Next Article in Journal
Association between Adherence with Recommended Antenatal Care in Low-Risk, Uncomplicated Pregnancy, and Maternal and Neonatal Adverse Outcomes: Evidence from Italy
Previous Article in Journal
Association of Internet Addiction with Adolescents’ Lifestyle: A National School-Based Survey
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 18
Issue 1
10.3390/ijerph18010171
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Calcium Superphosphate-Mediated Reshaping of Denitrifying Bacteria Community Contributed to N2O Mitigation in Pig Manure Windrow Composting

by
Yaguo Jin
1,
Yingcheng Miao
1,
Yajun Geng
1,
Mengyuan Huang
1,
Yihe Zhang
1,
Xiuchao Song
2,
Shuqing Li
1,3,* and
Jianwen Zou
1,3
1
Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Low Carbon Agriculture and GHGs Mitigation, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
2
Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China
3
Jiangsu Key Lab and Engineering Center for Solid Organic Waste Utilization, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Solid Organic Waste Resource Utilization, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(1), 171; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph18010171
Submission received: 1 December 2020 / Revised: 23 December 2020 / Accepted: 23 December 2020 / Published: 29 December 2020
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Composting is recognized as an effective strategy for the sustainable use of organic wastes, but also as an important emission source of nitrous oxide (N2O) contributing to global warming. The effects of calcium superphosphate (CaSSP) on N2O production during composting are reported to be controversial, and the intrinsic microbial mechanism remains unclear. Here, a pig manure windrow composting experiment lasting for ~60 days was performed to evaluate the effects of CaSSP amendment (5%, w/w) on N2O fluxes in situ, and to determine the denitrifiers’ response, and their driving factors. Results indicated that CaSSP amendment significantly reduced N2O emissions as compared to the control pile (maximum N2O emission rate reduced by 64.5% and total emission decreased by 49.8%). CaSSP amendment reduced the abundance of nirK gene encoding for nitrite reductase, while the abundance of nosZ gene (N2O reductase) was enriched. Finally, we built a schematic model and indicated that the abundance of nirK gene was likely to play a key role in mediating N2O production, which were correlated with NH4+-N and NO3−-N changing responsive to CaSSP. Our finding implicates that CaSSP application could be a potential strategy for N2O mitigation in manure windrow composting, and the revealed microbial mechanism is helpful for deepening the understanding of the interaction among N-cycle functional genes, physicochemical factors, and greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions.

1. Introduction

Composting is considered to be one of the effective ways for organic wastes disposal, which is presented as an environmentally friendly and cost-efficient process to manage and recycle organic solid wastes [1]. Nevertheless, gaseous nitrogen (N) losses constitute a significant challenge of manure composting, which are detrimental to the environment and can cause secondary pollution [2,3,4,5,6]). Nitrous oxide (N2O) is a potent greenhouse gas (GHG) that exhibits global warming potential of 298 times that of carbon dioxide (CO2) on a 100-year time horizon [7]. The N2O emissions from manure composting may constitute 0.2–9.9% of initial total nitrogen (TN) loss of raw materials [8,9].
Several strategies have been developed to mitigate gaseous emissions during composting, including aeration control [3,10,11,12], bulking agents [13], and amendment addition [14,15,16,17], as well as microbial inoculation [18]. Calcium superphosphate (CaSSP), a commonly used and low-cost phosphorus-containing additive fertilizer, has been proposed as a potential strategy to mitigate N loss from manure composting systems [19,20]. Luo et al. [15] and Yuan et al. [21] reported that the addition of CaSSP decreased N2O emissions by 22.2–55.4% during composting. By contrast, Yang et al. [22] showed that the CaSSP amendment increased N2O emissions during kitchen waste composting. These contradictory effects of CaSSP addition on N2O emissions may relate to the variation of physicochemical properties, and particular the involved microbial processes during composting.
It is well documented that the formation of N2O during composting were contributed to different microbial nitrogen-transforming pathways, including nitrification and denitrification processes under various oxygen conditions [23,24]. Nitrification is a two-step oxidation of ammonium (NH4+) to nitrate (NO3−) via nitrite (NO2−) by chemolithoautotrophic ammonia oxidizers and nitrite oxidizers, where ammonia monooxygenase encoding by amoA is known to an important enzyme in this process; while microbial denitrification represents the stepwise reduction of nitrate or nitrite to N2 covered by four denitrified genes (narG, nirK/S, norB and nosZ) [25,26,27]. It has been highlighted that nitrifying and denitrifying gene abundance could predict N2O emissions as potential proxies [28]. Importantly, these two nitrogen-transforming processes were regulated by various abiotic factors [29]. Changes in crucial environmental factors during composting can shape the N2O-related functional microbes [24], which will then directly affect N2O emissions. Several studies have documented that CaSSP addition during composting can affect the abiotic characteristics of composts, such as decreasing pH and shifting the NH4+-N and NO3−-N content, which was considered to be the primary factors driving the increase/decrease in N2O emissions [30,31]. However, the correlation between these changes in physicochemical factors and microbial community is ignored, and it is not yet clear how CaSSP addition can affect the behavior of microbial functional groups during composting. Therefore, more attention is needed to survey the response of functional microbial populations to CaSSP addition during composting, as well as the intermediary physicochemical factors, so as to understand the underlying mechanism that CaSSP addition affects N2O emissions.
In this study, commercial windrow composting was carried out to measure N2O fluxes in situ. The abundance of functional genes involved in N2O emissions were quantified by real-time quantitative PCR. The main objectives of this study were to (1) examine the dynamics of N2O emissions with CaSSP addition during composting; (2) identify the CaSSP-mediated key microbial pathways that affect N2O emissions during composting; (3) illustrate the CaSSP-responsive physicochemical factors that shape the functional microbial groups. We successfully identified that CaSSP addition mediated NH4+-N/NO3−-N transformation in pig manure composting, consequently suppressed the abundance of nirK genes, and significantly decreased N2O emissions, which firstly explains the microbiology mechanism involved in CaSSP-mediated N2O mitigation in composting.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Windrow Composting Experiment

The windrow composting system for ~60 days was conducted in a fertilizer company, located at Nanjing, Jiangsu province, China. Two treatments were carried out using pig manure mixed completely with vegetable (Broccoli) and wheat straw at a dry mass ratio of 6:1 as raw materials. In addition to the control treatment (CK), calcium superphosphate (CaSSP) was amended with a weight of 5% (w/w, dry weight (DW); according to Luo et al. [15] and Yuan et al. [21] of the raw composting materials in calcium superphosphate treatment (CaSSP treatment). Both treatments contained three windrow composts for replications. The volume of each composting pile was ~20 m3 (12 m in length, 1.5 m in width and 1 m in height). The composting process included two phases: phase I was the bio-oxidative phase with regularly turning by a composter turner every two days for ~30 days; phase II was the post-maturation phase without turning. Each pile was located for gas sampling respectively. Composting material samples were collected near the positions of gas sampling and included three replicates.

2.2. Gas Sampling and Flux Measurement

N2O fluxes were measured using closed static chamber system (diameter 0.45 m, height 5 m) [13,32]. For this, PVC chamber bases (30 cm length × 30 cm width × 25 cm height) were inserted 25 cm into the pile at 10–12 h before gas sampling. Gas samples were collected once a week. The opaque chamber was placed on the peak of each windrow with rim of the chamber fitted into the groove of collar. As sampling, the groove in the top edge of the collar was filled with water to seal the rim of the chamber (Figure S1). At 0, 5, 10, 20, and 30 min after the chamber closure, 60 mL of gas samples were extracted with an airtight syringe and immediately injected into 100 mL pre-evacuated gas sampling bags. Gas samples were taken mainly between 8:00 and 10:00 am on each sampling day and then transported to the laboratory for analysis by gas chromatograph (GC) within a few hours. Concentrations of N2O were measured by a Gas Chromatograph (Agilent 7890A, Agilent Technologies, Inc. Wilmington, USA) with a flame ionization detector (FID) and an electron capture detector (ECD) [32,33]. N2O fluxes were calculated by a linear regression as described by Hutchinson and Mosier [34]. Total N2O emissions were sequentially accumulated from the fluxes between every two adjacent measurements [32].

2.3. Physicochemical Properties Determination

During the aerobic composting process, windrow temperature at a depth of 30 cm was monitored by a mercury thermometer and recorded at each sampling day. Material samples were divided into three parts after passing through 2-mm sieve: one part was air-dried for total carbon (TC) and total nitrogen (TN) analyses. The other two parts were immediately stored at 4 °C and −80 °C for further analysis, respectively. Moisture content of fresh samples was determined as a weight loss upon drying at 105 °C in an oven for 24 h. Inorganic nitrogen, including ammonium (NH4+) and nitrate (NO3−), were extracted from material samples using 2 mol L−1 potassium chloride (KCl) solution and then analyzed using the segmented flow analyzer (Auto Analyzer 3, Seal, Germany). For pH measurement, the samples were diluted with deionized water at a volume ratio of 1:10 and analyzed by a pH electrode (PHS-3C mv/pH detector, Shanghai, China). The TC content, TN content and C/N ratio were determined using an element analyzer (Elementar Vario Macro cube, Hanau, Germany).

2.4. Real-Time Quantitative PCR (q-PCR) Assays of the Functional Genes

According to the manufacturer’s instructions, DNA samples were extracted from composting materials (days 1, 10, 24, 31, 45, and 60) in triplicate using the UltraClean soil DNA isolation kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), and then stored at −20 °C for q-PCR assays. The Nanodrop (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to determine the quantity and quality of DNA samples. Functional genes associated with nitrification and denitrification were quantified from the composting process to elucidate the role of nitrifying and denitrifying bacteria on N2O dynamics. Ammonium monooxygenase gene (amoA) was selected as nitrify marker gene, which include the ammonia oxidizing bacteria (AOB) and archaea (AOA), while the nitric oxide reductase gene (nirK/S) and nitrous oxide reductase gene (nosZ) were targeted as denitrify marker genes. The standard curves were made using stepwise 10-fold diluted pMD-18 vectors with correct functional gene fragments. Each DNA sample was diluted with sterile water to 10 ng DNA µL−1 before q-PCR assays. Amplification was performed using StepOne Plus Real-time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). PCR mixtures contained 10 µL SYBR@ Premix Ex Taq TM (Takara, Dalian, China), 0.4 µL forward and reverse primers, 0.4 µL ROX reference dye II (50×), 2 µL template DNA, and 6.8 µL sterile water with a final volume of 20 µL. Primers sequence and PCR reaction conditions were listed in Table 1.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

All data were reported as means and standard errors. After checking the normal distribution of results and the homogeneity of variances using Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) and Shapiro-Wilk (S-W) test by SPSS 22.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), a Tukey post hoc test was used to determine the significant difference between Control and CaSSP treatments. Pearson correlation analyses between N2O fluxes, functional genes abundance and physicochemical properties were carried out by using SPSS 22.0. Structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis conducted using AMOS 22.0 (Amos, Development Corporation, Meadville, PA, USA) was established to address the direct and indirect effects of calcium superphosphate on the soil properties, functional genes abundance, and N2O emissions.

3. Results

3.1. N2O Fluxes

Over the 60-day period of manure composting, N2O emission patterns and temporal trends for the different treatments were similar (Figure 1a). At the beginning, N2O fluxes maintained a constantly low level, then increased sharply on day 52 and lasted until the end of the composting. However, the peak N2O emission rate from CaSSP treatment (58.32 mg m−2 h−1) was significantly lower than that from Control (164.46 mg m−2 h−1), resulting in a 64.5% reduction of the maximum N2O emission rate brought by CaSSP application. Consequently, CaSSP amendment significantly reduced total N2O emission over the total composting period by 49.8% (1.18 g m−2 vs. 2.35 g m−2; Supplementary Figure S2).

3.2. Physical and Chemical Characteristics Measurement

Composting temperature in Control and CaSSP treatments generally showed similar variation patterns with a scope of 42 °C to 71 °C (Figure 1b), which went through three typical degradation phases (mesophilic, thermophilic and curing phases). For both treatments, the temperature increased and entered the thermophilic phase on day 10 and peaked on day 31 (68–71 °C). In addition, similar trends of moisture of the two treatments over the whole manure composting were observed. They decreased constantly to day 38 and then remained a stable level, with a range from 12–14% (Figure 1b).
The pH values of the two treatments remained at 6.8 to 7.6 during the whole composting process (Figure 2a). An increase in pH was noted in the control treatment within the first 10 days, and the peak was achieved at 7.5 on day 17. On the contrary, adding CaSSP decreased the pH due to its acidic feature.
The dynamic changes of TN with time were shown in Figure 2b. Along with the reduction of carbonaceous materials (Figure 2c), the TN content of the both treatments increased continuously. During composting, the rate of organic nitrogen mineralization was lower than that of organic carbon, causing the C/N ratio of the two treatments to decrease (Figure 2d).
As shown in Figure 3a,b, soil NO3−-N and NH4+-N contents ranged from 0.21 to 0.77 mg N kg−1 and 1.96 to 3.21 mg N kg−1, respectively, which showed a trade-off between each other during the composting, as NH4+-N contents generally revealed a decreased pattern along the time while that for NO3−-N contents was opposite. As expected, NH4+-N contents of CaSSP treatment were slightly higher than the Control, which could be attributed to that the lower pH caused by CaSSP addition hindered the conversion of NH4+-N to NH3. The NO3−-N concentration was distinctly lower than the NH4+-N concentration during the composting of CK and CaSSP. The NO3−-N concentration in CK and CaSSP piles decreased from 0.33 and 0.29 g kg−1 DW to 0.26 and 0.22 g kg−1 DW after the first 10 days composting, respectively (Figure 3b). The high temperature inhibited nitrifying bacteria activity and maintained the low NO3−-N concentration in the both treatments from day 10–30. Afterwards, the NO3−-N concentration in CK and CaSSP treatments slowly elevated until the end of the experiment.

3.3. Quantification of the Functional Genes Involved in N2O Emission

The nitrifying genes (AOA amoA and AOB amoA) and denitrifying genes (narG, nirK, nirS and nosZ) were quantified in the composting process (Figure 4). The copy numbers of AOB amoA in CK and CaSSP piles increased during the first 10 days composting, and then gradually decreased. After 31 days, a slightly increase was observed and the highest value occurred on day 60 of composting (Figure 4a); similar changing trend was observed in AOA amoA in both treatments (Figure 4b). The AOB amoA abundance in CaSSP treatment was higher than that in the Control pile, especially between 10 and 50 days; while the AOA amoA population was found to be similar in both treatments (Figure 4a,b). The abundance of nirS and nirK generally remained a consistently level at the beginning of the composting, and then showed a continuous increase and reached the peak finally (Figure 4c,d). Importantly, after 30 days, both the population of nirS and nirK in Control was observed to be significantly higher than that in CaSSP treatment (p < 0.05) (Figure 4c,d). On the contrary, the abundance of nosZ increased dramatically on day 10 and then showed a continuous decrease until the end of experiment; the Control pile revealed a lower nosZ population than CaSSP treatment before 30 days (Figure 4e).

3.4. Linking N2O Emissions to the Abundance of N-Cycling Functional Microbial Genes in CaSSP-Amended Compost

The N2O emissions were correlated with the abundance of N-cycling microbial functional genes and soil properties (Table 2). The N2O cumulative emissions measured in the CaSSP treatment displayed significant positive correlations with the abundance of nirK (r = 0.79, p < 0.05). However, correlation analyses showed that the N2O cumulative emissions shared negative correlations with pile moisture, Total C, C/N ratio, and NH4+-N.
To better understand the effect of CaSSP on N2O emissions linked to the nitrifier and denitrifier functional gene abundance, path analysis was used to examine the interactions among the variables (Figure 5). From this, the addition of CaSSP had direct and significant influence on NH4+-N, whereas indirectly influenced nirK abundance via changing NO3−-N. Therefore, the abundance of the nirK gene showed a significant and direct effect on N2O emissions (λ = 0.97, p < 0.05).

4. Discussion

The present study was performed to better understand the process by addressing the effects of CaSSP amendment on N2O mitigation during composting, as well as improve the mechanistic understanding of the role of microbial denitrification contributing to this mitigation.
N2O emissions in Control and CaSSP treatments observed in maturity stage during composting (Figure 1a), which may be attributed to accumulated NO3−-N during the thermophilic phase. It has been reported that high temperature (above 40 °C) and high concentrations of free ammonia may inhibit nitrifiers [12,40]. Here, it was observed that the CaSSP application significantly decreased the total N2O emissions by 49.8% compared to the Control pile (Figure 1a), as compared with the 22.2–55.4% N2O mitigation rates in response to CaSSP or biochar addition reported previously [15,17,21,24], the amendment of CaSSP can be recognized as an effective strategy for reducing GHG from composting.
It is known that N2O emissions during composting are a microbe-mediated process, which is a balance between production (NO3− to N2O as catalyzed by nitrite reductase encoding by nirS/nirK) and consumption (N2O to N2 as driven by nitrite reductase encoding by nosZ) [28]. In this study, CaSSP addition repressed the nirK and nirS abundance while increased nosZ copy numbers, as compared with the Control composting pile, which can explain the N2O mitigation based on the microbial functional genes relevant to N-cycle. It has been addressed that biochar, another popular amendment for reducing N2O production, also decreased nirK population in manure composting [17,24], or nirS density under field condition [41,42], and suppressed nosZ abundance [17].
The following question is which compost physicochemical properties can mediate the denitrifier community after CaSSP application. Correlation analyses showed that the abundance of nirK shared negative relationship with NH4+-N, moisture, TOC and C/N ratio, and positive correlations with TN as well as NO3−N. In contrast, the copy number of nosZ revealed positive and negative relationship with NH4+-N and NO3−-N, respectively (Table 2). Comparison of these characteristics between Control and CaSSP-added piles suggests that NH4+-N and NO3−-N (as well as TN) are the major factors that shaped the population of nirK and nosZ. In addition, the NH4+-N concentrations of CaSSP treatment were higher than that of CK in the composting process, indicating that CaSSP had a considerable effect on NH4+-N adsorption and retention. The contents of NO3−-N maintained a low level from initial stage to the 31th day after composting, but increased at the end of the experiment. This result coincided with Zeng et al. [43] who reported that nitrifying bacteria multiplied with the decrease of temperature and biodegradation rate would promote the transformation of NH4+-N to NO3−-N. Additionally, a growing number of studies have illustrated that changes in physicochemical parameters, such as TN, NH4+-N and NO3−-N, drove different time course patterns of N2O-related functional genes [44,45,46,47], which are consistent with our observation.
Additionally, previous studies had indicated that CaSSP could affect the composting conditions such as reducing pH, which led to an adverse effect on microbial growth [48,49,50]. Results in this study illustrated that the decreased pH brought by CaSSP application did not show significant negative effects on N-cycle functional gene abundance (Table 2). Interestingly, moisture content was found to be negatively correlated with AOA amoA, nirS, and nirK abundance.
Based on physicochemical and biological variables measurements during the composting and their correlation analyses, a schematic model was developed for explaining the dynamics of N2O fluxes associated with bacterial functional genes and physicochemical parameters during manure composting (Figure 5). In the schematic model, NH4+-N and NO3−-N are correlated with each other and interacting to shape the dynamics of bacterial functional gene abundance. Given this, there is a strong correlation between nirK genes and N2O fluxes. The present data advised particularly that the abundance of nirK genes was likely to play a key role in controlling N2O production.
In conclusion, results of this study suggested that calcium superphosphate (CaSSP) addition mediated NH4+-N/NO3−-N transformation in pig manure composting, consequently suppressed the abundance of nirK genes and significantly decreased N2O emissions. Therefore, the use of CaSSP is an effective and economical way to reduce environmental risks and improve compost quality. Additionally, using high-throughput sequencing and a culturomics strategy to determine the functional microbial groups involved in the CaSSP-mediated N2O mitigation process, as well as investigating their response to the changing pie physicochemical factors and detailed contribution to N2O emissions, will be of great importance for us to deeply understand the GHG mitigation mechanisms mediated by CaSSP, and should be performed in the future.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/1660-4601/18/1/171/s1. Figure S1: The pictures of the experimental static chamber system for gas sampling; Figure S2: Accumulative N2O emission over the total composting period in Control and calcium superphosphate-added (CaSSP) piles.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.L. and J.Z.; methodology, S.L. and J.Z.; software, Y.J.; validation, Y.J., Y.M., Y.G., and M.H.; formal analysis, Y.Z.; investigation, Y.J. and Y.M.; re-sources, J.Z.; data curation, S.L.; writing—original draft preparation, S.L.; writing—review and editing, J.Z.; visualization, X.S.; supervision, S.L. and J.Z.; project administration, S.L. and J.Z.; funding acquisi-tion, S.L. and J.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key Research and Development Projects of China (2017YFD0800201).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to conditional confidentiality of the requirements by the National environmental funding project.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Projects of China (2017YFD0800201).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Garcia-Gomez, A.; Bernal, M.P.; Roig, A. Organic Matter Fractions Involved in Degradation and Humification Processes during Composting. Compos. Sci. Util. 2005, 13, 127–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chen, Y.-X.; Huang, X.-D.; Han, Z.; Huang, X.; Hu, B.; Shi, D.-Z.; Wu, W. Effects of bamboo charcoal and bamboo vinegar on nitrogen conservation and heavy metals immobility during pig manure composting. Chemosphere 2010, 78, 1177–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Chowdhury, M.A.; de Neergaard, A.; Jensen, L.S. Potential of aeration flow rate and biochar addition to reduce greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions during manure composting. Chemosphere 2014, 97, 16–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kebreab, E.; Clark, K.; Wagner-Riddle, C.; France, J. Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from Canadian animal agriculture: A review. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 2006, 86, 135–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Philippe, F.; Laitat, M.; Nicks, B.; Cabaraux, J. Ammonia and greenhouse gas emissions during the fattening of pigs kept on two types of straw floor. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2012, 150, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zang, B.; Li, S.; Michel, F.C.; Li, G.; Zhang, D.; Li, Y. Control of dimethyl sulfide and dimethyl disulfide odors during pig manure composting using nitrogen amendment. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 224, 419–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  8. Beck-Friis, B.; Smår, S.; Jönsson, H.; Kirchmann, H. Gaseous emissions of carbon dioxide, ammonia and nitrous oxide from organic household waste in a compost reactor under different temperature regimes. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 2011, 78, 423–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Szanto, G.L.; Hamelers, H.V.M.; Rulkens, W.H.; Veeken, A.H.M. NH3, N2O and CH4 emissions during passively aerated composting of straw-rich pig manure. Bioresour. Technol. 2007, 98, 2659–2670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ahn, H.; Mulbry, W.; White, J.; Kondrad, S. Pile mixing increases greenhouse gas emissions during composting of dairy manure. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102, 2904–2909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shen, Y.; Ren, L.; Li, G.; Chen, T.; Guo, R. Influence of aeration on CH4, N2O and NH3 emissions during aerobic composting of a chicken manure and high C/N waste mixture. Waste Manag. 2011, 31, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yuan, J.; Chadwick, D.; Zhang, D.; Li, G.; Chen, S.; Luo, W.; Du, L.; He, S.; Peng, S. Effects of aeration rate on maturity and gaseous emissions during sewage sludge composting. Waste Manag. 2016, 56, 403–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Doublet, J.; Francou, C.; Poitrenaud, M.; Houot, S. Influence of bulking agents on organic matter evolution during sewage sludge composting; consequences on compost organic matter stability and n availability. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102, 1298–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Awasthi, M.K.; Wang, M.; Chen, H.; Wang, Q.; Zhao, J.; Ren, X.; Li, D.-S.; Awasthi, S.K.; Shen, F.; Li, R.; et al. Heterogeneity of biochar amendment to improve the carbon and nitrogen sequestration through reduce the greenhouse gases emissions during sewage sludge composting. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 224, 428–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Luo, Y.M.; Xu, D.G.; Li, G.X. Effect of Superphosphate as Additive on Nitrogen and Carbon Losses during Pig Manure Composting. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2013, 295, 1675–1679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rochette, P.; Van Bochove, E.; Prévost, D.; Angers, D.A.; Côté, D.; Bertrand, N. Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics Following Application of Pig Slurry for the 19th Consecutive Year II. Nitrous Oxide Fluxes and Mineral Nitrogen. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2000, 64, 1396–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, C.; Lu, H.; Dong, D.; Deng, H.; Strong, P.J.; Wang, H.; Wu, W. Insight into the Effects of Biochar on Manure Composting: Evidence Supporting the Relationship between N2O Emission and Denitrifying Community. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 7341–7349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wakase, S.; Sasaki, H.; Itoh, K.; Otawa, K.; Kitazume, O.; Nonaka, J.; Satoh, M.; Sasaki, T.; Nakai, Y. Investigation of the microbial community in a microbiological additive used in a manure composting process. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 2687–2693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Predotova, M.; Schlecht, E.; Gebauer, J. Nitrogen and carbon losses from dung storage in urban gardens of Niamey, Niger. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 2010, 87, 103–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Wu, Y.B.; Wang, Z.S.; Liao, X.D.; Liu, S.; Liang, A.M.; Wu, Q.T.; Huang, H.Z.; Zhou, L.X. Study on the odor production and control of swine manure composting. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2001, 17, 82–87. [Google Scholar]
  21. Yuan, J.; Li, Y.; Chen, S.; Li, D.; Tang, H.; Chadwick, D.; Li, S.; Li, W.; Li, G. Effects of phosphogypsum, superphosphate, and dicyandiamide on gaseous emission and compost quality during sewage sludge composting. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 270, 368–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yang, F.; Li, G.; Shi, H.; Wang, Y. Effects of phosphogypsum and superphosphate on compost maturity and gaseous emissions during kitchen waste composting. Waste Manag. 2015, 36, 70–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Angnes, G.; Nicoloso, R.D.S.; Da Silva, M.L.B.; De Oliveira, P.; Higarashi, M.M.; Mezzari, M.P.; Miller, P. Correlating denitrifying catabolic genes with N2O and N2 emissions from swine slurry composting. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 140, 368–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Li, S.; Song, L.; Jin, Y.; Liu, S.; Shen, Q.; Zou, J. Linking N2O emission from biochar-amended composting process to the abundance of denitrify (nirK and nosZ) bacteria community. AMB Express 2016, 6, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Coyotzi, S.; Doxey, A.C.; Clark, I.D.; Lapen, D.R.; Van Cappellen, P.; Neufeld, J.D. Agricultural soil denitrifiers possess extensive nitrite reductase gene diversity. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 19, 1189–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kraft, B.; Strous, M.; Tegetmeyer, H.E. Microbial nitrate respiration-Genes, enzymes and environmental distribution. J. Biotechnol. 2011, 155, 104–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Regan, K.; Kammann, C.; Hartung, K.; Lenhart, K.; Muller, C.; Philippot, L.; Kandeler, E.; Marhan, S. Can differences in microbial abundances help explain enhanced N2O emissions in a permanent grassland under elevated atmospheric CO2? Glob. Chang. Biol. 2011, 17, 3176–3186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Maeda, K.; Hanajima, D.; Toyoda, S.; Yoshida, N.; Morioka, R.; Osada, T. Microbiology of nitrogen cycle in animal manure compost. Microb. Biotechnol. 2011, 4, 700–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ji, C.; Li, S.; Geng, Y.; Miao, Y.; Ding, Y.; Liu, S.; Zou, J. Differential responses of soil N2O to biochar depend on the predominant microbial pathway. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2020, 145, 103348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hao, X.; Chang, C.; Larney, F.J.; Travis, G.R. Greenhouse gas emissions during cattle feedlot manure composting. J. Environ. Qual. 2002, 31, 376–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hao, X.; Larney, F.J.; Chang, C.; Travis, G.R.; Nichol, C.K.; Bremer, E. The Effect of Phosphogypsum on Greenhouse Gas Emissions during Cattle Manure Composting. J. Environ. Qual. 2005, 34, 774–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zou, J.; Huang, Y.; Jiang, J.; Zheng, X.; Sass, R.L. A 3-year field measurement of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from rice paddies in China: Effects of water regime, crop residue, and fertilizer application. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 2005, 19, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Liu, S.; Zhang, L.; Liu, Q.; Zou, J. Fe (III) fertilization mitigating net global warming potential and greenhouse gas in-tensity in paddy rice-wheat rotation systems in china. Environ. Pollut. 2012, 164, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Hutchinson, G.L.; Mosier, A.R. Improved Soil Cover Method for Field Measurement of Nitrous Oxide Fluxes. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1981, 45, 311–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Tourna, M.; Freitag, T.E.; Nicol, G.W.; Prosser, J.I. Growth, activity and temperature responses of ammonia-oxidizing archaea and bacteria in soil microcosms. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 10, 1357–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Stephen, J.R.; Chang, Y.-J.; Macnaughton, S.J.; Kowalchuk, G.A.; Leung, K.T.; Flemming, C.A.; White, D.C. Effect of Toxic Metals on Indigenous Soil β-Subgroup Proteobacterium Ammonia Oxidizer Community Structure and Protection against Toxicity by Inoculated Metal-Resistant Bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1999, 65, 95–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Braker, G.; Fesefeldt, A.; Witzel, K.-P. Development of PCR Primer Systems for Amplification of Nitrite Reductase Genes (nirK and nirS) To Detect Denitrifying Bacteria in Environmental Samples. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1998, 64, 3769–3775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Henry, S.; Baudoin, E.; López-Gutiérrez, J.C.; Martin-Laurent, F.; Brauman, A.; Philippot, L. Quantification of denitrifying bacteria in soils by nirK gene targeted real-time PCR. J. Microbiol. Methods 2004, 59, 327–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Scala, D.J.; Kerkhof, L.J. Nitrous oxide reductase (nosZ) gene-specific PCR primers for detection of denitrifiers and three nosZ genes from marine sediments. FEMS. Microbiol. Lett. 1998, 162, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Andersen, J.K.; Boldrin, A.; Christensen, T.H.; Scheutz, C. Mass balances and life cycle inventory of home composting of organic waste. Waste Manag. 2011, 31, 1934–1942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Anderson, C.; Hamonts, K.; Clough, T.; Condron, L. Biochar does not affect soil N-transformations or microbial community structure under ruminant urine patches but does alter relative proportions of nitrogen cycling bacteria. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2014, 191, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bai, S.H.; Reverchon, F.; Xu, C.-Y.; Xu, Z.; Blumfield, T.J.; Zhao, H.; Van Zwieten, L.; Wallace, H.M. Wood biochar increases nitrogen retention in field settings mainly through abiotic processes. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2015, 90, 232–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zeng, Y.; De, G.A.; Ziebal, C.; De, M.; Flávia, J.; Dabert, P. Impact of biodegradation of organic matters on ammonia oxidation in compost. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 136, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Gödde, M.; Conrad, R. Immediate and adaptational temperature effects on nitric oxide production and nitrous oxide release from nitrification and denitrification in two soils. Biol. Fertil. Soils 1999, 30, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kandeler, E.; Deiglmayr, K.; Tscherko, D.; Bru, D.; Philippot, L. Abundance of narG, nirS, nirK, and nosZ genes of denitrifying bacteria during primary successions of a glacier foreland. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72, 5957–5962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Zhang, L.; Zeng, G.; Zhang, J.; Chen, Y.; Yujie, Y.; Lu, L.; Lihua, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Huang, A.; et al. Response of denitrifying genes coding for nitrite (nirK or nirS) and nitrous oxide (nosZ) reductases to different physico-chemical parameters during agricultural waste composting. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 99, 4059–4070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhou, Z.F.; Zheng, Y.M.; Shen, J.P.; Zhang, L.M.; He, J.Z. Response of denitrification genes nirS, nirK, and nosZ to irrigation water quality in a Chinese agricultural soil. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2011, 18, 1644–1652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Fang, Y.; Cao, X.; Zhao, L. Effects of phosphorus amendments and plant growth on the mobility of Pb, Cu, and Zn in a multi-metal-contaminated soil. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2011, 19, 1659–1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Jiang, J.; Huang, Y.; Liu, X.; Huang, H. The effects of apple pomace, bentonite and calcium superphosphate on swine manure aerobic composting. Waste Manag. 2014, 34, 1595–1602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Tang, X.; Li, X.; Liu, X.; Hashmi, M.Z.; Xu, J.; Brookes, P.C. Effects of inorganic and organic amendments on the uptake of lead and trace elements by Brassica chinensis grown in an acidic red soil. Chemosphere 2015, 119, 177–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijerph 18 00171 g001 550
Figure 1. Dynamics of the N2O emission rates (a), temperature (T) and moisture (M) (b) during the pig manure composting experiment. Error bars show standard error of the mean of triplicate compost windrows. In (b), “M-Control” and “M-Superphosphate” represent the composting moisture of Control and CaSSP, respectively; “T-Control” and “T-Superphosphate” are the composting temperature of Control and CaSSP, respectively.
Figure 1. Dynamics of the N2O emission rates (a), temperature (T) and moisture (M) (b) during the pig manure composting experiment. Error bars show standard error of the mean of triplicate compost windrows. In (b), “M-Control” and “M-Superphosphate” represent the composting moisture of Control and CaSSP, respectively; “T-Control” and “T-Superphosphate” are the composting temperature of Control and CaSSP, respectively.
Ijerph 18 00171 g001
Ijerph 18 00171 g002 550
Figure 2. Changes of pH (a), total nitrogen (b), total carbon (c) and C/N (d) during composting. Error bars show standard error of the mean of triplicate compost windrows.
Figure 2. Changes of pH (a), total nitrogen (b), total carbon (c) and C/N (d) during composting. Error bars show standard error of the mean of triplicate compost windrows.
Ijerph 18 00171 g002
Ijerph 18 00171 g003 550
Figure 3. Changes of NH4+-N and NO3−-N contents during the pig manure composting experiment. Error bars show standard error of the mean of triplicate compost windrows. (a) NH4+-N content; (b) NO3−-N contents.
Figure 3. Changes of NH4+-N and NO3−-N contents during the pig manure composting experiment. Error bars show standard error of the mean of triplicate compost windrows. (a) NH4+-N content; (b) NO3−-N contents.
Ijerph 18 00171 g003
Ijerph 18 00171 g004 550
Figure 4. Changes in gene copy numbers per gram of compost (dry matter) for AOA amoA, AOB amoA, nirS, nirK and nosZ at the days 1, 10, 24, 31, 45 and 60 of composting for Control and CaSSP. Error bars show standard error of the mean of triplicate qPCR reactions. (a) AOB amoA; (b) AOA amoA; (c) nirS; (d) nirK; (e) nosZ.
Figure 4. Changes in gene copy numbers per gram of compost (dry matter) for AOA amoA, AOB amoA, nirS, nirK and nosZ at the days 1, 10, 24, 31, 45 and 60 of composting for Control and CaSSP. Error bars show standard error of the mean of triplicate qPCR reactions. (a) AOB amoA; (b) AOA amoA; (c) nirS; (d) nirK; (e) nosZ.
Ijerph 18 00171 g004
Ijerph 18 00171 g005 550
Figure 5. Structural equation model linking physicochemical factors and N-cycle functional genes abundance with N2O emissions. Red arrows denote for positive effects while blue arrows denote for negative effects; arrow widths correspond with the relative effect size of each variable. * and *** indicate significance at the 0.05 and 0.001 probability level, respectively.
Figure 5. Structural equation model linking physicochemical factors and N-cycle functional genes abundance with N2O emissions. Red arrows denote for positive effects while blue arrows denote for negative effects; arrow widths correspond with the relative effect size of each variable. * and *** indicate significance at the 0.05 and 0.001 probability level, respectively.
Ijerph 18 00171 g005
Table
Table 1. The information of PCR primers used in this study.
Table 1. The information of PCR primers used in this study.
Target GenePrime NameSequence (5′ to 3′)Product SizeReference
AOA amoACrenamoA23fATGGTCTGGCTWAGACG593 bp[35]
CrenamoA616rGCCATCCATCTGTATGTCCA
AOB amoAamoA-1FGGGGHTTYTACTGGTGGT491 bp[36]
amoA-2RCCCCTCKGSAAAGCCTTCTTC
nirSnirS-Cd3aFGTSAACGTSAAGGARACSGG425 bp[37]
nirS-R3cdGASTTCGGRTGSGTCTTGA
nirKnirK-F1aCuATCATGGTSCTGCCGCG473 bp[38]
nirK-R3CuGCCTCGATCAGRTTGTGGTT
nosZnosZ-FAGAACGACCAGCTGATCGACA380 bp[39]
nosZ-RTCCATGGTGACGCCGTGGTTG
Note: Y = C/T, S = C/G, V = A/C/G, W = A/T, H = A/C/T, K = G/T, R = A/G.
Table
Table 2. Correlations between the abundance of N2O-forming and consuming microbial functional genes and compost physicochemical properties with calcium superphosphate (CaSSP) addition during composting.
Table 2. Correlations between the abundance of N2O-forming and consuming microbial functional genes and compost physicochemical properties with calcium superphosphate (CaSSP) addition during composting.
Correlation Coefficients (r)
ParametersNH4+-NNO3−-NpHMoistureTemperatureTotal NTotal CC/NN2O
AOB0.00 0.23 −0.49 −0.55 −0.11 0.711 **−0.41 −0.63 0.35
AOA−0.45 0.70 *−0.16 −0.63 *−0.45 0.644 *−0.48 −0.60 *0.42
nirS−0.31 0.57 −0.34 −0.83 **−0.15 0.86 ***−0.71 *−0.82 ***0.64
nirK−0.66 *0.81 ***−0.21 −0.87 ***−0.14 0.83 ***−0.83 ***−0.89 ***0.79 **
nosZ0.63 *−0.67 *0.07 0.11 0.741 **−0.23 0.08 0.24 −0.42
* Indicates significance at the 0.05 probability level. ** Indicates significance at the 0.01 probability level. *** Indicates significance at the 0.001 probability level (n = 3).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jin, Y.; Miao, Y.; Geng, Y.; Huang, M.; Zhang, Y.; Song, X.; Li, S.; Zou, J. Calcium Superphosphate-Mediated Reshaping of Denitrifying Bacteria Community Contributed to N2O Mitigation in Pig Manure Windrow Composting. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 171. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph18010171

AMA Style

Jin Y, Miao Y, Geng Y, Huang M, Zhang Y, Song X, Li S, Zou J. Calcium Superphosphate-Mediated Reshaping of Denitrifying Bacteria Community Contributed to N2O Mitigation in Pig Manure Windrow Composting. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(1):171. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph18010171

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jin, Yaguo, Yingcheng Miao, Yajun Geng, Mengyuan Huang, Yihe Zhang, Xiuchao Song, Shuqing Li, and Jianwen Zou. 2021. "Calcium Superphosphate-Mediated Reshaping of Denitrifying Bacteria Community Contributed to N2O Mitigation in Pig Manure Windrow Composting" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 1: 171. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph18010171

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop