Next Article in Journal
Corrosion Behavior of the CoNiCrAlY-Al2O3 Composite Coating Based on Core-Shell Structured Powder Design
Next Article in Special Issue
The Electrical Conductivity of Molten Oxide-Fluoride Cryolite Mixtures
Previous Article in Journal
Research on Curing Water Demand of Cementing Material System Based on Hydration Characteristics
Previous Article in Special Issue
Physico-Chemical Properties of NaV3O8 Prepared by Solid-State Reaction
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 14
Issue 22
10.3390/ma14227099
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Impact of Li3BO3 Addition on Solid Electrode-Solid Electrolyte Interface in All-Solid-State Batteries

by
Evgeniya Il’ina
*,
Svetlana Pershina
,
Boris Antonov
and
Alexander Pankratov
Institute of High Temperature Electrochemistry, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, 20 Akademicheskaya St., 620990 Ekaterinburg, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2021, 14(22), 7099; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ma14227099
Submission received: 14 October 2021 / Revised: 10 November 2021 / Accepted: 17 November 2021 / Published: 22 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Electrochemical Energy Materials)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
All-solid-state lithium-ion batteries raise the issue of high resistance at the interface between solid electrolyte and electrode materials that needs to be addressed. The article investigates the effect of a low-melting Li3BO3 additive introduced into LiCoO2- and Li4Ti5O12-based composite electrodes on the interface resistance with a Li7La3Zr2O12 solid electrolyte. According to DSC analysis, interaction in the studied mixtures with Li3BO3 begins at 768 and 725 °C for LiCoO2 and Li4Ti5O12, respectively. The resistance of half-cells with different contents of Li3BO3 additive after heating at 700 and 720 °C was studied by impedance spectroscopy in the temperature range of 25–340 °C. It was established that the introduction of 5 wt% Li3BO3 into LiCoO2 and heat treatment at 720 °C led to the greatest decrease in the interface resistance from 260 to 40 Ω cm2 at 300 °C in comparison with pure LiCoO2. An SEM study demonstrated that the addition of the low-melting component to electrode mass gave better contact with ceramics. It was shown that an increase in the annealing temperature of unmodified cells with Li4Ti5O12 led to a decrease in the interface resistance. It was found that the interface resistance between composite anodes and solid electrolyte had lower values compared to Li4Ti5O12|Li7La3Zr2O12 half-cells. It was established that the resistance of cells with the Li4Ti5O12/Li3BO3 composite anode annealed at 720 °C decreased from 97.2 (x = 0) to 7.0 kΩ cm2 (x = 5 wt% Li3BO3) at 150 °C.

1. Introduction

All-solid-state batteries attract considerable scientific attention because such batteries have a number of advantages over commercially produced lithium-ion batteries, including increased safety, a wider operating temperature range, increased resistance to an aggressive atmosphere and high pressures, greater stability in the case of battery depressurization, and long lifetime [1,2,3,4]. According to the literature data [5,6,7,8,9], Li7La3Zr2O12-based solid electrolytes are attractive lithium-ion conductors for all-solid-state lithium and lithium-ion power sources. Li7La3Zr2O12 (LLZ) solid electrolyte has two structural modifications—tetragonal (I41/acd) and cubic (Ia-3d). The cubic modification is of greatest interest as a solid electrolyte for power sources, since its lithium-ion conductivity at room temperature (10−3–10−4 S cm−1) is 2–3 orders of magnitude higher compared to the tetragonal one [9,10]. However, the introduction of a dopant (for example, Al, Ga, Y, Nb, Ta, etc.) is required for stabilization of the highly conductive cubic LLZ [9]. Nevertheless, the high resistance at the solid electrode–solid electrolyte interface is one of the critical issues that should be addressed for mass production of all-solid-state power sources [3,4,9,11,12,13].
The research into the cathode–solid electrolyte interface optimization is still in its early exploratory stage. In some studies, the use of buffer layers, for example, Li3PO4 [14,15], LiPO3 [16], Li2SiO3 [17], Li3BO3 [18,19,20], Nb [21], etc. is proposed. Moreover, composite cathodes can also be obtained using additives in the form of ionic liquids [22], polymers [23], gels [24], low-melting lithium-containing additives [18], Li(CF3SO2)2N electrolytic salt [25], and lithium-conducting electrolytes [18,26,27]. Nowadays, LiCoO2 (LCO) compounds are widely used as a cathode material for lithium-ion batteries due to their high electrochemical characteristics and good cyclability [28]. In the work [18], a low-melting Li3BO3 additive (25 wt%), which has a lithium-ion conductivity of 2 × 10−6 S cm−1 at 25 °C, was added to the lithium cobaltite to solve the contact problem between electrode and electrolyte. The cathode material was obtained by the screen-printing method followed by annealing at 700 °C for one hour. K. Park et al. [20] used a mixture of LiCoO2 and Li3BO3 as a cathode with Li6.06Al0.20La3Zr2O12 solid electrolyte, which was preheated at 700 °C. It was noted that such modification of the cathode material led to a tighter contact at the interface between the electrode and the solid electrolyte, and also prevented the chemical interaction between LiCoO2 and Li7La3Zr2O12 with the formation of a low-conductivity La2Zr2O7 phase during heat treatment and cell cycling. In addition, more complex in composition (multicomponent) cathode materials are used in all-solid-state power sources [19,29]. For example, In2(1−x)Sn2xO3, Li3BO3 and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) were introduced into LiCoO2 [20] and Li[Ni0.5Co0.2Mn0.3]O2 [29] cathode materials. A significant decrease in the resistance at the cathode–solid electrolyte interface based on LLZ was observed, which in turn led to a decrease in polarization resistances and, as a consequence, to an improvement in the electrochemical characteristics of the all-solid-state battery in terms of capacity and Coulomb efficiency. It was also noted [19] that an increase in temperature from room values to 80 °C leads to a decrease in the total resistance of the cells studied. It should be noted that the available literature contains no data about the influence of Li3BO3 additive amount and the heat treatment conditions on the resistance at the cathode–solid electrolyte interface.
Lithium titanate Li4Ti5O12 (LTO) is considered to be a promising anode material for lithium-ion batteries due to its high theoretical capacity—175 mA h g−1, low degradation during cycling, and small volume change of the unit cell during intercalation/deintercalation of lithium ions [30]. It can be argued that LTO does not degrade during battery operation, unlike other anode materials (amorphous silicon, carbon/graphite, lithium metal and its alloys) [31,32]. In the work [33], it was shown that thin LTO films deposited on Li6.25Al0.25La3Zr2O12 ceramics using pulsed laser deposition demonstrated stable operation during cycling with capacity values close to the theoretical one. The interface optimization between LTO and Li6.25Al0.25La3Zr2O12 can be achieved through interface engineering: in this case, a stepwise electrolyte–electrode transition is created by introducing the anode into the porous layer of the electrolyte sample [34]. The modified cells had lower resistance values and improved capacitive characteristics compared to traditional electrode deposition (casting). In the work [35], LTO|Li6.25Al0.25La3Zr2O12|Li all-solid-state cells with a capacity of 70–75 A h kg−1 were assembled. It was established that capacity growth and the formation of optimal interface between solid electrolyte and electrode can be realized by isostatic pressing of the cells during their assembly. Yoshima et al. [36] introduced a 2 wt% polyvinylidene fluoride (PVdF) binder and 3 wt% addition of PAN-based monomer into the anode material in order to increase the contact area between the Li7La3Zr2O12 solid electrolyte and LTO. We propose another method of solid electrolyte–electrode interface optimizing by the sintering process of powdered LTO with a low-melting additive.
The choice of Li3BO3 (LBO) as an additive in the composite electrode creation is dictated by the fact that it has the lowest melting point and makes it possible to create dense protective coatings in a composition with more refractory compounds. Li3BO3 is a lithium-ion conductor and its coating can increase the concentration of Li+ in the contact layer with the solid electrolyte [37]. The aim of this work was to study the effect of LBO addition on the interface processes and total resistance of half-cells LCO/LLZ and LTO/LLZ.

2. Materials and Methods

Li2CO3,La2O3,Al(NO3)3 × 9H2O and ZrO(NO3)2 × 2H2O were used as starting components for the sol-gel synthesis of the cubic modification of Li7La3Zr2O12 with 0.15 mol of Al2O3 (c-LLZ). La2O3 was pre-dried at 1000 °C to a constant weight. The reagents were mixed in the stoichiometric ratio, except Li2CO3, which was taken with the excess of 10 wt%, as demonstrated in [9,10]. Lanthanum oxide and lithium carbonate were dissolved in diluted nitric acid. ZrO(NO3)2·2H2O and C6H8O7·H2O were dissolved in a small amount of distilled water. The solutions obtained were mixed and evaporated to a transparent gel at 80 °C. Then, the gel was dried and heated at ~200 °C. The synthesis was performed by increasing the temperature stepwise (700 °C—1 h; 800 °C—1 h; 900 °C—1 h). The samples of solid electrolytes were cold-pressed into pellets at 240 MPa and sintered in air for 1 h at 1150 °C.
Li2CO3, Co(NO3)2 × 6H2O, and C6H8O7 × H2O were used as the starting materials for obtaining the LiCoO2 by sol-gel synthesis as demonstrated in [38]. Lithium carbonate was dissolved in diluted nitric acid. Co(NO3)2 × 6H2O and C6H8O7 × H2O were dissolved in a small amount of distilled water. The solutions obtained were mixed and evaporated to a gel. Then, the gel was dried and heated at ~200 °C. The resulting product was annealed in air at temperatures of 500 and 700 °C for one hour.
Li4Ti5O12 was synthesized by sol-gel synthesis using Li2CO3 (analytical grade) and tetraethoxytitanium (C2H5O)4Ti (pure grade) as demonstrated in [39]. Sol-gel synthesis was carried out with citric acid C6H8O7 (reagent grade) as a complexing agent. The hydrolysis of a preset amount of tetraethoxytitanium at a ratio of Li:Ti = 4:5 was carried out on a magnetic stirrer with heating for three hours in a glassy carbon cup, followed by dissolution of a white precipitate of metatitanic acid with the addition of diluted HNO3 (1:1, extra pure grade). As a result, a transparent solution of titanyl was prepared, to which a solution of Li2CO3 with citric acid was added (the optimal ratio of citric acid R to the total amount of metal ions was 1/2, which was previously determined in [30]). As a result, a clear solution was obtained, which was evaporated to form a gel at 80 °C for twelve hours. Then the gel was heated in air to a temperature of ~200°C and held for five hours. Upon subsequent heating to 500 °C and holding for one hour, all organic compounds were completely decomposed and volatilized. Then the resulting blend was sintered in an Al2O3 crucible at 750 °C for one hour, at 800 °C for five hours in air. After the end of each regime, the mixture was ground in an agate mortar for thirty minutes.
Li3BO3 was obtained via a standard melt quenching method [40,41]. Starting components such as Li2CO3 and H3BO3 were mixed in the stoichiometric ratio and annealed at 1100 °C for thirty minutes in a Pt crucible. Then the melt was quenched between two stainless steel plates.
The thermal behavior of mixtures consisting of c-LLZ, LiCoO2, Li3BO3 or Li4Ti5O12 was investigated using simultaneous thermal analysis (STA). The STA measurements were performed in the Pt pans with a heating rate of 10 °C min−1 in air at an expulsion rate of 20 mL min−1 in the temperature range of 35–800 °C utilizing a thermal analyzer Netzsch STA 449 F1 Jupiter (Netzsch, Selb, Germany). The results obtained were processed by the NETZSCH Proteus software.
LiCoO2- and Li4Ti5O12-based composite electrodes with different Li3BO3 additions (0–15 wt%) were obtained by spraying from isopropanol slurry. The powders of electrode material with glass additive taken in an adjusted ratio were thoroughly mixed with isopropanol (99.9%) on a magnetic stirrer for twenty-four hours. The resulting suspension was sprayed onto heated to 100 °C pellet of preliminarily ground c-LLZ by Ultra airbrush (Harder&Steenbeck, Norderstedt, Germany). The half-cells were dried at 100 °C and then annealed at 700 and 720 °C for thirty minutes.
The phase composition of the synthesized solid electrolytes, electrode powders, and electrode composites, with different LBO content after heat treatment at different temperatures, was investigated by X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD). XRD was performed with a Rigaku D-MAX-2200V diffractometer (Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan) with a vertical goniometer at Cu Kα-radiation and 2θ = 10–60°. The identification of compounds was carried out using a PDF-2 database (2009).
The cross-section of LiCoO2 + Li3BO3|c-LLZ and Li4Ti5O12 + Li3BO3|c-LLZ half-cells was investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) using a TESCAN MIRA 3 LMU (TESCAN, Brno, Czech Republic). SEM images in SE (secondary electrons) and BSE (back-scattered electrons) modes were obtained at a high voltage of 10 kV and beam intensity of 10 mA.
Impedance measurements of GaAg|(100 − x)LiCoO2 + xLi3BO3|c-LLZ|GaAg and GaAg|(100 − x)Li4Ti5O12 + xLi3BO3|c-LLZ|GaAg cells were conducted in the air atmosphere using an immittance meter E7-25 (MNIPI, Minsk, Belarus) in the frequency range of 0.0251000 kHz in a two-probe cell with silver electrodes at temperatures from 25 to 340 °C. The cathode material completely covered the ceramic sample surface on one side, and a gallium-silver paste (GaAg) was used as the electrode on the other side. To check the reproducibility of the results, conductivity measurements were performed on several sets of samples.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Determination of Heat Treatment Conditions for LiCoO2- and Li4Ti5O12-Based Composite Electrodes

The stability of the cubic Li7La3Zr2O12 doped by Al in contact with LiCoO2 was evaluated in our previous work [38]. It was established that no exothermic or endothermic peaks are observed on the DSC curve after heating up to 900 °C. Moreover, the phase composition of the c-LLZ and LiCoO2 mixture does not change after heating at 400, 600 and 800 °C according to the XRD data. So, it was concluded that there is not any interaction between the solid electrolyte and the electrode material. The melting point of Li3BO3 was determined by DSC and the possible interaction of a mixture of c-LLZ, LCO, and Li3BO3 up to 800 °C was estimated.
DSC curves of individual materials (c-LLZ, Li3BO3, Li4Ti5O12) and mixture of powders (c-LLZ + LCO + Li3BO3 (1:1:1), c-LLZ + LTO (1:1), c-LLZ + LTO + Li3BO3 (1:1:1)) are shown in Figure 1. An intense endothermic peak at 706.6 ± 1.5 °C is associated with Li3BO3 melting, which is in good agreement with the literature data [42]. The second endothermic peak at 787 °C is presumably related to the interaction in the c-LLZ + LCO + LBO mixture. So, based on the data obtained, 700 and 720 °C were chosen as the temperatures for sintering electrode materials to the c-LLZ solid electrolyte.

3.2. LiCoO2/Li3BO3 Composite Cathode

LiCoO2 was sprayed onto the c-LLZ surface and then annealed at 100, 700 and 720 °C. According to the XRD data, the heat treatment of half-cells up to 720 °C does not lead to the formation of any impurity phases, Figure 2a. Peaks of lithium cobaltite and c-LLZ are found in the diffraction patterns. The presence of peaks related to cubic modification of LLZ can be explained by X-ray penetration due to the thin layer of the deposited cathode material. Then, (100 − x)LiCoO2 + xLi3BO3 composite cathodes with different contents of low-melting additive (x = 5,10 and 15 wt%) were deposited on the surface of the solid electrolyte and annealed at 700 and 720 °C. According to XRD data, the phase composition of the composite cathode does not depend on the content of lithium borate. Besides the main phases (LCO, LBO and c-LLZ), additional peaks of LiB3O5 were observed in the XRD patterns of half-cells annealed 700 °C. The annealing temperature growth (up to 720 °C) leads to the formation of La2Li0.5Co0.5O4 impurity phase. In the work [43], a thin layer of La2CoO4 (~50 nm) was observed at the LLZ|LiCoO2 in the assembled all-solid-state battery. Moreover, the possibility of this impurity phase formation was established using thermodynamic simulation in our previous work [44]. Since the appearance of this impurity was not identified by the XRD method in the cell with pure LCO, it can be assumed that the low-melting addition of lithium borate promotes this interaction.
It should be noted that LCO powder without lithium borate addition poorly held onto ceramics after drying at 100 °C, while annealing at higher temperature led to a tighter contact between the electrode and the solid electrolyte. These data are confirmed by the results of the half-cells resistance measuring. The temperature dependences for the conductivity of LCO|c-LLZ half-cells annealed at different temperatures are shown in Figure 3. It can be seen that there is an increase in the conductivity of the half-cells after temperature growth from 100 to 700 °C. However, a slight increase in temperature from 700 to 720 °C does not lead to further conductivity growth.
The typical impedance plots of LCO|c-LLZ and LCO/LBO|c-LLZ at 50 and 300 °C are presented in Figure 4. The total resistance of the half-cells was determined from the intersection of the arc and low frequency tail with the real part of the impedance value Z′. At close to room temperatures, the resistance values of the half-cell with lithium cobaltite could not be established due to the high interface resistance, Figure 4a, while the 5 wt% Li3BO3 addition with subsequent heat treatment at 720 °C led to a significant decrease in the interface resistance at the cathode–solid electrolyte even at 50 °C. It can be seen that one semicircle is visible, but it does not come out of zero, Figure 4a. It was found that the resistance value between zero and the point of the semicircle beginning refers to the resistance of the c-LLZ since these values are in good agreement with the values measured separately for the solid electrolyte. Figure 4b also shows an equivalent circuit, according to which the total cell resistance is the sum of the resistance of the electrolyte and the resistance at the interface between the electrode and the solid electrolyte. According to the data obtained, the additive content as well as the heat treatment temperature of the half-cells affect the interface resistance between the solid electrolyte based on the Li7La3Zr2O12 and LCO/LBO composite cathode. The optimal conditions for interface resistance decrease were reached using composite cathode with 5 wt% Li3BO3 addition annealed at 720 °C, Figure 5a. Apparently, the decrease in the sintering temperature for this composite cathode leads to a smaller contact area between cathode particles and ceramic electrolyte. To ensure a tight contact, either a larger glass addition is required (10 wt% LBO, Figure 5a,b) or a longer exposure time of sintering should be applied. Thus, a decrease in the interface resistance from 260 to 40 Ω cm2 at 300 °C is observed when a composite cathode with 5 wt% Li3BO3 is applied, in comparison with pure lithium cobaltite.
SEM images of the cross-section of LCO|c-LLZ and LCO + 5 wt% LBO|c-LLZ half-cells after heating at 720 °C are shown in Figure 6. It can be seen that the cathode material without LBO addition presents clearly visible particles of lithium cobaltite. However, the morphology of the cathode material significantly changes after the addition of low-melting LBO. The cathode has a less loose structure and better contact with the ceramics.

3.3. Li4Ti5O12/Li3BO3 Composite Anode

DSC curves of LTO and c-LLZ mixture with the same weight ratio were investigated to identify the possible products of their interaction, Figure 1. The endothermic peaks at ~250 and ~430 °C can be referred to as the removal of adsorbed water and CO2 from the c-LLZ sample, respectively [45,46]. The endothermic peak at ~588 °C can be referred to the removal of lithium oxide leading to La2Zr2O7 formation on the solid electrolyte powder surface, the reflections of which can be detected in the XRD patterns of the LTO and c-LLZ mixture annealed at temperatures above 600 °C, Figure 7a. The endothermic peak at 760 °C is probably related to chemical interactions between the components. Therefore, the XRD analysis of the mixture studied was additionally carried out after annealing at higher temperatures (800 and 900 °C). Li2TiO3 and La2Zr2O7 impurity phases are detected, Figure 7a.
The addition of Li3BO3 to the mixture studied leads to the appearance of additional endothermic peaks at 716 and 755 °C on the DSC curve, which are related to lithium borate melting and components interaction, respectively. The chemical interaction of the components investigated is confirmed by XRD data. The reflections from Li2TiO3, La2Zr2O7, LaTiO3, and Li3La2(BO3)3 can be observed in the XRD patterns of c-LLZ + LTO + Li3BO3 (1:1:1) mixture annealed at 800 °C, Figure 7b. Based on the data obtained, the temperatures of 700 and 720 °C were chosen for sintering the (100 − x)LTO/xLi3BO3 composite anode to the c-LLZ electrolyte surface.
XRD patterns of the surface of LTO/LBO|c-LLZ half-cells after heat treatment at 700 and 720 °C are shown in Figure 8. Li2TiO3, La2Zr2O7, LaTiO3, and Li3La2(BO3)3 impurity phases in addition to the main phase of Li4Ti5O12 are observed in Figure 8. Their formation is related to isothermal holding of the half-cells at ≥700 °C for 0.5 h, in comparison with the DSC study which was carried out with a constant heating rate without holding. Thus, the lithium borate introduction leads to the appearance of additional phases at high sintering temperatures of LTO with c-LLZ. Similar behavior was observed during the heat treatment of the Li1.5Al0.5Ge1.5(PO4)3 solid electrolyte with a LTO/LBO composite anode [47].
As can be seen from the micrographs, Figure 9, the introduction of LBO leads to an increase in the contact of LTO particles with c-LLZ. The impedance data for the LTO|c-LLZ and LTO/LBO|c-LLZ half-cells were collected across a wide temperature range to estimate the influence of Li3BO3 addition on the interfacial resistance between anode material and solid electrolyte. The impedance plots present a semicircle that does not come to a zero point, and a low frequency tail; from their intersection with the real part of the impedance value, the total resistance of the half-cells was determined. The high resistance values of the studied half-cells are caused by the interface resistance. The increase in the sintering temperature of Li4Ti5O12|c-LLZ half-cells from 100 to 750 °C leads to a decrease in the total resistance by two orders of magnitude, despite impurity phase formation (La2Zr2O7) during heat treatment, Figure 10 and Figure 11a.
Despite the fact that the highest conductivity values in LTO|c-LLZ half-cells were reached at 750 °C, the heat treatment temperature of LTO/LBO composite anode was lower than the interaction temperature in the c-LLZ + LTO + Li3BO3 mixture (725 °C, Figure 1) and was equal to 700 and 720 °C. It was established that the introduction of LBO additive into LTO leads to a decrease in interfacial resistance with solid electrolyte and an increase in specific conductivity of the half-cells studied with a decrease in the activation energy, Figure 11b. The lower resistance values of the cells studied were achieved with the addition of 5 wt% LBO. The total resistance of LTO|c-LLZ cells is equal to 97.2 kΩ cm2 while the resistance of LTO + 5 wt% LBO|c-LLZ was 7.0 kΩ cm2 at 150 °C. The decrease in resistance can be caused by an increase in the interfacial solid-solid contact during the softening of Li3BO3 above the melting point. However, the introduction of 10 wt% LBO into LTO leads to resistance growth with the activation energy increase, which is probably associated with an increase in the impurity content. Thus, the interfacial resistance between c-LLZ and the solid electrode can be reduced by obtaining composite electrodes with Li3BO3 addition.

4. Conclusions

In the presented work, the effect of Li3BO3 addition on the thermal stability, chemical compatibility, and interfacial resistance between cubic Li7La3Zr2O12 and electrode materials (LiCoO2 cathode and Li4Ti5O12 anode) was investigated. The possible interaction of c-LLZ with LCO, LTO and Li3BO3 up to 800 °C was studied by differential scanning calorimetry. It was established that the interaction in the studied mixtures with Li3BO3 begins at 768 and 725 °C for LCO and LTO, respectively. Therefore, 700 and 720 °C were chosen as the sintering temperatures for LiCoO2 + Li3BO3|c-LLZ and Li4Ti5O12 + Li3BO3|c-LLZ half-cells. According to XRD analysis, such heat treatments of LiCoO2-based composite electrodes lead to the formation of LiB3O5 and La2Li0.5Co0.5O4 impurity phases. However, a decrease in the interface resistance was observed in LiCoO2 + Li3BO3|c-LLZ half-cells because of Li3BO3 addition, in comparison with pure lithium cobaltite. According to SEM study and impedance spectroscopy data, optimal contact with the ceramic electrolyte is achieved by using composite cathode with 5 wt% Li3BO3 addition sintered at 720 °C. Impurity phases of Li2TiO3, La2Zr2O7, LaTiO3 and Li3La2(BO3)3 were detected after annealing. However, they do not have a negative effect on the interface resistance of the half-cells studied. According to the data obtained, Li4Ti5O12-based composite anodes with Li3BO3 addition have the lowest interfacial resistance with the solid electrolyte, which is due to an increase in solid–solid contact. Thus, the optimum amount of low-melting additives and the best possible heat treatment conditions for Li3BO3-modified composite electrodes based on Li4Ti5O12 and LiCoO2 leading to the decrease in the interface resistance with cubic Li7La3Zr2O12 were established and can be used in medium-temperature all-solid-state batteries.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.I. and S.P.; methodology, E.I. and S.P.; validation, E.I., S.P., B.A. and A.P.; formal analysis, E.I., S.P., B.A. and A.P.; investigation, E.I. and S.P.; data curation, E.I. and S.P.; writing—original draft preparation, E.I. and S.P.; writing—review and editing, E.I., S.P., B.A. and A.P.; visualization, E.I. and S.P.; supervision, E.I. and S.P.; project administration, E.I.; funding acquisition, E.I. and S.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the Research Program №AAAA-A19-119020190042-7 (IHTE UB RAS), Russian Academy of Sciences, Ural Branch, Russia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The research has been carried out with the equipment of the Shared Access Center “Composition of Compounds” of the Institute of High Temperature Electrochemistry, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Ekaterinburg, Russia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kim, J.G.; Son, B.; Mukherjee, S.; Schuppert, N.; Bates, A.; Kwon, O.; Choi, M.J.; Chung, H.Y.; Park, S. A review of lithium and non-lithium based solid-state batteries. J. Power Sources 2015, 282, 299–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chen, L.; Huang, Y.F.; Ma, J.; Ling, H.; Kang, F.; He, Y.B. Progress and perspective of all-solid-state lithium batteries with high performance at room temperature. Energy Fuels 2020, 34, 13456–13472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Banerjee, A.; Wang, X.; Fang, C.; Wu, E.A.; Meng, Y.S. Interfaces and Interphases in All-Solid-State Batteries with Inorganic Solid Electrolytes. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 6878–6933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Alexander, G.V.; Indu, M.S.; Murugan, R. Review on the critical issues for the realization of all-solid-state lithium metal batteries with garnet electrolyte: Interfacial chemistry, dendrite growth, and critical current densities. Ionics 2021, 27, 4105–4126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kammampata, S.P.; Thangadurai, V. Cruising in ceramics—discovering new structures for all-solid-state batteries—fundamentals, materials, and performances. Ionics 2018, 24, 639–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Liu, Q.; Geng, Z.; Han, C.; Fu, Y.; Li, S.; He, Y.B.; Kang, F.; Li, B. Challenges and perspectives of garnet solid electrolytes for all solid-state lithium batteries. J. Power Sources 2018, 389, 120–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zheng, F.; Kotobuki, M.; Song, S.; Lai, M.O.; Lu, L. Review on solid electrolytes for all-solid-state lithium-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 2018, 389, 198–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Takada, K. Progress in solid electrolytes toward realizing solid-state lithium batteries. J. Power Sources 2018, 394, 74–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ramakumar, S.; Deviannapoorani, C.; Dhivya, L.; Shankar, L.S.; Murugan, R. Lithium garnets: Synthesis, structure, Li+ conductivity, Li+ dynamics and applications. Prog. Mater. Sci 2017, 88, 325–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Murugan, R.; Thangadurai, V.; Weppner, W. Fast lithium ion conduction in garnet-type Li7La3Zr2O12. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 7778–7781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Indu, M.S.; Alexander, G.V.; Sreejith, O.V.; Abraham, S.E.; Murugan, R. Lithium garnet-cathode interfacial chemistry: Inclusive insights and outlook toward practical solid-state lithium metal batteries. Mater. Today Energy 2021, 21, 100804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Xiao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Bo, S.H.; Kim, J.C.; Miara, L.J.; Ceder, G. Understanding interface stability in solid-state batteries. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2020, 5, 105–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Callegari, D.; Colombi, S.; Nitti, A.; Simari, C.; Nicotera, I.; Ferrara, C.; Mustarelli, P.; Pasini, D.; Quartarone, E. Autonomous Self-Healing Strategy for Stable Sodium-Ion Battery: A Case Study of Black Phosphorus Anodes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 13170–13182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Shiraki, S.; Shirasawa, T.; Suzuki, T.; Kawasoko, H.; Shimizu, R.; Hitosug, T. Atomically Well-Ordered Structure at Solid Electrolyte and Electrode Interface Reduces the Interfacial Resistance. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 41732–41737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Pershina, S.V.; Druzhinin, K.V.; Shevelin, P.Y.; Raskovalov, A.A. Cathode half-cell of all-solid-state battery, modified with LiPO3 glass. Russ. J. Appl. Chem 2016, 89, 904–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nishio, K.; Horiba, K.; Nakamura, N.; Kitamura, M.; Kumigashira, H.; Shimizu, R.; Hitosugi, T. Bottom-current-collector-free thin-film batteries using LiNi0.8Co0.2O2 epitaxial thin films. J. Power Sources 2019, 416, 56–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Alexander, G.V.; Rosero-Navarro, N.C.; Miura, A.; Tadanage, K.; Murugan, R. Electrochemical performance of a garnet solid electrolyte based lithium metal battery with interface modification. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 42, 21018–21028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ohta, S.; Komagata, S.; Seki, J.; Saeki, T.; Morishita, S.; Asaoka, T. All-solid-state lithium ion battery using garnet-type oxide and Li3BO3 solid electrolytes fabricated by screen-printing. J. Power Sources 2013, 238, 53–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Liu, T.; Ren, Y.; Shen, Y.; Zhao, S.-X.; Lin, Y.; Nan, C.-W. Achieving high capacity in bulk-type solid-state lithium ion battery based on Li6.75La3Zr1.75Ta0.25O12 electrolyte: Interfacial resistance. J. Power Sources 2016, 324, 349–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Park, K.; Yu, B.-C.; Jung, J.-W.; Li, Y.; Zhou, W.; Gao, H.; Son, S.; Goodenough, J.B. Electrochemical nature of the cathode interface for a solid-state lithium-ion battery: Interface between LiCoO2 and garnet-Li7La3Zr2O12. Chem. Mater. 2016, 28, 8051–8059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kato, T.; Hamanaka, T.; Yamamoto, K.; Hirayama, T.; Sagane, F.; Motoyama, M.; Iriyama, Y. In-situ Li7La3Zr2O12/LiCoO2 interface modification for advanced all-solid-state battery. J. Power Sources 2014, 260, 292–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Hommo, K.; Shoji, M.; Munakata, H.; Kanamura, K. Interfacial formation between LiCoO2 and Li6.25Al0.25La3Zr2O12 using lithium-ion conductive liquids. In Proceedings of the 2nd World Conference on Solid Electrolytes for Advanced Applications: Garnets and Competitors, Shizuoka, Japan, 23–27 September 2019; p. 78. [Google Scholar]
  23. Chen, R.-J.; Zhang, Y.-B.; Liu, T.; Xu, B.; Shen, Y.; Li, L.; Lin, Y.-H.; Nan, C.-W. All-Solid-State Lithium Battery with High Capacity Enabled by a New Way of Composite Cathode Design. Solid State Ion 2017, 310, 44–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Luo, W.; Gong, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Li, Y.; Yao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Fu, K. (Kelvin); Pastel, G.; Lin, C.; Mo, Y.; et al. Reducing Interfacial Resistance between Garnet-Structured Solid-State Electrolyte and Li-Metal Anode by a Germanium Layer. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1606042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zhu, Y.; Gonzalez-Rosillo, J.C.; Balaish, M.; Hood, Z.D.; Kim, K.J.; Rupp, J.L.M. Lithium-Film Ceramics for Solid-State Lithionic Devices. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2021, 6, 313–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sun, C.; Liu, J.; Gong, Y.; Wilkinson, D.P.; Zhang, J. Recent Advances in All-Solid-State Rechargeable Lithium Batteries. Nano Energy 2017, 33, 363–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Chen, K.; Shen, Y.; Jiang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Lin, Y.; Nan, C.-W. High Capacity and Rate Performance of LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2 Composite Cathode for Bulk-Type All-Solid-State Lithium Battery. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 13332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bensalah, N.; Dawood, H. Review on Synthesis, Characterizations, and Electrochemical Properties of Cathode Materials for Lithium Ion Batteries. J. Material. Sci. Eng 2016, 5, 1000258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Liu, T.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Wang, L.; Zhao, S.-X.; Lin, Y.-H.; Shen, Y.; Luo, J.; Li, L.; Nan, C.-W. Enhanced Electrochemical Performance of Bulk Type Oxide Ceramic Lithium Batteries Enabled by Interface Modification. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 4649–4657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hao, Y.; Lai, Q.; Liu, D.; Xu, Z.; Ji, X. Synthesis by Citric Acid Sol–Gel Method and Electrochemical Properties of Li4Ti5O12 Anode Material for Lithium-Ion Battery. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2005, 94, 382–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Huang, S.H.; Wen, Z.Y.; Zhang, J.C.; Gu, Z.H.; Xu, X.H. Li4Ti5O12/Ag Composite as Electrode Materials for Lithium-Ion Battery. Solid State Ion. 2006, 177, 851–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hsiao, K.-C.; Liao, S.-C.; Chen, J.-M. Microstructure Effect on the Electrochemical Property of Li4Ti5O12 as an Anode Material for Lithium-Ion Batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2008, 53, 7242–7247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Pfenninger, R.; Afyon, S.; Garbayo, I.; Struzik, M.; Rupp, J.L.M. Lithium Titanate Anode Thin Films for Li-Ion Solid State Battery Based on Garnets. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1800879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Van den Broek, J.; Afyon, S.; Rupp, J.L.M. Interface-Engineered All-Solid-State Li-Ion Batteries Based on Garnet-Type Fast Li+ Conductors. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1600736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Van den Broek, J.; Rupp, J.L.M.; Afyon, S. Boosting the Electrochemical Performance of Li-Garnet Based All-Solid-State Batteries with Li4Ti5O12 Electrode: Routes to Cheap and Large Scale Ceramic Processing. J. Electroceram 2017, 38, 182–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yoshima, K.; Harada, Y.; Takami, N. Thin Hybrid Electrolyte Based on Garnet-Type Lithium-Ion Conductor Li7La3Zr2O12 for 12 V-Class Bipolar Batteries. J. Power Sources 2016, 302, 283–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhuravlev, V.D.; Nefedova, K.V.; Evschik, E.Y.; Sherstobitova, E.A.; Kolmakov, V.G.; Dobrovolsky, Y.A.; Porotnikova, N.M.; Korchun, A.V.; Shikhovtseva, A.V. Effect of Lithium Borate Coating on the Electrochemical Properties of LiCoO2 Electrode for Lithium-Ion Batteries. Chim. Tech. Acta 2020, 8, 20218101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Il’ina, E.A.; Antonov, B.D.; Vlasov, M.I. Stability Investigations of Composite Solid Electrolytes Based on Li7La3Zr2O12 in Contact with LiCoO2. Solid State Ion. 2020, 356, 115452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Pershina, S.V.; Antonov, B.D.; Farlenkov, A.S. Optimization of Technology for Synthesis of Li4Ti5O12 Anode Materials for Lithium-Ion Batteries. Russ. J. Appl. Chem 2021, 94, 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Raskovalov, A.A.; Pershina, S.V.; Reznitskikh, O.G.; Denisova, T.A.; Nevmyvako, R.D. The Transport Properties of the Composition Glassy LiPO3/Crystalline SiO2 System. Ionics 2015, 21, 695–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kwatek, K.; Slubowska, W.; Ruiz, C.; Sobrados, I.; Sanz, J.; Garbarczyk, J.E.; Nowiński, J.L. The mechanism of enhanced ionic conductivity in Li1.3Al0.3Ti1.7(PO4)3–(0.75Li2O·0.25B2O3) composites. J. Alloy. Compd. 2020, 838, 155623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ferreira, E.B.; Lima, M.L.; Zanotto, E.D. DSC Method for Determining the Liquidus Temperature of Glass-Forming Systems. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2010, 93, 3757–3763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kim, K.H.; Iriyama, Y.; Yamamoto, K.; Kumazaki, S.; Asaka, T.; Tanabe, K.; Fisher, C.A.J.; Hirayama, T.; Murugan, R.; Ogumi, Z. Characterization of the Interface between LiCoO2 and Li7La3Zr2O12 in an All-Solid-State Rechargeable Lithium Battery. J. Power Sources 2011, 196, 764–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Il’ina, E.A.; Raskovalov, A.A. Studying of Superionic Solid Electrolyte Li7La3Zr2O12 Stability by Means of Chemical Thermodynamics for Application in All-Solid-State Batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2020, 330, 135220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Pershina, S.V.; Il’ina, E.A.; Reznitskikh, O.G. Phase Composition, Density, and Ionic Conductivity of the Li7La3Zr2O12-Based Composites with LiPO3 Glass Addition. Inorg. Chem 2017, 56, 9880–9891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Larraz, G.; Orera, A.; Sanjuan, M.L. Cubic phases of garnet-type Li7La3Zr2O12: The role of hydration. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 11419–11428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Pershina, S.V.; Antonov, B.D. Glass-ceramics based on Li1.5Al0.5Ge1.5(PO4)3 for advanced all-solid-state batteries. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2021, 1967, 012014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 14 07099 g001 550
Figure 1. DSC curves of c-LLZ, Li3BO3, Li4Ti5O12 and mixtures of c-LLZ + LCO + Li3BO3, c-LLZ + LTO, c-LLZ + LTO + Li3BO3 powders.
Figure 1. DSC curves of c-LLZ, Li3BO3, Li4Ti5O12 and mixtures of c-LLZ + LCO + Li3BO3, c-LLZ + LTO, c-LLZ + LTO + Li3BO3 powders.
Materials 14 07099 g001
Materials 14 07099 g002 550
Figure 2. XRD patterns of LiCoO2 (a) and LiCoO2 + 5 wt%Li3BO3 composite cathode (b) after sintering onto c-LLZ substrate at different temperatures. *—La2Li0.5Co0.5O4 (PDF#01-083-1842).
Figure 2. XRD patterns of LiCoO2 (a) and LiCoO2 + 5 wt%Li3BO3 composite cathode (b) after sintering onto c-LLZ substrate at different temperatures. *—La2Li0.5Co0.5O4 (PDF#01-083-1842).
Materials 14 07099 g002
Materials 14 07099 g003 550
Figure 3. Arrhenius plots for the total conductivity of LiCoO2|c-LLZ half-cells annealed at different temperatures.
Figure 3. Arrhenius plots for the total conductivity of LiCoO2|c-LLZ half-cells annealed at different temperatures.
Materials 14 07099 g003
Materials 14 07099 g004 550
Figure 4. Impedance plots of LiCoO2|c-LLZ and LiCoO2 + 5 wt% Li3BO3|c-LLZ half-cells at 50 (a) and 300 °C (b).
Figure 4. Impedance plots of LiCoO2|c-LLZ and LiCoO2 + 5 wt% Li3BO3|c-LLZ half-cells at 50 (a) and 300 °C (b).
Materials 14 07099 g004
Materials 14 07099 g005 550
Figure 5. Concentration dependences (a) and Arrhenius plots (b) for the total conductivity of (100 − x)LiCoO2 + xLi3BO3|c-LLZ half-cells.
Figure 5. Concentration dependences (a) and Arrhenius plots (b) for the total conductivity of (100 − x)LiCoO2 + xLi3BO3|c-LLZ half-cells.
Materials 14 07099 g005
Materials 14 07099 g006 550
Figure 6. SEM images of the cross-section of LiCoO2|c-LLZ (a,b) and LiCoO2 + 5 wt% Li3BO3|c-LLZ (c,d) half-cells, after heating at 720 °C.
Figure 6. SEM images of the cross-section of LiCoO2|c-LLZ (a,b) and LiCoO2 + 5 wt% Li3BO3|c-LLZ (c,d) half-cells, after heating at 720 °C.
Materials 14 07099 g006
Materials 14 07099 g007 550
Figure 7. XRD patterns of Li4Ti5O12 + c-LLZ (1:1) mixture annealed at different temperatures (a) and c-LLZ + Li4Ti5O12 + Li3BO3 (1:1:1) annealed at 800 °C (b). *—La2Zr2O7, #—Li2TiO3.
Figure 7. XRD patterns of Li4Ti5O12 + c-LLZ (1:1) mixture annealed at different temperatures (a) and c-LLZ + Li4Ti5O12 + Li3BO3 (1:1:1) annealed at 800 °C (b). *—La2Zr2O7, #—Li2TiO3.
Materials 14 07099 g007
Materials 14 07099 g008 550
Figure 8. XRD patterns of Li4Ti5O12+5 wt%Li3BO3 composite anode after sintering onto c-LLZ substrate at 700 and 720 °C.
Figure 8. XRD patterns of Li4Ti5O12+5 wt%Li3BO3 composite anode after sintering onto c-LLZ substrate at 700 and 720 °C.
Materials 14 07099 g008
Materials 14 07099 g009 550
Figure 9. SEM images of the cross-section of Li4Ti5O12|c-LLZ (a,b) and Li4Ti5O12 + 5 wt% Li3BO3|c-LLZ (c,d), after heating at 720 °C.
Figure 9. SEM images of the cross-section of Li4Ti5O12|c-LLZ (a,b) and Li4Ti5O12 + 5 wt% Li3BO3|c-LLZ (c,d), after heating at 720 °C.
Materials 14 07099 g009
Materials 14 07099 g010 550
Figure 10. Impedance plots of Li4Ti5O12|c-LLZ half-cells after heating at 100 and 700 °C.
Figure 10. Impedance plots of Li4Ti5O12|c-LLZ half-cells after heating at 100 and 700 °C.
Materials 14 07099 g010
Materials 14 07099 g011 550
Figure 11. Arrhenius plots for the total conductivity of half-cells: (a) Li4Ti5O12|c-LLZ after heat treatment at different temperatures (100, 700, 720 and 750 °C); (b) (100 − x)Li4Ti5O12 + xLi3BO3|c-LLZ, annealed at 720 °C.
Figure 11. Arrhenius plots for the total conductivity of half-cells: (a) Li4Ti5O12|c-LLZ after heat treatment at different temperatures (100, 700, 720 and 750 °C); (b) (100 − x)Li4Ti5O12 + xLi3BO3|c-LLZ, annealed at 720 °C.
Materials 14 07099 g011
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Il’ina, E.; Pershina, S.; Antonov, B.; Pankratov, A. Impact of Li3BO3 Addition on Solid Electrode-Solid Electrolyte Interface in All-Solid-State Batteries. Materials 2021, 14, 7099. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ma14227099

AMA Style

Il’ina E, Pershina S, Antonov B, Pankratov A. Impact of Li3BO3 Addition on Solid Electrode-Solid Electrolyte Interface in All-Solid-State Batteries. Materials. 2021; 14(22):7099. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ma14227099

Chicago/Turabian Style

Il’ina, Evgeniya, Svetlana Pershina, Boris Antonov, and Alexander Pankratov. 2021. "Impact of Li3BO3 Addition on Solid Electrode-Solid Electrolyte Interface in All-Solid-State Batteries" Materials 14, no. 22: 7099. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ma14227099

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop