Next Article in Journal
An Overview Regarding Microbial Aspects of Production and Applications of Bacterial Cellulose
Previous Article in Journal
Non-Linear Dynamic Analysis on Hybrid Air Bearing-Rotor System under Ultra-High Speed Condition
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fabrication of Anti-Reflective Surface with Superhydrophobicity/High Oleophobicity and Enhanced Mechanical Durability via Nanosecond Laser Surface Texturing
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Rapid Fabrication of Smooth Micro-Optical Components on Glass by Etching-Assisted Femtosecond Laser Modification

State Key Laboratory of Integrated Optoelectronics, College of Electronic Science and Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 25 November 2021 / Revised: 14 January 2022 / Accepted: 15 January 2022 / Published: 17 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Laser Assisted Processing and Manufacturing)

Abstract

:
Femtosecond laser (fs-laser) is unfavorable in applications for the fabrication of micro-optical devices on hard materials owing to the problems of low fabrication efficiency and high surface roughness. Herein, a hybrid method combining fs-laser scanning, subsequent etching, and annealing was proposed to realize micro-optical devices with low roughness on glass. Compared to traditional laser ablation, the fabrication efficiency in this work was improved by one order of magnitude, and the surface roughness was decreased to 15 nm. Using this method, aspherical convex microlenses and spherical concave microlenses that possess excellent focusing and imaging properties are realized on photosensitive glass. The diameter and height of the microlenses were controlled by adjusting the fabrication parameters. These results indicate that the fs-laser-based hybrid method will open new opportunities for fabricating micro-optical components on hard materials.

1. Introduction

With the miniaturization and integration of modern optical systems, micro-optical components exhibit notable potential applications in virtual and augmented reality [1,2,3], autonomous navigation [4], medical monitoring [5,6], and laser shaping [7,8]. Among these components, microlenses and their arrays have been widely investigated and rapidly developed owing to their easy integration and broad functions [9,10,11,12,13]. A large number of technologies have been proposed to fabricate microlenses, such as photolithography [14], electron beam lithography [15], nanoimprint [16], and etching and fs-laser direct writing (FsLDW) [17,18]. For example, Yu et al. used electrohydrodynamic jet printing to fabricate a layered microlens array on a polydimethylsiloxane film and then used a microfluidic chip to deform the microlens array film to create an artificial compound eye with a variable field of view, ranging from 0° to 160° [19]. Jeong et al. reported a new microfabrication method for a multifocus microlens array using multilayer lithography and thermal reflow to extend the depth of field [20]. To date, most of these methods cannot fabricate microlenses with designable and complex profiles. Various FsLDW-based technologies exhibit a stupendous capacity to process arbitrary complex three-dimensional (3D) micro/nanostructures, including femtosecond laser multiphoton polymerization, femtosecond laser ablation, etching-assisted femtosecond laser modification, etc., have already been used to fabricate polymer micro-optical components with good profiles [21,22,23,24,25]. To enhance the stability and broaden the optical transmission region, it is necessary to fabricate micro-optical components on hard materials. When fs-laser ablation is used to process hard materials, laser-induced micro/nanostructures and scattered particles are formed on the surface, which has a serious impact on the performance of the micro-optical components [26,27,28,29]. Although laser polishing has been proposed to improve the surface quality [30,31], it does not satisfy the high requirement for applications in optical devices.
Recently, etching-assisted fs-laser modification has been proposed to fabricate micro-optical components on hard materials with high smoothness [32,33,34]. For example, Chen et al. successfully fabricated microlens arrays (surface roughness of 56 nm) on silica glass by wet etching-assisted fs-laser modification [35]. However, this method can only fabricate concave microlenses with spherical profiles.
In this study, a hybrid method combined with femtosecond laser scanning, subsequent etching, and thermal annealing was proposed to fabricate smooth micro-optical components on glass. Compared with direct laser ablation, the fabrication efficiency and surface quality of the micro-optical components can be significantly improved by the hybrid methods. To demonstrate its potential, we fabricated and characterized various convex and concave microlens with good 3D morphology and high surface smoothness.

2. Materials and Methods

As a proof-of-concept, we fabricated a convex microlens on a commercial photosensitive glass (Foturan, Schott, Mainz, Germany). A schematic of the hybrid fabrication method is presented in Figure 1a. First, a modified region was formed by a focused second harmonic fs-laser beam (515 nm), which was generated by a Pharos fs-laser (Light Conversion). The repetition frequency of the pulsed laser was 200 k; the energy of a single pulse was 20 nJ; the pulse width was 260 fs; the laser was focused by an objective lens (50×, NA = 0.7), and the effective fluence of a single pulse was approximately 70.1 mJ/cm2. The scanning was done line by line in a circularly trajectory by moving of a 3D platform. After laser irradiation, the photosensitive glass was processed with the first annealing to crystallize the lithium metasilicate by a tube furnace [36]. The temperature control process of this annealing can be roughly divided into two stages, firstly to 500 °C at a rate of 5 °C min−1 and maintained for one hour and secondly to 605 °C at a rate of 3 °C min−1 and maintained for one hour. The crystallized region can be facially etched using a hydrofluoric acid (HF) solution with a concentration of 10% in 5 min. Here, a profile scanning strategy was adopted to improve the fabrication efficiency. As shown in Figure 1a, although the redundant materials were not irradiated, they could be removed as a whole block. When the exposure point spacing was 200 nm, assuming a spherical microlens with a radius of 40 μm and depth of 30 μm, the number of laser-irradiated points by scanning of the whole structure (7.7 million) was one order of magnitude larger than that fabricated by the profile scanning method (0.38 million). After the first annealing and wet etching, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image showed the microlens with poor surface quality (Figure 1b). To improve the surface quality, a second annealing process was performed through heating for 1 h with temperature of 645 °C. Figure 1c shows the SEM image of the fabricated microlens after the second annealing. Compared with the microlens in Figure 1b, the roughness was reduced from 81 nm before annealing to 15 nm after annealing, and the surface quality was significantly improved.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 2a shows a schematic diagram of the evolution of the microlens morphology during the manufacturing process. Despite the energy of the laser beam being Gaussian, the lines scanned by the laser have a certain width. Moreover, the width of the line is related to the processing parameters of the laser, including laser energy and scanning point spacing, single-point exposure time, and so on. In the first annealing process, there was no material removal, and the scope of the modified area did not change, except that crystal precipitation occurred in the modified area. During the corrosion removal process, the locations where crystallization occurred in the modified area were removed. Therefore, in this experiment, the overall size of the structure after corrosion was reduced relative to the size of the laser-modified structure, and the amount of reduction depended on the width of the laser-modified line. In the second annealing process, owing to the higher temperature, the glass softened to a certain extent, and the structure tended to be smooth owing to the effect of surface tension. The height of the structure decreased, and the lateral size of the structure increased (as shown in Figure 2b). Moreover, the surface morphology of the structure fluctuated significantly. We used laser scanning confocal microscopy (LSCM, LECT OLS4100, Olympus, Japan) to measure the three-dimensional (3D) surface profile. After annealing, the surface profile of the cross section of the structure was notably improved, as was the smoothness. It can also be seen from the optical photographs in Figure 2c,d that the surface quality of the structure before and after the secondary annealing changed significantly, and the surface smoothness was significantly improved.
To illustrate the evolution of the morphology of the prepared microlenses with the process, we tested the variation in the height and diameter of the microlenses before and after annealing and the difference with the design parameters. Figure 3a shows that the diameter of the microlens before secondary annealing remained almost the same as the designed value with the designed microlens diameter unchanged. After the secondary annealing, the diameter of the microlens increased with an increase in the designed height. Figure 3b shows the variation in the microlens height. Before secondary annealing, the height of the microlens increased compared to the designed height in all cases. This is because the refractive index mismatch within the dielectric material caused the laser focus to stretch in the propagation direction, and the stretch length varied at different depths from the surface. This resulted in a difference between the height of the structure after laser processing and the designed value. After secondary annealing, the height of the microlens decreased, thus reducing the difference with the designed height. During the annealing process, the surface tension tended to smooth the structure, and the total amount of material did not change before and after annealing, and the reduction in height and the increase in diameter maintained the total amount of material in balance. In conclusion, the above study shows that the diameter and height of the final formed microlens can be controlled by the initial compensation design.
Using this method, we designed and successfully fabricated a convex microlens with a diameter of 40 μm and a height of 10 μm. The microlens exhibited good surface morphology and smoothness after wet etching and secondary annealing, as shown in the SEM image and the three-dimensional topography shown in Figure 4a,b, respectively. The black line in Figure 4c shows the cross-sectional profile of this convex microlens, which also demonstrates the excellent surface quality of this convex microlens. According to the principle of geometric optics, with the F-axis as the optical axis of the system, the profile of an axisymmetric aspheric lens in a right-angle coordinate system can be expressed by the following formula:
F ( x ) = cx 2 1 + 1 ( 1 + k ) c 2 x 2
where x is the ordinate value at each point of the system, c is the curvature at the vertex of the microlens, and k is the conic coefficient of the aspheric surface. According to the different values of k, the aspheric surface shape can be divided into different types, including hyperbolic, parabolic, elliptical, and circular. Here, the red line in Figure 4c shows the fitted profile of the convex microlens in Figure 4a, which is consistent with the experimental data. According to the fitting results, the curvature at the vertex of the microlens (c) is approximately 0.1452, and the conic coefficient of the aspheric surface (k) is approximately −2.76. When the value of k is less than −1, the cross-section profile of the prepared convex microlens is hyperbolic. The optical properties of our prepared convex microlens were also tested. As shown in Figure 4d,e and the results, the convex microlens with aspherical morphology can not only focus light well but also has good imaging capability, which has considerable potential applications in microendoscopy [37], laser beam shaping [38], bioinspired compound eyes [39], and spherical aberration compensation [40].
In addition, our proposed method of wet etching-assisted FsLDW can be used to prepare convex microlenses with high surface quality and high surface quality concave microlenses. As shown in the LSCM image in Figure 5a, a concave microlens with high surface smoothness was fabricated on glass. Figure 5b and c show the three-dimensional morphology and cross-sectional profile, respectively. The red line in Figure 5c exhibits the fitted line of the cross-section profile of the concave microlens in Figure 5a. The fitted result indicates that the concave microlens has a spherical profile with a radius of curvature of 220 μm. According to the principle of geometrical optics, the radius of curvature R and focal length f of the spherical microlens satisfy the following equations:
R = h 2 + ( D 2 ) 2 2 h
f = nR   n n
where h and D are the height and diameter of the spherical microlens structure prepared in the experiment, respectively, and n and n′ are the refractive indices of air (n = 1) and the material (n′ = 1.515), respectively. The variables h and D are known to be 20 μm and 180 μm, respectively; the radius of curvature R is 212.5 μm, and f is 412.6 μm, where the radius of curvature R and radius obtained by fitting are in good agreement.

4. Conclusions

For the foturan photosensitive glass material, we successfully fabricated convex and concave microlenses with good surface quality by etching assisted fs-laser modification. Compared with laser scanning of the entire structure, the processing efficiency can be improved by approximately one order of magnitude using a profile scanning method. In addition, the surface morphology (including the diameter and height) of the microlens can be adjusted by changing the parameters of the subsequent wet etching and annealing treatments. This hybrid approach shows immense potential for improving the processing efficiency and controllability of the microlens morphology at the same time. For example, convex microlens with aspherical morphology and concave microlenses with spherical morphology were realized on glass with good focusing and imaging properties. Therefore, this study presents a new way to fabricate micro-optical components with complex morphology and high surface quality on hard materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.-Q.L. and Y.-M.L.; methodology, B.-X.W., X.-Q.L. and Y.X.; formal analysis, B.-X.W., J.-Y.Q. and J.-X.Z.; investigation, B.-X.W., J.-Y.Q., J.-X.Z. and Y.X.; data curation, X.-Q.L. and Y.X.; writing—original draft preparation, B.-X.W. and J.-Y.Q.; writing—review and editing, B.-X.W. and J.-X.Z.; visualization, B.-X.W., J.-Y.Q. and J.-X.Z.; supervision, X.-Q.L. and Y.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC, Grant Nos. 61960206003, 62105117, and 61827826) and the Scientific Research Project of the Education Department of Jilin Province (JJKH20221005KJ).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ersumo, N.T.; Yalcin, C.; Antipa, N.; Pegard, N.; Waller, L.; Lopez, D.; Muller, R. A micromirror array with annular partitioning for high-speed random-access axial focusing. Light Sci. Appl. 2020, 9, 183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Fan, Z.-B.; Qiu, H.-Y.; Zhang, H.-L.; Pang, X.-N.; Zhou, L.-D.; Liu, L.; Ren, H.; Wang, Q.-H.; Dong, J.-W. A broadband achromatic metalens array for integral imaging in the visible. Light Sci. Appl. 2019, 8, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Wang, D.; Liu, C.; Shen, C.; Xing, Y.; Wang, Q.-H. Holographic capture and projection system of real object based on tunable zoom lens. PhotoniX 2020, 1, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Hsu, C.-P.; Li, B.; Solano-Rivas, B.; Gohil, A.R.; Chan, P.H.; Moore, A.D.; Donzella, V. A Review and Perspective on Optical Phased Array for Automotive LiDAR. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quant 2021, 27, 8300416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Qin, Z.; He, S.; Yang, C.; Yung, J.S.-Y.; Chen, C.; Leung, C.K.-S.; Liu, K.; Qu, J.Y. Adaptive optics two-photon microscopy enables near-diffraction-limited and functional retinal imaging in vivo. Light Sci. Appl. 2020, 9, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Poduval, R.K.; Coote, J.M.; Mosse, C.A.; Finlay, M.C.; Desjardins, A.E.; Papakonstantinou, I. Precision-Microfabricated Fiber-Optic Probe for Intravascular Pressure and Temperature Sensing. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quant 2021, 27, 7100412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sakakura, M.; Lei, Y.; Wang, L.; Yu, Y.-H.; Kazansky, P.G. Ultralow-loss geometric phase and polarization shaping by ultrafast laser writing in silica glass. Light Sci. Appl. 2020, 9, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Tian, Z.; Nix, M.; Yam, S.S.H. Laser beam shaping using a single-mode fiber abrupt taper. Opt. Lett. 2009, 34, 229–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Yanny, K.; Antipa, N.; Liberti, W.; Dehaeck, S.; Monakhova, K.; Liu, F.L.; Shen, K.; Ng, R.; Waller, L. Miniscope3D: Optimized single-shot miniature 3D fluorescence microscopy. Light Sci. Appl. 2020, 9, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Liu, X.-Q.; Yu, L.; Chen, Q.-D.; Cao, L.; Bai, B.-F.; Sun, H.-B. Sapphire Concave Microlens Arrays for High-Fluence Pulsed Laser Homogenization. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2019, 31, 1615–1618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fan, Y.; Li, J.; Lu, L.; Sun, J.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Li, Z.; Shen, Q.; Wang, B.; Zhang, R.; et al. Smart computational light microscopes (SCLMs) of Smart Computational Imaging Laboratory (SCILab). PhotoniX 2021, 2, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, X.-Q.; Yu, L.; Yang, S.-N.; Chen, Q.-D.; Wang, L.; Juodkazis, S.; Sun, H.-B. Optical Nanofabrication of Concave Microlens Arrays. Laser Photonics Rev. 2019, 13, 1800272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zou, X.; Zheng, G.; Yuan, Q.; Zang, W.; Chen, R.; Li, T.; Li, L.; Wang, S.; Wang, Z.; Zhu, S. Imaging based on metalenses. PhotoniX 2020, 1, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Liu, H.; Chen, F.; Wang, X.; Yang, Q.; Zhang, D.; Si, J.; Hou, X. Photoetching of spherical microlenses on glasses using a femtosecond laser. Opt. Commun. 2009, 282, 4119–4123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yu, W.X.; Yuan, X.C. Fabrication of refractive microlens in hybrid SiO2/TiO2 sol-gel glass by electron beam lithography. Opt. Express 2003, 11, 899–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. He, Z.; Lee, Y.-H.; Chen, R.; Chanda, D.; Wu, S.-T. Switchable Pancharatnam-Berry microlens array with nano-imprinted liquid crystal alignment. Opt. Lett. 2018, 43, 5062–5065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Pan, A.; Gao, B.; Chen, T.; Si, J.; Li, C.; Chen, F.; Hou, X. Fabrication of concave spherical microlenses on silicon by femtosecond laser irradiation and mixed acid etching. Opt. Express 2014, 22, 15245–15250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sun, Y.-L.; Dong, W.-F.; Yang, R.-Z.; Meng, X.; Zhang, L.; Chen, Q.-D.; Sun, H.-B. Dynamically Tunable Protein Microlenses. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 1558–1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhou, P.; Yu, H.; Zhong, Y.; Zou, W.; Wang, Z.; Liu, L. Fabrication of Waterproof Artificial Compound Eyes with Variable Field of View Based on the Bioinspiration from Natural Hierarchical Micro-Nanostructures. Nano-Micro Lett. 2020, 12, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bae, S.-I.; Kim, K.; Yang, S.; Jang, K.-W.; Jeong, K.-H. Multifocal microlens arrays using multilayer photolithography. Opt. Express 2020, 28, 9082–9088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yin, D.; Feng, J.; Ma, R.; Liu, Y.-F.; Zhang, Y.-L.; Zhang, X.-L.; Bi, Y.-G.; Chen, Q.-D.; Sun, H.-B. Efficient and mechanically robust stretchable organic light-emitting devices by a laser-programmable buckling process. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Li, Z.-Z.; Wang, L.; Fan, H.; Yu, Y.-H.; Chen, Q.-D.; Juodkazis, S.; Sun, H.-B. O-FIB: Far-field-induced near-field breakdown for direct nanowriting in an atmospheric environment. Light Sci. Appl. 2020, 9, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Wang, H.; Zhang, Y.-L.; Han, D.-D.; Wang, W.; Sun, H.-B. Laser fabrication of modular superhydrophobic chips for reconfigurable assembly and self-propelled droplet manipulation. PhotoniX 2021, 2, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, Y.-L.; Tian, Y.; Wang, H.; Ma, Z.-C.; Han, D.-D.; Niu, L.-G.; Chen, Q.-D.; Sun, H.-B. Dual-3D Femtosecond Laser Nanofabrication Enables Dynamic Actuation. Acs Nano 2019, 13, 4041–4048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jiang, H.-B.; Zhang, Y.-L.; Han, D.-D.; Xia, H.; Feng, J.; Chen, Q.-D.; Hong, Z.-R.; Sun, H.-B. Bioinspired Fabrication of Superhydrophobic Graphene Films by Two-Beam Laser Interference. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 4595–4602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Deng, Z.; Yang, Q.; Chen, F.; Bian, H.; Yong, J.; Du, G.; Hu, Y.; Hou, X. High-Performance Laser Beam Homogenizer Based on Double-Sided Concave Microlens. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2014, 26, 2086–2089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liu, X.-Q.; Chen, Q.-D.; Guan, K.-M.; Ma, Z.-C.; Yu, Y.-H.; Li, Q.-K.; Tian, Z.-N.; Sun, H.-B. Dry-etching-assisted femtosecond laser machining. Laser Photonics Rev. 2017, 11, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fang, R.; Zhang, X.; Zheng, J.; Pan, Z.; Yang, C.; Deng, L.; Li, R.; Lai, C.; Yan, W.; Maisotsenko, V.S.; et al. Superwicking Functionality of Femtosecond Laser Textured Aluminum at High Temperatures. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 2964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fang, H.-H.; Yang, J.; Ding, R.; Chen, Q.-D.; Wang, L.; Xia, H.; Feng, J.; Ma, Y.-G.; Sun, H.-B. Polarization dependent two-photon properties in an organic crystal. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010, 97, 101101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Nüsser, C.; Kumstel, J.; Kiedrowski, T.; Diatlov, A.; Willenborg, E. Process- and Material-Induced Surface Structures During Laser Polishing. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2015, 17, 268–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gisario, A.; Boschetto, A.; Veniali, F. Surface transformation of AISI 304 stainless steel by high power diode laser. Opt. Laser Eng. 2011, 49, 41–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Han, D.-D.; Zhang, Y.-L.; Ma, J.-N.; Liu, Y.-Q.; Han, B.; Sun, H.-B. Light Mediated Manufacture and Manipulation of Actuators. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 8328–8343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Liu, X.-Q.; Bai, B.-F.; Chen, Q.-D.; Sun, H.-B. Etching-assisted femtosecond laser modification of hard materials. Opto-Electron. Adv. 2019, 2, 19002101–19002114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Wang, Z.; Sugioka, K.; Midorikawa, K. Three-dimensional integration of microoptical components buried inside photosensitive glass by femtosecond laser direct writing. Appl. Phys. A 2007, 89, 951–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Liu, H.; Lin, W.; Hong, M. Hybrid laser precision engineering of transparent hard materials: Challenges, solutions and applications. Light Sci. Appl. 2021, 10, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hongo, T.; Sugioka, K.; Niino, H.; Cheng, Y.; Masuda, M.; Miyamoto, I.; Takai, H.; Midorikawa, K. Investigation of photoreaction mechanism of photosensitive glass by femtosecond laser. J. Appl. Phys. 2005, 97, 063517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Meng, X.; Chen, F.; Yang, Q.; Bian, H.; Du, G.; Hou, X. Simple fabrication of closed-packed IR microlens arrays on silicon by femtosecond laser wet etching. Appl. Phys. A 2015, 121, 157–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Du, G.; Lu, Y.; Uddin, N.; Lankanath, D.; Hou, X.; Chen, F. Giant electric field enhancement for plasmonic imaging via graphene based nanoslit optical superlens. Opt. Mater. Express 2020, 10, 3051–3059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Li, J.; Wang, W.; Mei, X.; Pan, A.; Sun, X.; Liu, B.; Cui, J. Artificial Compound Eyes Prepared by a Combination of Air-Assisted Deformation, Modified Laser Swelling, and Controlled Crystal Growth. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 114–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yu, H.; Zhou, G.; Leung, H.M.; Chau, F.S. Tunable liquid-filled lens integrated with aspherical surface for spherical aberration compensation. Opt. Express 2010, 18, 9945–9954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Diagram of the mixing process. (b,c) SEM images of the microlens before and after the second annealing.
Figure 1. (a) Diagram of the mixing process. (b,c) SEM images of the microlens before and after the second annealing.
Materials 15 00678 g001
Figure 2. Evolution of microlens morphology during preparation. (a,b) Schematic diagram and experimental results. (c,d) Comparison of surface morphology before and after secondary annealing.
Figure 2. Evolution of microlens morphology during preparation. (a,b) Schematic diagram and experimental results. (c,d) Comparison of surface morphology before and after secondary annealing.
Materials 15 00678 g002
Figure 3. Variation in height and diameter of different microlenses (a) before and (b) after secondary annealing and the difference with design parameters.
Figure 3. Variation in height and diameter of different microlenses (a) before and (b) after secondary annealing and the difference with design parameters.
Materials 15 00678 g003
Figure 4. Designed and prepared convex microlenses with diameter and height of 40 μm and 10 μm. (ac) are their SEM image, 3D morphology and section profile, respectively. (d,e) are imaging and focusing performance demonstrations.
Figure 4. Designed and prepared convex microlenses with diameter and height of 40 μm and 10 μm. (ac) are their SEM image, 3D morphology and section profile, respectively. (d,e) are imaging and focusing performance demonstrations.
Materials 15 00678 g004
Figure 5. (a) LSCM image of concave microlens, (b) three-dimensional morphology, and (c) cross-sectional profile.
Figure 5. (a) LSCM image of concave microlens, (b) three-dimensional morphology, and (c) cross-sectional profile.
Materials 15 00678 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, B.-X.; Qi, J.-Y.; Lu, Y.-M.; Zheng, J.-X.; Xu, Y.; Liu, X.-Q. Rapid Fabrication of Smooth Micro-Optical Components on Glass by Etching-Assisted Femtosecond Laser Modification. Materials 2022, 15, 678. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ma15020678

AMA Style

Wang B-X, Qi J-Y, Lu Y-M, Zheng J-X, Xu Y, Liu X-Q. Rapid Fabrication of Smooth Micro-Optical Components on Glass by Etching-Assisted Femtosecond Laser Modification. Materials. 2022; 15(2):678. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ma15020678

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Bao-Xu, Jin-Yong Qi, Yi-Ming Lu, Jia-Xin Zheng, Ying Xu, and Xue-Qing Liu. 2022. "Rapid Fabrication of Smooth Micro-Optical Components on Glass by Etching-Assisted Femtosecond Laser Modification" Materials 15, no. 2: 678. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ma15020678

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop