Next Article in Journal
Completeness of Medical Records of Trauma Patients Admitted to the Emergency Unit of a University Hospital, Upper Egypt
Next Article in Special Issue
Is the Association between Postpartum Depression and Early Maternal–Infant Relationships Contextually Determined by Avoidant Coping in the Mother?
Previous Article in Journal
Assessment of Nursing Workload as a Mortality Predictor in Intensive Care Units (ICU) Using the Nursing Activities Score (NAS) Scale
Previous Article in Special Issue
Chinese Women’s Acceptance and Uptake of Referral after Screening for Perinatal Depression
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 18
Issue 1
10.3390/ijerph18010082
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Perinatal Anxiety Symptoms: Rates and Risk Factors in Mexican Women

by
Janeth Juarez Padilla
1,
Sandraluz Lara-Cinisomo
1,
Laura Navarrete
2 and
Ma. Asunción Lara
2,*
1
Department of Kinesiology and Community Health, College of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL 61820, USA
2
Innovation and Global Health Department, Ramon de la Fuente Muñiz National Institute of Psychiatry, Tlalpan, Mexico City 14370, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(1), 82; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph18010082
Submission received: 14 December 2020 / Accepted: 18 December 2020 / Published: 24 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Maternal Perinatal Mental Health)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Anxiety during pregnancy and after childbirth can have negative consequences for a woman and her baby. Despite growing interest in the perinatal mental health of Mexican women living in the U.S., perinatal anxiety symptom (PAS) rates and risk factors have yet to be established for women in Mexico. We sought to determine PAS rates and identify risk factors, including the traditional female role (TFR) in a sample of Mexican women. This secondary data analysis is based on 234 Mexican women who participated in a longitudinal study on perinatal depression in Mexico. Anxiety symptoms were assessed in pregnancy and at six weeks postpartum. Rates were determined through frequencies, and multiple logistics regressions were conducted to identify risk factors in the sample. The PAS rate was 21% in pregnancy and 18% postpartum. Stressful life events and depressive symptoms were associated with a higher probability of PAS. Adherence to TFR increased the probability of prenatal anxiety; lower educational attainment and low social support during pregnancy increased the probability of postpartum anxiety. The PAS rates were within the range reported in the literature. The TFR was only associated with anxiety in gestation, highlighting the role of this culturally relevant risk factor. Culturally responsive early interventions are therefore required.

1. Introduction

Anxiety during the perinatal period (pregnancy and first postpartum year) is a global health issue because of its negative consequences for the mother and her baby [1,2,3,4]. However, perinatal anxiety symptoms (PAS) are not always diagnosed or treated, increasing the risks for both. Previous data show that women in low- and middle-income countries have a high prevalence of anxiety compared to those in more affluent countries [5]. Although anxiety has been assessed in individuals of Mexican descent living in the U.S. and Mexican women [6,7,8], the prevalence of PAS in Mexico has not been fully studied. To our knowledge, only one study has explored anxiety symptoms in Mexican women. Navarrete et al. (2012) found a 14.8% prevalence of anxiety in pregnancy and 10.6% at six weeks postpartum in Mexican women with depressive symptoms [9]. However, the study did not explore risk factors to explain observed rates because its focus was depressive symptoms.
While risk factors, such as not having a partner [10,11], lower social support [12,13,14], lower partner satisfaction [15,16,17], and multiparity [18] for perinatal depression have been identified, their associations with PAS have yet to be determined among perinatal women living in Mexico. Cesarean delivery and stressful life events [18,19,20,21] are risk factors for PAS in Colombia, Australia, and Rwanda, while resilience has been identified as a protective factor for PAS [22]. Nevertheless, these factors have not been tested in women living in Mexico.
During the perinatal period, Mexican women may experience culturally relevant stressors that may increase their risk of PAS such as traditional female role (TFR) expectations. Adherence to the TFR, defined as being submissive, conforming, indecisive, and passive, attributed to socialization within a structure that undervalues women, is particularly relevant here [23,24]. Although the TFR has been associated with depression in Mexican women at six weeks postpartum [25], its links with anxiety have not been tested. It is important to understand the role of the TFR as a risk factor for PAS to develop interventions and improve women’s mental health during pregnancy and the postpartum period.
The purpose of this study was to determine PAS rates in a sample of women receiving prenatal care who were followed postpartum to identify demographic, psychosocial, and culturally relevant risk factors to inform interventions and treatment options. We hypothesized that (a) women would have higher rates of anxiety during pregnancy than in the postpartum period; (b) cesarean delivery, psychosocial stressors (i.e., high levels of stressful life events, low social support, low educational attainment, not having a partner, and low partner satisfaction) would increase the likelihood of PAS; and (c) high depressive symptoms, low resilience levels, and high adherence to the TFR would increase the likelihood of anxiety during the perinatal period.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Participants

A non-probabilistic sample of 280 pregnant women receiving prenatal care agreed to participate in the parent study. Of these women, 234 (83.6%) were assessed during pregnancy and followed up at six weeks postpartum and were included in this study (Figure 1). Women were approached in the waiting rooms of a hospital that provides comprehensive medical care to state employees and a primary health center that provides prenatal and other medical care to the local community. To be eligible, women had to be at least 20 years of age, ≥26 weeks pregnant, and living in the Mexico City metropolitan area; women with bipolar disorder were excluded. Eligible participants who agreed to be interviewed provided written consent.

2.2. Procedures

Data were collected by trained final year psychology students and graduate psychology research assistants affiliated to the lead research institution. Interviews were conducted at ≥26 weeks of pregnancy and six weeks postpartum. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Ramon de la Fuente Muñiz National Institute of Psychiatry.

2.3. Measures

Sociodemographic information, including age, monthly family income, marital status, and educational attainment, were collected during the enrollment interview (≥26 weeks pregnant). Obstetric data included the number of children (collected at ≥26 weeks pregnant) and type of delivery in this pregnancy (collected at six weeks postpartum). Anxiety symptoms were assessed using the 10-item anxiety subscale from the Symptoms Checklist-90 or SCL-90 [26]. Participants reported the degree of distress they had experienced during the previous fortnight using a five-point Likert scale (none = 0; extreme = 4). The scale was validated in Mexico [27,28]. A score of ≥18 was considered an indicator of high anxiety symptomatology [26]. This instrument showed an internal consistency of α = 0.80 in Mexican women and has been used with perinatal women [9,29].
Because depression is treated as a risk factor here, the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) was used to assess depressive symptoms [30]. This is a nine-item depression module from the full PHQ, specifically developed for use in primary care. The PHQ-9 has proven its usefulness as an assessment tool for the diagnosis of depression with acceptable reliability, validity, sensitivity, and specificity; a score of ≥10 indicates a risk of depression [31]. The PHQ-9 was validated in Mexican women, showing an internal consistency of 0.89 [32] and estimated for this sample showing adequate validity: pregnancy: α = 0.78 and six weeks postpartum: α = 0.80.
Resilience was measured with the Resilience Inventory (RESI; [33]), designed to measure resilience in Mexican mothers. The RESI comprises seven dimensions: positive attitude, sense of humor, perseverance, religiosity, self-efficacy, optimism and goal orientation. Response options range from 1 (not at all) to 5 (completely), while the total score indicates the degree of resilience. The RESI was validated in this sample demonstrating good internal consistency (α = 0.88) in pregnant women and adequate concurrent validity for prenatal depressive symptoms (r = 0.27; p = 0.00) and stressful life events (r = −0.19; p = 0.00) [34]. In the absence of a pre-established cut-off point, the median minus one standard deviation [34] was used to determine high vs. low resilience.
Stressful life events were measured using the Life Events Scale, a brief, 12 item-form including potential stressors (such as illness, financial problems, accident, job loss or intimate partner violence) selected from the 23 original items [35], developed from Holmes and Rahe’s instrument [36], among other scales. These twelve items were considered more pertinent in the perinatal period [37]. The scale evaluates the occurrence of each event over the past six months as well as the perceived degree of stress it produced (0 = event was not present; 1 = present but produced no stress, 2 = produced little stress, 3 = produced moderate stress, 4 = produced great stress). A cut-off point of 13 was calculated as the 75th percentile to determine high vs. low-stress life events.
The Spanish version [38] of the English Postpartum Depression Predictors Inventory-Revised (PDPI-R) social support subscale [39] was used during pregnancy and postpartum. The 12-item scale quantifies the presence of instrumental and emotional support from the woman’s partner, mother, and other family members and friends. Each item is scored using dichotomous responses with a 0 (absent) or 1 (present), creating a possible summed range of scores from 0 to 12, where higher scores indicate greater support. This instrument has been validated in a sample of pregnant women and has shown adequate concurrent validity in postpartum samples [40]. The scale showed adequate reliability (α = 0.84) [40]. In the absence of a pre-established cut-off point, the median minus one standard deviation [40] was used to determine high vs. low social support.
The marital satisfaction subscale was also taken from the Spanish version [38] of the PDPI-R [39]. The three-item scale measures how satisfied women feel about the relationship with their partner or the father of their child. Each item is scored using dichotomous responses with a 0 (absent) or 1 (present), creating a possible summed range of scores from 0 to 3. This scale showed adequate concurrent validity compared with the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (r = 0.39; p = 0.001) in a sample of pregnant Mexican women [40]. A cut-off point was determined using the median minus one standard deviation (1) for high vs. low relationship satisfaction.
The TFR was measured in pregnancy through eight questions from the submissive subscale of the Inventario de Masculinidad y Femineidad (IMAFE; [24]). The scale measures the personality traits expected in many cultures, particularly those of Mexican women [24]. Using a 0 (“I’m never or almost never like this”) to 7 (“I’m always or almost always like this”) scale, participants indicated the extent to which each trait describes them, such that higher scores represented higher levels of TFR. The items included were being conformist, submissive, indecisive, having a weak personality, being resigned, cowardly, withdrawn, and shy. This short version demonstrated adequate reliability in this sample (α = 0.83) [25]. The submissive subscale has also shown adequate reliability in other Latin American countries, such as Colombia [41,42]. A cut-off point was determined using the median plus one standard deviation [25], indicating high vs. low adherence to a TFR.

2.4. Data Analyses

Frequencies/percentages were calculated for categorical data. The point prevalence of anxiety symptoms was calculated as the percentage of women with anxiety symptoms at each point of assessment (≥26 weeks pregnant; sixth week postpartum). The McNemar test was performed to determine whether there is a difference in the prevalence of anxiety between the two times. To identify risk factors for anxiety symptoms, a bivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to estimate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals. To identify the PAS risk factors, multivariate logistic regressions were performed. All analyses were performed using the SPSS version 21 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Participants

Participants had an average age of 29 (SD = 6.2), with an average monthly income of $498.70 U.S. dollars (SD = 502.3), an average of 12 years of schooling (equivalent to middle school), and had at least one child. Most had a partner and had given birth by cesarean section. Table 1 shows the distributions of perceived social support, experienced stressful life events, and adherence to the TRF. During pregnancy, 20.4% met the criteria for depressive symptoms, and 17.1% met the cutoff at six weeks postpartum.

3.2. PAS Prevalence Rates and Risk Factors

PAS rates (SCL-90 ≥ 18) were 22.1% and 17.5% at six weeks postpartum (shown as Table 2). Results from the McNemar analysis showed that there was no significant difference between perinatal periods (McNemar χ2 = 1.30; p = 0.25).

3.3. Regressions to Determine the Effects of Risk and Protective Factors on PAS

The bivariate logistic regressions to determine associations between psychosocial and culturally relevant factors and anxiety symptoms during pregnancy indicated that prenatal women who were single were at more than twice the risk of reporting prenatal anxiety symptoms than women who were in a relationship (OR = 2.59); prenatal women with low resilience were nearly three times more likely to report prenatal anxiety symptoms than women with high resilience (OR = 2.87); prenatal women with high adherence to the TFR were four times as likely to report prenatal anxiety symptoms than women with low adherence to the TFR (OR = 4.07); prenatal women with low relationship satisfaction had a four times higher risk of reporting prenatal anxiety symptoms than women with high marital satisfaction (OR = 4.03); women with low social support had a greater likelihood of prenatal anxiety symptoms than those with high social support (OR = 6.17); women who experienced stressful events were eight times as likely to report prenatal anxiety symptoms than women who did not (OR = 8.40); having depressive symptoms increased the risk nearly sevenfold (OR = 6.63).
The bivariate logistic regressions (Table 3) to determine the association between psychosocial and culturally relevant factors and anxiety symptoms during the sixth week postpartum showed that prenatal women who were single were over twice as likely to report postpartum anxiety symptoms than married women (OR = 2.25); higher educational attainment is associated with a reduction in the probability of reporting postpartum anxiety (OR = 0.89); prenatal women with low resilience had twice the odds of reporting postpartum anxiety symptoms than women with high resilience (OR = 2.24); prenatal women with low marital satisfaction had more than twice the odds of reporting postpartum anxiety symptoms than women with high marital satisfaction (OR = 2.43); prenatal women with low social support had six times the odds of reporting postpartum anxiety symptoms than women with high social support (OR = 6.63); postpartum women with low social support had twice the odds of reporting postpartum anxiety symptoms than women with high social support (OR = 2.85); prenatal women who experienced stressful events had three times the odds of reporting postpartum anxiety symptoms than women who did not (OR = 3.47); postpartum women who experienced stressful events had seven times the odds of reporting postpartum anxiety symptoms than women who did not (OR = 7.39); prenatal women with depressive symptoms had four times the odds of reporting postpartum anxiety symptoms than women who did not (OR = 4.55); and postpartum women with depressive symptoms had eleven times the odds of reporting postpartum anxiety symptoms than women who did not (OR = 11.25).
In the multivariate model of anxiety in pregnancy, the following variables were included as risk factors: age, monthly family income, educational attainment, number of children, marital status, resilience, TFR, marital satisfaction, social support, stressful life events, and depressive symptoms during pregnancy. The model showed that prenatal women with high adherence to the TFR were at twice the risk of experiencing prenatal anxiety symptoms as women with low adherence to the TFR (OR = 2.28). Stressful events increased the risk of PAS fourfold (OR = 4.35), while prenatal women with depressive symptoms were at four times the risk of reporting prenatal anxiety symptoms as women without them (OR = 3.82) (Table 4).
In the multivariate model of anxiety at six weeks postpartum, the following variables were included as risk factors: age, monthly family income, educational attainment, number of children, marital status, cesarean-delivery, resilience, TFR, marital satisfaction, social support, stressful life events, and depressive symptoms during pregnancy, and social support, stressful life events, and depressive symptoms during the postpartum period. The analysis showed that higher educational attainment was associated with a reduction in the probability of reporting postpartum anxiety symptoms (OR = 0.84), while women with low social support during pregnancy had almost five times the risk of reporting postpartum anxiety symptoms as women with high social support (OR = 5.60). Additionally, the risk of reporting postpartum anxiety symptoms was more than five times higher in those who experienced stressful events post-childbirth than in those who did not (OR = 5.42), while the risk of reporting postpartum anxiety symptoms was nine times higher in those with postpartum depressive symptoms than in those without them (OR = 9.03) (Table 5).

4. Discussion

As hypothesized, low levels of social support, stressful life events, and depressive symptoms significantly increased the odds of PAS. The TFR increased the odds of anxiety symptoms during pregnancy. We found that women who reported low levels of social support during pregnancy had five times the odds of PAS. These findings support the growing body of research showing that low social support is associated with increased anxiety during the perinatal period [43,44,45]. However, previous studies did not include women living in Mexico, where there are 34.9 million women of reproductive age [46], with much of the research focusing on English-speaking countries (such as the United States, Europe, and Australia). To our knowledge, this is the first study to assess the role of social support in PAS in Mexico. Given that anxiety might be more culturally acceptable than depression [47], these findings can help pave the way to increasing discussions about perinatal mental health in Mexico, which continues to be severely understudied and inadequately addressed. These findings can also help inform intervention in Mexico and other Latin American countries, where the role of social support during the perinatal period may change as a result of family migration and women’s increased workforce participation [48].
The results also showed that women who experienced stressful life events had nearly four times the odds of experiencing anxiety in pregnancy and nearly five times the odds of experiencing it postpartum. Although the assessment of stressful life events is based on retrospective data, the degree to which they caused stress is informative because stressful life events can have lasting, potentially detrimental effects particularly during a vulnerable period such as pregnancy and first-time motherhood [44,49,50]. Practitioners should therefore assess women living in Mexico for stressful life events to identify women at risk of developing PAS. Researchers are encouraged to develop early interventions to reduce the effects of stressful life events on the development of anxiety in these women.
As predicted, experiencing depressive symptoms at the time of assessment significantly increased the odds of PAS by a factor of 3.82 in pregnancy and of 9.03 postpartum. The growing body of research on depression shows that depression and anxiety are often comorbid [51,52]. However, the extent to which depression or depressive symptoms impact the likelihood of anxiety is less clear. This study helps clarify these associations and underlines the need to assess the presence of both throughout the perinatal period. While directionality was not established here, the results suggest that depressive symptoms might exacerbate feelings of anxiety, particularly in women where depression is stigmatized and not properly addressed. Results from a previous study show that prenatal anxiety symptoms were predictive of postpartum depressive symptoms in Mexican women [10]. As can be seen in Table 1, 20 percent of prenatal and postpartum women had depressive symptoms, which is at the top end of the range among women in the general U.S. population [53] and other countries [54], yet within the range of Latinas in the U.S. at 20–43% [15,18,55,56,57]. This highlights the importance of early prevention and detection.
Unlike the previously discussed risk factors, adherence to the TFR was significantly associated with PAS in pregnancy. A recent systematic review showed that the TFR was inconsistently associated with prenatal depression, but significantly and indirectly associated with postpartum depression [58]. Although this is the first study to examine the associations between TFR and PAS, we can draw on previous literature, which suggests that the limitations and gender-related biases women experience, particularly in a male-dominated culture, induce anxious symptoms and increase the risk of other mental health issues [59]. Because of the male-dominated culture in Mexico and the submissive role women and mothers are expected to assume, it will be important to determine how and why adherence to the TFR increases the risk of anxiety in women in Mexico to inform interventions and target specific policies that perpetuate those practices [60]. An additional necessary step is to determine why the TFR increased the odds of anxiety in pregnancy in this sample of Mexican women. One possible explanation is the social pressures pregnant women in Mexico experience. As previously mentioned, motherhood is revered in Mexico, but so are behaviors that may dictate what a woman can or cannot do, such as only seeking mental health treatment or participating in a study interview or experiment after receiving approval from her partner [37] and prioritizing bearing children even though they are working women [61,62,63]. The TFR might also conflict with the growing independence observed in Mexican women. For instance, although women in Mexico are engaged in the labor force and pursue higher education, they continue to experience gender-role expectations, such as serving as the primary caregiver and being submissive to a male partner [62,63]. These gender-role restrictions and expectations may be heightened in pregnancy when motherhood is added to the mix. Given the potentially complex factors that contribute to the TFR, future studies should determine whether the effects of this risk factor differ from pre-conception to pregnancy to help advance theory and inform intervention.
Though this study addresses significant gaps in the literature, several limitations exist. Preconception data on the risk factors involved could help explain whether the effect of stressful life events and low social support on anxiety symptoms is a function of motherhood or a consequence of those events. Previous literature has shown that stressful life events are indirectly associated with anxiety in adolescence and adulthood because of the rumination that ensues in the wake of these events [64]. It is possible that the onset of motherhood may trigger feelings associated with these stressful life events, which in turn could increase the risk of anxiety in women. However, this is speculation that should be tested by including those who have not conceived or given birth. A second limitation is the expectations and effectiveness of social support. Studies on depression in the perinatal period have shown that women in the perinatal period have specific expectations of and needs for social support during this life transition [65,66,67]. However, less is known about expectations of social support and their effects on anxiety. Future studies should therefore explore this area of inquiry to inform interventions. Moreover, because effective support is important, subsequent studies should also inquire as to how women define the support, they deem efficacious and help them identify sources of support that can provide this. A third limitation is the lack of information regarding the TFR before gestation. As suggested above, motherhood may increase specific gender-role expectations in the woman and those around her. It will therefore be important to assess levels of adherence to the TFR before gestation. On a related note, future studies should inquire as to whether adherence to the TFR is self-imposed or influenced by those around a woman, which can help inform interventions and psychoeducation before gestation and throughout the perinatal period. Furthermore, women in this study were predominantly Mexican women living in Mexico. Thus, the findings may be limited to Mexican women and it is unclear whether the findings would be the same for women from other Latin American countries or Latinas in the U.S.
Despite these limitations, the findings from this study can help inform clinical practice and increase early diagnoses by health care providers, particularly in Mexico, which can increase early intervention and decrease the long-term effects of PAS. For example, health providers working with perinatal women should assess anxiety levels as well as the presence of the risk factors identified here. Given the multigenerational implications of PAS, women and children will benefit from early prevention and appropriate treatment in the short- and long-term.

5. Conclusions

This study is the first to investigate PAS rates among women living in Mexico. PAS risk factors such as stressful life events, low social support, and depression support the findings in the literature. However, our study also found that the traditional female role was a risk factor for anxiety in pregnancy. This finding shows that the traditional female role is a temporary and culturally relevant risk factor among these women. Early culturally appropriate interventions are therefore needed. Although there is a dearth of interventions designed to address gender-role risk factors among Mexican mothers [10,68], researchers and clinical practitioners can draw on culturally-relevant interventions designed to improve poor maternal mental health outcomes among women of Mexican descent [69,70,71] and other Latina women. Recent studies using complementary and integrative health interventions, such as music therapy [72,73], have yielded encouraging results. The use of complementary and integrative health approaches is particularly important given potential fears of stigma and barriers to traditional psychotherapeutic and pharmacological interventions among Latina women [74]. While our study sampled perinatal women living in Mexico, the findings suggest that future studies on women of Mexican descent should consider evaluating culturally relevant factors such as the traditional female role.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.J.P.; methodology, L.N. and M.A.L.; formal analysis, L.N. and M.A.L.; resources, M.A.L.; writing—original draft preparation, J.J.P., S.L.-C., L.N., and M.A.L.; writing—review and editing, J.J.P., S.L.-C., L.N., and M.A.L.; visualization, L.N. and M.A.L.; supervision, M.A.L. and S.L.-C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The overall research project was supported by the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT, Mexico. CB-2009-01 133923) and the present study by the Minority Health and Health Disparities Research Training by National Institute on Minority Health and Health disparities (T37MD003405) Latino Mental Health Research Training Program at the University of Southern California.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the "Research Ethics Committee of the Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz National Institute of Psychiatry" on 27 April 2011. A code number was not asigned at the time, as certified by the president of the actual Research Ethics Committee: 5 January 2021, Ref.: CEI/M/001/2021.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the parent study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on requested from the corresponding author. The data can be available from the repository of the Ramon de la Fuente Muñiz National Institute of Psychiatry.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the staff and patients at the Centro de Salud Ángel Brioso Vasconcelos and the Hospital Regional del ISSSTE. Adolfo López Mateos.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. O’Hara, M.W.; Wisner, K.L. Perinatal mental illness: Definition, description and aetiology. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2014, 28, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Harrison, V.; Moore, D.; Lazard, L. Supporting perinatal anxiety in the digital age; a qualitative exploration of stressors and support strategies. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2020, 20, 363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Field, T. Prenatal anxiety effects: A review. Infant Behav. Dev. 2017, 49, 120–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Field, T. Postnatal anxiety prevalence, predictors and effects on development: A narrative review. Infant Behav. Dev. 2018, 51, 24–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Dennis, C.L.; Falah-Hassani, K.; Shiri, R. Prevalence of antenatal and postnatal anxiety: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Br. J. Psychiatry 2017, 210, 315–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Becerra, D.; Hernandez, G.; Porchas, F.; Castillo, J.; Nguyen, V.; Perez González, R. Immigration policies and mental health: Examining the relationship between immigration enforcement and depression, anxiety, and stress among Latino immigrants. J. Ethn. Cult. Divers. Soc. Work 2020, 29, 43–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Donato, K.M.; Caron, L.; Hamilton, E. Migration and mental health in Mexico: Domestic migrants, return U.S. migrants, and non-migrants. Front. Psychiatry 2019, 10, 970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Farina, A.S.J.; Kremer, K.P.; Caldera Wimmer, S.; Villarreal-Otalera, T.; Paredes, T.; Stuart, E. Anxiety, depression, and trauma among immigrant Mexican women up to two-years post-partum. J. Immigr. Minority Health 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Navarrete, L.E.; Lara, M.A.; Navarro, C.; Gomez, M.E.; Morales, F. Psychosocial factors predicting postnatal anxiety symptoms and their relation to symptoms of postpartum depression. Rev. Investig. Clin. 2012, 64, 625–633. [Google Scholar]
  10. Lara, M.A.; Navarrete, L.; Nieto, L. Prenatal predictors of postpartum depression and postpartum depressive symptoms in Mexican mothers: A longitudinal study. Arch. Women’s Ment. Health 2016, 19, 825–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Weiss-Laxer, N.S.; Johnson, S.B.; Ghazarian, S.R.; Osborne, L.M.; Riley, A.W. Maternal behavioral health symptom profiles in early family life: Complexity and context. Arch. Women’s Ment. Health 2020, 23, 429–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. De Castro, F.; Place, J.M.; Billings, D.L.; Rivera, L.; Frongillo, E.A. Risk profiles associated with postnatal depressive symptoms among women in a publicsector hospital in Mexico: The role of sociodemographic and psychosocial factors. Arch. Women’s Ment. Health 2015, 18, 463–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chen, H.H.; Chien, L.Y. A comparative study of domestic decision-making power and social support as predictors of postpartum depressive and physical symptoms between immigrant and native-born women. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0231340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Gao, L.; Qu, J.; Wang, A.Y. Anxiety, depression and social support in pregnant women with a history of recurrent miscarriage: A cross-sectional study. J. Reprod. Infant Psychol. 2020, 38, 497–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Marcos-Najera, R.; Rodriguez-Munoz, M.F.; Lara, M.A.; Navarrete, L.; Le, H.N. A cross-cultural analysis of the prevalence and risk factors for prenatal depression in Spain and Mexico. Cult. Med. Psychiatry 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Mukherjee, S.; Fennie, K.; Coxe, S.; Madhivanan, P.; Trepka, M.J. Racial and ethnic differences in the relationship between antenatal stressful life events and postpartum depression among women in the United States: Does provider communication on perinatal depression minimize the risk? Ethn. Health 2018, 23, 542–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Recto, P.; Champion, J.D. Social support and perinatal depression: The perspectives of Mexican-American adolescent mothers. Issues Ment. Health Nurs. 2020, 41, 932–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Lara, M.A.; Le, H.N.; Letechipia, G.; Hochhausen, L. Prenatal depression in Latinas in the U.S. and Mexico. Matern. Child Health J. 2009, 13, 567–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Clout, D.; Brown, R. Sociodemographic, pregnancy, obstetric, and postnatal predictors of postpartum stress, anxiety and depression in new mothers. J. Affect. Disord. 2015, 188, 60–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ricardo-Ramírez, C.; Álvarez-Gómez, M.; Ocampo-Saldarriaga, M.V.; Tirado-Otálvaro, A.F. Prevalencia de tamizaje positivo para depresión y ansiedad en gestantes de alto riesgo obstétrico en una clínica de Medellín, entre enero y agosto de 2013. Factores de riesgo asociados. Rev. Colomb. Obstet. Ginecol. 2015, 66, 94–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Umuziga, M.P.; Adejumo, O.; Hynie, M. A cross-sectional study of the prevalence and factors associated with symptoms of perinatal depression and anxiety in Rwanda. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2020, 20, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Ma, X.; Wang, Y.; Hu, H.; Tao, X.G.; Zhang, Y.; Shi, H. The impact of resilience on prenatal anxiety and depression among pregnant women in Shanghai. J. Affect. Disord. 2019, 250, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Johannesen-Schmidt, M.C.; Eagly, A.H. Another look at sex differences in preferred mate characteristics: The effects of endorsing the traditional female gender role. Psychol. Women Q. 2002, 26, 322–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lara, M.A. Inventario de Masculinidad-Femineidad: IMAFE; El Manual Moderno: Mexico City, Mexico, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  25. Albuja, A.F.; Lara, M.A.; Navarrete, L.; Nieto, L. Social support and postpartum depression revisited: The traditional female role as moderator among Mexican women. Sex Roles 2017, 77, 209–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Derogatis, L.R. Administration, Scoring and Procedures Manual-I for the Revised Version SCL-90R; Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine: Baltimore, MD, USA, 1977. [Google Scholar]
  27. Cruz-Fuentes, C.; López, L.; Blas-Gracia, C.; González, L.; Chávez, R. Datos sobre la validez y la confiabilidad de la Symptom Check List (SCL-90) en una muestra de sujetos mexicanos. Salud Ment. 2005, 28, 72–81. [Google Scholar]
  28. Lara, C.; Espinosa, I.; Cárdenas, M.L.; Fócil, M.; Cavazos, J. Confiabilidad y validez de la SCL-90 en la evaluación de psicopatología en mujeres. Salud Ment. 2005, 28, 42–50. [Google Scholar]
  29. Meades, R.; Ayers, S. Anxiety measures validated in perinatal populations: A systematic review. J. Affect. Disord. 2011, 133, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Spitzer, R.L.; Kroenke, K.; Williams, J.B. Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: The PHQ primary care study. Primary care evaluation of mental disorders. Patient Health Questionnaire. JAMA 1999, 282, 1737–1744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Kroenke, K.; Spitzer, R.L.; Williams, J.B. The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2001, 16, 606–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Familiar, I.; Ortiz-Panozo, E.; Hall, B.; Vieitez, I.; Romieu, I.; Lopez-Ridaura, R.; Lajous, M. Factor structure of the Spanish version of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 in Mexican women. Int. J. Methods Psychiatr. Res. 2015, 24, 74–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gaxiola Romero, J.C.; Frías Armenta, M.; Hurtado Abril, M.F.; Salcido Noriega, L.C.; Figueroa Franco, M. Validación del inventario de resiliencia (IRES) en una muestra del noroeste de México. Enseñanza Investig. Psicol. 2011, 16, 73–83. [Google Scholar]
  34. Nieto, L.; Lara, M.A.; Navarrete, L.; Duenas, K.; Rodriguez, K. Psychometric properties of the resilience inventory for pregnant Mexican women. Summa Psicol. 2018, 15, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lara, M.A.; Navarro, C.; Navarrete, L. The influence of life events and social support in a psycho-educational intervention for women with depression. Salud Pública Mex. 2004, 46, 378–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Holmes, T.H.; Rahe, R.H. The social readjustment rating scale. J. Psychosom. Res. 1967, 11, 213–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lara, M.A.; Navarro, C.; Navarrete, L. Outcome results of a psycho-educational intervention in pregnancy to prevent PPD: A randomized control trial. J. Affect. Disord. 2010, 122, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Genovez, M.; Le, H. Identification of Salvadoran pregnant women at risk for postpartum depression. In Proceedings of the Poster Presentation, 25th Annual Conference Postpartum Support International, Seattle, WA, USA, 16 September 2011; pp. 14–18. [Google Scholar]
  39. Records, K.; Rice, M.; Beck, C.T. Psychometric assessment of the postpartum depression predictors inventory-revised. J. Nurs. Meas. 2007, 15, 189–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Ibarra-Yruegas, B.; Lara, M.A.; Navarrete, L.; Nieto, L.; Kawas Valle, O. Psychometric properties of the Postpartum Depression Predictors Inventory-revised for pregnant women in Mexico. J. Health Psychol. 2018, 23, 1415–1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Martínez-Gómez, J.A.; Guerrero-Rodríguez, S.I.; Rey-Anacona, C.A. Assessment of construct validity and reliability of the inventory of masculinity and femininity in adolescents and young Colombian adults. Av. Psicol. Latinoam. 2012, 30, 170–181. [Google Scholar]
  42. Rey, C.A. Pro-social skills, gender personality traits and acceptance of violence toward women in adolescents who have witnessed violence in their parents/Habilidades prosociales, rasgos de personalidad de género y aceptación de la violencia hacia la mujer, en adolescentes que han presenciado violencia entre sus padres. Acta Colomb. Psicol. 2008, 11, 107–119. [Google Scholar]
  43. Feligreras-Alcala, D.; Frias-Osuna, A.; Del-Pino-Casado, R. Personal and family resources related to depressive and anxiety symptoms in women during puerperium. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 5230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Aktan, N.M. Social support and anxiety in pregnant and postpartum women: A secondary analysis. Clin. Nurs. Res. 2012, 21, 183–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Razurel, C.; Kaiser, B.; Antonietti, J.P.; Epiney, M.; Sellenet, C. Relationship between perceived perinatal stress and depressive symptoms, anxiety, and parental self-efficacy in primiparous mothers and the role of social support. Women Health 2017, 57, 154–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund. Progress for Every Child in the SDG Era Country Profile; UNICEF: Mexico City, Mexico, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  47. Lara-Cinisomo, S.; Clark, C.T.; Wood, J. Increasing diagnosis and treatment of perinatal depression in Latinas and African American women: Addressing stigma is not enough. Women’s Health Issues 2018, 28, 201–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Caballero, M.; Leyva-Flores, R.; Ochoa-Marin, S.C.; Zarco, A.; Guerrero, C. Women who are left behind: The impact of international migration on the process of seeking health care. Salud Pública Mex. 2008, 50, 241–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Lancaster, C.A.; Gold, K.J.; Flynn, H.A.; Yoo, H.; Marcus, S.M.; Davis, M.M. Risk factors for depressive symptoms during pregnancy: A systematic review. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2010, 202, 5–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Leahy-Warren, P.; McCarthy, G.; Corcoran, P. First-time mothers: Social support, maternal parental self-efficacy and postnatal depression. J. Clin. Nurs. 2012, 21, 388–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Ramakrishna, S.; Cooklin, A.R.; Leach, L.S. Comorbid anxiety and depression: A community-based study examining symptomology and correlates during the postpartum period. J. Reprod. Infant Psychol. 2019, 37, 468–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Choi, K.W.; Kim, Y.K.; Jeon, H.J. Comorbid anxiety and depression: Clinical and conceptual consideration and transdiagnostic treatment. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2020, 1191, 219–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Dagher, R.K.; Bruckheim, H.E.; Colpe, L.J.; Edwards, E.; White, D.B. Perinatal depression: Challenges and opportunities. J. Women’s Health 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Woody, C.A.; Ferrari, A.J.; Siskind, D.J.; Whiteford, H.A.; Harris, M.G. A systematic review and meta-regression of the prevalence and incidence of perinatal depression. J. Affect. Disord. 2017, 219, 86–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Lara-Cinisomo, S.; Grewen, K.M.; Girdler, S.S.; Wood, J.; Meltzer-Brody, S. Perinatal depression, adverse life events, and hypothalamic-adrenal-pituitary axis response to cold pressor stress in Latinas: An exploratory study. Women’s Health Issues 2017, 27, 673–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Lara-Cinisomo, S.; McKenney, K.; Di Florio, A.; Meltzer-Brody, S. Associations between postpartum depression, breastfeeding, and oxytocin levels in Latina mothers. Breastfeed. Med. 2017, 12, 436–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Mukherjee, S.; Trepka, M.J.; Pierre-Victor, D.; Bahelah, R.; Avent, T. Racial/ethnic disparities in antenatal depression in the United States: A systematic review. Matern. Child Health J. 2016, 20, 1780–1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Lara-Cinisomo, S.; Wood, J.; Fujimoto, E. A systematic review of cultural orientation and perinatal depression in Latina women: Are acculturation, Marianismo, and religiosity risks or protective factors? Arch. Women’s Ment. Health 2019, 22, 557–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Hackett, R.A.; Steptoe, A.; Jackson, S.E. Sex discrimination and mental health in women: A prospective analysis. Health Psychol. 2019, 38, 1014–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Navarro, D.M.; Robles, J.N.; Hernández, L.O. La mujer en México: Inequidad, pobreza y violencia. Rev. Mex. Cienc. Políticas Soc. 2014, 59, 117–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Rafful, C.; Medina-Mora, M.E.; Borges, G.; Benjet, C.; Orozco, R. Depression, gender, and the treatment gap in Mexico. J. Affect. Disord. 2012, 138, 165–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Diaz-Loving, R.; Aragon, S.R.; Aragóon, R.S. Rasgos instrumentales (masculinos) y expresivos (femeninos). Rev. Latinoam. Psicol. 2001, 33, 131–139. [Google Scholar]
  63. DiGirolamo, A.M.; de Snyder, N.S. Women as primary caregivers in Mexico: Challenges to well-being. Salud Pública Mex. 2008, 50, 516–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Michl, L.C.; McLaughlin, K.A.; Shepherd, K.; Nolen-Hoeksema, S. Rumination as a mechanism linking stressful life events to symptoms of depression and anxiety: Longitudinal evidence in early adolescents and adults. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 2013, 122, 339–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Gress-Smith, J.L.; Roubinov, D.S.; Tanaka, R.; Cmic, K.; Gonzales, N.; Enders, C.; Luecken, L.J. Prenatal expectations in Mexican American women: Development of a culturally sensitive measure. Arch. Womens Ment. Health 2013, 16, 303–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Negron, R.; Martin, A.; Almog, M.; Balbierz, A.; Howell, E.A. Social support during the postpartum period: Mothers’ views on needs, expectations, and mobilization of support. Matern. Child Health J. 2013, 17, 616–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Razurel, C.; Kaiser, B. The role of satisfaction with social support on the psychological health of primiparous mothers in the perinatal period. Women Health 2015, 55, 167–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Stein, G.L.; Guzman, L.E. Prevention and intervention research with Latino families: A translational approach. Fam. Process 2015, 54, 280–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Le, H.N.; Zmuda, J.; Perry, D.F.; Muñoz, R.F. Transforming an evidence-based intervention to prevent perinatal depression for low-income Latina immigrants. Am. J. Orthopsychiatry 2010, 80, 34–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Baker-Ericzén, M.J.; Connelly, C.D.; Hazen, A.L.; Dueñas, C.; Landsverk, J.A.; Horwitz, S.M. A collaborative care telemedicine intervention to overcome treatment barriers for Latina women with depression during the perinatal period. Fam. Syst. Health 2012, 30, 224–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Marsiglia, F.F.; Kulis, S.; Garcia Perez, H.; Bermudez-Parsai, M. Hopelessness, family stress, and depression among Mexican-heritage mothers in the southwest. Health Soc. Work 2011, 36, 7–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Garcia-Gonzalez, J.; Ventura-Miranda, M.I.; Requena-Mullor, M.; Parron-Carreño, T.; Alarcon-Rodriguez, R. State-trait anxiety levels during pregnancy and foetal parameters following intervention with music therapy. J. Affect. Disord. 2018, 232, 17–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Hepp, P.; Hagenbeck, C.; Gilles, J.; Wolf, O.T.; Goertz, W.; Janni, W.; Balan, P.; Fleisch, M.; Fehm, T.; Schaal, N.K. Effects of music intervention during caesarean delivery on anxiety and stress of the mother a controlled, randomised study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018, 18, 435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Lara-Cinisomo, S.; Wisner, K.L. (Eds.) Perinatal Depression Among Spanish-Speaking Women: A global Perspective on Prevalence, Treatment, and Outcomes; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijerph 18 00082 g001 550
Figure 1. Participant flow diagram.
Figure 1. Participant flow diagram.
Ijerph 18 00082 g001
Table
Table 1. Demographic, obstetric, and psychosocial risk factor characteristics.
Table 1. Demographic, obstetric, and psychosocial risk factor characteristics.
x ¯ SD
Age 28.96.2
Monthly family income 498.7502.3
Educational attainment (years) 12.73.8
Number of children 0.810.89
n%
Marital statusPartnered22379.6
Single5720.4
DeliveryVaginal8536.3
Cesarean14963.7
Resilience during pregnancyLow5720.4
High22379.6
Traditional female role during pregnancyLow20673.6
High 7426.4
Marital satisfaction during pregnancyLow6824.3
High 21275.7
Social support during pregnancyLow 4215.0
High23885.0
Stressful life events during pregnancyWith events 5921.1
Without events22178.9
Depressive symptoms during pregnancyWith symptoms5720.4
Without symptoms22379.6
Social support during the postpartum periodLow 4017.1
High19482.9
Stressful life events during the postpartum period With events 4516.1
Without events18967.5
Depressive symptoms during the postpartum period With symptoms 4020.1
Without symptoms19479.9
Note: n = 234 women; x ¯ = Mean; SD = Standard Deviation.
Table
Table 2. Perinatal anxiety symptom rates.
Table 2. Perinatal anxiety symptom rates.
Pregnancy
(n = 280)		Sixth Week Postpartum
(n = 234)
n (%)n (%)
With anxiety symptoms62 (22.1)41 (17.5)
Without anxiety symptoms218 (77.9)193 (82.5)
McNemar χ2 = 1.30, p = 0.25.
Table
Table 3. Bivariate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for demographic, obstetric and psychosocial variables associated withanxiety symptoms in pregnancy and sixth postpartum week.
Table 3. Bivariate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for demographic, obstetric and psychosocial variables associated withanxiety symptoms in pregnancy and sixth postpartum week.
Variables Time 1.
Pregnancy
(n = 280)		Time 2.
Sixth Week Postpartum
(n = 234)
OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)
Age0.99 (0.95–1.04)0.97 (0.92–1.03)
Monthly family income0.99 (0.89–1.03)0.99 (0.84–1.49)
Single2.59 (1.37–4.90) *2.25 (1.05–4.80) *
Educational attainment0.95 (0.89–1.03)0.89 (0.81–0.97) *
Number of children1.10 (0.81–1.50)1.31 (0.78–1.63)
Cesarean delivery--1.15 (0.57–2.29)
Low resilience during pregnancy2.87 (1.52–5.41) **2.24 (1.03–4.89) *
Traditional female role during pregnancy4.07 (2.23–7.41) **1.95 (0.95–4.01)
Low marital satisfaction during pregnancy 4.03 (2.19–7.40) **2.43 (1.17–2.42) *
Low social support during pregnancy6.17 (3.07–12.41) **6.63 (2.85–15.42) **
Stressful life events during pregnancy8.40 (4.40–16.02) **3.47 (1.66–7.27) **
Depressive symptoms during pregnancy 6.63 (3.49–12.58) **4.55 (2.15–9.59) **
Low social support during the postpartum period--2.85 (1.31–6.18) *
Stressful life events during the postpartum period--7.39 (3.50–15.60) **
Depressive symptoms during the postpartum period--11.25 (5.14–24.61) **
** p ≤ 0.01, * p ≤ 0.05.
Table
Table 4. Multivariate logistic regression model of anxiety symptoms during pregnancy.
Table 4. Multivariate logistic regression model of anxiety symptoms during pregnancy.
Pregnancy (n = 280)
OR95% CI
Age1.010.95–1.08
Monthly family income0.990.93–1.10
Educational attainment1.060.94–1.20
Number of children0.851.50–6.68
Single1.720.70–4.25
Low resilience during pregnancy1.160.48–2.78
Traditional female role during pregnancy2.28 *1.06–4.88
Low marital satisfaction during pregnancy 1.320.54–3.25
Low social support during pregnancy2.250.92–5.50
Stressful life events during pregnancy 4.35 **2.02–9.37
Depressive symptoms during pregnancy3.82 **1.72–8.48
χ2 = 77.11 p = 0.00 ** p ≤ 0.01, * p ≤ 0.05.
Table
Table 5. Multivariate logistic regression model of six weeks postpartum anxiety symptoms.
Table 5. Multivariate logistic regression model of six weeks postpartum anxiety symptoms.
Six Weeks Postpartum (n = 234)
OR95% CI
Age0.940.86–1.03
Monthly family income0.990.96–1.22
Educational attainment0.84 *0.72–0.99
Number of children0.820.32–2.11
Single3.030.92–9.80
Cesarean delivery section1.010.37–2.68
Low resilience during pregnancy2.000.65–6.11
Traditional female role during pregnancy0.900.31–3.08
Low marital satisfaction during pregnancy 5.061.50–20.84
Low social support during pregnancy2.25 *0.92–5.50
Stressful life events during pregnancy 0.980.31–3.08
Depressive symptoms during pregnancy 1.890.66–5.37
Low social support during the postpartum period0.300.07–1.19
Stressful life events during the postpartum period 5.42 **1.84–15.89
Depressive symptoms during the postpartum period 9.03 **3.24–15.12
χ2 = 72.11 p = 0.00 ** p ≤ 0.01, * p ≤ 0.05.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Juarez Padilla, J.; Lara-Cinisomo, S.; Navarrete, L.; Lara, M.A. Perinatal Anxiety Symptoms: Rates and Risk Factors in Mexican Women. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 82. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph18010082

AMA Style

Juarez Padilla J, Lara-Cinisomo S, Navarrete L, Lara MA. Perinatal Anxiety Symptoms: Rates and Risk Factors in Mexican Women. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(1):82. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph18010082

Chicago/Turabian Style

Juarez Padilla, Janeth, Sandraluz Lara-Cinisomo, Laura Navarrete, and Ma. Asunción Lara. 2021. "Perinatal Anxiety Symptoms: Rates and Risk Factors in Mexican Women" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 1: 82. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph18010082

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop