Next Article in Journal
The Mediating Effect of Decision Quality on Knowledge Management and Firm Performance for Chinese Entrepreneurs: An Empirical Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Surface Passivation of Boron Emitters on n-Type Silicon Solar Cells
Previous Article in Journal
A Spatio-Temporal Autowave Model of Shanghai Territory Development
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Restoring the Reactivity of Organic Acid Solution Used for Silver Recovery from Solar Cells by Fractional Distillation

1
Separation and Conversion Materials Laboratory, Korea Institute of Energy Research, Daejeon 34129, Korea
2
Photovoltaic Laboratory, Korea Institute of Energy Research, Daejeon 34129, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2019, 11(13), 3659; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su11133659
Submission received: 30 May 2019 / Revised: 30 June 2019 / Accepted: 1 July 2019 / Published: 3 July 2019

Abstract

:
Methanesulfonic acid (MSA) is used to recover silver (Ag) from solar cells by adding an oxidizing agent. It is possible to regenerate by substituting of H+ for Ag+, and thus it can be reused for additional reactions. However, MSA is highly hygroscopic, and as an oxidizing agent can easily decompose in the acidic environment during Ag extraction, leading to dilution due to the formation of H2O. This H2O in the MSA solution hinders the Ag extraction. In this study, we present a fractional distillation process for restoring the reactivity of reused MSA solutions by reducing the H2O content. Our results showed that the reactivity of the separated MSA was restored and Ag could be recovered from the solar cell.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The disposal of wastes associated with end-of-life (EoL) photovoltaic (PV) modules is problematic [1]. In general, the lifespan of a crystalline silicon (c-Si) PV module is 25–30 years, and it has been installed since the 1990s [2]. This means that the disposal of EoL PV modules will increase rapidly. In this regard, the IEA-PVPS (International Energy Agency-Photovoltaic Power Systems Programme) and IRENA (International Renewable Energy Agency) reported that the global waste generated from EoL PV modules is expected to reach 1.7–8 million tonnes by 2030 and 60–78 million tonnes by 2050 [3]. Therefore, a method to properly process PV modules is required. The European Union published the 2012/19/EU Directive, which includes guidelines on the handling of EoL PV modules. EoL PV modules are designated as waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE), so programs must be in place for their collection, recovery, and recycling [4]. For this reason, many recycling processes have been investigated for recovering valuable materials from PV modules with different levels of technologies [5,6,7,8,9]. In general, c-Si PV modules mostly comprise a piece of glass with aluminum frames, c-Si solar cells, an encapsulant, a back sheet, and a junction box. As Ag has a very low total weight in a PV module, it has not been considered worth recovering [10]. However, Ag is a very valuable material and has a relative value of almost half the cost of making PV modules [3]. For this reason, some studies have reported on the recovery of Ag from PV module components [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18], including extraction with inorganic acid [17,18]. However, this method is not environmentally friendly, as it results in the generation of waste solutions. Meanwhile, Yang et al. [19] reported the recovery of Ag from c-Si solar cells by using eco-friendly methanesulfonic acid (MSA) solutions. MSA has a lot of advantages; for example, it is easy to handle, and has high conductivity, high metal salt solubility, and low toxicity [20]. However, since MSA is more expensive than conventional inorganic acids, a process that can reuse MSA must be developed for MSA-based Ag recovery to be competitive. However, it is expected that the process of recovering Ag using MSA has a side reaction to generate H2O and the reactivity of MSA will decrease. In addition, H2O is added during the process because MSA is highly hygroscopic. In this study, we explored possibilities of MSA solution reuse after recovering Ag using an MSA solution. Reusing the MSA can have significant economic improvements. Previous studies have already reported that reusing an acid solution is of great economic value [21,22]. Moreover, the economic value of Ag is large because, as previously mentioned, it is one of the most valuable elements on Earth. For this reason, the recovery of Ag through MSA reuse is very meaningful from an economic point of view. Meanwhile, previous studies have confirmed the side reactions in which H2O is generated during the Ag recovery process using MSA. Because the generated H2O can lower the acid concentration and decrease the reactivity, even if the metal solubility of the MSA is high, it can have a negative effect on the reuse of the MSA solution. Therefore, the separation behavior of MSA and H2O was investigated by fractional distillation. As a result, it was confirmed that MSA can be reused using the optimum fractional distillation conditions. Finally, 2N grade Ag was recovered from 6″ commercial solar cells by MSA solution with restored reaction by fractional distillation.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Recovery of Ag Using Reused Organic Solvent

A 6″ mono c-Si commercial solar cell was applied to confirm the reuse of the MSA solution. The solar cell was broken into many pieces, which were immersed in a reused MSA solution with H2O2 (30 wt.%) for 1–12 h. The ratio of reused MSA and H2O2 was used 90:10. The stirring speed was 80 RPM and the experiment proceeded at 25 °C.

2.2. Fractional Distillation of Organic Compounds

A 1:1 mixture of MSA and H2O was used to investigate the optimum conditions for the separation behavior of H2O. A rotary evaporator (Hahnshin S&T HS-2005S-N, Gimpo-si, Korea) was used for the separation experiment. First, the mixture of MSA and H2O was placed in a round flask and distilled at 80 RPM for 3 h. The heating medium was silicone oil and the temperature of the coolant was 4 °C. As shown in Table 1, the heating temperatures of silicone oil for fractional distillation were 100, 150, and 200 °C and are indicated in (a), (b), and (c), respectively. The detailed experimental conditions are shown in Table 1.

2.3. Recovery of Ag Using a Separated MSA Solution

After confirming the optimal conditions for fractional distillation, the Ag recovery process from the solar cells was carried out until four times as described in Section 2.1. To recover Ag leached from the solar cell, HCl (35 wt.%) was put into the MSA-based leach solution with stirring at 200 RPM for 1 h. The precipitated AgCl was separated by centrifugation device. Recovered AgCl was converted to Ag metal powder by chemical wet process with stirring at 200 RPM for 1 h.
The concentration of Ag in the solution was analyzed by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES, Shimadzu ICPS-1000IV, Kyoto, Japan). Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR, Bruker ALPHA-P, Billerica, MA, USA) spectroscopy was used to investigate the qualitative analysis of fractionally separated MSA and distilled H2O. The phases of the recovered AgCl and converted Ag powder were also analyzed by X-ray diffractometer (XRD, Rigaku DMAX-2500, Tokyo, Japan). Glow discharge mass spectrometer (GDMS, Thermo VG 9000, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to analyze the concentrations of the various impurities in the Ag metal powder.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Extraction Behavior of Ag Using Reused Organic Solution

In the previous experiment, MSA and H2O2 were mixed and the optimum process was determined [19]. As shown in Figure 1, however, the reactivity of MSA for Ag extraction from solar cells was significantly reduced. The solubility of the Ag in the reused solution was reduced by about 15% even though the experiment was conducted for up to 12 h. This is because H2O was formed as a side reaction in the Ag extraction process using MSA and H2O2. The mechanism of the chemical reaction used to extract Ag with MSA and H2O2 is shown as follows [23].
2Ag + H2O2 → Ag2O + H2O
Ag2O + 2CH3SO3H → 2CH3SO3Ag + H2O
2CH3SO3H + 2Ag + H2O2 → 2CH3SO3Ag + 2H2O
The H2O generated by the side reaction lowers the concentration of MSA, which reduces the extraction reactivity of Ag from the solar cell. In an acidic environment, in addition, H2O2 further decomposes into H2O and O2 due in an acid-catalyzed reaction [24]. In an acidic solution, it is possible for H2O2 to be decomposed and become diluted solution due to the formation of H2O [25].
H2O2 + H → H2O + 1/2O2 + H
It is important to develop methods to control the H2O in solution because it has very strong effects on the physicochemical properties of acid [26]. Reduced reactivity with Ag in MSA solution is attributed to an increased amount of H2O, which results in a lower Ag dissolution rate from the solar cell. Also, MSA is hygroscopic and the process of extracting Ag requires a relatively long process time. Therefore, more H2O can be added to the MSA solution during the process. As a result, the reactivity of reused MSA is significantly lowered in the Ag extraction process.

3.2. Fractional Distillation Behavior of an Organic Solvent and H2O Mixture

Table 2 shows the fractional distillation behavior according to process conditions. We can use this process to separate a mixture of two miscible liquids that have boiling points that are different to each other. This process is carried out using a rotary evaporator apparatus. This method can separate a mixture of MSA (boiling point is about 290 °C) and H2O (boiling point is 100 °C) at 1 atm, respectively. In the case of (a) and (b), the fractional distillation was not affected much. However, in the case of (c), MSA and H2O were almost separated. In the case of (a) in which the fractional distillation temperature was 100 °C, the distilled H2O was only 110 mL and the remaining MSA was 490 mL. In the case of (b) in which the distillation temperature was 150 °C, it was confirmed that MSA still contained a large amount of H2O, although the distilled H2O increased to 200 mL. In the case of (c) in which the fractional distillation temperature was 200 °C, it was found that the distilled H2O was 290 mL and the remaining MSA was 310 mL. It was confirmed that the amount of separated MSA did not change after 3 h in all conditions. It can be seen that a temperature of about 200 °C is required for the H2O mixed with the MSA to be sufficiently separated.
Table 3 shows the location wavenumber and description of the MSA-H2O system to allow for a better understanding of the FTIR analysis results. It is based on various literature cited [27,28,29,30,31,32,33]. The FTIR analysis results, which were obtained through before and after fractional distillation, are shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3. Pure MSA, MSA + H2O, and separated MSA were analyzed by FTIR to investigate the reactivity behavior of MSA. Figure 2a shows typical FTIR peaks of pure MSA [25,26]. There were CH3 bands at 3030, 2940, 1415, and 980 cm−1, SO3 bands at 1320 and 1120 cm−1, a S–OH stretch vibration at 880 cm−1, and a C–S stretch vibration at 760 cm−1, as shown in Table 3. In the case of Figure 2b, the height of the FTIR peak was lowered overall, except for the C–S stretch vibration at 780 cm−1, because the MSA was mixed with H2O. In Figure 2c, on the other hand, we can see that the result of the FTIR analysis line is located in the middle of Figure 2a,b at parts of the CH3 and SO3 band and the C–OH stretch vibration at 3030, 2940, 1320, 1120, and 880 cm−1. It is considered that the result of the restoration of the reactivity of MSA was due to fractional distillation. Generally, the intrinsic physicochemical properties of the corresponding molecule can be confirmed by the wavenumber of each IR absorption peak [34]. The f actor that determines the peak intensity in the infrared spectra is the concentration of molecules in the sample [35]. In other words, the concentration of the sample is related to the height of the FTIR peak. The height of the peak increases as the concentration of the analytical sample increases. For this reason, the IR peak of Figure 2c, which corresponds to separated MSA, is in the middle of Figure 2a (pure MSA) and Figure 2b (MSA mixed with H2O). This result indicates that fractional distillation increases the MSA concentration, which means that the reactivity with Ag can be restored. Meanwhile, pure H2O and distilled H2O by fractional distillation are shown in Figure 3a,b. Pure H2O and distilled H2O showed differences in FTIR analysis results. First, the height of the O–H stretch at 3320 cm−1 of the distilled H2O was found to be lower than that of pure H2O, because the other components were mixed in the distilled H2O. In addition, the SO2 band was found at 1180 cm−1, the SO3 band was found at 1050 cm−1 and the C-S vibration was found at 780 cm−1 in the FTIR analysis of the distilled H2O. This means that MSA is also decomposed during fractional distillation process.

3.3. Recovery of Ag from Organic Solvent with Restored Reactivity

We confirmed that concentration of MSA can be restored by fractional distillation as a result of FTIR. Figure 4 shows the Ag extraction behavior by repeated use of MSA by ICP-AES analysis as a function of the reaction time. The yellow dotted line in Figure 4 indicates that Ag is entirely dissolved in the solution. From this, we can see that in all the cases where MSA was reused, the yellow line is reached within 4 h. It is indicated that the reactivity of MSA and Ag was improved by all fractional distillation experiments. In other words, the MSA concentration was restored through fractional distillation, and it was confirmed that the Ag could be dissolved in the reused MSA.
Figure 5 shows the XRD spectrums of AgCl recovered and Ag converted from AgCl by a wet chemical process. The converted Ag powder only shows the phase of Ag. As a result, pure Ag powder can be obtained using this simple chemical process. Table 4 provides a summary of the GDMS results for the purity levels of the as-recovered Ag powders. It can be confirmed that the Ag metal converted from AgCl had a purity of ~99.5% (2N), with an especially large amount of Cl and Pb present in the recovered Ag as impurities. It is expected that Pb dissolved due to the reaction of MSA solution and Pb. This is because Pb exists as a glass frit together with the Ag present in the solar cell [36]. Not only Ag but Pb also dissolves well in the MSA and H2O2 solution [37]. The dissolved Pb is considered to be precipitated together with PbCl2 when AgCl is leached by HCl [38]. For this reason, Pb and Cl were detected as 480 ppm and 4000 ppm in the GDMS analysis, respectively. In addition, it is expected that a large amount of Cl was detected in the Ag powder because not all of the AgCl was converted to Ag. As a result, 2N-grade Ag could be recovered from solar cells and it would be possible to recover higher purity Ag through the optimization condition of Ag conversion from AgCl and additional processes such as the electrochemical method.

4. Conclusions

MSA, an environmentally friendly organic acid, was used to recover Ag from solar cells. MSA is highly soluble, environmentally friendly, and easy to handle. However, when Ag is recovered using MSA and H2O2, a side reaction that generates H2O occurs and H2O2 decomposes in H2O under acidic conditions. Furthermore, because MSA is hygroscopic, the concentration of MSA decreased after the Ag extraction reaction, and the reactivity with Ag decreased. In order to improve the reactivity with Ag and to be able to reuse the MSA solution, fractional distillation was applied as a method to separate MSA and H2O. MSA and H2O were separated at a fractional distillation temperature of 200 °C, and MSA could be reused for recovering Ag. The Ag extracted from the solar cells was recovered in the form of AgCl, and the Ag was converted through the chemical wet process. The purity of converted Ag was 99.5%, and it was confirmed that Pb and Cl existed as impurities in the converted Ag. However, it may be possible to recover higher purity Ag from solar cells through the optimization conversion condition of Ag and additional process such as the electrorefining process.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: J.-K.L. and J.-S.L.; formal analysis: J.-K.L.; investigation: J.-K.L. and J.-S.L.; writing—original draft preparation: J.-K.L.; writing—review and editing: J.-S.L., Y.-S.A., and G.-H.K.; funding acquisition: J.-S.L.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE) and Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology (KIAT) through the International Cooperative R&D program (P0005441_Remanufacturing system of photovoltaic module with material recovered from end-of-life photovoltaic module). Further support came from the Research and Development Program of the Korea Institute of Energy Research (KIER) (B5-2464).

Acknowledgments

This research was financially supported by the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE) and Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology (KIAT) through the International Cooperative R&D program (P0005441_Remanufacturing system of photovoltaic module with material recovered from end-of-life photovoltaic module). Further support came from the Research and Development Program of the Korea Institute of Energy Research (KIER) (B5-2464).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Cucchiella, F.; D’Adamo, I.; Rosa, P. End-of-Life of used photovoltaic modules: A Financial analysis. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 47, 552–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Tao, J.; Yu, S. Review on feasible recycling pathways and technologies of solar photovoltaic modules. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2005, 141, 108–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Weckend, S.; Wade, A.; Heath, G. End-of-Life Management: Solar Photovoltaic Panels; No. NREL/BK-6A20-66178; National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL): Golden, CO, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  4. Directive 2012/19/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on waste electrical and electronic equipment, WEEE. Off. J. Eur. Union 2012, 197, 38–71.
  5. Shin, J.; Park, J.; Park, N. A method to recycle silicon wafer from end-of-life photovoltaic module and solar panels by using recycled silicon wafers. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2017, 162, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Klugmann-Radziemska, E.; Ostrowski, P. Chemical treatment of crystalline silicon solar cells as a method of recovering pure silicon from photovoltaic modules. Renew. Energy 2010, 35, 1751–1759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kang, S.; Yoo, S.; Lee, J.; Boo, B.; Ryu, H. Experimental investigations for recycling of silicon and glass from waste photovoltaic modules. Renew. Energy 2012, 47, 152–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Strachala, D.; Hylský, J.; Vaněk, J.; Fafilek, G.; Jandová, K. Methods for recycling photovoltaic modules and their impact on environment and raw material extraction. Acta Montan. Slov. 2017, 22, 257–269. [Google Scholar]
  9. Klugmann-Radziemska, E.; Ostrowski, P.; Drabczyk, K.; Panek, P.; Szkodo, M. Experimental validation of crystalline silicon solar cells recycling by thermal and chemical methods. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2010, 94, 2275–2282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Olson, C.; Geerligs, B.; Goris, M.; Bennett, I.; Clyncke, J. Current and future priorities for mass and material in silicon PV module recycling. In Proceedings of the 28th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition (28th EU PVSEC), Villepinte, France, 30 September–4 October 2013. [Google Scholar]
  11. Nieland, S.; Neuhaus, U.; Pfaff, T.; Radlein, E. New approaches for component recycling of crystalline solar modules. In Proceedings of the Electronics Goes Green 2012+ (EGG), Berlin, Germany, 9–12 September 2012; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  12. Palitzsch, W.; Loser, U. A new and intelligent de-metalization step of broken silicon cells and silicon cell production waste in the recycling procedure of crystalline Si modules. In Proceedings of the 37th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC), Seattle, WA, USA, 19–24 June 2011. [Google Scholar]
  13. Dias, P.; Javimczik, S.; Benevit, M.; Veit, H.; Bernardes, A.M. Recycling WEEE: Extraction and concentration of silver from waste crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules. Waste Manag. 2016, 57, 220–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yi, Y.K.; Kim, H.S.; Tran, T.; Hong, S.K.; Kim, M.J. Recovering valuable metals from recycled photovoltaic modules. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 2014, 64, 797–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lee, J.K.; Lee, J.S.; Ahn, Y.S.; Kang, G.H. Effect of current density on morphology of silver thin film recovered from crystalline silicon solar cell by electrochemical process. Thin Solid Films 2018, 663, 143–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Klugmann-Radziemska, E. Recycling of Photovoltaic Solar Cells and Modules-Te State-of-Art; Lambert Academic Publishing: Riga, Latvia, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  17. Lee, C.H.; Hung, C.E.; Tsai, S.L.; Popuri, S.R.; Liao, C.H. Resource recovery of scrap silicon solar battery cell. Waste Manag. Res. 2013, 31, 518–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Kuczyńska-Łażewska, A.; Klugmann-Radziemska, E.; Sobczak, Z.; Klimczuk, T. Recovery of silver metallization from damaged silicon cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2018, 176, 190–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yang, E.H.; Lee, J.K.; Lee, J.S.; Ahn, Y.S.; Kang, G.H.; Cho, C.H. Environmentally friendly recovery of Ag from end-of-life c-Si solar cell using organic acid and its electrochemical purification. Hydrometallurgy 2017, 167, 129–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gernon, M.D.; Wu, M.; Buszta, T.; Janney, P. Environmental benefits of methanesulfonic acid. Comparative properties and advantages. Green Chem. 1999, 1, 127–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ogata, H.; Tanaka, N. Reduction of waste in semiconductor manufacturing plant (sulfuric acid recycling technology). Glob. Environ. Oki Tech. Rev. 1998, 63, 41–44. [Google Scholar]
  22. Fong, S.S.; Seng, L.; Mat, H.B. Reuse of nitric acid in the oxidative pretreatment step for preparation of humic acids from low rank coal of Mukah, Sarawak. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2007, 18, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Colvin, A.E., Jr.; Jiang, H. Integrated Catalytic Protection of Oxidation Sensitive Materials. U.S. Patent 9,681,824, 6 June 2017. [Google Scholar]
  24. Kim, T.; Hwang, J.S.; Kwon, S. A MEMS methanol reformer heated by decomposition of hydrogen peroxide. Lab Chip 2007, 7, 835–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kim, E.H.; Kim, Y.H.; Chung, D.Y.; Shin, Y.J.; Yoo, J.H.; Choi, C.S. Decomposition of hydrogen peroxide in the aqueous solution. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 1996, 34, 249–252. [Google Scholar]
  26. Roitman, D.B.; McAlister, J.; Oaks, F.L. Composition characterization of methanesulfonic acid. J. Chem. Eng. Data 1994, 39, 56–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gerakines, P.A.; Schutte, W.A.; Greenberg, J.M.; van Dishoeck, E.F. The infrared band strengths of H2O, CO and CO2 in laboratory simulations of astrophysical ice mixtures. arXiv 1994, arXiv:astro-ph/9409076. [Google Scholar]
  28. Sumathi, S.; Sethuprakash, V.; Basirun, W.J.; Zainol, I.; Sookhakian, M. Polyacrylamide-methanesulfonic acid gel polymer electrolytes for tin-air battery. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2014, 69, 480–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Nishino, N.; Arquero, K.D.; Dawson, M.L.; Finlayson-Pitts, B.J. Infrared studies of the reaction of methanesulfonic acid with trimethylamine on surfaces. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 323–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Fernando, I.P.; Sanjeewa, K.K.; Samarakoon, K.W.; Lee, W.W.; Kim, H.S.; Kim, E.A.; Gunasekara, U.K.D.S.S.; Abeytunga, D.T.U.; Nanayakkara, C.; de Silva, E.D.; et al. FTIR characterization and antioxidant activity of water soluble crude polysaccharides of Sri Lankan marine algae. Algae 2017, 32, 75–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Santoso, U.T.; Nurmasari, R.; Umaningrum, D.; Santosa, S.J.; Rusdiarso, B.; Siswanta, D. Immobilization of humic acid onto chitosan using tosylation method with 1, 4-butanediol as a spacer arm. Indones. J. Chem. 2011, 12, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhong, L.; Parker, S.F. Structure and vibrational spectroscopy of methanesulfonic acid. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2018, 5, 181363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Givan, A.; Loewenschuss, A.; Nielsen, C.J. Infrared spectrum and ab initio calculations of matrix isolated methanesulfonic acid species and its 1:1 water complex. J. Mol. Struct. 2005, 748, 77–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chen, Y.; Zou, C.; Mastalerz, M.; Hu, S.; Gasaway, C.; Tao, X. Applications of micro-fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) in the geological sciences—A review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 30223–30250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Iglesias-Groth, S.; Cataldo, F.; Manchado, A. Infrared spectroscopy and integrated molar absorptivity of c60 and c70 fullerenes at extreme temperatures. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2011, 413, 213–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Shih, Y.C.; Lin, Y.H.; You, J.P.; Shi, F.G. Screen-printable silver pastes with nanosized glass frits for silicon solar cells. J. Electron. Mater. 2013, 42, 410–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, X.; Guan, J.; Guo, Y.; Cao, Y.; Guo, J.; Yuan, H.; Su, R.; Liang, B.; Gao, G.; Zhou, Y.; et al. Effective dismantling of waste printed circuit board assembly with methanesulfonic acid containing hydrogen peroxide. Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy 2017, 36, 873–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zuckerman, J.J. Inorganic Reactions and Methods: The Formation of Bonds to Halogens; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2009; Volume 4. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. The results ofICP-AES analysis depending on the extraction behavior of the first used MSA and the second used MSA.
Figure 1. The results ofICP-AES analysis depending on the extraction behavior of the first used MSA and the second used MSA.
Sustainability 11 03659 g001
Figure 2. Results of FTIR analysis before and after the fractional distillation: (a) pure MSA, (b) MSA and H2O mixture, and (c) separated MSA.
Figure 2. Results of FTIR analysis before and after the fractional distillation: (a) pure MSA, (b) MSA and H2O mixture, and (c) separated MSA.
Sustainability 11 03659 g002
Figure 3. Results of FTIR analysis before and after the fractional distillation: (a) pure H2O and (b) distilled H2O by fractional distillation.
Figure 3. Results of FTIR analysis before and after the fractional distillation: (a) pure H2O and (b) distilled H2O by fractional distillation.
Sustainability 11 03659 g003
Figure 4. Ag extraction behavior by repeated use of MSA by ICP-AES analysis. The marked yellow dashed line represents the theoretical solubility of Ag.
Figure 4. Ag extraction behavior by repeated use of MSA by ICP-AES analysis. The marked yellow dashed line represents the theoretical solubility of Ag.
Sustainability 11 03659 g004
Figure 5. The XRD spectrums of AgCl recovered and Ag converted from AgCl by a wet chemical process.
Figure 5. The XRD spectrums of AgCl recovered and Ag converted from AgCl by a wet chemical process.
Sustainability 11 03659 g005
Table 1. Experimental conditions of the fractional distillation process. MSA: methanesulfonic acid.
Table 1. Experimental conditions of the fractional distillation process. MSA: methanesulfonic acid.
Contents(a)(b)(c)
Distillation temperature (°C)100150200
Mixing ratio (MSA:H2O)1:1
Heating mediumSilicone oil
Time (hr)3
Flask rotation speed (RPM)80
Coolant temperature (°C)4
Table 2. The amount of residual MSA and H2O distilled by the following process conditions: (a) 100 °C, (b) 150 °C and (c) 200 °C.
Table 2. The amount of residual MSA and H2O distilled by the following process conditions: (a) 100 °C, (b) 150 °C and (c) 200 °C.
Contents(a)(b)(c)
Residual MSA (mL)490400310
Distilled H2O (mL)110200290
Table 3. Location of relevant indicator bands in the MSA-H2O system.
Table 3. Location of relevant indicator bands in the MSA-H2O system.
Location Wavenumber (cm−1)Description
3000–3400O–H stretch
3030CH3 asymmetric stretch
2940CH3 asymmetric stretch
1630O–H bend
1415CH3 asymmetric bend
1320SO3 asymmetric stretch
1180SO2 asymmetric stretch
1120SO3 symmetric stretch
1050SO3 symmetric stretch
980CH3 rock
880S–OH stretch
780C–S symmetric stretch
760C–S symmetric stretch
Table 4. The purity levels of the as-recovered Ag powders.
Table 4. The purity levels of the as-recovered Ag powders.
ElementsConcentration (ppmw)ElementsConcentration (ppmw)
Be<0.001Cr0.76
B0.89Mn0.42
Na3.4Fe16
Mg0.71Co0.01
Al4.8Ni0.89
Si65Cu2
P38Zn0.36
S0.5Ga<0.1
Cl4000Ge<0.1
K0.71AgMatrix
Ca1.1Sn2.8
Ti0.47Pb480

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, J.-K.; Lee, J.-S.; Ahn, Y.-S.; Kang, G.-H. Restoring the Reactivity of Organic Acid Solution Used for Silver Recovery from Solar Cells by Fractional Distillation. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3659. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su11133659

AMA Style

Lee J-K, Lee J-S, Ahn Y-S, Kang G-H. Restoring the Reactivity of Organic Acid Solution Used for Silver Recovery from Solar Cells by Fractional Distillation. Sustainability. 2019; 11(13):3659. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su11133659

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Jun-Kyu, Jin-Seok Lee, Young-Soo Ahn, and Gi-Hwan Kang. 2019. "Restoring the Reactivity of Organic Acid Solution Used for Silver Recovery from Solar Cells by Fractional Distillation" Sustainability 11, no. 13: 3659. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su11133659

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop