Next Article in Journal
Analysis of Incentives to Eco-Driving for Car Rental Companies’ Customers
Next Article in Special Issue
Stakeholder Expectations of Future Policy Implementation Compared to Formal Policy Trajectories: Scenarios for Agricultural Food Systems in the Mekong Delta
Previous Article in Journal
Numerical Study on Indoor Environmental Quality in a Room Equipped with a Combined HRV and Radiator System
Article

How Industrialization Stage Moderates the Impact of China’s Low-Carbon Pilot Policy?

by 1,2,*, 1,2,*, 1,2, 1,2, 1,2 and 1,2
1
Research Center of Resource and Environmental Economics, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
2
School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(24), 10577; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su122410577
Received: 21 November 2020 / Revised: 12 December 2020 / Accepted: 16 December 2020 / Published: 17 December 2020
The goal of China’s low-carbon pilot policy (LCP) is not only to solve the problem of climate change but, more importantly, to achieve the low-carbon transformation of cities. This paper analyzes the industrialization stage’s moderating effect on LCP policy implementation using the difference-in-difference model (DID) with the Low Carbon Development Index (LCDI) as the explained variable. We find that for the low-carbon pilot cities (LCPCs) at the later stage of industrialization, the LCP policy has a positive impact on LCDI, gradually increasing with the study period’s extension. The marginal impact reaches its maximum in the second year after its implementation. For the LCPCs at the middle stage of industrialization, the LCP policy has a weakly negative impact on LCDI. The marginal impact does not change to positive until the fourth year after its implementation. In terms of mechanism analysis, the LCP policy enhances LCDI by slowing down the industrialization process and boosting innovation; the industrialization stage does not constrain the effect. In contrast, the LCP policy’s impact on LCDI by facilitating FDI (Foreign Direct Investment)inflows is strongly influenced by the industrialization stage. For the LCPCs at the later stage of industrialization, the LCP policy can enhance LCDI through FDI. For the LCPCs at the middle stage of industrialization, the LCP policy reduces the inflow of FDI, and the positive effect of FDI on LCDI does not pass the significance test. Thus, this paper argues that a one-size-fits-all strategy to policy implementation should be avoided. Instead, the industrialization stage should be considered a criterion for city classification, and a differentiated target responsibility assessment mechanism should be adopted according to local conditions. View Full-Text
Keywords: low-carbon development index; industrialization stage; low-carbon pilot policy; difference-in-difference low-carbon development index; industrialization stage; low-carbon pilot policy; difference-in-difference
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Sun, Q.; Wu, Q.; Cheng, J.; Tang, P.; Li, S.; Mei, Y. How Industrialization Stage Moderates the Impact of China’s Low-Carbon Pilot Policy? Sustainability 2020, 12, 10577. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su122410577

AMA Style

Sun Q, Wu Q, Cheng J, Tang P, Li S, Mei Y. How Industrialization Stage Moderates the Impact of China’s Low-Carbon Pilot Policy? Sustainability. 2020; 12(24):10577. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su122410577

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sun, Qi, Qiaosheng Wu, Jinhua Cheng, Pengcheng Tang, Siyao Li, and Yantuo Mei. 2020. "How Industrialization Stage Moderates the Impact of China’s Low-Carbon Pilot Policy?" Sustainability 12, no. 24: 10577. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su122410577

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop