Next Article in Journal
Architecture and Methods for Innovative Heterogeneous Wireless Sensor Network Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Methodologies and Uncertainties in the Use of the Terrestrial Chlorophyll Index for the Sentinel-3 Mission
Article

Validation of NOAA-Interactive Multisensor Snow and Ice Mapping System (IMS) by Comparison with Ground-Based Measurements over Continental United States

1
NOAA-Cooperative Remote Sensing and Technology Center (NOAA-CREST), New York, NY 10031, USA
2
Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
3
National Ice Center, NOAA, Washington, DC 20395, USA
4
Center for Satellite Application and Research, NOAA, Washington, DC 20395, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2012, 4(5), 1134-1145; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs4051134
Received: 3 March 2012 / Revised: 17 April 2012 / Accepted: 17 April 2012 / Published: 25 April 2012
In this study, daily maps of snow cover distribution and sea ice extent produced by NOAA’s interactive multisensor snow and ice mapping system (IMS) were validated using in situ snow depth data from observing stations obtained from NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) for calendar years 2006 to 2010. IMS provides daily maps of snow and sea ice extent within the Northern Hemisphere using data from combination of geostationary and polar orbiting satellites in visible, infrared and microwave spectrums. Statistical correspondence between the IMS and in situ point measurements has been evaluated assuming that ground measurements are discrete and continuously distributed over a 4 km IMS snow cover maps. Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) land and snow classification data are supplemental datasets used in the further analysis of correspondence between the IMS product and in situ measurements. The comparison of IMS maps with in situ snow observations conducted over a period of four years has demonstrated a good correspondence of the data sets. The daily rate of agreement between the products mostly ranges between 80% and 90% during the Northern Hemisphere through the winter seasons when about a quarter to one third of the territory of continental US is covered with snow. Further, better agreement was observed for stations recording higher snow depth. The uncertainties in validation of IMS snow product with stationed NCDC data were discussed. View Full-Text
Keywords: snow; IMS; NOAA; NCDC; AVHRR snow; IMS; NOAA; NCDC; AVHRR
Show Figures

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, C.; Lakhankar, T.; Romanov, P.; Helfrich, S.; Powell, A.; Khanbilvardi, R. Validation of NOAA-Interactive Multisensor Snow and Ice Mapping System (IMS) by Comparison with Ground-Based Measurements over Continental United States. Remote Sens. 2012, 4, 1134-1145. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs4051134

AMA Style

Chen C, Lakhankar T, Romanov P, Helfrich S, Powell A, Khanbilvardi R. Validation of NOAA-Interactive Multisensor Snow and Ice Mapping System (IMS) by Comparison with Ground-Based Measurements over Continental United States. Remote Sensing. 2012; 4(5):1134-1145. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs4051134

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Christine, Tarendra Lakhankar, Peter Romanov, Sean Helfrich, Al Powell, and Reza Khanbilvardi. 2012. "Validation of NOAA-Interactive Multisensor Snow and Ice Mapping System (IMS) by Comparison with Ground-Based Measurements over Continental United States" Remote Sensing 4, no. 5: 1134-1145. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs4051134

Find Other Styles

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Back to TopTop