hypertensive patients receiving antihypertensive and heart rate-lowering drugs, which may question the validity of some results. However, the results did not change after controlling for blood pressure and heart rate-lowering therapy in the multiple regression analysis. The study lacks echocardiographic parameters and information about physical activity, which were not available for the patients included in the study but will be the aim of a future study. Mobil-O-Graph estimates pulse waves using an oscillometric method, which differs from the most widely applied applanation tonometry. Previous validation studies in different study populations, including hypertensive patients, revealed acceptable agreement between Mobil-O-Graph derived variables and invasive and noninvasive measurements and a good reproducibility of the technique [50,51,52].
Strengths of the study lie in the recruitment of real-world, middle-aged participants with grade 1–3 hypertension and high normal blood pressure, with a PWV increased for age in 21.4% of the participants and with both high and low cardiovascular risk, providing insights in terms of heart-vascular coupling rather than substitution of arterial stiffness measurement by ECG technique. As far as we know, our study is the first one reporting a significant relationship between intrinsic heart rate and arterial stiffness, respectively, as well as between P wave duration and EVA. The clinical implications of the present study are related to the prognostic importance of increased arterial stiffness and early arterial aging for cardiovascular risk. Simple, cost-effective, reproducible, quick to determine biomarkers, such as intrinsic heart rate, an index of sinus node function regardless of autonomic control, the duration of the P wave and QT interval can provide valuable, noninvasive information related to large vessels, arterial age and cardiovascular risk stratification in treated hypertensive patients, enabling personalized diagnosis and treatment of each patient, providing further targets for strategies to improve clinical outcomes and enable selection of patients requiring more aggressive therapy. Larger studies are needed in hypertensive patients to confirm the findings of the present study, to demonstrate that aging related functional and structural changes in the heart and artery are simultaneous and to reveal any connection between interstitial fibrosis related to aging associated remodeling of the myocardium, collagen content in the sinus node and arterial wall. Further prospective studies must confirm the synergistic prognostic effect of pulse wave velocity, early vascular aging, intrinsic heart rate, P wave and QT interval durations in hypertensive patients.

5. Conclusions

ECG provides information about pulse wave velocity and early vascular aging in patients with hypertension and high normal blood pressure. IHR and P wave duration are independent predictors of pulse wave velocity in patients with hypertension and high normal blood pressure. P wave and QT interval duration are sensitive and specific predictors of EVA.

Author Contributions

I.M., M.P. and D.J. designed the study, D.J. diagnosed and recruited the patients enrolled in the study, I.M. and C.M. performed pulse wave and statistical analysis, C.G., D.S. and M.P. contributed to data analysis, reviewed the literature, drafted and substantively revised the manuscript, I.M. and D.J. were involved in funding acquisition. All authors read and approved the manuscript before submission.

Funding

This research was funded by the Bioclinica, grant number 9/2743/9.03.2016. No funds were received for covering the costs to publish in open access.

Acknowledgments

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. A part of the data was presented at the Romanian Pathophysiology Conference 2019 and published as an abstract in Acta Medica Marisiensis. The founding sponsors did not influence study design, collection, analysis, or interpretation of data or drafting and submission of the manuscript.

References

  1. Movsisyan, N.K.; Vinciguerra, M.; Medina-Inojosa, J.R.; Lopez-Jimenez, F. Cardiovascular Diseases in Central and Eastern Europe: A Call for more Surveiillance and Evidence-Based Health Promotion. Ann. Glob. Health 2020, 86, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Piepoli, M.F.; Hoes, A.W.; Agewall, S.; Albus, C.; Brotons, C.; Catapano, A.L.; Cooney, M.T.; Corra, U.; Cosyns, B.; Deaton, C.; et al. 2016 European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: The Sixth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by invited experts) developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation (EACPR). Atherosclerosis 2016, 252, 207–274. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Mozos, I.; Maidana, J.P.; Stoian, D.; Stehlik, M. Gender Differences of Arterial Stiffness and Arterial Age in Smokers. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Vlachopoulos, C.; Xaplanteris, P.; Aboyans, V.; Brodmann, M.; Cífková, R.; Cosentino, F.; deCarlo, M.; Gallino, A.; Landmesser, U.; Laurent, S.; et al. The role of vascular biomarkers for primary and secondary prevention. A position paper from the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on peripheral circulation: Endorsed by the Association for Research into Arterial Structure and Physiology (ARTERY) Society. Atherosclerosis 2015, 241, 507–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Mozos, I.; Luca, C.T. Crosstalk between oxidative and nitrosative stress and arterial stiffness. Curr. Vasc. Pharmacol. 2017, 15, 446–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Williams, B.; Mancia, G.; Spiering, W.; Agabiti Rosei, E.; Azizi, M.; Burnier, M.; Clement, D.L.; Coca, A.; DeSimone, G.; Dominiczak, A.; et al. 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Society of Hypertension: The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Society of Hypertension. J. Hypertens. 2018, 36, 1953–2041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Tibaut, M.; Caprnda, M.; Kubatka, P.; Sinkovic, A.; Valentova, V.; Filipova, S.; Gazdikova, K.; Gaspar, L.; Mozos, I.; Egom, E.E.; et al. Markers of Atherosclerosis: Part 2—Genetic and Imaging Markers. Heart Lung Circ. 2019, 28, 678–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Buleu, F.N.; Luca, C.T.; Tudor, A.; Badalica-Petrescu, M.; Caraba, A.; Pah, A.; Georgescu, D.; Christodorescu, R.; Dragan, S. Correlations between Vascular Stiffness Indicators, OPG, and 25-OH Vitamin D3 Status in Heart Failure Patients. Medicina 2019, 55, 309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Rautaharju, P.M.; Surawicz, B.; Gettes, L.S.; Bailey, J.J.; Childers, R.; Deal, B.J.; Gorgels, A.; William Hancock, E.; Josephson, M.; Kligfield, P.; et al. AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: Part IV: The ST segment, T and U waves, and the QT interval: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society. Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009, 53, 982–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Mozos, I.; Filimon, L. QT and Tpeak-Tend intervals in shift workers. J. Electrocardiol. 2013, 46, 60–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Van Ockenburg, S.L.; Rosmalena, J.G.M.; Bakkerb, S.J.L.; de Jongea, P.; Gansb, R.O.B. Effects of Urinary Cortisol Levels and Resting Heart Rate on the Risk for Fatal and Nonfatal Cardiovascular Events. Atherosclerosis 2016, 248, 44–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Peer, N.; Lombard, C.; Steyn, K.; Levitt, N. Elevated resting heart rate is associated with several cardiovascular disease risk factors in urban-dwelling black South Africans. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 4605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Seravalle, G.; Grassi, G. Heart rate as cardiovascular risk factor. Postgrad. Med. 2020, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Custodis, F.; Schirmer, S.H.; Baumhäkel, M.; Heusch, G.; Böhm, M.; Laufs, U. Vascular pathophysiology in response to increased heart rate. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2010, 56, 1973–1983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Custodis, F.; Reil, J.C.; Laufs, U.; Böhm, M. Heart rate: A global target for cardiovascular disease and therapy along the cardiovascular disease continuum. J. Cardiol. 2013, 62, 183–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Jose, A.D.; Collison, D. The normal range and determinants of the intrinsic heart rate in man. Cardiovasc. Res. 1970, 4, 160–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bahrainy, S.; Levy, W.C.; Busey, J.M.; Caldwell, J.H.; Stratton, J.R. Exercise training bradycardia is largely explained by reduced intrinsic heart rate. Int. J. Cardiol. 2016, 222, 213–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. DeGoma, E.M.; Knowles, J.W.; Angeli, F.; Budoff, M.J.; Rader, D.J. The evolution and refinement of traditional risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Cardiol. Rev. 2012, 20, 118–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Nilsson, P.M. Early Vascular Aging in Hypertension. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2020, 7, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Iurciuc, S.; Cimpean, A.M.; Mitu, F.; Heredea, R.; Iurciuc, M. Vascular aging and subclinical atherosclerosis: Why such a “never ending” and challenging story in cardiology? Clin. Interv. Aging 2017, 12, 1339–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Mitchell, G.F. Arterial Stiffness and Hypertension: Chicken or Egg? Hypertension 2014, 64, 210–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Safar, M.E. Arterial Stiffness as a Risk Factor for Clinical Hypertension. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2018, 15, 97–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Mancia, G.; Fagard, R.; Narkiewicz, K.; Redon, J.; Zanchetti, A.; Böhm, M.; Christiaens, T.; Cifkova, R.; deBecker, G.; Dominiczak, A.; et al. 2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur. Heart J. 2013, 34, 2159–2219. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Mozos, I.; Jianu, D.; Gug, C.; Stoian, D. Links between High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein and Pulse Wave Analysis in Middle-Aged Patients with Hypertension and High Normal Blood Pressure. Dis Markers. 2019, 2568069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. World Medical Association Declaration Of Helsinki: Recommendations guiding physicians in biomedical research involving human subjects. Cardiovasc. Res. 1997, 35, 2–3. [CrossRef]
  26. O’Rourke, M.; Staessen, J.A.; Vlachopoulos, C.; Duprez, D.; Plante, G.E. Clinical Application of Arterial Stiffness; Definition and Reference Values. Am. J. Hypertens. 2002, 15, 426–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Fok, H.; Guilcher, A.; Li, Y.; Brett, S.; Shah, A.; Clapp, B.; Chowienczyk, P. Augmentation Pressure Is Influenced by Ventricular Contractility/Relaxation Dynamics. Novel Mechanism of Reduction of Pulse Pressure by Nitrates. Hypertension 2014, 63, 1050–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Wilkinson, I.B.; Prasad, K.; Hall, I.R.; Thomas, A.; MacCallum, H.; Webb, D.J.; Frenneaux, M.P.; Cockcroft, J.R. Increased central pulse pressure and augmentation index in subjects with hypercholesterolemia. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2002, 39, 1005–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Karpetas, A.; Sarafidis, P.A.; Georgianos, P.I.; Protogerou, A.; Vakianis, P.; Koutroumpas, G. Ambulatory Recording of Wave Reflections and Arterial Stiffness during Intra- and Interdialytic Periods inPatients Treated with Dialysis. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2015, 10, 630–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Wilkinson, I.B.; Mohammad, N.H.; Tyrrell, S.; Hall, I.R.; Webb, D.J.; Paul, V.E.; Levy, T.; Cockcroft, J.R. Heart rate dependency of pulse pressure amplification and arterial stiffness. Am. J. Hypertens. 2002, 15, 24–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chen, W.; Srinivasan, S.R.; Berenson, G.S. Differential impact of heart rate on arterial wall stiffness and thickness in young adults: The Bogalusa Heart Study. J. Am. Soc. Hypertens. 2008, 2, 152–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. García-Ortiz, L.; García-García, A.; Ramos-Delgado, E.; Patino-Alonso, M.C.; Recio-Rodríguez, J.I.; Rodríguez-Sánchez, E.; Gomez-Marcos, M. Relationships of night/day heart rate ratio with carotid intima media thickness and markers of arterial stiffness. Atherosclerosis 2011, 217, 420–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Tan, I.; Butlin, M.; Spronck, B.; Xiao, H.; Avolio, A. Effect of Heart Rate on Arterial Stiffness as Assessed by Pulse Wave Velocity. Curr. Hypertens. Rev. 2018, 14, 107–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Papaioannou, T.G.; Oikonomou, E.; Lazaros, G.; Christoforatou, E.; Vogiatzi, G.; Tsalamandris, S.; Chasikidis, C.; Kalambogias, A.; Mystakidi, V.X.; Galiatsatos, N. The influence of resting heart rate on pulse wave velocity measurement is mediated by blood pressure and depends on aortic stiffness levels: Insights from the Corinthia study. Physiol. Meas. 2019, 40, 055005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Park, B.J.; Lee, H.R.; Shim, J.Y.; Lee, J.H.; Jung, D.H.; Lee, Y.J. Association between resting heart rate and arterial stiffness in Korean adults. Arch. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2010, 103, 246–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Silva, C.; Heitor Reis, A. Heart rate, arterial distensibility, and optimal performance of the arterial tree. J. Biomech. 2014, 47, 2878–2882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tabara, Y.; Takahashi, Y.; Kohara, K.; Setoh, K.; Kawaguchi, T.; Terao, C.; Igase, M.; Yamada, R.; Kosugi, S.; Sekine, A.; et al. Association of longer QT interval with arterial waveform and lower pulse pressure amplification: The Nagahama Study. Am. J. Hypertens. 2013, 26, 973–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. D’Souza, A.; Bucchi, A.; Johnsen, A.B.; Logantha, S.J.; Monfredi, O.; Yanni, J.; Prehar, S.; Hart, G.; Cartwright, E.; Wisloff, U.; et al. Exercise training reduces resting heart rate via downregulation of the funny channel HCN4. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sîrbu, E.; Buzaș, R.; Mihăescu, R.; Suceava, I.; Lighezan, D. Influence of exercise training and eating behavior on arterial stiffness in young healthy students. Wien. Klin. Wochenschr. 2015, 127, 555–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Rivera-López, R.; Jiménez-Jáimez, J.; Sabio, J.M.; Zamora-Pasadas, M.; Vargas-Hitos, J.A.; Martínez-Bordonado, J.; Navarrete-Navarrete, N.; Rivera-Fernández, R.; Sanchez-Cantalejo, E.; Jiménez-Alonso, J. Relationship between QT Interval Length and Arterial Stiffness in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE): A Cross-Sectional Case-Control Study. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0152291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Mozos, I. The link between ventricular repolarization variables and arterial function. J. Electrocardiol. 2015, 48, 145–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Maebuchi, D.; Arima, H.; Ninomiya, T.; Yonemoto, K.; Kubo, M.; Doi, Y.; Tanizaki, Y.; Matsumura, K.; Iida, M.; Kiyohara, Y. Arterial stiffness and QT interval prolongation in a general population: The Hisayama study. Hypertens. Res. 2008, 31, 1339–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Mozos, I.; Hancu, M.; Cristescu, A. Ventricular arrhythmia risk in elderly heart failure patients. Rev. Glob. Med. Healthc. Res. 2010, 1, 18–29. [Google Scholar]
  44. Olgar, Y.; Degirmenci, S.; Durak, A.; Billur, D.; Can, B.; Kayki-Mutlu, G.; Arioglu-Inan, E.E.; Turan, B. Aging related functional and structural changes in the heart and aorta: MitoTEMPO improves aged-cardiovascular performance. Exp. Gerontol. 2018, 110, 172–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Dogdus, M.; Cinier, G. Coexistence of increased arterial stiffness and interatrial block in overweight subjects. Ann. Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2020, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Jaroch, J.; Rzyczkowska, B.; Bociąga, Z.; Vriz, O.; Driussi, C.; Loboz-Rudnicka, M.; Dudek, K.; Loboz-Grudzien, K. Relationship of carotid arterial functional and structural changes to left atrial volume in untreated hypertension. Acta Cardiol. 2016, 71, 227–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ruaengsri, C.; Schill, M.R.; Lancaster, T.S.; Khiabani, A.J.; Manghelli, J.L.; Carter, D.I.; Greenberg, J.W.; Melby, S.J.; Schuessler, R.B.; Damiano, R.J. The hemodynamic and atrial electrophysiologic consequences of chronic left atrial volume overload in a controllable canine model. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2018, 156, 1871–1879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Mancusi, C.; Canciello, G.; Izzo, R.; Damiano, S.; Grimaldi, M.G.; de Luca, N.; de Simone, G.; Trimarco, B.; Losi, M.A. Left atrial dilatation: A target organ damage in young to middle-age hypertensive patients. The Campania Salute Network. Int. J. Cardiol. 2018, 265, 229–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ravassa, S.; Ballesteros, G.; Díez, J. Aging and atrial fibrillation: A matter of fibrosis. Aging (Albany NY) 2019, 11, 9965–9966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wassertheurer, S.; Kropf, J.; Weber, T.; van der Giet, M.; Baulmann, J.; Ammer, M.; Hametner, B.; Mayer, C.C.; Eber, B.; Magometschnigg, D. A new oscillometric method for pulse wave analysis: Comparison with a common tonometric method. J. Hum. Hypertens. 2010, 24, 498–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Protogerou, A.D.; Argyris, A.; Nasothimiou, E.; Vrachatis, D.; Papaioannou, T.G.; Tzamouranis, D.; Blacher, J.; Safar, M.E.; Sfikakis, P.; Stergiou, G.S. Feasibility and reproducibility of noninvasive 24-hambulatory aortic blood pressure monitoring with a brachial cuff-based oscillometric device. Am. J. Hypertens. 2012, 25, 876–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Hametner, B.; Wassertheurer, S.; Kropf, J.; Mayer, C.; Eber, B.; Weber, T. Oscillometric estimation of aortic pulse wave velocity: Comparison with intra-aortic catheter measurements. Blood Press Monit. 2013, 18, 173–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijerph 17 04350 g001 550
Figure 1. QT interval as a sensitive and specific predictor of early vascular aging (EVA) (AUC = 0.671; 95% CI: 0.525–0.817), p = 0.04.
Figure 1. QT interval as a sensitive and specific predictor of early vascular aging (EVA) (AUC = 0.671; 95% CI: 0.525–0.817), p = 0.04.
Ijerph 17 04350 g001
Table
Table 1. Characteristics of the study population.
Table 1. Characteristics of the study population.
VariableMean ± SD
Age (years)48 ± 6 years
Male32 (57%)
High normal blood pressure12 (37.5%)
Grade 1 Hypertension16 (28.6%)
Grade 2 Hypertension13 (23.2%)
Grade 3 Hypertension6 (10.7%)
SBP (mmHg)137 ± 14
DBP (mmHg)91 ± 11
MAP (mmHg)111 ± 11
PP (mmHg)45 ± 10
PVW (m/s)7.26 ± 0.69
AP (mmHg)7.9 ± 6.5
AI (%)20 ± 13.71
EVA (%)18 patients (32.1)
HR (beats/min)69 ± 11
IHR (beats/min)91 ± 3
DHR (beats/min)22 ± 11
P (ms)105 ± 22
PR (ms)147 ± 31
QRS (ms)95 ± 17
QT (ms)409 ± 64
QTc (ms)434 ± 68
QTc > 450 ms14 patients (25%)
RV5 (mm)11 ± 6
RV6 (mm)11 ± 5
SV1 (mm)7 ± 4
SV2 (mm)8 ± 3
Therapyangiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (30%)
sartans (17.5%)
diuretics (32.5%)
beta blockers (32.5%)
calcium channel blockers (7.5%)
SBP—systolic blood pressure; DBP—diastolic blood pressure; MAP—mean arterial pressure; PP—pulse pressure; PVW—pulse wave velocity; AP—augmentation pressure; AI—augmentation index; EVA—early vascular aging; HR—resting heart rate; IHR—intrinsic heart rate; DHR—the difference between IHR and resting heart rate; P—P wave duration; PR—PR interval duration; QRS—duration of the QRS complex; QT—duration of the QT interval; QTc—heart rate corrected QT interval using the Bazett formula; RV5—amplitude of the R wave in lead V5; RV6—amplitude of the R wave in lead V6; SV1—amplitude of the S wave in lead V1; SV2—amplitude of the S wave in lead V2.
Table
Table 2. Correlations between electrocardiographic and pulse wave analysis variables.
Table 2. Correlations between electrocardiographic and pulse wave analysis variables.
Correlated VariablesCorrelation Coefficientp
PWV−IHRrP = −0.556˂0.0001
rK = −0.349˂0.0001
rS = −0.467˂0.0001
PWV−DHRrP = −0.2710.044
rK = −0.2280.015
rS = −0.3110.020
PWV−HRrP = 0.1110.416
AP−HRrP = −0.1570.249
AP−PrK = −0.2060.025
rS = −0.2750.040
AP−SV1rK = −0.2300.019
rS = −0.3050.022
AI−QTcrS = −0.2740.041
AI−SV1rP = −0.2860.033
rK = −0.2120.027
rS = −0.2950.027
rP—Bravais−Pearson’s correlation coefficient; rK—Kendall’s correlation; rS—Spearman’s correlation; PWV—pulse wave velocity; AI—augmentation index, AP—augmentation pressure, IHR—intrinsic heart rate, DHR—the difference between IHR and resting heart rate; P—P wave duration; QT—duration of the QT interval; QTc—heart rate corrected QT interval using the Bazett formula; SV1—amplitude of the S wave in lead V1.
Table
Table 3. Electrocardiographic predictors of pulse wave velocity (PWV) and early vascular aging (EVA). Results of linear regression analysis. Covariates-free analysis.
Table 3. Electrocardiographic predictors of pulse wave velocity (PWV) and early vascular aging (EVA). Results of linear regression analysis. Covariates-free analysis.
Predicted VariablePredictorUnst. BetaStand. BetaSignific.95% CIR2Adj. R2
PWVIHR−0.119−0.556<0.001−0.167–−0.070.5560.309
EVAIHR0.0380.2850.0470.001–0.0750.0810.062
EVAQTc450−0.333−0.3090.020−0.613–−0.0530.3090.096
AISV1−1.012−0.2860.033−1.937–−0.0860.2860.082
AIQTc450−8.286−0.2640.049−16.542–−0.0300.2640.070
IHR—intrinsic heart rate; QTc450—heart rate corrected QT interval duration exceeding 450 ms; AI—augmentation index; SV1—S wave amplitude in lead V1; Unst. Beta—Unstandardized Beta; Stand. Beta—Standardized Coefficients Beta; Signific.—significance; R2—R squared; Adj. R2—adjusted R squared.
Table
Table 4. Results of multiple linear regression analysis.
Table 4. Results of multiple linear regression analysis.
Predicted VariablePredictorUnst. BetaStand. Betap95% CIR2Adj. R2Signific.
PWVIHR
adjusted for SBP, MAP		−0.133−0.623˂0.001−0.177–−0.0890.4760.446˂0.001
PWVIHR
adjusted for SBP, MAP, therapy		−0.133−0.620˂0.001−0.177–−0.0880.4790.438˂0.001
EVAIHR adjusted for SBP, MAP, PP0.0210.1470.220−0.013–−0.0560.3090.2520.001
EVAIHR, therapy0.0280.1920.157−0.011–−0.0670.0530.0170.239
PVW—pulse wave velocity; EVA—early vascular aging; IHR—intrinsic heart rate; SBP—systolic blood pressure; MAP—mean arterial pressure; PP—pulse pressure; Unst. Beta—Unstandardized Beta; Stand. Beta—Standardized Coefficients Beta; Signific—significance; R2—R squared; Adj. R2—adjusted R squared; therapy—therapy with beta-blockers, calcium-channel blockers, sartans and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors.
Table
Table 5. Results of receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis for early vascular aging (EVA) and pathological pulse wave velocity (pPWV).
Table 5. Results of receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis for early vascular aging (EVA) and pathological pulse wave velocity (pPWV).
Test VariableState VariableAUC (95% CI)pCut-Off ValueSensitivitySpecificity
pPWVP0.731 (0.569–0.893)0.01594.583.3%70.5%
EVAP0.675 (0.527–0.824)0.03594.566.7%71.1%
EVAPR0.622 (0.458–0.786)0.143
EVAQT0.671 (0.525–0.817)0.04393.566.7%65.8%
EVAQTc0.659 (0.52–0.799)0.056
EVARV50.605 (0.428–0.783)0.207
EVA = early vascular aging; PWV = pulse wave velocity; pPWV = pathological pulse wave velocity (increased for age); P = P wave duration; PR = PR interval duration; QT = QT interval duration; QTc = heart rate corrected QT interval using the Bazett formula; RV5 = amplitude of the R wave in lead V5; AUC = area under the curve; CI = confidence interval.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mozos, I.; Gug, C.; Mozos, C.; Stoian, D.; Pricop, M.; Jianu, D. Associations between Intrinsic Heart Rate, P Wave and QT Interval Durations and Pulse Wave Analysis in Patients with Hypertension and High Normal Blood Pressure. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 4350. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph17124350

AMA Style

Mozos I, Gug C, Mozos C, Stoian D, Pricop M, Jianu D. Associations between Intrinsic Heart Rate, P Wave and QT Interval Durations and Pulse Wave Analysis in Patients with Hypertension and High Normal Blood Pressure. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(12):4350. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph17124350

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mozos, Ioana, Cristina Gug, Costin Mozos, Dana Stoian, Marius Pricop, and Daniela Jianu. 2020. "Associations between Intrinsic Heart Rate, P Wave and QT Interval Durations and Pulse Wave Analysis in Patients with Hypertension and High Normal Blood Pressure" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 12: 4350. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph17124350

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop