Next Article in Journal
The Effects of Plant and Soil Characteristics on Partitioning Different Rainfalls to Soil in a Subtropical Chinese Fir Forest Ecosystem
Previous Article in Journal
Heterotrophic Bacteria Play an Important Role in Endemism of Cephalostachyum pingbianense (Hsueh & Y.M. Yang ex Yi et al.) D.Z. Li & H.Q. Yang, 2007, a Full-Year Shooting Woody Bamboo
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Global Analysis of the WOX Transcription Factor Gene Family in Populus × xiaohei T. S. Hwang et Liang Reveals Their Stress−Responsive Patterns

State Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, Northeast Forestry University, 51 Hexing Road, Harbin 150040, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 26 November 2021 / Revised: 8 January 2022 / Accepted: 12 January 2022 / Published: 14 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Genetics and Molecular Biology)

Abstract

:
The WUSCHEL−related homeobox (WOX) family is a group of plant−specific transcription factors that play important regulatory roles in embryo formation, stem cell stability, and organogenesis. To date, there are few studies on the molecular mechanisms involved in this family of genes in response to stress. Thus, in this study, eight WOX genes were obtained from an endemic Chinese resilient tree species, Populus × xiaohei T. S. Hwang et Liang. Bioinformatic analysis showed that the WOX genes all contained a conserved structural domain consisting of 60 amino acids, with some differences in physicochemical properties. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that WOX members were divided into three evolutionary clades, with four, one, and three members in the ancient, intermediate, and modern evolutionary clades, respectively. The conserved structural domain species as well as the organization and gene structure of WOX genes within the same subfamily were highly uniform. Chromosomal distribution and genome synteny analyses revealed seven segmental−duplicated gene pairs among the PsnWOX gene family that were mainly under purifying selection conditions. Semi−quantitative interpretation (SQ−PCR) analysis showed that the WOX gene was differentially expressed in different tissues, and it was hypothesized that the functions performed by different members were diverse. The family members were strongly and differentially expressed under CdCl2, NaCl, NaHCO3, and PEG treatments, suggesting that WOX genes function in various aspects of abiotic stress defense responses. These results provide a theoretical basis for investigating the morphogenetic effects and abiotic stress responses of this gene family in woody plants.

1. Introduction

The WUSCHEL−related homeobox (WOX) family of transcription factors belongs to the Homeobox (HOX) superfamily. The typical homeodomain of the HOX superfamily has 60 amino acid residues that fold into a “helix−loop−helix−turn−helix” spatial structure, where a combination of the second and third helix forms a “helix−turn−helix” that can bind to specific DNA sequences [1,2,3,4,5]. WUSCHEL (WUS) is the most primitive gene in the WOX transcription factor family. In 2004, Haecker used a homology search method to identify 15 other members with similar structures using the WUS gene in the Arabidopsis thaliana genome and named them WOX genes [6]. As research continued, 31, 10, and 29 WOX genes were identified in Zea mays [7], Lycopersicon esculentum, and Camellia sinensis, respectively. Based on phylogenetic analysis, the WOX protein family was divided into three clades: the ancient, intermediate, and modern clades [8]. The distribution of WOX proteins contained in the three branches of plant taxonomic groups differed significantly, with all plants containing teleost WOX proteins. However, Chlorella and Physcomitrella patens contained only the ancient clade WOX proteins, and the intermediate clade proteins were found in higher ferns and seed plants, while the WUS clade WOX proteins were specific to higher seed plants [9,10].
As the function of WOX family genes continues to be studied, it has been demonstrated that they play a range of crucial roles in the development and growth of plants, such as in embryonic development patterns, organ formation, and stem cell maintenance [11,12,13,14]. WOX1 plays a role in the growth and regulation of leaf width in A. thaliana [15], Pharbitis nil, and Nicotiana tabacum. WOX4 is expressed in almost all of the vascular systems of the plant, and it has been found to have specific expression sites in the cambium and procambium tissues, i.e., sites that affect secondary plant growth [16,17]. WOX5 is mainly expressed in roots and maintains stem cell stability in the apical meristematic tissue. It is also expressed during the growth and development of the lateral root primordium and cotyledon primordium, indicating its involvement in the development of these tissues [18,19,20]. WOX9 is not only involved with WOX8 in regulating the development of A. thaliana from fertilized eggs to embryos, but is also expressed in the root tip meristem tissue and can promote root cell multiplication [21,22]. WOX13 is involved in the development of lateral roots and flowering organ formation in A. thaliana, and the results of Deveaux’s study confirm that the WOX13 orthologous group is the most conserved WOX clade [23,24].
WOX transcription factors broadly regulate postembryonic developmental processes in plants and enable the plant body to adapt to environmental changes under abiotic stresses through the corresponding signal transduction pathways [1]. The functional studies of WOX genes in abiotic stresses are still in their infancy. In 2004, Zhu discovered that the AtWOX6 allele mutant strain was sensitive to freezing, revealing its involvement in low−temperature response; this initiated the investigation of WOX in abiotic stress responses [6]. WOX11 regulates the growth and development of rice crown root by repressing the expression of RR2 gene, and its overexpression increases the resistance to drought stress [25,26]. In a study of tomato, drought induced the expression of SlWOX13 gene [27]. To date, there are even fewer studies on WOX genes in abiotic stress response in woody plants. Overexpression of the JrWOX11 gene in Juglans regia prompted advancing adventitious root primordia formation by two days, and also improved resistance to osmotic stress and salt tolerance in 84K poplar. The expression of PtoWOX11/12a gene in roots and leaves was significantly increased in Populus tomentosa under salt and drought treatments, and its overexpression transgenic poplar SOD and POD enzyme activities as well as proline were higher than the control, indicating that PtoWOX11/12a induced expression under salt and drought [28].
Based on the genomic data in the public platform, genome−wide analyses such as target gene member identification, gene structure, and expression patterns were performed to lay the foundation for revealing their related functions and regulatory mechanisms. In the latest genome−wide study, Kumar et al. identified the PIN gene family in wheat and found that the function of the PIN family is essential in regulating the distribution of polar growth hormone [29]. Based on genome−wide analysis, You et al. found that the MeNRT2 gene family may play a role in nitrate uptake and utilization, and based on this, low nitrogen treatment of trans−MeNRT2.2 strains showed that A. thaliana overexpressing the MeNRT2.2 gene exhibited higher fresh weight compared to the wild type, further corroborating the findings obtained from genome−wide [30]. The results of Feng et al. provided new insights into the role played by GIR gene members in cotton fiber formation and provided ideas for future research using breeding tools for cotton fiber improvement [31].
Populus × xiaohei was produced from a cross between Populus simonii and Populus nigra. The hybrid tree has many desirable characteristics, including rapid growth, drought resistance, and resistance to pests and diseases. It is an excellent fast−growing green species in the sandy and arid regions of northern China and is also an ideal material for studying the response mechanisms of woody plants to abiotic stresses. To date, the sequencing of the genome of Populus × xiaohei has not been completed; thus, in the present study, eight WOX genes were obtained by cloning with reference to the information of the genome of Populus trichocarpa and were analyzed by bioinformatic methods. In addition, we also determined the expression characteristics of WOX genes in different tissue sites and under various abiotic stresses. The results provide a theoretical reference for functional studies of WOX genes in woody plant growth and development as well as in abiotic stress responses of Populus × xiaohei.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cloning, Identification, and Physicochemical Characterization of PsnWOX Sequences

Based on the fact that the genome of Populus × xiaohei has not been released, we referred to the sequence of P. trichocarpa for identification. To identify WOX proteins from P. trichocarpa, the protein database of P. trichocarpa was downloaded from Phytozome v12.0 (https://phytozome.jgi.doe.gov/pz/portal.html (accessed on 11 January 2022)) [32], and the Hidden Markov Model files were downloaded from the Pfam database (https://pfam.xfam.org/ (accessed on 8 January 2022)) [33]. Using the hmmsearch command in HMMER v3.1 software [34], the poplar protein database was searched, and the identified sequences were integrated.
Specific primers were designed for the 8 identified P. trichocarpa sequences (Table S1). The full−length Open Reading Frame sequences of WOX genes were amplified using cDNAs from different tissues of Populus × xiaohei as templates, using KOD−Plus high−fidelity enzyme (KOD−201, TOYOBO (SHANGHAI) BIOTECH CO. LTD., Shanghai, China). The reaction system consisted of 10 × PCR Buffer for KOD−Plus− 1.7 µL, template 0.5 µL, 25 mM MgSO4 0.8 µL, 2 mM dNTPs 1.7 µL, KOD−Plus− 0.4 µL, 13.7 µL double distilled water, and 0.6 µL each of upstream and downstream primers. Reaction conditions were as follows: 94 °C pre−denaturation for 2 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94 °C denaturation for 15 s, 58 °C annealing for 30 s and 68 °C extension for 1 Kb/1 min. The target bands were then constructed into the pMD−18T vector, and the accuracy of the sequences was verified by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) and sequencing.
Tools from the ExPasy website (https://www.expasy.org/ (accessed on 5 November 2021)) were used to obtain the sequence lengths, molecular weights, and isoelectric points of the identified WOX proteins [35]. The online tool WOLF PSORT (https://www.genscript.com/psort/wolf_psort.html (accessed on 5 November 2021)) was used to predict subcellular localization [36].

2.2. Multiple Sequence Alignment and Phylogenetic Analysis of PsnWOX Proteins

Multiple sequence alignment of PsnWOX was performed using BioEdit software; secondary structure was generated through the PRABI (https://npsa-prabi.ibcp.fr/cgi-bin/npsa_automat.pl?page=npsa_sopma.html (accessed on 10 November 2021)) online website; sequence logos was generated using the Weblogo (http://weblogo.berkeley.edu/logo.cgi (accessed on 10 November 2021)) online website.
To reveal the evolutionary relationships of WOX genes between Populus × xiaohei and other species, a Neighbor−Joining (NJ) tree was constructed using MEGA v7.0.14 with the number of bootstrap replicates set to 1000 [37].

2.3. Exon/Intron Structure and Conserved Motifs Analysis

The online program GSDS 2.0 (http://gsds.cbi.pku.edu.cn (accessed on 12 November 2021)) was used to predict the distribution patterns of exons and introns in the PsnWOX genes [38]. The intron insertion information of the WOX genes of A. thaliana and Populus × xiaohei was obtained from Phytozome and the reference for P. trichocarpa, respectively. The online software MEME v5.0.5 (http://meme-suite.org/tools/meme (accessed on 12 November 2021)) was used to identify conserved motifs [39].

2.4. Chromosomal Location, Duplication Analysis, and Ka/Ks Calculation

Location information for the PsnWOX genes was retrieved from Phytozome and PopGenIE (http://popgenie.org/chromosome-diagram (accessed on 10 January 2022)) with reference to the P. trichocarpa [40]. The MG2C tool (http://mg2c.iask.in/mg2c_v2.0 (accessed on 10 January 2022)) was used to construct a chromosome distribution map of the PsnWOX genes [41]. Chromosome gff3 files of P. trichocarpa and other species were obtained from EnsemblPlants (https://plants.ensembl.org (accessed on 10 January 2022)). Then, gene replication events were analyzed using the Multiple Collinear Scanning toolkit (http://chibba.pgml.uga.edu/mcscan2/ (accessed on 10 January 2022)) under the Linux system. The Ka and the Ks values were calculated using DnaSP [42].

2.5. Plant Materials, Growth Conditions, and Stress Treatment

Populus × xiaohei plants were grown at the Northeast Forestry University Genetics and Breeding Laboratory, Harbin, China. The current year shoots were cut into spikes containing 2–3 axillary buds, and the cuttings were inserted into 5 cm × 5 cm nutrient bowls containing the same weight of substrate (black soil: humus: vermiculite = 2:1:1). After 2 months of incubation in a greenhouse with 16 h of light/8 h of darkness at 25 °C, plants of uniform growth and free from diseases and pests were selected as materials for gene cloning, tissue extraction, and abiotic stress treatment.
A total of five tissues were selected from the terminal bud, the third leaf, xylem, phloem, and root of Populus × xiaohei, and three sets of samples were collected from each tissue as three biological replicates, which were snap−frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored in −80 °C refrigerator for studying the expression characteristics of WOX gene in different tissue parts. Stem segments and leaves from the 1st–11th nodes and 1st–14th leaves of the whole plant were selected to simulate the whole developmental process from young to senescence, which were used to study the expression of WOX gene in the developmental process of leaves and stem nodes.
Abiotic stress treatments used 150 mM/L NaCl to simulate salt stress, 0.3 mol/L NaHCO3 to simulate mixed salt and base stress, 20% (w/v) PEG 6000 to simulate drought stress, and 150 μmol/L CdCl2 to simulate heavy metal stress, and 100 mL of the solution was poured into a culture bowl daily. The roots and the third and fourth functional leaves were taken at 0, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h of treatment, snap−frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80 °C for RNA extraction and gene expression analysis. To ensure the reliability of the results, the three plants were mixed as biological replicates.

2.6. RNA Extraction and SQ−PCR Analysis

Total RNA from the above plant samples was extracted using an RNA Extraction Kit (RP3302, BIOTEKE CORPORATION, Beijing, China) and then, single−stranded cDNA was synthesized using the ReverTra Ace qPCR RT Kit (FSQ−301, TOYOBO (SHANGHAI) BIOTECH CO. LTD., Shanghai, China) and diluted 10−fold as a PCR template. The 20 µL reaction system consisted of 10 µL of 2 × EsTaq Master Mix, 6 µL of double distilled water, 2 µL of template, and 1 µL each of upstream and downstream primers (Table S2). The reaction conditions for SQ−PCR were as follows: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 2 min, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s and annealing at 58 °C for 30 s, then a final extension at 72 °C for 10 s. PsnACT was used as an internal reference to adjust the loading volume to reach the same concentration of the product, and the corresponding amount of PCR product was taken for 0.8% agarose gel electrophoresis. We performed manual lane selection and standard volume input for the obtained gel images using GIS ID analysis software, with units set to ng, input method to total, and a standard total set. The obtained data were normalized and processed with the following equation:
Xnorm = X X m i n X m a x X m i n
X and Xnorm are the values before and after normalization, and Xmin and Xmax are the minimum and maximum values in the sample data, respectively. The obtained data were visualized using Heml software. Three technical replications were performed to ensure the reliability of the results.
To further determine the accuracy of the SQ−PCR results, we randomly selected different genes under different treatments and validated them using Quantitative Real−time PCR (qRT−PCR). Real−time PCR was performed using Power Green qRCR Mix reagent (R0202−02, Dongsheng Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) based on the SYBR Green fluorescence program. The PCR cycling protocol consisted of initial denaturation at 94 °C for 3 min, followed by 45 cycles of 94 °C for 5 s, 55 °C for 5 s, and 72 °C for 10 s. After the last cycle, a melting curve analysis was performed over a temperature range of 55–94 °C in increments of 1 °C to verify the reaction specificity. The PsnACT gene was used as an internal reference gene, and relative expression was measured using the 2ΔΔCt method. The results were visualized using GraphPad Prism software.

3. Results

3.1. Cloning, Identification, and Physicochemical Characterization of PsnWOX Sequences

PCR amplification was performed using cDNAs from different tissues of Populus × xiaohei as templates using the specific primers listed in Table S1, and PCR amplification and sequencing were performed after ligating pMD−18T. The results showed that the lengths of the eight PsnWOX genes were 1391, 683, 673, 657, 1124, 852, 682, and 832 bp (Figure 1), and they were highly homologous with the WOX gene of P. trichocarpa (Figure S1). Therefore, the above sequences were identified as the ORFs of the PsnWOX genes and were named PsnWOX1a, PsnWOX4a, PsnWOX4b, PsnWOX5b, PsnWOX9, PsnWOX13a, PsnWOX13b, and PsnWOX13c, using the naming strategy of Zhang et al. [1].
Physicochemical property analysis showed that the corresponding PsnWOX proteins’ (PsnWOXs) length and molecular weight ranges were 213–390 amino acids and 24506.56–44093.94 Da, and the isoelectric point range was 5.33–9.30. All of the proteins were hydrophilic proteins. Subcellular localization analysis demonstrated that all genes, except PsnWOX5b, were located in the nucleus (Table 1).

3.2. Multiple Sequence Alignment and Phylogenetic Analysis of PsnWOX Proteins

We analyzed a multiple alignment analysis of the 23 WOX genes using BioEdit software. The results are shown in Figure 2, which shows that the HB structural domain was highly conserved and consisted of 60 amino acid residues forming a helix−loop−helix−turn−helix structure [12]. AtWUS consists of 61 amino acid residues due to the insertion of a conserved Y residue after the 17th amino acid [1]. Eleven conserved proteins were reported by Zhang et al. after analysis of the homeodomains of Sorghum bicolor, Z. mays, O. sativa, A. thaliana, and P. trichocarpa, including Q and L in helix1 and V, W, F, N, and R in helix3, and these conserved proteins were also present in Populus × xiaohei. The results suggest that these amino acid residues are critical for the function of the PsnWOX genes.
To explore the evolutionary relationships of WOX genes between Populus × xiaohei and other species, an NJ tree was constructed for 63 WOX proteins from A. thaliana (At: 15), Eucalyptus grandis (Eg: 9), O. sativa (Os: 13), P. trichocarpa (Pt: 18), and Populus × xiaohei (Psn: 8). As shown in Figure 3, the 63 WOX genes divided into three clades: ancient, intermediate, and modern. PsnWOX1a, PsnWOX4a, PsnWOX4b, and PsnWOX5b belonged to the modern clade; PsnWOX9 belonged to the intermediate clade; PsnWOX13a, PsnWOX13b, and PsnWOX13c belonged to the ancient clade, consistent with previous findings [11]. The phenomenon of gene amplification in higher plants resulted in a much lower number of WOX genes in intermediate and ancient clades than in modern clades. Further analysis showed that the WOX genes of Populus × xiaohei and P. trichocarpa were highly homologous at 99% (Figure S1).

3.3. Exon/Intron Structure and Conserved Motifs Analysis

To further examine the structural diversity of the WOX genes in Populus × xiaohei, an exon−intron map was constructed using the GSDS 2.0 online site. As shown in Figure 4, the number of introns contained in genes within the same clade was conserved, while the number and position of introns differed in different clades. Two intron insertion sites are highly conserved in the ancient clade, indicating that the PsnWOX13a, PsnWOX13b, and PsnWOX13c genes have very high homology; in the modern clade, the genes PsnWOX4a and PsnWOX4b have completely conserved intron patterns, and both contain two intron insertion sites. The above results indicate that the genes have undergone replication events during the evolutionary process in the evolution of the gene family. PsnWOX1a has an extra intron insertion site that is presumed to be an important locus driving its functional differentiation. Further analysis revealed that the WOX genes of Populus × xiaohei and A. thaliana are directly homologous with a highly similar organization of exons and introns.
The conserved motifs in PsnWOXs were analyzed using MEME analysis software, and a total of 10 conserved motifs were identified and named as motifs 1–10 (Figure 4). The results showed that the PsnWOX genes all contained a homeodomain consisting of 60 amino acid residues (motif 1). Further analysis revealed that the subfamilies have similar conserved motif composition, and some motifs are unique to different clades. Motif 2 is present only at the N−terminus in the ancient clade; motif 6 is present only at the C−terminus in the ancient clade, and motif 4 and motif 5 are specific to the WOX4 subfamily of the modern clade. According to Kamiya et al., the rice WUS proteins have an acidic structural domain, a WUS−box, and an EAR−like structural domain [12]. Of these, the acidic domain is a potential transcriptional activation domain in eukaryotes, while the WUS−box motif is only present in members of the WUS clade and is located at the carboxyl terminal of the homologous structural domain, i.e., motif 3. The above results indicate that these motifs are shared by WOX proteins in their evolutionary clade and that they are essential for genes to perform a wide variety of functions. Detailed information is shown in Table S3.

3.4. Chromosomal Location, Duplication Analysis and Ka/Ks Calculation

To determine the distribution of the PsnWOX genes, we mapped their positions on the poplar chromosomes and the results are shown in Figure 5. The 8 PsnWOX genes were distributed on six chromosomes: two on each of chrom 02 and 05, and one on each of chrom 04, 10, 12, and 14.
Genome−wide analysis of Populus × xiaohei showed that seven fragment duplication events were identified among the 12 PsnWOX genes on duplicated fragments (Figure 6), including three pairs of PsnWOX4a and PsnWOX4b, PsnWOX13a with PsnWOX13c, and PsnWOX13b with PsnWOX13a, among the eight genes we cloned out. These results suggest that some PsnWOX genes may arise from gene duplication events and suggest that these duplication events are the main drivers of PsnWOX gene family amplification.
To further understand the gene duplication mechanism of the WOX gene family in Populus × xiaohei, a comparative map with the dicotyledonous plants A. thaliana and Glycine max and the monocotyledonous plant O. sativa was constructed (Figure 7). The number of homologs between Populus × xiaohei and A. thaliana and G. max were 16 and 37, respectively, much higher than the 2 in rice, indicating a strong direct homology between the Populus × xiaohei WOXs and the dicotyledons members, which showed a high degree of evolutionary divergence compared with the monocotyledons. WOX genes containing more co−connection gene pairs may have played an important role in the evolution of the Populus × xiaohei WOX gene family, such as PsnWOX5, which contains three co−connection gene pairs. The ratio of Ka/Ks can effectively improve the understanding of the evolutionary constraints of the WOX gene family, and the calculated results are shown in Table S4. Positive or Darwinian selection requires sequences with Ka/Ks > 1; neutral drift requires Ka/Ks = 1; and purifying selection requires Ka/Ks < 1 [43]. It follows that duplicated gene pairs are mainly under purifying selection conditions (Ka/Ks < 1.0).

3.5. Tissue−Specific Expression Pattern of PsnWOX Genes

The expression characteristics of WOX genes vary greatly in different species. For example, Liu et al. found that many WOX genes in Gossypium hirsutum have different expression patterns when compared with their homologs in A. thaliana [44]. To reveal the functions of this family of genes in woody plant growth and development, we analyzed the expression characteristics of eight PsnWOXs in different tissue sites by SQ−PCR. The results are shown in Figure 8 and Figure S2.
The expression characteristics of PsnWOX genes in terminal buds, leaves, xylem, phloem, and roots were analyzed, and the results as shown in Figure 8 showed that there were significant differences in the expression of PsnWOX genes in different tissues. The expression patterns of the three members of the WOX13 subfamily were generally similar, showing the highest expression in xylem and phloem, followed by roots, and the lowest expression in leaves, indicating that these genes play important roles in plant development. PsnWOX1a had the highest expression in leaves and terminal buds; PsnWOX4 was mainly expressed in xylem, and PsnWOX5 had a lower expression level in all plant parts.
Most of the PsnWOXs were expressed in both the xylem and the phloem of mature stems, and the expression of these genes was further analyzed during stem development. PsnWOX1a consistently had high expression levels at the early and late stages of stem node development. The expression patterns of WOX genes within the same subfamily remained relatively consistent. PsnWOX13b and PsnWOX13c showed a continuous increase in expression to a maximum at the early stage of node development, followed by a slight downregulation, and then remained relatively stable, suggesting that the two genes play important regulatory roles in the early stages of node development. PsnWOX4a and PsnWOX4b showed continuous decreases in expression throughout node development. The above results suggest that PsnWOXs have different functions during the development of stem nodes.
To analyze the expression of WOX genes at different stages of leaf development, the entire course of development from young to senescent leaves was selected, and the first leaf was used as a control. PsnWOX1a was consistently expressed at a high level during early and late leaf development; PsnWOX5b, PsnWOX13b, and PsnWOX13c were expressed at lower levels at the beginning of leaf development and then gradually increased, indicating that they performed their corresponding functions during late leaf development. PsnWOX13a was significantly less expressed in mature leaves than PsnWOX13b and PsnWOX13c, and there were slight differences in their expression patterns, suggesting that the three genes derived from replication events may have been altered with respect to their functions in the leaves.

3.6. Expression Patterns of PsnWOX Genes under Different Stress Treatments

WOX genes are involved in drought and salt damage response in Gossypium hirsutum and P. alba × P. glandulosa [45,46]. To investigate the effect of abiotic stress on the expression of the WOX genes in Populus × xiaohei, we counted its expression in roots and leaves under four stresses, CdCl2, NaCl, NaHCO3, and PEG. The results are shown in Figure 9 and Figure S2.
The expression of PsnWOX genes under CdCl2 treatment is shown in Figure 9. PsnWOX13a and PsnWOX13b showed a positive regulation pattern in the early stage of treatment, after which the expression decreased sharply; the expression of PsnWOX13c based on replication events continued to be downregulated throughout the stress process, suggesting that CdCl2 may have suppressed the expression of PsnWOX13c through the corresponding signal transduction pathway. PsnWOX1a in modern clades showed mainly upregulated expression during the stress treatment, with the gene expression reaching its highest value at 12 h, after which the expression was downregulated and stabilized. The expression of genes PsnWOX5b, PsnWOX13a, and PsnWOX13c in leaves was consistently elevated within 48 h of the stress treatment.
The response pattern of PsnWOX genes to NaCl stress is shown in Figure 9. NaCl treatment inhibited the expression of PsnWOX1a in the roots, and its expression was downregulated with increasing treatment time. Three genes in the PsnWOX13 subfamily showed similar expression patterns in roots, with a transient downregulation of expression at 6 h, followed by a rapid increase and leveling off, and a slight downregulation of expression after 48 h, indicating that these genes responded to NaCl stress. The expression of PsnWOX4a, PsnWOX4b, PsnWOX5b, and PsnWOX9 all increased to their highest levels at 24 h in roots, and PsnWOX5b increased significantly at 6 h in leaves.
The expression patterns of the WOX genes in the subfamily remained consistent in the NaHCO3−treated roots. Expression levels of all three genes in the WOX13 subfamily increased to the highest values at 24 h of treatment, and then their expression gradually decreased to below initial levels. The expression of two genes in the WOX4 subfamily increased at 24 h and decreased slightly with the increase of stress treatment time but was still above the initial level. Although PsnWOX1a and PsnWOX9 were in different evolutionary clades, their expression patterns were similar throughout the treatment, with their expression decreasing at the beginning of the stress treatment, being rapidly upregulated at 24 h and continuing until 48 h, after which their expression again decreased. In leaves, the expression levels of PsnWOX9, PsnWOX13a, PsnWOX13b, and PsnWOX13c all peaked at 12 h after stress treatment and then decreased slightly and leveled off.
In PEG−treated roots, drought stress inhibited the expression of PsnWOX1a, and its relative expression in roots was downregulated with increasing treatment time, while expression was induced in the remaining genes. The genes PsnWOX13b and PsnWOX13c in the ancient clade showed a significant upregulation at 6 h of drought treatment, indicating that Populus × xiaohei responds to drought stress by regulating the expression level of the PsnWOX13b gene; the gene PsnWOX5b in the modern clade had higher expression, increasing rapidly at 12 h and lasting until 48 h, after which the expression decreased; in the leaves, PsnWOX4a, PsnWOX4b, PsnWOX9, PsnWOX13a, PsnWOX13b, and PsnWOX13c showed mainly upregulated expression in the early stage of stress (12 h or 24 h), while the expression decreased slightly afterwards.
SQ−PCR is a common method for gene expression analysis, and to determine the correctness of the trend of the SQ−PCR results, they were compared with the qRT−PCR results (Figure 10). The results showed the same overall trend, and the qRT−PCR results further proved the accurate line of SQ−PCR results.

4. Discussion

WOX genes have been identified and studied in many plants [47,48,49,50]. Phylogenetic analysis showed that the 63 WOX genes were divided into three clades, ancient, intermediate, and modern (Figure 3), and this result was consistent with the results in Brassica napus [51], Panax ginseng [52], and Rosa rugosa. The phenomenon of gene amplification in higher plants resulted in a much lower number of WOX genes in intermediate and ancient clades than in modern clades [53]. A helix–loop–helix–turn–helix structure in the HB domain allows it to recognize sequence−specific targets. Furthermore, the domain is conserved in Z. mays [7], Petunia hybrid [54], and Vitis vinifera, thus maintaining its functional integrity. Compared with the conserved site of PsnWOXs, AtWUS has an extra Y residue in the loop structure [1], as do PtrWUS, OsWUS, and ZmWUS. The specific function of the Y residue has not been reported in the literature, and subsequent molecular biology experiments such as mutation of the Y residue can be performed to elaborate its specific biological function.
Analysis of the structural features of the PsnWOX genes revealed that the insertion sites of introns in the same clade were similar, further supporting the delineation of subclades and functional conservation. Outside the HB structural domain, the majority of conserved motifs are unique to each clade, implying their critical importance in the unique functions of the proteins. In addition, the WUS box motif is only present in members of the WUS clade and is located at the carboxyl terminus of the homologous structural domain [12].
The above results suggest that specific motifs are present in certain clade and subclade proteins, and presumably they are significant for maintaining functional conservation. In general, gene families expand by tandem duplication and segmental duplication. A genomewide analysis indicated that PsnWOX genes were subjected to whole−genome replications and tandem repeat events [55]. Seven tandem repeat events between twelve genes may have contributed to the evolution of the WOX gene family. The selection stress analysis indicated that continuous purification selection (Ka/Ks < 1) has played a key role in determining the number of WOX genes in Populus × xiaohei.
Analysis of WOX gene expression characteristics revealed that gene expression patterns and expression levels were generally similar for the same clade, but there were differences in the expression of different genes in different tissue sites and under various abiotic stresses. WOX proteins create a proximal differentiation gradient by repressing leaf proximal differentiation and promoting leaf distal differentiation, a regulatory pattern that allows for sustained leaf growth and allows the leaf to achieve its final shape [56,57,58]. The RcWOX1 gene was expressed only in the roots, and overexpression plants exhibited a significant increase in the number of lateral roots [59]. The homologous gene PsnWOX1 is highly expressed in leaves, leading to the speculation that it also functions in regulating lateral leaf growth. AtWOX4 is mainly expressed in the vascular cambium and procambium, maintaining the number and status of vascular cambium stem cells, and the OsWOX4 gene is also highly expressed in the inflorescence and floral meristem [60].
It has been shown that the lateral meristem development involving the WOX4 gene is dependent on certain growth hormone levels [61]. In this study, we found that PsnWOX4 was highly expressed in the xylem and that this may depend on certain growth hormone levels in the maintenance of vascular cambium stem cells under salt and drought stress. WOX5 was expressed in the apical meristematic region (RAM) of A. thaliana roots and was able to promote stem cell proliferation, with overexpression lines exhibiting short primary stems of seedlings or even failure to shoot [62]. TaWOX5 was also abundantly expressed in wheat roots; in poplar, WOX5a was mainly expressed in adventitious root tips and lateral root tips, and its overexpression led to an increase in AR numbers and a decrease in AR lengths and leaf numbers.
PsnWOX5b was detected in all tissue sites, presumably not only maintaining stem cell stability in root apical meristematic tissue but also responding to abiotic stress by regulating its expression level in roots. WOX8 and WOX9 are expressed during embryo development in A. thaliana [63], and their roles in regulating shoot structure are conserved across species. PsnWOX9 showed an upregulation trend at the late stage of stem development, with its expression peaking at the 11th stem node, presumably acting at the stem node maturation stage and co−involved in the regulation of shoot structure. AtWOX13 has high expression levels in inflorescence, flower buds, lateral roots, and root tips [64,65]; PtrWOX13 is expressed in several tissues including the xylem and the phloem, and it affects the nutritional growth and secondary tissue formation in P. trichocarpa. The PsnWOX13 subfamily genes, which are homologous in Populus × xiaohei, showed different levels of upregulated expression in the xylem, the phloem, and roots and may be involved in plant secondary growth and root development.
Our data suggest that a few PsnWOX genes have different expression patterns from their homologs in A. thaliana and differ somewhat from the expression in P. trichocarpa (Figure S3). PsnWOX5 was expressed at very low levels in roots and differed from the expression profile of WOX5 in Populus tomentosa [44]. We also noted that duplicated genes exhibited different expression levels, and this variability was present in species such as cotton [66]. PsnWOX4a was highly expressed in the phloem, whereas PsnWOX4b was difficult to detect at the same site; PsnWOX13b and PsnWOX13c were significantly more highly expressed in the terminal buds than PsnWOX13a. These results suggest that some WOX genes may have acquired different functions during evolution and that some differences exist between species [67,68].
After plants are subjected to drought and salt stress, a series of physiological and biochemical changes will occur in vivo, including re−establishing cellular ion homeostasis, repairing organismal injury, and coordinating growth regulation. In this process, signal transduction factors and transcription factors are important, as they can receive signals and transmit them to downstream transcription factors to regulate gene expression. For example, most of the constitutive BpWOX genes are tolerant to drought, salt, cold, and cadmium (CdCl2) [28]. Cadmium stress alters the expression of paralogous homologous WOX genes through cytokine accumulation, thereby affecting aboveground form and root size and shape; WUS/WOX5−related genes and cytokine signaling play key roles in the regulatory network of SAM and RAM maintenance and activity, and cadmium induces their misexpression [69,70,71].
In CdCl2−treated roots, PsnWOX13a and PsnWOX13b exhibited a positive regulatory pattern in the pretreatment period, presumably due to having a regulatory role in the corresponding abiotic stress process by responding to cytokines, whereas PsnWOX13c, which is based on replication events, differed in function, and its expression was continuously downregulated throughout the stress process, suggesting that CdCl2 stress may have suppressed its expression through the corresponding signal transduction pathway. In rice, the expression of OsWOX3 and OsWOX5 could be rapidly increased 3−fold to 8−fold after 1 h treatment with NaCl, while other WOX genes did not respond to NaCl stress [72].
The expression of PsnWOX5b also increased rapidly in the early stage, but other genes differed from rice, showing that the expression of all genes, except PsnWOX1a, in the roots was strongly induced at 24 h, indicating that these genes could respond rapidly during NaCl stress. In NaHCO3−treated roots, the expression of all PsnWOX genes was induced, indicating that PsnWOX genes are involved in salt stress resistance. In rice, eight WOX genes (OsWUS, OsWOX3, OsWOX4, OsWOX5, OsWOX9B, OsWOX11, OsWOX12A, and OsWOX12B) were upregulated nearly 4−fold after 3 h of induction due to drought; the OsWOX13 gene is ABA−responsive and is widely involved in regulating seeds and nutrient organs, and its overexpression results in premature flowering and extensive effects on biological processes following drought and salt stress [73,74]. In tomato, induced stress analysis revealed that SlWOX13 showed a significant upregulation under 7−d drought treatment conditions [34]; the expression of almost all PsnWOX genes was induced in drought stress, and the expression was rapidly upregulated when the treatment time reached 12 h, consistent with the results in rice. PsnWOX13b was significantly upregulated at 6 h of drought treatment, suggesting that Populus × xiaohei may respond to ABA and regulate various postembryonic developmental processes by regulating its expression level in roots in response to drought stress.

5. Conclusions

In this study, eight WOX genes were obtained by cloning, and bioinformatic analysis showed that all contained a conserved homeodomain. PsnWOX1a, PsnWOX4a, PsnWOX4b, and PsnWOX5b belonged to the modern clade; PsnWOX9 belonged to the intermediate clade, and PsnWOX13a, PsnWOX13b, and PsnWOX13c belonged to the ancient clade. Seven segmental−duplicated gene pairs among the PsnWOX gene family were mainly under purifying selection conditions. The expression of family members differed in different tissues, with PsnWOX1a mainly expressed in leaves, the PsnWOX4 subfamily mainly concentrated in the xylem and phloem, and the PsnWOX13 subfamily having high expression in the xylem, phloem, and roots. SQ−PCR showed that WOX genes responded strongly and were differentially expressed under four stress treatments, CdCl2, NaCl, NaHCO3, and PEG. The expression of PsnWOX4a, PsnWOX4b, PsnWOX9, PsnWOX13a, PsnWOX13b, and PsnWOX13c reached maximum levels in roots at 24 h under NaCl and NaHCO3 stress; the amount of expression of the PsnWOX13 subfamily was significantly increased in the early stages of CdCl2 treatment, and the expression of almost all of the PsnWOX genes was induced under drought conditions. This study provides important information concerning the WOX genes of Populus × xiaohei and provides a theoretical reference for their functions in abiotic stresses.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/article/10.3390/f13010122/s1. Table S1: Primers for PsnWOX gene cloning, Table S2: SQ−PCR primers for PsnWOX gene, Table S3: Motif sequences of PsnWOX proteins, Table S4: Information on the Segmental duplications analysis of the PsnWOX genes. Figure S1: Phylogenetic tree of Populus × xiaohei and P. trichocarpa, Figure S2: SQ−PCR electrophoresis profiles of the WOX gene of Populus × xiaohei in tissue sites and under abiotic stress, Figure S3: Tissue−specific expression profiles of PsnWOX genes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.L. and Y.L. (Yue Li); methodology, H.L.; software, Y.L. (Yue Li), F.L. and B.W.; validation, Y.L. (Yue Li) and H.L.; formal analysis, Y.L. (Yue Li); investigation, Y.L. (Yue Li), C.J., Y.L. (Yuting Liu), and L.W.; resources, Y.L. (Yue Li); data curation, Y.L. (Yue Li) and H.L.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.L. (Yue Li); writing—review and editing, H.L.; visualization, Y.L. (Yue Li); supervision, H.L.; project administration, H.L.; funding acquisition, H.L., G.L. and J.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Major Special Project on Breeding New Varieties of Genetically Modified Organisms, grant number 2018ZX08020002.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, X.; Zong, J.; Liu, J.; Yin, J.; Zhang, D. Genome-wide analysis of WOX gene family in rice, sorghum, maize, Arabidopsis and poplar. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2010, 52, 1016–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hao, Q.; Zhang, L.; Yang, Y.; Shan, Z.; Zhou, X.A. Genome-Wide Analysis of the WOX Gene Family and Function Exploration of GmWOX18 in Soybean. Plants 2019, 8, 215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Shi, L.; Wang, K.; Du, L.; Song, Y.; Li, H.; Ye, X. Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Profiling Analysis of WOX Family Protein-Encoded Genes in Triticeae Species. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 9325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Feng, C.; Zou, S.; Gao, P.; Wang, Z. In silicoidentification, characterization expression profile of WUSCHEL-Related Homeobox (WOX) gene family in two species of kiwifruit. PeerJ 2021, 9, e12348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Youngstrom, C.E.; Geadelmann, L.F.; Irish, E.E.; Cheng, C.L. A fern WUSCHEL-RELATED HOMEOBOX gene functions in both gametophyte and sporophyte generations. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Haecker, A.; Gross-Hardt, R.; Geiges, B.; Sarkar, A.; Breuninger, H.; Herrmann, M.; Laux, T. Expression dynamics of WOX genes mark cell fate decisions during early embryonic patterning in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 2004, 131, 657–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Nardmann, J.; Werr, W. The shoot stem cell niche in angiosperms: Expression patterns of WUS orthologues in rice and maize imply major modifications in the course of mono- and dicot evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2006, 23, 2492–2504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Wu, C.C.; Li, F.W.; Kramer, E.M. Large-scale phylogenomic analysis suggests three ancient superclades of the WUSCHEL-RELATED HOMEOBOX transcription factor family in plants. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0223521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Gambino, G.; Minuto, M.; Boccacci, P.; Perrone, I.; Vallania, R.; Gribaudo, I. Characterization of expression dynamics of WOX homeodomain transcription factors during somatic embryogenesis in Vitis vinifera. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 1089–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Dolzblasz, A.; Nardmann, J.; Clerici, E.; Causier, B.; van der Graaff, E.; Chen, J.; Davies, B.; Werr, W.; Laux, T. Stem Cell Regulation by Arabidopsis WOX Genes. Mol. Plant 2016, 9, 1028–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Lian, G.; Ding, Z.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, D.; Xu, J. Origins and evolution of WUSCHEL-related homeobox protein family in plant kingdom. Sci. World J. 2014, 2014, 534140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Van der Graaff, E.; Laux, T.; Rensing, S.A. The WUS homeobox-containing (WOX) protein family. Genome Biol. 2009, 10, 248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bürglin, T.R.; Affolter, M. Homeodomain proteins: An update. Chromosoma 2016, 125, 497–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Lau, S.; Slane, D.; Herud, O.; Kong, J.; Jürgens, G. Early embryogenesis in flowering plants: Setting up the basic body pattern. Ann. Rev. Plant Biol. 2012, 63, 483–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Nakata, M.; Matsumoto, N.; Tsugeki, R.; Rikirsch, E.; Laux, T.; Okada, K. Roles of the middle domainspecific WUSCHELRELATED HOMEOBOX genes in early development of leaves in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 519–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Ji, J.; Strable, J.; Shimizu, R.; Koenig, D.; Sinha, N.; Scanlon, M.J. WOX4 Promotes Procambial Development. Plant Physiol. 2010, 152, 1346–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Lin, H.; Niu, L.; McHale, N.A.; Ohme-Takagi, M.; Mysore, K.S.; Tadege, M. Evolutionarily conserved repressive activity of WOX proteins mediates leaf blade outgrowth and floral organ development in plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 366–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Nair, R.; Rost, B. LOCnet and LOCtarget: Sub-cellular localization for structural genomics targets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, W517–W521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Sarkar, A.K.; Luijten, M.; Miyashima, S.; Lenhard, M.; Hashimoto, T.; Nakajima, K.; Scheres, B.; Heidstra, R.; Laux, T. Conserved factors regulate signalling in Arabidopsis thaliana shoot and root stem cell organizers. Nature 2007, 446, 811–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kamiya, N.; Nagasaki, H.; Morikami, A.; Sato, Y.; Matsuoka, M. Isolation and characterization of a rice WUSCHEL-type homeobox gene that is specifically expressed in the central cells of a quiescent center in the root apical meristem. Plant J. 2003, 35, 429–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Wu, X.; Chory, J.; Weigel, D. Combinations of WOX activities regulate tissue proliferation during Arabidopsis embryonic development. Dev. Biol. 2007, 309, 306–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Wu, X.; Dabi, T.; Weigel, D. Requirement of homeobox gene STIMPY/WOX9 for Arabidopsis meristem growth and maintenance. Curr. Biol. 2005, 15, 436–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Deveaux, Y.; Toffano-Nioche, C.; Claisse, G.; Thareau, V.; Morin, H.; Laufs, P.; Moreau, H.; Kreis, M.; Lecharny, A. Genes of the most conserved WOX clade in plants affect root and flower development in Arabidopsis. BMC Evol. Biol. 2008, 8, 291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Romera-Branchat, M.; Ripoll, J.J.; Yanofsky, M.F.; Pelaz, S. The WOX13 homeobox gene promotes replum formation in the Arabidopsis thaliana fruit. Plant J. 2013, 73, 37–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Cao, Y.; Han, Y.; Meng, D.; Li, G.; Li, D.; Abdullah, M.; Jin, Q.; Lin, Y.; Cai, Y. Genome-Wide Analysis Suggests the Relaxed Purifying Selection Affect the Evolution of WOX Genes in Pyrus bretschneideri, Prunus persica, Prunus mume, and Fragaria vesca. Front. Genet. 2017, 8, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Zhang, F.; Wang, H.; Kalve, S.; Wolabu, T.W.; Nakashima, J.; Golz, J.F.; Tadege, M. Control of leaf blade outgrowth and floral organ development by LEUNIG, ANGUSTIFOLIA3 and WOX transcriptional regulators. New Phytol. 2019, 223, 2024–2038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Li, X.X.; Liu, C.; Li, W.; Zhang, Z.L.; Gao, X.M.; Zhou, H.; Guo, Y.F. Genome-wide identification, phylogenetic analysis and expression profiling of the WOX family genes in Solanum lycopersicum. Yi Chuan 2016, 38, 444–460. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  28. Tang, F.; Chen, N.; Zhao, M.; Wang, Y.; He, R.; Peng, X.; Shen, S. Identification and Functional Divergence Analysis of WOX Gene Family in Paper Mulberry. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 1782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Kumar, M.; Kherawat, B.S.; Dey, P.; Saha, D.; Singh, A.; Bhatia, S.K.; Ghodake, G.S.; Kadam, A.A.; Kim, H.U.; Manorama; et al. Genome-Wide Identification and Characterization of PIN-FORMED (PIN) Gene Family Reveals Role in Developmental and Various Stress Conditions in Triticum aestivum L. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. You, L.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, T.; Zhu, Y.; Ren, N.; Jiang, X.; Zhou, Y. Genome-wide identification of nitrate transporter 2 (NRT2) gene family and functional analysis of MeNRT2.2 in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz). Gene 2022, 809, 146038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Feng, X.; Cheng, H.; Zuo, D.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Q.; Lv, L.; Li, S.; Yu, J.Z.; Song, G. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of GL2-interacting-repressor (GIR) genes during cotton fiber and fuzz development. Planta 2021, 255, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Goodstein, D.M.; Shu, S.; Howson, R.; Neupane, R.; Hayes, R.D.; Fazo, J.; Mitros, T.; Dirks, W.; Hellsten, U.; Putnam, N.; et al. Phytozome: A comparative platform for green plant genomics. Nucleic Acids Res 2012, 40, D1178–D1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. El-Gebali, S.; Mistry, J.; Bateman, A.; Eddy, S.R.; Luciani, A.; Potter, S.C.; Qureshi, M.; Richardson, L.J.; Salazar, G.A.; Smart, A.; et al. The Pfam protein families database in 2019. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, D427–D432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Potter, S.C.; Luciani, A.; Eddy, S.R.; Park, Y.; Lopez, R.; Finn, R.D. HMMER web server: 2018 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, W200–W204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Wilkins, M.R.; Gasteiger, E.; Bairoch, A.; Sanchez, J.C.; Williams, K.L.; Appel, R.D.; Hochstrasser, D.F. Protein identification and analysis tools in the ExPASy server. Methods Mol. Biol. 1999, 112, 531–552. [Google Scholar]
  36. Horton, P.; Park, K.J.; Obayashi, T.; Fujita, N.; Harada, H.; Adams-Collier, C.J.; Nakai, K. WoLF PSORT: Protein localization predictor. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35, W585–W587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for Bigger Datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Hu, B.; Jin, J.; Guo, A.Y.; Zhang, H.; Luo, J.; Gao, G. GSDS 2.0: An upgraded gene feature visualization server. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 1296–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Bailey, T.L.; Boden, M.; Buske, F.A.; Frith, M.; Grant, C.E.; Clementi, L.; Ren, J.Y.; Li, W.W.; Noble, W.S. MEME SUITE: Tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, W202–W208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Sjödin, A.; Street, N.R.; Sandberg, G.; Gustafsson, P.; Jansson, S. The Populus Genome Integrative Explorer (PopGenIE): A new resource for exploring the Populus genome. New Phytol. 2009, 182, 1013–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Bolser, D.M.; Staines, D.M.; Perry, E.; Kersey, P.J. Ensembl Plants: Integrating Tools for Visualizing, Mining, and Analyzing Plant Genomic Data. Methods Mol. Biol. 2017, 1533, 1–31. [Google Scholar]
  42. Rozas, J.; Rozas, R. DnaSP version 2.0: A novel software package for extensive molecular population genetics analysis. Comput. Appl. Biosci. CABIOS 1997, 13, 307–311. [Google Scholar]
  43. Navarro, A.; Barton, N.H. Chromosomal speciation and molecular divergence—Accelerated evolution in rearranged chromosomes. Science 2003, 300, 321–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Liu, B.; Wang, L.; Zhang, J.; Li, J.; Zheng, H.; Chen, J.; Lu, M. WUSCHEL-related Homeobox genes in Populus tomentosa: Diversified expression patterns and a functional similarity in adventitious root formation. BMC Genom. 2014, 15, 296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Yang, Z.; Gong, Q.; Qin, W.; Yang, Z.; Cheng, Y.; Lu, L.; Ge, X.; Zhang, C.; Wu, Z.; Li, F. Genome-wide analysis of WOX genes in upland cotton and their expression pattern under different stresses. BMC Plant Biol. 2017, 17, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wang, L.Q.; Li, Z.; Wen, S.S.; Wang, J.N.; Zhao, S.T.; Lu, M.Z. WUSCHEL-related homeobox gene PagWOX11/12a responds to drought stress by enhancing root elongation and biomass growth in poplar. J. Exp. Bot. 2020, 71, 1503–1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Baesso, B.; Terzaghi, M.; Chiatante, D.; Scippa, G.S.; Montagnoli, A. WOX genes expression during the formation of new lateral roots from secondary structures in Populus nigra (L.) taproot. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 18890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Jha, P.; Ochatt, S.J.; Kumar, V. WUSCHEL: A master regulator in plant growth signaling. Plant Cell Rep. 2020, 39, 431–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Zhang, C.; Wang, J.; Wang, X.; Li, C.; Ye, Z.; Zhang, J. UF, a WOX gene, regulates a novel phenotype of un-fused flower in tomato. Plant Sci. Int. J. Exp. Plant Biol. 2020, 297, 110523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wang, C.; Zhao, B.; He, L.; Zhou, S.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, W.; Guo, S.; Wang, R.; Bai, Q.; Li, Y.; et al. The WOX family transcriptional regulator SlLAM1 controls compound leaf and floral organ development in Solanum lycopersicum. J. Exp. Bot. 2021, 72, 1822–1835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Li, M.; Wang, R.; Liu, Z.; Wu, X.; Wang, J. Genome-wide identification and analysis of the WUSCHEL-related homeobox (WOX) gene family in allotetraploid Brassica napus reveals changes in WOX genes during polyploidization. BMC Genom. 2019, 20, 317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Liu, J.; Jiang, C.; Chen, T.; Zha, L.; Zhang, J.; Huang, L. Identification and 3D gene expression patterns of WUSCEHEL-related homeobox (WOX) genes from Panax ginseng. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 143, 257–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wang, P.; Li, C.; Li, C.; Zhao, C.; Xia, H.; Zhao, S.; Hou, L.; Gao, C.; Wan, S.; Wang, X. Identification and expression dynamics of three WUSCHEL related homeobox 13 (WOX13) genes in peanut. Dev. Genes Evol. 2015, 225, 221–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Vandenbussche, M.; Horstman, A.; Zethof, J.; Koes, R.; Rijpkema, A.S.; Gerats, T. Differential recruitment of WOX transcription factors for lateral development and organ fusion in Petunia and Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2009, 21, 2269–2283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Cannon, S.B.; Mitra, A.; Baumgarten, A.; Young, N.D.; May, G. The roles of segmental and tandem gene duplication in the evolution of large gene families in Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Plant Biol. 2004, 4, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Vandenbussche, M. The role of WOX1 genes in blade development and beyond. J. Exp. Bot. 2021, 72, 1514–1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zhang, Z.; Runions, A.; Mentink, R.A.; Kierzkowski, D.; Karady, M.; Hashemi, B.; Huijser, P.; Strauss, S.; Gan, X.; Ljung, K.; et al. A WOX/Auxin Biosynthesis Module Controls Growth to Shape Leaf Form. Curr. Biol. CB 2020, 30, 4857–4868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Zhang, F.; Tadege, M. Repression of AS2 by WOX family transcription factors is required for leaf development in Medicago and Arabidopsis. Plant Signal. Behav. 2015, 10, e993291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Gao, B.; Wen, C.; Fan, L.S.; Kou, Y.P.; Ma, N.; Zhao, L.J. A Rosa canina WUSCHEL-related homeobox gene, RcWOX1, is involved in auxin-induced rhizoid formation. Plant Mol. Biol. 2014, 86, 671–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ohmori, Y.; Tanaka, W.; Kojima, M.; Sakakibara, H.; Hirano, H.Y. WUSCHEL-RELATED HOMEOBOX4 is involved in meristem maintenance and is negatively regulated by the CLE gene FCP1 in rice. Plant Cell 2013, 25, 229–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Suer, S.; Agusti, J.; Sanchez, P.; Schwarz, M.; Greb, T. WOX4 imparts auxin responsiveness to cambium cells in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2011, 23, 3247–3259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Stahl, Y.; Wink, R.H.; Ingram, G.C.; Simon, R. A signaling module controlling the stem cell niche in Arabidopsis root meristems. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19, 909–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Ueda, M.; Zhang, Z.; Laux, T. Transcriptional activation of Arabidopsis axis patterning genes WOX8/9 links zygote polarity to embryo development. Dev. Cell. 2011, 20, 264–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Sakakibara, K.; Reisewitz, P.; Aoyama, T.; Friedrich, T.; Ando, S.; Sato, Y.; Tamada, Y.; Nishiyama, T.; Hiwatashi, Y.; Kurata, T.; et al. WOX13-like genes are required for reprogramming of leaf and protoplast cells into stem cells in the moss Physcomitrella patens. Development 2014, 141, 1660–1670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Sun, X.D.; Xiang, N.; Wang, C.D.; Yang, S.H.; Li, X.; Yang, Y.Q.; Yang, Y.P. Isolation and Functional Analysis of SpWOX13 from Stipa purpurea. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 2015, 33, 1441–1450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. He, P.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, H.; Yuan, Y.; Wang, C.; Yu, J.; Xiao, G. Comprehensive analysis of WOX genes uncovers that WOX13 is involved in phytohormone-mediated fiber development in cotton. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Ten Hove, C.A.; Heidstra, R. Who begets whom? Plant cell fate determination by asymmetric cell division. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2008, 11, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Chandler, J.; Nardmann, J.; Werr, W. Plant development revolves around axes. Trends Plant Sci. 2008, 13, 78–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Leonardo, B.; Emanuela, T.; Letizia, M.M.; Antonella, M.; Marco, M.; Fabrizio, A.; Beatrice, B.M.; Adriana, C. Cadmium affects cell niches maintenance in Arabidopsis thaliana post-embryonic shoot and root apical meristem by altering the expression of WUS/WOX homolog genes and cytokinin accumulation. Plant Physiol. Bioch. 2021, 167, 785–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Zhou, X.; Guo, Y.; Zhao, P.; Sun, M.X. Comparative Analysis of WUSCHEL-Related Homeobox Genes Revealed Their Parent-of-Origin and Cell Type-Specific Expression Pattern During Early Embryogenesis in Tobacco. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Nakata, M.; Okada, K. The Leaf Adaxial-Abaxial Boundary and Lamina Growth. Plants 2013, 2, 174–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Cheng, S.; Huang, Y.; Zhu, N.; Zhao, Y. The rice WUSCHEL-related homeobox genes are involved in reproductive organ development, hormone signaling and abiotic stress response. Gene 2014, 549, 266–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Hussain, Q.; Asim, M.; Zhang, R.; Khan, R.; Farooq, S.; Wu, J. Transcription Factors Interact with ABA through Gene Expression and Signaling Pathways to Mitigate Drought and Salinity Stress. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Minh-Thu, P.T.; Kim, J.S.; Chae, S.; Jun, K.M.; Lee, G.S.; Kim, D.E.; Cheong, J.J.; Song, S.I.; Nahm, B.H.; Kim, Y.K. A WUSCHEL Homeobox Transcription Factor, OsWOX13, Enhances Drought Tolerance and Triggers Early Flowering in Rice. Mol. Cells 2018, 41, 781–798. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The products of PCR amplification of PsnWOX genes. M stands for DL 2000 Marker; number 1 stands for the PCR product. (A) PsnWOX1a; (B) PsnWOX4a; (C) PsnWOX4b; (D) PsnWOX5b; (E) PsnWOX9; (F) PsnWOX13a; (G) PsnWOX13b; (H) PsnWOX13c.
Figure 1. The products of PCR amplification of PsnWOX genes. M stands for DL 2000 Marker; number 1 stands for the PCR product. (A) PsnWOX1a; (B) PsnWOX4a; (C) PsnWOX4b; (D) PsnWOX5b; (E) PsnWOX9; (F) PsnWOX13a; (G) PsnWOX13b; (H) PsnWOX13c.
Forests 13 00122 g001
Figure 2. Multiple sequence alignment was performed on WOX proteins from Populus × xiaohei and A. thaliana. Sequence logo highlight conserved positions in the sequence comparison, and fully conserved residues are marked with colored underlines and red asterisks (*).
Figure 2. Multiple sequence alignment was performed on WOX proteins from Populus × xiaohei and A. thaliana. Sequence logo highlight conserved positions in the sequence comparison, and fully conserved residues are marked with colored underlines and red asterisks (*).
Forests 13 00122 g002
Figure 3. Phylogenetic relationships of 63 WOX genes. The WOX genes from A. thaliana (At: 15), E. grandis (Eg: 9), O. sativa (Os: 13), P. trichocarpa (Pt: 18), and Populus × xiaohei (Psn: 8) are shown as yellow squares, blue triangles, purple diamonds, green circles, and red triangles, respectively. Bootstrap values are shown near the nodes.
Figure 3. Phylogenetic relationships of 63 WOX genes. The WOX genes from A. thaliana (At: 15), E. grandis (Eg: 9), O. sativa (Os: 13), P. trichocarpa (Pt: 18), and Populus × xiaohei (Psn: 8) are shown as yellow squares, blue triangles, purple diamonds, green circles, and red triangles, respectively. Bootstrap values are shown near the nodes.
Forests 13 00122 g003
Figure 4. Gene structure and conserved motifs of WOX genes in A. thaliana and Populus × xiaohei. (A) The NJ tree was constructed from a total of 23 WOX genes from Populus × xiaohei and A. thaliana. The different background colors represent the three clades that are supported by high bootstrap values. (B) Gene structures were generated using the GSDS 2.0. (C) Conserved motifs were predicted using the MEME tool.
Figure 4. Gene structure and conserved motifs of WOX genes in A. thaliana and Populus × xiaohei. (A) The NJ tree was constructed from a total of 23 WOX genes from Populus × xiaohei and A. thaliana. The different background colors represent the three clades that are supported by high bootstrap values. (B) Gene structures were generated using the GSDS 2.0. (C) Conserved motifs were predicted using the MEME tool.
Forests 13 00122 g004
Figure 5. Chromosomal distribution of PsnWOX genes. Yellow strips represent chromosomes. Chromosome numbers are shown above the bar chart.
Figure 5. Chromosomal distribution of PsnWOX genes. Yellow strips represent chromosomes. Chromosome numbers are shown above the bar chart.
Forests 13 00122 g005
Figure 6. Schematic representations of segmental duplications of PsnWOX genes. The seven putative segmental duplication pairs are linked by the colored lines.
Figure 6. Schematic representations of segmental duplications of PsnWOX genes. The seven putative segmental duplication pairs are linked by the colored lines.
Forests 13 00122 g006
Figure 7. Synteny analysis of WOX genes between Populus × xiaohei and other plants. (A) Monocotyledonous plant O. sativa. (B) Dicotyledonous plants A. thaliana. (C) Dicotyledonous plants G. max. Grey lines in background indicate collinear blocks within Populus × xiaohei and other plant genomes; red lines indicate syntenic WOX gene pairs.
Figure 7. Synteny analysis of WOX genes between Populus × xiaohei and other plants. (A) Monocotyledonous plant O. sativa. (B) Dicotyledonous plants A. thaliana. (C) Dicotyledonous plants G. max. Grey lines in background indicate collinear blocks within Populus × xiaohei and other plant genomes; red lines indicate syntenic WOX gene pairs.
Forests 13 00122 g007
Figure 8. Tissue−specific expression pattern of PsnWOX genes. (A) Different tissue sites; (B) Stem nodes throughout the development period; (C) Leaves throughout development.
Figure 8. Tissue−specific expression pattern of PsnWOX genes. (A) Different tissue sites; (B) Stem nodes throughout the development period; (C) Leaves throughout development.
Forests 13 00122 g008
Figure 9. PsnWOX gene expression patterns under different stress treatments. The relative expression levels of WOX genes in two different tissues (roots and leaves) of Populus × xiaohei seedlings treated with CdCl2, NaCl, NaHCO3, or PEG were analyzed by SQ−PCR. The data represent the mean ± SE of three independent replicates. (A) Expression of CdCl2 treatment in roots; (B) Expression of CdCl2 treatment in leaves; (C) Expression of NaCl treatment in roots; (D) Expression of NaCl treatment in leaves; (E) Expression of NaHCO3 treatment in roots; (F) Expression of NaHCO3 treatment in leaves; (G) Expression of PEG treatment in roots; (H) Expression of PEG treatment in leaves.
Figure 9. PsnWOX gene expression patterns under different stress treatments. The relative expression levels of WOX genes in two different tissues (roots and leaves) of Populus × xiaohei seedlings treated with CdCl2, NaCl, NaHCO3, or PEG were analyzed by SQ−PCR. The data represent the mean ± SE of three independent replicates. (A) Expression of CdCl2 treatment in roots; (B) Expression of CdCl2 treatment in leaves; (C) Expression of NaCl treatment in roots; (D) Expression of NaCl treatment in leaves; (E) Expression of NaHCO3 treatment in roots; (F) Expression of NaHCO3 treatment in leaves; (G) Expression of PEG treatment in roots; (H) Expression of PEG treatment in leaves.
Forests 13 00122 g009
Figure 10. qRT−PCR analysis of some PsnWOXs expression to verify SQ−PCR results. Transcript levels of PsnWOXs were calculated using the 2ΔΔCt method. Green columns represent the expression in the leaf, black column represents the expression in the root.
Figure 10. qRT−PCR analysis of some PsnWOXs expression to verify SQ−PCR results. Transcript levels of PsnWOXs were calculated using the 2ΔΔCt method. Green columns represent the expression in the leaf, black column represents the expression in the root.
Forests 13 00122 g010
Table 1. Features of the eight WOX genes from Populus × xiaohei.
Table 1. Features of the eight WOX genes from Populus × xiaohei.
GeneChromosomeProtein Length (Amino Acids)Molecular Weight (Da)PIAliphatic IndexGRAVYSubcellular
Localization
PsnWOX1aChr1238844093.945.7861.42−0.768Nucleus
PsnWOX4aChr0221324506.569.3058.64−1.010Nucleus
PsnWOX4bChr1421324520.599.3058.64−1.010Nucleus
PsnWOX5bChr1021925237.668.9265.48−0.546Cytoblast
PsnWOX9Chr0439043080.379.1061.46−0.559Nucleus
PsnWOX13aChr0524827988.995.5166.85−0.887Nucleus
PsnWOX13bChr0521624604.805.7367.27−0.763Nucleus
PsnWOX13cChr0221524521.595.3359.91−0.775Nucleus
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, Y.; Jin, C.; Liu, Y.; Wang, L.; Li, F.; Wang, B.; Liu, G.; Jiang, J.; Li, H. Global Analysis of the WOX Transcription Factor Gene Family in Populus × xiaohei T. S. Hwang et Liang Reveals Their Stress−Responsive Patterns. Forests 2022, 13, 122. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/f13010122

AMA Style

Li Y, Jin C, Liu Y, Wang L, Li F, Wang B, Liu G, Jiang J, Li H. Global Analysis of the WOX Transcription Factor Gene Family in Populus × xiaohei T. S. Hwang et Liang Reveals Their Stress−Responsive Patterns. Forests. 2022; 13(1):122. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/f13010122

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Yue, Chunhui Jin, Yuting Liu, Lili Wang, Fangrui Li, Bo Wang, Guifeng Liu, Jing Jiang, and Huiyu Li. 2022. "Global Analysis of the WOX Transcription Factor Gene Family in Populus × xiaohei T. S. Hwang et Liang Reveals Their Stress−Responsive Patterns" Forests 13, no. 1: 122. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/f13010122

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop