Next Article in Journal
Validation and Test of Measurement Invariance of the Adapted Health Consciousness Scale (HCS-G)
Previous Article in Journal
Health Care Access Measures and Palliative Care Use by Race/Ethnicity among Metastatic Gynecological Cancer Patients in the United States
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 18
Issue 11
10.3390/ijerph18116043
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Diarrhoea among Children Aged under Five Years and Risk Factors in Informal Settlements: A Cross-Sectional Study in Cape Town, South Africa

by
Thi Yen Chi Nguyen
1,2,*,
Bamidele Oladapo Fagbayigbo
3,4,
Guéladio Cissé
1,2,*,
Nesre Redi
1,2,
Samuel Fuhrimann
1,2,
John Okedi
4,
Christian Schindler
1,2,
Martin Röösli
1,2,
Neil Philip Armitage
4,
Kirsty Carden
4 and
Mohamed Aqiel Dalvie
3,4
1
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland
2
University of Basel, CH-4003 Basel, Switzerland
3
Centre for Environmental and Occupational Health Research, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town 7925, South Africa
4
Future Water Institute, University of Cape Town, Cape Town 7700, South Africa
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(11), 6043; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph18116043
Submission received: 29 April 2021 / Revised: 31 May 2021 / Accepted: 1 June 2021 / Published: 4 June 2021
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: There is limited data on the association between diarrhoea among children aged under five years (U5D) and water use, sanitation, hygiene, and socio-economics factors in low-income communities. The study investigated U5D and the associated risk factors in the Zeekoe catchment in Cape Town, South Africa. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 707 households in six informal settlements (IS) two formal settlements (FS) (March–June 2017). Results: Most IS households used public taps (74.4%) and shared toilets (93.0%), while FS households used piped water on premises (89.6%) and private toilets (98.3%). IS respondents had higher average hand-washing scores than those of FS (0.04 vs. −0.14, p = 0.02). The overall U5D prevalence was 15.3% (range: 8.6%–24.2%) and was higher in FS than in IS (21.2% vs. 13.4%, respectively, p = 0.01). Water storage >12 h was associated with increasing U5D (OR = 1.88, 95% CI 1.00–3.55, p = 0.05). Water treatment (OR = 0.57, 95%CI 0.34–0.97, p = 0.04), good hand-washing practices (OR = 0.59, 95%CI 0.42–0.82, p = 0.002) and Hepatitis A vaccination (OR = 0.51, 95%CI 0.28–0.9, p = 0.02) had significant preventing effects on U5D. Conclusions: The study highlights that good hygiene practice is a key intervention against U5D in informal settlements. The promotion of hand-washing, proper water storage, and hygienic breastfeeding is highly recommended.

1. Introduction

In 2017, diarrhoea was among the leading cause of death among all ages globally (more than 1.7 million deaths) and the fifth leading cause of death among children younger than five years with more than 0.44 million deaths) [1]. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) 2017 report, more than a quarter (26.9%) of diarrhoea deaths occurred among children younger than five years, and about 90% of diarrhoea deaths occurred in South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa [2]. Statistics South Africa (Stats SA) estimates that 20% of under-five deaths may be attributed to diarrhoea [3], with 31,436 diarrhoea cases recorded in 2016 [4], while other sources estimate the mortality rate between 8%–24% [5,6].
There is an unequal geographical distribution of diarrhoea burden among children younger than five years of age across Africa [6]. Children in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are the most vulnerable to diarrhoea. More than half of all the diarrhoea-related deaths among children in Africa were estimated to occur in 7.0% of the first-level administrative subdivisions (i.e., states, regions or provinces depending on the country) on the continent [6]. Diarrhoea is closely associated with environmental and socio-economic conditions, with the impoverished communities being most affected [7]. In 2016, over 75% (101/133) of diseases or disease groups listed in the Global Health Observatory had significant links with the environment, and more than one-quarter of the 6.6 million under-five child deaths were associated with environment-related causes and conditions [8]. Among diseases contributing to the environmental burden of diseases, diarrhoea diseases count for 22% and parasitic and vector-borne diseases for 12% [9].
Informal Settlements (IS) in Africa are synonymous with public health challenges as a result of dense population and poor sanitation [10,11,12]. The urban population growth rates in Africa are the highest in the world, and it has been projected that by 2050, Africa’s cities will be home to an estimated 950 million people [13]. In South Africa, 3.5 million out of the 17 million households (20%) were living in rural and informal settlements. In 2013, the Cape Town metro alone had 204 informal settlements with more than 200,000 households estimated to be living in conditions where fire and sanitation are among major health hazards, and this number increases each year [14].
In 2016, the population of Cape Town was estimated at 4,617,560 inhabitants with a 2.40% annual growth rate, in which 17% of the population was located in informal dwellings [12]. Many of these informal settlements are located on low-lying, flood-prone areas or steep slopes with poor water and sanitation services. Generally, those informal settlements are characterized by dense populations, unhygienic conditions, improper disposal of waste, and poor sanitation. With such living conditions, citizens who live in those areas are particularly vulnerable to diarrhoea. Additionally, a lack of access to potable water supplies, contamination risks associated with the water sources, poor sanitation, poor drainage, presence of contaminated grey water, and inadequate stormwater management, among other factors, may increase the risks for diarrhea—especially for children under five. During 2012–2015, there were an estimated 25,000–30,000 diarrhoea cases each year in children aged less than five years [15]. In 2017, Nerse et al. found the one and two-week prevalence of diarrhea among under-five children in informal settlements surrounding Cape Town were 13.22% and 16.9%, respectively [16].
Diarrhoea is a major public health issue in the Western Cape, South Africa, with a seasonal variation that has a peak between March and June every year. However, the sources and burden of early childhood diarrhoea are multidirectional and difficult to truly ascertain [17,18], and further, less is known about the situation in informal settlements. In this study, we set out to assess under-five childhood diarrhoea and its risk factors in the informal settlements of the Zeekoe catchment area. The specific objectives were: (i) To determine the risk factors for diarrhoea in informal settlements; (ii) To identify the distribution of diarrhoea in children under five years in this setting; and (iii) To recommend prevention and control measures for children’s diarrhoea in the low-lying informal settlements in Cape Town.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ethics Statement

The study protocol was approved by the “Ethikkommission Nordwest—und Zentralschweiz (EKNZ)” in Switzerland (EKNZ BASEC 2016-00304) and by the “Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC)” of the University of Cape Town in South Africa (HREC REF 248/2016). All the interviews were conducted after the head of the household agreed to participate in the survey and informed consent forms were signed.

2.2. Study Location

The study was conducted in six informal and two formal settlements of Cape Town, located in the Zeekoe Catchment in the Cape Flats (a low-lying area of Cape Town). The map of the catchment study area is represented in Figure 1a–c. The catchment area overlays the Cape Flats Aquifer (CFA), a potential groundwater resource, and is marked by various land uses, precarious socio-economic conditions, black and grey water flows from settlements and industries, and a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) that discharges treated effluent to the sea (Figure 1).

2.3. Selection of Settlements and Study Population

The Zeekoe Catchment area consists of a wide range of communities, with many formal settlements blended into a poor informal settlement and sharing the same polluted premises [19]. Six informal settlements in the catchment selected in a previous phase of the study were also selected for this study, namely: Barcelona, Lotus Park, Phola Park, Sweet Home, Weltevrede, and Pelican Park (Figure 1c). In addition, we selected nearby formal houses from Gugulethu and Manenberg. The selection of these sites was based on the following criteria established with the civil society actors working in the areas: (i) Accessibility of the area; (ii) Interviewer’s availability for the survey in the settlement; and (iii) Security issues. Of note, all the settlements from the catchment considered for inclusion in the study were high-risk crime areas, and thus, it was important to minimize the threat to the safety of the field staff. Areas were visited if site facilitators were available to accompany field staff. Houses in the selected areas were selected opportunistically.

2.4. Study Population

The sample size was chosen for use in a Monte Carlo simulation. A sample size of approximately 90 households per each settlement was selected, assuming that the assumed prevalence of childhood diarrhoea in study sites was 40% with a standard deviation of 5%, and the ratio between exposed and non-exposed groups was 1:1. ‘Diarrhoea’ was defined as “having three or more loose or liquid bowel movements over a 24-h period, as reported by the mother or caregiver of the child, at any point during the seven days preceding the interview” [7].

2.5. Data Collection

Data were collected from March to June 2017. The questionnaire was developed in English and translated into Xhosa and Afrikaans for appropriate communication within the local community, given that many residents are not fluent in the English language. A pilot study was carried out three days before the beginning of the household survey to identify possible shortcomings of the questionnaire and to verify the anticipated duration of the interview. The questionnaire covered the following sections: (i) basic demographic information, (ii) socio-economic status, (iii) water source, (iv) sanitation and hygiene, and (v) child health status. The survey questions were addressed to the head of the household or its legal representative at the time of the interview. The questionnaires were administered by six groups of trained interviewers consisting of two persons per group. The anonymity of the respondents was preserved throughout the course of the research.

2.6. Statistical Analyses

Statistical analyses were carried out using Stata14 software (StataCorp LP, Lakeway, TX, USA). Using factor analysis, a wealth index was created based on possessions of household items, and a hand-washing index was created based on hand-washing. All variables were screened for irregularities and outliers. Basic descriptive statistical analyses, such as median, mean, interquartile ranges, standard deviation (SD), and confidence interval (CI), were obtained for the relevant continuous variables, and a frequency table was generated for other variables.
Due to the hierarchical structure of collected data where child’s data being nested in the household and household data in communities, multi-level logistic modelling was performed [20]. Mixed-effects logistic regression modelling was used to examine the effects of child-related variables (level 1) and household-related variables (level 2) on childhood diarrhoea.

3. Results

3.1. Characteristics of Studied Households

3.1.1. Demographic and Socio-Economic

A total of 707 households participated in the survey conducted in six informal settlements and two nearby formal settlements. There was a total of 778 children aged 0–5 years old in the recruited households. The demographic and health-related information of those children stratified by living location is shown in Table 1. The mean age of the children was 28.8 months (SD = 17), and 51.9% were female. While the gender of children was distributed equally in the IS, more females than males participated in FS (58.2% vs. 41.8%, respectively). The vast majority of caretaker respondents (>90%) were female. The median number of people per household in FS was 5 (SD: 2.2, range 1–18). It was also observed that residents of FS stay longer in their current address relative to those from the IS with an average duration of (23 years vs. 8 years, p = 0.005). Although FS families had a statistically significantly higher mean wealth index than those living in IS (p = 0.05), there was not much difference in the proportion of children going to daycare (47.1% vs. 47.3%, p = 0.99).

3.1.2. Water Access and Resources

The majority of children in participating households had access to potable water (>97%) for domestic use. In IS, 74.4% of households used public taps as the main source of drinking water (Figure 2a). All residences of IS had access to water predominantly from a public tap, with the exception of Pelican Park that had piped tap water inside the yard as the main water resource (Figure 2b). In contrast, piped tap-water on the premises (89.6%) was the most common water resource in formal areas (Figure 2c).
Most IS residents reported storing water either in plastic bottles or containers (96.3%), with the water storage duration exceeding 12 h in 13.1% of households. FS residents were more likely to store water <12 h than those in IS (91.3% vs. 76.2%, Chi-square χ2 =26.9, p < 0.001). Only a small proportion (0.6%) of the caretakers, all from IS, reported that they need over 30 min to get to the water source. A general overview of access to water resources of participating households during the study is represented in Table 2.

3.1.3. Sanitation

Most households (98.3%) reported access to latrines, but only 150 households (21.2%) had access to a flush toilet system. The proportion of IS households having access to an improved sanitation facility (modern toilet, potable water, waste disposal) was considerably lower than those of FS households (5.0% vs. 75.0%, Chi-square test, p < 0.001). Shared facilities were the most common in all IS (93%), while a private toilet was the most common among FS households (75%) (Figure 3a). The mean number of households that shared a sanitary facility in most informal households was 4 (range 1–11). Most of the sanitary facilities were located less than 50 m from the houses (94.8%). While flush toilets were the most frequently reported facility in formal areas (>96%) (Figure 3c), facility types varied across informal sites, with the flush toilet the most common in Pelican Park (96.6%) and Phola Park (97.7%); the portable toilet system is most common in Barcelona (71%) and Shengu (chemical toilets) and flush toilets in Lotus Park, Weltevrede, and Sweet Home (Figure 3b).

3.1.4. Hygiene

With regard to hygiene, the participants were asked, “When do you usually wash your hands?” with options: before eating, after eating, after defecation, after latrine use, before feeding child, after handing rubbish, after handling child’s diaper/feces, before food preparation, after touching animals. The questionnaire also included the hygiene question, “Have you seen any rats/cockroaches around your house in the last 7 days.” Additionally, interviewers recorded the availability of soap in the house using an observation checklist.
The respondents reported whether they washed hands before eating (69.9% IS vs. 95.7% FS), after eating (61.1% IS vs. 55.5% FS), after defecation (51.2% IS vs. 37.2% FS), after latrine use (62.6% IS vs. 59.8% FS), before feeding child (61.9% IS vs. 61% FS), after handling rubbish (58% IS vs. 42.7% FS), after handling child’s diaper/feces (52.9% IS vs. 34.2% FS), before food preparation (58.9% IS vs. 64.6% FS), and after touching animals (12.5% IS vs. 12.2% FS). The results of an analysis using a hand-washing index derived from the above indicators using principal component analysis showed that respondents from IS had better hand-washing practices than FS (t-test, p = 0.02). The availability of soap at hand-washing places reported in both formal and informal settlements are similar (28.5% vs. 26.2%) and not statistically significantly different. With regard to wastewater disposal, most IS respondents reported that wastewater was disposed of onto open ground (63.8%), while most FS respondents reported that they disposed wastewater into the toilet (51.2%) and onto open ground far away from their houses (18.3%). Pest (rats, cockroaches) invasion 2 weeks prior to the survey occurred more frequently in IS compared to FS (87.0% vs. 46.0%, p = 0.00); however, using pesticides inside the house during 2 weeks prior to the survey was less frequently reported in IS than FS households (44.0% vs. 57.0%, p = 0.004). Hygiene practices of respondents from informal and formal households are presented in Table 3.

3.1.5. Health-Related Indicators of Children

The health-related indicators for participating children include vaccines monitored by the South Africa Expanded Programme on Immunisation (EPI-SA). Children from FS were more frequently reported to be vaccinated than IS children: 74.1% vs. 50.9% for Hep B vaccination and 76.2% vs. 64.2% for Rotavirus, respectively (Chi-square test, p < 0.001). Interestingly, for HepA vaccination, which is not sponsored under EPI-SA, children living in informal households were reported to get injected more frequently than those living in formal households (45.0% vs. 33.9%, Chi-square test, p < 0.001). Overall, 12.3% of all children were breastfed exclusively for 6 months after birth. More than two-thirds of studied children (76.4%) reportedly had no breastfeeding at all. There was no statistically significant difference in breastfeeding rates between FS and IS children (21.1% vs. 24.5%, Chi-square test, p = 0.33).

3.2. Distribution of Diarrhoea Cases

The prevalence of diarrhoea among children under five years old was calculated based on the total number of cases that reported having diarrhoea during the 7 days prior to the interview in all the participating households. The distributions of diarrhoea cases by study site, age and gender distribution are illustrated in Figure 4.
Among a total of 778 recruited children, diarrhoea occurrence was recorded in 119 children (15.3%). The period prevalence was highest in Gugulethu (24.2%), followed by Pelican Park (19.4%), Manenberg (17.8%), Sweet Home (15%), Barcelona (14.4%), Lotus Park (11.1%), Phola Park (11.1%), and Weltevrede (8.6%) (Figure 4b). The prevalence of diarrhoea cases in this study was higher in formal settlements compared to informal settings (21.2% vs. 13.4% respectively, Chi-square test, χ2 = 6.6, p = 0.01) (Figure 4a). As seen in Figure 4c, the age group of 6–11 months had the highest prevalence of diarrhoea (26%), following by the group of 24–35 months (18%); conversely, the diarrhoea prevalence in other age groups was lower, ranging from 12%–13%. Diarrhoea prevalence was higher among girls than boys in all age groups, except in children aged 12–23 months. However, the gender difference was not statistically significant (Chi-square test, χ2 = 1.5, p = 0.22) (Figure 4d).

3.3. Risk Factors Associated with Diarrhoea Using Multi-Level Multivariate Analysis

The results from the multivariate analysis show that the caregiver’s education level was positively associated with the diarrhoea occurrence in children under five years old (OR =1.59, 95% CI 1.06–2.40, p = 0.03). There was no significant association between economic status, based on the wealth index and under-five-year child diarrhoea (OR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.38–1.17, p = 0.16). Usage of water stored >12 h showed a statistically significant positive association with diarrhoea (OR = 1.90, 95%CI 1.02–3.79, p = 0.05). Children from households who treat water before drinking were less likely to experience diarrhoea compared to children from households who do not treat water (OR = 0.57, 95%CI 0.34–0.97, p = 0.04). None of the drinking water sources were statistically significantly associated with diarrhoea. Interruption of water supply was not found to be statistically significantly associated (OR = 1.21, 95%CI 0.69–2.09, p = 0.5) with diarrhoea. Additionally, sanitation characteristics and ownership status, when summarized as a continuous variable, showed a significant association with under-five diarrhoea (OR = 0.47. 95% CI 0.26–0.84, p = 0.12). Interestingly, a higher number of households sharing the same facility was associated with a lower risk of diarrhoea among study participants. There was a significantly lower risk of diarrhoea among households sharing the facility with more than three other households compared to those using non-shared facilities (OR = 0.35, 95%CI 0.15–0.85, p =0.02). Dysfunctional toilet facilities showed a significant positive association with childhood diarrhoea (OR = 1.88, 95%CI 1.00–3.55, p = 0.05). An increased hand-washing index was found to be strongly associated with a lower risk of diarrhoea (OR = 0.61, 95%CI 0.47–0.79, p < 0.001). There was no significant association between under-five diarrhoea, gender, and age. The duration of breastfeeding showed a weak and statistically non-significant positive association with the risk of diarrhoea (OR = 1.11, 95%CI 1.00–1.23, p = 0.07). The results in Table 4 shows Hepatitis A vaccination to be a statistically significant protective factor (OR = 0.51, 95%CI 0.28–0.90, p = 0.02) while rotavirus vaccination was not statistically significantly associated with under-five diarrhoea (OR = 1.62, 95%CI 0.86–3.08, p = 0.14).

4. Discussions

This study revealed that socio-economic factors were important predictors of under-five diarrhoea. Children living in the formal settlements showed greater evidence of access to socio-economic facilities (accommodation, education and health) relative to those living in the informal settlements. It is important to note, however, that living in a formal settlement does not necessarily suggest better hygiene practice. People living in formal settlements have a surprisingly lower index of hand-washing compared to people living in informal settlements. The combination of poor living conditions, poor hygiene practices and contaminated environment in the neighbourhood contributed to diarrhoea cases in children under five in both formal and informal households. The literature suggests that the caregiver’s increasing level of education has been considered as a protective factor against diarrhoea [21,22,23]. However, the results in this study show that the higher education levels of caregivers are associated with a consistently increased risk of diarrhoea in children under five. The paradox has been found in some other studies reporting that there were no differences in knowledge of adequate dietary practices between different maternal education levels [24,25]. In addition, higher education could lead to earlier weaning which can increase episodes of diarrhoea in children [26].
Water access and resources is a crucial factor that serves as an indicator of community health. The majority of the investigated households in the formal settlements have access to the municipal water supply. Various factors relating to water access do not allow for any concrete conclusions about the safety of the system delivering water in informal households in this study. Inhabitants in informal settlements are not allowed to have private water connections to their homes; however, some make illegal connections without any supervision or instruction from local authorities, thus creating a path for potential pollution. There is seldom any system for draining the grey water generated by the in-house supply from the informal settlement [27].
Our findings show that sharing sanitation facilities with others was associated with an increased risk of diarrhoea relative to non-sharing facilities. Contamination of drinking water resources was higher in households with poor sanitation compared to those with adequate sanitation, and this may explain the increased risk of diarrhoea in the former. However, there are different types of shared sanitation services in informal settlements, varying from a self-maintained facility that is shared between a few nearby households to publicly run facilities (some might be maintained better than others). Although our data suggested that shared sanitation does not pose higher risks than private access, other factors related to sanitation could be more important in diarrhoea transmission. For instance, IS are constrained both with respect to space and water supply, and the majority of communal sanitation facilities are not linked to a sewage system. Stagnant water is often observed in such dense informal communities, which poses a big risk of spreading diarrhoea pathogens into the environment. Previous studies demonstrated children would face a high risk of diarrhoea from playing in soil and surface water outside the household [28,29]. Reinforcing the findings from other studies, we also found that dysfunctional toilet facilities to be significantly associated with childhood diarrhoea in this study. This study found that hygiene practices were associated with a reduced risk of childhood diarrhoea, which is consistent with the literature [30,31].
It is well-known that good hygiene could enhance healthy living, and treating point-use water reduces the risk of getting diarrhoea disease [30,32]. Our findings show that children from households with good hygiene are less likely to experience diarrhoea than those who did not. This study is consistent with similar studies elsewhere [33]. Hygiene practices, such as water purification methods, including water-boiling and filtration, could reduce the pathogen load in water if the process is carried out consistently and correctly according to standard techniques [30,34]. Another study also suggested that not all water treatment methods are effective if carried out in an unhygienic manner; improper infiltration could cause by unsafe storage water leading to recontamination after treating [35]. Our data shows that drinking water stored longer than 12 h could contribute to the potential risk of childhood diarrhoea. Similar results were found in other studies conducted in developing countries [36,37,38]. Our findings suggested that sharing a facility with more than four households significantly lower the risk of diarrhoea compared to those using a non-shared facility. Similar studies conducted in Tanzania showed that shared latrines contained lower concentrations of Escherichia coli compared to private latrines [39]. Both results are unexpected. Other studies and meta-analyses found that shared sanitation is generally dirtier and associated with an increased risk of diarrhoea compared to private sanitation [40,41,42,43], suggesting the need for further investigation.

4.1. Child-Health Related Factors

In this study, the highest diarrhoea prevalence occurred in children aged 06–11 months. This finding is consistent with that of previous research that suggests diarrhoea is more likely to happen to younger children under 12 months, and the risk reduces with increasing age [44,45,46]. Ordinarily, breastfeeding should increase the children’s immune system and thus protect them against diarrhoea, but this was not found to be the case for those aged under five in this study. This could be due to exposure to contaminated water lying around the informal settlements, increased exposure of the toddler to contaminated water and/or lack of personal hygiene. Additionally, practicing breastfeeding may contribute to childhood diarrhoea if the nursing mothers engage in unhygienic practices such as dirty breasts. Findings also revealed that children who took the HepA vaccine are at lower risk than those who were not HepA vaccinated. The prevalence of Hep A infection in the study is likely due to exposure to poor water and sanitation conditions. Serological studies detected HepA in fecal samples of children with acute diarrhoea in developing countries [47,48,49]. Furthermore, a number of studies have reported the detection or isolation of Hep A virus from water resources, with the detection rate ranging from 76% in surface water to 37% in wastewater plants and irrigation water [50,51]. However, there was no available data on the Hep A prevalence in children under five years in South Africa, and the role of Hep A virus as an element in diarrhoea has not been documented. The results from this study stress the need for further investigation with routine tracking of Hep A infection as a contributory cause of childhood diarrhoea in sub-urban areas in Cape Town.

4.2. Strengths and Limitations

The strengths of this study include the opportunity to estimate the effects of multiple environmental factors and diarrhoea burden using individual-level data from a community-based survey and using multi-level analyses to consider the effects of individual-level and household-level factors in one analysis. Among the limitations of this study, we did not explore the comparison of the ways sanitation facilities are shared in informal settlements with private access facilities. Most households in informal settlements had access to only shared sanitation facilities. There are limited data on how shared sanitation facilities in informal settlements were managed and maintained. In addition, documentation of how stagnant water and leakages were contained and managed was not explored by our study. Those factors may be important sanitation-related confounders on the effects of sanitation on childhood diarrhoea. We were unable to check our data on diarrhoea prevalence against that collected by the local health authorities owing to the difficulty in obtaining the necessary approvals within the limited time frame of the study. A standard limitation is that diarrhoea was reported by respondents with no clinical confirmation. This method is widely used, although clinical confirmations make the disease classification more reliable. The study also did not track the casual, social, and permanent movement of people from informal settlements to nearby formal houses with exposure to different types of water sources and sanitation facilities, which might contribute to the risk of getting diarrhoea. Moreover, the cross-sectional study design only allows us to describe associations but does not allow us to infer causality. Finally, the study did not involve any biomedical tests which could provide stronger information on diarrhoea aetiology.

5. Conclusions

The study found several factors that were significantly associated with the increased risk of diarrhoea among children under five years old living in informal and formal settlements of the Lotus River catchment area in Cape Town. Namely, these factors are caregiver’s education level, storing water longer than 12 h, not using proper water treatment, sanitation facility shared with more than four households, dysfunctional toilet facility, using pesticides inside the houses, poor hand-washing practices, longer duration of breastfeeding, and not having Hepatitis A vaccination. It was clear that good hygiene practices are key in the prevention of diarrhoea. Based on those findings, the promotion of hygienic practices is highly recommended. Caregivers should have more knowledge about and exercise better the practices of hand-washing, hygienic breastfeeding, and food preparation. Proper and healthy water storage is necessary, covering water containers, and basic water treatment techniques, such as boiling, filtration, and disinfection, should be observed. Local authorities should support improvement on the adequate sanitation and drainage service provision in both formal and informal settlements. A periodic water quality monitoring campaign at the communal level will be necessary to identify early enough possible water contamination problems, which can lead to diarrhoea. Finally, further studies on diarrhoea aetiology and transmission pathways in the informal urban context are required to get a better understanding of diarrhoea causality in these communities.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.Y.C.N., G.C., C.S., M.R., N.P.A. and M.A.D.; Data curation, T.Y.C.N., G.C., M.R., and M.A.D.; Formal analysis, T.Y.C.N. and C.S.; Funding acquisition, G.C., C.S., M.R., and M.A.D.; Investigation, T.Y.C.N., G.C., M.R., and M.A.D.; Methodology, T.Y.C.N., G.C., N.R., S.F., C.S., M.R., and M.A.D.; Project administration, T.Y.C.N. and G.C. and M.A.D.; Supervision, G.C., C.S., M.R., and M.A.D.; Validation, G.C., C.S., M.R., and M.A.D.; Visualization, T.Y.C.N.; Writing—original draft, T.Y.C.N. and B.O.F.; Writing—review and editing, T.Y.C.N., B.O.F., G.C., N.R., S.F., J.O., C.S., M.R., N.P.A., K.C., and M.A.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study is imbedded within the South African–Swiss Bilateral SARChI Chair in Global Environmental Health of Mohamed Aqiel Dalvie, the Centre for Environmental and Occupational Health Research, the University of Cape Town, and Martin Röösli, the Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute. This chair was formed in 2015 with funding sources from the South Africa National Research Foundation (NRF) SARChI (grant number 94883), Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation, University of Basel and the Swiss TPH.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by was approved by the “Ethikkommission Nordwest—und Zen-tralschweiz (EKNZ)” in Switzerland (EKNZ BASEC 2016-00304) and by the “Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC)” of the University of Cape Town in South Africa (HREC REF 248/2016).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. The data are not publicly available due to the presence of confidential participants’ information.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge and express thanks to all individuals and families who participated in the study. Special mention is needed for local teams of Edith Stephens Nature Reserve and A.L. Abbott & Associates, especially Dale Issac, who greatly supported the study and helped with logistical arrangements, translation, as well as community engagement during data collection.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Troeger, C.; Blacker, B.F.; Khalil, I.A.; Rao, P.C.; Cao, S.; Zimsen, S.R.; Albertson, S.B.; Stanaway, J.D.; Deshpande, A.; Abebe, Z.; et al. Estimates of the global, regional, and national morbidity, mortality, and aetiologies of diarrhoea in 195 countries: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2018, 18, 1211–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. World Health Organization. GHO by Category Number of Deaths (Thousands)—Data by WHO Region. Available online: https://apps.who.int/gho/data/view.main.CM1300N?lang=en (accessed on 22 February 2021).
  3. Lehohla, P.; Statistics South Africa. Levels and Trends of Morbidity and Mortality among Children Aged Under-Five Years in South Africa, 2006–2010; Statistics South Africa: Pretoria, South Africa, 2012.
  4. City of Cape Town. Diarrhoea Statistics Prove Interventions Are Working. Available online: https://www.capetown.gov.za/Media-and-news/Diarrhoea%20statistics%20prove%20interventions%20are%20working (accessed on 22 February 2021).
  5. Walker, C.L.F.; Black, R.E. Diarrhoea morbidity and mortality in older children, adolescents, and adults. Epidemiol. Infect. 2010, 138, 1215–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Reiner, R.C.; Graetz, N.; Casey, D.C.; Troeger, C.; Garcia, G.M.; Mosser, J.; Deshpande, A.; Swartz, S.J.; Ray, S.E.; Blacker, B.F.; et al. Variation in Childhood Diarrheal Morbidity and Mortality in Africa, 2000–2015. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 379, 1128–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Thiam, S.; Diène, A.N.; Fuhrimann, S.; Winkler, M.S.; Sy, I.; Ndione, J.A.; Schindler, C.; Vounatsou, P.; Utzinger, J.; Faye, O.; et al. Prevalence of diarrhoea and risk factors among children under five years old in Mbour, Senegal: A cross-sectional study. Infect. Dis. Poverty 2017, 6, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Prüss-Üstün, A.; Wolf, J.; Corvalán, C.; Bos, R.; Neira, M. Preventing Disease through Healthy Environments: A Global Assessment of the Burden of Disease from Environmental Risks, 2nd ed.; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2016; p. 147. [Google Scholar]
  9. World Health Organization. Inheriting a Sustainable World: Atlas on Children’s Health and the Environment [Internet]. Available online: http://www.who.int/ceh/publications/inheriting-a-sustainable-world/en/ (accessed on 26 February 2021).
  10. UN-Habitat. World Cities Report 2016. Urbanization and Development: Emerging Futures [Internet]. Available online: https://wcr.unhabitat.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/16/2016/05/WCR-%20Full-Report-2016.pdf (accessed on 26 February 2021).
  11. Smit, W. The challenge of COVID-19 in African cities: An urgent call for informal settlement upgrading. Cities Health 2020, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gibson, L.; Rush, D. Novel Coronavirus in Cape Town Informal Settlements: Feasibility of Using Informal Dwelling Outlines to Identify High Risk Areas for COVID-19 Transmission from A Social Distancing Perspective. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020, 6, e18844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. OECD, Sahel and West Africa Club. Africa’s Urbanisation Dynamics 2020: Africapolis, Mapping a New Urban Geography [Internet]. 2020. (West African Studies). Available online: https://0-www-oecd--ilibrary-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/development/africa-s-urbanisation-dynamics-2020_b6bccb81-en (accessed on 26 February 2021).
  14. Kellerman, A. Globalization and Spatial Mobilities: Commodities and People, Capital, Information and Technology; Edward Elgar Pubishing: Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA, USA, 2020; p. 198. [Google Scholar]
  15. City of Cape Town. Diarrhoea Trends Suggest that More Hard Work is Required [Internet]. Available online: https://www.capetown.gov.za/media-and-news/Diarrhoea%20trends%20suggest%20that%20more%20hard%20work%20is%20required (accessed on 16 February 2021).
  16. Nesre, R. Water Quality and Diarrhoeal Diseases in Children in the Lotus River Catchment Area in Cape Town, South Africa; University of Basel: Basel, Switzerland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  17. Chola, L.; Michalow, J.; Tugendhaft, A.; Hofman, K. Reducing diarrhoea deaths in South Africa: Costs and effects of scaling up essential interventions to prevent and treat diarrhoea in under-five children. BMC Public Health 2015, 15, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Dorrington, R.; Bradshaw, D.; Laubscher, R.; Nannan, N. Rapid Mortality Surveillance Report 2016; South African Medical Research Council: Cape Town, South Africa, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  19. Grobicki, A.M. Urban catchment management in a developing country: The Lotus River project, Cape Town, South Africa. Water Sci. Technol. 2001, 44, 313–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sommet, N.; Morselli, D. Keep Calm and Learn Multilevel Logistic Modeling: A Simplified Three-Step Procedure Using Stata, R, Mplus, and SPSS. Int. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 2017, 30, 203–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Hashizume, M.; Armstrong, B.; Hajat, S.; Wagatsuma, Y.; Faruque, A.S.G.; Hayashi, T.; Sack, D.A. Association between climate variability and hospital visits for non-cholera diarrhoea in Bangladesh: Effects and vulnerable groups. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2007, 36, 1030–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Azage, M.; Kumie, A.; Worku, A.; Bagtzoglou, A.; Anagnostou, E. Effect of climatic variability on childhood diarrhea and its high risk periods in northwestern parts of Ethiopia. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0186933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Wu, J.; Yunus, M.; Streatfield, P.K.; Emch, M. Association of climate variability and childhood diarrhoeal disease in rural Bangladesh, 2000–2006. Epidemiol. Infect. 2013, 142, 1859–1868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Musengimana, G.; Mukinda, F.K.; Machekano, R.; Mahomed, H. Temperature Variability and Occurrence of Diarrhoea in Children under Five-Years-Old in Cape Town Metropolitan Sub-Districts. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13, 859. Available online: https://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/pmc/articles/PMC5036692 (accessed on 26 February 2021). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Azage, M.; Kumie, A.; Worku, A.; Bagtzoglou, A.C. Childhood diarrhea in high and low hotspot districts of Amhara Region, northwest Ethiopia: A multilevel modeling. J. Health Popul. Nutr. 2016, 35, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Alexander, K.A.; Carzolio, M.; Goodin, D.; Vance, E. Climate Change is Likely to Worsen the Public Health Threat of Diarrheal Disease in Botswana. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2013, 10, 1202–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Aguilar-León, P.; Solano-Zapata, F. Heatwaves and health: Reflections on the El Niño phenomenon in Piura, Peru. Cadernos de Saúde Pública 2016, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Thompson, A.A.; Matamale, L.; Kharidza, S.D. Impact of Climate Change on Children’s Health in Limpopo Province, South Africa. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2012, 9, 831–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Kapwata, T.; Mathee, A.; Le Roux, W.J.; Wright, C.Y. Diarrhoeal Disease in Relation to Possible Household Risk Factors in South African Villages. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 1665. Available online: https://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/pmc/articles/PMC6121382/ (accessed on 26 February 2021). [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. UNICEF. Progress for Children: A Report Card on Water and Sanitation; UNICEF: New York, NY, USA, 2006.
  31. World Health Organization. Preventing Diarrhoea through Better Water, Sanitaiton and Hygiene Exposures and Impacts in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. [Internet]; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2014; Available online: https://0-ebookcentral-proquest-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/lib/uvic/detail.action?docID=1975014 (accessed on 26 February 2021).
  32. Schilling, K.A.; Omore, R.; Derado, G.; Ayers, T.; Ochieng, J.B.; Farag, T.H.; Nasrin, D.; Panchalingam, S.; Nataro, J.P.; Kotloff, K.L.; et al. Factors Associated with the Duration of Moderate-to-Severe Diarrhea among Children in Rural Western Kenya Enrolled in the Global Enteric Multicenter Study, 2008–2012. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2017, 97, 248–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Nygren, B.L.; O’Reilly, C.E.; Rajasingham, A.; Omore, R.; Ombok, M.; Awuor, A.O.; Jaron, P.; Moke, F.; Vulule, J.; Laserson, K.; et al. The Relationship between Distance to Water Source and Moderate-to-Severe Diarrhea in the Global Enterics Multi-Center Study in Kenya, 2008–2011. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2016, 94, 1143–1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Baker, K.K.; Sow, S.O.; Kotloff, K.L.; Nataro, J.P.; Farag, T.H.; Tamboura, B.; Doumbia, M.; Sanogo, D.; Diarra, D.; O’Reilly, C.E.; et al. Quality of piped and stored water in households with children under five years of age enrolled in the Mali site of the Global Enteric Multi-Center Study (GEMS). Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2013, 89, 214–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Alegbeleye, O.O.; Sant’Ana, A.S. Manure-borne pathogens as an important source of water contamination: An update on the dynamics of pathogen survival/transport as well as practical risk mitigation strategies. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2020, 227, 113524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Troeger, C.; Forouzanfar, M.; Rao, P.C.; Khalil, I.; Brown, A.; Reiner, R.C.; Fullman, N.; Thompson, R.L.; Abajobir, A.; Ahmed, M.; et al. Estimates of global, regional, and national morbidity, mortality, and aetiologies of diarrhoeal diseases: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2017, 17, 909–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Rheingans, R.; Kukla, M.; Adegbola, R.A.; Saha, D.; Omore, R.; Breiman, R.F.; Sow, S.O.; Onwuchekwa, U.; Nasrin, D.; Farag, T.H.; et al. Exploring Household Economic Impacts of Childhood Diarrheal Illnesses in 3 African Settings. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2012, 55, S317–S326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Govender, T.; Barnes, J.M.; Pieper, C.H. Contribution of Water Pollution from Inadequate Sanitation and Housing Quality to Diarrheal Disease in Low-Cost Housing Settlements of Cape Town, South Africa. Am. J. Public Health 2011, 101, e4–e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. World Health Organization; UNICEF. Progress on Drinking Water, Sanitation and Hygiene: 2017 Update and SDG Baselines; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland; UNICEF: New York, NY, USA, 2017.
  40. Baker, K.K.; O’Reilly, C.E.; Levine, M.M.; Kotloff, K.L.; Nataro, J.P.; Ayers, T.L.; Farag, T.H.; Nasrin, D.; Blackwelder, W.C.; Wu, Y.; et al. Sanitation and Hygiene-Specific Risk Factors for Moderate-to-Severe Diarrhea in Young Children in the Global Enteric Multicenter Study, 2007–2011: Case-Control Study. PLoS Med. 2016, 13, e1002010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kwiringira, J.; Atekyereza, P.; Niwagaba, C.; Günther, I. Descending the sanitation ladder in urban Uganda: Evidence from Kampala Slums. BMC Public Health 2014, 14, 624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Nelson, K.B.; Karver, J.; Kullman, C.; Graham, J.P. User Perceptions of Shared Sanitation among Rural Households in Indonesia and Bangladesh. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e103886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Simiyu, S.; Swilling, M.; Cairncross, S.; Rheingans, R. Determinants of quality of shared sanitation facilities in informal settlements: Case study of Kisumu, Kenya. BMC Public Health 2017, 17, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Bain, R.; Cronk, R.; Hossain, R.; Bonjour, S.; Onda, K.; Wright, J.; Yang, H.; Slaymaker, T.; Hunter, P.; Prüss--Ustün, A.; et al. Global assessment of exposure to faecal contamination through drinking water based on a systematic review. Trop. Med. Int. Health 2014, 19, 917–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Bain, R.; Cronk, R.; Wright, J.; Yang, H.; Slaymaker, T.; Bartram, J. Fecal Contamination of Drinking-Water in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS Med. 2014, 11, e1001644. Available online: https://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/pmc/articles/PMC4011876 (accessed on 26 February 2021). [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Health Effects Support Document for Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA); US EPA: Washington, DC, USA, 2016; p. 322.
  47. Sá, I.; Semedo, M.; Cunha, M.E. Kidney Cancer. Heavy Metals as a Risk Factor. Porto Biomed. J. 2016, 1, 25–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Zhao, G.; Ye, S.; Yuan, H.; Ding, X.; Wang, J. Surface sediment properties and heavy metal pollution assessment in the Pearl River Estuary, China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 2966–2979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Karri, V.; Schuhmacher, M.; Kumar, V. Heavy metals (Pb, Cd, As and MeHg) as risk factors for cognitive dysfunction: A general review of metal mixture mechanism in brain. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2016, 48, 203–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Mazumder, D.N.G. Arsenic and non-malignant lung disease. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A 2007, 42, 1859–1867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Von Ehrenstein, O.S.; Guha Mazumder, D.N.; Hira-Smith, M.; Ghosh, N.; Yuan, Y.; Windham, G.; Ghosh, A.; Haque, R.; Lahiri, S.; Kalman, D.; et al. Pregnancy outcomes, infant mortality, and arsenic in drinking water in West Bengal, India. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2006, 163, 662–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Ijerph 18 06043 g001 550
Figure 1. Map of South Africa (a), Western Cape (b), and the catchment area in Cape Town showing the six informal settlements in the (Zeekoe catchment) and different land use (c).
Figure 1. Map of South Africa (a), Western Cape (b), and the catchment area in Cape Town showing the six informal settlements in the (Zeekoe catchment) and different land use (c).
Ijerph 18 06043 g001
Ijerph 18 06043 g002 550
Figure 2. Types of drinking water sources (a) in each settlement type; (b) in six informal settlements (c) in two formal settlements.
Figure 2. Types of drinking water sources (a) in each settlement type; (b) in six informal settlements (c) in two formal settlements.
Ijerph 18 06043 g002
Ijerph 18 06043 g003 550
Figure 3. Types of sanitation facilities available (a) in each settlement type; (b) in six informal settlements; and (c) in two formal settlements.
Figure 3. Types of sanitation facilities available (a) in each settlement type; (b) in six informal settlements; and (c) in two formal settlements.
Ijerph 18 06043 g003
Ijerph 18 06043 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) The prevalence of diarrhoea cases by gender in each settlement type; (b) The prevalence of diarrhoea cases by gender in each study site; (c) The distribution of diarrhoea cases by gender in each age group; and (d) The prevalence of diarrhoea cases by house types in each age group. Note: BP (Barcelona Park), LP (Lotus Park), PP (Peligan Park), PH (Phola Park), WR (Weltevrede), SH (Sweet Home), GG (Gugulethu), and MB (Manenberg).
Figure 4. (a) The prevalence of diarrhoea cases by gender in each settlement type; (b) The prevalence of diarrhoea cases by gender in each study site; (c) The distribution of diarrhoea cases by gender in each age group; and (d) The prevalence of diarrhoea cases by house types in each age group. Note: BP (Barcelona Park), LP (Lotus Park), PP (Peligan Park), PH (Phola Park), WR (Weltevrede), SH (Sweet Home), GG (Gugulethu), and MB (Manenberg).
Ijerph 18 06043 g004
Table
Table 1. Demographic and health-related characteristics of children in participating households.
Table 1. Demographic and health-related characteristics of children in participating households.
SitesOverall (N = 778)Informal Settlements (IS)Formal Settlements (FS)
Overall IS
(n = 589)		Barcelona (n = 97)Lotus Park (n = 99)Pelican Park (n = 103)Phola Park (n = 90)Weltevrede (n = 93)Sweet Home (n = 107)Overall FS
(n = 189)		Gugulethu (n = 99)Manenberg (n = 90)
Gender
Male374 (48.1%)295 (50.1%)54 (55.7%)54 (54.6%)50 (48.5%)41 (45.6%)47 (50.5%)49 (45.8%)79 (41.8%)40 (40.4%)39 (43.3%)
Female404 (51.9%)294 (49.9%)43 (44.3%)45 (45.4%)53 (51.5%)49 (54.4%)46 (49.5%)58 (54.2%)110 (58.2%)59 (59.6%)51 (56.7%)
Age group (6 months intervals)
<685 (10.9%)60 (10.2%)6 (6.2%)7 (7.1%)10 (9.7%)5 (5.6%)18 (19.4%)14 (13.1%)25 (13.2%)15 (15.2%)10 (11.1%)
6–11 81 (10.4%)62 (10.5%)9 (9.3%)8 (8.1%)14 (13.6%)6 (6.7%)9 (9.7%)16 (15%)19 (10.1%)13 (13.1%)6 (6.7%)
12–23 149 (19.2%)117 (19.8%)12 (12.4%)25 (25.3%)18 (17.5%)23 (25.6%)17 (18.3%)22 (20.6%)32 (16.9%)17 (17.2%)15 (16.7%)
24–35 167 (21.5%)140 (23.8%)23 (23.7%)26 (26.3%)32 (31.1%)22 (24.4%)16 (17.2%)21 (19.6%)27 (14.3%)12 (12.1%)15 (16.7%)
36–47 148 (19%)106 (18%)26 (26.8%)17 (17.2%)18 (17.5%)12 (13.3%)18 (19.4%)15 (14%)42 (22.2%)22 (22.2%)20 (22.2%)
48–59 148 (19%)104 (17.7%)21 (21.7%)16 (16.2%)11 (10.7%)22 (24.4%)15 (16.1%)19 (17.8%)44 (23.3%)20 (20.2%)24 (26.7%)
Vaccination for child
HepA329 (42.3%)265 (45%)37 (38.1%)57 (57.6%)55 (53.4%)45 (50%)28 (30.1%)43 (40.2%)64 (33.9%)45 (45.5%)19 (21.1%)
Hep B522 (67.1%)378 (64.2%)53 (54.6%)59 (59.6%)93 (90.3%)70 (77.8%)43 (46.2%)60 (56.1%)144 (76.2%)69 (67.7%)75 (83.3%)
Rotavirus440 (56.6%)300 (50.9%)59 (60.8%)41 (41.4%)62 (60.2%)54 (60%)45 (48.4%)39 (36.5%)140 (74.1%)62 (62.6%)78 (86.7%)
Breastfeeding in the first 06 months
No breastfeeding594 (76.4%)445 (75.6%)77 (79.4%)76 (76.8%)62 (60.2%)76 (84.4%)72 (77.4%)82 (76.6%)149 (78.8%)82 (82.8%)67 (74.4%)
Partial88 (11.3%)73 (12.4%)11 (11.3%)13 (13.1%)23 (22.3%)8 (8.9%)8 (8.6%)10 (9.4%)15 (7.9%)9 (9.1%)6 (6.7%)
Inclusive96 (12.3%)71 (12.1%)9 (9.3%)10 (10.1%)18 (17.5%)6 (6.7%)13 (14%)15 (14%)25 (13.2%)8 (8.1%)17 (18.9%)
Having diarrhea during 07 days prior to the survey
Yes119 (15.3%)79 (15.3%)14 (14.4%)11 (11.1%)20 (19.4%)10 (11.1%)8 (8.6%)16 (15%)40 (21.2%)24 (24.2%)16 (17.8%)
n = Number of children of participating households.
Table
Table 2. Access to water resources of participating households from informal and formal settlements.
Table 2. Access to water resources of participating households from informal and formal settlements.
SitesOverall
N = 707		Informal Settlements (IS)Formal Settlements (FS)
Overall IS (n = 543)Barcelona (n = 89)Lotus Park (n = 88)Pelican Park (n = 87)Phola Park (n = 85)Weltevrede (n = 100)Sweet Home (n = 94)Overall FS
(n = 164)		Gugulethu (n = 84)Manenberg (n = 80)
Access to water resources99.4%99.3%97.8%100%100%100%98%100%100%100%100%
Drinking water resources
Piped tap inside house30.4%12.5%13.5%13.6%12.6%11.8%15%8.5%89.6%89.4%89.9%
Piped tap inside yard11.2%12.7%3.4%2.3%57.5%2.4%4%8.5%6.1%8.3%3.8%
Public taps57.7%74.4%83.2%84.1%28.7%84.7%81%83%2.4%2.4%2.5%
Use of bottled water0.7%0.4%001.2%1.2%001.8%03.8%
Distance to water resource
Within 500 m95.5%94.1%89.9%96.6%100%100%92%87.2%100%100%100%
>500 m4.5%5.9%10.1%3.4%008%12.8%000
Time spent to fletch water
Within 30 min99.4%99.3%97.8%100%100%100%98%100%100%100%100%
>30 min0.6%0.7%2.2%0002%0000
Storing water <12 h87.8%91.3%88.8%100%86.2% 89.4%93%90.4%76.2%87.1%64.6%
Water cut-off in the last 30 days19.4%20.1%36%16%6.9%5.9%42%10.6%17.1%10.6%24.1%
Treating water before drinking46.5%42.7%28.1%53.4%57.5%36.5%50%30.9%59.2%45.9%73.2%
Type of water-storing container
Plastic bucket/bottles96.398.3%100%98.9%98.8%97.6%97%98.9%89.6%85.7%93.8%
Other3.7%1.7%01.1%1.2%2.4%3%1.1%10.4%14.3%4.2%
Cleaning frequency of water-storing container
Daily79.5%82%69.7%90.9%90.8%789.4%75%77.7%71.3%77.7%64.6%
<1 time/day120.5%18%40.3%9.1%9.2%10.6%25%22.3%29.7%22.3%35.4%
Table
Table 3. The hygiene in participating households from informal and formal settlements.
Table 3. The hygiene in participating households from informal and formal settlements.
Overall (N = 707)Informal Settlements (IS)Formal Settlements (FS)
Overall IS (n = 543)Barcelona (n = 89)Lotus Park (n = 88)Pelican Park (n = 87)Phola Park (n = 85)Weltevrede (n = 100)Sweet Home (n = 94)Overall FS
(n = 164)		Gugulethu (n = 84)Manenberg (n = 80)
Respondent’s hand-washing practices
Before eating96.6%96.9%97.8%90.9%100%100%96%96.8%95.7%94.1%97.5%
After eating59.8%61.1%57.3%53.4%82.8%77.7%51%47.9%55.5%63.5%46.8%
After defecation48%51.2%39.3%53.4%66.7%61.2%42%46.8%37.2%50.6%22.8%
After latrine use62%62.6%58.4%59.1%83.9%72.9%50%54.3%59.8%64.7%54.4%
Before feeding child61.7%61.9%55.1%56.8%80.5%53.2%51%77.7%61%63.5%58.2%
After handling rubbish54.5%58%50.6%55.7%67.8%75.3%51%50%42.7%58.8%25.3%
After handling baby diaper/feces48.5%52.9%41.6%50%69%68.2%46%44.7%34.2%52.9%13.9%
Before food reparation60.3%58.9%49.4%59.8%87.4%64.7%48%50%64.6%57.7%72.2%
After touching animals12.5%12.5%9%8%23%24.7%3%9.6%12.2%18.8%5%
Observed availability of soap28%28.5%31.5%51.1%24.1%15.3%15%35.1%26.2%42.1%12.5
Hand-washing index (mean)−2.30 × 10−80.04−0.14−0.050.50.4−0.16−0.2−0.140.06−0.36
Pest invasion
Rat77.4%86.9%92.1%94.3%61%80%94%97.9%45.7%72.9%16.5%
Cockroaches70.9%71.8%78.7%83%60.9%57.7%81%68.1%67.7%58.8%77.2%
Using pesticides during the last 2 weeks
Inside house47.4%44.4%53.4%26.4%50.6%41.2%54.6%39.4%57.3%37.7%78.5%
Outside house21.6%21.7%22.5%18.2%25.3%12.9%26.3%23.9%21.3%28.3%13.9%
Waste water disposal
To open ground near house12.2%10.9%14.6%3.4%4.6%33.5%17%20.2%16.5%2.4%31.7%
To open ground far away from house44.8%52.9%58.4%52.3%18.4%69.4%61%56.4%18.3%31.8%3.8%
To toilet/ lavabo33.7%28.4%22.5%42.1%62.1%17.7%9%20.2%51.2%57.7%44.3%
To water storm drains9.3%7.9%4.5%2.3%14.9%9.4%13%3.2%14%8.2%20.3%
Table
Table 4. The multi-level multivariate mixed-effects logistic regression analysis of risk factors associated with diarrhoea.
Table 4. The multi-level multivariate mixed-effects logistic regression analysis of risk factors associated with diarrhoea.
Risk FactorsOR95% CIp-Value
Caretaker’s education level1.591.06–2.400.03
Having >2 U5-children0.670.38–1.170.16
Drinking water sources
  Private piped taps on premisesRef--
  Piped taps inside yard1.940.84–4.470.12
  Communal public tap0.590.14–2.540.48
Storing water >12 h1.91.02–3.790.05
Using water treatment0.570.34–0.970.04
Water interruption during 07 days prior the survey1.210.69–2.090.50
Toilet access and sharing
  Private toilet facilityRef--
  Shared with 1–3 households0.760.34–1.640.49
  Shared with ≥4 households0.350.15–0.850.02
  No toilet facility0.440.07–2.770.39
Reported problems with toilet facility1.881.00–3.550.05
Feces disposal1.180.75–1.840.47
Using pesticide inside house during 07 days prior the survey0.490.30–0.840.01
Hand-washing index0.590.42–0.820.02
Child’s age (in months)0.990.98–1.010.23
Child’s gender
  MaleRef--
  Female1.320.83–2.090.23
Duration of breast feeding1.111.00–1.230.07
Had Hepatitis A vaccine0.510.28–0.90.02
Had Rotavirus vaccine1.620.86–3.080.14
N.B: Results of multi-level multivariate analyses of risk factors associated with diarrhoea are presented, including the following groups of variables: socio-demographic (caretaker education level, having other under-5 children in the household and wealth index), water-related variables (drinking water sources, water storage >12 h, water treatment options and water interruption during within the period of seven 7 days prior the survey), sanitation and hygiene-related variables (facility access and sharing, reported a problem with toilet facility, disposal of child’s feces, hand-washing index), and children-specific variables (child’s age, gender, breastfeeding duration and immunization history of Hepatitis A and Rotavirus vaccine).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nguyen, T.Y.C.; Fagbayigbo, B.O.; Cissé, G.; Redi, N.; Fuhrimann, S.; Okedi, J.; Schindler, C.; Röösli, M.; Armitage, N.P.; Carden, K.; et al. Diarrhoea among Children Aged under Five Years and Risk Factors in Informal Settlements: A Cross-Sectional Study in Cape Town, South Africa. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 6043. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph18116043

AMA Style

Nguyen TYC, Fagbayigbo BO, Cissé G, Redi N, Fuhrimann S, Okedi J, Schindler C, Röösli M, Armitage NP, Carden K, et al. Diarrhoea among Children Aged under Five Years and Risk Factors in Informal Settlements: A Cross-Sectional Study in Cape Town, South Africa. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(11):6043. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph18116043

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nguyen, Thi Yen Chi, Bamidele Oladapo Fagbayigbo, Guéladio Cissé, Nesre Redi, Samuel Fuhrimann, John Okedi, Christian Schindler, Martin Röösli, Neil Philip Armitage, Kirsty Carden, and et al. 2021. "Diarrhoea among Children Aged under Five Years and Risk Factors in Informal Settlements: A Cross-Sectional Study in Cape Town, South Africa" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 11: 6043. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph18116043

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop