Next Article in Journal
Ecopathology of Ranaviruses Infecting Amphibians
Next Article in Special Issue
Dynamics of Persistent and Acute Deformed Wing Virus Infections in Honey Bees, Apis mellifera
Previous Article in Journal
Stress Granules in the Viral Replication Cycle
Previous Article in Special Issue
Complete Sequence, Analysis and Organization of the Orgyia leucostigma Nucleopolyhedrovirus Genome
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Lymantria dispar IPLB-Ld652Y Cell Line Transcriptome Comprises Diverse Virus-Associated Transcripts

by
Michael E. Sparks
and
Dawn E. Gundersen-Rindal
*
USDA-ARS Invasive Insect Biocontrol and Behavior Laboratory, 10300 Baltimore Ave., Bldg 011A, Rm 214, BARC-West, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Viruses 2011, 3(11), 2339-2350; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/v3112339
Submission received: 30 September 2011 / Revised: 12 November 2011 / Accepted: 14 November 2011 / Published: 21 November 2011
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Insect Viruses)

Abstract

:
The enhanced viral susceptibility of the gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar)-derived IPLB-Ld652Y cell line has made it a popular in vitro system for studying virus-related phenomena in the Lepidoptera. Using both single-pass EST sequencing and 454-based pyrosequencing, a transcriptomic library of 14,368 putatively unique transcripts (PUTs) was produced comprising 8,476,050 high-quality, informative bases. The gene content of the IPLB-Ld652Y transcriptome was broadly assessed via comparison with the NCBI non-redundant protein database, and more detailed functional annotation was inferred by comparison to the Swiss-Prot subset of UniProtKB. In addition to L. dispar cellular transcripts, a diverse array of both RNA and DNA virus-associated transcripts was identified within the dataset, suggestive of a high level of viral expression and activity in IPLB-Ld652Y cells. These sequence resources will provide a sound basis for developing testable experimental hypotheses by insect virologists, and suggest a number of avenues for potential research.

1. Introduction

The Lymantria dispar (gypsy moth) cell line, IPLB-Ld652Y, was originally derived from pupal ovary tissue by Goodwin et al. over three decades ago [1]. This cell line distinctly exhibits enhanced viral susceptibility, which has rendered it a popular in vitro system for studying virus effects in the Lepidoptera, particularly those mediated by nucleopolyhedroviruses [2,3,4,5,6,7] and baculovirus-like viruses [8]. Despite its utility towards facilitating molecular virology research in insects, this cell line has not yet been characterized from a transcriptomics perspective. No mRNA sequence libraries for Ld652Y have been made publicly available to date, nor do transcriptome or genome resources exist for the cell line’s host, L. dispar. As of August 2011, fewer than 40 distinct L. dispar mRNA sequences could be retrieved from the GenBank nucleotide database, and no transcript reads had yet been deposited to either the dbEST [9] or SRA [10] repositories. In the present communication, the gypsy moth transcriptome is profiled via the IPLB-Ld652Y cell line using both a survey of single-pass EST and 454-based reads derived from uninfected IPLB-Ld652Y cells (hereafter referred to as Ld652Y). This is the fourth established lepidopteran cell line cDNA library, as Landais et al. [11] and Deng et al. [12] generated cDNA libraries for Spodoptera frugiperda (fall armyworm) cell lines SF-9 and SF-21, respectively, and Okano et al. [13] profiled ESTs from the Bombyx mori cell line BmN. In particular, the Ld652Y-based cDNA library is the first to be generated using next generation sequencing technologies. Given the relevance and widespread utilization of Ld652Y cells for elucidating mechanisms of viral infectivity, these sequence resources will likely be of significant value to the insect virology community.

2. Results and Discussion

A collection of 14,368 Putatively Unique Transcripts (PUTs) was compared to the NCBI NR protein database using Blastx (see the Experimental Section below). 6,524 (≈45.4%) of these exhibited a best hit in NR satisfying moderately stringent parsing criteria. (5,069 of these NR hits were unique: Multiple PUTs may correspond to a particular NR gene, because their constituent transcript reads lack sufficient overlap to allow merging during assembly.) Although a number of PUTs corresponded to housekeeping genes such as ribosomal proteins (384) and proteasome subunits (73), numerous immune- and apoptosis-related genes that could potentially explain the response of gypsy moth larvae to baculovirus infection at the molecular genetic level were identified [5,6]. For example, we observed relatively high expression of a cyclophilin A gene, which has been implicated in conferring increased susceptibility to viral infection by HIV-1 in an in vitro context [14,15]. In addition, an annexin IX signal transduction factor was observed, which has been implicated in programmed cell death in the anterior silk gland of Bombyx mori [16]; apoptotic genes are known to play a significant role in baculoviral infection of lepidopteran cell lines [17,18].
Although beyond the scope of this report, this transcript collection will be useful for further exploration of virus-related phenomena in Ld652Y. For example, gypsy moth Cathepsin B, Actin A3 and Gloverin precursor transcripts, all of which are likely involved in silkworm anti-microbial immune response to infection by the nucleopolyhedrovirus BmNPV [19], are present in the dataset. Similarly, 29 aminoacyl tRNA synthetase transcripts were identified; these might facilitate research confirming the role of defective or depleted tRNA in global arrest of protein translation in AcNPV-infected Ld652Y cells, as has been previously hypothesized [3]. Heat shock cognate protein 70 (Hsc70)—a gene posited to play a key role in baculovirus infection of the Spodoptera frugiperda cell lines SF-9 [20] and SF-21 [21] and upregulated in infected Heliothis virescens [22]—was expressed at relatively high levels.
Many best hits among the NR Blastx results mapped to virus-related entries. Table 1 depicts the 20 viruses having the greatest number of sequences in the NR database exhibiting similarity to one or more Ld652Y putative unique transcripts, or “PUTs”. In particular, a substantial number of hits corresponded to gene sequences from retroviruses, including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1; 444 distinct entries), simian immunodeficiency virus (21 entries) and equine infectious anemia virus (37 entries). It is presently unclear whether these Ld652Y transcripts were expressed from retroviruses or from other retroelements sharing the typical suite of gag-pol-env genes (e.g., retrotransposons or Ty3/Gypsy LTR retroelements)—though the closest hits mapped to the Retroviridae family, suggesting a bona fide viral origin of these messages. These results are entirely consistent with the observation of endogenous retroviruses (errantiviruses) in both the SF-9 and Hi-5 lepidopteran cell lines derived from Spodoptera frugiperda and Trichoplusia ni, respectively [23]. DNA virus sequences were also encountered, some of which had significant similarity to the Poxviridae: Cowpox virus, Vaccinia virus and Variola virus, among others. A relatively large number of PUTs had hits to numerous genes from two very large-genomed viruses, the Acanthamoeba polyphaga mimivirus [24] and Cafeteria roenbergensis virus [25].
A number of nucleopolyhedrovirus-related sequences were detected, suggesting that the cell line may support one or more strains of baculovirus. Interestingly, in addition to baculovirus expressed sequences related to large ds DNA insect viruses, polydnaviruses (including both ichnoviruses and bracoviruses) and nudiviruses were detected. These viruses became associated with the progenitor of modern holometabolous insects over 300 million years ago [26]. The Ld652Y cells used in the present analyses were never exposed to any known insect virus repositories, which supports the hypothesis that the gypsy moth genome hosts laterally-transferred insect virus element(s). In fact, the p94 gene, which is shared between bracoviruses and baculoviruses [27], was detected in a preliminary assembly of scaffold genome sequence data obtained for Lymantria dispar itself—this result will be further described in a forthcoming report by the authors.
Katsuma et al. noted the expression of RNA viruses (macula-like latent viruses) in the Bombyx mori BmN cell line, which were not encoded by the host genome [28]. If persistent RNA viruses are also present and expressed in Ld652Y cells, this might help explain the increased susceptibility of these cells to viral infection. The PUT collection was probed with the RNA replicase and coat protein sequences enumerated in Table 1 of Katsuma et al. using Blastx, though no conclusive homologies were observed (data not shown). However, a comparison against a set of RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) sequences produced a number of alignments worthy of further consideration (see Figure 1)—These included alignments of PUT 1114 to RdRps identified in Eubacterium eligens and Burkholderia multivorans, and of PUT 1605 to an RdRp from Dictyostelium discoideum.
Separate from RdRp sequences per se, a number of other RNA virus-related genes were present in the data, including coat and capsid proteins and polyproteins. These results suggest the latent or sub-lethal presence of one or more RNA viruses in the Ld652Y cell line, and that certain of the viral detection methods described in the article by Liu et al. in this issue [29] could be used not only for positive confirmation, but also for reconstruction of their RNA viral genomes. Of note, however, is that the Ld652Y transcript library utilized in the present study was primarily designed to enable characterization of mRNA sequences, whereas methods geared expressly for virus discovery and viral genome assembly (e.g., Wu et al. [30] and Mi et al. [31]) utilize libraries composed by small RNAs [32]. Transcripts apparently encoding proteins associated with RNA interference pathways, including Dicer, Aubergine and Argonaute, were identified among the Ld652Y PUTs, which suggests that construction and analysis of a small RNA library from Ld652Y will likely generate novel viral discoveries.
To gain insight into the repertoire of expressed transcripts in common between Ld652Y and other lepidopteran cell lines, the Ld652Y PUT collection was compared with the 2,367 SF-21 ESTs reported in Deng et al. [12] and 2,711 ESTs derived from the Bombyx mori BmN cell line by Okano et al. [13]. Using tBlastx with an E-value threshold of 10−15, only 1,595 (67.4%) of SF-21 ESTs exhibited one or more significant matches with an Ld652Y PUT, of which 569 of these PUTs were unique. That so few SF-21 EST sequences would have been covered by the Ld652Y PUT collection, which is vastly larger in terms of sequence volume, was unexpected. The balance of unmatched SF-21 ESTs (772 sequences) was compared to NR using Blastx, of which only 217 (28.1%) exhibited one or more significant hits with E-values not more than 10−15. Similarly, only 1,121 BmN transcripts (41.4%) were covered by the Ld652Y PUTs; of the 1,590 remaining, unmatched transcripts, only 1,016 (63.9%) exhibited a match to NR per the indicated parsing criteria. These results suggest a high degree of transcript novelty in these Lepidopteran cell line transcriptomes.
The Ld652Y PUT collection was also compared to the Swiss-Prot subset of UniProtKB, which provides a manually annotated and highly reliable source of functional annotation data. 5,243 PUTs (≈36.5%) exhibited a hit satisfying the parsing criteria described in the Experimental Section below, and associated Pfam, KEGG and GO terms were retrieved. 2,107 unique Pfam families were encountered, and a pie chart depicting the 10 most frequently encountered families is shown in Figure 2, panel A. Many of these were for such ordinary families as RNA recognition motifs and glutathione s-transferases. Interestingly, reverse transcriptase proteins (RVT_1) are among the most abundant Pfam families in the dataset, which supports the notion of active expression of, for example, retroviruses/errantiviruses.
3,347 unique KEGG identifiers were retrieved, the 10 most abundant of which are shown in Figure 2, panel B. Perhaps unsurprisingly, the majority of KEGG terms identified corresponded to genes for pathways characterized in Drosophila. Finally, GO terms contained in the biological process domain of the Gene Ontology were compiled, with the 25 most abundant terms being listed in Table 2. Ninety-two PUTs were labeled by the ontology as being apoptosis-related, some of which are likely involved in the response of gypsy moth larvae to baculovirus infection.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. EST Sequence Processing

A normalized IPLB-Ld652Y cell line cDNA library was constructed by Marligen Biosciences (Ijamsville, MD, USA) by directional cloning of size-fractionated double-stranded cDNA into the Express1 vector and transformation into DH10B E.coli cells. From a subset of 3,000 isolated cDNA clones, 1,622 EST reads, comprising 1,560,600 bases, were produced using an ABI 3100 sequencing instrument. Base calling was performed using the Phred program [35], and Lucy [36] was used to clip away any remaining contaminant vector sequences, polyA tails and terminal segments of low-quality data. 20-base windows had to exhibit an average Phred score of 17 or better (i.e., not more than a 2.5% error rate) to be retained for analysis, and resultant regions of sufficiently high quality had to span at least 100 continuous nucleotides in length for the read to be retained. The remaining 1,178 trimmed EST sequences were then screened for known Dipteran repetitive elements using RepeatMasker [37] coupled with the most recent version of the RepeatMasker library (dated June 24, 2009 and available from RepBase [38]). Twenty unique sequences harboring such elements were purged from the dataset, and NCBI DUST [39] was used to flag low-complexity sequence. The remaining 1,158 reads were deposited in the dbEST division of GenBank and assigned accession numbers of JK670018-JK671175.

3.2. 454 Sequence Processing

Total RNA was harvested from uninfected IPLB-Ld652Y cells, depleted of rRNA, and reverse transcribed using the Evrogen MINT-Universal cDNA synthesis kit. The resulting non-normalized MINT cDNA library was then sequenced using a 454 GS-Junior pyrosequencing system (Roche 454 Life Sciences, Branford, CT, USA) located at the Beltsville Agricultural Research Center (Beltsville, MD, USA). 82,099 raw sequence reads at 100bp or greater in length were deposited into the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under accession number SRA047598.
Reads were trimmed to remove MINT-related adapter sequences [40] on the basis of Blastn alignments [41]. Seven hundred and eighteen reads flagged as repetitive elements by RepeatMasker were eliminated and low-complexity sequences were marked using NCBI DUST. 81,452 reads were retained for assembly, containing 36,521,172 bases of presumably usable information.

3.3. Derivation of Putative Unique Transcripts (PUTs)

A hybrid assembly of the 1,158 cleaned EST and 81,452 454-based transcript data was performed using the overlap-layout-consensus algorithm implemented in the cap3 assembly software [42]. This program gave superior results on the dataset from among a panel of assemblers tested (data not shown). 1,202 sequences placed in the singlets pool by cap3 that exhibited a contiguous span of five or more ’N’s were eliminated; no such sequences were placed in the contigs pool. The resulting assembly contained 5,924 contigs (comprising 4,836,170 bases) and 8,444 singlets (3,639,880 bases). Contigs and singlets were pooled to define a set of 14,368 putatively unique transcripts (PUTs) containing a grand total of 8,476,050 informative bases.

3.4. Gene Content Survey and Functional Analysis

In order to obtain a more defined picture of the gene content captured in the transcriptome data, PUTs were compared with the NCBI non-redundant protein database, NR, using Blastx. Only the top-scoring NR protein encountered in the results was considered, which must have exhibited an E-value not more than 10−5. Furthermore, PUTs were aligned to Swiss-Prot, the manually annotated subset of UniProtKB [43], using Blastx. The best hit for each PUT, which also required an expectation value of 10−5 or less, was identified and associated with a PUT. Functional annotation data for these best hits—provided by Pfam, GO and KEGG terms—was retrieved and transferred to the PUTs.

4. Conclusions

In this paper, the contributions of transcriptome sequence resources inherent to the gypsy moth cell line IPLB-Ld652Y, and germane to the investigation of virus-associated phenomena using this system, were revealed. This is the first such study performed on any cell line derived from Lymantria dispar, and these tools are expected to also facilitate discoveries in the host organism itself. The degree to which gene expression observed in these cells reflects that exhibited in an in vivo context remains unclear, and is a topic of future consideration. Numerous virus-associated transcripts were identified, indicative of a wide range of viral activity. Among the numerous viral-related transcripts detected were those that mapped to NR protein sequences derived from retrovirus (errantivirus), poxvirus and baculovirus samples. Functional annotation of the Ld652Y transcriptome not only suggested the presence of viral activity, but also helped identify a variety of avenues for future research aimed at elucidating the features of these cells underpinning their virus-susceptible nature. The assembly data and their relevant annotations are available from the authors by request.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Daniel Kuhar and Monica Pedroni for excellent technical assistance, Robert Harrison for insightful discussions, and three anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References and Notes

  1. Goodwin, R.H.; Tompkins, G.J.; McCawley, P. Gypsy moth cell lines divergent in viral susceptibility. I. Culture and identification. Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 1978, 14, 485–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Guzo, D.; Dougherty, E.M.; Lynn, D.E.; Braun, S.K.; Weiner, R.M. Changes in macromolecular synthesis of gypsy moth cell line IPLB-Ld652Y induced by Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus infection. J. Gen. Virol. 1991, 72, 1021–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mazzacano, C.A.; Du, X.; Thiem, S.M. Global protein synthesis shutdown in Autographa californica nucleopolyhedrovirus-infected Ld652Y cells is rescued by tRNA from uninfected cells. Virology 1999, 260, 222–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ishikawa, H.; Ikeda, M.; Yanagimoto, K.; Alves, C.A.; Katou, Y.; Laviña-Caoili, B.A.; Kobayashi, M. Induction of apoptosis in an insect cell line, IPLB-Ld652Y, infected with nucleopolyhedroviruses. J. Gen. Virol. 2003, 84, 705–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. McNeil, J.; Cox-Foster, D.; Gardner, M.; Slavicek, J.; Thiem, S.; Hoover, K. Pathogenesis of Lymantria dispar multiple nucleopolyhedrovirus in L. dispar and mechanisms of developmental resistance. J. Gen. Virol. 2010, 91, 1590–1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. McNeil, J.; Cox-Foster, D.; Slavicek, J.; Hoover, K. Contributions of immune responses to developmental resistance in Lymantria dispar challenged with baculovirus. J. Insect Physiol. 2010, 56, 1167–1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yamada, H.; Shibuya, M.; Kobayashi, M.; Ikeda, M. Identification of a novel apoptosis suppressor gene from the baculovirus Lymantria dispar multicapsid nucleopolyhedrovirus. J. Virol. 2011, 85, 5237–5242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lu, H.; Burand, J.P. Replication of the gonad-specific virus Hz-2V in Ld652Y cells mimics replication in vivo. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2001, 77, 44–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Boguski, M.S.; Tolstoshev, C.M.; Bassett, D.E. Gene discovery in dbEST. Science 1994, 265, 1993–1994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Leinonen, R.; Sugawara, H.; Shumway, M. The sequence read archive. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39, D19–D21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Landais, I.; Ogliastro, M.; Mita, K.; Nohata, J.; López-Ferber, M.; Duonor-Cérutti, M.; Shimada, T.; Fournier, P.; Devauchelle, G. Annotation pattern of ESTs from Spodoptera frugiperda Sf9 cells and analysis of the ribosomal protein genes reveal insect-specific features and unexpectedly low codon usage bias. Bioinformatics 2003, 19, 2343–2350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Deng, Y.; Dong, Y.; Thodima, V.; Clem, R.J.; Passarelli, A.L. Analysis and functional annotation of expressed sequence tags from the fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda. BMC Genomics 2006, 7, 264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Okano, K.; Shimada, T.; Mita, K.; Maeda, S. Comparative expressed-sequence-tag analysis of differential gene expression profiles in BmNPV-infected BmN cells. Virology 2001, 282, 348–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Braaten, D.; Franke, E.K.; Luban, J. Cyclophilin A is required for the replication of group M human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and simian immunodeficiency virus SIV(CPZ)GAB but not group O HIV-1 or other primate immunodeficiency viruses. J. Virol. 1996, 70, 4220–4227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Sherry, B.; Zybarth, G.; Alfano, M.; Dubrovsky, L.; Mitchell, R.; Rich, D.; Ulrich, P.; Bucala, R.; Cerami, A.; Bukrinsky, M. Role of cyclophilin A in the uptake of HIV-1 by macrophages and T lymphocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1998, 95, 1758–1763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kaneko, Y.; Takaki, K.; Iwami, M.; Sakurai, S. Developmental profile of annexin IX and its possible role in programmed cell death of the Bombyx mori anterior silk gland. Zool. Sci. 2006, 23, 533–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Thiem, S.M.; Chejanovsky, N. The role of baculovirus apoptotic suppressors in AcMNPV-mediated translation arrest in Ld652Y cells. Virology 2004, 319, 292–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Clem, R.J. Baculoviruses and apoptosis: A diversity of genes and responses. Curr. Drug Targets 2007, 8, 1069–1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bao, Y.-Y.; Tang, X.D.; Lv, Z.Y.; Wang, X.Y.; Tian, C.H.; Xu, Y.P.; Zhang, C.X. Gene expression profiling of resistant and susceptible Bombyx mori strains reveals nucleopolyhedrovirus-associated variations in host gene transcript levels. Genomics 2009, 94, 138–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nobiron, I.; O’Reilly, D.R.; Olszewski, J.A. Autographa californica nucleopolyhedrovirus infection of Spodoptera frugiperda cells: A global analysis of host gene regulation during infection, using a differential display approach. J. Gen. Virol. 2003, 84, 3029–3039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Salem, T.Z.; Zhang, F.; Xie, Y.; Thiem, S.M. Comprehensive analysis of host gene expression in Autographa californica nucleopolyhedrovirus-infected Spodoptera frugiperda cells. Virology 2011, 412, 167–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Breitenbach, J.E.; Shelby, K.S.; Popham, H.J.R. Baculovirus induced transcripts in hemocytes from the larvae of Heliothis virescens. Viruses 2011, 3, 2047–2064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Menzel, T.; Rohrmann, G.F. Diversity of errantivirus (retrovirus) sequences in two cell lines used for baculovirus expression, Spodoptera frugiperda and Trichoplusia ni. Virus Genes 2008, 36, 583–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Colson, P.; Yutin, N.; Shabalina, S.A.; Robert, C.; Fournous, G.; La Scola, B.; Raoult, D.; Koonin, E.V. Viruses with More Than 1,000 Genes: Mamavirus, a new Acanthamoeba polyphaga mimivirus Strain, and Reannotation of Mimivirus Genes. Genome Biol. Evol. 2011, 3, 737–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Colson, P.; Gimenez, G.; Boyer, M.; Fournous, G.; Raoult, D. The giant Cafeteria roenbergensis virus that infects a widespread marine phagocytic protist is a new member of the fourth domain of life. PLoS One 2011, 6, e18935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Thézé, J.; Bézier, A.; Periquet, G.; Drezen, J.-M.; Herniou, E.A. Paleozoic origin of insect large dsDNA viruses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108, 15931–15935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Drezen, J.-M.; Bézier, A.; Lesobre, J.; Huguet, E.; Cattolico, L.; Periquet, G.; Dupuy, C. The few virus-like genes of Cotesia congregata bracovirus. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 2006, 61, 110–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Katsuma, S.; Tanaka, S.; Omuro, N.; Takabuchi, L.; Daimon, T.; Imanishi, S.; Yamashita, S.; Iwanaga, M.; Mita, K.; Maeda, S.; et al. Novel macula-like virus identified in Bombyx mori cultured cells. J. Virol. 2005, 79, 5577–5584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Liu, S.; Vijayendran, D.; Bonning, B.C. Next generation sequencing technologies for insect virus discovery. Viruses 2011, 3, 1849–1869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wu, Q.; Luo, Y.; Lu, R.; Lau, N.; Lai, E.C.; Li, W.X.; Ding, S.W. Virus discovery by deep sequencing and assembly of virus-derived small silencing RNAs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2010, 107, 1606–1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mi, S.; Cai, T.; Hu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Hodges, E.; Ni, F.; Wu, L.; Li, S.; Zhou, H.; Long, C. Sorting of small RNAs into Arabidopsis argonaute complexes is directed by the 5’ terminal nucleotide. Cell 2008, 133, 116–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Ambros, V.; Lee, R.C. Identification of microRNAs and other tiny noncoding RNAs by cDNA cloning. Methods Mol. Biol. 2004, 265, 131–158. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. Finn, R.D.; Mistry, J.; Tate, J.; Coggill, P.; Heger, A.; Pollington, J.E.; Gavin, O.L.; Gunasekaran, P.; Ceric, G.; Forslund, K.; et al. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38, D211–D222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kanehisa, M.; Goto, S.; Furumichi, M.; Tanabe, M.; Hirakawa, M. KEGG for representation and analysis of molecular networks involving diseases and drugs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38, D355–D360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ewing, B.; Green, P. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities. Genome Res. 1998, 8, 186–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Chou, H.-H.; Holmes, M.H. DNA sequence quality trimming and vector removal. Bioinformatics 2001, 17, 1093–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Smit, A.F.A.; Hubley, R.; Green, P. RepeatMasker Open-3.0; 1996–2010. Available online: http://www.repeatmasker.org (accessed on 21 July 2011).
  38. Jurka, J.; Kapitonov, V.V.; Pavlicek, A.; Klonowski, P.; Kohany, O.; Walichiewicz, J. Repbase Update, a database of eukaryotic repetitive elements. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2005, 110, 462–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Morgulis, A.; Gertz, E.M.; Schäffer, A.A.; Agarwala, R. A fast and symmetric DUST implementation to mask low-complexity DNA sequences. J. Comput. Biol. 2006, 13, 1028–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Beldade, P.; Rudd, S.; Gruber, J.D.; Long, A.D. A wing expressed sequence tag resource for Bicyclus anynana butterflies, an evo-devo model. BMC Genomics 2006, 7, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Altschul, S.F.; Gish, W.; Miller, W.; Myers, E.W.; Lipman, D.J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol 1990, 215, 403–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Huang, X.; Madan, A. CAP3: A DNA sequence assembly program. Genome Res. 1999, 9, 868–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Schlicker, A.; Huthmacher, C.; Ramírez, F.; Lengauer, T.; Albrecht, M. Functional evaluation of domain–domain interactions and human protein interaction networks. Bioinformatics 2007, 23, 859–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. (a) Comparison of PUT 1114 to RdRps identified in Eubacterium eligens and Burkholderia multivorans. (b) Comparison of PUT 1605 with an RdRp identified in Dictyostelium discoideum.
Figure 1. (a) Comparison of PUT 1114 to RdRps identified in Eubacterium eligens and Burkholderia multivorans. (b) Comparison of PUT 1605 with an RdRp identified in Dictyostelium discoideum.
Viruses 03 02339 g001
Figure 2. (a) Absolute frequencies of the 10 most abundant Pfam protein families encountered in the Ld652Y cell line PUT collection. Counts denote the number of distinct PUTs that encoded the eponymous domain. More complete descriptions of Pfam identifiers are available from the Pfam resource [33]. (b) Absolute frequencies of the 10 most abundant KEGG reaction terms encountered by pathway analysis. More complete descriptions of KEGG terms are available from the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes [34].
Figure 2. (a) Absolute frequencies of the 10 most abundant Pfam protein families encountered in the Ld652Y cell line PUT collection. Counts denote the number of distinct PUTs that encoded the eponymous domain. More complete descriptions of Pfam identifiers are available from the Pfam resource [33]. (b) Absolute frequencies of the 10 most abundant KEGG reaction terms encountered by pathway analysis. More complete descriptions of KEGG terms are available from the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes [34].
Viruses 03 02339 g002aViruses 03 02339 g002b
Table 1. The 20 viruses having the greatest number of NR protein sequences exhibiting hits with IPLB-Ld652Y putative unique transcripts (PUTs). Subject count denotes the tally of unique protein sequences from the given virus that registered a hit to one or more PUTs, and PUT count represents the number of PUTs which had hits to the listed virus.
Table 1. The 20 viruses having the greatest number of NR protein sequences exhibiting hits with IPLB-Ld652Y putative unique transcripts (PUTs). Subject count denotes the tally of unique protein sequences from the given virus that registered a hit to one or more PUTs, and PUT count represents the number of PUTs which had hits to the listed virus.
Subject CountPUT CountVirus
44431Human immunodeficiency virus 1
1112Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus
8925Cowpox virus
635Human herpesvirus 5
6023Vaccinia virus
5754Acanthamoeba polyphaga mimivirus
373Equine infectious anemia virus
361Beak and feather disease virus
3513Variola virus
312Cassava brown streak virus
272Human herpesvirus 1
2530Amsacta moorei entomopoxvirus ’L’
2430Cafeteria roenbergensis virus BV-PW1
219Simian immunodeficiency virus
2028Autographa californica nucleopolyhedrovirus
1717Monkeypox virus
1733Melanoplus sanguinipes entomopoxvirus
1718Fowlpox virus
166Hyposoter fugitivus ichnovirus
158Human herpesvirus 8
Table 2. Absolute frequencies of the 25 most abundant Gene Ontology (GO) terms from the Biological Process domain encountered in the IPLB-Ld652Y cell line PUT collection.
Table 2. Absolute frequencies of the 25 most abundant Gene Ontology (GO) terms from the Biological Process domain encountered in the IPLB-Ld652Y cell line PUT collection.
CountGO Id.Description
399GO:0006412Translation
340GO:0006351transcription, DNA-dependent
287GO:0006355regulation of transcription, DNA-dependent
140GO:0006397mRNA processing
128GO:0015031protein transport
128GO:0006457protein folding
124GO:0006810Transport
110GO:0008380RNA splicing
106GO:0007275multicellular organismal development
105GO:0006281DNA repair
103GO:0006508Proteolysis
95GO:0051301cell division
95GO:0007067Mitosis
95GO:0006364rRNA processing
92GO:0006915Apoptosis
90GO:0022900electron transport chain
64GO:0000022mitotic spindle elongation
63GO:0055085transmembrane transport
63GO:0006260DNA replication
56GO:0007049cell cycle
55GO:0030154cell differentiation
51GO:0006886intracellular protein transport
49GO:0045454cell redox homeostasis
48GO:0007264small GTPase mediated signal transduction
48GO:0006511ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic process
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sparks, M.E.; Gundersen-Rindal, D.E. The Lymantria dispar IPLB-Ld652Y Cell Line Transcriptome Comprises Diverse Virus-Associated Transcripts. Viruses 2011, 3, 2339-2350. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/v3112339

AMA Style

Sparks ME, Gundersen-Rindal DE. The Lymantria dispar IPLB-Ld652Y Cell Line Transcriptome Comprises Diverse Virus-Associated Transcripts. Viruses. 2011; 3(11):2339-2350. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/v3112339

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sparks, Michael E., and Dawn E. Gundersen-Rindal. 2011. "The Lymantria dispar IPLB-Ld652Y Cell Line Transcriptome Comprises Diverse Virus-Associated Transcripts" Viruses 3, no. 11: 2339-2350. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/v3112339

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop