Next Article in Journal
Dissemination of Aerosol and Splatter in Clinical Environment during Cavity Preparation: An In Vitro Study
Previous Article in Journal
Evolution and Efficiency Assessment of Pesticide and Fertiliser Inputs to Cultivated Land in China
Previous Article in Special Issue
Energetic and Economic Evaluation of Zero-Waste Fish Co-Stream Processing
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Improvement of Enzymatic Glucose Conversion from Chestnut Shells through Optimization of KOH Pretreatment

1
Department of Biotechnology, Sangmyung University, 20, Hongjimun, 2-Gil, Jongno-Gu, Seoul 03016, Korea
2
Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Korea University, 145 Anam-Ro, Seongbuk-Gu, Seoul 02841, Korea
3
Department of Chemical Engineering, Kwangwoon University, 20 Kwangwoon-ro, Nowon-gu, Seoul 01897, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(7), 3772; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph18073772
Submission received: 14 March 2021 / Revised: 1 April 2021 / Accepted: 2 April 2021 / Published: 4 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biotechnology for Waste and Byproduct Treatment and Valorization)

Abstract

:
Worldwide, about one-third of food produced for human consumption is wasted, which includes byproducts from food processing, with a significant portion of the waste still being landfilled. The aim of this study is to convert chestnut shells (CNSs) from food processing into a valuable resource through bioprocesses. Currently, one of the highest barriers to bioprocess commercialization is low conversion of sugar from biomass, and KOH pretreatment was suggested to improve enzymatic digestibility (ED) of CNS. KOH concentration of 3% (w/w) was determined as a suitable pretreatment solution by a fundamental experiment. The reaction factors including temperature, time and solid/liquid (S/L) ratio were optimized (77.1 g/L CNS loading at 75 °C for 2.8 h) by response surface methodology (RSM). In the statistical model, temperature and time showed a relatively significant effect on the glucan content (GC) and ED, but S/L ratio was not. GC and ED of the untreated CNS were 45.1% and 12.7%, respectively. On the other hand, GC and ED of pretreated CNS were 83.2% and 48.4%, respectively, and which were significantly improved by about 1.8-fold and 3.8-fold compared to the control group. The improved ED through the optimization is expected to contribute to increasing the value of byproducts generated in food processing.

1. Introduction

According to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), a huge amount of food is produced every year for human consumption, however, about one-third is lost or wasted. Wastes generated from food processing also have a significant proportion, but most of them are landfilled. Since landfill or incineration is not desirable due to environmental pollution, the development of recycling technologies is urgently required [1]. Although the concept of biorefining has emerged to produce value-added substances including fuels, chemicals and substances from biomass, economical biorefinery design requires the supply of inexpensive raw materials such as agri-food waste [2,3].
Chestnut has received attention in the European food industry because it is a resource to produce marron glace and chestnut flour used for gluten-free diets [4]. According to a report by Pinto et al., world chestnut production was estimated to be 2.4 million tons in 2019 [5]. During the chestnut processing, outer shells (8.9–13.5%) and inner shells (6.3–10.1%) are generated as the residues [6]. These residues are commonly used for animal feed, compost, cosmetic ingredient and adhesive [7,8]. However, most of the chestnut shells (CNSs) have not been utilized and are disposed of as waste. It is necessary to suggest a new utilization plan for CNS. CNSs have been reported to consist of 21.5–29.0% cellulose, 16.2–26.0% hemicellulose and 35.2–35.4% lignin [9,10]. Due to these constituents of CNS, it was expected to be suitable as a raw material for biorefinery.
Several processes including pretreatment, saccharification and fermentation should be performed to utilize lignocellulosic biomass in biorefinery [11]. It has been reported that pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis account for 35% of the total biorefinery cost [12]. In order to reduce the overall process cost, it is significant to derive the optimum reaction conditions for each step. Pretreatment of biomass is a key process required to improve the recovery of fermentable sugars in enzymatic hydrolysis [13]. Various pretreatment (physical, chemical and biological) of lignocellulosic biomass have been conducted to remove the lignin, which inhibits the enzymatic hydrolysis, and to enhance the depolymerization and dissociation of fermentable sugar [14]. Chemical pretreatment has been widely used because of its advantages of low process cost and high sugar recovery [15]. Alkali pretreatment is carried out under mild conditions with less corrosive reagents including potassium hydroxide (KOH), sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2), and generates less fermentation inhibitory compounds compared to acid pretreatment [16]. The mechanism of alkali pretreatment is that saponification of intermolecular ester bonds by alkali reagents breaks the crosslinks between lignin, cellulose and hemicellulose, causing delignification [17]. The delignified biomass increases biodegradability and enzymatic accessibility, which leads to improved enzymatic hydrolysis efficiency [18]. Fermentable sugars produced by enzymatic hydrolysis are suitable for microbial fermentation because they have no fermentation inhibitory compounds such as furfural and 5-hydroxymethyl furfural (HMF) [19]. Various studies have been reported that have successfully produced the value-added materials such as bioethanol, cordycepin and carotenoid using these fermentable sugars for microbial fermentation [18,19,20,21].
In this study, to improve the enzymatic digestibility of CNS, the conditions of KOH pretreatment were optimized by the statistical method. Before optimization, fundamental effect of KOH concentration on chemical composition of CNS and the efficacy of enzymatic hydrolysis were investigated, and the desirable concentration of KOH was determined. In addition, the pretreatment conditions of reaction time, temperature and S/L ratio were optimized by response surface methodology (RSM). Under optimum conditions, the pretreated CNS was enzymatically hydrolyzed to produce glucose.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

CNSs were purchased from Cheongmyeongyagcho (Chungju-si, Chungcheongbuk-do, Korea). CNSs were dried at 105 °C for 48 h to remove moisture. The dried CNSs were pulverized to a size of 425 μm and stored in plastic bags at 4 °C. Celluclast® 1.5 L (cellulase) and Cellic® CTeC2 (cellobiase) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Potassium hydroxide (KOH), sulfuric acid (H2SO4), calcium carbonate (CaCO3) and citric acid monohydrate were purchased from Duksan Chemical (Ansan-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea).

2.2. KOH Pretreatment of Chestnut Shells

In order to investigate the KOH concentration suitable for CNS pretreatment, KOH solutions were prepared in various concentrations (0%, 1%, 2%, 3%, 4% and 5%, w/w). A 0% KOH concentration means that CNSs were pretreated using deionized water (DW). KOH pretreatment was performed with 100 g/L solid loading at 70 °C for 2 h. After pretreatment, the solid fractions were neutralized with DW until pH 7 and dried at 105 °C for 48 h. All experiments were carried out in triplicate to obtain the standard deviations. Solid recovery (SR) after pretreatment was calculated by the following equation:
Solid recovery, SR (%) = (weight of dried CNS after KOH pretreatment/weight of initial dried CNS) × 100

2.3. Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Chestnut Shells

CNSs were hydrolyzed with 60 filter paper units (FPUs) cellulase/g-biomass and 30 cellobiase units (CBUs) cellobiase/g-biomass at 50 °C for 72 h in a 50 mM sodium citrate buffer (pH 4.8) [22]. One FPU and CBU were defined as the amount of enzyme that released 1 μmol glucose per min under the standard assay conditions. All experiments were carried out in triplicate to obtain the standard deviations.

2.4. Experimental Design and Statistical Optimization

In order to optimize the pretreatment conditions for CNS, the central composite design (CCD) of RSM was carried out using Design-Expert 7 software (Stat-Ease Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA). The CCD shows the interaction between the independent factors affecting the response factor using statistical and mathematical models. Table 1 shows three independent factors (temperature, time and S/L ratio) divided into five levels (−2, −1, 0, 1 and 2) for the CCD. The range of factors was as follows: temperature (X1), 0–100 °C; time (X2), 0–4 h and S/L ratio (X3), 50–150 g/L. All experiments were carried out in triplicate to obtain the standard deviations.
The experimental results were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA). Each factor and their interactions were determined by applying the following equation:
Y = β0 + ∑ βiXi + ∑ βijXiXj +∑ βiiXi2
where Y is the response factor, Xi and Xj are the independent factors, β0 is the offset term, βi is the first order model coefficient, βii is the quadratic coefficient for the factor i and βij is the linear model coefficient for the interaction between factors i and j, respectively [23].

2.5. Analytical Methods

The chemical compositions of CNS were determined by referring to the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) analytical procedure (TP-510-42618) [24]. In 3 mL of 72% (w/w) H2SO4, 0.3 g CNS were immersed at 30 °C for 2 h. DW was added to each sample to dilute the acid concentration to 4%, and then reacted in an autoclave (VS-1221, Vision Scientific, Daejeon, Korea) at 121 °C for 1 h. After the reaction, each sample was neutralized using CaCO3 and the supernatant was filtered using 0.22 μm syringe filter for high liquid performance chromatography (HPLC) analysis. The HPLC analysis conditions to investigate the chemical compositions of CNS and the concentration of glucose released by enzymatic hydrolysis were as follows: Shodex SUGAR SH1011 H+ ion exclusion column (300 mm × 8 mm, Shodex, Japan); refractive index detector (RID-10A, Shimadzu, Japan); mobile phase of 0.005 N H2SO4; flow rate of 0.6 mL/min; temperature of column at 50 °C and injection volume of 20 μL. Glucan content (GC) and enzymatic digestibility (ED) of samples were calculated by the following equation:
Glucan content, GC (%) = (weight of glucan in dried CNS/weight of dried CNS) × 100
Enzymatic digestibility, ED (%) = (weight of glucose released/(weight of glucan × 1.1)) × 100
where 1.1. is the conversion factor of glucan to glucose.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effect of KOH Concentration on Pretreatment of Chestnut Shells

CNS is composed of 63.7% carbohydrate and 9.4% protein, which can be utilized as carbon and nitrogen sources in fermentation. The carbohydrate content includes 45.1–57.8% glucan and 2.4–5.9% XMGA. XMGA means hemicellulose composed of xylan, mannan, galactan and arabinan. Additionally, 1.2% lipid and 2.4% ash were present in CNS (Table 2). Worldwide, about 2.4 million tons of chestnuts are produced annually [5], and the production of CNS is estimated to be about 365–566 thousand tons per year. Therefore, the potential of CNS that can be utilized as a carbon source in biorefinery was estimated to be about 173–361 thousand tons.
Figure 1a shows the chemical compositions and solid recovery after KOH pretreatment of CNS. Untreated CNS consist of 45.1% glucan, 5.9% XMGA and 49.1% others. After the pretreatment using DW (0% KOH concentration) at 70 °C for 2 h, the chemical compositions of CNS were as follows: 46.1% glucan, 9.5% XMGA and 44.4% others. Pretreatment using DW did not significantly affect the complex structure of CNS and SR decreased to 54.5%. Obeng et al. reported that low SR disrupts the sugar recovery from biomass during enzymatic hydrolysis [25]. These results indicate that pretreatment using DW was not suitable for CNS pretreatment. GC following KOH pretreatment was found to be 70.4%, 74.4%, 80.1%, 80.2% and 83.3% at KOH concentrations of 1%, 2%, 3%, 4% and 5%, respectively. SR was found to be 47.7%, 47.5%, 29.0%, 24.0% and 20.2% at KOH concentration of 1%, 2%, 3%, 4% and 5%, respectively, and decreased steadily as the KOH concentration increased. KOH pretreatment significantly increased GC, and in particular, GC reached above 80.0% with a KOH concentration of 3% or more. These results are consistent with previous studies reported by Jiang et al. and Yan et al. that GC increases and SR decreases with increasing alkali concentration in biomass pretreatment [26,27].
Figure 1b shows the released glucose concentrations after enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated CNS. The glucose concentrations released by enzymatic hydrolysis of untreated CNS and CNS pretreated using DW were 1.9 g/L and 3.6 g/L, respectively. The pretreatment of CNS using DW at 70 °C for 2 h did not remarkably affect the chemical composition but increased the released glucose concentration by 1.9–fold. It is estimated that thermal water softens up the rigid structure of CNS. Various studies have reported that hot water pretreatment at high pressure and high temperature can enhance enzymatic hydrolysis of biomass without the addition of other chemicals [14,28]. The released glucose concentrations were found to be 8.7 g/L, 12.0 g/L and 15.3 g/L at KOH concentration of 1%, 2% and 3%, respectively, and were not significantly affected by KOH concentrations above 3%. In conclusion, KOH concentration suitable for CNS pretreatment was determined to be 3% KOH with high GC and released glucose concentration and low SR.

3.2. Optimization of KOH Pretreatment Conditions Using Response Surface Methodology

In order to optimize the pretreatment conditions of CNS, CCD of RSM was carried out. RSM, a statistical and mathematical method, is widely used to minimize the number of experiments and to acquire reliable data [29]. To establish CCD, three factors were divided into five levels as follows: temperature (X1): 0, 25, 50, 75 and 100 °C; time (X2): 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 h and S/L ratio (X3): 50, 75, 100, 125 and 150 g/L. Zero hours (X2: –2, Std no.11) means that CNS have not been pretreated. Table 3 shows 20 experiments designed by CCD and their responses. To confirm the repeatability of the experiments, the same experiments were performed 6 times at the center point (Std no. 15–20) [30]. The responses were determined as GC and ED because KOH pretreatment was performed to increase GC by removing other portions (e.g., lignin) of CNS and improve ED of CNS. The ranges of each response were 45.1–84.8% for GC and 12.7–53.8% for ED, respectively.
The model equation for the responses was estimated based on multiple regression analysis of the experimental data.
YGC = 73.67 + 6.37 X1 + 4.70 X2 − 0.69 X3 + 0.82 X1X2 − 0.084 X1X3 + 0.21 X2X3 + 0.19 X12 − 3.34 X22 + 0.37 X32
YED = 43.36 + 5.15 X1 + 5.81 X2 − 0.31 X3 − 0.40 X1X2 + 0.16 X1X3 − 0.66 X2X3 − 0.53 X12 − 3.51 X22 − 0.87 X32
where YGC is glucan content (%) and YED is enzymatic digestibility (%), respectively. X1, X2 and X3 are the independent factors and signify temperature, time and S/L ratio, respectively.
The ANOVA results for each response surface quadratic model are shown in Table 4 and Table 5. The mean squares were computed by dividing the sum of squares by the degrees of freedom [31]. The accuracy of models was described by the F-value [32]. F-values of each model were found to be 10.99 for GC and 9.42 for ED. A p-value lower than 0.05 means that the model or model term is significant [33]. The p-values of each model were found to be 0.004 and 0.008, respectively. Based on these results, both models were proved to be significant. In addition, it was verified that the three model terms such as X1, X2 and X22 (p-value < 0.05) had a significant effect on both GC and ED. The p-values of the lack of fit were found to be 0.0593 for GC and 0.0547 for ED, which was not significant for pure error (p-value > 0.05). It was confirmed that the predicted models statistically fit the experimental data for the responses [34]. The coefficient of determination (R2) should be more than 0.8, and the coefficient of determination approaching 1 means that the experimental value for the response agrees with the predicted value within the designed experimental range [35]. The difference between R2 and adjusted R2 should be less than 0.2 and the high adjusted R2 (>0.75) means that model is statistically acceptable [36]. R2 of each model were 0.9082 and 0.8945, respectively, and it was confirmed that the difference between R2 and adjusted R2 in each model did not exceed 0.2. The coefficient of variation (CV) explains the variance of the data, and the low CV (<10%) demonstrates the accuracy and reliability of the results [37]. The CV of each model was 5.16% and 9.86%, respectively, and both models were proved to have accuracy and reliability. The adequate precision represents the signal to noise ratio and is desirable greater than 4 [38]. Each model was suitable to explore the designed space, showing that the adequate precisions of each model were 13,939 and 12,306, respectively.
Three-dimensional response surfaces were plotted based on the model Equations (5) and (6). The three-dimensional plots are useful for explaining the effect of interactions between independent factors on the response [39]. Figure 2 shows the effect of the interactions between independent factors on GC. In Figure 2a, the minimum GC was estimated as 42.2% at 0 °C for 0 h. GC tended to increase steadily from the minimum point as temperature and time increased. Figure 2b depicts the interactive effect of temperature and S/L ratio on GC. The maximum GC was obtained with 90.3% at 100 °C and 50 g/L. GC was not significantly affected by the S/L ratio and decreased drastically with a lower temperature. Figure 2c portrays that GC was not significantly affected by the S/L ratio and rapidly altered as time changed based on 2.5 h. The effect of the interactions between independent factors on ED is represented in Figure 3. All three-dimensional plots showed similar tendency to those of GC. The effect of temperature and time on ED was observed in Figure 3a. The maximum ED was predicted to be 53.3% at 100 °C for 3 h and the minimum ED was estimated as 3.7% at 0 °C for 0 h. ED increased with increasing temperature and time. In Figure 3b, ED was not significantly affected by the S/L ratio and increased drastically with increasing temperature over the entire S/L ratio range. In addition, in Figure 3c, the S/L ratio did not significantly affect the ED and ED decreased rapidly as time decreased from 3 h.
The purpose of the KOH pretreatment is to improve the enzymatic hydrolysis efficiency [40]. Therefore, numerical optimization was performed by selecting the enzyme digestibility as the most important response (GC: importance level 3 and ED: importance level 5). The results of numerical optimization are shown in Table 6. Optimum reaction conditions for KOH pretreatment of CNS were determined as follows: temperature of 75.0 °C, time of 2.8 h and S/L ratio of 77.1 g/L. Under the optimum conditions, GC and ED were predicted to be 83.3% and 50.0%, respectively. In order to verify the reliability of our predicted model, an actual experiment was carried out under the same conditions as the predicted model. The experimental results show that GC and ED were found to be 83.2% and 48.4%, respectively, proving that our model was suitable to predict the KOH pretreatment of CNS. In conclusion, through the optimization of KOH pretreatment, ED of CNS was determined to be 48.4%, which was improved by 3.8-fold compared to the control group (untreated CNS, ED: 12.7%).
The recent studies that focus on the optimization of alkali pretreatment are summarized in Table 7. The pretreatment of various biomass such as canola straw, Sida acuta (Thailand Weed), Sicyos angulatus, Miscanthus, bamboo, corncob, walnut shell, corn stover, orange peel and spent coffee ground (SCG) were carried out under the determined conditions using alkali reagents (NaOH, NH3 and KOH) [17,18,22,41,42,43,44,45,46]. The reported data such as the solid components and enzymatic digestibility before and after the pretreatments were investigated. It was focused on the effect of pretreatment on improved sugar content by enzymatic hydrolysis. Among these, NH3 pretreatment have been shown to be effective for high glucose yield after enzymatic hydrolysis. It can easily break the sugar complex in biomass. However, it was not appropriate for a scale-up process due to high capital cost and time [17]. Another pretreatment, such as the NaOH pretreatment, is time-consuming, which could be a bottleneck [17,18,42]. Boonchuay et al. investigated KOH pretreatment and observed that it led to high glucose content from pretreated biomass [43]. It has also been an effective method for high glucose yield after enzymatic hydrolysis. Other reports also confirmed this phenomenon, and it was almost founded in the reaction conditions within 3 h of 3% KOH, 75–121 °C [44,45,46]. The CNS used in this study is rich in carbohydrates that can serve as substrates in the fermentation process. The pretreated CNS recovered about 3.8–fold improved glucose after enzymatic hydrolysis. Unlike other pretreatments, this is advantageous because of its high yield and adequate time. These results show that food wastes such as CNS have the potential to replace sugar cane and corn starch, which are currently utilized in biorefining industries but have food ethics issues. Thus, this study provides evidence for the potential for alkaline pretreatment of CNS for biorefinery systems. This can provide useful information regarding the development of economic and efficient processes using pretreatment systems.

4. Conclusions

In this study, the optimum conditions of KOH pretreatment were investigated to improve enzymatic digestibility of CNS using RSM. Statistical models were established to explain the effects of independent factors such as temperature, time, and S/L ratio on responses such as GC and ED. Temperature and time were found to have a relatively more significant effect on GC and ED than S/L ratio. As a result of numerical optimization, the optimum conditions were found as follows: temperature of 75.0 °C, time of 2.8 h and S/L ratio of 77.1 g/L. GC and ED of untreated CNS (control group) were found to be 45.1% and 12.7%, respectively. GC and ED of CNS pretreated under the optimum conditions (experimental group) were found to be 83.2% and 48.4%, respectively. By KOH pretreatment, GC and ED of CNS increased 1.8–fold and 3.8–fold, respectively, our KOH pretreatment had a significant effect on the improvement of enzymatic hydrolysis. Although the ED of CNS was significantly improved, but it was still less than 50%. The drastic improvement of the ED of CNS and the conversion of recovered glucose into more valuable substances through microbial fermentation will be our major study in the near future. The results of this study are expected to provide useful directions for reducing environmental pollution and promoting public health by using food waste as a raw material for biorefinery.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.H.L. and S.K.L.; methodology, J.L. and S.K.; software, K.H.L.; validation, C.P., S.W.K. and H.Y.Y.; formal analysis, K.H.L. and S.K.L; writing—original draft preparation, K.H.L. and S.K.L; writing—review and editing, C.P., S.W.K. and H.Y.Y.; supervision, S.W.K. and H.Y.Y.; project administration, C.P., S.W.K. and H.Y.Y.; funding acquisition, C.P. and H.Y.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT) (NRF-2020R1C1C1005060 and NRF-2020R1A2C1007493) and the research grant of Kwangwoon University (2020).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Food Loss and Food Waste, Food Loss Analysis (FLA) Reports and Factsheets. Available online: http://www.fao.org/food-loss-and-food-waste (accessed on 15 March 2021).
  2. Yoo, H.Y.; Kim, S.W. The Next-generation Biomass for Biorefining. Bioresources 2021, 16, 2188–2191. [Google Scholar]
  3. Rhie, M.N.; Kim, H.T.; Jo, S.Y.; Chu, L.L.; Baritugo, K.; Baylon, M.G.; Lee, J.; Na, J.; Kim, L.H.; Kim, T.W.; et al. Recent Advances in the Metabolic Engineering of Klebsiella pneumoniae: A Potential Platform Microorganism for Biorefineries. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 2019, 24, 48–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gullón, B.; Eibes, G.; Dávila, I.; Moreira, M.T.; Labidi, J.; Gullón, P. Hydrothermal treatment of chestnut shells (Castanea sativa) to produce oligosaccharides and antioxidant compounds. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 192, 75–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Pinto, D.; Vieira, E.F.; Peixoto, A.F.; Freire, C.; Freitas, V.; Costa, P.; Delerue-Matos, C.; Rodrigues, F. Optimizing the extraction of phenolic antioxidants from chestnut shells by subcritical water extraction using response surface methodology. Food Chem. 2021, 334, 127521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Echegaray, N.; Gómez, B.; Barba, F.J.; Franco, D.; Estévez, M.; Carballo, J.; Marszałek, K.; Lorenzo, J.M. Chestnuts and by-products as source of natural antioxidants in meat and meat products: A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 82, 110–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Husanu, E.; Mero, A.; Rivera, J.G.; Mezzetta, A.; Ruiz, J.C.; D’Andrea, F.; Pomelli, C.S.; Guazzelli, L. Exploiting Deep Eutectic Solvents and Ionic Liquids for the Valorization of Chestnut Shell Waste. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 18386–18399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Aires, A.; Carvalho, R.; Saavedra, M.J. Valorization of solid wastes from chestnut industry processing: Extraction and optimization of polyphenols, tannins and ellagitannins and its potential for adhesives, cosmetic and pharmaceutical industry. Waste Manag. 2016, 48, 457–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bianco, F.; Şenol, H.; Papirio, S. Enhanced lignocellulosic component removal and biomethane potential from chestnut shell by a combined hydrothermal–alkaline pretreatment. Sci. Total. Environ. 2021, 762, 144178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Wang, S.; Zou, C.; Yang, H.; Lou, C.; Cheng, S.; Peng, C.; Wang, C.; Zou, H. Effects of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin on the combustion behaviours of biomass under various oxygen concentrations. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 320, 124375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Regmi, S.; Choi, Y.S.; Kim, Y.K.; Khan, M.D.; Lee, S.H.; Cho, S.S.; Jin, Y.-Y.; Lee, D.Y.; Yoo, J.C.; Suh, J.-W. Endoglucanase Produced by Bacillus subtilis Strain CBS31: Biochemical Characterization, Thermodynamic Study, Enzymatic Hydrolysis, and Bio-industrial Applications. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 2020, 25, 104–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kapanji, K.K.; Haigh, K.F.; Görgens, J.F. Techno-economic analysis of chemically catalysed lignocellulose biorefineries at a typical sugar mill: Sorbitol or glucaric acid and electricity co-production. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 289, 121635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Yoo, H.Y.; Yang, X.; Kim, D.S.; Lee, S.K.; Lotrakul, P.; Prasongsuk, S.; Punnapayak, H.; Kim, S.W. Evaluation of the overall process on bioethanol production from Miscanthus hydrolysates obtained by dilute acid pretreatment. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 2016, 21, 733–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Fernandes, J.M.; Fraga, I.; Sousa, R.M.; Rodrigues, M.A.; Sampaio, A.; Bezerra, R.M.; Dias, A.A. Pretreatment of Grape Stalks by Fungi: Effect on Bioactive Compounds, Fiber Composition, Saccharification Kinetics and Monosaccharides Ratio. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 5900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Manmai, N.; Unpaprom, Y.; Ponnusamy, V.K.; Ramaraj, R. Bioethanol production from the comparison between optimization of sorghum stalk and sugarcane leaf for sugar production by chemical pretreatment and enzymatic degradation. Fuel 2020, 278, 118262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Vieira, S.; Barros, M.V.; Sydney, A.C.N.; Piekarski, C.M.; de Francisco, A.C.; Vandenberghe, L.P.D.S.; Sydney, E.B. Sustainability of sugarcane lignocellulosic biomass pretreatment for the production of bioethanol. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 299, 122635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yoo, H.Y.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, D.S.; Lee, J.H.; Lee, S.K.; Lee, S.J.; Park, C.; Kim, S.W. Enhancement of glucose yield from canola agricultural residue by alkali pretreatment based on multi-regression models. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2017, 51, 303–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Siripong, P.; Doungporn, P.; Yoo, H.Y.; Kim, S.W. Improvement of sugar recovery from Sida acuta (Thailand Weed) by NaOH pretreatment and application to bioethanol production. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2018, 35, 2413–2420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lin, R.; Deng, C.; Cheng, J.; Murphy, J.D. Low concentrations of furfural facilitate biohydrogen production in dark fermentation using Enterobacter aerogenes. Renew. Energy 2020, 150, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lin, H.-T.V.; Huang, M.-Y.; Kao, T.-Y.; Lu, W.-J.; Lin, H.-J.; Pan, C.-L. Production of Lactic Acid from Seaweed Hydrolysates via Lactic Acid Bacteria Fermentation. Fermentation 2020, 6, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Bertacchi, S.; Bettiga, M.; Porro, D.; Branduardi, P. Camelina sativa meal hydrolysate as sustainable biomass for the production of carotenoids by Rhodosporidium toruloides. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2020, 13, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. An, H.-E.; Lee, K.H.; Jang, Y.W.; Kim, C.-B.; Yoo, H.Y. Improved Glucose Recovery from Sicyos angulatus by NaOH Pretreatment and Application to Bioethanol Production. Processes 2021, 9, 245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lee, J.H.; Yoo, H.Y.; Lee, S.K.; Chun, Y.; Kim, H.R.; Bankeeree, W.; Lotrakul, P.; Punnapayak, H.; Prasongsuk, S.; Kim, S.W. Significant impact of casein hydrolysate to overcome the low consumption of glycerol by Klebsiella aerogenes ATCC 29007 and its application to bioethanol production. Energy Convers. Manag. 2020, 221, 113181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sluiter, A.; Hames, B.; Ruiz, R.; Scarlata, C.; Sluiter, J.; Templeton, D.; Crocker, D. Determination of Structural Carbohydrates and Lignin in Biomass Technical Report No. NREL/TP-510-42618; NREL: Golden, GO, USA, August 2012. [Google Scholar]
  25. Obeng, A.K.; Premjet, D.; Premjet, S. Combining Autoclaving with Mild Alkaline Solution as a Pretreatment Technique to Enhance Glucose Recovery from the Invasive Weed Chloris barbata. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Yan, X.; Cheng, J.-R.; Wang, Y.-T.; Zhu, M.-J. Enhanced lignin removal and enzymolysis efficiency of grass waste by hydrogen peroxide synergized dilute alkali pretreatment. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 301, 122756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jiang, D.; Ge, X.; Zhang, T.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, Z.; He, C.; Zhang, Q.; Li, Y. Effect of alkaline pretreatment on photo-fermentative hydrogen production from giant reed: Comparison of NaOH and Ca(OH)2. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 304, 123001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wells, J.M.; Drielak, E.; Surendra, K.; Khanal, S.K. Hot water pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass: Modeling the effects of temperature, enzyme and biomass loadings on sugar yield. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 300, 122593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kim, H.; Yoo, H.Y.; Park, N.; Kim, H.; Lee, J.; Baek, Y.; Lee, T.; Oh, J.-M.; Cho, J.; Park, C. Enhanced l-Lysine into 1,5-Diaminopentane Conversion via Statistical Optimization of Whole-Cell Decarboxylation System. Polym. 2019, 11, 1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Gao, Y.; Xiao, J.; Ye, J.; Huo, X.; Shen, A.Y. Catalytic oxidation of benzene over alumina-supported Cu-Mn-Ce mixed oxide catalysts. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2020, 37, 54–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Garba, Z.N.; Xiao, W.; Zhou, W.; Lawan, I.; Jiang, Y.; Zhang, M.; Yuan, Z. Process optimization and synthesis of lanthanum-cobalt perovskite type nanoparticles (LaCoO3) prepared by modified proteic method: Application of response surface methodology. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2019, 36, 1826–1838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kim, H.-D.; Choi, J.-I. Medium Optimization and Proteome Analysis of Protease Production by Janthinobacterium sp. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 2020, 25, 787–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Al-Dhabi, N.A.; Esmail, G.A.; Arasu, M.V. Enhanced Production of Biosurfactant from Bacillus subtilis Strain Al-Dhabi-130 under Solid-State Fermentation Using Date Molasses from Saudi Arabia for Bioremediation of Crude-Oil-Contaminated Soils. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 8446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Lee, K.; Jang, Y.; Kim, H.; Ki, J.-S.; Yoo, H. Optimization of Lutein Recovery from Tetraselmis suecica by Response Surface Methodology. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lim, J.-W.; Beh, H.-G.; Ching, D.L.C.; Ho, Y.-C.; Baloo, L.; Bashir, M.J.K.; Wee, S.-K. Central Composite Design (CCD) applied for statistical optimization of glucose and sucrose binary carbon mixture in enhancing the denitrification process. Appl. Water Sci. 2017, 7, 3719–3727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Kim, J.Y.; Yeom, S.H. Optimization of Biodiesel Production from Waste Coffee Grounds by Simultaneous Lipid Extraction and Transesterification. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 2020, 25, 320–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Feng, J.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, J.; He, Y.; Zhang, R.; Chen, C.; Liu, G. Enhanced methane production of vinegar residue by response surface methodology (RSM). AMB Express 2017, 7, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Charola, S.; Patel, H.; Chandna, S.; Maiti, S. Optimization to prepare porous carbon from mustard husk using response surface methodology adopted with central composite design. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 223, 969–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yang, X.; Guo, P.; Li, M.; Li, H.; Hu, Z.; Liu, X.; Zhang, Q. Optimization of Culture Conditions for Amoxicillin Degrading Bacteria Screened from Pig Manure. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 1973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Chi, X.; Liu, C.; Bi, Y.-H.; Yu, G.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Li, B.; Cui, Q. A clean and effective potassium hydroxide pretreatment of corncob residue for the enhancement of enzymatic hydrolysis at high solids loading. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 11558–11566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Yang, S.J.; Yoo, H.Y.; Choi, H.S.; Lee, J.H.; Park, C.; Kim, S.W. Enhancement of enzymatic digestibility of Miscanthus by electron beam irradiation and chemical combined treatments for bioethanol production. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 275, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yang, J.; Xu, H.; Jiang, J.; Zhang, N.; Xie, J.; Zhao, J.; Wei, M. Enhanced Enzymatic Hydrolysis and Structure Properties of Bamboo by Moderate Two-Step Pretreatment. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2020, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Boonchuay, P.; Techapun, C.; Leksawasdi, N.; Seesuriyachan, P.; Hanmoungjai, P.; Watanabe, M.; Takenaka, S.; Chaiyaso, T. An integrated process for xylooligosaccharide and bioethanol production from corncob. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 256, 399–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Tan, M.; Ma, L.; Rehman, M.S.U.; Ahmed, M.A.; Sajid, M.; Xu, X.; Sun, Y.; Cui, P.; Xu, J. Screening of acidic and alkaline pretreatments for walnut shell and corn stover biorefining using two way heterogeneity evaluation. Renew. Energy 2019, 132, 950–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Jang, Y.W.; Lee, K.H.; Yoo, H.Y. Improved Sugar Recovery from Orange Peel by Statistical Optimization of Thermo-Alkaline Pretreatment. Processes 2021, 9, 409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Lee, K.H.; Jang, Y.W.; Lee, J.; Kim, S.; Park, C.; Yoo, H.Y. Statistical Optimization of Alkali Pretreatment to Improve Sugars Recovery from Spent Coffee Grounds and Utilization in Lactic Acid Fermentation. Processes 2021, 9, 494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Effect of KOH pretreatment of chestnut shells (CNSs) on chemical composition (a) and the released glucose concentrations after the enzymatic hydrolysis (b).
Figure 1. Effect of KOH pretreatment of chestnut shells (CNSs) on chemical composition (a) and the released glucose concentrations after the enzymatic hydrolysis (b).
Ijerph 18 03772 g001
Figure 2. The three-dimensional response surface plot for the interactive effect of temperature and time (a), temperature and S/L ratio (b) and time and S/L ratio (c) on glucan content (GC).
Figure 2. The three-dimensional response surface plot for the interactive effect of temperature and time (a), temperature and S/L ratio (b) and time and S/L ratio (c) on glucan content (GC).
Ijerph 18 03772 g002aIjerph 18 03772 g002b
Figure 3. The three-dimensional response surface plot for the interactive effect of temperature and time (a), temperature and S/L ratio (b) and time and S/L ratio (c) on enzymatic digestibility (ED).
Figure 3. The three-dimensional response surface plot for the interactive effect of temperature and time (a), temperature and S/L ratio (b) and time and S/L ratio (c) on enzymatic digestibility (ED).
Ijerph 18 03772 g003aIjerph 18 03772 g003b
Table 1. Factors and their levels for the central composite design (CCD).
Table 1. Factors and their levels for the central composite design (CCD).
FactorsUnitSymbolCoded Factor Levels
−2−1012
Temperature°CX10255075100
TimehX201234
S/L ratiog/LX35075100125150
Table 2. Chemical compositions of chestnut shells (CNSs).
Table 2. Chemical compositions of chestnut shells (CNSs).
Main ComponentsComposition (%, w/w)
Carbohydrate
Glucan45.1–57.8
XMGA 12.4–5.9
Protein9.4
Lipid1.2
Ash2.4
Others23.3
1 XMGA: the summation of xylan, mannan, galactan and arabinan content in CNS.
Table 3. Experimental designs and their experimental data for five-level, three-factor response surface analysis.
Table 3. Experimental designs and their experimental data for five-level, three-factor response surface analysis.
StdCoded Factor LevelsResponse
X1X2X3GC 1 (%)ED 2 (%)
1−1−1−164.731.0
21−1−176.540.3
3−11−166.941.2
411−183.246.7
5−1−1162.531.1
61−1175.238.8
7−11166.936.5
811181.544.7
9−20061.528.0
1020084.853.8
110−2045.112.7
1202072.945.3
1300−275.338.8
1400272.440.3
1500074.444.8
1600071.746.4
1700073.139.9
1800070.041.8
1900073.842.9
2000076.443.7
1 GC: glucan content. 2 ED: enzymatic digestibility.
Table 4. ANOVA for response surface model of glucan content (GC).
Table 4. ANOVA for response surface model of glucan content (GC).
SourceSum of SquareDegree of FreedomMean SquareF-Valuep-ValueRemarks
Model1341.859149.0910.990.0004significant
X1649.431649.4347.86<0.0001significant
X2353.971353.9726.090.0005significant
X37.5717.570.560.4723
X1X25.3515.350.390.5443
X1X30.05610.0560.0041510.9499
X2X30.3610.360.0270.8734
X120.8710.870.0640.8049
X22280.531280.5320.670.0011significant
X323.3613.360.250.6294
Residual135.691013.57
Lack of fit111.54522.314.620.0593
Pure error24.1554.83
Total1477.5519
Coefficient of determination (R2): 0.9082. Adjusted R2: 0.8255. Coefficient of variation (CV): 5.16%. Adequate precision: 13.919.
Table 5. ANOVA for response surface model of enzymatic digestibility (ED).
Table 5. ANOVA for response surface model of enzymatic digestibility (ED).
SourceSum of SquareDegree of FreedomMean SquareF-Valuep-ValueRemarks
Model1282.209142.479.420.0008significant
X1423.941423.9428.040.0004significant
X2540.221540.2235.730.0001significant
X31.5411.540.100.7559
X1X21.3111.310.0860.7749
X1X30.2010.200.0130.9117
X2X33.4913.490.230.6411
X127.0117.010.460.5114
X22309.481309.4820.470.0011significant
X3219.12119.121.260.2871
Residual151.211015.12
Lack of fit125.23525.054.820.0547
Pure error25.9855.20
Total1433.4119
Coefficient of determination (R2): 0.8945. Adjusted R2: 0.7996. Coefficient of variation (CV): 9.86%. Adequate precision: 12.306.
Table 6. Numerical optimization and experimental data for the chestnut shells (CNSs) pretreatment.
Table 6. Numerical optimization and experimental data for the chestnut shells (CNSs) pretreatment.
FactorsCoded LevelsActual Levels
Temperature1.075.0 °C
Time0.82.8 h
S/L ratio−0.877.1 g/L
ResponsePredictedExperimental
GC (%)83.383.2
ED (%)50.048.4
Table 7. Summary of changes in the chemical properties of various biomass by alkali pretreatments.
Table 7. Summary of changes in the chemical properties of various biomass by alkali pretreatments.
BiomassPretreatment ConditionsGlucan (%)XMGA (%)ED (%)References
Bef.Aft.Bef.Aft.Bef.Aft.
Canola Straw19.3% NH3 at 70 °C for 16 h34.343.821.713.619.582.4[17]
9.2% NaOH at 70 °C for 16 h34.358.521.711.319.590.3
Sida acuta3% NaOH at 60 °C for 9 h42.761.416.123.35.722.6[18]
Sicyos angluatus2% NaOH at 121°C for 10 min16.446.76.211.322.155.3[22]
Miscnthus15% NH3 at 60 °C for 24 h41.355.428.734.633.171.3[41]
Bamboo2% NaOH at 25 °C for 48 h373316.613.224.547.1[42]
Corncob5% KOH at 90 °C for 1 h42.664.538.831.3-82.4[43]
Walnut shell3% KOH at 121 °C for 1 h39.635.618.536.9656[44]
Corn stover3% KOH at 121 °C for 1 h30.647.126.632.548100[44]
Orange peel3% KOH at 121 °C for 30 min2532.817-3687.8[45]
Spent coffee ground3% KOH at 75 °C for 2.8 h9.318.923.347.531.659.4[46]
Chestnut shell3% KOH at 75 °C for 2.8 h45.146.15.99.512.748.4This study
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, K.H.; Lee, S.K.; Lee, J.; Kim, S.; Park, C.; Kim, S.W.; Yoo, H.Y. Improvement of Enzymatic Glucose Conversion from Chestnut Shells through Optimization of KOH Pretreatment. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 3772. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph18073772

AMA Style

Lee KH, Lee SK, Lee J, Kim S, Park C, Kim SW, Yoo HY. Improvement of Enzymatic Glucose Conversion from Chestnut Shells through Optimization of KOH Pretreatment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(7):3772. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph18073772

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Kang Hyun, Soo Kweon Lee, Jeongho Lee, Seunghee Kim, Chulhwan Park, Seung Wook Kim, and Hah Young Yoo. 2021. "Improvement of Enzymatic Glucose Conversion from Chestnut Shells through Optimization of KOH Pretreatment" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 7: 3772. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph18073772

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop