Next Article in Journal
Study on the Contradiction between Population and Cultivated Land and the Priority Protection of Cultivated Land in the Policy of Poverty Alleviation: A Case Study of the Upper Reaches of Min River, Sichuan Province, China
Next Article in Special Issue
Motivations of Volunteers in Danish Grazing Organizations
Previous Article in Journal
Public Opinions about Online Learning during COVID-19: A Sentiment Analysis Approach
Review

Rewilding Lite: Using Traditional Domestic Livestock to Achieve Rewilding Outcomes

1
Fenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
2
James Hutton Institute, Aberdeen AB15 8QH, UK
3
Central Queensland University, Townsville, QLD 4810, Australia
4
Land & Water, CSIRO, Townsville, QLD 4810, Australia
5
Protected Places Mission, NESP2, Reef and Rainforest Research Center, Cairns, Qld 4870, Australia
6
Department of Agroforestry Science and Technology and Genetics, IDR, University of Castilla-La Mancha IREC, 02071 Albacete, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: C. Ronald Carroll
Sustainability 2021, 13(6), 3347; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su13063347
Received: 11 February 2021 / Revised: 11 March 2021 / Accepted: 11 March 2021 / Published: 18 March 2021
The vision of rewilding is to return ecosystems to a “natural” or “self-willed” state with trophic complexity, dispersal (and connectivity) and stochastic disturbance in place. The concept is gaining traction, particularly in Europe where significant land abandonment has taken place in recent years. However, in reality, the purest form of rewilding (Rewilding Max) is constrained by a number of context-specific factors whereby it may not be possible to restore the native species that form part of the trophic structure of the ecosystem if they are extinct (for example, mammoths, Mammuthus spp., aurochs, Bos taurus primigenius). In addition, populations/communities of native herbivores/predators may not be able to survive or be acceptable to the public in small scale rewilding projects close to areas of high human density or agricultural land. Therefore, the restoration of natural trophic complexity and disturbance regimes within rewilding projects requires careful consideration if the broader conservation needs of society are to be met. Here we highlight the importance of herbivory as a key factor in rewilding. We argue that the use of the suite of livestock species, and in particular traditional breeds, offers the opportunity, under both land sharing/sparing strategies, to reinstate a more “natural” form of herbivory but still retain the option for management interventions (Rewilding Lite). It will even be possible to gain economic returns (ecotourism, sale of livestock products) from these systems, which will make them more acceptable to state and private landowners. We develop our case based on the advantages of using landraces versus de-domestication strategies, and on the implementation of eco-shepherding herbivory as a restoration tool in fine mosaics of agriculture/natural patches. If this approach is adopted, then larger areas can be given over to conservation, because of the potential broader benefits to society from these spaces and the engagement of farmers in practices that are closer to their traditions. View Full-Text
Keywords: rewilding; livestock; traditional breeds; ecosystem services; conservation; eco-shepherding rewilding; livestock; traditional breeds; ecosystem services; conservation; eco-shepherding
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Gordon, I.J.; Pérez-Barbería, F.J.; Manning, A.D. Rewilding Lite: Using Traditional Domestic Livestock to Achieve Rewilding Outcomes. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3347. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su13063347

AMA Style

Gordon IJ, Pérez-Barbería FJ, Manning AD. Rewilding Lite: Using Traditional Domestic Livestock to Achieve Rewilding Outcomes. Sustainability. 2021; 13(6):3347. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su13063347

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gordon, Iain J., F. J. Pérez-Barbería, and Adrian D. Manning 2021. "Rewilding Lite: Using Traditional Domestic Livestock to Achieve Rewilding Outcomes" Sustainability 13, no. 6: 3347. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/su13063347

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop