Next Article in Journal
Numerical Flow Simulation on the Virus Spread of SARS-CoV-2 Due to Airborne Transmission in a Classroom
Previous Article in Journal
Frailty as a Predictor of Poor Rehabilitation Outcomes among Older Patients Attending a Geriatric Day Hospital Program: An Observational Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Association between Comorbidities and Comorbid Injuries on Treatment Outcome in Pediatric and Elderly Patients with Injuries in Korea: An Observational Study

1
Department of Healthcare Management, Eulji University of Korea, 553 Sanseongdaero, Sujeong-gu, Seongnam 13135, Kyeonggi-do, Korea
2
College of Health Science, Dankook University, 119 Dandaero, Dongnam-gu, Cheonan 31116, Chungcheongnam-do, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(10), 6277; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph19106277
Submission received: 11 March 2022 / Revised: 18 May 2022 / Accepted: 20 May 2022 / Published: 21 May 2022

Abstract

:
We aimed to compare the characteristics and types of injuries affecting pediatric and elderly patients and to identify factors associated with treatment outcomes. We used data from the 2006–2017 Korea National Hospital Discharge Survey. The patients were divided into two groups, children (0–12 years) and elderly (≥65 years), based on their age at discharge. In total, 47,528 (11,842 children and 35,686 older adults) patients with injuries were identified. The number of deaths and the LOS were 36 (0.3%) and 7.6 days (±10.1), respectively, in the children group, and 861 (2.4%) and 18.5 days (±27.3), respectively, in the elderly group (p < 0.001). In the children group, there were increased odds for surgery among boys, Medicaid and health insurance subscribers, patients with multiple injuries, patients without a subdiagnosis, and an increasing number of hospital beds. In the elderly group, there were increased odds for surgery among women, Medicaid and health insurance subscribers, patients who died, patients with a single injury, patients with a subdiagnosis, and increasing numbers of hospital beds. Treatment outcomes could be improved by providing early diagnosis and prompt treatment in pediatric patients and by taking multilateral approaches for multiple injuries and comorbidities in elderly patients.

1. Introduction

Advances in medicine have reduced disease-related mortality; however, there has been a consistent increase in injury-related morbidity and mortality [1]. Injury involves three factors, namely, host, agent, and vector and environment, and can be predicted and prevented at three time points: pre-event, event, and post-event [2]. Furthermore, injury cases can be classified according to age (pediatric, adult, and elderly injury); accordingly, there is a need for age-specific prevention policies tailored to specific types and characteristics of injuries.
Pediatric injury results in substantial individual, social, and national losses and burdens; further, it impairs the quality of life by causing permanent disability [3]. In South Korea, most pediatric injuries are unintentional, including traffic accidents, drowning, and murder [1], with the resulting deaths accounting for more than half of all deaths and mainly occurring at home and in residential areas (38.7%) [4]. The Korean government has established recent measures to raise awareness and prevent traffic accidents, the major cause of injury-related deaths among children, which has resulted in a decrease in traffic accidents involving children [5]. Moreover, measures have been taken to prevent home injury-related deaths among infants and toddlers aged <4 years by changing home environments as well as providing educational and legal interventions for their caregivers [4]. Due to the prevention policies tailored for different types and characteristics of pediatric injury-related deaths, the rate of pediatric injury mortality in Korea has dropped below the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development average to 2.93. Nevertheless, there has been a continuous increase in the rate of pediatric injuries [6]. In North America, Europe, Australia, and New Zealand, the annual incidence of brain injuries among children and adolescents aged ≤20 years is 691 per 100,000; however, the mortality rate is only 9 per 100,000, with the disability prevalence being higher instead [7].
Unlike pediatric injuries, even minor injuries in the elderly progress to severe conditions due to difficulties in recovery, resulting in a tremendous socioeconomic burden given the increased treatment cost [8], cost of support, and sequelae [9]. Injuries in older adults result in worsened visual acuity, hearing, and muscle strength, increasing the risk of falling and slipping. Accordingly, there has been an increase in the rate of hospitalization due to falls among older adults aged ≥65 years, which was 2336 per 100,000 as of 2013 in Korea [9]. In the U.S., the utilization rate of the emergency department (ED) among older adults aged ≥65 years is 458.6 per 10,000; further, the hospitalization and mortality rates were 130 per 10,000 and 5.4 per 10,000, respectively, which indicates that a considerable number of older adults die from falling [10,11]. As aforementioned, it is difficult for older adults to recover from injuries, with falls occurring frequently [12]. Further, injury-related diminished physical functioning adversely affects cognitive function and could cause psychological depression [13].
A common characteristic of injuries in children and older adults is that they primarily occur at home since these groups are vulnerable to external risk factors and require care from caregivers [12,14,15]. A study on developing countries, such as Iran, reported that 49.2% of household injuries in children aged <5 years are mild and often result from falling; contrastingly, approximately 50% of these cases are severe injuries that cause serious disabilities [16]. Moreover, falls are the major cause of traumatic brain injury in children aged <4 years. Although they are often non-fatal, unintentional injuries that mostly occur at home, they incur substantial treatment-related social costs [17]. In the U.S., household injuries are the second-most common injuries affecting children aged ≤19 years [18]. Additionally, accidents resulting from falling and slipping at home are common among older adults since they spend most of their time at home and are often alone [19,20,21,22].
Post-injury disabilities in children and older adults affect the work of their caregivers, incur substantial costs due to prolonged treatment, and impair their health-related quality of life [23,24]. Further, these injuries are associated with tremendous social and economic loss as well as a high rate of sequelae and fatality. Accordingly, there has been extensive research on this topic; however, most of these studies were exclusively conducted on specific age groups, including children aged 0–5 years or 0–12 years [25,26,27] and older adults aged ≥65 years [28,29,30]. Moreover, even studies on both pediatric and elderly injuries generally focused on a specific injury [31,32]; injury mortality; or injuries from a specific cause, including traffic accidents [33,34,35,36,37,38,39].
Given the aging population, there is a need for social and national management policies for injuries among older adults and children in dual-income families. Accordingly, there have been studies on the current management and prevention policies for specific injury types according to age (children and older adults). However, there remains unclear evidence regarding between-group differences in the types and characteristics of injuries and treatment outcomes. Obtaining conclusive evidence could inform policymakers in devising tailored prevention and management strategies for these age groups. Therefore, we aimed to analyze the incidence, types, sites, and treatment outcomes of injuries in children and older adults using data from the Korea National Hospital Discharge Survey.

2. Materials and Methods

We used data from the 2006–2017 Korea National Hospital Discharge Survey, which is an annual survey conducted by the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency (KDCA). This survey seeks to identify the number of discharged patients and their characteristics in order to provide data for informing effective national health policies. The collected data contain information regarding sociodemographic, admission, and disease and treatment characteristics as well as the external cause of injury [40]. After obtaining approval from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Eulji University, we obtained permission to extract and use these data for analysis.
Based on the age at the time of discharge, patients were divided into the children group (0–12 years) or the elderly group (≥65 years). We used the Korean Standard Classification of Disease 7th Version, which is based on the International Classification of Disease 10th Version. Patients with injury were defined as those with a primary diagnosis code of S00–S09 (head injury), S10–S19 (neck injury), S20–S29 (thorax injury), S30–S39 (injury of the abdomen, lower back, and pelvis), S40–S49 (injury of the shoulder and arms), S50–S59 (injury of the elbow and lower arm), S60–S69 (injury of the wrist and hands), S70–S79 (injury of the buttocks and thighs), S80–S89 (injury of the knees and lower legs), S90–S99 (injury of the ankle and feet), T00–T07 (injuries involving multiple body regions), T08–T14 (injuries to an unspecified part of the trunk and limbs), T15–T19 (effects of a foreign body entering through a natural orifice), T20–T32 (burns and corrosions), T33–T35 (frostbite), T36–T50 (poisoning by, adverse effect of, and underdosing of drugs, medicaments, and biological substances), T51–T65 (toxic effects of substances chiefly nonmedicinal as to source), T66–T78 (other and unspecified effects of external causes), or T79 (certain early complications of trauma). In the Korea National Hospital Discharge Survey, each patient is assigned 0–20 subdiagnosis codes. Further, to examine comorbidities in patients with an injury, we classified the subdiagnosis codes based on the disease codes as follows: A00–B99 (certain infectious and parasitic diseases), C00–D48 (neoplasm), D50–D89 (diseases of the blood and blood-forming organs and certain disorders involving the immune mechanism), E00–E90 (endocrine, nutritional and metabolic diseases), F00–F99 (mental and behavioral disorders), G00–G99 (diseases of the nervous system), H00–H59 (diseases of the eye and adnexa), I00–I99 (diseases of the ear and mastoid process), J00–J00 (diseases of the circulatory system), K00–K93 (diseases of the digestive system), L00–L99 (diseases of the skin and subcutaneous tissue), M00–M99 (diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue), N00–N99 (diseases of the genitourinary system), P00–P96 (certain conditions originating in the perinatal period), Q00–Q99 (congenital malformations, deformations, and chromosomal abnormalities), R00–R99 (symptoms, signs, and abnormal clinical and laboratory findings), NEC T80–T88 (complications of surgical and medical care, NEC), T90–T98 (sequelae of injures, poisoning, and other consequences of external causes), and U00–U19 (provisional assignment of new diseases of uncertain etiology or emergency use). Additionally, patients with and without an injury code as a subdiagnosis were considered to have a single injury and multiple injuries, respectively.
The chi-square test and t-tests were used for between-group comparisons of the number of discharged patients, sex, admission route, insurance type, treatment outcomes, number of hospital beds, and length of stay (LOS) by year. Moreover, we used the chi-square test for between-group comparisons of the incidence, type, place, and treatment outcomes of injuries. Finally, we performed logistic and linear regression analyses to determine the effects of sex, admission route, insurance type, treatment outcomes, number of hospital beds, multiple injuries, and subdiagnosis on surgery and LOS. The results of logistic regression analysis are presented as the adjusted odds ratio results considering all explanatory variables. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS 9.4 software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. General Characteristics of Patients with Injury

In the study period, there were 11,842 children and 35,686 older adults in the children and elderly group, respectively (Table 1). The children group was predominantly male (7627 [64.4%] boys and 4215 [35.6%] girls), while the elderly group was predominantly female (21,579 [60.5%] women and 14,107 [39.5%] men) (p < 0.001). The most common admission route in the children group was the ED (n = 7484; 63.2%), followed by outpatient clinics (n = 4342, 36.7%) and others (n = 16, 0.1%). The most common admission route in the elderly group was the ED (n = 23,543, 66.0%), followed by outpatient clinics (n = 12,119, 34.0%) and others (n = 24, 0.1%). Hospitalization through the ED was more common in the elderly group than in the children group (p < 0.001).
In the children group, the most common insurance type was national health insurance (NHI) (n = 8863, 74.8%), followed by others (n = 2595, 21.9%) and Medicaid (n = 384, 3.2%). In the elderly group, the most common insurance type was NHI (n = 25,153, 70.5%), followed by others (n = 7089, 19.9%) and Medicaid (n = 3444, 9.7%). Compared with the children group, the elderly group had a lower proportion of NHI and other insurance types as well as a higher proportion of Medicaid (p < 0.001). Regarding treatment outcomes, improvements were observed in most patients in the children (n = 11,543, 97.5%) and elderly groups (n = 33,076, 92.7%), with only a minor proportion of patients not improving (144 [1.2%] vs. 996 [2.8%]), receiving only a diagnosis (112 [0.9%] vs. 688 [1.9%]), expiring (36 [0.3%] vs. 861 [2.4%]), or others (7 [0.1%] vs. 65 [0.2%]). Compared with the children group, the elderly group showed higher rates of death and non-improvement (p < 0.001). The most common number of hospital beds was 500–999 and 100–299 beds in the children (n = 4986) and elderly (n = 16,774) groups (p < 0.001). In the children group, 6313 (53.3%) and 5529 (46.7%) patients lacked and had surgery, respectively, while the corresponding proportions in the elderly group were 19,271 (54.0%) and 16,415 (46.0%) patients, with no significant between-group difference (p = 0.191). There was a significant between-group difference in the LOS (7.6 days and 18.5 days in the children and elderly groups, respectively p < 0.001). Regarding the annual trends of injuries, the injury incidence declined over the years in the children group, while it either increased or decreased without marked changes in the elderly group (p < 0.001).

3.2. Characteristics of Injuries

Table 2 shows the injury characteristics. In the children group, the most common injury characteristic was unintentional injury (n = 11,711, 98.9%), followed by violence (n = 89, 0.8%), unidentified/under investigation (n = 29, 0.2%), intentional self-harm (n = 9, 0.1%), and unknown (n = 4, 0.0%). In the elderly group, the most common injury characteristic was unintentional injury (n = 34,410, 96.4%), followed by intentional self-harm (n = 800, 2.2%), violence (n = 279, 0.8%), unidentified/under investigation (n = 163, 0.5%), and unknown (n = 34, 0.1%) (p < 0.001). In the children group, injuries most commonly occurred in the place of living, followed by road/highway, unknown, school, and sports facility or stadium. Contrastingly, in the elderly group, injuries most commonly occurred in the place of living, followed by road/highway, unknown, farm, and healthcare facility (p < 0.001). The most common activity at the time of injury was activities of daily living and unknown in the children and elderly groups, respectively (p < 0.001). In the children group, the most common injury mechanism was a fall/slip, followed by traffic accident and bumping, while most cases in the elderly group were caused by a fall/slip (p < 0.001).

3.3. The Main Diagnoses of Patients with Injury

In the children group, the most common main diagnosis code was for injuries to the head, followed by injuries to the shoulder and upper arm, burn and corrosion, injuries to the knee and lower leg, and injuries to the elbow and lower arm (Table 3). Contrastingly, in the elderly group, the most common main diagnosis code was for injuries to the hip and thigh, followed by injuries to the head; injuries to the abdomen, lower back, and pelvis; injuries to the thorax; and injuries to the knee and lower leg. There were significant between-group differences in the main diagnosis codes (F = 8955.9, p < 0.001).

3.4. Subdiagnosis of Patients with Injury

Compared with the children group, the elderly group had a higher number of patients with a subdiagnosis (1446 [12.2%] vs. 17,859 [50.0%]) (Table 4). The most common subdiagnosis code in the children group was respiratory disease, followed by certain infectious and parasitic diseases and diseases of the digestive system. Contrastingly, the most common subdiagnosis code in the elderly group was diseases of the circulatory system, followed by diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue and endocrine, nutritional, and metabolic diseases. The percentage of multiple injuries (inclusion of injury codes in the subdiagnosis) was 36.7% and 39.0% in the children and elderly groups, respectively (p < 0.001).

3.5. Factors Associated with Surgery in Patients with Injury

In the children group, the factors associated with surgery were sex, insurance type, number of hospital beds, injury codes in subdiagnosis, and subdiagnosis codes (Table 5). Specifically, the odds for surgery were 1.194 times higher among boys than among girls (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.101–1.295), 2.719 times higher among patients with NHI than among those with other insurance (95% CI 2.447–3.022), and 2.719 times higher among patients with Medicaid than among patients with other insurance (95% CI 2.164–3.417). Compared with children hospitalized in a hospital with 100–299 beds, those hospitalized in hospitals with 500–999 beds and ≥1000 beds had 1.74 times (95% CI 1.584–1.912) and 2.074 times (95% CI 1.797–2.394) higher odds for surgery. Furthermore, patients with a single injury and without a subdiagnosis had decreased odds for surgery than those with multiple injuries and with a subdiagnosis, respectively (adjusted odds (aOR) 0.514, 95% CI 0.472–0.559 and aOR 0.578, 95% CI 0.511–0.653, respectively).
In the elderly group, the factors associated with surgery were sex, insurance type, treatment outcomes, number of hospital beds, injury codes in subdiagnosis, and subdiagnosis codes. Specifically, the odds for surgery were lower among men than among women (aOR 0.796, 95% CI 0.76–0.834). Further, the odds for surgery were 1.573 and 1.993 times higher among patients with Medicaid (95% CI 1.437–1.722) and NHI (95% CI 1.873–2.121) compared with those with other insurance types. Compared with patients with “other” treatment outcomes, the odds for surgery were 5.125 and 2.883 times higher among patients with improvement (95% CI 2.761–9.514) and those who died (95% CI 1.529–5.437), respectively. Additionally, the odds for surgery were positively correlated with the hospital size. The odds for surgery were 0.584 times lower among patients with multiple injuries than among those with a single injury (95% CI 0.557–0.613); further, they were 1.164 times higher among patients with a subdiagnosis than among those without (95% CI 1.113–1.217).

3.6. Factors Associated with LOS in Patients with Injury

In the children group, the factors associated with LOS were insurance type, number of hospital beds, injury codes in subdiagnosis, subdiagnosis codes, and surgery (Table 6). Specifically, the LOS was shorter among patients with NHI or Medicaid compared with that of patients with other insurance types (e.g., automobile insurance, worker’s compensation); moreover, it was negatively correlated with the number of hospital beds. The LOS was higher among patients with multiple injuries, subdiagnoses, and surgery compared with among patients with a single injury, without a subdiagnosis, and without surgery, respectively.
In the elderly group, the factors associated with LOS were sex, insurance type, number of hospital beds, injury codes in subdiagnosis, subdiagnosis codes, and surgery. Specifically, the LOS was shorter among men than among women as well as among patients with NHI or Medicaid than among patients with other insurance types (e.g., automobile insurance and worker’s compensation). The LOS was negatively correlated with the number of hospital beds. Further, the LOS was higher among patients with multiple injuries, subdiagnoses, and surgery compared with among patients with a single injury, without a subdiagnosis, and without surgery, respectively.

4. Discussion

This study compared the types and characteristics of injuries in children and older adults in Korea as well as the factors associated with treatment outcomes in the past 12 years. In both groups, there were high rates of admission through the ED, NHI subscribers, improved outcomes, and patients who did not undergo surgery. Contrastingly, the children group had more boys and more hospitalizations in 500–999-bed hospitals, while the elderly group had more women and more hospitalizations in 100–299-bed hospitals.
The finding of a high proportion of women in the elderly group is consistent with other reports in the U.S., Canada, and Taiwan [41]. This could be attributed to the longer life expectancy for women than for men, which results in a greater proportion of female patients in the elderly group. Specifically, since 2002, female patients are consistently discharged more often than male patients in Korea [42]. However, we observed higher odds for surgery among older men than among older women, which suggests that men are more vulnerable to injuries. Since falls that cause hip and thigh injuries frequently occur among older adults, the outcomes of falls may differ according to physical sexual dimorphism, including height and body weight. This indicates that men are at a greater risk of developing sequelae and disabilities after an injury than women. Taken together, there is a need for sex-specific preemptive interventions at time of admission to improve treatment outcomes.
In both groups, the most common places of injuries were place of living and roads/streets. However, there were between-group differences in the other common places of injuries; specifically, children frequently incurred injuries in play and cultural facilities, while older adults were frequently injured in healthcare facilities. Generally, most pediatric injuries were unintentional injuries, including those caused by traffic accidents, drowning, burns, and falls. These injuries may result in acquired disabilities or death, which could cause tremendous social and economic loss [43]. Accordingly, various national and international measures have been implemented to improve safety in common places of pediatric injuries.
Prevention of pediatric injuries requires accurate assessment of the current status, scientific evidence-based research, safety education and campaigns, and enactment and enforcement of regulations for creating a safe environment [44]. Specifically, regulations such as mandatory seatbelts, helmets, and fences are considered powerful measures for preventing injury. In fact, enforcing mandatory helmet use when riding a bicycle increased the rate of helmet usage [45], which reduced the occurrence of head injuries [46].
In Korea, safety signs, speed bumps, and speed safety cameras are installed in child safety zones to ensure slow driving and prevent traffic accidents [47]. Specifically, “Minshik’s law” was enacted in 2019, which stipulates that drivers who cause traffic accidents in child safety zones receive aggravated punishment [48]. Additionally, the act on safety management of child play facilities was enacted to allow children to safely and comfortably use the playground [49], and therefore prevent accidents. Further studies are warranted to determine whether these systems have positive influences on the incidence of accidents and the resulting pediatric injuries and deaths in order to identify effective safety measures.
The head and hip/thigh were the most common injury sites in the children and elderly groups, respectively, which are closely associated with the types of activities that cause injury [50]. Children often injure themselves during leisure activities, i.e., playing, and from falling or bumping into something during their normal day-to-day lives. Contrastingly, older adults often injure themselves during activities of daily living due to impaired gait and balance or from falling in healthcare and long-term care facilities [50,51]. Pediatric injuries are heavily influenced by environmental factors [52]; therefore, ameliorating the environment can prevent these injuries. In fact, the injury rate differs according to the targeted direction of policies [53]. Regarding the annual trends of injuries, both groups showed a marked reduction in the incidence of injury in 2013, which could be attributed to the development and dissemination by the KDCA in 2013 of evidence-based safety guidelines for preventing injuries [9].
Injuries among older adults in healthcare facilities can also be prevented, and therefore preventive measures are required [51]. Falls can be caused by intrinsic factors related to the deterioration of physical and mental functions as well as by extrinsic factors involving the physical and situational environments [54]. Falls are common among older adults and frequently occur in healthcare facilities. In fact, it is possible to predict and prevent a considerable percentage of falls. Accordingly, healthcare facilities have established various preventive strategies, including prevention activities targeting inpatients, multidisciplinary team efforts, and the use of fall prevention tools [55]; however, the rate of falls remains high. Falls frequently occur within 1–5 days of admission and contribute to extending the LOS [56]; therefore, it is important to thoroughly educate patients and caregivers upon admission. Moreover, there is a need for hospital-wide efforts to improve patient safety, including staff training and environmental management.
Even a minor injury can cause permanent disability among children, which impairs the quality of their remaining lives [57]. Moreover, injury-induced mobility problems in older adults deteriorate their quality of life and cause them to require care at other healthcare or nursing facilities, which results in additional socioeconomic costs. In fact, medical cost is strongly associated with injury severity [58]; furthermore, the burden of medical cost influences patients even after discharge. The increasing number of elderly patients resulting from the aging population has led to an increased incidence of injuries. Moreover, there is an increase in the number of older adults (age ≥ 80 years) with injury [59], which is suggestive of an increased medical cost burden among older adults with an injury. Our findings demonstrated a between-group difference in the LOS by approximately four fold. As suggested by the between-group difference in the number of hospital beds, older adults with injury are generally treated through long-term hospitalization in smaller hospitals and clinics. This indicates that older adults may require a relatively long time to recover from even minor symptoms or that they may require continuous management due to permanent sequelae or disability after injury treatment. In Taiwan, the mean LOS of elderly patients (age ≥ 65 years) with injury was 9.1 days (±12.0) [60], which is markedly shorter than that in Korea. Since extended hospital stay by patients with injuries aggravates caregiver burden and strains the health insurance finances, there is a need for tailored measures targeting specific age groups and hospital sizes.
Subdiagnosis, which was identified as a factor associated with LOS, was more common in the elderly group than in the children group. Respiratory and infectious diseases (acute diseases that occur during treatment) were more common comorbidities in the children group. Contrastingly, chronic diseases (e.g., heart disease and endocrine disease) and musculoskeletal disorders were more common in the elderly group. Chronic conditions increase the risk for complications, which increases the disease severity; therefore, it is important to prevent complications by managing chronic diseases [61]. Furthermore, given the annual increase in the population of older adults [62], there is a need for tailored prevention measures and post-care management measures for older adults.
Prevention policies and education specific to different injury types (e.g., injury site and mechanism) in children and older adults can facilitate injury prevention. Specifically, given the increasing incidence of severe injuries among older adults, who often have multiple chronic conditions, it is important to establish post-care management strategies for preventing injury and minimizing socioeconomic loss. Moreover, although both groups require care in their daily lives, they often receive inadequate care due to the increase in dual-income households and the older adult population. Accordingly, there is a need for public caregiving policies tailored to various injury characteristics [63].
Since we analyzed only patients hospitalized due to an injury, we excluded patients who received medical care in outpatient clinics or the ED. Nonetheless, our findings may inform the establishment of tailored injury prevention policies. Another strength of this study is that our findings demonstrate the significance of managing comorbidities, which were factors associated with the mean LOS and surgery.
However, this study has several limitations. First, patients with an injury were defined only based on their main diagnosis. Therefore, we excluded patients with an injury code only in their subdiagnosis, which could have led to the underestimation of the number of patients with an injury. Nonetheless, we additionally categorized patients into those with a single injury or multiple injuries based on whether their subdiagnosis codes included a code for injury. Second, we examined only a small number of factors associated with surgery and LOS due to the limitations of the study data. Third, we did not review the risk of coding errors in the recording of the diagnosis codes, which is a limitation of analyzing extensive datasets. Fourth, this study is an analysis of secondary data, which did not include information on whether the main diagnosis and sub-diagnosis existed at the time of admission. In fact, hospitals in South Korea often do not check or record the present on admission (POA). Even if it is recorded, there are differences in the methods for collecting information between hospitals, raising concerns in terms of the stability of the collected information and the reliability of the information. For this reason, this study assumed that the disease that the patient had at the time of admission and the disease that occurred after admission would equally affect patients’ death and length of hospitalization. It is necessary that follow-up studies resolve the limitations of the data in the current study by preparing a method to distinguish whether a disease was present at the time of admission and by examining the difference in results.

5. Conclusions

We aimed to compare the characteristics and types of injuries affecting pediatric and elderly patients and to identify factors associated with treatment outcomes. In the children group, there were increased odds for surgery among boys, Medicaid and health insurance subscribers, patients with multiple injuries, and patients without a subdiagnosis, and with an increasing number of hospital beds. In the elderly group, there were increased odds for surgery among women, Medicaid and health insurance subscribers, patients who died, patients with a single injury, and patients with a subdiagnosis, and with an increasing number of hospital beds. According to these results, treatment outcomes could be improved by providing early diagnosis and prompt treatment in pediatric patients and by taking multilateral approaches for multiple injuries and comorbidities in elderly patients.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.L.; formal analysis, J.H.; writing—original draft preparation, K.L.; writing—review and editing, J.H.; project administration, J.H.; funding acquisition, K.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Eulji University in 2021 (EJRG-21-12).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Eulji University of South Korea (IRB no. EU21-075).

Informed Consent Statement

The public big data provided by the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency did not include patient personal information, identification information, or institutional information, hence, patient consent was not required.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets analyzed during the current study are available at the following website: https://www.kdca.go.kr/contents.es?mid=a20303010502 (accessed on 8 March 2021).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Korean Disease Control and Prevention Agency and Eulji University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Available online: http://www.nih.go.kr/contents.es?mid=a20203020000 (accessed on 21 July 2021).
  2. Lett, R.; Kobusingye, O.; Sethi, D. A unified framework for injury control: The public health approach and Haddon’s Matrix combined. Inj. Control Saf. Promot. 2002, 9, 199–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Cho, W.; Jeong, W.; Lim, S.; Lee, S.; Jeon, B.; Kim, S. Socioeconomic Costs of Injury in Korea; Ministry of Health and Welfare: Sejong, Korea, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  4. Jung, K.Y.; Jung, J.H. Epidemiology of childhood injury in Korea. J. Korean Med. Assoc. 2008, 51, 208–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Available online: https://health.kdca.go.kr/ (accessed on 8 August 2021).
  6. Kim, M. Child Safety and Child Injury Prevention Strategies. J. Health Welf. Policy Mon. Forum. 2016, 3, 44–61. [Google Scholar]
  7. Thurman, D.J. The epidemiology of traumatic brain injury in children and youths: A review of research since 1990. J. Child Neurol. 2016, 31, 20–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Lee, K.; Lee, M. Characteristics of hospitalized elders with repeated falls and fractures. J. Korean Gerontol. Nurs. 2007, 9, 173–183. [Google Scholar]
  9. Available online: http://kdca.go.kr/search/search.es?mid=a20101000000 (accessed on 21 July 2021).
  10. Byun, J.; Robertson, J. Peer Reviewed: Tracking Senior Fall and Fall-Related Injury EMS Calls to Target Fall Prevention Programs, Salt Lake County, Utah. Prev. Chronic Dis. 2019, 16, 180462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Burns, E.; Kakara, R. Deaths from falls among persons aged ≥ 65 years—United States, 2007–2016. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2018, 67, 509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Available online: https://www.kihasa.re.kr/ (accessed on 21 July 2021).
  13. Kim, M. Factors associated with falls in the elderly: Based on 2014 the Korean elderly survey. J. Korea Contents Assoc. 2017, 17, 479–489. [Google Scholar]
  14. Lee, E.; Kim, C. A survey of fractures and factor associated with falls in elderly patients. J. Korean Gerontol. Nurs. 2003, 5, 182–192. [Google Scholar]
  15. Park, Y.-H.; Moon, J.-S. Home environmental hazards of falling accident in the elderly. Korean J. Health Educ. Promot. 2005, 22, 203–213. [Google Scholar]
  16. Rezapur-Shahkolai, F.; Afshari, M.; Moghimbeigi, A.; Hazavehei, S.M.M. Home-related injuries among under-five-year children and mothers’ care regarding injury prevention in rural areas. Int. J. Inj. Control. Saf. Promot. 2017, 24, 354–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Haarbauer-Krupa, J.; Haileyesus, T.; Gilchrist, J.; Mack, K.A.; Law, C.S.; Joseph, A. Fall-related traumatic brain injury in children ages 0–4 years. J. Saf. Res. 2019, 70, 127–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Aþýrdizer, M.; Yavuz, M.S.; Albek, E.; Cantürk, G. Infant and adolescent deaths in Istanbul due to home accidents. Turk. J. Pediatr. 2005, 47, 141–149. [Google Scholar]
  19. Johansson, B. Fall injuries among elderly persons living at home. Scand. J. Caring Sci. 1998, 12, 67–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Pi, H.-Y.; Hu, M.-M.; Zhang, J.; Peng, P.-P.; Nie, D. Circumstances of falls and fall-related injuries among frail elderly under home care in China. Int. J. Nurs. Sci. 2015, 2, 237–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Evans, D.; Pester, J.; Vera, L.; Jeanmonod, D.; Jeanmonod, R. Elderly fall patients triaged to the trauma bay: Age, injury patterns, and mortality risk. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2015, 33, 1635–1638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lim, K.-T.; Lee, J.-E.; Park, H.-E.; Park, S.-Y.; Choi, W.J. Understanding and Prevention of Fall-related Injuries in Older Adults in South Korea: A Systematic Review. Phys. Ther. Korea 2019, 2, 34–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Schneeberg, A.; Ishikawa, T.; Kruse, S.; Zallen, E.; Mitton, C.; Bettinger, J.A.; Brussoni, M. A longitudinal study on quality of life after injury in children. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 2016, 14, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Reitan, I.; Dahlin, L.B.; Rosberg, H.E. Patient-reported quality of life and hand disability in elderly patients after a traumatic hand injury—A retrospective study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2019, 17, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Osborne, J.M.; Davey, T.M.; Spinks, A.B.; McClure, R.J.; Sipe, N.; Cameron, C.M. Child injury: Does home matter? Soc. Sci. Med. 2016, 153, 250–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Rhodes, K.V.; Iwashyna, T.J. Child injury risks are close to home: Parent psychosocial factors associated with child safety. Matern. Child Health J. 2007, 11, 269–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Morrongiello, B.A.; Schell, S.L. Child injury: The role of supervision in prevention. Am. J. Lifestyle Med. 2010, 4, 65–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sirois, M.-J.; Griffith, L.; Perry, J.; Daoust, R.; Veillette, N.; Lee, J.; Pelletier, M.; Wilding, L.; Émond, M. Measuring frailty can help emergency departments identify independent seniors at risk of functional decline after minor injuries. J. Gerontol. Ser. A Biomed. Sci. Med. Sci. 2017, 72, 68–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Do, M.; Chang, V.; Kuran, N.; Thompson, W. Fall-related injuries among Canadian seniors, 2005–2013: An analysis of the Canadian Community Health Survey. Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada: Research. Policy Pract. 2015, 35, 99. [Google Scholar]
  30. Joyce, M.F.; Gupta, A.; Azocar, R.J. Acute trauma and multiple injuries in the elderly population. Curr. Opin. Anesthesiol. 2015, 28, 145–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. DeMers, G.; Lynch, C.; Vilke, G. Retail store-related traumatic injuries in paediatric and elderly populations. J. Paramed. Pract. 2011, 3, 632–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Siman-Tov, M.; Radomislensky, I.; Knoller, N.; Bahouth, H.; Kessel, B.; Klein, Y.; Michaelson, M.; Rivkind, B.M.A.; Shaked, G.; Simon, D.; et al. Incidence and injury characteristics of traumatic brain injury: Comparison between children, adults and seniors in Israel. Brain Inj. 2016, 30, 83–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Dutton, R.P.; Stansbury, L.G.; Leone, S.; Kramer, E.; Hess, J.R.; Scalea, T.M. Trauma mortality in mature trauma systems: Are we doing better? An analysis of trauma mortality patterns, 1997–2008. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2010, 69, 620–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Carroll, L.J.; Cassidy, J.D.; Cancelliere, C.; Côté, P.; Hincapié, C.A.; Kristman, V.L.; Holm, L.W.; Borg, J.; Boussard, C.-D.; Hartvigsen, J. Systematic review of the prognosis after mild traumatic brain injury in adults: Cognitive, psychiatric, and mortality outcomes: Results of the International Collaboration on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Prognosis. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2014, 95, S152–S173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Majdan, M.; Plancikova, D.; Brazinova, A.; Rusnak, M.; Nieboer, D.; Feigin, V.; Mass, A. Epidemiology of traumatic brain injuries in Europe: A cross-sectional analysis. Lancet Public Health 2016, 1, e76–e83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chang, S.; Symons, R.; Ozanne-Smith, J. Child road traffic injury mortality in Victoria, Australia (0–14 years), the need for targeted action. Injury 2018, 49, 604–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Moniruzzaman, S.; Andersson, R. Economic development as a determinant of injury mortality—A longitudinal approach. Soc. Sci. Med. 2008, 66, 1699–1708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Brazinova, A.; Majdan, M. Road traffic mortality in the Slovak Republic in 1996–2014. Traffic Inj. Prev. 2016, 17, 692–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Blazquez, C.; Lee, J.S.; Zegras, C. Children at risk: A comparison of child pedestrian traffic collisions in Santiago, Chile, and Seoul, South Korea. Traffic Inj. Prev. 2016, 17, 304–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Lee, Y.K.; Hong, S.O.; Park, S.J.; Park, M.; Wang, K.; Jo, M.; Kim, Y. Data resource profile: The Korea National Hospital Discharge In-depth Injury Survey. Epidemiol. Health 2021, 43, e2021052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Yang, Y.-J.; Chien, W.-C.; Chung, C.-H.; Hong, K.-T.; Yu, Y.-L.; Hueng, D.-Y.; Chen, Y.-H.; Ma, H.-I.; Chang, H.-A.; Kao, Y.-C.; et al. Risk of erectile dysfunction after traumatic brain injury: A nationwide population-based cohort study in Taiwan. Am. J. Men’s Health 2018, 12, 913–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Available online: https://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=117&tblId=DT_11730_N003&vw_cd=MT_ZTITLE&list_id=D16_A001&seqNo=&lang_mode=ko&language=kor&obj_var_id=&itm_id=&conn_path=MT_ZTITLE (accessed on 21 July 2021).
  43. Available online: https://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/books/NBK310643/ (accessed on 21 July 2021).
  44. Branche, C.J.O.-S.; Oyebite, K.; Hyder, A.A. World Report on Child Injury Prevention; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  45. Karkhaneh, M.; Kalenga, J.-C.; Hagel, B.E.; Rowe, B. Effectiveness of bicycle helmet legislation to increase helmet use: A systematic review. Inj. Prev. 2006, 12, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Macpherson, A.; Spinks, A. Bicycle helmet legislation for the uptake of helmet use and prevention of head injuries. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2008, 2008, CD005401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Park, S.; Ko, D. A multilevel model approach for investigating individual accident characteristics and neighborhood environment characteristics affecting pedestrian-vehicle crashes. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 3107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Joon, J.C. The Problems and Scheme of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Specific Violent Crimes and Road Traffic Act. Korea Law Rev. 2020, 99, 157–194. [Google Scholar]
  49. Chung, N. From ‘safety’to ‘creativity’: Changing discourses of the modern playground in South Korea. Int. J. Play. 2019, 8, 276–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Richter, M.; Becker, C.; Seifert, J.; Gebhard, F.; Pieske, O.; Holch, M.; Lob, G. Injury prevention in the elderly population. Der Unf. 2002, 105, 1076–1087. [Google Scholar]
  51. Chelly, J.E.; Conroy, L.; Miller, G.; Elliott, M.N.; Horne, J.L.; Hudson, M.E. Risk factors and injury associated with falls in elderly hospitalized patients in a community hospital. J. Patient Saf. 2008, 4, 178–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Baker, S.P.; Li, G. Epidemiologic approaches to injury and violence. Epidemiol. Rev. 2012, 34, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Fridman, L.; Fraser-Thomas, J.; Pike, I.; Macpherson, A.K. An interprovincial comparison of unintentional childhood injury rates in Canada for the period 2006–2012. Can. J. Public Health 2018, 109, 573–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lopez, K.D.; Gerling, G.J.; Cary, M.P.; Kanak, M.F. Cognitive work analysis to evaluate the problem of patient falls in an inpatient setting. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2010, 17, 313–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Francis-Coad, J.; Hill, A.-M.; Jacques, A.; Chandler, A.M.; Richey, P.A.; Mion, L.C.; Shorr, R.I. Association between characteristics of injurious falls and fall preventive interventions in acute medical and surgical units. J. Gerontol. Ser. A 2020, 75, e152–e158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kim, Y.S.; Choi-Kwon, S. Fall risk factors and fall risk assessment of inpatients. Korean J. Adult Nurs. 2013, 25, 74–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Sleet, D.A. The global challenge of child injury prevention. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 1921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. van der Vlegel, M.; Haagsma, J.A.; Geraerds, A.; de Munter, L.; de Jongh, M.A.; Polinder, S. Health care costs of injury in the older population: A prospective multicentre cohort study in the Netherlands. BMC Geriatr. 2020, 20, 417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Dinh, M.M.; Russell, S.B.; Bein, K.J.; Vallmuur, K.; Muscatello, D.; Chalkley, D.; Ivers, R. Age-related trends in injury and injury severity presenting to emergency departments in New South Wales Australia: Implications for major injury surveillance and trauma systems. Injury 2017, 48, 171–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Chien, W.-C.; Chung, C.-H.; Lai, C.-H.; Chou, C.-H. A retrospective population-based study of injury types among elderly in Taiwan. Int. J. Inj. Control. Saf. Promot. 2014, 21, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Kuhne, C.A.; Ruchholtz, S.; Kaiser, G.M.; Nast-Kolb, D. Mortality in severely injured elderly trauma patients—When does age become a risk factor? World J. Surg. 2005, 29, 1476–1482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Available online: https://kosis.kr/index/index.do (accessed on 10 May 2022).
  63. Lu, P.; Shelley, M. Comparing older adult and child protection policy in the United States of America. Ageing Soc. 2021, 41, 273–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics of discharged pediatric and elderly patients.
Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics of discharged pediatric and elderly patients.
0–12 Years
(n = 11,842)
≥65 Years
(n = 35,686)
p-Value
n%n%
Sex <0.001
 Male762764.414,10739.5
 Female421535.621,57960.5
Admission route <0.001
 Emergency department748463.223,54366.0
 Outpatient department434236.712,11934.0
 Others160.1240.1
Insurance type <0.001
 NHI886374.825,15370.5
 Medicaid3843.234449.7
 Others259521.9708919.9
Treatment outcome <0.001
 Improved11,54397.533,07692.7
 Not improved1441.29962.8
 Diagnosis only1120.96881.9
 Others70.1650.2
 Death360.38612.4
Number of hospital beds <0.001
 100–299381932.216,77447.0
 300–499184615.6477913.4
 500–999498642.112,03933.7
 ≥1000119110.120945.9
Surgery 0.191
 No631353.319,27154.0
 Yes552946.716,41546.0
Length of stay <0.001
 Mean ± standard deviation7.610.118.527.3
Year of injury (children/elderly) * <0.001
 2006 (0.02%/0.08%)166114.034009.5
 2007 (0.02%/0.07%)145612.331438.8
 2008 (0.01%/0.06%)119910.131498.8
 2009 (0.01%/0.06%)10619.029998.4
 2010 (0.01%/0.06%)118110.032989.2
 2011 (0.01%/0.05%)10368.730158.4
 2012 (0.01%/0.05%)9938.430718.6
 2013 (0.01%/0.04%)7376.225847.2
 2014 (0.01%/0.04%)6385.425007.0
 2015 (0.01%/0.04%)5694.823856.7
 2016 (0.01%/0.03%)5074.323416.6
 2017 (0.01%/0.05%)8046.8380110.7
chi-square test,  t-test, * It is the ratio of the number of patients to the population.
Table 2. Injury characteristics in the children and elderly groups.
Table 2. Injury characteristics in the children and elderly groups.
0–12 Years
(n = 11,842)
≥65 Years
(n = 35,686)
p-Value
n%n%
Intentionality <0.001
 Unintentional11,71198.934,41096.4
 Intentional self-harm90.18002.2
 Violence890.82790.8
 Unidentified/under investigation290.21630.5
 Unknown40.0340.1
Place of injury <0.001
 Home340628.810,39729.1
 Road/highway30732610,28928.8
 Unknown281023.710,03828.1
 Farm160.111773.3
 Water, ocean, outdoors1831.58252.3
 Healthcare facility250.25121.4
 Industrial, construction sites130.14841.4
 Commercial areas2552.24711.3
 Group residential facility160.14641.3
 Other1861.63541
 Play, cultural, and public Facilities4083.42310.6
 Other traffic areas320.32070.6
 School8527.21240.3
 Sports facilities and stadiums5674.81130.3
Activity during injury occurrence <0.001
 Unknown275723.312,43734.9
 In daily life277323.4882924.7
 While moving146012.3540315.1
 During other specified activities139311.8427112
 During paid work2021075.9
 During unpaid work3010512.9
 During a leisure activity241320.47412.1
 During treatment200.24121.2
 While drinking alcohol410.32800.8
 During a sports game4313.61020.3
 During education5494.6530.1
Mechanism of injury <0.001
 Falling, slipping410234.619,81255.5
 Traffic accident317826.8900525.2
 Bumping170414.417715
 Poisoning2442.114564.1
 Other4854.114484.1
 Unknown1611.410202.9
 Stabbing, cutting, severed4173.55571.6
 Fire, flame, heat145212.35321.5
 Asphyxiation420.4700.2
 Drowning460.4140
 Gun shot100.110
 Sexual violence1000
chi-square test.
Table 3. Main diagnosis codes in children and elderly patients with injury.
Table 3. Main diagnosis codes in children and elderly patients with injury.
Main Diagnosis
0–12 years
(n = 11,842)
≥65 Years
(n = 35,686)
Cases%Cases%
S70–S79Injuries to the hip and thigh3252.7640117.9
S00–S09Injuries to the head332428.1628017.6
S30–S39Injuries to the abdomen, lower back, and pelvis4563.9530514.9
S20–S29Injuries to the thorax1060.9517514.5
S80–S89Injuries to the knee and lower leg10498.927277.6
S50–S59Injuries to the elbow and lower arm9588.121726.1
S40–S49Injuries to the shoulder and upper arm157613.318955.3
S10–S19Injuries to the neck2722.311803.3
S60–S69Injuries to the wrist and hands8607.310933.1
T51–T65Toxic effects of substances chiefly nonmedicinal as to source12019852.8
S90–S99Injuries to the ankle and foot6675.68532.4
T20–T32Burns and corrosions155513.15941.7
T36–T50Poisoning by, adverse effect of, and underdosing of drugs, medicaments, and biological substances11814711.3
T00–T07Injuries involving multiple body regions570.51730.5
T15–T19Effects of foreign body entering through natural orifice2722.31580.4
T66–T78Other and unspecified effects of external causes890.8990.3
T08–T14Injuries to the unspecified part of trunk and limbs290.2930.3
T79Certain early complications of trauma80.1290.1
T33–T35Frostbite1030
Table 4. Subdiagnosis codes in children and elderly patients with injury.
Table 4. Subdiagnosis codes in children and elderly patients with injury.
Subdiagnosis 0–12 Years
(n = 11,842)
≥65 Years
(n = 35,686)
p-Value
Cases%Cases%
Subdiagnosis <0.001
No10,39687.817,82750.0
Yes144612.217,85950.0
Disease codes
A00–B991651.412673.6<0.001
C00–D48100.17622.1
D50–D89690.69402.6
E00–E90240.2534915.0
F00–F99600.521736.1
G00–G991120.916604.7
H00–H59780.76141.7
H60–H95570.53140.9
I00–I99370.310,50829.4
J00–J997446.331818.9
K00–K931511.332489.1
L00–L99970.88342.3
M00–M99690.6604216.9
N00–N99270.224156.8
P00–P96140.100.0
Q00–Q99340.3240.1
R00–R991371.212183.4
T80–T88470.42820.8
T90–T9840.01000.3
U00–U1970.1800.2
Injury code <0.001
Single749163.321,76261.0
Multiple435136.713,92439.0
Table 5. Factors associated with surgery in children and elderly patients with injury.
Table 5. Factors associated with surgery in children and elderly patients with injury.
Variables0–12 Years (n = 11,842)≥65 Years (n = 35,686)
aOR95% CIaOR95% CI
Sex
 Men1.1941.1011.2950.7960.760.834
 WomenRef. Ref.
Admission route
 Emergency department0.3910.1221.2520.9160.3932.136
 Outpatient department0.6250.1951.9990.8770.3762.046
 OthersRef. Ref.
Insurance type
 NHI2.7192.4473.0221.9931.8732.121
 Medicaid2.7192.1643.4171.5731.4371.722
 OthersRef. Ref.
Treatment outcome
 Improved2.2210.3713.3215.1252.7619.514
 Not improved0.5210.0813.3350.9270.4861.767
 Diagnosis only0.1390.0191.0040.390.1970.769
 Death3.150.4621.5732.8831.5295.437
 OthersRef. Ref.
Number of hospital beds
 ≥10002.0741.7972.3942.6592.4072.938
 500–9991.741.5841.9121.9891.892.093
 300–4990.9820.8691.1091.3951.3031.492
 100–299Ref. Ref.
Injury code
 Multiple0.5140.4720.5590.5840.5570.613
 SingleRef. Ref.
Subdiagnosis
 Yes0.5780.5110.6531.1641.1131.217
 NoRef. Ref.
aOR, adjusted odds; CI, confidence intervals.
Table 6. Factors associated with length of stay in the children and elderly patients with injury.
Table 6. Factors associated with length of stay in the children and elderly patients with injury.
Variables0–12 Years (n = 11,842)≥65 Years (n = 35,686)
βtp-Valueβtp-Value
Intercept5.2275321.230.218414.037012.260.0239
Sex
 Men−0.19788−1.10.271−1.08321−3.770.0002
 WomenRef. Ref.
Admission route
 Emergency department3.4376551.470.14240.2203380.040.9668
 Outpatient department1.5981930.680.4954−4.65999−0.880.3788
 OthersRef. Ref.
Insurance type
 NHI−4.83614−21.69<0.0001−9.4027−24.99<0.0001
 Medicaid−2.94505−5.71<0.0001−5.52255−9.88<0.0001
 OthersRef. Ref.
Treatment outcome
 Improved0.2725040.080.93862.9626970.920.3575
 Not improved−3.89227−1.070.2825−2.90815−0.880.381
 Diagnosis only−3.62249−0.990.3203−3.25628−0.970.333
 Death−5.77275−1.490.13532.0615510.620.5362
 OthersRef. Ref.
Number of hospital beds
 ≥1000−1.78143−5.59<0.0001−3.78238−6.18<0.0001
 500–999−1.29049−6.12<0.0001−1.6089−4.97<0.0001
 300–4990.0634640.240.81281.4102543.30.001
 100–299Ref. Ref.
Injury code
 Multiple3.88995820.38<0.00015.03969416.54<0.0001
 SingleRef. Ref.
Subdiagnosis
 Yes5.83747622.01<0.00018.64997531.03<0.0001
 NoRef. Ref.
Surgery
 Yes3.95294721.36<0.000111.1127738.24<0.0001
 NoRef. Ref.
R20.1504340.097606
F-value139.6257.21
p-value<0.0001<0.0001
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, K.; Hwang, J. The Association between Comorbidities and Comorbid Injuries on Treatment Outcome in Pediatric and Elderly Patients with Injuries in Korea: An Observational Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 6277. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph19106277

AMA Style

Lee K, Hwang J. The Association between Comorbidities and Comorbid Injuries on Treatment Outcome in Pediatric and Elderly Patients with Injuries in Korea: An Observational Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(10):6277. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph19106277

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Kyunghee, and Jieun Hwang. 2022. "The Association between Comorbidities and Comorbid Injuries on Treatment Outcome in Pediatric and Elderly Patients with Injuries in Korea: An Observational Study" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 10: 6277. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph19106277

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop