Evaluation of Mechanical Properties of a Hollow Endodontic Post by Three Point Test and SEM Analysis: A Pilot Study
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Plotino, G.; Grande, N.M.; Bedini, R.; Pameijer, C.H.; Somma, F. Flexural properties of endodontic posts and human root dentin. Dent. Mater. 2007, 23, 1129–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tang, W.; Wu, Y.; Smales, R.J. Identifying and Reducing Risks for Potential Fractures in Endodontically Treated Teeth. J. Endod. 2010, 36, 609–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Giudice, G.L.; Matarese, G.; Lizio, A.; Giudice, R.L.; Tumedei, M.; Zizzari, V.L.; Tetè, S. Invasive cervical resorption: A case series with 3-year follow-up. Int. J. Periodontics Restor. Dent. 2016, 36, 102–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sorrentino, R.; Salameh, Z.; Zarone, F.; Tay, F.R.; Ferrari, M. Effect of post-retained composite restorations and amount of coronal residual structure on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated teeth. Am. J. Dent. 2007, 20, 269–274. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Naumann, M.; Schmitter, M.; Krastl, G. Postendodontic restoration: Endodontic post-and-core or no post at all. J. Adhes Dent. 2018, 20, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Naumann, M.; Koelpin, M.; Beuer, F.; Meyer-Lueckel, H. 10-year survival evaluation for glass-fiber-supported postendodontic restoration: A prospective observational clinical study. J. Endod. 2012, 38, 432–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferrari, M.; Mannocci, F.; Vichi, A.; Cagidiaco, M.C.; Mjör, I.A. Bonding to root canal: Structural characteristics of the substrate. Am. J. Dent. 2000, 13, 255–260. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Lo Giudice, R.; Pantaleo, G.; Lizio, A.; Romeo, U.; Castiello, G.; Spagnuolo, G.; Lo Giudice, G. Clinical and spectrophotometric evaluation of, LED and laser activated teeth bleaching. Open Dent. J. 2010, 10, 242–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lo Giudice, G.; Lizio, A.; Giudice, R.L.; Centofanti, A.; Rizzo, G.; Runci, M.; Alibrandi, A.; Cicciù, M. The effect of different cleaning protocols on post space: A SEM study. Int. J. Dent. 2016, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goracci, C.; Sadek, F.T.; Fabianelli, A.; Tay, F.R.; Ferrari, M. Evaluation of the adhesion of fiber posts to intraradicular dentine. Oper. Dent. 2005, 30, 627–635. [Google Scholar]
- Perez, B.E.; Barbosa, S.H.; Melo, R.M.; Zamboni, S.C.; Ozcan, M.; Valandro, L.F. Does the thickness of the resin cement affect the bond strength of a fiber post to the root dentin? Int. J. Prosthodont. 2006, 19, 606–609. [Google Scholar]
- Mohammadi, Z.; Giardino, L.; Palazzi, F.; Shalavi, S.; Alikhani, M.Y.; Giudice, G.L.; Davoodpour, N. Effect of sodium hypochlorite on the substantivity of chlorhexidine. Int. J. Clin. Dent. 2013, 6, 173–178. [Google Scholar]
- Bru, E.; Forner, L.; Llena, C.; Almenar, A. Fibre post behaviour prediction factors. A review of the literature. J. Clin. Exp. Dent. 2013, 5, e150–e153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- D’Arcangelo, C.; Cinelli, M.; De Angelis, F.; D’Amario, M. The effect of resin cement film thickness on the pullout strength of a fiber-reinforced post system. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2007, 98, 193–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grande, N.M.; Butti, A.; Plotino, G.; Somma, F. Adapting fiber-reinforced composite root canal posts for use in noncircular-shaped canals. Pr. Proced. Aesthet. Dent. 2006, 18, 593–599. [Google Scholar]
- Caputo, A.A.; Standlee, J.P.; Collard, E.W.; Pallak, M.H. Analysis of stress distribution by endodontic post. Oral. Surg. 1972, 33, 952. [Google Scholar]
- Pedullà, E.; Lizio, A.; Scibilia, M.; Grande, N.M.; Plotino, G.; Boninelli, S.; Rapisarda, E.; Lo Giudice, G. Cyclic fatigue resistance of two nickel–titanium rotary instruments in interrupted rotation. Int. Endod. J. 2017, 50, 194–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mannocci, F.; Sherriff, M.; Watson, T.F. Three-point bending test of fiber posts. J. Endod. 2001, 27, 758–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rengo, C.; Spagnuolo, G.; Ametrano, G.; Juloski, J.; Rengo, S.; Ferrari, M. Micro-computerized tomographic analysis of premolars restored with oval and circular posts. Clin. Oral. Investig. 2014, 18, 571–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grandini, S.; Goracci, C.; Monticelli, F.; Tay, F.R.; Ferrari, M. Fatigue resistance and structural characteristics of fiber posts: Three-point bending test and SEM evaluation. Dent. Mater. 2005, 21, 75–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Calapaj, M.; Cicciù, M.; Nicita, F.; Alibrandi, A.; Giudice, G.L. Survival of hollow metal post-retained restorations:A long term clinical follow-up. J. Osseointegration 2017, 9, 263–268. [Google Scholar]
- Chieruzzi, M.; Rallini, M.; Pagano, S.; Eramo, S.; D’Errico, P.; Torre, L.; Kenny, J.M. Mechanical effect of static loading on endodontically treated teeth restored with fiber-reinforced posts. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomater. 2014, 102, 384–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chieruzzi, M.; Pagano, S.; Pennacchi, M.; Lombardo, G.; D’Errico, P.; Kenny, J.M. Compressive and flexural behaviour of fibre reinforced endodontic posts. J. Dent. 2012, 40, 968–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Stewardson, D.A.; Shortall, A.C.; Marquis, P.M.; Lumley, P.J. The flexural properties of endodontic post materials. Dent. Mater. 2010, 26, 730–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lo Giudice, G.; Cicciù, M.; Cervino, G.; Lizio, A.; Visco, A. Flowable resin and marginal gap on tooth third medial cavity involving enamel and radicular cementum: A SEM evaluation of two restoration techniques. Indian J. Dent. Res. 2012, 23, 763–769. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Dallari, A.; Rovatti, L. I perni endocanalari; Edizioni Martina: Bologna, Italy, 1996; pp. 65–72. [Google Scholar]
- Dallari, A.; Rovatti, L. Six years of in vitro/in vivo experience with Composipost. Compendium 1996, 17, 557–562. [Google Scholar]
- Kinney, J.H.; Marshall, S.J.; Marshall, G.W. The mechanical properties of human dentin: A critical review and re-evaluation of the dental literature. Crit. Rev. Oral. Biol. Med. 2003, 14, 13–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, S.N.; Du, Q.; Han, L.; Liu, P.; Li, T.; Zhang, L.L. Fiber post versus metal screw post for repair of residual crowns and roots: A systematic review. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue 2014, 23, 237–242. [Google Scholar]
- Figueiredo, F.; Martins, P.; Faria-e-Silva, A.L. Do metal post-retained restorations result in more root fractures than fiber post-retained restorations? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Endod. 2015, 41, 309–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarkis-Onofre, R.; Jacinto, R.D.C.; Boscato, N.; Cenci, M.S.; Pereira-Cenci, T. Cast metal vs. glass fibre posts: A randomized controlled trial with up to 3 years of follow up. J. Dent. 2014, 42, 582–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spagnuolo, G.; Ametrano, G.; D’Antò, V.; Formisano, A.; Simeone, M.; Riccitiello, F.; Amato, M.; Rengo, S. Microcomputed tomography analysis of mesiobuccal orifices and major apical foramen in first maxillary molars. Open Dent. J. 2012, 6, 118–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sahafi, A.; Peutzfeldt, A.; Asmussen, E.; Gotfredsen, K. Retention and failure morphology of prefabricated posts. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2004, 17, 307–312. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Stefanovska, M.; Risteska, S.; Samakoski, B.; Maneski, G.; Kostadinoska, B. Theoretical and experimental bending properties of composite pipes. Int. Sch. Sci. Res. Innov. 2015, 9, 706–710. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, J.-H.; Luo, W.-S. Flexural properties and fracture behavior of nanoporous alumina film by three-point bending test. Micromachines 2017, 8, 206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhao, S.; Teng, J.; Wang, Z.; Sun, X.; Yang, B. Investigation on the mechanical properties of SMA/GF/Epoxy hybrid composite laminates: Flexural, impact, and interfacial shear performance. Material 2018, 11, 246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Groups | Fracture Load (N) | Flexural Strength (MPa) | Maximum Deflection (mm) | Young’s Modulus (GPa) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Group 0 | 38.17 ± 1.7 | 908.87 ± 30.98 | 0.57 ± 0.03 | 40.33 ± 1.9 |
Group 1 | 57.09 ± 5.06 | 1323.53 ± 110.09 | 0.77 ± 0.07 | 42.87 ± 0.86 |
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Lo Giudice, G.; Ferrari Cagidiaco, E.; Lo Giudice, R.; Puleio, F.; Nicita, F.; Calapaj, M. Evaluation of Mechanical Properties of a Hollow Endodontic Post by Three Point Test and SEM Analysis: A Pilot Study. Materials 2019, 12, 1983. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ma12121983
Lo Giudice G, Ferrari Cagidiaco E, Lo Giudice R, Puleio F, Nicita F, Calapaj M. Evaluation of Mechanical Properties of a Hollow Endodontic Post by Three Point Test and SEM Analysis: A Pilot Study. Materials. 2019; 12(12):1983. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ma12121983
Chicago/Turabian StyleLo Giudice, Giuseppe, Edoardo Ferrari Cagidiaco, Roberto Lo Giudice, Francesco Puleio, Fabiana Nicita, and Massimo Calapaj. 2019. "Evaluation of Mechanical Properties of a Hollow Endodontic Post by Three Point Test and SEM Analysis: A Pilot Study" Materials 12, no. 12: 1983. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ma12121983