Next Article in Journal
Kaizen–Kata, a Problem-Solving Approach to Public Service Health Care in Mexico. A Multiple-Case Study
Previous Article in Journal
Flexibility in Spanish Elite Inline Hockey Players: Profile, Sex, Tightness and Asymmetry
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Application of Process Intensification in the Treatment of Pit Latrine Sludge from Informal Settlements in Blantyre City, Malawi

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(9), 3296; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph17093296
by Khumbo Kalulu 1,*, Bernard Thole 2, Theresa Mkandawire 3 and Grant Kululanga 3
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(9), 3296; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph17093296
Submission received: 8 March 2020 / Revised: 15 April 2020 / Accepted: 20 April 2020 / Published: 9 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Environmental Science and Engineering)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments are included in the commented pdf file attached 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

This paper investigated the extent which process intensification could lead to a reduction in land area required to dewater and sanitise pit latrine sludge from informal settlements of Blantyre City in Malawi. In assessing the land area reduction, the study also investigated the treatment time reduction and solids loading rates attainable through the intensification of the pit latrine sludge treatment process. It needs minor revision before it is published in this journal. The following issues should be carefully addressed.

  1. There are some grammatical errors and the sentences are monotonous in the manuscript, the authors need to go through the entire manuscript sentence by sentence;
  2. Abstract should be improved since it can not adequately attract the readers in this area;
  3. Authors should clearly mention the novelty of the study in Introduction;
  4. The figure number needs to be revised.
  5. Please add error bars and indicate how many repetitions in figures.
  6. Adding some discussion on the process intensification used in other fields.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The presentation has improved greatly.

However, I have one more comment: as the Authors have carried out the experiments in open environment, they should specify which were the  environmental conditions during the experiments, such as, at least, temperature and rain, if any.

The Authors may add a comment about the effets of intense and prolonged rain. Should they think that some kind of light roof or cover (open on the 4 sides, like a gazebo or canopy) on the drying beds should be advisable?

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop