Next Article in Journal
The Antiviral Effect of Baicalin on Enterovirus 71 In Vitro
Next Article in Special Issue
Recent Progress in Therapeutic Treatments and Screening Strategies for the Prevention and Treatment of HPV-Associated Head and Neck Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Regulation of the Host Antiviral State by Intercellular Communications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Papillomavirus Infectious Pathways: A Comparison of Systems
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Viruses
Volume 7
Issue 8
10.3390/v7082842
viruses-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Regulation of the Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling Pathway by Human Papillomavirus E6 and E7 Oncoproteins

by
Jesus Omar Muñoz Bello
1,
Leslie Olmedo Nieva
2,
Adriana Contreras Paredes
3,
Alma Mariana Fuentes Gonzalez
1,
Leticia Rocha Zavaleta
1 and
Marcela Lizano
1,3,*
1
Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Av. Universidad 3000, Col. Ciudad Universitaria, Del. Coyoacán, México DF CP. 04510, Mexico
2
Facultad de Química, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Av. Universidad 3000,Col. Ciudad Universitaria, Del. Coyoacán, México DF CP. 04510, Mexico
3
Unidad de Investigación Biomédica en Cáncer/Instituto Nacional de Cancerología-Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Av. San Fernando 22, Col. Sección XVI, Del. Tlalpan, México DF CP. 14080, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Viruses 2015, 7(8), 4734-4755; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/v7082842
Submission received: 8 May 2015 / Revised: 6 August 2015 / Accepted: 17 August 2015 / Published: 19 August 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Tumour Viruses)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Cell signaling pathways are the mechanisms by which cells transduce external stimuli, which control the transcription of genes, to regulate diverse biological effects. In cancer, distinct signaling pathways, such as the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, have been implicated in the deregulation of critical molecular processes that affect cell proliferation and differentiation. For example, changes in β-catenin localization have been identified in Human Papillomavirus (HPV)-related cancers as the lesion progresses. Specifically, β-catenin relocates from the membrane/cytoplasm to the nucleus, suggesting that this transcription regulator participates in cervical carcinogenesis. The E6 and E7 oncoproteins are responsible for the transforming activity of HPV, and some studies have implicated these viral oncoproteins in the regulation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Nevertheless, new interactions of HPV oncoproteins with cellular proteins are emerging, and the study of the biological effects of such interactions will help to understand HPV-related carcinogenesis. This review addresses the accumulated evidence of the involvement of the HPV E6 and E7 oncoproteins in the activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway.

1. Introduction

Signaling pathways are the mechanisms by which cells decide their fate and communicate with other cells and their environment. The binding of ligands to cell receptors can activate protein cascades and consequently affect gene transcription levels. Via these complex processes, cells transform external stimuli into biochemical signals that control biological effects, such as proliferation, differentiation, and death.
Many signaling pathways have been identified as being deregulated in cancer. Consequently, numerous elements targeting these pathways have been proposed as therapeutic targets. Consistent alterations of some important pathways controlling cell proliferation and apoptosis, such as PI3K/Akt, ERK/MAPK, Notch, and Wnt/β-catenin, have been identified in different types of cancer. In particular, the activation of the Wnt signaling pathway has been implicated in osteosarcoma [1], hepatocellular carcinoma [2], colorectal cancer [3], and breast cancer [4]. More recently, this signaling pathway was also implicated in oral cavity, oropharyngeal [5], and cervical cancers [6,7].
Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer in women worldwide and is one of the leading causes of cancer death in women in developing countries [8]. Persistent infection with Human Papillomavirus (HPV) is a necessary factor for cervical cancer development [9]. HPV is also associated with other pathologies, such as head and neck [10] and anal cancers [11]. HPV types linked to cancer are those classified as high-risk HPV (HR-HPV), whose viral oncogenes interact and regulate the function of several cellular proteins.
This review addresses the participation of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in HPV-related cancers and the possible mechanisms by which HPV E6 and E7 oncoproteins induce the activation of this pathway.

2. Wnt/β-Catenin Cell Signaling Pathway

The Wnt signaling pathway is involved in development, proliferation [12], differentiation [13], adhesion [14], and cellular polarity [15]. The term Wnt, which was adopted in 1991, includes a family of genes that encode secretory glycoproteins. Wnt is an acronym of homologous wingless (wg) and Int-1, which had been described in the fly and mouse, respectively [16]. In 1982, Nusse and Varmus found that the mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promotes mammary carcinogenesis in mice by inserting itself in a specific gene of the host genome [17]. They called this gene Int-1, and its nucleotide and amino acid sequences were obtained in 1984 [18]. Later, in 1987, the wingless gene in Drosophila melanogaster proved to be a homologue of Int-1 [19].
Currently, 11 receptors that are members of the Frizzled (Fz) family have been identified in humans. These receptors include Fz1 to Fz10 and Smo, as well as the two co-receptors LRP 5 and 6, and all of these receptors are responsible for Wnt signaling activation. Moreover, 19 Wnt ligands have been described for these receptors: Wnt1, 2, 2b, 3, 3a, 4, 5a, 5b, 6, 7a, 7b, 8a, 8b, 9a, 9b, 10a, 10b, 11, and 16 [20].
At least three signal transduction pathways activated by Wnt ligands are known, namely the canonical Wnt/β-catenin pathway and two non-canonical pathways: the planar cell polarity pathway (Wnt/PCP) and the Wnt/Ca2+ pathway. Moreover, the activation of the different pathways is ligand-specific, and the primary ligands that activate the canonical pathway are Wnt1, 2 [21], 3, 3a [22], 7a [23], 8 [24], and 10b [25,26]. The activation of the non-canonical pathways is mediated by Wnt4 [27], 5a [28,29], and 11 [30] ligands. However, diverse Wnt ligands have been shown to elicit various effects when binding to the same Fz receptor [31].
The non-canonical Wnt/PCP, also known as the Wnt/JNK pathway, is important in various processes including wound healing [32], the correct development of the neural tube [33], motility, and the modulation of cellular morphology [34]. These events are all generated by the reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton. Some of the main proteins involved in the transduction of the extracellular signal generated by Wnt/PCP are vangl2, celsr1-3 [35], Dvl, JNK, PKC [36], Rac, and RhoA [37].
In the Wnt/Ca2+ pathway, secondary messengers, such as IP3 and DAG, liberate calcium ions from the endoplasmic reticulum [29] and subsequently activate CaMKII [38] and PKC [39].
The processes that are triggered by the activation of this non-canonical pathway include the following: the regulation of convergent extension movements [40], the reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton [41], the modulation of cell motility [42], and the contribution to the inflammatory response [43].
The Wnt canonical signaling pathway is the best understood Wnt signaling cascade. In the absence of Wnt ligands (OFF-STATE), β-catenin is mainly located at cellular junctions. Nevertheless, a small amount remains in the cytoplasm and binds to a complex responsible for the degradation of β-catenin via the proteasome. This degradation complex consists of the scaffold protein Axin which recruits essential elements during this process such as GSK3β [44], CK1 [45], APC [46], YAP/TAZ, and β-TrCP [47]. CK1 phosphorylates β-catenin at the Ser45 residue, whereas GSK3β phosphorylates this protein at the Ser33, Ser37, and Thr41 residues [48,49]. Moreover, APC impedes the β-catenin dephosphorylation mediated by PP2A phosphatase [50]. Subsequently, the YAP/TAZ complex recruits the E3 ubiquitin ligase β-TrCP, which recognizes Ser/Thr phosphorylation, to promote β-catenin ubiquitination and its subsequent proteosomal degradation [47,51] (Figure 1A).
As a consequence of the Wnt ligand binding to the Fz receptor and LPR5/6 co-receptor [52] (ON-STATE), β-catenin delocalizes, accumulating in the cytoplasm [22] and nucleus [53,54]. When the Fz receptor dimerizes with the LRP5/6 co-receptor, the intracellular motifs of the Fz receptor recruits Disheveled (Dvl) protein [55], whereas CK1 phosphorylates LPR5/6 to allow Axin binding [56,57], which results in the disassembly of the β-catenin destruction complex. This process permits the accumulation and translocation of β-catenin to the nucleus. Moreover, the binding of FOXM1, a member of the Forkhead box (Fox) transcription factor family, to β-catenin promotes its nuclear translocation [58]. In the nucleus, β-catenin binds to transcriptional factors members of the TCF/LEF family [53,59], inducing the dissociation of co-repressors, such as Groucho/TLE [60], which allows the interaction with co-activators including CREPT [61], FHL2, and CBP/p300 [62,63] and remodelers of chromatin such as Brg-1 [64] (Figure 1B). These interactions with β-catenin promote the expression of diverse genes that regulate cellular polarity, proliferation, and differentiation, such as c-jun, c-myc, Cyclin D1, Axin-2, Tcf-1 [20], and β-catenin itself [65].
Viruses 07 02842 g001 1024
Figure 1. Wnt/β-catenin cell signaling pathway. (A) In the absence of stimuli (OFF-STATE), the Fz receptors are regulated by a group of antagonist proteins, such as SFRP, which prevent further receptor-ligand interaction. In the cytoplasm, a degradation complex is formed, to which β-catenin is recruited and phosphorylated at specific residues by the GSK3β and CK1 kinases. These phosphorylated sites are recognized by βTrCP ubiquitin ligase, which mediates β-catenin proteosomal degradation. In the nucleus, the Groucho/TLE repressor binds to TCF/LEF, avoiding its transcriptional activation; (B) In the presence of Wnt ligands (ON-STATE), LRP5/6 and Fz dimerize; subsequently, Axin binds to LRP5/6, whereas Disheveled (Dvl) interacts with Fz, allowing Axin-Dvl binding and the disassembly of the β-catenin degradation complex. Finally, β-catenin is released in the cytoplasm and translocated to the nucleus, aided by its binding partner FOXM1, where it binds to TCF/LEF and detaches the Groucho/TLE repressor.
Figure 1. Wnt/β-catenin cell signaling pathway. (A) In the absence of stimuli (OFF-STATE), the Fz receptors are regulated by a group of antagonist proteins, such as SFRP, which prevent further receptor-ligand interaction. In the cytoplasm, a degradation complex is formed, to which β-catenin is recruited and phosphorylated at specific residues by the GSK3β and CK1 kinases. These phosphorylated sites are recognized by βTrCP ubiquitin ligase, which mediates β-catenin proteosomal degradation. In the nucleus, the Groucho/TLE repressor binds to TCF/LEF, avoiding its transcriptional activation; (B) In the presence of Wnt ligands (ON-STATE), LRP5/6 and Fz dimerize; subsequently, Axin binds to LRP5/6, whereas Disheveled (Dvl) interacts with Fz, allowing Axin-Dvl binding and the disassembly of the β-catenin degradation complex. Finally, β-catenin is released in the cytoplasm and translocated to the nucleus, aided by its binding partner FOXM1, where it binds to TCF/LEF and detaches the Groucho/TLE repressor.
Viruses 07 02842 g001

3. Human Papillomavirus

Persistent infection with Human Papillomaviruses (HPVs) has been implicated in the carcinogenesis of the uterine cervix [9]. Oropharyngeal [10] and anal cancers have also been related to HPV [11]. In fact, almost 70% of cervical cancer cases are associated with HPV16 and HPV18 [66].
The carcinogenic potential of HPV is mainly due to the expression of E6 and E7 viral proteins, which are directly involved in cellular transformation [67,68]. The E6 and E7 oncoproteins interfere with cell cycle regulators and induce genomic instability, which results in a malignant phenotype.
More than 170 HPV types have been identified [69]. HPVs can infect the differentiating squamous epithelium and are classified in two main groups: cutaneotropic and mucosotropic. The majority of cutaneous HPVs belong to the beta and gamma genus, whereas the alpha genus contains all known mucosal HPV types, and at least 40 members of this genus infect the anogenital region [70]. The mucosal HPVs are further divided according to the outcome of infection into low-risk HPVs (LR-HPVs), which are associated with benign and self-limiting benign warts, and high-risk HPVs (HR-HPVs), which are linked to pre-malignant lesions (low- and high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia) and cancer. The most frequent HR-HPV types are: 16, 18, 58, 33, 45, 31, 52, 35, 59, 39, 51, and 56 [71].
Persistent HR-HPV infection is a crucial event in cellular transformation, but additional events are required to complete the malignant phenotype. Other mechanisms implicated in HPV-related cancers include the activation of multiple cellular pathways such as the Hedgehog [72], Erk/MAPK [73], Notch [74], and Wnt signaling pathways [75], which are involved in embryonic processes, differentiation, survival, proliferation, cell cycle progression, and self-renewal in stem cells.

HPV Genome

The HPV genome consists of a double-stranded circular DNA of approximately 8000 bp that contains genes that are expressed early (E) or late (L) during the viral life cycle and whose transcription and replication are mediated by the long control region (LCR) [76].
L1 and L2 are the HPV structural proteins [77,78]. Specifically, L1 is the major capsid protein and constitutes approximately 80% of the viral capsid [77].
E1 is the viral DNA helicase, and E2 a transcriptional activator and repressor that also complexes with E1 as a critical component of the HPV replisome [79]. E2 protein plays a crucial role in the HPV life cycle due to its ability to regulate viral DNA replication and the transcription of E6 and E7 oncogenes [80].
The E4 coding sequence is contained within the E2 open reading frame (ORF). Although E4 is located in the early region, it is expressed as a late gene and is regulated by a promoter that is responsive to differentiation transcription factors. Moreover, the properties of E4 have not been fully characterized, but several studies implicate E4 in virion release via its association with keratin filaments [81].
E6 and E7 are considered the most important viral oncoproteins: they play a clear role in cellular transformation [82]. Among several cellular interactions, E6 oncoprotein binds to the tumor suppressor protein p53 and to the E3-ubiquitin ligase E6AP, promoting p53 degradation via the proteasome and facilitating DNA damage and mutation [83]. Furthermore, E7 oncoprotein associates with a complex that contains Cullin 2, an E2 ubiquitin ligase, leading to the degradation of the tumor suppressor pRB, to promote cell cycle progression [84].
During the normal viral life cycle, the HPV genome exists in host cells as an episome. However, the viral genome may be incorporated into the host genome in rare cases. Viral genome integration is closely tied to the development of cancer because most HPV-induced cervical cancer cases contain an integrated form of the HPV genome. Viral episome rupture during integration frequently occurs in a zone that includes E1 and E2. The consequent loss of E2 causes the uncontrolled expression of the E6 and E7 oncoproteins, which increases the likelihood of HPV-induced carcinogenesis [85,86].

4. E6 and E7 in Cellular Transformation

E6 and E7 are small proteins that localize to the nucleus and cytoplasm and the interaction of both E6 and E7 immortalizes primary cells in a highly efficient manner [87].
Moreover, the expression of E6 and E7 in organotypic raft cultures results in cellular changes that are similar to those observed in high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions [88]. Accordingly, transgenic mice expressing HR-HPV E6 and E7 developed basal epithelial squamous carcinomas upon low-dose estrogen treatment [89]. In this model, E7 alone is sufficient to induce high-grade cervical lesions and invasive cervical neoplasia; nevertheless, the inclusion of E6 resulted in larger and more extended tumors. These data demonstrate the cooperative effect of E6 and E7 in promoting the development of cancer [67]. Even when E6 and E7 can immortalize cells in culture, these cells do not form tumors in nude mice models in which the co-expression of supplementary oncogenes, such as v-ras [90] or v-fos [91], is required for tumorigenesis [92].
During HPV infection, E6 and E7 induce the proliferation of undifferentiated and differentiated suprabasal cells and also inhibit apoptosis. These actions promote the accumulation of DNA damage and mutations that can result in cell transformation and the development of cancer [92]. Table 1 summarizes the known E6 and E7 cellular targets and their biological consequences.
Table
Table 1. Cell biological effects induced by HPV E6 and E7 oncoproteins via interactions with cellular elements.
Table 1. Cell biological effects induced by HPV E6 and E7 oncoproteins via interactions with cellular elements.
E6-InteractionsBiological Effects
Protein PDZ-domainDegradation of proteins harboring PDZ domains, with a loss of cell architecture and polarity [93].
E6APDegradation of targets such as p53 [83].
Activation of hTERT transcription, inducing immortalization [94].
Bak, FADD Procaspase 8Induction of respective protein degradation, suppressing apoptosis [95,96].
BRCA1Activation of estrogen receptor ER signaling pathway [97].
Tyk2Impairment of Tyk2 activation thereby inhibiting IFN-induced signaling [98].
CBP/p300Down-regulation of p53 activity by targeting the transcriptional coactivator CBP [99].
NFX1-91Degradation of NFX1-91 and activation of hTERT [100].
c-MycIncreased hTERT gene expression [101].
Dvl2β-catenin stabilization and Wnt signaling activation [102].
E7-InteractionsBiological effects
pRb family proteinsDisruption of pRb-E2F complexes thereby initiating the E2F-mediated transcription [103].
AP1Transactivation of members of AP1 family [104].
Cyclin A/CDK2Regulation of cell cycle [105].
Cyclin E/CDK2Regulation of cell cycle (binding through p107) [106].
p21Inactivation of p21, modulating CDK and PCNA inhibitory functions [107].
MPP2Enhancement of MPP2-specific transcriptional activity [108].
p600Contribution to anchorage-independent growth and transformation [109].
Mi2Complexes with HDAC to promote the E2F2-mediated transcription [110].
IRF1Abrogation of transactivation function of IRF1 [111].
p48Down-regulation of IFN α-mediated signal transduction [112].
p27Abolishment of p27’s cell cycle inhibitory function, which endows the cell with invasive properties [113].
PP2AInhibition of PP2A catalytic activity [114].
The E6 protein consists of approximately 150 amino acids and contains an LXLL motif in the amino terminal region that is required to interact with the ubiquitin ligase E6AP. Moreover, several proteins also bind to E6 via its LXLL motif, such as E6BP, IRF3, Tuberin, and Paxillin. Another critical E6 motif found in the carboxyl terminus is the S/TXV PBM (PDZ-binding motif), which mediates the interaction with specific domains on cellular proteins known as PDZ domains, specialized in protein-protein interactions [115]. E6 interactions with PDZ-containing proteins commonly induce their proteasome-mediated degradation [116]. PBM is present only in E6 of HR-HPV, suggesting a possible role for this motif in HPV-induced oncogenesis [117] (See Table 1).
The E7 protein consists of 98 amino acids separated in three conserved regions: CR1, CR2, and CR3. CR2 includes a conserved LXCXE motif that mediates high-affinity binding to pRB [118]. The CR3 region contains two CXXC motifs separated by 29 or 30 residues, forming a zinc-binding domain. This region is critical for interaction with cellular proteins, including pRB [119], p21 [107], p27 [120], TBP [121], and E2F [122] (See Table 1).
Growing evidence suggests that HPV oncoproteins can modulate cell signaling pathways to contribute to the carcinogenesis. Upon initial infection, this modulation may be necessary to complete the viral cell cycle and form infective viral particles. Nevertheless, the consistent high-level expression of viral oncoproteins may eventually alter the normal functions of the cell, triggering an uncontrolled transformation process. Via their different cellular interactions, E6 and E7 may be deregulating the different cell signaling pathways implicated in HPV-related cancers. Some of these pathways are involved in cell proliferation and apoptosis, such as PI3K/Akt, Ras/Raf, Notch, and Wnt/β-catenin [123].

5. Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling in HPV-Related Cancers

Several mutations in different components of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway have been described in various types of cancer [124]. In contrast, in HPV-related neoplasias, mutations in Wnt pathway members such as the CTNNB1 and AXIN1 genes are uncommon [125]. However, in cervical cancer biopsies and oropharyngeal squamous carcinoma cells, membrane β-catenin is lost, whereas cytoplasmic and nuclear β-catenin accumulation is observed during cancer progression [6,75]. Some studies have shown that LGR5, a member of the G protein-coupled receptor family, is progressively expressed in cervical neoplasia, promoting the proliferation and tumorigenesis of cervical cancer cells via the activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway [126]. Furthermore, post-transcriptional modifications have been identified in components that negatively regulate the pathway; for instance, in cervical cancer samples, GSK3β is inactivated by the phosphorylation of its Ser9 residue, inducing the over-activation of the Wnt signaling pathway [127].
Furthermore, patients with oral and lung cancers that express high levels of the β-catenin-binding partner FOXM1 exhibit worse overall and relapse-free survival than patients with tumors that express low levels of FOXM1; interestingly, this effect is significantly enhanced by the presence of HPV DNA sequences [128]. Therefore, alterations in Wnt cell signaling pathway regulatory elements are associated with cancer progression and poor prognosis in HPV-related cancers.
Epigenetic changes that suppress the activity of the negative regulator of the Wnt pathway have also been identified. Specifically, methylation markers in the APC and SFRP3 promoters have been found in ovarian cancer samples, but only in cases in which HR-HPV genomic sequences were detected [129]. Moreover, in cervical cancer samples, methylation markers have been found in the SRFP2 and DKK3 promoters [130].
Microarray expression studies of cervical cancer-derived tumors and cell lines have identified the over-expression of genes involved in Wnt pathway maintenance and regulation, such as JUN, MYC, FZD2, RAC1, GSK3β, Dvl-1, and CTNNB1 [131,132]. Specifically, Wnt/β-catenin elements are differentially expressed in HPV-positive cervical cancer cell lines (HeLa and SiHa) compared with a non-tumorigenic immortalized cell line (HaCaT) [133]. In this study, 38 genes were identified to be deregulated. Specifically, 15 genes were up-regulated (including CCND3, LRP5, TCF7, and FDZ9), and 23 gene were down-regulated (including CCND2, WNT10A, WNT7A, TCF3, WNT1, FZD4, and BTRC). Because these authors found that WNT7A expression was also significantly reduced in cervical cancer samples, they restored WNT7A expression in HeLa cells, which resulted in a strong decrease in cell viability, proliferation, and migration. In addition, aberrant hypermethylation in the CpG islands within the WNT7A promoter was found in HeLa and SiHa cells but not in HaCaT cells; this event suggests as a possible mechanism by which WNT7A is repressed.
Additionally, a systematic study in cervical cancer samples showed an alteration in the expression of miRNAs involved in Wnt/β-catenin pathway modulation [134]. In this study, miR-21-5p, miR-34c, and miR-96a were up-regulated, whereas miR-99b, miR-497-5p, and miR-617 were down-regulated. Although functional analysis was not performed, these expression patterns were hypothesized to modify the levels of their targets, i.e., WNT5A, FZD1, FAS, MYC, FZD6, CCND1, and PDGFRA, to facilitate cell proliferation and invasion.
Clear evidence indicates that the Wnt pathway is hyperactivated in HPV-related cancers. Currently, HPV oncoproteins are known to bind and alter the function of several cellular targets associated with Wnt pathway regulation, including hTERT, p53, p300/CBP, Dvl, and PP2A (see Table 1), and information about the possible viral regulatory mechanisms in this pathway is emerging.

6. Wnt/β-Catenin Cell Signaling Regulation by E6 and E7 Oncoproteins

The activation of the canonical Wnt pathway represents a second requirement for the malignant transformation of the HPV-infected epithelium [75,135]. Specifically, several findings support the direct or indirect participation of HPV oncoproteins in this pathway.
In HPV-positive oropharyngeal cells, β-catenin expression is strongly localized in the cytoplasm and nucleus, whereas β-catenin is mainly detected in the membranes of HPV-negative cells [5].
In these HPV16-positive oropharyngeal cancer cell lines, E6 and E7 repression was shown to significantly decrease the β-catenin cytoplasmic and nuclear protein levels as well as the β-catenin mRNA levels. Moreover, both E6 and E7 expression were confirmed to up-regulate β-catenin expression and to enhance TCF-mediated transcription. This effect was attributed to a decrease in the ubiquitin ligase type 3 Siah-1 protein (seven in absentia homologue-1 protein), which acts as β-TrCP to induce β-catenin degradation. Because p53 mediates Siah-1 transcriptional activation [136], the down-regulation of p53 induces a decrease in the Siah-1 mRNA and protein levels in HPV-positive cells that are E6-mediated, avoiding β-catenin degradation. However, the activation of Wnt/β-catenin by the E7 oncoprotein is currently poorly understood [5].
An in vitro study showed that the HR and LR-HPV E6 proteins can distinctly augment the TCF response, with the highest activity observed for the HR-HPV E6 proteins [137]. In contrast to the previous research, E6 augmented the Wnt/β-catenin/TCF signaling response, although it did not significantly alter β-catenin stability and expression. This process did not depend on p53 degradation, the E6 PDZ-binding motif, APC/Axin/GSK3β complex activity, or β-catenin nuclear localization; instead, the presence of the E6/E6AP complex enhanced the TCF transcriptional activity mediated by the proteasome, independent of changes in β-catenin levels.
Subsequently, E6AP was confirmed to act as a novel Wnt signaling regulator that cooperates with E6 [138]. Specifically, the levels of E6 decrease in a proteasome-dependent manner in cells in which the Wnt pathway is activated; however, E6 is restored and stabilized in the presence of E6AP, suggesting that E6 requires E6AP to function in Wnt-activated cells. The participation of E6AP in the induction of the TCF response is independent of its catalytic activity. In contrast, β-catenin is stabilized by E6/E6AP, a process that requires the E6AP catalytic domain. Subsequently, β-catenin nuclear accumulation depends on its phosphorylation by GSK3β [138]. The mechanism by which E6/E6AP stabilizes β-catenin is not clear. To date, a direct interaction of E6 or E6AP with β-catenin has not been proven, but the E6/E6AP complex could alternatively participate in the sequestration of a negative regulator of the Wnt pathway.
Another element participating in the Wnt signaling pathway is FOXM1, which is also regulated by the HPV E6 oncogene. FOXM1 can induce β-catenin nuclear translocation by directly binding to β-catenin [58]. In cells harboring the HPV genome, E6 but not E7 oncoprotein was associated with FOXM1 overexpression [128]. This regulation is mediated by the MZF1/NKX2-1 transcriptional factors axis. E6 induces MZF1 expression, and MZF1 consequently activates NKX2-1 transcription. Because the FOXM1 promoter contains three putative sites for NKX2-1, E6 indirectly enhances FOXM1 transcription. In E6-expressing cells, the high levels of FOXM1 increase β-catenin translocation, which promotes TCF transcriptional activation and the expression of Wnt/β-catenin targets such as c-Myc and Cyclin D1 and stemness genes such as Nanog and Oct4. Thus, via the MZF1/NKX2-1 axis, E6 is responsible for metastasis, invasiveness, and stemness induced by the FOXM1-mediated activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway.
In vivo studies of transgenic mice support the role of the HPV E6 oncogene in the Wnt signaling pathway. In the K14E6 transgenic mice, the nuclear accumulation of β-catenin depends on the E6 PDZ-binding motif [102]. In this model, Wnt target genes (MYC, BIRC5, and CCND1) were up-regulated in the presence of full-length E6, but these genes were not up-regulated in mice expressing a truncated version of E6 lacking the PDZ-binding motif. Nevertheless, in vitro studies showed that both E6 forms enhanced TCF transcriptional activity due to the interaction of E6 with Dvl2, which is responsible for the disassembly of the β-catenin degradation complex [102]. These results suggest that the ability of E6 to activate the TCF response can be both dependent and independent of β-catenin translocation.
Other assays of double-transgenic mice expressing E7 and a constitutively active β-catenin indicated that the co-expression of both proteins promotes invasive cervical cancer, supporting that the activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway in premalignant lesions may be partly due to HPV [135].
Viruses 07 02842 g002 1024
Figure 2. Participation of HPV oncogenes at different levels of Wnt/β-catenin cell signaling regulation. (A) The binding of E6-Dvl can disrupt the β-catenin degradation complex, releasing β-catenin which then accumulates in the cytoplasm; (B) The E6/E6AP complex stabilizes β-catenin, avoiding its proteasomal degradation and promoting its nuclear translocation, which results in an increase in TCF transcriptional activity; (C) E6-induced p53 degradation inhibits Siah-1 expression, which reduces β-catenin degradation; (D) E6 induces FOXM1 expression via the MZF1/NKX2-1 axis, which promotes FOXM1/β-catenin nuclear translocation and TCF transcriptional activation; (E) E7 binds to PP2A in the structural and catalytic domain, which may avoid the GSK3β activation and consequently β-catenin is stabilized.
Figure 2. Participation of HPV oncogenes at different levels of Wnt/β-catenin cell signaling regulation. (A) The binding of E6-Dvl can disrupt the β-catenin degradation complex, releasing β-catenin which then accumulates in the cytoplasm; (B) The E6/E6AP complex stabilizes β-catenin, avoiding its proteasomal degradation and promoting its nuclear translocation, which results in an increase in TCF transcriptional activity; (C) E6-induced p53 degradation inhibits Siah-1 expression, which reduces β-catenin degradation; (D) E6 induces FOXM1 expression via the MZF1/NKX2-1 axis, which promotes FOXM1/β-catenin nuclear translocation and TCF transcriptional activation; (E) E7 binds to PP2A in the structural and catalytic domain, which may avoid the GSK3β activation and consequently β-catenin is stabilized.
Viruses 07 02842 g002
Although the role of the E7 oncoprotein in the regulation of Wnt signaling has not been studied as well as that of E6, some findings suggest that this protein is involved in this pathway. Specifically, PP2A participates as a negative regulator of Wnt signaling. This phosphatase induces GSK3β activation via its dephosphorylation at the Ser 9 residue, which results in β-catenin degradation [139]. In a model based on primary human foreskin keratinocytes immortalized with E6 and E7 oncoproteins and transformed with SV40 small T antigen (smt), the smt antigen directly binds to the PP2A catalytic domain, preventing its activation to consequently induce Wnt signaling [75]. Moreover, cell line studies have demonstrated that the functions of E7 and smt are similar: they both strongly bind to the catalytic subunit of PP2A to inhibits its activity [114]. This role of E7 may contribute to β-catenin stabilization in the cytoplasm.
Notably, the above-described findings strongly support a role for HPV oncoproteins in the Wnt canonical pathway. Nevertheless, HPV has not been conclusively linked to the Wnt non-canonical pathway regulation, although some E6 targets, such as WNT7A and Dvl, are known to participate in the activation of Wnt non-canonical pathways.
Evidence supporting the role of HPV in the modulation of the Wnt signaling pathway is shown in Figure 2, which depicts the possible contribution of HPV oncoproteins at different levels in the activation of Wnt signaling.

7. Conclusions

Persistent infection with high-risk HPV types is clearly a main factor in cervical cancer development, and such infections are also implicated in the development of other types of cancer. HPV infection and the activation of diverse cellular processes such as signaling pathways are required to induce a malignant phenotype. Moreover, the Wnt/β-catenin pathway is deregulated in various neoplasias, and has been implicated in HPV-related cancers.
Several studies support the role of HPV oncoproteins in the activation of the canonical Wnt/β-catenin pathway, which may be involved in the onset, progression and maintenance of transformed cells.
Deciphering the precise mechanisms by which HPV oncogenes participate in Wnt/β-catenin modulation will help to elucidate HPV-related carcinogenesis. This information could eventually aid in identifying biomarkers of prognosis and contribute to the design of more effective targeted therapeutics.

Acknowledgments

This manuscript was partially supported by the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT) CB-166808. Jesus Omar Muñoz Bello and Leslie Olmedo Nieva are Ph.D. students from the following programs: “Doctorado en Ciencias Biomédicas” and “Doctorado en Ciencias Bioquímicas”, respectively, at the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México and are recipients of scholarships from CONACyT, México (444223 and 289892, respectively).

Author Contributions

J.O.M.B., L.O.N., A.C.P., and A.M.F.G. performed the bibliographic review and wrote the manuscript; L.R.Z. reviewed the manuscript; and M.L. directed and wrote the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lin, C.H.; Ji, T.; Chen, C.F.; Hoang, B.H. Wnt signaling in osteosarcoma. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2014, 804, 33–45. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. Takigawa, Y.; Brown, A.M. Wnt signaling in liver cancer. Curr. Drug Targets 2008, 9, 1013–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Krausova, M.; Korinek, V. Wnt signaling in adult intestinal stem cells and cancer. Cell Signal. 2014, 26, 570–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Khramtsov, A.I.; Khramtsova, G.F.; Tretiakova, M.; Huo, D.; Olopade, O.I.; Goss, K.H. Wnt/β-catenin pathway activation is enriched in basal-like breast cancers and predicts poor outcome. Am. J. Pathol. 2010, 176, 2911–2920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Rampias, T.; Boutati, E.; Pectasides, E.; Sasaki, C.; Kountourakis, P.; Weinberger, P.; Psyrri, A. Activation of Wnt signaling pathway by human papillomavirus E6 and E7 oncogenes in HPV16-positive oropharyngeal squamous carcinoma cells. Mol. Cancer Res. 2010, 8, 433–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Rodriguez-Sastre, M.A.; Gonzalez-Maya, L.; Delgado, R.; Lizano, M.; Tsubaki, G.; Mohar, A.; Garcia-Carranca, A. Abnormal distribution of E-cadherin and β-catenin in different histologic types of cancer of the uterine cervix. Gynecol. Oncol. 2005, 97, 330–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Clevers, H.; Nusse, R. Wnt/β-catenin signaling and disease. Cell 2012, 149, 1192–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Globocan 2012: Estimated Cancer Incidence, Mortality and Prevalence Worldwide in 2012. Available online: http://globocan.iarc.fr (accessed on 6 May 2015).
  9. Zur Hausen, H. Papillomaviruses and cancer: From basic studies to clinical application. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2002, 2, 342–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. D’Souza, G.; Kreimer, A.R.; Viscidi, R.; Pawlita, M.; Fakhry, C.; Koch, W.M.; Westra, W.H.; Gillison, M.L. Case-control study of human papillomavirus and oropharyngeal cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007, 356, 1944–1956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Daling, J.R.; Madeleine, M.M.; Johnson, L.G.; Schwartz, S.M.; Shera, K.A.; Wurscher, M.A.; Carter, J.J.; Porter, P.L.; Galloway, D.A.; McDougall, J.K. Human papillomavirus, smoking, and sexual practices in the etiology of anal cancer. Cancer 2004, 101, 270–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Bilir, B.; Kucuk, O.; Moreno, C.S. Wnt signaling blockage inhibits cell proliferation and migration, and induces apoptosis in triple-negative breast cancer cells. J. Transl. Med. 2013, 11, 280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Peng, X.; Yang, L.; Chang, H.; Dai, G.; Wang, F.; Duan, X.; Guo, L.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, G. Wnt/β-catenin signaling regulates the proliferation and differentiation of mesenchymal progenitor cells through the p53 pathway. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e97283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Gradl, D.; Kuhl, M.; Wedlich, D. The Wnt/Wg signal transducer β-catenin controls fibronectin expression. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1999, 19, 5576–5587. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  15. Dollar, G.L.; Weber, U.; Mlodzik, M.; Sokol, S.Y. Regulation of Lethal giant larvae by Dishevelled. Nature 2005, 437, 1376–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Nusse, R.; Brown, A.; Papkoff, J.; Scambler, P.; Shackleford, G.; McMahon, A.; Moon, R.; Varmus, H. A new nomenclature for int-1 and related genes: The Wnt gene family. Cell 1991, 64, 231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Nusse, R.; Varmus, H.E. Many tumors induced by the mouse mammary tumor virus contain a provirus integrated in the same region of the host genome. Cell 1982, 31, 99–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Van Ooyen, A.; Nusse, R. Structure and nucleotide sequence of the putative mammary oncogene int-1; proviral insertions leave the protein-encoding domain intact. Cell 1984, 39, 233–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rijsewijk, F.; Schuermann, M.; Wagenaar, E.; Parren, P.; Weigel, D.; Nusse, R. The drosophila homolog of the mouse mammary oncogene int-1 is identical to the segment polarity gene wingless. Cell 1987, 50, 649–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. The Wnt Homepage. Available online: http://web.stanford.edu/group/nusselab/cgi-bin/wnt/ (accessed on 6 May 2015).
  21. Bafico, A.; Gazit, A.; Wu-Morgan, S.S.; Yaniv, A.; Aaronson, S.A. Characterization of Wnt-1 and Wnt-2 induced growth alterations and signaling pathways in NIH3T3 fibroblasts. Oncogene 1998, 16, 2819–2825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Shimizu, H.; Julius, M.A.; Giarre, M.; Zheng, Z.; Brown, A.M.; Kitajewski, J. Transformation by Wnt family proteins correlates with regulation of β-catenin. Cell Growth Differ. 1997, 8, 1349–1358. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. Ohira, T.; Gemmill, R.M.; Ferguson, K.; Kusy, S.; Roche, J.; Brambilla, E.; Zeng, C.; Baron, A.; Bemis, L.; Erickson, P.; et al. WNT7a induces E-cadherin in lung cancer cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 10429–10434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Fagotto, F.; Guger, K.; Gumbiner, B.M. Induction of the primary dorsalizing center in Xenopus by the Wnt/GSK/β-catenin signaling pathway, but not by Vg1, Activin or Noggin. Development 1997, 124, 453–460. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  25. Ye, J.; Yang, T.; Guo, H.; Tang, Y.; Deng, F.; Li, Y.; Xing, Y.; Yang, L.; Yang, K. Wnt10b promotes differentiation of mouse hair follicle melanocytes. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2013, 10, 691–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Li, Y.H.; Zhang, K.; Ye, J.X.; Lian, X.H.; Yang, T. Wnt10b promotes growth of hair follicles via a canonical Wnt signalling pathway. Clin. Exp. Dermatol. 2011, 36, 534–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Louis, I.; Heinonen, K.M.; Chagraoui, J.; Vainio, S.; Sauvageau, G.; Perreault, C. The signaling protein Wnt4 enhances thymopoiesis and expands multipotent hematopoietic progenitors through β-catenin-independent signaling. Immunity 2008, 29, 57–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Liu, A.; Chen, S.; Cai, S.; Dong, L.; Liu, L.; Yang, Y.; Guo, F.; Lu, X.; He, H.; Chen, Q.; et al. Wnt5a through noncanonical Wnt/JNK or Wnt/PKC signaling contributes to the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells into type II alveolar epithelial cells in vitro. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e90229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Slusarski, D.C.; Corces, V.G.; Moon, R.T. Interaction of Wnt and a Frizzled homologue triggers G-protein-linked phosphatidylinositol signalling. Nature 1997, 390, 410–413. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  30. Flaherty, M.P.; Dawn, B. Noncanonical Wnt11 signaling and cardiomyogenic differentiation. Trends Cardiovasc. Med. 2008, 18, 260–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Kilander, M.B.; Dahlstrom, J.; Schulte, G. Assessment of Frizzled 6 membrane mobility by FRAP supports G protein coupling and reveals WNT-Frizzled selectivity. Cell Signal. 2014, 26, 1943–1949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Caddy, J.; Wilanowski, T.; Darido, C.; Dworkin, S.; Ting, S.B.; Zhao, Q.; Rank, G.; Auden, A.; Srivastava, S.; Papenfuss, T.A.; et al. Epidermal wound repair is regulated by the planar cell polarity signaling pathway. Dev. Cell 2010, 19, 138–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Murdoch, J.N.; Damrau, C.; Paudyal, A.; Bogani, D.; Wells, S.; Greene, N.D.; Stanier, P.; Copp, A.J. Genetic interactions between planar cell polarity genes cause diverse neural tube defects in mice. Dis. Models Mech. 2014, 7, 1153–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Babayeva, S.; Zilber, Y.; Torban, E. Planar cell polarity pathway regulates actin rearrangement, cell shape, motility, and nephrin distribution in podocytes. Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 2011, 300, F549–F560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Boutin, C.; Labedan, P.; Dimidschstein, J.; Richard, F.; Cremer, H.; Andre, P.; Yang, Y.; Montcouquiol, M.; Goffinet, A.M.; Tissir, F. A dual role for planar cell polarity genes in ciliated cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, E3129–E3138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Kinoshita, N.; Iioka, H.; Miyakoshi, A.; Ueno, N. PKCδ is essential for Dishevelled function in a noncanonical Wnt pathway that regulates Xenopus convergent extension movements. Genes Dev. 2003, 17, 1663–1676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Fanto, M.; Weber, U.; Strutt, D.I.; Mlodzik, M. Nuclear signaling by Rac and Rho GTPases is required in the establishment of epithelial planar polarity in the Drosophila eye. Curr. Biol. 2000, 10, 979–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kuhl, M.; Sheldahl, L.C.; Malbon, C.C.; Moon, R.T. Ca2+/Calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II is stimulated by Wnt and Frizzled homologs and promotes ventral cell fates in Xenopus. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 12701–12711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Sheldahl, L.C.; Park, M.; Malbon, C.C.; Moon, R.T. Protein Kinase C is differentially stimulated by Wnt and Frizzled homologs in a G-protein-dependent manner. Curr. Biol. 1999, 9, 695–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kuhl, M.; Geis, K.; Sheldahl, L.C.; Pukrop, T.; Moon, R.T.; Wedlich, D. Antagonistic regulation of convergent extension movements in Xenopus by Wnt/β-catenin and Wnt/Ca2+ signaling. Mech. Dev. 2001, 106, 61–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Okamoto, K.; Narayanan, R.; Lee, S.H.; Murata, K.; Hayashi, Y. The role of CaMKII as an F-actin-bundling protein crucial for maintenance of dendritic spine structure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 6418–6423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Wang, Q.; Symes, A.J.; Kane, C.A.; Freeman, A.; Nariculam, J.; Munson, P.; Thrasivoulou, C.; Masters, J.R.; Ahmed, A. A novel role for Wnt/Ca2+ signaling in actin cytoskeleton remodeling and cell motility in prostate cancer. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e10456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Pereira, C.; Schaer, D.J.; Bachli, E.B.; Kurrer, M.O.; Schoedon, G. Wnt5A/CaMKII signaling contributes to the inflammatory response of macrophages and is a target for the antiinflammatory action of activated protein C and interleukin-10. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2008, 28, 504–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Ikeda, S.; Kishida, S.; Yamamoto, H.; Murai, H.; Koyama, S.; Kikuchi, A. Axin, a negative regulator of the Wnt signaling pathway, forms a complex with GSK-3beta and beta-catenin and promotes GSK-3beta-dependent phosphorylation of beta-catenin. EMBO J. 1998, 17, 1371–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Sobrado, P.; Jedlicki, A.; Bustos, V.H.; Allende, C.C.; Allende, J.E. Basic region of residues 228–231 of protein kinase CK1α is involved in its interaction with axin: Binding to axin does not affect the kinase activity. J. Cell. Biochem. 2005, 94, 217–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Papkoff, J.; Rubinfeld, B.; Schryver, B.; Polakis, P. Wnt-1 regulates free pools of catenins and stabilizes APC-catenin complexes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1996, 16, 2128–2134. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  47. Azzolin, L.; Panciera, T.; Soligo, S.; Enzo, E.; Bicciato, S.; Dupont, S.; Bresolin, S.; Frasson, C.; Basso, G.; Guzzardo, V.; et al. YAP/TAZ incorporation in the β-catenin destruction complex orchestrates the Wnt response. Cell 2014, 158, 157–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Liu, C.; Li, Y.; Semenov, M.; Han, C.; Baeg, G.H.; Tan, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Lin, X.; He, X. Control of β-catenin phosphorylation/degradation by a dual-kinase mechanism. Cell 2002, 108, 837–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sakanaka, C. Phosphorylation and regulation of β-catenin by casein kinase Iε. J. Biochem. 2002, 132, 697–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Su, Y.; Fu, C.; Ishikawa, S.; Stella, A.; Kojima, M.; Shitoh, K.; Schreiber, E.M.; Day, B.W.; Liu, B. APC is essential for targeting phosphorylated β-catenin to the SCFβ-TrCP ubiquitin ligase. Mol. Cell 2008, 32, 652–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Winston, J.T.; Strack, P.; Beer-Romero, P.; Chu, C.Y.; Elledge, S.J.; Harper, J.W. The SCFβ-TrCP—Ubiquitin ligase complex associates specifically with phosphorylated destruction motifs in IκBα and β-catenin and stimulates IκBα ubiquitination in vitro. Genes Dev. 1999, 13, 270–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Cong, F.; Schweizer, L.; Varmus, H. Wnt signals across the plasma membrane to activate the β-catenin pathway by forming oligomers containing its receptors, Frizzled and LRP. Development 2004, 131, 5103–5115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Hsu, S.C.; Galceran, J.; Grosschedl, R. Modulation of transcriptional regulation by LEF-1 in response to Wnt-1 signaling and association with β-catenin. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1998, 18, 4807–4818. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  54. Schneider, S.; Steinbeisser, H.; Warga, R.M.; Hausen, P. β-catenin translocation into nuclei demarcates the dorsalizing centers in frog and fish embryos. Mech. Dev. 1996, 57, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Tauriello, D.V.; Jordens, I.; Kirchner, K.; Slootstra, J.W.; Kruitwagen, T.; Bouwman, B.A.; Noutsou, M.; Rudiger, S.G.; Schwamborn, K.; Schambony, A.; et al. Wnt/β-catenin signaling requires interaction of the Dishevelled DEP domain and C terminus with a discontinuous motif in Frizzled. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, E812–E820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Mao, J.; Wang, J.; Liu, B.; Pan, W.; Farr, G.H., 3rd; Flynn, C.; Yuan, H.; Takada, S.; Kimelman, D.; Li, L.; et al. Low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein-5 binds to Axin and regulates the canonical Wnt signaling pathway. Mol. Cell 2001, 7, 801–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Davidson, G.; Wu, W.; Shen, J.; Bilic, J.; Fenger, U.; Stannek, P.; Glinka, A.; Niehrs, C. Casein kinase 1 γ couples Wnt receptor activation to cytoplasmic signal transduction. Nature 2005, 438, 867–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Gong, A.; Huang, S. FoxM1 and Wnt/β-catenin signaling in glioma stem cells. Cancer Res. 2012, 72, 5658–5662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Korinek, V.; Barker, N.; Willert, K.; Molenaar, M.; Roose, J.; Wagenaar, G.; Markman, M.; Lamers, W.; Destree, O.; Clevers, H. Two members of the Tcf family implicated in Wnt/β-catenin signaling during embryogenesis in the mouse. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1998, 18, 1248–1256. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  60. Daniels, D.L.; Weis, W.I. β-catenin directly displaces Groucho/TLE repressors from Tcf/Lef in Wnt-mediated transcription activation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2005, 12, 364–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Zhang, Y.; Liu, C.; Duan, X.; Ren, F.; Li, S.; Jin, Z.; Wang, Y.; Feng, Y.; Liu, Z.; Chang, Z. CREPT/RPRD1B, a recently identified novel protein highly expressed in tumors, enhances the β-catenin·TCF4 transcriptional activity in response to Wnt signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 22589–22599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Labalette, C.; Renard, C.A.; Neuveut, C.; Buendia, M.A.; Wei, Y. Interaction and functional cooperation between the LIM protein FHL2, CBP/p300, and β-catenin. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2004, 24, 10689–10702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Takemaru, K.I.; Moon, R.T. The transcriptional coactivator CBP interacts with β-catenin to activate gene expression. J. Cell Biol. 2000, 149, 249–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Barker, N.; Hurlstone, A.; Musisi, H.; Miles, A.; Bienz, M.; Clevers, H. The chromatin remodelling factor Brg-1 interacts with β-catenin to promote target gene activation. EMBO J. 2001, 20, 4935–4943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Bandapalli, O.R.; Dihlmann, S.; Helwa, R.; Macher-Goeppinger, S.; Weitz, J.; Schirmacher, P.; Brand, K. Transcriptional activation of the β-catenin gene at the invasion front of colorectal liver metastases. J. Pathol. 2009, 218, 370–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Smith, J.S.; Lindsay, L.; Hoots, B.; Keys, J.; Franceschi, S.; Winer, R.; Clifford, G.M. Human papillomavirus type distribution in invasive cervical cancer and high-grade cervical lesions: A meta-analysis update. Int. J. Cancer 2007, 121, 621–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Riley, R.R.; Duensing, S.; Brake, T.; Munger, K.; Lambert, P.F.; Arbeit, J.M. Dissection of human papillomavirus E6 and E7 function in transgenic mouse models of cervical carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 2003, 63, 4862–4871. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  68. Song, S.; Pitot, H.C.; Lambert, P.F. The human papillomavirus type 16 E6 gene alone is sufficient to induce carcinomas in transgenic animals. J. Virol. 1999, 73, 5887–5893. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  69. De Villiers, E.M. Cross-roads in the classification of papillomaviruses. Virology 2013, 445, 2–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Bzhalava, D.; Guan, P.; Franceschi, S.; Dillner, J.; Clifford, G. A systematic review of the prevalence of mucosal and cutaneous human papillomavirus types. Virology 2013, 445, 224–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Munoz, N.; Bosch, F.X.; de Sanjose, S.; Herrero, R.; Castellsague, X.; Shah, K.V.; Snijders, P.J.; Meijer, C.J.; International Agency for Research on Cancer Multicenter Cervical Cancer Study Group. Epidemiologic classification of human papillomavirus types associated with cervical cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2003, 348, 518–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Samarzija, I.; Beard, P. Hedgehog pathway regulators influence cervical cancer cell proliferation, survival and migration. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2012, 425, 64–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Branca, M.; Ciotti, M.; Santini, D.; Bonito, L.D.; Benedetto, A.; Giorgi, C.; Paba, P.; Favalli, C.; Costa, S.; Agarossi, A.; et al. Activation of the ERK/MAP kinase pathway in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia is related to grade of the lesion but not to high-risk human papillomavirus, virus clearance, or prognosis in cervical cancer. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2004, 122, 902–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Weijzen, S.; Zlobin, A.; Braid, M.; Miele, L.; Kast, W.M. HPV16 E6 and E7 oncoproteins regulate Notch-1 expression and cooperate to induce transformation. J. Cell. Physiol. 2003, 194, 356–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Uren, A.; Fallen, S.; Yuan, H.; Usubutun, A.; Kucukali, T.; Schlegel, R.; Toretsky, J.A. Activation of the canonical Wnt pathway during genital keratinocyte transformation: A model for cervical cancer progression. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 6199–6206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Doorbar, J. Molecular biology of human papillomavirus infection and cervical cancer. Clin. Sci. Lond. 2006, 110, 525–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Buck, C.B.; Day, P.M.; Trus, B.L. The papillomavirus major capsid protein L1. Virology 2013, 445, 169–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Wang, J.W.; Roden, R.B. L2, the minor capsid protein of papillomavirus. Virology 2013, 445, 175–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Bergvall, M.; Melendy, T.; Archambault, J. The E1 proteins. Virology 2013, 445, 35–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. McBride, A.A. The papillomavirus E2 proteins. Virology 2013, 445, 57–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Doorbar, J. The E4 protein; structure, function and patterns of expression. Virology 2013, 445, 80–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. McLaughlin-Drubin, M.E.; Munger, K. Oncogenic activities of human papillomaviruses. Virus Res. 2009, 143, 195–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Scheffner, M.; Huibregtse, J.M.; Vierstra, R.D.; Howley, P.M. The HPV-16 E6 and E6-AP complex functions as a ubiquitin-protein ligase in the ubiquitination of p53. Cell 1993, 75, 495–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Huh, K.; Zhou, X.; Hayakawa, H.; Cho, J.Y.; Libermann, T.A.; Jin, J.; Harper, J.W.; Munger, K. Human papillomavirus type 16 E7 oncoprotein associates with the cullin 2 ubiquitin ligase complex, which contributes to degradation of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor. J. Virol. 2007, 81, 9737–9747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Pett, M.; Coleman, N. Integration of high-risk human papillomavirus: A key event in cervical carcinogenesis? J. Pathol. 2007, 212, 356–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Jeon, S.; Lambert, P.F. Integration of human papillomavirus type 16 DNA into the human genome leads to increased stability of E6 and E7 mRNAs: Implications for cervical carcinogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92, 1654–1658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Sashiyama, H.; Shino, Y.; Kawamata, Y.; Tomita, Y.; Ogawa, N.; Shimada, H.; Kobayashi, S.; Asano, T.; Ochiai, T.; Shirasawa, H. Immortalization of human esophageal keratinocytes by E6 and E7 of human papillomavirus type 16. Int. J. Oncol. 2001, 19, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. McCance, D.J.; Kopan, R.; Fuchs, E.; Laimins, L.A. Human papillomavirus type 16 alters human epithelial cell differentiation in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1988, 85, 7169–7173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Arbeit, J.M.; Howley, P.M.; Hanahan, D. Chronic estrogen-induced cervical and vaginal squamous carcinogenesis in human papillomavirus type 16 transgenic mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 2930–2935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Durst, M.; Gallahan, D.; Jay, G.; Rhim, J.S. Glucocorticoid-enhanced neoplastic transformation of human keratinocytes by human papillomavirus type 16 and an activated ras oncogene. Virology 1989, 173, 767–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Pei, X.F.; Meck, J.M.; Greenhalgh, D.; Schlegel, R. Cotransfection of HPV-18 and v-fos DNA induces tumorigenicity of primary human keratinocytes. Virology 1993, 196, 855–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Moody, C.A.; Laimins, L.A. Human papillomavirus oncoproteins: Pathways to transformation. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2010, 10, 550–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Watson, R.A.; Thomas, M.; Banks, L.; Roberts, S. Activity of the human papillomavirus E6 PDZ-binding motif correlates with an enhanced morphological transformation of immortalized human keratinocytes. J. Cell Sci. 2003, 116, 4925–4934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Liu, X.; Dakic, A.; Zhang, Y.; Dai, Y.; Chen, R.; Schlegel, R. HPV E6 protein interacts physically and functionally with the cellular telomerase complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 18780–18785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Thomas, M.; Banks, L. Human papillomavirus (HPV) E6 interactions with Bak are conserved amongst E6 proteins from high and low risk HPV types. J. Gen. Virol. 1999, 80, 1513–1517. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  96. Garnett, T.O.; Filippova, M.; Duerksen-Hughes, P.J. Accelerated degradation of FADD and procaspase 8 in cells expressing human papilloma virus 16 E6 impairs TRAIL-mediated apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 2006, 13, 1915–1926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Zhang, Y.; Fan, S.; Meng, Q.; Ma, Y.; Katiyar, P.; Schlegel, R.; Rosen, E.M. BRCA1 interaction with human papillomavirus oncoproteins. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 33165–33177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Li, S.; Labrecque, S.; Gauzzi, M.C.; Cuddihy, A.R.; Wong, A.H.; Pellegrini, S.; Matlashewski, G.J.; Koromilas, A.E. The human papilloma virus (HPV)-18 E6 oncoprotein physically associates with Tyk2 and impairs Jak-STAT activation by interferon-α. Oncogene 1999, 18, 5727–5737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Zimmermann, H.; Degenkolbe, R.; Bernard, H.U.; O’Connor, M.J. The human papillomavirus type 16 E6 oncoprotein can down-regulate p53 activity by targeting the transcriptional coactivator CBP/p300. J. Virol. 1999, 73, 6209–6219. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  100. Gewin, L.; Myers, H.; Kiyono, T.; Galloway, D.A. Identification of a novel telomerase repressor that interacts with the human papillomavirus type-16 E6/E6-AP complex. Genes Dev. 2004, 18, 2269–2282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Veldman, T.; Liu, X.; Yuan, H.; Schlegel, R. Human papillomavirus E6 and Myc proteins associate in vivo and bind to and cooperatively activate the telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 8211–8216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Bonilla-Delgado, J.; Bulut, G.; Liu, X.; Cortes-Malagon, E.M.; Schlegel, R.; Flores-Maldonado, C.; Contreras, R.G.; Chung, S.H.; Lambert, P.F.; Uren, A.; et al. The E6 oncoprotein from HPV16 enhances the canonical Wnt/β-catenin pathway in skin epidermis in vivo. Mol. Cancer Res. 2012, 10, 250–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Dyson, N.; Howley, P.M.; Munger, K.; Harlow, E. The human papilloma virus-16 E7 oncoprotein is able to bind to the retinoblastoma gene product. Science 1989, 243, 934–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Antinore, M.J.; Birrer, M.J.; Patel, D.; Nader, L.; McCance, D.J. The human papillomavirus type 16 E7 gene product interacts with and trans-activates the AP1 family of transcription factors. EMBO J. 1996, 15, 1950–1960. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  105. Nguyen, C.L.; Munger, K. Direct association of the HPV16 E7 oncoprotein with cyclin A/CDK2 and cyclin E/CDK2 complexes. Virology 2008, 380, 21–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. McIntyre, M.C.; Ruesch, M.N.; Laimins, L.A. Human papillomavirus E7 oncoproteins bind a single form of cyclin E in a complex with cdk2 and p107. Virology 1996, 215, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Funk, J.O.; Waga, S.; Harry, J.B.; Espling, E.; Stillman, B.; Galloway, D.A. Inhibition of CDK activity and PCNA-dependent DNA replication by p21 is blocked by interaction with the HPV-16 E7 oncoprotein. Genes Dev. 1997, 11, 2090–2100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Luscher-Firzlaff, J.M.; Westendorf, J.M.; Zwicker, J.; Burkhardt, H.; Henriksson, M.; Muller, R.; Pirollet, F.; Luscher, B. Interaction of the fork head domain transcription factor MPP2 with the human papilloma virus 16 E7 protein: Enhancement of transformation and transactivation. Oncogene 1999, 18, 5620–5630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Huh, K.W.; DeMasi, J.; Ogawa, H.; Nakatani, Y.; Howley, P.M.; Munger, K. Association of the human papillomavirus type 16 E7 oncoprotein with the 600-kDa retinoblastoma protein-associated factor, p600. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 11492–11497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Brehm, A.; Nielsen, S.J.; Miska, E.A.; McCance, D.J.; Reid, J.L.; Bannister, A.J.; Kouzarides, T. The E7 oncoprotein associates with Mi2 and histone deacetylase activity to promote cell growth. EMBO J. 1999, 18, 2449–2458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Um, S.J.; Rhyu, J.W.; Kim, E.J.; Jeon, K.C.; Hwang, E.S.; Park, J.S. Abrogation of IRF-1 response by high-risk HPV E7 protein in vivo. Cancer Lett. 2002, 179, 205–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Barnard, P.; McMillan, N.A. The human papillomavirus E7 oncoprotein abrogates signaling mediated by interferon-α. Virology 1999, 259, 305–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Yan, X.; Shah, W.; Jing, L.; Chen, H.; Wang, Y. High-risk human papillomavirus type 18 E7 caused p27 elevation and cytoplasmic localization. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2010, 9, 728–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Pim, D.; Massimi, P.; Dilworth, S.M.; Banks, L. Activation of the protein kinase B pathway by the HPV-16 E7 oncoprotein occurs through a mechanism involving interaction with PP2A. Oncogene 2005, 24, 7830–7838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Howie, H.L.; Katzenellenbogen, R.A.; Galloway, D.A. Papillomavirus E6 proteins. Virology 2009, 384, 324–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Zhang, Y.; Dasgupta, J.; Ma, R.Z.; Banks, L.; Thomas, M.; Chen, X.S. Structures of a human papillomavirus (HPV) E6 polypeptide bound to MAGUK proteins: Mechanisms of targeting tumor suppressors by a high-risk HPV oncoprotein. J. Virol. 2007, 81, 3618–3626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Lee, C.; Laimins, L.A. Role of the PDZ domain-binding motif of the oncoprotein E6 in the pathogenesis of human papillomavirus type 31. J. Virol. 2004, 78, 12366–12377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Munger, K.; Werness, B.A.; Dyson, N.; Phelps, W.C.; Harlow, E.; Howley, P.M. Complex formation of human papillomavirus E7 proteins with the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor gene product. EMBO J. 1989, 8, 4099–4105. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  119. Liu, X.; Clements, A.; Zhao, K.; Marmorstein, R. Structure of the human papillomavirus E7 oncoprotein and its mechanism for inactivation of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 578–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Zerfass-Thome, K.; Zwerschke, W.; Mannhardt, B.; Tindle, R.; Botz, J.W.; Jansen-Durr, P. Inactivation of the cdk inhibitor p27KIP1 by the human papillomavirus type 16 E7 oncoprotein. Oncogene 1996, 13, 2323–2330. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  121. Massimi, P.; Pim, D.; Banks, L. Human papillomavirus type 16 E7 binds to the conserved carboxy-terminal region of the TATA box binding protein and this contributes to E7 transforming activity. J. Gen. Virol. 1997, 78, 2607–2613. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  122. Hwang, S.G.; Lee, D.; Kim, J.; Seo, T.; Choe, J. Human papillomavirus type 16 E7 binds to E2F1 and activates E2F1-driven transcription in a retinoblastoma protein-independent manner. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 2923–2930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Manzo-Merino, J.; Contreras-Paredes, A.; Vazquez-Ulloa, E.; Rocha-Zavaleta, L.; Fuentes-Gonzalez, A.M.; Lizano, M. The role of signaling pathways in cervical cancer and molecular therapeutic targets. Arch. Med. Res. 2014, 45, 525–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Webster, M.T.; Rozycka, M.; Sara, E.; Davis, E.; Smalley, M.; Young, N.; Dale, T.C.; Wooster, R. Sequence variants of the axin gene in breast, colon, and other cancers: An analysis of mutations that interfere with GSK3 binding. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2000, 28, 443–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Su, T.H.; Chang, J.G.; Yeh, K.T.; Lin, T.H.; Lee, T.P.; Chen, J.C.; Lin, C.C. Mutation analysis of CTNNB1 (β-catenin) and AXIN1, the components of Wnt pathway, in cervical carcinomas. Oncol. Rep. 2003, 10, 1195–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Chen, Q.; Cao, H.Z.; Zheng, P.S. LGR5 promotes the proliferation and tumor formation of cervical cancer cells through the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Oncotarget 2014, 5, 9092–9105. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  127. Rath, G.; Jawanjal, P.; Salhan, S.; Nalliah, M.; Dhawan, I. Clinical significance of inactivated glycogen synthase kinase 3β in HPV-associated cervical cancer: Relationship with Wnt/β-catenin pathway activation. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2015, 73, 460–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Chen, P.M.; Cheng, Y.W.; Wang, Y.C.; Wu, T.C.; Chen, C.Y.; Lee, H. Up-regulation of FOXM1 by E6 oncoprotein through the MZF1/NKX2-1 axis is required for human papillomavirus-associated tumorigenesis. Neoplasia 2014, 16, 961–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Al-Shabanah, O.A.; Hafez, M.M.; Hassan, Z.K.; Sayed-Ahmed, M.M.; Abozeed, W.N.; Alsheikh, A.; Al-Rejaie, S.S. Methylation of SFRPS and APC genes in ovarian cancer infected with high risk human papillomavirus. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2014, 15, 2719–2725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Van der Meide, W.F.; Snellenberg, S.; Meijer, C.J.; Baalbergen, A.; Helmerhorst, T.J.; van der Sluis, W.B.; Snijders, P.J.; Steenbergen, R.D. Promoter methylation analysis of Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway regulators to detect adenocarcinoma or its precursor lesion of the cervix. Gynecol. Oncol. 2011, 123, 116–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Perez-Plasencia, C.; Vazquez-Ortiz, G.; Lopez-Romero, R.; Pina-Sanchez, P.; Moreno, J.; Salcedo, M. Genome wide expression analysis in HPV16 cervical cancer: Identification of altered metabolic pathways. Infect. Agent Cancer 2007, 2, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Fragoso-Ontiveros, V.; Maria Alvarez-Garcia, R.; Contreras-Paredes, A.; Vaca-Paniagua, F.; Alonso Herrera, L.; Lopez-Camarillo, C.; Jacobo-Herrera, N.; Lizano-Soberon, M.; Perez-Plasencia, C. Gene expression profiles induced by E6 from non-european HPV18 variants reveals a differential activation on cellular processes driving to carcinogenesis. Virology 2012, 432, 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Ramos-Solano, M.; Meza-Canales, I.D.; Torres-Reyes, L.A.; Alvarez-Zavala, M.; Alvarado-Ruiz, L.; Rincon-Orozco, B.; Garcia-Chagollan, M.; Ochoa-Hernandez, A.B.; Ortiz-Lazareno, P.C.; Rosl, F.; et al. Expression of WNT genes in cervical cancer-derived cells: Implication of WNT7A in cell proliferation and migration. Exp. Cell Res. 2015, 335, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. He, Y.; Lin, J.; Ding, Y.; Liu, G.; Luo, Y.; Huang, M.; Xu, C.; Kim, T.K.; Etheridge, A.; Lin, M.; et al. A systematic study on dysregulated microRNAs in cervical cancer development. Int. J. Cancer 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Bulut, G.; Fallen, S.; Beauchamp, E.M.; Drebing, L.E.; Sun, J.; Berry, D.L.; Kallakury, B.; Crum, C.P.; Toretsky, J.A.; Schlegel, R.; et al. β-catenin accelerates human papilloma virus type-16 mediated cervical carcinogenesis in transgenic mice. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e27243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Matsuzawa, S.I.; Reed, J.C. Siah-1, SIP, and Ebi collaborate in a novel pathway for β-catenin degradation linked to p53 responses. Mol. Cell 2001, 7, 915–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Lichtig, H.; Gilboa, D.A.; Jackman, A.; Gonen, P.; Levav-Cohen, Y.; Haupt, Y.; Sherman, L. HPV16 E6 augments Wnt signaling in an E6AP-dependent manner. Virology 2010, 396, 47–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Sominsky, S.; Kuslansky, Y.; Shapiro, B.; Jackman, A.; Haupt, Y.; Rosin-Arbesfeld, R.; Sherman, L. HPV16 E6 and E6AP differentially cooperate to stimulate or augment Wnt signaling. Virology 2014, 468–470, 510–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Li, X.; Yost, H.J.; Virshup, D.M.; Seeling, J.M. Protein phosphatase 2A and its B56 regulatory subunit inhibit Wnt signaling in Xenopus. EMBO J. 2001, 20, 4122–4131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bello, J.O.M.; Nieva, L.O.; Paredes, A.C.; Gonzalez, A.M.F.; Zavaleta, L.R.; Lizano, M. Regulation of the Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling Pathway by Human Papillomavirus E6 and E7 Oncoproteins. Viruses 2015, 7, 4734-4755. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/v7082842

AMA Style

Bello JOM, Nieva LO, Paredes AC, Gonzalez AMF, Zavaleta LR, Lizano M. Regulation of the Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling Pathway by Human Papillomavirus E6 and E7 Oncoproteins. Viruses. 2015; 7(8):4734-4755. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/v7082842

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bello, Jesus Omar Muñoz, Leslie Olmedo Nieva, Adriana Contreras Paredes, Alma Mariana Fuentes Gonzalez, Leticia Rocha Zavaleta, and Marcela Lizano. 2015. "Regulation of the Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling Pathway by Human Papillomavirus E6 and E7 Oncoproteins" Viruses 7, no. 8: 4734-4755. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/v7082842

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop