Leachate Pretreatment before Pipe Transportation: Reduction of Leachate Clogging Potential and Upgrading of Landfill Gas

Abstract

Leachate and landfill gas are the main contaminants produced by modern sanitary landfills. The leachate easily leads to clogging in the leachate transportation pipe, and the landfill gas can be used as renewable energy after the removal of CO₂. The study aims to investigate the removal of the major scale forming ion of Ca²⁺ in leachate using raw landfill gas before pipe transportation. The research demonstrated that, under the given experimental conditions, the removal rate of Ca²⁺ in the leachate was positively correlated with the pH value of the leachate, and negatively correlated with the intake flow rate of the landfill gas; the highest removal rate of Ca²⁺ was achieved when the intake flow rate and volume were 0.05 L/min and 2.0 L, respectively, and the highest removal rate of Ca²⁺ from the leachate was about 90%. The maximum removal rate of CO₂ from landfill gas could reach 95%, and the CO₂ content of the post-reaction gas was as low as 1.74% (volume percentage). The scanning electron microscope (SEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis showed that the precipitate was spherical and mainly contained inorganic substances such as CaCO₃, MgCO₃, Ca(OH)₂, Mg(OH)₂, and SiO₂. The study showed that, before the leachate was piped, the Ca²⁺ could be removed using the raw landfill gas, thereby reducing the potential for the formation of precipitation clogging in the pipeline. This study also provides new ideas for upgrading landfill gas to achieve a renewable-energy utilization plan, and reduces greenhouse gas emissions by reducing CO₂ emissions from landfills.

1. Introduction

At present, sanitary landfill is one of the main methods of municipal solid waste (MSW) disposal in China [1,2,3]. The leachate produced by the landfill mainly consists of moisture contained in the landfill waste and the decomposition of organic matter in the waste [4]. Leachate is a high-concentration organic wastewater with a complex composition. If the leachate is not treated, it can contaminate groundwater and the surrounding environment [5]. In modern sanitary landfills, the leachate collection system (LCS) is the basic component located above the low-permeability liners at the bottom of the landfill. The leachate collection system transports the leachate into the regulating pool under gravity. Leachate needs to be piped to the leachate disposal plant for final treatment [6,7]. When the leachate transfer pipes have been in operation for a period of time, severe clogging often occurs in them [8,9,10,11].

The accumulation of clogging materials in the pipes is a biological, chemical, and physical interaction process [12,13,14]. The main clogging material is calcium carbonate precipitate (CaCO₃(s)) [15]. The CaCO₃(s) content of the clogging materials in leachate transportation pipes can reach up to 84% [16,17]. In the leachate transportation pipes, anaerobic microorganisms ferment volatile fatty acids (VFAs) for growth and reproduction, and the by-products are carbon dioxide (CO₂) and methane (CH₄). CO₂ dissolved in leachate forms weak acid carbonic acid (H₂CO₃), which converts the acid–base system of leachate from medium strong acid (VFAs) to weak acid (carbonic acid) and raises the pH of leachate; simultaneously, the dissolved H₂CO₃ ionizes more into carbonate (CO₃²⁻), which reacts with Ca²⁺ in the leachate to form calcium carbonate precipitate (CaCO₃(s)) [18,19,20]. The CaCO₃(s) precipitate is related to the concentration of Ca²⁺ and chemical oxygen demand (COD) in the leachate [15,21]. CaCO₃(s) deposits in the inner wall of the transportation pipes, thus reducing the cross-sectional area of the pipes and causing clogging in severe cases [22,23].

How to control the clogging in transportation pipes of leachate is of increasing concern to landfill operators and researchers. One method is to flush out the clogging materials that are not firmly anchored to the inner wall of the pipes during the initial stages of clogging through high-pressure water jetting [16,17]. Regularly flushing the leachate transportation pipes is a passive treatment method. CaCO₃(s) is the main leachate material that forms precipitation clogging in the pipeline [15,24]. Hence, an active pretreatment method is to remove Ca²⁺ from the leachate prior to pipeline transportation, thereby reducing the potential for the formation of precipitation clogging in the pipeline.

Landfill gas is a biogas mixture produced by municipal solid waste when anaerobic microorganisms decompose organic components. The main components are CH₄ (40–60%) and CO₂ (30–50%) [25,26,27,28]. The removal of CO₂ greatly increases the quality and calorific value of landfill gas, and the remaining bio-methane can be used for renewable energy [29,30,31]. The methods for removing CO₂ components in landfill gas mainly include chemical absorption [7,32], membrane separation [33], pressure swing adsorption [34], biological techniques [35], cryogenic separation, and water scrubbing [36]. The chemical absorption method is based on the fact that the CO₂ component easily reacts with an alkaline solution (such as sodium hydroxide and potassium hydroxide) to form a carbonate solute. This removes the CO₂ component from the landfill gas and then improves the heat value and utilization efficiency of landfill gas [29]. The use of a leachate adjusted to alkaline conditions as a chemical absorption solvent for landfill gas can not only remove CO₂ from landfill gas and upgrade landfill gas [32], but Ca²⁺ from the leachate can also be removed. The CO₂ greenhouse gas is fixed in the form of carbonate precipitate to achieve the environmental protection goal of carbon sinks and greenhouse gas emission reduction [37]. As CO₂ dissolved in an alkaline solution reaches carbonate equilibrium (H₂CO₃* + HCO₃⁻ + CO₃²⁻), the three carbonates remain in equilibrium in the liquid phase, and the content of CO₃²⁻ increases gradually when the pH is higher than 8.34 [38]; thus, raising the pH and intake landfill gas into the leachate promotes the reaction of Ca²⁺ with CO₃²⁻ to form CaCO₃(s), thereby removing Ca²⁺ in the leachate [10], and reducing the potential for the formation of precipitation clogging in the pipeline [20].

Previous studies using simulated landfill gas and (or) synthetic leachate to remove the Ca²⁺ in the leachate have shown that Ca²⁺ can be removed thoroughly by adjusting the simulated landfill gas flow rate, leachate pH, and temperature. One study found that, the smaller the landfill gas intake rate, the higher the pH of the leachate, the lower the system temperature, and the higher the removal rate of Ca²⁺ in the leachate [39]. The research using simulated landfill gas generally used a gas in which CO₂ and N₂ were mixed in a certain proportion, and the CO₂ content was significantly different from the raw landfill gas [39]. Meanwhile, the purpose of using simulated landfill gas is relatively simple—it is only to investigate the effect of the CO₂ component on the removal of Ca²⁺, and it is impossible to carry out the research on the purification and enrichment of the available energy CH₄ component in landfill gas. The synthetic leachate used for clogging studies is mostly based on the physicochemical properties of young leachate, and is formulated using a variety of chemical reagents. The synthetic leachate contains higher VFAs and Ca²⁺, the pH is lower (at around 7.0), and the suspended solids (SS) content is low too [10,11,15]. During the formation of crystals of calcium carbonate, suspended solids in the raw leachate can act as a nucleus to promote the formation and precipitation of calcium carbonate precipitate [23]; however, as synthetic leachate does not contain suspended solids, research using it is insufficient. Therefore, studies using synthetic leachate and simulated landfill gas have some differences from raw leachate and landfill gas. In order to further study the feasibility of using raw landfill gas to prevent and control the clogging of leachate pipes and engineering applications to implement the technology, it is necessary to conduct research using raw leachate and landfill gas in landfills.

Herein, this study focused on using raw landfill gas to pretreat the leachate to remove the Ca²⁺ prior to pipe transportation by laboratory experiments. The optimal reaction conditions for the Ca²⁺ removal rate were obtained through a series of single-factor experiments, which were aimed at investigating the individual effects of the following operating factors: pH of the leachate, intake flow rate, and intake volume of raw landfill gas. The analysis of the chemical composition and morphology of the precipitate formed by X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and evaluation of the landfill gas upgrade effect in this process was carried out. Basic research work was carried out to achieve the engineering purpose of using landfill gas to prevent and control the clogging of leachate pipe transportation and to use the new method of landfill gas upgrade.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Material and Column

In this study, the laboratory experiment was conducted in one of the municipal solid waste landfill sites in Chengdu, China. The leachate was taken from the landfill regulating pool, and the raw landfill gas was collected from the vertical gas guiding wells by nylon hose (with a gas flow meter, control valve, and aeration pump) from the landfill site.

The main properties of the raw leachate (A) and landfill gas (B) after long-term monitoring are shown in

Table 1. The main properties of the raw leachate and landfill gas.

(A) Raw Leachate	Concentration
pH	7.8–8.3
Chemical oxygen demand (mg/L)	2100–5700
Ammonia nitrogen (mg/L)	780–1130
Calcium (mg/L)	280–370
Magnesium (mg/L)	200–350
Total suspended solids (mg/L)	1000–3000
(B) Raw landfill gas
CO2 (%)	32–36
CH4 (%)	52–62
Flow rate (mL/min)	720

.

The leachate had a higher concentration of Ca²⁺ of 280–370 mg/L, and the pH was over 7; therefore, this was easy to clog through the precipitation of CaCO₃(s) during transport in the pipe. The landfill gas flow rate of the vertical gas guide well used in this experiment was stable at 720 mL/min, while the volume percentage of CO₂ was about 32–36%.

The experimental column (Figure 1) was made of a 10 mm thick acrylic tube. The device was mainly composed of an aeration reaction column (upper part of the experimental column), a sedimentation column (lower part of the experimental column), and a stainless-steel landfill gas intake pipe connected to a microporous aerator device located at the bottom of the aeration reaction column. The aeration reaction column and the precipitation column were 600 mm long. The effective length of the aeration reaction column was 500 mm, and the effective volume was 1.413 L. The leachate was added from the top of the aeration reaction column. The top of the experimental column was sealed with a rubber stopper, and two holes with a diameter of 5 mm were created (one for the intake port connecting the landfill gas intake pipe and one for the gas collection bag). A water valve was attached to the bottom plate of the aeration reaction column for discharging the leachate after the reaction into the sedimentation column for sedimentation and sampling. The landfill gas collected from the vertical gas pipe well was taken into the leachate by microporous aeration at the bottom of the aeration column. A leachate sample port was installed 150 mm above the bottom of the sidewall of the sedimentation column for the sampling analysis. The effluent valve was at the bottom of the sedimentation column.

2.2. Analytical Procedures

According to the experimental design, the pH of the leachate was adjusted by gradually adding sodium hydroxide (NaOH), and it was then injected into the aeration reaction column. A certain volume and flow rate of landfill gas was then introduced into the leachate through the microporous aerator device. The microporous aeration device can disperse the landfill gas introduced into fine bubbles, increase the surface area of the gas–liquid contact, and facilitate gas–liquid mass transfer. The leachate after the reaction was discharged into the sedimentation column through the water valve and settled for 60 min, and the supernatant was sampled and analyzed from the sampling port. The main analytical indicators included COD, Ca²⁺, Mg²⁺, and pH, among others. XRD and SEM analyses were performed on the precipitates obtained from the effluent port.

The COD concentration was measured using potassium dichromate titration. Ca²⁺ and Mg²⁺ were expelled by nitric acid and perchloric acid, and were then obtained using a z-5000 atomic absorption spectrometer (Hitachi, Japan). The total suspended solids (TSS) were tested using gravimetric measurement of the residue retained on a 0.45 µm glass fiber filter dried at 105 °C. The ammonia nitrogen concentration was analyzed by distillation neutralization titration. The pH was analyzed using a PHS-3C pH meter (Shanghai Precision Scientific Instrument Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). The precipitate composition analysis was carried out on a dx-2700 XRD (Fangyuan Instrument Co., Ltd., Wenzhou, China), and the surface morphology was measured using a Quanta 250 SEM (FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA). The landfill gas flow rate was measured with a gas flow meter, and the contents of CO₂ and CH₄ were measured using a GC7900 gas chromatograph (Shanghai Tianmei Instrument Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). The detection methods of the main indicators are shown in

Table 2. Analytical methods for the main indicators.

Indicators	Method
COD	potassium dichromate titration
Ca2+, Mg2+	atomic absorption spectrophotometry
TSS	gravimetric measurement
Ammonia nitrogen	distillation neutralization titration
pH	PHS-3C pH meter method
CO2, CH4	gas chromatography

.

The removal rate of Ca²⁺ (${\mathrm{Rt}}_{{\mathrm{Ca}}^{2+}}$) in the leachate was set as the difference between the content of Ca²⁺ in the influent (A₁ mg/L) minus the content of the effluent (A₂ mg/L) divided by the content of Ca²⁺ in the influent (A₁) (Formula (1)).

$${\mathrm{Rt}}_{{\mathrm{Ca}}^{2+}}=\left({\mathrm{A}}_1-{\mathrm{A}}_2\right)/{\mathrm{A}}_1$$

(1)

The CO₂ removal rate (${\mathrm{Rt}}_{\mathrm{CO}2}$) was set as the difference between the content of CO₂ in the intake gas (B₁%) minus the content of the post-reaction gas (B₂%) divided by the CO₂ content of the intake gas (B₁) (Formula (2)).

$${\mathrm{Rt}}_{\mathrm{CO}2}=\left({\mathrm{B}}_1-{\mathrm{B}}_2\right)/{\mathrm{B}}_1$$

(2)

2.3. Main Experimental Methods

The effects of landfill gas intake volume, intake flow rate, and pH value of the leachate on the removal of Ca²⁺ were investigated. The design of each single-factor condition was as follows:

(1)

Examining the volume of the landfill gas, the landfill gas intake flow rate was set at 0.05 L/min, and the leachate pH was adjusted to about 9.08, 9.63, 10.23, 10.71, and 11.50. The intake volumes were 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 L, respectively.

(2)

Examining the intake flow rate of the landfill gas, the landfill gas volume was set at 2.0 L, and the pH of the leachate was adjusted to about 9.08, 9.63, 10.23, 10.71, and 11.50. The landfill gas intake flow rates were 0.05, 0.08, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4 L/min, respectively.

(3)

Examining the pH of the leachate, the landfill gas intake volume was set at 2.0 L, and the landfill gas intake flow rates were set at 0.05, 0.08, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4 L/min. The leachate pH was adjusted to about 9.08, 9.63, 10.23, 10.71, and 11.50, respectively.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effect of Volume of Landfill Gas Intake on the Rate of Calcium Removal

When the landfill gas intake volume was less than 2.0 L, the removal rate of Ca²⁺ increased with the increase in the landfill gas volume; as it was more than 2.0 L, the removal rate of Ca²⁺ decreased. The removal rate of Ca²⁺ in the leachate reached a maximum at the landfill gas intake volume of 2.0 L at different leachate pH levels (Figure 2); when the leachate pH was set at about 9.08, 9.63, 10.23, 10.71, and 11.50, the maximum removal rates of Ca²⁺ were about 71.02%, 73.67%, 82.47%, 83.66%, and 88.27%, respectively.

When the landfill gas was taken into the leachate, the CO₂ component dissolved and ionized to form bicarbonate (HCO₃⁻) and carbonate (CO₃²⁻) (Formulas (3)–(6)); with the gradual increase in the leachate pH value, the ionized carbonate also increased gradually, which reacted with Ca²⁺ in the leachate to form CaCO₃(s) (Formula (7)). This may be the reason that the optimal intake volume corresponding to different pH values was 2.0 L. However, when the intake volume exceeded 2.0 L, the CO₂ was passed into the leachate in excess, and the excess CO₂ could react with the newly generated CaCO₃(s) to form soluble Ca(HCO₃)₂ (Formula (8)). Hence, CaCO₃(s) could be dissolved again [40]. Therefore, when the intake volume was much greater than 2.0 L, the excess CO₂ could cause the Ca²⁺ removal rate in the leachate to decrease.

$${\mathrm{CO}}_2\left(\mathrm{g}\right)\leftrightharpoons {\mathrm{CO}}_2\left(\mathrm{aq}\right)$$

(3)

$${\mathrm{CO}}_2+{\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{O}\leftrightharpoons {\mathrm{H}}_2{\mathrm{CO}}_3$$

(4)

$${\mathrm{H}}_2{\mathrm{CO}}_3\leftrightharpoons {\mathrm{H}}^{+}+{\mathrm{HCO}}_3^{-}$$

(5)

$${\mathrm{HCO}}_3^{-}\leftrightharpoons {\mathrm{H}}^{+}+{\mathrm{CO}}_3^{2-}$$

(6)

$${\mathrm{Ca}}^{2+}+{\mathrm{CO}}_3^{2-}\leftrightharpoons {\mathrm{CaCO}}_3\downarrow$$

(7)

$${\mathrm{CaCO}}_3+{\mathrm{CO}}_2+{\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{O}\leftrightharpoons \mathrm{Ca}{\left({\mathrm{HCO}}_3\right)}_2$$

(8)

3.2. Effect of Landfill Gas Intake Flow Rate and Leachate pH on the Removal Rate of Calcium

Under all pH conditions, the removal rate of Ca²⁺ decreased with the increase in the intake flow rate of landfill gas (Figure 3). That is, the smaller the intake flow rate, the higher the removal rate of Ca²⁺ in the leachate. For the set experimental conditions, the optimal intake flow rate was 0.05 L/min, and the maximum removal rate of Ca²⁺ in the leachate was about 69.51–90.79%.

According to the double-membrane theory [41], after the adjustment of the pH of the leachate, the CO₂(g) is easily dissolved and ionized into carbonate in the liquid phase. Therefore, the gas–liquid mass transfer of the landfill gas in the leachate is a type of gas-film control, and increasing the intake flow rate can increase the turbulence of the gas phase and increase the gas–liquid mass transfer rate. However, in the case when the intake volume is constant, the intake flow rate is increased and the intake time is shortened, so that the total absorption amount of the liquid relative to the CO₂ component in the landfill gas is reduced. Therefore, an increase in the intake flow rate causes a decrease in the amount of CO₂ absorption, so that the removal rate of Ca²⁺ in the leachate is lowered.

As revealed in Figure 3, the removal rate of Ca²⁺ increased with the increase in pH from 9.08 to 11.5 at each intake flow rate. The landfill gas intake flow rate was 0.05 L/min; the leachate pH values were about 9.08, 9.63, 10.23, 10.71, and 11.50; and the corresponding Ca²⁺ removal rates were about 69.51%, 79.73%, 81.30%, 88.67%, and 90.79%, respectively. Thus, a satisfactory removal rate of about 90% could be achieved. At the same time, it could be observed that, when the pH was lower than 10.71, the removal rate of Ca²⁺ increased rapidly with the increase in pH value. When the pH was further increased, the effect on the removal rate of Ca²⁺ slowed down; at the intake flow rate of 0.05 L/min, the Ca²⁺ removal rate of leachate at pH 11.50 was not much different from that at pH 10.71. The partial pressure of CO₂ in the landfill gas was relatively large; according to Henry’s law, more CO₂ was dissolved in the leachate. When the CO₂ in the landfill gas was taken into the leachate, part of CO₂(g) dissolved in the leachate and converted to CO₂(aq) (Formula (3)). CO₂(aq) reacts with H₂O to form carbonic acid (Formula (4)). Carbonic acid underwent primary and secondary ionization reactions to form carbonate equilibrium (Formulas (5) and (6)). According to the carbonic acid balance theory, the content of CO₃²⁻ in the CO₂-solution system increases with the increase inpH; especially in the range of 8.34 to 11, the CO₃²⁻ content increases faster [39]. Therefore, the removal rate of Ca²⁺ increases as the pH of the leachate increases. When the pH is over 11, dissolved CO₂ mainly exists in the form of CO₃²⁻; at this time, the pH of the leachate increases again and the content of CO₃²⁻ no longer significantly increases, and the pH has a smaller effect on the removal rate of Ca²⁺. Meanwhile, excessive Na⁺ is introduced into the leachate and the higher pH is not conducive to the subsequent leachate treatment [42,43]. The intake flow rate is 0.05 L/min, and the change trend of the leachate pH value under different intake volumes is shown in Figure 4. With the continuous introduction of landfill gas, the pH of the leachate gradually decreased, but remained alkaline. Therefore, in order to prevent the clogging of the leachate pipeline and facilitate the subsequent treatment of the leachate, the pH of the leachate can be controlled below 11. In this case, a better Ca²⁺ removal rate can still be achieved.

3.3. Characterizations of Precipitates

The leachate discharged from the bottom of the sedimentation column contained a large amount of precipitates. The precipitates were granular (Figure 5). They could be deduced to be deposited easily at the bottom of the experimental column and engineering application facility, and so were easy to clean up. The main precipitates were CaCO₃, MgCO₃, Ca(OH)₂, Mg(OH)₂, and SiO₂ (Figure 6).

The leachate contained a large amount of TSS, which could serve as a crystal nucleus to facilitate the carbonate that forms a crystalline precipitate [23,44]. Under the action of anaerobic microorganisms in the leachate, the leachate itself becomes alkaline and contains a relatively high concentration of bicarbonate (HCO₃⁻) and carbonate (CO₃²⁻) [10]. When the pH was adjusted with NaOH and raw landfill gas was introduced, a large amount of CO₃²⁻ was produced (Formulas (3)–(6)), and Ca²⁺ and CO₃²⁻ reacted to form CaCO₃(s) in the leachate (Formula (7)). As Mg²⁺ and Ca²⁺ are the same type of A²⁺ ions, the solubility product of MgCO₃ is greater than that of CaCO₃, and the content of Mg²⁺ in the leachate was high, so when the Ca²⁺ content decreased to a certain value, Mg²⁺ could also form MgCO₃(s) precipitate with CO₃²⁻ (Formula (9)). At a higher pH, some Ca²⁺ and Mg²⁺ and excess OH⁻ formed Ca(OH)₂(s) and Mg(OH)₂(s) because of the high instantaneous content of OH⁻ (Formulas (10) and (11)). When the landfill gas was introduced, Ca(OH)₂ and Mg(OH)₂ reacted with CO₂ to form more insoluble CaCO₃(s) and MgCO₃(s) precipitates (Formulas (12) and (13)), but the precipitate still contained some Ca(OH)₂ and Mg(OH)₂.

$${\mathrm{Mg}}^{2+}+{\mathrm{CO}}_3^{2-}\leftrightharpoons {\mathrm{MgCO}}_3\downarrow$$

(9)

$${\mathrm{Ca}}^{2+}+{\mathrm{OH}}^{-}\leftrightharpoons \mathrm{Ca}{\left(\mathrm{OH}\right)}_2\downarrow$$

(10)

$${\mathrm{Mg}}^{2+}+{\mathrm{OH}}^{-}\leftrightharpoons \mathrm{Mg}{\left(\mathrm{OH}\right)}_2\downarrow$$

(11)

$$\mathrm{Ca}{\left(\mathrm{OH}\right)}_2+{\mathrm{CO}}_2\leftrightharpoons {\mathrm{CaCO}}_3\downarrow +{\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{O}$$

(12)

$$\mathrm{Mg}{\left(\mathrm{OH}\right)}_2+{\mathrm{CO}}_2\leftrightharpoons {\mathrm{MgCO}}_3\downarrow +{\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{O}$$

(13)

Therefore, CaCO₃(s), MgCO₃(s), Ca(OH)₂(s), and Mg(OH)₂(s) were contained in the obtained precipitates. Because of the complex composition of the leachate, other types of solids were also contained in the precipitates, for example, silica (SiO₂); SiO₂ is mainly derived from suspended solids and silt particles in the leachate, and is one of the substances that form the physical clogging [14].

3.4. Analysis of CO₂ and CH₄ Content Changes in Landfill Gas

The landfill gas intake flow rate was 0.05 L/min, the intake volume was 2.0 L, and the maximum removal rate of CO₂ in the landfill gas was 95% (Figure 7). The CO₂ content of the post-reaction gas was at least 1.74%, which meets the requirement that the CO₂ component content of the landfill gas energy utilization rate not be higher than 3% [7].

The removed CO₂ component is fixed in the form of carbonate precipitations, which play a role in carbon emission reduction. The CH₄ content of the post-reaction landfill gas was about 10–20% higher than that of the intake landfill gas, which is beneficial to the subsequent renewable energy utilization of landfill gas (Figure 8). As the pH of the leachate increased, it became more likely that the absorbed CO₂ converted into CO₃²⁻, which reacted with the Ca²⁺ in the leachate to form CaCO₃(s), thereby promoting the absorption and reaction of CO₂ in the leachate. The CO₂ removal rate of the landfill gas increased with the pH of the leachate. Because the experiment was done in the field outside of the landfill site, the volume of leachate used in each experiment was so small that the leachate could not maintain a basically stable temperature, and the composition of the raw landfill gas also fluctuated within a certain range. This could affect the dissolution of CO₂ in landfill gas, so some of the removal rates of CO₂ fluctuated.

4. Conclusions

In this study, using raw landfill gas from the landfill site itself to remove Ca²⁺ in the leachate before pipe transportation was carried out to control the clogging. The optimum conditions were an intake flow rate of 0.05 L/min and intake volume of 2.0 L. To facilitate the subsequent treatment of the leachate, the leachate pH did not exceed 11. The optimal Ca²⁺ removal rate was about 90%, and the clogging could be controlled when the leachate was transported by pipe. The removal rate of CO₂ in the landfill gas could increase up to 95%, and the CO₂ content of the post-reaction gas reached a minimum of 1.74%. The CH₄ content of the post-reaction landfill gas was about 10–20% higher than that of the intake landfill gas, which had important implications for the pretreatment and resource utilization of landfill gas.

The method of using CO₂ from landfill gas to remove Ca²⁺ in the leachate presents the following environmental benefits.

(1)

Most Ca²⁺ is removed prior to the leachate pipe transportation. This improves the service life of the relevant facilities and avoids the environmental pollution caused by the clogging of leachate pipes.

(2)

The CO₂ component of the landfill gas was mostly removed, and the upgrade of landfill gas increased its calorific value, laying the foundation for the energy utilization of landfill gas.

(3)

CO₂ is one of the main greenhouse gases, and landfills are one of its main sources; it is fixed by means of carbonate precipitation so as to reduce greenhouse gas emission.

Overall, it is completely feasible to use landfill gas to control the clogging of leachate, which is also in line with the policy of environmental protection and the comprehensive utilization of waste.

This study has some shortcomings. First, the raw leachate used in the study was middle- or old-aged leachate, and in-depth research needs to be carried out for young leachate. Second, the use of sodium hydroxide to adjust the pH caused the leachate to contain more Na⁺, and the pH of the leachate after the reaction was still alkaline; these factors will adversely affect the subsequent treatment of the leachate. How to take into account both the control of the leachate to form clogging in the transportation pipeline and the convenience of the subsequent treatment of the leachate still needs to be further studied. Third, as our experiments were carried out on-site at the landfill site, we used raw leachate and landfill gas, which have certain fluctuations in their properties, so some measured data also fluctuated.