Next Article in Journal
Metagenomic Studies of Viruses in Weeds and Wild Plants: A Powerful Approach to Characterise Variable Virus Communities
Next Article in Special Issue
Epidemiological and Immunological Features of Obesity and SARS-CoV-2
Previous Article in Journal
Development of a Recombinant RBD Subunit Vaccine for SARS-CoV-2
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Brief Report

Prognostic Role of Metabolic Syndrome in COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review Meta-Analysis

1
Department of Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ferrara, 44100 Ferrara, Italy
2
Department of Cardiology, Santa Maria Della Misericordia Hospital, 45100 Rovigo, Italy
3
Division of Cardiology, West Vicenza General Hospitals, Arzignano, 36071 Vicenza, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 6 September 2021 / Revised: 17 September 2021 / Accepted: 23 September 2021 / Published: 27 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Metabolic Syndrome and COVID-19)

Abstract

:
Background: The prevalence and prognostic implications of metabolic syndrome (MetS) in patients infected by the SARS-CoV-2 remain unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence and mortality risk in COVID-19 patients with MetS. Methods: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed in abstracting data and assessing validity. We searched MEDLINE and Scopus to locate every article published up to 1 September 2021, reporting data on MetS among COVID-19 patients. The pooled prevalence of MetS was calculated using a random effects model and presented using the related 95% confidence interval (CI), while the mortality risk was estimated using the Mantel-Haenszel random effects models with odds ratio (OR) and related 95% CI. Statistical heterogeneity was measured using the Higgins I2 statistic. Results: Six studies, enrolling 209.569 COVID-19 patients [mean age 57.2 years, 114.188 males (54.4%)] met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. The pooled prevalence of dyslipidaemia was 20.5% of cases (95% CI: 6.7–47.8%, p = 0.03), with high heterogeneity (I2 = 98.9%). Pre-existing MetS was significantly associated with higher risk of short-term mortality (OR: 2.30, 95% CI: 1.52–3.45, p < 0.001), with high heterogeneity (I2 = 89.4%). Meta-regression showed a direct correlation with male gender (p = 0.03), hypertension (p < 0.001), DM (p = 0.01) and hyperlipidaemia (p = 0.04), but no effect when considering age (p = 0.75) and chronic pulmonary disease (p = 0.86) as moderators. Conclusions: MetS represents a major comorbidity in about 20% of COVID-19 patients and it is associated with a 230% increased risk of short-term mortality.

1. Introduction

Since the beginning of COVID-19 outbreak, a growing body of evidence has demonstrated that clinical outcomes in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection are closely related to the burden of associated comorbidities [1], such as arterial hypertension (HT), diabetes mellitus (DM) and cardiovascular disease (CVDs) [2,3,4,5]. Notably, most of these concomitant diseases constitute the definition of metabolic syndrome (MetS), a frequent metabolic disorder in the general population, which is commonly considered as a risk factor for the progression of CVDs and type 2 diabetes [6]. Although some recent analyses have investigated the role of MetS in COVID-19 patients, a comprehensive assessment of data regarding the real prevalence and prognostic role of MetS in SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals has not yet been performed. The aim of the present study is to estimate the pooled prevalence and the influence of MetS on short-term mortality in COVID-19 patients by a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available data.

2. Methods

2.1. Data Sources and Searches

The study was performed in accordance with the Preferred Report Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (Supplementary File S1) [7]. PubMed and Scopus databases were systematically searched for articles, published in the English language, from inception through 1 September 2021 with the following Medical Subject Heading (MESH) terms: “COVID-19” OR “SARS-CoV-2” AND “Metabolic Syndrome”, following the same PICO (population, intervention, comparison, and outcome) strategy (Table 1).
In addition, references from the included studies were screened to potentially identify other investigations meeting the inclusion criteria.

2.2. Study Selection

Specifically, inclusion criteria were: (i) studies enrolling subjects with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19; (ii) studies providing data on the prevalence of MetS among patients enrolled and (iii) adjusted odds ratios (aORs) estimating the short-term mortality risk among COVID-19 patients with MetS. Conversely, case reports, review articles, abstracts, editorials/letters and case series with less than 10 participants were excluded. Each included article was independently evaluated by two reviewers (MZ, LR); in case of discrepancies a third author was involved (CB), and final consensus was achieved through discussion.

2.3. Data Extraction and Quality Assessment

Data were independently extracted by two reviewers (MZ, GR) using a standardized protocol. Disagreements were resolved. For this meta-analysis, the following data elements were extracted: sample size, mean age, number of non-survivors (NS), male gender, prevalence of MetS, major comorbidities such as HT, DM, obesity, chronic pulmonary disease; Hyperlipidaemia and aOR for short-term mortality in COVID-19 patients with MetS. The quality of included studies was graded using the Newcastle–Ottawa quality assessment scale (NOS) [8].

2.4. Outcomes

The prevalence of MetS in COVID-19 patients was chosen as the primary outcome while its associated mortality risk was selected as the secondary outcome.

2.5. Data Synthesis and Analysis

Continuous variables were expressed as mean or as a median while categorical variables as counts and percentages. The cumulative prevalence of MetS (n/N), defined as the ratio between patients with pre-existing Mets (n) and the number of patients enrolled in each study (N), were pooled using a random effects model and presented with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). To estimate the mortality risk, data were pooled using the Mantel-Haenszel random effects models with odds ratio (OR) as the effect measure with 95% CI. Heterogeneity among studies was assessed using Higgins and Thomson I2 statistic where I2 values corresponding with the following levels of heterogeneity: low (<25%), moderate (25–75%) and high (>75%) [9]. The presence of potential publication bias was verified by visual inspection of the funnel plot. Due to the low number of included studies (<10), small-study bias was not examined as our analysis was underpowered to detect such bias. A predefined sensitivity analysis (leave-one-out analysis) was performed removing one study at the time to evaluate the stability of our results regarding the mortality risk. To further appraise the impact of potential baseline confounders, a meta-regression analysis using age, gender, HT, DM, chronic pulmonary disease and hyperlipidaemia as moderator variables was performed. These variables were selected since previous analyses have identified those comorbidities as independent predictors of mortality in COVID-19 patients [2,3,10,11]. All meta-analyses were conducted using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software, version 3 (Biostat, Englewood, NJ, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Search Results

A total of 2949 articles were obtained by our search strategy. After excluding duplicates and preliminary screening, 1009 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility and 812 studies were excluded for not meeting the inclusion criteria while 1003 for unavailable outcomes, leaving six investigations fulfilling the inclusion criteria [12,13,14,15,16,17]. A flow diagram of the literature search and related screening process is shown in Figure 1.

3.2. Study Characteristics

Overall, 209,569 COVID-19 patients (mean age 57.2 years, 114,188 males (54.4%)) were included in the analysis. The general characteristics of the included studies are summarized in Table 2. Despite the concomitant comorbidities were not systematically investigated by the studies revised, HT and DM were the most frequently observed n = 43,987 (20.9%) and n = 35,124 (16.7%) for HT and DM, respectively. Quality assessment showed that all the studies were of moderate-high quality according to the NOS scale. The clinical characteristics considered by each revised study to define the presence of MetS are presented in Table 3.

3.3. Pooled Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome

The prevalence of MetS among COVID-19 patients ranged between 3.6% and 47.1%. A random effect model revealed a pooled prevalence of MetS in 20.5% of cases (95% CI: 6.7–47.8%, p = 0.03). A high heterogeneity was observed in the analysis (I2 = 98.9%) (Figure 2). The relative funnel plot is presented in Figure 3.

3.4. Dyslipidaemia and Mortality Risk

Five studies reported an aOR for the mortality risk in COVID-19 patients with Mets (n = 209,336 patients, mean age 59.2 years, 113,786 males) [12,13,15,16,17]. The variables used by each study to determine the aOR for the short-term mortality risk are presented in Table 4. On pooled analysis, patients with MetS showed a significantly higher mortality risk in the short-term period (OR: 2.30, 95% CI: 1.52–3.45, p < 0.001, I2 = 89.4%) (Figure 3). The relative funnel plot is presented in Figure 3B.

3.5. Sensitivity Analysis and Publication Bias

To evaluate the robustness of the association results, we performed a leave-one-out sensitivity analysis by iteratively removing one study at a time and recalculating the summary OR. The summary ORs remained stable (ranging between OR: 2.24, 95%CI: 1.12–2.88, p = 0.001 and OR: 2.35, 95%CI: 1.62–3.48, p < 0.001), indicating that our results were not driven by any single study. Due to the limited number of studies available to perform the meta-analysis, funnel plots cannot reassure the presence of potential publication bias, since the power of the test was too low in distinguishing chance from real asymmetry (Figure 4).

3.6. Meta-Regression

Meta-regression analysis revealed a direct relationship between the risk of short-term mortality and MetS in COVID-19 patients using male gender (p = 0.03), HT (p < 0.001), DM (p = 0.01) and hyperlipidaemia (p = 0.04). Conversely, there was no association when age (p = 0.75) and the prevalence of chronic pulmonary disease was considered as moderator (p = 0.86).

4. Discussion

Three major findings emerge from the present meta-analysis based on more 200,000 patients. Firstly, Mets is present in about one out of four COVID-19 patients. Secondly, and more importantly, SARS-CoV-2 infected patients with a pre-existing MetS had an approximately 230% higher risk of death in the short-term period compared to those without. Thirdly, this last association was directly influenced by male gender, HT, DM and hyperlipidaemia.
Our results are in accordance with previous investigations examining the prognostic role of single MetS components, such as HT, DM, dyslipidaemia and obesity [2,3,5,21], reinforcing the concept that cardio-metabolic comorbidities play a pivotal role in determining the COVID-19 patient’s outcome. Unfortunately, the revised studies did not systematically report the aOR regarding the mortality risk for each MetS constituent, therefore we were not able to assess the relative single contribution in determining the global risk. However, this later aspect is partially mitigated by the large number of results derived by recent studies linking the single MetS components with a poor outcome in COVID-19 patients [2,3,5,21]. Performing a meta-regression based on such a disease constituting the definition of MetS, it emerged that HT and DM were those that significantly increased the mortality risk, as observed by Leon-Pedroza et al. [17]. Intriguingly, two of the revised studies also demonstrated that the mortality risk increased according to the number of MetS components [15,17]. On the other hand, both age and male gander have been identified as independent predictors of worse outcomes in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection [22,23]. The high heterogeneity observed in our study is probably multifactorial. To this regard, the limited number of studies satisfying the inclusion criteria and the relative few numbers of enrolled patients represent, per se, a potential source of heterogeneity. Secondly, inherited biases derived from the original investigations may have further contributed to the heterogeneity level observed (methodological heterogeneity). In fact, different levels of methodological quality, sampling methods and definitions of MetS may have produced significant difference among the studies. Although some part of the heterogeneity between studies could be explained by the results of the meta-regression performed, our findings must be considered as preliminary, needing further confirmation from larger and randomized studies. What is certain is that, from a pathophysiological perspective, both aging and chronic metabolic disease, such as MetS, dysregulates the immune function leading to a chronic inflammatory state predisposing a perfect cytokine storm during COVID-19 infection [24] which influences the outcome of these patients [25].
Notably, some of the components of MetS are also related to low vitamin D level. In fact, a significant association between vitamin D deficiency and MetS has already been described in the general population [26]. To this regard, vitamin D deficiency seems to be common among COVID-19 patients, playing a significant role in worsening the prognosis of these patients [27,28,29]. However, none of the studies reviewed presented data on vitamin D status. Therefore, our results confirm that the metabolic status assessment remains important in the prognosis of these patients and in the risk of infection [30]. Our findings may have important implications in daily clinical practice, indeed, the prompt identification of patients with pre-existing MetS remains critical to promptly identify vulnerable populations who would require prioritization in treatment and prevention, and close monitoring if infected.
However, the presented results must be considered as preliminary, due the limited number of studies available on the relationship between MetS and COVID-19 mortality. Further investigations on this issue are urgently necessary to confirm our results.

5. Limitations

Our study has several limitations related to the design of the studied reviewed with all inherited biases and the numbers of investigation on the issue. In fact, only a few studies have analysed the relationship between MetS and mortality in COVID-19 patients, limiting our results and conclusions. Moreover, the relatively high heterogeneity observed, which probably depends on the inclusion criteria, as well as by the studies’ design and different criteria used to define the presence of MetS, may have resulted in the absence of firm conclusions. Furthermore, the potential underestimation of pre-existing MetS in hospitalized patients may have distorted our results. Further larger clinical studies are needed to confirm our preliminary results, as well as to compare the prognostic impact of individual comorbidities that constitute the definition criteria of MetS.

6. Conclusions

MetS is present in about 20% of patients with COVID-19 infection and is associated with an increased risk of short-term mortality Present results further reinforce the concept that cardiovascular comorbidities and risk factors play a pivotal role in determining the COVID-19 patient’s outcome [5]. However, this finding must be cautiously interpreted because of the high heterogeneity observed.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/article/10.3390/v13101938/s1. Table S1. PRISMA Checklist.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: M.Z. and L.R.; methodology: M.Z. and L.R.; Validation: C.B.; formal analysis: M.Z. and G.R.; data curation: G.R. and C.C.; writing—original draft preparation: M.Z., L.R. and G.R.; writing—review and editing: C.B., C.C. and G.Z.; supervision: L.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All the data pertaining to the study are available in the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Giorgi, A.D.; Fabbian, F.; Greco, S.; Simone, E.D.; Giorgio, R.D.; Passaro, A.; Zuliani, G.; Manfredini, R. Prediction of in-hospital mortality of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection by comorbidity indexes: An Italian internal medicine single center study. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2020, 24, 10258–10266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Zuin, M.; Rigatelli, G.; Zuliani, G.; Rigatelli, A.; Mazza, A.; Roncon, L. Arterial hypertension and risk of death in patients with COVID-19 infection: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Infect. 2020, 81, e84–e86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Roncon, L.; Zuin, M.; Rigatelli, G.; Zuliani, G. Diabetic patients with COVID-19 infection are at higher risk of ICU admission and poor short-term outcome. J. Clin. Virol. 2020, 127, 104354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Bae, S.; Kim, S.R.; Kim, M.-N.; Shim, W.J.; Park, S.-M. Impact of cardiovascular disease and risk factors on fatal outcomes in patients with COVID-19 according to age: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart 2021, 107, 373–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zuin, M.; Rigatelli, G.; Bilato, C.; Cervellati, C.; Zuliani, G.; Roncon, L. Dyslipidaemia and mortality in COVID-19 patients: A meta-analysis. QJM Int. J. Med. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Grundy, S.M.; Cleeman, J.I.; Daniels, S.R.; Donato, K.A.; Eckel, R.H.; Franklin, B.A.; Gordon, D.J.; Krauss, R.M.; Savage, P.J.; Smith, S.C.J.; et al. Diagnosis and Management of the Metabolic Syndrome: An American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute scientific statement. Circulation 2005, 112, 2735–2752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D.G. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and me-ta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009, 6, e1000097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Wells, G.A.; Shea, B.; O’Connell, D.; Peterson, J.; Welch, V.; Losos, M.; Tugwell, P. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality If Nonrandomized Studies in Meta-Analyses. Available online: http://wwwohrica/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxfordasp (accessed on 24 August 2021).
  9. Higgins, J.P.T.; Thompson, S.G.; Deeks, J.J.; Altman, D.G. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Br. Med. J. 2003, 327, 557–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Nguyen, N.T.; Chinn, J.; Ferrante, M.D.; Kirby, K.A.; Hohmann, S.F.; Amin, A. Male gender is a predictor of higher mortality in hospitalized adults with COVID-19. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0254066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Beltramo, G.; Cottenet, J.; Mariet, A.-S.; Georges, M.; Piroth, L.; Tubert-Bitter, P.; Bonniaud, P.; Quantin, C. Chronic respiratory diseases are predictors of severe outcome in COVID-19 hospitalised patients: A nationwide study. Eur. Respir. J. 2021, 58, 2004474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Xie, J.; Zu, Y.; Alkhatib, A.; Pham, T.T.; Gill, F.; Jang, A.; Radosta, S.; Chaaya, G.; Myers, L.; Zifodya, J.S.; et al. Metabolic Syndrome and COVID-19 Mortality Among Adult Black Patients in New Orleans. Diabetes Care 2021, 44, 188–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Lohia, P.; Kapur, S.; Benjaram, S.; Pandey, A.; Mir, T.; Seyoum, B. Metabolic syndrome and clinical outcomes in patients infected with COVID -19: Does age, sex, and race of the patient with metabolic syndrome matter? J. Diabetes 2021, 13, 420–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wang, J.; Zhu, L.; Liu, L.; Yan, X.; Xue, L.; Huang, S.; Zhang, B.; Xu, T.; Ji, F.; Li, C.; et al. Clinical features and prognosis of COVID-19 patients with metabolic syndrome: A multicenter, retrospective study. Med. Clin. 2021, 2021, S0025-7753(21)00320-1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Alamdari, N.M.; Rahimi, F.S.; Afaghi, S.; Zarghi, A.; Qaderi, S.; Tarki, F.E.; Ghafouri, S.R.; Besharat, S. The impact of metabolic syndrome on morbidity and mortality among intensive care unit admitted COVID-19 patients. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Clin. Res. Rev. 2020, 14, 1979–1986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cho, D.-H.; Choi, J.; Gwon, J.G. Metabolic syndrome and the risk of COVID-19 infection: A nationwide population-based case-control study. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2021, 31, 2596–2604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. León-Pedroza, J.I.; Rodríguez-Cortés, O.; Flores-Mejía, R.; Gaona-Aguas, C.V.; González-Chávez, A. Impact of metabolic syndrome in the clinical outcome of disease by SARS-COV-2 in Mexican population. Arch. Med. Res. 2021, 2021, S0188-4409(21)00084-9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lipsy, R.J. The National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. J. Manag. Care Pharm. JMCP 2003, 9 (Suppl. S1), 2–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Alberti, K.G.M.M.; Eckel, R.H.; Grundy, S.M.; Zimmet, P.Z.; Cleeman, J.I.; Donato, K.A.; Fruchart, J.-C.; James, W.P.T.; Loria, C.M.; Smith, S.C.J.; et al. Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome: A joint interim statement of the International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World Heart Federation; International Atherosclerosis Society; and International Association for the Study of Obesity. Circulation 2009, 120, 1640–1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Sperling, L.S.; Mechanick, J.I.; Neeland, I.J.; Herrick, C.J.; Després, J.-P.; Ndumele, C.E.; Vijayaraghavan, K.; Handelsman, Y.; Puckrein, G.A.; Araneta, M.R.G.; et al. The CardioMetabolic Health Alliance. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2015, 66, 1050–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Poly, T.N.; Islam, M.M.; Yang, H.C.; Lin, M.C.; Jian, W.-S.; Hsu, M.-H.; Li, Y.-C.J. Obesity and Mortality Among Patients Diagnosed With COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front. Med. 2021, 8, 620044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Peckham, H.; Gruijter, N.M.D.; Raine, C.; Radziszewska, A.; Ciurtin, C.; Wedderburn, L.R.; Rosser, E.C.; Webb, K.; Deakin, C.T. Male sex identified by global COVID-19 meta-analysis as a risk factor for death and ITU admission. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bonanad, C.; García-Blas, S.; Tarazona-Santabalbina, F.; Sanchis, J.; Bertomeu-González, V.; Fácila, L.; Ariza, A.; Núñez, J.; Cordero, A. The Effect of Age on Mortality in Patients With COVID-19: A Meta-Analysis With 611,583 Subjects. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2020, 21, 915–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mauvais-Jarvis, F. Aging, Male Sex, Obesity, and Metabolic Inflammation Create the Perfect Storm for COVID-19. Diabetes 2020, 69, 1857–1863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hojyo, S.; Uchida, M.; Tanaka, K.; Hasebe, R.; Tanaka, Y.; Murakami, M.; Hirano, T. How COVID-19 induces cytokine storm with high mortality. Inflamm. Regen. 2020, 40, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, C.-M.; Chang, C.-S.; Chang, Y.-F.; Wu, S.-J.; Chiu, C.-J.; Hou, M.-T.; Chen, C.-Y.; Liu, P.-Y.; Wu, C.-H. Inverse Relationship between Metabolic Syndrome and 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Concentration in Elderly People without Vitamin D deficiency. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 17052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Charoenngam, N.; Shirvani, A.; Reddy, N.; Vodopivec, D.M.; Apovian, C.M.; Holick, M.F. Association of Vitamin D Status With Hospital Morbidity and Mortality in Adult Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19. Endocr. Pr. 2021, 27, 271–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yisak, H.; Ewunetei, A.; Kefale, B.; Mamuye, M.; Teshome, F.; Ambaw, B.; Yitbarek, G.Y. Effects of Vitamin D on COVID-19 Infection and Prognosis: A Systematic Review. Risk Manag. Healthc. Policy 2021, 14, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Petrelli, F.; Luciani, A.; Perego, G.; Dognini, G.; Colombelli, P.L.; Ghidini, A. Therapeutic and prognostic role of vitamin D for COVID-19 infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 43 observational studies. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2021, 211, 105883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Ribeiro, H.G.; Dantas-Komatsu, R.C.S.; Medeiros, J.F.P.; Carvalho, M.C.D.C.; Soares, V.D.L.; Reis, B.Z.; Luchessi, A.D.; Silbiger, V.N. Previous vitamin D status and total cholesterol are associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Clin. Chim. Acta Int. J. Clin. Chem. 2021, 522, 8–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram.
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram.
Viruses 13 01938 g001
Figure 2. Pooled prevalence of pre-existing metabolic syndrome in COVID-19 patient.
Figure 2. Pooled prevalence of pre-existing metabolic syndrome in COVID-19 patient.
Viruses 13 01938 g002
Figure 3. Funnel plots for (A) the polled prevalence of metabolic syndrome in COVID-19 patients and (B) for the mortality risk due to metabolic syndrome in COVID-19 patients.
Figure 3. Funnel plots for (A) the polled prevalence of metabolic syndrome in COVID-19 patients and (B) for the mortality risk due to metabolic syndrome in COVID-19 patients.
Viruses 13 01938 g003
Figure 4. Forest plot investigating the mortality risk due to metabolic syndrome in COVID-19 patients using a random-effect model.
Figure 4. Forest plot investigating the mortality risk due to metabolic syndrome in COVID-19 patients using a random-effect model.
Viruses 13 01938 g004
Table 1. PICO criteria description and research question defined to systematic review.
Table 1. PICO criteria description and research question defined to systematic review.
ParameterDescription
PopualationCOVID-19 patients
IndicatorPresence of MetS
ComparisonCOVID-19 patients with vs without MetS
OutcomeShort-term mortality
Research questionIs MetS associated with higher mortality in COVID-19 patients?
Table 2. General characteristics of the population enrolled. NS: Non-survivors; MetS: Metabolic syndrome; HT: Arterial hypertension; DM: Diabetes Mellitus; CPD: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; NOS: Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale.
Table 2. General characteristics of the population enrolled. NS: Non-survivors; MetS: Metabolic syndrome; HT: Arterial hypertension; DM: Diabetes Mellitus; CPD: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; NOS: Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale.
AuthorN° of PtsAge (Years)Males, n (%)NS, n (%)MetS, n (%)HT, n (%)DM, n (%)Obesity, n (%)CPD, n (%)Hyperlipidaemia, n (%)NOS
Xie et al. [12]28761.5124 (43.2)58 (20.1)188 (66.0)230 (80.1)154 (53.6)187 (65.2)29 (10.1)122 (39.0)8
Lohia et al. [13]1.87166.0965 (51.6)613 (32.8)573 (30.6)1485 (79.4)792 (42.3)879 (47.0)317 (16.9)513 (27.4)8
Wang et al. [14]23347.0132 (56.7)045 (19.3)38 (16.3)18 (7.7)NR10 (4.3)NR7
Alamdari et al. [15]15768138 (87.8)NR74 (47.1)97 (61.7)78 (49.6)NR42 (26.7)51 (32.4)7
Cho et al. [16]4.07055.91530 (37.6)142 (3.4)1007 (24.7)1323 (32.5)590 (14.5)NRNR1386 (34.1)7
Leon-Pedroza et al. [17]202.95145111.299 (54.8)25.060 (12.3)7308 (3.6)40.814 (20.2)33.492 (16.6)39.873 (19.7)3.607 (1.8)NR8
Table 3. Criteria used by the revised studies to define the metabolic syndrome. BMI. Body mass index; TG: Triglycerides; HDL: High-density lipoprotein.
Table 3. Criteria used by the revised studies to define the metabolic syndrome. BMI. Body mass index; TG: Triglycerides; HDL: High-density lipoprotein.
AuthorCriteria Used to Define MetSN° of Criteria to Define MetS
Xie et al. [12]Modified WHO criteria [6]At least three
Lohia et al. [13]
  • History of diabetes or use of antidiabetics;
  • Obesity (BMI > 30);
  • History of hypertension or use of antihypertensive medications;
  • TG > 150 mg/dL;
  • HDL < 40 in males and <50 in females
  • History of hypercholesterolemia and use of cholesterol-lowering drugs
Wang et al. [14]Modified WHO criteria [6]At least three
Alamdari et al. [15]National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP)—Adult Treatment Panel (ATPIII) criteria [18]At least three
Cho et al. [16]American guidelines iof the Inernational Diabetes Federation and American Heart Association [19]At least three
Leon-Pedroza et al. [17]Sperling et al. [20]At least three
Table 4. Variables used in the revised studies to calculate the adjusted odd ratio for the mortality risk in COVID-19 patients with metabolic syndrome. CAD: Coronary artery disease; COPD: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CKD: Chronic kidney disease; ESRD: End-stage renal disease; HT: Arterial hypertension; HDL: High-density lipoprotein.
Table 4. Variables used in the revised studies to calculate the adjusted odd ratio for the mortality risk in COVID-19 patients with metabolic syndrome. CAD: Coronary artery disease; COPD: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CKD: Chronic kidney disease; ESRD: End-stage renal disease; HT: Arterial hypertension; HDL: High-density lipoprotein.
AuthorAdjustement Variables
Xie et al. [12]Age, gender, race, hospital site, Charlson Comorbidity index
Lohia et al. [13]Age, gender, race, smoking, insurance, CAD, COPD, asthma, CKD, ESRD, cancer, liver disease, previous stroke
Wang et al. [14]Not evaluated for the secondary outcome of the study since no death were registered in the original study
Alamdari et al. [15]Wrist circumference, increased blood glucose, HT, low HDL, elevated triglycerides
Cho et al. [16]Age, gender, region, social economic status, smoking, alcohol, physical activity, cardiovascular disease, asthma, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, cancer and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
Leon-Pedroza et al. [17]Age, sex
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zuin, M.; Rigatelli, G.; Bilato, C.; Cervellati, C.; Zuliani, G.; Roncon, L. Prognostic Role of Metabolic Syndrome in COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review Meta-Analysis. Viruses 2021, 13, 1938. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/v13101938

AMA Style

Zuin M, Rigatelli G, Bilato C, Cervellati C, Zuliani G, Roncon L. Prognostic Role of Metabolic Syndrome in COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review Meta-Analysis. Viruses. 2021; 13(10):1938. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/v13101938

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zuin, Marco, Gianluca Rigatelli, Claudio Bilato, Carlo Cervellati, Giovanni Zuliani, and Loris Roncon. 2021. "Prognostic Role of Metabolic Syndrome in COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review Meta-Analysis" Viruses 13, no. 10: 1938. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/v13101938

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop