Next Article in Journal
Influenza Virus Like Particles (VLPs): Opportunities for H7N9 Vaccine Development
Next Article in Special Issue
Glucose-Regulated Protein 78 Interacts with Zika Virus Envelope Protein and Contributes to a Productive Infection
Previous Article in Journal
Recombinant Myxoma Virus Expressing Walleye Dermal Sarcoma Virus orfC Is Attenuated in Rabbits
Previous Article in Special Issue
Asian Zika Virus Isolate Significantly Changes the Transcriptional Profile and Alternative RNA Splicing Events in a Neuroblastoma Cell Line
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Viruses
Volume 12
Issue 5
10.3390/v12050519
viruses-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

TRiC/CCT Complex, a Binding Partner of NS1 Protein, Supports the Replication of Zika Virus in Both Mammalians and Mosquitoes

by
Yuchen Wang
1,2,*,†,
Ryuta Uraki
2,3,*,†,
Jesse Hwang
2 and
Erol Fikrig
2,4
1
State Key Laboratory of Virology, College of Life Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
2
Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06519, USA
3
Department of Immunology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya City University, Nagoya 467-8601, Japan
4
Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD 20815, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Y.W. and R.U. contributed equally to this work.
Viruses 2020, 12(5), 519; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/v12050519
Submission received: 24 March 2020 / Revised: 2 May 2020 / Accepted: 6 May 2020 / Published: 8 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emerging Arboviruses)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Mosquito-borne Zika virus (ZIKV) can cause congenital microcephaly and Guillain–Barré syndrome, among other symptoms. Specific treatments and vaccines for ZIKV are not currently available. To further understand the host factors that support ZIKV replication, we used mass spectrometry to characterize mammalian proteins that associate with the ZIKV NS1 protein and identified the TRiC/CCT complex as an interacting partner. Furthermore, the suppression of CCT2, one of the critical components of the TRiC/CCT complex, inhibited ZIKV replication in both mammalian cells and mosquitoes. These results highlight an important role for the TRiC/CCT complex in ZIKV infection, suggesting that the TRiC/CCT complex may be a promising therapeutic target.

1. Introduction

Zika virus (ZIKV) is a mosquito-borne enveloped, positive-strand RNA virus in the genus Flavivirus and the family Flaviviridae [1]. ZIKV is primarily transmitted to mammals via the bite of an Aedes aegypti mosquito [2]. While symptoms are generally mild in most individuals, ZIKV infection of pregnant women can cause intrauterine growth restriction and microcephaly [3]. As no licensed vaccine or specific antiviral treatment is available, understanding the molecular mechanisms of ZIKV infection is crucial to develop countermeasures [4,5].
The flavivirus RNA genome encodes three structural (capsid, premembrane, and envelope) and seven nonstructural genes (NS1, NS2A, NS2B, NS3, NS4A, NS4B, and NS5), with untranslated regions (UTR) flanking the 5′ and 3′ ends [6]. ZIKV nonstructural proteins play roles in viral replication and assembly [7]. NS1 is a highly conserved nonstructural protein among the flaviviruses, which possesses multiple functions in the viral life cycle, including viral replication, immune evasion, and pathogenesis [8]. A previous study reported that an attenuated recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus-based vaccine expressing ZIKV prM-E-NS1 induces ZIKV-specific antibody and T cell immune responses, providing protection against ZIKV challenge [9]. Monoclonal antibodies targeting NS1 protein can also protect against disease and death in a murine model [10]. These studies suggest that ZIKV NS1 could be a potential therapeutic target.
Here, we utilized liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) to identify host factors that interact with the ZIKV NS1 protein. Among the putative interactions, we validated the oligomeric chaperonin containing TRiC (TCP-1 ring complex), as NS1-binding host factor. The TRiC/CCT complex, consisting of eight different subunits (CCT1–CCT8), is essential for protein folding in an ATP-dependent manner [11], and previous studies showed that the TRiC/CCT complex participates in the life cycle of several viruses, including DENV [12], hepatitis C virus [13], and reovirus [14]. We corroborate the functional role of TRiC/CCT complex during ZIKV replication by showing that CCT2 suppression reduces ZIKV replication in not only human cells but also in mosquitoes. These results demonstrate an important role of TRiC/CCT complex for the ZIKV life cycle in mammalian hosts and arthropod vectors and suggest that targeting this host factor may offer protection against ZIKV pathogenesis.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ethics Statement

All experiments were performed in accordance with guidelines from the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (National Institutes of Health). The animal experimental protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at the Yale University School of Medicine (assurance number A3230-01). The Assurance was approved 5 May 2015. All infection experiments were performed in a biosafety level 2 and arthropod containment level 3 lab (ACL3) animal facility according to the regulations of Yale University.

2.2. Viruses, Cell Lines, Mosquitoes, and Antibodies

An Asian-derived Cambodian strain (FSS13025 strain, referred to ZIKVCam, obtained from The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA) isolated in 2010 and Mexican strain (MEX2-81 strain, ZIKVMex, obtained from The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA) isolated in 2016 were used for infection. HEK293T cells (human embryonic kidney, ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) and Hela cells (human cervical cancer, ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) were used for vitro studies. Aedes aegypti (Orlando strain, obtained from the Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, New Haven, CT, USA) mosquitoes were used for vivo studies. The rabbit anti-human CCT2 (One World Lab, San Diego, CA, USA), rabbit anti-ZIKV NS1 (Genetex, Irvine, CA, USA), rabbit anti-ZIKV Capsid (Cap) (Genetex, Irvine, CA, USA), mouse anti-HA (Abcam), mouse anti-c-Myc (Sigma-Aldrich, Burlington, MA, USA), mouse anti-actin (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), HRP-linked rat anti-mouse IgG (Mouse TrueBlot® ULTRA, ROCKLAND, Limerick, PA, USA), HRP-linked goat anti-rabbit IgG (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA), mouse anti-ZIKV NS1 monoclonal (GeneTex, Irvine, CA, USA), rabbit anti-CCT2 monoclonal (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), goat anti-mouse IgG (H+L) cross-adsorbed secondary antibody-Alexa Fluor 555 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), and F(ab’)2-goat anti-rabbit IgG (H+L) cross-adsorbed secondary antibody-Alexa Fluor 488 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) antibodies were purchased. Pierce™ Anti-HA Magnetic Beads and Pierce™ Anti-c-Myc Magnetic Beads were purchased from Thermo Fisher (Branchburg, NJ, USA).

2.3. Pull-Down Assay and Mass Spectrometry

The ORF of NS1 from ZIKVCam was cloned into plasmid pcDNA4.1 in-frame with a c-Myc-His-tag sequence for the expression of C-terminally c-Myc-His-tagged NS1, c-Myc-His-tagged NS1 mutants, or naïve NS1 (no-tag). TRiC/CCT complex gene was cloned into plasmid pcDNA4.1 in-frame with a HA-tag sequence. 293T cells were transfected with plasmid DNA encoding HA-CCT1-8, naïve NS1, NS1-c-Myc-His, and NS1 deletion mutants by TransIT 2020 (Mirus, Madison, WI, USA). After 24 h post transfection, 293T cells were lysed with lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% NP-40, and protease inhibitor cocktail). The supernatants were incubated with anti-c-Myc magnetic beads according to manufacturer’s protocol. Immunoprecipitated proteins were eluted with Laemmli sample buffer (Biorad, Portland, ME, USA) and then subjected to SDS-PAGE followed by silver staining (Thermo Fisher kit, Branchburg, NJ, USA). Protein bands after silver staining were excised from the gel and were analyzed at the Yale University W.M. Keck Foundation core facility (New Haven, CT, USA). The samples were subjected to trypsin digestion followed by LC-MS/MS for peptide sequencing and identification.

2.4. Immunoprecipitation and Immunoblotting

HEK 293T cells were transfected with the plasmids by using the TransIT. After 24 h post transfection, cells were lysed as described above. The supernatants were incubated with anti-HA or anti-c-Myc magnetic beads according to manufacturer’s protocol. To examine the effect of ATP on the interaction, several concentrations of ATP (0, 10, 50, 100 mM) and 10 mM MgCl2 were added in Lysis buffer described above. Proteins bound to the beads were harvested and separated by SDS-PAGE. Proteins were transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). The blots were blocked in 1% non-fat milk. Primary antibodies and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies were diluted and incubated with the blots. After washing with 0.05% PBS-T, the immunoblots were imaged through chemiluminescent reagent (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA) with a LI-COR Odyssey imaging system (LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA).

2.5. Immunofluorescence Assay and Confocal Microscopy

HeLa cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at 48 h ZIKVCam post infection, followed by fixing in 4% (vol/vol) paraformaldehyde (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA, USA) for 15 min at room temperature, and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 (Sigma, Burlington, MA, USA). The cells were blocked with 3% (wt/vol) BSA and 5% non-fat dry milk in PBS for 1 h. The cells were subsequently immunolabeled with a mixture of primary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature at the following dilutions: the mouse anti-ZIKV NS1 monoclonal (GeneTex, Irvine, CA, USA), 1:500, the rabbit anti-CCT2 monoclonal (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), 1:250. Cells were washed with PBS several times and then immunolabeled with a mixture of secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature at the following dilutions: Alexa Fluor 488 F(ab’)2-goat anti-rabbit IgG (H+L) cross-adsorbed secondary antibody (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), 1:1000, Alexa Fluor 555 goat anti-mouse IgG (H+L) cross-adsorbed secondary antibody (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), 1:1000 for 1 h. Nuclei were stained with 2-(4-amidinophenyl)-6-indolecarbamidine dihydrochloride (DAPI) (Sigma, Burlington, MA, USA), 1:5000 for 15 min. After staining, the fluorescence signals were examined with a laser scanning confocal microscope (TCS SP5, Leica, Wetzlar, Germany).

2.6. Generation of Stable Cell Lines Suppressing CCT2

To generate cell lines that stably suppress CCT2 protein, Hela cells were transfected with CCT2 MISSION shRNA Plasmid (Thermo Fisher, Branchburg, NJ, USA). Cell clones were selected in DMEM supplemented with 10% (vol/vol) fetal calf serum (FCS), penicillin G (100,000 U/L), streptomycin (100 mg/L), and puromycin (2 μg/mL). Immunoblot was performed to confirm that the expression of CCT2 was suppressed in a selected clone.

2.7. Treatment of HSF1A and LDH Cytotoxicity Assay

HeLa cells were treated with HSF1A (0, 25, 50, 75, or 100 µM) 12 h prior to Zika virus infection. After Zika virus infection, infected cells were cultured in the media containing HSF1A (0, 25, 50, 75, or 100 µM). At several timepoints post infection (0, 12, 24, and 36 h), supernatants or whole-cell lysates were collected and analyzed by plaque assay or immunoblotting. The cytotoxicity of HSF1A toward HeLa cells was measured using a Pierce LDH Cytotoxicity Assay Kit (Thermo Scientific, Branchburg, NJ, USA). HeLa cells seeded into 48-well plates were treated with HSF1A compound at 0, 25, 50, 75, 100 μM HSF1A and DMSO (Negative control) for 48 h. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) released in the supernatants was measured as a cytotoxicity parameter.

2.8. Gene Silencing in Mosquitoes

Double-stranded (ds) RNA targeting either a 400 bp region of the A. aegypti CCT2 gene or an irrelevant green fluorescent protein (GFP) gene were transcribed using gene-specific primers designed with a T7 promoter and the MEGAScript RNAi kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Ambion, Branchburg, NJ, USA). DsRNA was produced using TranscriptAid T7 High Yield Transcription Kit (ThermoFisher, Branchburg, NJ, USA) and purified using phenol-chloroform extraction and ethanolprecipitation. Adult female A. aegypti mosquitoes were injected with 500 ng dsRNA in PBS into the thorax to silence the A. aegypti CCT2 gene. At day 3 following dsRNA injection, the mosquitoes were injected with ZIKVMex (100 PFU). At day 3, 7 days following virus injection, the whole mosquitoes were collected to examine the CCT2 expression levels by qRT-PCR to make sure the efficacy of dsRNA against CCT2 was as described below.

2.9. Quantitative Real-Time PCR

RNA from cells was extracted with RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA), and the mosquito total RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Ambion by Life Technologies, Branchburg, NJ, USA) according to manufacturer’s protocol. DsRNA was produced using TranscriptAid T7 High Yield Transcription Kit (ThermoFisher, Branchburg, NJ, USA) and purified using phenol-chloroform extraction and isopropanol precipitation. The cDNA was generated with an iScript cDNA synthesis kit (Bio-Rad, Portland, ME, USA) according to manufacturer’s protocol. Gene expression was examined by qRT-PCR using IQ SYBR Green Supermix. Viral RNA or Cct2 RNA levels were normalized to mosquito RP49 RNA levels according to 2−ΔΔCt calculations.

2.10. Statistical Analysis

GraphPad Prism software (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA) was used to perform statistical analysis on all data. Mosquitoes were randomly allocated into different groups. No statistical methods were used to predetermine sample size. The viral titers were analyzed using two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons test or one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. Rp49-normalized viral RNA levels were analyzed using the Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant, and all significant p-values are listed in the Figure legends.

2.11. Data Availability

Data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon request.

3. Results

3.1. TRiC/CCT Complex Interacts with the Zika Virus NS1 Protein

To identify host proteins that interact with the Zika virus NS1 protein, we transfected 293T cells with a plasmid expressing Zika virus NS1 gene (corresponding to amino acid residues 1-352) with c-Myc tag at C-terminus. After removal of cellular debris, the supernatants from mock and NS1-transfected cells were incubated with anti-c-Myc magnetic beads then analyzed by SDS-PAGE, followed by silver staining (Figure 1a). Two unique regions of stained gel were subjected to in-gel trypsin digestion for protein identification, followed by LC-MS/MS. The unique identities of band 1 and band 2 are shown in Table 1. Interestingly, all subunits of the eight-subunit chaperonin containing TCP-1 (TRiC/CCT complex), whose theoretical masses of the identified proteins were compatible with their locations on the gel, were identified as binding partners to NS1 protein.
TRiC/CCT complex is a molecular chaperone belonging to the family of chaperonins, a conserved class of large double-ring complex of 800 kDa enclosing a central cavity, and is found in the cytoplasm of all eukaryotic cells [15,16]. It is composed of two identical rings, each composed of eight different subunits (CCT1–CCT8), and mediates cytosolic protein folding and assembly [17,18,19]. In order to examine the specificity of the interaction of Zika virus NS1 protein with subunits of TRiC/CCT complex, we cotransfected expression plasmids encoding HA-tagged CCT1-8 and nontagged NS1 protein, and performed coimmunoprecipitation assay. We found that CCT2, CCT4, CCT6, and CCT8 interact with NS1 protein (Figure 1b), suggesting NS1 protein uses the TRiC/CCT complex as a chaperone during ZIKV replication.

3.2. CCT2 Interacts with the Central Region of Zika Virus NS1

As CCT2 (T-complex protein 1 subunit beta) was confirmed to bind NS1 protein by immunoprecipitation, and the Mascot score, a statistical score for how well the experimental data match the database protein sequences, was highest among the eight subunits of TRiC/CCT complex, we further investigated the contribution of CCT2 to ZIKV replication. First, the colocalization of the ZIKV NS1 with CCT2 was examined by confocal microscopy (Figure 2a), suggesting that ZIKV NS1 and CCT2 were colocalized in the cytoplasm of HeLa cells. To determine the regions responsible for the interaction, we generated a series of NS1 deletion mutants with c-Myc-His tag at the C-termini of NS1 (Figure 2b), co-expressed them with CCT2, and immunoprecipitated with anti-c-Myc magnetic beads. The expression levels of NS1 deletion mutants and CCT2 were confirmed by immunoblotting with anti-c-Myc and anti-CCT2 antibodies, respectively (Figure 2c). Although the binding affinity differed in strength, NS1 deletion mutants NS1-CΔ52, NS1-CΔ112, NS1-NΔ60, and NS1-NΔ120 coimmunoprecipitated with CCT2. By contrast, NS1-NΔ180 rarely bound with CCT2 and two NS1 deletion mutants (NS1-CΔ172 and NS1-CΔ232) failed to bind with CCT2. These data suggest that the region spanning amino acids at position 121–240 of NS1 is responsible for interaction with CCT2.

3.3. Interaction of ZIKV NS1 with CCT2 Depends on ATP Concentration

The central chamber of the TRiC/CCT complex folds many essential cellular proteins in an ATP-dependent manner [11]. As we did not add any ATP to the buffer in our previous immunoprecipitation system, we examined the effect of ATP concentration on the interaction of NS1 with CCT2. Immunoprecipitation was performed with anti-c-Myc beads under several concentrations of ATP (0, 10, 50, 100 mM). We found that the interaction between CCT2 and NS1 was ATP-dependent (Figure 3), suggesting ATP concentration may modulate the binding between ZIKV NS1 and TRiC/CCT complex, contributing to the ZIKV replication.

3.4. Knockdown of CCT2 Reduces Zika Virus Replication in Mammalian Cells

To examine the biological function of CCT2 during the ZIKV life cycle, we generated shRNA-mediated knockdown (KD) of CCT2 in HeLa cells and assayed for virus replication. An shRNA targeting GFP was used as a negative control. At every 6 h after infection with ZIKVCam, we harvested samples for testing protein expression and found that the expression levels of viral proteins and RNA were suppressed or delayed in CCT2-KD cells compared with control cells (Figure 4a,b). To investigate the effect of CCT2 knockdown on the production of infectious particles, we infected KD and control cells with ZIKVCam. As shown in Figure 4c, downregulation of CCT2 expression significantly reduced the replication of ZIKV. These results suggest that TRiC/CCT complex supports ZIKV life cycle.

3.5. Inhibition of TRiC/CCT Complex Function Using HSF1A Reduces Zika Virus Propagation

HSF1A is a cell-permeable compound that inhibits the function of TRiC/CCT [20]. To further elucidate the importance of TRiC/CCT complex during the ZIKV replication cycle, HeLa cells were treated with 0, 50, and 100 μM of HSF1A 12 h prior to ZIKV infection. The expression of viral proteins was suppressed in 50 and 100 μM HSF1A-treated cells compared with control cells with little toxicity (Figure 5a,b). The expression level of β-actin, whose expression/conformation is supported by TRiC/CCT complex, was not altered after HSF1A treatment, suggesting that the toxicity of HSF1A unlikely affects the expression level of viral proteins. To better understand the effect of HSF1A on the production of infectious particles, HeLa cells were treated with HSF1A 12 h prior to ZIKV infection. The amount of infectious virus in the supernatant was determined at 36 h post infection. Notably, ZIKV replication was significantly reduced in HeLa cells in a dose-dependent manner with little toxicity (Figure 5a,c). These findings support TRiC/CCT complex having an important role in the ZIKV replication cycle.

3.6. Suppression of CCT2 Reduces Zika Virus Burden in Mosquitoes

TRiC/CCT complex is conserved in all eukaryotic cells [21,22,23]. Thus, we hypothesized that this complex may regulate ZIKV infection in mosquitoes, which are vectors for ZIKV transmission cycle [24,25,26,27]. In order to investigate the role of this complex in mosquitoes, we silenced the CCT2 gene in A. aegypti mosquitoes using RNAi, and then investigated whether suppression of CCT2 gene expression alters ZIKV replication in mosquitoes. After 3 days post dsRNA injection, A. aegypti mosquitoes were injected with 100 PFU of ZIKVMex. Interestingly, there was a significant reduction in the levels of ZIKV in the CCT2 dsRNA-treated mosquitoes compared with the control GFP dsRNA-treated mosquitoes (Figure 6). This result demonstrates that the TRiC/CCT complex contributes to ZIKV replication in mosquitoes as well as mammalian hosts.

4. Discussion

Various screening methods for flavivirus–host protein interactions have been used to study the pathogenesis of flavivirus [12,28,29]. NS1 is a nonstructural protein highly conserved among the flaviviruses [30] and possesses multiple functions in the viral life cycle, including viral replication, immune evasion, and pathogenesis [8]. A previous study reported that an attenuated recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus (rVSV)-based vaccine expressing ZIKV prM-E-NS1 could induce Zika virus-specific antibody and T cell immune responses, thus providing protection against ZIKV challenge [9]. Also, mAbs targeting NS1 protein can protect against disease and death in a murine model [10]. These studies suggest that ZIKV NS1 could be a potential therapeutic target.
In this study, we identify the TRiC/CCT complex as a binding partner of the NS1 protein by pull-down assay followed by LC-MS/MS (Table 1). TRiC/CCT complex is a type II chaperonin composed of eight different subunits (CCT1–CCT8) that assists in the folding and assembly of essential host cytosolic proteins [31,32] and has been shown to be required for replication of several viruses [13,14,33,34,35], including flaviviruses [12,36,37]. Here, we found that several subunits (CCT2, CCT4, CCT6A, and CCT8) of TRiC/CCT complex are able to bind ZIKV NS1 (Figure 1b), suggesting that NS1 protein uses the TRiC/CCT complex as a chaperone during ZIKV replication.
Our data demonstrated that the region spanning amino acids at position 121–240 of NS1 is responsible for interaction with CCT2 (Figure 2). Several studies reporting the crystal structures of NS1 indicate that amino acids 121–240 might be involved in interactions with structural proteins Envelope (E) and precursor Membrane (prM) [38,39]. Interestingly, patients infected with Dengue virus (DENV) induce antibodies recognizing the region between amino acids 221 and 266 of DENV NS1, which is highly conserved among DENV serotypes [40]. Another study also demonstrated that the region located between amino acids 225 and 245 was highly conserved, which is beneficial for DENV vaccine design [41]. In addition, several monoclonal antibodies against WNV NS1 recognize amino acids 158 to 235, leading to strong protection against WNV in mice [42]. Considering the high structural similarity of NS1 among flaviviruses, targeting the 121–240 domain of the ZIKV NS1 could not only perturb NS1 function but also influence the interaction between the TRiC/CCT complex and NS1. Therefore, analyzing the spatiotemporal dynamics of NS1–CCT binding would be helpful to dissect this facet of host–pathogen interaction with greater precision.
Previous studies showed that the TRiC/CCT complex participates in the replication of several viruses, including DENV [12], hepatitis C virus [13], and reovirus [14]. Here, we found that the expression levels of viral proteins and RNA and the production of infectious particles were suppressed or delayed in CCT2-KD cells and in TRiC/CCT inhibitor-treated cells compared with control cells (Figure 4 and Figure 5), suggesting that TRiC/CCT complex can be a therapeutic target against multiple viruses.
Interestingly, our result demonstrates that the TRiC/CCT complex contributes to ZIKV replication in mosquito vectors as well (Figure 6). These data suggest the possible prevention of ZIKV spread in mosquitoes by using compounds targeting TRiC/CCT complex.
In conclusion, our study identified the TRiC/CCT complex as a binding partner of ZIKV NS1. Silencing the function of this complex reduces viral burden in mammalian cells and mosquitoes. These results highlight an important role for the relationship between NS1 and the TRiC/CCT complex during ZIKV infection. Although we need to investigate a possibility that viral RNA reduction in the CCT2 knockdown mosquitoes or viral reduction in the CCT2 knockdown cells is caused by diminished cell metabolism, we did not observe overt toxicity. Our results suggest that TRiC/CCT complex is exploited by ZIKV for maximal replication in both mammals and arthropod vectors and that TRIC/CCT complex may be a promising target for intervention.

Author Contributions

R.U. designed the experiments; Y.W. and R.U. performed the experiments and analyzed the data; J.H. and E.F. contributed experimental suggestions and strengthened the writing of the manuscript; Y.W., R.U., and E.F. wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by NIH grant (AI089992) and (AI127865). R.U. is supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Overseas Research Fellowships. Yuchen W. is supported by China Scholarship Council (No. 201806270109). E.F. is an investigator supported by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.

Acknowledgments

We thank the NIH and Yale School of Medicine for funding the Orbitrap Fusion (1S10ODOD018034-01) LC-MS/MS system located within the Yale MS & Proteomics Resource of the WM Keck Foundation Biotechnology Resource Laboratory. The authors also thank Kellie Ann Jurado, Junjun Jiang, Kathleen DePonte and Ming-Jie Wu for their technical assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

  1. Musso, D.; Gubler, D.J. Zika virus. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2016, 29, 487–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Powell, J.R. Mosquito-borne human viral diseases: Why aedes aegypti? Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2018, 98, 1563–1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Salinas, S.; Foulongne, V.; Loustalot, F.; Fournier-Wirth, C.; Moles, J.P.; Briant, L.; Nagot, N.; Van de Perre, P.; Simonin, Y. Zika virus, an emerging threat. Med. Sci. 2016, 32, 378–386. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bogoch, I.I.; Brady, O.J.; Kraemer, M.U.G.; German, M.; Creatore, M.I.; Kulkarni, M.A.; Brownstein, J.S.; Mekaru, S.R.; Hay, S.I.; Groot, E.; et al. Anticipating the international spread of zika virus from brazil. Lancet 2016, 387, 335–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Dong, S.; Kang, S.; Dimopoulos, G. Identification of anti-flaviviral drugs with mosquitocidal and anti-zika virus activity in aedes aegypti. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2019, 13, e0007681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Bollati, M.; Alvarez, K.; Assenberg, R.; Baronti, C.; Canard, B.; Cook, S.; Coutard, B.; Decroly, E.; de Lamballerie, X.; Gould, E.A.; et al. Structure and functionality in flavivirus ns-proteins: Perspectives for drug design. Antiviral Res. 2010, 87, 125–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Briant, L.; Despres, P.; Choumet, V.; Misse, D. Role of skin immune cells on the host susceptibility to mosquito-borne viruses. Virology 2014, 464–465, 26–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Amorim, J.H.; Alves, R.P.; Boscardin, S.B.; Ferreira, L.C. The dengue virus non-structural 1 protein: Risks and benefits. Virus Res. 2014, 181, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, A.; Yu, J.; Lu, M.; Ma, Y.; Attia, Z.; Shan, C.; Xue, M.; Liang, X.; Craig, K.; Makadiya, N.; et al. A zika virus vaccine expressing premembrane-envelope-ns1 polyprotein. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 3067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Bailey, M.J.; Duehr, J.; Dulin, H.; Broecker, F.; Brown, J.A.; Arumemi, F.O.; Bermudez Gonzalez, M.C.; Leyva-Grado, V.H.; Evans, M.J.; Simon, V.; et al. Human antibodies targeting zika virus ns1 provide protection against disease in a mouse model. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 4560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Gestaut, D.; Limatola, A.; Joachimiak, L.; Frydman, J. The atp-powered gymnastics of tric/cct: An asymmetric protein folding machine with a symmetric origin story. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2019, 55, 50–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Hafirassou, M.L.; Meertens, L.; Umana-Diaz, C.; Labeau, A.; Dejarnac, O.; Bonnet-Madin, L.; Kummerer, B.M.; Delaugerre, C.; Roingeard, P.; Vidalain, P.O.; et al. A global interactome map of the dengue virus ns1 identifies virus restriction and dependency host factors. Cell Rep. 2017, 21, 3900–3913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Inoue, Y.; Aizaki, H.; Hara, H.; Matsuda, M.; Ando, T.; Shimoji, T.; Murakami, K.; Masaki, T.; Shoji, I.; Homma, S.; et al. Chaperonin tric/cct participates in replication of hepatitis c virus genome via interaction with the viral ns5b protein. Virology 2011, 410, 38–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Knowlton, J.J.; Fernandez de Castro, I.; Ashbrook, A.W.; Gestaut, D.R.; Zamora, P.F.; Bauer, J.A.; Forrest, J.C.; Frydman, J.; Risco, C.; Dermody, T.S. The tric chaperonin controls reovirus replication through outer-capsid folding. Nat. Microbiol. 2018, 3, 481–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Hartl, F.U.; Hayer-Hartl, M. Molecular chaperones in the cytosol: From nascent chain to folded protein. Science 2002, 295, 1852–1858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Spiess, C.; Meyer, A.S.; Reissmann, S.; Frydman, J. Mechanism of the eukaryotic chaperonin: Protein folding in the chamber of secrets. Trends Cell Biol. 2004, 14, 598–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Yam, A.Y.; Xia, Y.; Lin, H.T.; Burlingame, A.; Gerstein, M.; Frydman, J. Defining the tric/cct interactome links chaperonin function to stabilization of newly made proteins with complex topologies. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2008, 15, 1255–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Frydman, J. Folding of newly translated proteins in vivo: The role of molecular chaperones. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2001, 70, 603–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hartl, F.U.; Hayer-Hartl, M. Converging concepts of protein folding in vitro and in vivo. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2009, 16, 574–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Neef, D.W.; Jaeger, A.M.; Gomez-Pastor, R.; Willmund, F.; Frydman, J.; Thiele, D.J. A direct regulatory interaction between chaperonin tric and stress-responsive transcription factor hsf1. Cell Rep. 2014, 9, 955–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Kabir, M.A.; Uddin, W.; Narayanan, A.; Reddy, P.K.; Jairajpuri, M.A.; Sherman, F.; Ahmad, Z. Functional subunits of eukaryotic chaperonin cct/tric in protein folding. J. Amino Acids 2011, 2011, 843206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Leitner, A.; Joachimiak, L.A.; Bracher, A.; Monkemeyer, L.; Walzthoeni, T.; Chen, B.; Pechmann, S.; Holmes, S.; Cong, Y.; Ma, B.; et al. The molecular architecture of the eukaryotic chaperonin tric/cct. Structure 2012, 20, 814–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Melkani, G.C.; Bhide, S.; Han, A.; Vyas, J.; Livelo, C.; Bodmer, R.; Bernstein, S.I. Tric/cct chaperonins are essential for maintaining myofibril organization, cardiac physiological rhythm, and lifespan. FEBS Lett. 2017, 591, 3447–3458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Boyer, S.; Calvez, E.; Chouin-Carneiro, T.; Diallo, D.; Failloux, A.B. An overview of mosquito vectors of zika virus. Microbes Infect. 2018, 20, 646–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tham, H.W.; Balasubramaniam, V.; Ooi, M.K.; Chew, M.F. Viral determinants and vector competence of zika virus transmission. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kauffman, E.B.; Kramer, L.D. Zika virus mosquito vectors: Competence, biology, and vector control. J. Infect. Dis. 2017, 216, S976–S990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Gutierrez-Bugallo, G.; Piedra, L.A.; Rodriguez, M.; Bisset, J.A.; Lourenco-de-Oliveira, R.; Weaver, S.C.; Vasilakis, N.; Vega-Rua, A. Vector-borne transmission and evolution of zika virus. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2019, 3, 561–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Scaturro, P.; Stukalov, A.; Haas, D.A.; Cortese, M.; Draganova, K.; Plaszczyca, A.; Bartenschlager, R.; Gotz, M.; Pichlmair, A. An orthogonal proteomic survey uncovers novel zika virus host factors. Nature 2018, 561, 253–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shah, P.S.; Link, N.; Jang, G.M.; Sharp, P.P.; Zhu, T.; Swaney, D.L.; Johnson, J.R.; Von Dollen, J.; Ramage, H.R.; Satkamp, L.; et al. Comparative flavivirus-host protein interaction mapping reveals mechanisms of dengue and zika virus pathogenesis. Cell 2018, 175, 1931–1945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Rastogi, M.; Sharma, N.; Singh, S.K. Flavivirus ns1: A multifaceted enigmatic viral protein. Virol. J. 2016, 13, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Dekker, C.; Stirling, P.C.; McCormack, E.A.; Filmore, H.; Paul, A.; Brost, R.L.; Costanzo, M.; Boone, C.; Leroux, M.R.; Willison, K.R. The interaction network of the chaperonin cct. EMBO J. 2008, 27, 1827–1839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Cong, Y.; Baker, M.L.; Jakana, J.; Woolford, D.; Miller, E.J.; Reissmann, S.; Kumar, R.N.; Redding-Johanson, A.M.; Batth, T.S.; Mukhopadhyay, A.; et al. 4.0-a resolution cryo-em structure of the mammalian chaperonin tric/cct reveals its unique subunit arrangement. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 4967–4972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Lingappa, J.R.; Martin, R.L.; Wong, M.L.; Ganem, D.; Welch, W.J.; Lingappa, V.R. A eukaryotic cytosolic chaperonin is associated with a high molecular weight intermediate in the assembly of hepatitis b virus capsid, a multimeric particle. J. Cell Biol. 1994, 125, 99–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zhang, J.; Wu, X.; Zan, J.; Wu, Y.; Ye, C.; Ruan, X.; Zhou, J. Cellular chaperonin cctγ contributes to rabies virus replication during infection. J. Virol. 2013, 87, 7608–7621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Hong, S.; Choi, G.; Park, S.; Chung, A.S.; Hunter, E.; Rhee, S.S. Type d retrovirus gag polyprotein interacts with the cytosolic chaperonin tric. J. Virol. 2001, 75, 2526–2534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Savidis, G.; McDougall, W.M.; Meraner, P.; Perreira, J.M.; Portmann, J.M.; Trincucci, G.; John, S.P.; Aker, A.M.; Renzette, N.; Robbins, D.R.; et al. Identification of zika virus and dengue virus dependency factors using functional genomics. Cell Rep. 2016, 16, 232–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Petrova, E.; Gracias, S.; Beauclair, G.; Tangy, F.; Jouvenet, N. Uncovering flavivirus host dependency factors through a genome-wide gain-of-function screen. Viruses 2019, 11, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Scaturro, P.; Cortese, M.; Chatel-Chaix, L.; Fischl, W.; Bartenschlager, R. Dengue virus non-structural protein 1 modulates infectious particle production via interaction with the structural proteins. PLoS Pathog. 2015, 11, e1005277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Akey, D.L.; Brown, W.C.; Jose, J.; Kuhn, R.J.; Smith, J.L. Structure-guided insights on the role of ns1 in flavivirus infection. Bioessays 2015, 37, 489–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Omokoko, M.D.; Pambudi, S.; Phanthanawiboon, S.; Masrinoul, P.; Setthapramote, C.; Sasaki, T.; Kuhara, M.; Ramasoota, P.; Yamashita, A.; Hirai, I.; et al. A highly conserved region between amino acids 221 and 266 of dengue virus non-structural protein 1 is a major epitope region in infected patients. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2014, 91, 146–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Jiang, L.; Zhou, J.M.; Yin, Y.; Fang, D.Y.; Tang, Y.X.; Jiang, L.F. Selection and identification of b-cell epitope on ns1 protein of dengue virus type 2. Virus Res. 2010, 150, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Chung, K.M.; Nybakken, G.E.; Thompson, B.S.; Engle, M.J.; Marri, A.; Fremont, D.H.; Diamond, M.S. Antibodies against west nile virus nonstructural protein ns1 prevent lethal infection through fc gamma receptor-dependent and -independent mechanisms. J. Virol. 2006, 80, 1340–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Viruses 12 00519 g001 550
Figure 1. Identification of the interaction of the human 293T cell proteins with Zika virus NS1 protein. (a) The identification of host factors binding to Zika virus NS1. Human 293T cells were transfected with c-Myc-tagged NS1-expressing vector. Twenty-four hours post transfection, the whole mock and NS1-transfected cell lysates were incubated with anti-c-Myc magnetic beads, then analyzed by SDS-PAGE, followed by staining with silver staining. The arrowheads indicate the position of NS1 protein and the band 1 and band 2 which are interacted with NS1 protein. (b) Co-immunoprecipitation of NS1 with CCT1-8. HA-tagged CCT1-8 proteins and naïve (nontagged) NS1 protein were expressed in 293T cells. After immunoprecipitation with anti-HA beads, samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE, followed by immunoblotting using a HA tag or NS1-specific antibody.
Figure 1. Identification of the interaction of the human 293T cell proteins with Zika virus NS1 protein. (a) The identification of host factors binding to Zika virus NS1. Human 293T cells were transfected with c-Myc-tagged NS1-expressing vector. Twenty-four hours post transfection, the whole mock and NS1-transfected cell lysates were incubated with anti-c-Myc magnetic beads, then analyzed by SDS-PAGE, followed by staining with silver staining. The arrowheads indicate the position of NS1 protein and the band 1 and band 2 which are interacted with NS1 protein. (b) Co-immunoprecipitation of NS1 with CCT1-8. HA-tagged CCT1-8 proteins and naïve (nontagged) NS1 protein were expressed in 293T cells. After immunoprecipitation with anti-HA beads, samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE, followed by immunoblotting using a HA tag or NS1-specific antibody.
Viruses 12 00519 g001
Viruses 12 00519 g002 550
Figure 2. Identification of the Zika virus NS1 region interacting with CCT2 in mammalian cells. (a) HeLa cells were infected with ZIKVCam, and colocalization of ZIKV NS1 and CCT2 were examined using confocal microscopy (Leica SP5, 100× objective): blue, cell nucleus; red, ZIKV NS1 protein; green, CCT2 protein. Right panels show enlargement of area indicated by the white boxes. (b) Diagrams of NS1 deletion mutants. A series of NS1 deletion mutants was constructed by sequential deletion from the N- or C-terminus of NS1. A c-Myc-tag was added at the C-terminus. (c) Immunoprecipitation of wild-type and deletion mutant NS1 proteins with naïve CCT2. Wild-type and the indicated deletion mutant NS1 proteins were expressed in 293T cells. Twenty-four post transfection, immunoprecipitations were performed with anti-c-Myc beads, followed by immunoblotting.
Figure 2. Identification of the Zika virus NS1 region interacting with CCT2 in mammalian cells. (a) HeLa cells were infected with ZIKVCam, and colocalization of ZIKV NS1 and CCT2 were examined using confocal microscopy (Leica SP5, 100× objective): blue, cell nucleus; red, ZIKV NS1 protein; green, CCT2 protein. Right panels show enlargement of area indicated by the white boxes. (b) Diagrams of NS1 deletion mutants. A series of NS1 deletion mutants was constructed by sequential deletion from the N- or C-terminus of NS1. A c-Myc-tag was added at the C-terminus. (c) Immunoprecipitation of wild-type and deletion mutant NS1 proteins with naïve CCT2. Wild-type and the indicated deletion mutant NS1 proteins were expressed in 293T cells. Twenty-four post transfection, immunoprecipitations were performed with anti-c-Myc beads, followed by immunoblotting.
Viruses 12 00519 g002
Viruses 12 00519 g003 550
Figure 3. ATP-dependent interaction between CCT2 and Zika virus NS1. c-Myc tagged NS1 was expressed in human 293T cells. Twenty-four post transfection, immunoprecipitation was performed with anti-c-Myc beads under several ATP concentrations (0, 10, 50, 100 mM), followed by immunoblotting.
Figure 3. ATP-dependent interaction between CCT2 and Zika virus NS1. c-Myc tagged NS1 was expressed in human 293T cells. Twenty-four post transfection, immunoprecipitation was performed with anti-c-Myc beads under several ATP concentrations (0, 10, 50, 100 mM), followed by immunoblotting.
Viruses 12 00519 g003
Viruses 12 00519 g004 550
Figure 4. The effect of suppression of CCT2 on Zika virus replication. (a) CCT2 knockdown or control HeLa cells were infected with ZIKV at Multiplicity of Infection (MOI) of 1. At the indicated timepoints post infection (0, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 h), samples were harvested and analyzed by immunoblotting with indicated antibodies. β-actin (ACTB) was used as a loading control. Red arrow shows detected NS1 protein. (b) CCT2 knockdown or control HeLa cells were infected with ZIKV at MOI of 1. At the indicated timepoints post transfection (6, 12, 24 and 36 h), samples were harvested and viral RNA levels were analyzed by qRT-PCR. Viral RNA levels were normalized to β-actin. (c) CCT2 knockdown and control cells were infected with ZIKV at MOI of 0.05. At the indicated timepoints post infection (12, 24, and 36 h), supernatants were collected, and virus titers were determined by plaque assay in Vero cells. **** p < 0.0001 by two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons test. Data are plotted as the mean ± SEM.
Figure 4. The effect of suppression of CCT2 on Zika virus replication. (a) CCT2 knockdown or control HeLa cells were infected with ZIKV at Multiplicity of Infection (MOI) of 1. At the indicated timepoints post infection (0, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 h), samples were harvested and analyzed by immunoblotting with indicated antibodies. β-actin (ACTB) was used as a loading control. Red arrow shows detected NS1 protein. (b) CCT2 knockdown or control HeLa cells were infected with ZIKV at MOI of 1. At the indicated timepoints post transfection (6, 12, 24 and 36 h), samples were harvested and viral RNA levels were analyzed by qRT-PCR. Viral RNA levels were normalized to β-actin. (c) CCT2 knockdown and control cells were infected with ZIKV at MOI of 0.05. At the indicated timepoints post infection (12, 24, and 36 h), supernatants were collected, and virus titers were determined by plaque assay in Vero cells. **** p < 0.0001 by two-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons test. Data are plotted as the mean ± SEM.
Viruses 12 00519 g004
Viruses 12 00519 g005 550
Figure 5. The effect of TRiC/CCT inhibitor HSF1A on ZIKV propagation. (a) HeLa cells treated with HSF1A (0, 25, 50, 75, or 100 µM) or DMSO (control) for 48 h, after which lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) released in the supernatants was assayed. (b) HeLa cells were pretreated with HSF1A (0, 50, or 100 µM) for 12 h and infected with ZIKV at MOI of 1. Infected cells were maintained in media containing HSF1A (0, 50, or 100 µM). At the indicated timepoints post infection (0, 12, 24, and 36 h), whole-cell lysates were harvested and analyzed by immunoblotting with indicated antibodies. β-actin was used as a loading control. Red arrow shows detected NS1 protein. (c) HeLa cells were pretreated with HSF1A (0, 25, 50, 75, or 100 µM) for 12 h and infected with ZIKV at MOI of 0.1. Supernatants were harvested and titrated at 36 h post infection by plaque assay. * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 by one-way ANOVA with Dunnet’s multiple comparisons test. Data are plotted as the mean ± SEM.
Figure 5. The effect of TRiC/CCT inhibitor HSF1A on ZIKV propagation. (a) HeLa cells treated with HSF1A (0, 25, 50, 75, or 100 µM) or DMSO (control) for 48 h, after which lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) released in the supernatants was assayed. (b) HeLa cells were pretreated with HSF1A (0, 50, or 100 µM) for 12 h and infected with ZIKV at MOI of 1. Infected cells were maintained in media containing HSF1A (0, 50, or 100 µM). At the indicated timepoints post infection (0, 12, 24, and 36 h), whole-cell lysates were harvested and analyzed by immunoblotting with indicated antibodies. β-actin was used as a loading control. Red arrow shows detected NS1 protein. (c) HeLa cells were pretreated with HSF1A (0, 25, 50, 75, or 100 µM) for 12 h and infected with ZIKV at MOI of 0.1. Supernatants were harvested and titrated at 36 h post infection by plaque assay. * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 by one-way ANOVA with Dunnet’s multiple comparisons test. Data are plotted as the mean ± SEM.
Viruses 12 00519 g005
Viruses 12 00519 g006 550
Figure 6. The effect of suppression of CCT2 in Aedes aegypti mosquitoes on Zika virus replication. Aedes aegypti mosquitoes were intrathoracically injected with 500 ng dsRNA targeting green fluorescent protein (GFP) (control) or CCT2 gene. After 3 days post dsRNA injection, Aedes aegypti mosquitoes were injected with 100 PFU of ZIKV. (left panels) At 3 and 7days post ZIKV injection, CCT2 expression levels in the whole Aedes aegypti mosquito were analyzed by qRT-PCR (Day 3: dsGFP-treated mosquitoes: n = 11, dsCCT2-treated mosquitoes: n = 12, Day 7: dsGFP-treated mosquitoes: n = 13, dsCCT2-treated mosquitoes: n = 12). CCT2 RNA levels were normalized to the levels of Rp49. (right panels) At 3 and 7 days post ZIKV injection, viral RNA levels in the whole Aedes aegypti mosquito were analyzed by qRT-PCR (Day 3: dsGFP-treated mosquitoes: n = 11, dsCCT2-treated mosquitoes: n = 12, Day 7: dsGFP-treated mosquitoes: n = 13, dsCCT2-treated mosquitoes: n = 12). Viral RNA levels were normalized to the levels of Rp49. Data are representative of three independent experiments with similar results. Significance is shown with asterisk ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.005 by Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM.
Figure 6. The effect of suppression of CCT2 in Aedes aegypti mosquitoes on Zika virus replication. Aedes aegypti mosquitoes were intrathoracically injected with 500 ng dsRNA targeting green fluorescent protein (GFP) (control) or CCT2 gene. After 3 days post dsRNA injection, Aedes aegypti mosquitoes were injected with 100 PFU of ZIKV. (left panels) At 3 and 7days post ZIKV injection, CCT2 expression levels in the whole Aedes aegypti mosquito were analyzed by qRT-PCR (Day 3: dsGFP-treated mosquitoes: n = 11, dsCCT2-treated mosquitoes: n = 12, Day 7: dsGFP-treated mosquitoes: n = 13, dsCCT2-treated mosquitoes: n = 12). CCT2 RNA levels were normalized to the levels of Rp49. (right panels) At 3 and 7 days post ZIKV injection, viral RNA levels in the whole Aedes aegypti mosquito were analyzed by qRT-PCR (Day 3: dsGFP-treated mosquitoes: n = 11, dsCCT2-treated mosquitoes: n = 12, Day 7: dsGFP-treated mosquitoes: n = 13, dsCCT2-treated mosquitoes: n = 12). Viral RNA levels were normalized to the levels of Rp49. Data are representative of three independent experiments with similar results. Significance is shown with asterisk ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.005 by Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM.
Viruses 12 00519 g006
Table
Table 1. Identification of Zika virus (ZIKV) NS1 protein-binding partners by LC-MS/MS (Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry).
Table 1. Identification of Zika virus (ZIKV) NS1 protein-binding partners by LC-MS/MS (Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry).
Protein IDProtein NameMass (Da)Sequence Coverage (%)Mascot Score
Band 1
GRP78_HUMAN78 kDa glucose-regulated protein Organism Name (OS) = Homo sapiens Gene Name (GN) = HSPA5 Protein Existence (PE) = 1 Sequence Version (SV) = 272,2886.4225
ZG16B_HUMANZymogen granule protein 16 homolog B OS = Homo sapiens GN = ZG16B PE = 1 SV = 322,72526181
RORB_HUMANNuclear receptor ROR-beta OS = Homo sapiens GN = RORB PE = 1 SV = 353,186632
WFKN2_HUMANWAP, Kazal, immunoglobulin, Kunitz and NTR domain-containing protein 2 OS = Homo sapiens GN = WFIKKN2 PE = 1 SV = 163,8985.231
COJA1_HUMANCollagen alpha-1(XIX) chain OS = Homo sapiens GN = COL19A1 PE = 1 SV = 3115,1496.529
ARHGC_HUMANRho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 12 OS = Homo sapiens GN = ARHGEF12 PE = 1 SV = 1173,1253.529
ZN469_HUMANZinc finger protein 469 OS = Homo sapiens GN = ZNF469 PE = 2 SV = 3409,9491.126
KNG1_HUMANKininogen-1 OS = Homo sapiens GN = KNG1 PE = 1 SV = 271,9125.726
EEA1_HUMANEarly endosome antigen 1 OS = Homo sapiens GN = EEA1 PE = 1 SV = 2162,3673.926
ATR_HUMANSerine/threonine-protein kinase ATR OS = Homo sapiens GN = ATR PE = 1 SV = 3301,1721.626
CIP1_HUMANE3 ubiquitin-protein ligase CCNB1IP1 OS = Homo sapiens GN = CCNB1IP1 PE = 1 SV = 131,5242.925
ARSJ_HUMANArylsulfatase J OS = Homo sapiens GN = ARSJ PE = 2 SV = 167,1931.523
CC180_HUMANCoiled-coil domain-containing protein 180 OS = Homo sapiens GN = CCDC180 PE = 2 SV = 2190,9790.922
KI2S1_HUMANKiller cell immunoglobulin-like receptor 2DS1 OS = Homo sapiens GN = KIR2DS1 PE = 2 SV = 133,6245.620
Band 2
TCPB_HUMANT-complex protein 1 subunit beta OS = Homo sapiens GN = CCT2 PE = 1 SV = 457,45247.91097
TCPQ_HUMANT-complex protein 1 subunit theta OS = Homo sapiens GN = CCT8 PE = 1 SV = 459,58335.8665
TCPH_HUMANT-complex protein 1 subunit eta OS = Homo sapiens GN = CCT7 PE = 1 SV = 259,32932.2627
TCPA_HUMANT-complex protein 1 subunit alpha OS = Homo sapiens GN = TCP1 PE = 1 SV = 160,30636.5623
TCPZ_HUMANT-complex protein 1 subunit zeta OS = Homo sapiens GN = CCT6A PE = 1 SV = 357,98836530
TCPG_HUMANT-complex protein 1 subunit gamma OS = Homo sapiens GN = CCT3 PE = 1 SV = 460,49533.2476
TCPE_HUMANT-complex protein 1 subunit epsilon OS = Homo sapiens GN = CCT5 PE = 1 SV = 159,63330.9458
TCPD_HUMANT-complex protein 1 subunit delta OS = Homo sapiens GN = CCT4 PE = 1 SV = 457,88818360
VIME_HUMANVimentin OS=Homo sapiens GN = VIM PE = 1 SV = 453,61912.297
S10AE_HUMANProtein S100-A14 OS = Homo sapiens GN = S100A14 PE = 1 SV = 111,65514.495
CH60_HUMAN60 kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrial OS = Homo sapiens GN = HSPD1 PE = 1 SV = 261,0163.359
KPYM_HUMANPyruvate kinase PKM OS = Homo sapiens GN = PKM PE = 1 SV = 457,9005.145
PRDX2_HUMANPeroxiredoxin-2 OS = Homo sapiens GN = PRDX2 PE = 1 SV = 521,87810.143
ACTA_HUMANActin, aortic smooth muscle OS = Homo sapiens GN = ACTA2 PE = 1 SV = 1 indistinguishable41,9824.239
TBA1A_HUMANTubulin alpha-1A chain OS = Homo sapiens GN = TUBA1A PE = 1 SV = 1 indistinguishable50,104439
RHG29_HUMANRho GTPase-activating protein 29 OS = Homo sapiens GN = ARHGAP29 PE = 1 SV = 2141,9743.337
ZFY27_HUMANProtrudin OS = Homo sapiens GN = ZFYVE27 PE = 1 SV = 145,8143.435
RUVB1_HUMANRuvB-like 1 OS = Homo sapiens GN = RUVBL1 PE = 1 SV = 150,196533
BLMH_HUMANBleomycin hydrolase OS = Homo sapiens GN = BLMH PE = 1 SV = 152,5282.433
TIAM2_HUMANT-lymphoma invasion and metastasis-inducing protein 2 OS = Homo sapiens GN = TIAM2 PE = 2 SV = 4189,9850.927
GON4L_HUMANGON-4-like protein OS = Homo sapiens GN = GON4L PE = 1 SV = 1248,4652.326
OR6S1_HUMANOlfactory receptor 6S1 OS = Homo sapiens GN = OR6S1 PE = 3 SV = 236,1032.425
PKRI1_HUMANPRKR-interacting protein 1 OS = Homo sapiens GN = PRKRIP1 PE = 1 SV = 120,9846.525
FBXL7_HUMANF-box/LRR-repeat protein 7 OS = Homo sapiens GN = FBXL7 PE = 2 SV = 154,5403.125
RINI_HUMANRibonuclease inhibitor OS = Homo sapiens GN = RNH1 PE = 1 SV = 249,9412.624
KI26B_HUMANKinesin-like protein KIF26B OS = Homo sapiens GN = KIF26B PE = 2 SV = 1223,7441.823
HMGB3_HUMANHigh mobility group protein B3 OS = Homo sapiens GN = HMGB3 PE = 1 SV = 422,965423
RNF32_HUMANRING finger protein 32 OS = Homo sapiens GN = RNF32 PE = 1 SV = 141,4901.922
BARD1_HUMANBRCA1-associated RING domain protein 1 OS = Homo sapiens GN = BARD1 PE = 1 SV = 286,5933.321
TC1D4_HUMANTctex1 domain-containing protein 4 OS = Homo sapiens GN = TCTEX1D4 PE = 1 SV = 123,3383.221
PRA10_HUMANPRAME family member 10 OS = Homo sapiens GN = PRAMEF10 PE = 2 SV = 455,175421
GTR7_HUMANSolute carrier family 2, facilitated glucose transporter member 7 OS = Homo sapiens GN = SLC2A7 PE = 2 SV = 255,6921.620

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Y.; Uraki, R.; Hwang, J.; Fikrig, E. TRiC/CCT Complex, a Binding Partner of NS1 Protein, Supports the Replication of Zika Virus in Both Mammalians and Mosquitoes. Viruses 2020, 12, 519. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/v12050519

AMA Style

Wang Y, Uraki R, Hwang J, Fikrig E. TRiC/CCT Complex, a Binding Partner of NS1 Protein, Supports the Replication of Zika Virus in Both Mammalians and Mosquitoes. Viruses. 2020; 12(5):519. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/v12050519

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Yuchen, Ryuta Uraki, Jesse Hwang, and Erol Fikrig. 2020. "TRiC/CCT Complex, a Binding Partner of NS1 Protein, Supports the Replication of Zika Virus in Both Mammalians and Mosquitoes" Viruses 12, no. 5: 519. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/v12050519

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop