Next Article in Journal
Standing Meetings Are Feasible and Effective in Reducing Sitting Time among Office Workers—Walking Meetings Are Not: Mixed-Methods Results on the Feasibility and Effectiveness of Active Meetings Based on Data from the “Take a Stand!” Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Factors Impacting Family Planning Use in Mali and Senegal
Previous Article in Journal
Affordability Assessment from a Static to Dynamic Concept: A Scenario-Based Assessment of Cardiovascular Medicines
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Women’s Work-Family Multiple Role and Role Combination on Depressive Symptoms in Korea
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Uptake of Skilled Maternal Healthcare in Ethiopia: A Positive Deviance Approach

by
Seman K. Ousman
1,2,*,
Jeanette H. Magnus
2,3,
Johanne Sundby
4 and
Mekdes K. Gebremariam
5
1
St Paul’s Hospital Millennium Medical College (SPHMMC), Addis Ababa 22728/1000, Ethiopia
2
Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, 1078 Oslo, Norway
3
Department of Global Community Health and Behavioral Sciences, Tulane School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA
4
Institute of Health and Society, HELSAM, University of Oslo, N-0316 Oslo, Norway
5
Department of Nutrition, University of Oslo, 0317 Oslo, Norway
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(5), 1712; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph17051712
Submission received: 11 December 2019 / Revised: 21 January 2020 / Accepted: 3 March 2020 / Published: 5 March 2020
(This article belongs to the Collection Women's Reproductive and Maternal Health)

Abstract

:
Risk factor approaches are often used when implementing programs aimed at enforcing advantageous health care behaviors. A less frequently-used strategy is to identify and capitalize on those who, despite risk factors, exhibit positive behaviors. The aim of our study was to identify positive deviant (PD) mothers for the uptake of skilled maternal services and to explore their characteristics. Data for the study came from two waves of the Ethiopian Demographic and Health Surveys conducted in 2011 and in 2016. PD mothers were defined as those reporting no formal education but with adequate use of antenatal care (ANC) and/or institutional delivery services. Two-level multilevel regression analysis was used to analyze the data. Factors associated with PD for the use of ANC services were: partner’s education status, involvement in household decision making, exposure to media, and distance to the health facility. Factors associated with PD for health facility delivery were: partner’s education, woman’s employment status, ANC visit during index pregnancy, exposure to media, and perceived challenge to reach health facility. Rural-urban and time-related differences were also identified. The positive deviance approach provides a means for local policy makers and program managers to identify factors facilitating improved health behaviour and ultimately better health outcomes while acknowledging adverse risk profiles.

1. Introduction

Maternal healthcare service utilization is an important predictor of favorable maternal and child health outcomes. Improving maternal and newborn healthcare is a priority of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) [1]. In Ethiopia, 27–33 mothers die every day due to birth-related complications, equivalent to a maternal mortality ratio (MMR) of 412 per 100,000 live births [2]. Despite a decline from 871 per 100 000 live births in 2000 [3], much work is needed in Ethiopia to reach the political MMR goal of less than 70 deaths per 100,000 live births by 2030 [1]. Evidence suggests that maternal deaths are reduced by widespread utilization of skilled maternal healthcare services [4,5,6]. There is currently an underutilization of all maternal healthcare services by a significant proportion of women [2,7,8,9], and strategies and programs aimed at improving use of maternal health services have been implemented [10,11]. Despite these efforts, a recent report states that in Ethiopia less than half of all pregnant women received skilled maternal healthcare services (antenatal, delivery, and postnatal care) by a trained health professional at home or at health facilities [12,13].
Previous studies focusing on all women of reproductive age have identified factors influencing uptake and utilization of skilled maternal healthcare at multiple levels. Individual and household level factors identified are maternal age and education, household wealth, women’s decision-making power, parity, the woman’s or husband’s occupation, and media exposure [14,15]. Community level factors are geographical accessibility, residing in a community where women have higher levels of health knowledge, decision-making autonomy, low community poverty rate, and availability of community media [16]. At the policy level, government health strategies aimed at improving utilization of skilled maternal services have influenced uptake and utilization of maternal healthcare services [17,18,19].
Prior research from different areas of public health also shows that in every community there are certain individuals or groups whose behaviors and strategies enable them to find better solutions to common challenges than their peers, despite access to the same limited resources. These individuals are considered positive deviants (PDs) [20]. Their strategies result in improved health outcomes, favorable health behaviors or increased adherence to policy advice, despite exhibiting risk factors indicating otherwise [21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. Research adopting a PD strategy when exploring factors influencing the use of maternal healthcare services is however still in its infancy [22], as existing literature in general focuses on all women in the reproductive age [14,15,16,17,18,19]. Identifying Ethiopian mothers with positive health behaviors despite an adverse risk profile and exploring their characteristics could help health policy implementation, enable program managers to optimize public health initiative’s performance, and ultimately improve population health. Against this background, the current study aims to identify women at a high risk for underutilization of skilled maternal healthcare services and to explore factors that characterize the PD women for maternal healthcare services uptake in Ethiopia.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Data Source

We used data from the two latest Ethiopian Demographic Health Surveys (EDHS), conducted by the Ethiopian Central Statistical Agency (CSA) and ORC Macro International, USA, between December 2010–June 2011, and January 2016–June 2016. The full details of the methods and procedures used in the data collection of each EDHS, are published elsewhere [2,3,28]. The current study includes weighted data from 7584 women collected from 641 enumeration areas (EAs) (clusters) in 2016 and 7908 women from 595 EA clusters in 2011 (additional Figure S1). The eligibility criteria were: being of reproductive age (15 to 49 years); reporting at least one birth during the five years preceding the actual survey (i.e., 2006–2011 and 2012–2016); and participating in one of the two surveys from any region in the country.

2.2. Measurement of Variables

2.2.1. Outcome measurement

The analyses in the current study addressed two maternity healthcare binary outcomes: (1) antenatal care (ANC) use, categorized into four or more visits (≥4) and less than four visits (<4), in accordance with the 2002 WHO ANC model; and (2) place of delivery, either home birth or birth at a health facility.

2.2.2. Potential Predictors

Individual level: Age at the last birth, the birth order, education level of the woman and her partner, employment status of the participant and her partner, empowerment (related to household decision making and whether the woman was involved or not in aspects related to- her own health care, large household purchases, visits to family or relatives), household wealth index (low and high household wealth as calculated by demographic health survey (DHS) algorithm), mass media (radio, TV) exposure (no exposure, exposed to either a radio or TV, exposed to both), relationship status (being in a polygynous union or not), breastfeeding status (Yes/No), and perceived distance to a health facility to get medical help (‘yes, big problem’; or, ‘not big problem’).
Contextual community level: place of residence (urban or rural), and if the region was classified as agrarian, pastoral, or a city.

2.3. Identification of Positive Deviants

We used Anderson’s behavioral model of health service use [29], to identify positive deviants and the factors associated with being a PD. We selected women with no formal education as a sub group with very low likelihood of skilled maternal healthcare utilization, as education was the strongest predictor of both outcomes ANC and utilization of skilled health care during delivery after adjusting for the other risk factors associated with skilled maternity care in this population [2,28]. PD mothers were mothers who reported no formal education, but had an adequate use of ANC visits and or institutional delivery services. Thereafter, the analyses compared the characteristics of the PD mothers to those of their counterparts. Due to significant variations by place of residence in the overall use of skilled maternal healthcare, analyses were stratified by place of residence.

2.4. Statistical methods

Modeling Binary Responses

We used a binary logistic multilevel regression model, as the data was clustered at the survey level. We adjusted for confounders, decided a priori from the literature as age while giving last birth and order of the last birth. Bivariate logistic regression was performed to estimate the crude odds ratios (COR) and 95% confidence intervals of facility delivery or not, and if she had at least four ANC visits or not. Variables significantly associated with the outcome variable in the univariate analysis were entered in the multiple multilevel logistic regression analysis.
The study uses several explanatory variables that might be correlated to each other (such as maternal age at last birth and birth order). Multi-collinearity was checked using variance inflation factors (VIF) and variables with VIF less than 10 were considered for the analysis. In addition, we computed an estimate of intra-cluster correlation coefficient (ICC), which described the amount of variability in the response variables attributable to differences between the clusters. We used the McKelvey & Zavoina Pseudo R2 to assess the fit of the model [30,31]. Since the data were obtained from surveys conducted at two different time points, interactions with time were performed to describe any changes in adequate ANC services and health facility delivery among PDs in 2011 compared to 2016.
Sampling weights were applied for the data when we computed the univariate analysis to manage the unequal probability of selection between the strata defined by geographical location and for non-responses. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the characteristics of mothers. Bivariate analyses were first conducted. We then fitted two separate random-effects multilevel logistic regression models, one for each outcome of interest (ANC, and delivery care) using only the variables that are significantly associated with each outcome in the bivariate model. The model parameter estimates were obtained in the statistical software StataSE 15 using the restricted maximum likelihood method (REML). The level of significance was set at 0.05.

2.5. Ethical Consideration

The study adhered to national and international ethical guidelines for biomedical research involving human subjects [32], including the Helsinki declaration. The study was reviewed and approved by the Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics (Code number: 2016/967/REK sør-øst A) and the Norwegian Centre for Research Data (Code number: 48407) at the University of Oslo. Our team also requested permission and access to the data from the CSA in Ethiopia and Inner City Fund (ICF) international by registering online on the website www.dhsprogram.com [33] and submitting the study protocol (See, additional File S1) by highlighting the objectives of the study as part of the online registration process. The ICF Macro Inc removed all information that could be used to identify the respondents; hence, anonymity of the data was maintained.

3. Results

3.1. Characteristics of Participants

A total of 15,492 women reported a live birth in the past five-years preceding the surveys, 6720 (85.0%) (rural), and 1188 (15.0%) (urban) in 2011 (with mean age of 29.1 (±6.9) years), and 6619 (87.3%) (rural), and 965 (12.7%) (urban) in the 2016 survey, (29.3 (±6.8) years). Overall, in terms of pregnancy characteristics, both the number of antenatal care visits and the proportion of health facility delivery were consistently higher among urban women compared to rural dwellers. Indeed, more than 63% of urban mothers made the minimum four antenatal visits versus 27% of the rural mothers, and 84% of urban mothers reported health facility delivery versus 24% of the rural mothers in 2016. Table 1 presents the background characteristics of the women included.

3.2. Factors Associated with Positive Deviant Behaviour for Better Maternal Health Outcomes

3.2.1. Factors Associated with Positive Deviant Behaviour for Antenatal Care

In 2011, among women with no formal education, 542 out of 4863 (11.2%) rural women and, 122 out of 407 (30.0%) urban women received at least four ANC services. In 2016 the numbers were 1050 out of 4562 (23.0%) rural women and 117 out of 229 (51.1%) urban women. These were classified as positive deviants (PDs) for ANC utilization. Between 2011 and 2016, the number of PDs for the uptake of adequate ANC services increased significantly by threefold (Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) = 3.01, (95% CI:2.55–3.55)) in rural areas, and by nearly double (AOR = 1.98, (95% CI:1.29–3.03)) in urban areas (Table 3 and Figure 1). There was no association with the order of the last birth or the number of under five children of PDs for the uptake of adequate ANC in the univariate models, so this was excluded from the multilevel models.
In 2011, rural mothers who were PDs for ANC uptake were more likely to be employed (p < 0.01), and in 2016, more likely to have husbands who were employed (p < 0.05), than their counterparts. The same was not true for urban PD mothers. The analysis also revealed that as compared to their counterparts, the rural PD women had partners with primary or above education (p < 0.05), were more likely to be involved in one or more decision making of the household (p < 0.05), and less likely to perceive a high distance to a health facility (p < 0.05) in both survey periods. In 2016, rural PDs were more likely to breastfeed (p < 0.05) compared to non-deviants’ peers. Both rural and urban PDs were more likely to report exposure to media (p < 0.05) in all surveys compared to non-deviants. In 2011, urban PD mothers were more likely to be from the city dwellers (p < 0.01), than non-deviants. Table 2 and Table 3 present the results of the multilevel regression analyses showing the characteristics of the PDs and ANC utilization in 2011 and 2016, respectively.

3.2.2. Factors Associated with Positive Deviant Behaviour for Health Facility Delivery Utilization

In 2011, among women with no formal education, 160 out of 4863 (3.3%) rural women and 115 out of 407 (28.3%) urban women used health facility delivery services. Similarly, in 2016, 806 out of 4562 (17.7%) rural women, and 153 out of 229 (66.8%) urban women reported health facility delivery, and were classified as PDs. Table 4 and Table 5 presents the results of the multilevel logistic regression analyses showing the characteristics of the PDs in 2011 and 2016, respectively. Between 2011 and 2016, the odds of uptake of health facility delivery among PD women increased significantly, nearly by fivefold (AOR = 4.92, (95% CI:3.92–6.18)) in rural areas and by more than threefold (AOR = 3.23, (95% CI:2.03–5.15)) in urban dwellers (Table 5 and Figure 1).
In 2011, rural mothers who were PDs for institutional health care delivery were more likely to have a job (p < 0.01) than non-deviant counterparts. Both rural and urban PD women were more likely to have partners with primary or above education (p < 0.05), and in both surveys the PDs reported at least one ANC visit during pregnancy (p < 0.01). Likewise, in 2016, both urban and rural PDs were more likely to report exposure to either radio or TV than no exposure (p < 0.05) and to have breastfeed (p < 0.05) compared to non-deviants. In 2016, the rural PDs were more likely to be involved in one decision than no decision making for the household (p < 0.05); the same was not true for urban PDs. Rural mothers with birth order two or more (p < 0.01), and who perceive distance as a challenge to reach health facility (p < 0.05) were less likely to be PDs in both surveys. Lastly, in 2011, both rural and urban PDs for institutional health care delivery were more likely to be living in the city than agrarian communities (p < 0.01); rural PDs were also more likely to be living in pastoralist than agrarian communities.

4. Discussion

The study investigated factors associated with PD, i.e., an adequate use of ANC services or institutional delivery services despite no formal education, and thus classifying as at high-risk for non-use. In all models, compared to their counterparts, the odds of utilization of skilled maternal healthcare services (adequate ANC or health facility delivery) among PD women increased significantly from 2011 to 2016; the increase was higher in rural areas than in urban areas and higher for health facility delivery compared to ANC utilization uptake. Our study identified factors at multiple levels associated with PD behaviour. The results of this study are in concert with earlier studies reporting that level of education is associated with utilization of maternal healthcare services in Ethiopia and elsewhere [9,34,35,36,37,38]. Mothers with no education are at a particularly high risk of low utilization of maternal healthcare services and are consequently a key target group for intervention. Factors associated with PD behaviour might inform such interventions. The current study found that the employment status of women, partners’ education status, access to media, the level of women’s self-reported empowerment, and perceived adversity of distance to a health facility were associated with uptake of skilled maternal healthcare, and in concert with prior studies using risk factor analysis [39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48].
The relation between rural women’s employment and skilled maternal healthcare services among rural PDs might be related to employment making healthcare affordable, which might increase maternal healthcare service utilization. Moreover, employed women might be more likely to receive information at work that promotes health-seeking behaviour [49,50]. Interestingly, our analyses suggested that, compared to their counterparts, rural PD women with employed partners were more likely to used ANC services, but not health facility delivery, in the 2016 survey. This is interesting, because a woman whose husband is employed is likely to have better financial resources, which could facilitate access to skilled delivery. A study in Bangladesh showed that employed partners of PD women may spend more time away from their households than unemployed husbands, which might influence decisions about place of delivery [22].
In our study, both rural and urban women who were PDs for the uptake of skilled care were more likely to have partners with at least primary education. These findings are in line with findings of studies from Ethiopia and elsewhere suggesting that husband’s education may lead to greater involvement in maternity care utilization, as it is men who generally have an upper hand in decision-making at the household level in a patriarchal society like Ethiopia [51,52,53,54,55,56]. Similarly, we demonstrated that all PDs for the uptake of skilled care were more likely to report exposure to media compared to non-deviants in both surveys, irrespective of their location. Previous studies have shown that exposure to mass media at the individual and community level positively influences the development of positive behaviour toward the utilization of maternal healthcare services [57,58,59,60]. The impact of mass media exposure was however less consistent for health facility delivery in the present study. The current findings suggest that as compared to their counterparts, rural PD women for the uptake of skilled care were involved in one or more decision making of the household. This finding is consistent with those of previous studies from Ethiopia and elsewhere suggesting that women’s involvement in decision making is associated with utilization of skilled care [49,61,62,63,64,65,66]. However, involvement in two or more decisions was not associated with PD for health facility delivery, which is a surprising finding that needs further exploration.
We also found that rural PD were less likely to perceived distance to the health facility as a challenge to receive care in both surveys. It can be argued that with limited transport availability, as well as the mountainous and rugged topography in rural parts of the country, women find accessing skilled care very challenging [8,15,35,40,43]. In 2016, both rural and urban PDs for health facility delivery were more likely to breastfeed than their peers. This might reflect personal characteristics of these PD women, who might have a higher self-efficacy towards adopting healthier behaviours, better perceptions and norms regarding infant-feeding [67,68]. Both rural and urban PDs for health facility delivery were significantly more likely to have attended at least one ANC visit during index pregnancy. The role of usage of ANC when enhancing health facility delivery has been reported previously [9,34,37,47,48].
The findings of this study highlight factors at the socio-economic, behavioural, and structural levels associated with the uptake of skilled maternal healthcare services in an otherwise high-risk population. These factors should be taken into consideration when aiming to improve maternal healthcare among high-risk populations. Our study indicated that women in disadvantaged circumstances can still achieve good outcomes amidst a host of contextual barriers that usually predict poor health outcomes. Positive deviants in this context are shown to be women who have husbands with primary education or above, who have access to information through mass media, and who are involved at least with one decision made in the household. By knowing these characteristics, multiple government sectors (i.e., education, information and culture among others, alongside ministry of health) can identify women who fit the description and thus develop and amplify action plans encouraging more positive deviant behaviours. Finally, further qualitative research is warranted to explore in-depth what other exceptional characteristics PD women possess in order to shed light on potential mechanisms behind some of the associations identified in this study.

Study Strength and Limitations

The study has several methodological strengths, including the use of multilevel modelling. The study was based on two different time points, and the data was nationally representative. The sample sizes of the surveys were large, providing high statistical power. The PD strategy offers an alternative to other approaches used in exploring the uptake of skilled maternal healthcare. Nonetheless, the PD sample size for urban women was small; thus, a lack of power might impact the multilevel analysis. The cross-sectional analyses at the two time points limited inference about causality.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we identified mothers with no education as a group at high risk of poor uptake of maternal healthcare services. The women’s employment status, their partners’ education, access to media, self-reported empowerment, and perceived distance to reach a health facility were associated with PD behaviour and utilization of skilled maternal healthcare services. Differences between rural and urban PD women were documented. Indeed, the positive deviance approach provides a means for local policy makers and program managers to identify factors facilitating improved health behaviour, and ultimately better health outcomes, despite an acknowledged adverse risk profile. Such strategy and knowledge could facilitate targeted efforts aimed at achieving global SDGs of reduction of maternal mortality in resource-poor populations.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/1660-4601/17/5/1712/s1 Figure S1. Schematic presentation of sampling for identification of PDs.

Author Contributions

Conceived the study by J.H.M.; data curation, designing, and analyzed by S.K.O.; S.K.O. drafted the first draft with significant input from J.H.M., and M.K.G. Critically reviewed and edited the manuscript for intellectual content from M.K.G., J.S. and J.H.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This publication was supported by NORAD (Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation) under the NORHED-Program, Agreement no. “ETH-13/0024”. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The success of the study is also possible by a number of institutions and individuals, especially NORAD, University of Oslo, St Paul’s Hospital Millennium Medical College, the Central Statistical Authority of Ethiopia and the ICF DHS Measure. The EDHS data are publicly available via Measure DHS by registering online on the website www.dhsprogram.com.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Abbreviations

ANCAntenatal Care
AORAdjusted Odds Ratio
CORCrude Odds Ratios
CSAEthiopian Central Statistical Agency
EAEnumeration Areas
EDHSEthiopian Demographic and Health Survey
HFDHealth Facility Delivery
HSDPHealth Sector Development Plans
HSTPHealth Sector Transformation Plan
ICCIntra-cluster Correlation Coefficient
MMRMaternal Mortality Ratio
NSDNorwegian Center for Research Data
PDPositive Deviance
REKRegional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics
REMLRestricted Maximum Likelihood method
SDGsSustainable Development Goals
USAUnited States of America
VIFVariance Inflation Factors
WHOWorld Health Organization.

References

  1. UN. The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2017; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  2. Central Statistical Agency (CSA); ICF. Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey 2016; CSA: Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; ICF: Rockville, MD, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  3. Central Statistical Authority (CSA); ORC Macro. Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey 2000; Central Statistical Authority: Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; ORC Macro: Calverton, MD, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  4. WHO; UNICEF. Trends in Maternal Mortality: 2000 to 2017: Estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  5. WHO; UNICEF. Trends in maternal mortality: 1990 to 2015: Estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ronsmans, C.; Graham, W.J. Lancet Maternal Survival Series Steering group. Maternal mortality: Who, when, where, and why. Lancet 2006, 368, 1189–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tessema, G.A.; Mekonnen, T.T.; Mengesha, Z.B.; Tumlinson, K. Association between skilled maternal healthcare and postpartum contraceptive use in Ethiopia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018, 18, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Kifle, D.; Azale, T.; Gelaw, Y.A.; Melsew, Y.A. Maternal health care service seeking behaviors and associated factors among women in rural Haramaya District, Eastern Ethiopia: A triangulated community-based cross-sectional study. Reprod. Health 2017, 14, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Tesfaye, B.; Mathewos, T.; Kebede, M. Skilled delivery inequality in Ethiopia: To what extent are the poorest and uneducated mothers benefiting? Int. J. Equity Health 2017, 16, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. FMOH. Health Sector Transformation Plan (HSTP): 2015/16–2019/20; FMOH: Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  11. FMOH. Health Sector Development Programme IV (HSDP) 2010/11–2014/15; FINAL DRAFT, Version 19 March; FMOH: Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ethiopian Public Health Institute (EPHI); ICF. Ethiopia Mini Demographic and Health Survey 2019: Key Indicators; EPHI: Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; ICF: Rockville, MD, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  13. WHO. Making pregnancy safer: The critical role of the skilled attendant. A Joint Statement by WHO, ICM, and FIGO: Department of Reproductive Health and Research; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  14. Sridharana, S.; Deyb, A.; Sethb, A.; Chandurkarb, D.; Singhb, K.; Hayc, K. Towards an understanding of the multilevel factors associated with maternal health care utilization in Uttar Pradesh, India. Glob. Health Action 2017, 10, 1287493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Mezmur, M.; Navaneetham, K.; Letamo, G.; Bariagaber, H. Individual, household and contextual factors associated with skilled delivery care in Ethiopia: Evidence from Ethiopian demographic and health surveys. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0184688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yadav, A.; Kesarwanir, R. Effect of individual and community factors on maternal health care service use in India: A multilevel approach. J. Biosoc. Sci. 2016, 48, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fox, H.; Topp, S.M.; Callander, E.; Lindsay, D. A review of the impact of financing mechanisms on maternal health care in Australia. BMC Public Health 2019, 19, 1540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Miteniece, E.; Pavlova, M.; Rechel, B.; Rezeberga, D.; Murauskienė, L.; Groot, W. Barriers to accessing adequate maternal care in Latvia: A mixed-method study among women, providers and decision-makers. Health Policy 2019, 123, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Belaid, L.; Ridde, V. An implementation evaluation of a policy aiming to improve financial access to maternal health care in Djibo district, Burkina Faso. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2012, 12, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Positive Deviance Initiative. Available online: http://www.positivedeviance.org (accessed on 7 May 2019).
  21. Long, K.N.; Gren, L.H.; Rees, C.A.; West, J.H.; Hall, P.C.; Gray, B.; Crookston, B.T. Determinants of better health: A cross-sectional assessment of positive deviants among women in West Bengal. BMC Public Health 2013, 13, 372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Goldenberg, T.; Stephenson, R. A Deviance Approach to Understanding Use of Maternal Health Care Services in Bangladesh. Int. Perspect. Sex. Reprod. Health 2017, 43, 141–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ramani, S.; Shaikh, N.; Das, S.; Pantvaidya, S.; Fernandez, A.; Jayaraman, A. “Everybody breastfeeds if they have milk”: Factors that shape exclusive breastfeeding practices in informal settlements of Mumbai, India. Int. Breastfeed. J. 2019, 14, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Alimonte, M.R.D.; Deshmukh, D.; Jayaraman, A.; Chanani, S.; Humphries, D.L. Using Positive Deviance to Understand the Uptake of Optimal Infant and Young Child Feeding Practices by Mothers in an Urban Slum of Mumbai. Matern. Child Health J. 2016, 20, 1133–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Wallace, M.E.; Harville, E.W. Predictors of Healthy Birth Outcome in Adolescents: A Positive Deviance Approach. J. Pediatr. Adolesc. Gynecol. 2012, 25, 314–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Ma, P.; Magnus, J.H. Exploring the Concept of Positive Deviance Related to Breastfeeding Initiation in Black and White WIC Enrolled First Time Mothers. Matern. Child Health J. 2012, 16, 1583–1593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ndiaye, M.; Siekmans, K.; Haddad, S.; Receveur, O. Impact of a positive deviance approach to improve the effectiveness of an iron-supplementation program to control nutritional anemia among rural Senegalese pregnant women. Food Nutr. Bull. 2009, 30, 128–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Central Statistical Agency; ICF International. Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey 2011; Central Statistical Agency: Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; ICF International: Rockville, MD, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  29. Anderson, R. National Health Surveys and Behavioral Model of Health Services Use. Med. Care 2008, 46, 647–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. McFadden, D. Quantitative methods for analysing travel behaviour of individuals: Some recent developments. In Behavioural Travel Modelling; Hensher, D.A., Stopher, P.R., Eds.; Croom- Helm: London, UK, 1979; pp. 279–318. [Google Scholar]
  31. McKelvey, R.; Zavoina, W. A statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables. J. Mathemat. Sociol. 1975, 4, 103–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. CIOMS; WHO. International Ethical Guidelines for Health-Related Research Involving Humans, Fourth Edition: Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS); CIOMS Publication: Geneva, Switzerland, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  33. Measure DHS Program. Available online: http://dhsprogram.com/data/available-datasets.cfm (accessed on 13 March 2019).
  34. Bhowmik, J.; Biswas, R.K.; Woldegiorgis, M. Antenatal care and skilled birth attendance in Bangladesh are influenced by female education and family affordability: BDHS 2014. Public Health 2019, 170, 113–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Okwaraji, Y.B.; Webb, E.L.; Edmond, K.M. Barriers in physical access to maternal health services in rural Ethiopia. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2015, 15, 493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Long, Q.; Zhang, T.; Xu, L.; Tang, S.; Hemminki, E. Utilisation of maternal health care in western rural China under a new rural health insurance system (New Co-operative Medical System). Trop. Med. Int. Health 2010, 15, 1210–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Navaneetham, K.; Dharmalingam, A. Utilization of maternal health care services in Southern India. Soc. Sci. Med. 2002, 55, 1849–1869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Regassa, N. Antenatal and postnatal care service utilization in southern Ethiopia: A population-based study. Afr. Health Sci. 2011, 11, 390–397. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  39. Mekonnen, T.; Dune, T.; Perz, J.; Ogbo, F.A. Trends and Determinants of Antenatal Care Service Use in Ethiopia between 2000 and 2016. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Ousman, S.K.; Mdala, I.; Thorsen, V.C.; Sundby, J.; Magnus, J.H. Social Determinants of Antenatal Care Service Use in Ethiopia: Changes Over a 15-Year Span. Front. Public Health 2019, 7, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Yaya, S.; Bishwajit, G.; Ekholuenetale, M.; Shah, V.; Kadio, B.; Udenigwe, O. Timing and adequate attendance of antenatal care visits among women in Ethiopia. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0184934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Yesuf, C.M. Disparities in the use of antenatal care service in Ethiopia over a period of fifteen years. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2013, 13, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Mekonnen, Z.A.; Lerebo, W.T.; Gebrehiwot, T.G.; Abadura, S.A. Multilevel analysis of individual and community level factors associated with institutional delivery in Ethiopia. BMC Res. Notes 2015, 8, 376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Yebyo, H.; Alemayehu, M.; Kahsay, A. Why Do Women Deliver at Home? Multilevel Modeling of Ethiopian National Demographic and Health Survey Data. PLoS ONE 2015, 4, e0124718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Benova, L.; Tunçalp, Ö.; Moran, A.C. Not just a number: Examining coverage and content of antenatal care in low-income and middle-income countries. BMJ Glob. Health 2018, 3, e000779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Saad-Haddad, G.; DeJong, J.; Terreri, N.; Restrepo-Méndez, M.C.; Perin, J.; Vaz, L. Patterns and determinants of antenatal care utilization: Analysis of national survey data in seven countdown countries. J. Glob. Health 2016, 6, 010404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Diamond-Smith, N.; Sudhinaraset, M. Drivers of facility deliveries in Africa and Asia: Regional analyses using the demographic and health surveys. Reprod. Health 2015, 12, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Yaya, S.; Bishwajit, G.; Ekholuenetale, M. Factors associated with the utilization of institutional delivery services in Bangladesh. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0171573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Tiruneh, F.N.; Chuang, K.Y.; Chuang, Y.C. Women’s autonomy and maternal healthcare service utilization in Ethiopia. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2017, 17, 718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Bobo, F.T.; Yesuf, E.A.; Woldie, M. Inequities in utilization of reproductive and maternal health services in Ethiopia. Int. J. Equity Health 2017, 16, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Mohammed, B.H.; Johnston, J.M.; Vackova, D.; Hassen, S.M.; Yi, H. The role of male partner in utilization of maternal health care services in Ethiopia: A community-based couple study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2019, 19, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Mersha, A.G. Male involvement in the maternal health care system: Implication towards decreasing the high burden of maternal mortality. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018, 18, 493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Altaye, D.E.; Karim, A.M.; Betemariam, W.; Zemicheal, N.F.; Shigute, T. Effects of family conversation on health care practices in Ethiopia: A propensity score matched analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018, 18, 72. [Google Scholar]
  54. Teklesilasie, W.; Deressa, W. Husbands’ involvement in antenatal care and its association with women’s utilization of skilled birth attendants in Sidama zone, Ethiopia: A prospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018, 18, 315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Forbes, F.; Wynter, K.; Wade, C.; Zeleke, B.M.; Fisher, J. Male partner attendance at antenatal care and adherence to antenatal care guidelines: Secondary analysis of 2011 Ethiopian demographic and health survey data. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018, 18, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Bhatta, D.N.; Aryal, U.R. Paternal Factors and Inequity Associated with Access to Maternal Health Care Service Utilization in Nepal: A Community Based Cross-Sectional Study. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0130380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Zamawe, C.O.F.; Banda, M.; Dube, A.N. The impact of a community driven mass media campaign on the utilisation of maternal health care services in rural Malawi. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2016, 16, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Acharya, D.; Khanal, V.; Kumar, S.J.; Adhjkari, M.; Gautam, S. Impact of mass media on the utilization of antenatal care services among women of rural community in Nepal. BMC Res. Notes 2015, 8, 345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Collins, Z.; Banda, M.; Dube, A. The effect of mass media campaign on Men’s participation in maternal health: A cross-sectional study in Malawi. Reprod. Health 2015, 12, 31. [Google Scholar]
  60. Sanda, H.U. Media awareness and utilization of antenatal care services by pregnant women in Kano State- Nigeria. J. Soc. Sci. Stud. 2014, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Chol, C.; Negin, J.; Agho, K.E.; Cumming, R.G. Women’s autonomy and utilisation of maternal healthcare services in 31 sub-Saharan African countries: Results from the demographic and health surveys, 2010–2016. BMJ Open 2019, 9, e023128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Ghose, B.; Feng, D.; Tang, S. Women’s decision-making autonomy and utilisation of maternal healthcare services: Results from the Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey. BMJ Open 2017, 7, e017142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Nigatu, D.; Gebremariam, A.; Abera, M.; Setegn, T.; Deribe, K. Factors associated with women’s autonomy regarding maternal and child health care utilization in Bale Zone: A community based cross-sectional study. BMC Women Health 2014, 14, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Grady, C.; Osamor, P. Factors associated with women’s healthcare decision-making autonomy: Empirical evidence from Nigeria. J. Biosoc. Sci. 2018, 50, 70–85. [Google Scholar]
  65. Adhlkari, R. Effect of Women’s autonomy on maternal health service utilization in Nepal: A cross sectional study. BMC Women Health 2016, 16, 26. [Google Scholar]
  66. Osamor, P.; Grady, C. Women’s autonomy in health care decision-making in developing countries: A synthesis of the literature. Int. J. Women Health 2016, 8, 191–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Chowdhury, R.; Sinha, B.; Sankar, M.J.; Taneja, S.; Bhandari, N. Breastfeeding and maternal health outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Paediatr. 2015, 104, 96–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Lassi, Z.S.; Bhutta, Z.A. Community-based intervention packages for reduc ing maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality and improving neonatal outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2015, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. The changes in odds of uptake of skilled maternal healthcare service utilization (antenatal care or health facility delivery) among positive deviant women in urban and rural areas in Ethiopia between 2006 and 2016. Vertical axis = adjusted odds ratio (AOR); horizontal axis = survey periods.
Figure 1. The changes in odds of uptake of skilled maternal healthcare service utilization (antenatal care or health facility delivery) among positive deviant women in urban and rural areas in Ethiopia between 2006 and 2016. Vertical axis = adjusted odds ratio (AOR); horizontal axis = survey periods.
Ijerph 17 01712 g001
Table 1. Background characteristics of 15,492 women with a live birth in the five years preceding the 2011 or 2016 surveys (Ethiopian Demographic Health Survey (EDHS)).
Table 1. Background characteristics of 15,492 women with a live birth in the five years preceding the 2011 or 2016 surveys (Ethiopian Demographic Health Survey (EDHS)).
EDHS Years 20112016
Stratified by Place of ResidenceRuralUrbanRuralUrban
Individual level Factors (N)672011886619965
Age of Mothers (Year) Mean (±SD)29.3 (±7.1)28.2 (±5.8)29.4 (±7.1)28.8 (±5.8)
Age when giving last birth (years)
15—241691 (25.2)319 (26.8)1623 (24.5)181 (18.7)
25—343234 (48.1)638 (53.7)3217 (48.6)604 (62.6)
35—491795 (26.7)231 (19.4)1779 (26.9)180 (18.7)
Order of the last birth
First1038 (15.4)361 (30.4)1100 (16.6)331 (34.3)
Second or third1990 (29.6)472 (39.7)1883 (28.4)399 (41.3)
Fourth or higher3692 (54.9)355 (29.9)3636 (54.9)235 (24.4)
Marital status
Not living with partner567 (8.4)156 (13.1)393 (5.9)87 (9.0)
Living with partner6153 (91.6)1032 (86.9)6226 (94.1)878 (91.0)
Education level of the women
No education4863 (72.4)407 (34.3)4562 (68.9)229 (23.7)
Primary1764 (26.2)506 (42.6)1833 (27.7)315 (32.6)
Secondary and above93 (1.4)275 (23.1)224 (3.4)421 (43.6)
b Working status of the women
Working2219 (33.0)550 (46.3)1702 (25.7)466 (48.3)
Not working 4494 (66.9)638 (53.7)4917 (74.3)499 (51.7)
Education level of their partners
No education3628 (54.0)230 (19.3)3200 (48.3)146 (15.1)
Primary2676 (39.8)507 (42.7)2480 (37.5)251 (26.0)
Secondary and above416 (6.2)451 (38.0)939 (14.2)568 (58.9)
Working status of partners
Working6687 (99.5)1172 (98.7)6129 (92.6)927 (96.1)
Not working33 (0.5)16 (1.3)490 (7.4)38 (3.9)
In a polygamous relationship
Yes1290 (19.2)233 (19.6)1094 (16.5)148 (15.4)
No5430 (80.8)955 (80.4)5525 (83.5)817 (84.6)
b Self-reported empowerment of women
Not involved at all in decision making795 (12.9)60 (5.8)764 (12.3)25 (2.8)
Involved in one891(14.5)90 (8.7)457 (7.3)33 (3.8)
Involved in two1373 (22.3)189 (18.3)793 (12.7)122 (13.9)
Involved in at least three3093 (50.3)694 (67.2)4212 (67.6)698 (79.5)
Household wealth index
Low household wealth status5015 (74.6)48 (4.1)4815 (72.7)79 (8.1)
High household Wealth status1705 (25.4)1140 (95.9)1804 (27.3)886 (91.9)
Exposure to mass media
No exposure 3051 (45.4)163 (13.7)4831 (73.0)192 (19.9)
Exposed to either radio or TV2246 (33.4)346 (29.1)1207 (18.2)335 (34.7)
Exposed to both radio and TV1423 (21.2)679 (57.2)581 (8.8)438 (45.4)
b Ever had a terminated pregnancy
Yes740 (11.0)96 (8.1)603 (9.1)77 (8.0)
No5980 (89.0)1092 (91.9)6016 (90.9)888 (92.0)
Number of under 5 children
No child278 (4.1)91 (7.7)219 (3.3)63 (6.5)
One child 2844 (42.3)720 (60.6)3101 (46.9)638 (66.1)
Two or more3598 (53.5)377 (31.7)3299 (49.8)264 (27.4)
Currently breastfeeding
Yes4573 (68.1)651 (54.8)4277 (64.6)534 (55.4)
No2147 (31.9)537 (45.2)2342 (35.4)431 (44.6)
b Perceived distance to a health facility to get medical help
Big problem5360 (79.8)397 (33.6)4244 (64.1)162 (16.8)
Not a big problem1356 (20.2)786 (66.4)2375 (35.9)803 (83.2)
Anemia status during pregnancy
Anemic1472 (21.9)235 (19.8)2076 (31.4)224 (23.2)
Not Anemic5248 (78.1)953 (80.2)4543 (68.6)741 (76.8)
Community level factors
Contextual Regions
Agrarian6406 (95.3)865 (72.8)6223 (94.0)671 (69.6)
Pastoralist291 (4.3)108 (9.1)370 (5.6)71 (7.3)
City dweller’s 23 (0.3)215 (18.1)26 (0.4)223 (23.1)
Maternal Healthcare Service
ANC Utilization
No ANC visits 4249 (63.2)295 (24.8)2734 (41.3)99 (10.3)
At least one ANC visit 2471 (36.8)893 (75.2)3885 (58.7)866 (89.7)
At least 4 antenatal care visits 973 (14.5)562 (47.3)1815 (27.4)609 (63.1)
Below 4 antenatal care visits5747 (85.5)626 (52.7)4804 (72.6)356 (36.9)
Place of delivery
Home birth6389 (95.1)558 (47.0)5024 (75.9)155 (16.1)
Health Institution331 (4.9)630 (53.0)1595 (24.1)810 (83.9)
b Total figure may not add to 100 percent due to ‘do not know’ and ‘missing cases’.
Table 2. Results of multiple multilevel logistic regression exploring factors associated with being a positive deviant for antenatal care utilization among urban and rural women, 2011 Ethiopia DHS.
Table 2. Results of multiple multilevel logistic regression exploring factors associated with being a positive deviant for antenatal care utilization among urban and rural women, 2011 Ethiopia DHS.
Survey Years2011 Model
Stratified by (N)Rural (4863)Urban (407)
Deviance Status PDs N (%) Non-PDs N (%)AOR (95 % CI)PDs N (%) Non-PDs N (%)AOR (95% CI)
Co-variates (n)542 (11.2%)4321 (88,8%)AOR (95 % CI)122 (30.0%)285 (70.0%)AOR (95% CI)
Age when giving last birth (years)
15—24 (ref)87 (8.9)893 (91.1)1 (1,1)17 (22.9)57 (77.1)1 (1,1)
25—34288 (11.7)2171 (88.3)1.26 (0.91, 1.73)72 (33.5)145 (66.5)1.03 (0.50, 2.12)
35—49167 (11.7)1257 (88.3)1.42 (1.00, 2.01) **33 (28.4)83 (71.6)1.25 (0.52, 3.00)
b Working status of the women
Not-working (ref)298 (8.9)3038 (91.1)1 (1,1)68 (32.9)140 (67.1)1 (1,1)
Working 243 (16.0)1278 (84.0)1.64 (1.28, 2.10) ***54 (27.2)145 (72.8)1.06 (0.60, 1.87)
Education level of their partners
No education (ref)302 (9.6)2864 (90.4)1 (1,1)48 (28.5)122 (71.5)1 (1,1)
Primary 213 (13.6)1353 (86.4)1.47 (1.15, 1.88) ***55 (30.4)126 (69.6)1.17 (0.64, 2.11)
Secondary or above27 (20.6)104 (79.4)1.90 (1.10, 3.27) **19 (34.3)37 (65.7)1.26 (0.56, 2.88)
Working status of partners
Not- working (ref)6 (23.8)19 (76.2)1 (1,1)9 (32.8)5 (67.2)1 (1,1)
Working536 (11.1)4302 (88.9)1.38 (0.35, 5.46)113 (32.8)280 (67.2)1.23 (0.33, 4.61)
b Self-reported empowerment of women
Not involved at all in decision making (ref)34 (5.4)599 (94.6)1 (1,1)5 (14.8)28 (85.2)1 (1,1)
Involved in one63 (9.8)582 (90.2)1.25 (0.78, 1.99)2 (4.4)42 (95.6)0.34 (0.10, 1.20)
Involved in two123 (12.4)868 (87.6)1.77 (1.16, 2.71) ***22 (27.7)56 (72.3)0.58 (0.21, 1.61)
Involved in at least three287 (13.0)1917 (87.0)1.73 (1.16, 2.56) ***78 (40.8)113 (59.2)1.22 (0.48, 3.12)
Household wealth index
Low HH wealth status(ref)376 (9.6)3554 (90.4)1 (1,1)1 (3.9)30 (96.1)1 (1,1)
High HH wealth status166 (17.8)767 (82.2)1.77 (1.35, 2.32) ***121 (32.3)255 (67.7)3.65 (1.01, 13.13) **
Exposure to mass media
No exposure (ref)177 (7.2)2295 (92.8)1 (1,1)27 (24.1)84 (75.9)1 (1,1)
Exposed to either radio or TV210 (13.3)1363 (86.7)1.26 (0.97, 1.63)36 (24.5)112 (75.5)1.31 (0.65, 2.63)
Exposed to both radio and TV155 (19.0)663 (81.0)1.90 (1.38, 2.61) ***59 (40.3)89 (59.7)2.80 (1.32, 5.94) ***
Currently breastfeeding
No (ref)191 (12.7)1313 (87.3)1 (1,1)52 (31.2)117 (68.8)1 (1,1)
Yes351 (10.4)3008 (89.6)0.80 (0.64, 1.02)70 (29.4)168 (70.6)0.74 (0.43, 1.27)
b Perceived distance to a health facility to get medical help
Not-big problem (ref)135 (15.1)762 (84.9)1 (1,1)80 (31.4)177 (68.6)1 (1,1)
Big problem407 (10.3)3555 (89.7)0.71 (0.54, 0.95) **42 (28.0)108 (72.0)1.05 (0.59, 1.87)
Anemia status
Non-anemic(ref)450 (12.0)3300 (88.0)1 (1,1)104 (33.5)208 (66.5)1 (1,1)
Anemic92 (8.2)1021 (91.8)0.81 (0.62, 1.06)18 (18.9)77 (81.1)0.70 (0.38, 1.29)
Community level Factors
Contextual Region
Agrarian (ref)525 (11.4)4076 (88.6)1 (1,1)79 (26.8)215 (73.2)1 (1,1)
Pastoralist15 (6.1)228 (93.9)0.65 (0.44, 0.96) **8 (12.2)54 (87.8)0.72 (0.27, 1.88)
City dweller’s2 (11.7)17 (88.3)0.87 (0.48, 1.59)35 (71.0)16 (29.0)4.92 (2.02, 12.00) ***
sig. at ** sig. at 5% level(in bold); *** sig. at 1% level (in bold); b Total figure may not add to 100 percent due to ‘do not know’ and ‘missing cases’. ref = reference group; PDs = Positive Deviants; N = Number of participants., AOR = Adjusted Odds ratios. Note: PD defined as illiterate women with an adequate use of antenatal care services.
Table 3. Results of multiple multilevel logistic regression exploring factors associated with being a positive deviant for antenatal care utilization among urban and rural women, 2016 Ethiopia DHS.
Table 3. Results of multiple multilevel logistic regression exploring factors associated with being a positive deviant for antenatal care utilization among urban and rural women, 2016 Ethiopia DHS.
Survey Years2016 Model
Stratified by (N)Rural (4562)Urban (229)
Deviance StatusPDs N (%)Non-PDs N (%)AOR (95 % CI)PDs N (%) Non-PDs N (%)AOR (95 % CI)
Co-variates (n)1050 (23%)3512 (77.0%)AOR (95 % CI)117 (51.1%)112 (48.9%)AOR (95 % CI)
Overall time effect (ref: 2011) 3.01 (2.55, 3.55 ) *** 1.98 (1.29, 3.03) ***
Age when giving last birth (years)
15—24(ref)119 (17.3)567 (82.7)1 (1,1)13 (80.5)3 (19.5)1 (1,1)
25—34608 (25.6)1763 (74.4)1.35 (1.03, 1.77) **75 (51.3)72 (48.7)0.49 (0.21, 1.11)
35—49323 (21.5)1182 (78.5)1.11 (0.83, 1.49)29 (44.0)37 (56.0)0.41 (0.17, 0.99) **
b Working status of the women
Not-working(ref)770 (22.4)2664 (77.6)1 (1,1)60 (47.4)66 (52.6)1 (1,1)
Working 280 (24.8)848 (75.2)1.00 (0.80, 1.25)57 (55.8)45 (44.2)1.08 (0.63, 1.87)
Education level of their partners
No education(ref)559 (20.7)2145 (79.3)1 (1,1)43 (40.6)62 (59.4)1 (1,1)
Primary 377 (26.0)1073 (74.0)1.32 (1.07, 1.62) **46 (64.4)26 (35.6)1.28 (0.71, 2.30)
Secondary or above114 (27.9)294 (72.1)1.63 (1.06, 2.48) **28 (54.2)24 (45.8)1.18 (0.58, 2.42)
Working status of partners
Not-working(ref)48 (13.0)320 (87.0)1 (1,1)11 (61.9)7 (38.1)1 (1,1)
Working1002 (23.9)3192 (76.1)1.52 (1.07, 2.14) **106 (50.3)105 (49.7)1.07 (0.52, 2.18)
b Self-reported empowerment of women
Not involved at all in decision making(ref)91 (16.2)470 (83.8)1 (1,1)2 (20.0)8 (80.0)1 (1,1)
Involved in one81 (25.9)231 (74.1)1.67 (1.11, 2.52) **4 (69.5)2 (30.5)3.10 (0.72, 13.34)
Involved in two145 (25.7)419 (74.3)1.17 (0.81, 1.69)12 (37.5)21 (62.5)0.84 (0.23, 3.03)
Involved in at least three657 (22.9)2210 (77.1)1.43 (1.07, 1.92) **84 (54.5)70 (45.5)1.98 (0.67, 5.90)
Household wealth index
Low HH wealth status(ref)756 (21.3)2801 (78.7)1 (1,1)15 (27.6)38 (72.4)1 (1,1)
High HH wealth status294 (29.3)711 (70.0)1.20 (0.93, 1.56)102 (58.2)74 (41.8)1.46 (0.71, 3.00)
Exposure to mass media
No exposure (ref)754 (21.2)2807 (78.8)1 (1,1)45 (41.8)63 (58.2)1 (1,1)
Exposed to either radio or TV207 (29.8)487 (70.2)1.38 (1.07, 1.78)**39 (52.3)35 (47.7)1.88 (1.06, 3.35) **
Exposed to both radio and TV89 (28.9)218 (71.1)1.27 (0.85, 1.90)33 (71.0)14 (29.0)4.71 (2.10, 10.59)***
Currently breastfeeding
No (ref)327 (19.4)1353 (80.6)1 (1,1)41 (42.5)55 (57.5)1 (1,1)
Yes723 (19.4)2159 (80.6)1.24 (1.03, 1.50) **76 (57.4)57 (42.6)1.55 (0.93, 2.59)
b Perceived distance to a health facility to get medical help
Not-big problem(ref)468 (29.5)1120 (70.5)1 (1,1)96 (54.3)81 (45.7)1 (1,1)
Big problem582 (19.6)2392 (80.4)0.73 (0.60, 0.90) ***21 (40.3)31 (59.7)0.94 (0.53, 1.67)
Anemia status
Non-anemic(ref)714 (23.5)2322 (76.5)1 (1,1)93 (51.2)89 (48.8)1 (1,1)
Anemic336 (22.0)1190 (78.0)0.98 (0.81, 1.20)24 (51.1)23 (48.9)0.61 (0.35, 1.05)
Community level Factors
Contextual Region
Agrarian(ref)1006 (23.7)3237 (76.3)1 (1,1)85 (52.0)79 (48.0)1 (1,1)
Pastoralist36 (11.9)264 (88.1)0.49 (0.35, 0.69) ***13 (33.1)25 (66.9)0.44 (0.21, 0.92) **
City dweller’s8 (40.6)11 (59.4)1.27 (0.72, 2.24)19 (71.6)8 (28.4)0.82 (0.39, 1.71)
sig. at ** sig. at 5% level (in bold); *** sig. at 1% level (in bold); b Total figure may not add to 100 percent due to ‘do not know’ and ‘missing cases’. ref = reference group; PDs = Positive Deviants; N = Number of participants., AOR = Adjusted Odds ratios. Note: PD defined as illiterate women with an adequate use of antenatal care services.
Table 4. Results of multiple multilevel logistic regression exploring factors associated with being a positive deviant for having a health facility delivery among urban and rural women, 2011 Ethiopia DHS.
Table 4. Results of multiple multilevel logistic regression exploring factors associated with being a positive deviant for having a health facility delivery among urban and rural women, 2011 Ethiopia DHS.
Survey Years2011 Model
Stratified by (N)Rural (4863)Urban (407)
Deviant Status PDs N (%)Home Birth N (%)AOR (95 % CI)PDs N (%)Home Birth N (%)AOR (95 % CI)
Co-variates (n) 160 (3.3%)4703 (96.7%)AOR (95 % CI)115 (28.3%)292 (71.7%)AOR (95 % CI)
Age when giving last birth (years)
15—24(ref)41 (4.2)939 (95.8)1 (1,1)19 (25.9)55 (74.1)1 (1,1)
25—3482 (3.3)2378 (96.7)1.46 (0.84, 2.54)76 (34.9)141 (65.1)0.91 (0.38, 2.17)
35—49‘37 (2.6)1386 (97.4)1.45 (0.74, 2.86)20 (17.0)96 (83.0)0.67 (0.22, 2.03)
Order of the last birth
First(ref)37 (7.1)494 (92.9)1 (1,1)21 (29.6)49 (70.4)1 (1,1)
Second or third38 (2.7)1344 (97.3)0.30 (0.16, 0.56) ***49 (32.2)103 (67.8)0.60 (0.23, 1.58)
Fourth or higher85 (2.9)2865 (97.1)0.32 (0.16, 0.63) ***45 (24.3)140 (75.7)0.60 (0.20, 1.79)
b Working status of the women
Not-working(ref)77 (2.3)3258 (97.7)1 (1,1)60 (28.7)148 (71.3)1 (1,1)
Working 82 (5.4)1438 (94.6)1.77 (1.21, 2.59) ***55 (27.6)144 (72.4)0.73 (0.39, 1.35)
Education level of their partners
No education(ref)102 (3.2)3064 (96.8)1 (1,1)32 (20.3)136 (79.7)1 (1,1)
Primary52 (3.3)1513 (96.7)1.62 (1.12, 2.36) **58 (30.1)124 (69.9)1.49 (0.79, 2.82)
Secondary and above6 (4.2)126 (95.8)1.55 (0.67, 3.61)25 (60.0)32 (40.0)3.05 (1.26, 7.36) **
Working status of partners
Not-working(ref)3 (11.2)22 (88.8)1 (1,1)3 (2.5)13 (97.5)1 (1,1)
Working157 (3.2)4681 (96.8)0.34 (0.10, 1.20)112 (29.1)279 (70.9)1.06 (0.24, 4.75)
b Self-reported empowerment of women
Not involved at all in decision making(ref)13 (3.7)620 (98.0)1 (1,1)7 (20.4)27 (79.6)1 (1,1)
Involved in one16 (2.6)629 (97.4)0.53 (0.29, 0.96) **13 (29.1)31 (70.9)0.90 (0.25, 3.30)
Involved in two31 (3.1)959 (96.9)0.60 (0.34, 1.05)12 (15.7)66 (84.3)1.20 (0.39, 3.72)
Involved in at least three79 (3.6)2125 (96.4)0.67 (0.40, 1.11)60 (31.7)130 (68.3)1.41 (0.47, 4.17)
Household wealth index
Low HH wealth status(ref)108 (2.7)3822 (97.3)1 (1,1)2 (5.2)29 (94.8)1 (1,1)
High HH wealth status52 (5.6)881 (94.4)1.26 (0.81, 1.95)113 (30.1)263 (69.9)1.47 (0.46, 4.67)
Exposure to mass media
No exposure (ref)79 (3.2)2393 (96.8)1 (1,1)17 (15.4)93 (84.6)1 (1,1)
Exposed to either radio or TV52 (3.3)1521 (96.7)0.88 (0.59, 1.31)43 (28.7)106 (71.3)1.01 (0.48, 2.11)
Exposed to both radio and TV29 (3.5)789 (96.5)0.91 (0.53, 1.58)55 (37.2)93 (62.8)1.62 (0.73, 3.60)
Number of under 5 children
No child(ref)18 (9.7)161 (90.3)1 (1,1)7 (30.1)16 (69.9)1 (1,1)
One child84 (4.4)1847 (95.6)0.35 (0.17, 0.73) ***57 (28.1)145 (71.9)3.52 (0.79, 15.65)
Two or more58 (2.1)2695 (97.9)0.25 (0.12, 0.53) ***51 (28.0)131 (72.0)3.02 (0.64, 14.20)
Currently breastfeeding
No(ref)55 (3.6)1449 (96.4)1 (1,1)42 (24.5)127 (74.5)1 (1,1)
Yes105 (3.1)3254 (96.9)1.23 (0.83, 1.82)73 (30.8)165 (69.2)1.35 (0.74, 2.46)
b Perceived distance to a health facility to get medical help
Not-big problem(ref)51 (5.7)845 (94.3)1 (1,1)73 (28.4)184 (71.6)1 (1,1)
Big problem109 (2.7)3854 (97.3)0.64 (0.42, 0.97) **42 (27.7)108 (72.3)0.65 (0.35, 1.19)
Anemia status
Non-anemic(ref)124 (3.3)3627 (96.7)1 (1,1)97 (30.9)215 (69.1)1 (1,1)
Anemic36 (3.2)1076 (96.8)0.89 (0.60, 1.31)18 (19.3)77 (80.7)0.41 (0.21, 0.79) ***
ANC Utilization
No ANC visits(ref)66 (2.0)3258 (98.0)1 (1,1)21 (12.5)146 (87.5)1 (1,1)
At least one ANC visit94 (6.1)1445 (93.9)2.77 (1.90, 4.04) ***94 (39.1)146 (60.9)2.89 (1.54, 5.43) ***
Community level Factors
Contextual Regions
Agrarian(ref)146 (3.2)4456 (96.8)1 (1,1)71 (24.1)223 (75.9)1 (1,1)
Pastoralist13 (5.3)230 (94.7)2.53 (1.48, 4.32) ***10 (16.1)52 (83.9)1.08 (0.39, 2.98)
City dweller’s 1 (6.3)17 (93.7)2.78 (1.22, 6.32) **34 (66.2)17 (33.8)10.12 (3.85, 26.61) ***
sig. at ** sig. at 5% level (in bold); ***sig. at 1% level (in bold); b Total figure may not add to 100 percent due to ‘do not know’ and ‘missing cases’. ref = reference group; PDs = positive deviants; N = number of participants., AOR = adjusted odds ratios. Note: PD defined as illiterate women with use of institutional delivery services.
Table 5. Results of multiple multilevel logistic regression exploring factors associated with being a positive deviant for having a health facility delivery among urban and rural women, 2016 Ethiopia DHS.
Table 5. Results of multiple multilevel logistic regression exploring factors associated with being a positive deviant for having a health facility delivery among urban and rural women, 2016 Ethiopia DHS.
Survey Years2016 Model
Stratified by (N)Rural (4562)Urban (229)
Deviant StatusPDs N (%)Home Birth N (%)AOR (95 % CIPDs N (%)Home Birth N (%)AOR (95 % CI)
Co-variates (n) 806 (17.7%)3756 (82.3%)AOR (95 % CI)153 (66.8%)76 (31.2%)AOR (95 % CI)
Overall time effect (ref: 2011) 4.92 (3.92, 6.18) *** 3.23 (2.03, 5.15) ***
Age when giving last birth (years)
15—24(ref)135 (19.7)551 (80.3)1 (1,1)10 (68.1)6 (31.9)1 (1,1)
25—34402 (17.0)1968 (83.0)1.08 (0.73, 1.58)108 (73.4)39 (26.6)1.16 (0.44, 3.01)
35—49269 (17.8)1237 (82.2)1.37 (0.88, 2.14)35 (53.2)31 (46.8)1.05 (0.35, 3.14)
Order of the last birth
First(ref)106 (28.2)270 (71.8)1 (1,1)24 (84.3)5 (15.7)1 (1,1)
Second or third216 (18.5)950 (81.5)0.47 (0.30, 0.75) ***51 (70.3)22 (29.7)0.71 (0.25, 2.05)
Fourth or higher484 (16.0)2536 (84.0)0.45 (0.27, 0.74) ***78 (61.4)49 (38.6)0.55 (0.18, 1.70)
b Working status of the women
Not-working(ref)575 (16.7)2859 (83.3)1 (1,1)81 (64.5)45 (35.5)1 (1,1)
Working 231 (20.4)897 (79.6)1.14 (0.89, 1.47)72 (70.5)30 (29.5)0.94 (0.50, 1.76)
Education level of their partners
No education(ref)425 (15.7)2278 (84.3)1 (1,1)64 (61.9)41 (38.1)1 (1,1)
Primary289 (19.9)1162 (80.1)1.34 (1.05, 1.70) **50 (69.6)22 (30.4)0.96 (0.49, 1.87)
Secondary and above92 (22.4)316 (77.6)1.98 (1.25, 3.14) ***39 (74.6)13 (25.4)1.73 (0.79, 3.79)
Working status of partners
Not-working(ref)49 (13.3)319 (86.7)1 (1,1)11 (70.1)6 (29.9)1 (1,1)
Working757 (18.0)3437 (82.0)1.30 (0.87, 1.93)142 (67.0)70 (33.0)0.84 (0.38, 1.86)
b Self-reported empowerment of women
Not involved at all in decision making(ref)83 (14.8)478 (85.2)1 (1,1)5 (45.2)6 (54.8)1 (1,1)
Involved in one65 (20.9)246 (79.1)1.68 (1.04, 2.69) **4 (67.2)2 (32.8)1.10 (0.23, 5.19)
Involved in two107 (18.9)457 (81.1)1.19 (0.78, 1.82)14 (43.6)19 (56.4)1.38 (0.38, 5.02)
Involved in at least three503 (17.5)2364 (82.5)1.14 (0.81, 1.61)116 (74.6)39 (25.4)1.57 (0.53, 4.66)
Household wealth index
Low HH wealth status(ref)568 (16.0)2989 (84.0)1 (1,1)18 (35.2)35 (64.8)1 (1,1)
High HH wealth status238 (23.6)767 (76.4)1.19 (0.89, 1.60)135 (76.8)41 (23.2)2.29 (1.12, 4.70) **
Exposure to mass media
No exposure (ref)557 (15.6)3005 (84.4)1 (1,1)61 (56.4)47 (43.6)1 (1,1)
Exposed to either radio or TV165 (23.9)528 (76.1)1.37 (1.02, 1.84) **55 (75.4)18 (24.6)2.02 (1.05, 3.90) **
Exposed to both radio and TV84 (27.5)223 (72.5)1.27 (0.81, 2.00)37 (79.3)11 (20.7)1.47 (0.61, 3.54)
Number of under 5 children
No child(ref)27 (19.2)113 (80.8)1 (1,1)8 (63.4)5 (36.6)1 (1,1)
One child 349 (17.3)1663 (82.7)0.95 (0.50, 1.81)87 (69.4)39 (30.6)1.92 (0.48, 7.66)
Two or more430 (17.8)1980 (82.2)1.10 (0.57, 2.14)58 (64.5)32 (35.5)2.76 (0.66, 11.56)
Currently breastfeeding
No(ref)253 (15.0)1427 (85.0)1 (1,1)54 (57.1)42 (42.9)1 (1,1)
Yes553 (19.2)2329 (80.8)1.45 (1.15, 1.84) ***99 (74.5)34 (25.5)2.02 (1.15, 3.53) **
b Perceived distance to a health facility to get medical help
Not- big problem(ref)367 (23.1)1221 (76.9)1 (1,1)126 (71.0)52 (29.0)1 (1,1)
Big problem439 (14.8)2535 (85.2)0.72 (0.57, 0.91) ***28 (54.1)24 (45.9)0.58 (0.32, 1.08)
Anemia status
Non-anemic(ref)593 (19.5)2444 (80.5)1 (1,1)126 (69.4)57 (30.6)1 (1,1)
Anemic213 (14.0)1312 (86.0)1.04 (0.83, 1.30)27 (58.6)19 (41.4)1.47 (0.80, 2.72)
ANC Utilization
No ANC visits(ref) 118 (5.4)2061 (94.6)1 (1,1)17 (42.2)26 (57.8)1 (1,1)
At least one ANC visit 688 (28.9)1695 (71.1)7.14 (5.42, 9.41) ***136 (73.0)50 (27.0)4.49 (2.16, 9.33) ***
Community level Factors
Contextual Regions
Agrarian(ref)761 (17.9)3482 (82.1)1 (1,1)116 (71.0)48 (29.0)1 (1,1)
Pastoralist39 (13.0)261 (87.0)0.54 (0.38, 0.78) ***15 (39.4)23 (60.6)0.20 (0.09, 0.46) ***
City dweller’s 6 (29.2)13 (70.8)1.96 (1.09, 3.52) **22 (82.5)5 (17.5)0.96 (0.40, 2.31)
sig. at **sig. at 5% level (in bold); ***sig. at 1% level (bold); b Total figure may not add to 100 percent due to ‘do not know’ and ‘missing cases’. ref = reference group; PDs = Positive Deviants; N = Number of participants., AOR = Adjusted Odds ratios. Note: PD defined as illiterate women with use of institutional delivery services.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ousman, S.K.; Magnus, J.H.; Sundby, J.; Gebremariam, M.K. Uptake of Skilled Maternal Healthcare in Ethiopia: A Positive Deviance Approach. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 1712. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph17051712

AMA Style

Ousman SK, Magnus JH, Sundby J, Gebremariam MK. Uptake of Skilled Maternal Healthcare in Ethiopia: A Positive Deviance Approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(5):1712. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph17051712

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ousman, Seman K., Jeanette H. Magnus, Johanne Sundby, and Mekdes K. Gebremariam. 2020. "Uptake of Skilled Maternal Healthcare in Ethiopia: A Positive Deviance Approach" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 5: 1712. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph17051712

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop