Next Article in Journal
Design of a Non-Linear Observer for SOC of Lithium-Ion Battery Based on Neural Network
Previous Article in Journal
Sensitivity Analysis of High-Pressure Methanol—Steam Reformer Using the Condensation Enthalpy of Water Vapor
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Multi-Variable DTR Algorithm for the Estimation of Conductor Temperature and Ampacity on HV Overhead Lines by IoT Data Sensors
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Internet of Things Approaches for Monitoring and Control of Smart Greenhouses in Industry 4.0

DIBRIS—Department of Informatics, Bioengineering, Robotics and Systems Engineering, University of Genoa, 16145 Genova, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 21 April 2022 / Revised: 16 May 2022 / Accepted: 19 May 2022 / Published: 23 May 2022

Abstract

:
In recent decades, climate change and a shortage of resources have brought about the need for technology in agriculture. Farmers have been forced to use information and innovation in communication in order to enhance production efficiency and crop resilience. Systems engineering and information infrastructure based on the Internet of Things (IoT) are the main novel approaches that have generated growing interest. In agriculture, IoT solutions according to the challenges for Industry 4.0 can be applied to greenhouses. Greenhouses are protected environments in which best plant growth can be achieved. IoT for smart greenhouses relates to sensors, devices, and information and communication infrastructure for real-time monitoring and data collection and processing, in order to efficiently control indoor parameters such as exposure to light, ventilation, humidity, temperature, and carbon dioxide level. This paper presents the current state of the art in the IoT-based applications to smart greenhouses, underlining benefits and opportunities of this technology in the agriculture environment.

1. Industry 4.0 and System Engineering (SE) Applications for Precision Agriculture: An Introduction

Currently, we are living in the Fourth Industrial Revolution, known as “Industry 4.0”, in which ICT-based production systems are requiring more and more integration and agility [1], resulting in digital matching or even in digital twins on the Internet. SE benefits from these new approaches in the design and analysis phases of the overall systems to tackle their complex structures.
The digital twins architecture supports the co-optimization of the production schedule, energy consumption, and cost, considering significant factors and including production deadlines, quality grading, heating, artificial lighting, energy prices (gas and electricity), and weather forecasts [2]. This work gives a new approach to vertical integration and optimization related to greenhouse production processes to improve energy efficiency, production throughput, and productivity, taking into account product quality or sustainability.
I4.0 was introduced at the Hannover Fair in 2011 in Germany, following discussions among representatives of industry, research, trade unions, and the state [3,4,5]. The main objective of this initiative was not to increase production automation, but to make production methods more intelligent through networking of machines and humans [6,7].
I4.0 is defined [8] as an industrial policy aiming to gain and maintain a global competitive advantage in manufacturing companies. Because of investments by companies in information technology, supply chain coordination, automation via cyber-physical systems, embedded systems, and robotics, I4.0 is regarded as a solution for the future [9,10]. Its objective is to respond to a change in consumers who request personalized products, forcing the industry to change its paradigms and practices and move toward personalized mass production [11,12]. I4.0 is mainly applied in the previous literature to collect, share, and analyze different types of data through network and data processing technologies, thus supporting decision-making processes along the entire wood supply chain [13].
The adoption of technological advances may lead to a significant transformation relating to the quality of products, reduced time, and lower production costs [14].
Technological advances, such as massive data analysis algorithms [15,16], IoT [17], and cloud computing [18], are more and more present in industrial companies and are causing the emergence of new process control concepts, new service proposals, and new products [19,20].
System of Systems (SoS), Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS), Internet of Things (IoT), Artificial Intelligence (AI), blockchain technology as well as big data analytics may be regarded as the most important enabling technologies of I4.0 [21,22]. In these systems, tight monitoring and synchronization of information from all related perspectives between physical plants and cyberspace are achieved. Moreover, networked machines will be able to operate more efficiently, resiliently, and collaboratively using advanced information analytics. The added value of IoT application lies in improving connectivity (data, devices, and connectivity related services) among horizontal and vertical services such as service quality, service integration, telecommunication services and data management by cloud technology.
I4.0, and specifically IoT, will affect a large number of economy sectors [23]. Manufacturing systems are allowed to establish real-time communication, as well as intelligent decision making and human–machine interaction in manufacturing organizations by monitoring physical processes and creating “digital twins” of physical entities [24,25].
Currently, many sectors are already using IoT as a way to reduce costs and improve productivity as far as the agricultural sector is concerned [26]. Agriculture is a key factor for making human life sustainable for the whole world population. Agriculture allows us to both feed the world and to employ more than 1.5 billion people around the world [27]. In the context of agriculture, IoT technology represents a network of sensor systems that record various indicators of climate, plant, and soil conditions: moisture, nutrition, temperature, pesticide level, etc. IoT-based use cases include precision agriculture, irrigation control, automated drones, field mapping, and, above all, smart greenhouses.
The agricultural sector has undergone a number of technological transformations over the past few decades, becoming increasingly industrialized and technology driven [28]. Furthermore, in this sector, IoT solutions take the form of devices connected to the Internet to collect environmental and mechanical measurements [29]. Farmers, by using a variety of smart agricultural tools, have gained more control over the breeding and growing process, making it more predictable and improving its efficiency [30].
IoT technologies have the potential to transform agriculture in many respects, such as data collection about weather conditions and soil and crop quality [31]. Furthermore, the ability to use these data to predict future parameters allows farmers to better plan production management and the consequent distribution and sales [32].
Connected objects may help to solve this problem by supporting farmers to produce more efficiently [33,34] and in a more sustainable way [35].
The IoT is increasingly spreading in this sector, and many innovations have already been adopted, as shown in the following sections. Agriculture is one of the domains that will be influenced by the IoT, and specifically agricultural greenhouses, which are the focus of this paper. A greenhouse is a building intended to shelter crops of ornamental, vegetable or fruit plants in more favorable or safer conditions than in the open air [36]. This structure protects the plants by climate control, which obtains optimal conditions of growth or minimizes photosynthesis, and also from the greenhouse-effect phenomenon which contributes to the good growth of the plant [37]. Currently, the technology trend is to use wireless techniques such as IoT, which has been integrated into many fields. As a result, tomorrow’s agriculture will be automated, and agricultural production will be based on the concept of intelligent agricultural greenhouses, which not only manage temperature, humidity, light, and watering, but also make control and access easier.
The installation of IoT infrastructure is capital-intensive and often translates to higher energy demand, which elevates the risk for climate change. A new challenge, due to high usage of IoT sensors and networks in the management of electronic waste, depletion of finite resources, and destruction of fragile ecosystems resulting in climate change, has been proposed [38].
IoT system’s energy savings are to be interpreted as greenhouses consumption optimization. Recent research studies focus on these topics, for example, a novel optimization system focused on obtaining a trade-off between energy consumption and expected climate setting [39]. The proposed model has been tested in a real case of study related to fifteen days of data collected in South Korea. Another related study focused on the total energy consumption and, as a consequence, to gas emissions in Turkey [40]. This work showed how it is possible to keep the wheat yield constant following the optimal total energy consumption.
This paper aims to present the literature on current technological and methodological models and methods in IoT architecture for smart greenhouse applications, monitoring and controlling the indoor microclimatic conditions of the greenhouse, such as indoor temperature, CO2, humidity, soil quality, and crop types by water and energy-saving approaches. The rest of the paper is organized as follows: Section 2 presents the IoT general architecture for greenhouse applications, specifically as it relates to the aspects of communication and sensors. The other sections are related to control and monitoring techniques in relation to specific applications. Section 3 describes the techniques used to optimize monitoring and control in the smart greenhouse. Section 4 describes the application of IoT to indoor parameters such as monitoring and control of temperature, air humidity, light intensity, soil features and internal or external wind speed. Section 5 describes the application of IoT in indoor parameters such as monitoring and control focused on CO2 emission. Section 6 discusses the IoT application regarding monitoring and controlling soil and crop quality by water and energy-saving approaches. Section 7 discusses the challenges and limits of IoT, and Section 8 describes the research direction.
Although a great number of papers relate to the application of IoT in the agricultural sector [41,42], few literature reviews have analyzed the application of IoT technologies regarding smart agricultural greenhouses. It is intended to explore the current research progress and future challenges of IoT technologies for smart greenhouses and to provide a reference for researchers to solve current challenges.
Generally, multisensor network technology has been applied to smart greenhouses [43]. Thus, the intelligent greenhouse monitoring system has been reviewed according to three different subsystems [44]: the monitoring subsystem for environmental perception, the information processing subsystem, and the communication subsystem, while the classification based on the sensor system and communication network has been tested in [45]. The microcontrollers and wireless connections mostly used in greenhouse automation have been considered [46], while IoT for crop disease detection has been addressed [47].
A greenhouse is a protected structure that may be covered with different kinds of materials and aims to adjust the climatic growing conditions to better manage the needs of the plants in order to increase the yields of the crops and to reduce production costs [48].
Our approach regarding the research paper selection is based on the main important parameters that are monitored and controlled in the specific context of greenhouse cultivation, which is microclimate indoor condition, CO2 level, and soil and crop quality by energy and water saving approaches [49,50,51,52,53,54]. Moreover, as it relates to the literature, this review does not only list the type of available IoT solutions, it also introduces papers that highlight approaches in terms of adopted IoT technologies. The methodologies, control techniques and optimization models that have been used to improve the quality in monitoring and control for smart greenhouse are presented, comparing them in terms of performance.
This work presents a systematic literature review approach using three major databases, which are Google Scholar, IEEE Explore, and Scopus, for the period 2010–2021. The searching paper criteria is based on the TAK approach [55], according to the keywords “greenhouse”, “IoT”, and “Internet of things”. Another set of papers was further considered by searching for the keywords “monitor” and “control”. Within the results, in Google Scholar, 461 papers were found; in Scopus, 124 papers; and in IEEE Explore, 90 papers. The matching of the scientific articles was carried out according to the specific context of greenhouses, excluding papers related to general agriculture or to other applications not relevant for this review. Finally, 95 citations classified into the different categories, concentrated in the last 11 years, were selected. In this list, papers published between the 2020–2021 comprise 32%, while 53% papers are dated in the period 2015–2019.

2. IOT Architectures for Greenhouse Applications

IoT is a technological revolution in computing and communication that has mobilized the industry in recent years [56]. IoT is defined as a global network of interconnected services and intelligent objects of all kinds that are designed to support humans in daily life activities through sensing, computing, and communication capabilities [57,58].
The ability to observe the physical world and provide information for decision making will be a fundamental architectural part of the Internet of the future [59,60]. These objects must work in a system that is beyond enterprise boundaries, which is the digital world [61]. IoT includes a great variety of devices and integrates sensors and actuators. These sensors and actuators are the key elements of IoT [62]. They follow the state of their environment and obtain information on different physical variables, e.g., temperature, movement, position [63], and forming a complex network [64], and they are generally composed of a potentially large number of nodes [65].
Sensors collect information present in the environment to enrich the functionalities of devices [66]. They are becoming smaller and smaller and are therefore more easily integrated into objects [34]. Seventy-five billion IoT devices will be connected to the Internet by 2025 [27].
IoT relates to the network, data and new services [67] and relates to various technical solutions, RFID, TCP/IP, mobile technologies, etc. that identify objects and capture, store, process, and transfer data in physical environments and between physical contexts and virtual worlds [68,69].
IoT is composed of a heterogeneous set of networks that support the communication of these objects [70]. LPWA networks are emerging, with LoRa and SIGFOX in particular [71]. These are long-range, low-speed networks that are entirely dedicated to communications between objects. Other technologies are also used, such as Narrow Band or LTE-m [72]. Figure 1 shows an IoT architecture diagram for greenhouse applications in smart agriculture.
IoT has added value that lies in the new uses it will bring about [73]. In the industrial sector, for example, we can now monitor machines remotely, perform predictive maintenance on equipment, or improve product traceability [74], with specific applications in agriculture.
In agriculture, IoT solutions take the form of sensors connected to the Internet to collect environmental and mechanical measurements [75]. By using various smart farming tools, farmers have gained greater control over the process of raising and growing crops, making it more predictable and improving its efficiency [75].
Due to these new technologies, the farm manager can now remotely control his/her machines via a guidance system, thus rationalizing their use [76], and can monitor the machine fleet and detect the slightest anomaly [77]. The implementation of predictive maintenance also contributes to improving employee safety [78]. IoT in agriculture introduces many innovations that are constantly emerging. For example, drones can analyze crops and see where it would be best to intervene according to the data in terms of positions and qualities [79]. Thus, the farmer can distribute fertilizer or water where it is needed without interrupting the portions that are doing well [80]. Of interest to the farmer is therefore that the distribution of fertilizer is conducted in a more efficient way [81]. This will also save costs in the sense that he/she will no longer have to place fertilizer on the entire field but only on specific parts [82]. These drones can also provide information on water requirements for crops [81].
Another example relates to small autonomous robots that can remove weeds [83]. Greenhouses will be able to take advantage of IoT, becoming a smart greenhouse [84], and thus adapting to evolutions in the environment by communication means and electronic processing interfaces [85]. Measurement and control systems of the greenhouse production environment are examples of IoT applications. Such systems can collect temperature, humidity and soil signals and use mobile wireless communication technology to achieve greenhouse monitoring [86].
The use of wireless communication is the most important and ideal tool to improve the comfort and security of goods and people, as well as of energy consumption reduction. Combining the advantages of emerging technologies such as IoT and Web Services can improve the measurement of the great amount of data in agriculture as well as manage energy usage [87].
A hierarchical wireless sensor network to monitor and control air humidity, temperature ground moisture and environment lightness has been proposed in a simulation environment [88]. The work shows some challenges and strong points in the Zigbee protocol used for the connection.
Therefore, tomorrow’s agriculture will be automated, and agricultural production will be based on the concept of an intelligent agricultural greenhouse in order to manage processes with easy remote access and control [89]. IoT communication technologies (LoRaWAN by LoRa Alliance based in Freemont California, Sigfox by Sigfox based in Labège France) make available the automation of various performance indicators of an agricultural greenhouse, providing a large number of high-quality crops with greater predictability [90]. Table 1 presents a comparison between the technologies used for connectivity in the agricultural system in terms of power consumption, frequency band, and transmission range.

3. Techniques Used to Optimize Monitoring and Control in the Smart Greenhouse

3.1. Fuzzy Logic, ANN, MPC and PID

Several techniques can be used to optimize control and monitoring. In this first part, the main challenging methods are introduced: fuzzy logic, ANN, MPC, and PID. In the second part of this section, we briefly discuss other recent control and monitoring methods applied to smart greenhouses.
The fuzzy control system is a mathematical system that analyzes analog input values in terms of logical variables. The FLC techniques usually decompose a complex system into several subsystems according to the human experts’ knowledge about the system. Many processes controlled by human operators cannot be automated using conventional control techniques, because their performance is often lower than that of the operators. One reason for this is that linear controllers, which are commonly used in control systems, are not suitable for nonlinear plants. Fuzzy sets are used to define the meaning of qualitative values of the controller inputs, and fuzzy logic can capture the continuous nature of human decision processes and is therefore an improvement over methods based on binary logic. The mathematical approach related to this concept can be written as:
P i :   i f   x 1   i s   C i 1 .   a n d   x N   i s   C i N   t h e n   u   i s   D i       i = 1 , 2 , , K
The partitioning of the temperature domain into three fuzzy sets according to the previous formula is shown in Figure 2.
The fuzzy sets are determined based on deep human expertise and knowledge of the thermal behavior of the GHS as well as of the usual operating ranges of the GHS [91].
The ANNs consist of many simple processors linked by weighted connections that can acquire knowledge from the environment through a learning process and store the knowledge in its connections. The mathematical formulation of the ANN is outlined in Figure 3.
A functional model of neurons must consider three basic components. The synapses of the neuron are modeled as weights whose values represent the strength of the connection. Positive weight values represent excitatory connections, and negative values represent negative connections. The next two components model the actual activity within the neuron cell. A summing function sums all inputs modified by their weights. An activation function controls the amplitude of the output of the neuron. The mathematical formulation according to the model of the previous figure is:
y k = φ ( v k ) = φ ( i = 1 p w k i x i + b i )
where b i is the bias, y k is the output, w k i is the weight between the neuron k of the previous layer and neuron i of the current layer and φ is the activation function, which is a differentiable and non-linear function. Strengths and weaknesses of NNs can be noted in different implementations in greenhouses, from microclimate forecast to energy consumption-specific tasks, including for example the control of CO2. Primary evidence as a guideline for designers of smart protected agriculture technology in the systems where 4.0 technologies are involved have been highlighted in [92].
Conversely, the MPC approach is outlined in Figure 4.
The plant represents the true system—in our case, the greenhouse. The prediction model is usually a simplified model, generally linear, describing the dynamics of the state variables of the plant. Such a prediction model usually gives good performance in the first instances of simulation, while it becomes completely unreliable after a while. The optimizer is usually defined as a cost function to be minimized and is often subjected to constraints. Mathematical programming, ANN, or other solving techniques can be used here. However, the solution should be computed in a relatively fast time compared to the system dynamics, which are usually less than the duration of a sample time, in the case of discrete time systems. MPC implements a rolling horizon approach to control the system. At each step, only the first value of the optimal control sequence is applied, as it is continuously recomputed taking into account new measures of the output of the system. The following formula shows a typical mathematical formulation with quadratic cost for a constrained optimal control:
min u x Q x + u R u
u m i n u k u m a x   k = 0 , 1 , , N 1
x m i n x k x m a x   k = 1 , , N
where
  • x is the prediction state variable;
  • u is the prediction control variable;
  • Q is the semi-definite positive symmetric matrix, and R is the definite positive symmetric matrix.
According to the characteristics of the optimization problem and prediction model, different MPC approaches can be identified by specific attributes, such as non-linear MPC, constrained MPC, etc. In a few words, an MPC problem faces the problem of achieving a good tradeoff between the computational complexities to resolve the optimization problem and the capacity to define the dynamic characteristics of the system [93].
The last method that is introduced is the PID. It is a control loop feedback mechanism that is widely used in industrial automation and a variety of other applications for its simplicity and good performance. A PID controller applies a feedback correction that continuously calculates an error value as the difference between a reference value r(t) and the measured variable y(t). The control function in a continuous time system can be written as:
u ( t ) = K p e ( t ) + K i 0 T e ( τ ) d τ + K d d e ( t ) d t
where e ( t ) = y ( t ) r ( t ) , and K p , K i and K d are respectively the proportional, integrative, and derivative gains. The control parameters must be adjusted to improve system performance. Stability is a base requirement, but different values of the gains may lead to different settling times, overshooting, etc. For this reason, PID tuning can be a difficult process. An example of a PID controller is shown in Figure 5.

3.2. Other Relevant Methodological and Technological Aspects

Other relevant methodological control techniques could be considered in the management of indoor parameters of smart greenhouses, specifically: robust control, distributed control, image analysis, Kalman filtering, and finite difference method.
Robust control is an approach to controller design related to uncertainty. The goal of robust methods is to carry out stability in the presence of limited modeling errors. In other words, the system is often optimized and controlled to minimize the maximum worst performance in order to guarantee a certain quality of service. Some real applications use this approach.
An H2 robust control method has been designed in [94]. The simulation proposed was based on a benchmark physical model in an experimentation greenhouse. Due to insufficient equipment power in the pilot greenhouse, there was a large bias in the target values. The result of the study showed good performance of the controller proposed. Another application related to the robust control based on feedback control architecture to study the energy-saving problem has also been proposed [95]. The study reports how the controller is insensitive to changes inside the greenhouse and how it can keep up the performance in instability conditions. With the goal to avoid waste energy, a fuzzy logic controller based on ventilation flow rate has been set up to achieve robust control [96].
Distributed control is an automatic control methodology where the controllers are in different systems and a central supervisory is not present. Due to the easy scaling architecture, it adds or removes subsystems and sensors [97]. The general drawback of these approaches is related to the time required to obtain an optimal control compromise among the different subsystems. This approach can be used for example among different neighboring greenhouses wishing to cooperate, sharing for example water and energy resources, or even at the level of a single greenhouse. For example, a recent work manages the indoor environment using automatic vehicles. An unnamed distributed control system related to the visual input of an aerial vehicle has been implemented to move autonomously inside an indoor environment [98]. Analogous studies based on visual acquisition data used image analysis to evaluate the growth of plants or flowers inside a greenhouse. Image analysis is commonly used to monitor crops in horticulture. Due to the difficulty in monitoring the growth of tomato cultivation in plant clusters, an automated clip-type IoT has been designed [99].
Sometimes, in a real context, the data from internal and external environmental sensors can be affected by noise. Filtering can be a classic way to cope with this problem, but currently, interesting new filtering techniques have been applied in this field. For example, a filtering model based on the ANN algorithm to update the error covariance in the Kalman filter has been proposed [100]. The experimental results prove that the proposed method improve the performance respect to traditional techniques.
In the field of modeling, the increasing speed of computation of traditional elaboration systems gives more and more details to the system specification. For example, the finite difference method for managing heat transfer of a wall in a solar greenhouse has been designed [101]. In the proposed work, the methods have been used to predict and evaluate the heat performance of the wall. This model was built to evaluate the periodic variation of environmental conditions, with a forward and backward approach to simulate the system efficiently.

4. IoT for Monitoring and Control of Temperature, Air Humidity, Light Intensity, Soil Features and Wind

Recently, the MPC application has taken great interest in the control of the climate of greenhouses that are provided with forefront IoT and ICT-based monitoring and control systems. Current control systems can be described as consisting of three major embedded subsystems: the monitoring sensor node network system, the communication network, and the control unit [93].
In this context, MPC has been applied to a smart greenhouse in order to control the indoor air temperature by determining the optimal control signals regarding the water mass movement produced by a heat pump [102]. The MPC has been developed as a multi-objective optimization model considering the active behavior of the greenhouse with regard to power and mass balances by an ICT-based monitoring and control system.
Similarly, control of the key indoor climate’s parameters of the greenhouse system has been improved by an intelligent control system based on fuzzy logic [91], adopting a specific measurement of temperature and humidity. A fuzzy logic control technique has been used to cope with the non-linearity and complexity of the system. An intelligent automation system for wireless data monitoring allowing for remote access to the data has been applied. The results show the effectiveness of the intelligent automation system on the monitoring of the different set points of the parameters. The energy savings and water consumption could reach, respectively, 22% and 33%. The production costs could then be significantly reduced with respect to a study on the GHS.
Currently, many control methods, such as feedback control, adaptive control, and intelligent control, require an accurate model and IoT applications. In this context, several mathematical models including ML and dynamic models with an ANN method for predicting indoor air and roof temperature (Ta and Tri) as well as the energy loss in a semi-solar greenhouse have been compared [103]. Data samples related to environmental factors that influence Ta and Tri have been collected. These factors include indoor soil temperature, outdoor air temperature, solar radiation on the roof, wind speed, and indoor air humidity. The performance of the proposed model can solve the nonlinear relationship between the indoor environment variables and can estimate Ta and Tri with high accuracy.
Further works that have been carried out are described below. The key parameters considered are indoor temperature, air humidity (which is considered in most cases), light intensity (which is often taken into account), soil features (which are taken into account in some cases), and parameters such as internal or external wind speed and direction (which are considered in some cases).
A model based on a constrained discrete MPC strategy for indoor temperature of a greenhouse has been developed, whose goal is to select the best control on the basis of an optimization procedure under the constraints of the control concept [104]. This model has been solved using Simulink MATLAB and the Yalmip optimization toolbox for the implementation of the algorithm and blocks. Mathematical modeling using the subspace system identification algorithm, which forms a state space that fits correctly in the acquired data of the greenhouse temperature dynamics, has been carried out. The simulation results have confirmed the accuracy of this model for controlling and monitoring the reference indoor temperature.
A model based on a nonlinear MPC approach for greenhouse temperature control using natural ventilation has been implemented [105]. In distinct climatic areas, natural airing is used to regulate greenhouse temperature and humidity. The nonlinear MPC used is based on a second-order Volterra series model determined by the input/output greenhouse data gathered during the experiments.
Optimal placement of sensors in order to monitor and control the internal environment such as the air temperature has been considered [106]. Two methods have been proposed: the error-based sensor placement, which allows for the selection of sensor locations where the monitored data were close to the desired value, and the entropy-based sensor placement, which allows for the selection of sensor position according to the external weather conditions. The accuracy of the selected sensors has been evaluated by statistical analysis, and the proposed methods have been found to be able to determine the optimal sensor locations for the entire facility environment and detected areas with significant air temperature variations.
Further work has been carried out to improve agricultural production using innovative solutions and modern agricultural technologies based on IoT [107]. This work has set up an intelligent system to control and monitor the temperature of greenhouses. A Petri Net model has been used to monitor the greenhouse environment and to control the internal temperature. An energy-efficient scalable system has also been designed that uses a dynamic graph data model to process massive amounts of IoT big data captured from sensors. The system organizes various formats of unstructured collected raw data into a structured form in a unified and independent manner by model transformations and model-driven architectures. The results show that the proposed system can autonomously control and monitor the parameters of the outdoor temperature, the angles of the sun’s rays, the energy consumption at peak hours, and generate the appropriate temperature. Environmental control systems for a greenhouse consist of special environmental and biological sensors along with other control and instrumentation devices that monitor all important environmental variables that affect crop growth [108,109].
An intelligent system to control frost through IoT and a weather station with an ANN has been developed [110] for an optimal prediction of the indoor temperature of greenhouses. A fuzzy expert system controls the activation of an IoT-based water pump system. The ANN involves input variables such as outdoor air temperature, indoor relative humidity, and solar radiation. The ANN models, through the coefficient of determination of the ANOVA method, are used to predict the internal temperature of the greenhouse and the temperature of the cultivated land, which are used to activate the anti-frost water distribution system. This work indicates a serial correlation with an approximate confidence level of 96%. Therefore, when the ANOVA model is adjusted, the ANN bias changes abruptly from its original value, and the R2 value indicates that the adjusted model explains 95.8% of the annual internal temperature variability.
IoT technology has been used to monitor environmental data such as temperature [111]. An intelligent supervisory fuzzy controller has been proposed that can monitor and change the parameters remotely, preventing damage to the plants, and including an alarm system to notify of any event, such as fire. The results show that the model can control the greenhouse parameters, and the user can monitor and adjust the desired temperature and humidity.
Another IoT-based system has been developed to monitor and control environmental parameters such as temperature, soil moisture, humidity, light intensity, etc. [112]. These parameters are monitored by a DHT11 sensor, an LDR sensor, a soil moisture sensor and a flame sensor. The environmental data are sent to a module that is used for further working processes. The results show an effective control of the greenhouse environment, which includes temperature and humidity via portable devices such as mobile devices.
In the same context, for environment monitoring and control, a data encapsulation method has been presented in order to reach the adaptation of data communication between the gateway and the server in a greenhouse IoT system [113]. This method, based on XML, has been designed to allow for data interoperability in a distributed greenhouse IoT system. Multi-agent system behavior has been used to fuse heterogeneous information and the responses for data synchronization. For real-time and cumulative data synchronization between the gateway and the Java Agent Development JADE-based server, the data communication mechanism has been tested in a specific greenhouse. The results show that the system could be applicable to data communication. The data loss rate between the data acquisition unit and the gateway was 1.52%, and the data loss rate between the gateway and the server was 0.4%.
A system for monitoring environmental conditions in a greenhouse uses sensors to collect information on significant parameters (temperature, soil temperature, humidity, soil moisture, and light intensity) [114]. The sensor data received by the gateway, via an access point the greenhouse area is equipped with, are displayed in real time through a Node-RED dashboard installed on the gateway as a user interface to monitor the greenhouse conditions. The average percentage of the data that have been successfully stored is 99.76%, and the average percentage of loss or duplication of data is 0.24%. Therefore, the effectiveness of the system for monitoring and controlling environmental conditions has been found to be satisfactory.
An Arduino-based system has been set up to monitor and control environmental parameters such as temperature, water content, humidity, light intensity, and soil pH [115]. DHT11 sensors, LDR sensors, soil moisture sensors, and pH sensors have been used. The environmental data from the sensors have been sent to an Android cell phone both online and offline via short message service through a global system for mobile communication modem, which allows the user to control the parameters and actuators (exhaust fan, cooling fan, water pump, artificial light, and motor pump) from any location. These data are sent to the server via ethernet and are stored in a database. The sensors that have been used give exact values of the environmental parameters, reducing energy consumption, maintenance needs and complexity.
Currently, wireless communication technologies in the process of data transmission are being developed in the IoT world. Wi-Fi, Zigbee, Bluetooth, and LoRa have been used. A real-time IoT system to monitor the environmental data (temperature, humidity, light intensity, and soil moisture) of the greenhouse has been set up [116]. This system uses the LoRa communication protocol. The sensor data are sent to the LoRa gateway through a LoRa RFM95 and are saved as an IoT platform. The tests that have been carried out include the comparison between received signal strength indicator (RSSI), signal to noise ratio (SNR), and packet loss values. The results are presented in terms of packet loss, RSSI, and SNR performed under indoor and outdoor conditions, and they show that the system delivery performance in indoor conditions is improved.
An agricultural greenhouse environment monitoring system based on ZigBee technology has been developed [117]. This system, which uses a wireless sensor and CC2530F256 control nodes, consists of front-end data acquisition, as well as data processing, data transmission, and data reception. The data processed by the sensor are sent to the intermediate node via a wireless network. This node gathers all the data and sends them to the PC via a serial port, which allows the user to analyze and store the real-time data for the agricultural greenhouses. This system has been found to improve operational efficiency and application flexibility. The greenhouse environmental data can be reliably transferred, and the control instructions can be sent on time.
An intelligent greenhouse management system using sensor networks and web-based technologies has been set up [118], which consists of sensor networks based on Zigbee protocols and of a software control system that communicates with a middleware system via serial network interface converters. This web-based system provides users with an interface to view the status of agricultural greenhouses, to manage hardware installations, and to send commands to the actuators to remotely manage environmental parameters such as temperature, humidity, and irrigation. The results show that the control of the greenhouse environment can be achieved through a website to facilitate the remote operation management.
An Arduino Mega2560-based system has been developed for hydroponics in smart greenhouses [119]. The data of variables such as temperature and humidity are stored in a real-time database. An internet connection via the ESP-01 module for data communication between the Arduino Mega2560 and the firebase platform is used. The results show the proper functioning of the system, which can monitor and control the greenhouse parameters via an application on a smartphone.
An approach to monitor internal greenhouse parameters is described, in which ANNs technologies are used [120]. An IoT node acts as a smart gateway (GW), and WSN is installed to process sensor data by an ANN-based prediction model. The results show that this forecast algorithm can predict the air temperature using the index root mean square error of 1.50 °C, a mean absolute percentage error of 4.91%, and an R2 score of 0.965.
An automated system has been set up that focuses on two factors that affect cultivation: weather conditions and plant diseases [121]. It monitors temperature and humidity and includes crop health inspection by image analysis. It is controlled by a Raspberry Pi microcontroller unit (MCU), an MSP432, a temperature sensor, a humidity sensor, and an OpenCV image inspection system. The yield of the product is enhanced through immediate control and monitoring without direct analysis by the farmers.
An IoT system has been set up to provide smart agricultural solutions to monitor and control the growth stages of tomatoes, monitoring temperature, humidity, and water supply. Disease monitoring and early detection are also provided [122]. The results show a weight accuracy of 91.5% for the visible wavelength in the support vector machine classification.
An intelligent management system for agricultural greenhouses based on the NB-IoT (Narrow Band Internet of Things) network and smartphone has been set up [123]. It includes a sensor node, a cloud platform, and an Android application. Environmental data such as temperature, humidity, wind speed and direction, and light intensity are collected by the sensor node and are uploaded to the cloud platform in real time via the NB-IoT network. The management of node information, user management, real-time monitoring, and alarm logging and historical information query are implemented by the web application and Android app, respectively. The results show that the data transmission is stable with a high success rate that meets the real-time management requirements.

5. IoT for Indoor Parameters Monitoring and Control Focus on CO2 Emissions

Several variables affect the growth and life of plants. Temperature (air and root zone temperature), light, relative humidity, and CO2 are the key variables in a greenhouse environment [124]. Therefore, controlling and monitoring these important environmental parameters to achieve high performance at a low cost may be a challenge [125]. However, as a greenhouse is also a production system, CO2 emissions are an important key performance indicator. In this respect, a comparison between three ML algorithms such as ANN, SVM, and DL for the forecasting of greenhouse gases emissions in Turkey has been made [126]. The electricity production data of the country between 1990 and 2014 was used to forecast gas emissions in the following years. Due to the high correlation between electricity production and greenhouse gases emission, the authors decided to use the historical data to forecast and try to reduce these emissions. These aspects are not the objectives of this paper. The goal is to monitor CO2 concentration by IoT in connection to the quality of greenhouse production.
CO2 concentration is one of the important environmental elements for photosynthetic assimilation, and photosynthetic capacity and productivity are often limited by CO2 concentration levels; therefore, CO2 enrichment has been used to a great extent in various cultivation facilities [127]. For example, a method for automatically controlling the CO2 concentration in a greenhouse that is dependent on ventilation to efficiently improve the productivity of strawberries under weather conditions in the northern part of Kyushu in Japan has been proposed [128].
In general, CO2 control approaches in greenhouses consider the interactions with the other system state variables present. That is why the use of IoT becomes even more strategic due to the need for more sensors for different state variables that also produce precise monitoring in space and time at a reasonable price. Within this framework, a system to monitor and control parameters such as CO2 level, humidity, light, etc., has been proposed [129]. This system collects these parameters and transfers them to a Raspberry pi, which acts as a real-time server based on the IoT. This system consists of sensor nodes that collect data and transfer them to the server via the ESP8266 Wi-Fi module. The stored data are compared with the appropriate parameters for crop growth, and the system provides users with a graph for the current values related to CO2 using the Red-Node software. Finally, the actuation unit generates corrections to obtain optimal conditions. This distributed system enables a more accurate control of growing conditions, allowing data to be accessed over the Internet from anywhere, thus reducing human effort.
Similarly, an IoT approach for smart greenhouse management has been followed using Raspberry Pi, Sense HAT, and Arduino [130]. The sensors, such as the Adafruit CCS811 air quality sensor used to detect CO2 level, detect the level of climate parameters and trigger the appropriate actuators automatically. These sensors also act as early warning systems that can mitigate unexpected events and return a total volatile organic compound, as well as an equivalent carbon dioxide reading.
A system to monitor and control parameters such as CO2 level, humidity, light intensity, temperature, and soil moisture using Raspberry Pi and Arduino has been developed [131]. The data are collected in real time from the smart greenhouse and are visualized on the ThingSpeak platform. This automated greenhouse has excellent security and a monitoring provider that could become an advanced and diversified version of the current systems.
Another system aimed at modeling CO2 flux from soil to the atmosphere in greenhouse conditions using MLR, ANN and deep learning neural networks (DLNN) has been developed [132]. This work compares the models to evaluate the prediction accuracy of the three predictive models via input parameters such as soil temperature and crop species. It has been concluded that the CO2 flux from soil to the atmosphere can be modeled with an accuracy higher than 98% and that DLNN can achieve a higher efficiency in similar cases.
A big data analysis approach based on HDFS has been followed, using cloud services for data storage [133]. The environmental data have been collected from their own IoT architecture, which includes sensors to detect the concentration in different gases such as CO2, O2, O3, and NO2. These sensors transfer the data to the STM32-ARM processing chip, where the data are collected and sent to a MYSQL database through the Wi-Fi module, which uses the TCP socket protocol for transmission. The data have been periodically stored in the MySQL database and transferred to the cloud platform. A big data analysis, such as HDFS, has been carried out to analyze the details of the plant, providing the end-user with useful data through web and Android interfaces. The results show that the data generated by the system could help growers with regard to accuracy, memory consumption and time.
The performance of ZigBee communication technology in a greenhouse environment has been examined, using sensors equipped with a ZigBee (XBee PRO S2 ZigBee) module to determine various parameters, such as gas sensors, carbon dioxide (CO2) sensor (TGS4161), SHT75 humidity sensors, MCP9700A temperature sensors, and PT-1000 soil temperature sensors [134]. These sensors measure environmental data and transmit it them to the PC via a router. The results show that in order to obtain better results, the sensor and the router must be placed at an appropriate distance and density.
In order to increase the yield and provide organic agriculture, a system for greenhouse agriculture control and remote sensing of agricultural parameters such as CO2 control, soil moisture, temperature and light has been set up [85]. The monitoring action for the greenhouse windows/doors is performed according to the crops throughout the year. Comparative results show the effectiveness of the system. Moreover, the results for the environmental parameters of the greenhouse, such as CO2, are analyzed using a graphical representation based on practical values from the IoT kit.
A real-time CO2 monitoring system has been set up, in which real-time data are stored in a ThingSpeak platform, and smartphone compatibility provides easy access [135]. The system uses an open-source ESP8266 for Wi-Fi 2.4 GHZ as a processing and communication unit and includes a CO2 sensor as a detection unit. The results show great promise and represent a significant contribution to IoT-based CO2 monitoring. This system has shown advantages both in installation and in configuration, because of the use of wireless technology for communications, and it has also been developed to be compatible with all devices.
A system for monitoring CO2 and other significant parameters has been set up [136]. The data are sent from the transmitter node to the receiver, which monitors and records the data in an Excel sheet on a computer by a Graphical User Interface, realized in LabVIEW. The LabVIEW data are transferred to a smartphone through an Android application. The system has been implemented and successfully validated at various locations. The sensor node for environmental parameters (CO2, humidity, temperature) consumes less energy (4.99 mW), with system reliability at about 65% with a multi-hop mechanism.
A method to monitor the concentration of CO2 in the greenhouse (applied to tomatoes) has been developed [137]. Two pieces of information have been chosen as the input parameters of the prediction model: the environmental parameters, which have been automatically collected by WSN, and the plant growth information, which has been manually obtained during the whole growth phase of the tomato. The results have shown the same trend as the theoretical analysis, and the model with a minimum of attributes has been found to have better predictive accuracy, proving that the system is useful for CO2 concentration control.
A monitoring system based on various sensors highlights a new IoT-based solution [138]. This DSS acts as a central operating system that governs and coordinates all activities. It records the collected data, such as CO2 level, UV light, pH and EC value, etc. Once the data are acquired, the data acquisition system sends it to the DSS, which analyzes this data and performs appropriate actions through an actuator management system. The system allows for increased productivity while reducing costs. Besides providing accurate information, the process also reduces the burden of manual work through automation.
An IoT platform applied to a greenhouse has been set up [139]. A fuzzy control method has been used for the controlling parameters (CO2, humidity, etc.), and the ZigBee protocol for wireless communications, using GPRS for remote control. A mobile communication network has been used by the master node to send the data from the perception layer to the application layer. The greenhouse environment data have been published on the web, and the corresponding authorized users can remotely check the associated information through a browser. The results show a stable performance of this monitoring system, with a simple structure and easy extensibility compared to traditional monitoring systems.
An intelligent system has been set up for real-time monitoring of environmental factors such as CO2 concentration, air temperature and humidity, soil moisture, and light intensity [140]. It has been designed to adopt IoT technology and to use the JenNet protocol to establish a wireless network. The UPPAAL time automata modeling tool has been used to verify the correctness of the logic and execution time on an established formal model. The results show that the system runs stably with high acquisition accuracy and low energy consumption of the nodes, which satisfies the intelligent greenhouse data acquisition and control demand.
A prototype has been developed that allows for remote monitoring of the parameters inside the greenhouse, such as CO2 concentration, light intensity, water irrigation, and ventilation [141]. The data are uploaded to a web page designed using a low-cost Wi-Fi module (NodeMCU V3) with appropriate sensors. An Android mobile application has been developed using a GSM A6 module to inform farmers about the status of the plants. In addition, it has been used to transmit the plant images through a web page to identify and classify diseases. A convolutional deep learning NN has been developed and implemented in a Raspberry Pi 4. The results show the ability of the system to identify the state of the plants and consequently to monitor and remotely control the greenhouse.

6. Monitoring and Control of Soil and Crop Quality by Water Supply and Energy Saving Approaches

Coupling IoT with a suitable control approach, such as MPC, enhances the optimization of the management of the overall systems, mainly in term of costs related to the consumption of resources. In this section, the energy-saving aspects related to the coupled use of smart controls and IoT are taken into account, while no consideration is given related to the energy consumption of IoT technology on its own.
One of the main advantages of introducing IoT technology is adopting smart controls to considerably reduce energy and water consumption, with the final goal of achieving an autonomous system with zero consumption of resources [142]. The performance of soilless crops depends on the accuracy of the collected data and on the efficiency of parameter measurement [143]. In this respect, the main factors that support the wide application of wireless sensor networks are the quality of the environmental control and energy and water consumption reduction. Several approaches have been adopted to monitor and control the quality of soils and crops to save water and energy.
In this context, a model of microclimatic parameters in two greenhouse crop production systems—the first, which is naturally ventilated, and the second by an evaporative cooling system—has been developed [144]. The model has flexible architecture and self-adaptive reference inputs, in order to function with various crops and cultural practices in which different growth stages can be modeled and analyzed. Two IoT connectivity boards are presented that use the ATmega328p microcontroller single-chip low power and low cost- ESP8266 serial module and integrated LoRa RFM95 module, providing a transceiver that makes network and point-to-point communication possible. The results demonstrate the successful adoption of simulation models fed by real-time IoT sensors and cloud-based data collection.
An MPC-based control model [102] provides approximately 30% electrical energy savings for a time horizon of 20 h in a smart greenhouse with sizes 15.3 and 9.9 m and an average height of 4.5 m, which compared to relay control, ensures a consistent temperature profile.
An intelligent system has been developed to collect and control information such as soil moisture data and soil temperature data [145]. It consists of a laptop, an Android terminal, a web terminal, an information perception module, an information processing and control module, a GPRS communication module and an LED display module. The GPRS module wirelessly transmits the collected data to realize real-time monitoring, data download, data display and data analysis. Once the data cross the limit, the intelligent alert system makes scientific decisions and remains available to users. Significant savings in terms of water are achieved by an automatic control of the irrigation system.
A system based on WSN has been set up [146]. This zoning irrigation system has been developed to optimize plant growth conditions and reduce water use and energy consumption. Environmental data of the plant, such as soil, humidity, and temperature, are transmitted by a server (Raspberry pi) based on RF communication. These data are processed by an FLC to control and monitor irrigation. This system uses an IoT-based human–machine interface (HMI) developed under IBM’s Node-RED, which generates an improvement of 26.41% and 65.22% in terms of water and energy savings with respect to the traditional irrigation techniques.
FLC has also been used to control the greenhouse climate by several greenhouse parameters, such as soil data, temperature and humidity, in order to save energy and water resources. A smart monitoring and control system has been set up [147]. This system is based on WSAN, as well as on a fuzzy logic controller using python language and HMI. The results show the advantages of the system in terms of energy use and cost reduction.
A fuzzy logic controller has been developed in MATLAB, which was implemented around an Arduino microcontroller, as well as implemented to create a simple webserver to monitor the greenhouse parameters [148]. The system has been found to control the variables in a single action, achieving significant energy savings. Another fuzzy logic-based intelligent control system has been set up [103], in which the control has been enhanced by a wireless data monitoring platform for data routing and logging, which allows for real-time data access. It has been demonstrated that the energy and water consumption savings could reach 22% and 33%, respectively.
An FLC system uses smart controllers to measure sequential online plant temperature, and it is recursively updated based on the energy balance of an elementary volume of air in the greenhouse [149]. The results of the greenhouse dynamics simulation show the effectiveness of the system without an exact mathematical model of the plant.
The hybrid WSN is one of the promising applications of wireless sensor networking techniques. In this context, an architecture of a hybrid WSN system of wireless sensors has been developed [150]. This system uses sensors to collect soil information, including water content and temperature. In WSN, the module used is a CC2430 wireless transceiver module based on the ZigBee agreement. The nRF905 wireless chip uses WUSN for information collection and transmission. In addition, the wireless sensor node has been designed by a modular design method. Within each node, there is a sensor module, a processor module, a wireless communication module and an energy supply module. The system takes into account the electromagnetic wave transmission parameters and energy losses for different volumetric soil water contents and different compositions of sandy and clay soils.
A wireless monitoring and control system with low power consumption for smart greenhouses has been set up, which uses LPL technology to reduce energy consumption of the wireless nodes and which adopts the ACK mechanism to improve the quality of wireless communication, as well as the software watchdog to improve the anti-jamming capability of the nodes [151]. The base station receives the data of indoor and outdoor environmental factors acquired by the sensor nodes via the relay node and enters them through the RS-232 serial port into the industrial computer to process, store, display and download. According to the test results during the wireless transmission process, there is no loss of data packets. In addition, the current of the nodes using LPL technology is much lower than the current in the three operating states (transmit, receive, and idle). Therefore, this system can meet the actual requirements of the greenhouse microclimate.
A wireless sensor network system to recover, store and transmit data to monitoring soil water content has been set up [152]. The system is composed of ten sensor nodes, as well as a central node, in order to collect data from the sensor nodes and a base node connected to a PC that retrieves, stores and presents the data. TinyOS and ZigBee are used as the operating system and communication protocol, respectively. In addition, a solar-powered module is used to provide the energy needs of the sensors and of the central nodes. The results of the packet delivery rate experiment indicate that, overall, stable data transmission has been achieved.
Another project evaluated a predictive event-based control system for a greenhouse irrigation process [153]. This system controls and maintains the level of the desired substrate moisture, which keeps water consumption at the lowest possible level. The control system uses a microlysimeter to provide irrigation, drainage and crop water loss measurements. A family of 32 MISO ARMAX models represents the transpiration dynamics as a function of two inputs: solar irradiation (VGR) and VVPD. It has been found that the use of a winter rye cover crop over the long term can improve the water dynamics of soil without sacrificing the growth of cash crops in the corn–soybean rotations.
An automated irrigation system has been developed [154] to optimize water use for smart greenhouses. This system has a distributed wireless network of temperature and soil moisture sensors. The information from the sensors is processed by a gateway unit that triggers actuators and transmits the data to a web application. In order to monitor and control the amount of water, an algorithm has been developed with limit values for soil moisture and temperature, which were scheduled into a microcontroller port. In addition, the system is photovoltaically powered and has a duplex communication link based on a cellular–Internet interface that allows the data to be inspected and the irrigation to be scheduled via a web page. This system achieves water savings of up to 90% compared to traditional irrigation practices in the agricultural area. The system has the potential to be helpful in geographically isolated and water-limited areas, due to its energy self-sufficiency and low cost.
A novel control strategy for the optimal operation of a microgrid-powered greenhouse has been set up [155]. This strategy is formulated using MPC to optimally maintain the desired greenhouse microclimate while properly managing energy and water flow for irrigation. The MPC-based optimization aims to maximize the rate of crop photosynthesis while optimizing the use of available water and energy sources for a better quality of crops.
An approach for energy reduction in agricultural greenhouses has been adopted [156], which allows for the installation of sensors at several locations for better resolution of the monitored data gradient. In order to have good coverage, the LPWAN technology has been used with a LoRa network. The environmental data from the sensors are transmitted to the gateway and are collected for analysis. The challenges and limitations of IoT connectivity in greenhouses are identified, to enhance opportunities for energy savings and efficient wireless data communication.
A system for monitoring greenhouse environment parameters such as soil moisture and water control has been developed [157]. This system uses NodeMCU ESP8266 sensors and cloud computing. Three methods have been used, namely traditional management, soil moisture control by a timer, and soil moisture control by an automatic system. The results show that the system is efficient, with a 41.2% better growth rate, productivity (70%), and water savings (20.9%) compared with a traditional farm.
In order to overcome the problems of increasing time and energy consumption, an effective data collection system for critical events (CEs) in smart greenhouses has been developed [158]. The key feature data types (KFDTs) are obtained from the archival data set to keep the key information about CEs. Moreover, the sensing nodes are made to sense the event-related data considering the latency constraints of the SDWSN software servers. The results show that the system can reduce sensing time, communication time, number of required sensors and volume of collected data, while proving a low latency agricultural information collection system.

7. Challenges and Limits of IoT

The objective of this article is to provide a literature review on IoT applications in agriculture, and specifically in the smart greenhouse sector. The literature review highlights the main significant benefits and limitations provided by IoT applications.
This new technology allows for the measurement of a range of physical characteristics of the soil, air, and water to create optimal conditions for the growth of crops. In addition, the constant monitoring of the physical characteristics of the environment allows these parameters to be kept stable in order to optimize the growth of the crop and therefore the yield, and to significantly anticipate the harvest.
It has been found that the introduction of IoT has led to improvements in quality of products, reduced time, and lower production costs. Therefore, there are still missing experiences related to reliability in time, availability, and maintainability of IoT-based systems in greenhouses.
The increase in efficiency by intelligent devices can automate several processes throughout the production cycle by adopting an energy- and water-saving approach, also minimizing irrigation and fertilization requirements [159]. These important aspects, favored by IoT technologies, also relate to the improvement in product quality and volume [160], and to ensuring the health and wellbeing of the crops across their various cycles [161].
An overview of the major challenges facing IoT-enabled smart greenhouse farming, such as low cost and reliable solutions for the monitoring and growing of plants, unified data transmission protocol, and secure data transmission and collection, have been discussed [90]. It is believed that major efforts by the researcher must be focused in order to improve the crop yield at lower cost, particularly if it will consider future smart greenhouse farming.
The challenges and limitations of IoT connectivity in a greenhouse has been tested in a pilot study [156]. A possible research outlook to increase the opportunities in saving energy and efficient wireless data communication has been also proposed.
Due to the increasing number of IoT devices with a lot of consumption of energy, a green solution to charge these designs has been tested [162]. The article is a challenge in IoT architecture because it focuses on motivation for further research to realize green IoT. The same concepts have been proposed in [163]. In this case, the focus is on the important points of view of the farmers that are important aspects of green IoT technologies, such as energy saving, financial saving and management issue.
The processing of the physical world into a digital one inside the industry’s context has made everything connected. Industrial IoT is one of the major goals not only in the manufacturing industries but also in different fields such as agriculture or medicine [164].
A combined approach between IoT and additive manufacturing to provide an escape from the limitations of mass production while obtaining economic and ecological savings has been performed [165]. The methods proposed to modify the production and supply paradigm reduces the ecological impact of industrial systems. This new approach could remodel the future of manufacturing.
The greenhouse industry due to its ability to produce fresh agricultural products with immense growth and production rates in recent years has been taken more into consideration in the agriculture community. A challenging issue in current greenhouse systems is related to the security and authenticity of agriculture data, particularly for yield monitoring and analysis. The parameters regarding a controlled environment must have optimal settings to produce increased food production [166].
A study regarding the forecasted economic benefits on the applications of IoT for an optimized greenhouse environment and resources management that are sustainable have been carried out [38]. The study affirms how any potential risks are incomparable to the long-term benefits in commercial agriculture.

8. Discussion and Research Directions

Despite that a greenhouse represents a quite ancient technological resource in the agricultural domain, new paradigms derived by Industry 4.0 have been recently added, and IoT may greatly support monitoring and control techniques as shown in the previous sections. Some aspects are however important to allow the reader to find its proper contribution and interest in the current state of the art. It is important to be reminded that IoT monitors a greenhouse with high detail in space and time at a reasonable cost. This fact defines more accurate models regarding the details of growing each single plant or flower and of the related physical variables affecting them. Such models can be coupled with MPC architectures for control schemes going beyond the traditional limitations given by nonlinear terms, constraints, and binary variables. Decisional problems in this domain are devoted to keep the greenhouse system autonomous, with zero energy and zero water needs. In our opinion, one promising field of research is the application of accurate monitoring and proper MPC to control crop production in extreme environments such as desert [167], underwater [168], or Mars missions [169]. Thus, in these cases, the objective becomes to keep the greenhouse system toward zero consumption in terms of water and energy, while forcing plant production to specific temperature, radiation and humidity trends related to a safer and more optimized production. In severe conditions, techniques related to robust control may also be more adequate to avoid critical system behaviors. Research in the MPC domain can also be coupled in this case with ML approaches, where an ANN can play the role of a predictive model. The trend toward autonomous greenhouse systems can be relaxed in certain conditions where several greenhouse systems, generally closer in space, can cooperate toward the same zero consumption objectives, but in this case as a system of systems. In this respect, important techniques that have interested researchers to investigate are related to distribution and cooperative control. However, despite the increasing number of applications present in the literature, few of them have been applied in a real context (see first row of Table 2).
From a methodology viewpoint, the great novelty introduced by IoT is the possibility to monitor the process, in this case the crop growth, at a detailed spatial and temporal level and at a reasonable cost. IoT sensors necessarily based on wireless connections could also be easily moved in the greenhouse to monitor different plants. Therefore, the flexibility and high level of detail given by such IoT sensor networks require flexible and detailed models, allowing for proper monitoring and control, as well as for simulations related to future trends of physical variables and plant growth. From this point of view, two main research trends will be increasingly well established in the near future.
The first research trend is related to flexible control, as required by a greenhouse where the configuration of the crops varies in time. In this respect, MPC and ANN techniques are the most promising methodologies. Conversely, as reported in Table 3, few papers have been published on the application of these techniques in greenhouses.
The second research trend is related to the need of designing and implementing virtual digital twins of greenhouses. A digital twin is an electronic corresponding to a real item representing its behavior and state in a virtual space. Using digital twins as a focus for greenhouse direction enables the splitting of the physical stream from its planning and control. Therefore, by using this technology, the farmers can remotely direct based on real-time digital information rather than by observation and tasks on-site. This approach grants them to work immediately in case of a (projected) deflection and to reproduce the effects of an action based on real data [171].
The results of a performance analysis between crop production in a real and simulated environment in different divisions have been compared. For the simulated greenhouse crop production, digital twin technology has been proposed [172]. By the availability of this digital twin of the real greenhouse, a detailed analysis can be performed to better understand the roles of different growth factors. For this reason, the digital twin may constitute a fundamental tool to reach the optimization of productivity, intended as the ratio between production and resource consumption [173]. These new methodologies in construction technology would bring the industry a step forward toward achieving the goal of Industry 5.0 [174].
A further required research activity is the one related to considering a greenhouse not as an isolated system but as a system interacting with other similar systems, i.e., with other greenhouses, or with other heterogeneous systems, i.e., a residential building, a swimming pool, a touristic location. In this respect, important interactions should be considered at the level of thermic and electrical energy consumption and production, and water consumption.
About 100 works are quoted where IoT plays a fundamental role in the monitoring and control of key variables of a greenhouse. IoT more and more represents the foundation of modern approaches to control key variables in greenhouses. For the sake of readability, Table 2 reports the variables that have been monitored by IoT for the different references. Similarly, Table 3 shows the techniques that have been used for management control or optimization in the greenhouse.

9. Conclusions

IoT is a technological revolution that has mobilized industry. It brings about new opportunities and challenges in several economic fields. IoT is an exciting technology that opens many possibilities for greenhouse cultivation. Moreover, it can be applied to various technical solutions that identify objects, as well as capturing, storing, processing, and transferring data in physical environments and in between physical and virtual worlds.
IoT supports the transition from the traditional greenhouse to smart solutions, which consists of an intelligent greenhouse equipped to track the indoor parameters and to communicate with the farmer who can make decisions automatically to preserve crops and improve production.
IoT for smart greenhouses includes a wide variety of devices integrated with sensors and actuators, which are connected to and interact with each other via the internet, trending toward a greater osmosis between the real world and digital world. Sensors and actuators, which are the key elements of the IoT, monitor the state of the system as well as the environmental parameters, obtaining information on temperature, humidity, CO2, water and energy consumption, movement, position, etc., and which manage the dynamics of the system.
Moreover, the possibility of controlling the above-mentioned indoor values within certain reference levels minimizes pesticide treatments for the prevention of the main diseases to which the crops are subjected. The possibility of monitoring and controlling the optimal conditions of crops in a protected environment minimizes the damage due to climate change or to any weather condition, as well as allows the farmer to intervene by irrigating, heating, and fertilizing only to the extent that is necessary to achieve the pre-established objectives, effectively avoiding waste and implementing water and energy-saving approaches.
In conclusion, mainly for its characteristics of accurate measurements everywhere, anytime, and at a reasonable cost, it can be said that the introduction of IoT and related technologies in greenhouse systems may allow for the development of a new developing economy in agriculture, above all, in specific territories, such as the ones present in the western part of the Liguria region in Italy, which has been excellent for many years in flower production, but which has also been in a deep crisis for the last few years.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.B., C.R., R.S., A.S. and E.Z.; methodology, C.B., C.R., R.S., A.S. and E.Z.; software, C.B., C.R., R.S., A.S. and E.Z.; validation, C.B., C.R., R.S., A.S. and E.Z.; formal analysis, C.B., C.R., R.S., A.S. and E.Z.; investigation, C.B., C.R., R.S., A.S. and E.Z.; resources, C.B., C.R., R.S., A.S. and E.Z.; data curation, C.B., C.R., R.S., A.S. and E.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, C.B., C.R., R.S., A.S. and E.Z.; visualization, C.B., C.R., R.S., A.S. and E.Z.; supervision, C.B., C.R., R.S., A.S. and E.Z.; project administration, C.B., C.R., R.S., A.S. and E.Z.; funding acquisition, C.B., C.R., R.S., A.S. and E.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study is supported by the SysE2021 project (2021–2023), “Centre d’excellence transfrontalier pour la formation en ingénierie de systèmes” developed in the framework of the Interreg V-A France-Italie (ALCOTRA) (2014–2020), funding number 5665, Programme de coopération transfrontalière européenne entre la France et l’Italie.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Nomenclature

ACKAcknowledgement
AMSActuator Management System
ANNArtificial Neural Network
ANOVAAnalysis of Variance
MPCModel Predictive Control
DASData Acquisition System
DSSDecision Support System
EEEnergy Efficient
FESFuzzy Expert System
FLCFuzzy Logic Controller
FLCFuzzy Logic Controller
GHSGreenhouse System
GSMGlobal System for Mobile communication
HDFSHADOOP Distributed File System
HMIHuman Machine Interface
ICTInformation and Communication Technologies
I4.0Industry 4.0
IPInternet Protocol
ISFCIntelligent Supervisory Fuzzy Controller
LDRLight Dependent Resistor
LEDLight Emitting Diode
LoRaLong Range
LPLLow Power Listening
LPWALow Power Wide Area
LTE-mLong Term Evolution for Machines
M2MMachine to Machine
MASMulti Agent System
MLRMultiple Linear Regression
PIDProportional Integral Derivative
PNPetri Nets
RFRadio Frequency
RFIDRadio Frequency Identification
SIMSubscriber Identity Module
SMSShort Messaging Service
TAKTitle, Abstract, and Keywords
TCPTransmission Control Protocol
TVOCTotal Volatile Organic Compound
VVPDVapor Pressure Deficit
WAPWireless Application Protocol
Wi-FiWireless Fidelity
WSANWireless Sensor and Actuator Net-work
WSNWireless Sensor Network
XMLExtensible Markup Language
ZigbeeZonal Intercommunication Glob-al-standard

References

  1. Paolucci, M.; Sacile, R. Agent-Based Manufacturing and Control Systems: New Agile Manufacturing Solutions for Achieving Peak Performance; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Howard, D.A.; Ma, Z.; Veje, C.; Clausen, A.; Aaslyng, J.M.; Jørgensen, B.N. Greenhouse industry 4.0–digital twin technology for commercial greenhouses. Energy Inform. 2021, 4, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhang, C.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Caiming, C. A review of research relevant to the emerging industry trends: Industry 4.0, IoT, blockchain, and business analytics. J. Ind. Integr. Manag. 2020, 5, 165–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Nascimento, D.L.M.; Alencastro, V.; Quelhas, O.L.G.; Caiado, R.G.G.; Garza-Reyes, J.A.; Rocha-Lona, L.; Tortorella, G. Ex-ploring Industry 4.0 technologies to enable circular economy practices in a manufacturing context: A business model proposal. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 2019, 30, 607–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ghobakhloo, M. The future of manufacturing industry: A strategic roadmap toward Industry 4.0. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 2018, 29, 910–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Jamwal, A.; Agrawal, R.; Sharma, M.; Giallanza, A. Industry 4.0 Technologies for Manufacturing Sustainability: A Systematic Review and Future Research Directions. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 5725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Oztemel, E.; Gursev, S. Literature review of Industry 4.0 and related technologies. J. Intell. Manuf. 2020, 31, 127–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Blanchet, M. Industrie 4.0 Nouvelle donne industrielle, nouveau modèle économique. Outre-Terre 2016, 46, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Giallanza, A.; Aiell, G.; Marannano, G. Industry 4.0: Advanced digital solutions implemented on a close power loop test bench. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2021, 180, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Giallanza, A.; Aiello, G.; Marannano, G.; Nigrelli, V. Industry 4.0: Smart test bench for shipbuilding industry. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. 2020, 14, 1525–1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Xu, L.D.; Xu, E.L.; Li, L. Industry 4.0: State of the art and future trends. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2018, 56, 2941–2962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Zhong, R.Y.; Xu, X.; Klotz, E.; Newman, S.T. Intelligent Manufacturing in the Context of Industry 4.0: A Review. Engineering 2017, 3, 616–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Molinaro, M.; Orzes, G. From forest to finished products: The contribution of Industry 4.0 technologies to the wood sector. Comput. Ind. 2022, 138, 103637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Akyazi, T.; Goti, A.; Oyarbide, A.; Alberdi, E.; Bayon, F. A guide for the food industry to meet the future skills requirements emerging with industry 4.0. Foods 2020, 9, 492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Babiceanu, R.F.; Seker, R. Big Data and virtualization for manufacturing cyber-physical systems: A survey of the current status and future outlook. Comput. Ind. 2016, 81, 128–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Babiceanu, R.F.; Seker, R. Manufacturing operations, internet of things, and big data: Towards predictive manufacturing systems. In Service Orientation in Holonic and Multi-Agent Manufacturing; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 157–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dijkman, R.M.; Sprenkels, B.; Peeters, T.; Janssen, A. Business models for the Internet of Things. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2015, 35, 672–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Xu, X. From cloud computing to cloud manufacturing. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 2012, 28, 75–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Prinsloo, J.; Sinha, S.; von Solms, B. A review of industry 4.0 manufacturing process security risks. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 5105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Trstenjak, M.; Cosic, P. Process Planning in Industry 4.0 Environment. Procedia Manuf. 2017, 11, 1744–1750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Lee, J.; Bagheri, B.; Kao, H.A. A Cyber-Physical Systems architecture for Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manuf. Lett. 2015, 3, 18–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lasi, H.; Fettke, P.; Kemper, H.G.; Feld, T.; Hoffmann, M. Industry 4.0. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 2014, 6, 239–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lee, I. The Internet of Things for enterprises: An ecosystem, architecture, and IoT service business model. Internet Things 2019, 7, 100078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kim, J.H. A review of cyber-physical system research relevant to the emerging IT trends: Industry 4.0, IoT, big data, and cloud computing. J. Ind. Integr. Manag. 2017, 2, 1750011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, S.; Wan, J.; Zhang, D.; Li, D.; Zhang, C. Towards smart factory for industry 4.0: A self-organized multi-agent system with big data-based feedback and coordination. Comput. Netw. 2016, 101, 158–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Mohanraj, I.; Ashokumar, K.; Naren, J. Field Monitoring and Automation Using IOT in Agriculture Domain. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2016, 93, 931–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. FAO. The State of Food Insecurity in the World; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  28. Rauch, E. Industry 4.0+: The Next Level of Intelligent and Self-optimizing Factories. In Advances in Design, Simulation and Manufacturing III. DSMIE 2020; Ivanov, V., Trojanowska, J., Pavlenko, I., Zajac, J., Peraković, D., Eds.; Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 176–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Boursianis, A.D.; Papadopoulou, M.S.; Diamantoulakis, P.; Liopa-Tsakalidi, A.; Barouchas, P.; Salahas, G.; Karagiannidis, G.; Wan, S.; Goudos, S.K. Internet of Things (IoT) and Agricultural Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) in smart farming: A comprehensive review. Internet Things 2020, 18, 100187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ratnaparkhi, S.; Khan, S.; Arya, C.; Khapre, S.; Singh, P.; Diwakar, M.; Shankar, A. Smart agriculture sensors in IOT: A review. Mater. Today Proc. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sinha, B.B.; Dhanalakshmi, R. Recent advancements and challenges of Internet of Things in smart agriculture: A survey. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2022, 126, 169–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Rajeswari, S.; Suthendran, K.; Rajakumar, K. A smart agricultural model by integrating IoT, mobile and cloud-based big data analytics. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Control (I2C2), Coimbatore, India, 23–24 June 2017; pp. 127–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Banu, S. Precision Agriculture: Tomorrow’s Technology for Today’s Farmer. J. Food Process. Technol. 2015, 6, 8–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Araby, A.A.; Elhameed, M.M.A.; Magdy, N.M.; Said, L.A.; Abdelaal, N.; Allah, Y.T.A.; Darweesh, M.S.; Fahim, M.A.; Mostafa, H. Smart IoT Monitoring System for Agriculture with Predictive Analysis. In Proceedings of the 2019 8th International Conference on Modern Circuits and Systems Technologie MOCAST, Thessaloniki, Greece, 13–15 May 2019; pp. 2019–2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Dagdougui, H.; Sacile, R.; Bersani, C.; Ouammi, A. Hydrogen Infrastructure for Energy Applications: Production, Storage, Distribution and Safety; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  36. Zhang, K.S.; Zhang, X.W.; Zhou, Y.; Tang, W. Design of agricultural greenhouse environment monitoring system based on internet of things technology. In Advanced Materials Research; Trans Tech Publications Ltd.: Beijing, China, 2013; Volume 791, pp. 1651–1655. [Google Scholar]
  37. Elijah, O.; Rahman, T.A.; Orikumhi, I.; Leow, C.Y.; Hindia, M.N. An overview of Internet of Things (IoT) and data analytics in agriculture: Benefits and challenges. IEEE Internet Things J. 2018, 5, 3758–3773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Maraveas, C.; Piromalis, D.; Arvanitis, K.G.; Bartzanas, T.; Loukatos, D. Applications of IoT for optimized greenhouse envi-ronment and resources management. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2022, 198, 106993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ullah, I.; Fayaz, M.; Aman, M.; Kim, D. An optimization scheme for IoT based smart greenhouse climate control with efficient energy consumption. Computing 2022, 104, 433–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Imran, M.; Ozcatalbas, O. Optimization of energy consumption and its effect on the energy use efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions of wheat production in Turkey. Discov. Sustain. 2021, 2, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mishra, K.N.; Kumar, S.; Patel, N.R. Survey on Internet of Things and its Application in Agriculture. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series; IOP Publishing: Goa, India, 2021; Volume 1714, p. 012025. [Google Scholar]
  42. Sharma, B.B.; Kumar, N. Internet of things-based hardware and software for smart agriculture: A review. Proc. ICRIC 2020, 2019, 151–157. [Google Scholar]
  43. Kumar, D.C.; Adiraju, R.V.; Pasupuleti, S.; Nandan, D. A Review of Smart Greenhouse Farming by Using Sensor Network Technology. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Recent Trends in Machine Learning, IoT, Smart Cities and Applications, Hyderabad, India, 28–29 March 2020; Springer: Singapore, 2021; pp. 849–856. [Google Scholar]
  44. Li, H.; Guo, Y.; Zhao, H.; Wang, Y.; Chow, D. Towards automated greenhouse: A state of the art review on greenhouse monitoring methods and technologies based on internet of things. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2021, 191, 106558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Bhujel, A.; Basak, J.K.; Khan, F.; Arulmozhi, E.; Jaihuni, M.; Sihalath, T.; Kim, H.T. Sensor Systems for Greenhouse Microclimate Monitoring and Control: A Review. J. Biosyst. Eng. 2020, 45, 341–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ardiansah, I.; Bafdal, N.; Suryadi, E.; Bono, A. Greenhouse monitoring and automation using Arduino: A review on precision farming and internet of things (IoT). Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol. 2020, 10, 703–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Solanke, S.; Mehare, P.; Shinde, S.; Ingle, V.; Zope, S. Iot based crop disease detection and pesting for greenhouse—A review. In Proceedings of the 2018 3rd International Conference for Convergence in Technology (I2CT), Pune, India, 6–8 April 2018; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  48. Danita, M.; Mathew, B.; Shereen, N.; Sharon, N.; Paul, J.J. IoT Based Automated Greenhouse Monitoring System. In Proceedings of the 2018 Second International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Control Systems (ICICCS), Madurai, India, 14–15 June 2018; pp. 1933–1937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Agale, R.R.; Gaikwad, D.P. Automated Irrigation and Crop Security System in Agriculture Using Internet of Things. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Computing, Communication, Control and Automation (ICCUBEA), Pune, India, 17–18 August 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sreekantha, D.K.; Kavya, A.M. Agricultural crop monitoring using IOT-A study. In Proceedings of the 2017 11th International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Control (ISCO), Coimbatore, India, 5–6 January 2017; pp. 134–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ding, Y.; Li, Y.; Li, D.; Li, M.Z. Automatic carbon dioxide enrichment strategies in the greenhouse: A review. Biosyst. Eng. 2018, 171, 101–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. La Notte, L.; Giordano, L.; Calabrò, E.; Bedini, R.; Colla, G.; Puglisi, G.; Reale, A. Hybrid and organic photovoltaics for greenhouse applications. Appl. Energy 2020, 278, 115582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Jawad, H.M.; Nordin, R.S.; Gharghan, K.; Jawad, A.M.; Ismail, M. Energy-efficient wireless sensor networks for precision agriculture: A review. Sensors 2017, 17, 1781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Ayaz, M.; Ammad-Uddin, S.M.; Mansour, Z.A.; Aggoune, E.H.M. Internet-of-Things (IoT)-based smart agriculture: Toward making the fields talk. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 129551–129583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Maroli, A.; Narwane, V.S.; Gardas, B.B. Applications of IoT for achieving sustainability in agricultural sector: A comprehensive review. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 298, 113488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Manavalan, E.; Jayakrishna, K. A review of Internet of Things (IoT) embedded sustainable supply chain for industry 4.0 requirements. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2019, 127, 925–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ray, P.P. A survey on Internet of Things architectures. J. King Saud Univ. Comput. Inf. Sci. 2018, 30, 291–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Da Xu, L.; He, W.; Li, S. Internet of things in industries: A survey. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2014, 10, 2233–2243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Syed, A.S.; Sierra-Sosa, D.; Kumar, A.; Elmaghraby, A. IoT in Smart Cities: A Survey of Technologies, Practices and Challenges. Smart Cities 2021, 4, 429–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Koubaa, M.; Aldawood, A.; Saeed, A.; Hadid, B.; Ahmed, A.; Saad, M.; Alkanhal, A. Smart Palm: An IoT Framework for Red Palm Weevil Early Detection. Agronomy 2020, 10, 987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ng, I.C.L.; Wakenshaw, S.Y.L. The Internet-of-Things: Review and research directions. Int. J. Res. Mark. 2017, 34, 3–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. González García, C.; Meana Llorián, D.; Pelayo G-Bustelo, C.; Cueva-Lovelle, J.M. A review about Smart Objects, Sensors, and Actuators. Int. J. Interact. Multimed. Artif. Intell. 2017, 4, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ping, H.; Wang, J.; Ma, Z.; Du, Y. Mini-review of application of IoT technology in monitoring agricultural products quality and safety. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng. 2018, 11, 35–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Aqeel-Ur-Rehman, A.; Abbasi, Z.; Islam, N.; Shaikh, Z.A. A review of wireless sensors and networks’ applications in agriculture. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 2014, 36, 263–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. O’Grady, M.J.; Langton, D.; O’Hare, G.M.P. Edge computing: A tractable model for smart agriculture? Artif. Intell. Agric. 2019, 3, 42–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Rayes, A.; Salam, S. The Things in IoT: Sensors and Actuators. In Internet of Things—From Hype to Reality; Springer International Publishing: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; pp. 57–77. [Google Scholar]
  67. Ju, J.; Kim, M.S.; Ahn, J.H. Prototyping Business Models for IoT Service. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2016, 91, 882–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. AL-Hawawreh, M.; Moustafa, N.; Sitnikova, E. Identification of malicious activities in industrial internet of things based on deep learning models. J. Inf. Secur. Appl. 2018, 41, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Valente, F.J.; Neto, A.C. Intelligent steel inventory tracking with IoT/RFID. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on RFID Technology & Application (RFID-TA), Warsaw, Poland, 20–22 September 2017; pp. 158–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Garrido-Hidalgo, C.; Hortelano, D.; Roda-Sanchez, L.; Olivares, T.; Ruiz, M.C.; Lopez, V. IoT Heterogeneous Mesh Network Deployment for Human-in-the-Loop Challenges Towards a Social and Sustainable Industry 4.0. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 28417–28437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Verma, A.; Ranga, V. Security of RPL Based 6LoWPAN Networks in the Internet of Things: A Review. IEEE Sens. J. 2020, 20, 5666–5690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Tabaa, M.; Monteiro, F.; Bensag, H.; Dandache, A. Green Industrial Internet of Things from a smart industry perspective. Energy Rep. 2020, 6, 430–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Simoens, P.; Dragone, M.; Saffiotti, A. The Internet of Robotic Things: A review of concept, added value and applications. Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst. 2018, 15, 1729881418759424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Villamil, S.; Hernández, C.; Tarazona, G. An overview of internet of things. Telkomnika 2020, 18, 2320–2327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Farooq, M.S.; Riaz, S.; Abid, A.; Abid, K.; Naeem, M.A. A Survey on the Role of IoT in Agriculture for the Implementation of Smart Farming. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 156237–156271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Kitouni, I.; Benmerzoug, D.; Lezzar, F. Smart agricultural enterprise system based on integration of internet of things and agent technology. J. Organ. End User Comput. 2018, 30, 64–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. de Souza, P.S.S.; Rubin, F.; Hohemberger, R.; Ferreto, T.C.; Lorenzon, A.F.; Luizelli, M.C.; Rossi, F.D. Detecting abnormal sensors via machine learning: An IoT farming WSN-based architecture case study. Meas. J. Int. Meas. Confed. 2020, 164, 108042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Grogan, A. Smart farming. Eng. Technol. 2012, 7, 38–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Anand Nayyar, N.G.; Bao-Le Nguyen, N. The Internet of Drone Things (IoDT): Future Envision of Smart Drones; Springer: Singapore, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  80. Bhuvaneshwari, C.; Saranyadevi, G.; Vani, R.; Manjunathan, A. Development of High Yield Farming using IoT based UAV. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2021, 1055, 012007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Aha, A.K.; Saha, J.; Ray, R.; Sircar, S.; Dutta, S.; Chattopadhyay, S.P.; Saha, H.N. IOT-based drone for improvement of crop quality in agricultural field. In Proceedings of the 8th IEEE Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (IEEE CCWC), Las Vegas, NV, USA, 8–10 January 2018; pp. 612–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Kulbacki, M.; Segen, J.; Kniec, W.; Klempous, R.; Kluwak, K.; Nikodem, J.; Kulbacka, J.; Serester, A. Survey of Drones for Agriculture Automation from Planting to Harvest. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Intelligent Engineering Systems (INES), Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain, 21–23 June 2018; pp. 353–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Israr, A.; Abro, G.E.M.; Sadiq Ali Khan, M.; Farhan, M.; Zulkifli, B.M.; ul Azrin, S. Internet of Things (IoT)-Enabled Unmanned Aerial Vehicles for the Inspection of Construction Sites: A Vision and Future Directions. Math. Probl. Eng. 2021, 22, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Kodali, R.K.; Jain, V.; Karagwal, S. IoT based smart greenhouse. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Region 10 Humanitarian Technology Conference (R10-HTC), Agra, India, 21–23 December 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Pallavi, K.; Mallapur, J.D.; Bendigeri, K.Y. Remote sensing and controlling of greenhouse agriculture parameters based on IoT. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Big Data, IoT and Data Science (BID), Pune, India, 20–22 December 2017; pp. 44–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Reka, S.S.; Chezian, B.K.; Chandra, S.S. A Novel Approach of IoT-Based Smart Greenhouse Farming System. In Green Buildings and Sustainable Engineering; Springer: Singapore, 2019; pp. 227–235. [Google Scholar]
  87. Gayatri, M.K.; Jayasakthi, J.; Anandha Mala, G.S. Providing Smart Agricultural solutions to farmers for better yielding using IoT. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE Technological Innovation in ICT for Agriculture and Rural Development (TIAR), Chennai, India, 10–12 July 2015; pp. 40–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Sampaio, H.; Motoyama, S. Implementation of a greenhouse monitoring system using hierarchical wireless sensor network. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 9th Latin-American conference on communications (LATINCOM), Guatemala City, Guatemala, 8–10 November 2017; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  89. Ferrag, M.A.; Shu, L.; Yang, X.; Derhab, A.; Maglaras, L. Security and Privacy for Green IoT-Based Agriculture: Review, Blockchain Solutions, and Challenges. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 32031–32053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Rayhana, R.; Xiao, G.; Liu, Z. Internet of Things Empowered Smart Greenhouse Farming. IEEE J. Radio Freq. Identif. 2020, 4, 195–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Azaza, M.; Tanougast, C.; Fabrizio, E.; Mami, A. Smart greenhouse fuzzy logic-based control system enhanced with wireless data monitoring. ISA Trans. 2016, 61, 297–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Escamilla-García, A.; Soto-Zarazúa, G.M.; Toledano-Ayala, M.; Rivas-Araiza, E.; Gastélum-Barrios, A. Applications of artificial neural networks in greenhouse technology and overview for smart agriculture development. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 3835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Bersani, C.; Ouammi, A.; Sacile, R.; Zero, E. Model Predictive Control of Smart Greenhouses as the Path towards Near Zero Energy Consumption. Energies 2020, 13, 3647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Bennis, N.; Duplaix, J.; Enéa, G.; Haloua, M.; Youlal, H. Greenhouse climate modelling and robust control. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2008, 61, 96–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Hu, H.; Xu, L.; Zhu, B.; Wei, R. A compatible control algorithm for greenhouse environment control based on MOCC strategy. Sensors 2011, 11, 3281–3302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. Riahi, J.; Vergura, S.; Mezghani, D.; Mami, A. Intelligent control of the microclimate of an agricultural greenhouse powered by a supporting PV system. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Sumalan, R.L.; Stroia, N.; Moga, D.; Muresan, V.; Lodin, A.; Vintila, T.; Popescu, C.A. A Cost-effective embedded platform for greenhouse environment control and remote monitoring. Agronomy 2020, 10, 936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Solis, J.; Karlsson, C.; Johansson, S.; Richardsson, K. Towards the Development of an Automatic UAV-Based Indoor Envi-ronmental Monitoring System: Distributed Off-Board Control System for a Micro Aerial Vehicle. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 2347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Lee, U.; Islam, M.P.; Kochi, N.; Tokuda, K.; Nakano, Y.; Naito, H.; Ahn, D.H. An Automated, Clip-Type, Small Internet of Things Camera-Based Tomato Flower and Fruit Monitoring and Harvest Prediction System. Sensors 2022, 22, 2456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Ullah, I.; Fayaz, M.; Naveed, N.; Kim, D. ANN based learning to Kalman filter algorithm for indoor environment prediction in smart greenhouse. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 159371–159388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Ma, C.; Lu, H.; Li, R.; Qu, M. One-dimensional finite difference model and numerical simulation for heat transfer of wall in Chinese solar greenhouse. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2010, 26, 231–237. [Google Scholar]
  102. Bersani, C.; Fossa, M.; Priarone, A.; Sacile, R.; Zero, E. Model Predictive Control versus Traditional Relay Control in a High Energy Efficiency Greenhouse. Energies 2021, 14, 3353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Taki, M.; Ajabshirchi, Y.S.; Ranjbar, F.; Rohani, A.; Matloobi, M. Heat transfer and MLP neural network models to predict inside environment variables and energy lost in a semi-solar greenhouse. Energy Build. 2016, 110, 314–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Hamidane, H.; El Faiz, S.; Guerbaoui, M.A.; Ed-Dahhak, A.L.; Bouchikhi, B. Constrained discrete model predictive control of a greenhouse system temperature. Int. J. Electr. Comput. Eng. 2020, 11, 1223–1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Gruber, J.K.; Guzmán, J.L.; Rodríguez, F.; Bordons, C.; Berenguel, M.; Sánchez, J.A. Nonlinear MPC based on a Volterra series model for greenhouse temperature control using natural ventilation. Control. Eng. Pract. 2011, 19, 354–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Lee, S.-Y.; Lee, I.-B.; Yeo, U.-H.; Kim, R.-W.; Kim, J.-G. Optimal sensor placement for monitoring and controlling greenhouse internal environments. Biosyst. Eng. 2019, 188, 190–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Subahi, A.F.; Bouazza, K.E. An Intelligent IoT-Based System Design for Controlling and Monitoring Greenhouse Temperature. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 125488–125500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Manoharan, S. Supervised Learning for Microclimatic parameter Estimation in a Greenhouse environment for productive Agronomics. J. Artif. Intell. Capsul. Netw. 2020, 2, 170–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Guo, T.; Zhong, W. Design and implementation of the span greenhouse agriculture Internet of Things system. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Fluid Power and Mechatronics (FPM), Harbin, China, 5–7 August 2015; pp. 398–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Castañeda-Miranda, A.; Castaño-Meneses, V.M. Internet of things for smart farming and frost intelligent control in green-houses. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2020, 176, 105614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Aghaseyedabdollah, M.; Alaviyan, Y.; Yazdizadeh, A. IoT Based Smart Greenhouse Design with an Intelligent Supervisory Fuzzy Optimized Controller. In Proceedings of the 2021 7th International Conference on Web Research (ICWR), Tehran, Iran, 19–20 May 2021; pp. 311–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Sujin, J.S.; Murugan, R.; Nagarjun, M.; Praveen, A.K. IOT Based Greenhouse Monitoring and Controlling System. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2021, 1916, 012062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Wang, J.; Chen, M.; Zhou, J.; Li, P.L. Data communication mechanism for greenhouse environment monitoring and control: An agent-based IoT system. Inf. Process. Agric. 2020, 7, 444–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Widyawati, D.K.; Ambarwari, A.; Wahyudi, A. Design and Prototype Development of Internet of Things for Greenhouse Monitoring System. In Proceedings of the 2020 3rd International Seminar on Research of Information Technology and Intelligent Systems (ISRITI), Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 10–11 December 2020; pp. 389–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Vimal, P.V.; Shivaprakasha, K.S. IOT based greenhouse environment monitoring and controlling system using Arduino plat-form. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Intelligent Computing, Instrumentation and Control Technologies (ICICICT), Kerala, India, 6–7 July 2017; pp. 1514–1519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Al Fajar, M.C.; Samijayani, O.N. Realtime greenhouse environment monitoring based on LoRaWAnProtocol using grafana. In Proceedings of the 2021 International Symposium on Electronics and Smart Devices (ISESD), Bandung, Indonesia, 29–30 June 2021; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Liu, D.; Cao, X.; Huang, C.; Ji, L. Intelligent agriculture greenhouse environment monitoring system based on IOT technology. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation, Big Data and Smart City, Halong Bay, Vietnam, 19–20 December 2015; pp. 487–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Li, Z.; Wang, J.; Higgs, R.; Zhou, L.; Yuan, W. Design of an Intelligent Management System for Agricultural Greenhouses Based on the Internet of Things. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering (CSE) and IEEE International Conference on Embedded and Ubiquitous Computing (EUC), Guangzhou, China, 21–24 July 2017; Volume 2, pp. 154–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Andrianto, H.; Suhardi; Faizal, A. Development of smart greenhouse system for hydroponic agriculture. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Information Technology Systems and Innovation (ICITSI), Bandung, Indonesia, 19–23 October 2020; pp. 335–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Codeluppi, G.; Cilfone, A.; Davoli, L.; Ferrari, G. AI at the Edge: A Smart Gateway for Greenhouse Air Temperature Fore-casting. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Workshop on Metrology for Agriculture and Forestry (MetroAgriFor), Trento, Italy, 4–6 November 2020; pp. 348–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Sundari, S.M.; Mathana, J.M.; Nagarajan, T.S. Secured IoT Based Smart Greenhouse System with Image Inspection. In Proceedings of the 2020 6th International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Systems (ICACCS), Coimbatore, India, 6–7 March 2020; pp. 1080–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Kitpo, N.; Kugai, Y.; Inoue, M.; Yokemura, T.; Satomura, S. Internet of Things for Greenhouse Monitoring System Using Deep Learning and Bot Notification Services. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE), Las Vegas, NV, USA, 11–13 January 2019; pp. 4–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Zhang, F.; Cui, J.; Wan, X.; Li, X.; Zheng, T.; Yang, Y. Smart greenhouse management system based on NB-IoT and smartphone. In Proceedings of the 2020 17th International Joint Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering (JCSSE), Bangkok, Thailand, 4–6 November 2020; pp. 36–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Oertel, C.; Matschullat, J.; Zurba, K.; Zimmermann, F.; Erasmi, S. Greenhouse gas emissions from soils—A review. Chemie. Erde. 2016, 76, 327–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  125. Raj, J.S. Automation Using Iot in Greenhouse Environment. J. Inf. Technol. Digit. World 2019, 1, 38–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Bakay, M.S.; Ağbulut, Ü. Electricity production based forecasting of greenhouse gas emissions in Turkey with deep learning, support vector machine and artificial neural network algorithms. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 285, 125324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Zhang, Y.; Yasutake, D.; Hidaka, K.; Kitano, M.; Okayasu, T. CFD analysis for evaluating and optimizing spatial distribution of CO2 concentration in a strawberry greenhouse under different CO2 enrichment methods. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2020, 179, 105811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Tagawa, A.; Ehara, M.; Ito, Y.; Araki, T.; Ozaki, Y.; Shishido, Y. Effects of CO2 enrichment on yield, photosynthetic rate, translocation and distribution of photoassimilates in strawberry ‘Sagahonoka’. Agronomy 2022, 12, 473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Taha, F.M.A.; Osman, A.A.; Awadalkareem, S.D.; Omer, M.S.A.; Saadaldeen, R.S.M. A Design of a Remote Greenhouse Monitoring and Controlling System Based on Internet of Things. In Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Computer, Control, Electrical, and Electronics Engineering (ICCCEEE), Khartoum, Sudan, 12–14 August 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Chamra, A.; Harmanani, H. A Smart Green House Control and Management System Using IoT. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Information Technology-New Generations (ITNG 2020), Las Vegas, NV, USA, 5–8 April 2020; pp. 641–646. [Google Scholar]
  131. Jaiswal, H.; Karmali Radha, P.; Singuluri, R.; Sampson, S.A. IoT and Machine Learning based approach for Fully Automated Greenhouse. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Bombay Section Signature Conference (IBSSC), Mumbai, India, 26–28 July 2019; Volume 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Altikat, S. Prediction of CO2 emission from greenhouse to atmosphere with artificial neural networks and deep learning neural networks. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 18, 3169–3178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Yang, J.; Liu, M.; Lu, J.; Miao, Y.; Hossain, M.A.; Alhamid, M.F. Botanical Internet of Things: Toward Smart Indoor Farming by Connecting People, Plant, Data and Clouds. Mob. Netw. Appl. 2018, 23, 188–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Lamprinos, I.; Charalambides, M. Experimental Assessment of Zigbee as the Communication Technology of a Wireless Sensor Network for Greenhouse Monitoring. Int. J. Adv. Smart Sens. Netw. Syst. 2015, 5, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Marques, G.; Pitarma, R. IAQ evaluation using an IoT CO2 monitoring system for enhanced living environments. Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput. 2018, 746, 1169–1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Shah, J.; Mishra, B. IoT enabled environmental monitoring system for smart cities. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Internet of Things and Applications (IOTA), Pune, India, 22–24 January 2016; pp. 383–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Yuhan, J.; Yiqiong, J.; Ting, L.; Man, Z.; Sha, S.; Minzan, L. An improved method of tomato photosynthetic rate prediction based on WSN in greenhouse. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng. 2016, 9, 146–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Tripathy, P.K.; Tripathy, A.K.; Agarwal, A.; Mohanty, S.P. MyGreen: An IoT- Enabled Smart Greenhouse for Sustainable Agriculture. IEEE Consum. Electron. Mag. 2021, 10, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Dan, L.; Jianmei, S.; Yang, Y.; Jianqiu, X. Precise agricultural greenhouses based on the IoT and fuzzy control. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Intelligent Transportation, Big Data & Smart City (ICITBS), Changsha, China, 17–18 December 2016; pp. 580–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Xiao, G. Intelligent Internet of Things Technology in Agricultural Environment Monitoring. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021, 769, 022042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Mellit, A.; Benghanem, M.; Herrak, O.; Messalaoui, A. Design of a novel remote monitoring system for smart greenhouses using the internet of things and deep convolutional neural networks. Energies 2021, 14, 5045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Boccalatte, A.; Fossa, M.; Sacile, R. Modeling, Design and Construction of a Zero-Energy PV Greenhouse for Applications in Mediterranean Climates. Therm. Sci. Eng. Prog. 2021, 25, 101046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Savvas, D.; Gruda, N. Application of soilless culture technologies in the modern greenhouse industry—A review. Eur. J. Hortic. Sci. 2018, 83, 280–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Shamshiri, R.R.; Bojic, I.; van Henten, E.; Balasundram, S.K.; Dworak, V.; Sultan, M.; Weltzien, C. Model-based evaluation of greenhouse microclimate using IoT-Sensor data fusion for energy efficient crop production. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 263, 121303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Han, W.; Liu, P.; Zhang, J.; Fu, J.; Yu, Y.; Wang, X.; Xu, L.; Cui, N. Intelligent Greenhouse Information Collection and Control System Based on Internet of Things. In New Developments of IT, IoT and ICT Applied to Agriculture; Springer: Singapore, 2021; pp. 191–199. [Google Scholar]
  146. Benyezza, H.; Bouhedda, M.; Rebouh, S. Zoning irrigation smart system based on fuzzy control technology and IoT for water and energy saving. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 302, 127001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Benyezza, H.; Bouhedda, M.; Faci, N.; Aissani, M.; Rebouh, S. Greenhouse Monitoring and Fuzzy Control System based on WSAN and IoT. In Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Applied Automation and Industrial Diagnostics (ICAAID), Elazig, Turkey, 25–27 September 2019; pp. 25–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Benyezza, H.; Bouhedda, M.; Zerhouni, M.C.; Boudjemaa, M.; Dura, S.A. Fuzzy Greenhouse Temperature and Humidity Control based on Arduino. In Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Applied Smart Systems (ICASS), Medea, Algeria, 24–25 November 2018; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Revathi, S.; Sivakumaran, N. Fuzzy based temperature control of greenhouse. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2016, 49, 549–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Yu, X.; Wu, P.; Han, W.; Zhang, Z. A survey on wireless sensor network infrastructure for agriculture. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 2013, 35, 59–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Xu, Z.; Yin, J.; Li, X. A Reliable Wireless Monitor and Control System with Low Power for Greenhouse Microclimate. In New Developments of IT, IoT and ICT Applied to Agriculture; Springer: Singapore, 2021; pp. 209–216. [Google Scholar]
  152. Li, Z.; Wang, N.; Hong, T.; Wen, T.; Liu, Z. Design of wireless sensor network system based on in-field soil water content monitoring. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2010, 26, 212–217. [Google Scholar]
  153. Pawlowski, A.; Sánchez-Molina, J.A.; Guzmán, J.L.; Rodríguez, F.; Dormido, S. Evaluation of event-based irrigation system control scheme for tomato crops in greenhouses. Agric. Water Manag. 2017, 183, 16–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Gutiérrez, J.; Villa-Medina, J.F.; Nieto-Garibay, A.; Porta-Gándara, M.Á. An automated irrigation system using a wireless sensor network and GPRS module. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2014, 63, 166–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Achour, Y.; Ouammi, A.; Zejli, D.; Sayadi, S. Supervisory model predictive control for optimal operation of a greenhouse indoor environment coping with food-energy-water Nexus. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 211562–211575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Singh, R.K.; Berkvens, R.; Weyn, M. Energy Efficient Wireless Communication for IoT Enabled Greenhouses. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on COMmunication Systems & NETworkS (COMSNETS), Bengaluru, India, 7–11 January 2020; pp. 885–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Bounnady, K.; Sibounnavong, P.; Chanthavong, K.; Saypadith, S. Smart crop cultivation monitoring system by using IoT. In Proceedings of the 2019 5th International Conference on Engineering, Applied Sciences and Technology (ICEAST), Luang Prabang, Laos, 2–5 July 2019; pp. 2019–2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Li, X.; Ma, Z.; Zheng, J.; Liu, Y.; Zhu, L.; Zhou, N. An effective edge-assisted data collection approach for critical events in the SDWSN-based agricultural internet of things. Electronics 2020, 9, 907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Nawandar, N.K.; Satpute, V.R. IoT based low cost and intelligent module for smart irrigation system. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2019, 162, 979–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Almetwally, S.A.H.; Hassan, M.K.; Mourad, M.H. Real Time Internet of Things (IoT) Based Water Quality Management System. Procedia CIRP 2020, 91, 478–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Cordovil, C.M.D.S.; Marinheiro, J.; Serra, J.; Cruz, S.; Palmer, E.; Hicks, K.; Erisman, J.W. Chapter 22-Climate-resilient and smart agricultural management tools to cope with climate change-induced soil quality decline. In Climate Change and Soil Interactions; Prasad, M.N.V., Pietrzykowski, M., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 613–662. [Google Scholar]
  162. Liu, X.; Ansari, N. Toward green IoT: Energy solutions and key challenges. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2019, 57, 104–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Ruan, J.; Wang, Y.; Chan, F.T.S.; Hu, X.; Zhao, M.; Zhu, F.; Lin, F. A life cycle framework of green IoT-based agriculture and its finance, operation, and management issues. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2019, 57, 90–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Goswami, V.; Jadav, P.; Soni, S.K. Review on How IIoT Has Revolutionized Greenhouse, Manufacturing and Medical Indus-tries. In Recent Advances in Mechanical Infrastructure; Springer: Singapore, 2022; pp. 179–192. [Google Scholar]
  165. Khorasani, M.; Loy, J.; Ghasemi, A.H.; Sharabian, E.; Leary, M.; Mirafzal, H.; Gibson, I. A review of Industry 4.0 and additive manufacturing synergy. Rapid Prototyp. J. 2022; ahead-of-print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Jamil, F.; Ibrahim, M.; Ullah, I.; Kim, S.; Kahng, H.K.; Kim, D.H. Optimal smart contract for autonomous greenhouse envi-ronment based on IoT blockchain network in agriculture. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2022, 192, 106573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Soussi, M.; Chaibi, M.T.; Buchholz, M.; Saghrouni, Z. Comprehensive Review on Climate Control and Cooling Systems in Greenhouses under Hot and Arid Conditions. Agronomy 2022, 12, 626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Dini, G.; Princi, E.; Gamberini, S.; Gamberini, L. Nemo’s Garden: Growing plants underwater. In Proceedings of the OCEANS 2016 MTS/IEEE Monterey, Monterey, CA, USA, 19–23 September 2016; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2016; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  169. Paul, A.L.; Bamsey, M.; Berinstain, A.; Braham, S.; Neron, P.; Murdoch, T.; Ferl, R.J. Deployment of a prototype plant GFP imager at the Arthur Clarke Mars Greenhouse of the Haughton Mars Project. Sensors 2008, 8, 2762–2773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Terence, S.; Purushothaman, G. Systematic review of Internet of Things in smart farming. Trans. Emerg. Telecommun. Technol. 2020, 31, 1–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Verdouw, C.; Tekinerdogan, B.; Beulens, A.; Wolfert, S. Digital twins in smart farming. Agric. Syst. 2021, 189, 103046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Hemming, S.; Zwart, F.D.; Elings, A.; Petropoulou, A.; Righini, I. Cherry tomato production in intelligent greenhouses—Sensors and AI for control of climate, irrigation, crop yield, and quality. Sensors 2020, 20, 6430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Chaux, J.D.; Sanchez-Londono, D.; Barbieri, G. A Digital Twin Architecture to Optimize Productivity within Controlled Environment Agriculture. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 8875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Ali, M.H.; Issayev, G.; Shehab, E.; Sarfraz, S. A critical review of 3D printing and digital manufacturing in construction engineering. Rapid Prototyp. J. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. IOT General architecture for greenhouse applications.
Figure 1. IOT General architecture for greenhouse applications.
Energies 15 03834 g001
Figure 2. Temperature domain divided into three fuzzy sets. The dash lines help to take information about the µ value in the three fuzzy sets at a specific temperature.
Figure 2. Temperature domain divided into three fuzzy sets. The dash lines help to take information about the µ value in the three fuzzy sets at a specific temperature.
Energies 15 03834 g002
Figure 3. Mathematical model of ANN.
Figure 3. Mathematical model of ANN.
Energies 15 03834 g003
Figure 4. MPC schema.
Figure 4. MPC schema.
Energies 15 03834 g004
Figure 5. PID controller design.
Figure 5. PID controller design.
Energies 15 03834 g005
Table 1. Comparison between the technologies used for connectivity in the agricultural system.
Table 1. Comparison between the technologies used for connectivity in the agricultural system.
ParametersData RateFrequency BandTransmission RangeEnergy
Consumption
Bluetooth1–24 Mb/s24 GHz8–10 mVery low
LoRa0.3–50 kb/s868/900 MHz<30 kmVery low
RFID40 to 160 kb/s860–960 MHz1–5 mLow
ZigBee20–250 kb/s2.4 GHz10–20 mLow
Mobile200 kb/s (3G)
0.1–1 Gb/s (4G)
865 MHz, 2.4 GHzEntire Cellular AreaLow
Wi-Fi1 Mb/s–7 Gb/s5 GHz–60 GHz20–100 mHigh
Table 2. Variables of the IoT-based agriculture monitoring and control system for the different references.
Table 2. Variables of the IoT-based agriculture monitoring and control system for the different references.
Variables References
Monitored/controlled in a real context [48,70,83,84,86,87,88,91,102,103,104,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,125,126,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142,144,146,147,148,149,152,153,154,156,157,158]
Temperatureair[48,59,62,64,65,67,70,84,86,87,88,91,93,102,104,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,115,116,117,118,120,121,122,123,125,129,130,131,133,134,136,137,138,139,140,142,144,145,147,148,149,157,158]
soil and water[90,103,114,119,124,140,145,146,154]
leaf[109]
roof[103]
Humidityair[59,64,65,70,84,86,87,88,90,91,102,103,104,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,118,119,120,122,123,125,129,130,131,133,134,136,137,138,139,140,141,144,148,149,153,157,158]
soil[130,140,145,146,153]
crop[48,121,124,131]
CO2 [49,51,52,53,54,88,103,117,124,125,126,127,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,158]
Soil and crop quality [31,50,86,87,88,103,110,112,114,115,116,124,134,140,143,150,152,153,154,157,161]
Others (PH, light intensity, etc.) [48,84,86,87,88,89,103,104,108,109,110,114,115,117,118,119,120,122,125,129,130,131,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142,147,158,170]
Table 3. Control and connectivity techniques used to optimize monitoring and control in the smart greenhouse.
Table 3. Control and connectivity techniques used to optimize monitoring and control in the smart greenhouse.
Control and Simulation TechniquesReferences
MPC[87,89,91,93,102,104,105,155]
Fuzzy Logic[63,64,65,91,93,102,106,110,111,137,139,144,145,146,147,148,149]
ANN[32,34,68,81,92,103,110,120,122,126,132,137,141,159]
PID[110]
Digital twin[2,24,25,171,172,173]
Connectivity technique
ZigBee[62,88,115,118,124,125,130,148,150,152]
RFID[68,70,74,83,133]
WSN[75,86,114,123,124,130,135,142,148,152,158]
Others[48,53,54,55,56,58,59,60,63,64,65,66,71,82,84,87,88,90,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,116,117,119,120,121,122,125,129,131,134,136,137,138,143,149,151,153,154,156,157,170]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bersani, C.; Ruggiero, C.; Sacile, R.; Soussi, A.; Zero, E. Internet of Things Approaches for Monitoring and Control of Smart Greenhouses in Industry 4.0. Energies 2022, 15, 3834. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/en15103834

AMA Style

Bersani C, Ruggiero C, Sacile R, Soussi A, Zero E. Internet of Things Approaches for Monitoring and Control of Smart Greenhouses in Industry 4.0. Energies. 2022; 15(10):3834. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/en15103834

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bersani, Chiara, Carmelina Ruggiero, Roberto Sacile, Abdellatif Soussi, and Enrico Zero. 2022. "Internet of Things Approaches for Monitoring and Control of Smart Greenhouses in Industry 4.0" Energies 15, no. 10: 3834. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/en15103834

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop