Next Article in Journal
The Kaposi’s Sarcoma-Associated Herpesvirus (KSHV) gH/gL Complex Is the Predominant Neutralizing Antigenic Determinant in KSHV-Infected Individuals
Previous Article in Journal
Preliminary Identification of Potential Vaccine Targets for the COVID-19 Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) Based on SARS-CoV Immunological Studies
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Viruses
Volume 12
Issue 3
10.3390/v12030255
viruses-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Baseline Amino Acid Substitutions in the NS5A ISDR and PKR Binding Domain of Hepatitis C and Different Fibrosis Levels and Levels of Development of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients Treated with DAAs

by
Stefania Paolucci
1,
Antonio Piralla
1,
Federica Novazzi
1,
Alice Fratini
1,
Renato Maserati
2,
Roberto Gulminetti
2,
Stefano Novati
2,
Giorgio Barbarini
3,
Paolo Sacchi
3,
Annalisa De Silvestri
4 and
Fausto Baldanti
1,5,*
1
Molecular Virology Unit, Microbiology and Virology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy
2
Institute of Infectious Diseases, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
3
Division of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy
4
Clinical Epidemiology and Biometric Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy
5
Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Viruses 2020, 12(3), 255; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/v12030255
Submission received: 24 January 2020 / Revised: 17 February 2020 / Accepted: 22 February 2020 / Published: 25 February 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Animal Viruses)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Variations in the interferon sensitivity-determining region (ISDR) within the NS5A region were related to the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV). The aim of the study was to investigate a relationship between ISDR/PKR substitutions and their association with liver fibrosis or HCC development. A total of 316 patients infected with HCV and treated with DAAs were evaluated. HCV RNA was quantified and sequenced before treatment. The liver fibrosis stage was assessed by transient elastography and equalized to METAVIR scores. Multivariate analysis showed that ≥3 substitutions in ISDR and ≥6 in PKR-bd were significantly associated with advanced fibrosis. Advanced fibrosis was observed in patients with higher substitutions in ISDR and PKR-bd. A higher correlation between advanced fibrosis and a high frequency of ≥3 substitutions in ISDR and ≥6 in PKR-bd was observed in patients infected with genotype 2c. In addition, in a higher proportion of HCC patients, advanced fibrosis (40.4% vs. 88.2%; p < 0.001) and ≥6 substitutions in PKR-bd (15.4% vs. 41.2%; p = 0.01) was observed. In conclusion, a higher number of substitutions in ISDR and PKR-bd were associated with advanced liver fibrosis, suggesting a use of like predictors for progression in the liver damage. A significantly higher number of PKR-bd substitutions was observed in HCC patients; in particular, in patients infected with HCV genotype 2c.

1. Introduction

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is one of the main causes of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Therapy to eradicate HCV prevents the progression of liver fibrosis [1,2,3] and the development of HCC [4,5,6]. However, HCC can develop even in patients with chronic hepatitis C who achieve sustained virologic response (SVR) [7,8]. Previous studies have shown that liver fibrosis is strongly associated with the development of HCC after SVR [9,10]. Thus, patients at risk of HCC should continue to have close surveillance after SVR. In addition, it is important to determine which patients might have higher risk factors for HCC after SVR, and for how long they should be monitored.
Due to the recent introduction of direct-acting antiviral drugs (DAAs) for HCV, an increased number of patients with chronic hepatitis C have achieved SVR. However, the high degree of HCV genetic diversity may play an important role in the virus’s ability to evade the immune response and antiviral therapy’s selective pressure [11,12]. This variability could be focused on changes occurring at different positions in the NS3 protease, NS5B polymerase, and NS5A protein. Several studies have highlighted the influence of sequence heterogeneity within a particular region, especially in the NS5A, on the outcome of IFN-based therapy due to its relationship with IFN responsiveness [13]. NS5A modulates HCV replication through interactions with other viral proteins and host proteins to form the HCV replication complex and regulate host cell functions, including viral pathogenesis [14]. In particular, amino acid substitutions in the interferon sensitivity-determining region (ISDR) within the NS5A region have been related to advanced fibrosis and the development of HCC in patients infected with HCV [10,15]. In addition, it is known that ISDR is located within the protein kinase R-binding domain (PKR-bd) involved in a tumor suppressor function [16]. Other studies reported that NS5A resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) were associated with advanced liver fibrosis [13]. However, the relationship between NS5A substitutions and liver disease progression remains unclear. The aim of the present study is to investigate a potential relationship between the number of baseline ISDR/PKR-bd substitutions and the liver fibrosis stage and/or the development of HCC in SVR after treatment with DAAs.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patient and Clinical Characteristics

This study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo (protocol no. 20080009620, approval date: 11 March 2008). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants in the study. A total of 316 patients infected with HCV with genotypes 1a, 1b, 2c, 3a, and 4d referred to the Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia between January 2017 and April 2019 were evaluated in the study. All patients were treated with DAAs. In addition, 70/316 patients had previously experienced peg-IFN treatment. The liver fibrosis stage was assessed by transient elastography and equalized to METAVIR scores, and F0–F2 was classified as low fibrosis, while F3-F4 as the advanced fibrosis stage [10]. Patients were monitored for at least 3 months after the completion of treatment to evaluate SVR. The follow-up period was defined as the period from the confirmation of SVR to HCC development or the last visit to assess HCC. Currently, patients with advanced fibrosis before treatment are monitored after stopping therapy for the duration of their lives to see the possible progression in HCC.

2.2. HCV-RNA Quantification and Sequencing

Serum samples were collected at the baseline in all 316 patients treated with DAAs included in the study, and the HCV load was quantified by using the Abbott HCV-RNA assay (Abbott Park, IL, USA). HCV genotyping was performed using the Abbott RealTime HCV Genotype II assay. In addition, in order to resolve possible ambiguities during the genotyping, the NS3/NS5B region was sequenced to further subtype the HCV strains. Data were analyzed using the Blast program (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). Viral RNA was extracted from serum samples using the automatic Easy Mag extractor (Biomerieux, Lyon, France). HCV NS5A domain I (aa 1-406), NS3-protease (aa 1-181), and NS5B (aa 1-591) genes were amplified using a nested RT-PCR [17,18]. The amplified NS5A region included PKR-bd (from aa 237 to 302) and ISDR (from aa 237 to 302). Direct sequencing was performed by using an automatic sequencer (ABI PRISM 3130xl genetic analyzer DNA Sequencer, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and the BigDye Terminator v1.1 Cycle Sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems) to evaluate the effect of the most represented viral quasispecies as already reported [10]. The RASs were defined according to the geno2pheno algorithm (http://hcv.geno2pheno.org/index.php) and other clinical and in vitro data for RAS interpretation [19,20,21]. Nucleotide sequences were aligned with MEGA 7.0 software and compared with the confirmed references: AF009606 for subtype 1a, D90208 for subtype 1b, JX227965 for subtype 2c, HM042073 for subtype 3a, and FJ462437 for subtype 4d. The reference strains have been chosen to be as homologous as possible to the HCV viral strains of the infected patients.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Continuous variables (i.e., viral load) were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test for independent nonparametric data. Categorical variables were compared by the chi-square or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate, and p-values of ≤0.05 were considered statistically significant. All these statistical analyses were performed using Graph Pad Prism software (version 5.00.288).
The cut-off values for the number of ISDR and PKR-bd amino acid substitutions were defined as three and six, respectively, by using ROC curve analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed under logistic regression models fitted for predicting high-grade fibrosis or HCC. These statistical analyses were performed using StataCorp USA 2017 (v15.1).

3. Results

Overall, only 9/316 (2.8%) patients failed to achieve SVR after treatment with DAAs. Development in HCC was observed in 17/316 (5.4%) patients within a year after treatment with DAAs. The evaluation of variants of the HCV NS5A-ISDR and PKR-bd genes was performed at pretreatment in all 316 patients. Overall, comparing ISDR and PKR-bd substitutions between SVR and failing-treatment patients, no significant differences were observed. In detail, the mean number of mutations observed in SVR and failing-treatment patients was comparable (1.85 ± 1.80 and 1.67 ± 1.32 in ISDR and 4.51 ± 2.42 and 4.67 ± 2.55 in PKR-bd, respectively p > 0.05). On the other hand, among all patients at baseline, a greater number of substitutions in both regions were observed in patients with advanced fibrosis levels. The mean number of mutations observed in the two regions of HCV patients with low and high fibrosis levels was comparable in ISDR (1.56 ± 1.28 and 2.20 ± 2.31; p = 0.13), while it was significantly different in PKR-bd (4.04 ± 1.74 and 5.07 ± 2.94; p = 0.006).
The results of univariate and multivariate analysis of factors associated with high fibrosis levels are shown in Table 1. In detail, 180/316 (56.9%) patients had low fibrosis values (F0–F2), and 136/316 (43.0%) patients had high fibrosis values (F3–F4). Univariate analysis showed that higher HCV RNA levels (p = 0.003), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) level (p < 0.001), γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (γ-GTP) levels (p < 0.001), male gender (p = 0.019), lower platelet (PLT) counts (p < 0.001), ≥3 substitutions in ISDR (p < 0.001), ≥6 substitutions in PKR-bd (p < 0.001), and PKR-bd with INS/DEL were associated with advanced fibrosis. According to multivariate analysis, higher HCV RNA level (p = 0.002), γGTP level (p = 0.002), lower platelet count (p < 0.001), ≥3 substitutions in ISDR (p = 0.007), and ≥6 in PKR-bd (p < 0.001) were identified as independent factors significantly associated with the development of advanced fibrosis. The number of substitutions observed in PKR-bd were significantly higher than those observed in ISDR (p < 0.001 vs. p = 0.007).
Clinical characteristics analyzed according to substitutions in the ISDR and PKR-bd are shown in Table 2. Among patients with ≥3 substitutions in ISDR and ≥6 in PKR-bd, older age (p = 0.006, p < 0.001) higher AST levels (p = 0.03, p < 0.001), γGTP levels (p = 0.01, p = 0.003), ALT levels (p = 0.01) in PKR-bd, and advanced fibrosis (p < 0.001, p < 0.001) were more frequently observed. In particular, a higher proportion of patients with ≥3 substitutions in ISDR and ≥6 in PKR-bd was observed in patients infected with genotype 2c (p < 0.001 in both genes). In addition, according to genotypes, a higher correlation between advanced fibrosis and ≥3 substitutions in ISDR and ≥6 substitutions in PKR-bd was observed in patients infected with genotype 2c (p < 0.001, p < 0.001), followed by genotype 1b (p = 0.007, p = 0.04) and genotype 1a (p = 0.013, p = 0.002) (Figure 1). To note, HCV with insertions/deletions (INS/DEL) in PKR-bd was observed in 16/316 (5.0%) patients: 10 infected with genotype 2c, 3 with genotype 1b, and 3 with genotype 3a (Figure 2). Among them, a significantly greater proportion of patients had advanced fibrosis stage (11/16, 67.8%; p = 0.0037). In particular, significant lower HCV RNA levels were observed in patients carrying HCV with INS/DEL in ISDR (amino acid 237 to 270), compared to patients with HCV carrying INS/DEL in the remaining part of PKR-bd (amino acid 271 to 302) (p = 0.021).
The comparison of factors according to the development of HCC showed that older age (p = 0.05), lower HCV RNA levels (p < 0.001), higher alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level (p < 0.001), AST level (p < 0.001), γGTP level (p = 0.02), and lower platelet count (p < 0.001) were observed at the baseline of patients who developed HCC after treatment with DAAs (Table 3). In particular, in a higher proportion of patients who developed HCC advanced fibrosis (40.4% vs. 88.2%; p < 0.001) and ≥6 substitutions in PKR-bd (15.4% vs. 41.2%; p = 0.01) was observed. In addition, the proportion of patients who developed HCC was higher among patients infected with genotype 1b (47%) than with genotype 1a (0%), genotype 2c (29.4%), genotype 3a (23.5%), or genotype 4d (0%).
Nevertheless, according to genotype, a significantly higher proportion of virus-carrying ≥3 substitutions in ISDR and ≥6 in PKR-bd was observed in patients who developed HCC infected with genotype 2c (5/5, 100%) than with patients infected with genotype 1b (2/8, 25%) (p < 0.001). No virus carrying high substitution levels was observed among HCC patients infected with genotypes 1a, 3a, and 4d.

Sequence Analysis of Other Viral Regions

Sequence analysis of the NS3 and NS5B regions was performed in all available samples to evaluate HCV variability in different genes. As expected, the proportion of amino acid changes detected in each region was variable, but no differences between samples from patients with low and high fibrosis levels were observed comparing NS3 and NS5B genes (data not shown).

4. Discussion

HCV eradication by DAA therapy reduces the progression of liver disease among patients with SVR. However, in a small proportion of them, a progression on HCC was observed [3,10,22]. The mechanisms and risk factors are still being investigated [23]. The optimal strategy for monitoring the incidence of advanced fibrosis and HCC remains unknown. Thus, it is important to determine the risk factors for liver damage progression after SVR. The association between substitutions in ISDR and development of HCC in patients who achieved SVR by IFN-based therapy has been reported in patients infected with HCV genotype 1b [10,15,24], which suggests that substitutions in ISDR might be a useful predictor for HCC together with higher γ-GTP level and older age. Here, the genetic variations in HCV NS5A-ISDR and PKR-bd of five different subtypes were evaluated. No differences were observed comparing SVR and treatment-failing patients. However, higher γ-GTP levels, lower PLT counts and plasma HCV RNA levels, as well as presence of higher level of substitutions in ISDR and in PKR-bd of HCV were associated with advanced liver fibrosis stage among all baseline treatment patients. In addition, a greater proportion of advanced fibrosis stage was observed among patients infected with HCV carrying INS/DEL in PKR-bd, as well as lower plasma HCV RNA levels being observed among patients infected with HCV carrying INS/DEL in ISDR compared to INS/DEL found in the rest of PKR-bd. As has already been hypothesized for the duplication of the V3 domain in NS5A, a higher number of substitutions in PKR-bd might alter protein functionality [25]. In fact, it is known that PKR can affect the pathogenesis of malignancies leading to cell growth [26,27] and may induce HCC cell proliferation with HCV infection [28]. Since the NS5A region suppresses PKR function, amino acid changes in ISDR and PKR-bd affect the binding and repression of PKR [16], thus determining a progression in the liver damage and hepatocarcinogenesis. NS5A of HCV genotype 1b carrying an ISDR with amino acid substitutions was associated with a reduced efficiency of infectious virus production in an in vitro human hepatocyte model determining a lower propagation ability [29,30]. Since lower plasma HCV RNA levels were observed among patients infected with HCV carrying higher substitutions in PKR-bd and carrying INS/DEL in ISDR, our hypothesis is that the mutated PKR-bd virus trapped in hepatocytes might indirectly determine a role in hepatocyte damage that could trigger a process of degeneration in HCC. Thus, higher levels of substitutions in the ISDR and even more in PKR-bd might be a useful predictor for advanced liver fibrosis and possibly for progression in HCC.
Among all patients infected with HCV carrying ≥3 substitutions in ISDR and ≥6 in PKR-bd, advanced fibrosis was observed in a higher proportion of patients infected with genotype 2c followed by patients infected with genotype 1b and genotype 1a. Overall, a higher proportion of patients who developed HCC had advanced fibrosis and ≥6 substitutions in PKR-bd compared to patients who did not develop HCC. Among pegIFN/RBV-treated patients, the highest percentage of subjects developing HCC was infected with HCV genotype 1b [31], and still now, among patients treated with DAAs, the higher proportion is infected with genotype 1b. However, among patients who developed HCC, a significant higher proportion infected with HCV genotype 2c had (i) higher substitutions in ISDR and PKR-bd, compared to patients infected with other genotypes, (ii) greater variability associated with advanced fibrosis, and (iii) a higher number of patients who developed HCC carried high numbers of PKR-bd substitutions at the baseline samples. Thus, it would be possible that over time this will lead to a change on the incidence of a greater frequency of development in HCC among patients infected with this subtype. However, further investigations are needed to assess (i) how many other recently treated patients will still develop HCC in a longer follow-up, (ii) the correlation between ISDR or PKR-bd substitutions and development in HCC, (iii) the correlation between advanced fibrosis after SVR and HCC development, and (iv) which genotype will be the most prone to develop HCC. With this perspective, it would be necessary to consider in the patient’s follow-up greater controls in assessing the state of the liver for longer periods and in particular considering, before starting DAA treatment, the presence of a greater number of ISDR/PKR-bd substitutions as a prognostic marker for advanced fibrosis and HCC.

Author Contributions

S.P.: Concept or design of the work, data analysis and interpretation, and drafting of the article. A.P.: Data analysis and interpretation. F.N.: Data collection. A.F.: Data collection. R.M.: Critical revision of the article. R.G.: Patient enrollment. S.N.: Patient enrollment. G.B.: Patient enrollment. P.S.: Patient enrollment. A.D.S.: Statistical analysis. F.B.: Critical revision of the article and final approval of the version to be published. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Ministero della Salute, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Ricerca Corrente (grant 80207; F.B.).

Acknowledgments

We thank Daniela Sartori for the careful preparation of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Shiratori, Y.; Imazeki, F.; Moriyama, M.; Yano, M.; Arakawa, Y.; Yokosuka, O.; Kuroki, T.; Nishiguchi, S.; Sata, M.; Yamada, G.; et al. Histologic improvement of fibrosis in patients with hepatitis C who have sustained response to interferon therapy. Ann. Intern. Med. 2000, 132, 517–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Persico, M.; Aglitti, A.; Milella, M.; Coppola, C.; Messina, V.; Claar, E.; Gentile, I.; Sogari, F.; Pierri, P.; Surace, L.A.; et al. Real-life glecaprevir/pibrentasvir in a large cohort of patients with hepatitis C virus infection: The MISTRAL Study. Liver Int. 2019, 39, 1852–1859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Toyoda, H.; Tada, T.; Yasuda, S.; Mizuno, K.; Ito, T.; Kumada, T. Dynamic Evaluation of Liver Fibrosis to Assess the Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C Who Achieved Sustained Virologic Response. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ogawa, E.; Furusyo, N.; Kajiwara, E.; Takahashi, K.; Nomura, H.; Maruyama, T.; Tanabe, Y.; Satoh, T.; Nakamuta, M.; Kotoh, K.; et al. Efficacy of pegylated interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin treatment on the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis C: A prospective, multicenter study. J. Hepatol. 2013, 58, 495–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Van der Meer, A.J.; Wedemeyer, H.; Feld, J.J.; Hansen, B.E.; Manns, M.P.; Zeuzem, S.; Janssen, H.L. Is there sufficient evidence to recommend antiviral therapy in hepatitis C? J. Hepatol. 2014, 60, 191–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Dandachi, D.; Hassan, M.; Kaseb, A.; Angelidakis, G.; Torres, H.A. Hepatitis C virus-associated hepatocellular carcinoma as a second primary malignancy: Exposing an overlooked presentation of liver cancer. J. Hepatocell. Carcinoma 2018, 5, 81–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Aleman, S.; Rahbin, N.; Weiland, O.; Davidsdottir, L.; Hedenstierna, M.; Rose, N.; Verbaan, H.; Stål, P.; Carlsson, T.; Norrgren, H.; et al. A risk for hepatocellular carcinoma persists long-term after sustained virologic response in patients with hepatitis C-associated liver cirrhosis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2013, 57, 230–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ioannou, G.N.; Green, P.K.; Beste, L.A.; Mun, E.J.; Kerr, K.F.; Berry, K. Development of models estimating the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma after antiviral treatment for hepatitis C. J. Hepatol. 2018, 69, 1088–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Toyoda, H.; Kumada, T.; Tada, T.; Kiriyama, S.; Tanikawa, M.; Hisanaga, Y.; Kanamori, A.; Kitabatake, S.; Ito, T. Risk factors of hepatocellular carcinoma development in noncirrhotic patients with sustained virologic response for chronic hepatitis C virus infection. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2015, 30, 1183–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yasuda, S.; Ishigami, M.; Ishizu, Y.; Kuzuya, T.; Honda, T.; Hayashi, K.; Toyoda, H.; Kumada, T.; Hirooka, Y.; Goto, H. Substitutions in interferon sensitivity-determining region and hepatocarcinogenesis after hepatitis C virus eradication. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2018, 33, 1904–1911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Patiño-Galindo, J.Á.; González-Candelas, F. Comparative analysis of variation and selection in the HCV genome. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2017, 49, 104–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Cuevas, J.M.; Gonzalez, M.; Torres-Puente, M.; Jiménez-Hernández, N.; Bracho, M.A.; García-Robles, I.; González-Candelas, F.; Moya, A. The role of positive selection in hepatitis C virus. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2009, 9, 860–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Muñoz de Rueda, P.; Fuentes Rodríguez, J.M.; Quiles Pérez, R.; Gila Medina, A.; Martín Álvarez, A.B.; Casado Ruíz, J.; Ruíz Extremera, A.; Salmerón, J. Hepatitis C virus NS5A region mutation in chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 patients who are nonresponders to two or more treatments and its relationship with response to a new treatment. World J. Gastroenterol. 2017, 23, 4538–4547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Polyak, S.J.; Paschal, D.M.; McArdle, S.; Gale, M.J., Jr.; Moradpour, D.; Gretch, D.R. Characterization of the effects of hepatitis C virus nonstructural 5A protein expression in human cell lines and on interferon-sensitive virus replication. Hepatology 1999, 29, 1262–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Hung, C.H.; Chen, C.H.; Lee, C.M.; Wu, C.M.; Hu, T.H.; Wang, J.H.; Yen, Y.H.; Lu, S.N. Association of amino acid variations in the NS5A and E2-PePHD region of hepatitis C virus 1b with hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Viral. Hepatol. 2008, 15, 58–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Gale, M., Jr.; Blakely, C.M.; Kwieciszewski, B.; Tan, S.L.; Dossett, M.; Tang, N.M.; Korth, M.J.; Polyak, S.J.; Gretch, D.R.; Katze, M.G. Control of PKR protein kinase by hepatitis C virus nonstructural 5A protein: Molecular mechanisms of kinase regulation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1998, 18, 5208–5218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Paolucci, S.; Fiorina, L.; Piralla, A.; Gulminetti, R.; Novati, S.; Barbarini, G.; Sacchi, P.; Gatti, M.; Dossena, L.; Baldanti, F.M. Naturally occurring mutations to HCV protease inhibitors in treatment-naïve patients. Virol. J. 2012, 9, 245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Paolucci, S.; Premoli, M.; Novati, S.; Gulminetti, R.; Maserati, R.; Barbarini, G.; Sacchi, P.; Piralla, A.; Sassera, D.; De Marco, L.; et al. Baseline and Breakthrough Resistance Mutations in HCV Patients Failing DAAs. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 16017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Sarrazin, C. The importance of resistance to direct antiviral drugs in HCV infection in clinical practice. J. Hepatol. 2016, 64, 486–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pawlotsky, J.M. Hepatitis C Virus Resistance to Direct-Acting Antiviral Drugs in Interferon-Free Regimens. Gastroenterology 2016, 151, 70–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Sorbo, M.C.; Cento, V.; Di Maio, V.C.; Howe, A.Y.M.; Garcia, F.; Perno, C.F.; Ceccherini-Silberstein, F. Hepatitis C virus drug resistance associated substitutions and their clinical relevance: Update2018. Drug Resist. Update 2018, 37, 17–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Galati, G.; Muley, M.; Viganò, M.; Iavarone, M.; Vitale, A.; Dell’Unto, C.; Lai, Q.; Cabibbo, G.; Sacco, R.; Villa, E.; et al. Occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after direct-acting antiviral therapy for hepatitis C virus infection: Literature review and risk analysis. Expert. Opin. Drug Saf. 2019, 8, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zou, W.Y.; Choi, K.; Kramer, J.R.; Yu, X.; Cao, Y.; El-Serag, H.B.; Kanwal, F. Risk of Hepatocellular Cancer Recurrence in Hepatitis C Virus+ Patients Treated with Direct-Acting. Antiviral Agents. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2019, 64, 3328–3336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Giménez-Barcons, M.; Franco, S.; Suárez, Y.; Forns, X.; Ampurdanès, S.; Puig-Basagoiti, F.; Barrera, J.M.; Llovet, J.M.; Bruix, J.; Sánchez-Tapias, J.M.; et al. High amino acid variability within the NS5A of hepatitis C virus (HCV) is associated with hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with HCV-1b-related cirrhosis. Hepatology 2001, 34, 158–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Petsaris, O.; Vallet, S.; Le Guillou-Guillemette, H.; Veillon, P.; Gouriou, S.; Barbier, G.; Nousbaum, J.B.; Saliou, P.; NKontchou, G.; Trinchet, J.C.; et al. Duplication of the V3 domain in hepatitis C virus (1b) NS5A protein: Clonal analysis and physicochemical properties related to hepatocellular carcinoma occurrence. J. Clin. Virol. 2016, 74, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Goh, K.C.; deVeer, M.J.; Williams, B.R. The protein kinase PKR is required for p38 MAPK activation and the innate immune response to bacterial endotoxin. EMBO J. 2000, 19, 4292–4297. [Google Scholar]
  27. Deb, A.; Haque, S.J.; Mogensen, T.; Silverman, R.H.; Williams, B.R. RNA-dependent protein kinase PKR is required for activation of NF-kappa B by IFN-gamma in a STAT1-independent pathway. J. Immunol. 2001, 166, 6170–6180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Watanabe, T.; Hiasa, Y.; Tokumoto, Y.; Hirooka, M.; Abe, M.; Ikeda, Y.; Matsuura, B.; Chung, R.T.; Onji, M. Protein kinase R modulates c-Fos and c-Jun signaling to promote proliferation of hepatocellular carcinoma with hepatitis C virus infection. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e67750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Liu, S.; Ansari, I.H.; Das, S.C.; Pattnaik, A.K. Insertion and deletion analyses identify regions of nonstructural protein 5A of Hepatitis C virus that are dispensable for viral genome replication. J. Gen. Virol. 2006, 87, 323–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sugiyama, R.; Murayama, A.; Nitta, S.; Yamada, N.; Tasaka-Fujita, M.; Masaki, T.; Aly, H.H.; Shiina, M.; Ryo, A.; Ishii, K.; et al. Interferon sensitivity-determining region of hepatitis C virus influences virus production and interferon signaling. Oncotarget 2017, 9, 5627–5640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Raimondi, S.; Bruno, S.; Mondelli, M.U.; Maisonneuve, P. Hepatitis C virus genotype 1b as a risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma development: A meta-analysis. J. Hepatol. 2009, 50, 1142–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Viruses 12 00255 g001 550
Figure 1. (A) Correlation between advanced fibrosis and ≥3 substitutions in interferon sensitivity-determining region (ISDR) according to genotype. (B) Correlation between advanced fibrosis and ≥6 substitutions in protein kinase R-binding domain (PKR-bd) according to genotype.
Figure 1. (A) Correlation between advanced fibrosis and ≥3 substitutions in interferon sensitivity-determining region (ISDR) according to genotype. (B) Correlation between advanced fibrosis and ≥6 substitutions in protein kinase R-binding domain (PKR-bd) according to genotype.
Viruses 12 00255 g001
Viruses 12 00255 g002 550
Figure 2. Sequence alignments of hepatitis C virus (HCV) with insertions/deletions in interferon sensitivity-determining region (ISDR) and direct-acting antiviral drugs (PKR-bd). Aminoacid insertions are in red (bold) and deletions are within red boxes.
Figure 2. Sequence alignments of hepatitis C virus (HCV) with insertions/deletions in interferon sensitivity-determining region (ISDR) and direct-acting antiviral drugs (PKR-bd). Aminoacid insertions are in red (bold) and deletions are within red boxes.
Viruses 12 00255 g002
Table
Table 1. Univariate and multivariate analysis of factors associated with high fibrosis levels.
Table 1. Univariate and multivariate analysis of factors associated with high fibrosis levels.
UnivariateMultivariate
F0–F2 (180)F3–F4 (136)OR (95%IC)p ValueOR (95%IC)P Value
Age in years (SD)62.24 (±13.0)63.69 (±14.0)1.0 (0.9–1.1)0.34
Gender (male) (%)86 (47.7)83 (61.0)1.7 (1.1–2.7)0.019
ALT (IU/L) (IQR)30 (20–46.5)62.5 (39.5–100)1.0 (0.9–1.0)0.16
AST (IU/L) (IQR)28 (23–40)58.5 (34.5–96.5)1.0 (1.0–1.0)<0.001
PLT (104/mm3) (SD)199.78 (±72.9)160.25 (±59.6)0.9 (0.9–0.9)<0.0010.99 (0.98–0.99)<0.001
γGTP (IU/L) (IQR)28.5 (18–46)65 (34–105)1.0 (1.0–1.0)<0.0011.01 (1.00–1,01)0.002
Log10 HCV load (UI/mL) (SD)5.71 (±0.89)5.4 (±0.95)0.7 (0.5–0.8)0.0030.65 (0.49–0.85)0.002
Genotype 1a (%)33 (18.3)19 (13.9)0.6 (0.3–1.1)0.45
Genotype 1b (%)57 (31.6)45 (33.1)0.7 (0.3–1.4)
Genotype 2c (%)57 (31.6)38 (27.9)0.8 (0.4–1.4)
Genotype 3a (%)19 (10.5)23 (16.9)1.5 (0.7–3.1)
Genotype 4d (%)14 (7.7)11 (8.1)0.9 (0.4–2.4)
ISDR ≥ 3 (%)36 (20)54 (39.7)2.6 (1.5–4.3)<0.0012.14 (1.2–3.7)0.007
PKR-bd ≥ 6 (%)12 (6.6)38 (27.9)5.4 (2.7–10.8)<0.0014.8 (2.2–10.2)<0.001
Ins/del (%)5 (2.7)11 (8.0)3.1 (1.0–9.1)0.04
ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; PLT, platelet; γGTP, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase; SD, standard deviation in mean analysis; IQR, interquartile range in median analysis. In bold are the significant values.
Table
Table 2. Clinical characteristics according to the number of substitutions in the ISDR and PKR-bd.
Table 2. Clinical characteristics according to the number of substitutions in the ISDR and PKR-bd.
ISDR MutationsPKR-bd Mutations
<3 (226)≥3 (90)p Value<6 (235)≥6 (81)p Value
Age in years (SD)61.5 (±13)66 (±14)0.00660.6 (±13)69.3 (±13)<0.001
Gender (male) (%)119 (52.7)52 (56.5)0.70128 (54.5)41 (50.6)0.61
ALT (IU/L) (IQR)39.5 (25–64)44.5 (23–87)0.3138 (23–64)53 (25–98)0.01
AST (IU/L) (IQR)33 (26–55)48.5 (25.3–78.8)0.0332 (25–52)52 (29–91)<0.001
PLT (104/mm3) (SD)187.4 (±73.1)171.2 (±61)0.13185.3 (±71.1)175.3 (±67.2)0.50
γGTP (IU/L) (IQR)36.5 (22–63)57.5 (24.3–108.3)0.0136 (21–64)59 (25–100)0.003
Log10 HCV load (UI/mL) (SD)5.6 (±0.9)5.5 (±0.9)0.715.7 (±0.9)5.3 (±0.9)0.002
Genotype 1a (%)40 (17.7)12 (13.3)<0.00145 (19.1)7 (8.6)<0.001
Genotype 1b (%)91 (40.3)11 (12.2)74 (31.5)28 (34.6)
Genotype 2c (%)35 (15.5)60 (66.7)53 (22.5)42 (51.8)
Genotype 3a (%)39 (17.2)3 (3.3)39 (16.6)3 (3.7)
Genotype 4d (%)21 (9.3)4 (4.4)24 (10.2)1 (1.2)
Advanced fibrosis (F3-F4) (%)82 (36.3)54 (60.1)<0.00182 (34.9)54 (66.7)<0.001
ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; PLT, platelet; γGTP, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase; SD, standard deviation in mean analysis; IQR, Interquartile range in median analysis. In bold are the significant values.
Table
Table 3. Baseline clinical characteristics of patients treated with direct-acting antiviral drugs (DAAs) according to development in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
Table 3. Baseline clinical characteristics of patients treated with direct-acting antiviral drugs (DAAs) according to development in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
NonHCCHCCp Value
Number of patients29917
Age in years (SD)62.5 (±13.2)66 (±10)0.05
Gender (male) (%)158 (52.84)11 (64.7)0.07
ALT (IU/L) (IQR)38 (23–67)59 (52–102)<0.001
AST (IU/L) (IQR)34.5 (25–62)70 (48–105)<0.001
PLT (104/mm3) (SD)185 (±70)136 (±56)<0.001
γGTP (IU/L) (IQR)38 (21–71)76 (37–114)0.02
Log10 HCV load (UI/mL) (SD)5.62 (±0.91)4.76 (±0.9)<0.001
Genotype 1a (%)52 (17.4)0 (0)<0.001
Genotype 1b (%)94 (31.4)8 (47.0)
Genotype 2c (%)90 (30.1)5 (29.4)
Genotype 3a (%)38 (12.7)4 (23.5)
Genotype 4d (%)25 (8.3)0 (0)
ISDR ≥3 (%)83 (27.7)7 (41.2)0.27
PKR-bd ≥6 (%)46 (15.4)7 (41.2)0.01
Ins/del (%)16 (4.4)0 (0)0.37
Advanced fibrosis (F3–F4) (%)121 (40.4)15 (88.2)<0.001
ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; PLT, platelet; γGTP, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase; SD, standard deviation in mean analysis; IQR, interquartile range in median analysis. In bold are the significant values.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Paolucci, S.; Piralla, A.; Novazzi, F.; Fratini, A.; Maserati, R.; Gulminetti, R.; Novati, S.; Barbarini, G.; Sacchi, P.; De Silvestri, A.; et al. Baseline Amino Acid Substitutions in the NS5A ISDR and PKR Binding Domain of Hepatitis C and Different Fibrosis Levels and Levels of Development of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients Treated with DAAs. Viruses 2020, 12, 255. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/v12030255

AMA Style

Paolucci S, Piralla A, Novazzi F, Fratini A, Maserati R, Gulminetti R, Novati S, Barbarini G, Sacchi P, De Silvestri A, et al. Baseline Amino Acid Substitutions in the NS5A ISDR and PKR Binding Domain of Hepatitis C and Different Fibrosis Levels and Levels of Development of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients Treated with DAAs. Viruses. 2020; 12(3):255. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/v12030255

Chicago/Turabian Style

Paolucci, Stefania, Antonio Piralla, Federica Novazzi, Alice Fratini, Renato Maserati, Roberto Gulminetti, Stefano Novati, Giorgio Barbarini, Paolo Sacchi, Annalisa De Silvestri, and et al. 2020. "Baseline Amino Acid Substitutions in the NS5A ISDR and PKR Binding Domain of Hepatitis C and Different Fibrosis Levels and Levels of Development of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients Treated with DAAs" Viruses 12, no. 3: 255. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/v12030255

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop